Friday, May 13, 2022

WHERE IT ALL BEGAN
Randy Weaver, participant in Ruby Ridge standoff, dies at 74

SPOKANE, Wash. (AP) — Randy Weaver, patriarch of a family that was involved in an 11-day Idaho standoff with federal agents 30 years ago that left three people dead and helped spark the growth of anti-government extremists, has died at the age of 74.


Randy Weaver

His death was announced Thursday in a Facebook post by daughter Sara Weaver, who lives near Kalispell, Montana.

“Love you always Dad” was written on Sara Weaver's Facebook page, posted with a picture of an older Randy and a smiling Sara, along with the dates Jan. 3, 1948, and May 11, 2022.

Sara Weaver did not immediately return Facebook messages and email requests for information. Details of Randy Weaver's death were not immediately available.

The standoff in the mountains near Ruby Ridge in the Idaho Panhandle transfixed the nation in August of 1992.

Randy Weaver moved his family to northern Idaho in the 1980s to escape what he saw as a corrupt world. Over time, federal agents began investigating the Army veteran for possible ties to white supremacist and anti-government groups. Weaver was eventually suspected of selling a government informant two illegal sawed-off shotguns.

To avoid arrest, Weaver holed up on his land near Naples, Idaho.

On Aug. 21, 1992, a team of U.S. marshals scouting the forest to find suitable places to ambush and arrest Weaver came across his friend, Kevin Harris, and Weaver’s 14-year-old son Samuel in the woods. A gunfight broke out. Samuel Weaver and Deputy U.S. Marshal William Degan were killed.

The next day, an FBI sniper shot Randy Weaver. As Weaver, Harris and Sara ran back toward the house, the sniper fired a second bullet, which passed through Vicki Weaver’s head as she held an infant and wounded Harris in the chest.

During the siege, Sara Weaver crawled around her mother’s blanket-covered body to get food and water for the survivors until the family surrendered on Aug. 31, 1992.

Harris and Randy Weaver were arrested, and Weaver’s three daughters went to live with their mother’s family in Iowa. Randy Weaver was acquitted of the most serious charges and Harris was acquitted of all charges.

The surviving members of the Weaver family filed a wrongful death lawsuit. The federal government awarded Randy Weaver a $100,000 settlement and his three daughters $1 million each in 1995.

“Ruby Ridge was the opening shot of a new era of anti-government hatred not seen since the Civil War,” said Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center in a 2012 interview on the 20th anniversary of the siege.

After Ruby Ridge, federal agents laid siege to the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas. It ended violently after 51 days on April 19, 1993, when a fire destroyed the compound after an assault was launched, killing 76 people.


Timothy McVeigh cited both Ruby Ridge and Waco as motivators when he bombed the federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995. Ruby Ridge has been cited often by militia and patriot groups since.

In the 30 years since the standoff, Ruby Ridge remained a rallying cry for anti-government extremists. The Spokesman-Review reported Weaver remained popular among white supremacists and extremists in the years following the standoff, and was often seen selling his book, “The Federal Siege at Ruby Ridge,” at gun shows and survivalist expos.


Sara Weaver lives near Kalispell, Montana, a city in the northwestern part of the state that is the gateway to Glacier National Park and more than 100 miles (160 kilometers) east of Ruby Ridge.

Sara Weaver said she is devastated each time someone commits a violent act in the name of Ruby Ridge. “It killed me inside,” she told The Associated Press in 2012, regarding the Oklahoma City bombing. “I knew what it was like to lose a family member in violence. I wouldn’t wish that on anyone.”

After graduating from high school in Iowa, Sara Weaver moved to the Kalispell area in 1996. Her sisters and father followed shortly after.

She has been back to Ruby Ridge, to the land her family still owns. All that remains of the family’s modest home is the foundation, she said.

Nicholas K. Geranios, The Associated Press

 

The WEF conspiracy theory is in the Conservative leadership race, and Canada’s main streets - The Globe and Mail

Author: @NSW4Freedom
Posted: Thu, 12 May 2022

The WEF conspiracy theory is in the Conservative leadership race, and Canada’s main streets
- The Globe and Mail

"After a lunchtime Pierre Poilievre rally in Fergus, Ont., a woman named Ava had a burning question: She wanted a journalist to ask how Mr. Poilievre can be trusted when a “member” of the World Economic Forum is co-chair of his campaign.

"She was talking about John Baird, the former foreign affairs minister under Stephen Harper. Ava believes billionaires Bill Gates and George Soros are trying to take over the world, in league with a German octogenarian named Klaus Schwab, who founded the WEF more than 50 years ago."

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-conservative-leadership-race-world-economic-forum/


The Klaus Schwab WEF ‘Great Reset’ Conspiracy Theory On The Pandemic And War


Photo: World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab, left,
and Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, right,]
at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Jan. 28, 2009.
(AP Photo/Michel Euler)

The Great Reset” — a conspiracy theory triggered by the World Economic Forum 2021 theme of the same name — claims that the global elite plans to dismantle capitalism and enforce a socialist world order.

In the new world order, covid-19 would solve overpopulation, pandemic survivors would be forced to get the vaccine and be enslaved by it, and private property would be abolished.

The theme of the 2021 WEF summit was “The Great Reset.” The event is attended each year by some of the world’s wealthiest and most powerful people at a ski resort in Davos, Switzerland. Organizers launched an initiative in June 2020 ahead of the 2021 event — the second one in a row held virtually because of the covid outbreak — calling for the covid-19 pandemic to be seen as a chance for what they called a great reset of the global economy.

President Vladimir Putin was invited to deliver a virtual special address at the World Economic Forum summit, held on Jan. 25–29, 2021 — in hindsight, possibly a really bad idea for its value in fueling a conspiracy theory.

By inviting Putin, forum founder and director Klaus Schwab was arguing for the need to nurture honest dialogue to end the era of polarization and isolation, Pavel K. Baev wrote for the conservative defense policy think tank, Jamestown Foundation.

However, in his speech, Putin talked about rising inequality and the inefficiency of global institutions. But the core of his message was a warning about the growing risk of war. He talked about the “bad peace” after World War I and the crisis in the 1930s that led to renewed global conflict within 20 years.

Putin warned that the coronavirus pandemic has exacerbated preexisting imbalances and tensions.
He said these could deteriorate to war of “all against all.”

“In the 20th century, the failure and inability to centrally resolve such issues resulted in the catastrophic World War II,” Putin said in the speech. “Of course, nowadays such a heated conflict is not possible, I hope that it’s not possible in principle, because it would mean the end of our civilization. But I would like to reiterate, that the situation might develop unpredictably and uncontrollably if we will sit on our hands doing nothing to avoid it. And there is a possibility that we may experience an actual collapse of global development that might result in a fight of all against all.”

“Left unsaid but strongly implied, however, (was) that Putin (was) supposedly ready to resort to military force in order to fight off the perceived encroachments on Russia’s interests,” Baev wrote.

In his speech, Putin also denounced the “digital giants” that he said want to manipulate societies. “The Russian special services are able to execute effective cyberattacks against the U.S., but they cannot control domestic information channels,” Baev wrote. However, he added, Putin “is more irked by the decision of Facebook and Twitter to block the accounts of his (oligarch friend).”

“Rampant corruption and rigid central control are the main causes of Russia’s protracted economic stagnation,” Baev wrote, “and their continuing impact denies the country any chance for a post-pandemic recovery.”

Schwab, a German engineer, economist and head of the World Economic Forum, wrote a book published in 2020 called “The Great Reset” with co-author Thierry Malleret. According to the dust cover, the book is “a guide for anyone who wants to understand how covid-19 disrupted our social and economic systems, and what changes will be needed to create a more inclusive, resilient and sustainable world going forward.”

An international non-governmental and lobbying organization, the Geneva, Switzerland-based World Economic Forum was founded in 1971 by Schwab. Its reason for existence, according to the WEF website, is to engage “the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas” for public-private cooperation.

While living in Germany during World War II, Schwab’s family was monitored and interrogated by the Gestapo. Schwab was later awarded a master’s degree in public administration from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. He was a professor of business policy at the University of Geneva for more than 30 years. Since 1979, he has published the annual Global Competitiveness Report, which assesses the potential of countries around the world for increasing economic growth and productivity.

The Great Reset proposes a stakeholder model, “where government, business, and individuals collaborate; where longer-term planning for future generations replaces short-sighted presentism, and where better measures of success allow us to move beyond a myopic focus on GDP and short-term profits,” Schwab wrote in a WEF blog.

Political scientist and writer Ivan Wecke was intrigued by the attention “the great reset” term was getting on social media — 8 million-plus interactions on Facebook and almost 2 million shares on Twitter as of August 2021. Wecke set out to “find out what the WEF’s Great Reset plan was really about,” he wrote for the openDemocracy media organization.

What he learned scared him.

“At the heart of conspiracy theories are supposed secret agendas and malicious intent,” Wecke wrote. “While these may be absent from the WEF’s Great Reset initiative, what I found was something almost as sinister hiding in plain sight. In fact, more sinister because it’s real and it’s happening now. And it involves things as fundamental as our food, our data and our vaccines.”

There are three main benefits in adopting a conspiratorial mindset: One: A conspiracy theory brings order to random events and provides a framework for understanding the world. Two: A conspiracy theory can distract its believer from facing fears about sociopolitical upheaval and uncertainty. Three: A conspiracy theory provides a social benefit — with a community of like-minded thinkers who validate each other’s anxieties and shared worldview.

Wecke wrote that in the multi-stakeholder model of global governance, instead of corporations serving many stakeholders, corporations are promoted to being official stakeholders in global decision-making, while governments are relegated to being one of many stakeholders. In practice, corporations become the main stakeholders, while governments take a back seat “and civil society is mainly window dressing.”

Covid vaccines are a landmark in the development of stakeholder capitalism, he wrote. He cited the COVAX initiative, a multi-stakeholder group of public and private partners that aimed to accelerate the development and manufacture of covid-19 vaccines, and to guarantee fair and equitable access for every country in the world. But it turns out, “It’s more important for (the pharmaceutical companies) to protect their interests and market mechanisms than to protect universal health or protect people from covid,” he wrote. 

Big tech is another landmark in the development of stakeholder capitalism, Wecke wrote. Civil society organizations fear Big Tech will create a global body to govern itself. This could increase their power over governments and multilateral organizations. If that happens, it would be a victory for Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft in their war with governments over tax evasion, antitrust rules, and their ever-expanding power over society.

In his critique of multi-stakeholder governance, Wecke found that such governance entails removing democracy by sidelining governments and putting unelected “stakeholders” – mainly corporations – in their place when it comes to global decision-making.

“Put bluntly, multi-stakeholder partnerships are public-private partnerships on the global stage. And they have real-world implications for the way our food systems are organized, how big tech is governed and how our vaccines and medicines are distributed,” Wecke wrote.

The Great Reset started as a marginal conspiracy theory on the fringes of the internet but has grown into a disinformation ecosystem in itself, according to the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD). The London-based nonprofit works to reverse polarisation, extremism and disinformation worldwide.

This disinformation has been amplified by right-wing U.S. media figures including Tucker Carlson and Ben Shapiro, who both appropriated elements of the Great Reset theory as proof of a plot to erode freedoms and capitalism, wrote Ciarán O’Connor, an ISD analyst with expertise on the far-right.

The most prolific communities promoting content about the Great Reset theory are Facebook groups that frequently feature covid-19 misinformation, O’Connor wrote.

Schwab wrote about the Great Reset agenda in a World Economic Forum blog in June 2020. “There are many reasons to pursue a Great Reset, but the most urgent is covid-19,” Schwab wrote. “Some countries have already used the covid-19 crisis as an excuse to weaken environmental protections and enforcement. And frustrations over social ills like rising inequality – US billionaires’ combined wealth has increased during the crisis – are intensifying … the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future.”

As Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and war in Europe sent shock waves around the world, The Great Reset and a new world order were on the minds of some Twitter users. Here are some of their comments:

  • “This is a WEF op” Keiko J.D. tweeted.
  • “The bankers want a great reset and World War III,” Wendy Rogers tweeted.
  • “They will use whatever means necessary to implement their NWO aka ‘Great Reset.’ They will use pandemics, climate change, cyber polygon, false-flags, and wars to finalize the destruction of Western civilization. This is all justified in their eyes so they can ‘build back better'” Sikh For Truth tweeted.
  • “A CONSPIRACY THEORY: Putin, a WEF Young Global Leader, is a superb actor. He’s fooled many into believing he’s on the “good side.” The Ukraine invasion has been partly set up to divert attention from the overwhelming evidence of Vaccine fraud and deaths. It’s just a theory” Mark Alan Marks tweeted.
  • Cameron 🇺🇸@IAMCAM3RON tweeted about a new world order: “Crash all the economies to bring in a NWO digital currency they all agree on. It’s beyond obvious what’s going on here….New World Order. By design.”
  • “Here are two alternative scenarios I’m considering,” Michael Krieger tweeted. “Putin is in on WEF great reset and this is his contribution and sacrifice. Putin/China wanted the west to overreact so they have cover to implement bigger plans.”

READ MORE: Fact Check: Covid Vaccines Produced 9 New Big Pharma Billionaires

https://twitter.com/meme5isalive/status/1497630847511322627?s=20&t=K0mr5ojCAf8gIT0nipEj-A

https://twitter.com/Mrsking20081/status/1496368087125618690?s=20&t=gHWT7Hc4TJru5iKj2WdxwQ

Photo: World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab, left, and Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, right, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Jan. 28, 2009. (AP Photo/Michel Euler)

The QAnon Queen Told Followers They Didn’t Need to Pay Bills. It Didn’t End Well.

The QAnon Queen of Canada told her followers to stop paying their electricity and water bills because she declared them free. But now the utility companies are calling.


By Mack Lamoureux
TORONTO, CA
VICE




A SCREENSHOT FROM A VIDEO ROMANA DIDULO RECENTLY MADE IN HER RV SHE IS TRAVELING THE COUNTRY IN. PHOTO VIA SCREENSHOT.


Followers of a QAnon influencer who's convinced some Canadians she’s the true Queen of Canada are saying their utilities are being cut off because they were told by their sovereign that they no longer had to pay bills.

One woman has repeatedly told her fellow QAnon Queen followers she’s “stopped paying hydro, water, natural gas, property taxes, line of credit, and my credit cards.” She pushes hard on her fellow true believers to join her in not paying their bills and chastising those who continue to pay.

“The more who do it, the quicker we can be free of enslavement,” she wrote on one of the group’s Telegram channels. “Those still living in fear are making it harder to get out. Don’t be afraid, because we’re in this together.”

Many, many others have posted that they, too, have stopped paying their bills after hearing that Romana Didulo—a QAnon influencer who has them convinced she’s running Canada behind the scenes—made a decree that electricity is free. Several have posted their power has been shut off or that they were on the verge of having it shut off and relented to finally paying.

"Dear (Queen Romana), when will the service companies stop shutting off our services for nonpayment?" one follower asked Didulo recently. "I just had my water supply shut off today in Stratford, Ontario."

Didulo, a Victoria, B.C.–based woman in her 50s or 60s, had little to no public profile until about two years ago. The short, soft-spoken Filipino immigrant has since rocketed to popularity over the last two years—thanks to other QAnon (a big-tent conspiracy movement that revolves around a secret war against a cabal of pedophilic elites) personalities giving her far-fetched claims of essentially running Canada from the shadows a giant boost. Since being "confirmed" by other QAnon influencers, her reach has grown to include over 70,000 followers on Telegram, many of whom follow her in real life.
 


ROMANA DIDULO AT A MALL WITH SOME OF HER FOLLOWERS. PHOTO VIA TELEGRAM.

Didulo is currently on a crowd-funded tour of Canada in a rented RV with several of her followers. The group makes frequent “meet and greets” in towns across the country and has drawn crowds as large as 50.

Are you a follower or a former follower, or do you have a loved one who follows Romana Didulo? We would love to hear your story. You can get in touch with Mack Lamoureux at mack.lamoureux@vice.com.

Didulo has issued several “royal decrees” on her Telegram page, some regarding utility bills. The critical ones are “Decree 24,” claiming that electricity is now free in Canada; “Decree 15,” which abolishes income tax; and “Decree 23,” which makes water bills illegal. Another decree, number 79, reverts the price of rent, housing, and propane back to 1955 levels. Other decrees issued by Didulo are that critical race theory is illegal in Canada (this was her very first decree, in fact) and that the age of consent was changed to 24—which sparked an outcry from her followers.

The bill-payment claims are causing direct harm to her followers, with many saying in their group chat that they've racked up thousands of dollars of bills. Many of Didulo's followers are vulnerable people, including seniors on fixed incomes, who could face steep consequences for these decisions. A page created by Didulo which allows her followers to ask her questions is filled with questions about bill payments.

"Dear Queen Romana I received a 24-hour notice for the power bill. Should I make a payment? Or will it be shut off?" reads one.

"Queen Romana please What do I say to the City of Red Deer trying to shut off my water on Monday," reads another. Some said that when they reach out for help about the situation, they’re mocked for their beliefs.

Christine Sarteschi, an extremist researcher who specializes in sovereign citizens and their pseudo-legal trickery, has been keeping a close eye on Didulo and her followers in recent months. Sarteschi says the prevalent discussions about followers’ utilities are disconcerting.

"A couple of times a week you see somebody who is posting about something like 'please help me, my utilities are going to get cut off' or something along those lines where they're experiencing some type of negative consequences from attempting to follow her decrees,” said Sarteschi. “It looks like the (bill payment) decree is the one I see mentioned the most in terms of people being harmed.”

One man who followed Didulo’s decree briefly spoke to VICE World News about his decision to stop paying his bills. He said he ceased payment four months ago and has yet to face any negative consequences. He said he’s not worried and that ”the ones who should be worried is the utilities companies, failure to comply with Queen Romana Royal Decrees carries a heavy penalty.” VICE News reached out to numerous people who said they have ceased paying their bills, but we received no response—like in many conspiracy cultures, this community tends to believe the media are corrupt and evil and are told not to speak to them.

If the followers’ claims and documents they post online are to be believed, the consequences for some extend further than just strongly worded email. Recently, the group panicked when a popular user had their power disconnected. The user, a person who posted regularly, had recently gone quiet. The group rallied around her.

“Joanna's power and water supply have been cut off,” a follower wrote on April 20. “Can we get a bunch of We The People to call and email her power company to inform them of the new laws, decrees, and let them know they are committing criminal offences against We The People!”




JUST SOME OF THE BILLS POSTED ONLINE BY DIDULO'S FOLLOWERS. PHOTO VIA TELEGRAM.

The group got together the emails of the heads of B.C. Hydro (who cut off the woman’s power) and sent them a deluge of emails about Didulo’s decrees and demanding they turn their friend's power back on. This tactic of sending emails about Didulo’s power to utility companies seems to be the group’s primary way of fighting back.

“If you supply the utility company's email address and your full name, I'll try to do whatever I can to help you get your utilities put back on,” one woman wrote to someone who said their power was shut off.

Didulo has told her followers that “those sending the bills are robots,” so a few are posting actual images of the threatening messages they’re getting from bill collectors and electricity and hydro providers as trophies. One email sent to a woman from a lawyer said she had “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument in the nature of a sham debt elimination scheme.”

One of the things experts have long said is that being involved in these fringe communities can come at great personal cost. This includes the alienation of a person from loved ones and financial consequences. For one fan the decree led her to both.

“I stopped (paying) Hydro three months ago. I got phone reminders, a reminder by mail and an actual person called my husband. He does not follow QR and he was not pleased. Told me to pay the hydro bill,” they wrote. “I want to help collapse the government not my marriage so I paid.”

Sarteschi said that she thinks the appeal of Didulo is the promises that she makes. That the promise of no more taxes or debt is an intoxicating offer for some people. For these people, who get so wrapped up in these ideas they may have to "learn the hard way.”

"Until they get their utility shut off, they may not even realize that it's not real," she added.

Some who posted that they’d stopped paying their bills and faced consequences left the movement and turned on Didulo. A few of them have joined an online group whose stated goal is to ruin Didulo. But still, every day her followers report not paying their bills and gleefully brag about the notices they're racking up.

“Is some help coming soon?” one of her followers asked in early May. “The warning to stock up and telling us not to pay utilities etc is really difficult. I’m scared I am going to get cut off and won’t have money to reconnect!”

Follow Mack Lamoureux on Twitter.


THE KIND OF UNION THE RIGHT WING LIKES
LILLEY: Hard hat revolution as another construction union backs Ford's PCs

Brian Lilley - Wednesday
Toronto Sun

© Provided by Toronto Sun
Ontario Premier Doug Ford greets workers before making an announcement at Algoma Steel's direct strip production complex on Friday morning. 
BRIAN KELLY

Doug Ford and the PC Party are picking up another endorsement from a significant construction trade union.

The International Brotherhood of Boilermakers is giving Ford its full support, saying that he understands the need to have more people in the skilled trades and to get things built in Ontario.

“I’m proud to lend my support to Doug Ford and the Ontario PCs,” said Arnie Stadnick, international vice president of the union.

It’s not something I ever expected to see in my lifetime, and I say that as someone whose late father was a boilermaker. My earliest political memories are of the NDP orange signs on the front lawn of our house and those of other tradesmen that filled our neighbourhood on Hamilton’s east mountain.

The idea of a union like the Boilermakers, or LiUNA before them, endorsing a PC government in Ontario would have been unthinkable. Things have changed, though, and the NDP isn’t the party of labour or skilled trades any longer.

In the recent past, the Boilermakers not only opposed PC Party policies, they donated to groups like the Working Families Coalition to help get Liberal governments elected. That coalition has fallen apart without the support of unions in the building trades — many now see the Liberals and NDP as standing in the way of approving projects that get their members working.

Stadnick’s statement said that Doug Ford and the PC Party are “the best choice to address the province’s labour shortage by getting more people into the skilled trades.”

In a statement, Ford said that he’s honoured to have the support and remains committed to rebuilding the skilled trades sector.

There is no chance that Ford or his party will be getting endorsed by the teachers’ unions or any labour group representing civil servants, but the people who work with their hands, who work outside and as Labour Minister Monte McNaughton says, “shower at the end of the day, not the start,” are looking at the PC government and liking what they see.

Much of the credit for this shift has to go to McNaughton who has won over many in the construction sector with what Stadnick calls his “open door policy.” McNaughton has been able to win over skeptical union leaders by simply listening to their concerns.

He hasn’t brought in radical labour policy that would be reminiscent of the NDP; he just stopped picking fights and started taking concerns seriously. That, and the government’s general support for building infrastructure, is why the PCs received the endorsement.

“Doug Ford, Monte McNaughton and the Ontario PCs understand the benefits of ensuring that the province not only maintains, but continually improves upon a supply chain that is largely serviced from within the province,” Stadnick said.

The Boilermakers aren’t the biggest union, just a few thousand members across the province, but their support is symbolic. It’s also not likely to be the last construction union to endorse the Ford government.

McNaughton has made no secret that he wants to make sure blue-collar workers see the PC Party as their natural political home. To accomplish that would be a sea change in provincial politics.

Conservative leaning parties elsewhere have tried to make that shift of blue-collar workers into their fold with varying levels of success.

Whether this support from construction unions grows or sticks around beyond this election remains to be seen. What is clear is that for the time being, the people who work on the front lines of building up Ontario see the Ford government as the best option for getting things built.

NO WAY

Canada weighs whether to rejoin U.S. ballistic missile defence of North America

Canada opted out of the program in 2005, in part because of its links to U.S. president George W. Bush's administration


Author of the article:
The Canadian Press
Lee Berthiaume
Publishing date:May 10, 2022 •
 
The test launch of what North Korean state media report is a "new type" of intercontinental ballistic missile, in this undated photo released on March 24, 2022. 
PHOTO BY KOREAN CENTRAL NEWS AGENCY

OTTAWA — Canada is weighing whether to reverse course and finally join the U.S. in defending against long-range ballistic missiles, Defence Minister Anita Anand said Tuesday, while declining to provide specific plans for upgrading North America’s aging defensive systems.

Anand was speaking at a conference hosted by the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, where she offered hints at a promised review of Canada’s defence policy while underscoring the need to recruit and retain more members of the Canadian Armed Forces.

Canada famously opted out of the U.S. ballistic missile defence program following a heated national debate in 2005, deciding not to invest in the network of land- and sea-based radars and interceptor missiles designed to stop an attack on North America.

Then-prime minister Paul Martin’s decision was seen by many as an attempt to bolster his minority Liberal government. The NDP, and many Canadians, opposed missile defence, in part because of its links to U.S. president George W. Bush’s administration.
t

Canadian Defence Minister Anita Anand speaks to the media during the Ukraine Security Consultative Group meeting at Ramstein air base on April 26, 2022 in Ramstein-Miesenbach, Germany.
 PHOTO BY THOMAS LOHNES/GETTY IMAGES

Yet the question of whether it should reconsider has repeatedly reared its head in the intervening years, and Anand left the door wide open when asked Tuesday whether it was time for Canada to rethink its previous decision.

“We are certainly taking a full and comprehensive look at that question, as well as what it takes to defend the continent across the board,” she said. “We are leaving no stone unturned in this major review of continental defence.”

The review in question involves upgrading Norad, the early-warning system that Canada shares with the U.S. The system is badly showing its age at a time when concerns about an attack on the continent are at their highest point since the Cold War.

The Conservatives as well as several parliamentary committees have previously called for Canada to embrace ballistic missile defence, particularly after North Korea conducted a number of long-range missile tests in 2017.

The system itself is not designed to stop an all-out attack from a country like Russia or China, and its actual effectiveness has been questioned against what the Congressional Budget Office has estimated as a US$176-billion price tag over the next decade.

Supporters of Canada’s involvement have nonetheless said any defence is better than nothing.

Canadian and American jets intercept a Russian Tu-142 maritime reconnaissance aircraft in 2020. PHOTO BY NORAD

Conservative defence critic Kerry-Lynne Findlay noted Norad’s deputy commander at the time told a parliamentary committee in 2017 that U.S. policy directed American military officials not to defend Canada if it was targeted in a ballistic missile attack.

New missile tests by North Korea in recent months along with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and growing concerns about China have all “amplified” the need to ensure Canada is properly protected, Findlay added.

“We have to understand that we would or could be defenceless in the event of a missile attack,” she said.

“Given that evolving threat, we’re very much in favour of Norad modernization, and we feel that Canada has to actively engage with the U.S. regarding that and joining the missile defence program.”

Anand did confirm that some of the $6 billion in new money earmarked for the military in last month’s budget will be spent on updating Norad, including the string of 1980s-era radars in Canada’s Arctic known as the North Warning System.

Yet the minister would not provide any timelines or other specifics, and instead promised announcements “in the short term,” echoing comments she made after meeting U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin in Washington last month.

Military officials have warned for years that the system is obsolete and in desperate need of replacement. Yet both governments have been slow to act, even in the face of new Russian aggression.

Anand defended the lack of details in an interview after the conference, saying the government is taking the appropriate amount of time given the scope and scale of work and money needed to update the system.

“It’s a major investment,” she said. “It’s going to be fully comprehensive. We are taking the time to get it right. And that’s the way I do business, and that’s the way our government does business.”

The government is also working to nail down the details on a planned review of Canada’s five-year-old defence policy, the minister said. The Liberals promised that review in last month’s budget, saying an update is necessary given recent changes to global security.

“We are answering all of those questions right now ourselves,” Anand said when asked about the review’s timing and who will lead it. “We are deeply engaged in setting the parameters of the review and the timeline and the substantive aspects.”

The minister did indicate that one of the areas in which the review will focus is on recruiting and retaining more Canadians to the Armed Forces, which is short thousands of members at a time when the military is busier than ever.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 10, 2022.
Experts say high mortality rate in Alberta honey bees this year

Quinn Campbell - Yesterday 
Global News

Southern Alberta fields are abuzz as honey bees begin to emerge after a long winter. But the bee population has taken a hit this spring.


© Demi Knight
Beekeepers are seeing high mortality rates this year in bee colonies

Renata Borba with the Alberta Beekeepers Commission said Alberta saw huge losses in the province's pollinators.

"We estimate so far about 45 per cent, which is very high," added Borba.

When it comes to the 'why,' Borba said its not a simple answer. It could be from parasites, viruses, pesticides or the weather.

Read more:
Alberta bee industry feels the sting from COVID-19

"We do have a few culprits that we think are the reason the colonies died and we experienced the high mortality, but we don't know for sure," she said.

University of Lethbridge associate researcher Shelley Hoover added the high death toll is Canada-wide, with some areas experiencing a 90 per cent loss.
Related video: Low bee populations cause concern for Canadian farmers (cbc.ca)

Closer to home, she said the drought and extreme heat that blanketed the prairies last year was hard on crops, which in turn was hard on bees.

"The crops are not producing the usual amounts of nectar or the pollen is nutritionally deficient — these are things that are affected by heat," added Hoover.

Read more:

She said the ongoing dry conditions this spring is also hard on the bees, who rely on a constant water source to survive.

"It''s just like any other livestock animal or wild animal: they have to go out and find water. They need it both in terms of drinking water but they also use evaporative cooling to cool their hives when it gets hot, so the drought was a double whammy."

The high mortality rate is causing a huge financial blow to bee producers who now have to replace their bees. The widespread loss means there is not many domestic options to choose from.

Read more:

"COVID has been limiting flights for about two years now, so its becoming increasingly hard to get international imports to replace bees as well," added Hoover.

With producers facing so many challenges, Hoover suggests the best way to support beekeepers to buy local honey.