Sunday, March 20, 2022

'Bringing quillwork back': Ojibway artist breathes new life into traditional artform

Creeson Ageoutay
CTV National News Parliament Correspondent

Mike McDonald
CTVNorthernOntario.ca 
Videojournalist
@MikeMcDonaldCTV 
Published  March 18, 202

Amber Waboose of the Batchewana First Nation in northern Ontario is drawing acclaim for revitalizing the traditional Indigenous artform of quillwork.

SAULT STE. MARIE, ONT. -- While most artists go to their local art supply store for their materials, Amber Waboose heads deep into the forest behind her home – and if she hasn't recently been gifted a porcupine, she has to go searching for one of those too.

Waboose’s designs using porcupine quills are eye-catching, intricate and detailed. When she does decide to put some of her rare work up for sale on her Etsy page, it's typically bought in less than 20 minutes.

“Especially the traditional Ojibway floral designs, bees, birds or strawberry designs. I sold my art all over Turtle Island and Australia [to] people who appreciate quillwork earrings, medallions, pins and broaches – I just haven’t made a hat yet,” Waboose, who is from the Batchewana First Nation near Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., told CTV National News.

Her quillwork includes traditional Ojibway designs of strawberries, flowers and the animals around her, but she is also inspired by pop culture. Other pieces feature designs from Star Wars, Marvel, Dragon Ball Z and the Legend of Zelda.



She treats her artwork as a hobby, and doesn’t want to take orders for fear it might one day feel like a job, but at the same time she doesn’t keep her art and sells it for others to admire.

“I try not to keep anything, but I’m always thinking about what I can do next, how I can challenge myself more, and how I can become a better artist,” said Waboose.

Waboose says she comes from a long line of artists within her family, and has been painting since she was young. She only started quillwork three years ago, after learning about her Ojibway language and culture through classes where local knowledge keepers and elders would teach her how to work with quills.

“One class I went to, the elder had all the materials for quillwork and the instructions in how to do it. She introduced it to me, and after that I was so fascinated by the art and the history of it, I just started collecting all my own materials,” she said.

Those materials include birch bark and sweet grass, for which she goes on walks in her own backyard, deep in the forest, as well as the often-elusive quills.

“I’m always on the lookout for porcupine roadkill. When I find one, I pick it up off the road and bring it home, pick and clean the quills off by hand, I wash the quills with warm soapy water and then when that’s done I will dye them and then sort them all by size. It usually takes me a day or two. The best time to harvest quills is in the late summer because if you do it too early there will be water in the quills,” she said, adding it’s also important to make sure the quills dry properly so they don’t grow any mould.

To colour the quills, Waboose has multiple ways to dye them, including using Kool-Aid. She hopes to learn how to create natural dyes one day.



Waboose says one piece of quillwork can use anywhere between 10 to 600 quills, and it can take five to 20 hours to make one piece, depending on the size and the amount of detail.

Lucia Laford, a family friend of Waboose as well as an artist and Indigenous arts educator, says that Waboose is "bringing quillwork back" as part of a larger renaissance of the artform.

“She is keeping that tradition alive, and she’s doing it in such a beautiful way. I think it’s a hard practice and its labour-intensive and it requires a lot of skill, and Amber is incredibly skilled in that. I’m always captivated by the bright colours that she uses, all of it is just very eye-catching and all of her designs are just so intricate. A lot of people in the community look up to her,” Laford said.

Laford’s late father – longtime Ojibway artist John Laford from Manitoulin Island – also inspired Waboose’s work along the way including more painting techniques. He passed away last November.

“My dad bought one of her paintings two weeks before he died, and he was so proud to have it. As he said … ‘Every Indigenous person should pick up the brush or at least try pick up the brush,’” said Laford.

Waboose says she will continue to make quillwork while inspiring the next generation.

“Quillwork is an important part of Indigenous culture," she said

"It’s one of the oldest art forms on Turtle Island, invented by the Indigenous people. It was practised more back then and when beads were introduced, quillwork was not practised as often, but now it’s being revitalized by a lot of young artists.”


Dr. Oz's primary challenger and his wife said in meeting with Trump that Oz's Muslim background was a liability: NYT report

salarshani@businessinsider.com (Sarah Al-Arshani) 
 Former President Donald Trump poses for photos with David McCormick at the Trump National Golf Club Bedminster clubhouse, Sunday, Nov. 20, 2016, in Bedminster, N.J. Mehmet Oz speaks at a town hall-style event at the Newtown Athletic Club, Feb. 20, 2022, in Newtown, Pa. AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster and AP Photo/Marc Levy

Dr. Mehmet Oz and David McCormick are running in Pennsylvania's GOP Senate primary.

Both Oz and McCormick have tried to secure an endorsement from former President Donald Trump.

McCormick's wife told Trump Oz's Islamic faith was a liability, sources told The New York Times.






 Dr. Mehmet Oz, one of the US' best-known celebrity doctors, is running for US Senate in Pennsylvania. But his health recommendations are not always supported by scientific evidence. Here are eight times Oz made false, baseless, or misleading scientific claims. Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories. Among Dr. Mehmet Oz's achievements are ten Emmy awards, a syndicated television show, an Ivy-League medical degree, and a rapport with Donald Trump, who appeared on his show in 2016.Oz, like Trump, is seeking to follow his success on television with a career in Washington, D.C. 
The celebrity doctor announced on Tuesday that he's running for US Senate in Pennsylvania as a Republican for the open seat currently held by GOP Sen. Pat Toomey, who is retiring in 2022. Oz also served on the President's Council on Sports, Fitness & Nutrition under the Trump administration and was been thrust into the spotlight once again during the COVID-19 pandemic, appearing frequently on programs like "Fox and Friends," one of Trump's favorite shows.
Though Oz has received some plaudits, he's also garnered plenty of controversy in the medical community for pushing unproven medical treatments and diets.
In a 2015 letter to Columbia University, where Oz is a professor, 10 doctors said he promoted "quack treatments and cures in the interest of personal financial gain." A 2014 study in the peer-reviewed British Medical Journal found that of 40 randomly selected episodes from Oz's television show, his health recommendations were based on evidence just 46% of the time. Here are eight times Oz made misleading or downright false scientific claims.A representative for Oz didn't immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment. 


DR. OZ IS RUNNING FOR US SENATE IN PENNSYLVANIA. HERE ARE 8 TIMES HE'S MADE FALSE OR BASELESS MEDICAL CLAIMS.


Dr. Mehmet Oz, one of the US' best-known celebrity doctors, is running for US Senate in Pennsylvania.
But his health recommendations are not always supported by scientific evidence.

Among Dr. Mehmet Oz's achievements are ten Emmy awards, a syndicated television show, an Ivy-League medical degree, and a rapport with Donald Trump, who appeared on his show in 2016.

Oz, like Trump, is seeking to follow his success on television with a career in Washington, D.C. The celebrity doctor announced on Tuesday that he's running for US Senate in Pennsylvania as a Republican for the open seat currently held by GOP Sen. Pat Toomey, who is retiring in 2022.

Oz also served on the President's Council on Sports, Fitness & Nutrition under the Trump administration and was been thrust into the spotlight once again during the COVID-19 pandemic, appearing frequently on programs like "Fox and Friends," one of Trump's favorite shows.

Though Oz has received some plaudits, he's also garnered plenty of controversy in the medical community for pushing unproven medical treatments and diets.

In a 2015 letter to Columbia University, where Oz is a professor, 10 doctors said he promoted "quack treatments and cures in the interest of personal financial gain." A 2014 study in the peer-reviewed British Medical Journal found that of 40 randomly selected episodes from Oz's television show, his health recommendations were based on evidence just 46% of the time.

Here are eight times Oz made misleading or downright false scientific claims.

A representative for Oz didn't immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment.
Read the original article on Business Insider

David McCormick and his wife met with former President Donald Trump and suggested Dr. Mehmet Oz's Muslim background would be a political liability in the Pennsylvania US Senate race, The New York Times reported.

McCormick, who is running against Oz in Pennsylvania for a seat in the US Senate, has been seeking Trump's endorsement, according to The Times. The meeting took place last year before McCormick announced his candidacy.

Oz entered the race in November 2021, while McCormick entered in January. Both are running as Republicans.

McCormick's wife, Dina Powell McCormick, served in the Trump administration as a senior national security official.

Powell McCormick, an Egyptian-born Coptic Christian, showed Trump a photo of Oz with a group that included some people wearing Islamic head coverings, four anonymous sources told The Times.

The couple made the case that Oz's Muslim background was an electability issue and that it was a political liability, according to the Times.


Since announcing his bid for Senate, Oz has been questioned over his dual US and Turkish citizenship. Critics have asked that he renounce his Turkish citizenship over concern for his loyalty to the US. Oz said on Wednesday he would renounce his Turkish citizenship if elected, CNN reported.

McCormick's campaign has also made public statements about Oz's dual citizenship, but told The Times they never mentioned his religion in the meeting with Trump.

The McCormick and Oz campaigns did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.

In a statement to The Times, McCormick spokesperson Jess Szymanski said the reports on Powell McCormick's remarks to Trump are an "anonymous, false smear on a candidate's wife who is an Arab-American immigrant woman who fled the Middle East to escape religious persecution."

She said the reports were "designed to distract from the legitimate national security concerns" about Oz, such as his dual citizenship.
Amazon knew customers felt tricked into signing up for Prime, but disregarded changes because they would reduce subscription growth, internal docs show

mturner@businessinsider.com (Matt Turner,Jordan Parker Erb) 

Hi, I'm Matt Turner, the editor in chief of business at Insider. Welcome back to Insider Weekly, a roundup of some of our top stories.


On the agenda today:
Internal documents show Amazon has for years knowingly tricked people into signing up for Prime subscriptions.


© Provided by Business Insider Amazon; Rachel Mendelson/Insider

Who here hasn't ordered something from Amazon in the past 12 months?


The e-commerce giant has built on its ubiquity to turn Amazon Prime into one of the most popular subscription programs in the world, with more than 200 million members as of last year. Often, it's been the promise of free shipping that's flipped shopper to subscriber.

But as Eugene Kim reported, those Prime sign-up screens have been the source of much debate inside Amazon. Internal documents show it has been aware for years of customer complaints that its user-interface design misleads people into signing up for Prime. But when Amazon tested clearer language on these pages, there were fewer signups.

Eugene's reporting takes us inside the issue, describing documents and emails discussing the trade-offs between Amazon's prized "customer centricity" and business goals. It also reveals a previously undisclosed inquiry from the Federal Trade Commission.

Here, Eugene gives us the behind-the-scenes scoop.

What's the most interesting thing you learned while reporting this piece?

Eugene: The big takeaway, from speaking with sources, is that Amazon preaches customer satisfaction — but only when it makes sense financially. The company knew for years that customers complained about Prime's sign-up process, but decided not to change much because it would have led to fewer sign-ups and smaller membership revenue. Maybe there are other examples of this within Amazon?

What do you think is next for Amazon's subscription practices?

Eugene: Many of my sources talked to me in hopes of seeing change in the Prime sign-up flow. So I would expect some kind of improvement in clarity. But it's also entirely possible Amazon won't do anything, given their statement to us that said the current design is "clear and simple."

Read the full story here:
Internal documents show Amazon has for years knowingly tricked people into signing up for Prime subscriptions. 'We have been deliberately confusing,' former employee says.

© Marianne Ayala/Insider Marianne Ayala/Insider
TORT LAW
Judge awards damages for 'family violence' in landmark case
Special to Financial Post 
© Provided by Financial Post The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently ordered a husband to pay his former wife damages of $150,000 on account of physical and psychological abuse.

LONG READ

In a ground-breaking decision, an Ontario court recently ordered a husband to pay his former wife damages of $150,000 on account of the physical and psychological abuse she endured over their 17-year marriage. In making the award, the court gave life to a new tort, or civil wrong, of “family violence” that addresses the cumulative impact of an abusive marriage.

In the case before Justice Renu Mandhane of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the parties had met in 1999, married shortly thereafter and welcomed their first child 18 months after marriage. Following their immigration to Canada from India in 2001 and 2002, both parties worked in a factory, alternating day and night shifts in order to care for the parties’ first child and to make financial ends meet. In 2004, their second child was born.

On many occasions during the parties’ relationship, the wife was subject to serious physical assaults. According to Justice Mandhane, the “general pattern was that the father would become irrationally jealous, drink, engage in verbal arguments, and then beat the mother.”

At trial, the mother’s accounts of the physical assaults were deeply troubling. They included numerous assaults over several years, including being beaten “black and blue,” being subject to a “hard beating,” being shaken, slapped and strangled. Following the abusive episodes, the father would often subject the mother to weeks or months of silent treatment which ended only after the mother complied with the father’s demands for sexual intercourse.

The father’s abusive behaviour was also psychological. He closely monitored the mother’s spending and controlled the family’s finances. The father belittled and insulted the mother and repeatedly threatened to leave her and the children penniless. The father followed through on his threat when he abandoned the mother and the children in 2016, at which time he closed the parties’ joint accounts and cancelled the credit card the mother used to purchase groceries. The father did so despite the mother being “totally financially dependent on him,” something the father admitted.

Over the course of an 11-day trial, Justice Mandhane was asked to determine the mother’s claim for “general, exemplary and punitive damages for the physical and mental abuse” arising from the father’s abusive behaviour. It was the father’s view that the mother’s claims were grounded in three specific incidents of battery and emotional abuse, both of which are existing tort claims. Conversely, it was the mother’s position that it was an overall pattern of abuse and coercive and controlling behaviour that gave rise to her claims and that the specific incidents of abuse were examples in a broader matrix.

Justice Mandhane agreed with the mother and, in so doing, penned a new tort called family violence. In recognizing the new tort, Justice Mandhane had specific regard to recent amendments to the Divorce Act, which applies across all Canadian provinces and territories. According to Justice Mandhane, those amendments, which went into effect in 2021, “explicitly recognized the devastating, life-long impact of family violence on children and families.”

Despite the changes, Justice Mandhane noted that the legislation did not address all the legal issues raised by an allegation of family violence.

“At its heart, spousal support is compensatory rather than fault driven. As such, spousal support awards are not meant to censure particularly egregious conduct during the family relationship that calls out for aggravated or punitive damages,” she wrote.

In fact, the Divorce Act makes clear that a judge must not consider a spouse’s misconduct when making an order for spousal support.

Justice Mandhane continued by noting the Divorce Act “does not provide a victim/survivor with a direct avenue to obtain reparations for harms that flow directly from family violence and that go well-beyond the economic fallout of the marriage…. (T)he no-fault nature of family law must give way where there are serious allegations of family violence that create independent, and actionable harms that cannot be compensated through an award of spousal support.”

The judge filled in the legislative gap by recognizing the new tort of family violence and went on to set out a test to be applied in assessing if damages ought to be awarded. Specifically, damages may be awarded on account of conduct by a family member in a family relationship, that 1) is violent or threatening, or 2) constitutes a pattern of coercive and controlling behaviour, or 3) causes the family member to fear for their own safety or that of another person.

Justice Mandhane acknowledged that the tort of family violence likely overlaps with existing torts, but said there were unique elements that justified a unique cause of action.

“Existing torts do not fully capture the cumulative harm associated with the pattern of coercion and control that lays at the heart of family violence cases and which creates the conditions of fear and helplessness,” she wrote in her ruling.

According to Justice Mandhane, the award of $150,000 is comprised of $50,000 in compensatory damages “in relation to the mother’s ongoing mental health disabilities and lost earning potential,” plus $50,000 in aggravated damages “due to the overall pattern of coercion and control and the father’s clear breach of trust” plus $50,000 in punitive damages since the father’s conduct “calls for strong condemnation.”

It is not yet known if the father will appeal the award.

Adam N. Black is a partner in the family law group at Torkin Manes LLP in Toronto.

ablack@torkinmanes.com
Rita Moreno Defends Actors Sharing Political Views: “Freedom of Speech Belongs to All of Us”
Chris Gardner 
© Kevin Winter/Getty Images


Not that any guests at Saturday night’s PGA Awards needed a reminder of Rita Moreno’s vivacity, she tipped them off anyway.

Feted by Oscar nominee Jessica Chastain, Moreno took the stage and broke out in dance ahead of accepting her Stanley Kramer Award for social justice work, shaking her shoulders and shimmying her way to the podium while Chastain did the same. While delivering a speech, Moreno kept the momentum going.

“I am not a person of religious faith, but for me, film has often been a sacred text that has spurred me to follow what [Abraham Lincoln] called the ‘better angels of our nature,'” Moreno detailed. “In 1963, I sat on Abraham Lincoln’s steps, only a few feet from [Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.]. I was there. … Thanks to an invitation from Harry Belafonte, I was there to hear the preacher’s dream. In seasons when profits fall silent and statesmen reign, thankfully, filmmakers keep on preaching and never stop advocating for matters of equity and justice.”

Producer and director Stanley Kramer, her award’s namesake, “was one such prophet who never shied from matters of social justice and equity in his body of work,” the actress told the crowd. Because of that, Moreno said it’s so meaningful and gratifying to receive such recognition and be associated with Kramer’s legacy.


“I am 90 now,” said the legend who stars in the best picture-nominated West Side Story for Steven Spielberg. “And working for a lifetime, and this business has taken tenacity and hard work. Advocating for issues of social justice for the last 60 years has been exhausting, exhilarating and life-giving. Had it not been for those sets and the fire set inside me as a young woman, I would certainly not be here tonight receiving this wondrous honor.”

She then praised Spielberg and writer Tony Kushner for the adaptation, a collaboration that tells “the immigrant story with integrity, fleshing out of characters and respecting ethnicities” in such a way that it “put logs on this fire that was inside me.”

Moreno closed her brief speech by countering critics who take aim at actors who use their platforms to speak out on issues that are meaningful to them.

“We are in the throes of yet another award season, and some in our tribe have been known to use a spotlight to advocate for issues addressed in their nominated works — climate change, universal health care, voting rights and LGBTQ advocacy, and many, many others,” Moreno explained. “And I know that in some audiences, that has been known to create, how shall I say — a mild discomfort? For others, heart palpitations. ‘After all, who are these actors, these Hollywood types think they are, huh? Citizens in a democracy?'”

To that, end Moreno said bluntly: “Well, f*** ’em. Freedom of speech belongs to all of us actors. And let’s not forget comedians are patriots, too — just look in the direction of Mr. Zelensky in Ukraine.”

With that, Moreno closed her brief and literal spin in the spotlight by saying, “Thank you, and I promise I’ll be more charming on another occasion.”
ONTARIO
Mine plan appears sound to some experts
BUT NOT TO ALL

MARATHON, ONT. — A federal agency examining a proposal for a palladium and copper mine near Marathon said the proponent’s plan to deal with waste rock and other contaminants appears basically sound, if long-term monitoring and other refinements to the plan are applied.

“We are generally satisfied with the waste management plan,” Natural Resources Canada research scientist Michel Houle said Thursday during an ongoing virtual environmental hearing into the Generation Mining project.

Houle said if the proposal for the open-pit mine is approved, potential leachate material from acidified waste rock into adjacent waterways would have to be closely monitored.

The proponent should also be prepared to test for palladium residues in waste water, since new research shows that the precious metal can be harmful to fish and other aquatic life, even though there are no current environmental regulations about that, Houle said.

The 30-day hearing is being convened by a three-member panel of experts, who are to examine the evidence and prepare a report that will either recommend that the open-pit project proceed or be declined.

If the mine plan is approved by the federal and provincial governments, the operation would run for 13 years and create 375 jobs a short drive from Marathon.

In a separate presentation by Thunder Bay provincial hydrogeology expert Alisdair Brown, the company was found to have properly identified the risks associated with its proposed ore-waste (tailings) facility.

The facility is to release treated water into Hare Lake, which is known to be a good place for angling.

Brown said water from a rock storage area will eventually migrate to the Pic River over time after the mine closes, but said that would not cause any “measurable change” in the Pic’s water quality.


Waste particles from the mine site will remain there for at least 100 years, the company said. It will take 17-30 years for the pits to fill with water after they’re no longer being mined.


Brown also noted the new science about the environmental impacts of palladium, and recommended long-term monitoring of waterways around the mine site.

Ontario’s Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks said Generation Mining needs to increase sampling of local fish species.
MY KINDA LIBRARY
Maine island library wants your banned books

The Associated Press
Saturday, March 19, 2022


Books are seen in this stock photo. (Pixabay/Pexels)

MATINICUS ISLAND, MAINE -- There's an "Island of Misfit Toys" in the popular holiday classic. Now there's an island for unwanted and banned books, too.

The tiny library on Matinicus Island 22 miles (35 kilometres) off the Maine coast is on a mission to fill its shelves with books that have fallen out of favour elsewhere.

From "And Tango Makes Three," the story of two male penguins that raised a chick together, to classics like "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee, "The Handmaid's Tale" by Margaret Atwood and "The Grapes of Wrath" by John Steinbeck, all books are welcome including those that are being banned or canceled in other parts of the country.''

Eva Murray recently returned from a trip to the mainland with a bunch of books including "And Tango Makes Three," which the American Library Association says is one of the most banned books in the country.

"We are buying banned books in order to publicly push back against the impetus to ban books. To say, `If you don't want it in your library, we want it in ours,"' Murray told the Bangor Daily News.

For years, islanders just traded books among themselves, but they decided to create a grassroots library in 2016 in a donated storage shed. It expanded in 2020 to add a second shed for a children's library with help from a grant from the Stephen and Tabitha King Foundation.

There's no librarian. Patrons borrow books using the honor system. Books are checked out by writing the book's name in a notebook.

As the library grew, the island started to become the bookish equivalent of the "Island of Misfit Toys," the place where unwanted toys reside in the Christmas classic, "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer."

The emphasis on banned books does not seem to be controversial on Matinicus, the state's most remote and isolated community.

With only 100 year-round residents, a live-and-let-live tolerance and appreciation for differences is essential.

"We are in a privileged position to say, `We don't ban books,' and that we welcome people's suggestions for books," Murray said.



Hockey player breaks silence about alleged sexual assault at Boston College


Rick Westhead
Correspondent, W5
CTV
Published Saturday, March 19, 2022

In an interview with W5, Tori Sullivan, a 25-year-old forward with the Boston Pride of the six-team Professional Hockey Federation, said that she was sexually assaulted following a party on Halloween in 2015.

A former Boston College hockey player alleges she was raped in 2015 by one of the school’s football players and that school officials failed to support her.

In an interview with W5, Tori Sullivan, a 25-year-old forward with the Boston Pride of the six-team Professional Hockey Federation, said that she was sexually assaulted following a party on Halloween in 2015.

W5 is aware of the identity of Sullivan’s alleged attacker but is not reporting his name at her request.

Sullivan said she told teammates and school officials about what had happened during the weeks following her alleged rape. As Sullivan struggled to cope with the trauma, she began to self-medicate with alcohol and suffered from suicidal ideation.

As her health deteriorated and Sullivan chose to take a medical leave from Boston College, she said her hockey coaches directed her teammates to block her on social media, and drop her from group text messages.

In 2017, when Sullivan said she was ready to return to campus and resume her hockey career, the school’s coaching staff kicked her off the team, she said.

“They trashed me,” Sullivan said. “Crumpled me up and tossed me away… I think they cared about a lot of other different things [rather] than the life of a human being and one of their own.”

Sullivan transferred to Northeastern University and played on two conference champion teams before moving on to pro hockey.

Boston College denied Sullivan’s allegations.


“Boston College treats any allegation of sexual misconduct with the utmost seriousness and provides extensive care, support, resources, and legal options for all of its students,” Boston College associate athletic director Jason Baum wrote in a statement to W5. “That standard is met in all cases, and any insinuation that a student-athlete was not supported is patently false.”

“The student-athlete’s decision to transfer to another university was made of her own accord,” Baum wrote. “Despite these specious accusations, we continue to wish her the best in her endeavors.”

Sullivan said she decided to come forward and share her story after watching former Chicago Blackhawks player Kyle Beach’s interview on TSN in October 2021.

“I just was like, ‘This is just so similar and just so awful and heartbreaking,’” Sullivan said. “You know, you have another hockey player who's been through a similar situation. This is a sign, you know, this is an invitation for you to tell your story.”

Sullivan recently filed a request asking Boston College to probe how university staff handled her case. The school told Sullivan it would not open an investigation, partly because it does not have the ability to compel the former football player or other witnesses to participate.


W5: Behind Her Smile, part two


When Tori Sullivan took a medical leave after her alleged sexual assault, she learned she was no longer a part of Boston College hockey.

Pro hockey player breaks her silence


A W5-TSN investigation looks into how an alleged sexual assault nearly cost a talented hockey player her career and her life.

‘The Sexism of Climate Change’: ‘Women tend to bear the brunt of climate change’ – But ‘few women make decisions about climate change’


 Climate DepotMarch 20, 2022 7:03 AM

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/19032022/warming-trends-why-walking-your-dog-can-be-bad-for-the-environment-plus-the-sexism-of-climate-change-and-taking-plants-to-the-office/

The Sexism of Climate Change

Women tend to bear the brunt of climate change effects. Globally, women often grow and process food in climates that are becoming more extreme, gather firewood in regions that are losing trees and collect water as droughts force them further away from their homes, subjecting them to more risk of gender-based violence during long journeys.

Despite their heightened vulnerability, few women make decisions about climate change on the world stage. Men make up more than 90 percent of the heads of governments and companies around the world.

That is why, for International Women’s Month this year, UN Women’s HeForShe Initiative is focused on gender equality and sustainability, particularly regarding climate change. The initiative, which started in 2015, is a movement that aims to empower men and boys to be advocates for gender equality.

“The top managers of the corporations that are responsible for emissions operate in … a highly competitive and power-oriented masculinity and are answerable to boards and shareholders who want to see a return on investment. Heads of government are operating in an environment with a clear objective of protecting the economic and political interests of their countries with regards to climate change,” wrote Edward Wageni, global head of the HeForShe Initiative in an editorial this month. “In the process they formulate policies that deepen gender inequalities and harm the environment further.”

#

Flashback 2005: Men Warm Globe, Women Feel the Heat, Group Claims – The solution?! ‘Climate gender justice’

Great Barrier Reef suffers widespread coral bleaching due to high ocean temperatures

A United Nations delegation will inspect the reef's health

next week

In this 2017 photo, fish are seen in the waters of Ribbon Reef No 10 near Cairns, Australia. Australia's Great Barrier Reef is suffering widespread and severe coral bleaching due to high ocean temperatures two years after a mass bleaching event, a government agency said on Friday. (J. Sumerling/Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority via Associated Press)

Australia's Great Barrier Reef is suffering widespread and severe coral bleaching due to high ocean temperatures two years after a mass bleaching event, a government agency said on Friday.

The report by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Authority, which manages the world's largest coral reef ecosystem, comes three days before a United Nations delegation is due to assess whether the reef's World Heritage listing should be downgraded due to the ravages of climate change.

"Weather patterns over the next few weeks will be critical in determining the overall extent and severity of coral bleaching across the Marine Park," the authority said.

"Bleaching has been detected across the Marine Park — it is widespread but variable, across multiple regions, ranging in impact from minor to severe," the authority added.

The reef has suffered significantly from coral bleaching caused by unusually warm ocean temperatures in 2016, 2017 and 2020. The previous bleaching damaged two-thirds of the coral.

The environmental group Greenpeace said the severe and widespread coral bleaching suffered during a La Nina weather pattern that is associated with cooler Pacific Ocean temperatures was evidence of the Australian government's failure to protect the coral from the impacts of climate change.

"This is a sure sign that climate change caused by burning coal, oil and gas is threatening the very existence of our reef," Greenpeace Australia Pacific climate impacts campaigner Martin Zavan said in a statement.

In July last year, Australia garnered enough international support to defer an attempt by UNESCO, the United Nations' cultural organization, to downgrade the reef's World Heritage status to "in danger" because of damage caused by climate change.

But the question will be back on the World Heritage Committee's agenda at its next annual meeting in June.

A UN delegation will inspect the reef's health next week.