Monday, March 27, 2023

Netanyahu agrees to pause judicial overhaul plans following widespread unrest in Israel

Story by Patrick Smith and Josh Lederman • 2h ago

JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agreed Monday evening to pause a divisive plan to overhaul the country’s judicial system until the next parliament session, according to a statement from one of the coalition partner parties, following widespread unrest in Israel.

Israel had been paralyzed Monday after hundreds of thousands of people stopped working to protest the proposal.

It followed unrest Sunday night after Netanyahu fired Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who became the first member of his Likud Party to speak out against the proposed changes. Gallant had warned that divisions over the plans threatened Israel’s security.

Tens of thousands protested in Tel Aviv, where demonstrators were sprayed with water cannons. Beersheba, Haifa and Jerusalem also saw unrest. At one point, crowds in Jerusalem gathered outside Netanyahu’s home and broke through a security cordon, Reuters reported.

The proposal by Netanyahu’s hard-right coalition in January would threaten the independence of the Supreme Court and limit judges’ powers, according to critics. It has faced stiff opposition, with Israelis regularly taking to the streets to demonstrate.

On Monday, Israel’s largest trade union called for a general strike that halted everything from medical services to flights to meals served by McDonald's restaurants.

Large crowds of protesters and counter-protesters gathered Monday in the shadow of the Supreme Court in Jerusalem, many waving Israeli flags. Some chanted in megaphones or banged on drums.

Leah Basa, 23, said she felt Netanyahu's plan would lead to the "downfall of democracy."

"I'm protesting the reform which is going to get rid of the checks and balances and get rid of the separation of powers," she said, adding, "I think that it is causing so many rips in society. No matter which side wins, nobody is going to win in the end because whether the reform passes or doesn't both sides just hate each other so much."

Salome Dunaevsky, 57, said she felt Netanyahu's plan would lead to chaos.

"It gives total power, almost total power, to the politicians," she said. "It means that there is no rule. You can do whatever."

Israel’s diplomatic staff were among those on strike Monday on the advice of their trade union, one diplomat who was not authorized to brief the media told NBC News. Israel’s embassies in Washington and around the world shut as a result and some diplomats replaced their social media profile pictures with the Israeli flag.

Netanyahu appealed for calm in the afternoon on social media as thousands flooded the streets of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, waving Israeli flags and placards.

“I call on all the demonstrators in Jerusalem, on the right and the left, to behave responsibly and not to act violently. We are brothers,” he said on Twitter.



Israel judicial reform protests (Ohad Zwigenberg / AP)© Provided by NBC News

Peter Lerner, the head of international relations at Histadrut, the Israeli trade union umbrella group representing some 700,000 workers, tweeted a video of cheering activists. He said the group’s chairman, Arnon Bar-David, had just told the meeting: “We are stopping the legal revolution.”


“This is the time that together we bring Israel back to sanity and to the right path. This is the time that we together say ‘enough’ and it doesn’t matter if we are right or left,” Histadrut said in a statement.

The unrest brought many daily operations to a halt. Israel's airport authority confirmed just before 11 a.m. local time (4 a.m. ET) that all departing flights from Ben-Gurion International Airport would be grounded.

Two of Israel’s main seaports, Haifa and Ashdod, said in separate statements seen by Reuters that they would shut down in support of the general strike.

Big brands are taking part in the protest: McDonald's said it would begin closing its restaurants across the country from midday (5 a.m. ET) before a full national closure from 2 p.m. (7 a.m. ET).

Israel’s leading universities will also be closed Monday in protest against both Netanyahu's judicial overhaul plan and Gallant’s firing.

“We, the presidents and rectors of the research universities in Israel, express deep concern about the division and polarization in Israeli society and processes that could lead to a real damage to the national strength and stability of the State of Israel,” they said in a statement. Netanyahu’s planned changes could lead to a “brain drain” in Israel and discourage international students, the statement added.

In an interview with Piers Morgan on Talk TV released Monday, Netanyahu defended his policy and said he was confident the movement to overturn the new law would not last.

“People will see in the end that Israel was a democracy, is a democracy and will be even a stronger democracy after this democratic reform,” he said.

He argued that the changes — which allow the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, to overrule almost all Supreme Court decisions and appoint judges — were necessary to curtail the increased power of the judiciary.

Critics who call the move autocratic “had not read the bill,” he said.

Netanyahu was in London on Friday to meet with British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.


Tens of thousands of Israelis have poured into the streets across the country in a spontaneous outburst of anger after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu abruptly fired his defense minister for challenging the Israeli leader's judicial overhaul plan. (Oren Ziv / AP)© Oren Ziv

Some of the prime minister's closest allies appeared intent on making sure the legislation passed.

"Under no circumstances should the reform to fix the justice system and strengthen Israeli democracy be stopped," said Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. In a video statement he added that to ditch the judiciary plan would mean submitting "to violence, anarchy and wild strikes."

Smotrich, who has a history of making controversial remarks and last week said there was no such thing as a Palestinian people, said he would attend a pro-government protest in Jerusalem later on Monday.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog was among those calling for the changes to be halted.

“The entire nation is rapt with deep worry. Our security, economy, society — all are under threat,” he said in a statement Monday.

Israel’s consul general in New York, Asaf Zamir, announced Sunday night he would resign after 18 months in the job, over the judicial changes and the defense minister’s firing.

International pressure was also growing over Netanyahu’s planned overhaul.

The White House released a statement from the National Security Council on Sunday night that said the most recent protests “further underscore the urgent need for compromise.”

“As the president recently discussed with Prime Minister Netanyahu, democratic values have always been, and must remain, a hallmark of the U.S.-Israel relationship,” it said.

Patrick Smith reported from London. Ali Zelenko reported from Jerusalem.

This article was originally published on NBCNews.com


Netanyahu ally agrees to delay Israeli judicial overhaul amid mass protests

Story by Laura Kelly • 

A key ally of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday agreed to delay plans to push through a controversial judicial overhaul that has drawn unprecedented public, government and military opposition and raised alarm from the U.S.


Netanyahu ally agrees to delay Israeli judicial overhaul amid mass protests© Provided by The Hill

Israel’s far-right Minister of National Security Itamar Ben Gvir has agreed to delay until May discussions surrounding the judicial reforms, his political party Otzma Yehudit, or Jewish Power, said in a statement, the Times of Israel reported.

The move comes amid pointed warnings from the U.S. to Netanyahu to pursue compromise with opposition lawmakers around the judicial reforms, which critics warn would destroy the bedrock of Israel’s democracy by stripping the independent oversight of the judicial branch.

“We’ve been very clear privately with Israeli leaders, as well as publicly, with our concerns over developments in the last 48 hours,” White House national security spokesperson John Kirby told reporters Monday morning, “and again, strongly urge Israeli leaders to compromise here.”

The judicial reforms, which are said to include allowing the government to overrule Supreme Court decisions and have greater control over appointing judges to the bench, have drawn unprecedented opposition. Hundreds of thousands of Israelis participating in weeks of protests, prompting commitments of refusals among some of Israel’s most elite military units and, on Monday, triggering a general strike among government workers.

President Biden has warned directly to Netanyahu that the judicial reforms risked threatening the “shared values” of the U.S. and Israel relationship and urged the Israeli leader to pursue compromise with the opposition.

“It really does come from a place…of supporting the very idea of checks and balances and the idea of consensus support. That’s where the President’s main concerns come from,” Kirby told reporters.

U.S. lawmakers have also expressed deep concern that the judicial overhaul is a crisis for Israel’s democracy.


Israel judicial overhaul plans delayed amid huge protests, says Ben Gvir’s Jewish Power party

Story by Amir Tal • 

Benjamin Netanyahu’s controversial plans to weaken Israel’s judiciary will be put on hold after widespread strikes and protests drove the country to a standstill, the party of National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir announced Monday.

CNN  Watch protesters flood Tel Aviv highway to protest Netanyahu View on Watch
Duration 1:00

The legislation will be paused until the next legislative term, after the Passover recess in April, Gvir’s Jewish Power party said in a statement.

Netanyahu himself has not commented on a delay. A nationwide strike on Monday saw workers in virtually every major sector walk out, and protesters clogged streets and rammed city centers across Israel, demanding an end to the plan.

The original proposals would have amounted to the most sweeping overhaul of the Israeli legal system since the country’s founding. The most significant changes would allow a simple majority in the Knesset to overturn Supreme Court rulings; the Netanyahu government also sought to change the way judges are selected, and remove government ministries’ independent legal advisers, whose opinions are binding.

But months of sustained protests over the plans drew global attention and rocked the country. The political crisis deepened on Sunday when Netanyahu’s office announced the firing of Defense Minister Yoav Gallant in a one-line statement, after he became the first member of the cabinet to call for a pause to the controversial plans.

In the hours that followed, Israeli society ground to a halt as anger at the bill mounted. Netanyahu was also condemned by his opponents and a host of former Israeli prime ministers.

“We’ve never been closer to falling apart. Our national security is at risk, our economy is crumbling, our foreign relations are at their lowest point ever, we don’t know what to say to our children about their future in this country. We have been taken hostage by a bunch of extremists with no brakes and no boundaries,” former Prime Minister Yair Lapid said at the Knesset.

As he fought to push ahead with his effort last week, Netanyahu’s government also passed a law making it harder to oust prime ministers that was condemned by critics as a self-preservation tactic.

By a 61-to-47 final vote, the Knesset approved the bill that states that only the prime minister himself or the cabinet, with a two-thirds majority, can declare the leader unfit. The cabinet vote would then need to be ratified by a super majority in the parliament.

Netanyahu, who is the first sitting Israeli prime minister to appear in court as a defendant, is on trial for charges of fraud, breach of trust and bribery. He denies any wrongdoing.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

Israeli unions launch strike, upping pressure on Netanyahu

The Canadian Press
Mon, March 27, 2023 



TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Workers from a range of sectors in Israel launched a nationwide strike on Monday, threatening to paralyze the economy as they joined a surging protest movement against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plan to overhaul the judiciary.

Departing flights from the country’s main international airport were grounded, large mall chains and universities shut their doors, and Israel's largest trade union group called for its 800,000 members — in health, transit, banking and other fields — to stop work. Local governments were expected to close the preschools they run and cut other services, and the main doctors union announced its members would also walk off the job.

The growing resistance to Netanyahu's plan came hours after tens of thousands of people burst into the streets around the country in a spontaneous show of anger at the prime minister's decision to fire his defense minister after he called for a pause to the overhaul. Chanting “the country is on fire,” they lit bonfires on Tel Aviv's main highway, closing the thoroughfare and many others throughout the country for hours.

Thousands of protesters gathered Monday outside the Knesset, or parliament, to keep up the pressure.

The overhaul — driven by Netanyahu, who is on trial for corruption, and his allies in Israel's most right-wing government ever — has plunged Israel into one of its worst domestic crises. It has sparked sustained protests that have galvanized nearly all sectors of society, including its military, where reservists have increasingly come out publicly to say they will not serve a country veering toward autocracy.

Israel's Palestinian citizens, however, have largely sat out the protests. Many say Israel’s democracy is tarnished by its military rule over their brethren in the West Bank and the discrimination they themselves face.

The turmoil has magnified longstanding and intractable differences over Israel's character that have riven it since its establishment. The protesters say they are fighting for the very soul of the nation, saying the overhaul will remove Israel’s system of checks and balances and directly challenge its democratic ideals.

The government has labelled them anarchists out to topple a democratically elected leadership and says the plan will restore a balance between the judicial and executive branches and rein in what they see as an interventionist court with liberal sympathies.

At the center of the crisis is Netanyahu himself, Israel's longest serving leader, and questions about the lengths he may be willing to go to maintain his grip on power, even as he battles charges of fraud, breach of trust and accepting bribes in three separate affairs. He denies wrongdoing.

The firing of his defense minister at a time of heightened security threats in the West Bank and elsewhere, appeared to be a last straw for many, including apparently the Histadrut, the country's largest trade union umbrella group, which had sat out the monthslong protests before the defense minister’s firing.

“Where are we leading our beloved Israel? To the abyss,” Arnon Bar-David, the group's head, said in a rousing speech to applause. “Today we are stopping everyone's descent toward the abyss.”

On Monday, as the embers of the highway bonfires were cleared, Israel's ceremonial president, Isaac Herzog, called again for an immediate halt to the overhaul.

“The entire nation is rapt with deep worry. Our security, economy, society — all are under threat,” he said. “Wake up now!”

Opposition leader Yair Lapid said the crisis was driving Israel to the brink.

“We’ve never been closer to falling apart. Our national security is at risk, our economy is crumbling, our foreign relations are at their lowest point ever, we don’t know what to say to our children about their future in this country,” Lapid said. “We have been taken hostage by a bunch of extremists with no brakes and no boundaries.”

It was unclear if the threats posed by the strikes to Israel's economy, which is already on shaky ground, would prompt Netanyahu to halt the overhaul. Israeli media reported that a lawyer representing the prime minister in his corruption trial threatened to quit if the overhaul was not halted.

The developments were being watched in Washington, which is closely allied with Israel yet has been uneasy with Netanyahu and the far-right elements of his government. National Security Council spokesperson Adrienne Watson said the United States was “deeply concerned" by the developments in Israel, "which further underscore the urgent need for compromise.”

“Democratic values have always been, and must remain, a hallmark of the U.S.-Israel relationship,” Watson said in a statement.

Netanyahu had reportedly spent the night in consultations and was set to speak to the nation, but later delayed his speech. Some members of Netanyahu's Likud party said they would support the prime minister if he did heed calls to halt the overhaul.

The architect of the plan, Justice Minister Yariv Levin, a popular party member, was long a holdout, promising he would resign if the overhaul was suspended. But on Monday, he said he would respect the prime minister's decision should he halt the legislation.

Still, Netanyahu's hard-line allies pressed him to continue on. “We must not halt the reform in the judicial system, and we must not give in to anarchy,” National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir said.

Netanyahu’s dismissal of Defense Minister Yoav Gallant appeared to signal that the prime minister and his allies would barrel ahead. Gallant had been the first senior member of the ruling Likud party to speak out against it, saying the deep divisions were threatening to weaken the military.

And Netanyahu’s government forged ahead with a centerpiece of the overhaul — a law that would give the governing coalition the final say over all judicial appointments. A parliamentary committee approved the legislation on Monday for a final vote, which could come this week.

The government also seeks to pass laws that would would grant the Knesset the authority to overturn Supreme Court decisions and limit judicial review of laws.

A separate law that would circumvent a Supreme Court ruling to allow a key coalition ally to serve as minister was delayed following a request from that party's leader.

Netanyahu returned to power late last year after a protracted political crisis that sent Israelis to the polls five times in less than four years. The elections were all a referendum on Netanyahu's fitness to serve while on trial for corruption.

___

Associated Press journalists Laurie Kellman in Tel Aviv and Isaac Scharf in Jerusalem contributed to this report.

Tia Goldenberg, The Associated Press

Israeli president urges immediate stop to judicial reforms as protests flare


AFP
Mon, March 27, 2023 

Israeli President Isaac Herzog on Monday called for an immediate halt to the government's controversial judicial reforms, a day after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sacked his defence minister for similar demands.

Herzog, who holds a largely ceremonial post, made the call following spontaneous demonstrations in Tel Aviv overnight in response to the minister's dismissal.

"For the sake of the unity of the people of Israel, for the sake of the necessary responsibility, I call on you to halt the legislative process immediately," Herzog said in a statement.

The plan to hand more control to politicians and diminish the role of the Supreme Court has ignited months of protests and been questioned by Israel's top allies including the United States, which expressed concern Sunday.

Netanyahu's hard-right government argues the changes are needed to rebalance powers between lawmakers and the judiciary.

Yoav Galant, the former defence minister and staunch ally of Netanyahu, earlier broke ranks and called for a halt to the reforms -- with lawmakers scheduled to vote this week on a central part of the proposals, which would change the way judges are appointed.

"The growing social rift has made its way into the (army) and security agencies," said Galant, a member of Netanyahu's right-wing Likud party. "It is a clear, immediate and tangible threat to Israel's security.

"I am committed to Likud values... and placing the State of Israel above all... but major changes on the national level must be made through deliberations and dialogue," he added, calling for a halt to the protests.

- 'Deep worry' -

On Sunday, moments after Netanyahu sacked Galant, demonstrators seized a central highway cutting through the coastal city of Tel Aviv, blocking traffic and burning tyres.

Some threw metal barricades at mounted offices while police deployed water cannon.

The large crowd waved national flags, blew airhorns and chanted in Hebrew: "Israel is not a dictatorship" and "No to a fascist government!"

"Last night we witnessed very difficult scenes," Herzog said.

"The entire nation is rapt with deep worry," he added, in an appeal to the government. "Our security, economy, society — all are under threat."

After months of rallies against the reform, including a weekend demonstration that brought out an estimated 200,000 people in Tel Aviv, protesters in the city said it felt like "a sort of climax".

In Jerusalem, demonstrators gathered Sunday outside the prime minister's residence, while other rallies took place in the northern city of Haifa and Beer Sheva in the south.

Protesters have announced a "national paralysis week", including protests outside ministers' homes and parliament.

The United States said it was "deeply concerned" and called on Israeli leaders to reach a compromise.

The White House noted that President Joe Biden recently told Netanyahu that "democratic values have always been, and must remain, a hallmark of the US-Israel relationship".

Galant, a former general, was named to his post in December as part of Netanyahu's coalition with extreme-right and ultra-Orthodox allies.

Two other Likud lawmakers have voiced support for Galant, raising questions over whether the government could count on a majority if it pushes ahead with a vote.

Adding to the political uncertainty, Israel's consul general in New York, Asaf Zamir, tendered his resignation Sunday over Netanyahu's "dangerous decision".

Opposition leader Yair Lapid said that while the prime minister had sacked Galant, "he cannot fire reality and cannot fire the people of Israel who are standing up to the insanity of the coalition".

"The Prime Minister of Israel is a danger to the security of the State of Israel," Lapid added.

- 'Illegal' intervention -

A parliamentary committee has amended the draft law to make it more acceptable to opponents, but the opposition has ruled out backing any part of the reform package until all legislative steps are halted.

Netanyahu, in a televised address last week, vowed to "responsibly advance" the reforms and "end the rift" they have caused.

In response, Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara on Friday accused Netanyahu of "illegal" public intervention on the process of adopting the judicial reforms.

Netanyahu is on trial over charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust, which he denies.

His broadcast gave rise to contempt of court accusations filed with the Supreme Court by the Movement for Quality Government in Israel, an anti-corruption campaign group.

The group's complaint alleges Netanyahu violated a court ruling that an accused prime minister does not have the right to act in a matter that could constitute a conflict of interest.

Israel Democracy Institute holds emergency conference in light of judicial reforms

Story by By JERUSALEM POST STAFF • 7h ago

An international emergency conference was held on Sunday morning at the Israel Democracy Institute (IDI) in Jerusalem and saw attendances and testimonies from officials, jurists and legal experts worldwide regarding the judicial reform.

Thousands march in protest of the judicial reform in Tel Aviv, March 23, 2023
© (photo credit: AVSHALOM SASSONI/MAARIV)

Participants came from Hungary, Poland, India, Ireland, Canada and France, during which they discussed the future of Israel. Jurists at the conference warned that Israel can expect violations of human rights, a collapse of the economy and a silenced media should the judicial reforms continue.

Research showed that an automatic majority to the current coalition to select justices is nearly nonexistent in other democracies, while judicial reform advocates claim that the overhaul will bring the judicial selection process closer to that of other parliamentary systems.

Statements by the president of the Israel Democracy Institute

"It is important to emphasize that Israel is not unusual in the way judges are chosen as is customary today," said IDI president Yohanan Plesner. "We hear from the supporters of the 'reform' that they are only implementing a process for selecting judges that exist in other liberal democracies, but most of the references to methods in other countries, such as those made by the prime minister on Thursday when he mentioned Canada and the United States, are very misleading or completely wrong."

"We hear from the supporters of the 'reform' that they are only implementing a process for selecting judges that exist in other liberal democracies."Yohanan Plesner

"Recently, we find the need to remind Israelis how vulnerable our democracy is compared to any other democracy in the world. Israel actually has no checks and balances. We have no constitution, no bill of rights, no federal distribution of power and no presidential veto.


Judicial reform protestors block the road at HaKfar HaYarok youth village in Ramat Hasharon on March 9, 2023. (credit: Shai Koriansky)© Provided by The Jerusalem PostJudicial reform protestors block the road at HaKfar HaYarok youth village in Ramat Hasharon on March 9, 2023. (credit: Shai Koriansky)

"The only brake on the power of a political majority is the Supreme Court. Therefore, damage to the independence of the court, small or large, has a significant and unique effect on the democratic balance in Israel," he continued.

Statements by former justice ministers from abroad


"I am amazed by the incompetence and the bizarre move," said former Irish Justice Minister Alan Shatter. "I understand the politics behind it, but I don't understand how intelligent people can deal with such an important issue in such a quick way and in such a short time.

Former Canadian Justice Minister and Attorney-General Irwin Kolter said: “There is absolutely no comparison to be made between the proposals being made in Israel and the system in Canada, any comparison is misleading - we do have a superseding clause, but it comes within the Canadian Bill of Rights, as part of the federal system, and Democratic rights. It is not the same as what is happening in Israel."


Mass protests erupt in Israel after Netanyahu fires minister who opposed judicial overhaul

Story by Hadas Gold • CNN

Massive crowds filled the streets of the Israeli city of Tel Aviv late Sunday night after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu fired his defense minister over his opposition to a planned judicial overhaul.

Watch protesters flood Tel Aviv highway to protest Netanyahu
View on Watch  Duration 1:00

Waving Israeli flags and chanting “democratia,” protestors could be seen blocking streets and bridges, including the Ayalon Highway.

Protesters lit several fires on the main highway in Tel Aviv, their acrid, black smoke billowing into the sky, partly obscuring some of the city’s iconic skyscrapers. By around 2 a.m. local time in Tel Aviv, protests had thinned out but live pictures from the scene showed security forces firing water cannons on those still gathered.

Israel’s political crisis deepened on Sunday when Netanyahu’s office announced the removal of Yoav Gallant in a one-line statement, after he became the first member of the cabinet to call for a pause to controversial plans to overhaul the country’s court system.

“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has decided to remove Defense Minister Yoav Gallant from his post,” the statement read.


Protesters clash with the police during a rally against the Israeli government's judicial reform in Tel Aviv, Israel on March 27. - Ahmad Gharabli/AFP/Getty Images

Gallant argued for a halt to the judicial reforms in a speech Saturday night, when Netanyahu was out of the country on an official visit to the United Kingdom. Some military reservists have pledged to pull out of their service in opposition to the plans, which critics say would undermine the independence of the judiciary. Gallant said pressing ahead with the proposals could threaten Israel’s security.

His ouster and the mass protests that followed prompted a string of prominent officials to call for a halt to the judicial reform process.

In a Facebook post on Monday, Israel’s President Isaac Herzog called on Netanyahu and his government to immediately pause the plans, saying “the eyes of the whole world are on you.”

“Deep concern hovers over the entire nation. Security, economy, society – everyone is threatened,” Herzog said in the statement.

“The eyes of all the people of Israel are on you. The eyes of all the Jewish people are on you. The eyes of the whole world are on you. For the sake of the unity of Israelis, for the sake of committed responsibility I call on you to halt the legislative procedure immediately.”

As protesters gathered into the early hours of Monday, Economy Minister Nir Barkat, Culture and Sports Minister Miki Zohar and Diaspora Affairs and Social Equality Minister Amichai Chikli – all members of Netanyahu’s Likud party – also suggested that Netanyahu should stop the legislation.

Barkat, a former mayor of Jerusalem, suggested Netanyahu should “stop and recalculate” his overhaul plan, warning it has brought the country to the brink of civil war.

“The reform is necessary and we will do it – but not at the cost of a civil war,” he said.


Former Israelie defense minsiter Yoav Gallant. - Amir Cohen/Reuters

In his speech on Saturday, Gallant said the pause was needed “for the security of Israel,” citing the refusal of some Israel Defense Forces reservists to train in protest at the government plans.

Gallant reiterated that sentiment in a tweet on Sunday after his dismissal: “The security of the State of Israel has always been and will always remain the mission of my life.”

Israel’s former Prime Minister Yair Lapid called Gallant’s dismissal a “new low.” He wrote on Twitter that Netanyahu might be able to fire the minister but “cannot fire the people of Israel who are standing up to the insanity of the coalition.”



Thousands streamed into central Tel Aviv on Sunday night in
 support of the fired defense minister - Ohad Zwigenberg/AP

He added: “The Prime Minister of Israel is a danger to the security of the State of Israel.”

Israel’s Consul General in New York, Asaf Zamir, resigned in response to Netanyahu’s decision to fire Gallant. In his resignation letter, which he posted on Twitter, Zamir called Netanyahu’s move a “dangerous decision” and added that that he had “become increasingly concerned with the policies of the new government, and in particular, the judicial reform it is leading.”

“I believe that this reform undermines the very foundation of our democratic system and threatens the rule of law in our country,” he wrote.

Universities in Israel will go on strike starting Monday, they announced, and the country’s largest labor union and business leaders said they would hold a press conference on Monday morning. The labor union, Histadrut, said its press conference with business leaders scheduled for 11 a.m. (4 a.m. ET) would be dramatic.

A contentious judicial overhaul

Under the proposals, the government would have control over the appointment of judges, and parliament would gain the power to override Supreme Court decisions.

The government argues the changes are essential to rein in the Supreme Court, which they see as insular, elitist, and no longer representative of the Israeli people. Opponents say the plans threaten the foundations of Israeli democracy.

The military reservists’ protest is seen as a particular worry for Israel’s government, as they are regularly called up to train and serve, even in peacetime.


Protesters lit fires on a Tel Aviv highway Sunday
 - Nir Elias/Reuters

Israel’s far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir had called on Netanyahu to fire Gallant after his speech on Saturday. “Gallant gave in tonight to blackmail and threats from all those anarchists who call for resistance and use the [Israel Defense Forces] as a bargaining tool,” Gvir tweeted.

“Gallant was elected by the votes of right-wing voters and in practice promotes a left-wing agenda. At the moment of truth he collapsed under the pressure of the media and the protesters. I call on the Prime Minister to fire him immediately.”

Piling further pressure on Netanyahu, Israel’s High Court on Sunday gave him a week to a respond to a petition calling for him to be held in contempt of court.

The legal move by the Movement for Quality Government in Israel comes after the attorney general told Netanyahu he acted illegally and violated a court-imposed conflict of interest order by saying he would personally involve himself in the judicial overhaul.

Part of the bill – which effectively strips the courts of the power to declare a prime minister unfit for office – has already been pushed through.

Critics say Netanyahu is pushing through the changes because of his own ongoing corruption trial; Netanyahu denies this.

Netanyahu himself has given no indication he will back down. In a speech on Thursday he said he would address the concerns of “both sides,” but pledged to continue with the reform plans.

Likud lawmaker Danny Danon said it was too soon to know if there were enough rebels in the party to stop the legislation, telling CNN, “We will only know Monday,” when members of the party meet in the Knesset, or parliament.

Netanyahu and his allies control 64 seats in the 120-seat legislature, so in theory five Likud rebels could deprive the coalition of an absolute majority. But lawmakers can abstain or be absent, bringing down the number of votes a law needs in order to pass.

CNN’s Richard Allen Greene contributed to this story from Jerusalem, Irene Nasser reported from Hong Kong and Lauren Said-Moorhouse wrote from London.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com


Netanyahu sacks defence minister, sparking mass protests


Protest against Israel's judicial overhaul and dismissing of the defense minister, in Jerusalem

By Ari Rabinovitch

JERUSALEM (Reuters) -Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday sacked Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, triggering mass protests, a day after Gallant broke ranks with the government and urged a halt to a highly contested plan to overhaul the judicial system.

As news of the dismissal spread, tens of thousands of protesters, many waving blue and white Israeli flags, took to the streets late at night across the country. Crowds gathered outside Netanyahu's home in Jerusalem, at one point breaching a security cordon.


Protest against Israel's judicial overhaul and dismissing of the defense minister, in Jerusalem© Thomson Reuters

Some three months since taking office, Netanyahu's nationalist-religious coalition has been plunged into crisis over the bitter divisions exposed by its flagship judicial overhaul plans.

"State security cannot be a card in the political game. Netanyahu crossed a red line tonight," opposition leaders Yair Lapid and Benny Gantz said in a joint statement.

They called on members of Netanyahu's Likud party not to have a hand in "the crushing of national security."

In announcing Gallant's dismissal, Netanyahu's office did not name a replacement nor give any other details. "Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has decided this evening to dismiss Defence Minister Yoav Gallant," it said.

Shortly afterward, Gallant, 64, wrote on Twitter: "The state of Israel’s security has always been and will always be my life's mission."



Protests against Israel's judicial overhaul and dismissing the defense minister, in Tel Aviv© Thomson Reuters

POLICE USE WATER CANNONS

Netanyahu made the decision to sack Gallant after the former navy admiral warned on Saturday that the overhaul plans risked "a clear, immediate and tangible threat to the security of the state" and called for them to be halted.

"At this time, for the sake of our country, I am willing to take any risk and pay any price," Gallant said in his televised address.

Netanyahu acted in response on Sunday night as he was poised to ratify a central part of the overhaul package, a bill that would tighten political control over judicial appointments, handing the executive wider freedom to name judges to the Supreme Court.

Earlier this month, President Isaac Herzog, the head of state who is supposed to remain above politics, warned that the country faced "disaster" unless a broader consensus could be reached on how to overhaul the judiciary.


But Netanyahu, on trial on corruption charges that he denies, has vowed to continue with a project he says is needed to rein in activist judges and restore the proper balance between an elected government and the judiciary.

As protesters poured into the streets, police used water cannons to push them back from Netanyahu's residence in Jerusalem, while in Tel Aviv, where hundreds of thousands have taken to the streets since the beginning of the year, protesters lighted a large bonfire on a main highway.

It was not immediately clear whether the protests would impact the government's tactics. At least three Likud ministers said publicly that it was time to reevaluate their strategy and they would support halting the legislation if Netanyahu decided to do so. The head of the parliamentary committee deciding on the legislation said discussions would continue on Monday.



Protests against Israel's judicial overhaul and dismissing the defense minister, in Tel Aviv© Thomson Reuters

The crisis came as Israel's security establishment has been bracing for potential violence in the coming weeks as the Muslim holy month of Ramadan overlaps with the Jewish Passover and the Christian Easter celebration.

Over the past year, Israeli forces have been conducting nearly daily raids in the occupied West Bank, killing more than 250 Palestinian fighters and civilians, while more than 40 Israelis and foreigners have been killed by Palestinian attackers.



Protests against Israel's judicial overhaul and dismissing the defense minister, in Tel Aviv© Thomson Reuters

DIPLOMAT RESIGNS

Gallant on Saturday became the most senior member of Netanyahu's right-wing Likud party to say he would not support the judicial overhaul, saying protests that have included growing numbers of military reservists were also affecting regular forces and undermining national security.



Protests against Israel's judicial overhaul and dismissing the defense minister, in Tel Aviv© Thomson Reuters

In recent weeks senior Finance Ministry officials have warned of an economic backlash and business leaders have sounded the alarm for their companies' future.



Protest against Israel's judicial overhaul and dismissing of the defense minister, in Jerusalem© Thomson Reuters

Adding to the pressure, the head of the Histadrut labour federation, the umbrella organisation for hundreds of thousands of public sector workers, said he was "astonished" by Gallant's removal and promised a "dramatic" announcement on Monday.

Israel's consul-general in New York said he was resigning over the dismissal. Israel's research universities announced they would stop holding classes due to the legislative push, calling for its immediate freeze.

Some of Netanyahu's hard-right coalition partners had called for Gallant to be sacked, but a number of other Likud lawmakers have backed his call for a halt to the reforms.

The turmoil comes at a key moment in the passage of the legislation with a bill giving the executive more control over the appointment of judges expected to be brought for ratification this week in the Knesset, where Netanyahu and his allies control 64 out of 120 seats.

But how - or even whether - that as yet-unscheduled vote will proceed has been thrown into question by the wave of protest sparked by Gallant's removal and the deepening splits within the coalition.

(Reporting by Ari Rabinovitch, Ronen Zvulun and Dan Williams in Jerusalem, Rami Amichay in Tel Aviv; Writing by James Mackenzie, Editing by Andrew Heavens and Cynthia Osterman)

Tens of thousands of Israelis protest judicial overhaul

Duration 1:11
View on Watch




Protest against Israel's judicial overhaul and dismissing of the defense minister, in Jerusalem


Netanyahu’s retreat will be like Napoleon’s from Russia

Story by By AMOTZ ASA-EL • Friday

Retreat stinks. Looking ahead, the retreater sees his destination melt like ice in the sun; looking back, the road that seemed so short when it led to the battlefield now seems to him as long as a continent; looking sideways, he imagines snipers, land mines and disease; and looking inwards, he sniffs disloyalty, despair and defeat.


PEOPLE HOLD Israeli flags next to a banner of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a demonstration in Tel Aviv last week against the judicial overhaul.
© (photo credit: RONEN ZVULUN/REUTERS)

This is not to say that all retreats end badly. The British retreat from Dunkirk was a success, having retrieved a large corpus from a war zone with minimum casualties, and thus salvaged much of the army that would later move to the offensive and win.

Such was also George Washington’s retreat from Long Island through Brooklyn and New Jersey to Pennsylvania, a maneuver which surprised the British invaders, and in due course enabled the Continental Army to turn the war’s tide.

The common denominator among such retreats is that their commanders did not start the wars they won. Someone else waged war, and retreat was merely the defender’s response before counterattacking, the way Russian General Mikhail Kutuzov did in the face of Napoleon’s assault.

Such are the glorious retreats of the defenders. The attackers’ retreats, by contrast, are inglorious, as they underscore machismo’s debacle, fantasy’s futility, and the frivolity of the choice to go to war. That is what happened, for instance, with Napoleon’s retreat from Russia in 1812, with Nasser’s retreat from Sinai in 1967, and with the Argentine junta’s retreat from the Falkland Islands in 1982.


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is seen gesturing at the Knesset, on July 26, 2021.
 (credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST)

Now, what those fiascoes constituted militarily awaits Benjamin Netanyahu politically as his retreat from the biggest political mistake of his career begins to unfold.

Netanyahu's retreat begins

YES, THE coalition’s decision on Monday to temporarily shrink the judicial overhaul was a political nonstarter and a publicity ploy.

The decision, to make do for now with the government’s appointment of two Supreme Court justices and delay the rest of the legislative package for later, created none of the impression its authors hoped to create – namely, that they are retreating.

Related video: Israel passes law shielding Netanyahu from being removed as prime minister    (NBC News)  Duration 2:28   View on Watch


It took no Sherlock Holmes to detect the deceit. Even one justice’s appointment by the ruling coalition is one too many, let alone the appointment of the court’s president. The whole idea is to prevent such political tinkering, as our system lacks the constitution and bicameral legislature that form other democracies’ checks and balances.

Evidently, the man behind this mock retreat still thinks the people are the same idiots he habitually fooled over the years with ease and impunity and can thus be fooled again. That is why the stubbornness and lying with which he and his operation responded to the protest movement are still intact.

Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich thus repeated on Tuesday the lie that under the current system, “the judges appoint each other.” As explained here previously, the Judges Selection Committee includes three judges, four politicians and two lawyers, meaning the judges are a minority, and that’s beside the fact that a Supreme Court justice’s appointment requires the approval of seven of the committee’s nine members.

“I expect the Chief of General Staff and the heads of the security forces to fight firmly the [service] refusal [of reservist fighter pilots].”Benjamin Netanyahu

The same spirit of deceit inspired Netanyahu’s televised demand on Sunday, before the cabinet’s weekly meeting: “I expect the Chief of General Staff and the heads of the security forces to fight firmly the [service] refusal [of reservist fighter pilots].” Netanyahu thus conveniently ignored the fact that these pilots are volunteers who give the Air Force one day of their working week, year after year. Instead, just like he and his felonious police minister dare call the protesters “anarchists,” Netanyahu now made it sound as if the reservist pilots are enlisted servicemen evading service.

And so, while ignoring the pilots’ grievance – namely, his threat to Israeli democracy – Netanyahu made it seem as if the problem the airmen pose is not political but disciplinary, and thus not his business but IDF Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi’s. Talk about shifting blame.

Well, despite the judicial revolutionaries’ continued lying and hoodwinking, this week’s events mean that Netanyahu now understands what he has uncorked and is desperately seeking a way to undo what he has done. Yes, he thought he could return the genie to the bottle by faking a retreat, but what he has just begun is a real retreat, an inglorious retreat from a Napoleonic misadventure’s inevitable collapse.

Netanyahu miscalculated Middle Israel's patriotism and sense of abuse

ALL INGLORIOUS retreats begin with miscalculation. Napoleon miscalculated the Russian winter, Nasser miscalculated Israel’s resolve to survive, and Argentina’s generalissimos miscalculated Britain’s will to fight. Netanyahu miscalculated Middle Israel’s patriotism, bellicosity and sense of abuse.

As this column warned him a month before the judiciary revolution’s announcement (“The Middle Israeli revolt,” December 9, 2022), Netanyahu emerged from his electoral victory intoxicated, convinced he and his allies’ abuse of Middle Israel can be redoubled at no cost, not realizing they are provoking its revolt. Now, faced with multitudes flooding the streets; staring at the blue-and-white forestations that the flags they carry form; and hearing the rebukes of entrepreneurs, economists, industrialists, rabbis, literati, former heads of the Mossad, Shin Bet, Rafael, the Atomic Energy Committee and a battery of retired generals including ten air-force commanders, from Amikam Norkin, 56, to Dan Tolkowsky, 102, Bibi knows that the revolt is here.

And as happened in other inglorious retreats, the failing offensive’s ranks are beginning to fray. Defense Minister Yoav Gallant threatens to resign; Economy Minister Nir Barkat vows to obey the court should it override the reform; and Likud MKs Eli Dallal and David Bitan call to halt the legislation and replace the judicial revolution’s unilateralism with dialogue.

Evidently, when Netanyahu besmirches patriotic pilots who risk their lives behind enemy lines while he is literally and visibly flanked by ultra-Orthodox ministers who did not serve in the army one hour, such Likudniks understand that they have been hijacked, that their leader has lost his cool, judgment and way, and that he and they now face only one choice: retreat.

www.MiddleIsrael.net
The writer, a Hartman Institute fellow, is the author of the bestselling Mitzad Ha’ivelet Ha’yehudi (The Jewish March of Folly, Yediot Sefarim, 2019), a revisionist history of the Jewish people’s political leadership.
Oppose judicial reform, olim group urges Canadian Likud MK

Story by By ZVIKA KLEIN • 5h ago

An activism group called Olim for Democracy launched a digital campaign and petition urging Likud MK Dan Illouz, himself an immigrant from Canada and the representative of new immigrants in the Likud, to oppose the judicial reform package “that goes against the Zionist vision of a Jewish and democratic Israel that has inspired tens of thousands to make Aliyah,” according to the group.


Dan Illouz, former Jerusalem City Council Member
© (photo credit: SHARON HASSON)

According to its Twitter handle, Olim for Democracy is a group of Israeli immigrants who are “concerned for the future of our democracy and by the judicial overhaul led by Netanyahu׳s far-right government.” The social media campaign is titled “Don’t Do It, Dan Illouz.”

The group tweeted that “Olot and Olim like you demand to live in a Jewish and democratic Israel.” They said that “you claim to be our voice in the Knesset. Now is the time to stand up for the Zionist vision that has inspired thousands just like us to make Israel our home.”


New immigrants from USA and Canada arrive on a special '' Aliyah Flight 2016'' on behalf of Nefesh B'Nefesh organization, at Ben Gurion airport in central Israel on August 17, 2016, (credit: MIRIAM ALSTER/FLASH90)© Provided by The Jerusalem PostNew immigrants from USA and Canada arrive on a special '' Aliyah Flight 2016'' on behalf of Nefesh B'Nefesh organization, at Ben Gurion airport in central Israel on August 17, 2016, (credit: MIRIAM ALSTER/FLASH90)

Olim for Democracy's stance


Olim for Democracy said that they are composed of “Orthodox, secular, Reform, Conservative and Haredi Jews. Among us you will find the full spectrum of Israeli political opinions, from Right to Left and everything in between.”

They added that “like us, you grew up as part of a minority. For us, it is inconceivable that the State of Israel, where Jews are the majority, could so gravely put at risk the basic rights of women and minority groups.

“Like many of us, you made aliyah from liberal democracy and moved to a country that shared those values. That will no longer be the case once these ‘reforms’ are passed. The legislation currently being advanced will force Jews facing antisemitism in their countries to choose between living in a society where they suffer hate crimes or moving to a country with restricted freedoms and a compromised justice system. It will extinguish the dream of Jews all over the world that they, too, can choose to live as free people in their own land.”

Olim for Democracy said in a press release that “the proposed ‘judicial overhaul’ is detrimental to the democratic values at the core of the Zionist vision from its very inception. By supporting this legislation, MK Dan Illouz, an immigrant himself, is not only expressly violating his promise to represent Olim’s interests in Likud and the Knesset, but decimating and risking the Zionist vision that has inspired thousands of Jews over the decades to choose to make Israel their home. Olot and Olim won’t forget who turns their back on Israel’s founding principles at this critical moment in the country’s history.”

A week ago, over 1,600 group members petitioned the Israeli government to halt the judicial overhaul legislation. In a letter copied to President Isaac Herzog, the members of this group, including immigrants from the US, the UK, several European countries, South Africa, Australia, Russia, Ukraine, and South America – called on the government to stop the legislation and on the Jewish Agency to take a clear stand.

Illuz responded to the campaign calling him to vote against the judicial reforms, saying in a statement to The Jerusalem Post that "I appreciate every person who makes aliyah to Israel out of Zionism and am happy to see olim involved in Israeli politics. Unfortunately, this group distorted reality." According to Illuz, "they represent a very small number of people who presume to speak on behalf of all olim. The truth is that olim are a diverse group with a variety of political opinions.

"Many support the reform and I am glad to represent them. Some oppose it and I respect their opinion," he said. He added that "the reform will be good for Israeli democracy and will only strengthen it. In fact, olim know this because they are familiar with the practices prevalent throughout the democratic world, which the reform will bring us closer to. I am happy to engage in conversation with those who oppose it at any time."
SETTLER RULES
Sask. First Act passes in front of gallery full of First Nations and Métis people opposed to bill

Story by Adam Hunter • Mar 16

Provincial government members voted unanimously to pass the Saskatchewan First Act on Thursday in front of a gallery full of First Nations and Métis community members who travelled to the legislature in opposition of the bill.

Last fall, the government introduced Bill 88, saying it would confirm the province's autonomy and jurisdiction over its natural resources.

The act "asserts its exclusive legislative jurisdiction under the Constitution of Canada, and in particular, those matters listed in sections 92 and 92A of the Constitution Act,1867."

The act says Saskatchewan has jurisdiction over the following:
Exploration of non-renewable resources.
Development, conservation and management of non-renewable natural and forestry resources.
Operation of sites and facilities for generation and production of electricity.
Regulation of all industries and businesses falling within provincial jurisdiction.
Regulation of fertilizer use.

Premier Scott Moe said the bill is meant to benefit all Saskatchewan people. He said it is designed to "prevent federal intrusion into provincial jurisdiction, which is in all people's best interest in this province."

The passage of Bill 88 on Thursday was a formality, thanks to the Saskatchewan Party government having a voting majority. All Saskatchewan Party MLAs in attendance voted in favour of the bill, as did Saskatchewan United Party Leader Nadine Wilson.

Opposition NDP members stood and voted against the bill. While they stood, the Indigenous guests in the gallery stood in a show of solidarity.

The bill has been criticized by the Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations (FSIN), which represents Saskatchewan's First Nations.

The FSIN has said the bill infringes on treaty rights. On Thursday, the FSIN "reaffirmed" its opposition to the Act and said it seeks in to be included in revenue sharing from natural resources.

"First Nations leaders believe the province of Saskatchewan does not have the legal authority to assert exclusive jurisdiction over natural resources, as Treaties signed with First Nations take precedence and pre-date the creation of the government," the FSIN said in a statement.

"FSIN will take legal action to oppose the Act, as it infringes on First Nations Inherent and Treaty Rights to land, water and resources."

Last fall, the legislative assembly of the Métis Nation-Saskatchewan (MN-S) unanimously rejected Bill 88.

The bill was amended before passage Thursday. Government MLA for Athabasca Jim Lemaigre moved to make three changes, most notably to include the following:

"Nothing in the Act abrogates or derogates from the existing Aboriginal and treaty rights of the Aboriginal peoples of Canada that are recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982."


Moe said the inclusion of the amendments was done to clarify that the Bill does not infringe on Indigenous rights.

"There is no question as to what the government's intent is. This bill is not in any way there to circumvent or change or modify the treaty rights that all Indigenous people most certainly have access to."

MN-S vice-president calls bill 'short-sighted,' 'divisive'

Michelle LeClair, vice-president of MN-S, was among the people that were seated in the galleries who stood up when the Opposition stood before voting no.

"It was a show of support for them to say no because we say no, enough is enough."

LeClair called the bill "short-sighted" and "dismissive."

"To say that we are profoundly disappointed by the passage of this bill would be an understatement."

LeClair said the bill "potentially could create such an impact on our rights. Our hunting, gathering, our ceremonies, all of those things will be greatly diminished."


Métis Nation–Saskatchewan (MN–S) vice president Michelle LeClair speaks to reporters after the Saskatchewan First Act passed.© Camille Cusset/Radio-Canada

LeClair said the government has not met or consulted with MN-S on the bill.

"I don't know who they have been talking to. We heard the word dialogue throughout the minister's speech. But we haven't had any dialogue or discussions with the provincial government."

Moe and the government have dismissed claims that they did not consult with First Nations before introducing the bill last year.

LeClair said Justice Minister Bronwyn Eyre suggesting the MN-S cancelled a meeting is "disingenuous."

"Consultation has to start early, it has to start before a bill is introduced."

LeClair said she wrote to the minister to have a "nation-to-nation dialogue," but did not hear back.

Opposition witnesses not allowed to take part in committee discussion

On Wednesday, the bill was discussed at committee for more than five hours.

Opposition justice critic Nicole Sarauer wanted to have Indigenous leaders who travelled to attend committee participate as witnesses and question Justice Minister Bronwyn Eyre and officials, but that motion was denied by government members on the committee.

A government spokesperson said Thursday that the Opposition critic made "numerous surprise motions without notice," and that if Sarauer wanted to have witnesses appear she should have "provided notice in writing to the committee clerk in advance of the meeting."

Sarauer said Thursday that she believes Bill 88 will not fundamentally change any of the province's future court challenges over jurisdiction with the federal government.

She said she thinks Bill 88 "will be challenged" in court by Indigenous leaders sooner rather than later.
FORTY YEARS OF TRYING
Canada falling behind on connecting rural areas to high-speed internet: report

The government's efforts to connect rural parts of the country to high-speed internet are falling short, Canada's auditor general says in a report tabled Monday — which warns that the gap between cities and everywhere could lead to equality issues as work, education and many services move online.

Auditor General Karen Hogan leaves after speaking at a news conference in Ottawa on November 15, 2022. Hogan tabled four reports Monday, one of which flagged a connectivity gap between rural and urban Canada.© Patrick Doyle/The Canadian Press

Story by Richard Raycraft • 

While nearly 91 per cent of Canadian households had access to high-speed internet in 2021, just 59.5 per cent of those in rural and remote areas enjoyed the same access. That number drops to 42.9 per cent for households on First Nations reserves.

"These findings emphasize the persistent digital divide for people living on First Nations reserves and in rural and remote communities, compared to people who live in urban areas," Auditor General Karen Hogan said in a news release.

"The government needs to take action so that there is affordable, high-speed connectivity coverage for Canadians in all areas of the country."

Ottawa has set a goal of connecting 98 per cent of Canadians to high-speed internet by 2026, with universal access by 2030.

The government defines high-speed internet as 50 megabits per second for downloads and 10 megabits per second for uploads.

The report said the urban-rural gap is especially problematic because of how work, education, medicine and government services are moving online.

"Being connected is no longer a luxury but a basic essential service for Canadians. This fact became more apparent

as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which transformed how many Canadians live, work and learn," the report's summary says.

"Without access to fast, reliable, and affordable high-speed Internet and mobile cellular services, people residing in remote communities do not have the same opportunities as people residing in more urban areas."

Ottawa hasn't tracked gender equality aid results


A separate audit by the auditor general, released Monday, said that Global Affairs Canada (GAC) could not demonstrate that international aid programs meant to advance gender equality are working.

As part of Canada's Feminist International Assistance Policy, Global Affairs Canada (GAC) commits 15 per cent of its bilateral foreign aid to initiatives related to gender equality and improving women's quality of life. The government spends $3.5 billion yearly on bilateral development assistance for low and middle-income countries, says the report.

GAC has "significant weaknesses" when it comes to storing and managing project information, a news release on the auditor general's report said. As a result, says the release, GAC could not provide evidence to show that the programs are getting results.

"It is imperative that Global Affairs Canada act immediately to improve its information management practices and reporting on results to show parliamentarians and Canadians the value of Canada's bilateral international assistance to support women and girls in low- and middle-income countries," Hogan said in the news release.

Hogan reported that GAC also did not meet two of its three spending commitments under the Feminist International Assistance Policy.

"The department fell short on funding projects that directly supported the empowerment of women and girls or that were located in sub-Saharan Africa, where the benefit in terms of reducing poverty and advancing gender equality is typically higher," the news release said.
U of A only school in Canada with multiple winners of national Killam fellowships

Story by Craig Gilbert • 4h ago

Associate professor Temitope Oriola spoke at the Black Parents Association of Alberta (BPAA) rally at the Alberta legislature against racism experienced by Black students and parents in Alberta schools on July 25, 2020.© Greg Southam

Sheer elation, delight, joy. Ecstasy.

Dr. Temitope Oriola had all the good feels when he learned he would be one of eight winners of the recently reinstated Dorothy Killam Research Fellowships , part of the 2023 Killam Prize administered by Canada’s National Research Council (NRC).

But there was an extra layer of delight for the professor since his University of Alberta colleague, Dr. Kisha Supernant, was also named a Dorothy Killam Research Fellow.

That means the U of A is the only school in Canada with more than one recipient of the two-year, $80,000 annual research prize.

“Keep in mind, this is a national award from a national competition,” Oriola, a criminologist, said Thursday. “To be among eight winners is absolutely thrilling.”

The funding means Oriola, a professor in the U of A’s Centre for Criminological Research, will be able to hire four or five graduate students for his research project, which will seek out the perspectives of Black, Indigenous and people of colour working in the criminal justice system as lawyers, judges, police and correctional officers.

“This will bring in more graduate students who will be involved in the process not just as data collectors but collaborators,” he said, co-authoring papers and presenting the work to the public by attending conferences, for example.

They’ll be exploring how BIPOC individuals manage their identities as they navigate the criminal justice bureaucracy as employees.

“While much of what we hear about BIPOC people and the justice system is about victimization, these are BIPOC professionals who work in these organizations who do their best, like their other colleagues, to make a difference,” Oriola explained. “In a time of Black Lives Matter and calls to defund the police, how do BIPOC people view their role in the system?”

Oriola is inviting anyone who fits that description to contact him directly at oriola@ualberta.ca

The award represents a sort of reckoning of Oriola’s academic career. Being named a Killam Fellow about a decade after he was a Killam Scholar, supported by the same trust as a doctoral student, means coming “full circle” to what is a household name for established academics.

“Killam is an incredibly efficient and focused organization,” Oriola said. “They do a great job of showcasing cutting-edge research across the social sciences in Canada. It’s a path-breaking organization, one that’s been at the forefront of funding emerging scholars.”

Digging roots


Supernant’s work, which is closely tied to the discovery of unmarked graves at former residential school sites, could hardly be contained by a two-year fellowship. There is some groundwork she’s already done for her project, titled recognizing Indigenous data sovereignty and Indigenous rights in heritage management.

“Indigenous people don’t have rights to our own archeology,” she said. “This project is about empowering First Nations to assert their rights. How do nations themselves create a framework for protecting their heritage?”

Supernant also aims to advance the national conversation on the subject with an eye to aligning Canadian legislation with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.



Dr. Kisha Supernant, director of the Institute of Prairie and Indigenous Archaeology, University of Alberta, speaks about the discovery of 169 potential remains with ground penetrating radar at the former Grouard Mission site in Treaty 8 during a news conference in Edmonton on Tuesday, March 1, 2022. Photo by Ian Kucerak© Ian Kucerak

She hopes the work she’ll be able to do during the fellowship will build some momentum, and get to a place where the conversation can continue.

“No one expects all our work on this will be completed in two years,” she said. “The fellowship is designed to give me the space I need to move this forward and it’s a wonderful and exciting opportunity. It alleviates some teaching and administrative tasks I’d have otherwise, allowing me to focus on the project.”

Supernant will remain director of the Institute of Prairie and Indigenous Archaeology during her Killam fellowship, which will be “essential to the work of the project.”

Part of the plan involves the institute hosting a workshop/gathering of Indigenous leaders. The students she will have working will be involved in that conversation, as well.

“For me, the motivation for this work is thinking about the next generations,” she said. “There’s a lot of power in recognizing heritage. I’m always thinking about, ‘How can we build a better future for everyone?’”

A professor in the U of A’s anthropology department, she said it’s the right time to look to the past for a better future.

“I don’t think this work would have even been possible 10 or 15 years ago,” Supernant said. “When Indigenous people are empowered to tell their own stories, everyone benefits from an enriched understanding of the past.”

crgilbert@postmedia.com
@yegcraig


Related
World ‘population bomb’ may never go off as feared, finds study

Story by Jonathan Watts • Yesterday 

The long-feared “population bomb” may not go off, according to the authors of a new report that estimates that human numbers will peak lower and sooner than previously forecast.


Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images© Provided by The Guardian

The study, commissioned by the Club of Rome, projects that on current trends the world population will reach a high of 8.8 billion before the middle of the century, then decline rapidly. The peak could come earlier still if governments take progressive steps to raise average incomes and education levels.

The new forecasts are good news for the global environment. Once the demographic bulge is overcome, pressure on nature and the climate should start to ease, along with associated social and political tensions.

But the authors caution that falling birthrates alone will not solve the planet’s environmental problems, which are already serious at the 7.8 billion level and are primarily caused by the excess consumption of a wealthy minority.

Declining populations can also create new problems, such as a shrinking workforce and greater stress on healthcare associated with an ageing society, as countries like Japan and South Korea are finding.

Related video: UN Reports Climate Time Bomb Ticking But World Can Still Avert Worst Calamities (Dailymotion)

One of the authors of the report, Ben Callegari, said the findings were cause for optimism – but there was a catch. “This gives us evidence to believe the population bomb won’t go off, but we still face significant challenges from an environmental perspective. We need a lot of effort to address the current development paradigm of overconsumption and overproduction, which are bigger problems than population.”

Previous studies have painted a grimmer picture. Last year, the UN estimated the world population would hit 9.7 billion by the middle of the century and continue to rise for several decades afterwards.

The new projection, released on Monday, was carried out by the Earth4All collective of leading environmental science and economic institutions, including the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Stockholm Resilience Centre and the BI Norwegian Business School. They were commissioned by the Club of Rome for a followup to its seminal Limits to Growth study more than 50 years ago.

The report is based on a new methodology which incorporates social and economic factors that have a proven impact on birthrate, such as raising education levels, particularly for women, and improving income. It sketches out two scenarios depending on the extent to which such policies are pursued.

In the business-as-usual case, it foresees existing policies being enough to limit global population growth to below 9 billion in 2046 and then decline to 7.3 billion in 2100. This, they warn, is too little too late: “Although the scenario does not result in an overt ecological or total climate collapse, the likelihood of regional societal collapses nevertheless rises throughout the decades to 2050, as a result of deepening social divisions both internal to and between societies. The risk is particularly acute in the most vulnerable, badly governed and ecologically vulnerable economies.”

In the second, more optimistic scenario – with governments across the world raising taxes on the wealthy to invest in education, social services and improved equality – it estimates human numbers could hit a high of 8.5 billion as early as 2040 and then fall by more than a third to about 6 billion in 2100. Under this pathway, they foresee considerable gains by mid-century for human society and the natural environment.

“By 2050, greenhouse gas emissions are about 90% lower than they were in 2020 and are still falling,” according to the report. “Remaining atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gases from industrial processes are increasingly removed through carbon capture and storage. As the century progresses, more carbon is captured than stored, keeping the global temperature below 2C above pre-industrial levels. Wildlife is gradually recovering and starting to thrive once again in many places.”