Monday, February 13, 2023


Poland: Wind power runs out of steam
Aleksandra Fedorska in Poznan, Poland
DW
02/12/2023

After a period of unregulated wind power development in Poland, the pendulum has swung in the opposite direction. Now, hardly any turbines are being built in the country.

https://p.dw.com/p/4NKgQ

The melt-in-the-mouth cheesecake on sale at Cafe Manufaktura Ciasta and the gentle sea breeze blowing around the village of Cisowo on the Baltic coast leaves visitors in no doubt that they are in a particularly lovely part of Poland — were it not for the huge wind turbine towering over the cafe just 3 meters (10 feet) from the road.

Within a radius of just a few hundred meters, a dozen other wind turbines have been erected in a seemingly random manner across the coastal landscape. They belong to two wind farms that were completed in 2001 and 2013.

It seems as if no consideration was given to maintaining any kind of distance from roads and houses. The operators of these wind farms — the companies Energia Eco and Enerco — said they obtained all the necessary construction permits from the relevant authorities.
Restrictions placed on turbine construction

To put a stop to this kind of unregulated wind turbine development, Poland's government, which is led by the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, passed a law in 2016 that introduced the so-called "10H rule" for all new wind turbine projects.

The village of Cisowo on Poland's Baltic coast is peppered with wind turbines that have been built close to roads and houses
Image: Aleksandra Fedorska/DW

This rule stipulates that the distance between a wind turbine and the nearest house or nature reserve must be at least 10 times the turbine's height. If, for example, a wind turbine is 200 meters (656 feet) high, it must be at least 2 kilometers (1.2 miles) from the nearest house or nature reserve.
Law limits land available for turbines

People who don't like the look of wind turbines or consider them unhealthy or even damaging to the environment — whether in Poland or elsewhere around the world — have welcomed such restrictions.

But for the operators of wind turbines and supporters of renewable energy, the 10H rule pretty much means the end of onshore wind power development. Janusz Gajowiecki, president of the Polish Wind Energy Association, said that because of the law, only 0.28% of Poland's land area is now available for the construction of wind turbines.

"Current legislation rules out virtually all land for the construction of new wind turbines," said Aleksandra Dziadkiewicz of the interdisciplinary Polish think tank Forum Energii. She goes on to say that any new turbines currently under construction are being built on the basis of permits that were issued before the 10H law came into force, in other words before 2016.

"Yet Poland needs lots of new wind turbines for the energy transition," she said, "and as quickly as possible."
Compromise sought to allow for development

In late January, an amendment to the law was put to parliament. The hope was that a compromise could be reached that would help wind turbine operators. The amendment proposed cutting the legally required distance between turbines and houses or nature reserves to 500 meters.

Aleksandra Dziadkiewicz (left) of Polish think tank Forum Energii said Poland needs lots of new wind turbines 'as quickly as possible
'Image: Forum Energii

According to the Polish Wind Energy Association, this would allow turbines to be erected on around 7% of the country's land area. But no agreement was reached in parliament. There are now plans to discuss an amendment that would fix the required distance at 700 meters.

Damian Babka of the renewable energy producer Qair Group confirmed that the failure to adopt the proposed 500-meter limit was a major setback for wind power producers. His company had pinned a lot of hope on the amendment. "While a distance of 700 meters would allow some projects to be implemented," said Babka, "it would keep the capacity to generate green energy at a very low level."

Residents of the picturesque village of Cisowo, which has a population of about 300, set up an association last fall that focuses on the impact of the unregulated development of wind power generation before 2016. Since 1998, 8.8% of residents have moved away from the village, and those who have stayed have little faith left in the authorities when it comes to enforcing laws.
Negative impact of liberal, flexible rules

There is huge support for the 10H rule in Cisowo, and the people of the village warmly welcomed its strict enforcement by the Polish authorities. The village has seen the downside of the market liberalization and the move to a system of more flexible rules.

Local residents aren't happy about the camps and huts that have been set up beneath the wind turbines in Cisowo
Image: ST Cisowo

For instance, several unauthorized camp sites and huts have been set up directly under the turbines. While they have a beautiful view of the sea, there is no wastewater treatment or refuse collections. The people in the village have no idea who built what and when. All they know is that the people camping there have not been moved on.

The house of the Bienert family, one of the founding members of the local association, is located just 450 meters from one of the wind turbines. The Bienerts are of the opinion that the noise and the change in the light caused by the turbine's rotors are having a negative impact on their well-being and health.

Maciej Bienert, the father of the family, is firmly in favor of the development of renewable energy in Poland. The Bienerts themselves have several solar panels on the roofs of their residential and commercial buildings, and sell a large amount of solar power.

"Clear rules are needed for it to work in the long run," said Bienert. "And you can't make those rules without the people who are directly affected by them."

This article was originally published in German.

International Condom Day: A brief history of rubbers

Carla Bleiker

Condoms are pretty great, preventing both diseases and unwanted pregnancies. They were first used in 3000 BC. Ancient Egyptians color-coded theirs while the Romans supposedly made them from the muscles of fallen enemies.

No one can agree on what should be considered humanity's greatest invention. The wheel? Antibiotics? The dishwasher? All valid contenders. But today we are looking at another scientific innovation that, although perhaps innocuous, has transformed life on Earth: The condom.

Thanks to these little latex sleeves, humans can have sex without passing on STDs or getting (someone) pregnant. The protection isn't 100% guaranteed ― according to Planned Parenthood in the US, condoms are 98% effective at preventing pregnancy when used perfectly. Since humans are not, in fact, perfect, in reality the contraceptive is about 87% effective ― around 13 of 100 people who use condoms as their only birth control will conceive.

Still! Condoms have saved lives and granted women autonomy in periods of history when getting pregnant out of wedlock threatened them with pariah status, if not worse. Let's dive into the history of happy hats, as the Internet calls them.

02:51


Condoms to protect against snakes down there


The first mention of a condom-like device dates back to 3000 BC. King Minos ― whom you might remember for his giant labyrinth containing a minotaur at its center ― was said to use a goat bladder to protect his sexual partners from contracting a rather unusual sexual disease: Legend has it, Minos' semen contained serpents and scorpions.

Sounds unpleasant indeed. Some accounts claim that Minos sheathed his penis with the goat bladder, while others say his wife Pasiphae inserted it into her vagina in order to prevent those pesky animals from biting her private parts. Either way, it's the earliest account of a barrier device used to prevent what we today would consider a sexually transmitted disease.

Class-coded condoms


The ancient Egyptians used protection as well. Archaeologist Howard Carter and his team found a condom in Tutankhamun's tomb containing samples of the pharaoh's DNA. It was made of fine linen soaked in olive oil and had been attached to a string that, the researchers believe, would have tied around his waist. They dated it to around 1350 BC.

Condoms weren't just for the god-kings, either. Other Egyptians used them too ― but only in the color assigned to their social class. No chance at fooling your date into believing you were part of the pharaoh's inner circle when the color of your condom made you out to be a lowly farmer.

In Ancient Egypt it wasn't the condom wrappers that came in different colors, but the contraceptives themselves.
Image: Oleksandr Latkun/Zoonar/picture alliance

In ancient Rome, condoms were also made of linen, as well as intestines or bladders of sheep and goats. The Romans did not wrap up as a way to prevent conception ― rather, the main motivator was stopping the spread of diseases like syphilis. They were also said to make condoms out of muscle tissue from men they killed in battle, "but no hard evidence for this exists," the authors of a study published in the Indian Journal of Urology point out.

The rubber revolution

There are various theories about where the term "condom" originated. It could go back to the Latin word "condus," meaning receptacle or vessel, or to the Persian word "kemdu," which refers to a long piece of animal intestine used for storage, the authors of the Indian study point out.

In their book "Contraception through the ages" from 1964, B.E. Finch and Hugh Green write that the name most likely comes from a physician at the court of King Charles II, who ruled in the 17th century. Charles was, as the story goes, upset about the growing number of his illegitimate children. So Dr. Condom (yes, that was his actual name) did some research. He came up with a sheath made from softened lamb intestine and advised his master to wear it during sex to finally stop impregnating his mistresses.

We have to thank American inventor Charles Goodyear for the first version of the modern condom as we know it today. In the mid-1800s, he discovered the process of vulcanization, in which natural rubber is heated up together with sulfur to form a material that is more malleable, durable and elastic. By 1860, condoms were produced on a large scale. They were expensive, but back in the day, men were told to clean and then reuse them. (Condoms today are strictly one-use only!)
Second-most popular contraception method globally

The invention of latex in the 1920s revolutionized the condom industry. 

Today's latex condoms can be stretched to up to eight times their original size before they rip and also come pre-lubricated, ribbed or flavored.

Today's condoms don't break easily, as participants in a World AIDS Day event showed in 2021
.Image: TONY KARUMBA/AFP/Getty Images

According to a UN study, the male condom was the second-most common contraceptive method used worldwide in 2019, beaten only by female sterilization. In 2019, 21% of people using contraception used a condom ― some 189 million users that year.

Condoms are also vital in preventing the spread of HIV. According to a meta analysis conducted by the Center for AIDS Intervention Research in the US, when used consistently and correctly, condoms are 90% to 95% effective in protecting against HIV.

International Condom Day, which is celebrated on February 13, was established by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, a US-based non-profit founded in 1987 in response to the AIDS epidemic. The organization celebrates the holiday by handing out free condoms.

Edited by: Clare Roth



Earthquake fans anti-Syrian sentiment in Turkey amid desperate conditions

Story by By Maya Gebeily and Ali Kucukgocmen • 

Aftermath of the deadly earthquake in Hatay© Thomson Reuters

ANTAKYA (Reuters) - The devastating earthquake to hit Turkey and Syria has fanned resentment among some Turks towards the millions of Syrian refugees in the country who are being blamed anecdotally by some for looting amid the destruction and chaos.

Several Turks in quake-hit towns and cities have accused Syrians of robbing damaged shops and homes. Anti-Syrian slogans such as "We don't want Syrians," "Immigrants should be deported," and "No longer welcome" trended on Twitter.

Syrians left homeless by the earthquake said they had been kicked out of emergency camps and a Syrian man opened a shelter in the city of Mersin just for his compatriots after they had faced racist slurs.

"We stopped going to rescue sites to watch because people start screaming at us and pushing us around when they heard us speaking Arabic," said a Syrian man, who didn't want to be named. "People accuse us of looting all the time but that's just to create discord."

Turkey's combined official death toll with Syria from the earthquake now stands at more than 37,000 and is predicted to rise further as hopes fade of finding many more survivors.

Hundreds of thousands have been left homeless and have waited for days in some areas for food and emergency shelter. Residents and aid workers have reported looting and several foreign aid teams briefly stopped work because of a deteriorating security situation.

Turkish authorities arrested 48 people for looting, the justice minister announced on Sunday, without saying where they were from. President Tayyip Erdogan has vowed to deal firmly with looters.

TENSIONS ON THE RISE

Turkey is home to nearly 4 million Syrian refugees, having opened its borders to those fleeing the civil war that erupted there in 2011. Many are concentrated in the south of the country close to the Syrian border. In the Turkish city of Gaziantep, badly hit by the earthquake, nearly half a million Syrians reside, making up a quarter of the population.

Related video: Syrians plead for help after earthquakes cause widespread devastation (MSNBC)   Duration 7:47   View on Watch

Resentment towards the Syrians is not new, but the earthquake has aggravated tensions.


Turkey has spent more than $40 billion since 2011 accommodating the refugees at a time of intense economic hardship in the country. Some Turks view Syrians as cheap labour taking over jobs and using services and the issue of Syrian refugees was set to be a major theme in this year's presidential and parliamentary elections.



Aftermath of the deadly earthquake in Hatay© Thomson Reuters

"Syrians walk around with their empty backpacks and fill them up from shops. There was a lot off looting here," said Ahmet, a dentist sitting across from the rubble of what used to be his surgery.

Some offers of help on social media have been openly anti-Syrian.

"Quake survivors are welcome to stay in my Ankara home for a year, on condition that they are not Syrian," said one tweet, with a picture of a wooden villa. Other offers of aid or temporary housing have set the same condition.

Syrian former opposition politician Mustafa Ali is running a makeshift shelter in Mersin for about 250 Syrians and says he agreed with local authorities to keep them apart from shelters for displaced Turks.

"There is a difference in culture, in the way of life, in the language, and this separation might resolve a lot of these problems," he said.

"At first a lot of shelters didn't ask people if they were Turkish or foreigners. But the next day, when there was some hassle and some racist commentary, we thought maybe some problems might come up that both they and we can do without."

Among those staying at Ali's shelter was Bilal Al-Sheikh, 35, who had fled the city of Iskenderun with his three children as the roof of their house collapsed.

"We were in a collective shelter and then stayed a day or two with some people and now we are here... At night the kids were sleeping and they came in and said you have to go to a different shelter... It's been like this for a week, we have been suffering."

Many Syrians initially considered Turkey as a stepping stone to a new life in Europe but then found themselves stuck after Turkey signed a deal with the European Union to halt the flow of migrants into Europe.

Some Syrians living without proper paperwork in Turkey and displaced by the earthquake said they are afraid to reach out to authorities for help, fearing it might expose them to possible deportation.

Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said on Monday, "claims that there is a new influx of refugees from Syria to Turkey (after the earthquake) are not true. We will not allow that; it is out of question."

(Writing by Ece Toksabay; Editing by Alexandra Hudson and Christina Fincher)
EV Charging Stations In The US Are Plagued By Reliability Issues: Study

Story by Iulian Dnistran • 

F-150 Lightning Charging© InsideEVs

At least 1 in 5 charging attempts have failed last year.

Charging your EV at public stations throughout the United States can sometimes be challenging, to say the least, with stalls that are out of order, software hiccups, and occasional vandalism rendering chargers useless. To put things into perspective, we now have fresh data that paints a dreary picture of the reliability of American public EV charging.

According to J.D. Power’s Electric Vehicle Experience Public Charging Study, quoted by Automotive News, the number of failed charging attempts grew from 15 percent in the first quarter of 2021 to more than 21 percent by the third quarter of 2022. At worst, almost 2 in 5 visits to chargers – or 39% – were unsuccessful last year.

The study included more than 26,500 charging attempts at Level 2 and Level 3 chargers in all 50 states, with one operator having almost no charger downtime at all, with a fail rate of just 3%. However, J.D. Power did not disclose which networks had the best and worst reliability records.

Out of all the responders to the study who couldn’t charge their vehicles last year, more than three-quarters said that they couldn’t top-up their batteries because the charger was out of service, with other major reasons for failed charging attempts being software glitches, payment processing errors, and vandalism.

Back in 2022, Tesla’s Destination Charger and Supercharger earned the top spots on J.D. Power’s study, with the American EV maker scoring above the segment average in both categories. The scoreboard for this year’s study hasn't been released yet, but be sure to check back on InsideEVs regularly, as we’ll post an article as soon as the complete data becomes available from J.D. Power.

Related video: Where will we charge the electric vehicles of the future? | Tech It Out (WION)
Duration 2:49   View on Watch


Unfortunately, the reality of charging an EV anywhere in the world, not just in the United States, is sometimes a bit of a gamble, with many owners having trouble when charging on-route. Sometimes, the drivers aren’t particularly well educated about their EVs and don’t even know what connector they need to top-up, sometimes the charger appears to be working but it doesn’t actually charge the batteries, and sometimes the stalls are simply out of order.

However, this is starting to change, with more and more educational campaigns from EV brands, some repair and upgrade programs from charging operators, and the government’s plan to offer up to $7.5 billion in subsidies for companies that can expand the nation’s charging infrastructure to 500,000 stalls by 2030.

What’s your take on this study: do you think it reflects the reality of owning an EV? Let us know in the comments below.
Disturbing: Humans Can Still Grow a Full Coat of Fur, Study Says

Story by Tim Newcomb • 

Surprise! It turns out humans actually still have the genes for growing a full coat of body hair, according to a new study.
© Getty Images

A new study researched body hair across mammals to see how genes interact with hair growth.
It turns out the genes are still in place for humans to grow a full fury coat.
The study says differing patterns of hair growth and development coincided with evolutionary patterns.

This could get hairy: A new study from scientists at the University of Utah and University of Pittsburgh, published in the journal eLife, shows that a set of genes and regulatory regions of the genome appear essential for making hair. And it seems humans actually have the genes for a full coat of body hair, but the researchers believe evolution simply “disabled them.”

“We have taken the creative approach of using biological diversity to learn about or own genetics,” Nathan Clark, a human geneticist now at Utah and a study coauthor, says in a news release. “This is helping us to pinpoint regions of our genome that contribute to something important to us.”

Exploring why some mammals have much less body hair than others led the group of three researchers to start comparing genetic codes from 62 animals. The scientists believe their study shows how regulatory regions of the genome influence the hair-growing process indirectly, guiding when and where certain genes turn on and just how much hair is made. They say they uncovered genes for which a role in sprouting hair had not yet been defined, possibly highlighting a new set of genes that could be involved in growing hair.

“There are a good number of genes we don’t know much about them,” Amanda Kowalczyk, an evolutionary genomes researcher now at Carnegie Mellon University and study coauthor, says in a news release. “We think they could have roles in hair growth and maintenance.”

The scientists say evolutionary processes changed the way genes acted, allowing some mammals to grow less hair. Clark says:

“As animals are under evolutionary pressure to lose hair, the genes encoding hair become less important. That’s why they speed up the rate of genetic changes that are permitted by natural selection. Some genetic changes might be responsible for loss of hair. Others could be collateral damage after hair stops growing.”

The scientists think the research could eventually lead to new ways to recover hair in humans. They also believe they’ve unlocked a new approach to defining genetic regions, potentially helping researchers understand a host of additional health conditions.
Ontario issues warning about invasive pest that threatens maples, other trees

Story by Postmedia News • Yesterday 

The Spotted Lanternfly© Provided by Toronto Sun

Ontario Parks is sounding the alarm on an invasive species that could be set to cause trouble in the province.

The Spotted Lanternfly “ threatens many of our native tree species, including maples, poplars, pines, and cherries. Grape vines are also susceptible to this pest,” warned Ontario Parks. While the insects haven’t yet been spotted in Canada, they are in many states in the U.S.

But that’s not all. Something called Tree of Heaven is also a potential threat.

Tree of Heaven is an invasive tree native to China. It was first introduced to North America in 1784 in the Philadelphia area, according to Ontario Parks, which added the species has since spread across Ontario.

It is the primary host species for the Spotted Lanternfly, which has been detected in nearby New York State.

Spotted Lanternfly species “threatens to severely impact Ontario’s viticulture (wine), fruit-tree, and maple industries, which have a combined estimated worth of over $530 billion/year in Canada,” they said.

Ontario Parks asks those who have spotted Tree of LIfe to upload a picture which will be added to the provincial database.


Tree of Life. Barb Alber/Ontario Parks

“ Tree of Heaven grows rapidly. It can become very large, and can reach heights of over 21 metres tall. It is able to produce suckers from its base, so it often appears to be the size of a small to medium-sized shrub.”
Murray Mandryk: Smith-Trudeau handshake a picture worth 1,000 words

Opinion by Murray Mandryk • 

As long as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau remains in office conservative politicians like Alberta Premier Danielle Smith will have a convenient place to redirect their voters' anger.
© Provided by Leader Post

It was a poorly executed handshake performed rather brilliantly.

The supposed awkward encounter last week between Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was about as good a barometer of our current political climate as you will find.

It surely summed up today’s most basic political reality: As long as Justin Trudeau remains prime minister, there will be little other than politics because he is what unites the very forces that oppose him.

As was the case at last week’s Canada Health Transfer funding meeting, where two-thirds of the premiers were of conservative bent, Trudeau again proved to be a handy foil — one that conservative politicians need.

After all, there will always be bad days in which Danielle Smith has to explain why she thought she could offer amnesty to anti-vaxxers, or Saskatchewan Health Minister Paul Merriman has to sputter his way through why he chose not to ask Ottawa for COVID-19 help sooner in 2021.

But what usually comes along the next day is a reason to remind voters why they dislike Trudeau and his federal Liberal government.

He is now what binds together conservatives in all their forms. He is why so many now rally around Premier Scott Moe and the Saskatchewan Party.

And he will handily remain so — as long as Carla Beck’s Saskatchewan NDP cling to a social-policy urban-based strategy and remain no threat to seizing power. A common enemy is still needed, and Trudeau perfectly fits the bill.

This is why Smith’s limp handshake with Trudeau last week was consequential.

Naturally, this infuriates those wondering why the media would fixate on such a thing amid heady matters like whether or not the provinces agree to the 10-year, $196-billion increase in Canada Health Transfers offered by the federal government. Well, here’s a few things to consider:

In the 15 years since the Sask. Party came to power, Canada health transfers alone have more than doubled to $45.2 billion from $21.7 billion through Conservative and Liberal administrations.

That’s been 15 years in which a Sask. Party government responsible for local health-care administration has had ample reason to do something other than complain about the previous NDP administration closing 52 rural hospitals.

In fact, some of those years have been the most prosperous in Saskatchewan history, suggesting there’s been plenty of time and money to address the problems. Yet didn’t we see angry protests this summer over closing rural emergency care ?

Does anyone believe that this has all been caused by federal underfunding of provincial health care rather than provincial budget spending choices? What have been those recent choices of late?

In Saskatchewan, a government with a $1.1-billion surplus in 2022-23 just handed every adult a $500 cheque.

Yet Premier Scott Moe was eagerly singing baritone in the premiers’ health-care chorus where the preferred selection is the feds are underfunding health care because they are only offering a paltry $200-billion increase.

Maybe it’s not totally about ganging up on one unpopular Liberal prime minister. It’s been going on for awhile.

Whether it’s been a Conservative or Liberal in the prime minister’s office, premiers have balked at health-care spending accountability, direct program funding or the provinces funding health care themselves through “tax points.”

Premiers have instead demanded cash, acting like spoiled teenagers always going back to dad when they’ve blown the inheritance.

But today the operative word is “acting,” as seen in Danielle Smith’s ineloquent embrace with the one-time high school drama teacher.

Clumsy, hostile and disdainful, it just seemed an all-too-deliberate message to the folks back home that Justin and Just Transition shan’t be touched. Sincere derision? Who can say, in the play-acting world of politics, which is all about sloganeering about how politicians have “got our backs.”

However, it was telling.

We fixate on such images because most communication is visual. The Smith-Trudeau picture said a thousand words — a clarion call to the base as to who is the source of all problems.

Make no mistake about who in this picture is framed as the common enemy.

Mandryk is the political columnist for the Regina Leader-Post and the Saskatoon StarPhoenix.

Related
Braid: A handshake about Smith's image on a day of health care confusion
NDP leader Jagmeet Singh urges industry minister to reject Rogers-Shaw merger

Story by Denise Paglinawan • 


New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh is urging federal industry minister François-Philippe Champagne to reject the proposed merger of Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc.
© Provided by Financial Post

New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh is urging federal industry minister François-Philippe Champagne to reject the proposed merger of Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc.

In a letter dated Feb. 12, Singh told Champagne that the deal “is expected to make our cell and internet bills more expensive,” citing the Competition Bureau, which failed to block the takeover after several attempts.

The $26-billion merger is now in the hands of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED), led by Champagne, who must approve the transfer of spectrum licences.

“Act now in the interests of the millions of Canadians that will ultimately be affected by your decision,” Singh wrote.

The NDP leader claimed Rogers’ takeover of Shaw will also result in “hundreds of workers” losing their jobs, noting that Rogers had said the deal would save $1 billion in “synergies.”

“In addition to higher prices and layoffs, the Rogers-Shaw merger is already leading to less competition, less innovation and less choice for consumers,” Singh added, alleging Rogers’ rivals had already bought out independent ISPs in preparation for the merger, including Bell’s recent acquisitions of EBOX and Distributel.

The deal has already received approval from the Competition Tribunal after weeks-long hearings, a decision that was upheld by the Federal Court of Appeals last month. Singh said the hands of the tribunal and the courts “were tied by a weak Competition Act.”

Vass Bednar: The Rogers-Shaw competition ruling shows the system is broken

The Tribunal rejected the Bureau’s arguments that combining the two telecom giants would substantially lessen wireless competition, particularly in light of a side deal to sell Shaw’s Freedom Mobile to Quebecor Inc. subsidiary Vidéotron for $2.85 billion.

• Email: dpaglinawan@postmedia.com | Twitter: denisepglnwn

Federal minister says he’s not bound by Rogers deadline

Shaw Communications Inc. briefly fell to its lowest since January after Canada’s industry minister said he’s not required to make a final decision on Shaw’s sale to Rogers Communications Inc. by the Feb. 17 deal deadline. 

“I am not bound by any date that the parties could decide between themselves,” Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne told reporters in Montreal. “What interests me is the interests of Canadians. I will make my decision in time and place.” 

Shaw fell as low as $39.32 on Monday before paring losses to trade at $39.57 at 11:24 a.m. The Rogers offer is C$40.50 per share. 

The companies can extend the deadline, as they already have on multiple occasions. Rogers and Shaw announced the friendly takeover in March 2021, saying they hoped to close it in mid-2022. That date was eventually shifted to the end of last year, then to Jan. 31, then to Feb. 17. 

Champagne’s approval is the final step in Rogers’ proposed $20 billion takeover of Shaw, a deal that represents one of the largest mergers in Canadian history. \

Rogers and Shaw have made a separate agreement to sell Freedom Mobile, Shaw’s main wireless business, to Quebecor Inc. for almost $3 billion. Without the minister’s consent for that, the larger deal can’t be completed because of antitrust issues. Rogers is already the largest wireless provider in Canada.


UFO'S OVER (NORTH) AMERICA
'This is rugged country,' says Yukon premier on search for downed object

Story by CBC/Radio-Canada •

The search continues to recover an unidentified object shot down over the Yukon this weekend.


Yukon Premier Ranj Pillai speaks with Yukon Morning's Elyn Jones on CBC Monday about the object shot down over the territory this weekend.© Chris Windeyer/CBC

The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) shot the object down in Canadian airspace, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said in an announcement Saturday. He noted Canadian Forces personnel would be working to recover and analyze the wreckage.

Yukon Premier Ranj Pillai said Monday that recovery efforts are still underway. The object is thought to have come down in the area east of Dawson City and west of Mayo.

"This is rugged country for anybody," Pillai said in interviews with CBC. "Yukoners who have either hiked or hunted in that area would know, there's lots of elevation ... It's big country. So I would assume this will [take] quite a while to get in there and find it."

He said if anyone stumbles across it, they should get the GPS co-ordinates and call the RCMP.


CityNews Mystery surrounds flying objects hovering over North America’s skies
2:10


Pillai met with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Monday morning. In advance of that meeting, he said he expected they would talk about Arctic security as well as infrastructure projects and health care.

Pillai said he was fresh from meetings with other Canadian premiers about the importance of Arctic security when he learned the object had been shot down.

"It was timely," he said of those meetings, adding he's been bringing up such issues for months with other premiers and with the federal government.

Some of the discussions have revolved around modernizing the early warning system and enhancing aerospace radar systems with NORAD.

"I think in a broader sense, we have to take this into consideration. We know that over the next 20 years, the Beaufort Sea is going to be an area where we're going to see more shipping — potentially one of the most significant shipping routes in the world, in the future," he said.

"This is work we have to start now, for the safety of future Yukoners as well as Canadians."

These are the US$439,000 missiles the U.S. is using to shoot down mystery UFOs

As mysteries continue to swirl around the balloon and three other so-far-unidentified objects shot down by the U.S. in recent days, one thing at least has been clear: the weaponry used to knock them out of the sky. Be it the original alleged Chinese surveillance balloon downed off South Carolina, or the as-yet-unknown objects targeted over Alaska, Michigan and Canada, all have met their demise by the same type of missile — the AIM-9X Sidewinder. 

Here’s what you need to know about it:

Who makes and uses them?

Raytheon Technologies Corp. produces the missile, which comes from a broader class of weaponry that has been in the U.S. arsenal for decades. While the weapons are primarily manufactured for U.S. forces, the missile is also sold in large quantities to a range of American allies. Raytheon says that it has 31 foreign military sales partners, with countries including South Korea, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia all having purchased the missile. Mainly conceived as an air-to-air weapon, the latest AIM-9X version is one that can also be used from the ground and against land-based targets. It is widely deployable in a range of modern aircraft including the F-16 Fighting Falcon and F-22 Raptor aircrafts. This versatility has allowed it break records by helping the advanced F-22 fighter jet score its first air-to-air kill. The US does not disclose the exact number of such missiles in its arsenal, but it’s likely to be significant with the US Air Force receiving its 100,000th such missile in 2021.

How much do they cost?

The U.S. Department of Defense is seeking to procure 255 of the missiles for $111.9 million in the 2023 financial year. That comes out to a cost of US$439,000 each. But there are significant discounts involved and other countries will usually need to pay for associated equipment, parts and training costs as well. Malaysia sought to procure just 20 for an estimated AIM-9X-2 missiles for $52 million in 2011, for example, after including such secondary costs.

How do they work?

The AIM-9X Sidewinder is a heat-seeking, supersonic, short-range missile. Its main components include an infrared homing guidance section, an active optical target detector, a high-explosive warhead and a rocket motor. The infrared in particular allows the missile to hone in on targets in a range of settings at any time of the day. The 186-pound (84 kg) device is powered by solid fuel, and it has a length of 9.9 feet (3 metres). The so-called Block II variant of the missile has enhanced features, including a lock-on-after-launch capability so the pilot shooting the device does not have to rely on just visual aiming.

Why are they being used?

Sidewinder missiles have a long history in the U.S. military. They were first developed in the 1950s by the U.S. Navy before being adapted by the U.S. Air Force. It was the first heat-seeking guided missile to become operational.  Early variants could only be used at very close range and could not be deployed at night. But subsequent improvements made it an ideal weapon for a variety of situations, and a later version of the missile was used during the Vietnam War. The 9X is the latest iteration of the Sidewinder and began to be deployed in 2003. Still, defence officials acknowledge their use against unidentified flying objects such as balloons is novel. The military concluded that its smaller warhead and its shorter range allowed the AIM-9X to be deployed more safely and effectively compared to other missiles like the AIM-120, General Glen VanHerck, the commander of North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command, told reporters on Feb. 6.

Aliens: The Source of ‘Objects’ Getting Shot Down? You Better Hope Not

Story by Harry Kazianis • 

So could the source of those balloons or whatever they are now getting shot down all over North America be some sort of alien technology sent from across the galaxy or universe to spy on us?


F-22 Raptor© Provided by 1945

Yes, we have reached peak balloon, or UFO fears on this issue, folks. And it seems our own government, to some extent, is fueling it.

Well, OK, I am going to take the bait on this one and try to answer the question: so what if it is aliens from another world? What does that mean?

Yes, I should stick to my lane of national security and politics, I know. But stick with me on this for a minute, folks.

Related video: Analyst thinks this is why more unidentified objects are being spotted (CNN)
Duration 1:36   View on Watch

More videos


Well, at least one of the world's most renowned scientists of all time would have had an answer if he was still with us: humanity and our entire civilization might be in deep trouble.

His theory was such aliens could be like the European colonists centuries ago and seek to take whatever they wish and care less about the harm they cause.

Here is what Dr. Stephen Hawkins said back in 2010:

"Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonize whatever planets they could reach," Hawking said in 2010 as part of his popular TV show "Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking," which was shown on the Discovery Channel.

"If so, it makes sense for them to exploit each new planet for material to build more spaceships so they could move on. Who knows what the limits would be?"

He also noted back in 2015 that"e don't know much about aliens, but we know about humans. If you look at history, contact between humans and less intelligent organisms have often been disastrous from their point of view, and encounters between civilizations with advanced versus primitive technologies have gone badly for the less advanced. A civilization reading one of our messages could be billions of years ahead of us. If so, they will be vastly more powerful and may not see us as any more valuable than we see bacteria."

Think of it this way: If an Alien species had the capability to send probes across the galaxy, our own military, indeed, would have no way to defeat them in any sort of fight. As Hawkins said, they would see us as a sort of bacteria - and crush us easily.

They would not use probes like the ones we see over North America or China, or anywhere else. They would have far better technology than that. We would surely have no clue it was even happening.

So, hurray for humanity. I don't think we have a case of aliens spying on us. However, if we did it, we most likely would have no clue it was happening and conquer us with ease.

Maybe we should hope China is spying on us after all?

Harry J. Kazianis (@Grecianformula) is a Senior Editor for 19FortyFive and serves as President and CEO of Rogue States Project, a bipartisan national security think tank. He has held senior positions at the Center for the National Interest, the Heritage Foundation, the Potomac Foundation, and many other think tanks and academic institutions focused on defense issues. He served on the Russia task force for U.S. Presidential Candidate Senator Ted Cruz, and in a similar role in the John Hay Initiative. His ideas have been published in the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Newsweek, CNN, CNBC, and many other outlets across the political spectrum. He holds a graduate degree in International Relations from Harvard University and is the author of the book The Tao of A2/AD, a study of Chinese military modernization. Kazianis also has a background in defense journalism, having served as Editor-In-Chief at The Diplomat and Executive Editor for the National Interest.