Sunday, July 03, 2022

PRODUCER, REFINER, PIPELINER
Exxon signals operating profits could double over the first quarter

Sabrina Valle
Fri, July 1, 2022

People pump gas at an Exxon gas station in Brooklyn, New York City


By Sabrina Valle

HOUSTON (Reuters) -Exxon Mobil Corp on Friday signaled that skyrocketing margins from fuel and crude sales could generate a record quarterly profit, according to a securities filing.

Energy prices have shot up this year with oil selling for more than $105 per barrel and gasoline at about $5 per gallon in the United States. The enormous earnings are likely to ignite new calls for windfall profit taxes.

The largest U.S. oil producer projected a sequential increase of about $7.4 billion in operating profits compared with the first quarter. In the first quarter, Exxon posted an $8.8 billion profit, excluding a Russia writedown.

The filing indicates a potential profit of more than $16 billion for the second quarter. The company's peak quarterly profit was $15.9 billion in 2012.

The filing showed Exxon expects higher oil and gas prices will add about $2.9 billion to results. Margins from selling gasoline and diesel will add another $4.5 billion to operating profits.

"High energy prices are largely a result of underinvestment by many in the energy industry over the last several years and especially during the pandemic," Exxon said in a statement on the profit gains.

Analysts tracked by IBES Refinitiv forecast a per share profit of $2.99, up from $1.10 in the same quarter a year ago. Official results for the period will be released on July 29, according to a summary of factors influencing the period disclosed late Friday.

Exxon's profits led U.S. President Joe Biden last month to say the company and other oil majors were capitalizing on a global oil supply shortage to fatten profits. Exxon, he said, was making "more money than God" after posting its biggest quarterly profit in seven years.

The company reacted to the president's comments saying it is investing more than any other producer in the United States to expand oil and natural gas production, including in the Permian, the country's largest unconventional basin.

U.S. Representative Ro Khanna on Friday said Exxon's record-breaking profits reinforce his call for Congress to pass a windfall tax on Big Oil.

"Big Oil companies should be providing relief to their customers, not pouring billions into stock buybacks to enrich their investors," he said in a statement.

Exxon's shares closed up 2.2% at $87.55 on Friday.

Exxon, which lost more than $22 billion in 2020, has been using the extra cash from higher energy prices sales to pay debt and raise distributions to shareholders. It plans to buy back up to $30 billion of its shares through 2023.

Despite losses during the pandemic, Exxon continued to invest in additional production and expects to increase output in the Permian by 25% in 2022, the company's spokesperson said.

The second-quarter results will be the first quarterly earnings report since Exxon decided to report results by four business units, giving a more detailed breakout of its petrochemical operations. The snapshot showed that margins in its chemical and specialty products units were flat in the second quarter compared with the first.

The company estimated the impact of exiting Russia would cut oil and gas profits by about $150 million compared with the first quarter. Exxon wrote down $3.4 billion in Russia assets earlier this year.

Exxon also signaled a contribution of about $300 million from asset sales in the quarter.

The CEO of social media giant Meta was cautiously optimistic during the first quarter results.

The mood has changed at the headquarters of Meta Platforms  (META) - Get Meta Platforms Inc. Report, parent of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, in Menlo Park, Calif. 

The atmosphere is beginning to resemble that currently found in many companies in America where the consequences of a looming recession are feared. 

Don't miss the next big investment opportunity! Save on TheStreet Smarts during our Fourth of July Sale!

For months now, many economists have been anticipating a sharp downturn in the economy due to aggressive monetary policy by the Federal Reserve and central banks around the world to combat record price increases everywhere. The Russian war in Ukraine has further exacerbated the supply chain problems caused by the covid-19 pandemic.

This cocktail, experts say, will affect consumption. Households should, these experts explain, reduce their expenses for fear of a disappointing tomorrow and focus only on essential expenses.

'Worst Downturn'

Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, now seems to share this pessimistic view. During the traditional weekly Q&A session with company employees on June 30, he said he expected "one of the worst downturns that we've seen in recent history," according to an audio recording obtained by Reuters.

Consequently, Meta will accentuate its cost reduction policy. The firm only plans to hire between 6,000 and 7,000 new engineers in 2022, against an initial project of 10,000 new recruits, indicates Reuters. It is therefore a revision of 30% to 40%.

In May, a source told TheStreet that the social media giant was planning to halt or in some cases slow hiring for most mid-to-senior level positions. The goal was to revise priorities and align hiring targets with current market estimates and pacing, the source said.

"We regularly re-evaluate our talent pipeline according to our business needs and in light of the expense guidance given for this earnings period, we are slowing its growth accordingly," a Meta spokesperson told TheStreet in an emailed statement. "However, we will continue to grow our workforce to ensure we focus on long-term impact.” 

At the time, this decision came just weeks after another cost-saving measure: the pause on hiring early-career engineers.

Russia Is a Problem for Sales

The company posted first-quarter revenues of $27.908 billion, up 6.6% year over year, nearly all of it coming from the new 'Family of Apps' division the company created last year, missing analysts estimates of a $28.2 billion tally. Ad revenues were up 6.1% to $27 billion.

But after suffering its first-ever decline in daily active users last quarter, Meta said the figures rose 4% from last year at 1.96 billion, just ahead of the Street consensus of 1.951 million, suggesting the social media group has been able to offset the market share gains of China-based TikTok with both its Facebook and Instagram apps. 

The company had, however, warned that the Russian war in Ukraine would weigh on its sales. Facebook was banned in Russia after the firm publicly voiced its opposition to Russian intervention by taking strong action to limit Kremlin propaganda on its platforms. 

Meta had 77,805 employees as of March 31, up 28.3% from March 31, 2021 when the company had 60,654 employees, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Meta isn't the only tech giant looking to cut costs.

Electric vehicle maker Tesla  (TSLA) - Get Tesla Inc. Report said in June that it would cut its workforce by around 3% in the coming months. Software giant Microsoft  (MSFT) - Get Microsoft Corporation Report has also lowered the hiring targets it had initially set, while the e-commerce giant Amazon  (AMZN) - Get Amazon.com Inc. Report is expected to reduce its initial hiring targets in the retail business, according to a leaked memo in May.

Meta cuts hiring plans as it prepares for 

'serious times'

Mariella Moon
·Contributing Reporter
Fri, July 1, 2022 

Justin Sullivan via Getty Images

In a weekly employee Q&A session, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg reportedly said the company is experiencing "one of the worst downturns [it has seen] in recent history." According to Reuters, the executive has revealed that Meta has slashed its target number for new engineers hires this year by about 30 percent. Meta previously said that it's slowing its hiring plans due to weak revenue forecasts, but now Zuckerberg has announced more details with exact figures. Apparently, from plans to hire 10,000 new engineers this year, Meta will only hire between 6,000 and 7,000.

Further, the CEO said that Meta is raising expectations on current employees and giving them more aggressive goals so that they can decide on their own if the company isn't for them. "[S]elf-selection is OK with me," he said. In a memo to employees, chief product officer Chris Cox has stressed that the company "is in serious times here and the headwinds are fierce." He also listed the company's six investment priorities for the second half of the year, starting with its metaverse initiatives Avatars and its virtual world Horizon Worlds.

According to the memo, published in full by The Verge, Meta is also aiming to monetize Reels as quickly as possible. Time spent on Reels has more than doubled around the world since last year, the memo reads, with 80 percent of that growth coming from Facebook. Cox called Reels, its short-form video format created as an answer to TikTok, a "bright point" for the company in the first half of 2022. Meta plans to continue improving the experience, including making changes to the home screen on Instagram and Facebook to incorporate the videos more natively.
-
In addition, Meta plans to focus on its AI initiatives, as well as on WhatsApp and Messenger in the second half of the year. It plans to test WhatApp communities before the feature launches around the world by the end of 2022. The company is also going to develop Instagram Creator channels and joinable chats, which are slated for rollout in the coming months.

Cox wrote in the memo:

"I have to underscore that we are in serious times here and the headwinds are fierce. We need to execute flawlessly in an environment of slower growth, where teams should not expect vast influxes of new engineers and budgets. We must prioritize more ruthlessly, be thoughtful about measuring and understanding what drives impact, invest in developer efficiency and velocity inside the company, and operate leaner, meaner, better exciting teams."

Tech companies continue to hit the breaks on hiring against the backdrop of a declining stock market and recession fears.

On June 30th, Meta's (META) founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the social media giant would scale back hiring and warned of an economic downturn.

"If I had to bet, I'd say that this might be one of the worst downturns that we've seen in recent history," Zuckerberg told employees during a weekly Q&A session which was recorded and heard by Reuters.

Earlier in June, Tesla's CEO Elon Musk ordered a hiring pause worldwide, citing a super bad feeling about the economy.

JPMorgan's CEO Jamie Dimon also warned of an economic “hurricane" ahead as the Federal Reserve continues its process of normalizing interest rates.

Hiring pauses, rescinded offers, and layoffs accelerated last quarter as stocks in every sector of the S&P 500 declined. Communications Services and Technology were among the worst performing sectors, behind Consumer Discretionary. The S&P 500 closed out its biggest loss for the first half of the year since 1970.

Yahoo Finance is tracking how tech companies are responding to a bear stock market, and a slowing economy.

Meta (META)

Facebook's parent company plans to slash hiring plans for engineers by at least 30%, according to Reuters.

In late June, CEO Mark Zuckerberg told employees the company aims to hire between 6,000-7,000 engineers in 2022, down from an initial target closer to 10,000. Meta had confirmed it would limit its intake of new employees in May, but exact figures had not been reported. The social media giant had 77,805 employees worldwide as of March 31, 2022.

Mark Zuckerberg warns staff Facebook will be ‘turning up the heat’ to weed out underperformers: ‘You might decide this place isn’t for you, and that’s OK with me’

Facebook parent Meta is cutting back on hiring and turning up the heat on its employees as slow growth and macroeconomic headwinds push the company to downgrade its economic outlook.

In a weekly employee Q&A session on Thursday, the social media giant's chief executive Mark Zuckerberg told employees that Meta is reducing its plans to hire engineers by at least 30% this year. Citing the market downturn and the looming recession, Zuckerberg said Meta will now only hire around 6,000 to 7,000 new engineers in 2022—a stark drop from its initial plan to hire more than 10,000.

"If I had to bet, I'd say that this might be one of the worst downturns that we've seen in recent history," Zuckerberg said in an audio recording heard by Reuters.

'Turning up the heat'

In addition to the hiring freeze, Zuckerberg also noted the company was leaving some vacant positions at the company unfilled and “turning up the heat” on performance management to weed out staffers who are unable to meet certain KPIs.

"Realistically, there are probably a bunch of people at the company who shouldn't be here," Zuckerberg said, adding, “Part of my hope by raising expectations and having more aggressive goals, and just kind of turning up the heat a little bit, is that I think some of you might decide that this place isn't for you, and that self-selection is OK with me."

The announcement comes after a period of staff growth at Meta, with the company ending the first quarter of 2022 with 28% more full-time employees than it had a year earlier. But as user growth and ad revenue both slowed, Meta was forced to impose a hiring freeze in May across several divisions of the company to shore up earnings—and slowed the pace of hiring in its Reality Labs division, the unit tasked with building its metaverse.

Meta did not respond to Fortune's request for comment by the time of publication.

Meta's headwinds

Meta’s planned scale-down was confirmed in an internal memo from chief product officer Chris Cox, seen by Reuters, who attributed the changes to macroeconomic pressures as well as new data privacy changes that have hurt the company's core online advertising business.

The memo, which appeared on the company's internal discussion forum Workplace before the Q&A, outlined the ways Meta planned to trim its losses. Meta has already lost around half of its market value this year alone, a trend that worsened in February after Meta reported it had lost daily active users on its flagship Facebook site for the first time ever in the last quarter of 2021.

“We need to execute flawlessly in an environment of slower growth, where teams should not expect vast influxes of new engineers and budgets,” Cox wrote, reiterating Zuckerberg's message. Cox added, “We must prioritize more ruthlessly, be thoughtful about measuring and understanding what drives impact, invest in developer efficiency and velocity inside the company, and operate leaner, meaner, better exciting teams.”

Meta spokesperson told CNBC that the memo was "intended to build on what we've already said publicly in earnings about the challenges we face and the opportunities we have, where we're putting more of our energy toward addressing.”

Instagram Reels

One way Facebook hopes to reverse its negative trends is by monetizing Instagram Reels—Meta’s video sharing platform which was first introduced in 2010 to challenge TikTok's dominance in the A.I.-driven content space. Both TikTok and Instagram Reels provide videos related to user interest gathered from data, rather than from accounts users follow.

Cox noted in the memo that the amount of time users have spent on Instagram Reels has doubled year over year and Meta would be investing heavily into A.I.-driven content recommendation. Cox noted user engagement on Reels could quickly bolster the bottom line and said the company intends to put ads on Reels "as quickly as possible.”

But if Reels and other algorithm-based content delivery are to have any success, Meta will need a lot more power, Cox noted. Meta will need to increase the number of graphic processing units (GPUs) in its data centers fivefold by the end of the year if it wants to have the computing power necessary to give users the content they want on their feeds.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Mark Zuckerberg Has an Original Idea to Get Rid of Employees


The CEO of social media giant Meta is pessimistic about the economy and is looking for ways to keep his company profitable

LUC OLINGA
JUL 1, 2022 

Times are tough even for the giants of Silicon Valley that are accustomed to big profits.

In recent months, the storm on the financial markets has particularly shaken the Nasdaq index, which is dominated by technology groups. Investors fearing a recession are liquidating their positions in risky assets. This particularly affects tech, which lives mainly on promises of future products and services.

Big Tech is not spared, especially since the slowdown in the world economy should also impact them because they are multinationals, present in many countries around the world. This is the case of Meta Platforms (META) - Get Meta Platforms Inc. Report, the parent company of social media platforms Facebook and Instagram.

The firm is one of the biggest players in online advertising, where Meta only trails Google (GOOGL) - Get Alphabet Inc. Report in terms of market share. According to experts, the economic slowdown, or worse, the recession will force companies and advertisers to reduce their budgets dedicated to marketing and advertising, which should logically affect Meta and Google for example.

CEO Mark Zuckerberg told employees on June 30 during the traditional weekly Q&A session to expect the "one of the worst downturns that we've seen in recent history."

"If I had to bet, I'd say that this might be one of the worst downturns that we've seen in recent history," Zuckerberg told staff, according to Reuters.


Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Reducing Hiring

Consequently, Meta will accentuate its cost reduction policy. The firm only plans to hire between 6,000 and 7,000 new engineers in 2022, against an initial project of 10,000 new recruits, indicates Reuters. It is therefore a revision of 30% to 40%.

In May, a source told TheStreet that the social media giant was planning to halt or in some cases slow hiring for most mid-to-senior level positions. The goal was to revise priorities and align hiring targets with current market estimates and pacing, the source said.

"We regularly re-evaluate our talent pipeline according to our business needs and in light of the expense guidance given for this earnings period, we are slowing its growth accordingly," a Meta spokesperson told TheStreet at the time in an emailed statement. "However, we will continue to grow our workforce to ensure we focus on long-term impact.”

But in a recent memo, chief product officer Chris Cox said that: "I have to underscore that we are in serious times here and the headwinds are fierce. We need to execute flawlessly in an environment of slower growth, where teams should not expect vast influxes of new engineers and budgets."

Is Bitcoin a Ponzi Scheme?

Just because it's risky, doesn't make it a scam.


by Emma Newbery | Motley Fool
Published on July 1, 2022


Key points
Ponzi schemes are scams in which fraudsters use money from new investors to pay rewards to the existing ones, without ever generating any revenue.

Bitcoin is a high-risk investment, but it has many traits that do not chime with being a Ponzi scheme or a scam.

Ever since people first began to invest in Bitcoin (BTC), skeptics have lined up to label it a Ponzi scheme. The thinking is that Bitcoin doesn't actually do anything, so the only way its value can go up is if people buy more of it and push the price up. But does that make it a Ponzi scheme? Let's dive in and find out.

What is a Ponzi scheme?


A Ponzi scheme is an investment scam that uses funds from new investors to pay high rewards to the existing ones. It's named after Charles Ponzi, who conned a number of investors in the 1920s. Unlike a real investment, the fraudster doesn't actually invest money or do anything to generate revenue.

Let's say you were an early entrant into a Ponzi scheme, and put in $500 with a promise of gaining a 20% APY. The scammer would use your $500 to pay the interest on other people's so-called "investments." He or she would then need to convince more people to put in more money, and use that to pay you. But eventually there wouldn't be enough new money coming in, the scam would unravel, and your $500 would have disappeared.

The most famous crypto Ponzi scheme is probably OneCoin -- a supposed cryptocurrency that didn't even have a blockchain behind it. The swindlers tricked investors around the world out of over $4 billion. Ruja Ignatova, the main figure behind OneCoin, disappeared and has never been caught.

How does this apply to Bitcoin?

The easiest way to answer this question is to look at some of the SEC's definitions of Ponzi scheme red flags and see how Bitcoin adds up.

1. High returns with little or no risk

Bitcoin has generated high returns in the past, but few crypto investors think there's little or no risk involved. For sure, if you'd invested in Bitcoin five years ago, you'd be up over 700% today -- in spite of the recent crash. However, this wasn't in any way guaranteed. This is still a relatively new and unregulated asset class and there is a lot of uncertainty about what will happen next.

We’ve found one company that’s positioned itself perfectly as a long-term picks-and-shovels solution for the broader crypto market — Bitcoin, Dogecoin, and all the others. In fact, you've probably used this company's technology in the past few days, even if you've never had an account or even heard of the company before. That's how prevalent it's become.

Sign up today for Stock Advisor and get access to our exclusive report where you can get the full scoop on this company and its upside as a long-term investment. Learn more and get started today with a special new member discount.Get started

2. Overly consistent returns

If Bitcoin were a Ponzi scheme, investors would be receiving regular payouts from somewhere. In truth, the value of Bitcoin is anything but consistent and its price can swing wildly. It isn't uncommon for Bitcoin to gain or lose 20% in a single day.

There are platforms that pay steady APYs on Bitcoin. Indeed, it would be fair to question whether any of the platforms paying crazy high returns on crypto deposits are Ponzi schemes. But to level this accusation at Bitcoin would be the same as calling the dollar a Ponzi scheme because some scammers use it as a form of payment.

3. Unregistered investments and unlicensed sellers


The SEC says, "Ponzi schemes typically involve investments that are not registered with the SEC or with state regulators." This is an area where crypto does run into more troubled waters. It is relatively unregulated, and only a few cryptocurrencies have registered with the SEC as investments. Most cryptos are regulated by the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), as they are treated as commodities rather than investments.

In terms of the sellers, some crypto exchanges are not fully licensed. But there are also a number of top crypto exchanges that work hard to stay on the right side of regulators. Crypto platforms in the U.S. have to have something called a money transmitter license. It isn't the same as being an SEC-authorized investment firm, but it's also not totally unregulated.

Just because it's risky, doesn't make it a scam

Many crypto investors bought for the first time last year. And a number of them -- me included -- are looking at significantly devalued portfolios right now. Some individual cryptocurrencies are down 90% or more from their all-time highs. These prolonged price drops have caused some investors to wonder if the naysayers were right all along. Which is entirely understandable.

Did we all just fall victim to an enormous scam? Unlikely. Not least because if Bitcoin were a scam, there'd be a nefarious person or people behind it actively profiting from the scheme. One of the core premises of Bitcoin is that it is decentralized -- there is no middleman. That isn't to say that crypto hasn't attracted its fair share of sketchy characters. It absolutely has. It's just that the digital currency itself doesn't fit the definition of a Ponzi scheme.

Put simply, there's a huge difference between putting money into a high-risk investment and actively being scammed. For starters, there's a good chance Bitcoin's price will eventually recover, meaning the investment could eventually come good. Plus, there's no Charles Ponzi-style figure tricking people into buying Bitcoin for his or her personal gain.

Bottom line


People who invest in Bitcoin do so because they hope it might prove transformative. Some see it as a form of digital gold, and others believe it could eventually become the currency of the internet. It could also capture a significant chunk of the lucrative remittance market. The challenge is that Bitcoin might not achieve any of these things. It is a highly speculative asset and the industry is in its infancy. There's a chance quantum computing or strict regulation could stifle the digital asset market before it has a chance to fully develop.

Nonetheless, the dramatic price drop and onset of crypto winter does not mean we can call Bitcoin a Ponzi scheme. Whether it can achieve everything Bitcoin believers believe it might is another question entirely.

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M

The CFTC just charged a bitcoin firm with

operating the 'largest ever fraud' involving 

the cryptocurrency


Jennifer SorFri, July 1, 2022 

Bitcoin cryptocurrency coin and a graph
Bitcoin cryptocurrency coin and a graphSTR/NurPhoto via Getty Images
  • The CFTC announced charges against a bitcoin firm for defrauding investors out of $1.7 billion.

  • Mirror Trading International operated as a fraudulent multi-level marketing scheme, the CFTC said.

  • "This action is the largest fraudulent scheme involving Bitcoin charged in any CFTC case," the regulator said,

The Commodities Futures Trading Commission on Thursday charged Mirror Trading International and the firm's owner, Cornelius Steynberg, with fraud, claiming the company operated as a fraudulent multi-level marketing scheme that scammed billions from investors.

"This action is the largest fraudulent scheme involving Bitcoin charged in any CFTC case," the commission said in a statement. Investors who pooled funds in the company, which was advertised as a bitcoin trading pool, lost a total 29,421 Bitcoin, a value of over $1.7 billion.

The firm, based in South Africa, advertised returns as high as 10% a month through investments manged by a trading "bot". CFTC documents state that Mirror Trading invented account figures and created "a fictitious broker at which the trading purportedly took place." Commissioner Kristin Johnson called the company a "Ponzi scheme" in a statement.

Cryptocurrency investors have dealt with a wave of scams and hacks this year. Earlier this month, the FTC reported that over 46,000 crypto owners were scammed in 2021, accumulating losses of over a billion dollars in bitcoin, ether, and other digital assets.

News of Steynberg's fraud also came on the same day the FBI announced a $100,000 reward for "Cryptoqueen" Ruja Ignatova, who stole $4 billion from victims in another scam. The Department of Justice on Thursday also charged six individuals with running various crypto schemes.

The CFTC said it was looking into heavier regulation of cryptocurrencies last month, according to the Wall Street Journal. In the meantime, the commission stated it is in the process of returning funds to MTI's investors – although it may not fully recover the money members had in the pool.

BAD MINER
Bitcoin Miner Loses Bid to Renew Power-Plant Permit in N.Y.

Josh Saul and David Pan
Thu, June 30, 2022 

(Bloomberg) -- New York State rejected the renewal permit for a power plant used by Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. for Bitcoin mining, a decision that comes after about six months of delays.

The Department of Environmental Conservation said it denied the application because of statewide limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

The ruling comes amid a heated debate between environmental groups and cryptocurrency miners about Bitcoin mining, which uses energy-intensive computers to process records of transactions and earn rewards in the virtual currency. It has become one of the most lucrative businesses and has expanded rapidly in the US.

Still, New York is putting forward restrictive measures on crypto mining facilities. The state Senate recently passed a bill that bars miners from using fossil-fuel sources to power their operations.

The bill is set to be delivered to Governor Kathy Hochul, who will decide whether it should become law. Hochul didn’t respond to a request for comment on the legislation.

This is the first time Greenidge’s permits to operate the natural-gas fired facility in upstate Dresden have come up for renewal. The state agency delayed decisions in January and again in March.

In its notice, the regulator said Greenidge hasn’t identified adequate mitigation measures or alternatives, and the mining operation’s inconsistency with emission limits isn’t justified.

Greenidge has said its operations are carbon neutral. Still, environmental advocates have criticized the mine, and politicians such as US Senator Elizabeth Warren have questioned the entire industry about its impact on the climate.

“Governor Hochul and the DEC stood with science and the people, and sent a message to outside speculators: New York’s former fossil fuel-burning plants are not yours to reopen as gas-guzzling Bitcoin mining cancers on our communities,” said Yvonne Taylor, vice president of Seneca Lake Guardian, a nonprofit group advocating for environmental protection.

Hochul administration moves to shut gas powered cryptocurrency plant


AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey

Marie J. French
Thu, June 30, 2022 

ALBANY, N.Y. — Gov. Kathy Hochul’s administration on Thursday denied a key permit for a gas powered cryptocurrency mining operation in the Finger Lakes, saying the facility spews too much planet-warming pollution to be allowed under the state’s climate law.

The decision by the state Department of Environmental Conservation on the Greenidge gas plant is the latest step in New York to curb the pollution from cryptocurrency mining facilities that have started to proliferate across upstate New York for the growing industry.

“We are applying a new law to a new operation which had significant increases in emissions — almost tripling emissions,” DEC Commissioner Basil Seggos told POLITICO in an interview Thursday. “The company itself was unable to demonstrate that it could come into compliance with the law.”

Hochul faced political pressure to deny the permit, but delayed it until after Tuesday's gubernatorial primary that she convincingly won. She is also being pushed to sign a measure to put a moratorium on any other new fossil powered cryptocurrency mining projects in New York.

The 106 MW Greenidge gas plant hosts a large-scale Bitcoin mining facility, with about 17,000 miners. The plant has faced aggressive opposition from many local residents, lawmakers and winemakers in the region.

Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc., the company running the plant that employs about 50 people, said they plan to appeal the decision and that it will keep operating as usual while the process plays out in a statement Thursday.

“We believe there is no credible legal basis whatsoever for a denial of this application because there is no actual threat to the State’s Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) from our renewed permit," the company said in a statement.

"This is a standard air permit renewal governing emissions levels for a facility operating in full compliance with its existing permit today. It is not, and cannot be transformed into, a politically charged ‘cryptocurrency permit’."

Environmental advocates and other opponents of the project argue the increased emissions from the cryptocurrency mining threaten achievement of New York’s sweeping Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act. The measure requires emissions to be slashed 40 percent from 1990 levels by 2030 and 85 percent by 2050.

DEC agreed in a letter explaining the decision to deny a renewal of the plant’s Title V emissions permit. The agency also said the company failed to provide any justification for a reliability or other need for the project given that it would interfere with the state’s climate goals, and that the purpose of the plant had changed significantly since the original permit was issued in 2016 for the plant.

“Any increase in emissions at this point makes it challenging for us to hit our targets which are very ambitious,” Seggos said. “As a slice of total emissions, this is but one operation but we are looking economywide … and we need to begin putting in place these strategies to reduce emissions as quickly as possible.”

Advocates who had pushed for the denial of the renewed permit praised the decision.

"Governor Hochul and the DEC stood with science and the people, and sent a message to outside speculators: New York's former fossil fuel-burning plants are not yours to re-open as gas-guzzling Bitcoin mining cancers on our communities," said Yvonne Taylor, vice president of Seneca Lake Guardian in a statement.

Greenidge has 30 days to pursue an administrative appeal of the permit denial. If it does not appeal, operations at the plant, which employs about 50 people, would have to cease.

The decision has significant implications for the state’s efforts to enforce the climate law, and may also alarm manufacturers, hospitals, universities, power companies and other businesses looking to renew their Title V permits. Seggos said the decision was narrowly tailored to the new cryptocurrency mining taking place at the plant.

DEC previously rejected two air permits to repower fossil fuel plants, building new gas turbines. The Greenidge plant was not seeking to build any new power generation, but instead sought to keep running the existing turbine at higher levels than in previous years while keeping emissions within previously permitted limits.

DEC’s decision letter notes that the actual emissions have increased since 2016, when the original permit was issued, and 2020, when the climate law was passed. That increase is because “Greenidge substantially altered the primary purpose” of the plant. A renewal would enable the company to continue to increase greenhouse gas emissions “for the benefit of its own behind-the-meter operations,” the letter states.

The DEC rejected arguments from Greenidge that the plant is only a fraction of the state’s total emissions and that a permit expiring before 2030 can’t interfere with the state’s 2030 emissions goals.

“Achieving the Statewide GHG emission limits will require substantial action prior to 2030, including to transition the energy sector away from its reliance on fossil fuels,” the letter states. “Even during the permit term, the Facility’s continued operation for the purpose of providing energy behind-the-meter to its cryptocurrency mining operations would make achievement of the Statewide GHG emission limits more difficult.”

The crypto mining now uses about 45 megawatts of the capacity of the 106 MW gas plant. When it runs, the plant is consistently selling power to the grid as well.


Greenidge was built in the late 1930s as a coal plant. It went out of service in 2011 and the new owners received state subsidies to convert to gas in 2017 when natural gas power was viewed as a “bridge” rather than a dead end for the planet. They then turned to Bitcoin to increase profits in 2020. The plant is owned by publicly traded Greenidge Generation Holdings, which also has digital currency mining operations in South Carolina.

The DEC had delayed the decision on a renewed permit again in March, citing a high volume of comments and an offer from Greenidge. Greenidge offered to cut its emissions 40 percent from current permitted levels by 2025 and be a zero emissions facility by 2035. That’s ahead of deadlines in the state’s climate law.

But those proposals are not sufficient, and the company failed to justify a need for the project, the department found.

Greenidge said the department did not engage on that proposal.

"They chose to pass up the opportunity to materially improve the environment, choosing instead to burden New York taxpayers with the expense of funding a lengthy administrative and judicial battle that could have easily been avoided," the company said in the statement.

Greenidge has increased the amount of pollution it spews into the air and the water it sucks in from the lake and dumps at a higher temperature into a trout stream since it began mining cryptocurrency in 2020.

Greenidge expected its actual, on-site carbon dioxide emissions in 2022 and beyond to be 520,386 metric tons annually, according to filings. Emissions in 2019 were 65,607 metric tons and lower than 200,000 in the two prior years.

Environmental groups have also raised concerns about the water quality and aquatic life impacts. Like many combustion plants located on shorelines, Greenidge sucks up water for cooling and dumps it back at an elevated temperature.