Wednesday, January 04, 2023

UK
NHS Has The Funding It Needs, Says Downing Street

Ned Simons
Tue, 3 January 2023 


Downing Street has said the government is “providing the NHS with the funding it needs”, amid warnings of a winter crisis at hospitals.

The Royal College of Emergency Medicine has said deaths of up to 500 people each week could be caused by delays in emergency care.

And the British Medical Association (BMA) has said future of the health service was “balanced on a knife-edge”.

It comes as ambulance staff are set to walk out on January 11 and 23 in a dispute over pay.

Nursing staff will strike for two consecutive days on January 18 and 19.

Asked about the situation in hospitals, the prime minister’s spokesperson said on Tuesday: “I think we are confident we are providing the NHS with the funding it needs – and as we did throughout the pandemic – to deal with these issues.”

The spokesperson said the pandemic was among the biggest causes of the current pressures on the NHS, but also pointed to delayed discharges as a reason.

They added it was an issue the government had “recognised and have been seeking to address this year with additional funding into the system”.

Asked if the PM thought the NHS was in crisis, the spokesperson said: “This is certainly an unprecedented challenge for the NHS brought about, as I say, by a number of factors.”

Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation said the current situation was “very difficult” with many trusts declaring critical incidents.

He told the BBC said that over the longer term, the NHS needs “sustained investment”.

Mark Harper, the transport secretary, earlier rejected the suggestion the health service did not have enough money. “I don’t agree with that,” he told Sky News. “There’s record investment.”

Tories 'breathtakingly complacency' after trying to blame Covid and flu for NHS meltdown

Government Dismisses NHS Crisis Claims Insisting Health Service Has Enough Money

Rishi Sunak leaves 10 Downing Street (Alamy)

03 January 2023


Rishi Sunak will not say whether he believes the NHS is in crisis despite mounting pressure on the government to tackle chaotic scenes in hospitals, a growing number of which have declared critical incidents.

The Prime Minister's spokesperson on Monday acknowledged that the health service was facing an "unprecedented challenge" amid widespread reports of overcrowded A&E departments, patients waiting hours and even days for treatment, and cases of oxygen running out. 

They added that it would be "very difficult" for a number of people to get access to NHS treatment in the coming weeks, "because of some of these huge challenges that the pandemic in particular has forced upon us".

But they refused to describe the service as being in "crisis" when challenged by reporters this morning, and insisted that ministers had been "up front with the public long advance" that the health service would come under severe pressure this winter. 

Matthew Taylor, Chief Executive of the NHS Confederation, has warned there will likely be further cases of hospital trusts declaring critical incidents in the next three months, as surging numbers of flu and Covid cases pile pressure on the health service at a time of staff shortages and strikes over pay and working conditions. 

"It seems likely that the next three months will be defined by further critical incidents needing to be declared and the quality of care being compromised," said Taylor. Over a dozen trusts and ambulance services have declared critical incidents in the past few days. 

“Some of our members have said their ward staffing numbers are now below minimum levels as they work hard to set up more escalation spaces to support arrivals from ambulances, that they have had instances where their oxygen cylinders have ran out temporarily, and that some of their patients have waited over two days for a bed," Taylor added.

The president of the Society for Acute Medicine, Dr Tim Cooksley, and the president of the Royal College of Physicians Edinburgh, Professor Andrew Elder, said in a joint statement they had “never been more concerned about standards of acute medical care across hospitals in the UK than we are now”.

Sunak's spokesperson insisted the government was giving the NHS the money it needed, however, stressing the health service had received "billions of pounds of additional funding".

"We are confident we are providing the NHS with the funding it needs, as we did throughout the pandemic, to deal with these issues," they said.

"We have been up front with the public long in advance of this winter that because of the pandemic and the pressures it has placed on the backlog of cases, this will be an extremely challenging winter. That is what we are seeing.

"We remain thankful to frontline NHS and care staff who are providing this level of care to the public in a challenging time."

Stephen Barclay, the secretary of state for health and social care, is expected to visit a hospital this week as ministers come under growing pressure to take further action to help the health service.

A report by The Sunday Times over the weekend catalogued numerous examples of delays facing patients at NHS hospitals, including a person waiting more than 30 hours in an ambulance outside Shrewsbury's Prince Royal Hospital, and a patient in York who waited in A&E for a bed for over 40 hours.

Historic strikes by nurses and ambulance workers were held at the end of last year, and a fresh wave of walkouts in the coming months, which could also include junior doctors, is likely to exacerbate delays in care. The government has refused to negotiate with unions who say the NHS pay review body of a 2 percent pay rise cap amounts to a real-terms pay-cut when record high inflation is taken into account. 

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) is calling for Sunak to give nurses a nineteen per cent pay rise, which it says would make up for years of real term pay cuts. 

Steve Barclay FINALLY pops up but shamelessly shifts blame for worst ever NHS crisis

Health Secretary Steve Barclay put the blame for the dire situation in the NHS over Christmas onto Covid, Strep A and flu rather than his Government's handling of the health service


By Lizzy Buchan
Deputy Online Political Editor
3 Jan 2023

Under-fire Health Secretary Steve Barclay has finally broken cover and attempted to shift blame for the NHS crisis onto Covid, Strep A and flu.

The top Tory admitted the dire situation in the health service was not acceptable after several trusts announced critical incidents and ambulances waited hours outside hospitals to transfer their patients.

But he said "a combination of very high rates of flu, persistent and high levels of COVID, continuing concerns particularly among many parents around Strep A" were at the root of the "massive pressures" faced by the health service over Christmas.

He told broadcasters: "There's £500 million of investment this year going into tackling the pressure in terms of social care. So we're putting more funding in. We've got more clinicians, we've got more staff working in the NHS.

Steve Barclay - seen for the first time since before Christmas - has been under pressure over the NHS crisis 

"Of course there's a range of factors that we need to do. There's been particular pressures over Christmas because we've had a surge in flu cases, Covid cases and also a lot of concern around Strep A."

But he failed to address the pleas from medics for more support, who warn that a decade of Tory cuts have left the NHS on the brink of collapse.

It comes after No10 refused to accept the NHS is in crisis and insisted the struggling health service has the resources it needs to cope with spiralling pressures.

Read More
Rishi Sunak and his health chief 'nowhere to be found' as NHS faces crisis

The NHS is coming under enormous pressure this winter 

The Prime Minister's official spokesman insisted the NHS has the funding it needs to battle a toxic cocktail of winter pressures, Covid backlogs, staffing shortages and looming strikes.


Pressed on whether the NHS was in “crisis”, Rishi Sunak's spokesman said: "This is certainly an unprecedented challenge for the NHS brought about by a number of factors, most significantly the global pandemic."

The spokesman said the Government had been "up front" with the public about the difficulties ahead.

He said: "I think we are confident we are providing the NHS with the funding it needs - and as we did throughout the pandemic - to deal with these issues.

"I think we have been up front with the public long in advance of this winter that because of the pandemic and the pressures it's placed in the backlog of cases that this would be an extremely challenging winter, and that is what we are seeing."

Critics have accused Mr Barclay and PM Rishi Sunak of going into hiding during the crisis - as neither of the top Tories had made a public appearance since before Christmas.

No10 said the Prime Minister was working in Downing Street this week but did not set out any plans for visits or public activity in the coming days.

Rishi Sunak has been keeping a low profile over the Christmas period 

Asked what Mr Sunak was doing, his official spokesman said: "He's got a lot of meetings in a normal way but if he has any public facing activity... we will update you in the normal way."

Mr Sunak was last seen in public on a visit to a soup kitchen on Christmas Eve - where he asked a homeless man if he worked in a business.

He has been working over the festive period except for spending Christmas Day with his family.

Shadow Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: "Everything’s “quite normal” in the NHS according to the Government.

"This breath-taking complacency does at least explain why Rishi Sunak and Steve Barclay are nowhere to be seen. Negligent, irresponsible, and a risk to the public’s health.

Lib Dem Cabinet Office spokesperson Christine Jardine said: "This is a national crisis but still Rishi Sunak is nowhere to be found. People are literally dying yet Sunak hasn't even bothered to address the nation, let alone act.

"The country is coming to a standstill with endless strikes and underfunded public services. Brits have lost all faith in this Government. It is just chaos after more chaos with this Conservative Government.

"Rishi Sunak has just weeks to turn this around before the country tells him his time is up as Prime Minister. If he can't be bothered to do this job then he either needs to step aside or call an election so we can finally get him out of Downing Street."


Tories have been accused of repeatedly ignoring the problems that have left the NHS at breaking point after 13 years of shameful underfunding as they blamed Covid, Strep A and flu instead

Health Secretary Steve Barclay 

Martin Bagot
Health and Science editor
3 Jan 2023

Stephen Barclay has been accused of passing the buck over the deadly crisis gripping the NHS.

The Health Secretary today blamed it on Covid, the flu and Strep A, despite a decade of Tory ­underfunding.

Unison union said: “Years of neglect are to blame.”

The Tories were tonight accused of repeatedly ignoring the problems that have left the NHS at breaking point after 13 years of shameful underfunding.

And despite the situation being of No10’s making, Health ­Secretary Steve Barclay tried to shift the blame on to Covid, flu and Strep A.

It comes as ambulance crews were ordered to leave patients in A&E even if there were no beds, a move branded “unsafe”.

Health chiefs warn patients will be at risk until the Government urgently tackles NHS demand and an exodus of fed-up staff.


Doctor warns patients are dying while waiting in A&E for days because the NHS is 'broken'


Ambulance crew outside the Royal London Hospital 

Royal College of Nursing general secretary Pat Cullen said: “The Government cannot blame the pandemic and other winter pressures for the unfolding crisis.

“This has been a long time in the making yet the Government has consistently ignored warnings.”
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak 

Unison union deputy head of health Helga Pile added: “The ­Government must stop buckpassing. Years of neglect are to blame. The way to begin fixing this is a boost to NHS pay to stop skilled staff leaving.”

Healthcare consultant Dr Peter Carter, who advises the NHS, said the Tories have been “asleep at the wheel” for a decade. He added: “You’ve got a major crisis. It’s no good people trying to dilute it. You’re now paying for a failure to act on this crisis.”


Liz Truss resigned after one month in office

Shadow Health Secretary Wes Streeting accused Mr Barclay and Rishi Sunak of hiding away. He said: “Everything’s ‘normal’ in the NHS according to the ­Government. This breathtaking complacency explains why Rishi Sunak and Steve Barclay are nowhere to be seen.”

The Department of Health and Social Care’s weekly media list today showed Mr Barclay had no NHS appearances, but he did emerge for a TV interview.

Former PM Boris Johnson 




London Ambulance Service has been told to spend just 45 minutes handing patients over to A&E in a push to get vehicles back on the road, a leaked NHS England email revealed.

It read: “If the patient is clinically stable ambulance clinicians will ensure they are on a hospital trolley or ­wheelchair/chair and notify the nurse in charge.”

But NHS doctor Rachel Clarke said: “This isn’t safe. Is the proposal merely to pile up more patients in ED corridors?”

Theresa May was PM until 2019

The College of Paramedics claims there are “100 or 200 patients who should not be in hospital” but who cannot be discharged due to a lack of social care beds.

Mr Barclay put the crisis down to “a combination of high rates of flu, high levels of Covid, concerns around Strep A”.

UK

TUC's Nowak demands “urgent meeting” with Sunak to resolve public sector strikes



TUC general secretary Paul Nowak has demanded an “urgent meeting” with Rishi Sunak about strikes by public sector workers, declaring that there will be “no resolution” to the disputes while ministers “refuse point blank” to discuss pay.

In a letter to the Prime Minister, Nowak argued that public sector workers “don’t want to be out on strike this winter” but “have been left with no choice” as a result of more than a decade of pay cuts and wage freezes.

The new TUC general secretary wrote: “Our public services are in crisis after years of underfunding and understaffing. We can’t solve these problems without a fair deal for the people on the frontline.”

“But we cannot fix the staffing crisis in our schools, hospitals and elsewhere if we do not fix the underlying causes. That means talking in an open and constructive way about improving public sector pay,” the letter continued.

Nowak said the government has so far “refused to negotiate directly about pay”, adding: “Unions have already made clear their willingness to sit down with the government and talk about boosting pay. But while your ministers continue to refuse point blank to discuss improving wages, there can be no resolution.”

He urged Sunak to meet with the TUC “as soon as possible” and to allow ministers to “adopt new approaches” to resolve the public sector pay disputes.

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) announced last month that its members will go on strike on January 18th and 19th unless negotiations with the government are opened. The potential walk-outs follow two days of industrial action in December.

Confirming the action, RCN general secretary Pat Cullen said: “Staff shortages and low pay make patient care unsafe – the sooner ministers come to the negotiating table, the sooner this can be resolved. I will not dig in if they don’t dig in.”

A strike ballot of RCN members was launched following the government’s decision in July to award most NHS staff a 5% pay rise. The union has argued that nurses should receive a pay rise of 5% above inflation.

The government has repeatedly claimed that the RCN’s pay demand is “unaffordable”. Health Secretary Steve Barclay has argued that such a pay rise is not possible “given the many other economic pressures that we face”.

Ambulance staff across most of England and Wales took part in one day of strike action in December in a coordinated walk-out by the three main ambulance unions, UNISON, GMB and Unite.

Barclay met with unions ahead of the strike, but UNISON general secretary Christina McAnea revealed following the meeting that “nothing” had been said about pay. The government reportedly instead sought reassurances over strike cover.

In an interview with LabourList in December, Nowak said: “The government could very easily see an end to the industrial action if they were serious about entering into meaningful talks with unions about pay. It’s as simple as that.”

He argued that it was not “inconceivable” that there would be a “continuing wave” of strikes “up to and beyond the spring Budget” if ministers failed to engage “meaningfully” in negotiations.

The National Education Union (NEU) announced in October that it was balloting its members in England and Wales on strike action over pay. The ballot opened on October 28th and will run until January 13th.

Fellow teachers’ union NASUWT has also launched a ballot of its members in England and Wales, which closes on January 9th. A separate ballot of NASUWT members in Scotland closed on November 21st, with more than 92% voting in favour of strikes on a turnout of almost 64%.

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) announced in November that nearly 33,500 members will be balloted on industrial action after the union’s demands for an increased pay offer were rejected by employers. The strike ballot is set to run until January 30th

Below is the full text of Paul Nowak’s letter to Rishi Sunak.

Dear Prime Minister.

I’m writing to you today to ask for an urgent meeting. Public sector workers don’t want to be out on strike this winter. They care passionately about their vocations and the communities they serve.

But they have been left with no choice. Ambulance staff, physiotherapists, teachers and millions of others have seen their living standards decimated by over a decade of pay cuts and wage freezes. And with inflation north of 10 per cent, they simply cannot afford another real-terms pay cut.

Our public services are in crisis after years of underfunding and understaffing. We can’t solve these problems without a fair deal for the people on the frontline. Every month experienced employees are quitting, with one in three public service staff now taking steps to leave their professions or actively considering it. This is simply unsustainable.

But we cannot fix the staffing crisis in our schools, hospitals and elsewhere if we do not fix the underlying causes. That means talking in an open and constructive way about improving public sector pay. But so far your ministers have refused to negotiate directly about pay with unions.

Unions worked closely with you during the pandemic to deliver the furlough scheme and to protect millions of jobs. That’s the kind of mature approach we need now. Unions have already made clear their willingness to sit down with the government and talk about boosting pay. But while your ministers continue to refuse point blank to discuss improving wages, there can be no resolution.

In the NHS, for example, appropriate structures already exist to allow the immediate start of pay negotiations involving health unions, employers and ministers. This was exactly what happened in 2018, leading to the three-year wage deal.

We want to find a resolution to the current disputes so our public service staff can get on with doing the jobs they love. And so our public services can start to improve for everyone who relies on them.

I urge with you to meet with us as soon as possible and allow your ministers to adopt new approaches to resolving the public sector pay disputes.

Paul Nowak – TUC general secretary


Paul Nowak: “A united trade union movement is a force to be reckoned with”


© Jess Hurd

“I’ve never seen anything like this in the 30 years that I’ve been a trade union activist and official,” Paul Nowak tells me when I ask about the wave of industrial action taking place across the country. The incoming TUC general secretary argues that workers involved in the strikes are simply saying that they “can’t afford another year of real-terms pay cuts”.

Nowak is speaking to me ahead of the release of TUC research that estimates that the average UK worker has lost £20,000 in real wages since 2008 as a result of pay not keeping pace with inflation. The analysis found that public sector workers have been hit even harder, with midwives and paramedics losing £56,000 in real earnings and nurses facing a pay squeeze of £42,000.

Nowak, who officially assumes the role of general secretary in January, argues that the outcome of the strikes is not “predetermined”, stressing: “The government could very easily see an end to the industrial action if they were serious about entering into meaningful talks with unions about pay. It’s as simple as that.” Failing that, he says we will have to “wait and see” how strikes develop in the coming months. “It’s not inconceivable that we see a continuing wave of industrial action up to and beyond the spring Budget. I think it’s the last thing that our members want to do. It’s the last thing that our public service unions want to do. But if the government isn’t going to be prepared to engage meaningfully, then I think that’s where we’ll be.”

Nowak and his predecessor as general secretary, Frances O’Grady, worked closely with the government during the Covid pandemic, including in the development of the furlough scheme. “They’ve forgotten the lessons that they should have took from the pandemic, which is the value of unions, employers and government working together,” Nowak tells me when I ask about the TUC’s current relationship with the government. He singles Health Secretary Steve Barclay out for criticism, accusing him of making “puerile arguments” about nurses’ pay demands. “I’m hoping that more sensible voices in the government prevail early next year.”

Asked whether he is concerned about how public opinion towards the strikes may shift, Nowak says: “You’re always worried about public opinion. But what I would say is that I’ve been pleasantly surprised how well public opinion has held up. And I think that just reflects a truism, which is our members are also members of the public.” Focusing on ongoing industrial action by postal workers, he acknowledges that “nobody likes a Royal Mail strike” but adds: “Most of the public have got a connection with a person who delivers their post every day.”

Nowak similarly believes that the government will find it difficult to “drive a wedge” between NHS workers and people who use the health service. “When it comes down to an argument between [Steve] Barclay on the one hand – and Jeremy Hunt – and UNISON paramedics, the Royal College of Nurses and physiotherapists on the other hand, I know which way my money would go in terms of who the British public trusts.”

Nowak thinks it is “likely” that the government will look to introduce more anti-strike measures in the future. Draft legislation to enforce minimum service levels during transport strikes is currently making its way through the Commons, while a change in the law to allow the use of agency workers to cover official industrial action has already come into force. The TUC has coordinated a legal challenge against the latter, arguing that it is unlawful in part because it violates fundamental rights protected by the European Convention on Human Rights.

“We will challenge anything that the government brings that threatens the right to strike. We’ll challenge it politically and we’ll challenge it in the court,” Nowak tells me. “Politically, we’ll be determined to derail the legislation and to make the government pay as high a political price as possible. And I think there will be some Conservative members in the House of Commons who will be feeling very uncomfortable about further restrictions on the right to strike.”

The TUC hosted a rally in Westminster in early November. The event featured speakers from across the union movement, who were united in their commitment to ongoing strike action. I ask Nowak – the event’s final speaker – whether it feels like there is a strong sense of unity within the TUC and the wider union movement. “It really does,” he tells me, adding: “We can’t be complacent and take that unity for granted. But a united TUC and a united trade union movement, I think, is a force to be reckoned with.”

I raise comments made by RMT general secretary Mick Lynch at TUC Congress earlier this year. The rail union leader called for an “uprising”, telling a fringe event: “I don’t care if Paul Nowak or Frances [O’Grady] are the ones that coordinate it as long as they don’t get in the way.” Nowak describes relations with the RMT and Lynch (a member of the TUC’s governing general council) as “good”. He explains that the TUC has been organising meetings involving the RMT and other unions to coordinate industrial action efforts. “That’s the role of the TUC,” he says. “To coordinate unions and make sure that we are talking to each other and that we’re not cutting across each other or undermining each other’s campaigns.”

Nowak stresses that there has been “no call” from within the general council for a general strike – echoing what O’Grady told me when I spoke to her in September. “We don’t hand down directives on high from Congress,” Nowak says. “Our job is to support and coordinate unions. And yes, to show leadership and to give people confidence. But, from my mind, it’s about respecting that those difficult decisions about industrial action are driven by members. They’re not driven by me. They’re not driven by TUC staff. They’re not even driven by union leaders.”

Nowak notes that coordination between unions does not necessarily mean synchronisation. “There’s been something very powerful about the fact that on one day we’ve had a group of railway workers taking industrial action, on the next day, it’s the Royal Mail, on the next day, it’s nurses,” he tells me. “It all builds up this picture that, underneath every single one of those disputes, is workers with legitimate concerns and legitimate issues.” He stresses that the TUC’s job is to help unions and their members win, declaring that he is “not interested” in “glorious defeats or in strikes for the sake of strikes”.

Prior to becoming a TUC official, Nowak does not recall ever receiving a permanent contract of employment. He says one of his “most formative” early union experiences took place during his time working for an employment agency for BT: “We organised a whole swathe of agency workers and then, as a result of that, effectively was dismissed. 80 of us told at one fell swoop that we were no longer required because the contract had changed.”

“My experience increasingly reflects, not everybody’s experience of the world of work, but more and more – particularly younger workers in insecure employment,” Nowak says, adding: “I’ve got three adult kids, and I’m constantly thinking about how do you make the trade union movements as relevant to them as it was to the previous generations.” He identifies Amazon as an employer that unions globally have “got to get to grips with”, adding that he hopes planned strike action by GMB members employed at a warehouse in Coventry will be a “little bit of the spark that lights the flame”.

“We’ve got to find a way of organising across whole sectors. I think that means unions coming together. I think it means legislative change,” Nowak tells me, adding: “I’m not under any illusions, it’s not going to happen with this Conservative government.” He describes O’Grady’s tenure as general secretary as a “difficult shift” given the government’s hostility towards the unions but argues that her impact has nonetheless been “immense”.

“Maybe one difference between my tenure as TUC general secretary and Frances’ tenure is that she had to deal with ten years of hostile government that was intent on keeping unions out the room and out the conversation,” Nowak says. “I hope that that will change in that we’ll have a Labour government that will open up the door to unions and see us as an essential part of the solution to the country’s problems.”

Nowak is positive about Labour’s new deal for working people and its plans to repeal anti-union legislation, arguing: “That begins to look like a set of policies that could help shift the balance of power in workplaces.” But he adds: “That doesn’t mean that unions and Labour are gonna agree on every issue all the time – and it was ever thus. In the 100-years-plus history of our relationship between the trade union movement and Labour Party, not every union’s agreed with the Labour leadership on every issue.”

“I want to spend the next few months in the run-up to the next election making sure that Labour continues to be an effective opposition,” Nowak adds. “But also that when Labour goes into that election, it goes into the election on a manifesto that really speaks to the issues and concerns that matter to millions of working people. And I think we’re absolutely on the right direction when it comes to that.”

Union says Scottish Government should make new year resolution fair pay for teachers

Members of the Educational Institute of Scotland are taking part in further industrial action in January. The Scottish Government said a 10% pay increase for teachers is not affordable.

31 DEC 2022

Further strike action is planned for January (Image: PA)

A teaching union is calling on the Scottish Government and local authorities to make a greatly improved pay offer for teachers their new year’s resolution.

The Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) made the plea ahead of further strike action by its members next month. The union’s general secretary, Andrea Bradley, said teachers deserve and expect an appropriate increase in their pay and not a “deep real-terms pay cut”.

EIS members will be among three unions taking further strike action in January in the dispute over pay. Teachers have already rejected a deal which would see most staff in classrooms receive a 5% pay rise, although the lowest-earning teachers would get a 6.85% increase.

The Scottish Government said that a 10% increase for all teachers is not affordable within its fixed budget. Ms Bradley said: “As 2022 comes to a close, Scotland’s teachers are still waiting for a pay settlement that should have been paid to them in April.

“What Scotland’s teachers have been offered by the Scottish Government and Cosla amounts to a record real-terms pay cut of up to 11% in a single year. This is in the context of the value of teachers’ pay dropping by a massive 20% since 2008.

“It is little wonder that teachers voted so overwhelmingly for strike action and remain determined to stand firm against the unprecedented pay cuts that have been offered.”

She added: “The Scottish Government and Cosla must do better. They owe it to Scotland’s teachers – the majority of them women – and Scotland’s pupils to end this dispute by committing to pay Scotland’s teachers a fair pay increase. This is about pay justice and gender pay justice.”

The EIS strike action on January 10 will involve members in primary schools, special schools and early years sites. The following day, the EIS, joined by the Scottish Secondary Teachers’ Association (SSTA), will stage another strike in secondary schools and secondary special schools.

NASUWT members in primary schools will also strike on January 10 while teachers working in secondary schools will walk out on January 11.


EIS members are also due to begin further strike action on January 16, when action will take place over 16 consecutive days, with teachers in two local authorities walking out each day. SSTA and NASUWT members took two days of strike action earlier this month while EIS members walked out on November 24.

Scotland’s Education Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: “We are committed to a fair, sustainable settlement for Scotland’s teachers and will continue to engage constructively with teaching unions and Cosla.

“It is very disappointing that the unions rejected the latest offer – the fourth that was put to unions – which mirrors the deal accepted by other local government workers.

“The request for a 10% increase for all teachers – even the highest paid – is not affordable within the Scottish Government’s fixed budget.”
Second day of New Year strike action on railways as Scots return to work

ScotRail will run a skeleton service of 12 routes across the network on strike days.


Just a handful of ScotRail services will run on Wednesday 
(Katharine Hay/PA) / PA Wire

By Lauren Gilmour

ScotRail services will be severely disrupted on Wednesday as railway workers walk out in a second day of strike action this week.

Network Rail workers across Scotland walked out yesterday as part of an ongoing dispute over pay and conditions.

Signal workers, guards, customer service and station workers are among those who downed tools on Tuesday and will do so again on Wednesday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday of this week.


While the dispute itself does not involve ScotRail staff, industrial action will have a major impact on the operators ability to run services.

Read More
Government needs to stop blocking rail dispute deal, RMT says

Many of those striking are employed in safety-critical roles.

Twelve routes across the Central belt and Fife will operate on a reduced timetable and only between 7.30am and 6.30pm.

David Simpson, ScotRail service delivery director, said: “It’s really disappointing to see more widespread disruption across the whole Great Britain rail network as a result of the dispute between Network Rail and the RMT at a time when we need to be encouraging more people back to the railway.

“For ScotRail, it’s going to mean that we won’t be able to operate the vast majority of our services between January 3 and 7, which we know will be really frustrating for our customers.

“We’re advising customers to seek alternative means of transport and to only travel if they really need to on the days of strike action.

“Customers should check their entire journey in advance to make sure their train is running.”

The routes and frequency of service in operation on the four strike days are:

Edinburgh Waverley – Glasgow Queen Street via Falkirk High: two trains per hourEdinburgh Waverley – Helensburgh Central: two trains per hourGlasgow Central – Hamilton/Larkhall: two trains per hourGlasgow Central – Lanark: two trains per hourEdinburgh Waverley – Glasgow Central via Shotts: one train per hourEdinburgh Waverley – Cowdenbeath: two trains per hourEdinburgh Waverley – Tweedbank: two trains per hourEdinburgh Waverley – North Berwick: one train per hourEdinburgh Waverley – Larbert: one train per hourGlasgow Queen Street – Larbert: one train per hourGlasgow Queen Street – Falkirk Grahamston: one train per hourMilngavie – Springburn: two trains per hour

Services between Scotland and England on Avanti West Coast are also disrupted due to a landslip at Carstairs.

The line will be closed until Friday January 6 the operator has said.

RMT general secretary Mick Lynch accused the UK Government of blocking a pay deal and has called for a settlement members can vote for.

RMT members are also campaigning against plans to close ticket offices, cut jobs and move the industry to widespread driver-only operation.


Mr Lynch said industrial action could continue until May unless a reasonable offer was made, he told the PA news agency from a picket line at Euston Station in London.

“We want to get the railway back to normal. We want good industrial relations and we want the services to run the way they should be running,” he said.

“The companies can’t run them on non-strike days, never mind when we’re out.

“So we need to change the equation and get a settlement to the dispute as quickly as possible, and that will mean the public can rely on the railway and get the services they need.”

Work and pensions secretary Mel Stride told the BBC on Wednesday the UK Government will come forward with further details on anti-strikes legislation.

He said: “I think we do have to question whether we’ve got the balance right between the rights of workers to strike and the inconvenience and sometimes danger that can pose to the public.

“So I think it’s quite right that the Government has come forward and already introduced some legislation, and we will come forward with further details.”

A Department for Transport spokesman said: “Passengers have rightly had enough of rail strikes and want the disruption to end.

“The Government has demonstrated it is being reasonable and stands ready to facilitate a resolution to rail disputes. It’s time the unions came to the table and played their part as well.

“Inflation-matching pay increases for all public sector workers would cost everyone more in the long-term – worsening debt, fuelling inflation and costing every household an extra £1,000.

“Unions should step back from this strike action so we can start 2023 by ending this damaging dispute.”

Liam Sumpter, route director for Network Rail Scotland, said: “We understand the impact this strike will have and we are working hard to keep as many passengers as possible moving during the next phase of RMT industrial action.

“We remain committed to working with the RMT to find a solution to this dispute, but we also need to agree a deal that is fair on the taxpayers who fund our railway.”

 Opinion

If the UK Government keeps refusing to talk about pay, the blame for the ongoing strikes will lie fairly and squarely at its door

It's a new year – but 2023 is starting with the same old problems, not least the deadlocked disputes across the public services which have led to nurses, train drivers, teachers, paramedics, postal workers and others taking strike action and the UK Government refusing to negotiate.

As people return to work after the festive break, more walk-outs are planned and ministers show little sign of softening their intransigent stance. Rail strikes resume this week as Network Rail staff across the UK stage repeated stoppages. Even in Scotland, junior doctors are preparing for industrial action and unions representing nurses and midwives have rejected the government's latest pay deal and are due to announce strike dates next month. Firefighters could be next.

With inflation at around 10 per cent and pay offers for some sectors as low as two per cent, it's hardly surprising that workers are feeling angry and desperate at their real-terms pay cuts. A growing number of nurses are said to be resorting to foodbanks to feed their families – a shameful situation for any society, but especially a rich nation like ours.

There was a time, at the height of Covid, when it looked as if there might be a fundamental rethink about how we value different jobs and an attempt to ensure proper recognition and reward for the vital role played by often low-paid workers. There was a genuine gratitude for the sacrifices made not just by health workers, but also others who kept society functioning – like delivery drivers, supermarket staff, teachers and bus and train drivers. These are the people who saved lives, maintained food supplies, made sure some basic level of education continued and helped essential workers get to their jobs.

But all that seems to have been forgotten now. Public service staff are told their pay claims are unaffordable and ministers accuse them of holding the country to ransom. The government tries to portray its position as reasonable because it is following the recommendations of “independent” pay review bodies. It ignores the fact the recommendations were produced before the surge in inflation and the review bodies are only independent within government-set parameters.

And ministers condemning the impact of walk-outs by nurses and paramedics is also tricky when people know hospital wards are understaffed all the time and ambulance response times are poor because so many are queuing outside A&E departments for hours.

No-one likes the idea of nurses striking – least of all the nurses themselves – and everyone gets frustrated by the disruption which industrial action in key sectors inevitably brings. But with shared worries about the impact of the soaring cost of living and wages not keeping up with inflation, many of the public are on the workers' side rather than the government's in these disputes. One poll just before Christmas showed support for nurses had risen by seven points since the strikes were announced, with 54 per cent blaming the government for the nurses taking action.

Disputes almost always end with negotiation and compromise. If the government maintains its refusal to have talks about pay, the blame for the continuing strikes and the consequent disruption will lie fairly and squarely at the government's door.

Hide Ad
Members of the Royal College of Nursing demonstrate outside the Scottish Parliament.  Picture: Lisa Ferguson.
Members of the Royal College of Nursing demonstrate outside the Scottish Parliament. Picture: Lisa Ferguson.