Thursday, April 13, 2023

USSA
A hotline to report teachers ratchets up tensions in US schools

Teachers expressed confusion about the program and fears that they would be subject to investigations concerning 'inappropriate lessons'


OLIVIER TOURON/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES

BY TJ L'HEUREUX
13 APRIL 2023

Teachers in Arizona were put on notice last month with the launch of the Arizona Department of Education’s “Empower Hotline” that encourages parents to report “inappropriate” lessons being taught in public school classrooms. In a state that ranks last in average cost-of-living adjusted teacher salaries in the U.S., where nearly a quarter of teaching jobs are unfilled, Arizona educators already face plenty of challenges. The new hotline is only adding to the pile.

What counts as inappropriate? An official announcement on the Department of Education’s website says that parents should report lessons that focus on “race or ethnicity, rather than individuals and merit, promoting gender ideology, social emotional learning, or inappropriate sexual content.” The hotline closely mimics a project that Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin began in January 2022 and ended about eight months later due to receiving “little or no volume” of serious accusations, according to a Youngkin spokesperson.

The program was a key campaign promise of Arizona’s newly elected superintendent of public instruction, Tom Horne, whose platform focused on promoting right-wing notions of patriotism and attacking critical race theory. It is hard to come by an Arizona educator who would say that the scholarly theory — that race is a social construct used to oppress people of color — is taught in Arizona’s K-12 schools.

Horne insists otherwise and is quick to assert his dedication to studying U.S. history. “If I hadn’t been a lawyer, I would have been a history teacher,” Horne told me in an interview. “I’ve been reading history every day since I was 14.” Horne, who served as the superintendent of public instruction from 2003 to 2011, was the only Republican in Arizona to win a major statewide role last November.

His campaign website could be a case study in 21st century American far-right spin. Offering only dubious citations, the homepage sets up a mock polemic between Horne and his predecessor, Kathy Hoffman, in which he trots out right-wing, fear-mongering narratives about gender, race, slavery and capitalism in America, and of course about Covid-19. He attacks Hoffman for closing Arizona schools during the pandemic, offering social support for LGBTQ+ students and encouraging teachers to assign Nikole Hannah-Jones’ Pulitzer Prize-winning 1619 Project.
‘If they’re teaching about slavery, what are they supposed to say?’

The hotline was billed as a solution to these so-called problems. But Arizona public school teachers — the state employees whose work most directly affects student outcomes — have largely been left out of the discussion. What will the hotline mean for their work in the classroom? Teachers I spoke with expressed confusion about the program and fears that they would be subject to investigations concerning “inappropriate lessons.”

“Teachers are on a daily basis reaching out to us as union officers and asking if it’s okay to teach things in the approved curriculum,” said Kelley Fisher, who has taught kindergarten for 24 years. “If they’re teaching about slavery, what are they supposed to say? What can and can’t they say in their classrooms? They’re scared, and that should not be what happens in a classroom. Teachers should not be afraid to teach students to think for themselves.”

Others worry that the hotline will cause parents to complain to state officials rather than addressing their concerns directly with teachers or administrators, creating a dynamic that could foster distrust and make it harder to resolve conflicts.

“There are already very well established ways for parents to bring concerns directly to teachers, or, if necessary, the school principal or administration,” said Emily Kirkland, a spokesperson for the Arizona Education Association. “The hotline goes around those existing systems entirely and leaves teachers with no due process at all. It’s really poorly thought out.”

Amber Gould, who has taught English for 12 years in the Glendale Union High School District and serves as treasurer for the Arizona Education Association, was among several educators who said they had received no guidance about what to expect from hotline reports or how to respond to investigations. In an interview, Horne confirmed that the department has not issued guidance to teachers.

Horne is primarily concerned about parents who feel they aren’t listened to, not teachers, he told me. “This has been intended to be a way for parents to communicate with us,” he said. He acknowledged concerns about bypassing existing systems, adding that parents with complaints should go to teachers and principals first. “[The hotline] wasn’t intended to do that,” he said. With regard to the process, Horne said he believes that the department would call the principal first, then the teacher, who would be asked to stop teaching whatever had triggered the call. “If they persist, theoretically we would make a discipline referral to the state board,” he said.

For Kelley Fisher, the hotline is an effort that neither helps teachers nor ensures that students are receiving the best instruction possible.

“This hotline was about appeasing the people who got [Horne] elected,” said the veteran kindergarten teacher. “It’s not about transparency in the classroom, it’s not about making sure teachers are doing a good job.”
Attacking standard K-12 teaching techniques

Perhaps most worrisome to educators is Horne’s vilification of social emotional learning, a key method used by teachers to help students learn to communicate, solve problems and act with compassion toward others. With little concrete evidence, Horne has alleged that teachers are using social emotional learning techniques to disguise their teaching of critical race theory, echoing narratives from right-wing organizations like the Center for Renewing America.





Related Articles

Missouri librarians are risking jail time – for doing their jobs


America’s culture warriors are going after librarians

Several teachers expressed confusion about the link between critical race theory and social emotional learning, which they say are completely different. Abby Knight, a kindergarten teacher in the Kyrene School District, said the current discourse has created a deep misunderstanding about what social emotional learning is.

“There is a level of disconnect when you’re not in the classroom and you’re not doing it,” she said. “SEL is made up of really basic concepts that, if you’re not an educator, you don’t realize are crucial to teaching young kids.”

She explained that you need to teach kids how to communicate effectively, problem solve, consider others and understand what constitutes an appropriate behavior for a given circumstance, in order to foster an effective learning environment.

“Learning really doesn’t take place unless there’s a lot of behavioral work that goes into a classroom,” Knight said.
Empowering pranksters while leaving teachers behind

What has the hotline actually achieved since its mid-March launch? It has seen plenty of action but almost no reports of “inappropriate” lessons. Instead, its staff have been bombarded by thousands of prank calls from outside Arizona and about 1,000 calls from within the state, the vast majority of which also came from pranksters. In an email, Arizona Department of Education spokesperson Rick Medina said that as of April 10, the department had received only a handful of calls that warranted investigation.

Horne said there was one serious hotline case he was aware of: “Someone called us about [a teacher] evangelizing in the classroom. We called the principal who said he was aware of it already, so we dropped it.”

Meanwhile, Arizona educators continue to face very real pressures that the hotline isn’t going to fix. The state is facing a critical shortage of teachers — one in five positions is unfilled — and wages haven’t kept pace with economic changes. Nevertheless, state-mandated responsibilities keep rising.

“People are leaving because it’s not feasible mentally or financially,” Knight said.

“It’s about the way teachers are being treated and it’s driving them out of the classroom,” Kelley Fisher said. “There are plenty of people in this state who are certified to be teachers, but they just don’t want to be teachers right now. It’s really sad.”

Amber Gould, who began teaching at the end of Horne’s last stint as the public schools superintendent, said she felt deja vu about his return to office. “I would hope that we’re able to have conversations with [Horne], because at the end of the day I hope that he wants to do what’s best for kids and not necessarily for his political talking points.”

It remains to be seen whether the hotline will fizzle out like in Virginia or lead to actual investigations into teacher conduct.

“I honestly feel like it’s more of a publicity stunt for Superintendent Horne and his office, but when the fight comes, we’re going to be ready,” Gould said. “We know our rights and we know that in the end, we’re going to do what’s best for kids.”

Support Coda


TJ L'Heureux is a freelance reporter and writer based in Phoenix.@tjlheureux0

Subsidy-Loving Elon Musk Roasted Over Call to ‘Defund NPR’: ‘Tesla Gets More Funding and Grants from the Government’

JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images

Elon Musk, yet again, sparked a backlash over one of his online hot takes on Wednesday. Musk tweeted an email from NPR’s tech reporter Bobby Allyn asking for comment on NPR’s decision to abandon Twitter. The Twitter CEO then replied to his own tweet, “Defund @NPR.” Critics were quick to seize on both the fact that NPR’s government funding is already at very low levels and Musk himself built his businesses on billions in government subsidies.

Musk’s call to “Defund NPR” came just hours after the GOP-led House Judiciary Committee tweeted the same call – fresh off its infamous “Kayne. Elon. Trump.” tweet, which was eventually deleted.

Allyn’s email read, “Because of the label, NPR is quitting Twitter across all of our 50+ accounts. Our executives say the government-funded media label calls into question our editorial independence and undermines our credibility.”

Allyn was referring to Musk’s Twitter labeling NPR “state-affiliated” media earlier in the week, which Musk later noted wasn’t quite accurate and the label was changed to “government-funded.” Musk kicked up a similar controversy by labeling the publicly funded BBC as “government funded.” The BBC label now says “publicly funded.”

“Some wonder if this will cause a chain reaction among news orgs. What’s your reaction?” Allyn’s email asked.

While Musk made his reaction clear, he sparked a bevy of quick and angry reactions. Musk has become an ever-increasingly polarizing figure since he bought Twitter for a highly overinflated price, promising to be a “free speech absolutist” searching for truth.

He sparked angry condemnation for sharing — and later deleting — a loathsome conspiracy theory about the brutal attack on Paul Pelosi, which was later completely debunked.  Musk has since managed to stay in the headlines with stunts like changing Twitter’s logo to the Dogecoin dog and removing the “W” in the headquarter’s sign so that it reads “T–itter.”

Critics pulled no punches in going after the eccentric billionaire.

“Our government already defunded NPR which is only one of several reasons why this whole plutocratic news cycle is so stupid,” wrote LA Times reporter Matt Pearce who also shared an article detailing the funding cuts for public radio dating back decades.

“NPR gets >1% of its funds from federal grants, grants which other non-profit newsrooms could apply for,” wrote Mother Jones’s Clara Jeffery, adding, “Neither Tesla or SpaceX would exist without MASSIVE government subsidies. Should they be defunded?”

“You seem to be a bit busy defunding Twitter,” jested podcaster Tommy Vietor.

“Tesla gets more funding and grants from the government than NPR does,” wrote tech journalist Zach Nelson, aka ‘JerryRigEverything.’ “And Tesla gets hardly any. So that’s saying something.”

Below are more reactions roasting Musk:

Have a tip we should know? tips@mediaite.com

Junior Doctor Really Puts The Amount Needed To Restore Pay Into Perspective

The government appears to have spent more for less substantial rewards in the past.


By Kate Nicholson
12/04/2023 
HUFFPOST

People hold British Medical Association (BMA) branded placards calling for better pay, as they stand on a picket line outside University College Hospital (UCH)
BEN STANSALL VIA GETTY IMAGES

A member of the BMA Union really put the pay rise the junior doctors are asking for into context during an interview with Sky News this week.

Junior doctors are in the middle of a four-day strike which is already being dubbed the most disruptive walkout in NHS history, with an estimated 250,000 appointments cancelled as a result.

Organised by the British Medical Association (BMA), the walkout comes on the back of the four-day Easter bank holiday weekend – meaning demand for services is even higher than normal.

But, the BMA says newly qualified medics earn just over £14 an hour and that their pay has fallen by 26% in real terms over the past 15 years.

RELATED NHSS KY NEWSJUNIOR DOCTORSSTRIKES UNION STRIKES

'Pricing Out An Entire Generation!' NHS Surgeon On Why Junior Doctors Turned To Strikes


It says that full pay restoration in the financial year of 2022/23 will cost £1.65 billion – with £0.62 billion returned to the Treasury for income tax and National Insurance contributions.

But the government just claimed that this works out to be a 35% pay increase, an “unreasonable” hike.

Dr Arjan Singh said: ”£37 billion was spent on a disastrous test and trace system, £4 billion on PPE that never saw the light of day and £3 billion on agency staff in the NHS – a demand that is only so high because we can’t retain doctors and start to work on a full-time NHS contract.”

It is worth noting though that – as FullFact found – around £29.5 billion was actually spent on the NHS test and trace, although it had a budget of £37 billion.

But the government did admit that it planned to burn £4 billion worth of PPE bought in the first year of the pandemic to “generate power” last June and ministers did say last year that the NHS in England had spent £3 billion on agency staff to fill gaps.

Dr Singh continued: “So the question isn’t, is it realistic to pay junior doctors, is the money there? The money is there.

“The real question we should ask is, is it realistic to expect a world-class healthcare service if you’re going to continually and vociferously cut the wages of doctors working in that system?



“The answer’s no.”

In the interview, Sky News presenter Sally Lockwood also pointed out that the BMA used the retail price index (RPI) to work out how much junior doctors’ pay has been cut.

She claimed the consumer price index “is normally used when it comes to measuring inflation for pay negotiations”, which puts the real-terms cut to doctors’ wages at 16% instead of the BMA’s suggested 26%.

She asked: “Would it not make more sense to have a more realistic demand?”

Dr Singh explained: “We use RPI – RPI is used for student loans, and junior doctors, as I’ve said, are in excess of £100,000.

“It’s also the best measure for housing costs, which is something junior doctors struggle with the most.”

The BMA has also said that health secretary Steve Barclay is refusing to negotiate and that the strikes would stop if pay was just raised to £19 an hour.

MUSK HAS A FRIEND IN CONGRESS —
House Republican tries to protect Musk and Twitter from FTC investigation

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) subpoenas FTC, claims it "harassed" Twitter and Musk.


JON BRODKIN - 4/12/2023

US Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) speaks at CPAC (Conservative Political Action Conference) in Washington, DC, on March 2, 2023.
Getty Images | Pacific Press237WITH

A Republican lawmaker who chairs a key House committee subpoenaed Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan today in an attempt to rein in the agency's ongoing investigation into Twitter.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), chairman of the Judiciary Committee and the newly created Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, told Kahn today that his committee's research shows "the FTC harassed Twitter in the wake of Mr. Musk's acquisition" and "abused it [sic] statutory and enforcement authority."

Jordan teamed up with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) last month to demand documents from the FTC about what they called "inappropriate and burdensome demands coinciding with Elon Musk's acquisition of the company." Jordan wasn't happy with Khan's response, so he followed up with today's subpoena.

"To date, your voluntary compliance has been woefully insufficient. Accordingly, the Committee is issuing a subpoena to compel the production of documents necessary to inform our oversight," Jordan wrote in a letter to Khan today.
Khan: We “enforce the law without fear or favor”

In response, an FTC spokesperson told news outlets that "we have made multiple offers to brief Chairman Jordan's staff on our investigation into Twitter. Those are standing offers made prior to this entirely unnecessary subpoena."

Khan reportedly told Jordan in a March 27 reply that FTC investigations are confidential and that the agency "will continue to faithfully discharge our statutory obligations and enforce the law without fear or favor." She also wrote that ensuring compliance is especially critical "when dealing with recidivists," referring to Twitter's earlier privacy transgressions.

Jordan did not release a copy of today's subpoena, but last month's letter requested all documents and communications "referring or relating to the FTC's investigation(s) of Twitter for the period April 1, 2022, to the present," and all communications "referring or relating to Mr. Musk's purchase of Twitter or the FTC's investigation of Twitter."

Musk is apparently concerned about the investigation into Twitter's privacy and data practices, as he requested a meeting with Khan late last year. Khan declined the meeting request and told Twitter that she was "troubled by Twitter's delays and the obstacles that these delays are creating for the FTC's investigation."

The FTC investigation reportedly focuses on whether Twitter is complying with conditions in a May 2022 settlement with the agency in which it agreed to pay a $150 million penalty for targeting ads at users with phone numbers and email addresses collected from those users when they enabled two-factor authentication. Twitter was already subject to a 2011 settlement that prohibited the company from misrepresenting its privacy and security practices.

Jordan dismisses FTC answer as “pretextual”


Jordan claims the FTC has gone beyond the stated purpose of the investigation. "On March 27, 2023, you sent a response letter seeking to justify the scope of the FTC's inquiry into Twitter by linking it to the terms of a narrower FTC Order related to Twitter's privacy practices," Jordan wrote, arguing that "the FTC's requests to Twitter were not limited to the scope of the Order, making the FTC's justification pretextual at best."

Jordan objected to the FTC asking for "the identities of the journalists with whom it was engaging." That's a reference to a December 13, 2022, request the FTC made related to Musk's release of the so-called "Twitter Files."

The FTC asked Twitter to identify any journalists who were "granted any type of access to the Company's internal communications (e.g., Slack, emails)" or to internal documents and files since Musk bought the company. The FTC request noted that journalist Bari Weiss "was reportedly given access to Twitter's employee systems, added to its Slack channel(s), and given a company laptop," and that she and other journalists were provided "extensive, unfiltered access to Twitter's internal communication and systems."

The FTC request was shown in the Judiciary Committee staff report titled, "The weaponization of the Federal Trade Commission: An agency's overreach to harass Elon Musk's Twitter." As reported by The Wall Street Journal today, the FTC letter also asked Twitter to say "whether the journalists were background-checked, and what steps the company took to ensure they didn't gain unauthorized access to sensitive user data."

Khan told Jordan in her reply letter last month that the FTC was concerned about journalists potentially being given access to user information. "Since the threat to Twitter users' privacy and security can arise any time anyone outside of Twitter is accessing users' personal information, there is no journalist exemption to the FTC's order," she wrote.

GOP accused of pushing Musk’s narrative


At a hearing last month, Democrat Stacey Plaskett reportedly accused Republicans of using "cherry-picked, out-of-context emails and screenshots designed to promote [Musk's] chosen narrative."

Plaskett is a nonvoting delegate to the House from the US Virgin Islands. According to The Wall Street Journal, she said that "Musk is helping you out politically, and you're going out of your way to promote and protect him."

The Jordan-chaired Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government was created in January after Republicans took control of the House. In February, Jordan subpoenaed Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft for documents related to what he called "the federal government's reported collusion with Big Tech to suppress free speech."

Separately, New York County District Attorney Alvin Bragg sued Jordan and other members of the Judiciary Committee in a federal court yesterday over their alleged attempts to interfere with the prosecution and investigation of former President Donald Trump. Bragg's lawsuit criticized Jordan and his committee for overstepping their authority, saying: "Congress has no power to supervise state criminal prosecutions."