Sunday, December 18, 2022


'Celtic are Palestine, Rangers are Israel': How Middle East politics bled into Scottish football

Paul McLoughlin
15 December, 2022

In-depth: The rivalry between Celtic and Rangers has been rooted in history and religion, yet Middle East politics have also shown to be a key symbol of both clubs' identities.

Several years ago, Scottish officials sought to cool tensions between Celtic and Rangers fans during Glasgow's highly-charged Old Firm derby by banning perceived symbols of sectarian identity.

Celtic supporters, the city's Catholic club, were ordered not to fly the Irish tricolour while Rangers, the Protestant team, were told not to display the Union Flag.

Security managed to prevent such paraphernalia from entering the stadium, but fans found an ingenious way of circumventing the restrictions to proudly parade their political and religious affiliations.

As kick-off commenced, the Rangers' stands transformed into a sea of blue and white of the Israeli flag, a country linked to Unionism in Northern Ireland, while at the Celtic end, thousands of Palestinian flags were raised, a cause long-associated with Irish Republicanism.


"The Old Firm rivalry thrives on dividing lines and these can be global as well as local"


The story, shared by thousands of people at pubs and football matches, is fake, perhaps romanticising the perceived tribalism of Scottish football and the political consciousness of working-class fans at Glasgow's two biggest clubs (non-aligned Patrick Thistle is often described as the city's atheist team).

Yet the tale does contain a kernel of truth. A typical Rangers fan would likely lean toward Israel during a debate on the Middle East while the odds are that a Celtic supporter stopped on the street would sympathise with Palestinians, although neither is likely to log onto The New Arab first thing in the morning.

"The reason you can tell that story is fake is because the Scottish FA would never ban the Union flag," jokes Sam Hamad, a writer and History PhD candidate at the University of Glasgow focusing on totalitarian ideologies, and a Celtic supporter.

The idea that Scottish football fans are as committed and informed on geopolitics as struggles at home is of course an exaggeration, yet there is a thread linking Glasgow to Jerusalem, via Northern Ireland.

RELATED
In-depth
Adam Doyle

Glaswegians of both Christian denominations often have familial ties to Belfast and Derry/Londonderry and it is one of the factors for the intense rivalries between the two clubs, which is occasionally articulated via the situation in Palestine-Israel.

Celtic fans have raised the Palestinian flag at games as a show of solidarity while the occasional Israeli flag can be spotted at Ibrox Park.

"It's not like every second Celtic fan is flying a Palestinian flag, it is mostly at a certain section of Celtic Park associated with the Celtic Ultras, The Green Brigade… who have an inherent anti-imperialist quality."

Palestinian flags are waved by fans during the UEFA Champions League Play-off First leg match between Celtic and Hapoel Beer-Sheva at Celtic Park on 17 August 2016 in Glasgow, Scotland. [Photo by Steve Welsh/Getty Images]

Palestinian solidarity


In 2016 when Celtic faced Israeli side Hapoel Beer Sheva at home - and this actually happened - the North Curve, home of the Green Brigade, was awash with dozens of Palestinian flags.

Fans made similar gestures during the Israeli assaults on Gaza and the occupied West Bank, highlighting the deep sense of affinity Celtic fans have with the Palestinian cause.

"The people of Irish identity in Scotland have a real connection to the north of Ireland, and the Irish Republican movement came to represent people, Celts if you like, sticking up for themselves," said Hamad.

"So in the 1970s, when Irish Republicans began to pay interest to the Palestinian cause - with quite strong links to the PLO - this bled out into Celtic. They both see in themselves movements for indigenous autonomy against powerful states."

Such pro-Palestine gestures by The Green Brigade have resulted in Celtic being fined thousands of pounds by European football's governing body, UEFA, for breaking Article 16 by displaying "provocative banner(s)".

"Modern Scottish nationalism was born from opposition to the union (between Scotland and England) and that gave Scottish nationalism an inherent anti-imperialism, which lends itself to support for the Palestinian cause"

The club paid a £9,000 penalty after the Hapoel Beer Sheva incident, which Celtic fans responded to by raising £130,000 for Palestinian charities.

One of the groups that benefited from The Green Brigade's solidarity act was Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP), an NGO that continues to receive support from Celtic fans.

"We hugely appreciate the support of Celtic fans, which helps us continue delivering our much-needed medical aid to Palestinians," Aisha Mansour, MAP's West Bank director, told The New Arab.

"We rely heavily on donations from individuals and groups, and we are grateful for this incredible support."

In a bid to avoid further penalties by UEFA, Celtic FC officials foiled one attempt by members of The Green Brigade to lay out dozens of Palestinian flags at the North Curve the evening before captain Scott Brown's final match for the club in 2021.

Celtic FC and The Green Brigade did not respond to emails on this issue.

RELATED
In-depth
Inigo Alexander

Scottish concerns


While The Green Brigade has been vocal in their support for the Palestinian cause, political commentary more commonly touches on local issues.

Celtic fans have raised tifos welcoming refugees to Scotland and placards slamming Conservative government policies. They also regularly raise money for local causes in Scotland, making them not only the most left-wing club in the UK but probably the most charitable.

This year, The Green Brigade Food Drive raised nearly £60,000 and seven vans full of food.

Hamad said that Celtic's founding 135-years-ago by Irish immigrants has given the fans a genuine affinity with the poor and dispossessed whether in Scotland or Palestine.

Celtic FC's non-sectarian policy and widespread socialist sentiments have also attracted fans from minority groups, in a way Rangers - with its heady displays of British Unionism and love of 'the Crown' - might not.


A girl walks past a portion of a mural on Falls Road on 20 August 2002 in west Belfast, Northern Ireland. [Getty]


"Some of our most famous players have been Protestants, we have Muslim fans, we have Jewish fans, we have never had a sectarian policy. Unlike Rangers, the club was always open to all players from all backgrounds," Hamad said.

There is little surprise that the Glasgow area was known as Red Clydeside and one of the few parts of the UK to elect Communist members of parliament. Today, the city is represented solely by seven Scottish National Party MPs, campaigning for independence for Scotland.

"Modern Scottish nationalism was born from opposition to the union (between Scotland and England) and that gave Scottish nationalism an inherent anti-imperialism, which lends itself to support for the Palestinian cause, the anti-Apartheid cause, which was really strong in Scotland," Hamad said.

A recent YouGov poll found that around a quarter of the Scottish population's sympathies lie with Palestinians and only eight percent with Israel. This was only slightly above the average in England (apart from London) where, the vast majority - as in Scotland - stated "don't know" or that their sympathies lay with neither party.

UEFA fine for Celtic fans for flying Palestinian flag
Society  The New Arab

Ulster ties


Across the Irish Sea, the Unionist community is mostly descendants of English and Scottish plantation farmers and other immigrants who settled in 16th and 17th-century Ireland, creating a Protestant enclave on the island and tying Northern Ireland to the UK.

Sections of them have historically affiliated with Israel including via the British-Israelite tradition which was particularly strong among Evangelical and other Protestant communities in Northern Ireland.

This pseudo-scientific belief states that the British people are the descendants of the lost tribe of Israel and many tied their faith to a zeal of having Protestantism survive on the Catholic-majority island.

There is also the theory that the hexagram in the Ulster banner is actually a Star of David - which also forms the heart of the Israeli flag - and some Protestants continue to use this symbol to express their faith and identity.

When upheavals and famine hit Ireland in the 19th century, many Ulster-Scots joined Irish Catholics and packed their bags for Scotland's West Coast and Glasgow.


A Rangers supporters' flag is seen next to a political mural in East Belfast on Monday 19 April 2021 in Belfast, Northern Ireland. 
[Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images]


On both sides of the Irish Sea, the descendants of Ulster Scots became a bedrock of Rangers' support, many of whom raise Ulster, British, and occasionally Israeli flags at games against Celtic.

"There is a 'British-Israelite' tradition within Ulster Protestantism which has been much more influential on that community than is often understood and I think that feeds into attitudes within parts of the Rangers fanbase," said David Scott, director of Nil by Mouth, a charity working to end sectarianism in Scotland.

"Likewise at Celtic, you will have fans who equate the situation in the North with the Palestinian situation and wish to display solidarity with those they view as being historically wronged."

Today, Unionist parties have established strong ties with Israel including the late firebrand politician and preacher Ian Paisley who launched Northern Ireland Friends of Israel in 2009.


"There is a 'British-Israelite' tradition within Ulster Protestantism which has been much more influential on that community than is often understood and I think that feeds into attitudes within parts of the Rangers fanbase"

The group hosted Israeli President Isaac Herzog, son of former President Chaim Herzog, at Stormont in 2018 to mark the 100th anniversary of his father's birth in Belfast.

Mayor of Craigavon Stephen Moutray, a member of Northern Ireland's Democratic Unionist Party, explained the connection between Protestants on the island and Israel during a 2010 speech in Dublin.

"We as unionists in Northern Ireland can emphasise with the government and people of Israel as we know only too well what it is like to suffer injustice, to have our name blackened in the international community and to be misrepresented by the media," he said according to The Irish Times.

"That is why we are able to stand with Israel in her hour of need; to understand what the Israeli people are going through as they face the deadly threat of Hamas terrorism and the dark shadows of international contempt."

RELATED
In-depth
Abeer Al-Najjar

Old Firm

The sectarian dimensions in Glasgow can be contrasted to the situation on Scotland's East Coast, which saw much lower levels of immigration from Northern Ireland.

Hibernian FC, like Celtic, in Edinburgh was founded by Irish immigrants but fierce local rivals Hearts' fanbase is generally made up of Scottish Protestants with no connection to the island.

It highlights the continued animosity that the political situation in Ireland brings to the Celtic vs Rangers rivalry.

"The Old Firm rivalry thrives on dividing lines and these can be global as well as local. Both clubs draw significant support from across the Irish Sea and over the decades there are numerous examples of elements within their respective fan bases rallying to their respective 'cause' and point of view as to the political situation and future of their neighbouring land mass," Scott told The New Arab. The Republic-Palestinian connection and Unionist association with Israel is also a driver in Old Firm games.

"There are sections of both supporters which associate themselves very clearly and visibly with states and political positions within the Middle East and Palestinian and Israeli flags can often be seen on display," Scott added.

"But I don’t think it would be correct to say they are 'picking sides' simply out of habit. There are latent sentiments at play here."

"The Irish people can see Palestinians going through very similar experiences to what we went through"

Sporting lessons

While the beautiful game has been a vector for the ugliest side of sectarianism in Scotland, sport is also being used to build bridges and dialogue between different communities.

Mark Ward, a Sinn Fein Teachta Dála (TD) for Dublin Mid-West, visited Ramallah earlier this year as part of a tour of young Irish boxers to the occupied West Bank.

"Palestine was a place I always wanted to see, and I never thought I would get the opportunity, and when it arose I took the lads up on the invitation. I thought the people were absolutely amazing there," he told The New Arab.

One Palestinian who runs a boxing gym in Ramallah, told the tour that the Palestinian people acknowledge Irish sympathy with their cause.

"He said it wasn't the Palestinian people who came to Ireland to ask for help, the Irish people just offered to help. The reason for that is we were also a people who were occupied for years, a country in conflict, thank God the military side of that conflict has ended and we are in the peace side of that and looking for a resolution," he said.

Ward said how one of the boxing coaches from Belfast recalled how the experiences of navigating the myriad Israeli checkpoints and roadblocks reminded him of the situation in Northern Ireland, where Catholics were constantly stopped, asked questions, and intimidated by British and local security forces, just for trying to go about their daily lives.

RELATED
Why is Northern Ireland's police force working with Israel?
In-depth
Adam Doyle


"The Irish people can see Palestinians going through very similar experiences to what we went through," he said.

Ward hopes sport will help fix problems in the occupied territories and help Palestinians cope with their suffocating frustrations of life under occupation.

"Sport is the universal language, it is a language that crosses all political divides. Once you get onto the playing field - whether it's a boxing ring or a running track - you're there to compete on the same level as the person or team opposite you," he said.

"With all sports you might have a favourite, but it is unpredictable and anything can happen - whether that's Celtic on the football pitch or two lads in the boxing ring. Nobody knows the outcome and that's the beauty of sports, I think it has a great way of bringing people together, crossing political divides, and having people in the same space on the same terms."

Paul McLoughlin is a senior news editor at The New Arab.

Follow him on Twitter: @PaullMcLoughlin
Iran arrests lawyer of jailed journalists amid protests: report

The New Arab Staff & Agencies
17 December, 2022

Mohammad Ali Kamfirouzi's arrest brings to 25 the number of lawyers detained in connection to the protests, according to the reformist daily Ham Mihan.

The Mahsa Amini protests that have swept Iran have resulted in the arrest of countless civilians, activists, journalists and lawyers [Getty]

Iran has arrested the lawyer of two female journalists jailed after covering the death in custody of a young woman that sparked three months of protests, a newspaper said on Saturday.

The Islamic republic has been rocked by protests since Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish-Iranian woman, who died on September 16 after her arrest for an alleged breach of the country's dress code for women.

"Mohammad Ali Kamfirouzi, the lawyer for several activists and journalists, has been detained," the Ham Mihan newspaper said.

The arrest brings to 25 the number of lawyers detained in connection to the protests, according to the reformist daily.

Kamfirouzi's lawyer Mohammad Ali Bagherpour was cited as saying his client had not received a summons, was unaware of the charges he faced and that he had been detained without any legal formalities.

Ham Mihan quoted Kamfirouzi's brother as saying that his arrest had occurred on Wednesday, as well as that the judiciary was "responsible for protecting my brother's life and health".

Among Kamfirouzi's clients were Niloufar Hamedi and Elaheh Mohammadi, the two female journalists arrested after covering Amini's death and its aftermath.

Iran carries out second execution linked to protests

Hamedi, who works at the reformist newspaper Shargh, was detained on September 20 after visiting the hospital where Amini had spent three days in a coma before her death.

Mohammadi, a journalist at Ham Mihan, was taken into custody on September 29 after she travelled to Amini's hometown of Saqez in Kurdistan province to report on her funeral.

The pair were charged on November 8 with propaganda against the state and conspiring against national security - capital crimes under Iran's sharia law.

Paris-based media watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF) has expressed concern about their fate and demanded their immediate release.

Iran said on December 3 that more than 200 people have been killed in the protests - which officials describe as "riots" - including dozens of security personnel.

Norway-based group Iran Human Rights said Iran's security forces had killed at least 469 people in the protests, in an updated toll issued on Saturday.

Thousands of people have been arrested over the protests. Eleven have been sentenced to death, and two have already been executed.

Meanwhile, Iran this week released two teenagers who had been arrested on allegations of taking part in the demonstrations, reformist newspapers said on Saturday.

Amir Hossein Rahimi, 15, and Sonia Sharifi, 17, were both released on Thursday after almost two months in detention, the Etemad and Ham Mihan dailies reported.
ZIONISTS DEPORT HIM TO FRANCE
Salah Hammouri from prison: The persecuted speaks up and does not apologise

Detained by Israel and threatened with deportation, Palestinian human rights lawyer writes from prison a letter of defiance, refusing to apologise for standing up to the occupation and colonisation of his homeland.

Israeli Interior Minister Ayelet Shaked ordered the deportation of a jailed Palestinian human rights lawyer Salah Hammouri. He writes that this is Israel's 8th attempt to expel him. [GETTY]

This was written in November by French-Palestinian human rights defender Salah Hammouri from his cell in Hadarim prison. Salah has been held without charge by Israel since March this year when he was arrested in his home in Jerusalem. Since then, Israeli Interior Minister, Ayelet Shaked, reaffirmed her decision to revoke his residency and earlier this month, and he faces imminent deportation to France.

This is the latest in Israel’s longstanding judicial harassment of him.

“Get up, get up!”

These were the words I woke up to at 4:00am, finding myself surrounded by 15 heavily armed members of the ‘Yamam’ force (Israel's National Counter Terror Unit). For a brief moment, the green lasers emitting from their assault rifles were the only illumination in an otherwise dark room. When the lights eventually came on, I realised I was awakening to a reality which the Israeli occupation excels in creating.

In this reality, Fairouz’s voice is replaced by the sound of plastic handcuffs locking hands together, informing you that your journey has begun.

This is their eighth attempt to expel me.

In their sixth attempt I was arrested and held under ‘administrative detention’, detained with neither a trial nor reason. In the seventh, I was put under house arrest and my family was forcibly deported from our homeland. This time, they revoked my Jerusalem identity card.
These are the means of forcible expulsion, of gradual uprooting from my land, my home, my social surroundings, my history in this place.

But these are not my memories alone, but those of a people whose Nakba has not ceased since 1948, experiencing daily arrest, expulsion, surveillance, monitoring, harassment, killing and displacement. I am therefore both the individual and the collective, I am the prisoners and the homeland.

This settler-colonial project wants your land without you on it, confiscates your dream, destroys your reality, tries to deny your memories, whilst accusing you of terrorism and vandalism. It attempts to wear you down, to strip you of your very humanity and to subjugate you by all available methods, even holding you responsible for the murder, torture, persecution and harassment they visit upon you daily.

It turns you into a site of experimentation for their weapons, old and new, and for their means of surveillance and suppression.

RELATED
Voices  Mohammed El-Kurd

Even our mobile phones do not escape the comprehensive control of Zionist colonialism, a fact I discovered for myself last year. Me, my people, my family, our land, our identity, our culture and our memory are all comprehensively targeted.

You no longer have an ID card demonstrating that you are a Jerusalemite Palestinian by birth and identity, but why should you need such a certificate?! It is the alleys of the Old City and the neighbourhoods of Jerusalem, its soil, its walls and its people that provide this identity and belonging.

Israel can exile you to the West Bank, or deport you like those they expelled in 1948. You may be divided between the Palestinians of the outside and those of the inside, between those on the land occupied by Israel in 1948 and those in the West Bank, and between Jerusalem and Gaza.

Each sub-group has adopted a culture and identity, and its borders are the borders of our geography – the geography of colonialism mobilised against Palestine’s ancient Arab identity. It’s a geography that creates fragmenting ideas and visions, and divides one group into several smaller ones, imposing customs that seek to annihilate a people and their cause.

They do not guard a sacred fire, but guard a crime.



This geography prevents a love story between a young man and a young woman, destroying human connections. It tries to produce a new identity on this basis and a culture defined by a limited political ‘solution’, a shackle and a barbed wire one is forbidden to cross.

However, as we have always said, we will hold back oblivion and challenge those who try to impose it on us. The reality they enforce cannot prevent our will to come together, our power of belonging: it cannot defeat our identity.

We challenge them everywhere, and still believe in a national project of one people, one cause and total resistance - based on the principles of mass participation - that fights for liberation from this geography of colonialism.

Wherever a Palestinian goes, he takes with him these principles and the cause of his people: his homeland carried with him to wherever he ends up.

I am still waiting, and perhaps I will be deported and forced to confront this first-hand. But homeland, belonging, and challenging Zionist settler colonialism do not need an identity card. They need political consciousness, a sense of oneself and a project, a will, and vision.

Each of us faces these same challenges from our own position and place in the world, always confronting and resisting. For this we do not ask permission and do not apologise.

Salah Hammouri is a French-Palestinian human rights lawyer and a native Jerusalemite. His residency status was officially revoked by Israel's interior minister, Ayelet Shaked, in October 2021 under the pretext of a "breach of allegiance to the State of Israel." Following his arrest in March, he now faces deportation to France.
New Jersey politicians show solidarity with Muslims after mosque harassment

Brooke Anderson
Washington, D.C.
17 December, 2022

As a series of harassment incidents at mosques in New Jersey is being investigated, politicians and religious leaders of different faiths are voicing their solidarity with the state's Muslim community



A series of harassment incidents at mosques in New Jersey is under investigation [Getty]


New Jersey politicians, including the governor and a senator, as well as religious leaders of different faiths are showing solidarity with Muslims over harassment at four mosques in the state.

In the incidents of harassment, a truck drove up to mosques with a lighted digital billboard with pictures of the 2008 Mumbai attacks. All the incidents took place on 26 November, the 14th anniversary of the bombings and shootings committed by extremists from Pakistan that killed 175 people.

Though no one was harmed during the harassment, the act of a truck bearing inflammatory images and pulling up to crowded mosques was unsettling for congregants, who were taken by surprise and had no idea what was going to happen next.

During a speech on Friday at the Islamic Center of Old Bridge in New Jersey, Governor Phil Murphy reportedly said: "We will not stand for anti-Muslim behaviour.

"We will not stand for any intimidation of your right to worship. And we will, whether it's [through] the hard edge of law enforcement or using my bully pulpit or social media or, more importantly, where I choose to stand and speak."

Earlier this month, Senator Cory Booker showed his support for his state's Muslim community, writing in a tweet: "Anti-Muslim harassment has no place in New Jersey — or anywhere. We must stand together to reject acts of hate anywhere they happen."

As for religious leaders of different faiths, the group Hindus for Human Rights attended an interfaith rally held 11 December in response to the incidents.

It is still unclear who is behind the harassment at these mosques in New Jersey. However, there are some indications that it could be linked to Hindu extremism, based on previous incidents that have occurred in the area, Dina Sayedahmed, communications manager for the Council on American-Islamic Relations-New Jersey, told The New Arab.

RELATED
Voices  Dina Sayedahmed and Hamzah Khan

In August, an Indian business association marched in an Indian Independence Day celebration driving bulldozers, often used as a symbol for the demolition of Muslim homes in India. Local Hindu groups at the time denounced it.

So far, the police have not released much information and are not commenting on the ongoing investigation.

What is known at this point is that the driver has been apprehended and questioned. It appears that he was hired to drive by the mosques and that he was unaware of the significance of what he was doing.

"We're not putting any onus on the driver," said Sayedahmed. "We don't want to see public shaming. We just want to see the harassment not occur."

Iran and the ‘Asianisation’ of world politics

Author: Alam Saleh, ANU

In an era characterised by the conspicuous rise of China and growing Russian aggression, a new post-West world order is taking shape within international politics. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) was established to pursue the ‘Asianisation’ of a post-Western and pre-plural world order. China and Russia, in an attempt to undermine US global influence, are seeking to foster cooperation and alliances with strong regional powers. Iran was made a permanent member of the SCO.

Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi delivers a speech during the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Dushanbe, Tajikistan 17 September 2021 (Photo: Reuters/Didor Sadulloev).

Iran’s resurgence as a regional power in the Middle East, fomenting since 2003, has been considered a threat to both its neighbours and to US strategic interests in the region. Tehran’s expansionist policies have coincided with rapid military and nuclear strengthening. The country’s leadership is intent on restoring Iran as a key regional power.

A strengthened and assertive Iran, positioned in the northeast corner of one of the most geostrategically critical regions in the world, is of significant interest to China and Russia. The ostensibly important differences in policy and ideology between the three are overridden by a visceral hostility to US hegemony. Strategic alignment in this respect has led to comprehensive strategic agreements being drawn up with Iran and joint military exercises in the Indian Ocean, indicating a new era of cooperation between the three countries.

These new strategic ties have been particularly important for Iran since former US president Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear deal with Iran and imposed a policy of maximum pressure, coupled with the international isolation of the country since 2018. Tehran has been left with no other option but to look East for achieving its economic and political objectives and reformulating the geostrategic function of Iran. Beijing and Moscow have welcomed Tehran’s growing tendency to look East — and the SCO is being used as the institutional framework that will protect and align the interests of the three countries.

SCO membership ensures Iran’s economic survival in the face of Western sanctions. Iran’s increased involvement and cooperation with SCO members enables Tehran to undermine US containment policies, aimed at marginalising Iran politically. It enables Iran to engage in security cooperation arrangements that will advance the country’s military prowess. The deepening of relationships with Eastern powers may also enable Iran to further its nuclear program and overcome diplomatic hurdles in the 5+1 nuclear talks. Both Russia and China enjoy UN Security Council veto power, which Iran may require in its ongoing power struggle against the West.

SCO membership will boost Iran’s trade, increase inward investment flows, spur growth in tourism, unlock access to a SWIFT alternative, assist in the state’s fight against terrorism and empower Tehran to counter separatist factions in the country. The vast geographical scope and demographic scale of the SCO bloc will create unprecedented market opportunities for Iranian oil and gas traders, with many of the biggest producers and consumers of energy in the world being members of the SCO.

Iran’s membership in the SCO facilitates Beijing’s expanding economic and political footprint in the Middle East. With US power in the Middle East declining, the integration of Iran into an organisation embedded with Chinese interests will unlock opportunities for China to extend its regional influence. Access to Iran’s oil and gas reserves comprises another important advantage for China as it looks to diversify its energy sources. Iran’s SCO membership will also enhance Chinese access to the strategically critical Persian Gulf — an essential geographical component of the Belt and Road Initiative.

From Russia’s perspective, Iran can function as an instrument for countering NATO power by engaging in geopolitical power struggles in the region and beyond. Tehran may be able to play a decisive role in undermining US interests in the Middle East, particularly in countries where Tehran has significant influence. Just as Tehran dragged Moscow into the war in Syria, so now Russia is pulling Iran into the quagmire of the Ukraine war by using Iran-made drones.

Iran’s SCO membership will connect Tehran with two ambitious global powers, both of which share the Iranian regime’s disgruntlement with US hegemony. SCO membership will likely further Iran’s geopolitical interests in the Middle East, empowering Tehran to undermine US influence in the region. Iran’s membership in other regional organisations, such as the Conference on Interaction and Confidence-Building Measures in Asia and the Caspian Economic Forum, will be exploited in conjunction with SCO membership to serve its political and economic objectives.

In gauging whether the SCO is intended as an ‘anti-Western, Anti-NATO’ bloc for emerging powers in Asia to subvert and replace the old US hegemonic order, the inclusion of Iran as a permanent member should dissuade us from any doubt. It ensures an economic lifeline, political influence and security for Tehran.

Asianisation is a progression towards a so-called ‘Westless’ global order and Iran’s decisive and dogmatic hostility to the West, combined with its geostrategic importance, means that it can play a vital role in the transfer of power to the East if it is consistently supported by Russia and China.

Alam Saleh is Lecturer in Iranian Studies at the Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies, The Australian National University.

Trump and his movement are symptoms of America's profound disorder — but not the cause

Chauncey Devega,
 Salon
December 16, 2022

Trump supporters (Shutterstock)

The American people — or a great many of them, at least — believe they can finally see the end of the fascist fever dream they have been lost in for these last seven years. It's a cruel illusion; escape from the waking dream-nightmare is much farther away than it appears.

This article first appeared on Salon.

It is true that large numbers of Americans tried to reorient and steady themselves by voting in favor of "democracy" in the midterm elections. But most people in this country remain punch-drunk, confused by the trauma and abuse they've been bombarded with during the Age of Trump.

As for Trump himself and the neofascist movement and larger white right, they are largely undeterred by that electoral setback. Their existential threat to American democracy and society has by no means ended, and if anything they are amplifying their attacks. We cannot return to "normal" through a state of denial or by ignoring reality. The peril will not magically go away. History has repeatedly shown that ignoring fascism and other forms of authoritarianism is essentially to surrender to them.

This collective denial and amnesia is amplified by a deeper problem: American society and culture are profoundly immature, unserious and superficial. In many ways, 21st-century America is typified by the spectacular and the ridiculous. The Republican-fascists and "conservative" movement understand this, and have deftly exploited and cultivated those failings.

In an unhealthy democracy, politics is largely a function of supply and demand. The Republicans' embrace of fascism and other forms of right-wing extremism simply reflects what their public wants — and what it has been trained to expect.

An immature culture is especially vulnerable to exploitation by right-wing fake populists and demagogues who care only about power and have no conception of the common good or responsible governance.

In a recent essay for the Atlantic, Tom Nichols explores this deviant political feedback loop, as exemplified by Republican candidate Herschel Walker's failed U.S. Senate campaign in Georgia:
Win or lose, all the criticisms of Herschel Walker obscure a larger point: The Republicans have acclimated the American public to ghastly behavior from elected officials and candidates for high office. The result is lasting damage to our political system…. Walker's candidacy is a reminder of just how much we've acclimated ourselves to the presence of awful people in our public life. Although we can be heartened by the defeat of Christian nationalists and election deniers and other assorted weirdos, we should remember how, in a better time in our politics, these candidates would not have survived even a moment of public scrutiny or weathered their first scandal or stumble….
The Republicans were once an uptight and censorious party — something I rather liked about them, to be honest — and they are now a party where literally nothing is a disqualification for office. There is only one cardinal rule: Do not lose…. There's a lot of blame to go around, but no one did more to pioneer the politics of disgust than Donald Trump, who took the outrageous moments of his two presidential campaigns and turned them into virtues.

Nichols concludes by arguing, "As usual, however, the real problem lies with the voters," who have fallen prey to "an unhinged faux-egalitarianism that demands that candidates for office be no better than the rest of us, and perhaps even demonstrably worse. How dare anyone run on virtue or character; who do they think they are?"

Nichols correctly observes that the fact that Walker became a viable candidate for high office, "and garnered millions of votes from perfectly normal American citizens," is symptomatic of a profoundly damaged political system. It's also true that Walker's embrace by the Republican Party cannot be understood as something independent of racism and white supremacy as he fulfilled the stereotypical role of a Black buffoon.

Caroline Williams addresses this in another Atlantic essay:
Walker is a big, ball-carrying Black man, and these Republicans do not have an ounce of care for him. They are using him to advance their own Constitution-compromising agenda, the way conservative white people in this country have always used Black bodies when given half a chance.
Walker stands up at podiums, and I feel shame and sorrow and resentment. He is incoherent, bumbling, oily. He smiles with a swagger that does nothing to disguise his total ignorance of how blatantly he is being taken advantage of by a party that has never intended to serve people who look like him.

Walker's candidacy is a fundamental assault by the Republican Party on the dignity of Black Americans. How dare they so cynically use this buffoon as a shield for their obvious failings to meet the needs and expectations of Black voters? They hold him up and say, "See, our voters don't mind his race. We're not a racist party. We have Black people on our side too." Parading Walker at rallies like some kind of blue-ribbon livestock does not mean you have Black people on your side. What it means is that you are promoting a charlatan — a man morally and intellectually bereft enough, blithely egomaniacal enough, to sing and dance on the world stage against his own best interest. Is he in on the joke? Does he know they picked him to save money on boot black and burnt cork, this man who made his name by bringing the master glory on the master's field, who got comfortable eating from the master's table?...

From where I sit, the election looks like a kind of grotesque minstrelsy. The Republican Party is saying that it wants power more than decency. It's saying that race is a joke. We must all take note—it is willing to destroy a man to advance its cause. The party thinks he won't break. And if he does, well, he wasn't really one of them, anyway, was he?

The immature and deeply pathological subculture that elevated Donald Trump and the panoply of other Republican fascists and extremists — Kari Lake, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Lauren Boebert, Ron DeSantis and many others — is multilayered and complex.

American society elevates anti-intellectualism and anti-rationality. As historian and political scientist Richard Hofstadter famously observed some six decades ago, this is especially true of the Republican Party and larger "conservative" movement. Since the rise of right-wing hate media in the 1990s, this embrace of overt ignorance and conspiratorial thinking, and the accompanying rejection of expert knowledge, has become a defining feature of the American right.

More than half of all Americans cannot read at a sixth-grade level. High quality primary and secondary public education, as well as the college and university system — which should create citizens who are capable of critical thinking and acting as responsible members of a democratic community — have been systematically targeted for destruction by the Republican Party and "conservative" movement.

As part of the larger project of authoritarian capitalism, today's "conservative" movement seeks to create human drones who possess "job skills," rather than well-rounded human beings capable of thinking for themselves and asking questions about power, justice and the future of our society.

To some significant degree, the internet, social media and its algorithms, our ubiquitous smart phones and digital technology, and a larger media culture designed to drive what is euphemistically described as "engagement," damages people's ability to think deeply and critically about complex matters.

While overuse of social media and digital technology can be harmful across all demographic cohorts, research suggests it has a particularly negative impact on the brain and emotional development of younger people. Psychologists and other researchers have demonstrated that many Americans are increasingly unable to concentrate or engage in deep focused thinking for more than a few minutes.

Many Americans are trapped, by choice, in a surreal experience machine and surreality where they seek to medicate their social alienation, numbness and learned helplessness and misery through constant stimulation and distraction (as well as through pharmacological means as well). In the language of our gangster-capitalist dystopia, this is known as the "fear of missing out."

Americans in general are also sleep-deprived. Public health experts, social psychologists and other researchers have demonstrated that sleep deprivation and exhaustion negatively impact empathy and other feelings of connectedness and shared concern for others, which can only facilitate the spread of authoritarianism and other cruel politics.

America's media and public discourse are increasingly driven by speed, superficiality and endless desire for "content" that is antithetical to reflective writing that speaks truth to power.

America's news media and the nation's larger public discourse are increasingly dictated by speed and superficiality and an endless supply of "content" in service to clicks, likes, downloads, retweets and of course advertising revenue. Contemplation, rigorous thinking, serious public conversations about politics and society, and the kinds of reflective writing and other thinking that speaks truth to power and empowers citizens is shoved underground or rendered invisible by such a system.

These cultural problems are amplified (and in some ways created) by what philosopher Nancy Fraser calls the "cannibalistic" tendencies of late capitalism, meaning its drive to monitor, regulate, financialize and ultimately devour every aspect of human life from before birth to after death. This version of capitalism has created extreme wealth and income inequality and a collective experience of economic precarity for most Americans. Survival mode and "grind culture" guts one's ability to live a full and well-rounded and happy life. Such outcomes are antithetical, by design, to genuine democracy, let alone human freedom and human flourishing.

Ultimately, America's democracy crisis and the rise of neofascism are a symptom, not a cause, of deeper cultural and social problems in what the Pulitzer-winning journalist Chris Hedges has called an "empire of illusion." Donald Trump and the Republican Party could disappear tomorrow, and the Age of Trump will likely soon be deleted from the public's collective memory. But the deeper roots of America's democracy crisis will not go away. Our society is sick and is using maladaptive behavior to compensate for that condition. American society will not get better until its leaders and the public at large face up to and admit the horrible reality of the situation and then do the hard work to remedy it.
What the final stage of Reaganism looks like

Thom Hartmann
December 16, 2022

The Republican war on reality started decades before Trump: Paul Krugman


Back in 1981, when Ronald Reagan was sworn in and implicitly promised to destroy our government because it was “the problem,” many of us who strongly opposed him wondered what the final stage of Reaganism would look like.

Now we know. We’re there.

Violence toward women and minorities has exploded. Armed militias tried to assassinate the Vice President and Speaker of the House in an attempted coup directed by the Republican President of the United States. They tried to kidnap and murder the Democratic governor of Michigan. They’re blowing up power substations from Oregon to the Carolinas. They’ve embedded themselves in DHS, police departments, and our military. They’re coordinating with fascists overseas.

Leading up to this moment was a 41-year political war that splattered the American Dream like gut-shot blood across a dystopian Republican hellscape mural.

Reaganism brought us:
— the collapse of the middle class;
— student and medical debt that’s impossible to climb out of;
— an explosion of predation from health insurance companies and for-profit hospitals;
— political manipulation by corporations and billionaires;
— an explosion of homelessness and untreated mental illness;
— and turned our elementary schools into killing fields.


The question today is whether we as a nation and a people will recover from it, or if it will, as Reagan promised on January 20, 1981, end the American experiment of pluralistic liberal democracy.

The seeds of Reaganism were planted in 1972 when President Nixon put tobacco lawyer Lewis Powell on the US Supreme Court.

Powell had written his infamous “Memo” a year earlier, arguing that corporate America and the morbidly rich needed to join forces to wrest back control of America after forty years of FDR’s New Deal had empowered middle class union workers, consumers, and environmentalists.


Attacking Ralph Nader (forgive the brag: he wrote the foreword to my book on monopolies) for kicking off the consumer movement with his 1965 book Unsafe At Any Speed and Rachel Carson for the environmental movement with her 1962 book Silent Spring, Powell asserted that “leftists” — middle class socialists and communist sympathizers — had taken over our government, universities, the Supreme Court, and our media:
“Current examples of the impotency of business, and of the near-contempt with which businessmen’s views are held, are the stampedes by politicians to support almost any legislation related to ‘consumerism’ or to the ‘environment.’”

It was the job of big business and the very wealthy to reclaim our nation from the clutches of people concerned about the environment or the rights of average American consumers, Powell wrote:

“Business must learn the lesson, long ago learned by labor and other self-interest groups. This is the lesson that political power is necessary; that such power must be assiduously cultivated; and that when necessary, it must be used aggressively and with determination — without embarrassment and without the reluctance which has been so characteristic of American business.”

Once on the Supreme Court, Powell went to work. In 1976, he and his colleagues considered a case that would redefine the next five decades: Buckley v Valeo.

Congress passed strict regulations on political campaign fundraising and spending with the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. Following the Agnew and Nixon bribery scandals (that led to Vice President Agnew’s resignation to avoid prison), Congress doubled-down by strengthening that law in 1974 and creating the Federal Elections Commission (FEC).


This outraged then-Senator James Buckley, the elder brother of the late William F. Buckley and now the Senior Judge for the DC Circuit Court. Most Republicans opposed those laws and agencies but he and his side in the Senate had lost the vote, so limits on money in political campaigns became law and the FEC was created.

Like a sore loser, he sued, essentially saying that the “free speech” right of wealthy people like himself and his friends to buy off politicians was inhibited by such clean-campaign legislation.

The result, legalizing political bribery, was a first for America and the developed world. The Supreme Court ruled with and for Buckley, striking down nearly a century of campaign finance legislation going all the way back to Teddy Roosevelt’s Tillman Act.

Two years later, in the First National Bank v Bellotti case, Powell himself authored the decision that gave corporations that same legal right to bribe politicians or insert themselves into campaigns for ballot initiatives (among other things).

Prior to this, from the end of the Republican Great Depression right up until the Reagan Revolution — from 1933 to 1981 — the American middle class had a half-century of uninterrupted political and economic progress. About two-thirds of Americans were in the middle class when Reagan was elected in 1980.

Before Reagan, we’d passed the right to unionize, which built America’s first middle class. We passed unemployment insurance and workplace safety rules to protect workers. Social Security largely ended poverty among the elderly, and Medicare provided them with health security.

A top personal income tax rate between 74% and 91% throughout that period kept wages strong for working people and prevented the corrosive wealth inequality we see today. We didn’t get our first billionaire until after the Reagan revolution.

America built colleges that were free or affordable; gleaming new nonprofit hospitals; the world’s finest system of public schools; and new roads, bridges, rail, and airports from coast to coast.

We cleaned up the environment with the Environmental Protection Agency, cleaned up politics with the Federal Elections Commission, cleaned up corporate backroom deals with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We outlawed banks from gambling with our deposits via the Glass-Steagall law.

Then the Supreme Court legalized political bribery with the Buckley and Bellotti decisions (and tripled-down on them both with Citizens United in 2010).

Reagan was the first modern American president to jump through this newly opened door to giving government favors to corporations and wealthy individuals who threw their money at his political party.

He installed America’s first anti-labor Secretary of Labor, our first anti-environmentalist in charge of the EPA (Neal Gorsuch’s mother, Anne), our first anti-public-schools crusader as Secretary of Education, and our first end-times “Jesus will make all things new” fanatic in charge of selling off public lands as Secretary of the Interior.

He cut the top income tax rate on the morbidly rich from 74% to 27%, and tore the top rate for corporations from 50% down to 25%.

To pay for both, he tripled the national debt.

He crushed unions, starting with one of only three that had supported his candidacy: the Professional Air Traffic Controllers (PATCO). He gutted federal support to education, kicking off what is today’s student debt crisis.

He froze the minimum wage. He cut federal benefits to the poor, pregnant women, and the mentally ill, kicking off today’s crisis of homelessness. He encouraged corporations to send our jobs overseas in an orgy of “free trade.”

As a result, money flowed into the GOP like an unending river, continuing to this moment. The result we see today, after a mere 41 years, is stark.

Republican-leaning businesses bought up radio stations from coast-to-coast and put “conservative” talk radio into every town and city in America. Wealthy people began running for political office or supporting those politicians who’d do their bidding.

Conservative donors demanded rightwing economics and political science professors in universities across America. Rightwing think tanks and publishers were funded to support them. Billionaires founded a movement to pack our courts, including the Supreme Court.

As a result, seven years ago the American middle class ceased to be half of us: it went from two-thirds of Americans when Reagan took office to 49 percent in 2015. NPR commemorated it with the headline: “The Tipping Point: Most Americans No Longer Are Middle Class.

Last year, according to statistics from the US Census and the Fed, middle class households also sank below the top 1% in total wealth. Last year’s most clear-eyed headline went to Bloomberg: “Top 1% of U.S. Earners Now Hold More Wealth Than All of the Middle Class.”

As the GOP’s game of shilling for corporations and the morbidly rich became obvious, support for the party slipped. Needing more votes to gain and hold political office, Republicans reached out to bigots, racists, misogynists, antisemites, and open fascists. Each slice of that poison pie gave them a few percent more votes.

When working class white men realized they’d been screwed by 40 years of Reaganism, they were unsure where to focus their rage.

Republican politicians and rightwing media were happy to supply the villains: women in the workplace when they should be home barefoot and pregnant; racial minorities who “want your job” or to “rape your daughter”; and queer people who are “after your children.”

Reagan kicked off his 1980 campaign for president with a speech to an all-white audience near Philadelphia, Mississippi, where three Civil Rights activists were brutally murdered. His topic was “state’s rights.”

Bush the Elder rolled out his Willy Horton ad and George the younger lied us into two wars with Muslim nations.

Finally, like an evil Santa, Trump dumped out his bag of malice, malevolence, and odium. He embraced the world’s worst despots, seeing them as role models for a future America, while trashing our allies and disparaging democracy. He applauded police violence and ridiculed its victims.

Demagogues like DeSantis and Abbott further raised the temperature by accusing career public school teachers of promoting “Critical Race Theory” and librarians of hustling perversion and porn.

They used desperate refugees as human pawns in their vicious game. They purged millions of mostly Black, Hispanic, and young voters from the rolls, a process endorsed by five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court in 2018.

Our most recent Republican President of the United States is hawking NFT art and facing decades in prison in multiple state and federal venues for his crimes while in office.

Now, at the end of these forty-one short years of this unrelenting barrage of corruption and hate promoted by Republican media and politicians, we’ve arrived at the end stage of Reaganism. As a result, our nation stands upon a precipice:

Will we continue down Reagan’s path that I charted in my book on neoliberalism and end up, as did Russia and Hungary, with neofascist strongman rule and a total collapse of the American experiment?

Or will we turn back to the lessons of the New Deal and Great Society, embraced by presidents and politicians of both parties for a half-century, and rebuild our middle class and our democracy, along with our trust in each other?

For most of the past 41 years the choice has not been as clear to as many people as it is today. Now that America can no long plead uncertainty, we must seize hold of the awesome responsibility for rescuing our nation and her democracy from the extraordinary damage of Reagan’s neoliberalism.

For ourselves, our nation, our children and grandchildren, and the larger world.
FIRE HIM
Revealed: Louie Gohmert told Mark Meadows to launch emergency probe to prove antifa was behind Capitol riots

Brad Reed
December 14, 2022

Louie Gohmert (Saul Loeb AFP)

Newly revealed text messages from former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows' phone show that former Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) was a true believer in the false conspiracy theory that Antifa was really behind the January 6th Capitol riots.

As reported by Talking Points Memo, Gohmert sent Meadows a text message on January 8th, two days after the assault on the Capitol, pushing the Trump chief of staff to get the Department of Justice involved in an investigation to uncover the purported truth about the riots.

"Constitutional loyal DOJ personnel have 11 days to prove the truth: Antifa led the breach of the Capitol," Gohmert wrote to Meadows. "If the evidence is not shown to the public in 11 days, then it will be subverted & the false narrative will likely be the Trump legacy that DT & his loyal supporters under his urging attacked the Capitol. It was a brilliant leftist op, but it's got to be exposed by DOJ quick."

In fact, there is no evidence that "Antifa" led the assault on the Capitol, and every single person charged for breaking into the building on that day has a documented history of supporting former President Donald Trump.
Trump-supporting head of 'Priests for Life' booted by Vatican over 'blasphemous communications'

Tom Boggioni
December 18, 2022

Frank Pavone (Facebook)

According to a report from the New York Times, the head of "Priests for Life" has been both rebuked and ousted from the priesthood by the Vatican.

Frank Pavone, who was once a religious adviser to former president Donald Trump, was removed by the church in a letter sent by the Dicastery for the Clergy, a Vatican office.

According to the letter, "This action was taken after Father Pavone was found guilty in canonical proceedings of blasphemous communications on social media, and of persistent disobedience of the lawful instructions of his diocesan bishop.”

According to the Catholic News Service, which first reported that Pavone was dismissed, "Archbishop Christophe Pierre, the Apostolic Nuncio to the United States, wrote that the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Clergy issued the decision on Nov. 9, adding that there was 'no possibility of appeal.'"

The Times added, "Mr. Pavone, a ubiquitous figure at anti-abortion rallies and fund-raisers, is prolific on social media. By his own account, his outspoken anti-abortion activism has won the support of some church leaders over the years but has also led to clashes with others."

In an interview right after Pavone heard the news, he told an interviewer, "I’ve been persecuted in the church for decades, decades. This is nothing new for me. They just don’t like the work I’m doing for these babies.”

You can read more here.
Actress Jane Fonda says cancer in remission

Agence France-Presse
December 17, 2022

US actress Jane Fonda

US actress and activist Jane Fonda says her cancer is in remission, just three months after revealing her diagnosis.

The Oscar winner, a prominent supporter of the Democratic Party, wrote on her blog on Thursday that she is no longer in treatment for non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

"Last week I was told by my oncologist that my cancer is in remission and I can discontinue chemo," the environmentalist, who turns 85 next week, wrote in a post entitled "Best birthday present ever"

"I am feeling so blessed, so fortunate. I thank all of you who prayed and sent good thoughts my way. I am confident that it played a role in the good news."

Fonda, who shot to fame in the 1960s, revealed in September that she had been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a cancer that starts in the lymphatic system, a part of the body's immune defenses, and can develop into widespread tumors.

Symptoms can include swollen lymph nodes, abdominal pain or swelling, chest pain, coughing or trouble breathing, the Mayo Clinic says.

Fonda said treatment had started out easily enough, but had got harder.

"I’m especially happy because while my first 4 chemo treatments were rather easy for me, only a few days of being tired, the last chemo session was rough and lasted 2 weeks making it hard to accomplish much of anything."
Climate activism

Fonda first appeared on screen in 1960, and scored Academy Awards for best actress for "Klute" (1971) and "Coming Home" (1978).


She has five other Oscar nominations in her career, four of them for best lead actress.

As well as anti-war activism during the US-Vietnam war that saw her dubbed "Hanoi Jane" and blacklisted in Hollywood, she was also a major figure in the home fitness video craze of the 1980s.

Fonda continues to work, and appears as the voice of an elegant dragon who is the CEO of a luck-making operation in the Apple TV+ animated movie "Luck."


She also stars in the popular, long-running Netflix hit "Grace and Frankie."

Fonda comes from a family of famous stars; her father Henry was a legend of the big screen appearing as the hold-out juror in "12 Angry Men," and winning best actor for "On Golden Pond" (1981).

Her brother Peter was a seminal figure in 1960s counterculture, whose turn in "Easy Rider" is a touchstone of Hollywood history.


© Agence France-Presse