Friday, April 29, 2022

Stopping mass extinctions among fish and reptiles



Two studies bear dire warnings for marine and reptile biodiversity.


The world’s oceans are facing a massive extinction – comparable to the worst event ever recorded in the history of the Earth – according to new research in Science. But, if greenhouse gas emissions are curbed quickly, the risk of this extinction falls by 70%.

“Aggressive and rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are critical for avoiding a major mass extinction of ocean species,” says senior researcher Curtis Deutsch, professor of geosciences at Princeton University, US.

According to the research, current greenhouse gas emissions trajectories are going to heat and deoxygenate the oceans to the point where they become uninhabitable for most marine species.

Human action, like overfishing and pollution, is often considered the worst driver of marine biodiversity loss – but the heat from climate change alone is enough to cause a massive extinction event by 2100.

According to the researchers’ modelling, this event could be on par with the Permian Extinction – a loss of biodiversity that occurred 250 million years ago, and remains the worst in the Earth’s history. Between 80 and 95% of the worlds species were wiped out.

“The silver lining is that the future isn’t written in stone,” says first author Dr Justin Penn, a postdoctoral research associate in geosciences, also at Princeton.

“The extinction magnitude that we found depends strongly on how much carbon dioxide we emit moving forward. There’s still enough time to change the trajectory of CO2 emissions and prevent the magnitude of warming that would cause this mass extinction.”

According to Penn and Deutsch’s study, reversing greenhouse gas emissions trends diminishes the mass extinction risk by 70%.
The researchers found that as emissions increase (gray), the loss of biodiversity (red) would be greatest in tropical waters, while polar species are at the highest risk of extinction. Credit: Figure by Justin Penn

There’s also bad news for reptiles. According to a different paper published this week in Nature, while they face less devastation than their marine counterparts, a fifth of the world’s reptiles are threatened with extinction.

The researchers assessed 10,196 reptile species around the world, finding 1,829 (21%) to be vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered.

Like marine species, the current obvious drivers of these threats are human activities: agriculture, logging, urban development and invasive species. Unlike marine species, the threats from climate change are more ambiguous.

The researchers say urgent conservation efforts are needed to protect these species.

Originally published by Cosmos as Stopping mass extinctions among fish and reptiles


Ellen Phiddian
 is a science journalist at Cosmos. She has a BSc (Honours) in chemistry and science communication, and an MSc in science communication, both from the Australian National University.

VIVE LES TOMATOES

WATCH| French President Emmanuel Macron Pelted With Tomatoes

WATCH| France President Emmanuel Macron Pelted With Tomatoes
French President Emmanuel Macron (Image Credit: ABC News)


French President Emmanuel Macron who was recently reelected had to scurry for cover after a protestor pelted him with tomatoes.

Emmanuel Macron was attacked during his first election victory walkabout in France where he was meeting voters at a market in Cergy, northwest of Paris.

President Macron was not directly hit but it sent his security team into a frenzy as they tried to shield him with an umbrella and prevent the rain of tomatoes from hitting him.

According to the Daily Mail UK, the president said, ‘it’s not serious’ before he was ushered away by his bodyguards.

Watch the video below;


This is not the first time President Macron had some crowd problems. In 2021,  he was slapped in the face on an official visit to the southeast of France.

In the video which went viral on social media, Macron was walking up to a barrier on a trip to Tain-l’Hermitage outside the city of Valence when a man in a green T-shirt slapped him in the face.

The man reportedly shouted “Down with Macron-ism” as he slapped the president.

The president was quickly pulled away from the crowd.

The man was arrested fafter the incident. He was later sentenced to 4 months in prison.

Dr. Deborah Birx’s Rehabilitation Book Tour Keeps Getting Interrupted By Reality


Birx, a leading member of Trump’s COVID response team who is now promoting a book about her experience, hit a snag in her attempt to defend her silence as Trump mishandled the pandemic.


BY APRIL 28, 2022

Former White House COVID Response Coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx visits Fox News Channel Studios on April 27, 2022.

BY JOHN LAMPARSKI/GETTY IMAGES

Dr. Deborah Birx’s rehabilitation tour hit a 12-minute speed bump this week, as CNN anchor Brianna Keilar confronted the former Trump COVID response coordinator about things she said—and, perhaps most notably did not—during her tenure in Donald Trump’s White House. Birx, whose failure to speak out against Trump’s false claims about the coronavirus came to define her legacy, has been making the rounds to promote her new book, Silent Invasion: The Untold Story of the Trump Administration, COVID-19, and Preventing the Next Pandemic Before It’s Too Late. In it, she writes that the majority of the deaths after the first surge could have been “mitigated or reduced substantially with better leadership.” Keilar began her interview by asking, “Does that include, with better leadership from you?”—a question on many minds, apparently, based on the damning videos of what Birx was actually saying at that time that have recirculated in response to her press blitz. (Birx replied, “That includes all of us.”) One such video was played back to the doctor during the interview:

Keilar—who has previously criticized Birx for, in the post-Trump era, pushing a narrative that minimizes the extent to which she helped enable the president’s catastrophic handling of the pandemic—showed Birx a compilation of videos of Trump advocating for the U.S. to do less testing because it would decrease the number of cases. “Things were being said, and we were doing the opposite,” Birx said in response, claiming the task force was “spending billions” to expand testing behind the scenes. “You talk about what you’re doing privately. But that comes up completely in the face against what he is saying very publicly, and what you are not necessarily saying publicly to counter what he was doing at the time,” Keilar noted. Birx claimed the silence on her part was a result of her having “no access to national media" after a April 23 press conference in which Trump suggested treating COVID by injecting people with bleach and Birx, while visibly uncomfortable, said nothing to counter the unhinged and dangerous notion. “Yes you did [have access to national media],” Keilar said, “if you chose to speak to them. But you chose not to.” Birx then pivoted to the argument that she would have been fired from the White House if she spoke to the press independently and “had to find another way to make sure my voice was heard.”



Indeed, as CNN’s Jake Tapper noted, Birx not only had access to national media, but to CNN specifically. Tapper, who also seemed to be having a hard time reconciling Birx’s attempt to rewrite history when he had her on his show this week, reminded her how, when he’d asked her about the Trump disinfectant comments days after they were made, she was bothered that it was still in the news cycle. “Do you regret not taking that opportunity to provide the correct information to the American people about why they should not ingest bleach instead of chastising the news media?” Birx responded by noting what she did behind closed doors, and that she was “just so focused on [conveying] the data” of the spread at that time. But, she told Tapper, “You point out a very important piece.


Deborah Birx's first meeting with Donald Trump lasted just 30 seconds as he flipped on Fox News, book says

Kimberly Leonard and Grace Panetta
Dr. Deborah Birx as President Donald Trump speaks about the coronavirus on April 23, 2020. AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Dr. Deborah Birx is out with a tell-all book about her time in the Trump administration.
Birx says her first meeting with Trump in March 2020 about COVID-19 lasted only 30 seconds.
She failed to impress on Trump that the novel coronavirus was far more serious than the flu.

Dr. Deborah Birx's first meeting with President Donald Trump about COVID-19 lasted only 30 seconds before he lost interest and turned the channel to Fox News, Birx writes in her new memoir.

Birx, a leading public-health expert and diplomat known for her work on HIV/AIDS, was persuaded by Matthew Pottinger, the deputy national security advisor at the time, to leave her post at the State Department as the US's global AIDS coordinator to serve as the coordinator of the White House's newly formed coronavirus task force.

Birx's first met with Trump on March 2, 2020, nine days before the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. By that point, public-health experts across the globe closely following the data on the virus' spread were alarmed.

Birx's goal in that meeting, she writes, was to impress upon Trump the urgency of the situation and to convey that the highly contagious and deadly COVID-19 virus, which could be spread largely by those with no symptoms, was nothing like the seasonal flu.

When Birx finally got Trump's attention in the crowded room, things didn't go as she had hoped.

"Mr. President, this is not like the flu. This is far more serious than the flu. We have to shape our response differently," she told Trump, according to the book.

Trump, she writes, flashed a "glib grimace" of a smile before responding: "Well, the people I'm talking to say this isn't going to be any worse than the flu."

"Mr. President, I don't know who are you speaking with, but I have evidence to fully support the conclusion that this outbreak is going to be nothing like the seasonal flu or even pandemic flu. This virus is very deadly," she said, according to the book.

"Well these are good people," he replied, according to Birx. "Smart people. I trust these people. They know what they're saying."

Birx repeated her concerns about the virus, but Trump lost interest.

"His eyes return to his television screens. He reaches for the remote control, and the voice of someone at Fox News enters what passed for a conversation between us," Birx writes. "I don't hear the rest. Someone takes a few steps toward me and gestures toward the door. I've had less than thirty seconds to speak with the president."

Birx says other presidents she's worked for, including George W. Bush and Barack Obama, "had the ability to shift gears and direct their focused attention in a way President Trump has not."

"I'm not going to get him to change," she writes. "I have to change my approach. Experience has taught me that you have to meet people where they are."

In the book, "Silent Invasion: The Untold Story of the Trump Administration, COVID-19, and Preventing the Next Pandemic Before It's Too Late," published on Tuesday, Birx describes her tumultuous experience on the White House COVID-19 task force and suggests the Trump administration's handling of the virus contained numerous flaws and missteps.

THEY LIED; THAT'S A CRIME
Twitter admits overstating audience figures for three years

Social media group reveals ‘error’ as it posts double-digit rise in users and revenue about 15 hours ago

Tim Bradshaw


Twitter admitted to overstating its audience figures by as much as 1.9 million users for almost three years, in a report that also revealed a 16 per cent rise in users and revenues for the first quarter.

Twitter admitted to overstating its audience figures by as much as 1.9 million users for almost three years, in a report that also revealed a 16 per cent rise in users and revenues for the first quarter.

Twitter, which on Monday agreed a $44 billion (€42 billion) buyout from Tesla chief Elon Musk, offered minimal commentary on its latest financial report and did not provide any guidance for the rest of the year.

First-quarter revenues of $1.2 billion came in slightly below Wall Street’s forecasts, which the social network blamed on “headwinds associated with the war in Ukraine”.

However, Twitter’s monetisable daily active users, its own unique metric for tracking its audience, came in better than investors expected at 229 million, with year-on-year growth of 6.4 per cent in the US and 18.1 per cent in the rest of the world.

Net income jumped to $513 million, thanks to a one-off benefit from the $1 billion sale of its mobile advertising unit MoPub to AppLovin, which closed in January.

Shares in Twitter rose around 1 per cent to $49.10 in pre-market trading, below the $54.20 per share price at which Mr Musk has agreed to buy the company.

Twitter also revealed what it described as an “error” introduced in the first quarter of 2019 that “resulted in an overstatement of mDAU” that went undiscovered for almost three years.

The difference between the figures Twitter reported over the past year and the true count ranged between 1.4-1.9 million, it said, or just below 1 per cent of the total. It did not provide a reconciliation for 2019 or most of 2020.

“In March of 2019, we launched a feature that allowed people to link multiple separate accounts together in order to conveniently switch between accounts,” the company explained. “An error was made at that time, such that actions taken via the primary account resulted in all linked accounts being counted as mDAU.”


Fake or spam accounts represented “fewer than 5 per cent” of its mDAU during the quarter, Twitter said, after an internal review. Mr Musk has said that he plans to crack down on “bots” or fake accounts when he takes over. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2022


 

Celebrity and Politician Profiles Report Massive Loss of Followers After Elon Musk Buys Twitter

The social network has limited itself to declaring that the fluctuation is due to 100% organic factors, that is, the creation and deactivation of new accounts.

By 
This article was translated from our Spanish edition using AI technologies. Errors may exist due to this process.

Only a couple of days have passed since the news was made public that Elon Musk is the new owner of Twitter and there are already reports of atypical activity on the social network. According to a note from NBC News , several profiles of artists, influencers and celebrities have reported a massive loss of followers for no apparent reason. The account of the singer  , the third with the largest number of followers on the social network (with more than 108 million!) registered a decrease of about 200,000 users from one day to the next. Former US President  lost 300,000 followers and actor  tweeted that he had lost 8,000 followers in one day. In the comments of the famous Star Wars actor's tweet, you can read comments from other accounts complaining about the same situation, including Neera Tanden and the Auschwitz Memorial account.

SOPA Images | Getty Images

Christopher Bouzy , the creator of Bot Sentinel , a platform created in 2018 that monitors the activity of false accounts on Twitter, uploaded a post in which he assures that the accounts of Democratic politicians have suffered a loss of users, while those of politicians Republicans have increased their number of supporters.

What is happening with the followers on Twitter?

Despite the multiple complaints that the social network has received, it has not given a specific explanation and has limited itself to saying that it is an organic loss of accounts that were closed when it was reported that the social network had been sold to Elon Musk. That would explain the loss of followers in some profiles, but not the increase in others. "While we continue to take action on accounts that violate our spam policy, which may affect follower numbers, these fluctuations appear to be largely the result of an increase in creation and deactivation," Twitter said in a statement. of new accounts.


Twitter May Already Be Cashing In On Conservative Users Lured By Musk

Robert Hart
Forbes Staff
I cover breaking news.
Apr 28, 2022,

Twitter could be gaining millions in quarterly ad revenue from an influx of conservative Twitter users in the days after Elon Musk’s takeover bid, data of followers of major partisan accounts suggests, more than offsetting potential losses from an exodus of left-leaning accounts amid concerns over the billionaire’s approach to free speech and censorship on the platform.



Elon Musk is in the process of acquiring Twitter. 

KEY FACTS

Two days following the announcement of Musk’s acquisition of Twitter on Monday, leading conservative accounts gained an average of 17,229 followers while leading liberal ones lost 6,062 followers, according to data from analytics tool Social Blade analyzed by The Verge.

The shift—with conservative accounts gaining roughly three followers for every one liberal accounts lose—appears to be the result of organic “account creation and deactivation,” rather than the platform taking action against rule breaking accounts, a Twitter spokesperson told Forbes.

The influx of users following the top 50 conservative accounts could net Twitter around $5.6 million a quarter in advertising revenue, assuming no overlap between the new followers, Forbes estimates, based on Twitter’s financial report from the last quarter of 2021.

The number of new users following Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday alone (141,556)—the most of any top 50 conservative account—could earn Twitter an estimated $923,000 in ad revenue a quarter, Forbes estimates, with gains to Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) that day worth around $163,000 and $267,000, respectively.

The gain Twitter stands to make from users flocking to follow conservative accounts on the platform after Musk’s announcement outweighs the prospective loss of users unfollowing liberal accounts, which Forbes estimates could lose Twitter nearly $2 million a quarter based on losses from just the top 50 accounts.

Of the top 50 liberal accounts, Vice President Kamala Harris lost the most followers on Tuesday (22,453), which amounts to a loss for Twitter of around $146,000 a quarter.


BIG NUMBER

$6.50. That’s how much each Twitter user is worth to the company in ad revenue per quarter, according to the platform’s financial filing from the fourth quarter of 2021. During that time, there were an average of 217 million active daily users on the platform, Twitter said, and it made $1.41 billion from them in ads. Ads make up the vast majority—around 90%—of Twitter’s overall revenue and the total revenue per user will be slightly higher.

NEWS PEG

Musk has offered to buy Twitter for $44 billion. The company’s board has accepted the offer and it will now be presented to shareholders for a vote. The deal is not closed, however, and both parties can walk away, subject to a termination fee of $1 billion. Regulators could also step in to stop the deal, but seem unlikely on antitrust grounds as Twitter is not joining a competitor.

KEY BACKGROUND

Since news of Musk’s acquisition broke on Monday, there have been reports of liberal users leaving Twitter in droves. NBC first reported an exodus among top liberal accounts and celebrities, though the figures quoted were significantly higher than Social Blade data suggests (including around 300,000 for former President Barack Obama and 200,000 for singer Katy Perry, which would be worth roughly $2 million and $1.3 million a quarter in ad revenue, respectively). Concerns over Musk’s approach to censorship on Twitter and his self-proclaimed absolutist views on free speech purportedly motivated the exodus. These could also potentially explain the uptick in followers for conservative figures on Twitter reported gaining followers, many of whom have previously slammed the platform for perceived bias and censorship and praised Musk’s criticism apparent commitment to protecting “free speech.”
WHAT WE DON’T KNOW

Who is driving the changing number of followers. While the makeup of users following leading liberal and conservative accounts has changed, this may not have been driven by a shift in the number of conservative or liberal users on the platform and other factors could possibly explain the changes. Managerial and policy changes are unlikely to have been made and the deal has not yet closed. Twitter said it has not taken significant action against spam accounts that could explain the change. Data from app analytics firm Sensor Tower indicates a broader interest in social media apps that are popular among the political right, however, with former President Donald Trump’s Truth Social jumping to the top spot on Apple’s App Store on Tuesday.
WHAT TO WATCH FOR

Continued demographic changes on Twitter. The data in this story only covers changes in the number of people following top liberal and conservative accounts on the Monday and Tuesday since the deal was announced. These changes have broadly continued throughout the week.

FURTHER READING

What Twitter employees are saying about Elon Musk (The Verge)

Twitter says mass deactivations after Musk news were ‘organic’ (NBC News)

Conservative Twitter accounts got boost in followers after Musk acquisition, data shows (The Verge)

Elon Musk’s $44 Billion Twitter Deal: What Actually Happens Next? (Forbes)



Robert Hart
I am a London-based reporter for Forbes covering breaking news. Previously, I have worked as a reporter for a specialist legal publication covering big data and as a freelance journalist and policy analyst covering science, tech and health. I have a master’s degree in Biological Natural Sciences and a master’s degree in the History and Philosophy of Science from the University of Cambridge. Follow me on Twitter @theroberthart or email me at rhart@forbes.com

Twitter takeover gives the Mastodon social network a boost


Users can sign up to Mastodon via the homepage of any ‘instance’, an individual server run by a group or community. — Picture by Mastodon via ETX Studio



NEW YORK, April 28 — Released in 2016, and yet still relatively little known, the Mastodon decentralised social network is experiencing a resurgence of interest that is surprising, to say the least. Since the announcement of Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter, some of the platform’s users have shifted to this open-source social network.

Just hours after Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter was announced, there were already over 40,000 new users on the site. According to the “Mastodon Users” profile, the site has no less than five million accounts.

Entirely decentralised, Mastodon is a social network made up of thousands of interconnected communities, all unique, and each with different interests and their own rules. Unlike Twitter, which controls its entire network, Mastodon is potentially hosted on as many servers as there are communities. Nevertheless, it has anti-harassment tools with moderators available if problems arise.

 

This open-source software is accessible from any browser or via a dedicated mobile application (on Android and iOS). Mastodon is essentially a collection of many sites or communities, federated to make one larger network. To join Mastodon, you first have to join one such community — an individual server known as an “instance” — which in turn serves as a gateway to a more global network called the “Fediverse.” Everyone can create their own thematic instance, bearing in mind that it is possible to communicate with any other Mastodon user, as soon as they too are connected to the Fediverse.

In terms of interface, the look and feel are reminiscent of TweetDeck, the well-known Twitter account management application. On the homepage feature a general timeline, notifications, a search field and even a local feed, corresponding to the activity of the instance to which the user is registered.

Here, posts are called “toots” and can be up to 500 characters. As on Twitter, it is obviously possible to include emojis or photos/videos. Each of these messages can be configured both in terms of confidentiality (public, private or direct message) and in terms of possible warnings about their content (the text is then hidden). — ETX Studio