Saturday, November 19, 2022

Why fixing methane leaks from the oil and gas industry can be a climate game-changer – one that pays for itself




















Methane can leak from pipelines, oil and gas wells, even burners on your stove. 

THE CONVERSATION
Published: November 17, 2022 

What’s the cheapest, quickest way to reduce climate change without roiling the economy? In the United States, it may be by reducing methane emissions from the oil and gas industry.

Methane is the main component of natural gas, and it can leak anywhere along the supply chain, from the wellhead and processing plant, through pipelines and distribution lines, all the way to the burner of your home’s stove or furnace.

Once it reaches the atmosphere, methane’s super heat-trapping properties render it a major agent of warming. Over 20 years, methane causes 85 times more warming than the same amount of carbon dioxide. But methane doesn’t stay in the atmosphere for long, so stopping methane leaks today can have a fast impact on lowering global temperatures.

That’s one reason governments at the COP27, the 2022 United Nations climate change conference in Egypt, have focused on methane as an easy win in the climate battle.

So far, 130 countries, including the United States and most of the big oil producers other than Russia, have pledged to reduce methane emissions from oil and gas by at least 30%. China has not signed but has agreed to reduce emissions. If those pledges are met, the result would be equivalent to eliminating the greenhouse gas emissions from all of the world’s cars, trucks, buses and all two- and three-wheeled vehicles, according to the International Energy Agency.

There’s also another reason for the methane focus, and it makes this strategy more likely to succeed: Stopping methane leaks from the oil and gas industry can largely pay for itself and boost the amount of fuel available.


Capturing methane can pay off

Methane is produced by decaying organic material. Natural sources, such as wetlands, account for roughly 40% of today’s global methane emissions. But the majority comes from human activities, such as farms, landfills and wastewater treatment plants – and fuel production. Oil, gas and coal together make up about a third of global methane emissions.

In all, methane is responsible for almost a third of the 1.2 degrees Celsius (2.2 degrees Fahrenheit) that global temperatures have risen since the industrial era.

Unfortunately, methane emissions are still rising. In 2021, atmospheric levels increased to 1,908 parts per billion, the highest levels in at least 800,000 years. Last year’s increase of 18 parts per billion was the biggest on record.

Among the sources, the oil and gas sector is best equipped to stop emitting because it is already configured to sell any methane it can prevent from leaking.

Methane leaks and “venting” in the oil and gas sector have numerous causes. Unintentional leaks can flow from pneumatic devices, valves, compressors and storage tanks, which often are designed to vent methane when pressures build.

Unlit or inefficient flares are another big source. Some companies routinely burn off excess gas that they can’t easily capture or don’t have the pipeline capacity to transport, but that still releases methane and carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

Nearly all of these emissions can be stopped with new components or regulations that prohibit routine flaring.

Making those repairs can pay off. Global oil and gas operations emitted more methane in 2021 than Canada consumed that entire year, according to IEA estimates. If that gas were captured, at current U.S. prices – $4 per million British thermal unit – that wasted methane would fetch around $17 billion. The IEA determined that a one-time investment of $11 billion would eliminate roughly 75% of methane leaks worldwide, along with an even larger amount of gas that is wasted by “flaring” or burning it off at the wellhead.

The repairs and infrastructure investments would not only reduce warming, but they would also generate profits for producers and provide direly needed natural gas to markets undergoing drastic shortages due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Getting companies to cut methane emissions

Motivating U.S. producers to act has been the big hurdle.


The Biden administration is aiming for an 87% reduction in methane emissions below 2005 levels by the end of the decade. To get there, it has reimposed and strengthened U.S. methane rules that were dropped by the Trump administration. These include requiring drillers to find and repair leaks at more than 1 million U.S. well sites.

The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 further incentivizes methane mitigation, including by levying an emissions tax on large oil and gas producers starting at $900 per ton in 2024, increasing to $1,500 in 2026. That fee, which can be waived by the Environmental Protection Agency and doesn’t affect small producers or leaks below 0.2% of gas produced, is based on the social cost to society from methane’s contribution to climate damage.

Customers are also putting pressure on the industry. Regulatory indifference by the Trump administration to U.S. methane flaring and venting led to cancellation of some European plans to import U.S. liquefied natural gas.

Reducing methane isn’t always straightforward, though, particularly in the U.S., where thousands of oil companies operate with minimal oversight.

A company’s methane emissions aren’t necessarily proportional to its oil and gas production, either. For example, a 2021 study using data from the EPA found Texas-based Hilcorp Energy reporting nearly 50% more methane emissions than ExxonMobil, despite producing less oil and gas. Hilcorp, which specializes in acquiring “late life” assets, says it is working to reduce emissions. Other little-known producers have also reported large emissions.

Investor pressure has pushed several publicly traded companies to reduce their methane emissions, but in practice this sometimes leads them to sell off “dirty” assets to smaller operators with less oversight.

In such a situation, the easiest way to encourage companies to clean up is via a tax. Done right, companies would act before they had to pay.

Using technology to keep emissions in check


Unlike carbon dioxide, which lingers in the atmosphere for a century or more, methane only sticks around for about a dozen years. So, if humans stop replenishing methane stocks in the atmosphere, those levels will decline.

A review of methane leaks in the Permian Basin shows the big impact that some regions can have.

Researchers found that gas and oil operations in the Permian, in west Texas and New Mexico, had a leakage rate estimated at 3.7% in 2018 and 2019, before the pandemic. A 2012 study found that leakage rates above 3.2% make climate damage from using natural gas worse than that from burning coal, which is normally considered the biggest climate threat.
Map of methane emissions from oil, gas and coal globally, 2016. Joshua Stevens/NASA Earth Observatory

Methane leaks used to escape detection because the gas is invisible. Now, the proliferation of satellite-based sensors and infrared cameras makes detection easy.

Companies such as GTI Energy’s Veritas, Project Canary and MiQ have also launched to assist natural gas producers in reducing emissions and then verifying the reductions. At that point, if leaks are less than 0.2%, producers can avoid the federal fee and also market their output as “responsibly sourced” gas.

Author
Jim Krane
Fellow for Energy Studies, Baker Institute for Public Policy; Lecturer, Jones Graduate School of Business at Rice University





Sask. education minister admits there may have been oversight gap at church-run schools

By Nathaniel Dove 
Global News
Posted November 17, 2022 


The minister frequently touted new regulations he announced in August, after former students at another church-run school filed a lawsuit against their former church, now called Mile Two Church.

Saskatchewan Education Minister Dustin Duncan said a church-run, government-funded school may have started complying with provincial curricula after it started to receive government funding – even though adhering to the curricula is required to receive the funding.

Duncan, in an exclusive interview, responded to Global News’ reporting that a school official at a government-funded, church-run school told a student being gay was wrong.

Cody Hamilton, who attended Prairie Christian Academy (PCA), said the principal of the school, Rene Boutin, called him into his office in the fall of 2013 when he learned Hamilton was gay. Hamilton said Boutin told him he needed to choose God because being gay was wrong.


PCA, as a qualified independent school (QIS), received more than $200,000 from the Saskatchewan government for the 2013-14 school year, according to government accounts.

Boutin, who was listed in the Education Ministry’s records as the school’s director at the time and not the principal, did not respond to multiple interview requests.

Hamilton also said the school taught that the world is approximately 6,000 years old.

“If there were things that maybe were not in alignment with the curriculum in that timeframe, that 2013-2014 timeframe,” Duncan said, when asked about Hamilton’s allegations, “I think that probably was just a reflection of the fact that the ministry was still working with the schools to ensure that what they were teaching (and) the resources that they were using were in alignment with the provincial curriculum.”

During the interview, the minister frequently touted new regulations he announced in August, after former students at another church-run school filed a lawsuit against their former church, now called Mile Two Church. Those regulations allow for more inspections of QIS, up to one a month, he said. Previously inspectors only visited schools three times per school year.

The students allege church staff abused them. The allegations have not been tested in court.


In an interview on Tuesday, Global News asked if the ministry had taken any new steps regarding PCA since Global first contacted the minister’s office on Oct. 31.

“So, certainly the ministry has conducted one of their inspections,” Duncan said.

He said the ministry had worked with the school to ensure it is providing a safe and welcoming environment for all the students.

Global News obtained the government’s inspection reports for PCA using a freedom of information request. The 2013 report, conducted in January of that year, shows the inspector found “the intellectual, emotional and physical well-being of children is acceptable.”

Hamilton said that in August of 2013 he became suicidal because church teachings condemn homosexuality and he realized he was gay. He said Boutin called him into his office in September of that year to tell him being gay was wrong.

The 2014 report, which was conducted in May of that year, does not have the same box to check on the form regarding children’s well-being. But it does quote the inspection regulations, which includes “observing any aspect of the educational activities and educational operations… to protect the societal interests of educating the pupils in the school.” The report did not note anything that would seem to violate that objective. And a letter attached to the report stated the inspector found the school adhered to The Education Act and The Independent School Regulations with regards to educational operations.

“I wish you success in the 2013-14 school year,” the inspector wrote in May 2014. The inspection shows the 213-14 school year was scheduled to end in June.

Ministry staff did not provide any other inspection reports for that period in response to Global News’ freedom of information request.

Global News asked the minister about the apparent discrepancy between the reports’ findings and what Hamilton said he experienced.

“Certainly our ministry staff are not there in the schools each and every day. But we certainly trust the professionals that are working in those schools, that they are first and foremost teaching the Saskatchewan curriculum, providing a safe and welcoming environment for their students,” he said.

“Just like in in any school, any public school … the ministry is not going to catch everything that may not be in alignment with the curriculum or may not provide a safe and welcoming environment for every single student.”

But he said the ministry takes all allegations seriously and follows up on any allegations. Duncan also said allegations should be taken to the appropriate entity, such as the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission.


He told Global News allegations are not specific to qualified independent schools, which, he pointed out, students are not required to attend.

Former members of Faith Alive Family Church, which runs PCA, have told Global News their view that the church is a cult and that their value is determined by their adherence to the church leaders’ directives.

Several former members said they were expected to donate 10 per cent of their gross income and that they were encouraged to donate more. One member said he was giving 20 per cent of his gross income.

Global News contacted Faith Alive and asked church leaders to comment on this. Albertos Polizogopoulos, Faith Alive’s lawyer, in an email said “the tithes and offerings of Faith Alive Ministries are none of your or Global News’ business,” saying they are private voluntary donations made by members to their church.

When asked if the allegedly controlling environment would affect parents’ decision to remove their children from the school, Duncan said the ministry’s increased regulations ensure schools are following Saskatchewan curricula, policies and procedures and that the schools are employing professional teachers.

A previous statement from the education ministry said, starting in the 2022-23 school year, QIS are required to provide records of supervision by a Professional “A” teacher of any non-professional staff.

The PCA website no longer provides biographical information for school staff, with the information disappearing around the end of August. The public registry for Saskatchewan teachers shows only two people listed on the website prior to the biographical information disappearing who are certified Professional “A” teachers.


During the interview, Duncan said there is a constitutional right to provide for groups of people to organize and register schools as it relates to their freedom of conscience and freedom of religion. He cited the province’s Catholic schools as an example.

Unlike qualified independent schools, Catholic schools in Saskatchewan are fully funded by municipal and provincial governments. QIS receive provincial funding of 50 per cent of the provincial per student average based on the number of students who attend the school.

The president of the Saskatchewan School Board Association (SSBA), which represents public, Catholic and French school boards in the province, and the president of the Saskatoon Teachers Association (STA) told Global News previously that Catholic schools have Professional “A” teachers in every classroom. QIS are required to have one Professional “A” teacher per 40 students.


John McGettigan, the STA president, and Shawn Davidson, the SSBA president, both said the education in a Catholic school matches the education in any other publicly funded school except that the religious schools offer specific religious courses. What is taught in science or history is fact-based and separate from religion, they said.

Duncan said the Education Ministry is comfortable that the 2022 curricula at QIS schools and provincial curricula are in alignment.



Mile Two Church has not responded to several requests for comment, though a statement posted on Facebook on Aug. 3 says “(t)he people that are accused of (the actions alleged in the lawsuit) are no longer here or affiliated with us in any way. We have and will cooperate fully with any officials or authorities that are investigating their actions.”

Global News contacted Faith Alive leaders several times and asked for interviews with church and school leaders. A statement from “the Directors of Faith Alive Ministries” said they are “a Christian, faith-based school entitled by law and under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to teach our students love of God out of a theological, anthropological, and moral perspective derived exclusively from what we sincerely hold as Biblical truth.”


LightSail 2 just met its fiery end, but solar sailing is just getting started

The latest LightSail mission gave us a glimpse into the future of solar sailing.


By GEORGINA TORBET
Nov 18, 2022,

The last image taken by LightSail 2 before it re-entered the atmosphere. Image: The Planetary Society

After three years in space, the Planetary Society’s LightSail 2 mission burned up in the atmosphere on Thursday, November 17th. During its mission, the crowdfunded spacecraft made 18,000 orbits of the planet using its giant reflective sail and demonstrated that controlled solar sailing is possible.

LightSail may now be over, but it has opened the door to the use of solar sailing in space exploration. “It doesn’t fit every situation, but now it gives another arrow in the quiver of options for types of propulsion you can use,” said Bruce Betts, Chief Scientist and LightSail program manager.

LightSail 2 operated in Earth orbit, while future solar sailing missions would likely be in deep space. That makes the requirements somewhat different. “We had the challenge that’s analogous to sailing a sailboat in the harbor versus out in the ocean,” Betts said. LightSail had an easier time with issues like communications than deep space missions would but had to constantly turn to keep in orbit.

The biggest drawback in using solar sailing for space exploration is that the forces involved are so small that craft start out traveling very slowly. “The disadvantage is that you’re using a push from the sun that is really, really tiny,” Betts explained. “The push on our entire sail if it were reflecting perfectly, from the sun at Earth’s distance, is about the same force that a housefly has when it’s sitting on your hand, pushing down.” But the advantage of the method is that this force just keeps building up over time, allowing acceleration up to high speeds without using up fuel.

Upcoming programs like NASA’s NEA Scout and Advanced Composite Solar Sail System (ACS3) will also use solar sailing. The ideal targets for these kinds of missions are within the inner solar system, as the craft stays close enough to the sun to get enough force from the sunlight to keep moving and to change an orbit.

Another type of exploration solar sailing enables is entering orbits that would otherwise be impossible using conventional propulsion systems. Missions that orbit around the sun, for example, currently have to sit in very particular regions called Lagrange points to be in a stable orbit. Trying to get closer to the sun would use up too much fuel. But with a solar sail, a spacecraft can orbit closer to the sun and use its sail to maintain its orbit by making constant adjustments.

There’s also plenty of room for improvement in solar sailing technologies. Researchers are eager to explore ideas such as the use of lasers to push at sails and the development of more sophisticated steering systems. Betts compared the LightSail program to learning to crawl, with the next wave of new technologies enabling the equivalent of walking.

In the extremely long term, one use for solar sailing is the potential to visit other star systems. Interstellar travel is still generations and generations away from being anything like a real possibility, with major technical challenges standing in the way of exploring beyond our solar system. Chemical propulsion systems like those used on the Voyager probes, the most distant man-made objects, would take tens of thousands of years to visit the nearest star systems. But spacecraft with solar sails could potentially reduce that timescale as they can continue to accelerate as they travel. “It’s the only technology we’ve got so far that shows anything resembling practical ability to do that someday,” Betts said.

As for more immediate uses, the most likely use of solar sailing isn’t that it will replace chemical propulsion systems but that it’ll be a viable option for use in certain specific missions.

“In 10 or 20 years, when people are planning a mission, they’ll think about, ‘Hey, would solar sailing work for that?’ And for some of them, it will,” Betts said. “It’ll be part of the real choices for a science mission. And that’s what we’ve contributed to with one step in the pioneering of this.”

Destruction and Renewal: Nova by Samuel R. Delany

    TOR BOOKS

    In this bi-weekly series reviewing classic science fiction and fantasy books, Alan Brown looks at the front lines and frontiers of the field; books about soldiers and spacers, scientists and engineers, explorers and adventurers. Stories full of what Shakespeare used to refer to as “alarums and excursions”: battles, chases, clashes, and the stuff of excitement.

    There are authors who work with the stuff of legends and make it new and fresh and all their own. There are authors who make their prose sing like it was poetry, and authors whose work explores the cosmos in spaceships, dealing with physics and astronomy. And in a few rare cases, there are authors who bring all those elements together into something magical. One of those authors is Samuel R. Delany, whose book Nova is a classic of the genre.

    Delany, still in his 20s, burst onto the science fiction scene of the 1960s like a nova himself. He has been nominated for many awards, and won two Nebulas back to back in 1966 and 1967. My first exposure to his work was The Einstein Intersection, a reworking of the legend of Orpheus. My second was Nova, which became a lifelong favorite. In Nova, he created a novel that works on many levels, including myth and legend, unfolding against a solidly-researched science fiction background. There are other authors who would happily build an entire book around merely a tenth of the ideas that Delany packs into Nova. After Nova, I’ve continued to read the author’s work, and while I appreciated the craftsmanship in novels like Dhalgren and Triton, nothing ever hit my personal sweet spot like the headlong narrative rush of Nova.

    What I did not know at the time, as I was not yet connected to SF fandom, and because it was not mentioned on the paperback copies of his books, was that Delany is African-American and a gay man. So he was not only winning awards (at a remarkably young age), he was breaking down barriers in the SF community, which at the time was overwhelmingly dominated by white male authors.

     

    About the Author

    Samuel R. Delany (born 1942) is a native of New York, who grew up in Harlem and attended the Bronx High School of Science and City College. In his younger days, he traveled the world, working in a variety of jobs before he reached the point where he could support himself with his writing. Delany became a professor in 1988 and has taught at several universities, most notably serving on the faculty of Temple University’s English Department from 2001 until he retired in 2015. He received vital support early in his career from editor Fred Pohl, and was quickly and widely acclaimed from the start of his career as a gifted and skillful author. He has won the Hugo Award twice and the Nebula award four times, collecting many more nominations for those awards over the years. In addition to Nova, his novels include Babel-17 (Nebula Award winner in 1966), The Einstein Intersection (Nebula Award winner in 1967), The Fall of the TowersThe Jewels of Aptor, and Dhalgren. Of his many short stories, “Aye, and Gomorrah…” won the Nebula Award in 1967, and “Time Considered as a Helix of Semi-Precious Stones” won both the Hugo and Nebula Awards in 1968. He won another Hugo, in the Best Related Work category, in 1989 for The Motion of Light in Water: Sex and Science Fiction Writing in the East Village 1957-1965. He was inducted into the Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame in 2002, and named as a Science Fiction Writers of America Grand Master in 2013.

    Mr. Delany has been called “the first African-American science fiction writer,” a label he rejected in a New York Review of Science Fiction article in August 1998, pointing out several African-American authors before him who wrote stories that could be identified as science fiction. If not the first to write in the genre, however, he was definitely the first to make such a large and lasting impact on the genre right from the beginning of his writing career. During his career, he also came out as gay, and did not shy away from including sexual situations in his fiction. This reportedly caused some discomfort among booksellers and publishers at the time. When Mr. Delany started his career, science fiction writers and the characters they portrayed were largely male, white, and heterosexual (particularly when it came to their protagonists). Mr. Delany has been a pioneer in changing that, and helped to open the doors of the science fiction genre for the many diverse authors who followed in his footsteps.

     

    The World of Nova

    Cover art by Chris Moore

    In the novel, which takes place in the 32nd Century CE, human civilization is split between the Earth-led worlds of Draco and the worlds of the Pleiades star cluster, where shorter travel distances have allowed a younger confederation to blossom. These powers compete in the non-aligned Outer Colonies. The economy of these worlds is controlled by a few families, whose power exceeds that of the robber barons of the United States at the end of the 19th Century. The Pleiades worlds are dominated by the Von Ray family, while the Draco worlds are dominated by the Reds of Red Shift Ltd. The Von Ray family has played a large role in keeping the Pleiades free from domination by the corporations of Draco—something that is seen as patriotism among the Pleiades, but as piracy by the people of Draco.

    This future civilization is fueled by the fictional element Illyrion, a power source like none ever seen before. There is not much of this element available, but even the smallest amounts can generate huge amounts of energy. The discovery of even modest amounts of Illyrion could completely upset the balance of power among human worlds. From a scientific standpoint, while Transuranium elements tend toward faster and faster radioactive decay rates as they get heavier, scientists have long speculated that there might be “islands of stability,” where super-heavy elements such as the fictional Illyrion exist. No trace of these elements has ever been found in nature, but they remain an intriguing possibility.

    Novas have long captured the imagination of those who watch the sky. The very idea of a star becoming unstable and exploding into cosmic fury—one that could destroy every world that orbits—it is both frightening and fascinating. Scientists now separate the phenomena into two types of events: classical novas, which are caused by two binary stars interacting, and supernovas, which involve a massive star exploding toward the end of its lifespan. Supernovas can reshape the elements of the star itself in a process known as nucleosynthesis.

    Interstellar travel in Delany’s 32nd Century, which involves journeys at speeds faster than light, is made possible by manipulating the flow of forces unknown to us today in a process akin to sailing. These forces of the space-time continuum are accessed by energy vanes, each of which is controlled by a computer operated by the “cyborg studs” who make up the crew of a starship.

    Most humans have been outfitted with cybernetic control sockets in their wrists and at base of their spines. This allows them to control a range of devices and power tools, from vacuum cleaners to mining machines and right up to starships. It also allows people to be much more flexible in moving from career to career. Some reviewers have drawn a parallel between these sockets and the jacks that would later appear as a popular element in the cyberpunk genre. But unlike those jacks, which connect people with a virtual world that stands apart from the physical world, the sockets in this novel connect people to devices in the physical world, and allow the physical world to be sensed in different ways.

     

    Nova

    As the novel opens, we meet a young man from Earth nicknamed The Mouse, a cyborg stud who has been knocking around the Solar System, looking for a berth aboard an interstellar ship; he’s also a musician who plays the multi-media sensory-syrynx. On a terraformed moon of Neptune, the Mouse meets a ruined and blind old man, Dan, who rants about diving into a star for Captain Lorq Von Ray. He then meets Katin, a young intellectual from Luna, and the two of them encounter Von Ray, who is not only looking for Dan, but is also looking to form a new crew. Von Ray has a hideously scarred face, and is more than a bit obsessive. The Mouse and Katin agree to join his crew, along with the brothers Lynceos and Idas, and the couple Sebastian and Tyÿ, who have amorphous, black, flying pet “gillies” accompanying them. Von Ray tells them they are heading toward a nova, attempting something that has led to failure twice before, and in a race with scions of one of Draco’s most powerful families, Prince Red and his sister Ruby Red. Poor Dan stumbles into a volcanic chasm and dies—he’s not the last character in the book that will meet a fiery fate.

    The story not only charts the preparations of this crew and their voyage to their nova, but reveals Von Ray’s motivation through two long flashback scenes. The first is a childhood encounter between Lorq, Prince Red, and Ruby Red on Lorq’s homeworld. Prince Red has a birth defect that has damaged one of his arms, and wears a cybernetic prosthesis. He has been sheltered and coddled by his family to the point where he sees even a mention of his arm as a personal insult, and shows signs of a cruel and sadistic nature. Lorq is attracted to Ruby Red, who is already dominated by her brother’s forceful personality.

    The second flashback involves another encounter between Lorq, Prince, and Ruby. Lorq has become an accomplished spaceship racer, and is invited by the Reds to a costume party on Earth. When he arrives, Prince gives him a pirate costume. Lorq has not paid much attention to his family history, and it falls to Ruby to explain that the pirate costume is an insult. He is again attracted to Ruby, who remains unhealthily devoted to her cruel brother. There is a confrontation, and Prince attacks Lorq, leaving him with a scarred face. Lorq returns to his family, finds out from his father that Draco is finally making inroads into the Pleiades, and that unless something changes, they will lose their independence, and his family will lose its fortune. Lorq decides to keep his facial scar as a reminder of his duty, and develops a plan to harvest Illyrion from an exploding star, upsetting the interstellar economy in the favor of the Pleiades. His first attempt, with a carefully selected crew, leaves Dan crippled, and Lorq decides to depend more on chance than planning in his second attempt.

    Lorq is reckless and driven, and constantly seeks personal confrontations with Prince Red, even when they are unwise. His search for a crew in the heart of Draco is just one sign of his aggressive approach. His randomly selected crew does prove useful, as at one point Sebastian’s pets save him from Prince, and he draws inspiration and guidance from the various crew members, especially Tyÿ, who is a skilled reader of Tarot cards.

    I will refrain from further summary of the plot, because if you haven’t read this book, you should do so at your earliest convenience, and I don’t want to spoil things. Suffice it to say, the nova of the title is not only a physical presence: it also represents conflict and destruction, along with renewal and rebirth.

    Katin and the Mouse represent two different vehicles for the author’s viewpoint to enter the story. Delany worked as a guitarist and singer in his younger days, and Mouse represents the attitude of a performing musician, focused on senses, emotions, and the immediacy of the moment. Katin, on the other hand, is an intellectual and a Harvard graduate, and his continual note-taking for a novel he has yet to start offers a wry commentary on an author’s challenges. Katin is cleverly used as a vehicle for expository information, as he has a habit of lecturing people. The observations of Katin and the Mouse on the events of the novel are entertaining and often amusing.

    Delany draws on his travels around the world, and the book is notable for the diversity of its characters and the various cultures it portrays, especially among Lorq’s crew. Lorq is the son of a mother with Senegalese heritage, while his father’s heritage is Norwegian. Mouse is of Romani heritage, Dan is Australian, Katin is from Luna, Sebastian and Tyÿ are from the Pleiades, and the twin brothers Lynceos and Idas are of African descent, with one being an albino.

    Delaney explicitly evokes Tarot cards and grail quest legends in the book, but I also noted an array of other possible influences, as well. Dan reminded me of the old blind sailor Pew who sets the plot in motion in Stevenson’s Treasure Island. Von Ray’s obsession recalls Captain Ahab’s search for the white whale in Melville’s Moby-Dick. There is also a hint of Raphael Sabatini’s protagonists in Von Ray, a man driven by a need for revenge. And perhaps most strongly of all, Von Ray functions as an analog for Prometheus, striving and suffering to bring fire to his people. The book works on many levels, and is all the stronger for it.

     

    Final Thoughts

    Nova worked well upon my first readings, and holds up surprisingly well after fifty years. There are very few of the obvious anachronisms you often find in older works, where new developments in real life society and science have rendered the portrayed future as obsolete. The book contains interesting scientific speculation, social commentary, compelling characters, and action and adventure aplenty. I would recommend it without reservation to anyone who wants to read an outstanding science fiction novel.

    And now, as I always do, I yield the floor to you. Have you read Nova, and if so, what did you think? What are your thoughts on other works by Delany? And how do you view his work in terms of the history of the science fiction field?

    Alan Brown has been a science fiction fan for over five decades, especially fiction that deals with science, military matters, exploration and adventure.


    New Information Reveals Donald Trump Posted Classified Satellite Imagery on Twitter as President

    Three years ago former President Donald Trump posted a satellite image in Iran, and new information confirms the photo was classified.


    By Nikki Main
    Published Yesterday 

    Declassified documents confirm former President Donald Trump illegally posted a satellite image of a failed rocket launch in Iran on Twitter in 2019. The image showed a rocket that exploded on a launch pad after country officials unsuccessfully tried to launch a satellite. Trump reportedly published the image to seemingly prove the U.S. was not involved in the incident.

    “The United States of America was not involved in the catastrophic accident during final launch preparations for the Safir SLV Launch at Semnan Launch Site One in Iran,” Trump tweeted at the time. “I wish Iran best wishes and good luck in determining what happened at Site One.”



    The image was so sharp that some experts suspected it wasn’t taken by satellite at all. “This picture is so exquisite, and you see so much detail,” Jeffrey Lewis, who studies satellite imagery at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey told NPR. “At first, I thought it must have been taken by a drone or something.”

    Through a Freedom of Information Act request, NPR obtained the original image from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA). The outlet says they went through a thorough review with the Pentagon to confirm the image could now be shared with the public. However, several details remain redacted.

    Steven Aftergood, a specialist in secrecy and classification at the Federation of American Scientists told NPR this decision shows Trump seemed to have no problem sharing highly sensitive information on social media while president.

    “He was getting literally a bird’s eye view of some of the most sensitive US intelligence on Iran,” Aftergood told the outlet. “And the first thing he seemed to want to do was to blurt it out over Twitter.”

    When the image was first posted, aerospace experts determined the photo was taken by a classified spacecraft called USA 224, believed to be a multibillion-dollar KH-11 reconnaissance aircraft. The spacecraft is similar to the Hubble Telescope, but instead of getting a closer look at the stars, it views the Earth’s surface.

    According to reports last year by Yahoo! News, Trump was shown the satellite image during a daily intelligence briefing with top national security advisors. According to Yahoo, a former Trump administration official told the outlet that Trump had asked whether he could keep the photo. After some hesitation, he was told he could. About an hour later, Trump tweeted out the image to his millions of followers.

    Aftergood told NPR that by releasing the image, Trump may have provided invaluable information to other countries, including Russia and Iran, saying if one of those countries had released a similar image, the U.S. would have assembled a task force to learn what they could about the information.

    This new information comes only days after Trump formally announced his bid to run for president in 2024. That announcement now makes him immune to fact-checking on Facebook, according to Meta’s policies preventing moderators from weighing-in on politicians’ posts. And it’s anyone’s guess whether he’ll continue to post whatever he wants on Truth Social or whether he’ll go back to his old stomping grounds, pending the green light from Twitter after being banned for his role in January 6.

    News of the reckless posting of classified photos might not be that surprising for those following along. The former President seemed to have a thing for classified information. Over the summer, the FBI seized troves of classified documents from his Mar-a-Lago estate


    OPINION
    GUEST ESSAY

    I Was the Head of Trust and Safety at Twitter. This Is What Could Become of It.

    Nov. 18, 2022
    Justin Lane/EPA, via Shutterstock

    By Yoel Roth
    Mr. Roth is a former head of trust and safety at Twitter.



    This month, I chose to leave my position leading trust and safety at Elon Musk’s Twitter.

    My teams were responsible for drafting Twitter’s rules and figuring out how to apply them consistently to hundreds of millions of tweets per day. In my more than seven years at the company, we exposed government-backed troll farms meddling in elections, introduced tools for contextualizing dangerous misinformation and, yes, banned President Donald Trump from the service. The Cornell professor Tarleton Gillespie called teams like mine the “custodians of the internet.” The work of online sanitation is unrelenting and contentious.

    Enter Mr. Musk.

    In a news release announcing his agreement to acquire the company, Mr. Musk laid out a simple thesis: “Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated.” He said he planned to revitalize Twitter by eliminating spam and drastically altering its policies to remove only illegal speech.

    Since the deal closed on Oct‌. 27‌‌, many of the changes made by Mr. Musk and his team have been sudden and alarming for employees and users alike, including rapid-fire layoffs and an ill-fated foray into reinventing Twitter’s verification system. A wave of employee resignations caused the hashtag #RIPTwitter to trend on the site on Thursday — not for the first time — alongside questions about whether a skeleton crew of remaining staff members can keep the service, now 16 years old, afloat.

    And yet when it comes to content moderation, much has stayed the same since Mr. Musk’s acquisition. Twitter’s rules continue to ban a wide range of lawful but awful speech. Mr. Musk has insisted publicly that the company’s practices and policies are unchanged. Are we just in the early days — or has the self-declared free speech absolutist had a change of heart?

    The truth is that even Elon Musk’s brand of radical transformation has unavoidable limits.

    Advertisers have played the most direct role thus far in moderating Mr. Musk’s free speech ambitions. As long as 90 percent of the company’s revenue comes from ads (as was the case when Mr. Musk bought the company), Twitter has little choice but to operate in a way that won’t imperil the revenue streams that keep the lights on. This has already proved to be challenging.

    Almost immediately upon the acquisition’s close, a wave of racist and antisemitic trolling emerged on Twitter. Wary marketers, including those at General Mills, Audi and Pfizer, slowed down or paused ad spending on the platform, kicking off a crisis within the company to protect precious ad revenue.

    In response, Mr. Musk empowered my team to move more aggressively to remove hate speech across the platform — censoring more content, not less. Our actions worked: Before my departure, I shared data about Twitter’s enforcement of hateful conduct, showing that by some measures, Twitter was actually safer under Mr. Musk than it was before.

    Marketers have not shied away from using the power of the purse: In the days following Mr. Musk’s acquisition, the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, a key ad industry trade group, published an open call to Twitter to adhere to existing commitments to “brand safety.” It’s perhaps for this reason that Mr. Musk has said he wants to move away from ads as Twitter’s primary revenue source: His ability to make decisions unilaterally about the site’s future is constrained by a marketing industry he neither controls nor has managed to win over.

    But even if Mr. Musk is able to free Twitter from the influence of powerful advertisers, his path to unfettered speech is still not clear. Twitter remains bound by the laws and regulations of the countries in which it operates. Amid the spike in racial slurs on Twitter in the days after the acquisition, the European Union’s chief platform regulator posted on the site to remind Mr. Musk that in Europe, an unmoderated free-for-all won’t fly. In the United States, members of Congress and the Federal Trade Commission have raised concerns about the company’s recent actions. And outside the United States and the European Union, the situation becomes even more complex: Mr. Musk’s principle of keying Twitter’s policies on local laws could push the company to censor speech it was loath to restrict in the past, including political dissent.

    Regulators have significant tools at their disposal to enforce their will on Twitter and on Mr. Musk. Penalties for noncompliance with Europe’s Digital Services Act could total as much as 6 percent of the company’s annual revenue. In the United States, the F.T.C. has shown an increasing willingness to exact significant fines for noncompliance with its orders (like a blockbuster $5 billion fine imposed on Facebook in 2019). In other key markets for Twitter, such as India, in-country staff members work with the looming threat of personal intimidation and arrest if their employers fail to comply with local directives. Even a Musk-led Twitter will struggle to shrug off these constraints.

    There is one more source of power on the web — one that most people don’t think much about but may be the most significant check on unrestrained speech on the mainstream internet: the app stores operated by Google and Apple.

    While Twitter has been publicly tight-lipped about how many people use the company’s mobile apps (rather than visit Twitter on a web browser), its 2021 annual report didn’t mince words: The company’s release of new products “is dependent upon and can be impacted by digital storefront operators” that decide the guidelines and enforce them, it reads. “Such review processes can be difficult to predict, and certain decisions may harm our business.”

    “May harm our business” is an understatement. Failure to adhere to Apple’s and Google’s guidelines would be catastrophic, risking Twitter’s expulsion from their app stores and making it more difficult for billions of potential users to get Twitter’s services. This gives Apple and Google enormous power to shape the decisions Twitter makes.

    Apple’s guidelines for developers are reasonable and plainly stated: They emphasize creating “a safe experience for users” and stress the importance of protecting children. The guidelines quote Justice Potter Stewart’s “I know it when I see it” quip, saying the company will ban apps that are “over the line.”

    In practice, the enforcement of these rules is fraught.

    In my time at Twitter, representatives of the app stores regularly raised concerns about content available on our platform. On one occasion, a member of an app review team contacted Twitter, saying with consternation that he had searched for “#boobs” in the Twitter app and was presented with … exactly what you’d expect. Another time, on the eve of a major feature release, a reviewer sent screenshots of several days-old tweets containing an English-language racial slur, asking Twitter representatives whether they should be permitted to appear on the service.

    Reviewers hint that app approval could be delayed or perhaps even withheld entirely if issues are not resolved to their satisfaction — although the standards for resolution are often implied. Even as they appear to be driven largely by manual checks and anecdotes, these review procedures have the power to derail company plans and trigger all-hands-on-deck crises for weeks or months at a time.

    Whose values are these companies defending when they enforce their policies? While the wide array of often conflicting global laws no doubt plays a part, the most direct explanation is that platform policies are shaped by the preferences of a small group of predominantly American tech executives. Steve Jobs didn’t believe porn should be allowed in the App Store, and so it isn’t allowed. Stripped bare, the decisions have a dismaying lack of legitimacy.

    It’s this very lack of legitimacy that Mr. Musk, correctly, points to when he calls for greater free speech and for the establishment of a “content moderation council” to guide the company’s policies — an idea Google and Apple would be right to borrow for the governance of their app stores. But even as he criticizes the capriciousness of platform policies, he perpetuates the same lack of legitimacy through his impulsive changes and tweet-length pronouncements about Twitter’s rules. In appointing himself “chief twit,” Mr. Musk has made clear that at the end of the day, he’ll be the one calling the shots.

    It was for this reason that I chose to leave the company: A Twitter whose policies are defined by edict has little need for a trust and safety function dedicated to its principled development.

    So where will Twitter go from here? Some of the company’s decisions in the weeks and months to come, like the near certainty of allowing Mr. Trump’s account back on the service, will have an immediate, perceptible impact. But to truly understand the shape of Twitter going forward, I’d encourage looking not just at the choices the company makes but also at how Mr. Musk makes them. Should the moderation council materialize, will it represent more than just the loudest, predominantly American voices complaining about censorship — including, critically, the approximately 80 percent of Twitter users who reside outside the United States? Will the company continue to invest in features like Community Notes, which brings Twitter users into the work of platform governance? Will Mr. Musk’s tweets announcing policy changes become less frequent and abrupt?

    In the longer term, the moderating influences of advertisers, regulators and, most critically of all, app stores may be welcome for those of us hoping to avoid an escalation in the volume of dangerous speech online. Twitter will have to balance its new owner’s goals against the practical realities of life on Apple’s and Google’s internet — no easy task for the employees who have chosen to remain. And as I departed the company, the calls from the app review teams had already begun.


    More on Twitter

    Resignations Roil Twitter as Elon Musk Tries Persuading Some Workers to Stay
    Nov. 17, 2022


    Opinion | Farhad Manjoo
    Elon Musk Has No Idea What He’s Doing at Twitter
    Nov. 10, 2022


    Two Weeks of Chaos: Inside Elon Musk’s Takeover of Twitter
    Nov. 11, 2022


    Yoel Roth (@yoyoel) was the head of trust and safety at Twitter, where he spent seven years directing the company’s policy and enforcement work on abuse, election security and anti-spam issues.

    A version of this article appears in print on Nov. 19, 2022, Section A, Page 23 of the New York edition with the headline: I Led the Trust and Safety Teams at Twitter. Here’s What Could Happen Next..