Friday, November 04, 2022

UPDATED
Twitter sued by employees amid mass layoffs

Mariella Moon
·Contributing Reporter
Fri, November 4, 2022

Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

Twitter is facing a class action lawsuit over its ongoing mass layoffs, which could potentially cut its workforce in half. According to Bloomberg, employees filed a class action lawsuit against the company in San Francisco federal court, arguing that Twitter's actions run afoul of the US Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. Under the labor law, companies with 100 or more employees are required to notify them of mass layoffs 60 days in advance.

The New York Times reported earlier that Twitter would begin layoffs and that around half of the company's staff members would be affected. In an email seen by The Washington Post, Twitter said that the layoffs are "unfortunately necessary to ensure the company's success moving forward." The company also told employees to stay at home today and to wait for an email. If they get one in their Twitter-owned email inbox, their job is safe. But if they receive the email in their personal account, that means they're being let go. Some people are reporting on the social network that they have already been locked out of their work emails and had been removed from the company's central Slack account.

The plaintiffs are asking the court to issue an order forcing Twitter to obey the WARN Act. They also want the court to prohibit the company from soliciting employees to sign away their right to litigate. Shannon Liss-Riordan, the lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said they filed the complaint "in an attempt to make sure that employees are aware that they should not sign away their rights and that they have an avenue for pursuing their rights."

Liss-Riordan was also the lawyer who handled the lawsuit against Tesla in June over layoffs that cut 10 percent of the automaker's workforce. Similar to this complaint, the plaintiffs back then argued that Tesla violated the WARN Act. Company chief Elon Musk, who took over Twitter a week ago, called the lawsuit "trivial" in a talk with Bloomberg Editor-In-Chief John Micklethwait. The court had also sided with the company and ruled that employees should negotiate with Tesla in a closed-door arbitration instead.

Twitter employees file lawsuit claiming mass layoffs violate federal law requiring notice


Brie Stimson
FOX NEWS
Fri, November 4, 2022 
A class-action lawsuit was reportedly filed against Twitter on Thursday on behalf of workers claiming the company’s intended layoffs violate a federal law requiring 60 days notice for employees.

A week after Elon Musk finalized his $44 billion purchase of the Silicon Valley-based social media platform, a letter went out to employees saying about half of the company’s 7,500-person workforce will be losing their jobs starting Friday.

"Team, in an effort to place Twitter on a healthy path, we will go through the difficult process of reducing our global workforce on Friday," Thursday's email to employees read, according to the Washington Post. "We recognize that this will impact a number of individuals who have made valuable contributions to Twitter, but this action is unfortunately necessary to ensure the company’s success moving forward."

Several top executives have already left the company amid the impending layoffs, including former CEO Parag Agrawal, Chief Financial Officer Ned Segal, and policy chief Vijaya Gadde.

ELON MUSK SCRAPPING TWITTER'S ‘DAYS OF REST’ FROM EMPLOYEE CALENDARS: REPORT

The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act requires large companies to notify workers two months in advance of planned job cuts, according to Bloomberg.

"We filed this lawsuit tonight in an attempt to make sure that employees are aware that they should not sign away their rights and that they have an avenue for pursuing their rights," attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan, who filed the San Francisco lawsuit said, the outlet reported.


Low-angle view of sign with logo on the facade of the headquarters of social network Twitter in the South of Market neighborhood of San Francisco Oct. 13, 2017.


ELON MUSK PLANNING TO CUT HALF OF TWITTER'S WORKFORCE: REPORT

She continued, "We will now see if he is going to continue to thumb his nose at the laws of this country that protect employees. It appears that he’s repeating the same playbook of what he did at Tesla."


In this photo illustration the logo of Twitter can be seen on a smartphone on March 10, 2022 in Berlin.


Liss-Riordan filed a lawsuit in Texas against Musk’s electric car company in June after it laid off 10% of its employees.

A Texas judge ruled in favor of Tesla, ordering employees to go through arbitration.

According to Twitter's merger agreement with Musk, laid off employees must receive severance and benefits on par with what they would have received before his takeover, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Twitter did not immediately respond to Fox Business' overnight request for comment.

Fox News' Paul Best contributed to this report.

Elon Musk's Twitter Hit By Bad News
The platform would not have respected the rules on mass layoffs.
THE STREET

Elon Musk has taken over Twitter.

The billionaire begins to make his mark on the social network, considered the de facto Town square of our time.

One of its first major measures is the launch of an austerity cure materialized by massive layoffs. These drastic workforce reductions start this Friday, November 4, according to an internal memo seen by TheStreet.


"In an effort to place Twitter on a healthy path, we will go through the difficult process of reducing our global workforce on Friday," the company said. "This action is unfortunately necessary to ensure the company's success moving forward."

In all, Musk plans to cut half of the jobs, or 3,700 jobs.


The decision is already the subject of controversy since a lawsuit has just been filed against Twitter. The plaintiffs, who have recently been terminated, accuse the company of failing to meet the legal notice period for mass layoffs.

The lawsuit was filed on November 3 by Emmanuel Cornet, Justine De Caires, Grae Kindel, Alexis Camacho, and Jessica Pan with the Northern District of California in San Francisco.


'Locked Out'


"As an early example of the anticipated mass layoff, on November 1, 2022, plaintiff Cornet was notified that his employment was being terminated effective immediately," the lawsuit said. "Twitter did not provide sixty (60) days advance written notice (or any advance notice at all) to plaintiff Cornet of his impending layoff. Nor did Twitter provide any severance pay to plaintiff Cornet."

The complaint continued: "Although not formally notified of a layoff, or given any advance notice, Plaintiffs De Caires, Pan, and Kindel were locked out of their company accounts on November 3, 2022."

Twitter was, and is, the complaint said, "subject to the notice and back pay requirements of the California WARN Act because Twitter is a business enterprise that employed 75 or more employees, as defined in the California WARN Act."

The Federal Worker Adjustment and Restraining Notification Act limits large companies to carry out mass layoffs without giving notice to affected employees at least 60 days in advance.

In their ten-page complaint, the employees ask that this complaint be filed as a class action suit. They are also claiming material damages and reimbursement of their legal fees.

They also point out that Musk is customary to violate the Warn Act. Indeed, Shannon Liss-Riordan, their lawyer, had already launched a complaint against Tesla in June when the manufacturer of electric vehicles had cut 10% of its workforce. A federal judge had, however, asked the plaintiffs to reach an agreement with Tesla in arbitration and not in court.

You can read the lawsuit here.

Twitter didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Top Executives Out


Musk is looking for ways to revive Twitter, which he acquired for $44 billion. If the social network is influential because it often determines the important issues, it generates on the other hand much less income than its rivals Youtube, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok which attract more advertisers.

The "Technoking" started by firing four top executives in the early hours of his takeover: CEO Parag Agrawal, chief financial officer Ned Segal, senior legal heads Vijaya Gadde and Sean Edgett.

There are the departures of other executives such as Chief Marketing Officer Leslie Berland, Chief Customer Officer Sarah Personette.

The billionaire also fired, unsurprisingly, the entire board of directors. He is currently the only board member but has indicated that it is only temporary.

The new boss also intends to remove other benefits, such as "days of rest", one day per month granted to all employees when the covid-19 pandemic hit. He also wants employees back in the office.

Besides the cost cuts, Musk wants to make people pay for using Twitter.

The platform will soon start charging for blue badges showing that an account has been verified. Basically the person is who they say they are. This blue badge was previously free. This will now be part of a monthly subscription of $8 per month which gives subscribers other benefits.

With Twitter layoffs set to start, employees worry about getting their severance

Jaimie Ding
Thu, November 3, 2022

Elon Musk reportedly plans to lay off about half of Twitter's workforce as part of sweeping changes since he took control of the social media company. (Jeff Chiu / Associated Press)

In recent years, big technology companies have dangled ever more generous benefits to entice engineers in a seller's talent market. Layoffs, a rarity in Silicon Valley over the last decade, have typically come with the consolation of generous severance packages often including months of salary and healthcare coverage.

Now that expectation is collapsing — and nowhere more rapidly than at Twitter, where thousands of employees are suddenly facing the prospect of joblessness in a newly chilly employment landscape.

Under new owner Elon Musk, the social media platform is preparing to terminate a large portion of its workforce — about half of its 7,500 workers, according to Bloomberg.

In an email shared with the Los Angeles Times, the company said all employees would be notified of whether they still had their job via email by 9 a.m. Friday. All offices will be temporarily closed and badge access suspended, and any employees at an office were asked to return home, the email said.

After the completion of Musk's $44-billion takeover a week ago, there has been widespread concern among employees about what severance benefits they might receive and how Musk might seek to reduce the expected payout.

The Twitter layoff news comes during widespread layoffs in the tech industry, with Lyft announcing layoffs of 13% of its staff and Stripe cutting 14% of its workforce.

Stripe announced a generous severance payout of 14 weeks plus more for longer tenure, as well as six months of healthcare, 2022 bonuses and accelerated stock vesting for laid-off employees.

It's unclear what benefits Twitter employees might receive, but in the event of a mass layoff, workers have some rights protected by both state and federal law, as well as the terms of the merger agreement between Musk and Twitter.

Musk, however, has a long history of pushing the legal envelope in matters involving regulations around how Tesla advertises its autonomous driving capabilities, an agreement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to get his tweets approved in advance, a public health order to close a factory during COVID-19 lockdowns and numerous other examples.

In his pursuit of Twitter, Musk ignored SEC disclosure requirements and tried to back out of a signed merger agreement.

Employees have some protection in the terms of that merger agreement, which states that Musk must provide severance payments and benefits to employees terminated within one year of the acquisition that are “no less favorable” than those applicable before Musk took over.

Ramish Saqib, who worked as a software engineer at Twitter for a year, said he was given one week's notice and 60 days of severance pay when he was laid off in July. Speaking on background, another former employee said the standard severance for large layoffs was 60 days with additional pay based on years of tenure.

If Musk doesn’t offer similar severance packages to employees laid off in the next year, they would have grounds to sue the company as intended third-party beneficiaries to the agreement, said Lloyd Greif, chief executive of Greif & Co., an investment bank that handles mergers and acquisitions.

“It’s a promise from the company to the employees that when Elon Musk signed on the dotted line to buy Twitter, he became the company,” Greif said. “They could bring an action against the company he now owns … to enforce that promise.”

Musk skimping on severance packages for laid-off employees would certainly invite class-action litigation against the company under elements of the California labor code meant to protect workers in these types of situations, Greif said.

Under the federal WARN Act, companies with more than 100 employees are required to give at least 60 days' notice if they plan to lay off more than a third of the workers at one location or more than 500 employees, regardless of the percentage, within a 30-day period. An employer that violates the notice requirement may be liable for back pay for the number of days less than the 60-day requirement. Companies often offer 60 days of severance pay in lieu of notice.

California’s WARN Act is even stricter, applying when there’s a layoff of 50 or more employees within a 30-day period, and the employer can be liable for civil penalties in addition to the back pay.

According to a number of sources close to Twitter, there has been widespread speculation among employees in recent days that Musk may try to use for-cause firings to deny severance to many terminated workers. Immediately upon taking over, Musk set aggressive deadlines for new feature launches; managers reportedly urged their teams to work 12-hour days and sleep in the office or risk being targeted for dismissal.

Musk already terminated several top Twitter executives last week, including its CEO and chief financial officer. By classifying them as for-cause firings, he is reportedly seeking to avoid paying compensations of $20 million to $60 million listed in the terms of the merger agreement.

In fact, the WARN Act does not distinguish between employees fired and those let go for cause, said Laura Reathaford, a California employment lawyer with Lathrop GPM. Companies are typically cautious about firing employees for cause during periods of large-scale workforce reductions and tend to handle such terminations as layoffs to avoid opening themselves up to legal scrutiny.

At the same time, WARN regulations are often “cumbersome and confusing” to enforce, making litigation over the act uncommon, Reathaford said.

Tesla, the electric-car maker that is the source of most of Musk's vast fortune, was sued in June by former employees who said the company violated the WARN Act by failing to provide 60 days’ notice when it laid off more than 500 employees at a plant in Nevada.

Several software engineers who were laid off during that time in a 10% reduction of the workforce received only one week’s severance and were told they were fired in secret meetings with their managers, according to reporting by Gergely Orosz in the Pragmatic Engineer.

Orosz said Tesla was trying to bypass the WARN Act by disguising the layoffs as performance-related terminations. Twitter did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Tesla does not maintain a media relations department or respond to media inquiries.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Elon Musk takes away 'days of rest' 

at Twitter in another major shift from 

Jack Dorsey's leadership style

Elon Musk, the owner of Twitter, is pushing for a harder-driving culture at the company.
Elon Musk, the owner of Twitter, is pushing for a harder-driving culture at the company.Carina Johansen/Getty Images
  • Elon Musk has started to impose his more demanding style on Twitter workers.

  • Under Twitter founder Jack Dorsey's leadership, the company implemented "Days of rest" in 2020.

  • Already, Musk has been demanding a "24/7" work culture as he moves to remake Twitter.

Twitter employees are losing additional days off in yet another change to their work culture under Elon Musk's leadershipaccording to people familiar with the matter.

On Thursday, employees began to notice that regular companywide days off — called "days of rest" — had been removed from their calendars, two people with knowledge of the company told Insider.

Meanwhile, the people said there has been "absolutely zero" communication from the company's top leadership since Musk's takeover — about days off or anything else. Employees had to ask their managers directly about the changes to their calendar, the people said. Eventually, individual managers confirmed that the "days of rest" were no more, they said.

A representative of the company did not respond to a request for comment. Bloomberg previously reported the days were being taken away.

During the first peak of the pandemic in 2020, Twitter implemented "Days of rest" under Jack Dorsey, the previous CEO and a cofounder of the company. He encouraged employees to avoid burnout and to set days every week where they had no meetings.

As part of that effort, the company also instituted one "day of rest" each month where the entire company took the day off. These were on top of any holidays or individual vacation days.

Musk's style of leadership is not one that looks to avoid burnout. At Tesla and SpaceX, workers are known to work grueling hours as the billionaire strives to hit lofty goals. The CEO has said in the past he has slept on Tesla's factory floor and worked 120 hour weeks to meet his targets.

Already at Twitter, some employees are working late and on weekends — and a few have even spent the night in the office to keep up with Musk's demands.

He's ordered people working on "Elon-critical projects," like getting a new subscription model for verification, to work "literally 24/7and in 12-hour shifts around the globe to get the work done on an incredibly tight timeline, according to an internal memo seen by Insider. Overall, people are expected to work at a "maniacalpace and pitch Musk directly with new "cool" ideas, if they would like to keep their jobs.

In another step away from Dorsey's leadership style, the billionaire also plans to end Twitter's remote-work policy, according to a report from Bloomberg on Wednesday. Musk made a similar move in June at Tesla when he ordered workers to return to the office full-time or quit. Twitter was one of the first major tech companies to declare a work-from-home "forever" policy in 2020.

Even with a new amount of effort and forced productivity, thousands of Twitter employees are expected to lose their jobs, along with those in the C-suite and many high-ranking managers that already haveAs Insider reported, more than 3,700 people have been selected at the company for layoffs, widely expected to take place on Friday.

Elon Musk is reportedly cracking the whip at Twitter.JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images
  • A Twitter employee shared a photo appearing to show his boss asleep on the office floor.

  • His boss said in response that her team was "pushing round the clock to make deadlines."

  • Insider previously reported that some staff have been asked to work 24/7 since Elon Musk's takeover.

A Twitter employee shared a photo appearing to show his boss asleep on the office floor just days after Tesla CEO Elon Musk took over the company.

The photo shows Esther Crawford, director of product management at the social media giant, wearing an eye mask and wrapped up in a sleeping bag on top of a sleeping mat.

"When you need something from your boss at elon twitter," Evan Jones, a product manager at Twitter Spaces, tweeted at around 2:00 a.m. New York time Wednesday.

Crawford replied, tweeting: "When your team is pushing round the clock to make deadlines sometimes you #SleepWhereYouWork."

It is unclear where the photo was taken. Jones' Twitter page says he is based in New York, while Crawford's says she is based in Los Angeles. Twitter has offices in all four US timezones.

Insider reached out to both Jones and Crawford early Wednesday morning, but they did not immediately respond.

Crawford tweeted Tuesday that she was "very proud" of efforts at Twitter "to quickly shift gears and bring this new vision to life."

Staff at Twitter have been clocking up much longer hours than usual since Musk took over, with his team assigning them big tasks on tight deadlines. Some staff at the company see the assignments as a test by Musk's team to see who works hard and worry their jobs could be on the line amid the looming threat of layoffs.

An internal message told Twitter staff working on changes to the company's verification process that "the expectation is literally to work 24/7 to get this out," Insider previously reported.

CNBC reported that Twitter managers have told some staff to work 12-hour shifts, seven days a week, while The New York Times reported that some managers slept at the office on Friday and Saturday nights.

Musk's $44-billion purchase of Twitter went through last Thursday night. The tech mogul had first offered to buy the platform in April after becoming the company's biggest shareholder, though he tried to back out of the deal a few months later, citing concerns about the number of bots on the platform.

Social media as we know it is over

Social media will never be the same

The world is still digesting the news that billionaire Elon Musk actually owns Twitter, but in fact, the development marks just the latest sign that social media as we know it has come to an end.

Twitter and the company formerly known as Facebook once dominated social media, but now both of them face uncertain futures. Twitter took on $13 billion in debt to complete the Musk deal. Facebook parent Meta (META) spent $10 billion last year on a pivot to the metaverse while its main Facebook app struggles to remain relevant to younger users.

Upstart social networks with sophisticated AI-powered recommendation engines such as short-form video site TikTok, unfiltered photo app BeReal, chat app Discord, and video streaming app Twitch are angling to stake their claims as the next social media companies to rule the world. That means companies that once defined social media could become irrelevant.

We’ve heard this story before. Remember Friendster, anybody?

“Let's not forget, MySpace and some of the other earlier iterations of [social media],” TECHnalysis president and chief analyst Bob O’Donnell told Yahoo Finance. “Those platforms that, at a certain period of time felt like they were inevitable and indestructible, all of a sudden faded over time.”

Meta and Twitter are struggling to figure out their business models

Both Meta and Twitter are grappling with crises that will alter the course of their businesses for years. Meta is transforming itself into a metaverse-first company, which cost the firm $10 billion in 2021 and nearly $6.5 billion so far this year. Meta expects those losses to “grow significantly” in 2023 before slowing down.

FILE - Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk arrives on the red carpet for the Axel Springer media award in Berlin on Dec. 1, 2020. Musk suggested in a Saturday, Oct. 15, 2022, tweet that his rocket company SpaceX may continue to fund its satellite-based Starlink internet service in Ukraine. But Musk's tone and wording also raised the possibility that the irascible Tesla CEO was just being sarcastic. (Hannibal Hanschke/Pool Photo via AP, File)
Tesla CEO Elon Musk is seemingly figuring out how to monetize Twitter via tweet. (Hannibal Hanschke/Pool Photo via AP, File)

There’s no guarantee the metaverse will take off. According to The Wall Street Journal, Meta expected to have 500,000 users in its main Horizon Worlds app by the end of this year. It’s since lowered expectations to just 280,000, since fewer than 200,000 people use the service.

Meanwhile, Musk is trying to figure out how to properly monetize Twitter, with ideas ranging from charging $8 to $20 per month for verified users, to growing its other subscription service effort.

ByteDance’s TikTok — which features short-form videos — continues to gain on Meta and leave Twitter in the dust. According to data.ai, TikTok grew at a faster rate than Meta, exploding by 45% from 1.1 billion to nearly 1.6 billion between Q1 2021 and Q1 2022. The larger Meta grew by just 5% in the same period.

Twitter has just 238.7 million monetizable daily active users, its measurement of users that it says see ads on the platform.

TikTok’s growth stems in part from its AI-powered For You page, a continuous stream of short videos that match up with users’ interests that Meta is trying to replicate on Facebook.

“TikTok, that’s kind of signaling the power of AI when it comes to getting your attention over more primitive approaches,” NYU Stern School of Business professor Vasant Dhar explained. “That's like a big force that's hitting these platforms pretty hard.”

“That coupled with the economic downturn is just kind of causing changes in both thinking about what they are really all about and also business models.”

Mark Zuckerberg debuted Meta's lates headset during its Meta Connect conference in Oct. (Image: Meta)

BeReal promises a new kind of social media experience where users share content with friends that’s meant to be spontaneous rather than the manufactured look of posts on Instagram and TikTok. That’s helped push the app’s popularity from 756,000 downloads in January 2022 to 14.7 million downloads in September 2022, according to SensorTower.

The world of social media is more fragmented than ever

When Facebook and Twitter began in 2004 and 2006, respectively, social media was still in its infancy. As Facebook exploded in users, jumping from 305 million monthly users in September 2009 to 1 billion three years later, Twitter became the go-to megaphone for high-profile figures.

But the new guard of social media platforms — TikTok, Discord, Twitch — offers tailored social media experiences and a chance to join a service your grandma doesn’t use.

“There are many more specialized platforms that are becoming available,” explained University of Chicago Booth School of Business professor Pradeep Chintagunta.

“For an individual it becomes how many platforms do I want to be on? And then also, what is the kind of information that I want to reveal about myself, or what are the kinds of posts I want to make?” Chintagunta added.

Social network trends resemble those in fashion. They take off, their popularity soars, and then a new generation of consumers decides those platforms aren’t cool anymore. And that’s exactly what’s happening at Facebook, Meta’s photo-sharing site Instagram, and Twitter.

According to an August 2022 Pew survey, just 32% of teens say they use Meta’s Facebook app, down from the 71% who said they used the app in a similar survey of teens conducted between 2014 and 2015.

While 62% of teens say they use Meta’s Instagram, 67% report using its arch nemesis: TikTok.

“Facebook originally was for younger people,” O’Donnell said, “and now it's for their parents.”

By Daniel Howley, tech editor at Yahoo Finance. Follow him @DanielHowley


THAT'S TODAY
Elon Musk announces Twitter mass layoffs to begin Friday

The reduction, which will be delivered by email, comes as the new Twitter CEO was speculated to cut as much as 50% of staff


Elon Musk will begin mass layoffs at Twitter, according to an email sent to staff on Thursday. Photograph: Justin Sullivan/Getty 


Kari Paul, Josh Taylor and agencies
Fri 4 Nov 2022 

Elon Musk will begin mass layoffs at Twitter on Friday, sharply reducing the social media platform’s workforce, the company said in an email to staff on Thursday.

“In an effort to place Twitter on a healthy path, we will go through the difficult process of reducing our global workforce on Friday,” said the email. The New York Times and Washington Post both reported on the layoffs and cited the internal email.



All employees will receive an email on Friday, the notice said. Those who will keep their jobs will get an email to their work account, those being laid off will receive a notification to their personal email. Employees were reminded not to disclose “confidential company information” on social media or with press.


General Mills latest to halt Twitter ads as Musk takeover sparks brand exodus


The layoffs come as Musk was speculated to cut as much as 50% of Twitter’s workforce, just days after becoming the head of the company he purchased for $44bn. That could mean thousands of jobs lost, as the company had more than 7,000 employees at the end of 2021 according to a regulatory filing.

Twitter said in the email to employees that its offices will be temporarily closed and all badge access will be suspended in order “to help ensure the safety of each employee as well as Twitter systems and customer data”.

Musk already fired several top Twitter executives immediately upon taking control of the company, including the chief executive, Parag Agrawal, finance chief, Ned Segal, and legal affairs and policy chief, Vijaya Gadde.

Musk’s job slashes come as part of a broader effort to make the company profitable after purchasing it for $44bn, a price he admitted constituted “overpaying”. To complete the deal, Musk put forward a combination of his own funding and loans of approximately $13bn, which he is now facing pressure to pay back.

On Thursday, Musk directed Twitter’s teams to free up $1bn in annual infrastructure cost savings by slashing funding for cloud services and servers. He has floated a number of ideas to make profit at Twitter, including a plan to charge for “verified” badges, and creating an “everything app” that would combine several platforms into one.

The Washington Post, citing an internal source, said the pending layoffs were anticipated to impact the company broadly, with cuts in marketing, product, engineering, legal, and trust and safety.


Experts in misinformation and civil rights advocates have warned that cutting Twitter staff just days before midterm elections in the US could have grave consequences, as the platform has already struggled with content moderation and will now have fewer resources.

“With the horrific attack on Paul Pelosi, we only just witnessed how social media conspiracy theories can result in real-world violence, yet Musk is dangerously speed-running through this process,” said Sacha Haworth, executive director at the Tech Oversight Project.

Twitter employees shared messages of support with one another on the platform on Thursday as layoffs loomed, many using the workplace hashtag #OneTeam.

On Thursday evening into Friday morning, Twitter employees began tweeting about being fired – with some saying they’d learned by being locked out of their work email, laptops, or the company’s internal communications app, Slack.

Just lost access to my Twitter email and Slack. This is all so unreal. #LoveWhereYouWorked #OneTeam— Morgan Bell  (@livelovegeek) November 4, 2022

#OneTeam forever. Loved you all so much,” Senior community manager Simon Balmain tweeted. “So sad it had to end this way.”

“Can a heart be full and broken at the same time?” the company’s head of inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility, James Loduca tweeted before removing references to Twitter from his Twitter bio.



The upheaval wasn’t just limited to Twitter’s US operations. In Australia, the company’s local marketing manager also tweeted on Friday “bye Twitter, it’s been a ride.”

Workplace morale has reportedly been suffering for months as the chaotic saga of whether Musk would purchase Twitter wore on, with employees quitting in droves.

Chaos, confusion reign ahead of Twitter layoffs

Sheila Dang and Katie Paul
Thu, November 3, 2022



(Reuters) - Fear and dread spread across Twitter Inc offices on Thursday as 7,500 employees from San Francisco to Singapore feared for job cuts that were planned to hit about half of the staff, according to current and former employees and message board posts shared with Reuters.

Since billionaire Elon Musk took over last week, he has kept employees in the dark. He has not addressed the staff or laid out his plans for the future of the company, leaving workers to study message boards, news reports and tweets by Musk and his advisers for clues about their fate, multiple employees said.

Managers have been forbidden from calling team meetings or communicating directly with staff, one senior Twitter employee said.

Twitter did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Employees have largely stopped posting on internal Slack channels for fear of reprisal from new bosses, with many instead taking to venting in encrypted messaging apps and the dedicated Twitter company channel on the app Blind, which provides a space for employees to share information anonymously.

"I'm really worried tweeps," a Twitter staffer wrote Thursday on Blind, which verifies employees through their work email addresses. Twitter colleagues often refer to each other as "tweeps."

The comment only scratched the surface of the dark and apprehensive mood inside the social media company now controlled by the Tesla Inc chief executive. Employees are waiting to hear if they will still have jobs on Friday, when layoffs are expected to begin, according to speculation among employees.

WAITING FOR THE AXE


Some Twitter employees have stopped taking calls or responding to emails from clients hounding them for information, because they did not know if they still had jobs, one employee told Reuters.

Others raced to meet deadlines by Friday U.S. time, when they expected the axe to fall, another employee said. One manager tweeted of a photo of herself sleeping on the floor of the office in a silver sleeping bag.

While some worried about annual bonuses or how they would be notified of layoffs, others rushed to apply for jobs at other companies. International employees fretted about the status of their visas. One employee sought advice on Blind on whether it was worth mentioning Twitter on their resume.

Employees who spoke with Reuters said they are learning about changes at their company by observing their work calendars and screenshots of discussion from managers, not from official communication from Musk or other leaders.

One employee confirmed that "days of rest," which are highly popular company-wide days off, have been removed from calendars for the rest of the year.

"Give us the details," a Google employee wrote in a Blind post directed at Twitter staff.

"It's worse than everything you're reading. Much worse," answered a Twitter employee.

(Reporting by Sheila Dang in Dallas and Katie Paul in Palo Alto, Calif.; Additional reporting by Arriana McLymore in New York; Editing by Jon Boyle)

Amid Twitter’s mass layoffs, don’t forget it began with a $150 million weed joke














Scott Nover
Fri, November 4, 2022

Did it for the lulz.

Twitter began laying off thousands of its employees on Friday, Nov. 4—possibly half of the 7,500-person staff—just one week after being bought by billionaire Elon Musk.

The layoffs are an emergency cost-cutting measure for Musk, by some estimates the world’s richest man, after executing a leveraged buyout of the social media company with $12.5 billion in bank loans. Paying off that debt will cost Musk about $1 billion annually, according to Bloomberg.


The layoffs are the byproduct of a lopsided deal. Musk first proposed, and eventually did end up, buying Twitter for $54.20 per share. At the time, the price was seen as high (38% above the stock price when Musk started buying up shares) but not outrageous. The only truly outrageous aspect of the price was that Musk chose to make a weed joke with the bid (420 is slang for marijuana.).


On this day of mass layoffs at Twitter, let’s calculate just how much that joke cost.

Musk weed joke cost at least $150 million

Let’s assume that, if had been otherwise uninterested in making a dumb weed joke, Musk would have bid a flat $54 per share to acquire Twitter. (Valuations in M&A often seem arbitrary, so perhaps $53, or even $50, would have been enough to succeed without the dumb weed joke, but we’re being generous). That pegs the cost of the dumb weed joke at $0.20 per share, to get from $54 to the $54.20 that Musk ultimately paid, dumb weed joke and all.

Twitter had just over 765 million outstanding shares. Multiplying the total share count by $.20 per share gives us $153 million. That’s the minimum number Musk spent on the dumb weed joke.

But Musk’s debt payments are not a laughing matter. He owes $1 billion in interest each year and just laid off half of the company to try to cut costs. If he didn’t round up to $54.20, it’s likely he could have saved hundreds of people’s jobs.

How many jobs could Musk have saved?


It’s difficult to divine the average salary of a Twitter employee. But since we’re already using back-of-the-napkin estimates, let’s not be deterred.

We do have data about salaries for H-1B visa applicants, which might reasonably represent a sample of Twitter’s total staff. Taking the average salaries for each listed position, according to the aggregator H1B Grader, and averaging those, we get a mean salary of about $185,000. Dividing the $153 million by the estimated average Twitter salary gives us 827 jobs.

Yes, what was once a $0.20 rounding error to make people laugh at his offer could have cost 827 people their jobs at Twitter.

Musk orders Twitter to cut infrastructure costs by $1 billion -sources



Thu, November 3, 2022 


By Sheila Dang, Paresh Dave and Katie Paul

(Reuters) -Elon Musk has directed Twitter Inc's teams to find up to $1 billion in annual infrastructure cost savings, according to two sources familiar with the matter and an internal Slack message reviewed by Reuters, raising concerns that Twitter could go down during high-traffic events like the U.S. midterm elections.

The company is aiming to find between $1.5 million and $3 million a day in savings from servers and cloud services, said the Slack message, which referred to the project as "Deep Cuts Plan."

Twitter is currently losing about $3 million a day "with all spending and revenue considered," according to an internal document reviewed by Reuters.

Twitter did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The steep infrastructure cuts could put the Twitter website and app at risk of going down during critical events when users are rushing to Twitter to consume and share information, such as during moments of crisis or major political events, the sources said.

The social media platform is exploring whether to cut extra server space that is kept to ensure Twitter can handle high traffic, one source said.

"(Musk) is willing to introduce that risk to meet these goals," the person said.

The second source described the proposed cuts as "delusional," adding that when user traffic kicks up, the service can fail "in spectacular ways."

Teams across Twitter are racing to present a plan to achieve the cost savings by a Nov. 7 deadline, according to one of the sources and the Slack message. Some employees have been ordered to work in the office every day of the week to meet the deadline, the source said.

Cost cuts could also come from reduced spending on Google Cloud services, the source said.

A spokesperson for Google Cloud to declined to comment.

(Reporting by Sheila Dang in Dallas, Paresh Dave in Oakland, Calif.,and Katie Paul in Palo Alto, Calif.; Editing by Kenneth Li, Matthew Lewis and Richard Pullin)

Tamara Lich told 'very controversial' Pat King not to go to Ottawa protest, she tells inquiry

Lich also described the protest in Ottawa as a 'love fest' and said she saw no evidence to support reports of harassment and intimidation ROFLMAO

Author of the article: Ryan Tumilty, Christopher Nardi
Publishing date: Nov 03, 2022 
 
Tamara Lich testifies at the Public Order Emergency Commission in Ottawa on November 3, 2022. 
PHOTO BY PATRICK DOYLE/REUTERS


OTTAWA – Convoy leader Tamara Lich said the massive amount of money raised for the Freedom Convoy became an enormous source of tension among protest organizers.

While most of the money organizers raised became embroiled in legal disputes and was either returned to donors or left frozen in escrow accounts, the convoy raised more than $24 million across several platforms.

Lich, who is still facing criminal charges, said she was under constant pressure over the money, with people wanting her to spend it on sound systems for the protests or hot dogs for everyone.

“I just felt like the vultures are circling,” she said. “I had a lot of people coming up to me and… telling me what I needed to do with the money, what I should do with the money, could be doing with the money,” she said. “It was very overwhelming.”

She said people became focused on her because they assumed she had control over the funding.

“They just saw $10 million over my head.”

She agreed with previous testimony that there were “power struggles” between groups involved in the convoy and felt like some were just looking for an opportunity for self-promotion. She pointed out a group called “Taking Back Our Freedoms” in particular.

She denied that she had any desire to promote herself.

ROFLMAO

RECOMMENDED FROM EDITORIAL

Controversial convoy organizer Pat King speaks at inquiry: 'What's a little bit of horns for ten days?'


Freedom Convoy raised $24M but frozen funds didn't get to truckers


Lich also described the protest in Ottawa as a “love fest” and said she had seen no evidence to support testimony by local residents, businesses and police about harassment and intimidation. “I can’t say I ever witnessed any of that.”


JUST LIKE FOX NEWS AND GOP JAN 6 EXCUSES


Previous testimony on Thursday gave more insight into some of the divisions between organizing factions.

Lich said there were tensions between herself and Pat King, whom she described as “very controversial.” She confirmed she had a tense conversation with King about his involvement and that she’d both told him he should not come to Ottawa and to “check his ego” after e claimed he’d organized the convoy alone

She described herself as “concerned” about King’s controversial rhetoric. He had previously said in videos that Prime Minister Trudeau might “catch a bullet” or spoke of a conspiracy that there is a plan to depopulate the Anglo-Saxon race.

“I was getting messages and phone calls from a lot of people that were concerned that he was involved,” she said.

Benjamin Dichter, a former Conservative candidate who became a convoy organizer, testified before Lich (who described him as a friend) and said he was frustrated by the decision making. (HE GOT ALL THE CRYPTOCURRENCY DONATIONS)

Dichter complained about a deal that some convoy members struck with the City of Ottawa to move vehicles out of residential areas and onto Wellington Street, in front of Parliament Hill.

Dichter said the deal was a bad idea and the people pushing it weren’t aligned with the protesters broader goals.

“I think they were focused on ending the protests and getting everybody out of the city as quickly as possible,” he said.

Dichter said Keith Wilson, a lawyer that had represented the convoy, led them astray and seemed more interested in scoring political points.

“I thought we were getting professional counsel. We got Pat King in a suit.”


The commission also heard from James Bauder, a convoy organizer who published a controversial memorandum of understanding, calling for the Senate and the Governor General to work with a citizens’ commission taking over from the government.

His proposal would have suspended all COVID-19 mandates and refund any fines people had paid for breaching COVID rules.

Bauder said he stood by the document, but ultimately no one was willing to sign on

“It means nothing because nobody signed it. nobody entered into it.”

Several other organizers have testified that they didn’t want anything to do with Bauder’s memorandum. He confirmed he had written it himself without any legal help.

He said he didn’t want any political parties involved and saw the Senate as the last hope for citizens.

“This was just strictly the people of Canada to sit with their Senate.”

But Bauder contradicted himself later when he saw a press conference where another organizer suggested the convoy could sit with opposition parties in a coalition government and said that would be a good idea.


FAKE COP
At 'African COP', continent's climate needs may go unmet


Patrick GALEY
Thu, November 3, 2022


It is being billed as the "African COP" but scientists and campaigners on the continent least responsible for climate change fear the UN summit that begins on Sunday in Egypt will once again leave them sidelined.

As the toll of climate-linked disasters mounts in debt-ridden countries across Africa, governments are demanding that rich polluters pay for the harm their emissions have already caused, known as "loss and damage".

"Historically, Africa is responsible for less than four percent of global emissions, but Africans are suffering some of the most brutal impacts of the climate crisis," said Ugandan campaigner Vanessa Nakate.

"We need financial support to cope with the loss and the damage we're experiencing across the continent. We need polluters to compensate for the destruction they've caused."

Richer governments rejected a call for a financial mechanism to address losses and damage at last year's climate talks in Glasgow and instead negotiators agreed to start a "dialogue" on financial compensation.

But as floods, heat waves and droughts sweep across the planet, hitting the most vulnerable hardest, activists are hoping the issue will take centre stage at COP27 in Egypt.
- African countries 'shortchanged' -

In Africa alone, extreme weather events have killed at least 4,000 people and displaced 19 million so far this year, a study by the Carbon Brief news service said last week.

The ongoing drought in East Africa is impacting the livelihoods of more than nine million people, and 1.4 million people have been displaced in recent weeks in the worst floods on record in Nigeria.

The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in February warned that tens of millions of Africans face a future marked by drought, disease and displacement due to global heating.

"Multiple African countries are projected to face compounding risks from: reduced food production across crops, livestock and fisheries; increasing heat-related mortality; heat-related loss of labour productivity; and flooding from sea level rise," scientists wrote in a dedicated chapter on the continent.

Chukwumerije Okereke, a professor in environment and development at Britain's Reading University, said that African nations would demand greater action from the polluting countries that are driving climate change.

"African countries believe they have been significantly shortchanged because they are the most vulnerable to the impact of climate change," he told AFP.

"Ultimately, the best way to stave off a more devastating impact of climate change on the continent is through rapid decarbonisation."

Countries agreed at last year's UN climate talks in Glasgow to raise the ambition of their emissions-cutting plans. However, the UN says those additional measures would result in a pollution cut of less than one percent by 2030.

The Glasgow summit also produced a new strategy for financing the energy transition, with a group of rich nations committing to providing $8.5 billion to coal-dependent South Africa over three to five years -- in grants and loans -- to help its climate plan and catalyse private investment.

This week the World Bank said that South Africa, one of the world's largest greenhouse gas emitters, will require at least $500 billion to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.

Susan Chomba, director of the African NGO Vital Landscapes, said governments should use COP27 to push green development investment on the continent.

"We do need development for our people and we need to use the resources that are within our reach on the continent," she said.

"The war in Ukraine has exposed the naked risk of overdependence on fossil fuels, even for the richest economies, but also the ripple effect that it is having on energy fertiliser and food prices on the continent."

- 'Fake promises' -


Progress at recent COPs has been stymied by a failed promise by rich nations to provide at least $100 billion annually to developing ones to help decarbonise while adapting to climate impacts.



"The key point that I'm really looking forward to is that COP27 is going to be a COP where we're going to be able to build up trust," said Ineza Grace from the Loss and Damage Youth Collaborative.

"All of those fake promises have never been accomplished and we are the generation that is kind of living in the hotspot. But we are also a generation that does not want to sit down and just continue to be victims."

Okereke said to expect "constructive ambiguity" around loss and damage finance.

"If they do set up such a facility then it might still be four or five years before the structure or the functionalities of such a facility is agreed," said Okereke.

"So poor countries should be aware that while having a facility is a victory, it may not necessarily translate to more dollars coming to them."

After six years, UN climate summit returns to Africa

The Associated Press
Wanjohi Kabukuru
Publishing date: Nov 03, 2022

MOMBASA, Kenya (AP) — The U.N. climate summit is back in Africa after six years and four consecutive Europe-based conferences.

The 27th annual Conference of the Parties of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change — better known as COP27 — will be held in the resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt and begins next week. It’s been branded as the “African COP”, with officials and activists hoping the conference’s location will mean the continent’s interests are better represented in climate negotiations.

Hosts Egypt say the meeting represents a unique opportunity for Africa to align climate change goals with the continent’s other aims, like improving living standards and making countries more resilient to weather extremes. Organizers expect over 40,000 participants, the highest number ever for a climate summit on the continent.

Ever since the conference’s first iteration in Berlin in 1995, the U.N. climate summit continues to rotate annually among the five U.N. classified regions: Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, central and eastern Europe, and western Europe. It’s the fifth time that an African nation has held the U.N. climate summit, with Morocco, South Africa and Kenya all serving as former hosts.

The first African summit, held in Marrakech in 2001, passed landmark accords on climate funding and made other key decisions on land use and forestry. The following three meetings on the continent had some success on issues like adapting to climate change, technology and sowing the seeds for the Paris Agreement in 2015 years earlier. Marrakech is also the last African city to host the event, having hosted a second COP in 2016, that aimed to implement some of the Paris goals.

The Paris Agreement, considered a major success of the U.N. climate summits, saw nations agree to limit warming to “well below” 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), with an aim of curbing it to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit).

And although experts don’t expect agreement between countries to reach the same scale as Paris, hopes on the continent are high for the upcoming conference.

Mithika Mwenda, who heads the Pan African Climate Justice Alliance, told The Associated Press that the summit “presents a unique opportunity to place Africa at the center of global climate negotiations” and hoped the conference “truly delivers for the African people.”

Mwenda said that the “special needs and circumstances” of the continent need to be considered as it attempts to both increase access to electricity for millions of people while addressing climate change and limiting the use of fossil fuels.

He added negotiations must prioritize how vulnerable countries will adapt to climate change, address compensation from high-polluting countries to poorer ones, known as “loss and damage”, and seek avenues for financing for both a move to cleaner energy and building resilience to climate change. Many developing countries look to the U.S. and much of Europe, who have contributed the largest share of emissions over time, to pay for damage caused by climate change.

So far, pledges by rich countries on climate finance, such as the $100 billion-a-year promise to help poorer nations meets their climate goals, have not been met. The Egyptian organizers said the summit should focus on how countries can implement pledges made in previous years.

“Africa’s hopes for COP27 is that there has to be progress on a new goal on financing,” said Jean-Paul Adam, who heads the climate change division at the U.N. Economic Commission for Africa, adding there needs to be “clarity as to what will be provided as grants and what will be provided as concessional loans and the remainder being dealt with through prudential private sector investment.”

The onus is also on industrialized countries to rapidly reduce emissions so that the global climate goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius can be achieved, Mwenda said. African countries account for just 3% of total global greenhouse gas emissions but experts say they are highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change in large part because they lack the ability to quickly adapt to the warming climate.

The climate conference will be a real test of world leaders’ commitment to addressing climate change, said Landry Ninteretse, regional director for the environmental group 350Africa.org.

“We are tired of years of empty talk and broken promises,” said Ninteretse. “We are now demanding nothing else but robust funding mechanisms that address loss and damage in a fair, accessible and transparent way.”

Ninteretse agreed that “the biggest emitters must commit to rapidly cut emissions” and “help the nations most vulnerable to climate change” by financing climate initiatives.

Past COPs have seen disagreements and hardline positions emerge as national interests clash, a concern for those hoping tangible results will come out of the negotiations.

“The discussions tend to be protracted, uncompromising and acrimonious at times,” said Mwenda, a veteran of the climate negotiations circuit. “But in 2015, the world ratified the Paris Agreement, which was a major milestone.”

But the success of the COP in Paris was the exception, rather than the rule, experts say, with a lot of work still to do to address climate change.

“Negotiations have lasted three decades but the impacts of the climate crisis, manifested by floods, droughts, among other extremes, persist,” Mwenda said.

——

Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP’s climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.