Thursday, August 03, 2023

 

Why India's rice ban could trigger a global food crisis

  • PublishedShare
IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Purchase limits were imposed on rice in a grocery store in Canada after India's export ban

What happens when India bans exports of a food staple that is essential to the diets of billions around the world?

On 20 July, India banned exports of non-basmati white rice in an attempt to calm rising domestic prices at home. This was followed by reports and videos of panic buying and empty rice shelves at Indian grocery stores in the US and Canada, driving up prices in the process.

There are thousands of varieties of rice that are grown and consumed, but four main groups are traded globally. The slender long grain Indica rice comprises the bulk of the global trade, while the rest is made up of fragrant or aromatic rice like basmati; the short-grained Japonica, used for sushi and risottos; and glutinous or sticky rice, used for sweets.

India is the world's top rice exporter, accounting for some 40% of the global trade in the cereal. (Thailand, Vietnam, Pakistan and the US are the other top exporters).

Among the major buyers of rice are China, the Philippines and Nigeria. There are "swing buyers" like Indonesia and Bangladesh who step up imports when they have domestic supply shortages. Consumption of rice is high and growing in Africa. In countries like Cuba and Panama it is the main source of energy.

Last year, India exported 22 million tonnes of rice to 140 countries. Of this, six million tonnes was the relatively cheaper Indica white rice. (The estimated global trade in rice was 56 million tonnes.)

IMAGE SOURCE,AFP
Image caption,
Farmers plant rice saplings at a water-logged farm in India in June

Indica white rice dominates around 70% of the global trade, and India has now ceased its export. This comes on top of the country's ban last year of exports of broken rice and a 20% duty on non-basmati rice exports.

Not surprisingly, July's export ban has sparked worries about runaway global rice prices. IMF chief economist Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas reckons the ban would drive up prices and that global grain prices could rise up to 15% this year.

Also, India's export ban has not come at a particularly propitious time, Shirley Mustafa, a rice market analyst at the UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) told me.

For one, global rice prices have been steadily rising since early 2022, with an increase of 14% since last June.

Second, supplies are under strain, given that the arrival of the new crop in the markets is still about three months away.

Inclement weather in South Asia - uneven monsoon rains in India and floods in Pakistan - has affected supplies. Costs of growing rice have gone up because of a rise in prices of fertilisers.

The devaluation of currencies has led to increased import costs for numerous countries, while high inflation has elevated borrowing costs of the trade.

IMAGE SOURCE,AFP
Image caption,
India is the world's top rice exporter, accounting for some 40% of the global trade in the cereal

"We have a situation where importers are constrained. It remains to be seen whether these buyers will be in a position to cope with further price increases," says Ms Mustafa.

India has a stockpile of an eye-popping 41 million tonnes of rice - more than three times the buffer requirement - in public granaries for its strategic reserve and the Public Distribution System (PDS), which gives more than 700 million poor people access to cheap food.

Over the past year, India has grappled with nagging food inflation - domestic rice prices have risen more than 30% since last October - resulting in increased political pressure on the government ahead of general elections next year. Also, with a host of state-level elections in the coming months, the escalating cost of living poses a challenge to the government.

"I suspect that the action to ban non-basmati rice exports is largely precautionary and hopefully it will prove temporary," Joseph Glauber of International Food Policy Research Institute (Ifpri) told me.

Devinder Sharma, an expert in agriculture policy in India, says that the government is trying to get ahead of an anticipated production shortfall, with rice-growing regions in the south also exposed to risks of dry rain as the El Nino weather pattern sweeps through later this year.

Many believe India should avoid rice export bans as they are detrimental to global food security.

More than half of the rice imports in around 42 countries originate from India, and in many African nations, India's market share in rice imports surpasses 80%, according to Ifpri.

In top consuming countries in Asia - Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, Indonesia, Thailand and Sri Lanka, for example - the share of rice consumption in total calorie intake a day ranges from 40% to 67%.

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
In many African nations, India's market share in rice imports surpasses 80%

"These bans hurt the vulnerable people most because they dedicate a larger share of their incomes to buying food," says Ms Mustafa. "Rising prices could compel them to reduce the quantity of food they consume or switch to alternatives that are not nutritionally good or cut expenses in other basic necessities like housing and food." (To be sure, India's ban does permit some government shipments to countries on the basis of food security.)

Food export bans are not new. Since last year's Russian invasion of Ukraine, the number of countries imposing export restrictions on food has risen from from three to 16, according to Ifpri. Indonesia banned palm oil exports; Argentina banned beef exports; and Turkey and Kyrgyzstan banned a range of grain products. During the first four weeks of the Covid pandemic, some 21 countries implemented export restrictions on a range of products.

But experts say India's export ban poses greater risks. It would "surely cause a spike in global prices of white rice" and "adversely affect food security of many African nations", warn Ashok Gulati and Raya Das of the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (Icrier), a Delhi-based think tank. They believe that in order for India to become a "responsible leader of the Global South in G-20", it should avoid such abrupt bans. "But the bigger damage," they say, "will be that India will be seen as a very unreliable supplier of rice."

 

Amazon rainforest: Deforestation in Brazil at six-year low

  • PublishedShare
IMAGE SOURCE,REUTERS
Image caption,
The fines imposed on illegal logging have increased since President Lula came into office

The rate of deforestation in Brazil's Amazon has dropped to its lowest in six years, space agency data suggests.

In July of this year, 500 sq km (193 sq miles) of rainforest were cleared in Brazil - 66% less than in July of last year, national space agency Inpe said.

The drop is a welcome boost for the government of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who pledged to end deforestation by 2030 when he took office in January.

Rainforest destruction had surged under his predecessor, Jair Bolsonaro.

The far-right leader promoted mining in indigenous lands in the Amazon and forest clearances soared at the same time as resources to protect the forest were cut.

The Amazon rainforest is a crucial buffer in the global fight against climate change and 60% of it is located in Brazil.

Lula came to power promising to halt the damage done during Mr Bolsonaro's four-year term and the figures released by the satellite agency show that things are improving.

Inpe said that the area of forest cut down in the first seven months of 2023 was smaller than that razed in the same period in 2022.

The drop is substantive and makes for an impressive turnaround just days before an Amazon summit with leaders from countries that share the world's largest rainforest.

On Wednesday, Lula told the BBC that the meeting next week was something the whole world should watch.

He argued that all too often, promises made at global summits were not met, but he insisted that "where there's a will, there's a way".

Data released by Inpe also shows that the authorities are going after those engaging in illegal logging.

The fines imposed in the first seven months of this year have topped $400m (£315), a rise of almost 150%.

Reversing the damage done in the Amazon remains challenging but the deforestation drop announced by Inpe on Thursday will send a reassuring message to the world that progress has been made in a relatively short time.

 

Pope Francis lashes out at Portugal’s Catholic hierarchy for ignoring clergy sexual abuse




By Euronews, AP

The pope said that ignoring the clergy sexual abuse scandal for so long marred the Catholic Church and drove people away from it.

Pope Francis blasted members of Portugal's Catholic hierarchy for ignoring the country's clergy sexual abuse for so long, a reaction that he said drove people away from the Catholic Church and marred its reputation.

Talking in his native Spanish, Pope Francis acknowledged that many clergy and nuns are feeling weary because people are losing faith. "It is often accentuated by the disappointment and anger with which some people view the church, at times due to our poor witness and the scandals that have marred her face and called us to a humble and ongoing purification, starting with the anguished cry of the victims, who must always be accepted and listened to," he said, referring to Portugal's sexual abuse scandal. 

On Thursday, the first day of a five-day visit to Lisbon for the Catholic Church's World Youth Day festival, the pope also met with 13 survivors of sexual abuse, with whom he talked for over an hour.

The meeting was aimed at trying to help members of the church in Portugal, as well as the faithful, overcome the difficult moment they're now facing as the country comes to terms with the same legacy of abuse and cover-up which has recently been revealed in other European countries.

In February, a panel of experts hired by Portugal's bishops reported that priests and other church personnel may have abused at least 4,815 of boys and girls since 1950. The report revealed the problem of child sex abuse within the church to be much bigger than previously suggested when bishops tried to minimise it saying there were only a handful of cases. 

After the release of the report, Portugal's bishops initially refused to remove abusers from ministry and said they would only compensate victims if courts ordered them to.

Following the Pope's comments earlier in the day, Bishop Jose Ornelas, the head of the Portuguese Bishops' Conference, said that the country's church will devote "special attention to the protection of the welfare of children and the undertaking to protect them from all kinds of abuse."

Portugal's bishops are committed to "putting the victims first," and "working together" with victims on reparations and their recovery, a statement after the conference said.

António Grosso of "Coração Silenciado" (literally, "Silenced Heart") -- the only association for victims of Church abuse in Portugal -- told the Spanish news agency EFE that the Pope "had an obligation" to talk about the scandal to "warn the world youth who are present in Lisbon not to allow themselves to be manipulated by abusers within the Church, but to denounce them."

Body found trapped in Greg Abbott’s anti-migrant buoys along Mexico-Texas border


Bevan Hurley
Thu, August 3, 2023 

A body has been found stuck to buoys that were installed by Texas authorities in the Rio Grande along the US-Mexican border to deter migrants, Mexican officials say.

A person was found dead in the southern part of the floating barrier near Eagle Pass on Wednesday afternoon, Mexican Foreign Affairs Secretary Alicia Barcena said in a statement.

Search teams from Mexico’s National Institute of Migration are trying to recover the body, whose nationality and cause of death has not yet been confirmed.

The body of a second unidentified person was found floating about 3 miles (5kms) upriver near the buoys earlier in the week, Mexican officials said.


It’s unclear if the deaths are connected.

The 1,000 foot floating barrier was erected in July at the orders of Texas Governor Greg Abbott despite warnings they posed a grave danger to migrants.

The Justice Department is suing the state of Texas over the buoys, arguing they flout federal law, pose a public safety threat and risk damaging US-Mexican relations.


Buoys placed in the Rio Grande by Texas officials have been roundly condemned as a human rights violation
(Associated Press)

The Mexican foreign ministry again condemned the barrier as a “violation” of their sovereignty.

“We express our concern about the impact on the human rights and personal safety of migrants that these state policies will have, which run counter to the close collaboration between our country and the federal government of the United States.

“We made clear our concern about the impact on migrants’ safety and human rights that these state policies would have,” officials said in a statement.

The buoys are part of a military-style buildup along the border by Mr Abbott’s administration that includes razor wire and hundreds of national guard troops.

Hundreds of migrants drown along the Rio Grande every year.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, other progressives to visit left-ruled Latin American nations










Tracy Wilkinson - Los Angeles Times (TNS)


WASHINGTON — New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and a group of fellow progressive Democrats are heading to South America later this month on a congressional trip that will also challenge Biden administration policy in the region.

An 11-member group of lawmakers and staff plan to leave Aug. 14 to meet with officials and civil society groups in the region's three largest leftist-ruled democracies: Brazil, Chile and Colombia. The weeklong trip to the countries' capitals, which has not yet been announced, will be sponsored by a progressive advocacy group based in Washington and won't use taxpayer funds, the organizers said.

"It's long past time for a realignment of the United States' relationship to Latin America," Ocasio-Cortez said in a statement provided to The Times. "The U.S. needs to publicly acknowledge the harms we've committed through interventionist and extractive policies, and chart a new course based on trust and mutual respect."

Rep. Joaquin Castro of Texas, the top Democrat on the influential House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, is also scheduled to join the delegation. His office confirmed his plans but declined to comment further.

With the arrival to the White House of President Biden — A Democrat who prides himself on decades of familiarity with Latin America — many activists, advocates and progressive political organizations believed he would reverse some of Republican predecessor Donald Trump's policies that they felt ignored or were hostile to the region.

But two and a half years into his presidency, Biden has maintained some of Trump's controversial immigration policies involving Latin America; kept in place punitive measures against Cuba while opting not to revive Obama-era rapprochement; and overlooked human rights or other abuses in Mexico, Colombia and other countries in favor of U.S. economic and trade interests.

Biden's critics on his party's left flank believe the president fumbled last year when he refused to invite Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua to the Summit of the Americas, a gathering of Western Hemisphere leaders that traditionally includes all countries in the region.

The summit, held every three or four years, was held in Los Angeles in 2022, hosted by the U.S for the first time in nearly three decades. Biden's exclusion of the three generally authoritarian countries triggered a boycott of the event by several Latin American leaders.

Meanwhile, a democratic left wave was sweeping parts of the continent.

In Brazil, veteran leftist former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was returned to power on Jan. 1 after defeating a hard-right populist and staunch Trump ally.

Voters in Chile — where democracy has flourished after decades of right-wing authoritarian military rule and governments have transitioned peacefully between progressive and conservative leaders — last year elected Gabriel Boric as the youngest president in the hemisphere.

And Colombia, Washington's closest ally in the region, for the first time in its history elected a president who did not hail from either of the country's two traditional, mainstream pro-U.S. parties. Gustavo Petro, a former guerrilla fighter, was sworn in to office late last year.

"We have much to learn from our counterparts in these countries, including how to confront disinformation and violent threats to our democracies, how to protect our environment from capitalist pressures, and how to engage in productive truth-and-reconciliation efforts that provide true justice to citizens that have been harmed by their governments," Ocasio-Cortez said.

Brazil's Da Silva, widely known as Lula, confronted his own version of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol when supporters of his defeated rival, Jair Bolsonaro, fueled by misinformation about election fraud, stormed and trashed the Brazilian Congress, Supreme Federal Court and presidential palace on Jan. 8 of this year, hoping to overturn Lula's victory.

The Biden administration has also confronted numerous obstacles in its efforts to promote better governance and economic prosperity in Central America, partly in hopes of eradicating the violence and poverty that have stoked migration and requests for U.S. asylum.

Guatemala, which was not long ago on the road to cleaning up corruption and electing better leaders, is in the throes of political turmoil in which the military and wealthy business class are attempting to block a leftist presidential candidate who is leading in some polls. Meanwhile, El Salvador has been taken over by Nayib Bukele, a millennial autocrat who is ruling with an iron fist and little regard for human rights.

"The United States shares critical challenges with our friends in Latin America, but we have too often prioritized corporate interests or great power competition in our historical engagement with the region," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) said in a statement ahead of the trip, which his chief of staff, Misty Rebik, is joining.

"I hope this delegation will help present a new face to the hemisphere, one based on engagement for the sake of people and planet," Sanders added.

Other participants include Democratic Reps. Maxwell Frost of Florida, Nydia M. Velázquez of New York and Greg Casar of Texas, according to organizers at the Center for Economic Policy Research.

In addition to delving into issues surrounding democracy, the organization said, delegates will hear from South Americans on environmental protection — with a particular focus on the vast Amazon jungle, where Lula has made progress in arresting rampant deforestation.

They also plan to discuss reconciliation projects following civil wars and other unrest that have plagued the continent.

©2023 Los Angeles Times.

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.




Henrietta Lacks' family settles with biotech company that used her cells. Here's why her story is so important.


Rachel Grumman Bender
Updated Tue, August 1, 2023 

During a biopsy in 1950, Henrietta Lacks' tissue was removed and used in medical research without her knowledge or consent. She died of cervical cancer in 1951.
 (Photo: Getty Images)

On Tuesday, Henrietta Lacks’ family settled their lawsuit with biotechnology company Thermo Fisher Scientific, which reportedly profited from the use of Lacks’ cells in biomedical research. The cells were taken without permission during a biopsy more than 70 years ago. (The terms of the agreement were not disclosed.)

Lacks’ story gained national attention after Rebecca Skloots’ bestseller, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, came out in 2010. Lacks’ cells — known as the HeLa cell line (named after Lacks) — have played an incredibly important role in medical research, leading to numerous scientific breakthroughs. But her family has argued for years that the cells were obtained unethically, and they haven’t “seen a dime” despite “staggering profits” from biotechnology companies such as Thermo Fisher Scientific “using the HeLa line.”

So who was Henrietta Lacks? And why is her story and the settlement important? Here’s what you need to know.

Who was Henrietta Lacks?

Lacks was a young Black mom with five children who lived in Baltimore. She died of an aggressive cervical cancer in 1951 at just 31 years old. Before her death, she sought treatment for vaginal bleeding at Johns Hopkins Hospital in 1950. A gynecologist found a large, malignant tumor on her cervix and began treating her with radium, according to Johns Hopkins Medicine. While receiving treatment, samples of tissue from Lacks’ cervix were taken without her knowledge or consent during a biopsy and were given to a research team — a practice that was not unusual at the time.

In the lab, the researchers discovered that Lacks’ cells were remarkably unique. According to Johns Hopkins, while other cell samples would die, Lacks’ cells “doubled every 20 to 24 hours.” Because of this, they were considered the first “immortal” cell line, allowing scientists to cultivate her cells and use them in biomedical research. HeLa cells are the oldest and most widely used human cell line.

Johns Hopkins Medicine has said they "never sold or profited from the discovery or distribution of HeLa cells" and do not own the rights to the HeLa cell line. Rather, HeLa cells are offered freely and widely for scientific research.

Despite the fact that Lacks’ cells were a crucial part of a multi-billion dollar biotech industry, her family, who have struggled financially, had never received any compensation in the past.

Although Johns Hopkins said they didn’t profit from the HeLa cell line, they did admit that they “could have — and should have — done more to inform and work with members of Henrietta Lacks’ family out of respect for them, their privacy and their personal interests.” They added that, even though collecting and using Lacks’ cells in research was “an acceptable and legal practice in the 1950s, such a practice would not happen today without the patient’s consent.”

Why it matters

Women’s health expert and author Dr. Jennifer Wider tells Yahoo Life that it’s “very important for people to recognize the impact that Henrietta Lacks had on modern medical advancements,” pointing out that Lacks' cells are “directly responsible for many medical discoveries in biomedical research including the polio vaccine” and medications to treat HIV, as well as “cancer treatments and gene sequencing.”

According to the National Institutes of Health: “HeLa cells have served as a standard for understanding many fundamental biological processes, such as testing the polio vaccine, establishing basic techniques for cloning and in vitro fertilization" and "advancing the development of anti-cancer drugs.”

Along with being used to develop COVID-19 vaccines, Lacks' own cell line helped identify that HPV can lead to certain types of cervical cancer — the disease that ultimately took her life.

Despite these medical advances, Lacks’ story also serves as a reminder of why medical consent is crucial. “The story of Henrietta Lacks not only underscores the importance of patient consent, it highlights other ethical principles in medicine, including the right to privacy and proper communication between donors and researchers,” says Wider.

Additionally, her story illustrates how some patients, particularly patients of color, have been exploited. According to the Associated Press, the suit stated that “the exploitation of Henrietta Lacks represents the unfortunately common struggle experienced by Black people throughout history. Indeed, Black suffering has fueled innumerable medical progress and profit, without just compensation or recognition.”

Although statements released from both the Lacks’ estate and Thermo Fisher said that the parties are “pleased” with the settlement, Wider says that, in her opinion, “a financial settlement does not fully right the wrong that was committed against Ms. Lacks. All patients should have their rights respected and protected. But a settlement in favor of Henrietta Lacks' family is an acknowledgment” that biomedical companies had and have “an ethical obligation to inform and work directly with the Lacks family in the past, present and future.”

Civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who represents Lacks’ family, said on Tuesday that the lawsuit also served to raise awareness of Lacks’ invaluable contributions to medicine. Crump stated that it’s “an injustice” that “everybody in America doesn’t know who Henrietta Lacks is,” adding: “And that’s why we’re fighting. Because Black history is American history. Henrietta Lacks is American history.”

Senator Chris Van Hollen agrees that Lacks' contributions to medicine should be recognized. “Henrietta Lacks changed the course of modern medicine," he said in a recent statement. "It is long past time that we recognize her life-saving contributions to the world."

Additional reporting by Tayler Adigun
'Astonishing’ number of wine glasses unearthed at mysterious ancient city in Albania

Aspen Pflughoeft
Thu, August 3, 2023 

Looking toward the top of a ridge in Albania, viewers see a rocky landscape with lush bushes. From down below, the hilltop doesn’t look particularly unusual.

But something “unique” has been hidden in the hillside — for millennia.

An “unknown city” was rediscovered by archaeologists in Bushat in 2018, according to a July 25 news release from the University of Warsaw.

The long-forgotten ruins, considered by archaeologists to be of an “important urban center,” are situated on two ridges with a small valley in between, giving the city a roughly triangular shape, according to a 2021 study published in the journal Antiquity.


“Nowadays ruins of extensive ancient towns of unknown name are generally no longer discovered,” archaeologists said.

Hoping to find answers about the mysterious place, archaeologists with the Antiquity of Southeastern Europe Research Centre excavated a “very large building” at the highest point in the city, the organization said in a news release.

The building was about 2,400 years old with “three spacious rooms and a long corridor,” archaeologists said. Photos show the outline of the ruined structure.


The ruins of a central building for public and religious activity.

Inside, archaeologists found “an astonishing number” of “wine drinking vessels of various sizes,” Piotr Dyczek, an archaeologist with the Antiquity of Southeastern Europe Research Centre, told the university.

“We have discovered a unique building,” Dyczek said. He identified the building as a prytaneion, an ancient Greek structure where government officials met, or a “hestiateron, (which) is one of the public structures in which an eternal fire should burn.”

These “surprising” findings suggest the mysterious city was planned and run like ancient Greek cities, archaeologists said. The settlement, however, was not Greek.

The city was part of ancient Illyria, archaeologists said. The Illyrians controlled much of the modern-day Balkans until being conquered by the ancient Romans in 168 B.C., according to Britannica.


Ruins of the “unknown city” as seen from above in 2022.

Excavations previously unearthed the ruins of defensive walls and two city gates, evidence of the site’s size and importance, the university said.

Archaeologists will continue excavations next year, according to the research center.

Bushat is about 50 miles northwest of Tirana, the capital of Albania, and near the border with Montenegro.

Adidas sells £344m worth of Yeezy stock

Sales of Yeezy's generated around €400million from April to June this year

Adidas donated €10million in the second quarter


By DANIEL FESSAHAYE
 3 August 20

Adidas generated around €400million (£344million) in sales of Yeezy stock in the second quarter as the sportswear giant attempts to rid itself of the brand.

It was the first release of Yeezy goods after the group in October cut ties with designer Ye, the rapper previously known as Kanye West, over his antisemitic comments as Adidas attempts to offload unsold shoes.

The group, which plans to donate part of Yeezy proceeds to anti-hate groups, showed signs of a turnaround in the three months to June with sales better than expected as the company revealed plans to 'build a business without Yeezy'.


Adidas dropped Kanye 'Ye' West after the rapper launched several anti-semitic attacks back in October last year




The €400million generated in the second quarter was better than expected which helped the company reduce its estimated loss for the year to €450million from its previous estimation of €700million

Yeezy sales helped the company reduce its estimated loss for the year to €450million from its previous estimation of €700million.

Although Yeezy stocks have helped the group narrow its projected full-year loss, Adidas executives played down expectations for the next releases.

Bjørn Gulden, CEO of Adidas, told reporters on a call: 'Our task now is to limit the damage, get rid of the inventory, use the proceeds to (do) good stuff, and then build a business without Yeezy.'

The rapper's $220million annual deal with the German sports brand, which is worth $1.5billion in total, was terminated back last October after his controversial behaviour.

West has claimed he lost $2billion in a single day as multiple companies severed ties with the rapper.




A statement that Adidas released last year stating that it had terminated its contract with West with immediate effect

Gulan said in a statement: 'We are happy with the way the second quarter developed. The core adidas business was slightly better than we expected. Although we still have too much slow-moving inventory in the market, sell-through has been improving.


'We will continue to carefully sell off more of the existing Yeezy inventory.'

Adidas donated €10million in the second quarter and set aside €100million for further donations to charities including the Foundation to Combat Antisemitism and the Anti-Defamation League.

Gulan added: 'This is much better than destroying and writing off the inventory and allows us to make substantial donations to organizations like the Anti-Defamation League, the Philonise & Keeta Floyd Institute for Social Change and Robert Kraft's Foundation to Combat Antisemitism.

'And it is of course also helping both our cash flow and general financial strength.'
Generative AI could increase access to justice: High Court judge

Justice Aedit Abdullah (second from left) said generative AI could soon be used to help unrepresented litigants. 
PHOTO: SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW

Lee Li Ying
Correspondent

SINGAPORE - Generative artificial intelligence (AI) could soon be used to help unrepresented litigants navigate the legal system better and improve access to justice, said Justice Aedit Abdullah in a panel discussion on technology and the legal profession on Thursday.

Generative AI refers to deep-learning algorithms, such as ChatGPT, that can generate high-quality text, images and other content based on the data they were trained on.

Justice Aedit’s comments came at a two-day conference, The Next Frontier Of Lawyering: From ESG To GPT, organised by the Singapore Academy of Law and Singapore Management University.

When asked by moderator David B. Wilkins, Lester Kissel Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, on how he and the Singapore courts viewed the role of generative AI, Justice Aedit said the technology provided a tremendous opportunity to ensure a proper mode of legal representation for people who might not be able to hire lawyers due to reasons like financial difficulties.

He detailed what he called a “gold standard” for a service in the courthouse that would help those unrepresented to file necessary claims of defence, identify strengths and weaknesses of their case, consider the necessary evidence they can present to a judge, or nudge them towards a settlement or resolution out of a courtroom if that is feasible.

“We are working on multiple streams with different project teams... and some of the discussions are more advanced than others. We hope, before too long, you’ll at least see some of the early-stage progress we can make. We are very excited and this will mean a tremendous shift in power and capability,” he said.

Justice Aedit also commented on how generative AI has been used in courtrooms elsewhere to give judicial officers recommendations on setting bail and sentencing, and to help lawyers analyse which arguments have the likeliest probability of success before judges.

Describing a situation where technology may be able to highlight the questions that opposing counsel may ask a witness, and the essential points a judge may take into account in coming to a decision, Justice Aedit said: “Will we reach a point where everyone knows what is happening, and really what is the point of cross-examination then?”

“It may not be a bad thing, it will be an interesting point to see how it plays out in terms of what the impact will be on the business of litigation and judging... We should perhaps rethink the use of an adversarial system, and maybe, as we have in family justice, consider a more judge-led (approach), taking into account what we have seen in the use of these technologies,” he said.

Other panellists taking part in the discussion included Mr Eric Chin, Asia Pacific director of NewLaw at PWC; Mr Adrian Fisher, Asia head of technology, media and telecom at Linklaters; and Assistant Professor Jerrold Soh from the Yong Pung How School of Law.

The discussion spanned how technology would reshape the role of a lawyer, and how lawyers can add value to their profession.

The conference was held at the Yong Pung How School of Law and was attended by 170 people including lawyers, academics, in-house counsel and students from the region and China.

On whether technology would replace the role of lawyers, Mr Chin said it was not possible for now.

“Generative AI is what a calculator is to maths. It’s just really useful in calculating something really fast, but you still need subject-matter experts to provide the structure and contextualise the information that gets generated,” said Mr Chin.

MORE ON THIS TOPIC