Key Opposition Leader Charged in Malaysia Weeks Before Polls

Ram Anand and Kok Leong Chan
Mon, July 17, 2023

(Bloomberg) -- The election director of Malaysia’s biggest opposition coalition Perikatan Nasional has been charged with the country’s colonial-era sedition laws, just weeks before he is set to spearhead the alliance in the state elections next month.

Muhammad Sanusi Md Nor was charged on two counts of sedition at a Sessions Court in the state of Selangor over remarks that allegedly could incite disloyalty to the country’s rulers, local media reported Tuesday, citing court charges. He pleaded not guilty and was granted bail.

Sanusi is the latest among a group of PN leaders to face court charges since Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim took office last November. PN president Muhyiddin Yassin, who is also Malaysia’s former premier, and the alliance’s former information chief Wan Saiful Wan Jan were both charged with graft earlier this year.

To be sure, the development is not expected to cause an immediate setback to Sanusi, as the court proceedings are expected to play out well after the state elections conclude. He also remains eligible to contest in the polls.

“Let the law take it course,” Anwar told reporters after speaking at an event at Sekinchan in Selangor. “The palace lodged the report, the police investigated the case and the Attorney General’s Chambers decided to prosecute. I don’t want to interfere.”

When asked about the Sedition Act, Anwar said “we try not to use sedition as a policy but when it involves the royalty? We have never used sedition when they criticized me as PM. In this case, we have to defend the dignity of the royalty to avoid an unhealthy trend in politics.”

Sanusi allegedly questioned the decision making of both Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah and Malaysia’s King Sultan Abdullah Ahmad Shah in his political speech in Selangor on July 11, according to media reports. He had issued an apology to the Sultan of Selangor last Friday.

Selangor is among the states headed for elections in August, alongside Kedah, Penang, Terengganu, Kelantan and Negeri Sembilan. Sanusi is the caretaker chief minister of the northern Kedah state.

GREEN CAPITALI$M

Another major utility is accelerating its transition to renewables



Julian Spector
Mon, July 17, 2023 at 1:30 AM MDT·3 min read

DTE Energy, one of Michigan’s largest utilities, pledged to build far more renewable energy as part of a long-term plan finalized Wednesday.

The 20-year plan would spend $11 billion on clean energy construction in Michigan and hasten the closure of DTE’s remaining coal plants. Notably, the utility proposal won support from a cohort of 21 different community groups spanning the environmental, labor, energy and business domains. The resulting “settlement agreement” still needs to be approved by state utility regulators, but that broad public buy-in bodes well for its chances.

The Michigan utility, which serves electricity to 2.3 million customers, is the latest example of how investor-owned utilities are embracing more rapid clean-energy adoption thanks to falling costs and the likelihood of stricter emissions-reduction policies. The federal Inflation Reduction Act makes this shift even more financially attractive for utilities by providing a decade of predictable tax credits for clean energy deployment.

DTE had previously pledged to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, adopting the midcentury timeline that has become standard for the power sector since Xcel Energy led the way in 2018. But around the country, climate hawks, consumer advocates and a growing number of state legislators are pushing for a quicker shift to clean energy, both to avoid locking in new fossil fuel investments and to lower the price of electricity for households.

After winning a legislative trifecta in the 2022 elections, Michigan Democrats introduced an ambitious bill last month to mandate a carbon-free grid by 2035. That policy, which is still being debated in the legislature, would make Michigan the most ambitious state for grid decarbonization, as well as the first state to align with President Biden’s goal of cleaning up the electricity sector by 2035. DTE’s resource planning started two years ago, so it had largely wrapped up by the time the new legislative proposal arrived this summer.

The utility’s new strategy will shutter the 3,400-megawatt Monroe coal plant in 2032, three years ahead of schedule. That move will bring an end to DTE’s use of coal power, which supplied 77 percent of its electricity as of 2005. DTE will also develop 15 gigawatts of in-state renewable power by 2042, balanced by an expansion of energy storage to 780 megawatts by 2030 and 1,800 megawatts by 2042.

Earthjustice attorney Shannon Fisk called the Monroe plant the “third-largest climate polluter in the country”; in its next long-term resource plan, DTE will examine closing it even earlier, in 2030.

Since renewables have become so economical relative to fossil fuels, the utility’s accelerated embrace of clean energy will save a considerable amount of money, in addition to reducing emissions.

“We are also proud this plan puts our customers first by reducing the future costs of our clean energy transformation by $2.5 billion, while reliably generating cleaner, affordable energy now, and for generations to come,” CEO Jerry Norcia said in a statement.

The resource plan reflects utilities’ growing appetite for a renewables-heavy future. DTE started with wind and solar development, and it now calls itself “Michigan’s largest producer of and investor in renewable energy.” After seeing firsthand how the technologies work, the company grew comfortable speeding up the pace of clean energy deployment, which in turn has made it possible to close coal plants ahead of schedule and still ensure a reliable grid.

Should the Michigan government enact a 2035 carbon-free standard, the utility — and all the others in the state — would have to introduce new plans to meet the goal. In other words, DTE may have to ratchet up its clean energy plans yet again in the near future.

GREENWASHING

House Republicans propose planting a trillion trees as they move away from climate change denial


STEPHEN GROVES
Mon, July 17, 2023

WASHINGTON (AP) — As Speaker Kevin McCarthy visited a natural gas drilling site in northeast Ohio to promote House Republicans' plan to sharply increase domestic production of energy from fossil fuels last month, the signs of rising global temperatures could not be ignored. Smoke from Canadian wildfires hung in the air.

When the speaker was asked about climate change and forest fires, he was ready with a response: Plant a trillion trees.

The idea — simple yet massively ambitious — revealed recent Republican thinking on how to address climate change. The party is no longer denying that global warming exists, yet is searching for a response to sweltering summers, weather disasters and rising sea levels that doesn't involve abandoning their enthusiastic support for American-produced energy from burning oil, coal and gas.

“We need to manage our forests better so our environment can be stronger," McCarthy said, adding, “Let's replace Russian natural gas with American natural gas and let's not only have a cleaner world, let's have a safer world.”

The Biden administration has also boosted exports of liquefied natural gas to Europe after Russia, one of the continent's largest suppliers of energy, invaded Ukraine. The Democratic president has also said that coal, oil and gas will be part of America’s energy supply for years to come.

Scientists overwhelmingly agree that heat-trapping gases released from the combustion of fossil fuels are pushing up global temperatures, upending weather patterns around the globe and endangering animal species. But the solution long touted by Democrats and environmental advocates — government action to force emissions reductions — remains a non-starter with most Republicans.

Enter the idea of planting a trillion trees. A 2019 study suggested that planting trees to suck up heat-trapping carbon dioxide from the atmosphere could be one of the most effective ways to fight climate change. Major conservation groups, and former President Donald Trump, who downplayed humanity's role in climate change, embraced the idea.

But the tree-planting push has drawn intense pushback from environmental scientists who call it a distraction from cutting emissions from fossil fuels. The authors of the original study have also clarified that planting trees does not eliminate “the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”

Planting one trillion trees would also require a massive amount of space — roughly the size of the continental United States. And more trees could even increase the risk of wildfires by serving as fuel in a warming world.

“There is a lot of value to planting trees, but it is not a panacea,” said Mark Ashton, a professor of forest ecology at Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.

The GOP’s new approach on climate was apparent in 2021. McCarthy and other GOP lawmakers, led by Arkansas Rep. Bruce Westerman, backed a bill to incentivize growing timber forests in the U.S. as part of a worldwide effort to plant 1 trillion trees. Westerman said he expects a similar proposal to advance this year.

For Republicans, the bill checks the right boxes. It is friendly to the timber industry and touts a climate solution — sequestering a massive amount of carbon from manmade emissions — that would also partially alleviate the need to wean the country off fossil fuels.

Now that he has a slim House majority, McCarthy has also pushed for expanded energy production. He made the “ Lower Energy Costs Act” the top legislative priority of the new GOP majority, as signified by its bill number — H.R. 1. The proposal, which passed the House on a mostly party-line vote in March, would spur American energy production, especially oil, gas and coal.

Democrats like President Joe Biden rejected the bill as a “thinly veiled license to pollute,” but Republicans argued it would reduce carbon emissions because U.S.-produced fossil fuels are usually cleaner than those produced overseas.

“What we’ve been able to demonstrate to the Republican conference is that the strategies that actually work are those that are actually increasing U.S. resources,” said Louisiana Rep. Garret Graves, one of McCarthy’s top lieutenants on energy and environmental issues. “It lowers energy prices, it lowers emissions, and it makes us more energy independent.”

The energy legislation also would increase production of critical minerals such as lithium that are used in batteries for electric vehicles, computers and cellphones — a priority Biden shares. House Republicans and many Democrats have also advanced proposals to speed permitting for energy projects of all types, including those for “clean energy” such as wind, solar and geothermal power.

“I keep reminding Republicans that H.R. 1 made energy affordable, reliable, and clean,” said Utah Rep. John Curtis, who has become a leading Republican voice on environmental issues. “We’re very quick to point out that it made it affordable and reliable. Sometimes we forget to remind people: yes, and clean. That’s an important part.”

But not all Republicans agree that there's a need to address climate change. Rep. Scott Perry, who leads the hard-right House Freedom Caucus, in a hearing Thursday alleged that the Biden administration's climate agenda was tackling “a problem that doesn't exist."

Perry went on to declare — without evidence — that global leaders pushing to reduce carbon dioxide emissions are “grifting.”

Nearly across the board, House Republicans have tried to undo parts of Biden's climate agenda, deriding them as expensive and burdensome. They have targeted government incentives for clean energy projects and denounced investment strategies that account for environmental impact. Last week, they moved to restrict the Department of Defense from using funds to implement the president's executive orders on climate.

“You are seeing a recognition in the Republican Party that climate change is something they are going to have to at least acknowledge because their constituents are dealing with it on a daily basis and it's having an increasing economic toll,” said Lena Moffit, executive director of Evergreen Action, an environmental group that promotes urgent action. “But you cannot say you are committed to putting out the house fire while you pour more gasoline on it.”

Still, Curtis said he has seen an eagerness among Republicans to engage on the issue since he started the Conservative Climate Caucus two years ago. The group has grown to 84 Republicans, representing over one-third of the GOP conference.

Curtis said he decided to launch the caucus after he struggled to respond when asked about climate change by constituents in Utah, where he represents a district marked by ski resorts and national parks.

“I would get a lot of these young people who would come to town hall meetings and I would see the disappointment in their eyes when I didn’t have a good answer for them,” Curtis said. “I felt like, in many ways, we were losing a generation of Republicans on this issue.”

GREEN STEEL

A surprising new industry could bring countless jobs to the Rust Belt: ‘This … prioritizes American workers’


Nina Phillips
Mon, July 17, 2023 at 9:00 AM MDT·2 min read

In the next few years, the steel industry is expected to decline significantly — a fact that could directly affect the over 44,000 Americans who currently work in steel-related jobs.

But a new version of the steel industry — called “green steel” — could bring countless new jobs and completely revitalize the decaying rust belt, Grist reports.

Green steel refers to steel made with green hydrogen, a fuel source that uses clean energy such as wind or solar to generate power by separating the hydrogen and oxygen contained in water molecules. The process, unlike traditional steel production methods, doesn’t release carbon pollution.

At the moment, steel and iron manufacturing is considered one of the top producers of carbon pollution and one of the highest energy-consuming processes in the industrial field. Steel production accounts for around 7% of global air pollution, according to Canary Media, with each ton of steel produced creating over 1.83 tons of carbon pollution, per The World Counts.

What’s more, traditional steel manufacturing needs an absurd amount of power. According to The World Counts, it takes 20 gigajoules of energy to create just one ton of steel, which is enough to run the average central AC system nonstop for about 100 days.

The developments in green steel technology come as several Rust Belt states are struggling to employ their steelworkers. A study from the Ohio River Valley Institute found that, currently, regional steel-related jobs are expected to fall 30% by 2031. However, green steel could add between 27% and 43% more jobs — potentially more than making up for that loss.

It seems as though investment in green steel will continue as the industry falls deeply in line with the government’s new goals for reducing air pollution. By 2030, the government hopes to reduce air pollution by at least 50% when compared to 2005 levels, World Resources Institute reported.

In a statement released in April 2021, The White House explained the U.S.’s pollution goals, stating that: “Meeting [our] 2030 emissions target will create millions of good-paying, middle class, union jobs” and that the plan would “ensure economic competitiveness, advance environmental justice, and improve the health and security of communities across America.”

“This target prioritizes American workers,” the statement added.

The bridge to Crimea is crucial to Russia's war effort in Ukraine and to asserting Moscow's control




In this handout photo taken from video released by the Investigative Committee of Russia on Monday, July 17, 2023, investigators work at an automobile link of the Crimean Bridge connecting Russian mainland and Crimean peninsula over the Kerch Strait not far from Kerch, Crimea. Traffic on the key bridge connecting Crimea to Russia's mainland was halted on Monday, July 17, after reports of explosions that Crimean officials said were from a Ukrainian attack.

 (Investigative Committee of Russia via AP)

The Associated Press
Updated Mon, July 17, 2023 

The bridge connecting Crimea and Russia carries heavy significance for Moscow, both logistically and psychologically, as a key artery for military and civilian supplies and as an assertion of Kremlin control of the peninsula it illegally annexed in 2014.

An attack on the bridge before dawn Monday, killing a couple and seriously injuring their daughter, left a span of the roadway hanging perilously. The damage initially appeared to be less severe than what was caused by an assault in October, but it highlighted the bridge’s vulnerability.

Russia blamed Ukraine for both attacks. A spokesman for the Ukrainian Security Service on Monday did not directly acknowledge responsibility but said the service would reveal details about organizing the blast once Ukraine achieves victory in the war.

A CRITICAL CONNECTION

The Crimean Peninsula extends south from Ukraine’s mainland, with road connections on two isthmuses, one of which is less than 2 kilometers (1 mile) wide, and by a bridge from a narrow spit. Those links to Ukraine go into territory occupied by Russian forces that come under attack from the Ukrainian military.

The bridge, which connects Crimea’s eastern extremity with Russia’s Krasnodar region, provides the only fixed link that steers clear of the disputed territory.

The 19-kilometer (12-mile) bridge over the Kerch Strait that links the Black and Azov seas carries road and rail traffic on separate sections and is vital to sustaining Russia’s military operations in southern Ukraine.

A SYMBOLIC STRUCTURE

The bridge is the longest in Europe and a subject of considerable pride in Russia. Construction began in 2016, about two years after Russia's annexation, and was completed in little more than two years. The pace of construction was impressive but led some critics to question whether it was hastily designed and built.

The bridge was constructed despite strong objections from Ukraine and is the most visible and constant reminder of Russia’s claim over Crimea.

President Vladimir Putin drove across the bridge at its formal opening. Putin is also closely connected to construction tycoon Arkady Rotenberg, whose company got the $3.5 billion contract for the bridge.

CONSEQUENCES OF THE ATTACK

Rail traffic on the bridge reportedly was restored within a few hours Monday but it was unclear when full road service could be restored. Ferries were being organized to try to ease the burden, but it was not immediately clear whether the vessels could accommodate demand. Crimea’s beaches and mountains are popular with summer tourists.

Russian authorities advised people who wanted to leave Crimea quickly to go via Russian-controlled territory in Ukraine. That would add up to 600 kilometers (350 miles) to their journey and likely raise their anxiety about going through insecure areas.

Russian officials denounced Monday’s attack but did not immediately specify retaliatory measures, although Russia has responded with cruise missiles and drone barrages to other Ukrainian attacks.

___

Follow AP’s coverage of the war in Ukraine: https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine

Drone boats give Ukraine a cheap, 'asymmetric' edge against Russia and may have just damaged a key bridge

Chris Panella
Updated Mon, July 17, 2023 

THEY LOOK LIKE DALEK DRONES FROM DR. WHO

It's been reported that naval drones were used to attack the Kerch Strait Bridge.

United 24/Ukrainian government

Waterborne drones are an inexpensive asset, giving Ukraine an "asymmetric" naval edge against Russia.


Russia blamed Ukraine for using the drones to attack the Kerch Strait Bridge in Crimea on Monday.


The bridge is key for Russian economic, military, and cultural interests in occupied Crimea.

Ukraine has heavily relied on cheap-but-effective airborne drones for attacks on front-line Russian positions and on targets behind enemy lines. Waterborne drones are also inexpensive and devastating, and there are indications they were used to damage a key Russian bridge into Crimea.

On Monday, explosions rocked the 12-mile Kerch Strait Bridge, damaging the roadbed, halting traffic, and killing two adults. Russian authorities blamed Kyiv, vowing "targeted and quite inhumane" repercussions.

It's at least the second time the bridge has been damaged in less than year. Last October, a bomb-laden truck exploded, severely damaging the bridge and killing three people. It was closed to normal vehicle traffic until February 2023 and railway traffic until May 2023.

Russian state media attributed Monday's incident to Ukraine's unmanned drones, and Ukrainian state media outlet, Ukrinform, citing sources in the Security Service of Ukraine, said the SBU and Kyiv's naval forces carried out the nighttime attack and that unmanned surface vessels were involved.

An anonymous source from Ukraine's Security Service also confirmed to CNN that Ukraine's naval drones carried out the attack, as did a state official.

In general, unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) — commonly called drone boats — are remotely operated waterborne vessels. There's been a push to develop waterborne drones for both Ukraine and the US, the latter increasing production to counter China while the former looks for ways to counter Russia's formidable military.

Ukraine has been crowdfunding the development of a full-blown naval drone fleet, noting that the unmanned vessels first gave them an operational advantage to target Russian ships in October 2022. "The killers of Ukrainian civilians — warships armed with missiles — became targets themselves," a state-run fundraiser said.

They can pack a punch, and they're relatively cheap, too, especially compared to a traditional warship or the defenses required to defeat these unmanned surface vessels.

"The cost of manufacturing and fielding these vehicles is considerably less — many magnitudes less — than the cost of trying to defend against them and just basic resource allocation in trying to interdict and destroy these assets," said Samuel Bendett, a research analyst with the Center for Naval Analyses' Russia Studies Program.

"So again, the cost of defending against such vehicles falls on the defender — a single ship, a fleet, or an entire country — while the cost of manufacturing them is considerably smaller."

The result is an "asymmetric advantage" for Ukraine. They stress Russian defenses at a low cost to the Ukrainians and their available resources.

While Ukraine didn't take responsibility for the attack, Kyiv has repeatedly threatened to target the bridge.

Crimea24TV/AFP via Getty Images

The Kerch Bridge, which may have been the target of these assets, is a valuable access point for Moscow, connecting Russia to Crimea and allowing economic and cultural control over the illegally occupied territory.

It also served as an ideal transportation route for Russia's military equipment before its February 2022 invasion. Supply routes have mostly shifted to northern land bridges since October's attack, according to Bendett, but the repeated incidents raise a host of questions about how Russia is going to defend the Kerch Bridge.

"These USVs don't travel for thousands of kilometers, they have to operate in relative proximity to their operators or their launching point," Bendett said. "How do you defend a long bridge like that? Where do you place your defenses? Do you fly patrols around it? Do you install sensors on it all the time? Do you have maritime patrols all the time?"

In short: "It's difficult to properly and completely defend an asset as large as a bridge like that."

And although it's too early to tell how significant Monday's attack on the bridge is and what the impacts will be, especially since only part of the roadbed was damaged, Kyiv can, assuming its forces were the ones who executed the attack, can presumably count this as a win.

"Ukraine exploited its [the Kerch Strait Bridge] vulnerability by launching relatively cheap and inexpensive USVs in what turned out to be a successful attack," Bendett said.

Ukraine’s sea drone attack on Crimea bridge signals shift in strategy

Roland Oliphant

THE TELEGRAPH
Mon, July 17, 2023 

Ukraine’s security service told local media that it and the navy pulled off the attack using surface drones

Sunday’s sea and air drone attack on Sevastopol harbour and the Kerch road bridge highlight a shift in maritime warfare, the vulnerability of Crimea, and uncomfortable truths about high-stakes remote strikes.

Officially Ukraine is coy about attacks on Russian territory, public officials confining themselves to nudges and winks rather than explicit claims of responsibility.

But the SBU, Ukraine’s security service, has briefed local media that it and the Ukrainian navy pulled off the attack using surface drones.

There is clear footage of the attacks using the sea drones.

But images from previous Ukrainian maritime drone attacks give us a rough idea of what they look like - and how their designers have combined modern navigation tech with sea sports kit and old-fashioned bomb making.

The drones we have seen so far resemble sharp-prowed speed boats around 5.5 metres long.

Towards the bow, a rotatable camera stands on a small tower. Towards the stern, another tower contains what appears to be the communications array used for control - possibly a Starlink terminal.

Propulsion also seems to be from a non-military source: likely a petrol-driven water jet produced by Canadian firm Sea Doo, a maker of civilian jet skis.

The only discernible military grade, non-commercial kit are two pressure detonators taken from the Soviet-designed FAB-500 aerial bomb.

Unmanned bomb ships are nothing new. Sir Francis Drake sent fireships against the Spanish Armada in 1588.

Western navies - and the Royal and US navies in particular - have been thinking about fending off fast-moving small boats ever since an al-Qaeda suicide bomber on a speed boat attacked the USS Cole in 2000.

But modern drone technology has driven down costs and means navies do not need suicide helmsmen to get close to their targets.

When around half a dozen of the Ukrainian bomb-boats attacked the Black Sea Fleet at anchor in Sevastopol harbour, some naval experts hailed a turning point in naval warfare.

No Russian ships were sunk, but at least two were damaged, one apparently seriously, and by penetrating Sevastopol Bay’s heavily defended harbour mouth, the drones proved a new and serious threat had arrived on the Black Sea.

Monday morning’s attack shows that threat remains potent and continues to evolve. Other navies will be studying it carefully.

The Kerch bridge is one of Russia’s major vulnerabilities.

Completed in 2018, it was both a major engineering achievement and a symbol of Vladimr Putin’s conquest of Crimea four years earlier.

It also eased pressure on an overburdened ferry that was the only other direct route from the Russian mainland.

Now it is a critical bottleneck in the logistics network supplying Russia’s forces in southern Ukraine. And it is proving difficult to protect.

Ukrainians first attacked it in October last year, with a truck bomb that blew a hole in the road and set fire to a train on the neighbouring rail section. The bridge was out of action for weeks.

Monday’s attack shows despite Russia’s best efforts, a 12-mile bridge is difficult to secure.

The Kerch bridge is one of Russia’s major vulnerabilities and is proving difficult to protect - Reuters

The apparently undamaged railway section is more important from a military point of view than the damaged road section, but closing the bridge again will put inevitable pressure on the troops trying to hold back Ukraine’s counter-offensive.

Russian authorities have already re-routed tourist traffic via the “new territories” of occupied Ukraine, with obvious risks for both the civilians and military logistics. There were reports of heavy traffic jams on Monday afternoon.

Lastly, it highlights the uncomfortable moral compromises involved in prosecuting any war, but especially high-stakes operations behind enemy lines.

Russian authorities say the alleged drone strike killed a civilian couple and wounded their fourteen-year-old daughter as the family drove across the bridge.

October’s truck bomb attack, which killed five people including the driver of the lorry, raises trickier ethical questions. Was the driver a willing participant? If so, is suicide bombing ever admissible? If not, is there any excuse for duping a civilian into carrying a bomb?

The Kerch bridge is a legitimate military target. Some collateral damage is inevitable in a total war of national survival. And those deaths are nothing compared to the well documented and clearly deliberate atrocities committed by Russia during the war.

But war is always a murky, dirty business, no matter which side you are on. There is no point in pretending otherwise.

Drone Boats Used In Kerch Bridge Strike: Reports (Updated)

Howard Altman
Mon, July 17, 2023 

Kerch bridge USV attack

The Ukrainian federal security service, known by the acronym SBU, carried out Sunday's attack on the Kerch Bridge in cooperation with the country's navy using uncrewed surface vessels (USVs), according to state media and many other reports. The attack badly damaged the bridge linking Russia to the Crimean peninsula it has occupied since 2014.

We must highlight that these are initial reports and there is a massive information war also being fought by both sides. The War Zone could not independently verify these claims at this time, but they have been reconfirmed by various outlets. Still, Ukraine has a history of not giving information out on high-profile long-range attack. The possibility that this is a misdirect to obscure another form of attack is very real and must be kept in mind.

Close-up view of damaged Kerch Bridge span. 

(Satellite image ©2023 Maxar Technologies.)

View of the damaged Kerch Bridge span. 

(Satellite image ©2023 Maxar Technologies.)

Russian officials say it forced a halt to vehicle traffic and killed two motorists and injured their young daughter. Railroad traffic, across the bridge, however, continued, they say. You can read more about the strike and its potential impact in our initial coverage here.

This would mark the latest escalation in Ukraine's use of USVs, which you can read more about later in this story.

https://twitter.com/oalexanderdk/status/1680888907959787520?s=12\u0026t=BQRSNakUKt7_8ssZiGBW-A https://twitter.com/JanR210/status/1680822162414788610

“A nighttime attack on the Kerch Strait Bridge was a special operation conducted by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) and the Ukrainian Navy,” the official Ukrainian Ukrinform news agency reported Monday. “According to Ukrinform's sources in the SBU, the SBU and the Ukrainian Navy are behind a nighttime explosion at the bridge. Unmanned surface vessels were used to attack the bridge.”

"It was hard to get to the bridge, but this was eventually done," the SBU said, according to Ukrinform, adding that SBU Chief Vasyl Maliuk stated that the bridge is a legitimate target for Ukraine.

The bridge was attacked by Ukrainian sea drones, an anonymous Ukrainian official told The Washington Post Monday.

CNN had a similar report, saying "a source in Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) told CNN this attack was a joint operation of the SBU and Ukraine’s naval forces. The source spoke on condition of anonymity because they had not received authorization to speak on the record."

The SBU’s quick acknowledgment of its role in the attack is in stark contrast to how Ukraine reacted after the previous Kerch Bridge strike on October 8, 2022. Ukrainian officials like Maj. Gen. Kyrylo Budanov, head of the Defense Intelligence Directorate, played coy about their role in that attack. It was only until recently, when, as we reported, Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Hanna Maliar listed that operation among Ukraine’s accomplishments during the 500 days of all-out war.

Of course, by Monday morning, Russian officials were blaming Ukraine.

The Russian Foreign Ministry condemned what it called a “terrorist attack” on the bridge.

“A criminal case was opened after the terrorist attack, and the necessary investigative actions are being taken,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said. “We are confident that those guilty will be found and will not escape justice. If the investigation finds that the surface drones that attacked the bridge are of Western origin, and that Western countries played a role in planning, sponsoring and conducting this operation, it will confirm their complicity in the Kyiv regime’s terrorist activity.”

The Foreign Ministry “strongly condemns the terrorist attack on the Crimean Bridge, which is a purely civilian facility. We hope that the international community and relevant multilateral agencies will put their foot down and give a proper assessment of yet another crime committed by the Ukrainian authorities. The damage to the Crimean Bridge caused by the terrorist attack will be repaired shortly. All attempts to disrupt the transport link to the peninsula and tear Crimea from the rest of Russia are invariably futile.”

https://twitter.com/mfa_russia/status/1680951468067631105

“The Kyiv regime committed another barbaric crime,” Kherson Oblast occupation governor Volodymyr Saldo said Monday on his Telegram channel. “Damage to the structures of the Crimean Bridge is secondary. Primarily, Ukrainian propaganda mocks the death of civilians on the bridge. This shows the true face of those who are now sitting on Bankova Street in Kyiv or hiding somewhere in bunkers.”

USVs Weapon Of Choice

If the SBU claim is true this marks not just the second Ukrainian attack on the bridge, but a big increase in the capabilities of its USV fleet.

Starting last October, Ukraine began using USVs to attack Sevastopol in Crimea, home to Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. You can read more about that attack in our story here.

There have been numerous Ukrainian USV attacks since then, both in Crimea and reportedly in the open waters of the Black Sea, according to Russia.

The Russian Defense Ministry claimed that it foiled yet another aerial drone and USV attack on Sevastopol on July 16.

https://twitter.com/gloooud/status/1680832616864399367

It is roughly 320 nautical miles (368 miles) from the closest Ukrainian-controlled shore to the Kerch Bridge, taking the most direct route around Crimea to the bridge. That is a very long-range strike that is unprecedented for Ukrainian USVs used against littoral targets. If the attacks on Russian vessels deep to the south in the Black Sea are indeed as Russia has purported them to be, such a long-range capability has been demonstrated. There is also the possibility that they were clandestinely launched much closer via a mothership vessel, but there is no evidence of that at this time.

Russia keeps a very close watch on the bridge and its approaches for just this kind of an attack. The span is heavily defended, but clearly not enough if indeed USVs got through and did this kind of damage. The low-slung area of the bridge that was hit would have maximized the impact from the blast from a explosive laden USV below.

Key Span

The Kerch Bridge is a key span for Russian logistics as it fights Ukraine's counteroffensive pushing slowly south toward Crimea. As we mentioned earlier this morning, vehicle traffic that normally would flow across the bridge is being rerouted via routes through territory in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia oblasts that Russia occupies.

Taking out the bridge makes for a much longer trip to southern Ukraine, though if the rail lines are still operating as Russian officials claim, that would certainly reduce the impact of this attack. But beyond the inconvenience factor, it also means that Russian resupply efforts by road have to travel far closer to the front lines and well within the operational distance of Ukraine's extended-range strike weapons. These weapons pose more of a threat to static vehicles and bridges (as we have seen targeted in the recent past) and key roadways areas though, not hitting moving vehicles.

https://twitter.com/GlasnostGone/status/1680942863721406464 https://twitter.com/georgewbarros/status/1680770032119283712

Saldo said that he and Sergie Askenov, the occupation governor of Crimea, have been working on plans to make those routes easier to travel with the increased traffic.

Those regions “will be fully involved in the organization of traffic for people to Crimea along the land route along the Azov coast, an alternative to the Crimean bridge,” said Saldo. “Kherson region is preparing to increase the transport and passenger flow. At the moment, most of the road from Melitopol to the Dzhankoy checkpoint within the region has been overhauled, the entrances to the checkpoint have been expanded. Measures will be taken to expedite the screening of people and vehicles.”

Specialists are working on the possibility of directing part of the tourist flow through the Armyansk checkpoint, he added.

“It could be used by tourists heading to the eastern coast of Crimea,”

Meanwhile, the ferry crossing from the Krasnodar Territory has resumed its work - the first batch of passengers from the port of Kavkaz has already arrived at the port of Kerch, the Russian Defense Ministry’s Zvezda News reported on its Telegram channel Monday. “However, for now, only passengers of regular buses can use the sea route.”

https://twitter.com/NatalkaKyiv/status/1680959700135755778

https://twitter.com/aborealis940/status/1680895219410116610

Deputy Prime Minister Khusnullin said officials should know in a few hours the extent of the damage.

“I personally went downstairs and looked,” he told Zvezda News. “Now designers and builders are working out technological schemes for repairs, discussing whether it is possible to start the machines. A couple more hours - and there will be a decision. The divers are finishing their inspection of the supports.”

https://twitter.com/OAlexanderDK/status/1680868585290309632

"Previously, the railway bridge supports were not damaged, now they are studying automobile supports. In two hours there will be information, we will confer for now, outline a plan of action," the deputy prime minister told Zvezda.

While the ability of train traffic across the bridge will certainly help Russian logistics, it remains to be seen just how much and just how long it will take to repair the bridge after this attack.

In the wake of this attack, Russia announced it was canceling the Black Sea Grain Initiative, hammered out over the summer to allow grain and other food and fertilizer to be shipped out via Ukraine's Black Sea ports of Odesa, Chornomorsk and Yuzhny.

https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1680958032291692547

There is also the possibility that Russia will carry out retaliatory strikes across Ukraine.

We are certainly be watching for future developments and will update this story when there is more information to report.

Update 4:41 p.m. Eastern:

During a televised speech Monday, Russian President Vladimir Putin vowed a response to the attack.

"The terrorist act seriously damaged the road along several spans of the Crimean Bridge, and as a result auto and railway traffic was halted.”

However, railway traffic has already been restored, he said.

“Considering that this is the second terrorist attack on the Crimean Bridge, I am waiting for specific proposals on how to improve the security of this strategically important transport facility. We discussed this in detail this morning.”

Putin added that the attack was “senseless” because the bridge hadn’t been used for military logistics for a while.

“Of course there will be a response from the Russian side,” he said. “The Defense Ministry is preparing adequate proposals.”

https://twitter.com/OAlexanderDK/status/1681029040528846853?s=20

Contact the author: howard@thewarzone.com

UK

SNAFU

Cruise ships set to house asylum seekers in Liverpool and Edinburgh sent back to owners after finding nowhere to dock

Sky News
Updated Tue, 18 July 2023 


Two giant cruise ships set to house 1,000 asylum seekers were unable to find anywhere to dock and have been returned to their owners, a senior source has told Sky News.

In June, Rishi Sunak announced the government acquired two more vessels, alongside the Bibby Stockholm barge - which arrived in Dorset today - as part of continued efforts to cut down on hotel bills of £6m a day for those coming to the UK via small boat Channel crossings.

Plans for one of the cruise ships to house asylum seekers near Liverpool were scrapped after being declined by the port operator, and it is understood one of the boats was also planning to dock near Edinburgh.

It is not clear how much the government paid for the boats before returning them to the owner.

Asked if Mr Sunak was disappointed with the news, the PM's official spokesman said: "We continue discussions about providing additional accommodation facilities and sites.

"Stockholm arrived today and will be taking people aboard this month."

But Labour's shadow immigration minister, Stephen Kinnock, said it showed the "incompetence of this Conservative government knows no limits".

Read more:
Who will be living on the barge - and what's it like on board?

MP demands safety reports on barge

The Home Office said it could not comment on commercial arrangements, but said the government had been looking at a "range of accommodation options which offer better value for the British taxpayer than expensive hotels".

A spokesperson added: "This is why we will be using alternative accommodation options, such as barges, which are more manageable for communities, as our European neighbours are doing".

However, Mr Kinnock added: "Having already overseen the asylum backlog grow nine-fold on their watch, and the cost rocket to £3.6bn, they are now shifting to yet another plan that hasn't been thought through - spending money on boats that have nowhere to dock.

"We need this shower of a government to get out of the way so that Labour can deliver our five-point plan to end the dangerous Channel crossings, end hotel use and fix an asylum system which has been utterly broken by the Conservatives."

Last month, Mr Sunak said Channel crossings were down by a fifth compared to last year and his plan to "stop the boats" was "starting to work".

Speaking from Kent, he said housing asylum seekers on ships could "reduce pressures on local communities", adding that the Bibby Stockholm barge would "arrive in Portland in the next fortnight and we've secured another two today".

The government would not confirm the names of the two other vessels or the company they were acquired from.

The Bibby Stockholm, which has arrived in Dorset a month behind schedule, is due to start housing asylum seekers in the coming weeks.

Alaska volcano eruption eases after producing towering ash cloud. 

See photos
AP | | Posted by Nisha Anand
Jul 19, 2023 

An ash cloud with an initial height of around 5.5 miles (8.9 kilometers) was reported following the morning eruption of Shishaldin Volcano.

An ongoing eruption of a remote volcano in Alaska’s Aleutian Islands produced an ash cloud so large Tuesday that warnings were sent to pilots about potentially dangerous conditions.

This web camera image provided by the U.S. Geological Survey shows a low-level ash plume from the Shishaldin Volcano captured on Tuesday, July 18, 2023.(AP)


An ash cloud with an initial height of around 5.5 miles (8.9 kilometers) was reported following the morning eruption of Shishaldin Volcano. But by early afternoon, ash emissions were below 1.9 miles (3 kilometers), and the aviation alert was downgraded, according to the Alaska Volcano Observatory.

The volcano is about 700 miles (1,127 kilometers) southwest of Anchorage and sits near the middle of Unimak Island. The island’s 65 or so residents live about 25 miles (40 kilometers) northeast of the volcano, in the community of False Pass.

This web camera image provided by the U.S. Geological Survey shows a low-level ash plume from the Shishaldin Volcano captured on Tuesday, July 18, 2023.(AP)

Shishaldin Volcano began erupting July 11. A U.S. Coast Guard overflight confirmed lava erupted the same day within the summit crater.

A significant explosion early Friday produced an ash cloud that reached up to 7.5 miles (12 kilometers) and drifted south over the Pacific Ocean. A second smaller explosion occurred later Friday.

This web camera image provided by the U.S. Geological Survey shows glowing lava erupting within the summit crater of Shishaldin around 12:30 a.m. AKDT, Tuesday, July 18, 2023.(AP)


The volcano, one of the most active in the Aleutian arc, saw increased lava eruptions just after midnight Tuesday, with no significant ash emissions, the observatory said. That changed hours later with the ash cloud. The National Weather Service issued an advisory due to the drifting ash cloud.

Volcanic ash is angular and sharp and has been used as an industrial abrasive. The powdered rock can cause a jet engine to shut down.

Shishaldin is a symmetric cone with a base diameter of 10 miles (16 kilometers), the observatory said. The 660-foot (210-kilometer) funnel-shaped crater often emits steam and an occasional amount of ash.

There have been at least 26 confirmed eruptions at Shishaldin Volcano since 1824. Most are small, but the observatory said a 1999 eruption produced an ash cloud that reached 8.5 miles (14 kilometers).

Officials worry about confusion with Alaska's tsunami-warning alert system

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Confusion around an emergency alert received by Alaska residents in areas not at risk of a potential tsunami after a major weekend earthquake could shake public confidence in the warning system, local officials said.

A magnitude 7.2 earthquake about 70 miles (111 kilometers) south of Sand Point triggered a brief tsunami warning for parts of southern Alaska late Saturday that prompted people to evacuate from low-lying areas. People as far away as Anchorage also received tsunami alerts on their phones, though they were not at risk of a tsunami, the Anchorage Daily News reported.

A warning issued late Saturday by the National Tsunami Warning Center covered an area about 40 miles (64 kilometers) southwest of Homer to an area about 80 miles (128.7 kilometers) northeast of Unalaska. It was later downgraded to an advisory and then canceled.

Emergency managers and tsunami scientists said they were following their systems, which err on the side of caution and speed. But others worry that confusion around whether the tsunami posed an actual danger could erode public trust in the warning system.

“This is our concern: We’re going to have a cry-wolf situation where people aren’t going to respond to the warning anymore and they just won’t evacuate,” said Mark Robl, the police chief in Homer, who said dispatchers there received “hundreds of phone calls an hour” after the warning was issued.

A large earthquake can trigger a release of energy that can lead to a destructive wave. When sensitive instruments pick up such an event, an automated alert goes out. But there’s no time to immediately verify if such a wave is forming, said James Gridley, director of the National Tsunami Warning Center in Palmer.

“We issue a warning right away because we need to get anybody in the immediate area out of danger right away,” he said.

Then scientists with the center review data from buoys and other instruments to determine whether a wave is forming, and what size it is, Gridley said. Warnings are revised or canceled, though that part of the response can take about an hour, he said.

Alerts from the center also can trigger localized emergency responses, such as the sounding of sirens urging residents to seek higher ground.

The Kenai Peninsula Borough sounded its tsunami warning sirens, emergency manager Brenda Ahlberg said. Many in the region also received cellphone notifications. Wireless Emergency Alerts are sent to anyone in a geographic area of certain cellphone towers in zones that can be widely defined — which is why people in Anchorage received notifications.

While the alerts are a way to reach people quickly, broad notification areas can mean people get alerts when they don't need them. Gridley said efforts were ongoing to better hone the system.

The Kenai Peninsula Borough currently can only deploy its sirens systemwide, but it plans to install soon a new tsunami siren system that will allow for precise, community-by-community warnings, Ahlberg said.

“Is it unfortunate that they have been false alarms, or is it fortunate that we have been able to deploy the system, get people out of harm’s way, and then realize it wasn’t necessary?” she asked.

The Associated Press

J&J Must Pay $18.8 Million to California Cancer Patient in Baby Powder Suit

By Reuters
July 18, 2023

A bottle of Johnson and Johnson Baby Powder is seen in a photo illustration taken in New York

Mike Segar/Illustration

By Brendan Pierson

(Reuters) -Johnson & Johnson's must pay $18.8 million to a California man who said he developed cancer from exposure to its baby powder, a jury decided on Tuesday, a setback for the company as it seeks to settle thousands of similar cases over its talc-based products in U.S. bankruptcy court.

The jury ruled in favor of Emory Hernandez Valadez, who filed suit last year in California state court in Oakland against J&J, seeking monetary damages. Hernandez, 24, has said he developed mesothelioma, a deadly cancer, in the tissue around his heart as a result of heavy exposure to the company's talc since childhood. The six-week trial was the first over talc that New Brunswick, New Jersey-based J&J has faced in almost two years.

The jury found that Hernandez was entitled to damages to compensate him for his medical bills and pain and suffering, but declined to award punitive damages against the company. Hernandez will not be able to collect the judgment in the foreseeable future, thanks to a bankruptcy court order freezing most litigation over J&J's talc.

J&J vice president of litigation Erik Haas said in a statement that the company would appeal the verdict, calling it "irreconcilable with the decades of independent scientific evaluations confirming Johnson's Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer."

A lawyer for Hernandez could not immediately be reached for comment.

Reuters watched the trial through Courtroom View Network.

In closing arguments to the jury on July 10, J&J's lawyers said there was no evidence either linking Hernandez's kind of mesolthelioma to asbestos or proving that Hernandez was ever exposed to tainted talc. Hernandez's lawyers during closing arguments accused J&J of a "despicable" decades-long coverup of asbestos contamination.

Hernandez testified in June, telling jurors that he would have avoided J&J's talc if he had been warned that it contained asbestos, as his lawsuit alleges. Jurors heard from Hernandez's mother, Anna Camacho, who said she used large amounts of J&J's baby powder on her son when he was a baby and through childhood. She cried as she described Hernandez's illness.

Tens of thousands of plaintiffs have sued, alleging that J&J's baby powder and other talc products sometimes contained asbestos and caused ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. J&J has said its talc products are safe and do not contain asbestos, which has been linked to mesothelioma.

J&J subsidiary LTL Management in April filed for bankruptcy in Trenton, New Jersey, proposing to pay $8.9 billion to settle more than 38,000 lawsuits and prevent new cases from coming forward. It was the company's second attempt to resolve talc claims in bankruptcy, after a federal appeals court rejected an earlier bid.

Most litigation has been halted during bankruptcy proceedings, but U.S. Chief Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan, who is overseeing LTL's Chapter 11, let Hernandez's trial proceed because he is expected to live only a short time.

Hernandez's form of mesothelioma is extremely rare, making his case different from the vast majority pending against J&J.

Asbestos plaintiffs are seeking to have LTL's latest bankruptcy filing dismissed. They have argued the filing was brought in bad faith to insulate the company from litigation.

J&J and LTL have argued that bankruptcy delivers settlement payouts to plaintiffs more fairly, efficiently and equitably than trial courts, which they have likened to a "lottery" in which some litigants get large awards and others nothing.

J&J said in bankruptcy court filings that the costs of its talc-related verdicts, settlements and legal fees have reached about $4.5 billion.

(Reporting By Brendan Pierson in New York; Editing by Will Dunham and Sandra Maler)

Unions are having a major moment — but don't expect a 1930s-level boom

Kelsey Vlamis
Jul 18, 2023

Writers on strike march with signs on the picket line on day four of the strike by the Writers Guild of America in front of Netflix in Hollywood, California on May 5, 2023. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images

The Hollywood strikes are the latest example of an increase in strike activity in the US.
While unions are more popular than they've been in decades, a smaller share of workers are in unions.

It's unclear if the strike wave will translate into a labor resurgence absent pro-union legislation.

If it feels like unions are having a moment, that's because they are.

It's the first time writers and actors have gone on strike at the same since 1960, effectively putting the film and television industries on hold. A wave of unionization has also hit digital media — staffers of this publication were on strike for 13 days last month, setting a record for the industry. And unionization efforts have come for companies like Amazon, Starbucks, and Trader Joe's.

In 2022, the number of workers involved in a work stoppage was 50% higher than the year prior, a significant resurgence in strike activity. According to Gallup polling, 71% of Americans said they approved of labor unions in 2022, up from 48% in 2009, marking the highest level of public support since 1965.

But none of this necessarily means we're approaching a union boom anywhere near the levels of the 1930s.

Despite the increase in strikes last year, the share of American workers in a union actually continued to decline, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The percentage of workers who were members of a union was 10.1% in 2022, a drop of 0.2 percentage points from the year prior. In the 1950s, one in three workers were in unions.

Workers in more industries have expressed interest in unionizing, but forming a new union is still very difficult, according to Alexander Hertel-Fernandez, an associate professor at Columbia University. There are also examples of companies engaging in union-busting tactics or discouraging unionizing, with federal labor officials accusing companies like Apple of illegal anti-union practices.

David Leonhardt of The New York Times noted the labor movement of the 1930s was sparked by legislation, something that seems unlikely in today's Congress. House Democrats did pass the Protecting the Right to Organize Act in 2021, which Biden supported, but it lacked the support needed from Senate Republicans.

So while unions are certainly having a moment, it's not yet clear if we're approaching the labor resurgence that some are hoping for.

 Net Zero helps Canada to balance non-eliminable emissions from wildfires

Yingzhe Zhang

CGTN

As Canada faces one of its worst wildfire seasons in history, the country has already emitted more than 600 million tons of carbon dioxide from forest fires this year.  This is almost as much as Canada used to radiate into the atmosphere over the course of an entire year.

Like the consequence of wildfires, many greenhouse gases are difficult to eliminate in sectors such as agriculture and aviation.

Carbon residue is almost permanent, as studies show that around 30 to 70 percent of carbon dioxide remains after 500 years.

This is where the concept of Net Zero becomes important, Kirsten Ziekfeld from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says, adding that countries need to balance any emissions that they cannot eliminate by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.