Wednesday, July 19, 2023

The American Public's Views on Israel Are Undergoing a Profound Shift. Washington Hasn't Caught Up

Yasmeen Serhan
Wed, July 19, 2023 

ISRAEL-US-POLITICS-DIPLOMACY
Flags of Israel and the U.S. are hung up along streets by the Jerusalem municipality on July 10, 2022, ahead of U.S. President Joe Biden's visit to Israel. 
Credit - Ahmad Gharabli—AFP via Getty Images

When Israeli President Isaac Herzog addresses a joint session of the U.S. Congress on Wednesday, there will be some notable absences. At least five progressive U.S. lawmakers, including Reps. Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Jamaal Bowman, and Cori Bush, confirmed that they will be skipping Herzog’s speech in protest of Israel’s policies toward Palestinians in the occupied territories, which some Democrats recently described as “racist” and akin to apartheid.

While these Democrats may be in the minority among their congressional peers, their positions are more mainstream than the D.C. establishment might suggest. Polls this year have shown that the gap between the American public and those elected to represent them is widening when it comes to U.S. policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly among Democrats. This year, for the first time, an annual Gallup survey found that Democrats’ sympathies lie more with Palestinians than Israelis by a margin of 49% to 38%. The survey found that sympathy toward Palestinians among U.S. adults is at a new high of 31%, while the proportion not favoring either side is at a new low of 15%. That’s a remarkable shift from only a decade ago, when sympathy toward Palestinians stood at just 12%. During that same period, sympathy toward Israelis has declined from 64% to 54%.


Other recent surveys, carried out by researchers at the University of Maryland and Ipsos, reveal similarly noteworthy trends. A new poll published on the eve of Herzog’s address found that, in the absence of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, three-quarters of Americans would choose a democratic Israel that is no longer Jewish over a Jewish Israel that denies full citizenship and equality to non-Jews. The U.S. and the wider international community are still officially committed to a two-state solution, but many experts believe it’s no longer viable as a result of Israeli settlement expansion.

Americans are also increasingly less likely to describe Israel as a democracy. When asked to describe the way Israel looks in a poll conducted between March and April, only 9% of respondents chose “a vibrant democracy,” a common descriptor for Israel among U.S. officialdom. The rest chose “a flawed democracy” (13%), “a state with restricted minority rights” (7%), and “a state with segregation similar to apartheid” (13%). Some 56% responded with “I don’t know.” Shibley Telhami, a Middle East expert at the University of Maryland who conducted the poll, tells TIME that the percentage of “don’t knows” was surprising. He says that this suggests that those polled “are either uncertain or they’re uncomfortable answering.”

These shifting opinions coincide with a particularly tense period in Israel, which over the past year has been marked by unprecedented and sustained protests against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his right-wing government’s efforts to weaken the judiciary, the sole administrative check on their power. It has also featured an uptick in violence in the occupied Palestinian territories, which have been subject to deadly raids and, in the case of Huwara, what one Israeli general described as a “pogrom” carried out by Israeli settlers. The violence has resulted in the killing of at least 174 Palestinians this year, according to the U.N., putting 2023 on course to become the deadliest for Palestinians on record since the body began recording the number of fatalities in 2005. At least 23 Israelis have been killed in the occupied territories during the same period.

While lawmakers such as Tlaib (the first Palestinian American woman elected to Congress) and Omar have long been critical of Israel’s treatment of Palestinians—they were banned from visiting the country in 2019—disquiet over Israel’s rightward shift has been growing among Democratic lawmakers in recent years, including among traditionally pro-Israel politicians on Capitol Hill. “We have always said that the U.S.-Israel relationship is built on shared interests and on shared values, but clearly we do not share the values of someone like Ben-Gvir,” Sen. Chris Van Hollen, a leading Democratic lawmaker on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told Israeli newspaper Haaretz following a recent visit to the country, referencing one of Netanyahu’s far-right coalition partners.

Read More: Biden’s Hidden Birthday Message for Israel

And it’s not just politicians. Noura Erakat, an associate professor at Rutgers University and author of Justice For Some: Law and the Question of Palestine, tells TIME that there has been a “serious shift” across academic associations, the arts, and other social justice movements when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. “There is now clear and robust support and understanding of Palestine as a freedom struggle,” she says.

There has also been a notable shift within the American Jewish community, where the subject of Israel has become more polarizing in recent years. A 2021 Pew survey found that while more than half (58%) of American Jews express an attachment toward Israel, markedly fewer approve of its government’s leadership (40%) or its efforts toward achieving peace with the Palestinians (33%).

But this disquiet has yet to manifest itself within Washington—a reality that was best exemplified in recent days by the uproar over comments made by Rep. ​​Pramila Jayapal, the Democratic chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, who came under fire for referring to Israel as a “racist state.” Jayapal ultimately walked back her comments—explaining that she doesn’t believe the “idea” of Israel as a nation is racist, but that the discriminatory policies perpetuated by its government are—though not before being denounced by congressional Republicans (some of whom dubbed the remarks “anti-Semitic”) and many of her own Democratic colleagues. A resolution affirming that Israel “is not a racist or apartheid state” was passed by the House of Representatives on Tuesday, with 412 lawmakers in support and 9 against.

Nor has this shift been acknowledged within the White House. Despite President Joe Biden’s criticism of Netanyahu’s governing coalition—one composed of ultranationalist and pro-settlement leaders that the President described as “one of the most extremist” he’s seen—his administration has resisted calls to leverage U.S. aid to Israel or to ensure that U.S. funding isn’t used in the military detention of Palestinian children. On Monday, Biden extended an invitation to Netanyahu for a face-to-face meeting in the U.S. after months of delays, though it is as yet unclear if such a meeting would take place in the White House.

U.S. lawmakers are undoubtedly aware of this widening gap. “They would have to have their heads buried in the sand not to see a world changing around them,” says Erakat. But American public opinion doesn’t always dictate U.S. policy, nor is this issue as front of mind as more pressing foreign policy concerns, such as the ongoing war in Ukraine.

“Obviously, policymaking is not just about public opinion,” says Yousef Munayyer, a senior fellow at the Arab Center in Washington, D.C. and an expert on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. “In the United States in particular, it’s about elections, it’s about interest groups, and it’s also about American geopolitical interests. And all of those things coming together have made it easier for American policymakers to hold on to the old pro-Israel policies than to be responsive to a base that is increasingly calling for change.”

The question is how long that remains sustainable. “This is going to continue to shake the U.S.-Israel relationship,” Munayyer adds. “When exactly that translates into policy change is not something we can tell.”


Democrats are increasingly divided on Israel as its president visits Washington

Israeli President Isaac Herzog is expected to give an address to a joint session of Congress on Wednesday.


Alexander Nazaryan
·Senior White House Correspondent
Updated Wed, July 19, 2023 

WASHINGTON — The visit of Israeli President Isaac Herzog to Washington this week is exposing the growing divisions between moderate and progressive Democrats when it comes to the Jewish state.

Herzog is the top opposition figure in the right-wing government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has tried to institute highly unpopular reforms that would curb the power of the generally liberal judiciary branch.


Israeli President Isaac Herzog speaks to the media following a meeting with President Biden at the White House on Tuesday. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Violence between Israelis and Palestinians in the West Bank is also escalating, with younger militants taking advantage of the Palestinian Authority’s eroding credibility among a stateless and impoverished people.

Herzog met with President Biden on Tuesday. On Wednesday he will give an address to a joint session of Congress. His appearance on Capitol Hill is proving especially divisive, revealing the widening gulf among Democrats.

Read more from Yahoo News: Israel’s democracy crisis explained

A progressive boycott


Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., at a press conference in Washington on June 22.
 (Paul Morigi/Getty Images for Just Majority)

Several members of the informal progressive House caucus known as "the Squad" have said they would boycott Herzog’s speech on Wednesday. Squad members also boycotted Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi when he addressed Congress last month.

The boycott of Herzog’s address is being led by Reps. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, both of whom are Muslim. Tlaib is of Palestinian descent.

“The Israeli government is responsible for enforcing an apartheid state and rampantly abusing the rights of Palestinians. Congress should not be giving a platform to the President of a country that shows no respect for human rights. I will not be attending his joint address,” tweeted Rep. Cori Bush of Missouri, who has joined the boycott. So have Reps. Jamaal Bowman and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York.

On Saturday, Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington state, leader of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, called Israel a “racist state” during a gathering of activists in Chicago. The remark caused widespread outrage, including from some Democrats, and Jayapal issued an apology the following day.

Read more from our partners: Israeli leader’s visit sparks internal Democratic fight

Republicans see an opening


Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley speaks at the Christians United for Israel summit on Monday.
 (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Although most American Jews are Democrats, it is Republicans who are now more closely affiliated with Israel, especially since Netanyahu is a close ally of former President Donald Trump.

Republicans seized on the anti-Israel sentiment on Capitol Hill.

“It’s time to censure the Squad and get antisemitism out of America for good,” former South Carolina Gov. and United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley, who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination, said at a meeting of pro-Israel Christians in Washington on Monday.

On Tuesday, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., planned to hold a vote on a pro-Israel measure that is clearly intended to force Democrats to take a stance on a divisive issue.

“If there’s anybody in the [Democratic Party] that does not think that antisemitism is bad, then I think this puts them on the record,” said Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, who introduced the measure.

Read more from our partners: Dems grit their teeth to get through another awkward Israel dustup

Biden stands firm


Herzog and Biden in the Oval Office on Tuesday. 
(Shawn Thew/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Biden has moved to the left on many domestic issues. But when it comes to foreign policy, he remains a mainstream Democrat who has tried to strengthen long-standing bonds instead of upending them.

That has held true when it comes to Israel. “America’s commitment to Israel is firm and it is ironclad,” Biden told reporters as his Oval Office meeting with Herzog was about to begin.

Biden spoke with Netanyahu on Monday, finally extending him a White House invitation.

But the White House has also been hesitant to condemn progressives with different views. Asked by Yahoo News if Rep. Bush had lapsed into antisemitism by calling Israel an “apartheid state,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre gave a less than firm answer that downplayed differences between the White House and congressional Democrats.

"I cannot speak to other congressional members in the House,” she said.

Read more from our partners: Biden takes fire from both sides ahead of Herzog meeting

Rep. McCollum skips Israeli president’s Congress speech


Cheryl Diaz Meyer/Star Tribune/TNS

Hunter Woodall, Star Tribune
Wed, July 19, 2023 

WASHINGTON – The longest serving member of Minnesota's congressional delegation said Wednesday she is not attending Israeli President Isaac Herzog's speech to Congress.

Rep. Betty McCollum, the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations defense subcommittee, has been a critic of Israel's treatment of Palestinians during her time in Congress.

"Due to a longstanding commitment with tribal leaders which had to be rescheduled because of an added Interior Appropriations markup this week, I am unable [to] attend the joint address in person," McCollum said in a statement. "I will be reading the transcript of the speech in its entirety to stay apprised of the issues raised."

Her decision comes after Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar and a small number of other progressives said earlier that they are boycotting Herzog's speech. The rest of Minnesota's congressional delegation attended the joint address.

McCollum's statement came after she voted present on a House resolution focused on Israel on Tuesday. The resolution, that passed with 412 yes votes, said "Israel is not a racist or apartheid state," that "Congress rejects all forms of antisemitism and xenophobia," and also added "the United States will always be a staunch partner and supporter of Israel."

Omar was among the nine Democrats to vote no on the resolution. The effort was voted on after the Congressional Progressive Caucus leader Rep. Pramila Jayapal called Israel "a racist state." Jayapal apologized and walked back her comment, but her words caused major congressional tensions ahead of Herzog's speech.

Progressive Democrats protest Israeli president’s address to US Congress


Joan E Greve
Tue, July 18, 2023 

Photograph: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images

Democratic divisions over Israel were on stark display on Tuesday, as lawmakers prepared to welcome Isaac “Bougie” Herzog, the president of Israel, for an address to a joint session of Congress.

Several progressive House members, including Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, intend to boycott Herzog’s speech on Wednesday to protest against the treatment of Palestinians under the government of Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Related: Why progressives like AOC are right to boycott Israeli President Isaac Herzog | Peter Beinart

“In solidarity with the Palestinian people and all those who have been harmed by Israel’s apartheid government, I will be boycotting President Herzog’s joint address to Congress,” Representative Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat of Michigan, said on Monday. “I urge all members of Congress who stand for human rights for all to join me.”

House Democratic leaders have struck a much more conciliatory tone toward Herzog, embracing the opportunity to hear from the Israeli president.

“President Bougie Herzog has been a force for good in Israeli society,” Hakeem Jeffries, the House Democratic leader, said on Friday. “I look forward to welcoming him with open arms when he comes to speak before Congress.”

The tension between House Democrats reached a boiling point over the weekend, after Pramila Jayapal, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, described Israel as a “racist state” while speaking at a conference in Chicago.

Jayapal clarified her comments on Sunday, saying: “I do not believe the idea of Israel as a nation is racist. I do, however, believe that Netanyahu’s extreme rightwing government has engaged in discriminatory and outright racist policies and that there are extreme racists driving that policy within the leadership of the current government.”


The Congressional Progressive Caucus chair, Pramila Jayapal, described Israel as a ‘racist state’ before clarifying her comment. Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

House Republicans swiftly attacked Jayapal’s comments, calling on Democratic leaders to join them in rejecting the congresswoman’s criticism of Israel.

“I think if the Democrats want to believe that they do not have a conference that continues to make antisemitic remarks, they need to do something about it,” the House Republican speaker, Kevin McCarthy, said on Monday.

Amid the backlash, more than 40 House Democrats signed on to a statement lambasting Jayapal’s “unacceptable” remarks and praising Israel as “the only vibrant, progressive, and inclusive democracy in the region”. House Democratic leaders also issued a joint statement on Sunday denouncing the characterization of Israel as a “racist state”.

“As House Democratic leaders, we strongly support Israel’s right to exist as a homeland for the Jewish people,” the leaders said. “We are also firmly committed to a robust two-state solution where Israel and the Palestinian people can live side by side in peace and prosperity.”

Although the joint statement did not mention Jayapal by name, progressives balked at the leaders’ rejection of one of their colleagues in an effort to quiet criticism from Republicans.

“I am proud to call [Jayapal] a colleague, a friend and our CPC Chair,” Omar said on Tuesday on Twitter. “I am also deeply concerned about the shaming – often of women of color – when they speak out about human rights violations happening in Palestine and Israel, especially when similar concern is not expressed for the lives being lost and families being torn apart.”

House Republicans seized the opportunity to highlight the Democratic divisions over Israel. The House Republican majority leader, Steve Scalise, announced on Monday that the chamber would vote on Tuesday on a resolution asserting “the state of Israel is not a racist or apartheid state”.

“It should be an easy vote,” Scalise said on Twitter. “Will [Democrats] stand with our ally or capitulate to the anti-Semitic radicals in their party?”

As his congressional allies clashed over Herzog’s visit, Joe Biden met with the Israeli president in the Oval Office on Tuesday.

“This is a friendship, I believe, that’s just simply unbreakable,” Biden told Herzog. “America’s commitment to Israel is firm, and it is ironclad.”

A day before his meeting with Herzog, Biden spoke to Netanyahu over the phone, and the two leaders agreed to meet in the coming months. But a spokesperson for the national security council, John Kirby, would not specify whether that meeting will take place at the White House, as Netanyahu has repeatedly requested.

“They will meet probably before the end of this year,” Kirby told reporters on Monday. “And all the details of the ‘wheres’ and the ‘whens’ are still being worked out.”


Tlaib labels Israel an ‘apartheid state’ in impassioned floor speech



Nick Robertson
Tue, July 18, 2023

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) harshly denounced a House resolution supporting Israel in a floor speech on Tuesday, the day before Israeli President Isaac Herzog will address a joint meeting of Congress.

“Israel is an apartheid state. To assert otherwise, Mr. Speaker, in the face of this body of evidence, is an attempt to deny the reality and an attempt to normalize violence of apartheid,” Tlaib said.

“Don’t forget: This body, this Congress, supported the South African apartheid regime, and it was bipartisan as well,” she added.

Tlaib, who is of Palestinian heritage, is one of a slate of progressive members of Congress who plan to skip Herzog’s speech to Congress on Wednesday out of protest against the Israeli government.

The protests come as violence against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank has increased in recent months, and the Israeli government faces internal strife over attempted judicial reforms.

Tlaib pointed out that the United Nations as well as advocacy groups Human Rights WatchAmnesty International and B’tselem have labeled Israel an apartheid state.

The resolution supporting Israel passed overwhelmingly, with nine members of Congress — mostly Democratic members of the progressive “Squad” — voting against. It specifically states that Israel is “not a racist or apartheid state.”

On Saturday, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said Israel is a “racist state,” vowing to vote against the resolution and skip Herzog’s speech.

Those comments sparked calls for action from Republicans who believed the remarks were antisemitic.

Democrats have dismissed the outrage as a political squabble, but it has caused some rifts within the party.

“There is a difference between criticizing the right of Israel to exist, which is beyond the pale, and criticizing the conduct of the Israeli government, which I think is horrible,” Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), who is Jewish, said Tuesday.

Herzog met with President Biden on Tuesday.

ECOCIDE
Large Oil Spill Reported Near Site of Pemex Platform Blast in Gulf of Mexico

Amy Stillman
Tue, July 18, 2023



(Bloomberg) -- Petroleos Mexicanos is responding to an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico near the site of a deadly explosion at one of the state-owned company’s natural gas platforms.

Scientist Guillermo Tamburini Beliveau detected the leak July 4, days before the blast off the coast of Mexico’s Campeche, Greenpeace and others said in a statement. The spill was about 400 square kilometers (154 square miles) earlier this month and may have grown to about two-thirds the size of Mexico City, Tamburini said in a presentation that includes satellite images of the leak.

Pemex confirmed the spill in a statement but said it was far smaller than the groups estimated. Most of the oil was recovered immediately, and the leak is now under control, the company said.

The oil giant has come under scrutiny for its safety and environmental record after frequent accidents and explosions at its facilities. The company has $107.4 billion in debt, the most of any oil major, and faces a liquidity crunch. In the second half of May alone, half of its refineries caught fire, while the company reported a spate of accidents in a single day at three separate facilities in February.

The spill might not be connected to the blast earlier this month, but it’s much larger than a typical platform leak, said Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate, a lead researcher on a study from the Polytechnic University of Valencia that last year uncovered two large methane leaks from a Pemex offshore platform.

Since the spill started before the gas platform fire in early July, “I would tend to think that these are two unfortunate incidents that have coincided on similar dates but do not have to be related,” she said in an interview. “But it is true that this particular leak is, by far, much bigger and it is lasting much longer than normal, which is undoubtedly very worrying.”
Poll: Amid heat wave, more Americans say climate change has 'made things worse' in their lives

Andrew Romano
·West Coast Correspondent
Wed, July 19, 2023 

National Park Service rangers pose next to an unofficial heat reading in Death Valley National Park in California on July 16. (Ronda Churchill/AFP via Getty Images)

As blistering heat waves, fatal floods or toxic wildfire smoke afflict nearly every corner of the U.S. this summer, a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll finds that a growing number of Americans say climate change has “made things worse” in their lives — and will continue to do so in the future.

The survey of 1,638 U.S. adults, which was conducted from July 13 to 17, shows that more than a third (34%) now believe they have already been personally affected in a negative way by climate change, up 7 points from October 2021 (the last time Yahoo News and YouGov asked the question). Likewise, 47% of Americans — a 5-point increase — now say their own lives will get worse in years to come because of the warming planet.

And while nearly half of U.S. adults (48%) say climate change has not personally affected them yet, just 30% say it will make “no difference” to them in the future.


It’s worth noting that much of the shift in perceptions of how climate change has “made things worse” in “your life so far” has been concentrated among younger adults, who have gone from being the least likely age group to cite a negative effect in 2021 to the most likely group today:


Age 18-29: up 17 points, from 20% to 37%


Age 30-34: up 9 points, from 24% to 33%


Age 45-64: up 4 points, from 27% to 31%


Age 65+: down 1 point, from 35% to 34%


The pervasiveness of this summer’s extreme weather seems to have influenced views. Two years ago, in July 2021, 54% of Americans said yes when asked if they had “noticed more extreme weather events (heat waves, fires, storms, etc.) where you live.” Today, 57% say yes. A 13-point jump among the youngest adults (from 47% to 60%) again accounts for most of the change.

Despite the continuing politicization of climate issues, most Americans now accept that climate change is “contributing to extreme weather events.” When one half of respondents were asked if that is the case regarding the ongoing “heat wave across the Southwest,” 55% said yes; when the other half were asked if the same is true about the “flooding this week in Vermont,” nearly as many (52%) answered in the affirmative — even though flash floods could be considered a less obvious side effect of global warming than hot temperatures. (Hotter air contains more moisture, leading to heavier rains.)

Overall, nearly 8 in 10 Americans agree that Earth’s climate is changing, with 54% saying it’s changing “as a result of human activity” and just 25% saying human activity isn’t responsible. Only 8% of Americans refuse to accept that the climate is changing.


On a similar note, 56% of adults describe climate change as “an established scientific fact," and even more (61%) say they are at least somewhat worried about it. A full 30% say they are “very worried” — including 65% of those who say climate change has already “made things worse” in their lives. Additionally, 17% of Americans who say climate change has already made their lives worse also name it as their most important issue when thinking about next year’s election — just behind inflation and democracy (20% each) and far ahead of the 3% of all other Americans who say climate change is the most important election issue for them.

This probably reflects the fact that people tend to care more about climate change after they’ve been personally affected — and perhaps also suggests that Americans who already care most about the issue are more likely to realize that it's exacerbating whatever extreme weather they experience.

At the moment, nearly half of all voters (48%) describe climate change as “an existential threat that must be addressed now with major legislation,” while fewer dismiss it as either “not a real threat” (27%) or “a threat the government has already done enough to address” (13%).

But the parties remain divided on whether the U.S. should take urgent action. Just 12% of voters who cast their ballot for Donald Trump in 2020 want major legislation; among 2020 Joe Biden voters, that number is 82%.

____________

The Yahoo News survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,638 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 13 to 17, 2023. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2020 election turnout and presidential vote, baseline party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Baseline party identification is the respondent’s most recent answer given prior to March 15, 2022, and is weighted to the estimated distribution at that time (32% Democratic, 27% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov’s opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 2.7%.
How a drugstore staple, made in an Indian factory and tainted with an antibiotic-resistant superbug, slipped past the FDA.

ByPeter Robison and Priyanka Pulla
July 17, 2023 

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a rod-shaped bacterium a fraction of a millimeter long. In a petri dish, it smells of corn tortillas. It’s opportunistic, invading any tissue that’s already compromised, and can be lethal: Among the especially vulnerable, the mortality rate can be as high as 50%. But perhaps the bacterium’s most notable characteristic is how hard it is to kill. The hardiest of pseudomonas are antibiotic-resistant superbugs that rage on no matter what drugs doctors throw at them.

In May 2022, an unusually virulent strain appeared for the first time in the US, in a hospital patient in Los Angeles. Over the summer three more local cases emerged. As doctors tried to fight the bug, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention began to track it, reviewing every location and item the patients had in common. Pseudomonas aeruginosa can spread even among people who never came into contact with the original source. The bacteria showed up in Connecticut, then Utah. It was found in people’s lungs and in their blood. It took eight months for the agency to determine the culprit: over-the-counter eyedrops. The two affected brands were widely available for less than half the price of better-known ones. They weren’t counterfeit. They weren’t imported illegally. They were made in India and sold by two US distributors in boxes stamped with the drug inventory numbers that the Food and Drug Administration issued.

The eyedrops from EzriCare LLC and Delsam Pharma LLC were recalled after the pseudomonas contributed to four deaths, 18 cases of vision loss and scores of infections. The particulars are horrific. In four people the bacteria spread so quickly that doctors had to remove their eyeballs to stop it. Others had their corneas turn into cloudy abscesses of scar tissue. Some endured migraines, discharges from their eyes and light sensitivity that kept them in the dark for days and even months.

Attached File

What made the outbreak possible is a gaping hole in the FDA’s supervision of over-the-counter medicines. They’ve long been among the agency’s lowest priorities—the assumption being that even if they don’t work, they probably won’t kill anyone. These drugs are essentially produced and sold on the honor system. A company doesn’t have to prove to the agency that its medicine is safe or effective or that it’s being made in proper conditions. There’s no testing involved; no inspection required. A company must attest only that it’s using approved ingredients and complying with good manufacturing practices. Basically, paperwork.

It turns out, the contaminated eyedrops were sold by two inexperienced entrepreneurs who didn’t know each other but had found the same tiny company in Chennai, India, to make the supposedly sterile medicine. Ezriel Green is a wholesale drug distributor in New Jersey; Kuppusamy Arumugam is a pharmacist in the Bronx, New York. Neither of them ever sold a drug of their own before the eyedrops. Records show that their manufacturer, Global Pharma Healthcare Pvt Ltd., had never exported any medicine of any kind to the US. Eyedrops must be made with a guarantee that they’re sterile, a demanding and expensive process. Global Pharma was allowed to ship hundreds of thousands of bottles of eyedrops without ever having the FDA inspect its factory.

The eyedrops were marketed as being free of preservatives. But that meant they also lacked the chemicals to prevent the growth of bacteria. Most manufacturers sell such drops only in single-use vials or specially designed multiuse ones to maintain sterility. Both cost more. Global Pharma’s preservative-free drops came in regular, cheaper-to-make bottles containing multiple doses.

The FDA’s automated process for listing an OTC drug didn’t flag that crucial flaw. Nor did it spot the other warning sign: the insubstantial backgrounds of the manufacturer and the distributors. Jeremy Kahn, an FDA spokesperson, says the agency deactivates listings that don’t meet its requirements and is working on ways to improve its monitoring. He says the agency’s “highest priority is protecting public health,” which includes recommending and coordinating voluntary recalls, sending public notifications, and inspecting and holding discussions with the companies. As for the contaminated eyedrops, he says the agency is monitoring the situation.

The generic drug industry has stretched across the world to produce cheap drugs. Regulators haven’t kept up: In some places rules aren’t enforced; in others they’re inadequate. The result is shortages and recalls and health risks. The FDA announced more than 900 recalls in 2022, triple the number four years ago. India, which supplies one-fifth of the world’s generic drugs, has come under increasing scrutiny for quality problems. Manufacturing lapses in generic cancer medicines, for instance, led to shortages that left patients waiting for potentially life-saving treatments this year. The World Health Organization linked the deaths of more than 60 children in Gambia last year to toxic medicinal syrups made in India.

How U.S. officials cracked mystery of eyedrops that blinded people across country



By — Mike Stobbe, Associated Press
Health Feb 28, 2023


NEW YORK (AP) — The patients’ eyes were painfully inflamed. They could sense light but could see almost nothing else. A doctor called one case the worst eye infection he’d ever seen.

It was the beginning of a national outbreak caused by an extremely worrisome bacteria — one that some say heralds an era in which antibiotics no longer work and seemingly routine infections get horribly out of hand.

At last count, 58 Americans in 13 states have been infected, including at least one who died and at least five who suffered permanent vision loss. All have been linked to tainted eyedrops, leading to a recall.

READ MORE: This researcher builds ‘cool stuff for blind people.’ He’s also trying to help transform society

Experts marvel at how disease detectives pieced together the case: Patients were scattered across the country. The illnesses occurred over the span of months. The infections were found in different parts of the body — in the blood of some patients, in the lungs of others.

But scientists also shudder, because they have long worried common bacteria will evolve so that antibiotics no longer work against them.

“This really shows us that it’s not something theoretical and in the future. It’s here,” said Dr. Luis Ostrosky, an infectious diseases expert at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

This account is drawn from phone and email interviews with U.S. disease investigators, health officials in three states and regulators in the U.S. and India.

___

The investigation started in May in Los Angeles County, California. A patient who’d recently been to an ophthalmologist came in with a bad eye infection. A month later, local health officials got a second report. Another bad eye infection, same eye doctor.

Two more cases were reported in the county before the summer was over. The patients’ eyes were inflamed with heavy yellow pus that obscured most of the pupil. Among the four, two had complete vision loss in the affected eye.

The hospital that reported the first infection determined it was caused by a bacteria called Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The institution, which was equipped to do advanced genetic testing, quickly realized the bacteria had a rare gene that protected it from the effects of commonly used antibiotics.

It was an early break for investigators, said Kelsey OYong, of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health.

OYong and her colleagues knew they were dealing with a scary germ, and they notified the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Pseudomonas infections are not new. Drug-resistant strains of the bacteria cause more than 30,000 infections annually among hospitalized patients in the U.S. and more than 2,500 deaths, the CDC said. It can spread through contaminated hands or medical equipment, and is particularly dangerous to fragile patients who have catheters or are on breathing machines.

But the California infections were in patients’ eyes, not more common spots like the blood and lungs. Also, the lab analysis determined the infections were caused by a Pseudomonas germ that could resist just about every antibiotic.

The only thing that worked was a newer antibiotic called cefiderocol, administered by IV.

___

Over the summer, Pseudomonas outbreaks were seen at long-term care facilities in two other states.

In Connecticut, the first case was in June. Eventually, the bacteria was found in 25 patients from five nursing homes in different parts of the state, said Christopher Boyle, a spokesperson for Connecticut’s health department.

In Davis County, Utah, north of Salt Lake City, the first of six cases was reported to the CDC in August. While the patients had the bacteria, none actually got sick, said Sarah Willardson of the Davis County Health Department.

L.A. County health investigators thought the cases there might be due to some kind of equipment contamination at the eye doctor’s office.

But that suspicion faded in early October, when genetic testing showed the clusters in California, Connecticut and Utah were all caused by the same bacteria strain — a version of the germ that hadn’t been seen anywhere before.

“That made us start thinking that this was some kind of a product,” said Maroya Walters, the CDC official supervising the investigation.

___

As the year went on, other reports of drug-resistant Pseudomonas came in, including a Washington man who died with a bloodstream infection.

Given the initial cluster at the California ophthalmologist’s office, investigators suspected an eye care product was the culprit, though that hypothesis was complicated by the fact that the infections at the long-term care facilities were mainly found in the lungs.

But it wasn’t impossible. Tear ducts drain into the nasal cavity, which leads to the lungs and could provide a path to deep inside the body.

In early November, investigators determined most of the infected Connecticut patients had been given artificial tears, though it wasn’t clear who had been given which brand.

Then, on Nov. 9, a Florida hospital contacted the CDC to report bad eye infections connected to an outpatient clinic. A check of artificial tears brands used in Connecticut, Florida and Utah pointed to one common product: EzriCare Artificial Tears, an over-the-counter product marketed in the U.S. by New Jersey-based EzriCare LLC and made in India by Global Pharma Healthcare.

___

The Pseudomonas bacteria is “pretty much everywhere” in India and the drug-resistant germ is common in many hospitals, said Dr. Gagandeep Kang, who studies microbes in the Christian Medical College in the same state as Global Pharma’s factory.

In January, genetic sequencing confirmed the Florida cases were caused by the same bacteria strain as the clusters in California, Connecticut and Utah. On Jan. 20, the CDC urged doctors to avoid recommending the EzriCare product.

There was no recall or widespread public notice, however. Investigators had strong circumstantial evidence pointing toward the EzriCare drops, but didn’t get more conclusive proof until more than a week later after testing found the bacteria in seven open bottles of EzriCare Artificial Tears in Connecticut and New Jersey.

In early February, CDC officials issued a public health alert and the FDA recalled the EzriCare eyedrops and Delsam Pharma’s Artificial Tears, another product made by Global Pharma. Last week, the recall was expanded to include Delsam Pharma’s Artificial Eye Ointment.

Global Pharma didn’t respond to emailed requests for comment.

___

A month before the first recall, the FDA blocked imports of Global Pharma products.

FDA spokesperson Audra Harrison said the U.S. import ban was “unrelated to the outbreak,” and was instead based on the company’s “inadequate response” to a records request and problems with its manufacturing procedures. She wouldn’t say what those problems were.

The subsequent recall, she said, was recommended due to lack of microbial testing and issues with the product’s formulation and packaging.

The FDA, tasked with assuring the safety of drug products shipped to the U.S., has long struggled to inspect facilities in China and India that account for the vast majority of raw materials used in American medicines. A search of FDA’s online inspection database shows no records of agency staff visiting the plant.

Indian drug inspectors visited the plant and the country’s drug controller asked Global Pharma to stop making all products related to treating eye disorders until they finish their investigation, said P.V. Vijayalakshmi, the drug controller for southern Tamil Nadu state.

___

Ostrosky, the University of Texas expert, called the U.S. investigation “a public health victory” saying it shows that fighting drug-resistant bacteria requires international collaboration and investment. But he also said the case is disheartening.

An infection that’s usually easy to treat with common antibiotic eyedrops “has become an infection that can be deadly and has pretty much no treatment except one IV antibiotic,” he said.

Pseudomonas now joins a growing list of bugs — including bacteria that cause urinary tract infections — that are getting increasingly difficult to treat, Ostrosky added.

“It’s like a wave coming for us,” he said.

AP writers Matthew Perrone in Washington and Aniruddha Ghosal in New Delhi contributed.

'That's what solidarity is': This UPS worker fired back at a commenter who said drivers don't deserve $42/hour because it takes 'zero skill' — explains the real reason they could go on strike

Serah Louis
Wed, July 19, 2023 


UPS workers are prepared to strike come August if the company doesn’t meet their demands for better pay and benefits. But with the deadline looming, some Americans are now pushing back on whether the postal delivery workers are entitled to those higher salaries in the first place.

"No way you deserve 42 an hour as a delivery guy lol. Takes zero skill,” wrote a viewer on one of UPS driver Juan Trujillo’s TikTok posts.

Trujillo fired back in a viral video, claiming that even $42/hour isn’t enough, which is why full-time UPS workers will be getting a raise of around $1.50 this year. UPS typically adds a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) to its wages each year in addition to any other base raises, but the company has yet to confirm a hike for this year.

“We’re not going on strike because the drivers aren’t getting a raise,” Trujillo continues. “We’re going on strike because the part-timers are only making $16 an hour, and that’s unacceptable.”

If UPS and union members don’t reach an agreement by Aug. 1, 97% of union members have voted to authorize a strike — which would be the first in 25 years for the postal delivery giant.

Why UPS workers may go on strike

The Teamsters union, which represents about 340,000 UPS workers, is calling for better benefits, pay raises and to ax the two-tier wage system for part-time and full-time workers.

Delivering packages can often be a physically demanding job and especially with temperatures this summer hitting record highs, the conditions can range from uncomfortable to unsafe. UPS has reported at least 143 heat-related injuries to the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration since 2015. In some cases, workers have been hospitalized, or even died.

A tentative agreement over air conditioning in delivery vehicles was reached in June, but negotiations fell apart last week, with each side accusing the other of walking away from the table.

On the UPS website, it says full-timers make $95,000 a year and part-timers earn $20 an hour on average after 30 days — but union leader Sean O’Brien told ABC News that’s “not telling the true story.”

O’Brien says full-timers work 60 to 65 hours a week, while part-time wages are actually closer to $16 an hour.

“UPS is selective. They pick and choose on who they're going to pay, what area, and they can raise the rates,” he says.

O’Brien says part-time workers are currently “working for poverty wages,” and his goal is to ensure UPS establishes a livable starting wage for these workers. The company reported over $100 billion in revenue last year, and O’Brien believes union members deserve to reap some of those benefits as well.

And many full-time workers agree. “I’ll sacrifice two weeks of work if [I have to] because that’s what solidarity is. That’s what we do,” Trujillo says in his video.

What a strike means for the economy


A 10-day UPS strike could cost the U.S. economy over $7 billion, with $4 billion in losses for consumers and small businesses, according to analysis from consulting firm Anderson Economic Group. This would also mark the most expensive strike in at least a century.

UPS makes up 24% of the market share by parcel volume, according to Pitney Bowes Parcel Shipping Index. Competitor FedEx also revealed in an internal report obtained by NPR that, "In the event of a market disruption, no carrier can absorb all UPS volume.”

If a strike goes ahead, Americans can expect slower delivery times, supply chain disruptions and even higher shipping costs.

Ohio State University logistics professor Terry Esper also told Forbes that rural areas with limited delivery options and small businesses that can’t afford to switch providers will be hardest hit by the strike.

Esper says even if businesses do find another provider, since many are contracted to delivery companies, any last-minute switching to standard published rates could drastically push up costs — and likely result in those costs being passed on to consumers.

White House 'confident' UPS, Teamsters will reach agreement ahead of potential workers strike


Olivia Evans, Louisville Courier Journal
Wed, July 19, 2023 

UPS and Teamsters, the union representing nearly 340,000 UPS workers are trying to reach a new five-year labor contract before the current contract expires at midnight on July 31.

Earlier this month, the two sides departed the bargaining table without coming to a consensus on a new contract. Teamsters have repeatedly said they will strike starting Aug. 1 if a new contract is not ratified. In June, Teamsters passed a strike authorization vote, giving the union the ability to strike if and when they deem necessary.

On Sunday the Associated Press reported that International Brotherhood of Teamsters General President Sean O'Brien said he has asked the White House not to intervene in the dispute between UPS and the union.

Since June, the union has declared it will strike on Aug. 1 if a tentative agreement is not reached on a full contract before expiration on July 31 at midnight.

If Teamsters were to strike, it would be the largest single employer strike in U.S. history and would cause massive disruption to the supply chain and U.S. economy.

UPS supports the national and global economy. The company estimates it "transports more than 3% of global (gross domestic product) and about 6% of U.S. GDP daily," including everything from home-ordered Amazon packages to business shipments to medical necessities.

In an economy dependent on the logistics and shipping industry, a UPS employee strike could have drastic consequences. Customers could see slower delivery of goods to households and higher prices on products and shipping, according to the Associated Press.

Here's what we know about the federal government's involvement in the UPS and Teamsters dispute.

What is the White House saying?


Recently, O'Brien has started saying Teamsters would be willing to return to negotiations. He also recently asked President Joe Biden to not intervene between UPS and Teamsters negotiations.

"Anytime ... there are these discussions we want to ensure we're playing a constructive and productive role," said U.S. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Monday during a White House press briefing.

Jean-Pierre said the White House will continue to be in touch with both UPS and Teamsters and will "support any efforts to reach a solution."

"We are confident that both sides are going to come to an agreement," Jean-Pierre said.

Does the federal government have the power to intervene in a strike?

Yes.

Under the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, the president could ask the attorney general to seek a federal court injunction to prevent or block a strike in court that was found to be endangering the public's health or safety. If the strike was found to endanger the public's health or safety, the two disputing parties could be ordered to reach a settlement within 60 days to resolve the dispute.

In 2002, then-President George W. Bush enacted the Taft-Hartley Act to stop an 11-day shutdown of 29 West Coast ports, the New York Times reported then.
Congress stopped the railroad strike in December. Can it do that with UPS?

In December, Biden signed legislation to prevent a strike by the railroad companies under the Railway Labor Act which also governs the UPS pilots and aircraft mechanics. At the time, President Biden warned a nationwide freight rail strike would be detrimental to the U.S. economy and would have triggered "a recession," USA Today reported.

Despite UPS having some of its employees governed under the Railway Labor Act, the current UPS dispute between the company and Teamsters does not fall under the Railway Labor Act.

USA Today White House correspondent Joey Garrison contributed to this report. Contact reporter Olivia Evans at oevans@courier-journal.com or on Twitter at @oliviamevans_

This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: UPS workers strike: White House asked not to intervene in negotiations


US retailers push for deal in UPS-Teamster talks as deadline looms

Lisa Baertlein
Wed, July 19, 2023 

UPS Teamsters picket ahead of an upcoming possible strike in Brooklyn, New York

By Lisa Baertlein

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A U.S. retail industry group on Wednesday urged United Parcel Service and the Teamsters union to reach a labor contract deal and avert a strike that could result in billions of dollars of economic losses.

The world's biggest package delivery firm and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters have until midnight on July 31 to reach a contract deal covering some 340,000 workers that sort, load and deliver packages in the United States.

A key sticking point in the talks is pay increases for experienced part-time workers who are making roughly the same or even less than new hires because starting wages jumped due to the labor shortage in the last few years.

If a deal is not done by the deadline, UPS workers have vowed to strike.

Any disruption to the business of UPS would be broadly felt because the company handles about a quarter of the parcel shipments in the United States - including deliveries for online retailers like Amazon.com, high-value prescription drugs for doctors and hospitals, and inventory for millions of other large and small businesses.

A 10-day strike could cost the U.S. economy more than $7 billion, according to a recent estimate from Anderson Economic Group.

"Even the most robust planning won't shield retailers or consumers from the impact of shutting down a key component in the supply chain as we head full-steam into back-to-school and then holiday shopping seasons," the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA) said.

Regardless of the outcome, UPS customers may face higher shipping rates.

"A new Teamsters deal could drive cost per piece (about) 2% higher than current expectations," Susquehanna analyst Bascome Majors said in a client note this week.

Shippers will end up absorbing that extra cost, said Alfredo Ortiz, CEO of the Job Creators Network, a conservative advocacy group started by Bernie Marcus, the co-founder of Home Depot.

"It gets passed on to customers. That's what we're really concerned about," Ortiz said.

(Reporting by Lisa Baertlein in Los Angeles; Editing by Chris Reese)

UPS pilots won’t fly if Teamsters strike

Eric Kulisch
Tue, July 18, 2023 

Two Airbus A300 freighters wait to be loaded at the UPS facility at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport.
 (Photo: Jim Allen/Freightwaves)

The union representing UPS pilots says they will not cross picket lines if Teamsters drivers and package sorters walk off the job when the current contract expires Aug. 1, resulting in the immediate shutdown of the express logistics company’s global air operations.


UPS (NYSE: UPS) has 3,300 pilots who are represented by the Independent Pilots Association (IPA), a separate union from the Teamsters.

“If the Teamsters are on strike, we will honor that strike and we will not fly,” IPA spokesman Brian Gaudet told FreightWaves.

UPS pilots are allowed to honor primary picket lines and did that for 16 days during the Teamsters’ strike in 1997.

Even with freighters in service, a strike by 340,000 package car drivers, truck drivers and warehouse workers would effectively ground most UPS Airlines operations because there would be few, if any, personnel to load and unload aircraft, process packages and deliver them to and from airport facilities. UPS says it is training nonunion employees to handle packages in the event there is a labor disruption. Parcel consulting firm ShipMatrix estimates management could move about 22% of the 18.6 million daily parcels in its system through contingency plans.

The Teamsters union has a $300 million to $350 million fund to support workers with strike pay, but UPS pilots who don’t report to work will bear the burden on their own.

“We don’t have a strike fund. If you’re a UPS pilot and you’re being asked to not cross that picket line, that means you stay in your hotel, you don’t show up, you don’t fly and it’s on your nickel,” said Gaudet.

UPS pilots ratified a two-year contract extension last August.

Bascome Majors, a senior transportation equity analyst at Susquehanna International Group, estimated in a research note that the Teamsters’ fund could last at least two weeks. Part-time workers would end up making about $210 less than their normal weekly pay, while full-timers would make about $1,450 less, which “could splinter enthusiasm for an extended strike and hurt Teamster solidarity.”

Barring a solidarity action by pilots, UPS likely would use a skeleton fleet to protect some international and overnight flights to its Worldport hub in Louisville, Kentucky, said Derek Lossing, founder of Cirrus Global Advisors, in an interview.

FedEx Express (NYSE: FDX) is the only air carrier that can realistically absorb UPS overnight, next-day package volumes, he explained. FedEx will try to take on as much of that business as it can because it is lucrative. Shippers that have a big relationship with UPS and only tender small volumes to FedEx are likely paying $6 to $8 more per parcel. FedEx can realistically handle 5% of UPS overnight volumes, Lossing added.

UPS management and the Teamsters union are at an impasse over wages and other economic issues after previously agreeing on other terms.
Rich labor deal poses risks

Analysts say UPS is in a bind because it already is experiencing some shipment diversion to rival FedEx and could drive away more customers if it sharply raises rates to help cover the cost of an overly generous Teamster deal.

A new Teamsters contract could drive the cost per parcel about 2% higher than current expectations and cut a dollar from UPS’ earnings per share next year, said Majors. Parcel consultants are forecasting that shippers can expect rate hikes of 6% to 10% in 2024, before a Teamsters contract is finalized.

Majors predicts the Teamsters’ contract will boost wages by 18% for part-time workers and 7% for full-timers, with another 7% increase in costs for inflation and other factors.

Many businesses that felt burned by UPS during the last three years, when demand soared and the carrier didn’t bend on applying steep rate hikes, could be willing to look for alternative carriers.

“If UPS gives away too much in labor costs, it’s going to be forced to raise rates to shippers and significantly lose a share of their wallet because the 12- to-18 month outlook doesn’t justify price increases,” wrote Lossing, a former logistics manager at Amazon who helped the online retailer build out its private cargo airline and international last-mile delivery network, on LinkedIn.

For every 10% increase in labor costs UPS negotiates, it will lose 4% of its average daily volume over the next two years, according to modeling conducted by Cirrus Global Advisors. If UPS tries to maintain margins by passing on costs to customers, a portion of its parcel business will spill to FedEx, the U.S. Postal Service, logistics companies that specialize in downstream parcel injection into the postal system, regional parcel carriers and Amazon’s own delivery network. FedEx would pick up about 180,000 daily ground packages, followed by Amazon (175,000), regional carriers (70,000), with the U.S. Postal Service and postal consolidators taking the remainder. If the Teamsters union wins a 20% increase in compensation, UPS could lose 140,000 daily packages to regional competitors.

Labor is UPS’ largest expense item, consuming nearly half of global revenue. According to UPS, delivery drivers on average earn $95,000 per year and part-timers earn $20 an hour, plus health and pension benefits. With FedEx and Amazon using an independent contractor model with nonunion workers for final-mile delivery, UPS has to control labor costs or risk “a slow spiral” that makes it uncompetitive, Lossing said.

Online shoppers will experience slower deliveries if there is a UPS strike and e-commerce companies will be forced to cancel free shipping and increase shipping charges, he predicted.

Companies that haven’t integrated other carriers besides UPS into their transportation planning systems could face significant operational and financial impact from a potential strike, logistics experts say.


UPS is massive. Here's a breakdown of how a strike could impact delivery globally.


Olivia Evans, Louisville Courier Journal
Tue, July 18, 2023 

UPS worker Geraldine Dawson holds up a sign while wearing a t-shirt with the logo 'Pay Up' in the style of United Parce Service as she and members of Teamsters Local 89 began a practice strike outside Worldport, the largest sorting and logistics facility in America Wednesday morning in Louisville, Ky. June 28, 2023

UPS and Teamsters, the union representing nearly 340,000 UPS workers are trying to reach a new five-year labor contract before the current contract expires at midnight July 31.

Earlier this month, the two sides departed the bargaining table without coming to a consensus on a new contract. Teamsters have repeatedly said they will strike starting on Aug. 1 if a new contract is not agreed upon. In June, Teamsters passed a strike authorization vote, giving the union the ability to strike if and when they deem necessary.

In Louisville, Kentucky, and nationwide, Teamsters Union barns have been hosting practice pickets ahead of what is anticipated to be the largest single-employer strike in U.S. history.

As of July 5, no additional negotiations between the union and the company have been scheduled.

UPS employs about 25,000 people in Louisville, one of the metro's largest employers, and close to 500,000 nationwide. Louisville is home to UPS Worldport, the largest sorting and logistics facility in America, and the UPS Airlines headquarters.

UPS supports the national and global economy, and the company estimates it "transports more than 3% of global (gross domestic product) and about 6% of U.S. GDP daily," including everything from home-ordered Amazon packages to business shipments and medical necessities. Employees at UPS Worldport play a major role in the company's economic impact, sorting more than 400,000 packages hourly.

Teamsters Local 89, represents roughly 10,000 UPS employees in Louisville. Stephen Piercey, the communications director for Teamsters Local 89, previously said a UPS strike would be a 24/7 operation at Worldport with union members rotating picket line shifts.

The more than 3,000 UPS Airlines pilots who are members of the Independent Pilots Association would support the picket line, just like it did in 1997, the last time UPS experienced a strike.

Domestically, UPS has five total airport hubs, including Worldport and excluding the company's Miami location which primarily serves Central and South America. UPS operates roughly 1,200 domestic and 780 international flight segments daily.

If a strike were to occur at UPS on Aug. 1, it could have a major effect on operations in Louisville. Here are five visuals that illustrate the scope of how a UPS strike could impact the company's domestic airline hubs and just how big UPS Worldport is.

Where are the domestic UPS Air Hubs located?

There are five domestic UPS Air Hubs. The hubs, located in Louisville, Kentucky, (UPS Worldport), Philadelphia, (UPS East Coast Hub), Dallas (UPS Southwest Hub), Rockford, Illinois (UPS Rockford Regional Hub) and Ontario, California, (UPS West Coast Hub), are all cities that have international airports.

How many daily flights does each hub have?

Across the globe, UPS serves more than 750 airports. Domestically, the five air hubs alone are responsible for more than 570 flights daily, almost 50% of all UPS domestic flight segments each day.

How big is each UPS domestic air hub?


Louisville's UPS Worldport facility is the company's largest air operations facility globally. In the U.S., Worldport is more than six times larger than the company's next largest domestic air hub in Ontario, California.

How many packages does the facility handle?


In 2022, UPS delivered an average of 24.3 million packages daily for a total of 6.2 billion packages delivered last year. For the company to deliver that quantity of packages to the more than 220 countries and territories it serves, the domestic air hubs are heavily relied on to sort and load packages quickly. At UPS Worldport, 416,000 packages are handled hourly.

What geographic area does the air hub serve?


Across the company, UPS services more than 220 countries and territories globally. The only air hub to provide service to all of these locations is the Worldport facility. The other four domestic hubs serve roughly 10-20 states each, with some overlapping areas of service.

Contact reporter Olivia Evans at oevans@courier-journal.com or on Twitter at @oliviamevans_.

This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: How a UPS Teamsters strike could impact delivery globally
Teamsters issue strike notice at Yellow

Yellow faces bankruptcy: Who is in line to benefit?


Todd Maiden
Tue, July 18, 2023 

The Teamsters say the carrier has until Sunday to pay up. (Photo: Jim Allen/FreightWaves)

Shortly after less-than-truckload carrier Yellow Corp. said Tuesday it would go through with plans to defer required contributions to funds managed by Central States Funds, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters issued a strike notice.

The notice said a work stoppage could occur as soon as Monday.

“Yellow has failed its workers once again and continues to neglect its responsibilities,” said Sean O’Brien, Teamsters general president. “Following years of worker givebacks, federal loans, and other bailouts, this deadbeat company has only itself to blame for being in this embarrassing position.”

On Monday, Central States issued a delinquency notice to plan participants working at Yellow (NASDAQ: YELL) operating companies YRC Freight and Holland. The letter said the companies had deferred health and welfare and pension contributions due this past Saturday and would do the same for payments due August 15.

“The Company advised Central States Funds that it would defer payment of health and pension contributions for June (due July 15) and July (due August 15) to preserve liquidity as it worked to obtain meetings with the IBT [International Brotherhood of Teamsters] as well as secure additional financing,” a Tuesday evening statement from Yellow read.

The combined payments total $50 million for the two-month period.

A recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission showed Yellow had in excess of $100 million in cash as of June 30.

Yellow has said it will repay the amounts with interest in the future.

If unpaid, the carriers’ participation in the pension plan would be terminated on Sunday and health care claims incurred by employees after Saturday would not be paid.

Employees have the option to pay for health care out of pocket. In a separate notification, Central States said the cost is $471.86 per week through July 29. The amount increases to $507.08 per week after that. Payments must be received by August 23.

Yellow and the Teamsters have been unable to reach an agreement on operational changes that the carrier says are necessary for it to remain in business.

The Teamsters statement said the company has until Sunday to make the payment.

“Yellow has a responsibility and obligation to workers. Our members should not suffer because of management’s incompetence and financial irresponsibility,” said Fred Zuckerman, Teamsters general secretary-treasurer. “The Teamsters are working with our local unions, and we will continue to regularly update members as this situation unfolds.”


Yellow not paying — yet — even as potential strike looms


Todd Maiden
Tue, July 18, 2023

Teamsters strike could happen as soon as Monday. (Photo: Jim Allen/FreightWaves)

Less-than-truckload carrier Yellow Corp. issued a statement Tuesday evening saying it would defer its required contributions for June and July as planned, potentially resulting in a strike by some of its Teamsters workforce.

Central States Funds, which manages health and welfare and pension funds for Teamsters at Yellow (NASDAQ: YELL) operating companies YRC Freight and Holland, issued a delinquency notice to plan participants Monday evening. The notice showed the carriers’ participation in the pension plan would be terminated Sunday and health care claims incurred after Saturday would not be paid.

The letter said the company withheld the June payment and was planning to withhold the July payment. Central States estimated payments for the two periods to be more than $50 million.

A separate letter from the Teamsters on Monday advised the impacted local unions to demand payment by Friday or risk a work stoppage on or after Monday. The protocol is part of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement, which requires the union to give the employer 72 hours’ notice of a strike authorization.

“The Company advised Central States Funds that it would defer payment of health and pension contributions for June (due July 15) and July (due August 15) to preserve liquidity as it worked to obtain meetings with the IBT [International Brotherhood of Teamsters] as well as secure additional financing,” a Tuesday evening statement from Yellow read.

Yellow said the two months of deferrals would equal “approximately $50 million dollars” and reiterated that it had only deferred one of the two payments thus far.

“The company intends to repay the funds with interest immediately upon securing additional financing and has asked the funds to discuss acceptable terms,” Yellow’s statement read.

A recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission showed Yellow had in excess of $100 million in cash and cash equivalents as of June 30.

Plan participants have the option to pay for health insurance out of pocket, Central States advised. The health coverage costs $471.86 per week through July 29, increasing to $507.08 per week through July 2024, the notice stated. Payments must be received by Aug. 23.

Roughly half of Yellow’s Teamster employees are covered by Central States.

Asked about the likelihood of a work stoppage if the payment isn’t made, Yellow declined further comment.

Yellow and the Teamsters remain at odds over proposed operational changes, which the carrier maintains are required for its survival.
U$ CHILD LABOR KILLS
16-year-old boy dies in accident at a Mississippi poultry plant


Laura Strickler and Didi Martinez
Updated Tue, July 18, 2023

A 16-year-old boy from Guatemala died as a result of an on-the-job accident at a poultry plant in Mississippi, authorities said Tuesday.

It happened at about 8 p.m. on July 14 at the Mar-Jac Poultry plant in Hattiesburg, Forrest County deputy coroner Lisa Klem said.

Workers under the age of 18 are not allowed to work in poultry plants because it’s deemed to be too dangerous and therefore a violation of child labor laws.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division have launched investigations into the incident, a spokesperson said. Any company found to be in violation could face a federal fine of more than $30,000 per incident.
- ADVERTISEMENT -


The death was caused by equipment at the plant, Klem said, adding that the results of an autopsy will be released Wednesday.

Duvan Tomas Perez. (via Facebook)

A worker who was on duty at the time of the accident spoke of hearing the boy screaming for help, but it was already too late.

“Two times he began to scream, ‘Help! Help!’” the worker said.

“I knew he had died,” the worker added.

The victim, identified by local authorities and a family member as Duvan Tomas Perez, was a middle school student who arrived in this country from the town of Huispache about six years ago.

“We’re very sad,” said the relative, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they face a pending immigration issue. “He was generous, smiley and very fun and very responsible at work.”

Joe Colee, the manager of the Mar-Jac facility, said in a statement that “our employees are our most valuable asset and safety is our number one priority."

"We strive daily to work as safely as possible and are truly devastated whenever an employee is injured," he added.

Colee also acknowledged the OSHA investigation and said the company is cooperating fully.

“Any issues identified in the investigation will be corrected immediately," Colee said.

The incident marked the second time in two years a plant worker died from injuries sustained in an accident.

The Mar-Jac poultry plant in Hattiesburg, Miss. (Google maps)

In May 2021, an employee was killed when he got pinned "partially under" a machine after it snagged his sleeve, according to OSHA records.

OSHA fined Mar-Jac $27,306, but the company contested it and the case remains ongoing.

Debbie Berkowitz, former OSHA official from the Obama administration, said the company has a "horrible safety record" and previously "fought to prevent OSHA from looking for safety violations after previous serious injuries."

An OSHA enforcement record from October 2021 notes that inspectors who went to the company’s Georgia location were unable to complete an inspection because they were denied entry.

Mar-Jac did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the 2021 death.

The latest incident comes as the Biden administration is cracking down on child labor violations involving migrants.

NBC News reported last month that a federal investigation into Guatemalan children working in the U.S. in violation of child labor laws has expanded to include meatpacking and produce firms that have allegedly hired underage migrants in at least 11 states.





Dark matter power: James Webb telescope may have proven the existence of giant dark stars

Matthew Rozsa
SALON
Sun, July 16, 2023 

An illustration of a supermassive black hole at the center of a galaxy NASA/JPL-Caltech

Since 2007, astronomers have proposed the existence of a weird type of star: one powered by the heat of dark matter. In cosmology, dark matter is a difficult thing to explain because we literally don't know what it is. We can't see it, hence the name "dark," but without it factored into our equations of the universe, things just don't add up. Learning how certain so-called "dark stars" form would be a major win for better understanding our place in the cosmos. Now, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) may have just proven that dark stars exist.

The ancient universe was very different than it is today. Some astronomers believe that before our solar system existed — indeed, before our galaxy was formed — dark stars were abundant. According to this theory, dark stars would have been fueled by large quantities of dark matter that would generate heat. This heat in turn would prevent dark stars from turning into modern stars — the bright, burning kind fueled by nuclear fusion — and, instead, to become enormous clouds of molecular hydrogen and helium.

If these dark stars still exist today, they would be too cold and dark to be easily detected. Only their gamma ray, neutrino and antimatter emissions would reveal their existence, as might perhaps the presence of cold molecular hydrogen gas. A new study in the journal PNAS suggests that, thanks to the power of the James Webb Space Telescope, we may have identified three entities that might very well be lingering dark stars.

Theoretical physicist Katherine Freese, coauthor of the paper and a physics professor at both the University of Texas and Stockholm University, has been pursuing different ways to detect dark matter since her career began in the '80s. In a 2008 paper in the journal Physical Review Letters, she and her colleagues proposed a "new phase of stellar evolution," in which the first stars in the universe are much cooler and powered by the annihilation of dark matter.

One of the leading theories about dark matter is that it's composed of a type of particle known as a WIMP, or Weakly Interacting Massive Particle. When two WIMPs collide, they can annihilate each other, transforming into other particles. This would generate energy that is different from the fusion process that powers modern stars (including our own), in which hydrogen atoms combine under extreme heat and pressure to form helium. However, until the James Webb telescope came along, there has been no direct evidence supporting this theory about dark stars.

"Nothing has been proven for sure by our paper," Freese explained to Salon in an email, but it is some of the strongest evidence for dark stars to date. Back in 2007, Freese and her fellow coauthor Cosmin Ilie (then her graduate student at the University of Michigan) determined what a dark star would look like in the JWST. Once the telescope had enough data to test their theories, Freese and Ilie began sifting through the new information.

"JWST has found roughly 700 high redshift objects (i.e. from very early in the Universe)," Freese said. "Of these, one of their instruments has been able to measure spectra (i.e. the intensity at different frequencies) for 9 of them, thereby for sure proving that they are indeed from the early Universe."

Five of those nine produced useable data, and from there the researchers studied four of them as JADES objects, which stands for the James Webb Advanced Extragalactic Survey. In the end, Freese said, they determined that "three of them are a good match to our predictions for dark stars."

Those three objects include JADES-GS-z13-0, JADES-GS-z12-0 and JADES-GS-z11-0. The authors ruled out the possibility that their readings were somehow messed up by a low redshift contaminant, and they similarly found "smoking gun" features that their previous research had anticipated would signify the presence of dark stars. The study concludes with a bold proclamation: "The confirmation of even a single one of those objects as a Dark Star (with detailed NIRSpec spectra) would mark a new era in astronomy: the observational study of DM–powered stars."

Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.

"The discovery of a new type of star, made of hydrogen and helium but powered by dark matter, would be a huge advance," Freese added, echoing the enthusiasm in her paper. "As yet it is not possible to distinguish dark stars from early galaxies; as yet both are possible explanations for the data. Better spectra in the future will enable discovery of a helium line in the data — that would be a smoking gun for dark stars."

The research team — which included Freese, Ilie and Jillian Pauline from Colgate University —suggests that these dark stars would not be lit by nuclear fusion, but rather would be much more massive than most stars, so large they could even resemble galaxies from Earth-based telescopes. The researchers also argue that the dark stars collapse into supermassive black holes when they get older, which would explain why there are so many black holes in the universe.

This is hardly the first ancient celestial discovery that would have been made possible by the JWST. Speaking with Salon earlier this week, NASA official Dr. Michelle Thaller explained why she is particularly fond of some "splotches" that may be among the oldest known objects in the universe.

"The Big Bang was only about 13.8 billion years ago. So we're looking back to the very, very early youngest galaxies here," Thaller told Salon at the time. "The thing that blows my mind about these splotches is that I never thought I would be able to actually see an image of this, when I was in astronomy grad school and we were learning about what happened in the very earliest part of the universe."

Freese also praised the JWST in her interview with Salon, making it clear that it alone was technologically advanced enough to acquire this data.

"JWST is the only telescope as yet capable of seeing far enough back in the universe to discover dark stars," Freese told Salon, adding that other telescopic instruments currently being developed may also serve that purpose, such as Roman and EUCLID.

"As yet all we know for sure is that objects have been found in JWST that are the earliest ever to form in the universe," Freese concluded. "We don't know anything more about their past evolution, until we know for sure what these objects are."
China Warns Youth Unemployment to Worsen After Hitting Record

Jill Disis and Phila Siu
Sun, July 16, 2023 


Wall Street Cuts China Growth Forecasts as Economy Disappoints


(Bloomberg) -- China’s youth unemployment rate hit a record in June — marking a third consecutive month above 20% — and the government warned the situation may get even worse as new graduates start looking for work.

The jobless rate for people aged between 16 and 24 was 21.3% last month, the National Bureau of Statistics said Monday. That’s the highest on record in data that goes back to 2018, and NBS spokesman Fu Linghui said the number for July would likely be higher still.

Young people are finishing their studies and looking for jobs, adding to upward pressure on the unemployment rate, Fu told a press briefing Monday. The government has said it expects a record of nearly 12 million students to graduate from colleges and universities this year.

Youth unemployment has been at high levels for more than a year as Covid disruptions and a property slump add to existing structural problems in the labor market. The flagging recovery in the world’s second-biggest economy is now likely making employers reluctant to hire.

The youth rate continued to climb even as the national urban jobless rate remained at 5.2% over the past three months.

The central government attaches high importance to youth employment and has striven to put job creation for young people in a “more prominent position,” Fu said, adding that they were focusing their efforts on college graduates and young people starting their own businesses.

China still needs to work at stabilizing the employment situation, Fu said. He added that the youth rate will likely start trending back down after August.