Monday, July 11, 2022

Beachgoers flee from Sea Lions in California


Beachgoers flee sparring sea lions in viral video: ‘Godzilla is chasing them’

A TikTok clip showing the panicked frolickers running helter-skelter has nearly 10m views, but experts say it’s common behavior




00:27Beachgoers flee as sea lions chase each other on California beach – video


Associated Press
Tue 12 Jul 2022 

A TikTok video showing dozens of San Diego beachgoers running and jumping out of the way of two fast-moving sea lions has generated nearly 10m views and sparked conversations about whether the mammals were going after people and reclaiming picturesque La Jolla Cove’s narrow strip of sand.

But sea lion expert Eric Otjen of SeaWorld San Diego said what he saw was normal sea lion behavior for this time of year, when males are sparring as breeding season gets underway.

Otjen said the male flopping along at a rapid-fire pace as he darted around people was fleeing from the other male closer to the water’s edge that was chasing him because they were likely fighting over which females they could get. Both sea lions had ample opportunities to attack people but instead barreled past them, he said.

“He’s got swimmers all around him on his way back out, but they don’t bother him. What this is all about is his right to mate,” Otjen said, adding: “This behavior is not uncommon at all. The reason why the video has gotten like 10 millions views is because everybody is running like Godzilla is chasing them.”

It it not uncommon to see sea lions basking in the sun in La Jolla, San Diego, California. Photograph: Mike Blake/Reuters

And with good reason, he added.

“It may look funny that everybody is running, but it’s not a bad choice. You don’t want to be caught in the cross fire,” Otjen said. “Even if they don’t bite, it’s not a great feeling to have 200 to 300 pounds roll over you.”

According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s guidelines, people should stay at least 50 ft (15 meters) away from sea lions, seals and other species protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Act.

Otjen said for questions on behavior of the animals or to report a sick or injured animal, people can all SeaWorld’s hotline at 800-541-7325.
Baseball-Dodger Stadium workers vote to authorize strike ahead of All-Star game

By Rory Carroll - 

© Reuters/Kirby Lee MLB: Chicago Cubs at Los Angeles Dodgers

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Concession workers at Dodger Stadium have voted overwhelmingly to authorize a strike just over a week before the venue is set to host Major League Baseball's All-Star Game.

More than 1,500 workers for concessions giant Compass Group and Levy Restaurants voted 99% in support of the authorization and union leaders said a strike could be called at any moment.

The workers are currently trying to negotiate a new contract.

"I voted yes to strike because I often have to pick up shifts at the Rose Bowl just to try to make ends meet," Dodger Stadium bartender Laura Ortiz said in a press releases put out by Unite Here Local 11.

"I love working at Dodger Stadium and know that our company can do better."

The union said it represents food servers, bartenders, suite attendants, cooks and dishwashers at the iconic Southern California stadium.

The All-Star Game, which includes nearly a week of events in the lead-up to the July 19 contest, is returning to Los Angeles for the first time since 1980 and is expected to draw thousands of hungry and thirsty fans from around the country and beyond.

The Dodgers did not respond to a request for comment but the Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA) voiced their support for the workers.

"Like thousands of ballpark workers across the country, Local 11's members are a vital yet under-appreciated part of what makes our game great," the players said in a statement.

"They deserve to be treated fairly and will continue to have 1,200 members of the MLBPA behind them."

The players themselves were locked out by the league's owners earlier this year amid a contract dispute that threatened to cancel the start of the season before an agreement was reached in March.

(Reporting by Rory Carroll in Los Angeles; Editing by Ken Ferris)

 UK SCAB CHARTER

MPs approve controversial plans to let agency workers cover for striking staff

Critics accuse ministers of introducing a ‘scab charter’ that risks public safety and workers’ rights


The legal change comes hours after further strike action was confirmed, this time involving drivers at eight train companies who are preparing to walk out over pay.
Photograph: Dinendra Haria/SOPA Images/Rex/Shutterstock

Cash Boyle
Tue 12 Jul 2022 

Ministers have approved controversial plans to allow agency workers to replace striking workers, voting through the regulations on Monday night by 289 votes to 202.

While the business minister, Jane Hunt, said the change, which was accelerated as a result of the ongoing rail strikes, was needed to remove the “outdated blanket ban” on using agency workers to cover official industrial action, critics say the measure is akin to a “scab charter”.

Hunt told the Commons: “Some trade unions appear to us to be looking to create maximum disruption in a bid to stay relevant rather than constructively seeking agreement with employers and avoid conflict.”

The TUC had urged MPs to vote against the “pernicious anti-union measures”, which were deplored as “anti-business and anti-worker” by Labour’s deputy leader, Angela Rayner.

“They will risk public safety, rip up workers’ rights, and encourage the very worst practices. And above all they will not prevent strikes, they will provoke them,” said Rayner.

Hunt denied safety concerns, and said these changes will not affect the right to strike.

The Conservative MP Alec Shelbrooke voted against the plans, arguing that they diminish the intended impact of industrial action.

“If people are going to lose their ability to have an effect when they withdraw their labour, then I am afraid they have effectively lost the ability to withdraw their labour,” the Elmet and Rothwell MP said.

This was the first time Shelbrooke had voted against the government since being elected in 2010.

The Labour MP Ian Byrne said the government should be voting to protect workers’ rights, rather than introducing a “scab charter for bad employers”.

This change comes hours after further strike action was confirmed, this time involving drivers at eight train companies who are preparing to walk out over pay.

Though agency workers can now replace strikers, questions remain over the numbers of spare teachers, nurses and train drivers who can step in as replacements.

With both the National Education Union and NASUWT threatening strike action in the autumn term, the Conservative MP Jonathan Gullis offered to return to the classroom should those threats materialise.

Separately, a Labour motion to annul regulations to increase the level of damages a court can award in the case of unlawful strike action was defeated by 290 votes to 201.












UK Seeks to Stymie Future Strikes With Use of Agency Workers


(Bloomberg) -- Battling to contain the UK’s worst rail strikes in 30 years, Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government is moving ahead with legislation to allow employers to use agency workers to stand in for those taking industrial action. 

The framework to be introduced Thursday by Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng will peel back what the government called “burdensome legal restrictions” and help counter future walkouts, according to a statement from the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. 

The move comes as some 40,000 rail workers staged a second one-day strike over pay and conditions on Thursday after talks between employers and the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers failed to produce a deal. The first stoppage on Tuesday brought much of the nation’s rail network to a standstill, and a third is planned for Saturday. 

“The situation we are in is not sustainable,” Kwarteng said. “Trade unions are holding the country to ransom by grinding crucial public services and businesses to a halt.”

RMT General Secretary Mick Lynch is pushing 13 train firms and track operator Network Rail for pay rises to match soaring inflation, as well as a guarantee that there will be no compulsory layoffs as part of the settlement.

The union is “working constructively” with the rail companies but the government is a “silent partner” and should be taking part in talks, Lynch told the BBC. Further strikes are likely if a settlement isn’t reached, he said.

Teachers, Postal Workers

Johnson’s administration faces the prospect of what the UK media has dubbed a summer of discontent, with barristers also planning strikes and teachers and postal workers warning they too may take industrial action. Late on Wednesday, National Education Union Deputy General Secretary Niamh Sweeney told Sky News that a strike is more likely than at any point in the two decades she’s worked in the teaching profession. 

Inflation at a four-decade high of 9.1% and predicted by the Bank of England to hit double figures later in the year is squeezing household budgets and leading workers to clamor for wage increases that keep pace with rising prices. 

“The pay simply hasn’t kept up with other graduate professions and teachers are saying to us that they are finding it difficult,” Sweeney said, adding that many are “struggling to survive” as heating bills rise.  

The RMT’s Lynch and Transport Secretary Grant Shapps have clashed repeatedly over the rail crisis, with the potential use of temporary workers one of the sore points. Lynch -- who has become a minor celebrity due to his handling of TV interviews -- says the staff won’t be adequately trained and union members would encourage them not to go to work. The government denies that will be the case. 

“Businesses will still need to comply with broader health and safety rules that keep both employees and the public safe,” BEIS said. “It would be their responsibility to hire cover workers with the necessary skills and/or qualifications to meet those obligations.”

The changes will be made through a so-called statutory instrument that’s subject to Parliamentary approval. The government said it hopes the rules will come into force “over the coming weeks.”

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.



UK Strike Threat Returns as Train Drivers Vote on Action


(Bloomberg) -- The UK train drivers’ union will announce on Monday whether it plans to strike, raising the prospect of further British travel disruption in a summer marked by industrial action across sectors.

The Aslef union is expected to post results of a vote of more than 21,000 members for a possible work stoppage over a pay dispute. The group has said it’s likely to coordinate across the national railway system to maximize disruptions.

A decision to strike by Aslef drivers would mark a new wave of turmoil for Britain’s rail network, in a week where criminal barristers and post office staff are also taking industrial action. The UK government is facing widespread anger from trade unions over pay settlements and conditions, with Boris Johnson’s administration having argued that it needs to be cautious with pay awards for fear of stoking inflation.

Read More: UK Confronts 1970s-Style Problems With Strikes and Inflation

The Aslef vote comes even as the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers consults with members on the latest proposals to resolve its dispute, which led in June to the country’s biggest train strike in 30 years.

Aslef is seeking higher wages for members who it says have had no raise since 2019 as inflation spirals. Aslef General Secretary Mick Whelan told the Financial Times last week that a national drivers strike would cause “massive” disruptions to travel this summer. 

Read More: UK Seeks to Stymie Future Strikes With Use of Agency Workers

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

UK
Teachers and nurses ‘ready to quit’ over delays to pay rises, union leaders warn


Newly appointed cabinet ministers are under pressure to swiftly resolve wage deals for public sector workers or face them leaving their professions in coming weeks

A protest in London last month against the government's handling of the cost of living crisis and call for pay rises for public sector workers. 
Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Toby Helm 
THE GUARDIAN
Sun 10 Jul 2022 


Union leaders have warned newly appointed cabinet ministers that many teachers and nurses will quit their professions in the coming weeks if public sector pay deals are further delayed by chaos at the top of government.

The decision on Thursday by Boris Johnson to step down as prime minister – and a series of changes to his cabinet – have left public sector workers increasingly fearful that long-overdue pay rises will be pushed back to the autumn.

Even before the implosion of the Johnson government last week, unions were already on collision course with it over the extent of any pay increases – and were warning of possible strike action if their demands were not met.

Teachers, NHS workers and others in the public sector have been demanding increases of at least the rate of inflation – currently 9.1% – while ministers had been insisting that pay restraint was necessary because the Treasury needs to limit spending and curb inflation.

Now, however, there is anxiety that the already delayed pay process, including consultations with unions, will be delayed further, meaning many workers will quit in frustration. The impasse over pay – and threats of strikes – will be one of the most pressing issues facing the government as the Conservative party prepares to select a new leader and prime minister.

On Saturday the country’s biggest union, Unison, said it had written to the new health secretary, Stephen Barclay, demanding to see the as yet unpublished recommendations of the NHS pay review body. It also reiterated warnings about possible industrial action unless progress was made quickly.

Unison’s head of health, Sara Gorton, said: “The government’s leadership vacuum is no excuse for further delay on putting NHS pay right. The government is already months behind its own timetable. Surging costs are having a terrible effect on staff and helping them should be top of the priority list for the new secretary of state, not an afterthought.”

In her letter to Barclay, Gorton added: “The ambitious targets to reduce waiting times and remove the elective backlog will not be met without urgent pay action from you to prevent people leaving the health service.

“NHS staff cannot afford to wait for the leadership matters in your party to be settled before announcing your pay position. I will be talking to other unions about coordinating our plans, including consultative ballot options over inaction.

“Pay is crucial in making sure the NHS is properly staffed and able to provide the care patients need. Giving a proper wage award will show that ministers are serious about protecting the health service and the millions who rely on it.”

Patrick Roach, general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers, has also written to the new education secretary, James Cleverly, asking for publication of the review body recommendations for teachers.

Roach said it was essential that agreement was reached as soon as possible so that teachers did not leave the profession before the beginning of the new school year. “What is important is that process is not kicked into the long grass. We must ensure that full consultation takes place and that teachers get what they deserve.”

The TUC’s general secretary, Frances O’Grady, said: “The government may be in chaos, but ministers must not forget the cost of living crisis facing workers. Britain needs a pay rise now.”

A government spokesperson said: “The government wants a fair pay deal for nurses, doctors and the taxpayer, and is carefully considering the recommendations from the independent pay review bodies.

“We are incredibly grateful to all NHS staff and they received a 3% pay rise last year – increasing nurses’ pay by £1,000 on average despite a public sector pay freeze – and we are giving NHS workers another pay rise this year.”

This article was amended on 10 July 2022 to add a comment from a government spokesperson that was received after publication.
WASABI BLUES
Japanese horseradish farmers fear for future amid climate change

A woman waters a flower bed at a park under the strain of Tokyo's hottest June streak since 1875, on June 30, 2022. 
PHOTO: REUTERS

TOKYO (REUTERS) - Masahiro Hoshina, a Japanese farmer, starts worrying about typhoon season months before it begins, haunted by memories of the heavy rains and landslides that washed away wasabi farms during one 2019 storm.

"Recently the power of typhoons feels totally different from before due to global warming. It's getting stronger," said the 70-year-old farmer in Okutama, west of downtown Tokyo.

"Since it's happened once, there's no guarantee it won't happen again."

Wasabi, the tangy Japanese horseradish that's an essential part of sushi and dabbed onto slices of raw fish or into bowls of soba buckwheat noodle soup, is usually grown along streams in narrow valleys, leaving farms prone to disasters.

Typhoon Hagibis, which slammed into eastern Japan in 2019, slashed production in Okutama by nearly 70 per cent the next year. The need for replanting and careful tending meant it's taken nearly three years for sushi farms there to recover.

Experts say global warming is affecting production not only by increasing the number and severity of storms, but with rising temperatures that threaten growth of the plants, which need to be in water a consistent 10-15 degrees Celsius year-round.

A lack of wasabi could also endanger traditional Japanese foods such as sushi and sashimi, where the tang of the wasabi is used as a contrast with raw fish.

Weather isn't the only obstacle wasabi farmers face. A drop in rural populations due to aging means there are no successors.

Because of the two factors, the output of wasabi grown in clear-flowing water, like at Hoshina's farm, had fallen to half that of 2005, according to the Agriculture Ministry.

Norihito Onishi, head sales manager at a chain of soba buckwheat noodle restaurants called Sojibo, has seen his business directly affected by wasabi shortages and supply problems.

The restaurants were long known for allowing customers to grind their own wasabi roots to produce the spicy paste used as a condiment for soba. But they've had to mostly give this up.

"In the past, we served all the cold soba noodles with a piece of raw wasabi, but now we can no longer do that," Onishi said.

Though wasabi root was plentiful when the restaurant first opened 30 years ago, Onishi said over the last 5 to 10 years there have been times when he couldn't get any at all. The precious root is now made available only for certain types of dishes.

"If this unstable supply of wasabi persists, due to many factors including global warming, we will face a situation where we need to come up with other ways to overcome the problem so we don't end up not serving raw wasabi at all," said Onishi.
Vladimir Putin's Plan A in Ukraine failed, but his revised theory of victory is coming into view

By Mick Ryan
Putin wants the subjugation of the Ukrainian people and the end of their sovereignty, according to his pre-invasion eve speech.
(Reuters: Sputnik/Aleksey Nikolskyi/Kremlin)

All wars, the longer they drag on, evolve in their conduct.

As the belligerents commit more resources, suffer gains and losses of people and territory, and interact with each other, they adapt their objectives. As war objectives evolve, so too must the strategies to achieve them.

Throughout the war in Ukraine, however, Russia has maintained a singular objective. The objective Putin seeks is the subjugation of the Ukrainian people, and the extinguishment of their sovereignty. This is what Putin described in his pre-invasion eve speech.

This objective was slightly muddled in the wake of Putin's May 9 Victory Day speech, where he focused just on the Donbas region. But more recently though, Putin has been "back on message".

Who is winning the war in Ukraine?
Ukraine has now been under almost constant bombardment from Russia for more than five months, but analysts say the defining months could be just ahead.
Read more

At an event last month, casually reclining in an armchair, President Putin confirmed that in Ukraine, he is leading a war of imperialist conquest.

He and his nation were not, as he described on May 9, defending themselves against NATO aggression and encirclement. He described how, like the conquests of Peter the Great, it was Russia's "lot to return and strengthen".

Last week, Putin doubled down on this noting that the war might drag on to "the last Ukrainian left standing".

The Russians have also implemented measures in the Luhansk and Zaporizhia regions, such as the introduction of the Russian Rubel and appointment of Russian administrators, that indicate their desire to annex these areas.

Throughout Putin's war against Ukraine, his primary objective has not shifted. What has evolved since February 24 has been the ways and means he has used to achieve it.
Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume.

WATCH
Duration: 41 seconds41s
Plan A failed

Putin's Plan A was for a lightning military operation conducted on multiple fronts to shock the Ukrainian military into submission. This would facilitate the removal of the democratically elected government and the installation of Quislings who would do the bidding of Putin and his oligarchs.

This approach failed. But despite their battlefield setbacks, Putin and his defence and intelligence chiefs have cobbled together an alternative theory of victory for Ukraine. It goes something like this.

First, they have prioritised their military operations, and eschewed concurrent, multi-front offensives. Deciding Kyiv and Kharkiv were too difficult, they have instead focused on an eastern offensive and southern defensive campaigns.

This allows the Russians to husband the military forces that remain from the original invasion while building follow on echelons for operations in the coming months. And, it has drawn the Ukrainians into a war of attrition, something they avoided in the Battles of Kyiv and Kharkiv.

As such, this is the first element of the Russian theory of victory: destroy the Ukrainian Army faster than it can be rebuilt.

Holding the south

Next, Russia aims to hold Ukraine's south, which includes its only seaports. This is a productive agricultural region and is also the site of heavy industry including steel making and ship building.

And while the Ukrainian resistance movement corrodes Russian morale in the south, and Ukrainian counter attacks slowly regain territory in Kherson, holding the south is the second key element of Putin's theory of victory because it slowly strangles Ukraine economically, removing its ability to fund itself as a sovereign state.

Third, Russia now sees benefit in drawing out the war. Having lured the Ukrainians into an attritional conflict in the east, they are now reliant on western weapons and munitions. And with Russia occupying the southern regions, the Ukrainians are becoming increasingly dependent on international economic aid.

This is where Putin sees opportunity. He believes that the lack of strategic patience that the populations of western nations have shown in places like Somalia, Iraq and Afghanistan will occur in Ukraine if he can hold out to the northern winter.

Then, with increasing energy costs, rising inflation and a general weariness with the war (among populations who are sacrificing nothing), Putin is counting on assistance to Ukraine declining. And he is betting on greater pressure on Ukraine from the old European powers for some form of accommodation.

Finally, Russia is using continued energy exports to generate revenue to support its war in Ukraine. It has continued to export fossil fuels to many nations. This has allowed it to generate almost 1 billion Euros per day since the beginning of the invasion. And this vast some continues to wash into Russian accounts.
We need to understand how Putin thinks

The aim of exploring Putin's revised theory of victory is not academic, however.

If western nations can understand just how Putin thinks he might win this war, defeat mechanisms can be developed that attack each element of Putin's approach.

Olha was raped by a Russian soldier. Can she get justice?
Across Ukraine, accounts of rape by Russian soldiers are growing. It is the 'most hidden' war crime and as the first rape case of the war begins in a Ukrainian court, human rights lawyers are working out how victims like Olha can get justice, and even if Vladimir Putin himself could be charged with the crime.


So far, there has been some success. Western long-range rockets have allowed the Ukrainians to degrade Russia's artillery, the main killer on the battlefield. It has also allowed them to support southern counter attacks with the aim of taking back their coastline and seaports.

Importantly, many nations have made political and strategic commitments to support Ukraine "to the end" to address the challenge of strategic patience. And sanctions on Russia continue to evolve to cover loopholes.

Just as Putin has evolved his theory of victory for Ukraine, so too must the nations of the west continue to revise and adapt their approach in supporting Ukraine.

The West is in a battle to out-think and out-adapt Russia. It is a fight that can absolutely be won, but will require strategic patience, and the ongoing commitment of military, intelligence, economic and humanitarian aid to the nation of Ukraine. To the end.

Mick Ryan is a strategist and recently retired Australian Army major general. He served in East Timor, Iraq and Afghanistan, and as a strategist on the United States Joint Chiefs of Staff. His first book, War Transformed, is about 21st century warfare.
Australia 'on track' to generate half its electricity from renewable sources by 2025, report finds

By energy reporter Daniel Mercer
Solar is seen as the leading contender to decarbonise global energy systems.
(ABC News: Michael Franchi)

Australia is on track to generate half its electricity needs from renewable sources within three years, according to a report highlighting the extraordinary pace of change underway in the country's energy system.

Key points:

The Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering says the country's renewable energy share will rise to 69 per cent by 2030

The academy is calling for changes to help guide and coordinate massive investments needed to transition away from fossil fuels

It comes as amid upheaval in the eastern states' power and gas industries, which have been hit hard by soaring prices and fears of supply shortages

In what it described as a snapshot of the industry, the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering (AATSE) found renewable energy adoption was galloping ahead as wind and solar power became cheaper.

The group, which is comprised of technical experts, said renewable energy was "tracking towards" 50 per cent of Australia's electricity generation in 2025, a share that was expected to rise to 69 per cent by 2030.


It also suggested Australia's electricity networks would be capable of running on 100 per cent green energy for periods at a time by the middle of the decade.

But the academy stressed that urgent investment was needed, not only in new wind and solar farms, but in the back-up services that would be required to keep the lights on during the transition period.

AATSE said it expected pumped hydro and batteries to fill in many of the gaps but acknowledged that gas may be needed to act as a safety net during times of high demand or when wind and solar were insufficient to produce the required energy.
Big changes, big opportunities

The group also noted the massive scope of challenges facing Australia to power its transport, heating and industry with renewable electricity rather than gas or coal.

Although still the mainstay of Australia's biggest power grid, coal-fired plants are rapidly exiting.
(Supplied: AGL)

"Australia is in the throes of an energy crisis, with electricity generation prices around 115 per cent above the previous highest average wholesale price ever recorded," the report said.

"Meanwhile all states are achieving record highs for renewables powering our electricity system.

"It is critical to determine how these technologies will work harmoniously to decarbonise energy systems, provide new economic opportunities, and meet the needs of Australian industries, communities, and people."

The report from AATSE comes amid upheaval in the eastern states' power and gas industries, which have been hit hard by soaring prices and fears of supply shortages.

State energy ministers, led by Federal Energy Minister Chris Bowen, have largely backed an insurance-like policy known as a capacity market to help deal with the switch away from fossil fuels towards renewable sources.

The academy did not comment on the proposal.

Households leading the charge

Ahead of a major energy forum in Sydney, at which Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will speak, Professor Renate Egan from the University of New South Wales said renewable energy already accounted for nearly a third of Australia's electricity generation.

Professor Egan, who leads the Australian Centre for Advanced Photovoltaics, says this share has doubled in just five years and will need to double again in "at least" 10 years.

She noted the pace of change was being driven to a significant extent by householders, who were behind about half of the renewable energy installed in Australia during 2021.

"Last year, we put on 3 gigawatts of rooftop solar," Professor Egan said.

Professor Renate Egan from UNSW is optimistic about Australia's ability to handle the transition.
(ABC News: Chris Taylor)

"That's about $3 billion of investment by end consumers in energy generation for Australia.

"And we put on a total amount of centralised wind and solar of around 3 gigawatts — so another $3 billion.

"So $6 billion of assets were invested last year in renewable energy generation and half of that was by end consumers who own those assets and want to be able to use it.

"There's a significant change in the way the investments are being made, where it's going and how it's being delivered."
Technologies 'already available'

George Maltabarow, a former managing director at NSW poles-and-wires company, Ausgrid, said the technologies that could carry Australia to a completely renewable state were available but achieving the goal would not be straightforward.

To handle the transition smoothly, Mr Maltabarow argued it was imperative that governments and regulators brought in clear laws and rules to guide investment.

He said investment should include so-called distributed energy resources such as rooftop solar and household and community batteries, large-scale green generation and "firming" services.

Victoria is pinning its hopes on offshore wind to underpin its move away from fossil fuels.(Supplied: Oyvind Gravas)

Mr Maltabarow added that "you'll need smart sensors deployed pretty much everywhere" to ensure the proliferation of solar panels and household devices could be coordinated to the benefit of the grid.

"Conventional wisdom about how much capacity intermittent renewables can be sustained … in a grid, has evolved greatly over the last decade and particularly over the last five years," he said.

"Some overseas grids already support between 50 and 60 per cent intermittent renewables and they're targeting 100 per cent by the mid-2030s.

"But we shouldn't underestimate the challenges of actually getting there.

"What we need to manage this transition are the frameworks that will support the right sort of investment."

The carbon paradox


Carbon, born inside stars, catalysed life on Earth — but lately it’s been getting a bad rap. This is carbon’s journey from cosmic wonder to global pariah. It starts at an (in)famous music festival in 1970.

By environment reporter Nick Kilvert
ABC Science
11 Jul 2022

A BEAUTIFUL MULTI MEDIA PAGE ON THE LIFE OF CARBON



CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
Former F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone facing fraud charge over $700m in overseas assets

Prosecutors say a long-running investigation led to the charge against Bernie Ecclestone. (AP: Luca Bruno)

Former Formula 1 boss Bernie Ecclestone has been charged with fraud over allegedly failing to declare more than 400 million pounds ($700 million) of overseas assets.

Key points
:

Prosecutors claim millions of dollars worth of assets were "concealed" from the tax office

The case is set to be heard in London on August 22

The former F1 boss was arrested in Brazil earlier this year for carrying a gun onto a plane


Prosecutors said Mr Ecclestone, 91, faced one count of fraud by false representation after a government investigation found he had failed to declare the assets to the British tax office.

Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs' Fraud Investigation Service director Simon York said the announcement followed a "complex and worldwide" investigation into the businessman's finances.

"The criminal charge relates to projected tax liabilities arising from more than 400 million pounds of offshore assets which were concealed from Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs," he said.

"Our message is clear — no-one is beyond our reach."

The first hearing in the case is set for August 22 at London's Westminster Magistrates Court.

Mr Ecclestone declined to comment when contacted by Reuters in Ibiza, but indicated the charge was not a surprise.

Bernie Ecclestone says he isn't surprised by the charge.(Reuters: Leonhard Foeger)

"It's something that has been talked about happening, but not in the way you said, something a little bit different to that, quite a while ago," he said.

"They've probably got all excited again. Let's see what happens."

The fraud charge is only the latest controversy to strike the British billionaire, after he was arrested by Brazilian police in May.

They said they had found a handgun in his luggage as he was trying to leave the country.

Mr Ecclestone acknowledged owning it but said he was unaware it was in his luggage. He was freed to leave after paying bail.

The 91-year-old has already come under fire for declaring he would "take a bullet" for Vladimir Putin. (REUTERS: Maxim Shemetov/File Photo)

He also caused offence and drew condemnation in June when he defended Russian President Vladimir Putin in a television interview as a "first class person" he would "take a bullet" for.

He later apologised, saying he was not defending the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

The Briton was ousted as Formula 1 supremo in 2017 when US-based Liberty Media took over the sport's commercial rights.

He maintains an office in London but now spends most of his time abroad, with residences in Switzerland and Ibiza as well as a farm in Brazil.

ABC/AP/Reuters