Winged seeds of the west wind

Let’s see how Rahul Gandhi fits in with the gust and its potential to recast India’s political field.

Jawed Naqvi 

Published January 31, 2023 


The BBC showed a damning report on communal violence in Gujarat; a ripping investigation by a US company into alleged financial turpitude scalded a nouveau riche Indian tycoon in whose private plane Prime Minister Modi landed in Delhi in May 2014 to take the oath of allegiance to the constitution; and Rahul Gandhi’s hugely popular 4,000-kilometre long march for national harmony ended in snow-clad Srinagar. The elements are mixed and disparate. But, they are signalling in unison to a harrowed audience: the winged seeds of change are sprouting.

Shelley used the metaphor of the seeds in his Ode to the West Wind, a poem of hope and rekindling of life in seeds that are given up for dead.

“The winged seeds, where they lie cold and low,/ Each like a corpse within its grave, until/ Thine azure sister of the Spring shall blow/ Her clarion o’er the dreaming earth, and fill/ (Driving sweet buds like flocks to feed in air)/ With living hues and odours plain and hill:/ Wild Spirit, which art moving everywhere;/ Destroyer and Preserver; hear, O hear!”

In a manner of speaking, a west wind is blowing that could end the suffocation of Indians enduring their most traumatic years since independence. In 1977, the west wind had gushed at the overthrow of a short-lived dictatorship.

Let’s first see how Rahul Gandhi fits in with the gust and its potential to sweep and recast India’s political field. We know that the two-part BBC documentary hit the right-wing establishment in the solar plexus. That a major government saw Modi as directly responsible for an unspeakable carnage 20 years ago is a significant new input into the public dossier still piling up against the former chief minister and his party. Modi’s supporters have called the BBC report an insult to the Supreme Court, but the apex court has listed a petition against the official ban for hearing on Feb 3. Be that as it may, the documentary has engulfed university campuses and colleges like wildfire

As for the $218 billion Gautam Adani empire, the US-based Hindenberg Research published a damning report on Jan 24. The result was instant and destructive. The Hindu reported the effect sans emotion. “The benchmark S&P BSE Sensex slid 1.5 [per cent] on Friday, dragged down by banking stocks on investor fears that a short-seller triggered rout in Adani Group stocks could impact lenders with a substantial exposure to the ports-to-commodities conglomerate.”

The Sensex fell 874.16 points to 59,330.90, with State Bank of India leading the losses at 5.03pc. The flagship Adani Enterprises, which opened a Rs20,000 crore follow-on public offer on Friday, slumped 18.5pc to Rs2,762.15 on the BSE. The Congress has demanded a “serious investigation” by the Reserve Bank of India and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) into the report that accused the Adani Group of “brazen stock manipulation and accounting fraud” — charges the Adani Group said were “malicious” and timed to “ruin the public listing of its shares”. Rahul Gandhi had often named Adani as one of the clutch of tycoons around Mr Modi who had benefited from crony state support at the expense of the country. On Monday, Adani called the Hindenberg report an attack on India. Hindenberg Research, in its reply, said Adani was using nationalism to dodge the questions about alleged fraud.

A Western news agency reported that SEBI had increased scrutiny of deals by the Adani Group over the past year and will study the Hindenburg report to add to its own ongoing initial investigation into the group’s foreign portfolio investors.

Between the BBC documentary and the Hindenberg report is a hint of the West’s gathering discomfort with an Indian leadership they have needed to court. But there is unease as Mr Modi flaunts his ties with President Putin, after having canvassed support for a second term for Donald Trump, both being pariahs for the Biden-led alliance. Equally significantly, Modi’s self-advertised proximity to the Israeli leadership, in particular to Prime Minister Netanyahu, could be recoiling. He had leveraged useful support through his Israeli links in the portals of US politics. But, now, given the extreme right-wing control of Israel with its threatened adverse fallout on the alliance’s material help to Ukraine, it has robbed Netanyahu of traditional legitimacy.

Modi’s critical gambit in his balancing act concerns India’s membership of the anti-China Quad. However, with the subsequent formation of AUKUS between the old Anglo-Saxon allies of Australia, US and the UK, the Quad has become a B team in America’s anti-China talent hunt. In any case, Modi’s centrality to Washington’s need for an anti-Beijing anchor in India may no longer be the unchallenged proposition it was.

Rahul Gandhi has positioned the opposition to supplant him. A repeated theme in Gandhi’s long march to unite India focused on China. The topic has little political traction at home but should be finding keen eavesdroppers abroad. Rahul’s fulminations usually covered a gamut of issues from communal harmony to big corruption. But one of his favourite targets of attack was Prime Minister Modi and his alleged vulnerability against China. “The media will ask me personal questions all the time, but would they ever want to know what we think of Mr Modi’s handling of the Chinese moves on our borders?” The question posed by Rahul at whistle-stop media briefings masks a messaging.

By going hard on the China border issue, Gandhi was indicating a strengthened continuity in a foreign policy stance favoured by the West vis-à-vis China. In a way, it cancels his late father’s televised handshake with Deng Xiaoping in 1988, now an unspoken impediment to the post-Cold War pro-West Congress position. Rahul’s hard line on China clearly outpaces Modi’s. On human dignity, on doing business fairly, without cronyism, and in diplomatic finesse, Rahul Gandhi and the Congress are preparing the opposition to take charge. The wind looks rather favourable too.

The writer is Dawn’s correspondent in Delhi.

jawednaqvi@gmail.com
Published in Dawn, January 31st, 2023

Tanks & memories

Mahir Ali

Published February 1, 2023 

GERMAN tanks on the borders of Russia. Why does that ring a distant bell, in fact, an alarm bell? The last time that happened may have been 80 years ago, but the so-called Great Patriotic War still resonates loudly in the collective Russian consciousness, partly as a consequence of relentless state propaganda, but also because for some survivors it’s still a living memory.

It’s likely the German government’s reluctance to supply Ukraine with Leopard 2 tanks was in part an oblique acknowledgement of that horrible history. Germany invaded Russia twice in the 20th century; it’s understandable why it might not wish to be seen as the driving force behind a third attempt in the 21st century.

The government of Chancellor Olaf Scholz, which has already been supplying plenty of military aid to Ukraine, much of it surreptitiously, finally caved in last week after relentless bullying by its Nato allies. It also does not want to be singled out as a stumbling block in Western assistance for Kyiv’s resistance. Last week, it agreed to supply 14 of its coveted Leopards, in “lockstep” with allies such as Poland, the UK and US.

America’s M1 Abrams tanks were high on Volodymyr Zelensky’s Christmas wish list when the Ukrainian president visited Washington in December. Santa was happy to bounce young Volodya on his knee, but prepared to provide him only the smaller war toys — armoured vehicles, missile launchers and defence systems, and the like. Joe Biden relented last week: 31 Abrams tanks will wind their way to the war zone at some point. It could take months, if not years, The New York Times quoted military sources as saying.

Can more Western weapons ‘save’ Ukraine?

The Leopards could reach Ukraine much quicker, certainly in time for the commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the Battle of Kursk in western Russia in July-August 1943, which effectively turned the tide against the Soviet Union’s Nazi invaders. It is remembered as the largest tank battle in history: 6,000 tanks, 4,000 aircraft and 2,000,000 troops were involved, according to Encyclopaedia Britannica.

The difference this time around is that Russia is the invader. Notwithstanding serial Nato provocations over the previous three decades, the hostilities launched this month last year were Vladimir Putin’s choice. It would have qualified as an extraordinarily dumb choice even if his initial assumptions of a cakewalk to Kyiv had proved to be realistic.

They turned out instead to be absurdly inflated. Russian military adventurism has come a cropper on almost every front, and frequent changes of command have not helped. Raw recruits thrust onto front lines with little training can hardly be blamed for their poor performance, and too many of them will not live to tell their tales. Both sides are estimated to have lost more than 100,000 military personnel each. And for what? The Ukrainians can at least credibly claim to be defending their homeland. The Russians lack a viable excuse for their enforced sacrifice.

The Western attitude towards the conflagration of which it is incontrovertibly a part is broadly divided between those who consider the steadily increasing weaponisation of Ukraine to be a means of pushing Putin to the negotiating table, and an increasing number of others who envisage a decisive Russian defeat. But what exactly does a Russian defeat look like? Would driving Russian forces out of the territories occupied since last February suffice, or would it involve a reversion to the pre-2014 status quo ante? Both aims could be justified, the latter on the basis of the 1991 agreement between Russia, Ukraine and Belarus that demolished the Soviet Union.

There could be ambitions beyond that, though, which could feed into Putin’s claims of threats to the Russian Federation’s integrity. Ultimately, though, Putin himself is the biggest threat to Russia. Putin must go, and the impetus for that needs to come from within Russia, not from Washington, Brussels or Berlin. His reign since the turn of the century has been disastrous in many respects, but the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine takes the (poison) cake.

A Kremlin without Putin could potentially benefit both Russia and Ukraine. But there is no clear indication that such a development is imminent, and it is far from clear who will take over if, by hook or by crook, he departs. Among the possible successors is Yevgeny Prigozhin, whose brutal Wagner group of mercenaries has militarily been more effective than the regular Russian army. That would truly be disastrous, but the alternatives too provide little cause for hope.

Russia’s disastrous performance in World War I triggered the revolutions of 1917. It could do with a repeat. But the lethal arming of Ukraine — and broader Western hyperbole, such as The Guardian’s headline ‘Terror on New Year’s Eve: huge Russian missile attack kills one in Ukraine’ — doesn’t really help.

mahir.dawn@gmail.com
Published in Dawn, February 1st, 2023

Our Latin American slide

Sakib Sherani 

Published January 29, 2023

After a CIA- and MI6-orchestrated campaign of mass killing and ‘purges’ in Indonesia in the 1960s that left an estimated upward of one million Indonesians dead, the attention of the US turned to ‘fighting communism’ in South America.

In Chile, a bloody coup was engineered that ousted the popular and democratically elected, left-leaning government of president Salvador Allende on Sept 11, 1973, by Gen Augusto Pinochet. What followed was a dark chapter in Chile’s history, filled with brutal repression, enforced disappearances, illegal detentions and torture, and mass killings by the military regime and its secret police.

This period was characterised by the unleashing of state terrorism, the suppression of fundamental rights, and the complete evaporation of the rule of law and accountability of the army and security services. Over 40,000 Chileans are officially recognised as having been subjected to human rights abuses by the military and intelligence agencies over this period, including an estimated 3,200 subjected to extrajudicial killing.

Argentina’s dark period with regard to human rights abuses and political repression began with the military coup of 1976, the umpteenth time in the country’s history, that deposed president Isabel Perón and brought a junta into power. Led by army chief Gen Jorge Rafael Videla, the junta began an unprecedentedly violent campaign against political opponents and leftists, that it itself branded as “the dirty war”. Thousands of Argentinians were summarily picked up by security agencies, brutally tortured, killed and thrown into unmarked mass graves, ‘disappeared’ forever, or murdered by right-wing death squads.

Human rights abuses and debt-induced economic instability could be the new norm.

As the US’s ‘covert’ war against the spread of socialism and communism in the western hemisphere, dubbed Operation Condor, metastasized through South America, the same pattern of human rights abuses and killings on industrial scale by military regimes or proxies propped up by the US and actively supported by American military advisers and CIA operatives was replicated in Guatemala, Nicaragua, Ecuador and Honduras.

All told, an estimated several hundred thousand people across Central and South America died during this period in the “dirty wars” conducted by imposed military juntas.

Another feature of this period in Latin America’s history was that the military coups almost invariably provided beachheads for US corporations and the ‘Chicago Boys’ — technocrats inspired by, and working under, Milton Friedman and promoting the idea of an unfettered free market. Along with US involvement, poor economic management and protracted reliance on foreign loans, leading to unsustainable debt burdens, was another feature of Latin America that may resonate with Pakistanis.

Fast forward in time. In 2013, in yet another military coup against a popular and elected government taking place with the full backing of the US, president Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood party, Egypt’s first democratically-elected president, was ousted by the army chief, Gen Abdul Fatah al-Sisi. Thousands of Muslim Brotherhood supporters and other pro-democracy activists were gunned down or imprisoned without trial. The human rights abuses unleashed by the Sisi military dictatorship have been described as the worst since the Mubarak years.

One of the most egregious abuses occurred in August 2013, when the army and security forces attacked a peaceful protest by Morsi supporters, killing an estimated 1,000 unarmed demonstrators. Human Rights Watch described it as “one of the largest killings of demonstrators in a single day in recent history”. Hundreds of alleged supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood were also sentenced to death in a single mass trial.

In 2019, Mr Morsi died in detention in what UN experts ruled could amount to a “state sanctioned arbitrary killing”. There has been a deafening silence from the self-anointed global champions of human rights since the illegal coup and subsequent abuses of Gen Sisi’s dictatorship.

Since the regime change in April 2022, the Pakistani establishment seems to be dangerously tilting towards adopting the ‘politicide’ undertaken by Sisi’s Egypt (and previously by a host of anti-democratic regimes in Latin America and other places). While human rights abuses have a long history in Pakistan, they have generally taken place in the context of armed conflict against the state. Journalists have been killed, beaten and intimidated in the past, including some high-profile ones, but the assassination in Kenya of the country’s most prominent investigative journalist Arshad Sharif is a new and sorry low. Others have received death threats and been forced into exile. Adoption of inhuman torture tactics, including alleged sexual abuse, against political opponents is also an ominous new chapter.

As an aside, while the US involvement in Latin American military coups and subsequent human rights abuses had a clear strategic rationale, as well as commercial objectives (such as for the Iraq war), the motives for regime change in Egypt or Pakistan may be immediately less obvious. In Egypt’s case, keeping a client state within its sphere of influence is an obvious candidate — while keeping ‘Islamist’ influences at bay, no matter how democratic and peaceful. (France’s reaction to the Islamic Salvation Front (FIS) win in Algeria in 1992 and its involvement in sparking another “dirty war” in its former colony is another case in point).

In Pakistan’s case, US motivation in promoting regime change appear two-fold. Reinstating the discredited and crooked old guard ensures continuation of a pliant political system in which the military and corrupt domestic ruling elite operate hand in hand in furthering US interests. The other is to contain China’s influence after the launch of CPEC and cut off its potential access to Gwadar. Limiting China’s access to Afghanistan’s mineral riches also appears to be a strategic goal.

Regime change. Abductions. Wrongful confinement. Torture. Assassination. Attempted assassination. Enforced disappearance. False cases. Exile. Silencing of critics. Repositioning as a US client state. We appear to be ticking all the boxes.

While human rights abuses in Pakistan are not new, they have taken a dangerous turn in their scale as well as brazenness in the post-regime change scenario. Whether Pakistan is going to ‘walk like an Egyptian’ or slide like Latin America, either way it is a dangerous and ominous development that can only be the precursor to several very difficult years ahead.

The writer was a member of the economic advisory council under the former prime minister.

Published in Dawn, January 29th, 2023

Future of Pakistan

Faisal Siddiqi 

Published January 28, 2023


“For a revolution to break out, it is not enough for the lower classes to refuse to live in the old way; it is necessary also that the upper classes should be unable to live in the old way.” — Lenin

THE recent narratives of imminent collapse and inevitable need for radical change propounded by Miftah Ismail and Shahid Khaqan Abbasi remind me of my recurring conversations with my wife.

I recently again explained to her that if things in Pakistan do not radically change, collapse is imminent. My wife’s response was devastatingly insightful. She reminded me that I had propounded the same analysis of imminent collapse and the inevitable need for radical change for the last two and a half decades, but still Pakistan had neither collapsed nor had the inevitability of radical change emerged.

Neither breakup nor collapse but violent chaos: Anyone who bases his theory, or need, for radical change on the premise that unless radical change occurs, Pakistan will either break up or collapse, will be disappointed.

Firstly, at present, the only secessionist movement in Pakistan is the Baloch insurgency. Despite their unquestionably legitimate complaint of being treated as a colony in their own country, they neither have the military capacity nor will any international power intervene on their behalf to defeat the Pakistani state. They will continue to be a violent problem for the Pakistani state, like the Kurdish separatist movement in Türkiye.

Secondly, as Theda Skocpol in her book States and Social Revolutions explains, external wars and their connected fiscal crises lead to social revolutions.

Although Pakistan is involved in a low-intensity conflict, or cold war, with both India and elements from Afghanistan, there appears to be little possibility of a full scale war with India or that of extremist religious elements like the TTP defeating the Pakistani state. These conflicts will continue to bleed Pakistan, but the country will not collapse because of these conflicts.

Pakistan is imploding, and its future is not breakup or collapse but more violence and chaos.

Thirdly, will the fiscal crisis lead to a collapse? Our history shows that Pakistan’s utility as a mercenary state for international forces, especially in this critically important geopolitical region and also as a nuclear power, has always provided a reason to financially bail out Pakistan, as happened under Ayub, Zia, Musharraf and even under the post-2008 democratic regimes.

The most likely scenario is that we are entering a period of continuous severe economic crises and political chaos with unending game-of-thrones battles between the PTI and other political parties, ever-increasing terrorism by Baloch separatist and religiously motivated extremists, international and regional semi-isolation, an extraordinarily corrupt and inefficient state, and collapsing societal institutions in the face of unchecked population explosion and unregulated urbanisation — while our human development indicators get progressively even worse.

Pakistan is imploding, and its future is not breakup or collapse but more violence and chaos.

Lovers of the status quo: This raises the key Leninist question cited above — why are our ruling elites able to survive and flourish by maintaining their old ways/status quo despite the ever-increasing dysfunctionality and crisis of both state and society?

Most analysts think that the Pakistani ruling elites are either too incompetent to comprehend solutions, or selfish (with mala fide intentions), or both. But the answer lies elsewhere: firstly, the current status quo of a corrupt, inefficient, elitist and anti-people Pakistani state is being sustained because it guarantees the political and bureaucratic power of these elites. So why would they change something which benefits them?

Secondly, all ruling elites have mala fide intent or are selfish, or both. But similar elites in other countries have historically reformed themselves in order to remain the ruling elite because the old order was unsustainable. Angels will not descend from the skies to govern us.

Thirdly, these elites have seen it all; namely, fiscal crisis, wars, terrorism, crime, an inefficient state and the worst social indicators; but, despite this, they have still survived and flourished. So why reform?

Agents of change, not solutions: There is always hope for change in countries like Pakistan because such ruling elites have neither the capacity for complete repression of dissent nor the intelligence (in their own self-interest) to initiate at least some reform to legitimise their elitist rule.

Moreover, the answer doesn’t lie in devising new solutions to our old problems, as examples from other developed countries provide a complete roadmap solution to building a democratic and modern state. Rather, the answer lies in identifying the agents of change.

Power within contemporary Pakistan is wiel­d­ed by eight actors and divided into: coercive and surveillance power (military establishm­ent), exe­c­utive and legislative power (politicians and bur­e­aucrats), constitutional and legal power (judiciary), narrative power (media), political mob­ili­sation power (middle class, especially youth and women), economic power (the moneyed elite), fatwa power (old and new religious leaders) and anarchic power (terrorists and secessionists).

Meanwhile, the ruling elite in Pakistan is broadly composed of two cooperating but also conflicting groups: a status quo elite that doesn’t want to change, and a selfish but enlightened elite (within the military, politicians, bureaucracy, judiciary, media, moneyed and old religious elite circles) which realises that this country is becoming unmanageable and unlivable for them and their children.

This latter group also feels ashamed of being viewed as a failed and beggar nation internationally. This selfish enlightened elite needs to rigorously push for radical reform from within the state and should refuse to support this decaying status quo.

In other words, they must expunge this status quo from the power structure. But this selfish enlightened elite will only succeed if the middle classes mobilise themselves against the status quo. The middle classes are the greatest losers in this continuing status quo as they are neither part nor beneficiaries of the ruling elites. The middle classes are the new societal agents of change, as Aasim Sajjad rightly argues in his book The Struggle for Hegemony in Pakistan,and this middle class power is also evident in the rise of the PTI and the successful lawyers’ movement.

Will change happen? The answer really lies within each one of us.

The writer is a lawyer.

Published in Dawn, January 28th, 2023

Pakistan’s corruption perception score falls to worst level in 10 years

Amin Ahmed 

Published February 1, 2023 

ISLAMABAD: Although Pakistan managed to maintain its ranking in Transparency International’s Corru­ption Perceptions Index (CPI) in 2022, its overall score fell to the lowest level since 2012.

According to the report released on Monday, Pakistan ranked 140 out of 180 countries — a position unchanged from 2021. However, its overall CPI score fell to 27 out of 100. Last year, the score was 28 out of 100.

“Pakistan [...]continued its statistically significant downward trend, this year hitting its lowest score since 2012 at just 27 points amidst ongoing political turmoil,” Transparency Inter­national said.

It added that former prime minister Imran Khan came to power on the promise of tackling corruption and undertaking social and economic reforms. “[B]ut little has been accomplished on any of these fronts since he took the reins in 2018.”

Country maintains 140th spot on Transparency International ranking

Under the PTI government, the ranking of Pakistan gradually slid from 117 out of 180 in 2018 to 140 in 2021.

The Berlin-based organisation said since Mr Khan was ousted through a no-confidence motion in April 2022, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) disqualified him over allegations “he failed to declare gifts and profits he made from selling them during his tenure.”

“While awaiting the verdicts from these two cases, it’s most important that the new government does not allow such political scandals to derail comprehensive anti-corruption efforts,” the organisation said in its review of Pakistan’s performance on the index.

The index ranks 180 countries and territories by their perceived levels of public-sector corruption according to experts and businesspeople. It relies on 13 independent data sources and uses a scale of zero to 100, where zero is highly corrupt and 100 is very clean.

Pakistan is among the 10 nations whose CPI score has significantly declined since 2017. Among the biggest declines are Luxembourg (77), Canada (74), the United Kingdom (73), Austria (71), Malaysia (47), Mongolia (33), Pakistan (27), Honduras (23), Nicaragua (19) and Haiti (17).

Recommendations

However it said that upcoming elections in major countries, including Pakistan, offer some hope for addressing the issue,

“Elections in Bangladesh, Paki­stan, Thailand, Cambodia, Myanmar and more can be important moments... to address corruption concerns that weigh so heavily on many.”

To improve its ranking, TI recommended Pakistan reinforce checks and balances and promote separation of powers; share information and uphold the right to access it; limit private influence by regulating lobbying, promote open access to decision-making; and combat transnational corruption.

Published in Dawn, February 1st, 2023

PAKISTAN
Situationer: Looking for work that isn’t there

Aamir Shafaat Khan Published January 31, 2023 

A SEVEN per cent drop in textile exports during the current fiscal year has brought about thousands of layoffs in the industry, putting daily wagers and contractual workers at risk of starvation. And this is “just the beginning”.

The situation in the auto sector is equally grave, as more than “250,000 people have lost their jobs” due to a dip in the sale of automobiles.

Mazhar Iqbal (not his real name), 32, has been jobless for a month. “I worked as a contractual employee in the quality inspection department of a textile unit in FB Area for six years. But after I proceeded on sick leave, my employer asked me not to come back to work because my ‘job does not exist anymore’,” he told Dawn.

Mr Iqbal and his family depend on his sister, who works as a doctor in the UK, for sustenance. He said that after spending more than six years in the industry, it has become difficult for him to switch professions. But his dilemma is that other mills are not hiring.

Over 400,000 informal workers from textile, auto sectors lost their jobs in first half of FY23; stakeholders urge govt to develop strategy to avert further retrenchments

“I have been trying hard to get the same type of job but officials in other textile mills say that they cannot hire due to lack of work owing to a dip in export orders.”

Sharing his experience of the deplorable working conditions in the textile industry, he said it is a big challenge to survive in textile units. If a person fails to mark their attendance for two consecutive days, then the staff — posted at the gate — would take away their employment card and bar them from entering the premises, he claimed.

Shahbaz Ahmed (name changed to protect his identity), a machine operator who worked as a daily wager, has a similar ordeal to report. He lost his job at an auto parts unit in Korangi Creek almost six months ago, where he was earning Rs20,000 a month coupled with paltry overtime. But after losing his job, he has nowhere to turn. “Two months back, I tried my luck by setting up a cabin of confectionery items at Korangi No.6, but I was robbed twice,” Mr Ahmed disclosed.

According to him, he was taking care of a four-year-old daughter while three of his children have already passed away.

Living in a joint family with four married brothers in an 80 square-yard house in Korangi No. 3, he said, “I cannot explain how I am surviving this economic crunch, especially after the massive jump in prices of food items and utility bills.”

Seven million layoffs?

As if this was not enough, the market is buzzing with claims regarding layoffs of at least seven million workers employed in the textile sector, including the value-added textile exporters.

Value-Added Textile Exporters Patron Jawed Bilwani said the apathy shown by the government towards the flailing textile sector has aggravated the sufferings of millions of employees.

If the situation failed to improve, the industries will be compelled to shut down and sack at least seven million textile workers as 80 to 90 per cent of the workforce in the textile sector is working on daily wages and contracts. All these employments depend on a consistent stream of export orders, he added.

Speaking about the dearth of export orders, he said rising gas and utility charges, non-availability of gas besides a shortage of dollars and raw materials were playing havoc with textile production in the country.

“Foreign buyers prefer lifting low-priced items and that is why Pakistan is lagging behind exports in comparison with its regional competitors,” Mr Bilwani said. He said he was not hopeful about future orders either, as till now they were not up to expectations.

A textile exporter, who asked not to be named, carefully estimated that 150,000-200,000 people have definitely lost their livelihood during the ongoing economic crisis.

Pakistan Institute of Labor Education and Research (PILER) Executive Director Karmat Ali said a large number of people in the industry are fast losing their jobs and urged the government to form a strategy to address the rising unemployment. The textile sector holds a 60pc share of the country’s total job outlook, he added. Mr Karmat said the majority of people working in the textile sector are not on a permanent basis, as most of the jobs have been outsourced by the companies.

Auto sector

Pakistan Association of Automotive Parts & Accessories Manu­facturers Senior Vice Chairman Usman Aslam Malik said at least 250,000-300,000 workers have been laid off due to a persistent drop in sales of vehicles.

Millat Tractors Limited Executive Director Sohail Bashir Rana said around 2,000 workers were affected owing to a decline in the sale of tractors over the last six months. Mashood Ali Khan, who exports auto parts, blamed economic uncertainty and dwindling sales of vehicles for the spike in unemployment. He said there was a need to control overhead expenses and the soaring cost of raw materials to handle the crisis-like scenario.

The only way forward to save the industries and jobs is the establishment of the National Economic Development Plan after developing a consensus among stakeholders, particularly political parties and industrialists. The former president of the Employers Federation of Pakistan (EFP), Ismail Suttur, said the business in the textile sector has gone down by 50pc since June last year.

“This is just the beginning. If this government continues with its policies, I fear the day when these retrenchments will hit the services sector and will prove disastrous for the breadwinners of Pakistan,” Mr Suttur said.

“If we do not act now, every passing week would push Pakistan further down,” he feared.

Published in Dawn, January 31st, 2023

Automakers suspend production

Aamir Shafaat Khan Published February 1, 2023 

KARACHI: Faced with a demand slump and raw material shortages amid unfavourable economic conditions, Indus Motor Company (IMC) on Tuesday annou­nced a fourth production suspension from Feb 1-14.

Also, Agriauto Indus­tries Ltd (AIL), an auto vendor, announced a partial closure this month due to a sharp decline in demand for parts and accessories from major automakers.

The assembler of Toyota vehicles in a stock filing said it would resume production from Feb 15 on a single shift basis until further notice.

IMC said the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) on Jan 2 advised commercial banks to prioritise/facilitate imports to specified sectors only, which does not include the auto sector. This has disrupted the entire supply chain and the vendors are unable to supply raw materials and components to the company, IMC said.

The company had kept its production operation suspended from Aug 1-13, Sept 1-16 and Dec 20-30, 2022.

Despite production stoppages and a 52pc drop in sales in IHFY23, IMC shocked its customers by raising prices from Rs280,000 to Rs1.2 million on various models in the second week of this month.

Lucky jacks up prices: Kia Lucky Motor Corporation has raised the price by Rs100,000 to Rs1.3m from Feb 1. Till last month, the company has been offering a price lock option to the customers with immediate delivery.

As per the company’s website, the new price of Kia Picanto Manual and Automatic will be Rs3.2m and Rs3.4m, a rise of Rs100,000 and Rs200,000 respectively.

Bike gets costlier: The country’s no.1 bike assembler, Atlas Honda Ltd (AHL), has raised the price of 70cc-150cc bikes by Rs7,400-30,000 from Feb 1. The new rates of CD-70, CD-70 Dream, Pridor, CG-125, CG125S, CB125F, CB150F and CB150F (Silver) are Rs128,900, Rs137,900, Rs170,900, Rs194,900, Rs230,900, Rs305,900, Rs383,900 and Rs387,900.

United Auto Industries, the country’s second-largest bike assembler, has announced a price hike of Rs6,000-10,000 in 70cc-125cc bikes from Feb 1.

Memon Motor Private Ltd, assembler of Super Star Motorcycle, has raised the price of 70cc-125cc bikes by Rs6,000 from Jan 30. NJ Auto Industries, maker of Super Power bikes, has made a price jump of Rs5,000-8,000 in 70cc-200cc bikes from Jan 27.

Published in Dawn, February 1st, 2023

A perfect global storm

Maleeha Lodhi 

Published January 30, 2023 



Describing the ongoing global turmoil as a perfect storm, UN Secretary General António Guterres said in his speech at the World Economic Forum that cooperation was urgently needed in a fragmented world. This was also the theme of the annual Davos meeting earlier this month. The perfect storm, he maintained, was raging on several fronts, especially economic, with an unfolding cost-of-living crisis, rising inequality, looming recession, energy crunch, soaring inflation and supply chain disruptions among its many aspects. Yet, when international solidarity was needed most, geopolitical rifts and the deepening North-South divide was undermining efforts to meet global challenges.

There is no doubt that the world is at an inflection point and in the midst of an intensely unsettled period. Instability is being engendered by rising geopolitical tensions and global economic volatility. Power shifts continue in an increasingly fragmented international system, with multilateralism under growing stress. Uncertainty is the ‘new normal’ and the outlook remains troubled. Most assessments by experts paint a picture of unpredictability ahead, with strong headwinds unleashed by competing crises and a multiplicity of interconnected but so far unmet challenges.

The World Economic Forum’s annual Global Risks Report sees an era of low-growth, low cooperation and low investment with the cost-of-living crisis presenting the biggest short-term risk confronting the world right now, and climate change as the biggest long-term threat. It identifies old and new risks which are converging to shape a fraught landscape, and finds that economic warfare has become the norm, with increasing clashes between major powers and geopolitical cooperation eroding. The report makes for sober reading, even though it expresses the hope that collective and decisive action would help to chart a way towards a more positive, inclusive and stable world.

But for now, global stability is nowhere in sight. The major contributory factors to the ongoing geopolitical turbulence and economic disruption are the war initiated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine and continuing US-China confrontation. The Ukraine war, which has had global repercussions, will soon enter its second year, with no negotiated end to the conflict in sight. Russian forces are reported to be readying themselves for a spring offensive. Few, if any, diplomatic efforts are underway for a ceasefire or dialogue, which indicates that a prolonged war of attrition lies ahead. Russian targeting of Ukrainian infrastructure and strikes on key cities have not sapped Kyiv’s will to resist and fight. Nor has Western unity to help Ukraine weakened. Sophisticated military weapons have been sent to Ukraine to give it a qualitative edge in armaments. In what is described as a major policy shift, Germany and the US now plan to send battle tanks to Ukraine to help it counter Russian offensives. A week ago, the US and Nato indicated supplying a package of heavy weapons to Ukraine. All this suggests an escalation in coming months.

With rising geopolitical tensions, a divided and leaderless world is unable to meet global challenges.

The war has taken a heavy toll on the global economy, coming as it did on the back of the pandemic and its devastating economic fallout. It has disrupted global supply chains, trade, commodity and energy markets. The conflict has given rise to soaring food prices, while supply disruptions have intensified inflationary pressures across the world. This has hit poorer, debt-burdened economies especially hard. With major economies struggling to curb inflation, global financial conditions have also tightened. Weak global growth holds the prospect of recession in major economies and beyond. The international economic environment is in a volatile and uncertain state and facing a bleak future.

The Ukraine crisis isn’t the only challenge to international peace and stability. Another major source of global instability is the turbulent relationship between the US and China, the world’s most consequential bilateral relationship and a defining feature of the global landscape today. Relations between them have sunk to a historic low, raising concerns across the world about the advent of a new Cold War. Tensions have ensued in most part from America’s policy to contain China’s rise, which is being countered by an assertive response from Beijing. The US seeks to reduce dependence on Chinese supply chains and products to decouple its economy from China’s. This has involved waging a trade war with Beijing. Guterres describes the risk of decoupling of the world’s two largest economies as the ‘Great Fracture’. He has often urged both countries to avoid decoupling, which would have deleterious consequences for them as well as the rest of the world.

A meeting last October between Presidents Biden and Xi Jinping in Bali — their first — on the sidelines of the G20 summit raised hopes of a de-escalation of tensions and a move towards a more stable relationship between the global powers. But it did not result in any narrowing of differences over the contentious issues and disputes that divide them, including Taiwan, trade, technology curbs and military postures. Indeed, both sides again spelt out their respective red lines on Taiwan.

While Taiwan represents the most dangerous arena of US-China confrontation, tensions are escalating on other fronts too. Washington is engaged in a battle to maintain supremacy in technology. Its national security strategy unveiled in October 2022 declares the aim is to outpace China in the technological domain. Last October, the US imposed a sweeping ban on American companies from exporting chips and advanced chip equipment to China in order to cripple its semiconductor industry. These export restrictions were the latest in the tech war and were described as “the biggest shift in US policy” on technology exports to China since the 1990s. Apart from taking this issue to the WTO, China is expected to enhance funding to its semiconductor industry. But it is by no means clear whether Washington will be able to coax its allies to join the restrictions, as the interests of their companies diverge with the US on these unilateral measures. This nevertheless underlines how intense the tech war has become.

Of course, there are other sources of instability in the world. What all of them add up to is a deeply divided and leaderless world which is increasingly falling short of addressing multiple global challenges that are cascading into what Guterres rightly calls an impending perfect storm.

The writer is a former ambassador to the US, UK & UN.

Published in Dawn, January 30th, 2023

Tory leader asked BBC chief if ‘Pakistan origin staff’ was behind Modi film

Monitoring Desk Published January 31, 2023 

LORD Raminder Singh Ranger. —Twitter / RamiRanger.

A Conservative member of the UK’s House of Lords is facing criticism for his “racially charged” remarks over BBC’s documentary about Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Guardian reported on Monday.

Raminder Singh Ranger, also known as Lord Rami Ranger, who belongs to the Conservative party, wrote a letter to BBC’s director general, Tim Davie, asking “if your Pakistani-origin staff were behind this nonsense”.

The documentary, which questio­ned Mr Modi’s leadership during the 2002 Gujarat riots, was released earlier this month. India has already ter­med the documentary ‘propaganda’.

The Tory leader called the documentary “insensitive”, one-sided, and accused the BBC of having “opened old wounds by creating hatred between British Hindus and Muslims,” the Guardian added.

India’s Supreme Court to take up petitions against govt’s move to block documentary

Mr Ranger called the film an insult to the Indian prime minister claiming he had been exonerated from having any involvement in the riots.

Mr Modi was exonerated in 2012 following an inquiry overseen by the Supreme Court and a petition questioning his exoneration was dismissed in 2022, according to Reuters

In his response, Mr Ranger defended his remarks.

“I referred to ‘any Pakistani origin’ staff of the BBC as, unfortunately, the politics of the subcontinent has been known to impact the UK, which again not conducive or helpful to our social cohesion and fragile race relation in building greater community relations,” the Guardian quoted him as saying.

India has already called the documentary a “propaganda piece” meant to push a “discredited narrative”. External Affairs Ministry Spokesperson Arindam Bagchi said a “bias”, “lack of objectivity”, and “continuing colonial mindset” is “blatantly visible” in the production.

Views similar to India’s stance have been echoed by another House of Lords member as well.

Another Conservative member, Dolar Popat, wrote to the BBC director general on the day the second part of the documentary was released, calling it “heavily one-sided” and urging for the film to be pulled, the Guardian added.

The BBC has defended the journalists behind the documentary. A spokesperson said the film was “rigorously researched according to highest editorial standards”.

SC to take up petitions

The Indian government’s action to block the documentary on YouTube and Twitter using emergency powers under its IT rules has been challenged in the Supreme Court which will consider the petitions next week, Reuters has reported.

The Supreme Court will take up the petitions next week, Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud said in court on Monday.

A New Delhi-based lawyer, M L Sharma, opposed the government’s move in one of the petitions, according to Reuters.

A separate petition by lawyer Prashant Bhushan, journalist N. Ram and opposition politician Mahua Moitra focused on the order to take down social media links to the documentary.

In a Twitter comment on the second petition, Law Minister Kiren Rijiju said, “This is how they waste the precious time of the Honourable Supreme Court, where thousands of common citizens are waiting and seeking dates for justice.”

Published in Dawn, January 31st, 2023

World ‘dangerously unprepared’ for next pandemic: Red Cross

AFP Published January 31, 2023

GENEVA: All countries remain “dangerously unprepared” for the next pandemic, the Red Cross warned on Monday, saying future health crises could also collide with increasingly likely climate-related disasters.

Despite three “brutal” years of the Covid-19 pandemic, strong preparedness systems are “severely lacking”, the International Federa­tion of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) said.

The world’s largest humanitarian network said building trust, equity and local action networks were vital to get ready for the next crisis.

“All countries remain dangerously unprepared for future outbreaks,” the IFRC said, concluding that governments were no more ready now than in 2019.

It said countries needed to be prepared for “multiple hazards, not just one”, saying societies only became truly resilient through planning for different types of disaster, as they can occur simultaneously.

The IFRC cited the rise in climate-related disasters and waves of disease outbreaks this century, of which Covid-19 was just one. It said extreme weather events were growing more frequent and intense, “and our ability to merely respond to them is limited”.

The IFRC issued two reports making recommendations on mitigating future tragedies on the scale of Covid-19, on the third anniversary of the World Health Orga­nisation declaring the virus an international public health emergency.

“The Covid-19 pandemic should be a wake-up call for the global community to prepare now for the next health crisis,” said IFRC secretary general Jagan Chapagain.

“The next pandemic could be just around the corner; if the experience of Covid-19 won’t quicken our steps toward preparedness, what will?” The report said major hazards harm those who are already vulnerable the most, and leaving the poorest exposed was “self-defeating”, as a disease can return in a more dangerous form.

Breakdown of trust

The IFRC said if people trusted safety messages, they would be willing to comply with public health measures and accept vaccination. But the organisation said crisis respon­ders “cannot wait until the next time to build trust”, urging consistent cultivation over time.

The IFRC said if trust was fragile, public health became political and individualised — something which impaired the Covid response.

It also said the coronavirus pandemic had thrived on and exacerbated inequalities, with poor sanitation, overcrowding, lack of access to health and social services, and malnutrition creating conditions for diseases to thrive in.

“The world must address inequitable health and socio-economic vulnerabilities far in advance of the next crisis,” it recommended.

The organisation also said local communities should be leveraged to perform life-saving work, as that is where pandemics begin and end. The IFRC called for the development of pandemic response products that are cheaper, and easier to store and administer.

By 2025, it said countries should increase domestic health finance by one percent of gross domestic product, and global health finance by at least $15 billion per year.

The IFRC said its network had reached more than 1.1 billion people over the past three years to help keep them safe during the Covid pandemic.

Published in Dawn, January 31st, 2023

Canadian research team discovers widespread manufacturing flaw in most device batteries

Story by MobileSyrup • 

An assistant professor at Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia has come forward with a discovery that could change how batteries in personal devices are manufactured.


Canadian research team discovers widespread manufacturing flaw in most device batteries© Provided by MobileSyrup

Micheal Metzger, part of a research team at the university, says that unexpected battery drainage is likely due to a widespread manufacturing flaw.

The group of Halifax-based researchers has determined that the problem stems from tiny pieces of tape that hold the components of the battery. These pieces are said to be made using the wrong type of plastic. According to Metzger, most batteries are experiencing a phenomenon known as “self-discharge.” This is caused by the battery’s electrons being unable to correctly flow through connected cables, powering a circuit, before returning to the battery. This causes the battery to be depleted internally and a device to lose its charge, even if it’s off.

“These days, batteries are very good,” Metzger said to the CBC. “But, like with any product, you want it perfected. And you want to eliminate even small rates of self-discharge.”

Dalhousie University’s battery lab is being used to test dozens of experimental battery cells. The research team is charging them and discharging them in hot environments, with temperatures upwards of 80 degrees Celsius. The team aims to learn why a battery fails over time in order to tweak its electrodes, whether positive or negative or change the electrolyte fluid.

Over the course of the team’s testing, the battery components were analyzed. As such, the team discovered that the inside casing of the battery was being held by metal, insulated coil, and tape. The sections of tape were comprised of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), commonly found in water bottles and other items. As it turns out, the use of PET leads to self-discharge within the battery.

This discovery has been public since November 2022. The Halifax research team proposes the use of a slightly more expensive plastic compound in batteries to solve the issue. A durable, more stable option is polypropylene. This compound is commonly used in reusable water bottles and doesn’t decompose as quickly as PET.

Whether or not manufacturers pick up on this discovery and adopt new procedures is another story.

Source: CBC