Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Oslo is long dead. Time to revive the PLO


Kareem Youssef and Mishlin Mekleh
10 November 2022


Demonstrations against the Palestinian Authority over the death in PA custody of Nizar Banat in 2021 STRAPA images

The Oslo accords were signed 29 years ago, on 13 September 1993. The Palestinian Authority, its main manifestation, has attempted and failed for nearly three decades to contain the Palestinian people’s resistance and struggle for national liberation.

Palestine’s enemy today is not only Israel and its US backers, but also those who are rewarded for complying with Oslo: the Palestinian Authority, those who take money from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and the diplomatic and lobby missions – like the Muslim Leadership Initiative – that reflect Zionist aspirations.

From the Jordanian monarchy and US-funded Egyptian leadership to the treachery of Gulf countries and big Arab capitalists, normalization in a post-Oslo world is a concept and practice rejected by Palestinian fighters, organizers and activists in the homeland and diaspora.

These different forces normalize the existence of Israel and the “two-state” concession plan as envisioned by Oslo. Those who cling to the futile “two-state solution,” and believe a Zionist, settler-colonial entity can reform and thus become some kind of “normal” partner of Palestinians and Arabs, must be isolated and defeated. These normalizers help silence, arrest, assassinate and surveil members of the Palestine liberation movement and our allies, per the Oslo security protocol drawn up by Zionists and the US.

The betrayal by Yasser Arafat and those around him at Oslo – keeping negotiators in Madrid in the dark over the secret talks – manifested into a public “peace” initiative that abandoned the Palestinian people after the sacrifices and steadfastness in Lebanon in the 1970s and early ‘80s, and the first intifada of the late 1980s and early 1990s. But the fight for liberation, from the river to the sea, continues despite the Oslo-born PA.

The constants

Palestinians and Arabs have the right to resist military occupation and settler-colonialism, including by armed resistance. The Palestine liberation struggle is committed to the thawabet (“constants”), which truly unifies the movement and are today maintained by the coordinated resistance in Palestine and support from the entirety of the diaspora. These thawabet are:

1) Self-determination and independence for the Palestinian people from the river to the sea, with Jerusalem as our indivisible capital;

2) The non-negotiable Right of Return (including restitution and reparations) for all Palestinian refugees and their descendants to the homes and lands they were exiled from since the beginning of Zionist colonization, in 1947-1948, and again in 1967;

3) The right of resistance in all its forms to end the colonization and occupation of all Palestinian and Arab lands.

Palestinian martyrs, prisoners and refugees bear the brunt of sell-out Oslo policies, which laid the groundwork for the especially shameless “security coordination” between Israel and the PA. This coordination targets our own people, including Bassel al-Araj, who openly decried the PA’s treachery and was assassinated by the Israelis in 2017.

PA thugs did the deed themselves when Nizar Banat, a prominent and popular leader who amplified anti-corruption and anti-normalization demands, was killed last year.

Hundreds of Palestinians in the homeland rallied for justice for Banat and were met with batons and other violence by the PA police and “security forces.” The US Palestinian Community Network (USPCN) is currently one of a number of US-based organizations that are in the leadership of an international campaign to ensure accountability for Nizar’s murder.

When Al Jazeera journalist and US citizen Shireen Abu Akleh was murdered by the Israelis in Jenin in May of this year, all of the contradictions of Oslo came to the fore once again.
Security collusion

Except under exceptional circumstances, the agreement bans Israel from entering “Area A,” (which constitutes approximately 18 percent of the land of the West Bank) and is ostensibly under full civilian and security control of the PA). But Israel ignores this and attacks Palestinians whenever and wherever it wants.

Israel has brazenly ignored its responsibilities within the agreement for decades, but the PA continues to function as if Oslo is binding. The PA did not and could not protect Abu Akleh. And the fight for justice and accountability in the international arena and in the US Congress is being fought mostly by her family and advocates.

The PA’s security apparatus, in collusion with Israel and the US, also targets student organizers. Students in Hebron, Birzeit, Nablus and other places have been abducted and imprisoned by PA police, and it is clearly Oslo and security coordination that is the source of the repression.

The PA sometimes even delivers Palestinian revolutionaries to Israel, as we have seen over many years in, among many examples, from the prominent case of Ahmad Saadat, to, just recently in September, when two Palestinians – one of whom is high on Israel’s “wanted list” – were arrested by the PA in Nablus. Palestinians there responded to this arrest by confronting the PA police, which shot and killed a protester.

The security coordination between Israel and the PA feeds into Israel’s colonial political prisoner system, where any Palestinian can be jailed without charge and tried before a military court, a tool used regularly to target influential organizers, create fear and trauma, and fracture the grassroots resistance movement.

A number of institutions in the US have initiated and supported campaigns to advocate for the release of abducted political prisoners like Khalida Jarrar, Khitam Saafin, Ata Khattab, and Ubai Aboudi, and children like Ahmad Manasra, while also championing hunger strikers like Khalil Awawdeh and Hisham Abu Hawash.

Some of these prisoners are leaders of grassroots institutions – such as the six recently designated as “terrorist organizations” by Israel – that organize to create a reality independent of Zionism and corrupt PA influence.

Oslo also created conditions for economic partnerships between Israel and the PA. These settler-colonial investments favor a class of Palestinians that operates to control and exploit the working class masses. Oslo left the PA almost entirely financially reliant on international donors and Israeli tax collections, and thus vulnerable to donor sentiment and Israel’s good graces. Not surprisingly, this has caused anything from food insecurity and monopolizing capital to exposing Palestinian villages like Birzeit to toxic waste and hazardous working conditions.

Rejecting the PA

PA agents for Oslo have been active in the US for years, but many organizations have rejected PA attempts to engage them in dialogue.

Last year, USPCN publicly called out a coalition effort that was ostensibly formed to unite Palestinians in the US, but ultimately exposed as a front for the PA. Also last year, a PA initiative to revive the General Union of Palestinian Students (GUPS) was rejected by Palestinian students in the US, who exposed it as an attempt to detract from their already-successful organizing outside of the PA’s influence. (For the sake of clarity, there is a GUPS at San Francisco State University that has been active for decades, and has absolutely no connection to the PA.)

In addition, institutions across the diaspora stood firmly alongside forces inside Palestine that rejected the most recent Palestine National Council meeting in April. This was not out of a lack of support for the PNC, but because Palestinians in the US were clearly handpicked by the PA to attend and help elect a new Palestine Liberation Organization Executive Committee that is, unfortunately, no longer representative – as it was in its heyday – of all Palestinians in the homeland and diaspora.

To reject Oslo is to reject normalization, all two-state solutions, and US and other imperialist funding. And despite living here as immigrants, refugees and citizens, Palestinians and Arabs in the US are still part and parcel of the Arab world and the indivisible nation of Palestine. In the US, our communities recognize that the tactic of boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) is also a rejection of normalization, and an effective tool to place economic pressure on Israel.

One of the major lessons of Oslo is that Palestinians are not in any kind of state-building stage, as the PA has tried to argue for decades. We are still in the national liberation stage of our movement, and accordingly, we must unite across political lines, ideological persuasions and social sectors to defeat the colonizers. Palestinian political unity around the thawabet (constants) and unity within the resistance itself are prime examples of what our people want and the trajectory of the liberation movement.

Today’s PLO is used duplicitously to consolidate power in the hands of the PA, which is still led by a stream within Fatah. This does not mean that the PLO should be abandoned or liquidated. On the contrary. To uphold the thawabet, the PLO must be rebuilt and reformed to again become the sole legitimate representative of all Palestinian social sectors, political forces, resistance organizations and geographical regions across Palestine and further afield, including those that were not part of the original body. The PLO must again lead our unified national liberation movement.

The vast majority of Palestinians worldwide are anti-Oslo, anti-normalization, anti-PA and pro-resistance. When it was clear that the deal was a “peace for capital” arrangement and not a path to liberation, Oslo was ultimately rejected by the Palestinian people. It could never, and will never, silence our unbreakable will on the road to liberation.

Kareem Youssef is a long-time organizer with USPCN’s Southern California chapter and a PhD student in Materials Science at UCLA.

Mishlin Mekleh is an organizer with USPCN’s Southern California chapter and serves the greater Arab community of the Southland with mental health support and healing.
Ben & Jerry’s repudiates Israeli ice cream sold under its name

Ali Abunimah
16 November 2022

Vermont-based Ben & Jerry’s says that ice cream marketed with its name and insignia in Israel and the occupied West Bank has nothing to do with it. Debbie HillUPI

Ben & Jerry’s has repudiated the ice cream sold under its name in Israel and the occupied West Bank by an Israeli company.

The sale of the frozen treats in Israeli settlements built on Palestinian land in violation of international law is at the heart of a legal dispute between Ben & Jerry’s and its owner Unilever.

“Without the consent of Ben & Jerry’s Independent Board, Unilever has sold trademark rights to the Hebrew and Arabic language versions of the Ben & Jerry’s name to Blue & White Ice Cream Ltd,” Ben & Jerry’s independent board said Tuesday.

“Any products sold by Blue & White Ice Cream Ltd. are uniquely its own and should not be confused with products produced and distributed by Ben & Jerry’s Homemade Inc,” the board added, noting that the Vermont-based company “has no ownership of, affiliation with, or economic interest in Blue & White Ice Cream Ltd.”

Ben & Jerry’s reiterated that “the sale of products bearing any Ben & Jerry’s insignia in the occupied Palestinian territory is against our values. Such sales are inconsistent with international law, fundamental human rights and Ben & Jerry’s social mission.”

Blue & White Ice Cream Ltd is a company owned by Avi Zinger, the former Israeli licensee to which Unilever purports to have transferred Ben & Jerry’s trademarks and intellectual property in Israel.

Lawsuit advancing


Ben & Jerry’s announcement on Tuesday comes as the legal dispute between the Vermont-based ice cream maker and its parent company over the matter appears to be heating up.

In July 2021, Ben & Jerry’s decided that it would end a longstanding licensing agreement that allowed its products to be manufactured and sold in Israel and the occupied West Bank, following years of campaigns by Palestinian rights activists.

A year later, however, Unilever announced that it had sold the Ben & Jerry’s brand and trademark in Israel to the Israeli licensee.

Under this deal, the ice cream would continue to be marketed throughout Israel and the occupied West Bank using the Ben & Jerry’s logo in Hebrew and Arabic.

Unilever admitted that it made the move under threats and pressure from Israel and its lobby.

But Ben & Jerry’s disputed Unilever’s right to make the deal.


In July it sued Unilever in federal court in New York, claiming that the transfer of the ownership of its trademarks and intellectual property to the Israeli company violated the acquisition agreement that Ben & Jerry’s signed when Unilever bought it in 2000.

Under the agreement, Ben & Jerry’s retained an independent board “empowered to protect and defend Ben & Jerry’s brand equity and integrity.”

The board says it was never consulted by Unilever over the sale of its rights to the Israeli company and that the action undermines Ben & Jerry’s renowned advocacy on progressive social issues, a core feature of its brand.

Over the summer, efforts to settle the dispute through mediation failed, reportedly because Ben & Jerry’s did “not want to ‘cave’ on its social mission and stance on Palestinian human rights.”

Security threats

At the end of September, Ben & Jerry’s filed an amended complaint with additional allegations against Unilever.

These include misconduct by Unilever against the board, such as refusing to pay directors their compensation.

This was “particularly egregious given the security threats that board members have faced, leaving individual Board members to pay for their own security measures – including relocation –while not being compensated,” the complaint states.

The lawsuit does not specify the nature of the security threats, but it is alarming that threats board members faced after taking a stance in support of Palestinian rights were so severe that they were effectively forced to go into hiding.

Another key claim is that Unilever secretly transferred Ben & Jerry’s trademarks to a Unilever-owned entity without informing or consulting the independent board just months after the 2000 merger, flagrantly violating the acquisition agreement.

Ben & Jerry’s says in the amended complaint that this secret transfer only came to light in court papers filed by Unilever this summer in response to the lawsuit.

Ben & Jerry’s alleges that the surreptitious transfer was an “attempted end-run around Ben & Jerry’s rights and protections.”

Ben & Jerry’s felt the pressure

The amended lawsuit also reveals how effective public and activist pressure was in getting Ben & Jerry’s to address its complicity in Israel’s violations of Palestinian rights.

It notes that the company “had begun receiving complaints regarding the human rights implications of selling its products in the West Bank” as early as 2013. In response, the board formed a special committee and sent multiple fact-finding missions to the region.

One such delegation in 2019, including Ben & Jerry’s CEO Matthew McCarthy, other top executives and board chair Anuradha Mittal, met “members of the Israeli government, human rights organizations such as Human Rights Watch, former Israeli soldiers, local farmers, Palestinian representatives and UN agencies,” according to the complaint.

In the meantime, “pressure continued to grow,” with McCarthy and the company receiving “hundreds of emails” expressing “concerns regarding the human rights implications of Ben & Jerry’s continued sales in the West Bank.”

But the lawsuit alleges that McCarthy – who was appointed by Unilever as Ben & Jerry’s CEO – “failed to inform the board about the number of emails.”

There was also huge pushback on social media. The complaint cites, for example, how in June 2020, “Ben & Jerry’s experienced a 204 percent increase in mentions relating to its business in the West Bank and Palestinian rights.”

As McCarthy and Unilever dragged their feet over these calls for action, Ben & Jerry’s managers and board members expressed concern that the issue could no longer be brushed aside.

“We will need to focus on this issue … before this turns into a huge campaign against us,” board chair Mittal wrote to CEO McCarthy and parent company Unilever in June 2020.

The same month Mittal wrote to them again emphasizing that “the slow pace” on the question of trading in Israeli settlements is “becoming a threat to the business, social mission and brand integrity” of Ben & Jerry’s.

One Ben & Jerry’s employee wrote, “I don’t think I can overstate just how much of a danger this is to our activism in Europe.”

That was only the tip of the iceberg. A group of 28 Ben & Jerry’s managers wrote to McCarthy expressing their frustration: “We believe that our activities in Israel contravene our social mission and values and seriously impede our activism work.”

The managers noted that they were already seeing a “backlash” that was “affecting both the credibility of what we can do and the ability to work with progressive partners on campaigns and projects.”

At one point, the ice cream maker’s global social mission officer stressed, “I believe this is getting quite urgent.”

But according to Ben & Jerry’s lawsuit, Unilever and McCarthy didn’t see it that way and continued to procrastinate. So the board took action itself, culminating in the July 2021 decision to end the licensing agreement with the Israeli company.

Ben & Jerry’s notes that its decision to end sales in Israel was supported by its founders Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, and that even Unilever issued a statement confirming that it had “always recognized the right of the brand and its independent board to take decisions about its social missions.”

But a year later, under pro-Israel pressure, Unilever reversed course. Its purported sale of the Ben & Jerry’s brand in Israel to the Israeli licensee was hailed by Israel and its lobby as a blow to the Palestinian campaign for boycott, divestment and sanctions.

It was, however, a hollow victory.

Far from making the issue melt away, Unilever’s actions have ensured that the unethical profiteering of multinational businesses from Israel’s system of occupation, settler-colonialism and apartheid will remain front and center as the lawsuit grinds on.

Ben & Jerry’s is asking the court to stop Unilever from doing anything further to facilitate ice cream sales using its trademarks and intellectual property in Israel, to return ownership of all its trademarks to Ben & Jerry’s and to pay damages and legal costs.

Israel kills nine Palestinians so far in November


Tamara Nassar 
Rights and Accountability 
15 November 2022



Palestinians mourn Musab Muhammad Mahmoud Zabin Nafal, who was shot and killed by Israeli forces. Ahmad ArouriAPA images

The first week of November saw nine Palestinians killed by Israeli occupation forces.

This has been the deadliest year in the West Bank on a monthly average since the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs began systematically tracking fatalities in 2005.

Last month, for instance, the Israeli military killed on average one Palestinian every day. As Palestinians in the West Bank continue their resistance against Israel’s occupation, this average shows no sign of letting up.

On 14 November, the Israeli army killed a 15-year-old Palestinian girl in the town of Beitunia near Ramallah.

She was identified as Fulla al-Masalmeh from a town in the southern West Bank.

The Israeli army said a vehicle approached them during a military incursion into Beitunia and refused to stop when ordered. They opened fire on the vehicle, killing al-Masalmeh.

On 9 November, a 29-year-old man was shot and killed by Israeli forces in Jenin.

The Palestinian health ministry confirmed his identity as Raafat Ali Abdullah Ayyaseh. He was from the village of Sanur near Jenin.

Initially, Israeli soldiers detained Ayyaseh and then turned him over to the Red Crescent, which transferred him to hospital in critical condition where he was declared dead, Red Crescent ambulance service head Mahmoud Saadi told the Palestinian news agency WAFA.

Israeli occupation forces also killed a child overnight on 9 November during an incursion into the city of Nablus.

The Israeli army was escorting a group of right-wing Israeli lawmakers attending an event at Joseph’s Tomb, an archeological site located in the city, which is considered sacred by Muslims, Christians and Jews.

The settler visit went ahead even though senior Israeli army officials had reportedly objected. A division commander approved it in the end.

Youths, including Muhammad Hamdallah Hashash, 15, started confronting settlers and Israeli forces.

They placed a homemade explosive object, according to a field investigation conducted by Defense for Children International-Palestine.

Mahdi approached the object when it fell out of place, and Israeli forces shot him in the leg 400 meters away.

Even after Mahdi fell, Israeli forces continued to shoot at him and the explosive object, causing the bomb to go off and kill him.

Residents of the area are regularly harassed and provoked by incursions into the site by Israeli settlers under heavy military guard.
Teen killed near Ramallah

On 5 November, Israeli occupation forces killed a teen with seven bullets at an intersection near the town of Sinjil near Ramallah in the occupied West Bank.

Musab Muhammad Mahmoud Zabin Nafal was 18. His body was handed over to Palestinian ambulance medics, according to the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, which conducts field investigations.

During the same incident, Israeli forces also wounded his cousin, Nishan Dumar Zabin Nafal, 18.

The Israeli army accused the teens of throwing stones and damaging vehicles.

There were no Palestinian eyewitnesses to the incident, but PCHR concluded that “the fact that Israeli occupation forces handed the corpse of the Palestinian teenager to ambulance attendants constitutes a new crime of extrajudicial execution and assassination.”

Israeli troops routinely use live fire against Palestinians they accuse of throwing stones or Molotov cocktails, even if there are no injuries to Israeli soldiers or civilians.

It is legal under international humanitarian law for an occupied people to resist a military occupation.

Meanwhile, on 3 November, members of the Yamam unit of Israel’s Border Police used a civilian minibus with a Palestinian license plate to sneak into the Jenin refugee camp in the occupied West Bank.

They barricaded a butchery where people were readying to celebrate the upcoming wedding of Farouq Jamil Hasan Salameh, a commander of Islamic Jihad’s military wing.

Salameh was fatally injured by gunshots to the chest, abdomen and head when a Yamam member opened fire on people inside the butchery. Others were wounded, and five were arrested.

The Israeli army later cordoned off Salameh’s house in the Jenin refugee camp while Palestinians threw stones at the invaders.
Israel kills child

Israeli forces also shot and killed a 14-year-old boy near the entrance to the camp.

Muhammad Samer Muhammad Khalouf had arrived at the entrance of the camp where others were confronting the Israeli army.

He “allegedly fired a homemade gun at Israeli military vehicles,” according to DCIP, which conducted a field investigation.

Troops opened fire on Muhammad from 100 meters away, hitting him in the chest.

On the same day, a man was killed by Israeli police after allegedly stabbing and moderately injuring an Israeli police officer in Jerusalem’s Old City.

The Palestinian health ministry identified the man as Amer Husam Bader, 20.

Birzeit University, where Bader was a civil engineering student, mourned him “with great pride.”

Two other Israeli policemen were wounded by their colleagues who were shooting at Bader.

The day before, on 2 November, a man accused of ramming a car into and attacking an Israeli soldier with an axe was shot and killed by Israeli occupation forces.

Footage reported to be of the incident shows a white minibus ramming into a person near a small structure and hitting a pole.

Afterwards, the truck driver emerges from the vehicle and appears to attack the soldier with an object. Apparently shot, the driver then falls to the ground.

The soldier was transferred to hospital with serious injuries, the army said.
Shooting protestors

The Israeli military said it wished to avoid publication of documentation from the scene of the attack, which took place at a checkpoint at the entrance of Beit Ur near Ramallah. But some media circulated footage purportedly showing the attack.

The man accused of carrying out the operation was identified as Habbas Abdelhafith Yousef Rayyan, 54, by the Palestinian health ministry. He was from the village of Beit Duqqu northwest of Jerusalem.

His son, Qusai Rayyan, had been in Israeli prison when the incident took place. Israel detained him in September and he was released days after his father’s killing.

The day after killing Habbas Rayyan, the Israeli military raided his home and shot rubber-coated steel bullets and tear gas canisters at protestors who had gathered nearby, PCHR reported.



Palestinians threw stones in protest, and the Israeli military responded with live fire and more rubber-coated steel bullets and tear gas, killing 42-year-old Daoud Mahmoud Khalil Rayyan with a bullet to the chest.

Mustafa Mirar, a resident living nearby, tried to help Daoud Rayyan by pulling him into his yard and calling emergency services. Medical personnel arrived immediately, but the Israeli military denied them entry, PCHR said.

Despite Rayyan’s critical condition, the Israeli army didn’t allow medical crews to take him to hospital until a half hour later.

Despite the Israeli army’s claims that Palestinians threw Molotov cocktails when Rayyan was shot, Mirar and other eyewitnesses told PCHR’s fieldworkers that no Molotov cocktails were seen with protesters or Daoud Rayyan, “who did not pose any danger to the Israeli soldiers that directly targeted him in his chest,” PCHR said.

Elsewhere, an Israeli settler succumbed to wounds sustained when he was reportedly stabbed by a Palestinian on 25 October near the al-Funduq village in the northeastern West Bank.Tamara Nassar's blog
KURDISTAN

85 years ago, the execution of Seyit Riza


The 15 November marks the 85th anniversary of the execution of Seyit Riza by the Turkish state.




ANF
NEWS DESK
Wednesday, 16 Nov 2022, 08:22

15 November marked the 85th anniversary of the execution of Seyt Riza. Commemorations have taken place in Dersim and many other cities.

Seyit Riza (1863 – 1937) was an Alevi, Zaza-Kurdish political leader from the Dersim region of North Kurdistan (today part of the Turkish state). He is known and remembered in the Kurdish Liberation Movement as the chieftain of the Dersim Rebellion, a military uprising that happened during the years 1937 and 1938 to protest the oppression of the Kurdish people by the Turkish state. This revolt was the 27th Kurdish uprising since the creation of the Turkish State in 1923 and the last of the 20th century until the appearance of the PKK (Workers’ Party of Kurdistan) and the start of its armed struggle in 1984.

The Dersim revolt took place in the continuity of the multiple Kurdish uprisings that followed the process of the Turkish nation-state formation after the fall of the Ottoman empire. All those uprisings were caused because of the Turkification of the country by its first president, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. Indeed, from his accession to power in 1923 until his death in 1928, the latter pursued a repressive policy of homogenization of the country by imposing the Turkish ethnic identity in every aspect of social life: from the language that people speak in the streets to the language to be taught at schools, from the education to the industrial life, from the trade to the cadres of state officials, from the civil law to the settlement of citizens to particular regions (let’s note that this policy did not change at all and continue to live in today’s Erdogan’s policy…). Many minorities protested against it, but their revolts have all been drowned in blood.

Nevertheless, until 1936, the mountainous region of Dersim, known for its rebellious character (11 revolts had happened in the previous 40 years), had been little affected by the Turkish state’s assimilation campaigns. The Kurdish and Zaza tribes living there were rejecting the Turkish authorities and also were refusing to pay any taxes. Their interference was such that Ataturk considered Dersim to be the country’s most important domestic problem.

To put an end to the Dersim’s resistance, Ataturk appointed General Abdullah AlpdoÄŸan responsible for the region by giving him the authority to exile people if anyone would refuse assimilation. To make this possible, several military observation posts were then built around Dersim and more and more Turkish soldiers were brought to the region. It is said that planes flew over Dersim every day.

As the tension between the Turkish soldiers and the population was getting higher and higher, Seyit Reza decided to send one of his own sons to negotiate with General AlpdoÄŸan in order to avoid a war and to protect the population and its rights. But the latter killed the emissary. In response to the death of his son, Seyit Reza decided to call the Dersim clan leaders and, in early 1937, they joined forces to counter the Turkish attack. The first action was the attack on a police convoy.

The Turkish army, under Ataturk’s direct order, tried to break the rebels by strength and sent more than 25,000 soldiers supported by plane bombardments. But the fighters of Seyit Riza resisted fiercely and refused to surrender. They fought so hard that the Turkish army had to trick them in order to end the resistance.

In the fall of 1937, General AlpdoÄŸan invited Seyit Riza to discuss a peace agreement. When Seyit Riza went there, he was made prisoner together with his 16-year-old son and 8 of his men. Such a treacherous action was so inconceivable in the rules of honor and tradition of the time that it is said that Seyit Riza only spit the following words:

“Government without honor and deceitful!”

After eight days, they were all hanged. Before his hanging, Seyit Riza last words were:

“I am now 75 years old. I will fall Sehid and join the Sehids of Kurdistan. Dersim lost, but the Kurds and Kurdistan will win. The Kurdish youths will take revenge on me. Thus shall cruel men die, so shall vile and deceitful men die.”

After his death, the resistance continued for another year. But the atrocity of the repression that came down on Dersim, where men, women and children were massacred by Turkish soldiers, put an end to the rebel troops. According to official reports, more than 10,000 civilians were massacred and more than 11,000 were taken into exile, depopulating the province. Many rebels who surrendered were executed and women and children were burned alive. A total of 40,000 Kurds were killed.

* Text compiled by The Internationalist Commune
TURKIYE'S REICHSTAG FIRE

KCK: Istanbul attack shows that AKP-MHP are pursuing new malicious plans

“Our movement has nothing to do with this attack. The attempt to blame our movement shows that the AKP-MHP are pursuing new malicious plans. We call on everyone to be sensitive, careful, vigilant and make all necessary efforts to understand the truth.”


ANF

BEHDINAN
Tuesday, 15 Nov 2022, 12:04

The Co-Presidency of the KCK (Kurdistan Communities Union) Executive Council released a statement about Sunday’s deadly bomb attack that killed 6 people and injured 81 others in Taksim, Istanbul.

While Turkish officials were quick to blame the Kurdish freedom movement for the deadly attack, claiming that the attacker had come from northern Syria, the Headquarters Command of the People’s Defense Center (HSM), the armed wing of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), denied involvement in the incident, making it clear that they were against attacks directed at civilians.

The General Commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) Mazlum Abdi said, “Our forces have nothing to do with the Istanbul attack and deny the allegations that blame our forces.”

The People’s Defense Units (YPG) also refuted the Turkish state’s allegations, saying, ““We strongly reject these groundless allegations. We have no connection to the terrorist Ehlam El-Beşîr who carried out the attack. The whole world knows that the principle of our forces is based on the protection of human rights and counter-terrorism. We condemn any form of attack directed at civilians. Our forces struggle within the context of democracy, human and women’s rights, and the fight against terror and dictatorship.”

The statement released by the KCK Executive Council Co-Presidency on Tuesday includes the following:

“On November 13, 2022, many people were killed and injured in an explosion on Istiklal Street in Istanbul. We are deeply saddened by the loss of life and injuries as a result of this attack. As the Kurdish Freedom Movement and on behalf of our people, we would like to express that we share their sorrow and express our condolences. We extend our condolences to the people of Turkey and the families of those who lost their lives and wish a speedy recovery to those who were injured. We strongly condemn this attack, which was clearly organized under a dark guise and targeted the democratic future of the peoples of Turkey. Although the HPG Central Command [Hêzen Parastina Gel – People´s Defense Forces] announced that they have no relation with this attack and that it is out of the question for them to carry out attacks targeting civilians, the fascist AKP-MHP state and its supporters are persistently trying to blame this attack on our movement. We would therefore like to state once again that the Kurdish Freedom Movement has nothing to do with this attack. The fascist AKP-MHP state insistently wants to blame this attack on our movement in order to hide the truth and to create the necessary conditions for them to carry out their malicious plans. We therefore call on everyone, especially the democratic public and media, to make all efforts necessary to expose this attack. The statements and slanders of the fascist AKP-MHP state accusing our movement do absolutely not reflect the truth. To the contrary, they only serve to conceal the truth of the incident. Even based on a preliminary evaluation, it is not difficult to understand that this constitutes a plot by the AKP-MHP. That is why we strongly urge Turkey’s intellectuals, democrats, democratic press and political forces that seek the democratization of Turkey, to disregard the statements of the fascist AKP-MHP state aimed at concealing the truth and to make efforts to reveal the truth of this incident.

The fascist AKP-MHP alliance pursues a policy that is based on enmity towards the Kurdish people. It has vowed to realize Kurdish genocide and to destroy the Kurdish Freedom Movement, which struggles for the freedom of the oppressed, exploited and denied people of Kurdistan. The fascist AKP-MHP alliance spends all of Turkey’s wealth and all the values of society on the annihilation of the Kurds. No means have been left unused, all kinds of inhumane methods have been applied and massacres and occupations have been carried out. The AKP-MHP alliance, which knows no bounds in enmity towards the Kurds, has resorted to the most despicable and inhumane weapons of mass destruction when it could not achieve its goals despite having used all kinds of dirty and ugly war methods. The AKP-MHP has not only wasted the values of the people for the anti-Kurdish war, but has also committed crimes against humanity by using chemical weapons and has thus put the whole society of Turkey under suspicion. However, despite all inhumane practices, including the use of chemical weapons, the fascist AKP-MHP alliance has not been able to achieve its malicious goals. On the contrary, due to the revelation of the use of chemical weapons, its true face has been revealed even more. This has caused it to experience serious problems and has made its plans fail. No matter what methods the fascist AKP-MHP alliance resorts to, it cannot succeed against the resistance of the guerrilla and the struggle of the peoples, women and democratic forces, especially the Kurdish people. Today, everybody knows that the AKP-MHP alliance aims to eliminate democracy by destroying the Kurdish Freedom Movement and the Kurds and to establish a religious, nationalist, authoritarian and fascist order in Turkey. However, as a result of the resistance and struggle, the AKP-MHP has realized that they cannot not realize this goal. They now know that they have lost the support of society and that they will lose their power in the case of elections. The AKP-MHP alliance has not only failed to realize its fascist and genocidal plans, but has been exposed, blocked and ended up in a helpless situation due to its crimes against humanity.

It is obvious that the AKP-MHP alliance plans to resort to new and malicious methods in order to change this situation and to get out of its crisis. The attack in Istanbul constitutes the first step of this plan. Once again, we would like to stress that this is a new and malicious plan. We call on everyone to be vigilant in this regard and to make efforts to reveal the truth by not relying on the statements made by the AKP-MHP state. With this attack, the AKP-MHP alliance aims to create an environment that resembles the situation after the massacre on October 10, 2015 [in front of Ankara's main train station]. It is important for everybody to realize that this is a malicious and despicable plan targeting the future of Turkey and the efforts of the Kurdish and Turkish peoples to live together. Everyone in favor of democracy and coexistence must take the right and necessary attitude and thus defeat this malicious plan, just as the previous plans of the fascist AKP-MHP alliance have been defeated.

The fascist AKP-MHP state’s attempt to blame this attack on our movement and to claim that it was carried out from Rojava constitutes a highly deliberate manipulation. Everyone knows that one of the most important parts of the fascist AKP-MHP alliance’s Kurdish genocide is the occupation of Rojava. It is very obvious that the AKP-MHP aims to create the necessary environment for an invasion by targeting Rojava with this plot. The timing of this attack is also very telling. It was carried out at a time when it has been revealed that the AKP-MHP uses chemical weapons and burns soldiers’ bodies, when Turkish society is struggling with serious economic problems, when the war against the Kurds and the religious, gangster, mafia-oriented order are being questioned and demands for democracy are being voiced more and more loudly, and when the AKP-MHP is losing the support of society. It is clear that this is a diversion of the political agenda and that it aims to initiate malicious developments again. Whenever malicious developments are wanted, massacres are organized and Kurds are blamed. The latest attack in Istanbul also has such a purpose. Everybody must therefore be sensitive and vigilant. This is a deliberate effort to portray the perpetrator of the attack as being from Rojava or Syria. By doing so, they want to create a certain environment. Regardless of who carried out the attack, Kurdish or not, this attack and the individuals mentioned have nothing to do with our movement or the Rojava revolutionary forces. The Rojava forces have already declared that they have nothing to do with this attack. Everyone should be aware of this fact and should not become a tool for the AKP-MHP’s plan that involves malicious ambitions. Our movement can never be linked to attacks targeting civilians. We would never plan and carry out such attacks. We are a movement that resists the genocidal attacks of the fascist AKP-MHP alliance, seeks a democratic solution to the Kurdish question and struggles for the democratization of Turkey. Everyone in Turkey knows this. It is very clear that any attitude that is not based on such an approach will support the AKP-MHP alliance and serve their malicious plans.

The fascist AKP-MHP alliance has reached a stage of collapse as a result of the resistance and struggle of the Kurds, the peoples, women and all democratic forces. It now has difficulties carrying out its genocidal fascist plans and surviving. The use of chemical weapons has also been exposed, which has caused even more difficulties for the AKP-MHP. Turkey’s future, well-being and democratization depend on the destruction of this fascist alliance that aims to darken the future by organizing malicious plans and that commit crimes against humanity. Due to this malicious plan, it is now necessary for everyone to see the reality of the AKP-MHP alliance and its horrible and malicious goals even better and to fight against it. The AKP-MHP alliance even burns soldiers’ corpses in order to hide what they are doing and to prevent anyone from knowing what is going on. This is the reality of the AKP-MHP. Everyone who claims not to be fascist, to care about Turkey, to not be an enemy of the Kurds, to be human, in short, to not be an AKP-MHP member, needs to acknowledge this reality, make an effort to make this reality known to the public and stand against the AKP-MHP’s plan to make the facts invisible by silencing the press with the help of the disinformation law. Being human, democratic, steadfast and moral requires this.

We would like to once again condemn this attack, which has deeply saddened our people and the people of Turkey. We share the sorrow for the loss of lives and the injured. As the Kurdish Freedom Movement, we reiterate our promise to our people and the peoples of Turkey to realize the goal of democracy and freedom, and once again promise to continue the struggle for this. We state clearly once again that our movement has nothing to do with this attack. The attempt to blame this attack on our movement shows that the AKP-MHP are pursuing new malicious plans. Therefore, we call on everyone to be sensitive, careful, vigilant and make all necessary efforts to understand the truth.

HSM denies involvement in Istanbul explosion, calls for its exposure
The Headquarters Command of the People’s Defense Center (HSM) released a statement denying any involvement in the deadly explosion at Istanbul’s Istiklal Avenue on Sunday.While Turkish officials ...

SDF Commander-In-Chief: Our forces have nothing to do with the Istanbul attack
The General Commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) Mazlum Abdi announced on Monday that their forces had nothing to do with Sunday’s attack in Istanbul that claimed the lives of six people...

YPG denies connection with the Istanbul attack and the perpetrator
A bomb attack killed 6 people and injured 81 others in Istanbul’s busiest street, Istiklal Avenue, on Sunday. Turkish officials were quick to blame the Kurdish freedom movement for the deadly attac...

TURKIYE

New indictment against Kurdish politician Aysel TuÄŸluk

A new indictment has been prepared against Kurdish politician Aysel TuÄŸluk, who was recently released. The charge is "membership of a terrorist organization" and relates to an alleged incident in 2014


ANF
AMED
 
Tuesday, 15 Nov 2022, 10:41

Kurdish politician Aysel Tuğluk, who was recently released from prison after the Forensic Medicine Institute (ATK) reported that she could not stay in prison because she is suffering from dementia, was targeted by a new indictment on charges of "membership in a terrorist organization" after the statement of a "witness", by the Diyarbakır Chief Public Prosecutor's Office.

In his statement to the Adana Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, about 8 years after the incident, the alleged member of the organization, Turgut Taşkıran, who was injured during the ISIS attack on Kobanê in 2014, claimed that Tuğluk helped him.

Taşkıran gave his statement to Adana Chief Public Prosecutor's Office on 17 January 2021, the indictment states. He claimed that he was injured while changing the house he was in during the ISIS attacks in 2014. Stating that he was injured in his leg, Taşkıran said that YGP members brought him to the Turkish soldier at the border and he was being treated at Suruç State Hospital. He claimed that Tuğluk and Faysal Sarıyıldız, who were MPs of the HDP at that time, came to visit him during the treatment.

Taşkıran argued that they asked him where he wanted to go after the treatment.

Taşkıran, who said that he wanted to go to Diyarbakır, claimed that Tuğluk and Sarıyıldız offered him to be admitted to another hospital after his mother stated that he would be arrested if he came to their house in Diyarbakır. Taşkıran claimed that he was later taken to Cizre by Tuğluk and Sarıyıldız. Taşkıran identified Tuğluk, who is well known to the public, in a photograph.

The indictment demanding that Tuğluk be sentenced to 7 years, 6 months and 15 years in prison on the charge of "member of a terrorist organization" was requested to be combined with the file opened against Tuğluk on the same charge at the Diyarbakır 4th High Criminal Court. The request of the Diyarbakır Chief Public Prosecutor's Office to join the two cases was accepted by the Diyarbakır 4th High Criminal Court.

Aysel TuÄŸluk finally released from prison
Kurdish politician Aysel Tuğluk, who is suffering from dementia, was released from Kandıra No. 1 F Type Closed Prison this evening after the Forensic Medicine Institute (ATK) said in a report that ...

Forensic Medicine Institute says in a report that Aysel TuÄŸluk cannot stay in prison
The Forensic Medicine Institute (ATK) issued a report on Kurdish lawyer and politician Aysel TuÄŸluk, who is suffering from dementia and is held in Kocaeli No. 1 F-Type Prison, in which it said that...

As world population hits 8 billion, next billion to come from these 8 countries

Published on Nov 15, 2022 

World Population: Half of the population still lives in just seven countries: 

China, India, the US, Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria and Brazil, Bloomberg reported.

World Population: A boy takes in the view of the Los Angeles skyline.(AP)
World Population: A boy takes in the view of the Los Angeles skyline.(AP)

World population hit eight billion people according to a report by the United Nations. UN's World Population Prospects 2022 report said that the next billion people are projected to come from these eight countries- Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Philippines and Tanzania. The report also said that India is on course to surpass China as the world's most populous country in 2023.

Read more: UN says world population is 8 billion. Where are five, six & seven billionth babies?

Half of the population still lives in just seven countries: China, India, the US, Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria and Brazil, Bloomberg reported.

The United Nations called the eight billion-mark "a historic milestone for humanity" saying, "This unprecedented growth is due to the gradual increase in human lifespan owing to improvements in public health, nutrition, personal hygiene and medicine."

The United Nations also emphasised that though there was a big surge in the second half of the 20th century, population growth may now begin to slow. The global life expectancy is 72.8 years as of 2019, an increase of nearly nine years since 1990. Current projections believe the life expectancy could be 77.2 years by 2050, the report said adding that it could take 15 years to reach the nine- billion mark

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres had earlier said, "This is an occasion to celebrate our diversity, recognise our common humanity, and marvel at advancements in health that have extended lifespans and dramatically reduced maternal and child mortality rates."


Earth at 8 billion: Consumption not crowd is key to climate


 With Doha skyline in the background, a man prepares to casts his fishing pole at the Corniche waterfront promenade in Doha, Qatar, Nov. 11, 2022. The 8 billionth baby on Earth is about to be born on a planet that is getting hotter. But experts in climate science and population both say the two issues aren't quite as connected as they seem. 
(AP Photo/Hassan Ammar, File)More

SETH BORENSTEIN
Tue, November 15, 2022 

SHARM EL-SHEIKH, Egypt (AP) — The world is getting hotter and more crowded and the two issues are connected, but not quite as much as people might think, experts say.

On Tuesday somewhere a baby will be born that will be the globe’s 8 billionth person, according to a projection by the United Nations and other experts. The Earth has warmed almost 0.9 degrees Celsius (1.6 degrees Fahrenheit) since the world hit the 4 billion mark in 1974.

Climate and population is a touchy subject for scientists and officials.

While more people consuming energy, mostly from the burning of fossil fuels, is warming the planet, the key issue isn’t the number of people as much as how a small fraction of those people are causing way more than their share of carbon pollution, several climate and population experts told The Associated Press.

“We do have a population problem and we do have a population issue,” said Vanessa Perez-Cicera, director of the Global Economics Center at the World Resources Institute. “But I think most importantly, we have an overconsumption issue.”

And because of that the 8 billionth child born will “not have what we had ... because there’s not enough resources,” she said.

Kenya, which is suffering through a devastating drought, has 55 million people, about 95 times more than the population of Wyoming. But Wyoming emits 3.7 times the carbon dioxide as Kenya. Africa as whole has 16.7% of the world’s population but historically emits only 3% of the global carbon pollution, while the United States has 4.5% of the planet’s people but since 1959 has put out 21.5% of the heat-trapping carbon dioxide.

The average Canadian, Saudi and Australian put out more than 10 times the carbon dioxide into the air though their daily living than the average Pakistani, where one-third of the nation was flooded in a climate change worsened event. And in Qatar the per capita emissions is 20 times Pakistan’s, according to the World Bank.

“The question is not about population but rather about consumption patterns," said climate scientist Bill Hare of Climate Analytics. "So it’s best to look at the major northern emitters to begin with.”

Climate Interactive, a group of scientists who run intricate computer simulations that can be tweaked to see what factors matter the most in fighting climate change, looked at the difference population makes. It found it made a small contribution compared to other factors, like economics.

Comparing two United Nations population projections scenarios of 8.8 billion people and 10.4 billion people, Climate Interactive’s Andrew P. Jones found only a 0.2 degrees Celsius (0.4 degrees Fahrenheit) difference. But the difference between no price or tax on carbon and $100 a ton was 0.7 degrees Celsius (1.3 degrees Fahrenheit).

Hare said there is more than a tinge of racism in the myth that overpopulation is the major issue behind climate change.

“One of the biggest arguments that I hear almost exclusively from men in high-income countries is that, ‘Oh, it’s just a population problem,'” The Nature Conservancy Chief Scientist Katharine Hayhoe said. “Nothing could be further from the truth.”

“The 50% poorest people in the world are historically responsible for 7% of heat trapping gas emissions,” Hayhoe said. “Yet when you look at which countries are bearing the brunt of the impacts from climate change, countries like Malawi, Mozambique, Senegal, Afghanistan topped the list.”

And even within countries, it’s the wealthiest who cause more of the carbon pollution, Hare said. Overall, he said, “80% of the population, the global population, emits a small fraction of emissions.”

The world’s population is growing mostly in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia “and they’re contributing the least to man-made climate change,” said Colette Rose, project coordinator at the Berlin Institute for Population and Development.

Eight nations, five in Africa, three in Asia, are going to have at least half of the population growth between now and 2050, Rose said. They are Egypt, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Pakistan, India and the Philippines.

Worldwide population growth has substantially slowed, will likely peak sometime this century, and is now down to growing less than 1% a year, Rose said. But carbon emissions are growing faster, at 1% more this year than 2021.

For environmental advocacy groups and officials the issue of population and climate has caused problems.

“Population is an issue that no one has wanted to touch from the very beginning. Too politically sensitive,” Joanna Depledge, a climate historian from the University of Cambridge in England, said in an email. “There are many dimensions, notably in relation to religion and accusations of racism — population growth is mostly concentrated in non-white populations, of course.’’

For a long time, the Sierra Club had promoted efforts to try to control the world population, until a couple decades ago, when the environmental group looked harder at the issue and broke down the numbers, said the group's president, Ramon Cruz. They found the problems were more overconsumption and fossil fuel use and those problems would be the same “at 6 billion, 7 billion or 8 billion” people, he said.

While most environmental groups try to avoid the issue, 11 years ago, when the world hit 7 billion people, the Center for Biological Diversity made special issue condoms with population and environmental messages such as “Wrap with care, save the polar bear.”

___

Follow AP’s climate and environment coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment

___

Follow Seth Borenstein on Twitter at @borenbears

___

Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP’s climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.













 

The returning of Africa and Europe’s ghosts

The time has come for the restitution of African art and artefacts looted in the colonial era and selfishly kept in Europe’s museums and universities.

Lorenzo Marsili
Writer, political activist, and the founder of international NGO European Alternatives.
15 Nov 2022
The theatre and music ensemble GROUP50:50 performing “The Ghosts are returning”, a musical theatre piece about "(neo)colonial crimes, death and mourning".[https://www.group5050.net]

In 1952, a Swiss doctor brought home from colonial Congo seven skeletons belonging to the nomadic Mbuti people and gave them to the University of Geneva for research.

Seventy years later, Swiss, German and Congolese artists from the theatre and music ensemble GROUP50:50 travelled to a forest in the Democratic Republic of the Congo to meet the descendants of the seven Mbuti whose skeletons were stolen. Together, they developed a ritual to allow the seven spirits to find rest. Consequently, GROUP50:50 transformed these experiences into a multimedia musical theatre piece about “(neo)colonial crimes, death and mourning”.

Named The Ghosts Are Returning, the show is part of a growing international mobilisation of African and European activists, artists, and policymakers demanding the restitution of myriad African artefacts and works of art looted in the colonial era and now jealously guarded in Europe’s museums and universities.

Congolese artist Mwazulu Diyabanza, for instance, recently “took home” a 19th-century funerary stone belonging to the Bari people of Chad by removing it from the Quai Branly Museum in Paris, which hosts more than 70,000 African objects. He made similar attempts in Marseilles and Amsterdam, each time raising a heated public debate about who the thief really is.

Diyabanza himself appears certain who the real “thief” is. “They were the ones who stole,” he argues. “They stole a part of my history, a part of my identity. And I did what I think everyone here would do if they saw a thief: get back what they took without asking permission.”

His point about identity is key to understanding the significance of the restitution movement. Objects of art, and ritual, help humans navigate their past and their present, providing a fundamental anchor for the self and for the communities of selves that we call society and state.

The cultural dispossession suffered by the African continent during European colonialism was tantamount to an erasure of its past – an erasure that was retrospectively used to try and vindicate the false claim that Africa was an empty continent lying outside of history before colonisation.

Works such as the 16th-century Benin Bronzes, which are not only incredibly complex but also depict pre-colonial interactions between Europe and Africa, for example, are testaments to the long history and cultural richness of the continent. Many of these Bronzes, however, are now not where they belong in West Africa, but in European museums.

Human remains and ritual masks also tie Africa’s past to its present and inform its current inhabitants of the depth of their heritage. They should today be scattered across villages, connecting communities with their past through the exercise of the political and spiritual power they yield. Most of these objects too, however, like the seven Mbuti skeletons, are far from home. Taking such treasures away is more than aesthetic spoilation: it is the attempted erasure of a people’s sense of identity.

Pressed by shifting international perceptions and increased artistic activism, European governments and museums are beginning to respond. In July, Germany sealed an agreement with Nigeria to return more than 1,000 looted items, engaging a large array of institutions ranging from State Ethnographic Museums to the Berggruen Museum, otherwise known for its extraordinary Picasso collection. In August, the United Kingdom followed suit. France also took action, commissioning a ground-breaking report on restitution in 2019 and returning the Benin treasures in its possession to Cotonou, the country’s largest city, this year.

While the restitution of the most famous works is often decided at the highest diplomatic level, cities are starting to play an equally important role in both physical restitution by municipally-owned museums and, crucially, the people-to-people contact that accompanies the ceremonies for the “coming home” of the works.

On December 13, the French city of Montpellier will host, together with Palermo-based Fondazione Studio Rizoma, the first gathering of municipalities on the theme of restitution. City-level diplomacy has increasingly been taking centre stage internationally – from issues of climate change to migration. Now mayors and municipal policy are also taking the lead in restitution efforts.

Europe has much to gain from this process of restitution. The Ghosts Are Returning, GROUP50:50’s play, certainly refers to the return of the skeletons to their rightful place. But, equally, it refers to the return (or much-delayed recognition) of Europe’s own ghosts – first and foremost the exploitation and violence that characterised its colonial past and upon which much of its present wealth is built.

The restitution movement helps both Africans and Europeans develop a better and deeper awareness of their past. “For a better future to blossom, we must subject our museums to psychoanalysis,” as GROUP50:50 violist Ruth Kemna puts it in the play.

Contemporary Europe, as explained by French philosopher Paul Ricoeur, is defined by “pardon” and “reconciliation”. Following two world wars and unspeakable cruelties committed against one another, European countries have eventually stared together into the abyss of their guilt and moved beyond mutual resentment. As a result, they managed to transform a history of violence and hostility into a vast political union. They now could and should expand these rebuilding and reconciliation efforts towards Africa.

Returning Africa’s stolen cultural heritage swiftly is the bare minimum Europe can do to show it is taking reconciliation seriously. However, this is hardly enough. How does one address the human, environmental and economic pillage suffered by African nations over centuries?

“The Ghosts Are Returning” also touches upon this question. The equatorial forest that has been the habitat of the Mbuti people for generations is now under threat from illegal logging by multinational – including European – companies. Shouldn’t true restitution include a response to this ongoing pillage too?

Europe could decide to hold onto its declining privilege and ignore all calls for restitution and reconciliation. Or it could seize the opportunity to truly engage African states and their civil society in a conversation among equals that could provide both Europeans and Africans with answers to planetary challenges.

As Cameroonian philosopher Achille Mbembe reminds us, the French term for knowledge is “connaissance”, a word that literally means “being born together”. That is a very apt definition of the knowledge that art can transmit. Ultimately, this is what theatre and politics have in common: They force us to come to terms with our ghosts.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.


Lorenzo Marsili
Writer, political activist, and the founder of international NGO European Alternatives.
Marsili is also the co-president of the European Media Initiative, an international campaign demanding better protection for media freedom at European level. Together with Yanis Varoufakis he is one of the initiators of DiEM25. His latest book, Planetary Politics, is published by Polity Press.

TIKTOK USERS ACCUSE QATAR OF USING FAKE FANS TO PROMOTE 2022 WORLD CUP

Daniel Munro
1 day ago

TikTok videos uploaded by a Qatari company have led to some claiming that the country may have hired fake fans to support foreign nations in order to help promote the upcoming World Cup.

Having been subjected to great discussion in the media throughout the year, the FIFA 2022 World Cup is nearly upon us, with the host nation Qatar set to host Ecuador in the opening fixture on Sunday, November 21.

Though a single game is yet to be played, the tournament has already generated a great deal of controversy, the latest of which has arisen after TikTok users shared their suspicions about some of the fans who are in Qatar ahead of the tournament starting.

QATAR LIVING ACCOUNT POSTS FOOTAGE OF FANS CELEBRATING WORLD CUP BUILD-UP

The footage in question was posted by Qatar Living, a website that promotes local Qatari businesses and uploads tips and guides for tourists visiting the country.

Multiple clips on their TikTok account showed groups of fans said to be supporting the likes of Argentina, Brazil and England gathering in the nation’s capital of Doha.

Each set of fans could be seen wearing their nation’s colors, while waving flags, holding up banners and in some instances, dancing and chanting in a rather jovial manner.

The bulk of the footage was uploaded on Friday, November 4, some 16 days away from the World Cup starting, but each nation already had a large group of fans represented in the clips, prompting some users to question how legitimate the clips were.

Many viewers noticed in the England fan footage that there was very little chanting being carried out by the supporters who instead played various instruments as they marched together.

One user asked below the post: “I do wonder if they just hired random people to cheer”.

Images posted by B/R Football on Twitter also highlighted that several fans representing Brazil were wearing T-shirts that read “Brazil Fans Qatar” on the back.

It is unclear whether this means that Qatar provided these T-shirts to the Brazil supporters in Doha, or if they are just souvenir items.

GRV Media and HITC have reached out to Qatar Living for comment over the fake fan accusations.

REPORTS CLAIM SOME FANS ARE BEING PAID TO ATTEND QATAR WORLD CUP

The accusations on TikTok about supposed fake fans at the Qatar World Cup come just weeks after it was claimed that some football fans are being paid to be ambassadors for the tournament.

The Guardian reported on November 4 that groups of fans from England and Wales are set to be paid to travel to the World Cup and invited to the opening ceremony, in return for being official representatives of the tournament.

The Times reported that as many as 80 people across England and Wales had agreed to take up roles as representatives, a role that The Guardian states will require said fans to adhere to “certain terms and conditions.”

Representatives of the Qatar World Cup have described the fan ambassadors as “playing a crucial role” in the tournament.