Wednesday, October 19, 2022

‘Bad situation’: Soaring US dollar spreads pain worldwide


Strong Dollar Global Impact 
Workers gather as they wait for customers outside a secondhand car parts shop in the industrial area of the capital Nairobi, Kenya, Friday, Oct. 7, 2022. In a gritty neighborhood of Nairobi known for fixing cars and selling auto parts, businesses are struggling and customers are unhappy.
 (AP Photo/Brian Inganga)

PAUL WISEMAN, KELVIN CHAN, SAMY MAGDY and AYSE WIETING
Mon, October 17, 2022 

The cost of living in Cairo has soared so much that security guard Mustafa Gamal had to send his wife and year-old daughter to live with his parents in a village 70 miles south of the Egyptian capital to save money.

Gamal, 28, stayed behind, working two jobs, sharing an apartment with other young people and eliminating meat from his diet. “The prices of everything have been doubled," he said. "There was no alternative.''

Around the world, people are sharing Gamal's pain and frustration. An auto parts dealer in Nairobi, a seller of baby clothes in Istanbul and a wine importer in Manchester, England, have the same complaint: A surging U.S. dollar makes their local currencies weaker, contributing to skyrocketing prices for everyday goods and services. This is compounding financial distress at a time when families are already facing food and energy crunches tied to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

“A strong dollar makes a bad situation worse in the rest of the world,’’ says Eswar Prasad, a professor of trade policy at Cornell University. Many economists worry that the sharp rise of the dollar is increasing the likelihood of a global recession sometime next year.

The dollar is up 18% this year and last month hit a 20-year high, according to the benchmark ICE U.S. Dollar Index, which measures the dollar against a basket of key currencies.

The reasons for the dollar’s rise are no mystery. To combat soaring U.S. inflation, the Federal Reserve has raised its benchmark short-term interest rate five times this year and is signaling more hikes are likely. That has led to higher rates on a wide range of U.S. government and corporate bonds, luring investors and driving up the U.S. currency.

Most other currencies are much weaker by comparison, especially in poor countries. The Indian rupee has dropped nearly 10% this year against the dollar, the Egyptian pound 20%, the Turkish lira an astounding 28%.

Celal Kaleli, 60, sells infant clothing and diaper bags in Istanbul. Because he needs more lira to buy imported zippers and liners priced in dollars, he has to raise prices for the Turkish customers who struggle to pay him in the much-diminished local currency.

“We’re waiting for the new year," he said. "We’ll look into our finances, and we’ll downsize accordingly. There’s nothing else we can do.''

Rich countries aren't immune. In Europe, which was already teetering toward recession amid soaring energy prices, one euro is worth less than a $1 for the first time in 20 years, and the British pound has plunged 18% from a year ago. The pound recently flirted with dollar parity after Britain's new prime minister, Liz Truss, announced huge tax cuts that roiled financial markets and led to the ouster of her Treasury secretary.

Ordinarily, countries could get some benefit from falling currencies because it makes their products cheaper and more competitive overseas. But at the moment, any gain from higher exports is muted because economic growth is sputtering almost everywhere.


A rising dollar is causing pain overseas in a number of ways:

— It makes other countries' imports more expensive, adding to existing inflationary pressures.

— It squeezes companies, consumers and governments that borrowed in dollars. That's because more local currency is needed to convert into dollars when making loan payments.

— It forces central banks in other countries to raise interest rates to try and prop up their currencies and keep money from fleeing their borders. But those higher rates also weaken economic growth and drive up unemployment.

Put simply: “The dollar’s appreciation is bad news for the global economy,’’ says Capital Economics’ Ariane Curtis. “It is another reason why we expect the global economy to fall into recession next year.’’

In a gritty neighborhood of Nairobi known for fixing cars and selling auto parts, businesses are struggling and customers unhappy. With the Kenyan shilling down 6% this year, the cost of fuel and imported spare parts is soaring so much that some people are choosing to ditch their cars and take public transportation.

“This has been the worst,” said Michael Gachie, purchasing manager with Shamas Auto Parts. “Customers are complaining a lot.’’

Gyrating currencies have caused economic pain around the world many times before. During the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s, for instance, Indonesian companies borrowed heavily in dollars during boom times — then were wiped out when the Indonesian rupiah crashed against the dollar. A few years earlier, a plunging peso delivered similar pain to Mexican businesses and consumers.

The soaring dollar in 2022 is uniquely painful, however. It is adding to global inflationary pressures at a time when prices were already soaring. Disruptions to energy and agriculture markets caused by the Ukraine war magnified supply constraints stemming from the COVID-19 recession and recovery.

In Manila, Raymond Manaog, 29, who drives the colorful Philippine mini-bus known as a jeepney, complains that inflation — and especially the rising price of diesel — is forcing him to work more to get by.

“What we have to do to earn enough for our daily expenses," he said. “If before we traveled our routes five times, now we do it six times.”

In the Indian capital New Delhi, Ravindra Mehta has thrived for decades as a broker for American almond and pistachio exporters. But a record drop in the rupee — on top of higher raw material and shipping costs — has made the nuts much costlier for Indian consumers.

In August, India imported 400 containers of almonds, down from 1,250 containers a year earlier, Mehta said.

“If the consumer is not buying, it affects the entire supply chain, including people like me,’’ he said.

Kingsland Drinks, one of the United Kingdom’s biggest wine bottlers, was already getting squeezed by higher costs for shipping containers, bottles, caps and energy. Now, the rocketing dollar is driving up the price of the wine it buys from vineyards in the United States — and even from Chile and Argentina, which like many countries rely on the dollar for global trade.

Kingsland has offset some of its currency costs by taking out contracts to buy dollars at a fixed price. But at some point, “those hedges run out and you have to reflect the reality of a weaker sterling against the U.S. dollar,” said Ed Baker, the company's managing director.

Translation: Soon customers will just have to pay more for their wine.

____

Wiseman reported from Washington, Chan from London, Magdy from Cairo and Wieting from Istanbul. Cara Anna and Desmond Tiro in Nairobi; Mehmet Guzel in Istanbul; Krutika Pathi in New Delhi; and Joeal Calupitan in Manila contributed to this story.


Chapter 12: "Necessity" of Imperialism, and "Ultra-imperialism"

  1. Ultra-Imperialism | libcom.org

    https://libcom.org/library/ultra-imperialism-kautsky

    7/24/2005 · Karl Kautsky - Ultra-imperialism 'The article below was complete several weeks before the outbreak of the War It was intended for out number which was to have greeted the planned Congress of the International. Like so much else this Congress has been brought to nothing by the events of the last days. Yet although purely theoretical in nature ...

    1. Karl Kautsky - The Platypus Affiliated Society

      https://platypus1917.org/.../kautskykarl_ultraimperialism1914_NLR05… · PDF file

      Karl Kautsky 





India says Pernod delaying $244 million tax demand probe


Pernod Ricard's brand names are seen inside its India office in Gurugram


Tue, October 18, 2022 
By Abhirup Roy and Aditya Kalra

MUMBAI (Reuters) - Indian authorities have asked a court to quash Pernod Ricard's bid to halt proceedings related to a $244 million tax demand, accusing the French spirit giant of being a "habitual litigant" and conspiring to "defraud" the government, legal documents show.

The Oct. 3 Mumbai court filing by India's customs authority, which has not been reported previously, underlines the growing dispute between Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government and Pernod's local unit over how the company valued some of its imports for over a decade.

The customs authority says Pernod did so to evade full payment of import taxes.

The tussle comes when Pernod Ricard is facing business and regulatory stress in India, one of its key growth markets where it accounts for a 17% share. It has previously told Modi that long-running disputes over the valuation of liquor imports had "inhibited fresh investments" in India.

After India demanded back taxes from the maker of Chivas Regal and Absolut vodka in June, Pernod challenged it in court, saying the investigation should be put on hold as it relied on incorrect industry data, and the process was "neither fair nor reasonable."

In the 43-page October filing, India's customs authority said the French company was resorting to "delay tactics" by approaching a court for relief, instead of responding to the government's tax demand notice.

It accused the company of a conspiracy "to defraud the Govt. of India of its legitimate revenue."

Pernod has been "a habitual litigant and always attempts to abuse the due process of law," the filing added, referring to some previous tax demands Pernod challenged in India.

Asked for comment, Pernod referred Reuters to a previously issued statement, which said the company is actively working on demonstrating its position to Indian authorities and has "always endeavoured to act with full transparency and in compliance with customs and regulatory requirements."

It declined further comment due to ongoing litigation and because the filing by the customs authority wasn't public. The court case will next be heard on Oct. 20 in Mumbai.

The Indian investigation assessed Pernod India's import bills of liquor concentrates from a group subsidiary, UK-based Chivas Brothers, and found they were undervalued for years.

To compensate for the undervalued imports, Pernod paid "hefty" dividends to the group's holding company, Pernod Ricard in France, which also owns Chivas Brothers, the investigation found. Import duties on liquor concentrates are 150% while dividends attract lower taxes.

The long-standing tax disputes Pernod faces in India has led to business uncertainty - in July, the company wrote a letter to a federal tax authority saying the company was "facing significant business continuity challenges", asking for a resolution.

Last week, Pernod said its India CEO, Thibault Cuny, had stepped down due to health reasons.

(Reporting by Abhirup Roy in Mumbai and Aditya Kalra in New Delhi; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)
Explainer-What's driving Haiti's humanitarian crisis?


 Demonstrators block roads to protest fuel shortages, in Port-au-Prince

Tue, October 18, 2022 

(Reuters) - Haiti is facing a humanitarian crisis, with shortages of food, fuel and water causing catastrophic hunger, and the government pleading for military assistance from abroad.

WHAT IS CAUSING THE CRISIS?

The trigger for the current crisis is the blockade of a key fuel terminal by armed gangs that began in September. That has led to shortages of gasoline and diesel and halted most transport, in turn creating shortages of basic goods, including clean water.

WHO ARE THE GANGS LEADING THE BLOCKADE?

The blockade is being led by a coalition of gangs called G9, which controls areas in and around the capital Port-au-Prince. The group's leader, Jimmy "Barbecue" Cherizier, is a former police officer who has been the target of sanctions by the U.S. Treasury Department for his role in a 2018 massacre.


He and other gang leaders are considered the de facto authority in areas including Cite Soleil, a poor coastal town that has suffered brutal outbreaks of gang violence this year. It was also where the first cases were reported in an outbreak of cholera in October.

WHAT DO THE GANGS WANT?

The G9 on Sept. 12 dug trenches outside the main entrance of the Varreux fuel terminal to protest an announcement by Prime Minister Ariel Henry that the government was cutting fuel subsidies. Barbecue, who said higher fuel costs would harm the Haitian people, appeared in October in an online video at the entrance to the terminal demanding that Henry resign.

WHY ARE THE GANGS SO POWERFUL?

Haitian gangs have expanded their control over the country's territory since the 2021 assassination of President Jovenel Moise.

The killing, which involved Colombian mercenaries, created a political power vacuum. Henry has governed on an interim basis since, even though the constitution calls for both a president and prime minister.

Haiti was already in political crisis before the assassination, having failed to hold scheduled elections in 2019. It no longer has a functioning parliament because the terms of lawmakers have expired, but few believe an election can be held under the current circumstances.

WHAT HAS BEEN THE IMPACT OF THE BLOCKADE?

The fuel shortages have halted most economic activities.

Hospitals have either shut their doors or curtailed their operations because they cannot power diesel generators, which are necessary to maintain stable electricity in Haiti because the power grid is unreliable.

The United Nations says Haiti is witnessing catastrophic hunger, with more than 4 million Haitians facing acute food insecurity.

Civil unrest is on the rise, and anti-government protests have at times devolved into looting. Haitians report increased incidence of gun battles in residential areas that are waged between rival gangs or with police.

The gangs are using sexual violence, including against children and the elderly, in order to instill fear in the local population, the United Nations said.

HOW HAS THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY REACTED?

U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has proposed a "rapid action force" to confront the gangs and reopen the terminal, while the United States and Mexico have proposed a security mission that would be led by an unnamed "partner country."

That came after Haiti asked for international military assistance.

Allies including Canada and the United States have promised to provide security assistance to Haiti, but have not offered to send troops. The Bahamas has said it would send troops if asked to do so.

Most countries appear wary of military involvement.

A U.N. stabilization force that operated in Haiti between 2004 and 2017 faced intense criticism, including over its role in a deadly cholera outbreak.

(Reporting by Harold Isaac in Port-au-Prince and Brian Ellsworth in Miami, Editing by Rosalba O'Brien)
Retired military officials are finding high-paying jobs with the Saudi government and can make up up to 7-figure salaries working for other foreign governments: WaPo


Lloyd Lee
Tue, October 18, 2022 

Michael Flynn testifying on Capitol Hill on February 11, 2014.
 Flynn was one of hundreds of retired military personnel who 
took jobs from foreign governments.
Lauren Victoria Burke/AP

Hundreds of retired military officials took jobs in foreign governments since 2015, per WaPo report.

They often accept highly lucrative positions that pay up to seven figures in salary and benefits.

Some of the countries these veterans work for have committed human rights violations, per WaPo.


Hundreds of retired military officials took high-paying jobs in foreign governments, at times making up to seven figures in salary and benefits, despite how some of the countries have been accused of human rights violations, according to a report.

A new investigation by The Washington Post found that more than 500 retired military personnel have taken jobs with foreign governments since 2015, and a majority of the positions were located in North Africa or the Middle East, including consulting jobs for Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Defense.


The jobs are also highly lucrative, The Post found through a Freedom of Information Act request.

Australia's government, for example, offered former senior US Navy officials more than $10 million for consulting deals. In Azerbaijan, one retired US Air Force general was offered a consulting job with a pay of $5,000 a day.

In comparison, an active four-star general with more than two decades of experience receives up to $203,698 a year in basic pay, according to The Post.

Saudi Arabia, which has been repeatedly accused of human rights violations, has hired at least 15 retired US generals and admirals as consultants for the country's Defense Ministry, The Post reported.

One former Navy Seal was hired as a special operations advisor for $258,000 a year.

Saudi Arabia's offense against outside dissenters also has not stopped US military officers from taking work from the country.

In 2018, Jamal Khashoggi, a columnist for The Post, was killed inside the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul. The country's officials later admitted that Saudi agents carried out a "rogue operation" without the knowledge of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. However, the CIA determined that the crown prince ordered the assassination.

Still, dozens of military personnel have accepted jobs contracted from Saudi Arabia since Khashoggi's killing.

Retired general James L. Jones, who served as national security advisor during the Obama administration, has two Virginia-based consulting firms — Ironhand Security LLC and Jones Group International LLC — that have contracts with Saudi Arabia.

In an interview with The Post, Jones said that he was encouraged by the Trump administration to accept more contracts from the country's Defense Ministry. According to Jones, his companies have four such contracts, with 53 US citizens in Riyadh. Eight are retired generals and admirals, and 32 are former lower-ranking military personnel, The Post reported.

"Nobody ever came to us and said, 'Hey, we think you ought to pull out,'" Jones told The Post. "I don't know what the alternative would have been if we had pulled away. I was worried that (the Saudis) would possibly drift off to other relationships with the Chinese and the Russians, and I didn't think that would be very good."

Charles Wald, a retired four-star Air Force general, who accepted a job to work in Riyadh for one of Jones' firms said there was considerable debate on whether to stop working for Saudi Arabi after Khashoggi's killing.

"We asked ourselves, are we basically turning a blind eye toward immorality? Or supporting a legitimate government," Wald told The Post. The firm decided to stay.

Other military personnel has taken jobs in Indonesia or the United Arab Emirates.

Under the Emoluments Clause Restrictions, the Consitution states that retired US military personnel, which generally applies to those who served at least 20 years in uniform and are eligible to receive a pension, cannot receive consulting fees, gifts, jobs, or titles from foreign governments without expressed approval from Congress.

The Post found however that approval is almost always granted. Out of the 500 requests since 2015, about 95% were approved. The Post also reported that some people negotiated jobs with foreign governments during active service.

There is no penalty for violating the law and enforcement is rare, according to the publication.

One of the more prolific cases of a former US military officer being penalized for accepting fees from a foreign government was Michael Flynn, the former national security advisor to Donald Trump.

An investigation by the Defense Department found that Flynn received about $450,000 from Russian and Turkish sources in 2015, a year after he retired from the Army, according to The Post.

Flynn pled guilty in December 2017 for lying to the FBI about his ties to a Russian ambassador. Trump pardoned Flynn in November 2020.
CHILD BRIDES OK IN U$A
Idaho Supreme Court won't weigh legality of child marriage


Erin Carver stands outside her attorney's office in Boise, Idaho, Monday, Feb. 28, 2022. A legal loophole that allows parents of teens to nullify child custody agreements by arranging child marriages will remain in effect under a ruling from the Idaho Supreme Court on Tuesday, Oct. 18. The case arose from a custody battle between Carver and her ex-husband, William Hornish, who planned to move to Florida and wanted to take their 16-year-old daughter along. Hornish was accused of setting up a “sham marriage” between his daughter and another teen as a way to end the custody fight.

AP Photo/Rebecca Boone
REBECCA BOONE
Tue, October 18, 2022

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A legal loophole in Idaho that allows parents of teens to nullify child custody agreements by arranging child marriages will remain in effect, under a ruling from the state Supreme Court on Tuesday.

In a split decision, the high court declined to decide whether Idaho's child marriage law — which allows 16- and 17-year-olds to marry if one parent agrees to the union — is unconstitutional. Instead, the justices said that once a child is emancipated by marriage, the family court loses jurisdiction over custody matters.

The case arose from a custody battle between a Boise woman and her ex-husband, who planned to move to Florida and wanted to take their 16-year-old daughter along. The ex-husband was accused of setting up a “sham marriage” between his daughter and another teen as a way to end the custody fight.

It's not a rare scenario — all but seven states allow minors below the age of 18 to marry, according to Unchained At Last, an organization that opposes child marriage. Nevada, Idaho, Arkansas and Kentucky have the highest rates of child marriage per capita, according to the organization. Although minors are generally considered legally emancipated once they are married, they generally still have limited legal rights and so may be unable to file for divorce or seek a protective order.


Erin Carver and William Hornish divorced in 2012, and only their youngest was still living at home last year when both sides began disputing the custody arrangements.

Carver said she learned Hornish was planning a “sham marriage” for the teen to end the custody battle, and asked the family court magistrate to stop the marriage plans. Several days later, the magistrate judge agreed, but it was too late. The teen had already married.

The high court heard arguments in March, and Carver's attorney contended that the child marriage law is unconstitutional because it allows one parent to terminate another parent's rights without due process. Hornish's attorney, Geoffrey Goss, countered that his client had acted legally and followed state law.

In Tuesday's ruling, a majority of the Supreme Court justices said that because the marriage had occurred before an initial ruling was made, the family court lost jurisdiction. Once a child is married, they are emancipated and no longer subject to child custody arrangements, the high court said.

The justices also declined to weigh whether the law is legal under the state constitution, saying in part that neither side provided enough legal arguments on the matter. The high court did find, however, that the law was not clearly unconstitutional.

Justices Gregory Moeller and John Stegner dissented from the majority opinion, finding that the lower court could have done more to “address the outrageous actions of a father,” by making the initial order retroactive. That would have allowed Carver to seek an annulment of the marriage as the custodial parent.

“Father has not only made a mockery of our marriage laws, he has also exposed his 16-year-old Daughter to the potential life altering consequences of an ill-conceived and hasty marriage of convenience,” Moeller wrote in the dissent.

The Associated Press could not find contact information for Hornish, and his attorneys did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither Carver nor her attorney immediately responded to a request for comment.

Other Idaho families have been watching the case closely.

Ryan Small, a Boise man who has been embroiled in a similar custody battle, said he was disappointed by the ruling. Small was trying to keep his ex-wife from moving out of state with their son last winter when he learned the 16-year-old boy had been secretly married off to another teen with his mother's permission.

Small hasn't seen the teen since Nov. 15, 2021, and because the boy is considered self-emancipated, Small has little ability to track him down or bring him back to Idaho.

“I am disappointed that the Supreme Court decided to punt the issue of the constitutionality of the law,” Small said on Tuesday. “The role of a parent is to protect their child, and the court not taking up the constitutionality of the law will allow abusive parents to use their children as pawns to sidestep the protection of the court.”
'Powerful explosions' behind Nord Stream leaks, Danish police say


Nord Stream gas leak

Tue, October 18, 2022 
By Stine Jacobsen

COPENHAGEN (Reuters) - A preliminary investigation of damages to the two Nord Stream gas pipelines in the Danish part of the Baltic Sea shows that the leaks were caused by "powerful explosions", Copenhagen Police said on Tuesday.

Swedish and Danish authorities are investigating four holes in the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines, which link Russia and Germany via the Baltic Sea and have become a flashpoint in the Ukraine crisis.

Further investigations into the Sept. 26 ruptures in Denmark's exclusive economic zone will be handled jointly by Copenhagen Police and the country's Security and Intelligence Service.

World leaders have called the damages an act of sabotage but it still remains unclear who might be behind the detonations.

The Danish findings appeared to be similar to those of Swedish prosecutors, who said two other holes in the pipelines also seemed to have been caused by explosions and that the case was being investigated as an act of gross sabotage.

A section measuring at least 50 metres (164 feet) is missing from the ruptured Nord Stream 1 gas pipeline, Swedish daily Expressen reported on Tuesday after filming what it said were the first publicly released images of the damage.

Reuters could not independently verify that the images published by the newspaper were of Nord Stream 1.

Seismologists in Denmark have previously said they had registered tremors in the vicinity of the leaks measuring as much as 2.3 on the Richter scale and that the signals did not resemble those from earthquakes.

Danish police could not say when the investigation is expected to be concluded.

"It is still too early to say anything about the framework under which the international cooperation with e.g. Sweden and Germany will run, as it depends on several factors," Copenhagen Police said in a statement.

(Reporting by Stine Jacobsen, editing by Terje Solsvik and Ed Osmond)


Tuesday, October 18, 2022

Why the book bans and censorship? Those who rule want to crush knowledge — and freedom

Chris Hedges - Yesterday 

A student holds up a sign against banning CRT holds up a sign as members of the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School Board meeting© Provided by Salon

A student holds up a sign against banning CRT as members of the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School Board meet in Placentia, California, on March 23, 2022. Leonard Ortiz/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register via Getty ImagesThis article originally appeared at ScheerPost. Used by permission.

August Wilson wrote 10 plays chronicling Black life in the 20th century. His favorite, "Joe Turner's Come and Gone," is set in 1911 in a boarding house in Pittsburgh's Hill District. The play's title comes from "Joe Turner's Blues," written in 1915 by W.C. Handy. That song refers to a man named Joe Turney, the brother of Peter Turney, who was the governor of Tennessee from 1893 to 1897. Joe Turney transported Black prisoners, chained in a coffle, along the roads from Memphis to the Tennessee State Penitentiary in Nashville. While en route, he handed over some of the convicts, for a commission, to white farmers. The prisoners he leased to the farmers worked for years in a system of convict leasing — slavery by another name.

In Wilson's play, Herald Loomis, a convict who worked on Turner's farm, arrives in Pittsburgh after seven years of bondage with his 11-year-old daughter, Zonia, in search of his wife. He struggles to cope with his trauma. At a boarding house, he meets a conjuror named Bynum Walker, who tells him that in order to face and overcome the demons that torment him, he must find his song.

It is your song, your voice, your history, Walker tells him, which gives you your identity and your freedom. And your song, Walker tells him, is what the white ruling class seeks to eradicate.

This denial of one's song is instrumental to bondage. Black illiteracy was essential to white domination of the South. It was a criminal offense to teach enslaved people to read and write.

Related

The poor, especially poor people of color , remain rigidly segregated within educational systems. The backlash against critical race theory (CRT), explorations of LGBTQ+ identities and the banning of books by historians such as Howard Zinn and writers such as Toni Morrison, are extensions of this attempt to deny the oppressed their song.

PEN America reports that proposed educational gag orders have increased 250 percent compared with those issued in 2021. Teachers and professors who violate these gag orders can be subject to fines, loss of state funding for their institutions, termination and even criminal charges. Ellen Schrecker, the leading historian of the McCarthy era's widespread purge of the U.S. education system, calls these gag bills "worse than McCarthyism." Schrecker, author of "No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities," "Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America" and "The Lost Promise: American Universities in the 1960s," writes:

The current campaign to limit what can be taught in high school and college classrooms is clearly designed to divert angry voters from the deeper structural problems that cloud their own personal futures. Yet it is also a new chapter in the decades-long campaign to roll back the changes that have brought the real world into those classrooms. In one state after another, reactionary and opportunistic politicians are joining that broader campaign to overturn the 1960s' democratization of American life. By attacking the CRT bogeyman and demonizing contemporary academic culture and the critical perspectives that it can produce, the current limitations on what can be taught endanger teachers at every level, while the know-nothingism these measures encourage endangers us all.

The more social inequality grows, the more the ruling class seeks to keep the bulk of the population within the narrow confines of the American myth: the fantasy that we live in a democratic meritocracy and are a beacon of liberty and enlightenment to the rest of the world. Their goal is to keep the underclass illiterate, or barely literate, and feed them the junk food of mass culture and the virtues of white supremacy, including the deification of the white male slaveholders who founded this country.

When books that give a voice to oppressed groups are banned, it adds to the sense of shame and unworthiness the dominant culture seeks to impart, especially to children.

When books that give a voice to oppressed groups are banned, it adds to the sense of shame and unworthiness the dominant culture seeks to impart, especially toward marginalized children. At the same time, bans mask the crimes carried out by the ruling class. The ruling class does not want us to know who we are. It does not want us to know of the struggles carried out by those who came before us, struggles that saw many people blacklisted, incarcerated, injured and killed to open democratic space and achieve basic civil liberties from the right to vote to union organizing. They know that the less we know about what has been done to us, the more malleable we become. If we are kept ignorant of what is happening beyond the narrow confines of our communities and trapped in an eternal present, if we lack access to our own history, let alone that of other societies and cultures, we are less able to critique and understand our own society and culture.

W.E.B. Du Bois argued that white society feared educated Blacks far more than they feared Black criminals.

"They can deal with crime by chain-gang and lynch law, or at least they think they can, but the South can conceive neither machinery nor place for the educated, self-reliant, self-assertive black man," he wrote.

Those, like Du Bois, who was blacklisted and driven into exile, who pull the veil from our eyes are especially targeted by the state. Rosa Luxemburg. Eugene V. Debs. Malcolm X. Martin Luther King Jr. Noam Chomsky. Ralph Nader. Cornel West. Julian Assange. Alice Walker. They speak a truth the powerful and the rich do not want heard. They, like Bynum, help us find our song.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

In the U.S., 21 percent of adults are illiterate and a staggering 54 percent have a literacy level below sixth grade. These numbers jump dramatically in the U.S. prison system, the largest in the world with an estimated 20 percent of the globe's prison population, although we are less than 5 percent of the global population. In prison, 70 percent of inmates cannot read above a fourth-grade level, leaving them able to work at only the lowest-paid and most menial jobs upon their release.

You can watch a two-part discussion of my book "Our Class: Trauma and Transformation in an American Prison," and the importance of prison education, here and here.

Like Loomis, those freed from bondage become pariahs, members of a criminal caste. They are unable to access public housing, barred from hundreds of jobs, especially any job that requires a license, and denied social services. The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) estimates in a new report that 60 percent of the formerly incarcerated are jobless. Of more than 50,000 people released from federal prisons in 2010, the report found, 33 percent found no employment at all over four years, and at any given time, no more than 40 percent of the cohort was employed. This is by design. More than two-thirds are rearrested within three years of their release and at least half are reincarcerated.

You can see a two-part discussion on the numerous obstacles placed before those released from prison with five of my former students from the NJ-STEP college degree program here and here.

White members of the working class, although often used as shock troops against minorities and the left, are equally manipulated and for the same reasons. They, too, are denied their song, fed myths of white exceptionalism and white supremacy to keep their antagonism directed at other oppressed groups, rather than the corporate forces and the billionaire class that have orchestrated their own misery.


White members of the working class are equally manipulated. They, too, are denied their song, fed myths of white exceptionalism and white supremacy to keep their antagonism directed at other oppressed groups.

Du Bois pointed out that poor whites, politically allied with rich Southern plantation owners, were complicit in their disenfranchisement. They received few material or political benefits from the alliance, but they reveled in the "psychological" feelings of superiority that came with being white. Race, he wrote, "drove such a wedge between white and black workers that there probably are not today in the world two groups of workers with practically identical interests who hate and fear each other so deeply and persistently and who are kept so far apart that neither sees anything of common interest."

Little has changed.

The poor do not attend college, or, if they do, they incur massive student debt, which can take a lifetime to pay off. U.S. student loan debt, totaling nearly $1.75 trillion, is the second-largest source of consumer debt behind mortgages. Some 50 million people are in debt peonage to student loan companies. This debt peonage forces graduates to major in subjects useful to corporations and is part of the reason why the humanities are withering away. It limits career options because graduates must seek jobs that allow them to meet their hefty monthly loan payments. The average law school student debt of $130,000 intentionally sends most law school graduates into the arms of corporate law firms.

Meanwhile, fees to attend colleges and universities have skyrocketed. The average tuition and fees at private national universities have jumped 134 percent since 2002. Out-of-state tuition and fees at public national universities have risen 141 percent while in-state tuition and fees at public national universities have risen 175 percent.

The forces of repression, backed by corporate money, are challenging in court Biden's executive order to cancel some student debt. A federal judge in Missouri heard arguments from six states attempting to block the plan. To qualify for the debt relief, individuals must make less than $125,000 a year or $250,000 for married couples and families. Eligible borrowers can receive up to $20,000 if they are Pell Grant recipients and up to $10,000 if they haven't received a Pell Grant.

Education should be subversive. It should give us the intellectual tools and vocabulary to question the reigning ideas and structures that buttress the powerful. It should make us autonomous and independent beings, capable of making our own judgments, capable of understanding and defying the "cultural hegemony," to quote Antonio Gramsci, that keeps us in bondage. In Wilson's play, Bynum teaches Loomis how to discover his song, and once Loomis finds his song, he is free.

Read more

about the censorship battles of 2022
"Statewide book bans" are coming to Florida's classrooms, enforced by the far right

Irish republican party Sinn Fein asks Canada to halt trade talks with U.K.
Yesterday 

OTTAWA — An Irish political party pushing to unify the island of Ireland wants Ottawa to halt post-Brexit trade talks with Britain, arguing that London is undermining the agreement that brokered peace between Catholics and Protestants.



"It is the duty of friends to sometimes pull each other up, whenever they are behaving in a way which is not acceptable," said Sinn Fein member of Parliament John Finucane.

This week, the Belfast MP, who sits in the United Kingdom's House of Commons, travelled to Toronto and Ottawa to ask Canadian leaders for their help.

He wants them to nudge Britain to abide by the rules that have historically allowed seamless travel betweenNorthern Ireland, mainland Britain and the Republic of Ireland.

Sinn Fein operates in both countries. The party was once the political wing of the Irish Republican Army, a Catholic militant group embroiled in three decades of armed conflict with the British over the status of Northern Ireland, which is a region of Britain.

The conflict largely ended in 1998 with the Good Friday Agreement, which set out rules for the U.K. and Ireland to maintain peace, including an effectively invisible border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, which remains part of the European Union.

After Britain left the EU, the two countries negotiated an agreement that allows for customs checks of goods transiting in the sea between Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

The move avoided the need for a hard borderon the island, while annoying those who want to keep the region as a regular part of the U.K.

But this spring, Britain tabled legislation to curtail the border rules, which the European Commission argues violate international law.

The British government is also modifying human-rights legislation in ways that Amnesty International argues will violate the Good Friday Agreement, though London insists otherwise.

"We are dealing with a British government, through numerous examples, that seems to have very little respect for international law or indeed international agreements," Finucane argued.

Washington has cited those concerns in tapping the brakes on trade talks with Britain, while London has resorted to talking with individual American states as it tries forming post-Brexit trade links.

Meanwhile, Canada launched formal trade talks with Britain in March to replace the interim deal that followed Brexit.

But Finucane wants Ottawa to make those trade talks conditional on the U.K. respecting rules aimed at avoiding a reignition of sectarian conflict.

"It (should be) not even allowing a trade deal negotiation to get off the ground, if there's damage to the Good Friday Agreement," he said.

Trade Minister Mary Ng had no comment on his request.

"Canada will always support maintaining the integrity of the Good Friday Agreement," spokeswoman Alice Hansen wrote.

In a statement, the British government said its priority is to protect the agreement.

"Our focus has been, and will always be, preserving stability in Northern Ireland," wrote Ottawa high commission spokesman Tom Walsh.

"The U.K.'s preference has always been for a negotiated solution, but we have also said we need to resolve the situation in Northern Ireland soon," he wrote, saying this is the purpose of the legislation Britain tabled this spring.

Finucane noted that Canadian officials played a part in forming the Good Friday Agreement in the first place — including former Supreme Court justice Peter Cory and Gen. John de Chastelain.

"Canada has invested too much. The international community has invested too much to allow it to be undermined or indeed undone by the actions of the British government," he said.

Sinn Fein is also pushing for a citizens' assembly on what a united Ireland would look like, arguing that census data, electoral trends and polls suggest growing support for unity.

In May, voters handed Sinn Fein the largest share of seats in Northern Ireland's assembly, marking the first time a Catholic party has outranked Protestant groupings in the region.

Finucane said that's due, in part, to the chaos resulting from Brexit, which he argues has made it less appealing for the region to remain part of the United Kingdom.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 18, 2022.

Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press
CSIS worried convoy protests were being used as 'recruiting ground' for violent 'hardened elements'

Christopher Nardi - Yesterday



OTTAWA – Midway through the Freedom Convoy protests, Canada’s spy agency worried that they were being used as a “recruiting ground” for other causes but saw no sign of foreign threat actors supporting the movement.

A first glimpse into assessments of the convoy by Canada’s secretive intelligence agencies is contained in a summary of a call between municipal, provincial and federal government officials on Feb. 6, nine days after protests began in Ottawa.

The document was tabled at the Public Order Emergency Commission (POEC) Tuesday.

During the call, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) director David Vigneault said that at that point, the Freedom Convoy was “primarily a domestic issue” and that there was little to no evidence of influence by foreign actors.

But he did worry that the convoy had been infiltrated at protests across Canada — namely Parliament Hill, Quebec City, Toronto and Alberta — by “hardened elements” from “other” unnamed causes who “will likely use violence.”

“However, they are not actively participating or organizing it and are likely using this as a recruiting ground,” Vigneault is reported as saying.

The document also reveals CSIS was not seeing any signs of foreign funds flowing towards the convoy nine days into its arrival in Ottawa.

“CSIS has also not seen any foreign money coming from other states to support this,” Vigneault is reported as saying. “There is no foreign actors identified at this point supporting or financing this convoy.”
Trudeau accused Ford of 'hiding from his responsibility' during Freedom Convoy
Mendicino 'concerned' RCMP withheld badge numbers of officers who cleared Freedom Convoy protest

His private comments were made at a time of growing concern from experts and other government officials that some of the millions of dollars raised for the Freedom Convoy via crowdfunding websites such as GoFundMe was coming from foreign threat actors hoping to destabilize Canada.

By Feb. 6, GoFundMe had already frozen the fundraiser set up by convoy organizer Tamara Lich (which had topped $10 million) and begun refunding donors.

“We strictly prohibit user content that reflects or promotes behavior in support of violence — in this case, the organizer met our requirements and the fundraiser did not violate our Terms of Service at the time of creation,” the company said at the time.

In the meantime, a new fundraiser had also been launched on U.S.-based “Christian fundraising” website GiveSendGo.

Vigneault said FINTRAC and banks were already tracking the money being fundraised for the convoy and “making sure that it is not used for a non-peaceful purpose.”

He also noted that there was no “major organizing” of truckers coming to Canada from the United States at that time, and that the protest was mainly driven by domestic concerns.

“There is not a lot of energy and support from the USA to Canada,” the document says he noted.

Further intelligence assessments by CSIS of the Freedom Convoy after Feb. 6 have not yet been made public by the commission.

But 10 days after the Feb. 6 call and a few days after controversially invoking the Emergencies Act, Liberal ministers described border blockades in Ontario and Alberta as well as the Ottawa protests as foreign-funded, foreign-organized attacks meant to undermine our nation’s sovereignty.

“We have seen strong evidence that it was the intention of those who blockaded our ports-of-entry in a largely foreign-funded, targeted and coordinated attack, which was clearly and criminally intended to harm Canada, to harm Canadians, to interrupt vital supply lines, to idle our workers and close our factories,” Emergency Preparedness Minister Bill Blair told reporters on Feb. 16.

Blair, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and a slew of other Liberal ministers are also set to testify at the commission, likely in November.

With additional reporting by Bryan Passifiume.
Biden set to go to the mat with Big Oil over gas prices



Adam Cancryn
Tue, October 18, 2022 

The White House is intensifying a pressure campaign against the oil industry over rebounding gas prices as it tries to contain the political fallout of rising fuel costs just ahead of the midterms.

Top Biden administration officials in recent weeks have publicly warned companies against inflating prices. In private, their message has been even more direct. They’ve aired complaints to executives over their ballooning profits and threatened drastic new restrictions — such as limits on companies’ fuel exports — if the industry refuses to help ease the price at the pump, according to people familiar with those discussions.

Biden this week is expected to authorize releasing more oil from the administration’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve — continuing a months-long pattern aimed at heading off even more significant price increases.

The administration’s efforts to keep pump prices low underscore how intertwined the cost of gas and electoral fortunes tend to be for the party in power. They also illustrate how limited the policy options are for the occupant inside the White House.


A mix of factors outside the government’s control is driving fuel prices, analysts said. Among them are refinery outages in California and the Midwest, tightening European sanctions on Russia, entrenched supply and demand imbalances and the recent decision by OPEC to defy the White House and cut its oil production. So the White House has settled on a long-shot strategy of arm-twisting — publicly excoriating oil companies while privately pressuring their executives.


The offensive comes as the cost of gas trended up again nationwide, erasing weeks of declines that President Joe Biden had championed as evidence his economic policies were working. Though that trend abated over the past few days, the longer-term picture looks bleak, alarming officials who worry that fluctuating prices could cause eleventh-hour damage to Democrats’ midterm chances.

“If you own it on the way up, you own it on the way down,” said Tobin Marcus, a former Biden adviser and current senior policy and politics strategist at Evercore ISI. “They got some really good political mileage from highlighting the sharp improvements over the summer … and now must make the best of a non-optimal situation.”

The average cost of gas now sits at $3.87 per gallon, roughly 20 cents higher than a month ago. In more than a dozen states, prices have topped a $4 mark that Biden allies see as particularly troublesome for a Democratic party trying to sell voters on an improving economy.

Biden and his advisers have fixated on the political importance of the cost of gas, believing it shapes how voters feel about the economy. Absent immediate policy fixes, they’ve turned their fire on the industry, attacking oil companies for collecting record profits and suggesting they could single-handedly lower gas prices if not for their own greed.

Biden in late September directly urged oil and gas companies to slash prices, accusing them of profiting excessively off higher fuel costs, even as the global price of oil declined.

“Bring down the prices you’re charging at the pump to reflect the cost you pay for the product,” he said. “Do it now. Not a month from now. Do it now.”

More recently, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm singled out oil giant ExxonMobil after it objected to administration demands that the industry limit exports abroad in favor of boosting supply in the U.S.

“These companies need to focus less on taking every last dollar off the table, and more on passing through savings to their customers,” Granholm said, adding that ExxonMobil “misreads the moment we are in.”


In a statement, White House spokesperson Abdullah Hasan characterized the administration's aggressiveness toward the industry as aimed at "advancing the interests of the American people — whether that meant asking the industry for their ideas to increase oil and gas production, or calling them out for setting record profit margins at a time of war."

Senior Biden officials — including National Economic Council Director Brian Deese and top State Department energy adviser Amos Hochstein — have been even more persistent in private, pressing industry representatives repeatedly to find new ways to push down prices, people familiar with the discussions said.

Though the administration has always kept an open channel to the industry, the people familiar said conversations have grown blunter and more frequent of late — with officials increasingly convinced companies could be doing more.

That’s prompted protests from the oil and gas industry that there’s little it can do to single-handedly move prices, especially on the administration’s accelerated timeline. Energy market experts largely agree, noting prices are affected by a range of global dynamics and companies can’t produce more oil on a whim.

“You can yell at them all you want,” said Ryan Kellogg, an economist and professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy. “There’s no switch you can turn that’s immediately going to cause a bunch more oil to come out of the ground.”


But Biden aides remain undeterred. In public and private, officials have complained that oil refiners have been slow to restart facilities, pressing them to boost production as quickly as they shut it down when demand cratered early in the pandemic. They've also focused on the time it takes for lower oil prices to translate into cheaper gas for consumers, arguing energy companies and retailers should reflect the savings when oil prices fall just as fast as they hike prices when oil markets surge.

"We're still not up to pre-pandemic levels [of supply] and yet demand has almost gotten there," said one Energy Department official involved in the talks, adding that continued low inventories represent the core of the administration's frustration. "We really do need to understand what's holding back industry."

The more aggressive turn has produced little in the way of measurable progress lately, though an administration official said there has been some pick-up in refinery restarts this year. But it's further soured an already frosty relationship between the administration and the oil industry. One senior industry official, granted anonymity to talk candidly about the White House, questioned Biden aides’ understanding of the energy markets. The person summed up the intense focus on daily price fluctuations as the administration “asking the wrong questions and taking the wrong steps.”

Another industry official said that despite months of discussions, Biden and the industry share virtually no common ground on policies they believe could ease fuel costs.

“We appreciate an open engagement with the administration,” said Frank Macchiarola, senior vice president of policy, economics and regulatory affairs at the American Petroleum Institute. “But the administration needs to change its policies, and it needs to stop its rhetoric about price gouging, which has been debunked consistently.”


Still, the approach has thrilled some Democrats who long believed the White House should take a harder line with the oil industry over its outsized profits — a tactic they argued could also help deflect frustration with gas prices that voters might otherwise train on Biden himself.

Several Democratic lawmakers, as well as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, have called for imposing a tax on the so-called windfall profits that oil companies earn from high prices.

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), an early advocate for the windfall tax, told POLITICO he’s now working on a bill restricting refined gasoline exports after the Biden administration signaled it was open to the idea.

The White House has yet to fully embrace either a windfall profits tax or an export ban, both of which represent major interventions that experts and some officials worry could backfire and drive prices higher by destabilizing the oil markets and the delicate geopolitical landscape. Aides are wary, for example, that restricting exports could hurt European allies already facing high energy costs because of their sanctions on Russia.

Yet even if it doesn’t translate into new policy or make a measurable dent in gas prices, Democrats maintain that keeping pressure on the oil industry is worth the potential political payoff.

“They’re trying to keep it from being any worse than it has to be as a political matter between now and the finish line of the midterms,” Marcus said. “Political narratives function best when there’s an identifiable villain.”

Ben Lefebvre contributed to this report.