Monday, May 30, 2022

Texas shooting: America won't solve mass killings until it stops exporting violence

Azad Essa
26 May 2022 
As public calls for a reckoning with the gun lobby increase, there is no accompanying discussion on the ways in which the US is exporting violence elsewhere

A woman cries as she attends the vigil for the victims of the mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas on 25 May 2022 (AFP)

At this time, we don’t know why the 18-year-old gunman who killed 19 children and two adults in a mass shooting at a south Texas primary school did it.

And even if, after authorities comb through his personal belongings, devices and social media history, we may never fully know what led him to carry out this carnage. All we know is that Tuesday's massacre is likely to go down as the second deadliest school shooting in the country's history after Sandy Hook in 2012.

For families in the US, the uncanny familiarity of the latest tragedy is all but normalised

This time, a lone gunman strapped in body armour, armed with a handgun and an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle, entered the Robb Elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, and slaughtered 21 victims. The military-grade ammunition caused such immense devastation that some victims were unrecognisable. Authorities were forced to ask parents for DNA samples to help identify the children.

For families in the US, the uncanny familiarity of the latest tragedy is all but normalised. Across the US, parents gripped onto their young ones and gasped as their screens rolled over one update after another.

Just days earlier, a self-identified white supremacist entered a supermarket and killed 10 Black people in Buffalo, New York. A day later a person was killed and several injured in California when a gunman entered a church used by Taiwanese Americans and opened fire.

Last month, a man in his early 60s unleashed a volley of gunshots on New York City subway, injuring 23 people.

Americans recognise that each time their children go to school, or they go to the local shopping mall, church or synagogue, they play with their lives. They also know they can’t do much about it.

Mass protests

America has been here before.

Just over four years ago, a gunman entered the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in an affluent suburb in Florida and murdered 17 students.

All conversations about gun violence in America continues to sidestep arguably the biggest issue of them all: the political economy of the arms industry in the country

The shootings mobilised young Americans with more than a million people taking to the streets in several hundred rallies across the country to demand gun controls. The public actions drew support from corporations and politicians; A-list celebrities like Oprah Winfrey, George Clooney and Steven Spielberg donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the rallies. Before long, it had become a corporate carnival.

"The March for Our Lives (MFOL) was a massive outcry against extreme violence delivered with a mix of pop sentiment, corporate cooperation, and an awareness of the socioeconomic privilege that allows certain voices to be heard louder than others," the New Yorker wrote, adding: "The student leaders were grateful, thanking their celebrity donors and corporate sponsors on social media, posing in front of the little blue bird at Twitter’s Washington offices."

Their good intentions notwithstanding, their absorption into the American mainstream was an attempt to commodify their message. It was also emblematic of a movement that had derived its legitimacy through its proximity to power and influence.

High School shooting survivor David Hogg speaks at an installation of body bags assembled on the National Mall by Gun Control activist group March For Our lives on 24 March, 2018 (AFP)

The MFOL movement suggested several changes to gun laws, including a ban on semi-automatic weapons, the implementation of universal background checks and surveillance of gun sales, moving the legal age to purchase guns to 21; and ending gun shows and second-hand sales.

In 2021, it added several important elements to its policy agenda, including a more serious articulation of state-sanctioned police violence in a bid to become a more intersectional movement.

But like almost all conversations about gun violence in America, it continues to sidestep arguably the biggest issue of them all: the political economy of the arms industry in the country.

Stunning hypocrisy


The US government spends more money on arms than any other country. In 2021, it spent $801bn, or 3.5 percent of its GDP.


"The increase in R&D spending over the decade 2012–21 suggests that the United States is focusing more on next-generation technologies," said Alexandra Marksteiner, a researcher with Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in a press release last month. "The US government has repeatedly stressed the need to preserve the US military’s technological edge over strategic competitors."

SIPRI has repeatedly demonstrated that not only is Washington the biggest procurer of arms, it is also the world's largest arms exporter. Between 2017-2021, the US was responsible for 39 percent of all arms deliveries around the world.

This is two times more than Russia and close to 10 times as much as China, making their way to around 103 countries, many of whom are led by either corrupt, oppressive regimes or war criminals.

In other words, as frustration and pressure builds on politicians to make meaningful changes to American gun laws, the American military-industrial complex continues to expand abroad.


And as the public calls for a reckoning with the gun lobby, there is no accompanying discussion on the ways in which America is exporting violence elsewhere. Instead, the debate is almost always reduced to dogmatic and fundamentalist politicians in the pockets of the gun lobby.

It is odd that little to none of these attacks on schools, churches, malls or department stores have led anti-gun activists to openly question American militarism.


This is a society that fawns over its troops who can kill and murder civilians and children by "mistake", run torture camps, deploy secret drone campaigns that incinerate targets on the basis of "safeguarding American interests", but themselves expect to be treated with the utmost care and dignity. This is also a society that calls for gun controls while its military interferes with the domestic affairs of other nations through its 750 military bases in 80 countries around the world.


The hypocrisy is stunning.


Solving the epidemic


In the first five months of 2022, there have been reportedly over 200 mass shootings, including 27 school shootings, in the US. This is absurd. No other country in the world endures such ignominy.


The American republic of white supremacy Read More »

The rhythm and geographic spread of the violence has been so unpredictably random and grotesque in scale that there are families, particularly those belonging to minority groups, who are genuinely afraid of what the next day will bring for their loved ones.

Schools have become death traps.


And with the country growing increasingly polarised, and post-pandemic induced inequality, mental illness and racist conspiracy theories on the rise, the easy availability of guns makes America especially dangerous.

But solving this epidemic will require more than implementing gun controls. It requires a reckoning with the American project, the one that institutionalised violence in the name of building a homeland and later, an empire.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.


Azad Essa is a senior reporter for Middle East Eye based in New York City. He worked for Al Jazeera English between 2010-2018 covering southern and central Africa for the network. He is the author of 'The Moslems are Coming' (Harper Collins India) and 'Zuma's Bastard' (Two Dogs Books).



Coal ash cleanup contractor not immune from workers' suit


TRAVIS LOLLER
Tue, May 24, 2022, 

FILE - In this Aug. 6, 2019, photo, Ansol and Janie Clark pose at a memorial Ansol Clark constructed near the Kingston Fossil Plant in Kingston, Tenn. The Tennessee Valley Authority was responsible for a massive coal ash spill at the plant in 2008 that covered a community and fouled rivers. The couple says the memorial is for the workers who have come down with illnesses, some fatal, including cancers of the lung, brain, blood and skin and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ansol Clark who drove a fuel truck for four years at the cleanup site, and suffered from a rare blood cancer, has also died now.
(AP Photo/Mark Humphrey, File)

A contractor hired to clean up the nation's worst coal ash spill is not immune from being sued by workers who say they were not properly protected, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week.

More than 200 workers blame Jacobs Engineering for exposing them to ash they say caused a slew of illnesses, including cancers of the lung, brain, blood and skin.

A Knoxville, Tennessee, jury in 2018 took only a few hours to decide that Jacobs — a contractor hired by Tennessee Valley Authority — breached its duty of care to the workers, exposing them to airborne “fly ash” with known carcinogens. The jurors said Jacobs’ actions were capable of making the workers sick. Whether those actions actually did make them sick, and thus eligible for monetary damages, was left for a subsequent trial or trials.

The federal judge in the case ordered mediation, alluding to many workers' urgent need for medical care. More than three years later, the two sides have not been able to come to an agreement and a new trial date has not been set.

In the meantime, Jacobs has challenged the workers' right to sue. In the question decided last week, Jacobs argued that TVA was immune from lawsuits because it is a federal public utility, and that protection extends to the contractor through derivative immunity.

In its ruling, the federal appeals court panel found that TVA is not immune from suit and neither is Jacobs. The court notes that Congress, in creating the TVA, wrote a clause into statute specifically providing that the utility can “sue and be sued in its corporate name.”

The largest industrial spill in modern U.S. history began with a leaky six-story earthen dam outside TVA’s Kingston Fossil Plant. On Dec. 22, 2008, that dam collapsed, releasing more than a billion gallons of coal ash sludge in a torrent that knocked nearby homes off their foundations. As the sludge slowly dried over the yearslong course of the cleanup, it turned into a fine dust that had to be constantly watered down but still filled the air, especially on windy days, according to trial testimony.

Some of the cleanup workers took on 12-hour shifts for months at a time with few or no days off. A Jacobs subcontractor testified at trial that workers were not allowed to wear masks to protect them from the fly ash “because it looked bad.” In Associated Press interviews, workers recalled constantly coughing and joking about “coal ash flu.” Later they began suffering strange lesions. Dozens developed cancers and at least 40 later died from illnesses.

Jacobs’ attorneys have said the company did its best to mange the cleanup in a way regulators said was safe. It has not been proven that Jacobs — or even coal ash — is to blame for any illnesses, and the EPA classifies coal ash as nonhazardous.

But Duke University geochemist Avner Vengosh, who is not involved in the litigation, found high levels of radioactivity and toxic metals, including arsenic and mercury in the Kingston coal ash. In a statement about his 2009 peer-reviewed study, he warned that inhaling airborne particles could have a "severe health impact.”

Still, if and when the workers get a new trial, it could be difficult to prove the ash caused their illnesses. Experts say there just is not enough research on the health effects of prolonged exposure to fly ash.
What happens when abortion is banned? Lessons from Kenya and the world

"We took her to the hospital, but there was a long queue and she died while we were waiting."

In Summary


•But in a country where access to abortion is tightly restricted by law, and those who undergo the procedure are stigmatised, Ann was forced to secretly obtain abortion pills from an unregistered pharmacist.

•Days later, she was dead.

As soon as Kenyan housewife Ann found out she was pregnant in September last year, she knew having the child was out of the question.

For years, the 27-year-old had been a victim of domestic violence: her husband beat her routinely, denied her money to feed their three children, and had sexual relationships with other women.

Ann - whose name has been changed to protect her children's identity - did not want to bring another child into her world of violence and poverty, one of her close friends told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

But in a country where access to abortion is tightly restricted by law, and those who undergo the procedure are stigmatised, Ann was forced to secretly obtain abortion pills from an unregistered pharmacist. Days later, she was dead.

"I heard the screaming coming from her home in the middle of the night and found her lying on the ground bleeding," said one of Ann's friends who also lives in Korogocho, an informal settlement in northeast Nairobi, asking not to be named.

"We took her to the hospital, but there was a long queue and she died while we were waiting for treatment," the friend said.

With the U.S. Supreme Court poised to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling that legalised abortion nationwide, campaigners for abortion rights from Africa to Latin America are warning of the potentially devastating consequences.

They say the conservative-majority court should consider the impact of anti-abortion measures globally - from deaths like Ann's in Kenya and women being wrongly jailed over miscarriages in El Salvador to the persecution of abortion rights defenders in Poland.

"My message to the U.S. Supreme Court judges is that they will never end abortion. Women have had and always will have abortions regardless of the law," said Evelyne Opondo, senior regional director for Africa at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR).

"All overturning the law will do is end safe abortions. Women will turn to unsafe abortions like those done by quacks in backstreet clinics and it will be the poor and marginalised who will be hit most."

Christian conservatives and many Republican officeholders have long sought to overturn Roe v. Wade, and numerous Republican-led states have passed various abortion restrictions in defiance of the Roe precedent in recent years.

BACKSTREET ABORTIONS

Around the world, abortion is completely banned in 26 countries including El Salvador, Honduras, Egypt, Madagascar and the Philippines, according to CRR.

Another 50 nations only allow abortion when the woman's health is at risk or in cases of rape or incest, the group says.

More than three-quarters of countries have some kind of legal penalties related to abortion, which can include lengthy prison sentences or hefty fines for people having or assisting with the procedure.

Health experts say such restrictions lead women and girls to take desperate measures to end their unplanned pregnancies - from using coat hangers or drinking bleach to visiting backstreet clinics run by untrained practitioners.

Globally, more than 25 million unsafe abortions occur every year, resulting in the deaths of about 39,000 women and girls and leading millions more to be hospitalised with complications, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

Most of these deaths are among poor women living in lower-income countries – with more than 60% of them in Africa and 30% in Asia, it said.

In Kenya - where abortion is permitted only when the woman's health or life is at risk and in cases of rape - more than 2,500 women and girls die annually in unsafe abortions, amounting to seven deaths every day, according to the CRR.

A ministry of health study shows almost half a million abortions - most of which were unsafe - were conducted in Kenya in 2012, with one in four women suffering complications such as high fever, sepsis, shock and organ failure.

The study also found that women and girls seeking treatment due to botched abortions placed an added burden on Kenya's public healthcare system - costing an additional $5 million.

"All of the things we are seeing here in Kenya, they will see in the U.S. if the ruling is overturned," said Nelly Munyasia, executive director of the Reproductive Health Network Kenya.

JAILED FOR MISCARRIAGES

In El Salvador, where abortion has been a crime since 1998 under all circumstances - even in cases of rape, incest, fetal anomalies or when the woman's health is in danger - scores of women have been sent to jail on abortion charges.

In 2008, Cinthia Rodriguez was eight months pregnant when she went to hospital to seek emergency care after she had a stillbirth. Instead, she was handcuffed to the hospital bed, arrested, convicted of aggravated homicide, and sentenced to 30 years imprisonment.

"You're in mourning for the loss of your child and then when you're charged with a crime that you didn't commit, it's really hard," said Rodriguez, adding that she was labelled a "baby killer" and was physically assaulted by other inmates.

She was released only after serving nearly 11 years.

Five other Latin American countries also have total abortion bans, but El Salvador stands apart for its conviction rates and harsh jail terms.

In the last two decades, more than 180 women have been jailed for abortion-related crimes, says the Citizen Group for the Decriminalization of Abortion, a nonprofit.

"Abortion shouldn't be criminalised," said Rodriguez. "Every woman knows their own situation and the truth about what they have gone through."

Campaigners said policies that outlaw or restrict access to abortion have also resulted in high rates of teenage girls having to drop out school due to unplanned pregnancies.

In some countries such as Tanzania and Sierra Leone, pregnant girls and young mothers have even been banned from attending school in the past.

The policies - which not only promote stigma and shame, but also lead to harassment and discrimination - can impact others too, abortion rights advocates say.

In many countries, sexual and reproductive health clinics as well as women's rights campaigners are targeted by right-wing groups, members of the public, and even by the authorities.

In Poland, where abortion is permitted only in cases of rape, incest and threat to the woman's life, abortion rights campaigners also face threats, persecution and jail terms of up to three years.

Marta Lempart, a 43-year-old lawyer and a leader of Strajk Kobiet (Women's Strike) - a movement opposing tighter abortion restrictions, said her actions in protest against Poland's abortion law had come at great personal cost.

"I had to leave my home because my address was published and there was at least one attempt on my life," Lempart said, adding that she had been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of such persecution.
WHO: Monkeypox won't turn into pandemic, but many unknowns


Monkeypox just needs action to curtail


Dr. Isaac Bogoch says governments need to test, trace and isolate Monkeypox sufferers to get things under control quickly.


TEXT:
Maria Cheng, The Associated Press
Published Monday, May 30, 2022 8:36AM EDT


LONDON (AP) -- The World Health Organization's top monkeypox expert said she doesn't expect the hundreds of cases reported to date to turn into another pandemic, but acknowledged there are still many unknowns about the disease, including how exactly it's spreading and whether the suspension of mass smallpox immunization decades ago may somehow be speeding its transmission.

In a public session on Monday, WHO's Dr. Rosamund Lewis said it was critical to emphasize that the vast majority of cases being seen in dozens of countries globally are in gay, bisexual or men who have sex with men, so that scientists can further study the issue and for populations at risk to take precautions.

“It's very important to describe this because it appears to be an increase in a mode of transmission that may have been under-recognized in the past,” said Lewis, WHO's technical lead on monkeypox.


PHOTOS

In this photo provided by the Unidad de Microscop­a Electronica del ISCIII in Madrid, on Thursday May 26, 2022, an electronic microscope image shows the monkeypox virus seen by a team from the Arbovirus Laboratory and the Genomics and Bioinformatics Units of the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII) in Madrid. Health authorities in Europe, North America, Israel and Australia have identified more than 100 cases of monkeypox in recent days.
(Unidad de Microscopa Electronica del ISCIII, via AP)

Still, she warned that anyone is at potential risk of the disease, regardless of their sexual orientation. Other experts have pointed out that it may be accidental that the disease was first picked up in gay and bisexual men, saying it could quickly spill over into other groups if it is not curbed.

Lewis said it's unknown whether monkeypox is being transmitted by sex or just the close contact between people engaging in sexual activity and described the threat to the general population as “low.”

“It is not yet known whether this virus is exploiting a new mode of transmission, but what is clear is that it continues to exploit its well-known mode of transmission, which is close, physical contact,” Lewis said. Monkeypox is known to spread when there is close physical contact with an infected person or their clothing or bedsheets.

She also warned that among the current cases, there is a higher proportion of people with fewer lesions that are more concentrated in the genital region and sometimes nearly impossible to see.

“You may have these lesions for two to four weeks (and) they may not be visible to others, but you may still be infectious,” she said.

Last week, a top adviser to WHO said the outbreak in Europe, U.S., Israel, Australia and beyond was likely linked to sex at two recent raves in Spain and Belgium. That marks a significant departure from the disease's typical pattern of spread in central and western Africa, where people are mainly infected by animals like wild rodents and primates, and epidemics haven't spilled across borders.

Most monkeypox patients experience only fever, body aches, chills and fatigue. People with more serious illness may develop a rash and lesions on the face and hands that can spread to other parts of the body. No deaths have been reported in the current outbreak.

WHO's Lewis also said that while previous cases of monkeypox in central and western Africa have been relatively contained, it was not clear if people could spread monkeypox without symptoms or if the disease might be airborne, like measles or COVID-19.

Monkeypox is related to smallpox, but has milder symptoms. After smallpox was declared eradicated in 1980, countries suspended their mass immunization programs, a move that some experts believe may be helping monkeypox spread, since there is now little widespread immunity to related diseases; smallpox vaccines are also protective against monkeypox.

Lewis said it would be “unfortunate” if monkeypox were able to “exploit the immunity gap” left by smallpox 40 years ago, saying that there was still a window of opportunity to close down the outbreak so that monkeypox would not become entrenched in new regions.

 CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M

How the US Government Steals from Other Countries

The American Government explains its thefts from other countries as being justifiable because the U.S. Government has slapped sanctions upon those countries, and because these sanctions authorize the U.S. Government to steal whatever it wants to steal, from them, that it can grab. Here are just a few such examples:

On May 26, Reuters headlined “U.S. seizes Iranian oil cargo near Greek island,” and reported:

The United States has confiscated an Iranian oil cargo held on a Russian-operated ship near Greece and will send the cargo to the United States. …
“The cargo has been transferred to another ship that was hired by the U.S.,” the source added, without providing further details.
The development comes after the United States on Wednesday imposed sanctions on what it described as a Russian-backed oil smuggling and money laundering network for Iran’s Revolutionary Guards’ Quds Force. …
U.S. advocacy group United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), which monitors Iran-related tanker traffic, said the Pegas had loaded around 700,000 barrels of crude oil from Iran’s Sirri Island on Aug. 19, 2021.
Prior to this load, the Pegas transported over 3 million barrels of Iranian oil in 2021, with over 2.6 million of those barrels ending up in China, according to UANI analysis.
In 2020, Washington confiscated four cargoes of Iranian fuel that were bound for Venezuela and transferred them with the help of undisclosed foreign partners onto two other ships which then sailed to the United States. …

On 24 October 2019, USA Today bannered “Pentagon planning to send tanks, armored vehicles to Syrian oil fields” and pretended that if (Syria’s actual invader) America wouldn’t be stealing Syria’s oil, then (Syria’s actual defender, invited into the country in order to help defeat the U.S.-led invasion of it) Russia would be stealing it. Their article closed by saying that: “Nicholas Heras, an expert on Syria with the Center for a New American Security [CNAS], … said, ‘the Pentagon is making contingencies for a big fight with Russia for Syria’s oil.’” Perhaps the intention of that article was to help build Americans’ support for stealing Syria’s oil. (The CNAS is a Democratic Party think tank, and was there endorsing the Republican President Trump’s operation to steal Syria’s oil — it’s a bipartisan goal of the U.S. Government.) By contrast, two days later, Russia’s Sputnik News headlined about America’s thefts of oil from Syria, “The Russian military described the US scheme as nothing less than ‘international state banditism.’” (Russia had no need to deceive anyone about that.)

On 14 December 2019, Syria Times headlined “A huge convoy for US occupation forces enters Syria’s Qameshli city,” and reported that:

In a new breach of international laws, the US occupation forces sent today to Qameshli city in Hasaka province a new convoy composed of tanks, ambulances and dozens of vehicles and cars loading military and logistic materials. According to local sources, the convoy illegally entered this morning from Iraq in order to fortify the US occupation forces’ positions in the Syrian Jazeera.
This convoy is the biggest one that entered the Syrian territories since several months.
Over the few past months, the US occupation forces sent through illegal crossing points thousands of vehicles loaded with weapons, military equipment and logistic materials to reinforce their existence in the Syrian Jazeera region and to steal Syrian oil and wealth.

On 2 August 2020, Reuters bannered “Syria says U.S. oil firm signed deal with Kurdish-led rebels” and reported that,

Damascus “condemns in the strongest terms the agreement signed between al-Qasd militia (SDF) and an American oil company to steal Syria’s oil under the sponsorship and support of the American administration”, the Syrian statement said. “This agreement is null and void and has no legal basis.”

Furthermore: “There was no immediate response from SDF officials to a Reuters’ request for comment. There was no immediate comment from U.S. officials.”

The U.S. Government has done this also to Venezuela and other countries that it likewise wants to take over.

On 13 March 2022, Reuters headlined “Sanctions have frozen around $300 bln of Russian reserves, FinMin says,” and reported that “Foreign sanctions have frozen around $300 billion out of $640 billion that Russia had in its gold and forex reserves, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov said in an interview with state TV.”

The lawyer and geostrategic analyst Alexander Mercouris explains how and why America’s blocking Russia’s international payments of Russia’s sovereign debt, and Germany’s seizure of some of Gazprom’s German assets, “violate the [international-law] principle of sovereign immunity; both the central bank and Gazprom are, after all, owned by the Russian Government. … These were the sort of acts that, once upon a time, governments could legally make only in time of war. But of course Germany and the United States are not formally at war with Russia. So we see how another extraordinary step has been taken, towards … ever-greater illegality.” He wonders “what damage” will be done “to the international legal system and to the international financial system.”

Many of these actions, by America and its allies, are alleged to be done not in order to reinforce existing international laws (which, of course, they instead violate), but the opposite: to advance “the international rules-based order,” which “rules,” that will be made by the U.S. Government, will be introduced as constituting new legal precedents in order to replace the current source of international laws, which is the U.N. and its authorized agencies. The U.S. Government would gradually replace the U.N., except as the U.N.’s being a sump for unprofitable expeditions that the ‘humanitarian’ and ‘democratic’ U.S. Government can endorse. There would be a further weakening of the U.N., which is already so weak so that, even now, anything which is done by the U.S. and its allies is, practically speaking, not possible to be prosecuted in international courts such as the International Criminal Court, which body is allowed to prosecute alleged crimes only by leaders of “third world” nations. America’s “rules-based international order” would replace that toothless U.N.-based system, and would be backed up by America’s over-800 military bases around the world. Unlike the existing U.N., which has no military, this “rules-based international order” would be enforced at gunpoint, everywhere.

However, even America’s allied nations are getting fleeced, though in different ways, by the U.S. Government. This is being done via international corruption. For example: America’s F-35 warplanes from Lockheed Martin Corporation and its sub-contractors (Northrop-Grumman, Pratt & Whitney, and BAE Systems), are so bad and so very expensive that the U.S. Government wants to cut its losses on the plane without cutting the profits by Lockheed Martin and other ‘defense’-contractors’ on it, and therefore needs to increase its allies’ purchases of these warplanes. NATO is the main marketing organization for U.S. ‘defense’ contractors; and, so, on 15 April 2022, Russia’s RT news headlined “US nuclear bombs ‘shared’ with European allies will be deployed on Lockheed Martin jets, NATO explains,”and reported that,

Jessica Cox, director of the NATO nuclear policy directorate in Brussels, said … that “By the end of the decade, most if not all of our allies will have transitioned” to the F-35. …
Germany would replace its aging Tornado jets with F-35s, committing to buy up to three dozen and specifically citing the nuclear sharing mission as factoring in the decision. …
Finland and Sweden have recently voiced a desire to join NATO, and Helsinki already announced it would buy some 60 F-35s in early February [notably, BEFORE Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24th]. …
The F-35 was originally proposed as a cost-effective modular design that could replace multiple older models in service with the US Air Force, Navy, and the Marines. In reality, it turned into three distinct designs with a lifetime project cost of over $1.7 trillion, the most expensive weapons program in US [and in all of global] history.
In addition to the price tag, the fifth-generation stealth fighter has also been plagued with performance issues, to the point where the new USAF chief of staff requested a study into a different aircraft in February 2021.
General Charles Q. Brown Jr. compared the F-35 to a “high end” sports car, a Ferrari one drives on Sundays only, and sought proposals for a “clean sheet design” of a “5th-gen minus” workhorse jet instead. Multiple US outlets characterized his proposal as a “tacit admission” that the F-35 program had failed.

That word “characterized” was there linked through to a number of informative articles, such as these, about the F-35:

Forbes: “The U.S. Air Force Just Admitted The F-35 Stealth Fighter Has Failed
Defense News: “The Hidden Troubles of the F-35: The Pentagon will have to live with limits on F-35’s supersonic flights

That Defense News report said that the basic design-requirements for the F-35 prohibit any speed higher than the speed of sound (Mach 1), because the air-friction above that speed would instantly melt the stealth coating, and,

The potential damage from sustained high speeds would influence not only the F-35’s airframe and the low-observable coating that keeps it stealthy, but also the myriad antennas located on the back of the plane that are currently vulnerable to damage, according to documents exclusively obtained by Defense News.

Though that publication — which could not exist apart from the funding that is provided directly or indirectly from America’s ‘defense’ contractors — used euphemisms to describe this problem, such as “potential damage” and that there would need to be imposed “a time limit on high-speed flight” and that “the F-35 jet can only fly at supersonic speeds for short bursts of time before there is a risk of structural damage and loss of stealth capability,” the actual facts are: those “short bursts” would, in the practical world, be virtually instantaneous, approximating zero seconds, and the phrase “a risk” would be referring to 100% — a certainty. That’s virtually the opposite of the ‘news’-report’s allegation that the F-35 would need to avoid “sustained high speeds,” because the plane would instead need to avoid ANY supersonic speed. In other words: the plane’s stealth capability would need to be virtually 100% effective and at speeds only below the speed of sound, in order for the plane to be, at all, effective, and deserving to be called a “stealth” warplane. The only exception to that would be the F-35A, for the Air Force (not usable by the Navy — from aircraft carriers — nor by the Army).

As regards the F-35A (Air Force F-35 version), Wikipedia says about the F-35 that its maximum speed is Mach 1.6 (1.6 times the speed of sound). By contrast, Russia’s Su-57 (which is less expensive), has a maximum speed of Mach 2.0. The reason why Russia’s is both a better plane and far less costly is that Russia’s military-industrial complex is controlled ONLY by the Government, whereas America’s Government is instead controlled mainly by its ‘defense’-contractors, and is, therefore, overwhelmingly corrupt, which is also the reason why America is the permanent and unceasing warfare-state, ever since 25 July 1945, when its “Cold War” started, and has never ceased.

One of the few honest statements that the world-champion liar and the world’s most respected living person, U.S. President Barack Obama, made about his goals as President, was his 28 May 2014 statement to the graduating class at the West Point Military Academy, that,

The United States is and remains the one indispensable nation. That has been true for the century passed and it will be true for the century to come. … Russia’s aggression toward former Soviet states unnerves capitals in Europe, while China’s economic rise and military reach worries its neighbors. From Brazil to India, rising middle classes compete with us, and governments seek a greater say in global forums. … It will be your generation’s task to respond to this new world.

He was saying there that all other nations — including U.S. ‘allies’ — are “dispensable.” Consequently, of course, in that view: stealing by the U.S. Government, from any other Government, is acceptable. It’s the U.S. Government’s viewpoint, and is politically bipartisan in America. At least until now, it is an acceptable viewpoint, to most people. Perhaps truths have been hidden from them. Who has been doing this, and why, would then be the natural question on any intelligent individuals’ minds. But certainly there can be no reasonable doubt that the U.S. Government does — and rather routinely — steal from other countries. That’s a fact, if anything is.FacebookTwitteReddit

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s next book (soon to be published) will be America’s Empire of Evil: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change. It’s about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social "sciences" — duping the public. Read other articles by Eric.
Around 100 killed in clashes between Chad gold miners, 40 wounded: defence ministry

The New Arab Staff & Agencies
30 May, 2022

Violence broke out on May 23 at Kouri Bougoudi near the Libyan border, sparked by a "mundane dispute between two people which degenerated," said Chad's Defence Minister General, adding that the toll was "around 100 dead and at least 40 wounded"


Chad's Defence Minister General Daoud Yaya Brahim announced the death toll to the press on Monday [Getty]

Around 100 people have died in clashes between gold miners in northern Chad, Defence Minister General Daoud Yaya Brahim said on Monday.

Violence broke out on May 23 at Kouri Bougoudi near the Libyan border, sparked by a "mundane dispute between two people which degenerated," he said, adding that the toll was "around 100 dead and at least 40 wounded".

The clashes occurred in the Tibesti Mountains, a rugged and lawless region in the central Sahara some 1,000 kilometres (600 miles) from the capital N'Djamena.

The discovery of gold there 10 years ago sparked a rush of miners from across Chad and neighbouring countries, and tensions often run high.

The latest clashes were between Mauritanians and Libyans, Yaya Brahim said.

He spoke to AFP by phone from the area, where he said he was with a large military contingent sent to help restore order.

"This isn't the first time that there's been violence among gold miners in the region, and we have decided to suspend all gold mining at Kouri until further notice," he said, adding that "the great majority (of mines in the area) are illegal".

The incident was first announced last Wednesday, when Communications Minister Abderaman Koulamallah said in a statement there had been "loss of human life and several wounded," but gave no further details.

The same day, the head of Chad's National Human Rights Commission, Mahamat Nour Ibedou, told AFP that after the fighting broke out, "the government sent in a force to intervene, which fired on people".

"According to our information, there are at least 200 dead," he said, adding that he had no evidence to support this figure.

Succes Masra, who heads an opposition party called The Transformers, and Chad's main armed rebel movement, the Front for Change and Concord in Chad (FACT), also gave a toll of some 200 dead.

But Yaya Brahim denied this figure and said the authorities were not to blame.

"The defence and security forces absolutely did not open fire, and there were not 200 deaths," he said.

On Monday, another rebel group in the region, the Military Command Council for the Salvation of the Republic (CCMSR), said in a statement there had been "carnage," which had unfolded "under the complicit gaze of the security forces".

RELATED
World
The New Arab Staff

Troubled region

The Tibesti region is notorious for ethnic troubles and for fostering revolts that have marked Chad's history since the vast central West African country gained independence from France in 1960.

In January 2019, several dozen people died in Kouri when fighting erupted between Libyan Arabs and people from the eastern Chadian region of Ouaddai.

Koulamallah, in comments to AFP last Wednesday, described the gold-mining area as a "hostile zone, almost lawless, it's the Far West. They all go there because there's gold, so there's conflict".

The impoverished Sahel state last year lost its 30-year ruler, Idriss Deby Itno, who was killed during an operation against rebels.

His place was taken by his son, General Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno, at the head of a 15-member military junta.

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
Destructive Gold Mining Plagues Suriname, French Guiana Border



30 MAY 2022 BY SCOTT MISTLER-FERGUSONEN

Large-scale illegal gold mining continues to operate in plain sight on the Lawa River, a natural border between French Guiana and Suriname, despite public efforts from both governments to end the environmentally destructive practice.

Photographs obtained by InSight Crime show at least six gold dredgers, or skalians, as they're known in Suriname, operating on the river earlier in May.

Illegal mining operations have garnered widespread condemnation for the environmental degradation they cause in both Suriname and French Guiana.


SEE ALSO: Dirty Business - The Smuggling Pipeline Carrying Mercury Across the Amazon

The use of the heavy metal, mercury, which binds to gold, is especially detrimental. Runoff mercury pollutes the river and its populations of fish, damaging an important source of food for local indigenous communities, local media have reported
.
Mining dredgers on the Lawa River. Credit: ProBios

According to Starnieuws, a local news website, the Surinamese government has acknowledged the presence of these dredgers on the river and pledged to take action to get rid of them.
 
InSight Crime Analysis

The presence of dredgers in the area is nothing new, but their continued operation despite the clear detrimental impact on the local environment raises questions about the political will from either side of the river to curb illegal gold mining.

Dredgers are commonly used in South America for river gold mining, particularly in illegal zones, because of the relative ease for operators to move quickly and relocate should authorities crack down on them.

Erlan Sleur, an environmental expert and founder of the nongovernmental organization ProBios, which is dedicated to protecting Suriname’s biodiversity, told InSight Crime that this is exactly what the miners photographed in May have been doing.

“From the photographs, it seems they have been working for a long time already. If you see the destruction in the forest on the riverside, it’s clear that this isn’t a recent activity,” Sleur said.

Mining dredges on the Lawa River. Credit: ProBios

Despite the presence of French and Surinamese military on the river, miners have not been captured nor had their dredgers and equipment seized.

According to Sleur, the security forces’ inaction is due to a lack of political will and a tense relationship between the two governments when it comes to the border.

“There have been some tensions especially when the French police and the army seized some [dredgers] about five years ago,” stated Sleur, in reference to military operations conducted by the French government to seize and destroy gold mining dredgers on territory claimed by Suriname.

Border delineation issues on the Lawa Rivers, as well as Maroni River, were officially resolved last year. This should have paved the way for a tougher stance on illegal mining by both governments. Yet Sleur contends that the Surinamese government remains an obstacle to completely erasing illegal mining on the river.

“I know my government is corrupt. They are part of the problem, as many people within the government are stakeholders within these activities,” claimed Sleur.


The Surinamese government, headed by President Chan Santokhi certainly inherited a challenging situation. It is a coalition government whose vice president, Ronnie Brunswijk, is a convicted drug trafficker and fugitive from Interpol. Before being elected, Brunswijk had at least six gold concessions, though these have now been handed over to a foundation. One Dutch reporter claimed these concessions had been illegally acquired.

Thus the ties between the government and gold mining in the country, rife under former president and convicted murderer, Dési Bouterse, remain today. During Bouterse’s reign, even the mint house was connected to illegal gold mining activity, according to a report by IBI Consultants.
New Somalia president Hassan Sheikh Mohamud calls for reconciliation as US troops return

Earlier this month, President Joe Biden authorised the redeployment of US troops who will help train, equip and support the Somali military's elite Danab special forces, who are fighting the Al-Shabaab.



Hassan Sheikh Mohamud was elected earlier this month as Somalia's new president [Getty]

Somalia's new president has applauded the return of US troops to help fight a deadly insurgency and says delivering security depends on reconciliation with other Somali leaders, after a power battle splintered the security forces into rival factions.

US President Joe Biden this month authorised the redeployment of hundreds of US soldiers who will help train, equip and support the military's elite Danab special forces fighting the Al-Qaeda-linked Al-Shabaab militants.

President Donald Trump withdrew them in December 2020, leaving them flying in and out for missions from neighbouring Kenya, a move experts described as costly and dangerous.

"We are very much grateful for President Biden to send back some of the forces, they always have been playing a role in war against Al-Shabaab," President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud told Reuters, adding that he wanted US support to continue.

Al-Shabaab has killed tens of thousands of Somalis in bombings in Mogadishu and elsewhere as it seeks to topple the government, as well as civilians in neighbouring countries in attacks on a shopping mall, hotel, university and restaurants.

Somali legislators selected Mohamud as president this month - the country has not held one-person-one-vote elections since civil war erupted in 1991.

Legislators foiled attempts by the previous president to extend his term, but the issue deeply divided security forces, who battled each other in the capital's streets.

The protracted crisis drained attention from a growing humanitarian emergency forcing more than 6 million Somalis to depend on food aid.

James Swan, the top UN official in Somalia, praised Mohamud's appointment of a prominent politician to handle the emergency, triggered by the worst drought in 40 years.

RELATED
In-depth
Shafi Abtidon

Top Priority


Since Mohamud's win on May 15, official government social media accounts have pumped out images of him welcoming former political rivals and beaming Somali regional leaders, many of whom fought armed clashes with his predecessor.

"The people have to reconcile," former educator Mohamud said from a gilt chair in Villa Somalia, a government complex painted in the national colours of white and sky blue.

Mohamud's words have encouraged allies frustrated by slow progress under his predecessor, which allowed the insurgency to amass a huge warchest.

Lieutenant General Diomede Ndegeya, commander of African Union forces in Somalia, said he hoped local forces and administrations could help secure roads for AU and Somali forces to make progress against Al-Shabaab.

"It's important for us to all work together," he said.

The last major offensive against Al-Shabaab was in 2019. The insurgents still control swathes of the country but African Union peacekeeping forces are due to leave in three years.

This month, Al-Shabaab overran an AU peacekeeping base, killing dozens of soldiers. Burundi put the death toll at 10.

"Our top priority is the security," said Mohamud, although he listed other urgent matters, including building institutions and codifying election laws and government powers.

When Mohamud previously served as president, from 2012-2017, rampant corruption packed the military with ghost soldiers. Those that did exist often sold their guns when their wages were stolen.

Since then, the United Nations has set up a long-planned biometric database. Soldiers and civil servants now receive their salaries directly to their bank accounts.

Mohamud acknowledged the repeated complaints of corruption, but hailed digitalisation and said he planned to continue a financial reform package he had previously helped negotiate with the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

"We are all for the economic reforms," he said.

Campaigners say the proof will be whether backers receive plum procurement contracts or top posts they use for kickbacks.

"We need an audit for all the taxes raised in Mogadishu, we need to pay salaries on time and we need avoid cronyism," said Mohamed Mubarak, founder of anti-corruption group Marqaati.

(Reuters)


Palestinian flag to be banned in Israeli universities and public buildings

Far-right Israelis want to ban the display of the Palestinian flag in public buildings


The New Arab Staff
30 May, 2022

The flag is an important part of Palestinian identity [Getty]

Israel is close to banning the display of Palestinian flags at universities and public buildings in the country, according to reports.

The government's legislative committee approved a draft law on Sunday that could make it illegal to wave "enemy flags" in Israeli government-funded institutions - a bill that appears aimed at effectively banning the Palestinian flag.

The bill, sponsored by Likud MK Eli Cohen, will go to the Knesset where lawmakers will vote on the bill.

The government has said it will allow coalition members - which includes left-wing, centrist, and far-right parties - to "vote with the conscious".

RELATED
MENA
The New Arab Staff

It follows the display of the flag by 1948 Palestinians at recent Nakba commemorations in schools and universities in Israel, leading to an angry response by right-wing Israelis.

The display of Palestinian flags is not technically illegal in Israel and the occupied territories, but Israeli forces routinely confiscate them from protesters.

Palestinian banners were violently snatched by Israeli police from mourners at Sherine Abu Akleh's funeral and her family home earlier this month. The Palestinian journalist was shot dead by Israeli forces on 11 May.

Activists have pointed out that the Palestinian flag is not technically banned in Israeli-occupied East Jerusalem, and so Israeli forces acted illegally by confiscating the banners.

Israeli police have also violently seized the flag from protesters in Sheikh Jarrah and other areas of the occupied Palestinian territories.

It remains a symbol of pride, defiance, and identity for Palestinians in all parts of historic Palestine.



 

Sri Lanka’s crisis forces garment workers to prostitution

Women in Sri Lanka who were formerly employed in the textiles and garment industry are being forced to turn to prostitution and sex work, as an economic crisis on the island continues to impact on livelihoods reports The Telegraph.

“Poor politics has shattered my life and this is my only hope to put food on the table for my children,” on sex worker told The Telegraph.

According to the Stand Up Movement Lanka (SUML), there has been a 30 per cent increase in women joining the sex industry in Colombo since January alone.

“The whole garment industry is at risk,” said Padmini Weerasuriya, director of the Women’s Centre. “The cost of production has also gone up and factories have begun trimming down their personnel.”

The apparel industry has been particularly hard hit in Sri Lanka’s economic crisis. Sri Lanka’s Joint Apparel Association Forum warned last week that the country is losing 10 - 20% of its orders to India and Bangladesh as the ongoing crisis has shaken the faith of buyers.

“Some of the buyers have said that there is a high risk, so they have shifted 10 - 20% of their orders to India and Bangladesh,” JAAF Deputy Chairman Felix Fernando told interviewers at Derana.

“We could see up to one million people, mainly women, facing unemployment over the next six months if the economic crisis worsens as expected,” added Weerasuriya.

The rise in sex work has particularly been seen in Colombo, the Sri Lankan capital, where workers reports a wide range of clientele.

“Recently we had a famous member of the mafia in Colombo and I could see all his bullet wounds. I’ve had doctors, lawyers and even reverends,” said one woman. “There is this one, old professor and he can barely walk, but every time he comes he pays to spend time with all the girls at once.”

Read more from The Telegraph here.