Saturday, May 07, 2022

Emperor Penguin at serious risk of extinction due to climate change

Fri, May 6, 2022
By Lucila Sigal

(Reuters) - The emperor penguin, which roams Antarctica's frozen tundra and chilly seas, is at severe risk of extinction in the next 30 to 40 years as a result of climate change, an expert from the Argentine Antarctic Institute (IAA) warned.

The emperor, the world's largest penguin and one of only two penguin species endemic to Antarctica, gives birth during the Antarctic winter and requires solid sea ice from April through December to nest fledgling chicks.

If the sea freezes later or melts prematurely, the emperor family cannot complete its reproductive cycle.

"If the water reaches the newborn penguins, which are not ready to swim and do not have waterproof plumage, they die of the cold and drown," said biologist Marcela Libertelli, who has studied 15,000 penguins across two colonies in Antarctica at the IAA.

This has happened at the Halley Bay colony in the Weddell Sea, the second-largest emperor penguin colony, where for three years all the chicks died.

Every August, in the middle of the southern hemisphere winter, Libertelli and other scientists at Argentina's Marambio Base in Antarctica travel 65 km (40 miles) each day by motor bike in temperatures as low as -40 degrees Celsius (-40°F) to reach the nearest emperor penguin colony.

Once there, they count, weigh, and measure the chicks, gather geographical coordinates, and take blood samples. They also conduct aerial analysis.

The scientists' findings point to a grim future for the species if climate change is not mitigated.

"[Climate] projections suggest that the colonies that are located between latitudes 60 and 70 degrees [south] will disappear in the next few decades; that is, in the next 30, 40 years," Libertelli told Reuters.

The emperor's unique features include the longest reproductive cycle among penguins. After a chick is born, one parent continues carrying it between its legs for warmth until it develops its final plumage.

"The disappearance of any species is a tragedy for the planet," said Libertelli. "Whether small or large, plant or animal - it doesn't matter. It's a loss for biodiversity."

The emperor penguin's disappearance could have a dramatic impact throughout Antarctica, an extreme environment where food chains have fewer members and fewer links, Libertelli said.

In early April, the World Meteorological Organization warned of "increasingly extreme temperatures coupled with unusual rainfall and ice melting in Antarctica" - a "worrying trend," said Libertelli, since the Antarctic ice sheets have been depleting since at least 1999.

The rise of tourism and fishing in Antarctica has also put the emperor's future at risk by affecting krill, one of the main sources of food for penguins and other species.

"Tourist boats often have various negative effects on Antarctica, as do the fisheries," said Libertelli.

"It is important that there is greater control and that we think about the future."

(Reporting by Lucila Sigal; writing by Isabel Woodford and Brendan O'Boyle; edited by Nicolás Misculin and Richard Pullin)
Mexico closes US gravel quarry that had been pressured




MARK STEVENSON
Fri, May 6, 2022, 12:18 PM·3 min read

MEXICO CITY (AP) — The Mexican government said Friday it has closed a limestone gravel quarry owned by a U.S. company, a move likely to add fuel to an ongoing trade dispute with the firm.

The Environment Department said Friday it closed the quarry owned by Vulcan Materials near Playa del Carmen, on the Caribbean coast. Parts of the quarry have been excavated below the water table, and the department said the mining threatened water quality and subsoil conditions.

But the timing of the move raised questions: Vulcan has been operating the quarry for around three decades, and President Andrés Manuel López Obrador had recently threatened the company.

López Obrador wants the water-filled quarry to be used as a theme park to rival the nearby XCaret park. He also wants Vulcan to build a cruise ship dock at a freight terminal it operates on the coast. He has pressured the Alabama-based aggregates company to sell the property to the government, or open a water park itself.

Vulcan issued a statement Thursday saying it “strongly believes that this action by the Mexican government is illegal."

“The Company has the necessary permits to operate and intends to vigorously pursue all lawful avenues available to it in order to protect its rights and resume normal operations,” it said.

The company's property includes several adjoining sites; some have have already been quarried, and others haven't. In late 2018 the company filed for an arbitration panel under the old North American Free Trade Agreement, after Mexico refused to allow quarrying at some of the sites.

The company said a decision is expected in the second half of 2022. The Environment Department said the company is seeking about $1.5 billion in damages.

The Mexican government originally said a tentative agreement had been reached with Vulcan Materials, and the company said it was willing to open a water park and cruise ship facility. But it has no experience at doing either, and would really just like to continue mining gravel.

López Obrador wants the gravel to use as ballast for another of his signature projects, the Maya Train, a 950-mile (1,500- kilometer) rail line that will run in a rough loop around the Yucatan Peninsula, connecting Caribbean coast resorts with archaeological sites inland.

Controversially, and with no environmental studies, the president decided to cut down a swath of low jungle between Cancun and Tulum, near the quarries, to build the train line. He has raised the possibility that the future water park could be a stop on the train line.


The project needs huge amounts of gravel ballast to spread between rail ties to stabilize them, and it also needs a seaport like the one Vulcan has to get rails, cars and other train-building materials into the jungle.

SEE 

López Obrador has often used pressure and threats in a bid to get private and foreign companies to shore up his infrastructure plans and projects — state-run ports, terminals and rail lines that could become white elephants unless the private sector boosts them with real traffic.

Earlier this week, his administration announced it would force about 20% of the flights using Mexico City's International Airport to move to the Felipe Angeles terminal north of the city, — a project pushed by López Obrador that has struggled to attract flights and passengers because of its distance from the city.

Moreover, it was inaugurated before rail and road links were completed, making it hard to get to. Passengers and airlines have avoided switching to the new airport, which currently handles only about six flights per day.

Sri Lankan protesters undeterred 

by state of emergency



STORY: Protesters waved flags and chanted slogans outside President Gotabaya Rajapaksa's office and the official residence of his elder brother, Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, demanding the government to step down over a worsening economic crisis.

Some were seen carrying out a mock funeral procession for the prime minister.

Details of the latest emergency regulations were not yet made public, but previous emergency laws have given greater powers to the president to deploy the military, detain people without charge and break up protests.

On Friday, police fired tear gas at dozens of demonstrators outside parliament, the latest in more than a month of sporadically violent anti-government protests amid shortages of imported food, fuel and medicines.

 

Sri Lanka president declares state of emergency after day of protests


Fri, May 6, 2022
By Uditha Jayasinghe and Alasdair Pal

COLOMBO (Reuters) -Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa declared a state of emergency on Friday following a day of anti-government strikes and protests over a worsening economic crisis.

The measure, which drew immediate criticism from opposition leader Sajith Premadasa and from Canada's ambassador, is effective immediately and was taken in the interests of public security, a government notice said.


Police earlier fired tear gas at dozens of demonstrators outside parliament, in the latest in more than a month of sporadically violent anti-government protests amid shortages of imported food, fuel and medicines.

Hit hard by the pandemic, rising oil prices and government tax cuts, Sri Lanka has been left with as little as $50 million in useable foreign reserves, the finance minister said this week.

Details of the latest emergency regulations were not yet made public, but previous emergency laws have given greater powers to the president to deploy the military, detain people without charge and break up protests.

His order must be approved by parliament within 30 days.

Calling on Rajapaksa to resign, Premadasa said the state of emergency "runs counter to seeking any solution to the crisis".

Canada's ambassador to Sri Lanka, David McKinnon, said the decision was unnecessary.

"Over the past weeks, the demonstrations across Sri Lanka have overwhelmingly involved citizens enjoying their right to peaceful freedom of expression, and are a credit to the country’s democracy," he said.

'SICK AND TIRED OF POLITICIANS'


Hundreds of university students and other protesters gathered on Friday on the main road to parliament where they had started a sit-in on Thursday.

Some hung underwear on barricades as an insult to the political leadership.

"We are here because we are sick and tired of politicians lying to us. We want the president and this government to go home," said Purnima Muhandiram, a 42-year-old advertising professional.

Thousands of shops, schools and businesses closed earlier on Friday as public and private sector workers went on strike, demanding the president and the government step down for their handling of the island's worst financial crisis in decades.

Commuters were left stranded as private bus and train operators joined the strike.

Healthcare workers also joined the strike, though emergency services remained operational.

Rajapaksa has refused to step down, repeatedly calling for a unity government led by him, but opposition leaders plan to move a no-confidence motion against the president and the government next week.

Rajapaksa previously declared a state of emergency on 1 April but rolled it back after five days.

(Reporting by Uditha Jayasinghe and Alasdair Pal; Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore, Frances Kerry and John Stonestreet)



Diplomats concerned by state of emergency in Sri Lanka


Sri Lankan police officers walk past a closed restaurant during a country wide strike in Colombo, Sri Lanka, Friday, May 6, 2022. Protesters have hung undergarments near Sri Lanka’s Parliament while shops, offices and schools closed and transport came to a near standstill amid nationwide demonstrations against the government over its alleged inability to resolve the worst economic crisis in decades. 
(AP Photo/Eranga Jayawardena) 


KRISHAN FRANCIS
Fri, May 6, 2022, 11:55 PM

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka (AP) — Diplomats and rights groups expressed concern Saturday after Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa declared a state of emergency and police used force against peaceful protesters amid the country's worst economic crisis in recent memory.

The economic and political situation has triggered protests across the Indian Ocean island nation demanding the resignation of Rajapaksa and his powerful ruling family.

Rajapaksa issued a decree declaring a public emergency on Friday. He invoked sections of the Public Security Ordinance that allow him to make regulations in the interests of public security and preserving public order, and for the maintenance of essential supplies.

Under the emergency regulations, Rajapaksa can authorize detentions, seize possession of property and search any premises. He can also change or suspend any law.

U.S. Ambassador to Sri Lanka Julie Chung tweeted Saturday that she is “concerned” by the state of emergency, adding that “the voices of peaceful citizens need to be heard.”

“And the very real challenges Sri Lankans are facing require long term solutions to set the country back on a path toward prosperity and opportunity for all. The SOE (state of emergency) won’t help do that,” Chung added.

Canadian envoy David McKinnon said Sri Lankans have a right to peaceful protest under democracy and that it is “hard to understand why it is necessary, then, to declare a state of emergency.”

The declaration of emergency came on the same day that shops, offices, banks and schools closed across the country heeding calls for a shutdown in protest against the president and his family. Trade unions have warned of continued strikes from May 11 if they do not resign by then.

The government said Saturday the emergency was declared to create political stability so that reforms can be implemented to help resolve the economic crisis.

It also said the emergency status would help create necessary conditions for negotiations with the International Monetary Fund and other agencies and countries for financial assistance and debt restructuring.

“The emotive protests organized in the capital and many parts of the country have become a threat to public safety,” a government statement said, adding that continued protests will only aggravate the economic difficulties.

Sri Lanka is near bankruptcy. It announced it is suspending repayment of its foreign loans and its usable foreign currency reserves have plummeted below $50 million. The country has $7 billion in foreign loan repayments due this year out of $25 billion to be repaid by 2026. Its total foreign debt is $51 billion.

Police used tear gas and a water cannon twice Friday at protesters near the Parliament who were criticizing lawmakers for not ousting the president and his government, whom they say are responsible for the economic crisis. Protesters are angry that lawmakers elected a government-backed deputy speaker of Parliament by a large majority when the protesters say they should be voting Rajapaksa’s government out of power.

Police first fired tear gas at a student-led protest that began Thursday after the election of the deputy speaker in what was seen as a key victory for the governing coalition. Separately, police dispersed more protesters with tear gas Friday night, also near Parliament.

The rights group Amnesty International said protests have been peaceful and the authorities have unlawfully restricted the right to freedom of peaceful assembly.

Protesters have vowed to continue their demonstrations despite the emergency law, while an occupation of the entrance to the president's office continued for a 29th day Saturday.


UPDATES

Musk's $44 billion Twitter buyout challenged in shareholder lawsuit


By Jonathan Stempel - Yesterday 

(Reuters) - Elon Musk and Twitter Inc were sued on Friday by a Florida pension fund seeking to stop Musk from completing his $44 billion takeover of the social media company before 2025.

In a proposed class action filed in Delaware Chancery Court, the Orlando Police Pension Fund said Delaware law forbade a quick merger because Musk had agreements with other big Twitter shareholders, including his financial adviser Morgan Stanley and Twitter founder Jack Dorsey, to support the buyout.

The fund said those agreements made Musk, who owns 9.6% of Twitter, the effective "owner" of more than 15% of the company's shares. It said that required delaying the merger by three years unless two-thirds of shares not "owned" by him granted approval.

Morgan Stanley owns about 8.8% of Twitter shares and Dorsey owns 2.4%.

Musk hopes to complete his $54.20 per share Twitter takeover this year, in one of the world's largest leveraged buyouts.

He also runs electric car company Tesla Inc, leads The Boring Co and SpaceX, and is the world's richest person according to Forbes magazine.

Twitter and its board, including Dorsey and Chief Executive Parag Agrawal, were also named as defendants.

Twitter declined to comment. Lawyers for Musk and the Florida fund did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The lawsuit also seeks to declare that Twitter directors breached their fiduciary duties, and recoup legal fees and costs. It did not make clear how shareholders believed they might be harmed if the merger closed on schedule.

On Thursday, Musk said he had raised around $7 billion, including from sovereign wealth funds and friends in Silicon Valley, to help fund a takeover.

Musk had no financing lined up when he announced plans to buy Twitter last month.

Some of the new investors appear to share interests with Musk, a self-described free speech absolutist who could change how the San Francisco-based company moderates content.

Florida's state pension fund also invests in Twitter, and Governor Ron DeSantis said this week it could make a $15 million to $20 million profit if Musk completed his buyout.

In afternoon trading, Twitter shares were down 60 cents at $49.76.

The case is Orlando Police Pension Fund v Twitter Inc et al, Delaware Chancery Court, No. 2022-0396.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Howard Goller and Mark Potter)

Florida pension fund sues Elon Musk over Twitter deal


SOPA Images via Getty Images

Amrita Khalid
·Contributing Writer
Fri, May 6, 2022,

Elon Musk's $44 billion buyout of Twitter is facing its first legal challenge. A Florida pension fund is suing Musk and Twitter, arguing that the deal can't legally close until 2025 due to the billionaire's stake in the platform. The proposed class-action lawsuit — filed today by the Orlando Police Pension Fund in the Delaware Chancery court— also declares that Twitter’s board of directors breached its fiduciary duties by allowing the deal to go through. In addition to Musk and Twitter, the lawsuit also named former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, current Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal and the company’s board as defendants.

In a message to Engadget, Tulane Law School’s Professor Ann M. Lipton says the lawsuit raises "some very novel issues" under Delaware corporate law. Under a law known as Section 203, shareholders who own more than 15 percent of the company can’t enter a merger without two-thirds of the remaining shares granting approval. Without this approval, the merger can’t be finalized for another three years.

The fund’s lawyers state that Musk initially owned roughly 10 percent of Twitter’s shares, which would seemingly not make Section 203 applicable. But, the fund argues, Musk formed a pact with Morgan Stanley (which owns 8.8 percent of shares) and former CEO Jack Dorsey (who has 2.4 percent) to advance the deal. The combined stake of these parties allegedly makes Musk and his allies in the takeover deal an "interested shareholder" under Section 203 — which, if the court agrees with the underlying reasoning presented in the case, means the merger must either be delayed or get approval shareholders representing at least two-thirds of the company's ownership.

“Section 203 is not often litigated, and so the issue of whether Musk's relationship with these parties actually counts for statutory purposes is an unsettled question and it will be interesting to watch how it unfolds,” wrote Lipton.

More details of Musk’s highly complex $44 billion buyout of Twitter have been made public since the social media platform accepted the billionaire’s offer last month. The New York Times reported that Musk promised investors returns of nearly five to ten times their investments if the deal went through. Parts of the deal are being scrutinized, including its reliance on foreign investors and whether Musk bought shares in the company specifically to influence its leadership. But antitrust experts say the merger is unlikely to be blocked by the FTC. The agency will decide in the next month whether to quickly approve the merger or launch a lengthier investigation.


Analysis-Musk's new Twitter funding could draw TikTok-like U.S. scrutiny


Fri, May 6, 2022
By Echo Wang

(Reuters) - Elon Musk's decision to accept some foreign investors as part of his $44 billion buyout of Twitter Inc runs the risk of inviting the kind of regulatory scrutiny over U.S. national security that social media peer TikTok faced, legal experts say.

Musk disclosed on Thursday that Saudi Arabia's Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, Qatar's sovereign wealth fund and Binance, the world's biggest cryptocurrency exchange founded by Chinese native Changpeng Zhao, were part of a group of investors that will help him fund the acquisition of Twitter.

This could give the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) an opening to scrutinize the deal for potential national security risks, six regulatory lawyers not involved in the transaction and interviewed by Reuters said. CFIUS is a panel of government agencies and departments that reviews mergers and acquisitions for potential threats to U.S. security.

"To the extent that Musk's proposed acquisition of Twitter includes foreign investment, it very well could fall under CFIUS jurisdiction," said Chris Griner, chair of law firm Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP's national security practice.

A spokesperson for the U.S. Treasury Department, which chairs CFIUS, declined to comment on whether the national security panel planned to scrutinize Musk's Twitter deal.

Spokespeople for Musk, bin Talal, Qatar and Binance did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Former President Donald Trump's administration turned to CFIUS in 2020 in a bid to force TikTok's Chinese parent ByteDance to divest the short video app. His successor Joe Biden abandoned that effort after ByteDance agreed to changes on how the data of U.S. users are stored and protected.

The regulatory lawyers interviewed by Reuters said the risk of CFIUS blocking Musk's deal is small because he will control Twitter under the proposed takeover and the foreign investors are acquiring relatively small stakes.

They added that their assessment would change were Musk to give the foreign investors influence over the company, through a seat on its board or other means.

The risk is not negligible, however, given that the business of handling personal data by social media companies such as Twitter is typically viewed as critical infrastructure by CFIUS, the lawyers said.

"One of the items that's considered sensitive personal data, is non-public electronic communications. So that would be email, messaging or chat communications between users. Twitter allows you to do that," law firm Vinson & Elkins LLP partner Richard Sofield said.

One area of potential scrutiny for CFIUS, the lawyers said, could be Musk's business dealings with foreign governments hostile to free speech or keen to overtake the United States technologically. Tesla Inc, the electric car maker he leads, relies heavily on China, for example, to manufacture and sell its vehicles.

China blocked Twitter in 2009 but many Chinese officials have been active on the social media platform. Some of them have complained that the company's efforts to restrict misinformation have targeted them unfairly.

"One of the considerations would be whether or not there will be an opportunity for China to leverage its business activity in order to achieve a desired outcome," Sofield added.

BROADCOM PRECEDENT


There is precedent for CFIUS shooting down a deal based on the risk that an acquirer's business ties could compromise them, the lawyers said. Trump blocked chip maker Broadcom Inc's $117 billion acquisition of U.S peer Qualcomm Inc 2018 after CFIUS raised concerns about the deal.

Broadcom was a publicly listed company with U.S. shareholders that was headquartered in Singapore, but the White House fretted that Broadcom's relationship with "third-party foreign entities" would set the U.S. back in its technology race with China.

Nevena Simidjiyska, a regulatory lawyer at law firm Fox Rothschild LLP, said it was possible CFIUS would look into whether Musk or other U.S. investors in the Twitter deal can be influenced by foreign entities in a similar way.

"CFIUS may determine that even U.S. investors in Twitter fall under CFIUS review if they are controlled by foreign parties," Simidjiyska said.

Musk's Twitter deal does not face the most common type of regulatory risk seen in mergers and acquisitions — pushback from antitrust regulators. The world's richest man has no media holdings, and regulatory experts have said they do not expect the deal to face significant antitrust scrutiny.

(Reporting by Echo Wang in New York; Additional reporting by Alexandra Alper in Washington, D.C.; Editing by Greg Roumeliotis and Lincoln Feast)







ONTARIO
Former staffer fired after convoy donation sues Ford government, media



Protesters gather near Ottawa's Parliament Hill, on February 12, 2022.
 REUTERS/Lars Hagberg

Adrian Humphreys - Yesterday 
National Post

A former senior Ontario government spokeswoman said she was fired from her job within minutes of being outed as a convoy protest donor, even though she was a loyal soldier for the government.

Marion Isabeau Ringuette claims she was wrongfully axed as director of communications for Ontario’s solicitor general for Premier Doug Ford’s “personal political gain” — allowing him to show public opposition to the convoy — in a lawsuit against Ford, his chief of staff, the Ontario government, Toronto Star Newspapers Limited and two journalists.


In her statement of claim, Ringuette says she was promoted to her job in February 2020 and was a rarity in Ford’s government: a fully bilingual political staffer.

None of the allegations in the statement of claim have been tested in court.

She said she followed government directives, including canceling travel plans to visit family in Texas for the 2021 Christmas holidays in keeping with Ford’s policy against travel during COVID-19 restrictions.

On Feb. 5, Ringuette donated $100 to the protest, called the Freedom Convoy, after a group of truckers and others opposed to vaccine mandates and other grievances rolled into Ottawa the week before. The protest became increasingly controversial during its occupation of city streets.

Her lawsuit says her donation was made when there was no government policy against the protest and a day before the city of Ottawa declared a state of emergency. The province didn’t take a position against the convoy protest until Feb. 10, making her private donation legal and not against government policy, according to her claim.

“Ms. Ringuette had every expectation that her donation would be private and confidential,” her suit says.

GiveSendGo began hosting the protest’s fundraising after it was banned from the more mainstream site GoFundMe. The GiveSendGo site was hacked on Feb. 13.

The hack was openly declared as an activist attack and a database of information entered by donors was made publicly available.

It included information on 92,844 donations totalling more than $8.4 million, such as the name, email address, amount given, postal code, country, and Internet Protocol address of the donor, and how the payment was made. The leaked data did not include credit card numbers.

GiveSendGo co-founders blame government for not telling them it had issues with 'Freedom Convoy' blockades

It allowed analysts, news organizations and critics to look at where the protest’s money was coming from.

The data unveiled names behind the donations, some of whom were prominent or had jobs making their support publicly awkward.

Ringuette was one of them.

Her $100 donation was made under the initials, M.R., but the leaked data included a personal email address containing her name.

A journalist made the connection to Ringuette.

On Feb. 15, Charles Pinkerton, interim editor of QP Briefing, a publication focusing on Ontario politics owned by the Toronto Star, called Ringuette on her cell phone, her claim says. She didn’t answer. He then texted her, but she ignored the text. He then emailed both her work and personal email addresses asking her to confirm her job with the government and her donation to the convoy, her claim says.

A similar email was sent to the premier’s office.

Within minutes she was called by her immediate supervisor, David Garland, who asked if she had donated to the convoy. She said she had.

“The premier’s office wanted to fire her,” she was told, according to her claim. Garland said he would try to intervene but called back several minutes later and said she had been fired “because they wanted to be seen as acting ‘quickly,’” according to the claim.

Someone from Ford’s office came onto the line and confirmed she was fired with 16 weeks of severance, she claims.

The government then replied to Pinkerton’s email saying Ringuette was no longer working for the government, her claim says.

Ringuette’s lawsuit says the government’s response confirmed her identity as a donor, allowing public disclosure of her personal information.

Pinkerton and Andrew Takagi, a reporter at QP Briefing, shared the byline on a Feb. 15 story on qpbriefing.com with the headline “Senior staffer of solicitor general out of job after donating to ‘Freedom Convoy’.” They also co-authored a story repeating the information on iPolitics.ca.

Ringuette’s suit against the two journalists and their employer claims they “acted in callous disregard” for her privacy and the damage the “politically controversial” information would have on her career.

The suit also accuses Ford and his chief of staff, James Wallace, of acting in bad faith.

“A provincial election was imminent and Premier Ford’s decision to terminate Ms. Ringuette’s employment was based on his and his campaign team’s belief that it would benefit him politically to, finally, oppose the Freedom Convoy,” the suit alleges.

Ringuette seeks $450,000 from the government and its officials for wrongful dismissal, in addition to a joint claim against all defendants for $1.5 million for invasion of privacy, public disclosure of private fact, damage to reputation and emotional distress.

The National Post contacted the premier’s office, the Toronto Star and Queen’s Park Briefing for comment, but received no replies by press time.

Some news stories on the donors treated the data in aggregate or anonymous form. Others revealed names if they could confirm the identity, or if the donor acknowledged they made it. This included National Post and some other Postmedia newspapers.

For news organizations, it was usually reserved for government officials, civil servants, or publicly prominent people, in a bid to hold institutions and public figures to account. Some business owners also received coverage.

After the names became public, through news stories or on social media, several people lost or left their jobs. At least one person was publicly misidentified, an Alberta judge who shares a name with a donor.
High wages, low housing costs keep homes affordable in Alberta

Economic factors and government policies, such as tightened controls around energy efficiency, are putting upward pressure on home prices.


Josh Skapin - Yesterday 
Edmonton Journal


The average cost of absorbed single-family homes in the Edmonton census metropolitan area (CMA) in February was $561,753, says Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. During the same month in 2021, it was $538,587.

“Edmonton to Calgary, together, one of our secret super powers is the fact that we have high wages and low housing costs relative to the rest of the country,” says Kalen Anderson, Urban Development Institute (UDI-)Edmonton’s executive director.

“That’s a critical strategic advantage for us,” she added. “We want to make sure that we maintain that affordability and attainability of housing.

“It’s really hard to have a big Canadian city with attainable housing in it for all different prices points, and we currently have that, but it’s really easy for that to erode.”
Energy Efficiency

With expenses in mind, energy efficiency is a “significant” factor for the industry, says Fraser de Walle, chair of BILD (Building Industry and Land Development) Alberta.

“We understand and endorse the fact that better efficiency and lower greenhouse gas emissions will further shape the homes of our future,” he says. “However, decisions that are made without conciliation of appropriate industry can have unintended consequences on the price of the home for consumers.

“We are trying to be very pro-active on this topic, staying in front of it … we are very engaged in it.”

“The key thing is we need to maintain affordability in housing, which needs to stay central to those discussions and planning. We have seen climate policy acceleration by municipalities and often that acceleration by the municipalities, specifically Calgary and Edmonton, sometimes lack broader alignment.

“We are activity working on a broader strategy to attain greater alignment and clarity with the municipalities on that topic.”

The industry is also shouldering ongoing limitations related to supply chains and subsequent inflation.

Growth and Delays


The Edmonton census metropolitan area saw 12,546 starts on homes of all kinds in 2021, rising from 11,512 and 10,720 in 2020 and 2019, respectively, according to CMHC.

Alberta, in total, rose to 30,612 starts from 20,043, year over year.

“We are optimistic 2022 will be strong, as well,” says de Walle.


However, he adds, the flip-side of that positive momentum is ongoing delays.

“Still, just coming from the end of COVID, we are going to likely continue to see increased costs and delays in products and materials, which is an ongoing concern for us,” he added. “Things that will help with that are … reducing red tape and improved alignment between stakeholders and government officials. BILD Alberta works very hard on that.

“For approvals for land titles, just because of the sheer volume of activity — and you’d think that’s a positive, the volume of activity — but there has been an unintended consequence with that activity where Service Alberta can’t keep up with the deal flow,” he added.

“There were delays across our provincial land title offices, which created a lot of challenges.”

BILD Alberta worked with the government on addressing this bottleneck in land titles approvals and collaborated on an interim solution, he added.

“It caught us by surprise … the demand that occurred through the pandemic,” says Anderson. “What we quickly learned as we sat at home and zoomed our way into our offices was that a home was not just a place to lay your head at night or make dinner, it was your gym, your kindergarten, your everything.

“Time is money,” she adds. “The cost of lending and time holding development through approvals processes — the more we can tighten that up, the more affordability can be maintained because the price goes down.

“Edmonton relative to Canada is doing a really positive job in that, but we want to keep working on it.”

City Charters


City charters that have the ability to influence the cost of a home are another priority for the residential building industry.

“We are working very hard to address the issues related to levies and inclusionary housing to have those removed from the city charters,” says de Walle, adding there’s concern over potential implications in Edmonton and Calgary if this is not addressed.

“The current structure within the city charters will further increase the costs to development, erode affordability and impact business confidence in our two largest cities,” de Walle says. “We haven’t encountered another jurisdiction in Canada that provides cities with as much broad and considerable power over development costs as they do in Alberta.

“We are looking for engagement from the province to provide clear and consistent rules governing these significant costs to provide a level of certainty and predictability for our industry.”

Infrastructure


Timing around infrastructure planning is another key, says Anderson.

“We don’t want to overbuild infrastructure before it is needed,” she added. “Infrastructure enables growth to happen. We want to be able to have a good sense of where growth will occur so we can all be prepared well in advance.

“Building out new neighbourhoods, there’s a lot of momentum to continue to fill them out because a half-built neighbourhood is basically all the infrastructure with half the houses. So we want to work with the city to make sure we enable growth to happen continuously and as efficiently as possible.”
Scarcity of water is expected to get worse in 80% of all croplands


Ryan Morrison For Dailymail.Com

Water scarcity is going to increase over the next few decades in more than 80 per cent of the world's croplands due to climate change, a new study has warned.

Researchers examined current and future water requirements for global agriculture, to determine whether the required water levels would be available by 2050.

The team from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing looked at maximum levels of water possible from rainwater and irrigation in each cropland area.

They created an index to measure and predict water scarcity in major agriculture sources, including soil, rain, irrigation and rivers, finding that 80 per cent of all cropland areas around the world won't have enough water by 2050.

In the last 100 years, the demand for water worldwide has grown twice as fast as the human population, with water scarcity an increasing issue in drought struck areas such as the western US states, served by the Colorado River basin.

Earlier this week US officials announced what they called extraordinary steps on to keep hundreds of billions of gallons of water stored in the Lake Powell reservoir.

This was done to prevent it from shrinking more amid prolonged drought and climate change that has seen reservoirs in the region drop to record lows.

'Farming techniques that keep rainwater in agricultural soils could help mitigate shortages in arid regions,' the researchers suggest.


© Provided by Daily Mail
If greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, agricultural water scarcity is predicted to intensify in 84 per cent of cropland from 2026 to 2050. In this figure, darker brown hues indicate greater water scarcity

Water scarcity is already an issue on every continent with agriculture, presenting a major threat to food security, the team warned.

Despite this, most water scarcity models have failed to take a comprehensive look at both blue and green water.

Soil water that comes from rain is called green water, and irrigation from rivers, lakes and groundwater is called blue water.

This is the first study to apply a comprehensive index of possible water worldwide and predict global blue and green water scarcity as a result of climate change.

It predicts whether the water levels available, either from rainwater or irrigation, will be sufficient to meet those needs under climate change.

'As the largest user of both blue and green water resources, agricultural production is faced with unprecedented challenges,' said Xingcai Liu, an associate professor at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and lead author of the new study.

'This index enables an assessment of agricultural water scarcity in both rainfed and irrigated croplands in a consistent manner.'


Water scarcity is going to increase over the next few decades in more than 80 per cent of the world's croplands due to climate change, a new study has warned. Stock image

A majority of rainfall ends up as green water, but it is often overlooked in water studies because it is invisible in the soil and can't be extracted for other uses.

The amount of green water available for crops depends on the how much rainfall an area receives and how much water is lost due to runoff and evaporation.

Farming practices, vegetation covering the area, the type of soil and the slope of the terrain can also have an effect.

US to hold back Lake Powell water to protect hydropower

U.S. officials announced what they called extraordinary steps on Tuesday to keep hundreds of billions of gallons of water stored in a reservoir on the Utah-Arizona line to prevent it from shrinking more amid prolonged drought and climate change.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation plans to hold back about 480,000 acre-feet of water in Lake Powell to maintain Glen Canyon Dam's ability to produce hydropower for millions of homes and businesses in the region.

That's roughly enough water to serve 1 million to 1.5 million average households annually.

Tanya Trujillo, the bureau's assistant secretary of water and science, said keeping the water stored in the reservoir would stave off hydropower concerns for at least 12 months, giving officials time to strategize for how to operate the dam at a lower water elevation.

The lake currently holds less than one-fourth of its full capacity and the dam produces electricity for about 5 million customers in seven U.S. states.

'We have never taken this step before in the Colorado River basin, but conditions we see today and the potential risks we see on the horizon demand that we take prompt action,' Trujillo said.

The shifting of temperatures and rainfall patterns due to climate change, as well as intensive farming practices, mean green water is unlikely to be enough to support the number of needed crops to support a growing population.

Mesfin Mekonnen, an assistant professor of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama who was not involved in the study, said the work is 'very timely in underlining the impact of climate on water availability.'

'What makes the paper interesting is developing a water scarcity indicator taking into account both blue water and green water,' he said.

'Most studies focus on blue water resources alone, giving little consideration to the green water.'

The researchers find that under climate change, global agricultural water scarcity will worsen in up to 84 per cent of croplands, with a loss of water supplies driving scarcity in about 60 per cent of those croplands.

Changes in available green water, due to shifting rainfall patterns and evaporation caused by higher temperatures, are now predicted to impact about 16 per cent of global croplands.

'Adding this important dimension to our understanding of water scarcity could have implications for agricultural water management,' the team said.

There will be areas that benefit, and those that suffer.

They gave the example of northeast China, predicted to receive more rain which could help alleviate agricultural water scarcity in the region.

However, reduced rainfall in the midwestern US and northwest India may lead to a need to increase irrigation to support intense farming.

The new index could help countries to assess the threat and causes of agricultural water scarcity and develop strategies to reduce the impact of future droughts.

The western US states are currently going through the worst drought in 1,200 years, causing a drop in run off and record low levels in reservoirs and rivers.

Multiple practices help conserve agricultural water, the team said, including mulching, which reduces evaporation from the soil.

No-till farming encourages water to infiltrate the ground and adjusting the timing of plantings can better align crop growth with changing rainfall patterns.

'Longer term, improving irrigation infrastructure, for example in Africa, and irrigation efficiency would be effective ways to mitigate the effects of future climate change in the context of growing food demand,' Liu said.

The findings have been published in the journal Earth s Future. Read more

A Russian motor just spontaneously exploded while orbiting Earth

Joshua Hawkins - Yesterday
BGR


Yet another cloud of space debris has appeared in orbit around Earth. This particular cloud was birthed by the explosion of an old Russian rocket motor. Currently, the U.S. Space Force’s 18th Space Squadron is tracking 16 pieces tied to the event.

An old Russian rocket motor exploded in space

The U.S. Space Force cataloged the object that blew up as Object #32398. The object itself was an old Russian rocket motor, journalist Anatoly Zak says. The ullage motor was part of a space tug that helped put three Russian GLONASS satellites into orbit back in 2007.

A Russian Proton rocket did most of the heavy lifting for the satellite launch in 2007. However, the upper stage of the rocket featured two small ullage motors. Russia used these ullage motors to help accelerate the parent rocket stages slightly, according to Jonathan McDowell.

McDowell is an astrophysicist and satellite tracker working at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

These small motors essentially help ensure the fuel is positioned correctly in the tanks. That’s important for any engine restarts needed once the rocket reaches orbit. However, these old Russian rocket motors don’t use up all of their propellant when they fire.

As such, they tend to explode some years, or even decades later. This creates a cloud of space debris in orbit.

Space debris and space junk aren’t a new factor. We’ve been dealing with them for a while. In the past, space debris has threatened the ISS. And, we’ve even looked for new ways to combat space junk.

Those efforts are still ongoing, though. This isn’t likely to be the last time we hear about old Russian rocket motors exploding in space, either.

McDowell says there are at least 64 ullage motors currently in orbit. Further, this isn’t the first one to explode.

Adding to the problem


© Provided by BGR
old russian rocket motor joins already outrageous amount of space debris around Earth

According to tweets from McDowell, at least 54 of the ullage motors have exploded over the years. Russia also refers to these old Russian rocket motors as SOZ motors. SOZ is short for “Sistema Obespecheniya Zapuska.” That translates roughly to “Launch Assurance System”.

The name makes sense. However, what doesn’t make sense is that we still have so many of these motors orbiting Earth, waiting to make new clouds of debris.

The old Russian Motor that just exploded was making its way around Earth in an elliptical orbit. At its closest point, it would get within 241 miles of Earth. At its furthest point, the Russian rocket motor would be 11,852 miles away from Earth. Because of this orbit, the debris field will take a while to reenter Earth’s atmosphere.

Ultimately, though, satellite tracks expected this debris event to happen at some point. “So – this debris event was predictable and is well understood; still very unfortunate,” McDowell wrote in a tweet. Experts are currently tracking over 173 debris objects from similar explosions of Russian rocket motors.



SOUNDS LIKE A JOB FOR:

IT'S A FEDERAL LIBERAL GOVT. TIME FOR;
Another big Maritime fishery quota cut looming

Paul Withers - Yesterday 
CBC

Another Maritime fishery is facing a big quota cut this year — the only question is how big.

This time it is the large herring fishery in southwestern Nova Scotia and the Bay of Fundy.


The stock is in the critical zone where serious harm is occurring, but the fishery employs hundreds of people in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.

What happens next will again test how far Canada's fisheries minister is willing to go to rebuild a depleted stock.

63% cut looms


If DFO decides to use a new modelling process, the quota would likely be slashed to 13,050 tonnes from 35,000 tonnes — a 62.7 per cent cut.


That advice is the result of a management strategy evaluation, which is being used to produce a total allowable catch for this herring fishery for the first time.

The simulation-based process determines the quota or total allowable catch to achieve a desired outcome. The objective in this case is to get the herring stock out of the critical zone.

DFO has refused to say if it has decided to use advice from the management strategy evaluation.

A department spokesperson told CBC News in an email that a decision on the quota would be announced in the coming weeks.

The Bay of Fundy season opens in June.

Industry proposes smaller cut

One industry group has offered to cut the quota by 30 per cent.

In a news release, Bay of Fundy Herring Industry said it would be prepared to reduce the total allowable catch to 25,000 tonnes from 35,000 tonnes for the 2022 season.


"Our fishery recognizes the need for caution and to promote stock revitalization," said Noël Després, president of Saulnierville-based Comeau Seafoods, in the release.


© Robert F. Bukaty/The Associated Press
A file photo shows herring in a bucket. A decision on the total allowable catch for the herring fishery in southwestern Nova Scotia and the Bay of Fundy is expected to be announced in the coming weeks.

Most of the quota is caught by seiners — boats that use big nets to circle a school of herring as it comes to the surface.

The industry said it has undertaken voluntary conservation measures, citing major spawning ground closures, seasonal and weekend closures, and protections for juvenile fish.

"Our rebuilding efforts are showing signs of success, although it's going a little slower than what we were anticipating," said Tony Hooper of Connors Bros., based in Blacks Harbour, N.B.

Seeking to pause process


Industry leaders are also calling on DFO to pause the management strategy evaluation process, claiming the modelling is flawed.

"More work needs to be done before it can be implemented," said Tim Kaiser of Scotia Garden Seafood Inc., based in Yarmouth, N.S.

"We're seeing inconsistencies in the model, and the best thing we can do now is to take a brief pause, get back to the table and resolve these issues before making long-term decisions for the fishery."


© Paul Withers/CBC
Sebastian Pardo is sustainable fisheries co-ordinator at the Ecology Action Centre in Halifax. Pardo says previous quota cuts have not resulted in population rebuilding of the stock.

Environmentalist Sebastian Pardo said the management strategy evaluation has been in development since 2019. The model was finalized after a review by DFO and external scientists.

"For the most part, the conclusion was that the science is robust," said Pardo, sustainable fisheries co-ordinator at the Ecology Action Centre in Halifax.

The proposed cut is far bigger in tonnage than the total shutdowns imposed on the Atlantic mackerel and Gulf of St. Lawrence spring herring fisheries earlier this year.

"This is a much more difficult decision in terms of economic consequences. Any TAC [total allowable catch] reduction that big would be very painful for industry and it would have major consequences," said Pardo.

"From a conservation perspective, this stock has been in the critical zone for a while and the sequential TAC reductions that have happened in the past have not resulted in population rebuilding.

"I think this is a major test."


© Paul Withers/CBC
West Nova MP Chris d'Entremont says changes are needed, but there are factors besides biomass that have to be considered.

West Nova MP Chris d'Entremont represents a Nova Scotia riding that is home to large herring processing plants and seiner ports.

"We understand there has to be changes. The biomass may not be there as we need it, but there's also other considerations that need to be brought forward," d'Entremont told CBC News.

Nova Scotia Fisheries and Aquaculture Minister Steve Craig plans to meet with industry representatives next week to talk about the quota.

Meanwhile, the herring industry is warning DFO that sudden and significant changes could be disastrous for business.

"Here at Connors we can deal with a certain level of change in the TAC from year to year, but we can't change our inputs and products overnight," said Hooper.

"It's difficult to keep the plant viable if we see drastic cuts in the TAC on short notice."
When it comes to food prices, the Canadian government's hands are tied

Michael von Massow, Associate Professor, Food Economics, University of Guelph
 - Sunday
The Conversation

The rhetoric around inflation and increasing food prices has become a point of emphasis for politicians, particularly for those in opposition to the incumbent government.

Even pundits and non-profit organizations are pressuring the government into taking specific actions on food prices. This begs the question: Should governments take steps to reduce food prices? And more importantly — can they?

This is not to say that food inflation doesn’t matter. It has clear impacts on food security in North America and across the world. While some argue there is little that can be done, there are some steps the government can take.

Putting a limit on food prices

The most obvious step the government could take is regulating food prices using price ceilings. This is virtually unheard of in North America, but has happened elsewhere, most recently in Malaysia where the government has announced price control measures for key staples.

While this might initially seem like a good idea, price ceilings actually end up taking money out of the system. If that money isn’t replaced (i.e. through government subsidies), products either stop being produced or make their way to other, more profitable markets. Currently, the Canadian government can’t afford these kinds of subsidies because of the debt accumulated from COVID-19 relief.

There are some products, like dairy and poultry, that have domestic production controls. Farm prices are set based on a cost-of-production model, meaning farmers earn back the amount of money it costs to produce their products. If grocery prices were capped, retailers and processors would make less money and less dairy products would make it to store shelves.

Price ceilings are impractical for food. They are unlikely to achieve much and end up hitting farmers, processors and retailers the hardest. In the long run, they end up reducing access to products and stifling innovation and research investment.
Limiting food exports

In some countries, governments have chosen to limit exports — meaning goods must be sold domestically — as a way of reducing food prices. Argentina did this recently after wheat prices increased following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. While this is good for domestic consumers, it puts the burden on farmers who could stop production in favour of selling unregulated products.

Export taxes can also be used in place of export controls. While these stabilize domestic prices, they end up hurting domestic producers, who get lower prices, and importing countries, who face higher prices.

Canada, as a significant exporter of food products, cannot afford to let its reputation as a trusted exporter be compromised. In addition, limiting or taxing exports would only have small impacts on domestic prices, but would negatively impact Canadian producers and export customers.

For countries that import food, like India, the reduction of import duties can also help to reduce domestic prices. Import duties are often used to protect domestic producers. For the most part, Canada does not have high tariffs on food products, with the exception of supply-managed products, so this approach is not broadly applicable.

Some U.S. states are considering waiving food taxes. In Canada, most retail food items are not taxed, so this is not an option, although a similar tax is being used in Alberta to reduce the cost of transportation. One critique of this approach is that it benefits those that spend the most, rather than those that need it most.

What can governments actually do?


Another option could be to deal with the root causes of the inflation. However, many of these factors — like drought and extreme weather events, the war in Ukraine and supply chain disruptions — are beyond the control of the Canadian government.

There has been discussions from CEOs and political parties about implementing a grocery code of conduct for regulating how large grocery companies interact with their suppliers. While a code might benefit grocers and their suppliers, it is unclear if it would actually lower food prices for consumers.

While there is not a lot that governments can do about food prices, policy makers can still provide broader economic relief. Those with the lowest incomes are feeling the pinch of inflation more than others — they are being squeezed not only by food price increases, but by rising rent and fuel prices.

Income support for those with lowest incomes would hep reduce the burden of rising costs of living. Broader tax relief could also take the pressure off for the middle class, but tax relief is less effective for low income earners that pay little tax. Targeted programs, like the school food programs announced in the 2022 federal budget, could also increase food access for vulnerable populations.

Politicians who criticize incumbent government for rising food prices should be challenged to provide real proposals that would differentiate them. This is not an easy fix and we shouldn’t be pretending it is.

This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts.

Read more:

The delicate balance between grocery store profit and food security


Michael von Massow receives funding from a variety of organizations including the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Genome Canada, and Protein Industries Canada.