Monday, September 19, 2022

Hurricane Fiona rips through powerless Puerto Rico

HAVANA (AP) — Hurricane Fiona struck Puerto Rico's southwest coast on Sunday as it unleashed landslides, knocked the power grid out and ripped up asphalt from roads and flung the pieces around.


Hurricane Fiona rips through powerless Puerto Rico
© Provided by The Canadian Press

Hundreds of people were evacuated or rescued across the island as floodwaters rose swiftly. Rushing rivers of brown water enveloped cars, first floors and even an airport runway in the island's southern region.

Forecasters said the storm threatened to dump “historic” levels of rain on Sunday and Monday, with up to 30 inches (76 centimeters) possible in eastern and southern Puerto Rico.

“The damages that we are seeing are catastrophic,” said Gov. Pedro Pierluisi.

The storm washed away a bridge in the central mountain town of Utuado that police say was installed by the National Guard after Hurricane Maria hit in 2017. Large landslides also were reported, with water rushing down big slabs of broken asphalt and into gullies.

Fiona was centered 45 miles (75 kilometers) south-southeast of Punta Cana, Dominican Republic with maximum sustained winds of 85 mph (140 kph) on Sunday night, according to the U.S. National Hurricane Center. It was moving to the west-northwest at 10 mph (17 kph).

Fiona struck on the anniversary of Hurricane Hugo, which hit Puerto Rico 33 years ago as a Category 3 storm.

The storm's clouds covered the entire island and tropical storm-force winds extended as far as 140 miles (220 kilometers) from Fiona's center.

U.S. President Joe Biden declared a state of emergency in the U.S. territory as the eye of the storm approached the island's southwest corner.

Luma, the company that operates power transmission and distribution, said bad weather, including winds of 80 mph, had disrupted transmission lines, leading to “a blackout on all the island.”

“Current weather conditions are extremely dangerous and are hindering our capacity to evaluate the complete situation,” it said, adding that it could take several days to fully restore power.

Health centers were running on generators — and some of those had failed. Health Secretary Carlos Mellado said crews rushed to repair generators at the Comprehensive Cancer Center, where several patients had to be evacuated.

Fiona hit just two days before the anniversary of Hurricane Maria, a devastating Category 4 storm that struck on Sept. 20, 2017, destroying the island's power grid and causing nearly 3,000 deaths.

More than 3,000 homes still have only a blue tarp as a roof, and infrastructure remains weak, including the power grid. Outages remain common, and reconstruction started only recently.

“I think all of us Puerto Ricans who lived through Maria have that post-traumatic stress of, ‘What is going to happen, how long is it going to last and what needs might we face?’” said Danny Hernández, who works in the capital of San Juan but planned to weather the storm with his parents and family in the western town of Mayaguez.

He said the atmosphere was gloomy at the supermarket as he and others stocked up before the storm hit.

“After Maria, we all experienced scarcity to some extent,” he said.

The storm was forecast to pummel cities and towns along Puerto Rico’s southern coast that have not yet fully recovered from a string of strong earthquakes starting in late 2019.

More than 1,000 people with some 80 pets had sought shelter across the island by Sunday night, the majority of them in the southern coast.

Ada Vivian Román, a 21-year-old photography student, said the storm knocked down trees and fences in her hometown of Toa Alta.

“I’m actually very anxious because it’s a really slow-moving hurricane and time does not move,” she said. “You look at the clock and it’s still the same hour.”

She said she is also worried about whether the public transportation she relies on to get to her job at a public relations agency will be operating by the time she has to go back to the office.

“But I know that I’m privileged compared with other families who are practically losing their homes because they are under water,” she said.

In the southwest town of El Combate, hotel co-owner Tomás Rivera said he was prepared but worried about the “enormous” amount of rain he expected. He noted that a nearby wildlife refuge was eerily quiet before the storm hit.

“There are thousands of birds here, and they are nowhere to be seen,” he said. “Even the birds have realized what is coming, and they're preparing.”

Rivera said his employees brought bedridden family members to the hotel, where he has stocked up on diesel, gasoline, food, water and ice, given how slowly the government responded after Hurricane Maria.

“What we’ve done is prepared ourselves to depend as little as possible on the central government,” he said.

Puerto Rico’s governor, Pierluisi, activated the National Guard as the Atlantic hurricane season’s sixth named storm approached.

“What worries me most is the rain,” said forecaster Ernesto Morales with the National Weather Service in San Juan.

Fiona was predicted to drop 12 to 16 inches (30 to 41 centimeters) of rain over eastern and southern Puerto Rico, with as much as 30 inches (76 centimeters) in isolated spots. Morales noted that Hurricane Maria in 2017 had unleashed 40 inches (102 centimeters).

Fiona was forecast to swipe the Dominican Republic on Monday and then northern Haiti and the Turks and Caicos Islands with the threat of heavy rain. It could threaten the far southern end of the Bahamas on Tuesday.

A hurricane warning was posted for the Dominican Republic's eastern coast from Cabo Caucedo to Cabo Frances Viejo.

Fiona previously battered the eastern Caribbean, killing one man in the French territory of Guadeloupe when floods washed his home away, officials said. The storm also damaged roads, uprooted trees and destroyed at least one bridge.

St. Kitts and Nevis also reported flooding and downed trees, but announced its international airport would reopen on Sunday afternoon.

In the eastern Pacific, Tropical Storm Madeline was forecast to cause heavy rains and flooding across parts of southwestern Mexico. The storm was centered about 160 miles (260 kilometers) west-southwest of Cabo Corrientes on Sunday night, with maximum sustained winds of 50 mph (85 kph).

Dánica Coto, The Associated Press

SEE




https://www.marxists.org/archive/bordiga/works/1951/murder.htm

In Italy, we have long experience of “catastrophes that strike the country” and we also have a certain specialisation in “staging” them. Earthquakes, volcanic ...


https://selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/naomi-klein-the-shock-doctrine.pdf

Shocking Times: The Rise of the Disaster Capitalism Complex. 14. Shock Therapy in the U.S.A.: The Homeland Security Bubble 283.


https://www.versobooks.com/books/2254-disaster-capitalism

Disaster has become big business. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, ...

https://harpers.org/archive/2007/10/disaster-capitalism

Disaster Capitalism. Adjust. Share. The new economy of catastrophe. by Naomi Klein,. This article is only available as a PDF to subscribers. Download PDF ...

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell Ordered to Face Voting-Fraud Defamation Suit



Erik Larson
Mon, September 19, 2022 

(Bloomberg) -- MyPillow Inc. Chief Executive Officer Mike Lindell must face a defamation suit filed by a voting machine maker that was falsely accused of participating in a conspiracy to rig the 2020 election against former President Donald Trump.

A federal judge in Minneapolis on Monday denied MyPillow and Lindell’s motion to dismiss the suit by Smartmatic Corp. US District Judge Wilhelmina Wright said there was a “wealth of information” that could have tipped off the defendants that the conspiracy theory was false, including individual states’ election reports and public statements by election officials.

Wright said Smartmatic had reasonably alleged that Lindell’s false statements about the company were made with “actual malice,” a key threshold for a defamation claim to survive against a public figure, which under US law includes corporations.

Lindell’s lawyer, Andrew D. Parker, didn’t immediately respond to a message seeking comment.

Smartmatic, whose voting machines were only used in Los Angeles County in 2020, claims Lindell’s conspiracy theory has made its brand “synonymous with election fraud in the minds of members of the public and government officials.” A competitor, Dominion Voting Systems Inc., has filed similar suits against Lindell and others.

Lindell last week also had his phone seized by Federal Bureau of Investigation agents while he was in his car at a Hardee’s fast-food restaurant in Minnesota, where MyPillow is based. He later said on social media the search warrant for his phone was tied to a probe of a county clerk in Colorado accused of tampering with voting machines.
Colombia relaunches plan to buy fighter jets



José Higuera
Mon, September 19, 2022

SANTIAGO, Chile — Colombian President Gustavo Petro has reactivated the process to acquire new fighter jets to replace the country’s aging Kfir fleet.

Petro’s decision may come as a surprise given his stance earlier this year on the campaign trail, when he said the purchase of combat aircraft or other military hardware would not be a priority during his time in office, if elected.

Military sources in the capital Bogota, speaking on the condition of anonymity to protect their careers, told Defense News that the credit for Petro’s U-turn belongs to Gen. Luis Carlos Córdoba, the chief of the Colombian Air Force. They explained that Córdoba convinced Defense Minister Iván Velásquez about the urgent need to replace at least part of the Kfir fleet, which will begin retirements later this year, and Velásquez in turn persuaded the president.

Since 1989, Colombia has acquired 24 Kfir jets, made by Israel Aerospace Industries. To counterbalance the acquisition of Sukhoi Su-32 fighters by Venezuela, Colombia’s Kfir fleet underwent upgrades between 2009 and 2017 performed by IAI’s Lahav Division.

The last upgrade, to the C-60 standard, involved fitting Elta Systems’ ELM-2032 active electronically scanned array radar and a data link as well as integrating Rafael Advanced Defense Systems’ Derby weapon — an air-to-air, beyond-visual-range missile. IAI says that standard is equivalent to the F-16 Block 52.

Colombia’s modernized Kfirs are possibly the most advanced fighter jets with the most capable systems in service in South America. But the age of the airframes is taking its toll; between 2012 and 2014, multiple aircraft were lost in accidents, at one point grounding the entire fleet. Extensive maintenance support from IAI brought the aircraft back to service.

The Colombian government is now considering how it can afford to buy new fighters. The president is already pressing for investments in social issues, and about 25% of the country’s annual budget is earmarked to pay off debts.

Bogota-based independent defense and security analyst Erich Saumeth is skeptical.

“President Preto came into power making many promises about social development spending, and has a core group of supporters that are not friendly about buying military equipment. On the other hand, the Army and Navy also have need of modernization,” Saumeth told Defense News. “So either nothing will happen, or [there will be] a not-so-good, sort-of-mediocre stopgap solution.”

Colombia previously received offers of secondhand Eurofigher Typhoon and Dassault Rafale fighters, but the Air Force, which prefers single-engine aircraft, appears focused on Lockheed Martin’s F-16 and Saab’s Gripen. The government has already received offers of both new aircraft of the latest variants as well as secondhand, upgraded options.

One of the military sources told Defense News that “most likely a first batch of 12 aircraft will be procured” and that “secondhand offers of modern airframes with a large service life remaining and significant upgrade potential are surely to attract more interest than before.”



Moderna Gives WHO’s mRNA Hub Some Help, Pfizer Snubs Request



Antony Sguazzin
Mon, September 19, 2022 

(Bloomberg) -- Moderna Inc. has allowed its Covid-19 vaccine to be used in a World Health Organization effort to develop mRNA shots that would increase production and access for poor countries.

Afrigen Biologics & Vaccines, a South African biotechnology company working with the WHO, has used the Moderna vaccine in comparison studies in mice to test the effectiveness of its own shots, said Petro Terblanche, Afrigen’s managing director.

Demand for Covid shots has slowed across the world as more recent variants of the virus have caused milder illness, yet many people in low- and middle-income countries like South Africa remain unvaccinated and vulnerable to the potentially lethal disease. With Moderna’s help, Afrigen is aiming to develop a shot that may be manufactured by at least 15 production facilities around the globe under the aegis of the WHO’s mRNA Vaccine Technology Transfer Hub in Cape Town.

Moderna didn’t supply the vaccine directly. It allowed the vaccine to be provided by the French government after a request from the United Nations-backed Medicines Patent Pool, according to Marie-Paule Kieny, the pool’s chair. Pfizer Inc. refused a similar request because it didn’t regard the need as urgent, she said.

Moderna and the partnership of Pfizer and BioNTech SE have come under increased pressure to allow factories in poorer countries to produce their vaccines after the world’s richest nations raced to inoculate their populations while barely any vaccines were available in large parts of Africa. Pfizer’s shot is the most commonly used Covid-19 vaccine in South Africa while Moderna’s inoculation has barely been used on the continent.

More Support Needed

“Since the start of the pandemic Pfizer has received many requests to collaborate on studies and other initiatives from many different worthy sources,” Pfizer said in a response to questions. “Unfortunately, it is impossible to support them all and our focus remains on delivering as per our existing supply agreements with governments.”

Moderna declined to comment.

France has supported the mRNA hub, giving it 20 million euros ($20 million) in assistance so far, said Kieny. The WHO’s mRNA hub has a more ambitious plan, with the production of a vaccine designed by Afrigen to take place at factories in countries including South Africa, Argentina, Ukraine and Bangladesh.

The early-stage trials of Afrigen’s shot in mice produced “a strong immune response,” the company said. Moderna placed some conditions on the use of its vaccine in the studies, Terblanche said, declining to elaborate.

Still, Afrigen may need further assistance from Moderna or Pfizer, including allowing the use of vaccine for comparative human trials that are expected to start by May. That request is expected in coming weeks, Kieny said.

Ultimately the WHO plans to follow the production of a Covid-19 vaccine with an attempt to develop inoculations for neglected diseases that plague the citizens of poor countries such as tuberculosis, HIV-AIDS, some forms of cancer and hemorrhagic fevers such as Ebola, Lassa fever and the Marburg virus.
Schools across US hit with dozens of false shooting, bomb threats. Experts say it's a 'cruel hoax'




Jeanine Santucci, USA TODAY
Sun, September 18, 2022 at 4:00 AM·6 min read

Across the country, dozens of schools went on lockdown. Students and teachers hid in classrooms. Police searched campuses. Parents panicked.

Each time, there was no threat. Officials say there's been a wave of false reports of school shootings and threats of violence over the last several days. USA TODAY found at least 30 active shooter false alarms and threats made at schools last week.

Authorities haven't publicly said the incidents are related, but experts say these intentional false reports have similarities. Their origins can be difficult or impossible to trace, but waves of false alarms are often the work of disgruntled pranksters trying to disrupt school or malicious bad actors trying to sow fear. And such hoaxes seem to increase around this time of year with students returning to classrooms.

"A red flag... is when you start seeing a chunk of these very similar threats in multiple cities in one area or region or state, and then others in another state. It's usually a red flag for what they call swatting," said Kenneth Trump, a school safety expert.

"Swatting" is making a hoax call to law enforcement to deliberately cause a large police or SWAT team response. Sometimes, an individual does it to single out someone specific, but the calls can also be done in waves as a trend to seemingly random targets.

MORE ON SHOOTINGS: Mass killings database reveals trends, details and anguish in every US event since 2006

INCREASED VIOLENCE: Shots fired in US schools spiked dramatically last year, gun violence report finds
False school shooting reports in Florida, California and more

In Texas on Tuesday, Houston authorities received a call that said two shooters were rampaging Heights High School and 10 students had been shot. Police did a room-by-room search of the school. They found no trace of a shooting.

Similar false reports happened at several other schools in Texas and California that day.

On Wednesday, threats made on social media temporarily shuttered schools in the Thorndale Independent School District in central Texas, Eisenhower High School outside of Houston and a false shooting report put a Fresno, California high school on lockdown.

The same thing happened Thursday in Santa Barbara, California where another false shooting report was phoned in, and in Northampton, Massachusetts, where a school received a bomb threat on social media.

False shooting reports were also called in about schools in Florida, Arkansas, Oregon, Illinois, Kansas and Oklahoma.

Fear among students, parents during hoaxes


Seventeen-year-old Ray High School junior Amaris Sanchez talks on the phone outside the school after police responded to a false report of an active shooter on Friday, Sept. 16, 2022. The report prompted a lockdown before police determined it was false, and students were released early.

Amaris Sanchez, 17, was in English class at W.B. Ray High School in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Friday when the school went on lockdown after police got a call about an active shooter on campus. It turned out to be false.

“I was mentally preparing myself, you know, whatever happens,” Sanchez told the Corpus Christi Caller Times, part of the USA TODAY Network. “It was a very scary moment because you don’t know what was going to happen. I didn’t know at the moment if I was going to be OK.”

Belen Alaniz, a parent of two children at South Fort Myers High School in Florida where a false shooting report was made Friday, told the Fort Myers News-Press, part of the USA TODAY Network, she left work immediately when she heard about a shooting on campus.

"The first thought was leaving work and I didn't care," Alaniz said. "I told my manager, 'I'm leaving,' and I ran out the door. I didn't even clock out because that's how afraid I was."
FBI probing possible connections in slew of threats

Local FBI field offices in a few states are working with police to determine whether there is a connection between some of the threats.

“We’re working with local authorities and our field offices nationwide to determine if there is a link. Obviously, any hoax threat to a school can have serious consequences for students, teachers and others, as well as first responders, and can be prosecuted as a crime," said Laura Eimiller, a spokesperson for the FBI's Los Angeles field office.

HISTORIC HIGH: It's not just Uvalde, Texas — gunfire on school grounds is at historic high in the US

AFTER UVALDE: Texas school shooting report finds 'systemic failures' in law enforcement response

In the wake of the elementary school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, that killed 19 fourth-graders and their two teachers, schools and families across the country are on high alert and in a constant state of anxiety over school safety, Trump said. "People are on edge," he said.

Many of the recent false alarms have fallen into two categories, said Trump, who said he has no relation to the former president and heads the Cleveland-based National School Safety and Security Services.

In some cases, threats are made by members of the local community, oftentimes teenagers or young adults who are disgruntled with the school or who might be trying to pull a prank or get out of a test.

"They're not realizing that once you press send, you can't put the threat back into the smartphone," Trump said. "And then when the ton of bricks hits, as happens in many other teen bad decisions, in this case, you're getting significant consequences."

Those consequences can include suspension, expulsion, criminal prosecution and serious fines. Just last week, authorities say teens were charged in Michigan and Florida for making school shooting threats.

The other category of swatting threats comes from malicious outside parties that often have no connection to the schools or the local communities. They can be generated from anywhere in the country or even internationally.

"The FBI is aware of the numerous swatting incidents wherein a report of an active shooter at a school is made. The FBI takes swatting very seriously because it puts innocent people at risk," the FBI said in a statement to USA TODAY.

Hoax threats drain resources, traumatize students and staff

Students and parents reunite at South Fort Myers High School after a threat of a gun was called in Friday afternoon. Lee County Sheriff's Office declared that there was no active shooter after officers searched the school. It was declared a "swatting" incident.

The false reports of active shootings can traumatize students and staff. They also drain significant resources from schools and local authorities.

"Non-credible school hoaxes are a serious offense that Los Angeles Unified takes seriously. Threats disrupt the educational environment, increase stress levels, and interfere with law enforcement's ability to protect schools from real dangers. It also poses a serious risk to our community, draining resources and occupying the time of critical first responders," the Los Angeles Unified School District said in a statement after a hoax report of shots fired at Hollywood High School last week.

The swatting threats can also pose a serious risk of injury. In 2017, California resident Tyler Barriss made a swatting call reporting a fake hostage situation after arguing with a fellow gamer playing "Call of Duty." He gave an address of an innocent, unrelated person who police ended up fatally shooting during their response. Barriss was sentenced to 20 years in prison.

An uptick in these types of calls isn't unusual this time of year, Trump said. There's also a spike in the spring, and a wave of copycat threats in the wake of any mass school shooting. But the last several days have seen a higher number of incidents.

"I don't like to use the word prank," Trump said. "It's not really a prank that we're seeing, it's really a cruel hoax."

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Schools hit with fake shooting threats across US; FBI probes possible link

GOP Secretary of State candidate Mark Finchem denies hating Jews by being more antisemitic

EJ Montini, Arizona Republic   Mon, September 19, 2022 


Republican Secretary of State candidate Mark Finchem

Mark Finchem, the Republican candidate for Arizona secretary of state, has claimed again and again and again that rich Jews are financing his opposition.

But he says this does not make him antisemitic.

Finchem claims that rich Jews are directing the media.

But he says this does not make him antisemitic.

Finchem says, essentially, that if you don’t vote for him, rich Jews will control the government.

But he says this does not make him antisemitic.

Finchem gets called out and doubles down

Last week, as part of a column about a Finchem’s pal and conspiracy cohort, Kari Lake, the Republican candidate for governor, I noted Finchem’s latest antisemitic trope.

He published a tweet reading, “Democrat politicians on the ballot in Arizona are liars and deceivers. They want total control over you and our state. Their loyalty is to George Soros and Mike Bloomberg. They want Arizona to be like California. Do not be deceived.”

I might have pointed out another antisemitic tweet from the same day, in which Finchem wrote, “People say ‘oh don’t talk about Trump’ for the general election. I am a Trump supporter. I am endorsed by Trump. But I am also honest. Democrats & Independents – I will protect your vote. It is the guy who is funded by Soros you should worry about. He will sell you out.”

In response, the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Phoenix, tweeted,  “@RealMarkFinchem: your reliance on #antisemitic tropes to spearhead your campaign is an embarrassment to the majority of #Arizona residents.”

I believe that is true.

I’d also like to believe we’re better than that.

Oath Keeper insurrectionists are not patriots

Finchem, however, is betting on just the opposite.

He tweeted in response, “Calling out Soros and Bloomberg and their political objectives is not anti-Semitic. This is a political discussion, not a religious one. I love the Jewish people. I do not love Marxists who hate America. The gaslighting of patriots must end NOW.”

Finchem calling himself a patriot is almost as outrageous as him claiming not to be antisemitic.

Finchem is a proud member of the Oath Keepers, whose leader and others have been charged with seditious conspiracy in connection with the insurrection of Jan. 6, 2021.

Finchem was at the Capitol that day, mingling with the mob.

He is now spouting the lunatic conspiracy theory that former Vice President Mike Pence orchestrated a “coup” of Donald Trump. As if the election didn’t happen. As if every review and court case of the election found nothing that would change the outcome.

Finchem accuses Pence: Says Pence orchestrated a coup against Trump

Finchem says he needs to beat the 'deceiver'

The Oath Keepers, by the way, also are xenophobes, white nationalists, Christian nationalists and conspiracy theorists, with who knows how many other festering prejudices.

Patriots?

Ahhhh, no.

In addition, Finchem and Kari Lake are proud supporters of Republican state Sen. Wendy Rogers, an Oath Keeper like Finchem who shares the same sick tropes – the same sick beliefs – as Finchem.

Rogers called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy a “globalist puppet” of Soros and also shared a picture on social media of herself next to a dead rhino branded with a Star of David.

The day after the Jewish Community Relations Council called out Finchem for his antisemitism, Finchem doubled down on his antisemitism, adding a photo to a tweet reading in part, “I need to raise $15k by midnight to stop the deceiver who is bankrolled by billionaires Soros & Bloomberg. ...”

Supporting Fontes makes you a Marxist?

That so-called “deceiver” is Finchem’s Democratic opponent Adrian Fontes, whom Finchem says cannot be trusted to run a fair election.

This is the same Adrian Fontes who, as Maricopa County recorder, oversaw an election in 2020 in which Fontes himself was defeated. Fontes, a former Marine, has drawn to his campaign a number of longtime Republicans who have gone public with their support.

To that, Finchem tweeted, “‘Republicans’ who endorse Adrian Fontes are not Republicans, they are Marxists pretending to be Republicans, deceiving voters.”

So to review, according to Finchem:

Independent-thinking Republicans who are disinclined to support him are “Marxists.”

While he is not an antisemite.

Got it.

Reach Montini at ed.montini@arizonarepublic.com.

This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Mark Finchem denies hating Jews by being more antisemitic

TRUMP'S ATTACK ON FEDERAL WORKERS
Congress Blows Its Shot to Stop Trump’s ‘Deep State’ Revenge

Sam Brodey
Mon, September 19, 2022 

Photo Illustration by Thomas Levinson/The Daily Beast/Getty

In the final days of his presidency, Donald Trump quietly attempted what might have been his most brazen play yet to reshape the federal government in his image: He issued an executive order giving him the power to fire essentially any civil servant at will.

That attempt was thwarted by the election of Joe Biden. But in laying out a 2024 presidential bid and a White House comeback, Trump has vowed to enact that order again immediately, Axios reported.

Congress has the power to block him—or any other president—from executing those plans. But it’s increasingly looking like they won’t use it.

On Thursday, the House of Representatives passed legislation to codify civil service protections, with six Republicans joining all Democrats in voting yes. But in the Senate, where 10 GOP senators would be needed to vote in favor, the prospects for the legislation are grim.

You’re Going to Miss the Deep State When It’s Gone

For proponents of the bill, their window to change the dynamic is closing rapidly. If either the House or Senate flip to GOP control in this November’s elections—and at least one switch is likely—the bill’s chances of passage would drop dramatically.

That could clear a path for Trump, or any other like-minded president, to assert a level of control over influential policy officials not seen in centuries.

“What you’re talking about is politicizing the civil service and doing away with objective, impartial, nonpartisan government service… in favor of a 2 million-person workforce that is potentially more loyal to a politician than the Constitution,” said Walter Shaub, a former director of the federal Office of Government Ethics who is now a senior fellow at the Project on Government Oversight.

“That,” Shaub said, “should terrify people.”

It appears a critical mass of people on Capitol Hill, however, are not especially terrified. Although Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) was able to muscle the legislation through the House, insiders have taken note of how low-profile this push has been.

That dynamic has been starkest in the Senate, where the bill is yet to get a hearing in the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

While Republicans in that chamber have been more comfortable opposing Trump—and this bill is widely seen, fairly or not, as a shot across the bow to the ex-president—few are eager to take up the cause of federal workers, given long-running conservative gripes about the bureaucracy. No GOP senators are on record supporting the legislation.

Meanwhile, it’s unlikely any Democratic senators would oppose the measure, but very few have been raising the alarm over the threats to the civil service and ratcheting up the pressure to move the legislation. Leadership aides say the prospect for the bill’s passage is grim if Republicans don’t support the measure, a reflection of the political reality of legislating in an evenly divided chamber where passing most things takes 60 votes.

Roger Stone, Who Had His Ass Saved by Barr, Turns on ‘Deep State’ Attorney General

On the day the House passed its bill, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA)—the sponsor of the Senate companion bill—expressed optimism to The Daily Beast that the House’s movement could be infectious, but emphasized he didn’t have an update on the bill’s status.

“There’s a culture of the Senate that does not truly appreciate the threats to democracy right now,” argued Shaub. He made the case that Democrats don’t feel urgency because Biden is in charge and that Republicans “lack the imagination” to be concerned that another president, of either party, might pursue a path similar to Trump.

The sponsor of the House bill, Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA), said that the issue should be nonpartisan because lawmakers in both parties should want to assert the power of the legislative branch—intended to be the first among equals—to rein in any executive.

Connolly told The Daily Beast that while he doesn’t intend the bill to be a reaction to a particular president, it is a reaction to Trump’s behavior.

“What he showed, apparently, is that any president can do this,” Connolly said.

The emerging impasse on Capitol Hill over the legislation is in keeping with the legislative branch’s struggle, both during and after the Trump presidency, to assert its power to respond to the ex-president’s shattering of established norms.

Trump’s allies, for example, routinely tested whether the House would use its constitutionally endowed powers to hold accountable those who ignored or defied lawful congressional subpoenas for information. Only since the Jan. 6 investigation, after Trump left office, have lawmakers been willing to really flex that authority by holding several of his associates in criminal contempt of Congress.

The week the House passed its bill, lawmakers continued negotiations over changing the archaic process by which Congress certifies presidential elections—a process Trump sought to exploit on Jan. 6 to keep himself in power.

Trump Asked His Diet Coke Valet What He Should Do After 2020 Loss, Book Says

As with those issues, the particulars of Trump’s designs on the federal workforce can sound dry and technical. But he and his allies have been plainspoken about what they want to accomplish through executive order.

"We will pass critical reforms making every executive branch employee fireable by the president of the United States," Trump said at a March rally in South Carolina. “The deep state must and will be brought to heel.”

In October 2020, Trump signed an executive order that created a new classification category for federal employees called “Schedule F.” Employees classified as Schedule F would quickly lose protections making it harder to fire them, essentially making them employed at-will—namely, fireable at any time.

Trump’s intention, Axios reported, was to shift as many as 50,000 federal employees into the Schedule F category. That’s just 2.5 percent of the federal workforce, but it could be an influential slice, including career agency policymakers, regulatory enforcers, and decision-makers across the federal government.

If given the power, Trump could use Schedule F to fire important officials, from his White House to agencies such as the Department of Justice, for any reason he chooses. Axios reported that the plan is a centerpiece of Trump and his allies’ governing plans should he run again in 2024 and win another term in office.

Connolly, the author of the House measure, summed up the thinking of many by calling this prospect a “nightmare.”

The legislation, titled the Preventing A Patronage System Act of 2022, codifies current employment protections and essentially blocks the reassignment of federal workers in the existing schedules to any newly created schedule.

“This is a real issue, and a real risk,” Connolly said, “if you’re worried about authoritarianism, anti-democratic behavior.”

John Kelly Reportedly Bought a Book on Trump’s Mental Health

In arguing against the bill, Trump’s allies in the House leaned on a typical minority argument—that Congress has better things to do—and tapped into long-running GOP messaging that Democrats disproportionately value federal bureaucrats.

The lead Republican on the Oversight Committee, Rep. James Comer (R-KY), framed Trump’s effort as a well-intentioned campaign to improve “accountability” in the federal government by making it easier to fire poor performers.

But Republicans’ most emphatic arguments against the bill seemed to say the quiet part out loud. “President Trump sought to take on this bureaucracy and restore power to the people by draining the swamp,” Comer said. “We should all be in favor of policies making it easier to remove civil servants who refuse to follow the will of the voters.”

On the House floor, Connolly responded that Trump’s order “was never about removing employees who are performing poorly.”

Instead, he said, it was “designed to intimidate and remove career employees who dared to provide impartial advice that may be perceived as contrary to an administration’s political agenda.”

The first rank-and-file Republican to speak against the bill was Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), who came out of left-field by comparing the situation to the movie “Pirates of the Caribbean.”

“On the Black Pearl,” she said, “it has pirates on the ship that become part of the ship walls.” (“It’s the second one,” Greene helpfully noted, for those confused about which film in the aughts-era Johnny Depp swashbuckling trilogy she meant.)

The bill in question, Greene said, “will make employees in the executive branch just that, part of the building wall, making it impossible to get rid of them.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene Appears to Kick Protester During Mind-Numbing Gun Argument

Ultimately, six Republicans joined with all Democrats to pass the measure, a group that includes several retiring members and outspoken Trump critics.

Those numbers did not seem to portend a Senate groundswell. The Daily Beast reached out to the offices of three GOP senators who might be more open to considering the measure: Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME), Mitt Romney (R-UT), and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK).

Collins’ office referred The Daily Beast to a comment she previously made to local press, in which she stated that the top priority for the federal workforce should be getting employees back to in-person work in order to improve their service. The Maine senator did not weigh in on the bill specifically, but said she “would carefully review any plan to reclassify the status of thousands of federal employees and oppose blatant efforts to politicize the civil service.”

Romney’s office declined to comment; Murkowski’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

With election season in full swing, Congress has few days left this year to legislate, and its plate is full with spending bills to avert a government shutdown.

Lawmakers are holding out hope that there is a way to get the civil service protections passed—perhaps by attaching them to a must-pass bill—but most understand that this could be a long fight.

While a potential GOP takeover of Congress, and a Trump 2024 bid, are looming over the effort, Connolly stressed that the underlying issue is not primed to go away.

Democrats see Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a presidential aspirant for 2024 or beyond, as someone who could potentially adopt Trump’s attitudes on the civil service.

“I do not believe it’s an impulse that will go away, and there are other authoritarian figures potentially more lethal than Trump,” Connolly said. “We have to fix this in law.”

Read more at The Daily Beast.
Law will punish doctors for saving women's lives via abortion | Opinion


Chloe Akers
Mon, September 19, 2022 

The Tennessee trigger ban on abortion makes it a crime to terminate a pregnancy for any reason. There are no exceptions to the law − not for rape, incest or even in cases where the life of the mother is in danger. Instead, the law contains only a narrow affirmative defense.

As United States District Court Judge B. Lynn Winmill recently explained, “An affirmative defense is an excuse, not an exception. The difference is not academic. The affirmative defense admits that the physician committed a crime but asserts that the crime was justified and is therefore legally blameless. And it can only be raised after the physician has already faced indictment, arrest, pretrial detention, and trial for every abortion they perform.”

As it stands, physicians in Tennessee now face the possibility of prosecution every time they perform an abortion. And while the law does offer a narrow affirmative defense, this defense is available only if proven to a jury after arrest, during an expensive and burdensome trial.

Contrary to a recent suggestion by Stacy Dunn, president of Tennessee Right to Life, the impact of this law has nothing to do with its actual prosecution. Instead, the impact of this law, like all laws for that matter, turns on the possibility of prosecution.


Demonstrators hold signs and chant together in support of abortion rights as they march along Gay St. in downtown Knoxville during the Bans Off Our Bodies March on Tuesday, July 5, 2022.

It is simply the possibility of being arrested and going to prison that keeps folks from committing crimes. The threat alone is enough. The law recognizes this as the principle of general deterrence, a concept built around the idea that criminal conduct can be prevented through fear of retribution, i.e., prison sentences. To the extent fear is quite a strong motivator, it tends to work.


Hear more Tennessee voices:Get the weekly opinion newsletter for insightful and thought-provoking columns.

Of course, the concern here is that the criminal conduct deterred by this law is not something like robbing a bank or driving drunk – instead, it’s a medical procedure sometimes necessary to treat complications of pregnancy and keep women alive. The result is that we now live in a state where the mere existence of this law puts doctors in fear of performing this procedure, regardless of the circumstances, because terminating a pregnancy is now a Class C felony, a crime that carries up to 15 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

It is also worth noting that enforcing this law, while not necessary to achieve its deterrent effect, is not a choice to be made by what Dunn refers to as “rogue prosecutors.” In Tennessee, all district attorneys have a legal duty to prosecute all violations of the state criminal statutes. In fact, earlier this summer when asked about district attorneys who would not enforce the trigger law or make it a low priority, Will Brewer, legal counsel for Tennessee Right to Life, responded, “in order to effectively do their jobs they need to make sure these laws are prosecuted to the fullest extent.”

The bottom line is this: The law Dunn’s organization worked so diligently to create, a law ironically referred to as the Human Life Protection Act, criminalizes a medical procedure without exception. Sometimes this medical procedure is necessary to save a mother’s life. While the law does not need to be enforced to be feared, enforcement is not only required, but even endorsed by Dunn’s own legal counsel.

This law does not protect life. This law threatens life.

I just hope we can change it before it actually takes a life.

Chloe Akers is a Knoxville-based criminal defense attorney in private practice.

This article originally appeared on Knoxville News Sentinel: Opinion: Law will punish doctors for saving women's lives via abortion

How Roe v. Wade inspired this former Miss America to run for Congress: 'We need more women at that table'



In 2018, Cara Mund became the first Miss North Dakota to ever be named Miss America. Today, she’s gearing up to make history once again — but this time, as the first woman to represent North Dakota in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Mund, who announced her run in August, is running as an Independent, and says the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe. v. Wade is what inspired her to throw her hat in the ring.

“I grew up knowing my rights as a woman, and now, to potentially raise a young daughter in the future, knowing that her rights are going to be less than the rights that I have, I'm concerned,” Mund tells Yahoo Life. “We need more women at that table.”

Frustrated with the two-party system, the former Republican congressional intern secured more than 1,000 signatures to get her name on the November ballot as an Independent. "When you are upset with your government, when you're upset with your leaders, when you're upset with the political parties in your state, there needs to be an avenue," she says. "And so rather than pay to get on the ballot, I wanted to make sure I worked my way on the ballot."

After Mund announced her candidacy, the Democratic candidate Mark Haugen was pressured to drop out of the race, leaving a clear path for her to take on the Republican incumbent, Kelly Armstrong.

While North Dakotans typically vote Republican, Mund believes that many in her state are seeking common ground and alternative leadership, and she aims to be a voice for those who may feel unacknowledged by the major parties.

Miss North Dakota Cara Mund reacts after being announced as the winner of the 97th Miss America Competition in Atlantic City, New Jersey U.S. September 10, 2017.  REUTERS/Mark Makela
Miss North Dakota Cara Mund wins the 97th Miss America Competition in 2017. (Photo: REUTERS/Mark Makela)

“When the Roe decision came out, I felt like there needs to be someone willing to challenge the status quo. The Democratic candidate at the time was anti-choice, as well as the Republican candidate. So I didn't feel like my voice, my perspective, was being heard — and it wasn't just me, it was for women across the entire state. If I didn't do it, I didn't think anyone else would step up," says Mund.

Working as her own campaign manager and without the backing of a large fundraising machine, Mund knows her bid for Congress will be an uphill battle. Still, this isn't the first time she's used her voice to speak up against the powers that be.

Early on in her reign as Miss America, there was a shake-up of pageant leadership due to the leaking of sexist emails, leading to some friction between Mund and those in charge during the transition. “There was a lot of pressure. I knew everything I said and did had a larger purpose and it represented the people of my state. The leadership change happened in December, and it became very evident early on that I was expected to be a puppet," says Mund. "I was not okay with it."

Later, Mund would make public claims of being "bullied" and "silenced" by those including Board Chair Gretchen Carlson (who denied all charges). “I look back on my decision to speak out and I'm so proud," she recalls. "It was one of the hardest days that I've had, but also the moment where I think I really found my voice and got the courage that when I see injustice, I have no issue standing up for those who aren't being heard."

During that period, Mund hired a pro bono lawyer who she says helped her to realize the power of the law. In 2022, she graduated from Harvard Law school, and last summer she was studying to take the bar exam in North Dakota when Roe v. Wade was overturned.

“The Dobbs decision came down right when I was studying that part of constitutional law, so it almost just cemented it even further," says Mund.

Mund is able to find common ground with her opponent on some issues, such as opposing President Joe Biden's loan-forgiveness program. But on the topic of abortion, Republican Kelly Armstrong, who is seeking his third term, won't budge on his strong pro-life stance.

"He has stated that he is fully anti-choice and I've challenged him in a debate about our North Dakota trigger laws," says Mund. "I push back a lot on that, and he keeps pushing that it should be back to the states. But he voted against codifying it when most of the nation, I think, is pro-choice, and making sure that those decisions are between a woman and her doctor."

Just like when she was Miss America, Mund says she refuses be a puppet. But she's more than happy to be the voice for those in North Dakota who aren't being heard or have been kept out of the conversation.

"We need women in these spaces, and especially after the Dobbs decision, because if you're not at the table," says Mund, "you're going to be on the menu."

—Video produced by Olivia Schneider


Feldman: Indiana's abortion law from a doctor's perspective

Dr. Richard Feldman

This column’s intention is to give readers a look at what resulted from Indiana’s abortion legislation from a physician perspective; it is not meant to take a position on the pro-life and pro-choice debate.

This legislation is termed as one of the most restrictive in the country as it bans abortion from zero weeks gestation. But it’s not as restrictive as it could have been. It allows certain exceptions for protection of the health and life of the mother, fetal anomalies, and incest and rape.

Indiana’s abortion bill is the most consequential legislation enacted in memory. But unfortunately, it was passed in haste. Public testimony was cut short. And legislators should have given more time to engage with physicians and other health professionals to study the legislation’s ramifications thoroughly and thoughtfully.

The introduced bill was pretty much a done deal, only tweaked around the edges before passage. Legislators were largely deaf to the long procession of physicians who testified to the high potential for unintended consequences and who offered solutions to mitigate potential problematic outcomes.

According to the new law, abortions involving rape and incest must be performed at ten weeks gestation or earlier. Especially for pregnant children, more time is needed to identify the pregnancy due to delay in diagnosis from unawareness, hiding the pregnancy because of intimidation or shame, irregular menstrual cycles and denial and rationalization.

Although there may be confusion due to inconsistent bill language, the law allows for abortion throughout the entire pregnancy to protect the health and life of the mother. However, the legislation utilizing a standard of “reasonable medical judgment” for that determination is problematic, as it is open to interpretation. What is reasonable medical judgment? What conditions are legitimate risks to the mother? At what point is the disease severe enough for an allowed termination? Further, there needs to be a certificate with clinical documentation filed first with the hospital to justify the termination. I cannot find any provision for emergency situations demanding immediate action.

There is an exception for “the fetus is diagnosed with a lethal fetal anomaly” defined as a condition that with reasonable certainty results in death not more than three months after birth. “Reasonable certainty” is subject to opinion and clinical variability as is the life expectancy of a specific condition.

My above concerns largely result from inclusion of physician felony criminal prosecution. The abortion ban beginning at zero weeks gestation creates many more potentially unlawful situations. Physicians will be second-guessed and challenged on acting in a responsible, evidenced-based, good-faith manner by non-physicians, some with political or philosophical agendas. Physician accountability belongs with the Indiana Medical Licensing Board, not in criminal court.

Physicians may hesitate to act or withhold care in emergent situations, weighing their duty as a physician with criminal prosecution. Criminality should be a matter of intent and only for blatant and egregious violations. This will have a chilling effect on practicing obstetrics in such a punitive, adversarial, and restrictive environment. Maternity-care access and Indiana’s already high maternal/infant mortality rates will suffer.

Admirably, the General Assembly enacted companion legislation (Senate Bill 2) providing much needed funding, especially for low-income families, in support of healthy pregnancies, infants, children, families, and adoption. Allocations total $75 million with $45 million for establishment of the Family First Fund. More funding will be needed. Time will tell what impact this will have.

Commitment to pro-life should not end with the birth of the baby.

A former resident of South Bend, Dr. Richard Feldman is an Indianapolis family physician and is a past Indiana state health commissioner. Email him at richarddfeldman@gmai­l.com.

Dr. Richard Feldman (Photo Provided/Jim Barnett)

This article originally appeared on South Bend Tribune: A look at Indiana's abortion law from a doctor's perspective