Friday, September 01, 2023

US Providing Up to $12 Billion to Retrofit Auto Plants for EVs

Ari Natter
Thu, August 31, 2023 



(Bloomberg) -- The Biden administration is making up to $12 billion available for automakers to retrofit their facilities to make electric vehicles and hybrids.

The funding comes amid tense negotiations between Detroit auto companies and the United Auto Workers, which has raised concerns the transition to EVs may threaten union jobs. It includes $10 billion in newly announced funds from a US Energy Department loan program for clean vehicles. The Energy Department also said it’s planning to make available an additional $3.5 billion in financing to expand domestic battery manufacturing for vehicles and the nation’s power grid.

US Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm vowed Thursday the US wouldn’t leave American autoworkers behind, telling reporters the funding will support projects in longstanding auto making communities to help retain workers amid the transition.

The financing signals the Biden administration is doubling down on efforts to support carmakers’ transition to EVs, even as it seeks to retain support from labor groups pushing for more autoworker job security and higher wages.

“This funding will help existing workers keep their jobs and have the first shot to fill new good jobs as the car industry transforms for future generations,” President Joe Biden said in a statement.

The UAW’s new president, Shawn Fain, cautiously welcomed the measure, noting it came with language favoring projects offering higher pay and union representation. Fain had warned the White House earlier this month not to push EVs at the expense of blue collar jobs.

The union, which is in the middle of contentious talks with the three legacy Detroit automakers over a new four-year contract, blasted a June announcement of a $9.2 billion federal loan to a Ford joint venture as a gateway to “low-road jobs.”

“The EV transition must be a just transition that ensures auto workers have a place in the new economy,” Fain said Thursday in an emailed statement.

Read More: UAW Boss Seeks 46% Raise, 32-Hour Work Week in Carmaker ‘War’

The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents most major auto manufacturers in Washington, said in a statement the incentives and grants from the Department of Energy “will further advance the domestic automotive supply chain and globally competitive battery manufacturing platform that automakers have already made sizable investments.”

A spokesperson for General Motors Co., which has pledged to electrify its entire fleet by 2035, said the carmaker supports public funding that promotes “domestic investment in manufacturing.” Representatives for Ford and Stellantis NV, which owns the Jeep and Ram brands, said their companies were reviewing the announcement.

Shares of GM and Ford closed up less than 1% in regular trading Thursday in New York. Stellantis fell less than 1%.

In addition to electric vehicles, the financing can be used for factories that make efficient hybrid, plug-in electric hybrid, plug-in electric drive and hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, the department said.

The funding, which also includes $2 billion in “manufacturing conversion grants” from Biden’s signature climate law, comes amid a broader administration goal of having EVs represent at least half of all new car sales in the US by 2030.

--With assistance from Chester Dawson and Keith Laing.

 Bloomberg Businessweek

US offers $12 billion to auto makers, suppliers for advanced vehicles


Thu, August 31, 2023 
By Timothy Gardner

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Biden administration is offering $12 billion in grants and loans for auto makers and suppliers to retrofit their plants to produce electric and other advanced vehicles, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said on Thursday.

"While we transition to EVs, we want to ensure that workers can transition in place, that there is no worker, no community left behind," Granholm, a former governor of car-manufacturing state Michigan, told reporters in a call.

Speeding grants and other subsidies to fund conversion of existing auto plants to build electric vehicles could help the White House blunt criticism from automakers and the United Auto Workers (UAW) union over proposed environmental rules aimed to help usher in the EV era.

The UAW has warned that a rapid change could put thousands of jobs at risk in states such as Michigan, Ohio, Illinois and Indiana.


Last week UAW members voted overwhelmingly in favor of authorizing a strike at the Detroit Three automakers if an agreement over wages and pension plans is not reached before the current four-year contract expires on Sept. 14.

On Thursday UAW President Shawn Fain cheered the announcement, saying the policy "makes clear to employers that the EV transition must include strong union partnerships with the high pay and safety standards that generations of UAW members have fought for and won."

President Joe Biden said in a release that "building a clean energy economy can and should provide a win-win opportunity for auto companies and unionized workers who have anchored the American economy for decades."

Fain has vowed to save a Jeep factory in Belvidere, Illinois, that Stellantis has put on track to shutter. The automaker has left open the possibility that the factory could get a new product with government aid.

When asked about the chances that the grants could keep that factory open, Granholm said plants that had been built up around communities are "prime for taking advantage of these funding opportunities."

There will be no specific labor requirements for companies to obtain the funding, but projects that have better labor conditions will have a greater chance of receiving the funding, an Energy Department official said on the call.

The administration will also offer $3.5 billion in funding to domestic battery manufacturers, Granholm said.

For the advanced vehicles, $2 billion in grants will come from the Inflation Reduction Act which was passed by Democrats last year, and $10 billion in loans will derive from the Energy Department's Loans Program Office.

(Reporting by Timothy Gardner in WashingtonAdditional reporting by Joe White in Detroit;Editing by Bill Berkrot and Matthew Lewis)
Chart: Renewables are on track to keep getting cheaper and cheaper

Alison F. Takemura
Canary Media
Fri, September 1, 2023


Canary Media’s chart of the week translates crucial data about the clean energy transition into a visual format.

Renewable energy already beats fossil fuels on cost globally — and according to analysts, the gap is only going to grow.

By 2030, technology improvements could slash today’s prices by a quarter for wind and by half for solar, according to the authors of a recent report from clean energy think tank RMI. (Canary Media is an independent affiliate of RMI.)

These remarkable and ongoing cost declines have made clean energy so attractive that it now outcompetes fossil fuels for new investment: 62 percent of global energy investment is expected to flow to clean energy technologies this year.

That cash is helping push renewables to new heights. According to estimates from the International Energy Agency, global clean energy capacity is expected to jump a jaw-dropping 107 gigawatts to more than 440 gigawatts this year — its largest increase ever.

What we’re living in “is an energy technology revolution,” said report co-author Kingsmill Bond, an energy strategist at RMI. It’s obvious from the data, yet the point is often lost in “a consistent drumbeat of counternarratives” about how difficult it is, and will be, to leave fossil fuels behind, he added.

“U.S. fossil-fuel demand peaked 15 years ago,” Bond said. “This is happening; people have just missed it.”

Renewable energy costs have fallen, and are projected to keep falling, because these technologies are riding “learning curves”: For every cumulative doubling of the deployed tech, its cost declines by a quantifiable percentage that varies by technology. Learning curves are a robust phenomenon that’s been observed for over 50 kinds of tech. Over the past 40 years, the average learning rate has been 20% for solar and 13% for wind.

That’s the underappreciated power of learning by doing; the more solar panels and turbines people make, the more they discover how to make them better, faster and cheaper. The RMI report's range of forecasted cost declines is based on both these long-term average learning rates and the higher rates observed in more recent years (30% for solar and 25% for wind).

Fossil fuels, by contrast, have not gotten on empirical learning curves. For more than a century, fossil fuel prices have swung wildly without trending consistently downward.

Fossil fuels aren’t getting cheaper because they’re not technologies, but rather commodities dug up from the ground, said Sam Butler-Sloss, co-author of the report and an energy analyst at RMI. The tech used to extract and refine them undergoes far fewer iterations than solar panels and wind turbine blades, which are mass-produced, a characteristic of technologies with fast learning rates.

Lower costs are just one reason to pursue clean energy among many others that are much harder to assign a dollar value to, Butler-Sloss said: greater energy security, less price volatility, lives saved from displaced fossil fuel pollution, and avoidance of the climate disasters that come with a much warmer world. All those concerns point toward investing in a renewable energy future, he added.

That’s not to say the energy revolution will happen on its own. As the report states, “We have to work hard” to stay on this trajectory. “We need to build out grids, change permitting laws, scale up flexibility solutions, improve regulatory and market systems, and speed up deployment in the Global South.”

But those actions will only become easier the cheaper renewable energy gets, according to Butler-Sloss. “There is an inexorable economic logic to this transition,” he said. And although the transition needs to go faster, “it provides massive momentum to have the economics on our side.”

Orsted delays 1st New Jersey wind farm until 2026; not ready to 'walk away' from project

WAYNE PARRY
Thu, August 31, 2023 






Land-based wind turbines in Atlantic City, N.J., turn on July 20, 2023. On Aug. 30, 2023, the offshore wind energy company Orsted said it is delaying its first offshore wind project in New Jersey until some time in 2026; it had previously been due to be completed by 2024. (AP Photo/Wayne Parry)


OCEAN CITY, N.J. (AP) — Orsted, the global wind energy developer, says its first offshore wind farm in New Jersey will be delayed until 2026 due to supply chain issues, higher interest rates, and a failure so far to garner enough tax credits from the federal government.

The Danish company revealed the delay during an earnings conference call Wednesday, during which it said it could be forced to write off about $2.3 billion on U.S. projects that are worth less than they had been.

It also said it had considered simply abandoning the Ocean Wind I project off the southern New Jersey coast.

But Orsted still believes the wind farm, to be built in waters off of Atlantic City and Ocean City, will be profitable in the long run.

“As it stands today, we believe the best direction is to continue to invest in these projects,” said David Hardy, an executive vice president and CEO of the company's North American operations. “It still is the better choice than walking away today.”

The company did not say when in 2026 its Ocean Wind I project will be fully operational, and a spokesperson could not say Thursday what the new timetable is. Previously, Orsted had said power would be flowing to customers sometime in 2025.

Orsted has federal approval for the Ocean Wind I project, and has state approval for a second New Jersey project, Ocean Wind II.

However, during Wednesday's call, the company said it is “reconfiguring” Ocean Wind II and its Skipjack Wind project off the coasts of Maryland and Delaware because they do not currently meet its projected financial standards. It did not give details of what that reconfiguration might entail.

Two other Orsted projects — Sunrise Wind off Montauk Point in New York, and Revolution Wind off Rhode Island — are also affected by the same negative forces requiring the New Jersey project to be delayed. But the New York and Rhode Island projects remain on schedule, the company said.

News of the delay was a blow to supporters of offshore wind in New Jersey, which is trying to become the capital of the nascent industry on the U.S. East Coast. It also offered new hope to foes of the technology.

Earlier this year, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy signed a law allowing Orsted to keep federal tax credits it otherwise would have been required to pass along to ratepayers. The governor said he acted to protect jobs the offshore wind industry will create.

Republicans, who tend to oppose offshore wind in New Jersey and nationally, seized on the delay as further proof of what they consider the inherent unprofitability of the industry.

“It was a travesty when Gov. Murphy bailed out Orsted at the expense of New Jersey taxpayers the first time they threatened to walk away," said Republican state Sen. Michael Testa. “I’m calling on the Murphy administration to state unequivocally that our residents will not be sold out for Orsted a second time. Supply chain issues and rising inflation prove that these projects are unsustainable and the cost of continuing these projects will be too much of a burden for our state to bear.”

A dozen environmental groups issued a joint statement in support of offshore wind, calling it essential to avoiding the worst effects of climate change caused by the burning of fossil fuels.

“Innovation and transformation take time when done correctly,” the statement read. “The offshore wind industry is not immune to the supply chain crisis. We stand united in our support for responsibly developed offshore wind to help New Jersey achieve 100% clean energy.”

Orsted said it has already invested $4 billion in its U.S. wind energy portfolio, which factored into its decision, at least for now, to stick with its proposed projects. The company plans to make a “final investment decision” on whether or not to go forward with U.S. projects, including one in New Jersey, by the end of this year or early next year.

——

Follow Wayne Parry on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, at www.twitter.com/WayneParryAC

Hawaii quit coal one year ago. Here's how it's been going

Julian Spector
Thu, August 31, 2023 


HONOLULU — In the last three weeks, Hawaii’s electric grid has made headlines for horrifying reasons. Early evidence indicates that power lines owned and maintained by for-profit utility Hawaiian Electric sparked the ferocious brush fire that killed at least 115 people and destroyed the historic town of Lahaina in early August. The fire’s cause has not been determined officially, but the county of Maui and several other groups are suing the company, and its stock price and credit rating have plummeted.

That tragedy has understandably eclipsed a quiet but significant anniversary: One year ago, Hawaii shut down its one remaining coal plant, with a plan to replace its electricity only with renewable energy projects.

That milestone broke new ground in the clean energy transition because no other state had attempted to eliminate coal without building new fossil gas plants. Hawaii sought to show that renewables and batteries are ready to take over from the most carbon-emitting power plant fuel. It’s worth taking stock of that journey; so far, the seas have been choppy, even before the Maui tragedy. But the undertaking has demonstrated how small-scale clean energy can solve problems when big clean energy projects fall behind.

Proving it’s possible to leap from coal to solar

The AES coal plant in the industrial hub of West Oahu churned out cheap electricity for 30 years, starting in 1992. Oil-burning plants supplied most of Oahu’s power, then and now, so the long-term coal contract hedged against oil-price volatility and pushed electricity prices down. Unlike mainland states, Hawaii had no natural-gas supply for its power sector; in 2015, then–Governor David Ige (D) rejected a gas importation proposal and signed the nation’s first law mandating a full transition to renewable electricity. The legislature doubled down in 2020 with an order banning new coal-power contracts.

What happens in Hawaii can feel distant from the mainland, but the absolute and relative scale of Oahu’s exit from coal rendered it a proof of concept for the broader transition to clean energy. The coal plant had supplied 16% of peak power for Oahu’s 1 million residents; that’s more than the total population of several other states, but Oahu’s grid also powers a constellation of U.S. military bases and a major Pacific shipping hub. If the plan to switch to renewable energy went well, it would demonstrate that today’s clean energy technology is ready to leapfrog fossil gas, long hailed as a “bridge fuel” necessary for balancing the ups and downs of renewable power production.

Now, a year after the plant shuttered, Oahu hasn’t quite proven that theory. The full fleet of large solar and battery plants summoned to replace the coal plant still hasn’t materialized, except for two projects that developer Clearway Energy managed to complete. Utility Hawaiian Electric had to lean on its legacy oil-fired plants to fill the gap, just as oil prices reached painful heights due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Instead of cheaper bills, the coal closure left customers paying more, at least temporarily.

Hawaiian Electric declined to comment on the impacts of the coal shutdown while focusing on Maui restoration efforts.

In an email to Canary Media, State Senator Glenn Wakai (D), who now serves as majority floor leader, called the coal shutdown “a monumental mistake by lawmakers” in light of how rates went up for Oahu customers (back in 2020, the mandate passed the Senate unanimously).

On the positive side, Hawaii did succeed in exiting coal. In the past year, AES has decommissioned the plant and is moving forward with dismantling it, said Sandra Larsen, who serves as the company’s Hawaii market business leader. Crucially, the lights stayed on during this shift.

“There has not been a single blackout related to the coal plant closure,” said State Representative Nicole Lowen (D), who worked on the effort as chair of the Committee on Energy and Environmental Protection. “Time has shown that a lot of the fear-mongering was just that: fear-mongering.”

Electricity shortfalls were a real possibility, but Ige’s energy policy leaders worked overtime to salvage enough new capacity elsewhere. The rooftop solar sector, in particular, heeded the call for help and quickly rallied a decentralized fleet of batteries to assist the grid at key hours.

“We need to address climate change, but transformational change is difficult,” said Rocky Mould, executive director of the Hawaii Solar Energy Association. “I think we have the vision and we have the wherewithal, and our industry has proved gritty and resilient to be able to address these challenges.”

The transition from coal still isn’t complete, though, and the political dynamics have already shifted. Governor Ige left office last year, and several of his key allies on clean energy have been forced out of their roles by legislators capitalizing on public frustrations around energy price hikes. Current Governor Josh Green (D) supports the renewable energy push, but he ran on Hawaii’s housing and affordability crisis as his signature issue; early in his administration, it remains to be seen what kind of political capital he’ll invest in pushing the energy transition along.

Instead of an easy win for clean energy, Hawaii’s exit from coal offers a cautionary tale of the complexity of pulling off a well-executed transition from fossil fuels. It requires unprecedented coordination among the public and private sectors, utilities and clean-energy entrepreneurs. And success depends on political leadership to provide cover when things don’t go according to plan. In an era of global pandemics, sudden land wars and jaw-dropping climate disasters, clean-energy planners should expect to be surprised.

Still waiting on big solar, batteries

When the coal plant shut down, Hawaiian Electric was still waiting on a slew of large-scale solar and battery plants it had signed contracts for to fill the gap. That wait continues: Hawaiian Electric rode into the coal shutdown with just one new solar-plus-storage plant online, Clearway Energy’s Mililani project. These delays meant that the coal plant closure sent prices up, not down, hitting customers in their pocketbooks.

Absent the full force of clean energy reinforcements, Hawaiian Electric kept the lights on in September 2022 by burning more oil at the legacy plants that still provide the majority of the island’s electricity. The utility passes on fuel costs to its customers, meaning the people of Oahu became even more exposed to oil-market volatility.

Jay Griffin, Hawaii’s lead utility regulator at the time, had raised the alarm about this dubious fallback plan in March 2021, decrying the risks for customers and the adverse climate impacts of switching from coal to oil. That warning proved all the more prescient the following year when Russia invaded Ukraine, pushing oil prices through the roof.

There were many ways to avoid this outcome. If Hawaiian Electric had aggressively pursued solar power earlier, it would have protected itself against fuel-cost surges. This isn’t fanciful thinking: The locally owned cooperative that generates power for Kauai did just that, and its customers pay less for electricity that’s more than twice as clean as Hawaiian Electric’s. If the utility had managed its big solar buildout more expeditiously, or if third-party developers hadn’t encountered such debilitating Covid-era supply-chain hangups, the outcome would have been different. The chart below shows how Hawaii's residential electricity prices have fluctuated since January 2021.

As it happened, only Clearway Group and its battery supplier Wärtsilä delivered before the coal deadline, and they followed up with another project completion in Waiawa early this year.

Plus Power’s 185-megawatt stand-alone battery at Kapolei, down the street from the discontinued coal smokestacks, is still winding through commissioning now. This project, intended to maintain grid stability in lieu of the coal plant, is expected online early in the fourth quarter of 2023, per the developer.

The next biggest outstanding project for Oahu, from Hanwha affiliate 174 Power Global, is now slated to begin operating in 2024. AES, having shuttered its coal plant, will complete its West Oahu solar-storage project in a few months, and then two more Oahu projects next year, Larsen noted.

The Covid supply-chain constraints have faded, but developers still contend with the complexity of gaining access and permits to build on Hawaii’s scarce and precious acreage. As Larsen put it, “Growing partnerships and prioritizing local relationships is critical to advancing this work with the community.”

Governor Ige pushed projects along with his cross-cutting Powering Past Coal task force, which gathered all the key energy-sector players monthly to take stock of the latest clean energy delays and find ways to lubricate the gears. That body met for the last time in October and has not resumed under Green’s auspices, removing a key institution for expediting the sluggish installation schedule.

Green’s administration is pursuing a slew of federal funding opportunities to enhance grid resilience, electric vehicle charging, energy efficiency and energy affordability, noted Hawaii’s Chief Energy Officer Mark Glick in an email. The state’s Hydrogen Hub proposal is still pending with the U.S. Department of Energy. The state energy office is also working with community colleges “to create an adequate supply of well-trained clean energy professionals needed to effectuate Hawai’i’s energy transition,” Glick said.

Distributed solar and batteries fill the gap

Throughout the year, while large solar and battery developments foundered, Oahu’s distributed solar companies proved they could deliver quickly to avert a crisis.

Utilities and grid planners tend to dismiss small, customer-sited solar and batteries as a sideshow to the real business of running an electric grid. In Hawaii, that stance is harder to justify, because the combined forces of the state’s rooftop solar arrays produce far more power than its utility-scale clean energy plants. Hawaiian Electric reported more than 100,000 distributed energy systems hooked up in its territory as of mid-August; these small customer-sited devices produced 46.6% of the utility’s renewable generation last year. Large wind trailed at 19.1%, and large solar only made 13.8%.

“We have a really high penetration of distributed rooftop solar here,” said Mould of the Hawaii Solar Energy Association. “When there was an emergency need brought on by the closing of the coal plant in our transition, we were able to tap those resources, to get value out of those resources that were there.”

Mustering the latent power of thousands of home solar systems required a new incentive structure. When it became clear that the big solar plants wouldn’t arrive in time, Griffin’s Public Utilities Commission fast-tracked approval for Battery Bonus, a program to pay customers thousands of dollars for storing their rooftop solar production in batteries and sharing it with the grid at the hours of greatest need. Originally, the goal was to install 50 megawatts of residential battery capacity; that got amended to 40 megawatts by an enrollment deadline of the end of October.

Oahu had 26.5 megawatts of capacity enrolled in Battery Bonus by July 1, about one year into the program. Installers are hustling to sign up the remaining customers before the window of opportunity closes.

That’s not a huge number in absolute terms, but it easily ranks among the largest fleets of residential batteries being used to meet peak demand on an American grid. Vermont utility Green Mountain Power’s network of home batteries has reached that capacity after building up since 2015. And 27 megawatts is bigger than a couple of the outstanding solar-paired battery projects Oahu is waiting on, and approaching the scale of a couple more. Then again, this network of little batteries is delivering more power than all of the larger projects that don’t yet exist.

Large-scale renewables promise better economics and considerable firepower, but that’s only if they actually materialize. Solar on homes and businesses didn’t run into the same land-use concerns that held back their more massive counterparts.

“I think utility-scale assets could have provided those services, but there are challenges to interconnecting large-scale resources,” Mould said. “There are land constraints on Hawaii, so we should be really looking to maximize our available roof space, canopies over parking lots, places that are already spoken for.”

The particulars of the Battery Bonus program might not be replicated elsewhere, but it’s a case study in how simple design enhances the speed of execution. To qualify for the incentive, battery systems need to be hard-wired to discharge power during the two-hour peak window every night when the sun gorgeously descends across the watery horizon and solar production dips out. No need for fancy controls and real-time response to market signals — the batteries do the same thing every day, shifting clean power to a time that’s guaranteed to be high-demand and carbon-intensive.

Now the commission is hashing out a permanent distributed energy policy to succeed Battery Bonus in compensating residents for helping the grid. Another priority is to clear permitting bottlenecks so that multifamily homes can access solar and storage, Mould added. The legislature also recently designated $50 million for the Green Infrastructure Authority to lend to lower-income households seeking solar power.

Political fallout leaves the future energy strategy unclear

Now two major sources of uncertainty loom over Hawaii’s energy transition: Many of the key players behind clean energy action thus far have left the scene, and the tragic fires on Maui have fundamentally altered the state’s priorities — and Hawaiian Electric’s prospects.

Ige’s lieutenant governor, Josh Green, became governor late last year. As a fellow Democrat, he offered political continuity, but several policymakers shepherding the clean energy transition left their positions in the changeover.

First, Ige himself is out, after eight years of putting real heft behind his clean energy agenda. He blocked natural gas, stopped mainland utility NextEra’s bid to acquire Hawaiian Electric and signed the law to achieve 100% renewable power by 2045. When the utility fell behind in its project management of the coal replacement projects, he empowered his Chief Energy Officer Scott Glenn to get things back on track with the coal task force.

That task force came about because lead utility regulator Jay Griffin, who holds a doctorate in clean and distributed energy, did the math and realized Hawaiian Electric’s clean energy buildout wasn’t on track. But Griffin chose not to seek confirmation for a second term as chief regulator, perhaps sensing the political retribution that such a move would incur. Griffin’s fellow regulator Jennifer Potter also left her post last fall, after ushering in a first-in-the-nation smart rate policy through rulemaking.

Glenn went up for the lead job in Hawaii’s Office of Planning and Sustainable Development, but after he easily cleared a committee vote, powerful Senate leaders intervened and scuttled the confirmation with a tie vote — one member fled the scene rather than cast the deciding vote. After Glenn fought to save the coal closure which the legislature itself had mandated, his opponents publicly blamed him for the high energy bills that ensued. Local press noted that Glenn’s takedown doubled as “payback time” for his refusal to hand out favors to a politically connected but economically and environmentally dubious biomass plant on the Big Island.

Green’s administration has vowed to continue the clean energy journey. But the individuals who did so much to smooth the exit from coal no longer have an official say in what happens next.

Now the climate-change-fueled disaster on Maui demands the full attention of political and utility leadership. It’s unclear how much time or resources they’ll have to bring the current clean energy projects to fruition, or to lead the next wave of decarbonization.

LNG

Big Tech Is Coming for the Oil Patch’s Workers, and Winning


Ruth Liao and David Pan
Fri, September 1, 2023





(Bloomberg) -- Jose De Hoyos is recruiting in the oil patch. He got his start meeting workers in Pennsylvania’s Marcellus shale basin. This month, you’ll find him glad-handing in Odessa, Texas.

But De Hoyos isn’t in the Permian to hire engineers for gas rigs or roughnecks to join drilling crews. Instead, the founder of the cryptocurrency consulting firm LFG Mining is pitching a career pivot to data centers, the unsexy backbone of all things tech. He touts better pay and working conditions and a career with big growth potential.

“We are going to cross train them and make them proficient in the Bitcoin mining and traditional data center setup,” said De Hoyos, who is seeking to hire as many as 12 people for operations in Pecos and Odessa.

While it’s hardly new for energy workers to migrate toward tech — President Joe Biden infamously encouraged coal miners to “learn to code” — the current push from De Hoyos and other recruiters to poach them comes at a precarious moment for the gas industry.

Developers are racing to build a series of massive projects in Texas to liquefy and export US gas to make up for reduced Russian pipeline flows to Europe in the wake of the Ukraine invasion. These companies need every skilled worker they can get. Executives and analysts warn the increasing competition from tech threatens to drive up project costs and slow construction as the clock is ticking to bring the fuel to the global market.

The recruiters targeting the Texas energy industry have been a nightmare for Paul Marsden, president of the energy division at the engineering and construction company Bechtel. He’s losing workers to Elon Musk’s SpaceX and the technology titans that moved to the Lone Star State amid the pandemic migration.

“Big Tech has a lot of buying power,” he said in an interview. “The mission is to go hard, go fast, and that’s been a disruptor for the labor market. That’s not something we’ve had to compete with in the past.”

The US is set to become the world’s largest LNG exporter this year, but to keep up with demand, it’ll need to get new export terminals online quickly.

NextDecade Corp. will need as many as 5,000 workers on site as it starts construction of an $18.4 billion LNG export plant in Brownsville, dubbed Rio Grande LNG. Golden Pass, a joint venture between QatarEnergy and Exxon Mobil Corp., needs as many as 7,700 workers near the Louisiana border before it opens next year. In nearby Port Arthur, Sempra’s project needs as many as 1,500 workers a month over the 4 1/2 years it will take to construct.

The cost and availability of workers is a huge issue for companies as they embark on these massive LNG projects, according to Mike Webber, managing partner at the firm Webber Research and Advisory, an energy industry consultant.

“Not only will the existing labor pool get stretched, that pool is getting more expensive” along the US Gulf of Mexico coast, Webber said in an email. “There’s a hidden cost of training so many new people and ramping their skill level to the point it can hit the quality standards.”

Golden Pass declined to comment on the risk of delays or cost overruns at its project, while NextDecade didn’t directly address the question. Sempra said it was seeing a tighter labor market and cost increases, but that it seeks to keep those to a minimum by locking in prices in advance.

The biggest US LNG producer, Cheniere Energy Inc., is expanding one of its export terminals in Corpus Christi. The company says costs on that project might be about 10% higher because of the “inflationary environment.” Executives have also said that industrywide, project costs are up as much as 40% at some sites because of rising labor and construction expenses and higher interest rates.

Read more: Oil Workers Expect More Pay Raises Amid Competing Job Offers

Sarah Oliveira, who works as a recruiter for the firm Airswift Global, says competition from tech companies has made it increasingly difficult to fill LNG roles in Texas. For every five potential engineering candidates that she’s vetting for LNG-specific roles, she says at least one or two of them are also interviewing with Tesla. And Tesla often offers higher pay.

“Money can be the dealbreaker,” she said.

Of course the labor shortage in Texas isn’t wholly unique. Across the US, companies in industries from semiconductors to meatpackers are struggling to find workers amid historically low unemployment. Trade workers are particularly hard to find, with the US short some 200,000 electricians, according to industry estimates.

“The trades are in a desperate need,” said Helene Webster, executive director of the Independent Electrical Contractor, Texas Gulf Coast.

Specialized roles for major infrastructure projects, like project managers who make sure everything is running smoothly and on time, can be particularly difficult to fill.

“We say it’s like finding hens’ teeth,” Damon Hill, president of growth and development for projects at Wood Group, a consultant on major infrastructure works.

The increased competition for Texas workers also reflects how the economy transformed over recent decades. While the state remains the US energy hub, the industry is a smaller part of the overall Texas economy than it was in years past. The number of oil and gas workers in Texas has fallen 20% since 2018, according to data from the Texas Workforce Commission, while jobs tied to computing infrastructure, data processing and other related work grew by almost 40% over the same period.

Jeff Reid, 34, left a job doing business development for Mesa Natural Gas Solutions, a company supplying natural gas generators to shale operations, in February to join Sunbelt Solomon. His new employer provides electrical equipment such as transformers to data centers and other businesses.

“A lot of my friends in the oil and gas industry either make the moves themselves or ask me how to get away,” Reid said. “They have seen the energy cycles and the volatility of the oil and gas industry. It gets a little scary when things slow down.”

Reid said there’s a surprising amount of overlap in skills needed for either field. “There are a lot of parallels,” Reid said. “Plugging in computers and trouble-shooting, hooking up electrical components, tightening pipes, set the equipment on site.”

De Hoyos, whose company does repairs, training and operations for cryptomining facilities, said one of his favorite hunting grounds for recruits is gas stations.

He stalks out the parking lot looking for tell-tale signs of energy workers, specifically the large ice chests in the back of their vehicles that provide cool drinks in the sweltering West Texas oil patch. He always makes sure to mention that data centers are air conditioned.

--With assistance from Catarina Saraiva.

 Bloomberg Businessweek
Powered by solar and wind, this $10B transmission line will carry more energy than the Hoover Dam

SUSAN MONTOYA BRYAN
Fri, September 1, 2023 

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — An energy infrastructure project bigger than the Hoover Dam is how Hunter Armistead describes the $10 billion venture his company will be overseeing during the next three years.

As the chief executive of one of the world's largest wind and solar development companies, Armistead said breaking ground on Pattern Energy's SunZia transmission line marks a major milestone as the United States looks to make good on promises to address climate change and bolster the nation's already overwhelmed power grids as demand increases and weather events become more extreme.

It is also a cautionary tale, he told The Associated Press in an interview ahead of Friday's ceremony on the open plains of north-central New Mexico.

The U.S. can't afford to take 12 years to “create this type of solution” given the growing need for more energy infrastructure, Armistead said.

He pointed to Europe and China, where billions of dollars are being invested in new high-voltage lines to connect power plants to cities where demand is high.

“They all recognize the need to build out bulk transmission, to create inter-regional transfer points in order to create greater reliability,” he said. "It also creates diversity in resources and diversity in dealing with weather, which is now the new most important factor driving both our load and our generation.”

The Biden administration has set a goal to eliminate carbon emissions from the power sector by 2035. The effort faces numerous challenges, including the lack of transmission.

The U.S. Department of Energy has cited independent estimates that indicate transmission systems need to expand by 60% by 2030 and may need to triple by 2050. The agency is working with two national laboratories on a transmission planning study, with findings and recommendations expected later this year.

The Biden administration is just the latest to promise speeding up the development and modernization of the nation’s energy infrastructure through expedited federal permitting and regulatory reforms. Former Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump also vowed to roll back bureaucracy.

The SunZia transmission project has been more than a decade in the making. After an initial review over several years, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management authorized a right-of-way grant on federal lands. That was revisited when developers in 2021 submitted a new application modifying the route after the U.S. Defense Department and environmentalists raised concerns about the path of the high-voltage lines.

Final approval came in May, with U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland saying the latest application was reviewed in record time as the administration has tried to fast-track more projects.

In Arizona, there are still concerns about potential ecological damage from SunZia where it will cross the San Pedro River Valley. Critics plan to appeal a recent court decision affirming regulatory approval in that state.

“I disagree with those who believe that poorly planned projects like SunZia should now be used as the pretext for granting the federal government even greater authority to sidestep legitimate state and local concerns over federal powerline siting decisions,” said Peter Else, chair of the Lower San Pedro Watershed Alliance.

Haaland said the Bureau of Land Management consistently sought collaboration to develop the best possible route for the line. She doubled down Friday on the administration's promise to permit at least 25 gigawatts of onshore renewable energy by 2025. She said New Mexico, her home state, stands to play a big role in production given its supply of sunshine and wind.

The SunZia project will stretch about 550 miles (885 kilometers) — funneling renewable energy to more populated areas in Arizona and California. Developers say it will be capable of transporting more than 3,500 megawatts of new wind power to 3 million people in the West.

Other projects in the works include the Southern Spirit transmission line that would link Texas with other grids in the southeastern U.S., the proposed Greenlink West Transmission Project in Nevada, and a set of high-voltage lines that would span from central Utah to east-central Nevada.

Aside from addressing climate issues, U.S. Sen. Martin Heinrich said such projects represent one of this generation’s greatest economic opportunities. He and other officials have pointed to construction jobs and tax revenues for local governments and states.

The New Mexico Democrat earlier this year introduced legislation to improve the planning, permitting and financing of transmission infrastructure. The proposals include a 30% investment tax credit for large-scale projects as well as coordinated agency reviews and early stakeholder engagement.

Armistead said developers historically have tried to avoid federal lands because of the bureaucracy involved. The irony is that the federal government actually wants developers to build more transmission lines, he said.

SunZia will cross varied terrain, from a riparian area along the Rio Grande to rugged canyons and cactus-dotted valleys.

While rerouting the line around sensitive areas in New Mexico took more time and money, Armistead said he believed it was the right thing to do.

“I believe that is a model for how it should be done in the future. And that’s what I’m so proud of,” he said. “I think this creates the credibility and the reality of what is possible, and we better keep building on from there.”

The many factors behind Alberta’s power grid alert


Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is using a recent alert urging Albertans to reduce their electricity use as ammunition in her firefight against the federal government’s regulations to clean up Canada’s power grid by 2035.

On Monday afternoon, the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) issued the alert due to a combination of hot weather, low wind generation and an outage in B.C. that affected Alberta’s ability to import power from the neighbouring province.

An alert like this means the power grid is under stress and AESO may need to use “emergency reserves to meet demand and maintain system reliability,” so consumers are asked to temporarily reduce their electricity use, according to the operator’s website.

In the days following the alert — which did not result in any rolling blackouts — Smith has repeatedly said the province needs “more natural gas generation brought online asap” to backstop power from wind and solar.

In the case of Monday’s power grid alert, the situation was a lot more complex than Smith made it out to be.

Low wind power was only one of many conditions that led to Alberta’s energy shortfall. Reduced gas generation and outages combined with issues with importing energy from B.C. played a larger role in the shortage.


Forecasts for Monday indicated there would be approximately 120 megawatts (MW) of wind, however, for almost the full duration of the grid alert, there were only about 50 MW available, AESO communications manager Leif Sollid said in an emailed statement to Canada’s National Observer.

“The overall contribution of wind wasn’t significant” when you consider that the peak demand was 11,188 MW, Sollid explained. “We were expecting low wind, and what we got was fairly consistent with expectations.”


There were also four natural gas generators offline or operating at reduced capacity, resulting in a loss of approximately 600 MW during Monday’s grid alert, he said.

During extremely hot weather, the cooling ponds adjacent to natural gas facilities become warmer, and the water circulating through the plants can’t keep them cool enough to operate at optimal temperature, explained Sollid. To compensate, the plants have to operate at a reduced output or capacity.

Adding to the difficulties, one of the lines BC Hydro uses to transfer power to Alberta was out of service for planned maintenance, which reduced its ability to transfer power to Alberta by 466 MW, said Sollid. The line’s return to service and addition of the missing 466 MW was “a significant factor in returning the grid to normal operating conditions,” his statement reads.

Demand was also 100 MW higher than anticipated, Sollid added.

According to Smith, increasing natural gas generation is the answer to Alberta’s energy supply woes.

In Smith’s sustained attack on the federal government’s clean electricity regulations, she regularly claims the incoming regulations will bar provinces from adding more gas generation.

This is false. The federal regulations will allow new gas generation, as long as the facilities use carbon capture technology to curb a majority of the planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions created. Existing gas plants or those opened before the regulations are finalized in 2025 will be able to operate for two decades without any emission-capturing technology, according to federal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault.

“I wish that carbon capture was as perfect as they think it is,” said Smith when this reality was pointed out to her in a radio interview with Global News this week.

“They say that it has to abate 95 per cent of the emissions by 2035 or you go to jail. Like, let's be clear about what it means. It's criminal jail time.”

“Talking about criminal jail time is deliberately inflammatory,” a spokesperson for Guilbeault’s office said in response to Smith’s comments, pointing out that clean electricity regulations are the same as regulations for phasing out coal. Like the coal regulations, the federal government’s clean energy regulations will fall under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, which carries criminal liability for failing to meet its requirements.

However, “like many regulations across government, there [is] a spectrum of measures to address non-compliance, that range from written warnings to escalating fines, which get bigger depending on severity,” the spokesperson told Canada’s National Observer in a written statement.

When it comes to stress on the power grid as Alberta’s energy mix changes, there are many ways to plan for and address the issue, said Jason Wang, an Alberta-based senior analyst with the Pembina Institute, a non-profit think tank focused on the energy transition.

Adding more renewable generation to the grid is one piece of the puzzle, he told Canada’s National Observer in a phone interview. Even when there’s low wind, it's still blowing, he pointed out.

“Wind and solar are able to provide energy even throughout the winter,” said Wang. “In our work, we looked back to 2010 and found the worst days of wind availability and solar availability, and looked at: Will we have enough electricity in the system?”

The Pembina Institute’s analysis found the answer was yes across all the scenarios except for the worst-case scenario, where the longest stretch is 12 hours, said Wang. This yet-to-be-released analysis, which Canada’s National Observer reviewed, is based on a 2035 energy mix, evolved from last year’s mix. The model allows for new gas to come online, in accordance with the federal government’s forthcoming clean electricity regulations.


“That's a situation where, you know, simplifying a little bit, if we built like one more (battery) storage facility, we would have been able to cover that gap,” said Wang.

More generation can help fill this gap, said Wang, pointing to the approximately $33 billion worth of investments in proposed solar and wind projects now stalled because of Alberta’s recently imposed seven-month moratorium on renewable energy project approvals.

“So much more generation wants to come into our market, and having a moratorium doesn't help … with fixing these issues in the shorter term,” said Wang.

That $33 billion is for 118 proposed projects comprising 5.3 gigawatts (GW) of wind, 12.7 GW of solar and 1.5 GW of battery energy storage for solar projects, according to Pembina Institute’s analysis.

Realistically, not all those projects will be built, but it's indicative of developers’ interest in the province’s renewable energy market, he added.

Last year, Alberta led Canada for renewable energy growth, accounting for 77 per cent of the 1.8 GW of solar and wind generation capacity that came online that year, according to data from the Canadian Renewable Energy Association.


Another piece of the puzzle is to reduce electricity demand by making sure our homes are built — or retrofitted — to be more energy efficient, said Wang. More energy-efficient homes use less electricity to stay cool in summer and warm in the winter.

Right now, Alberta only has one provincial intertie with B.C. Expanding the capacity of provinces to share electricity and adding more of these interties will improve grid stability for all, said Wang. However, new transmission lines take time to build, “often in the order of a decade,” he added.

Provinces often have different energy needs in different seasons so interties are a mutually beneficial measure, said Wang. A recent electricity-sharing agreement between Ontario and Québec is the latest example of this.

On Aug. 30, the two provinces announced Ontario’s Independent Electricity System Operator and Hydro-Québec will trade up to 600 MW of energy each year.

The two provinces have complementary seasonal peaks in electricity demand: Ontario’s peak demand occurs in the summer, driven mainly by air conditioning on hot days, and Québec’s peak demand occurs in the winter, driven mainly by electric heating on cold days, according to Ontario’s news release on the agreement. The deal — which could start this winter — will “be a straight swap of capacity with no payments required by either party, protecting ratepayers in both provinces,” according to the release.

The new agreement, lasting up to 10 years, will not require any new transmission lines to be built because there are already six interties between Ontario and Québec transmission systems with a total combined capacity of approximately 2,775 MW.

Natasha Bulowski, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Canada's National Observer