Wednesday, July 12, 2023

Hollywood edges closer to actors strike as talks sour

By AFP
Published July 12, 2023

Actors have been supporting Hollywood writers on the picket line for weeks; now, they could formally join them on strike - Copyright AFP/File Robyn Beck
Andrew MARSZAL

Tens of thousands of Hollywood actors on Wednesday anxiously awaited their union’s decision on whether to strike, as last-ditch talks with the likes of Disney and Netflix appeared to sour just hours before the crunch deadline.

The Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA) has already agreed to one extension of talks with studios, but the two sides have still not been able to thrash out a deal over thorny issues of pay, the use of artificial intelligence, and more.

If midnight Wednesday (0700 GMT Thursday) passes without a deal or another prolongation, actors will hit the picket line, joining writers who have already been marching outside studios for more than two months.

“We are not confident that the employers have any intention of bargaining toward an agreement,” said the union, which represents some 160,000 actors and performers.

“Time is running out,” it warned.

A “double strike” of actors and writers, not seen in Hollywood since 1960, would bring nearly all US film and television productions to a halt.

It would also prevent A-listers from promoting some of the year’s biggest releases, right at the peak of the movie industry’s key summer blockbuster season, just as the industry attempts to rebound from the lean pandemic years.

Christopher Nolan’s “Oppenheimer” is due to have its US premiere in New York on Monday.

The massive annual Comic-Con pop culture gathering in San Diego next week could be stripped of its stars.

And a scheduled red-carpet launch this weekend at Disneyland for the new “Haunted Mansion” movie may be downgraded to a “private fan event.”

Such is the concern in Hollywood that powerful agency chiefs — who act as gatekeepers to Tinseltown’s starriest “talent” — have reached out to SAG leaders, offering to help smooth negotiations.

Hollywood studios have called in federal mediators to help resolve the deadlock.

SAG-AFTRA said Tuesday it had agreed to the studios’ “last-minute request” for mediation, while voicing skepticism about good-faith efforts on the other side.

The studios have “abused our trust and damaged the respect we have for them in this process,” it said.

“We will not be manipulated by this cynical ploy to engineer an extension when the companies have had more than enough time to make a fair deal.”


– ‘Swift resolution –



SAG members have pre-approved industrial action if a deal is not struck.

On Wednesday, Hollywood unions representing directors, behind-the-scenes film workers and writers issued a statement of “unwavering support and solidarity” with the actors.

“While the studios have collective worth of trillions of dollars, billions of viewers globally, and sky-high profits, this fight is not about actors against the studios,” it said.

Workers “across all crafts and departments” stand together “to prevent mega-corporations from eroding the conditions we fought decades to achieve,” it said.

While the writers’ strike has already dramatically reduced the number of movies and shows in production, an actors’ walkout would shutter almost everything.

Some reality TV, animation and talk shows could continue.

But popular series set to return to television this year face lengthy delays. And, if strikes continue, future blockbuster films would be postponed too.

Even the Emmy Awards, television’s version of the Oscars which is due to take place on September 18, is reportedly mulling a delay to November or even next year.

An actors strike would mean a boycott of the ceremony by stars.

“We hope the ongoing guild negotiations can come to an equitable and swift resolution,” said Television Academy chairman Frank Scherma, as the Emmy nominations were announced Wednesday.


– Pay and AI –



Should negotiations fail, it will be the first time that all Hollywood actors and writers have been on strike simultaneously since 1960, when actor (and future US president) Ronald Reagan led a showdown that eventually forced major concessions from the studios.

Like the writers, who have already spent 11 weeks on the picket lines, actors are demanding higher pay to counteract inflation, and guarantees for their future livelihoods.

In addition to salaries when they are actively working, actors earn payments called “residuals” every time a film or show they starred in is aired on network or cable — particularly helpful when performers are between projects.

But today, streamers like Netflix and Disney+ do not disclose viewing figures for their shows, and offer the same paltry flat rate for everything on their platforms, regardless of its popularity.

Muddying the waters further is the issue of artificial intelligence. Both actors and writers want guarantees to regulate its future use, but studios have so far refused to budge.


The mega-strike that could take down Hollywood

  • PublishedShare
IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Actors like Lily Tomlin and Jane Fonda have supported writers on the picket line
 - and may soon join the strike too

Hollywood's writers have been on strike for two months and soon the actors may join them, swapping the red carpet for the picket lines.

The Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) contract expires at midnight local time on 12 July, following a deadline extension that delayed the possibility of a mega-strike by almost two weeks.

They would join the Writers Guild of America, which went on strike on 2 May after failing to reach a deal with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP), an umbrella group representing studios like Disney, Netflix, Amazon and Apple.

Both SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP have said they will not comment while contract negotiations are ongoing.

It would be the first time that unions representing both writers and actors would strike at the same time since 1960, when future US President Ronald Reagan was president of the actors' union.

A third union, the Directors Guild of America, has already negotiated a contract and will not join the strike.

Dozens of productions have already been halted since the writers went on strike, including Stranger Things, Billions and Marvel's Blade.

If there is an actors' strike, there could be even more delays, and some shows may be cancelled altogether.

For audiences, that likely means the next series of your favourite TV show will be delayed, and many shows may disappear forever.

While some international productions will continue, it will be limited, because SAG-AFTRA represents more than 160,000 performers around the world - like writer and actor Phoebe Waller-Bridge, who addressed the strike at the London premiere of the latest Indiana Jones movie.

"I really hope we can get this sorted. Writers are the most important people in this industry, I really believe that," she said.

Like the writers already on strike, actors say that streaming services haven't shared the wealth, even as they have led to an explosion of entertainment content. The never-ending quest for new subscribers is an unsustainable business model, they say, and studio executives are reaping huge salaries while many actors and writers can't make a decent living.

Actors and writers used to make money from re-runs on network TV. They would get a cheque in the post every time a movie or show they worked on was re-broadcast and that allowed actors to survive between projects in the business, which has always been a feast-or-famine job.

But streaming services upended Hollywood, and now actors and writers get little or nothing when someone watches their work on a streaming service, which also traditionally pays less than network TV.

The negotiations are being conducted in secret so it's not clear what might be the sticking points or if a deal is imminent. Members overwhelmingly voted in favour of a strike if a deal cannot be reached.

"If they could replace us, they would have done it many years ago," writer and actor Adam Conover said while picketing outside Netflix.

"Are they going to replace you with reality TV? Or with YouTube stars? Well, they can try," he said, adding that people around the world turn on the TV to watch shows like Stranger Things and sports.

IMAGE SOURCE,BBC/ REGAN MORRIS
Image caption,
Musician and actress Kim Gordon says she would never let her image be used for AI

In a surprise move, many of Hollywood's A-list actors signed a letter to their union supporting a strike if they cannot get a "transformative" new contract from studios.

The letter - which has been widely circulated in Los Angeles - was signed by the likes of Meryl Streep, Mark Ruffalo, Jennifer Lawrence and Quinta Brunson - has more than 1,000 signatures now, according to industry publication Deadline.

Both the writers and actors are striking for not only better pay, but for restrictions on using artificial intelligence (AI) in productions, which they say is an "existential" threat.

Actors say AI could create a doomsday scenario where deep fakes and dead actors could be the stars of tomorrow through computer-generated faces and voices.

For many in the business, it's a bleak thought - computer generated moviemaking without a camera crew, actor or writer involved.

Influential musician and artist Kim Gordon, the founder of Sonic Youth and a Screen Actors Guild member, said she'd never consider allowing an AI version of herself.

"It's important to be worried about it," Ms Gordon said while picketing outside Netflix. "But I feel like AI will never replace creativity."

CLIMATE CRISIS
Drought scuppers salmon fishing season in California


Romain FONSEGRIVES
Mon, July 10, 2023

The number of salmon expected to return to California's rivers has plummeted close to historic lows (Patrick T. FALLON)

Gazing out at San Francisco harbor from her wooden fishing boat, Sarah Bates looks glum.

In happier times, she would head out to sea every morning. But for much of this year, she has remained hopelessly docked, due to a ban on salmon fishing as a result of California's drought.

"Salmon is my main fishery and it's 90 per cent of my income," says the 46-year-old.

In force since April along the entire coast of the Golden State, and parts of neighboring Oregon, the moratorium will last until the end of the salmon fishing season in September.

It was brought in as the number of salmon expected to return to the region's rivers has plummeted close to historic lows.

The decades-long drought gripping the American West, aggravated by climate change, has seen the levels of California's rivers drop, and their waters grow warmer.

With many dams already constructed on these waterways, these inhospitable conditions mean salmon are struggling to swim upstream to reproduce, and their offspring often die before reaching the ocean.

The ban is a significant blow to California, where salmon fishing generates $1.4 billion per year, and supports 23,000 jobs, according to the Golden State Salmon Association.

On the San Francisco harbor front, several restaurants have been forced to import salmon from further afield, including Canada, in order to keep the popular fish on their menus.

"Salmon is king... that's what people want," says Craig Hanson, a 60-year-old chartered boat operator specializing in sport fishing.

"They're also a very spectacular fish to catch... the salmon is going to fight you to the end."

- 'Marine heat waves' -

In summers past, Hanson would take his boat out every day. This season, the sailor weighs anchor only four times a week

He blames a lack of enthusiasm among customers for fishing halibut or striped bass.

Despite the loss of income, Hanson approves of the ban if it helps the future of the industry, and is optimistic that salmon can rebound soon thanks to recent months of heavy rain and snow.

Yet many fishermen fear another ban next year.

"The Chinook salmon that are fished here in California typically have a three- or four-year life cycle," explains Nate Mantua, a scientist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

"So when things happen to them in freshwater, as eggs or juveniles, we see it impacting the fishery two or three years later."

The decline in salmon numbers has been precipitous for at least a decade.

Low river water levels -- which authorities have tried to work around, by trucking baby salmon down to the ocean -- are only part of the problem.

Between 2014 and 2016, the Pacific reached temperatures never before seen off the west coast of North America.

"Marine heat waves" created "really poor growth and survival conditions for salmon", says Mantua.

Deprived of cold ocean currents that bring essential nutrients, the fish fell prey to other hungry species.

"It's not just a California problem. It's really the entire Pacific, except for a few exceptions," such as certain Alaskan species, he adds.

- 'Climate shocks' -


But in California, "our fish were already predisposed to being vulnerable to any kind of climate shocks," says Mantua.

This is because the state -- with a giant 40-million population, and a sprawling agricultural sector essential for feeding the United States -- has relentlessly developed its rivers, in order to support its cities and farms.

Due to countless dams and canals, salmon have lost 80 percent of the habitats in which they can spawn.

Water management, and the priority afforded to farmers in central California, is now a major source of grievance for fishermen.

In San Francisco, many are calling for water to be re-diverted into rivers, rather than supplying producers of water-intensive crops like almonds, pistachios and walnuts -- which are often grown for export.

"When it comes down to it, water is more important for the fish than it is for nuts," says Ben Zeiger, a 23-year-old deckhand working on a local sport-fishing boat.

Salmon fishers are waiting to receive financial compensation from federal authorities for this year's fishing ban.

But their priority is efforts to improve salmon habitats.

Along northern California's Klamath River, a giant project has just begun to demolish four hydroelectric dams, potentially reopening 400 miles of river for migratory fish.

"If we don't fix the water policy, we're going to be here again" in future drought years, says Bates, back on the wharf.

"Climate change is happening. And it's happening faster than I think any of us expected."

rfo/amz/dw
Iraq ancient sites, fragile stability spur new trickle of tourists

July 11, 2023

A view of Hadra Ancient city, which was included in the list of world heritage sites by UNESCO in 1985 and was severely damaged in 2015 due to the attacks as cleaning and maintenance works start in Hadra, Iraq on June 14, 2023
[Ismael Adnan Yaqoob/Anadolu Agency]

Reuters
July 11, 2023 

When Jacob Nemec's family heard he was planning to go on holiday in Iraq, they pleaded with the 28-year-old American to reconsider.

"I got a text from my grandma, for the first time in five years saying – being your grandmother and to respect me – I would appreciate it if you don't go. I got crying phone calls from my Mum," said Nemec, a warehouse supervisor from Reno, Nevada.

He decided to go, anyway, but understood his family's concerns.

Iraq has seen almost non-stop turmoil for decades, from an eight-year war with Iran in the 80s, to the first Gulf war in the 90s and heavy sanctions, the 2003 US invasion, years of bloody sectarian warfare and then conflict with Daesh militants.

The situation, however, has gradually improved since Daesh's territorial defeat in 2017, with blast walls coming down and cranes going up in Baghdad and other cities, as they turn to construction and find a new sense of normalcy.

Iraq hosted its first Gulf Cup in more than 40 years earlier this year, with thousands of Arab visitors in attendance – an event that helped put the country back on the map.

WATCH: Discover Babylon, Iraq

Now, a small, but growing number of tourists are heading to Iraq to see attractions, spanning from vast desert and marshland ecosystems to ruins of the worlds earliest cities and empires.

Many have come from neighbouring Arab Gulf countries, but defying warnings advising against travel, an increasing number of adventurous tourists are also trickling in from Europe and the United States.

Nemec, along with a Russian and a British tourist, visited the maze-like ruins of the ancient city of Babylon, the Shia holy city of Najaf with its tight alleys and mud-brick houses, and the old city of Mosul in the north.

"I was a little hesitant coming as an American, like 'Oh my god my government did really bad things here. Is everyone going to hate me for that?'" Nemec said.

"That hasn't been the case at all … Governments can be bad, but people, wherever you go, are good."

The uptick in tourism coincides with a push by Iraq's government to show that the country is safe and open to foreign businesses and visitors, as it looks to diversify its oil-dependent economy.

Tourism Minister, Ahmed Fakak Al-Badrani, said work was under way to build new hotels to keep up with growing demand and to refurbish tourist sites and heritage buildings.

He said the country's image in the West as an arena of conflict would gradually change as more people visited.

Tourists "are messengers, who tell these states that Iraq has returned to being a safe country and is not a red line as some say. Maybe the issue needs some time, but not too long," he told Reuters.

Foreign governments are not convinced.

'Do not travel'

The US and European countries still warn against any travel to Iraq due to security concerns. The US State Department website says: "Do not travel to Iraq due to terrorism, kidnapping, armed conflict, civil unrest".

It urges people to write a will and make funeral arrangements with their families, should they chose to go.

Westerners became a main target of kidnappings and killings following the US invasion, including by extremist Sunni Muslim groups, such as Al Qaeda and Daesh, and hard-line Shia militias close to Iran, all of whom viewed the United States as an occupier.

WATCH: Discover Ur, Iraq

In November of last year, a US citizen was killed in central Baghdad – a rare attack that, nonetheless, sent jitters through the foreign community in the city.

Five Western diplomats said that there would be no change to US or European travel advisories any time soon, due to the continued possibility of unpredictable violence, such as armed clashes in Baghdad last year that killed dozens of Iraqis.

That has not stopped people coming, though just how many are showing up is unclear.
A side forgotten

The Tourism Minister did not provide figures of tourist arrivals.

Major-General Abdel-Karim Sudani, a security adviser to the Prime Minister, told Reuters just over 2.5 million foreigners had visited Iraq in the 6-month period between 15 November, 2022 and 15 May of this year, including 312,000 Arab visitors.

In any case, the tourism sector remains heavily under-developed.

Few of the ancient ruins that dot the country have signs describing their significance, nor accredited tour guides.

Baghdad International Airport does not have its own website, with the top search item, instead, directing browsers to a page that warns: "We do not recommend to visit the country (it is one of the most dangerous places on Earth)."

READ: Iraq holds first Babylon International Festival since 2003

Many Iraqis are trying to make up for those shortcomings and show another side of the country.

Ali Hilal, a travel blogger, is one of them.

He got stuck in Iraq during the COVID-19 pandemic while visiting from Canada, where he lived, and decided to travel around the country, filming magnificent ancient palaces and lush green mountains in videos posted online and shared widely.

"Of course we have innumerable political and social and environmental problems," Hilal said.

"But there is a side we might have forgotten, and that's the side I am trying to see and have people see with me."

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.

Group of Republican senators accuse Biden of Israeli boycott

A group of Republican senators are accusing US President Joe Biden of engaging in "an antisemitic boycott of Israel" following moves to end US support for science and technology collaboration with Israeli institutions in the occupied territories, according to a report by Jewish Insider.

The 14 Republican senators are getting ready to send a letter, seen by Jewish Insider, to Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, warning that they will block confirmations if the Biden administration doesn't change its policy.

"We... write to emphasize that any effort to deepen American policies that discriminate between territories Israel controlled before and after June 1967 will risk a full rupture in my/our ability to engage the Department of State on these issues," the letter reportedly reads.

"Candidly, it is untenable for State Department officials to continue testifying to Congress that they support the US-Israel relationship and then — once out of view — to push policies designed to undermine that relationship. Without reversing these trends, Congressional oversight and the expeditious vetting of nominees would become intractable," the letter continues.

The Biden policy is a reversal of that of former President Donald Trump's administration, which allowed US taxpayer funding for Israeli scientific research in the occupied West Bank. However, the letter appears to imply the Biden policy is new, though it is reverting to a pre-Trump policy.

The letter says that Biden's move "does something America has never done before unilaterally impose territorial restrictions on US scientific research aid to Israel."

The letter is led by Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas and signed by 13 other senators from his party. The Democrats hold a razor-thin margin in the Senate. However, an individual Republican can block a nominee at the committee level.

© Al-Araby Al-Jadeed

THE NAKBA  CONTINUES

Israel evicts Palestinian family from home after 45-year legal battle

Nora Ghaith-Sub Laban and her family were evicted from their home (Mahmoud Illean/AP)
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Associated Press Reporters

Israeli authorities evicted a Palestinian family from a contested apartment in Jerusalem’s Old City on Tuesday, capping a decades-long legal battle that has come to symbolise the conflicting claims to the holy city.

Activists say the Ghaith-Sub Laban family’s removal is part of a wider trend of Israeli settlers encroaching on Palestinian neighbourhoods with the government’s backing and cementing Israeli control by seizing property in contested east Jerusalem.

Israel describes the eviction as a simple battle over real estate, with settlers claiming the family was squatting in an apartment formerly owned by Jews.

Earlier this year, Israel’s Supreme Court struck down the family’s final appeal, ending a 45-year-long legal battle and clearing the way for the eviction.

Nora Ghaith-Sub Laban
Nora Ghaith-Sub Laban reacts to her family’s eviction from their home to make way for Israeli settlers in Jerusalem’s Old City (Mahmoud Illean/AP)

Police officers came to Nora Ghaith-Sub Laban’s apartment in Jerusalem’s Old City early on Tuesday morning, forced open the door and removed the family.

Her son, Ahmad Sub-Laban, said the family was barred from re-entering the premises.

Mr Sub-Laban said: “When we got back in front of the house, we faced the new reality that our main entrance had been closed and we don’t have the right to use it anymore.

“They took the key and changed the lock.”

Several dozen protesters gathered around the block of apartments and chanted “occupation no more”.

Jewish settlers also gathered outside, dancing and smiling as they stared at the distraught family. Other settlers poured water down on family members from windows above.

Nora Ghaith-Sub Laban, the family matriarch, said she was in the hospital when police arrived and accused Israel of trying to “ethnically cleanse” the area of Palestinians and vowed to continue fighting the eviction.

She said: “My tears and all my crying is just sadness for losing my home, I’m parting with my entire life and all my memories that are in this house. But I’m not weak.”

But Arieh King, a settler leader and deputy mayor of Jerusalem, said it was a day to celebrate.

“At last after 40 years. They should be ashamed for using the property that does not belong to them.”

The family says it moved into the property in the early 1950s and rented it from a “general custodian” for abandoned properties, first under Jordanian authorities and then under Israel after the 1967 Mideast war.

Activists gather outside of Nora Ghaith-Sub Laban's home after their eviction
Activists gather outside of Nora Ghaith-Sub Laban’s home after their eviction (Mahmoud Illean/AP)

The case dragged on for decades as the Israeli custodian and then the Kollel Galicia trust, the original property owner, contested the family’s “protected” status.

Among the trust’s claims was that the family did not use the property for extended periods. The family has said its members moved out for periods due to illness or attempts to repair the property.

Jerusalem’s Old City, home to holy sites of three monotheistic faiths, was captured by Israel along with the rest of east Jerusalem during the 1967 war and later annexed in a move unrecognised by most of the international community.

Israel considers the entire city its capital, while the Palestinians seek east Jerusalem as the capital of a future independent state.

Today, more than 220,000 Jews live in east Jerusalem, largely in built-up settlements that Israel regards as neighbourhoods of its capital.

Most of east Jerusalem’s 350,000 Palestinian residents are crammed into overcrowded neighbourhoods where there is little room to build.

The Ghaith-Sub Laban family said authorities did not let them back into the house to recover furniture or medicine for the mother and another son, Rafat. They were only able to grab one item as the authorities forced them out — a plant that has been in the family for 17 years.

Mr Sub-Laban said: “We decided to take it to remember that we lived here, our children grew up here and that we are looking forward to returning to the house.”

Ahmad and his siblings were evicted from the house in 2016 and for now, Mrs Ghaith-Sub Laban and her husband plan to stay with their children until they can find a permanent place to live.

Across the city’s eastern half, particularly in and around the Old City, settler organisations and Jewish trusts are pursuing other court battles against Palestinian families to clear the way for settlers.

Nora Ghaith-Sub Laban touches the door to her home
Nora Ghaith-Sub Laban has said she will continue to fight for her home (Mahmoud Illean/AP)

An Israeli law passed after the annexation of east Jerusalem allows Jews to reclaim properties that were Jewish before the formation of the Israeli state in 1948.

Jordan controlled the area between 1948 and the 1967 war.

There is no equivalent right in Israel for hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who fled or were forced from their homes during the war surrounding Israel’s establishment in 1948.

During British rule over historic Palestine, before the war over Israel’s creation, the Ghaith-Sub Laban apartment was owned by a trust for Kollel Galicia, a group that collected funds in Eastern Europe for Jewish families in Jerusalem.

A spokesman for Kollel Galicia declined comment.

A similar dispute that could lead to evictions of Palestinian families in the nearby Sheikh Jarrah neighbourhood stirred tensions that built up to a 2021 war between Israel and the Hamas militant group in Gaza that killed over 250 people.

Nearly 1,000 Palestinians, including 424 children, currently face eviction in east Jerusalem, according to the United Nations humanitarian office.

Mrs Ghaith-Sub Laban said. “I will not stay quiet. If I find any loophole in the law, I will use it and I will sue them, because this is my right, and this is my home, and this is my land, and this is my country.”