Tuesday, April 25, 2023

LIBERAL FEMINISM
Women's shelters across Canada are losing nearly $150 million in federal funding

Story by Marina von Stackelberg • Yesterday - CBC

The more than 600 women's shelters across Canada will soon lose hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding they say has kept them afloat during the pandemic and is still desperately needed.

Since April 2020, Ottawa has provided $300 million in emergency pandemic funding to organizations that fight violence against women. Nearly half of that sum — about $145 million — went to fund women's shelters. On average, each shelter received nearly $130,000 extra a year under the pandemic program.

That funding stream is set to expire in September.

"This money is absolutely needed," said Frances Daly, the shelter director at Oshki Kizis Lodge, an Indigenous women's shelter in Ottawa. It received nearly $640,000 through the program.

"The funding that we've gotten during COVID has alleviated suffering. And the absence of it will mean that there will be suffering."


Frances Daly of Oshki Kizis Lodge in Ottawa says the additional funds from the federal government helped fill many holes in their patchwork budget.© Michel Aspirot/CBC

The funding came as women's shelters reported an uptick in demand for their services during the pandemic. Domestic violence flared during the pandemic due to a host of factors, including isolation restrictions that cut women off from regular support systems.

Shelters used the money to hire extra staff, pay for desperately-needed upgrades to their buildings and run programs like child care.

They also spent it on additional emergency supports for women and their children — helping them out with food and medication, transportation, or paying for emergency accommodation in hotels when shelter beds were full.

"We've been able to buy clothing for women who've had to flee and had nothing but flip flops and a pair of pajamas on when they got here," Daly said.

"We've filled in all these little gaps that come up that seem small, but are huge when people are facing them."



Erin Lee, who runs Lanark County Interval House and Community Support in the Ottawa Valley, said many of the family violence issues made worse by the pandemic haven't gone away.© Michel Aspirot/CBC

While pandemic restrictions have ended, the need for the extra money has not, said Erin Lee, executive director of Lanark County Interval House. It runs a women's shelter in the Ottawa Valley.

"It's certainly not over in terms of the incidents and the level of incidents that were exacerbated through COVID," Lee said. "The recovery for women in terms of healing, in terms of family law and navigating the system, is far from over.

Related video: Vital support for women's shelters about to run out (cbc.ca)
Duration 2:12  View on Watch

cbc.caCanada Soccer execs questioned over treatment of women's team
1:44

Global News'People are getting the message that it's ok to act out, cross lines': Sociology professor reflects on COVID-19 pandemic's impact on crime
1:43


"This support was invaluable to our communities, especially folks like us who are in a rural community."

The shelter used its extra $540,000 to pay for food hampers, establish a day program for kids experiencing domestic violence and hire a housing advocate, among other things.

Minister won't commit to extending funding

The federal minister for the status of women said the government "will not leave women and organizations in a lurch" but did not commit to renewing the money.

"I will not say at this point that I won't extend funding. I think that these are decisions that are being made," said Marci Ien.

"I will say and continue to say to the organizations that we've had their back and will continue to have her back."

The funding cut comes after the recent inquiry report on the mass shooting that left 22 people dead in Nova Scotia called intimate partner and family violence an "epidemic" that needs to be funded by all orders of government at pandemic levels.

In the most recent federal budget, released just days before the inquiry's final report, Ottawa did not commit any new money for tackling domestic violence and offered nothing to fund women's shelters. Instead, it set aside $53 million each year for the "Women's Program." It funds one-time projects under the general banner of addressing women's equality.

Unlike previous funding, the Women's Program money can't be used to help with an organization's operations.

'Enough to keep the lights on'


"There is no indication of any future money coming," said Kaitlin Geiger-Bardswich, a spokesperson for Women's Shelters Canada. The non-profit was tasked with distributing $120 million of the pandemic funding to women's shelters outside of Quebec.

"Shelters are always underfunded," she added. "This money was a temporary relief."

Women's shelters in Canada currently operate on a patchwork of funding. Most receive core operating funds from their provinces or territories through various models.

"It's enough to maybe keep their lights on and keep the building functioning," Geiger-Bardswich said.

Women's shelters usually rely on donors, fundraising and one-time grants from all levels of government to make up their remaining budgets and help pay for staff and services, Geiger-Bardswich said.

Federal funding, Geiger-Bardswich said, usually comes as one-time grants.

That's why the pandemic money was vital, she said, because shelters could use it to cover anything they needed.

"It was a recognition that the work you're doing is life-saving," she said. "You don't have to come up with a new and innovative way of doing it."

The money also came at a vital time, she said, as the high cost of living and the housing crisis have together made it even harder for women and children fleeing a violent home to find a safe place to live.

"It was literally life-saving both for keeping the shelters open, and for saving the lives of the women and children who are accessing them," she said.
1 dead, 1 injured in blast at Chicago area petroleum plant

Story by The Canadian Press • 

LEMONT, Ill. (AP) — An explosion and fire at a suburban Chicago petroleum refinery killed one person and injured a second Tuesday morning, authorities said.


1 dead, 1 injured in blast at Chicago area petroleum plant© Provided by The Canadian Press

The Will County Sheriff’s Office said one person was confirmed dead and a second was transported to a hospital in Joliet with injuries following the explosion at Seneca Petroleum in Lemont, Illinois.

Dan Tasso, chief of the Lemont Fire Protection District, said that aside from the fatality, one person suffered a minor injury.

He said his department received a call for assistance about 9:40 a.m. Tuesday and the fire at the plant was under control within about 40 minutes.

The sheriff’s office said the explosion brought down some power lines at the plant in Chicago's southwestern suburbs.

“Initial reports indicate that the explosion may be from an asphalt tank. Fire personnel do not believe that any type of hazmat situation has occurred and there is no danger to the public,” the sheriff's office said in a news release.

A number listed for Seneca Petroleum rang unanswered Tuesday afternoon.

Television footage of the scene showed damage to several circular tanks at the complex, with large pieces of debris on the ground and yellow railing hanging from more than one tank. Apparent power lines were also visible on top of a damaged pickup truck at the site, which is adjacent to railroad tracks and a roadway.

The Illinois Occupational Safety and Health Administration was called to the scene, as well as ComEd, the local utility, the sheriff's office said.

Tasso said the Will County Coroner's Office and the Illinois State Fire Marshal were also investigating the incident.

Lemont is a village located in Cook, DuPage, and Will counties southwest of Chicago.

The Associated Press
Tsleil-Waututh Nation urges banks to stop financing Trans Mountain Expansion Project

Story by The Canadian Press • Yesterday 2:30 p.m.

A coalition of First Nations groups are calling on Canada’s six largest banks to cease lending funds to the Trans Mountain Expansion project (TMX).

The Tsleil-Waututh Nation and the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs (UBCIC) have written letters to the CEOs of RBC, BMO, TD, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank, urging them to reconsider the $10 billion loan currently being negotiated for the pipeline.

The proposal for further funding comes after the cost of the controversial project mushroomed from $21 billion to $31 billion in March.

In a letter to RBC, included within a statement released April 19, the Nation said the bank’s involvement with the project is a violation of the rights and interests of Indigenous communities—one that contradicts their own public commitments to reconciliation and addressing climate change.

“You say climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our age and that RBC has an important role in supporting the most significant economic transition in centuries. You also commit to acting on reconciliation 'in genuine and meaningful ways.' But actions speak louder than words,” it reads.

“Your decision to further finance TMX will be a litmus test of the sincerity of your commitments, and your role in propping up the pipeline will mean that your bank will forever be linked to Canada’s greatest boondoggle.”

If granted, the funding would mark the second time Canadian banks have fronted large sums to finish the pipeline expansion. Financial support was given last year, when Trans Mountain announced the estimated cost of the project had grown to $21.4 billion, a four-fold increase in cost since the project was purchased by Canada in 2018 for $4.5 billion.

The letter said the Nation was “dismayed” to learn that last year’s initial $10 billion loan is earning the bank 1.85 per cent interest—below the prime rate at the time and below the interest rates that Canadians are currently facing.

“This means RBC chose to provide a preferential rate to the oil and gas sector, and forego potential earnings, contrary to your own shareholders’ interests."

The letter noted the loan would expose the public to further potential losses, with Canadians likely to lose “tens of billions of dollars” on the pipeline and tanker project.

Among the signatories was the Nation’s Director Treaty Lands and Resources Gabriel George and the UBCIC Executive Grand Chief and President Stewart Phillip, and Vice-President Chief Don Tom.

“The banks are lying about their commitments to reconciliation and to helping the climate,” said Charlene Aleck, the Nation’s Sacred Trust Spokesperson.

“There isn’t even a good business case for their actions. The banks are losing money for their shareholders to prop up a costly, devastating and archaic oil pipeline project.”

Aleck said the project is a threat to the life and culture of the local Tsleil-Waututh community, affecting everything from the survival of the southern resident killer whales to the Nation’s ability to practise their traditions and culture in the Burrard Inlet.

President of the UBCIC, Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, said the bank’s actions contradict the promises it has been making as a company.

“It is an absolute disgrace that RBC and Canadian banks are positioning themselves as fossil fuel lenders of last resort while painting an image of a corporation that cares about people and the planet,” he said.

“This is disgusting colonial era corporate greed in real time.”

Mina Kerr-Lazenby is the North Shore News’ Indigenous and civic affairs reporter. This reporting beat is made possible by the Local Journalism Initiative.

MKerrLazenby@nsnews.comtwitter.com/MinaKerrLazenby



Gap to cut hundreds of jobs in new round of layoffs - WSJ

(Reuters) -Apparel retailer Gap Inc is eliminating hundreds of jobs from its global workforce, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the situation.


A sign hangs outside a GAP clothing retail store in Manhattan, New York© Thomson Reuters

The company joins a growing number of American firms, including tech giant Facebook-parent Meta Platforms Inc and consumer companies Clorox Co and Wayfair Inc, to downsize its workforce amid mounting worries of a recession in the United States.

The current round of job cuts at Gap is expected to be larger than the roughly 500 corporate roles it eliminated in September, the report added.

Gap declined to comment on the report.

The company began notifying the employees it planned to lay off in its international sourcing division on April 18, the report said, adding that it plans to inform staff about prospective layoffs at its San Francisco headquarters this week.

As of Jan. 28, 2023, the company had a workforce of about 95,000 employees, according to a regulatory filing.

(Reporting by Granth Vanaik in Bengaluru; Editing by Subhranshu Sahu)
ABOLISH SCOTUS
A property owned by Neil Gorsuch was bought by the head of a major law firm days after he was confirmed to the Supreme Court: Politico

Story by rcohen@insider.com (Rebecca Cohen) • TODAY

Supreme Court Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch. 
Jabin Botsford - Pool/Getty Images

A property owned by Neil Gorsuch was bought by the head of a law firm days after Gorsuch joined the Supreme Court.

The chief executive of Greenberg Traurig bought a home in Granby, Colorado co-owned by Gorsuch.

Politico reported that Gorsuch held a 20% stake in the home.


A property co-owned by Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch was bought by the head of a major law firm just days after Gorsuch was confirmed to the Supreme Court, Politico reported.

On April 16, 2017, Brian Duffy, the chief executive of Greenberg Traurig, bought a 3,000-square-foot home in Granby, Colorado, co-owned by Gorsuch and two others, Politico reported, citing real estate records.

Gorsuch was confirmed to the Supreme Court on April 7, 2017.

Politico reported that Gorsuch held a 20% stake in the home and, citing the Justice's federal disclosure form, reported that Gorsuch profited somewhere between $250,001 and $500,000 from the $1.825 million sale. On the same forms, Gorsuch declined to note the purchaser of the property, according to Politico.

Clarence Thomas defense falls apart: SCOTUS did review case involving billionaire pal Harlan Crow

Story by Areeba Shah • SALON -TODAY

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's close friend Harlan Crow, who funded luxury vacations and private jet flights for the justice and his wife, had business before the Supreme Court, according to documents reviewed by Bloomberg.


Clarence ThomasOLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images© Provided by Salon

In January 2005, the architecture firm Womack+Hampton Architects LLC filed a petition seeking over $25 million from Trammell Crow Residential Co., which was co-owned by Crow Holdings, for allegedly violating copyrighted building designs. But the court refused to review the appeal and Thomas was not noted to have recused himself or dissented in the one-sentence order issued, according to Bloomberg.

"Given his vast wealth and business interests, it would be supremely naive to think that Harlan Crow would not at some point have a financial interest in the outcome of a case that could come before the Supreme Court," Virginia Canter, chief ethics counsel for the D.C.-based watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, told Salon. "The fact that such a case apparently did come before the Court in January 2005 is hardly surprising."

Related

ProPublica investigation published earlier this month revealed that Thomas accepted luxury vacations around the globe for more than two decades from the Republican megadonor. Crow offered gifts and travel worth tens of thousands of dollars, including a private jet trip and a stay on a private island.

While Thomas has faced scrutiny for failing to disclose that such trips were financed by his billionaire friend, he has defended himself, saying he was advised "by colleagues and others in the judiciary" against doing so since Crow "did not have business before the court."

"What is surprising is that unlike the executive and legislative branches, the Supreme Court has no Code of Conduct and no $20 or $50 cap or other restriction that bars Members of the Court from accepting more expensive gifts from persons who first befriend them after their Court appointment," Canter said. "If they had, it surely would have prevented this type of potential conflict of interest from arising in the first place."

Although the Crow name is not explicitly mentioned in the case caption, a disclosure statement attached to the filing reveals that the corporate parent of Metric Holdings is linked to Trammell Crow Residential Company. Crow's office told Bloomberg that the Crow family held a non-controlling interest in Trammell Crow Residential Company during that period.

When the architecture firm submitted its appeal to the Supreme Court, Crow served as the CEO and chairman of the board at Crow Holdings, a position that he still holds. But in 2017, he stepped down as CEO, according to Bloomberg.

Related video: Senator Calls For Clarence Thomas To Resign: 'Unsalvageable' (Newsweek)
Duration 1:00   View on Watch

"At the time of this case, Trammell Crow Residential operated completely independently of Crow Holdings with a separate management team and its own independent operations," Crow's office told Bloomberg in a statement.

Crow Holdings only had a minority interest in the parties involved in the case and had no control over any of these entities, the statement said, adding that Harlan Crow and Crow Holdings were not involved in the case.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

There has been growing pressure on justices to increase transparency regarding their financial disclosures and activities. This is not the first time that Thomas has faced allegations of ethical misconduct, including conflicts of interest and failure to disclose his wife's sources of income as required by law.

Following ProPublica's investigation, CREW filed a complaint calling for both civil and criminal investigations into Thomas' alleged violations of federal law for failing to disclose hundreds of thousands of dollars in gifts from and property sales to Crow.

"Justice Thomas's acceptance of and failure to disclose these repeated, lavish gifts and shocking real estate sales not only undermines public trust in his ability to serve impartially on the Court, it undermines confidence in the Supreme Court as an institution," CREW President Noah Bookbinder said in the complaint.

Thomas' lack of disclosure about these trips is a clear violation of government ethics law, legal experts say.

But his approach to ethics has long been criticized, especially after he didn't recuse himself from cases that included the involvement of his wife, Ginni Thomas, in efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden earlier this week asked Crow to provide a full account of gifts he has made to Thomas over the years, NBC News reported.

Wyden requested a detailed list of all of Thomas' free flights on Crow's private jets and superyacht, an accounting of federal gift tax returns for gifts made to Thomas or his family and information about three Georgia properties Crow bought from Thomas and his relatives, according to the report.

While there are exemptions from the gift tax for certain payments, Wyden noted, "none of these exemptions appear to apply to any gifts you made to Justice Thomas."

The Supreme Court last month tightened its rules for what judges and justices need to include in annual financial disclosure statements. The change took place just weeks before the ProPublica article was published.

"Justice Thomas and conservative billionaire Harlan Crow have carried out a decades-long improper financial relationship at the highest levels," Accountable.US president Kyle Herrig said. "Their cozy relationship has undermined the integrity of our nation's highest court — and they must be held accountable."

Read more  about Clarence Thomas






Towards smarter agriculture: automatic identification of crop heads with artificial intelligence

Novel approach can generate large synthetic datasets to train deep learning models for smart agricultural applications

Peer-Reviewed Publication

NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY THE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), alongside drones and digital cameras, have greatly extended the frontiers of smart agriculture. One attractive use case for these technologies is precision agriculture. In this modern approach to farming, the idea is to optimize crop production by gathering precise data about plants and the state of the field, and then act accordingly. For example, by analyzing aerial images of crops, AI models can determine what parts of a field need more attention, as well as the current stage of development of the plants.

Among all the crop monitoring functions that AI can do, crop head counting remains as one of the most challenging to implement. Images of crops contain densely packed, repeating patterns that are usually irregular and overlapped, making it difficult for deep learning models to automatically detect specific plant organs. Ideally, one would train such models using thousands of manually annotated images, in which pixels belonging to crop heads are pre-specified. In practice, however, annotating crop images is extremely tedious and time-consuming.

To address this issue, a research team including Assistant Professor Lingling Jin from the University of Saskatchewan, Canada, developed an innovative technique that can simplify the training and development of deep learning models. Their approach, which is described in a paper recently made available online on 24 February 2023 in Plant Phenomics, could promote a more widespread adoption of AI in agriculture.

To illustrate their idea, the team focused on the identification (or ‘segmentation’) of wheat heads in crop images as an example use case. Their strategy revolves around generating a synthetic annotated dataset. That is, instead of manually marking pixels belonging to wheat heads in hundreds of images, they devised a convenient way to produce artificial images in which the wheat heads are automatically marked.

First, the researchers recorded short videos of a wheat field and of other locations without wheat plants (also called ‘background’ videos). From the footage of the wheat field, they extracted a small number of still frames and manually annotated them, identifying all the wheat heads. Then, using frames from the background videos as a canvas, they generated synthetic wheat images by pasting ‘cutouts’ of the manually segmented wheat heads onto them. This approach enabled the team to produce thousands of training images for a deep learning model with minimal effort.   

To further improve the model, which was based on a customized U-Net architecture, the researchers also employed various domain adaptation techniques. These techniques fine-tuned the algorithm so that it would perform better on images from various real-world wheat fields, even though it was trained mainly on synthetic images. Numerous tests on an open-access dataset revealed impressive gains in accuracy, as Jin highlights: “Our approach established—and by a wide margin in performance—a new state-of-the-art model for wheat head segmentation.

Worth noting, the techniques showcased in this work are not limited to identifying wheat heads. In this regard, Jin remarks: “While we showed the utility of the proposed method for wheat head segmentation, it could be applied to other applications that have similar dense repeating patterns of objects, such as segmenting plant organs in other crop species or segmenting molecular components in microscopy images.” Hence, this work paints a bright future for deep learning both in agriculture and other fields.

Let us hope further polishing of these AI techniques pave the way to a world where we can all work smarter, not harder!

###

Reference

Authors

Keyhan Najafian1, Alireza Ghanbari2, Mahdi Sabet Kish3, Mark Eramian1, Gholam Hassan Shirdel2, Ian Stavness1, Lingling Jin1, and Farhad Maleki4

Affiliations

1Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan

2Mathematics Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Qom

3Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Science, Shahid Beheshti University

4Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary

Corresponding author email: lingling.jin@cs.usask.cafarhad.maleki1@ucalgary.ca 

 

Stanford and MIT study: A.I. boosted worker productivity by 14%—those who use it 'will replace those who don't'

Story by Jennifer Liu • 12h ago

Artificial intelligence tools like chatbots helped boost worker productivity at one tech company by 14%, according to new research from Stanford and MIT that was first reported by Bloomberg.



The study is thought to be the first major real-world application of generative AI in the workplace. Researchers measured productivity of more than 5,000 customer support agents, based primarily in the Philippines, at a Fortune 500 enterprise software firm over the course of a year.

Tech support agents who used AI tools that created conversational scripts boosted their productivity, measured as issues resolved per hour, by 14% on average, but the improvement was even more pronounced for "novice and low-skilled workers" who were able to get their work done 35% faster.

In some cases, using AI trumped having real-life work experience: Customer service agents with two months of experience who used AI support performed as well or better than agents with over six months of experience working without AI.

Meanwhile, the use of AI tools showed a minimal impact on "experienced or highly skilled workers," the authors note, and at times served as a distraction.

AI support can be especially helpful to entry-level or early-career workers, says Lindsey Raymond, an MIT Ph.D. candidate and co-author of the paper. Less experienced workers benefit from AI by taking its recommendations to get up to speed and learn skillsets that usually come with experience.

With that said, AI tools benefit from the best and brightest workers training the AI itself by providing examples of best practices, which the technology then turns into recommendations for others workers to apply.

Businesses should understand that, despite less dramatic changes in productivity, high-performing employees should be recognized and compensated for generating the solutions that others can learn from, Raymond says.
Happier workers and customers

The year-long experiment also revealed that AI assistance improved customer satisfaction, reduced requests for managerial intervention and improved employee retention.

The research isn't meant to hypothesize whether AI will replace workers, Raymond says, but rather concludes the technology will help workers more effectively multitask and handle more complicated questions faster.

Better and faster work led to happier customers, who were in turn nicer to customer service agents and improved employee retention, Raymond says.

Tools that make people more effective at their jobs make the experience of work less stressful, she adds.

Results that generative AI can boost productivity is generally good news, though the biggest benefits may not be evenly distributed, says Erik Brynjolfsson, the director of the Digital Economy Lab at the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI, and co-author on the report. "There's no guarantee we'll all benefit, but it certainly sets the table for us all being better off," he says.

'Workers who work with generative AI will replace those who don't'

Brynjolfsson says call centers are a great place to use generative AI because it involves a lot of scripted language, but that "almost any kind of information or knowledge work that involves language could benefit from this," including across legal, marketing, medicine, teaching and other fields.

Workers at all levels can benefit from the technology, he adds — he recently spoke with a CEO who used generative AI to prepare for a board meeting.

"Probably over half of the U.S. workforce will be significantly affected by these tools," Brynjolfsson says.

He adds that workers, especially young workers, can stay ahead of the curve by embracing the reality of the technology: "Workers who embrace the technology, play around with it and learn how to use it are the ones that are going to succeed and benefit the most," Brynjolfsson says. "I don't think the generative AI is going to replace workers, but workers who work with generative AI will replace those who don't."

Some experts say generative AI tools could affect how two-thirds of current jobs are performed and could eventually raise global gross domestic product by as much as 7%, according to one economic report from Goldman Sachs.

One recent survey of LinkedIn's Top Companies found that nearly 70% say AI is already helping them be faster and smarter, and another 32% say they expect to see larger gains from using AI in the coming years. And companies like EY explicitly listed AI as one of their top three hiring priorities, while Wells Fargo and Kaiser Permanente are implementing AI across their workflows.

Check out: Meta has a new AI tool to fight misinformation—and it’s using Wikipedia to train itself
US officials seek to crack down on harmful AI products


The U.S. government will “not hesitate to crack down” on harmful business practices involving artificial intelligence, the head of the Federal Trade Commission warned Tuesday in a message partly directed at the developers of widely-used AI tools such as ChatGPT.



FTC Chair Lina Khan joined top officials from U.S. civil rights and consumer protection agencies to put businesses on notice that regulators are working to track and stop illegal behavior in the use and development of biased or deceptive AI tools.

Much of the scrutiny has been on those who deploy automated tools that amplify bias into decisions about who to hire, how worker productivity is monitored or who gets access to housing and loans.

But amid a fast-moving race between tech giants such as Google and Microsoft in selling more advanced tools that generate text, images and other content resembling the work of humans, Khan also raised the possibility of the FTC wielding its antitrust authority to protect competition.

Related video: How To Cope With AI Anxiety (unbranded - Newsworthy)
Duration 1:02    View on Watch


“We all know that in moments of technological disruption, established players and incumbents may be tempted to crush, absorb or otherwise unlawfully restrain new entrants in order to maintain their dominance,” Khan said at a virtual press event Tuesday. “And we already can see these risks. A handful of powerful firms today control the necessary raw materials, not only the vast stores of data, but also the cloud services and computing power that startups and other businesses rely on to develop and deploy AI products.”

Khan didn't name any specific companies or products but expressed concern about tools that scammers could use to “manipulate and deceive people on a large scale, deploying fake or convincing content more widely and targeting specific groups with greater precision.”

She added that “if AI tools are being deployed to engage in unfair, deceptive practices or unfair methods of competition, the FTC will not hesitate to crack down on this unlawful behavior.”

Khan was joined by Charlotte Burrows, chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Rohit Chopra, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; and Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke, who leads the civil rights division of the Department of Justice.

As lawmakers in the European Union negotiate passage of new AI rules, and some have called for similar laws in the U.S., the top U.S. regulators emphasized Tuesday that many of the most harmful AI products might already run afoul of existing laws protecting civil rights and preventing fraud.

”There is no AI exemption to the laws on the books," Khan said.

Matt O'brien, The Associated Press
Cybersecurity Expert: Banning a Chinese App Like TikTok Is a Red Herring That Ignores a Greater Danger

Story by Joseph Steinberg • 

For nearly 30 years, I have been warning about the growing danger posed to national security by general American indifference to Chinese technological advancement in the realm of cybersecurity.

Yet, at the same time, not only do I regularly use TikTok, but, I am also among its first professional users in the USA, having joined its Musical.ly predecessor nearly 7 years ago.


There is no contradiction: While few people may choose to do so, it is possible to use TikTok safely. And, with relatively little effort, phone manufacturers can apply better security by default when people use TikTok.

Unfortunately, the current focus on TikTok as the symbolic representative of the risks to U.S. national security emanating from Chinese technology may be more dangerous than TikTok itself.

In my experience in cybersecurity, Chinese hardware — not software — poses, by far, the greatest risk to American national security. While software is certainly a concern, the reality is that, for multiple reasons, rogue hardware threatens to undermine security and inflict related damage in a far more dramatic fashion than does software. All the while, problematic hardware is simultaneously far harder to detect, identify, and remove once deployed than is software.

Proposed bans of particular apps, as well as on the use of VPNs to circumvent government controls, are not only ineffective at addressing such risks but are clearly reminiscent of the reprehensible censorship and controls implemented by oppressive regimes. It was not that long ago, that we, the taxpayers of the United States, paid to create and distribute the anonymizing system known as Tor precisely to help people worldwide overcome such government oppression. And, because preserving freedom of communication is so important, we left that system in place even as it was abused to distribute drugs, guns, and stolen data. In the name of preserving our freedoms, we must not now open a Pandora's box that not only fails to protect rights that we cherish, but threatens to do the opposite.

Related video: TikTok Troubles – Who Supports The Ban? (Stringr)
Duration 1:00  View on Watch


Yet, the talk of the day in Washington is about bans on apps and VPNs — ignoring the blatantly obvious problem that despite federal bans on acquiring and/or utilizing various Chinese hardware, we still have state and local governments, as well as private companies, purchasing and deploying such hardware en masse. Likewise, our governments have done absolutely nothing to discourage (never mind prevent) individuals from buying inexpensive, off-brand Chinese hardware through online retailers and marketplaces, nor has any American government institution even attempted to stop such marketplaces from facilitating such transactions. And, it is no secret that counterfeit hardware components, impersonating "Made in USA" devices, are readily available online at discounted prices.

Chinese hardware of dubious origins can pose a danger not only to whomever purchases and deploys it, but to our entire country. If a private citizen cannot blast music at 4 a.m. in his backyard because the sound carries and adversely impacts his neighbors, or dump oil on her own property because doing so impacts others as the pollutant spreads underground, why should a person be allowed to connect dangerous hardware to the internet, thereby enabling (if not actively facilitating) attacks on his digital neighbors, and, potentially, on our nation's critical infrastructure?

There are two additional factors compounding the risk to national security. The first is the fact that American manufacturers are sourcing hardware components from factories all over China over which the former have little true control. The second factor is that as a result of decades of mergers and acquisitions, partnerships, white-labeling deals, other forms of alliances, and even government policies that incentivized American companies to outsource manufacturing to facilities in China, Chinese technology — including from vendors appearing on the federal government's No-Buy list — is embedded within products bearing American brand-name logos and "Made in the USA" labels. Sometimes, the involved vendors are unaware of this being the case.

Consider, for example, that engineers at Sepio Systems, who I had asked to look into such matters after I joined the firm's advisory board, found what appears to be Huawei firmware running within HP 5500 commercial-grade network switches, with one internal default password even containing a reference to a Huawei-3com partnership formed nearly 20 years ago. Younger engineers may not remember that the 5500 series did not begin its life as an American-made product, or that when HP acquired 3Com 13 years ago, the American technology giant absorbed significant Huawei technology. Per a press release from 2005: "For its third quarter that ended September 30, 2005, revenue for the Huawei-3Com joint venture was $111 million, an increase of 16 percent over the previous quarter and a 69 percent increase year-on-year. Sales of the jointly developed 5500 line of Layer 3 switches with Gigabit Ethernet and Power Over Ethernet were particularly brisk."

While U.S. Intelligence does perform thorough studies of supply chains for certain DoD projects, there is no equivalent in most other areas of government nor in the private sector. Few, if any, CIOs or CISOs truly understand what hardware is running within their respective organizations. Even those who believe that they, in fact, possess "complete inventories" rarely (if ever) actually do — they may have a list of laptops and servers, for example, but rarely will they know the details as to what motherboards and storage devices are within those devices.

Considering that no amount of security software can secure a system if the hardware on which it runs is subject to compromise, our collective lack of knowledge about what is actually inside our computing devices puts us at tremendous risk; billions of dollars of investments in cybersecurity technology are currently being spent on the technological equivalent of building forts on quicksand.

While banning apps from creators outside the U.S. and VPNs is part of the current conversation, the risk from hardware is ongoing. If we want to address the particular risk from China, we cannot simply ban TikTok and the equivalent; we must take action that produces far greater results. We must immediately start paying attention to what hardware we allow to connect to our nation's information infrastructure; we are already at risk, and cannot afford to delay our move away from Chinese hardware. In my next piece, I'll outline what these moves could look like, and how stakeholders like business leaders and elected officials might put them into motion.
NO ONE LIKES WEARING PPE
Blade to Barron's face makes NHL players cringe, but they say no to extra protection

Story by The Canadian Press • 

Morgan Barron's stitched face sends a shudder through his NHL brethren, but players find the idea of more facial protection equally distasteful.


Blade to Barron's face makes NHL players cringe, but they say no to extra protection© Provided by The Canadian Press

While many players have voluntarily adopted cut-resistance socks and wristbands, they've historically met any augmentation of head gear with resistance.

Barron is currently playing with a full cage because he was cut for 75 stitches in Game 1 of his Winnipeg Jets playoff series against the Vegas Golden Knights.

Knight's goalie Laurent Brossoit's skate blade jammed into the space between Barron's face and his half-visor during a goalmouth scramble.

Vertical stitches run from the top of Barron's forehead to the corner of his right eye. Reduced swelling has left a rainbow of bruising to enhance his bar-fight look.

"Oh man, goalies sharpen their skates really sharp, too," Toronto Maple Leafs defenceman Mark Giordano said. "That's what's scary about it.

"Goalies have sharp skates because they have to catch their edge all the time. It was such a tough play for (Barron). It was almost like in slow motion. It felt like he couldn't avoid it. Thank god he's OK and it was wasn't anywhere in the eye."

"Freak accident" and "knock on wood" was a common refrain from players when asked about Barron's face.

"Definitely saw it. Super-unfortunate event and glad the guy's OK because that was really scary," Edmonton Oilers captain Connor McDavid said. "Any time you're around the eye, it's obviously a little bit scary.

"That being said, it's a fast game out there. Those things can happen. Those things tend to not happen, knock on wood. It's kind of a one-off-situation, I guess."

Players don't want any encumbrances their eyes might have to adjust to, or look around, to see what's happening on the ice.

They'll don a cage or full shield for as short a time as possible after a facial injury, in order to protect that area and continue playing.

"I'd like to be back in the (half) visor and hopefully I will be kind of soon just to get a clearer visibility out there, but it's not too bad," Barron said.

The idea of increasing facial protection generally was met with a shake of the head.

NHL PLAYERS FEAR FACE MASKS 

"I would say no. I'm pretty satisfied with the facial protection," Oilers forward Evander Kane said.

"When you have to put a cage on sometimes, guys look forward to getting rid of that as soon as possible. I don't think there would be a big appetite for the players with that."

Said Barron: "I'd rather be back in a visor for the time being, to be honest with you. Just the visibility is so much better. Wearing a mouth guard is another thing. I can't wear a mouth guard in a cage. It's too much work to take it in and out on the bench."

Such has been players' reluctance to add anything above the neck that the NHL had to grandfather in both helmets and half-visors over time to make both standard.

Over 30 years after helmets became mandatory, the NHL instituted in 2013-14 half-visors for players with fewer than 25 games of experience.


Gruesome eye injures to both Bryan Berard (2000) and Manny Malhotra (2011) dented arguments against it.

But as was the case with helmets — Craig McTavish famously played his last season in 1997 without one — there are still a few half-visor holdouts.

"I wish it wasn't grandfathered in for the visors," said Toronto's Ryan O'Reilly, who is one of the few left playing barefaced. "I've been without it for many, many years now. It's just comfort. It makes it easier for me to play."

There's a marketing argument against more facial protection, Tampa Bay Lightning coach Jon Cooper said, because fans want to see the players' faces.

"These are star athletes. If you cover up their face, who would you recognize as a star athlete?" Cooper asked. "You want the fans to be able to see your players and expressions and who we are.

"Do you want to be introduced to Connor McDavid one day and say, 'Well, oh my god, this first time I've seen what you look like?'

"These are contact sports. There's so much prevention going on all over the place, but you can't look after every single injury. It's unbelievably unfortunate what happened to the poor kid in Winnipeg, but it's not a norm in our game."

Related video: Tough Jets forward Barron inspires teammates (The Canadian Press)
Duration 2:21  View on Watch

NHL players from the NCAA wore either a full cage or full face shield during their college careers. Winnipeg's Nate Schmidt did at Minnesota, but doesn't want to in the NHL because he thinks it could make players reckless.

"I hope not," Schmidt said. "If you start having guys with cages, you're going to have sticks flying all over the place, guys diving face-first into things and taking things in throats.

"A lot of times guys will turn their heads. They'll protect their face a little more now. If you have full shield, guys don't care. They'll run headfirst into things."

Junior A leagues across Canada will be played with full facial protection by 2025-26 at the behest of Hockey Canada.

A phasing in starts next season with players aged 16-18 required to wear it, although both the Ontario Junior Hockey League in 2016 and the Northern Ontario Junior Hockey League in 2020 have already adopted cages and full shields.

The day players reach a level of hockey where they can shed full facial protection feels like a rite of passage for them. They don't want to go back.

"I think visors are where it's going to stop for a while," Giordano said.

— With files from Joshua Clipperton and Judy Owen

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 25, 2023.

Donna Spencer, The Canadian Press