Tuesday, June 14, 2022

Amazon accused of using posters, text messages to interfere with Montreal union drive


June 14, 2022
By Sonia Ulebor


MONTREAL — A major labour union in Quebec is calling recent action by the management of an Amazon warehouse in Montreal “tactics of intimidation and harassment” that interfere with a recently launched unionization campaign

The Confédérations des syndicats nationaux said its legal department sent the company two lawyer’s letters — on May 20 and June 2 — over alleged breaches of labour rights. Federation vice-president David Bergeron-Cyr says Amazon’s anti-union messaging is “omnipresent” at the warehouse.

“It’s intimidation,” Bergeron-Cyr said in a recent interview. “This American company needs to respect Quebec labour laws.”

Photos viewed by The Canadian Press of the Montreal warehouse’s employee break room show posters plastered on each of the transparent walls that divide the dining tables.

“We encourage you to speak for yourself,” the posters say. “We do not believe that we need a third party between us.”

The company has sent text messages — also viewed by The Canadian Press — to employees’ personal phones, telling them they have the right to decide whether to sign a union card or an online petition. “It is your fundamental right to sign or to say, ‘No, thank you,’ or ‘I am not interested,’” the text messages say.

Under Quebec’s Labour Code, an employer has free speech rights but is not allowed to interfere with a unionization campaign, nor is it allowed to issue threats or promises. It cannot use its authority to induce employees to adopt its views. And employees must have the option of receiving or not receiving the employer’s messages about unions.

Frédéric Paré, a professor of labour rights at Université du Québec à Montreal, says Amazon’s strategy of posting notices in the break room and sending text messages “could be problematic” if it becomes overwhelming.

“It’s a question of balance,” Paré said in a recent interview. Amazon’s approach, he added, reflects an American mentality that won’t fly in Quebec.

“Amazon comes here … but they have an old American way of doing things where the employer has more leverage,” Paré said. “Here … with unionization, employers don’t have a say.”

Bergeron-Cyr said workers reached out to his labour federation earlier in April and launched an organizing drive, in part, for higher wages, which he said hover around $17 or $18 an hour. Unionized workers in comparable factory jobs in the province make between $26 and $30 an hour, he said.

“The workload and pace of it all are insane,” Bergeron-Cyr said. “People are under pressure .… A lot of them are immigrants who don’t know their rights, and Amazon uses that to its own advantage.”

If more than half of the 250 to 300 employees at the warehouse sign a membership card, the Quebec labour relations commission can certify the union.

Several workers, whom The Canadian Press agreed not to identify because they fear repercussions at work, described what they said are Amazon’s clear attempts to prevent unionization. All spoke of managers’ efforts to separate groups of workers talking about the union and of oral threats to close the warehouse if they unionize.

One worker said his life has become miserable since he uttered the word “union” at work. “Every co-worker who talks to me, after a few seconds, they are interrogated by the manager. When they do that, people don’t want to talk to you anymore. I’m being isolated,” he said.

Another worker said, “Most people you talk to think we deserve more. But they don’t want to sign the union card because they’re afraid that the company will know that they did and will fire them.”

Amazon Canada spokeswoman Ryma Boussoufa said in a statement that the company doesn’t think “unions are the best answer for our employees.” But she added: “No person in our organization will ever force, intimidate, threaten, make promises or unduly influence our employees’ decision to join a union, or not join a union, and any allegations of this nature are simply unfounded.”

Several groups of workers from Amazon warehouses across the world, including in Montreal, have reported difficult working conditions that include 10-hour shifts and the need to package products quickly, which they have said leads to injuries. They have also reported that managers overwork employees in order to get bonuses and that the warehouses are equipped with intrusive surveillance systems.

When asked about allegedly poor working conditions, Boussoufa said Amazon strives for a culture of safety, and she listed the benefits offered by the company, such as dental care and tuition subsidies.

Barry Eidlin, an associate professor of sociology at McGill University and author of the 2018 book “Labour and the Class Idea in the United States and Canada,” said the workers’ allegations aren’t surprising, adding that Amazon’s alleged workplace abuses and its anti-union stance have been well-documented.

“This is just the company culture: viciously opposed to any attempt at workers to have independent control in the workplace,” Eidlin said in a recent interview.

The pandemic, Eidlin said, exacerbated the problems in warehouses because of the explosion of online orders — but it also engendered a widespread unionization movement. “It’s an after-effect where people realized that Amazon prioritizes its products and profit over employees.”

In April, employees at one Amazon warehouse in New York City pulled off the first successful U.S. organizing effort in the retail giant’s history. Workers at a second facility in the city, however, voted overwhelmingly against unionizing. Meanwhile, other unionization efforts are underway at Amazon sites in Alberta and Ontario.

“It’s going to be a tough fight,” Eidlin said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 14, 2022.



This story was produced with the financial assistance of the Meta and Canadian Press News Fellowship.



Virginie Ann, The Canadian Press

Bitcoin plunges as Caisse-backed crypto company Celsius Network freezes customer withdrawals, transfers – The Globe and Mail

 June 13, 2022
By Megan Johnson

Celsius Network Ltd., which for years touted itself as the “world’s leading crypto earning and lending platform,” is freezing all withdrawals and transfers between its 1.7 million customers, as tokens such as bitcoin continue to plunge and investors rush to exit the digital asset market.

Citing “extreme market conditions,” the New Jersey-based company said in a blog post that a risk management clause about withdrawal obligations in its terms-of-use agreement has been activated indefinitely. That means customers are unable to pull their money out of Celsius, as the unregulated crypto exchange has decided to halt all transactions. As of May, the company held more than US$11-billion in assets.

“There is a lot of work ahead as we consider various options, this process will take time, and there may be delays,” Celsius said late Sunday. “Our ultimate objective is stabilizing liquidity and restoring withdrawals, Swap and transfers between accounts as quickly as possible.”

Major cryptocurrencies tumbled on Monday following the Celsius announcement. Bitcoin touched an 18-month low of $30,349. Ether dropped as much as 16 per cent to $1,585, its lowest price in two years.

While investing and holding cryptocurrencies remains the most common way of entering the digital asset market, many companies have also been offering customers avenues to earn interest on their investments in recent years.

These companies function much like traditional lenders such as banks or credit unions, but they lend cryptocurrency such as dogecoin, instead of a fiat currency such as the dollar. Investors get crypto dividends based on amounts that the companies lend to borrowers, and the lenders can take up crypto loans from different platforms.

Celsius is one of many such crypto lenders, and quickly became the most prominent. Founded in 2017, it has attracted major investors.

Just last October, Canadian pension fund giant Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec invested US$400-million in Celsius. It was an early move into the crypto world by an established Canadian pension fund manager. Shortly afterward, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan participated in a US$420-million funding round for the trading platform FTX Exchange that same month.

“Celsius is the world’s leading crypto lender with a strong management team that puts transparency and customer protection at the core of their operations,” Alexandre Synnett, executive vice-president and chief technology officer at the Caisse, said in a news release for its investment at the time.

But Jarrett Vaughan, a business professor at the University of British Columbia who studies blockchains and cryptocurrencies, said it’s hard to see how institutional investors will not be scared away from the market by the Celsius announcement. “With risk can come reward, so if you’re investing into a risky environment like crypto, you have to be aware of something like this happening. And hopefully, now, that’s a risk you’ll be more aware of,” he said.

The Caisse’s investment, in partnership with San Francisco-based venture capital firm WestCap Investment Partners LLC, placed a total value of US$3-billion on Celsius. Other investors in Celsius include Tether International Ltd., an issuer of tether, a stablecoin cryptocurrency pegged to and backed by the U.S. dollar.

WestCap and Celsius did not respond to requests for comment.

In a statement to The Globe and Mail on Monday, the Caisse defended Celsius. “In an environment of generalized market declines, investors are reducing their risk in all asset classes. In this context, Celsius has been impacted by very difficult markets in recent weeks, more specifically, the strong volume of withdrawals by customers,” wrote Kate Monfette, a senior spokesperson for the Caisse, adding that her team is “closely monitoring the situation.”

Ms. Monfette would not say if the Celsius announcement will impact future plans at the Caisse for investments into cryptocurrency. “Celsius is taking proactive action to uphold its obligations to its customers and has honoured its obligation to its customers to date,” she said.

Ledn, a Toronto-based cryptocurrency lending company that works much like Celsius, has seen its digital assets under management grow to billions over the past three years. “I really hope this one-off item about Celsius does not lead to broad conservatism in the space, certainly not from investors,” said Adam Reeds, chief executive officer of Ledn, in an interview.

This is not the first time Celsius has faced scrutiny, however. Earlier this year, Celsius came under immense pressure from crypto market observers, who believed the company played a role in the dramatic meltdown of luna and terrasUSD cryptocurrencies. Celsius had disputed those claims.

Late last year, a month after the Caisse’s investment, Celsius chief financial officer Yaron Shalem was implicated in a fraud investigation by Israeli police. The company suspended him.

In a tweet on Monday, rival lending platform Nexo offered to buy qualifying assets from Celsius, calling it an “insolvency” that is causing repercussions for retail investors in the crypto community.

Nexo attached a letter of intent to its tweet, which mentioned its interest in the Celsius collateralized loan portfolio, but did not provide a price for its offer.

Celsius Crypto FOMO Proved Irresistible to Finance Pros Too

Analysis by Lionel Laurent | Bloomberg
June 14, 2022 

Another day, another blow-up in the hype-driven world of cryptocurrency lending.

And this time there’s a cautionary tale where even sophisticated bankers and pension funds were vulnerable to crypto’s Fear Of Missing Out (FOMO) chasing unrealistic rewards in the unregulated world of “decentralized finance.”

Celsius Network Ltd.’s freezing of withdrawals, swaps and transfers on its platform Monday came just weeks after the $60 billion implosion of stablecoin Terra, and barely a day after Celsius boss Alex Mashinsky dismissed talk of halted withdrawals as “misinformation.”

Even before selling pressure began to batter DeFi platforms, regulators had been ringing alarm bells on Celsius for some time. The platform, which in 2021 said it had over $20 billion in crypto assets and 1 million customers, was hit by actions from several US states amid scrutiny on whether interest-bearing crypto accounts ran afoul of securities laws.

With lucrative yields of up to 18%, those warnings were easily ignored — even as terms clearly stated that collateral posted on the platform may not be recoverable in the event of bankruptcy.

Yet the FOMO that won over punters seems to have also worked its magic on professional financiers, too.

Those apparently unsustainable rewards appeared to sway those in charge of Quebec’s 420 billion Canadian-dollar ($326.7 billion) pension fund, which together with venture-capital firm WestCap Group led a $400 million investment valuing Celsius at $3 billion last year — even after the US warnings.

Not to mention the move by Royal Bank of Canada’s former chief financial officer, Rod Bolger, to take up the same position at Celsius in February — replacing an executive who was suspended after his arrest in Israel in connection with suspected fraud. (He rejected the allegations.)

The official view from the Caisse de Depot et Placement du Quebec (CDPQ) at the time of its reported $150 million investment was that this was a bet on the disruptive potential of blockchain technology — or, as the Quebecois say, “les chaines de blocs.”

Those rewards seem to have drowned out the risks of DeFi’s bank-like products that lack bank-like oversight. Such risks include the panic spiral of falling prices, forced selling and bank-run-style loss of confidence that would stretch a lending business to the limit.

And the excitement of what CPDQ called a hunt for a crypto “diamond in the rough” also seems to have relegated US fears over Celsius to the background.

Now, to be clear, it’s easy to criticize in hindsight. This is only a drop in the ocean of the crypto market, which exceeded $3 trillion in November but slipped below $1 trillion Monday. “Our team is closely monitoring the situation,” the Canadian pension fund said in a statement.

Still, even in calmer times, Mashinsky’s own description of Celsius’s business model last year showed the pressure to keep swinging for the fence: With more than 100,000-115,000 bitcoin held in return for 6-7% interest rates, the platform had to generate 6,000-7,000 bitcoin “just to break even” with customers, he explained — hence expansion into Bitcoin mining, a capex-heavy and competitive business, and plans for a credit card.

For a pension fund unable or unwilling to directly touch cryptocurrencies, this kind of business might have seemed like an ideal “picks and shovels” play — especially at a time of low interest rates. But even then, only after gulping a fair amount of blockchain Kool-Aid and ignoring the rumblings of concern from watchdogs.

As for Bolger’s own view of his move to Celsius as CFO, it includes pride in “a world-class risk management team” using practices “similar to other large financial institutions” — and also a hefty dose of optimism that crypto lending reduces “barriers” to finance. None of that is on display today.

He wouldn’t be the first banker to be tempted by the lure of crypto riches: The prospect of fewer regulatory constraints and more money has seen plenty of finance workers switch jobs. The staff flows from banks to fintech firms between 2020 and 2022 are revealing, such as the 37 Goldman Sachs Group Inc. employees who moved to Coinbase Global Inc.

Even as crypto dominoes topple, the pressure on banks and funds to clamber onto the crypto and DeFi train won’t go away easily: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wants to bring “trillions of dollars” of assets into DeFi, and PWC’s annual crypto hedge fund report this year found more than 40% of funds used borrowing and lending to juice returns — perhaps one reason why Mike Novogratz thinks two-thirds of crypto hedge funds will fail.

Yet the irony now is that as regulators sift through the wreckage, they’ll seek to make DeFi look more like banking — with the higher costs, lower profits and increased box-ticking that implies. ING Groep NV economist Teunis Brosens says of Celsius: “If this does not illustrate why crypto regulation is welcome, I don’t know what does.”

When the first banker moves back to TradFi from DeFi, we’ll have Quebec’s pensioners to thank.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering digital currencies, the European Union and France. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes.

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com/opinion


©2022 Bloomberg L.P.



Bitcoin falls 14% after crypto lender Celsius Network freezes withdrawals

Tom Wilson and Elizabeth Howcroft and Hannah Lang
Publishing date: Jun 13, 2022 

LONDON — Bitcoin slumped 14% on Monday after major U.S. cryptocurrency lending company Celsius Network froze withdrawals and transfers citing “extreme” conditions, in the latest sign of the financial market downturn hitting the cryptosphere.

The Celsius move triggered a slide across cryptocurrencies, with their value dropping below $1 trillion on Monday for the first time since January 2021, dragged down by bitcoin , the largest token.

New Jersey-based Celsius, which has around $11.8 billion in assets, offers interest-bearing products to customers who deposit cryptocurrencies with its platform. It then lends out cryptocurrencies to earn a return.

After Celsius’s announcement, bitcoin touched an 18-month low of $22,725, before rebounding slightly to around $23,924. No.2 token ether dropped as much as 18% to $1,176, its lowest since January 2021.

“It’s still an uncomfortable moment, and there’s some contagion risk around crypto more broadly,” said Joseph Edwards, head of financial strategy at fund management firm Solrise Finance.

Crypto markets have dived in the past few weeks as rising interest rates and surging inflation prompted investors to ditch riskier assets across financial markets.

Markets extended a sell off on Monday after U.S. inflation data on Friday, which showed the largest price increase since 1981, prompting investors to raise their bets on Federal Reserve rate hikes.

Cryptocurrency investors have also been rattled by the collapse of the terraUSD and luna tokens in May which was shortly followed by Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin, briefly breaking its 1:1 peg with the dollar.

In a blog post on Monday, Tether said that while it has invested in Celsius, its lending activity with the crypto platform has “always been overcollateralized” and has no impact on Tether’s reserves. The token was last trading flat at $1.

Also on Monday, BlockFi, another crypto lending platform, said it was reducing its staff by about 20% due to “dramatic shift in macroeconomic conditions worldwide.” BlockFi said that it has no exposure to Celsius and has “never worked with them.”

Bitcoin, which surged in 2020 and 2021, is down around 50% so far this year. Ethereum is down more than 67% this year.

Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky and Celsius did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment.

CRYPTO LENDING

Celsius says on its website that customers who transfer their crypto to its platform can earn an annual return of up to 18.6%. The website urges customers to “Earn high. Borrow low.”

In a blog post on Sunday evening, the company said it had frozen withdrawals, as well as transfers between accounts, “to stabilize liquidity and operations while we take steps to preserve and protect assets.”

“We are taking this action today to put Celsius in a better position to honor, over time, its withdrawal obligations,” the company said.

Celsius’s Token, which crypto borrowers and lenders on its platform could earn interest on or pay interest in, has fallen about 97% in the last 12 months, from $7 to around 20 cents, based on CoinGecko data.

‘GREY AREA’

Crypto lending products have surged in popularity and many companies have launched offerings within the last year.

That has sparked concerns among regulators, especially in the United States, who are worried about investor protections and systemic risks from unregulated lending products.

Celsius and crypto firms that offer services similar to banks are in a “grey area” of regulations, said Matthew Nyman at CMS law firm. “They’re not subject to any clear regulation that requires disclosure” over their assets.

Celsius raised $750 million in funding last year from investors, including Canada’s second-largest pension fund Caisse de Dépôt et Placement du Québec. Celsius was valued at the time at $3.25 billion.

As of May 17, Celsius had $11.8 billion in assets, its website said, down by more than half from October, and had processed a total of $8.2 billion worth of loans.

Mashinsky, the CEO, was quoted in October last year saying Celsius had more than $25 billion in assets.

Rival crypto lender Nexo said on Monday it had offered to buy Celsius’ outstanding assets.

“We reached out to Celsius Sunday morning to discuss the acquisition of its collateralised loan portfolio. So far, Celsius has chosen not to engage,” said Nexo co-founder Antoni Trenchev.

Celsius did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Nexo’s offer.

 (Reporting by Tom Wilson and Elizabeth Howcroft in London and Hannah Lang in Washington; additional reporting by Abinaya Vijayaraghavan in Bengaluru and Alun John in Hong Kong; Editing by Bradley Perrett, Jane Merriman and David Evans)



WHEN THE LAW WORKS

Gun, drug charges stayed against Yukon man after RCMP's 'profound failure' to respect Charter rights

Jonathan Baglee was arrested in 2019 when police entered

his home without a warrant

Crown attorney Noel Sinclair entered a stay of proceedings — essentially, where the Crown opts to end a prosecution — against Jonathan Baglee on Thursday. Baglee had been arrested and charged in 2019. (Jackie Hong/CBC)

Prosecutors have stayed 19 drug-and-gun-related charges against a Yukon man after a judge ruled a large portion of evidence inadmissible in court, citing the "profound failure" of RCMP officers to respect Charter rights.

The failures included searching the man's house without a warrant, keeping him detained in handcuffs for an unreasonable amount of time, and not informing him of his right to a lawyer in a timely fashion.

Crown attorney Noel Sinclair entered the stay of proceedings — essentially, where the Crown opts to end a prosecution — against Jonathan Baglee on Thursday. 

The move came about three months after territorial court Judge Karen Ruddy, following an application from Baglee, ruled that RCMP officers had over-reacted to the situation and any evidence collected during the warrantless search, including firearms, cocaine and verbal statements, could not be used in court. 

Baglee was arrested on July 30, 2019 after RCMP officers assisting with the nation-wide search for two teens wanted for a murder spree in northern B.C. heard the sound of gunshots in the distance. 

According to Ruddy's decision, B.C. RCMP had received a tip that the teens had been seen at a highway rest stop near Jake's Corner, approximately 80 kilometres southeast of Whitehorse. 

Yukon RCMP Const. Joseph Miller and Cpl. Cameron Long were checking the area when they heard three gunshots, followed by another five to six, and decided to investigate. 

The officers followed the sound to Baglee's home, about three kilometres down the Alaska Highway, where they noticed bullet casings on the ground. Baglee's partner came out of the house, followed by Baglee, and said she'd been firing a .22 calibre rifle. The officers said that based on the casings, they didn't believe her even after she showed them the gun.

During the interaction, Baglee said his partner may have also fired a .308 rifle.

Miller followed her into the house when she went to retrieve it, and confiscated a shotgun that she identified in a bedroom closet. Baglee also admitted to the officers that he was under a court order at the time, which prohibited him from possessing firearms.

Police arrested and handcuffed Baglee. Long then decided to "clear the house," entering Baglee's home without a warrant and doing a "tactical walk-through," according to Ruddy's decision. 

Baglee further admitted to having cocaine in his garage, which the officers again searched without a warrant. 

Police later obtained a search warrant for Baglee's property, but not before locating three firearms. They found six additional firearms, along with firearm accessories and drug paraphernalia, during the warranted search. 

Unrelated manhunt influenced police response

Ruddy, in her decision, found that Long and Miller were unduly influenced by the nation-wide manhunt. She said that the pair allowed the unrelated search for the teens to influence their approach to what would otherwise be a mundane situation — the sound of gunshots in rural Yukon near hunting season.

While there are situations during which police officers may be justified in entering a home without a warrant — responding to a 911 call, or where there's evidence of someone in immediate distress, for example — Baglee's case was not one of them, Ruddy said. 

As well, Ruddy ruled that there was no reason to keep Baglee detained for more than a few minutes, noting he was cooperative, posed no imminent threat and, other than the initial deceit about the .22 rifle, was "honest to a fault." However, he was detained for more than an hour, during which police asked him questions, and wasn't informed of his right to seek legal advice until he was brought into Whitehorse. 

Ruddy also noted that Long and Miller, when taking the witness stand during the hearing of Baglee's Charter application, were "defensive" or "non-responsive" when pushed on why they decided to investigate the sound of gunshots and their approach to the investigation. Long, for example, insisted that the second round of gunshots he heard must have come from an illegal firearm despite not being sure about the actual number of shots fired, while Miller said he'd feared being first in the line of fire as he drove up to Baglee's house despite no evidence the he was going to be shot at. 

Their testimony also differed from each other's — Long has testified that he and Miller had put on body armour while still at the rest stop, for example, while Miller said he didn't have armour that day.   

Ruddy ruled that Miller and Long's actions violated Baglee's section 8, 9 and 10(b) Charter rights — the right against unreasonable search, the right to be free from arbitrary detention and the right to have the opportunity to get legal advice.

The violations were "neither transient or trifling," Ruddy continued, but a "profound failure" to respect Charter norms; the unwarranted search saw police go through every room in Baglee's house, and the drugs and guns found were crucial to the Crown's case.

'Very long and painful process'

Baglee's lawyer, Vincent Larochelle, said in an interview after the Crown stayed the charges against Baglee that his client was "certainly very happy… that the whole ordeal has come to an end." 

"It's obviously been a very long and painful process for him," Larochelle said. 

He added that Ruddy's ruling, and the Crown's staying of charges, vindicated not just Baglee's rights, but the rights "of Yukoners in general."

"It seems to be a fairly common thing in the Yukon for police officers to make warrantless searches of either residences, individuals or their vehicles," Larochelle said. 

"What we need to understand is that it's only when the police violate the Charter and find something illegal that it makes its way to court... (Judges) don't get to see the times when police violate people's Charter rights and nothing happens and no charges are laid."

About 90 items seized by police from Baglee's house, include various firearms, ammunition, cash and dummy grenades will be returned to him, while 18 items, including a Beretta 92 pistol, .9mm handgun and cocaine, will be forfeited.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Jackie Hong
Reporter
Jackie Hong is a reporter for CBC North in Whitehorse. She was previously the courts and crime reporter at the Yukon News and, before moving North in 2017, was a reporter at the Toronto Star where she covered everything from murder trials to escaped capybaras. You can reach her at jackie.hong@cbc.ca

What do rural Quebec voters think of Bill 96?

Residents of the Mauricie region discuss protecting French while welcoming more newcomers to the area

Jules Bastien, 81, returned to his home region of the Mauricie after he retired from working as a machinist in Montreal for more than 40 years. (Simon Nakonechny/CBC)

Jules Bastien's eyes light up as he speaks about his son, a trilingual English teacher in Montreal. 

Bastien, 81, returned to his home region of the Mauricie in 2003 after a 43-year career as a machine operator in the city.

Over the years, he says he's noticed a decline in how much people seem to use French in public spaces in Montreal since he first moved there in 1961.

But he's also noticed how people in the Mauricie region, where 97 per cent of the population has French as their mother tongue, are increasingly speaking more than just French — something he is impressed by.

"My son came here two weeks ago and he was speaking Spanish here in Louiseville with someone at the Tim Hortons," Bastien said, looking amazed.

"He was so happy because he loves speaking other languages."

The Quebec government's overhaul of the Charter of the French language, Bill 96, received royal assent on June 1 and several of its clauses now officially apply across the province.

The updated law is large in scope and several parts of it have sowed controversy and division, such as a clause calling for immigrants to learn French within six months and the lack of exemptions made for Indigenous communities.

When the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) government presented the bill, most opposition parties in the National Assembly agreed the province could benefit from additional measures to protect French within a globalizing North America.

But its sweeping use of the notwithstanding clause, which overrides basic freedoms guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, is causing concern among legal experts and professionals in municipalities, courts and civil services expected to apply the law.

The details of omnibus laws like Bill 96 often get lost on the general public. In Louiseville and Maskinongé, two neighbouring municipalities in the Mauricie region, many of the people CBC spoke to didn't know about the law, but those who did said they supported it and the cause to protect French in Quebec.

Their region is in desperate need of workers because of a serious labour shortage.

Micheline Rabouin, who has lived in Louiseville for about 30 years, said that while she supports the law, she believes six months is too short to learn the language. 

Micheline Rabouin said she believes the government should give immigrants a year to learn French, instead of the six months outlined in Bill 96. (CBC)

"When I lived [in the Maritimes], it took me a while to learn English," she said. "I'd say at least a year."

CAQ popularity in Mauricie

All four MNAs representing the electoral districts in the Mauricie are part of the CAQ, the ruling party that tabled the bill. Before the party grew to prominence under the current premier, François Legault, voters in the region mostly voted for the Parti Québécois and at times, the Quebec Liberal Party. 

Bastien, the former machine operator, says he's more "nationalist than federalist," but that he's voted for "all the parties." He said that though French was important to him, it wasn't necessarily an issue at the ballot box.

François Rousseau, 70, plans to vote for the CAQ again in the upcoming election. Throughout his life, Rousseau said he's voted for a variety of parties in federal and provincial elections, including the NDP, Bloc Québécois and the now defunct Social Credit Party — but never Liberal. 

Why not? "Multiculturalism," Rousseau said.

The Canadian policy dating back to former prime minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau in the 1970s was heavily opposed in Quebec due to concerns it would lead to an increase in bilingualism and a decline in the use of French. 

The province has since then favoured policies that seek to integrate newcomers into Quebec society, a distinction that may be due to the idea of collective identity versus individual identity, according to Daniel Béland, the director of the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada. 

Louiseville, a town on the banks of Lac Saint-Pierre south of Trois-Rivières, has a population of about 5,400. (Simon Nakonechny/CBC)

"There is a sense that there is a majority culture and that is important in the way minorities are treated," Béland said in a recent interview.

The Charter of the French language, known as Bill 101, was voted into law in 1977, six years after Trudeau's multicultural policy. It made French the common language in Quebec and stipulated that the children of newcomers were to be educated in French. 

Protecting French

Rousseau, a Maskinongé resident, says Bill 96 is necessary given the increase in immigration to his region. 

Rousseau said he believes the CAQ is so popular there because it has managed to tap into nationalist sentiments while leaving separatism aside.

"People can't say, 'Oh, I won't vote for them because they're separatist,'" Rousseau said. 

Daniel St-Yves is also 70 and also voted for the CAQ, despite voting PQ in the past. A trucker most of his life, St-Yves said he is happily retired after "eating pavement" for 40 years. 

He travelled throughout Quebec, Ontario and New Brunswick throughout his career, covering 100,000 kilometres per year.

Daniel St-Yves spent his life travelling across several Canadian provinces as a trucker. 'When I go elsewhere, I have to speak English,' he said. 'When you come here, speak to me in French.' (Simon Nakonechny/CBC)

"When I go elsewhere, I have to speak English. When you come here, speak to me in French," St-Yves said, noting he's in favour of additional "pressures" on people to learn French in the province.

"I'm not against immigration, but when you come here you have to adapt to Quebec."

The latest census data suggests newcomers are learning French more than ever.

Between 1976 and 2015, the percentage of students going to school in French whose first language isn't French went from 20 per cent to 90 per cent.

Labour shortage a path to modernization?

While a shortage of more than 200,000 workers is affecting businesses across the province, the Mauricie's agriculture and manufacturing sectors are looking at ways to modernize, according to Renée Cloutier of the local chamber of commerce.

Some are pairing up with organizations that provide psychological support to workers, as well as with the Service d'accueil des nouveaux arrivants de Trois-Rivières, which helps immigrants settle in the region and works to "promote harmonious intercultural relations between Quebecers of all origins," according to its website.

"There is a scarcity of labour and several companies on our territory are using creativity to attract workers," said Pier-Olivier Gagnon, who works for the municipality of Maskinongé.

Gagnon and Cloutier say the companies hope their methods help revitalize the region's industries, which are vital to the province's economy. 

Millions of Canadians believe in white replacement theory: poll

New nationwide polling by Abacus Data finds millions of Canadians believe in conspiracy theories, and think there is a plot to replace native-born Canadians with immigrants.



© Provided by National Post
Mourners gather at a memorial to the 10 fatalities at the May 14, 2022 shooting at a Tops supermarket in Buffalo, N.Y. Authorities said the gunman was motivated by a white-nationalist racist ideology known as “replacement” theory.

The data found 44 per cent of Canadians believe “big events like wars, recessions and the outcomes of elections, are controlled by small groups of people working in secret against us.” The survey sample represents the equivalent of 13 million Canadians, Abacus said.


Nearly as many, or 41 per cent, agree “much of our lives are being controlled by plots hatched in secret places.”



More than one-third of Canadians believe in the so-called white replacement theory. Thirty-seven per cent of respondents, representing 11 million Canadians, agreed with the statement: “There is a group of people in this country who are trying to replace native-born Canadians with immigrants who agree with their political views.”


Abacus surveyed 1,500 randomly selected, nationally representative Canadian adults from May 20 to 24, as part of a series called “ Trust & Facts: What Canadians Believe.” Respondents were also asked about specific conspiracy theories.

One in five Canadians, or 20 per cent of those surveyed, believe it is definitely or probably true that the World Economic Forum (WEF) is “a group of global elites with a secretive strategy to impose their ideas on the world.”

Federal ethics commissioner flooded with emails calling for investigation into WEF conspiracy


A further 13 per cent believe it is definitely or probably true that Microsoft founder Bill Gates is using microchips to track people and affect human behaviour.

The survey also looked at demographic and political leanings.

It found that of the 44 per cent of the population who believe in conspiracy theories, the views depended on party affiliations. Seventy-two per cent of supporters of the People’s Party of Canada believed in conspiracy theories compared with 28 per cent of PPC supporters who did not. Among Conservative Party of Canada supporters, belief was split 50 per cent for and 50 per cent against conspiracy theories. Among Liberal supporters, 31 per cent believed in conspiracy theories versus 69 per cent against. And 30 per cent of NDP voters believed the theories versus 70 per cent who did not.


Of those who believe in the white replacement theory, 49 per cent identified as having views on the “right”; 41 per cent said their views were “centre”; and 21 per cent had “left” views.

Among those who believed the WEF conspiracy theory was definitely or probably true, 32 per cent have views on the “right”; 20 per cent have centrist views; and 15 per cent have “left” views.

The survey also found a strong correlation among those who believe in conspiracy theories and a distrust of the media and government.

Among those who believed in the WEF conspiracy theory, 42 per cent said they don’t trust media; 36 per cent said they don’t trust government; and 51 per cent said they did not have COVID shots.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.53%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment and region.



SEE




GREENWASHING
Conservatives Do Want A Clean Energy Transition


Traditionally, conservatives have endorsed fossil fuels as the only viable energy source. Recently, however, momentum has shifted so that more conservatives than ever are publicly embracing the potential for renewables.


"Renewable energy - Nonrenewable energy" by kevin dooley is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

ByCarolyn Fortuna
Published11 hours ago

As of Sunday, the national average cost of a gallon of gasoline in the US stood at $5.01, according to the AAA. It seems like in no time the US will exceed the July, 2008 price of $5.37 (adjusted for inflation from $4.14 per gallon). It’s clear that the clean energy transition is overdue. The US ranks fourth, behind Japan, China, and the European Union, on research and development for energy technologies as a share of GDP. A lack of consensus about the power and place of renewables across the political aisle has limited its potential.

There’s no question about it: for the US to play catch-up, the clean energy transition will need the support of conservatives.

The future of clean energy can pivot with the nod of conservative political elites who have — up until recently — promoted policies friendly to fossil fuels and resisted efforts to mitigate the climate crisis. Not everyone is convinced that fossil fuels are the end game. In fact, a new breed of conservatives is slowly taking hold, and a clean energy transition is patiently waiting in the wings.


Evolving Conservative Viewpoints about a Clean Energy Transition

Decarbonization is the process of transitioning from the production and use of fossil fuels to more renewable and sustainable sources of energy. Underlying values, beliefs, and political orientations generally point to attitudes about decarbonization. Decades-long disinformation campaigns from fossil fuel companies linger in the minds of many conservatives. Change in attitudes comes slowly.

What was once climate denial has morphed into climate action delays. We’re seeing more and more conservatives whose perspectives have become somewhat, shall we say, malleable.

That’s partially because new ways of framing have emerged that position the energy transition through positive economic lenses. New questions have arisen. To what degree can conservative leaders continue to promote short-term gains from fossil fuel deep pockets? How long can conservatives avoid the inevitable long-term losses from failure to invest in renewables?

Climate activists have long argued that clean energy innovation needs rapid transitions that push faster than do market forces. Rewiring America, an organization that promotes electrifying everything, argues that the policy mandate is the only way to reach decarbonization climate goals. “The invisible hand of markets is definitely not fast enough; it typically takes decades for a new technology to become dominant by market forces alone as it slowly increases its market share each year,” the Rewiring America handbook states.

Behind the scenes, conservative leaders recognize the cognitive dissonance of speaking positively about two disparate energy solutions — fossil fuels and renewable energy. They’re also more wary than ever of suffering electoral losses due to perceived lack of climate leadership from voters.

How can conservative leaders garner support for a clean energy transition? In what ways can they adjust the cost-risk-reward strategy from the yesterday’s familiar fossil fuel sources to tomorrow’s healthy planet renewables? When will it become the norm to embrace the vision to replace oil and gas jobs with clean technology career training?

Framing an Energy Middle Ground that’s Consistent with Values

Economic conservatism and self-identified conservative/right ideology are strongly associated with opposition to energy transition. Economic conservatism captures support for free enterprise, government intervention in the economy, and wealth redistribution. Economic conservatism structures individuals’ political preferences across many countries.

However, when elite conservative leaders cue their rhetoric toward adopting more climate-friendly stances for the good of the nation, their supporters tend to follow the lead. Additionally, being able to see local forms of renewable energy, such as wind turbines, makes people more likely to support that form of energy, especially in rural areas. Recognizing these patterns, an incremental change is taking place in conservative camps. Conservative leaders are slowly adding rhetorical transparency to their communications about a clean energy future. While they continue to be reluctant to suggest government intervention in the economy, conservatives now discuss “everything possible” energy solutions.

The points where conservatives and progressives coalesce is a collective pride in US innovation — a commonality in celebrating US values of individualism, self-reliance, and wherewithal. Language from conservative clean energy advocates now refers to “market-based” transitions for encouraging energy alternatives that protect national security and protect independence.

A study in Energy Policy identifies factors associated with the most enthusiasm for an energy transition:rejections of the future of oil and gas
support for market conservative values

The Christian Coalition Network says, “Taking responsibility to care for God’s creation and protecting the future of our children and grandchildren is a core family value. Further delays in action will impact our national security, our economic security, and our family security.”

Young Conservatives for Energy Reform want to “create meaningful energy reform focusing on the key concerns of national security and economic growth through home grown energy and clean technology jobs to ensure a prosperous economy now and for future generations of Americans.”

The Conservative Energy Network argues that “put simply, energy independence is energy security—and energy security is national security. When America is energy independent, our economy is more secure and our hand in foreign policy matters is strengthened.” CEN calls subscribers “energy patriots.”

The Military Advisory Board, a group of retired high-level officers from the US Armed Forces, sees getting off foreign oil and getting onto clean energy as a top national security concern — both in terms of the threats that emerge from climate change and the resources the US expends to secure foreign oil interests. “Projected climate change is a complex multi-decade challenge,” the group says, that “makes clear that actions to build resilience against the projected impacts of climate change are required today. We no longer have the option to wait and see.”

Final Thoughts


Like the GOP, the Tories in the UK have moved somewhat away from their traditional constituencies to embrace working class voters on an anti-internationalist platform. The UK is more committed to climate action among conservatives, however. The Climate Change Act of 2008 was amended in 2019 under a coalition government of the Conservatives and their North Irish allies. Rather than weakening the 2008 law, the amendment set a target of net-zero GHG emissions by 2050.

The lesson that US conservatives are absorbing from the Tories is the need to define climate action on their own terms, as a matter of economics. Studies that outline how affordable it can be to replace a fossil fuel like coal with renewable energy are getting notice.

Conservative resistance to climate-friendly initiatives is starting to soften alongside a strong economic case for them. “Done right, we don’t need to lose US jobs over this,” said Senator John Curtis, a Republican from Utah, during a recent panel discussion on climate change and bipartisanship. “I think we can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and, actually, fuel our economy at the same time.”
Why haven’t plastic-eating bacteria fixed the ocean plastic pollution problem?

Scientists have discovered enzymes from several plastic-eating bacteria. So, why are our oceans still full of plastic pollution?


Credit: Naja Bertolt Jensen / Unsplash

KEY TAKEAWAYS

Many enzymes only work for one specific kind of plastic, but much of our trash combines several kinds of plastic.
 
Enzymes work (and bacteria live) only under certain environmental conditions, such as those found in a controlled laboratory. We won't be able to sprinkle plastic-eating bacteria into the ocean.
 
Even if we could, the enzymes or bacteria could produce toxic byproducts.


Scientists from the University of Texas announced they’ve created a plastic-eating enzyme that could keep billions of pounds of plastic out of landfills.

Now, if that sentence gives you déjà vu, you’re not alone.

Followers of science news may have seen similar exciting headlines over the years, from 2008’s Science Fair Project Isolates Plastic-Eating Microbes–about a 17-year-old science fair winner who got bacteria to degrade plastic bags by 43%–to last month’s New Enzyme Discovery is a New Step Towards Beating Plastic Waste, wherein British scientists developed an enzyme that could break down PTA, an ingredient in plastic bottles.

You’ve seen lots of similar titles in between: “New super-enzyme eats plastic bottles six times faster,” “Plastic-eating bacteria could help aid global recycling efforts,” etc., which give the impression of a silver bullet (itself undoubtedly recyclable) that will slay our monstrous plastic problem.

Why are these plastic-eating bacteria just twiddling their thumbs? We’ve got a crisis to deal with!

So what is taking so long? Why are these bacteria just twiddling their thumbs while we have a crisis to deal with?

It turns out there are a few reasons things aren’t so simple:

Plastic isn’t all the same. Many enzymes or bacteria only work for one specific kind of plastic, and much of our trash combines several kinds of plastic.

Most plastic-recycling efforts focus on PET, the plastic used in plastic bottles. PET represents about 20% of global plastic waste. It’s chemically easier to break down than polyethylene or polypropylene, types used in plastic film and food packaging.

That’s an important caveat: most of these solutions would only put a dent in our plastic problem, rather than solve it entirely.

Many solutions only work under special conditions. Often, the reactions or bacteria only work at certain temperatures, in special environments, or after extended periods of time. The harder it is to create the conditions, the less practical it is to do it at scale. This also means that it’s unlikely bacteria will solve the issue of plastic pollution already in nature — more on that soon.


They cost too much. These processes can be expensive. Further, most solutions simply break down plastic to its original monomers, which are really only useful for creating more plastic.

This has two problems: one, it doesn’t reduce the amount of plastic in the world, and two, making new plastic is already really cheap. Creating a costly factory, shipping tons of waste to it, and having bacteria slowly churn out ingredients that are worth virtually nothing — and still aren’t biodegradable — isn’t a great business model or arguably even an efficient use of taxpayer funds.

It’s not necessarily safe or effective to release in nature. Often there’s an assumption that this bacteria could be released to chew through the mountains of plastic we currently have buried in landfills, swirling in the oceans, or scattered as litter.

But even if bacteria or enzymes could work under totally unregulated conditions, it could have toxic byproducts, destroy plastic that is still in use (like, say, the device you’re using to read this right now, cutting you off from finishing this valuable article), or require releasing tremendous quantities into an area to make a difference.

So, for now, these technologies could really only be used within our existing recycling systems, rather than being a fundamentally new alternative. We will still have to sort, collect, and process all the plastic we want the bacteria to eat.

Fortunately, there’s also some good news: scientists from Japan to Saudi Arabia to the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory are working on these problems, and things are improving.

For example, the recent discovery at UT-Austin identified an enzyme that cuts the time to break down plastic to a matter of hours, and it can work at the relatively attainable temperature of 50° C (122° F). And it was found using an AI algorithm that could continue to iterate and improve its performance.

Fortunately, there’s also some good news: scientists from the US to Saudi Arabia to Japan are working on these problems, and things are improving.

And the first demonstration plant dedicated to enzyme-based plastic recycling recently opened. French firm Carbios, which runs it, announced they have successfully produced new plastic bottles from PET with a process that makes them infinitely recyclable.

That is a breakthrough worth celebrating. Today, even if plastic is recycled (over 80% is not, including over 90% in the US), it can generally only be turned into lower-quality plastic, for niche uses like carpeting.

Traditional mechanical recycling processes are expensive and inefficient, requiring waste to be sorted, shredded, cleaned, melted and pelletized — and discarding any batches contaminated with food or incompatible materials. Chemical recycling processes can often create their own toxic byproducts.

Carbios is planning to create a commercial-scale facility by 2024, and while it doesn’t expect their plastic to be as cheap as freshly made varieties, they hope environmentally-minded companies and consumers will pay a little extra for it. Plus, its approach will allow plastic to be recycled from mixed garbage more efficiently and with less waste.

We don’t have to rely on miracle bacteria to do our dirty work.

Time will tell if new processes will help chip away at our plastic problem. In the meantime, other scientists and companies are creating biodegradable materials that can replace plastics altogether, from MIT’s cellulose-based solution to companies using bacteria to grow sustainable materials. Governments in Europe are taking another approach and banning harder-to-recycle plastics.

And of course you don’t have to wait for any of them — individuals around the world are finding creative ways to reduce their own plastic use. Exciting as they may be, we don’t have to rely on miracle bacteria to do our dirty work.

This article was originally published by our sister site, Freethink.