Tuesday, October 03, 2023

PAKISTAN
Relying on debt

DAWN
Published October 3, 2023 

PAKISTAN is in a debt spiral that may push it over the cliff should the world decide to remove the drip-feed of bilateral and multilateral loans that is keeping its failing economy on life support.

Grappling with several economic problems — elevated inflation, large fiscal deficits, low industrial and agricultural productivity, a frail balance-of-payments position, a weak exchange rate, etc — Pakistan’s dependence on cash injections from its few foreign friends and global lenders is increasing by the day.

For the last few decades, we have been a most loyal customer of the IMF, the World Bank, and others to pay our bills, because we do not collect enough taxes to finance our budget, and the country’s capacity to earn enough dollars to pay for imports from its own pocket is severely hampered by low productivity.

Thus, it is no surprise that Islamabad was the top borrower of cheaper funds from the International Development Association among South Asian countries. The World Bank’s annual report for 2023 says Pakistan had secured $2.3bn in financing from the IDA during the last fiscal year.

With the government’s reliance on domestic and external loans growing rapidly to meet all its expenditures after making escalating debt payments, Pakistan’s debt hangover is worsening rapidly. State Bank data shows that the total public debt rose to 74.3pc of GDP at the end of FY23 from 73.9pc a year ago.

The mounting debt stock is not only making the government borrow more to pay back its creditors but also eroding its capacity to support inflation-stricken people and grow the economy to produce jobs.

Sadly, the ruling military and civil elite haven’t grasped the seriousness of the situation, in spite of repeated warnings from multilateral agencies and ‘friendly’ countries. Instead of taking measures and making sound economic policies to solve the fundamental weaknesses in the economy, they continue to grope for a big bailout from the Gulf monarchies.

The materialisation of the promised multibillion-dollar investment bailout may provide temporary relief — just like the recent $3bn IMF loan delayed sovereign default has — but it will not change the inevitable.

No amount of bailout dollars can take the place of basic economic reforms. There are no quick-fix solutions to the multidimensional economic crisis.

Successive governments have delayed fundamental reforms for far too long, owing to political reasons, and have used borrowed cash to pump economic growth.

Once the short low-growth spurts end, the economy will find itself in a much deeper hole, with the man on the street left to bear the increased cost and pain of new adjustments while the elite classes keep enjoying their privileges.

As the nation tries to control grave internal political and faith-based conflicts, it is postponing economic reforms. This will prove disastrous for the country.

Published in Dawn, October 3rd, 2023
Roosevelt, once a swanky Manhattan hotel, now a refugee shelter

Anwar Iqbal 
Published October 2, 2023 

PIA, which owns 99pc shares of the hotel, has leased it for three years to fetch $220m.
—Photo by the writer


NEW YORK: Dirty and crowded — and surrounded by police, both in uniform and plain clothes — this is how once a swanky New York hotel, Roosevelt, now looks: a shelter for homeless refugees.

Like other properties in distress, Roosevelt has graffiti on the front, partly covered with placards and contrasts sharply with the nearby Grand Central station that glistens after renovation.

The 19-storey building, with 1,025 rooms, named after former US President Theodore Roosevelt — opened its door to America’s rich and famous in 1924, almost 100 years ago. Now, most of its tenants are illegal refugees from neighboring Latin American nations, although some are from distant regions as well.

In 1979, an American real estate developer Paul Milstein leased the hotel to Pakistan International Airlines (PIA). In 2000, PIA and Saudi Prince Faisal bin Khalid bought the hotel, and PIA then acquired Prince Faisal’s ownership stake.

Real estate developer believes hotel can still earn profit with some effort

In 2020, the hotel closed due to continued financial losses associated with the Covid-19 pandemic. In 2023, it reopened as a shelter for asylum seekers deported to liberal states by the conservative governor of Texas.

The building — now run by the New York government — has two American flags on the entrance though it had a Pakistani flag, too, until recently. It was removed after PIA leased it to the New York government.

A group of Pakistani journalists visited the shelter on Sept 24, during the 78th session of the UN General Assembly, which is the busiest season for New York’s hotel.

As it’s close to the UN headquarters, Roosevelt was once a favourite abode of visiting leaders and diplomats. During the UNGA, the hotel often had two or three foreign flags to show which foreign leaders were staying there.

“I remember President Musharraf having breakfast with other world leaders,” said Moviz Siddiqui, a Pakistani journalist who has covered the UNGA for almost 20 years now. “Scores of ministers and diplomats stayed here too.”

But there were no presidents or prime ministers on Sept 24. Police allowed Pakistani journalists to watch the refugees, not to interview them or take their pictures. Yet, they managed to do both, after moving to a ‘safer’ distance.


“You are beautiful,” said a refugee, Kevin, to a Pakistani journalist as she tried to interview him. He asked for a joint (marijuana) and when she said she did not have any, he told her: “Life here is tough. Marijuana can lessen the burden.”

Another refugee, who, like others, only gave her first name, Michel, said “the situation is particularly bad for children.” She said they were living in unhygienic conditions and had no future.

“People have no hope, so they get violent,” she said. “They often get into fights with each other.

Dozens arrested


On Sept 25, The New York Post reported that police arrested two migrants from Roosevelt for criminally assaulting another refugee. Two more were arrested during the weekend. Since early this summer, when the refugees started coming, police have arrested 40 people from Roosevelt.

Four to five refugees live in each of the 850 rooms they occupy. When the journalists visited, many stood on the sidewalks and more lined up on the front, under the two American flags, waiting for food.

The police let them stay but when shopkeepers of this upscale commercial district of Manhattan complain, they push them back into an already crammed hotel.

Leased for $220m

PIA still owns 99 per cent shares of the hotel while the Saudi prince holds on to one per cent. The airline has leased the hotel to the city for three years, at the rate of about $200 a day for a single room. The city will pay a total of $220 million in three years.

The agreement requires the city to repair and clean the hotel before it hands it back to PIA. But Imran Igra, a New York real estate developer of Pakistani origin, thinks it’s unlikely.


“In such arrangements, the lease is automatically extended,” he said. “Pakistan neither has the desire nor the resources to restore the hotel to its past glory.”

Mr Igra said that in its present condition, Roose­velt would sell for $636m. But if it’s sold as a midtown Manhattan hotel, after restoration, it could fetch between $1bn and $1.4bn. Repairs may cost up to $500m. He, however, opposes selling it because he believes it can be turned into a profit-making property with some effort.

Published in Dawn, October 2nd, 2023Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.
Govt decides to evict over 1m foreigners illegally residing in Pakistan: state media

Dawn.com 
Published October 2, 2023 

The caretaker government has decided to evict 1.1 million foreigners living illegally in Pakistan because of their involvement in funding and facilitating terrorists and other illegal activities, according to state-run wire service Associated Press of Pakistan.

“In the first phase, illegal residents, in the second phase, those with Afghan citizenship and in the third phase, those with proof of residence cards will be expelled,” it stated.

Quoting a “source privy to the development”, the report said foreigners illegally residing in the country “pose a serious threat to the security of Pakistan”.

It stated that the plan for eviction of illegally residing Afghan citizens had also been approved “as the lot is involved in funding, facilitating and smuggling terrorists whereas 700,000 Afghans have not renewed their proof of residence in Pakistan”.

“It has been informed that in the first phase, illegal residents will be deported along with those who do not renew their visas. In the second phase, those with Afghan citizenship will be deported, in the third phase, those with proof of residence cards will be deported,” the APP report said, adding that the interior ministry had devised the plan in consultation with stakeholders and the Afghan government.

“In the meantime, the ministry has also issued directives to the concerned to compile a record of Afghans living without permits and prepare a transportation plan to bring them to the Afghan border.

“Apart from checking the records of all the Afghans residing in the country, the concerned officials were directed to quickly deal with the applications filed regarding the registration of Afghans,” the report concluded.

Today’s development comes as the most recent in the state’s crackdown on Afghan refugees.

September has seen an alarming rise in the rounding up and detention of Afghan refugees. The government cites illegal immigration and rising crime as the reasons behind the crackdown.

Around 1.3m Afghans are registered refugees and 880,000 more have legal status to remain in Pakistan, according to the latest United Nations figures.

Police and politicians have said a recent round-up targets only those without legal status and is in response to rising crime and poor regulation of immigration that is straining resources.

At least 700 Afghans have been arrested since early September in Karachi alone — 10 times more than in August — and hundreds more in the other cities, according to official police figures.

Meanwhile, Afghans say the arrests have been indiscriminate.

They accuse police of extorting money and ignoring legal documents while pointing to rising anti-Afghan sentiment as prolonged economic hardship burdens Pakistani households and tensions rise betwe­­en Islamabad and Kabul’s new Taliban government.

Crackdown rattles Afghans in Pakistan

AFP Published September 29, 2023
PEOPLE gather at the tea shop at an Afghan refugee camp in Karachi.
— AFP

KARACHI: The cow had been slaughtered and bags of rice purchased, but young bride Wahida’s nuptials were cut short when her groom was arrested on their wedding day, one of hundreds caught in a recent crackdown on Afghans living in Pakistan.


The 20-year-old now lives with her in-laws at the Afghan Muhajir aid camp in Karachi, but without her husband-to-be, a registered refugee.

“We are without hope,” the groom’s mother, Safar Gul, told AFP. “The police took away our son. What can we do, they have the power.” Faizur Reh­man, 22, was arrested “just be­­cause he was Afghan”, another relative named Zulaikha said.

Around 1.3 million are registered refugees and 880,000 more have legal status to remain in Pakistan, according to the latest United Nations figures.

Police say action only aimed at illegal immigrants; lawyers helpless to help those without documents

Police and politicians have said a recent round-up targets only those without legal status and is in response to rising crime and poor regulation of immigration that is straining resources.

At least 700 Afghans have been arrested since early September in Karachi alone — 10 times more than in August — and hundreds more in the other cities, according to official police figures.

Afghans say the arrests have been indiscriminate.

They accuse police of extorting money and ignoring legal documents, while pointing to rising anti-Afghan sentiment as prolonged economic hardship burdens Pakistani households and tensions rise betwe­­en Islamabad and Kabul’s new Taliban government.

An estimated 600,000 Afghans have arrived since the Taliban seized power in Kabul in August 2021.

Lawyers have said the police operation has been complicated by registration cards for vast numbers of documented Afghans expiring at the end of June, although their status remains in place until the government rules on their renewal.

Lawyer Moniza Kakar said she can do little for Afghans who do not have documents, and that those recently deported include the sick and poor, as well as human rights defenders and women students.

More than 1,800 Afghans were deported from Karachi last year, city police said, and nearly 1,700 have been arrested so far in 2023.

But Kakar, along with the several other lawyers giving free legal help to Afghans, said the vast majority in this sweep are documented, compared to roughly a quarter rounded up in past crackdowns.

“Our action is purely aimed at illegal immigrants,” Karachi police chief Khadim Rind told AFP, adding that allegations of arrests of legal document holders and bribe-taking should be investigated.

Afghan consul general Syed Abdul Jabbar said Afghans in Pakistan were paying the price for disputes between Kabul and Islamabad.

Published in Dawn, September 29th, 2023




PAKISTAN

Refugee question

Huma Yusuf 
Published October 2, 2023 


IT has been a bad week for refugees. A debate is brewing on whether the UN’s refugee convention is still fit for purpose. A recent Financial Times poll found that 56 per cent of Americans and 60pc of Britons say immigration is too high. Closer to home, our interim government authorised the deportation of undocumented Afghan refugees. Our policymakers should closely follow the evolving global rhetoric on refugees for it will inevitably affect Pakistan’s global standing.


It is not surprising that refugees are back in the headlines. According to the UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, as of May this year, more than 110 million individuals were forcibly displaced due to conflict, persecution or human rights violations, of which more than 35m were categorised as refugees.

Pakistan is in a double bind. On the one hand, as the preferred destination for over 2m Afghan refugees, it faces international pressure to sign up to the UN refugee convention (Pakistan is not a signatory and thus does not have national legislation guiding refugee and asylum protocols or non-refoulement, which is why it can deport vulnerable Afghans without breaching local or international law). On the other, as a (growing) exporter of refugees, it will face mounting pressure to stem the tide as well as aggressive containment approaches. Our economic, security and foreign policies are not adequately equipped to manage the challenge.

The interim set-up has already faced criticism for its decision to deport undocumented Afghan refugees (Pakistan hosts 1.4m documented Afghan refugees; an equal number of undocumented Afghans are also believed to reside in the country). The refugees complain of harassment and police mishandling, claiming that Pakistani authorities have been slow to approve registrations and visa extension applications. The international community is raising its eyebrow at a country ready to send Afghans, including girls and women, back to a country where human rights violations are extreme.

Pakistan should consider the benefits of welcoming refugees.


Pakistan uses deportations as a way to demonstrate it is cracking down on cross-border militancy, while also hoping it serves as a pressure tactic to elicit more support from Kabul to limit this security threat. This is largely ineffective given that most Afghan refugees are legitimately fleeing hunger, conflict and women’s rights violations.

Pakistan should, instead, consider the benefits of welcoming Afghan refugees, as it has historically done. This would be humane and demonstrate that Pakistan does not condone the extremism and horrific misogyny of the Taliban. It would also position Pakistan well for future international negotiations in which it would want to advocate for Pakistani refugees in other countries to be treated humanely and in accordance with international laws.

As a first step, Pakistan should sign the UN refugee convention, but on the condition that its Western allies provide it with support to comply with non-refoulement requirements (the prohibition on states to return individuals to places where they would be at risk). Indeed, refugee management could become a core aspect of our foreign policy.

Pakistan since 2021 has been resisting setting up a Resettlement Support Centre to enable the US to process resettlement applications of Afghan refugees and relocate them onwards to the US. It argues that an RSC would trigger a flood of Afghan refugees. The US, meanwhile, refuses to handle resettlement cases without an RSC. This is an area for productive engagement between Pakistan and the US: Islamabad can enable Washington to meet its commitments in the wake of its messy Afghanistan exit, while receiving support to manage the influx of refugees in exchange.

Turkey is currently the world’s largest refugee-hosting country, and knowledge sharing of best practices for refugee/ asylum frameworks could be a key element of the growing partnership between the two states. Pakistan could also serve as a valuable interlocutor with allies such as China and the GCC to encourage them to take a greater share of the global refugee population in line with their economic status, an argument that can only be made from the moral high ground, but that would help sustain the relevance of Pakistan’s voice globally, and help secure fair treatment for Pakistani refugees later.

The world is on a difficult trajectory and the number of refugees and asylum seekers will only soar. Our own worsening security and economic environment and sickening levels of religious intolerance mean that Pakistani refugees will be among that count. If we want to safeguard our compatriots, we must change our perspective on the refugee challenge. Let’s not forget the age-old wisdom of doing unto others as you would have them do unto you.

The writer is a political and integrity risk analyst.

X (formerly Twitter): @humayusuf


Published in Dawn, October 2nd, 2023

PAKISTAN

Killjoys in Swat

Editorial
DAWN 
Published October 3, 2023 

IN yet another blow to women’s rights in Pakistan, a group of young, spirited girls seeking to participate in a Sunday cricket match in Swat’s Charbagh town were robbed of the opportunity. The hopes of the 12-year-old organiser were dashed when the girls were sent away by angry men, telling them playing in an open ground would be ‘immodest’. How can playing a sport, a celebration of one’s talents, be seen as a mark against one’s modesty? The tehsil chairman cited ‘unstable security conditions’. After outrage ensued on the media, the local government promised a match ‘in a week or two’.


What a shame that where Malala’s fight for the rights of young girls was born, such events continue to transpire. While age-old prejudices might have had a hand in the obstruction of an innocent game, such biases have no place in contemporary Pakistan. Our nation has seen the ascent of women in all spheres, including sports, proving that skill knows no gender. The stifling of these young girls’ dreams is another reminder that the fight against extremism goes beyond kinetic action: it requires dealing with a regressive mindset. When the girls were denied permission to play, they were denied the simple joys and life lessons that sports offer, such as teamwork, perseverance and discipline. Addressing the issue requires a multifaceted approach. Community awareness programmes, promotion of female role models, the start of a dialogue with religious leaders, the creation of safe spaces for women, and introduction of sports into school curricula will all go a long way in changing deeply ingrained beliefs. It is also important to engage men and boys to stand up for the rights of their sisters, daughters and friends. Our country’s future lies in the empowerment of its youth, regardless of gender. The valleys of Swat should echo with the sound of the bat striking the ball, and with cheers, not with the silence of dreams deferred.

Published in Dawn, October 3rd, 2023
Palestine abandoned
DAWN
Published October 3, 2023


IT appears to be only a matter of time before a normalisation deal is announced between Saudi Arabia and Israel. While significant questions remain unanswered, specifically about the fate of the two-state solution, signals from all major stakeholders — Riyadh, Tel Aviv and Washington — indicate a deal is on the horizon. The recent statement by White House spokesman John Kirby that the “basic framework” of the plan was ready only strengthens claims by Saudi and Israeli leaders that normalisation is at hand. While the Saudis have long said they stand by the two-state solution, the commitment to this goal may be diluted in order to make peace with Tel Aviv. For example, the Palestinians may be given cosmetic guarantees that their quest for statehood will be supported in order to make the ‘mega-deal’ a reality. The truth is that the Israelis are unlikely to make any major concessions for peace, specifically where the right of return and ending illegal settlements are concerned This ‘mega-deal’ is simply a bilateral understanding between Riyadh and Tel Aviv blessed by Washington; the Palestinians are but an irritating detail. Moreover, even if the Palestinian Authority is won over by the Saudis with promises of funds and support, this does not mean the Palestinians will accept the bartering away of their historical homeland. After all, the PA is widely seen as corrupt and inefficient, in fact, an extension of the repressive Israeli occupation. And without Hamas, which rules Gaza, on board, the deal cannot be seen to have full Palestinian support.

Just as Oslo and the so-called Abraham Accords have failed to end the brutal Israeli occupation and pave the way for a viable Palestinian state, the Saudi-Israeli normalisation, too, won’t achieve anything. If the deal goes through, many Arab and Muslim states will shed their inhibitions and extend a hand of friendship towards Tel Aviv. Never mind the fact that extremist ministers within the current Israeli cabinet have talked about “wiping out” Palestinian towns and have refused to give up an inch of illegal settlements. The Arab and Muslim worlds will have to decide which side they are on: will they stand by the oppressed and call for the end of the Israeli occupation? Or will they choose the path of realpolitik, and sue for illusory peace with an apartheid state?

Published in Dawn, October 3rd, 2023
Maldives and its neighbours


Jawed Naqvi 
Published October 3, 2023 
 

PRESIDENT Biden was assiduously cultivating leaders of Pacific Island nations the other day when in the distant Maldives archipelago in the Indian Ocean an electoral run-off was poised to evict a friendly head of state.

The White House meeting underscored how any piece of land along the sea lanes plied by China or Russia were coveted as anchor to upstage strategic rivals. The Maldives was under British administration when an Italian ship was sunk off its coast during World War II. It faded from importance with the arrival of the Diego Garcia base loaned by Britain to the US in the Indian Ocean, not far from the Maldives, from where the Iraq invasion was carried out.

Mr Biden’s meeting with Pacific islanders was avowedly a response to China’s inroads into the oceanic region where Beijing has struck up a handy partnership with a key island state. In this vein, one can see that a setback may have occurred for Mr Biden when Mohamed Muizzu won the Maldives race.

However, it is difficult to see how India stood to lose from the election of a leader described curiously in Indian and Western press as an anti-India and pro-China man.

If Muizzu and his party proclaim themselves to be anti-Indian yet not as openly anti-West, there is something there for Indian diplomats to ponder. Is the Maldives alone in being anti-India (and pro-China) in South Asia, if at all it is that? Or is it the same rubbish at work whereby entire communities at home are damned by India’s state-backed TV channels with hostile propaganda, simply because some Sikhs or Muslims, or any other, may not see eye to eye with an increasingly delinquent state.

Leave alone the Maldives. What about Sri Lanka where China has a strong presence? Or Bangladesh where Beijing has traditionally had a key presence despite India’s seminal role in the creation of the nation in 1971? Why is predominantly Hindu Nepal looking such a piece of heavy weather for Indian diplomacy?

Even Bhutan, which has a treaty that tethers it to India in crucial ways, is spending extensive time in quiet confabulations with China. We need not even get to Pakistan and Afghanistan from the set of countries that were once eyeing at least a courteous relationship with India under the canopy of Saarc, the South Asian club that India under Prime Minister Modi, for reasons best known to him, has throttled into near extinction.

In its essence, Mr Muizzu’s election needn’t be a threat to India or a favour to China. It may be just a rap on the knuckles for diplomatic sullenness at the most. As such, the entire India-China-Maldives discourse seems like a hangover from the bloc days of the Cold War. The truth lies elsewhere.

The Indian middle class has nurtured dreams of a Mitty-esque conquest of the world, a self-congratulatory arrival of the Vishwaguru, the spiritual and temporal leader of the world. In this dream sequence, they have been obsessively busy courting the global stage in the footsteps of the prime minister. Many went berserk with the G20 summit Mr Modi hosted recently.

The rumblings waiting to erupt in Canada were ignored and dismissed curtly. This was also the time when the UK was suddenly distancing itself from its own duplicity in buying refined oil products from India whose source was located in Russia. Then Australia admonished Hindutva activists over a vandalised Hindu temple falsely blamed on the Sikh diaspora. All in all, not great tidings for the self-proclaimed Vishwaguru.

If Muizzu and his party proclaim themselves to be anti-Indian yet not as openly anti-West, there is something for Indian diplomats to ponder.

Contrast the absence of marked diplomatic finesse of recent days with approaches signalled by previous prime ministers. Indira Gandhi hosted 130 non-aligned movement leaders in 1983, followed by the mega Commonwealth summit in Goa. At the NAM summit in Fidel Castro’s company, she led a united appeal for denuclearisation of the Indian Ocean while the summit also called on the US to vacate the Diego Garcia base.

Mr Modi has flipped that policy, allowing India to be sucked into a self-defeating anti-China ambit that serves Western interests without necessarily addressing New Delhi’s border issues with China, if they ever could.

An approach to pragmatic diplomacy was shown by Inder Gujral shortly after the end of the Cold War. He directed the Indian intelligence apparatus to suspend their aggressive presence in countries in India’s neighbourhood, particularly so in Pakistan. He met Nawaz Sharif in Male during the 1997 Saarc summit and rekindled reconciliation with Islamabad as part of a foreign policy structured in concentric circles, giving priority to relationships closer home. That line was pursued by Manmohan Singh.

Despite the terror unleashed in Mumbai in November 2008 with an unspeakable massacre of civilians by armed killers from across the border, Singh preferred a rapprochement with Islamabad at Sharm el Sheikh in Egypt. He was like Arjun, the hero of Mahabharat who was famously riveted to the eye of the fish to shoot the arrow at. In Singh’s case, the eye was the soaring free market economy he had initiated.

There are rare occasions when their morality is tested for nations flaunting democratic and liberal credentials. One such occasion came in the Maldives at a regional summit when member states showcased their respective cultures and heritage.

It was around then that Pakistan, under Asif Ali Zardari’s presidency, if I remember right, set up an exhibition in Male, claiming Pakistan’s Buddhist legacy as a major component of its national identity. This was no small departure from the puritan path the Zia regime had prescribed for cultural preferences. Muslim zealots from Male ransacked the exhibition as un-Islamic.

It was just the time for India to speak up for Pakistan. One can’t remember a squeak from New Delhi. The fault, therefore, is not in the stars. Or, as Samuel Beckett says, it doesn’t help to blame the boots for the faults of the feet.

The writer is Dawn’s correspondent in Delhi.

jawednaqvi@gmail.com

Published in Dawn, October 3rd, 2023

From crypto wars to financial revolution

Ussama Yaqub
Published October 2, 2023 

While many today view cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin primarily as a financial asset suitable for speculation, it is crucial to clarify that cryptocurrency transcends being merely a technological innovation or a financial asset.

It embodies a socio-political movement rooted in the ideology of cryptography and safeguards against state overreach. The start of this movement can be traced back several decades before Bitcoin’s emergence, stemming from what is now recognised as the “Crypto Wars.”

Before the onset of the information age in the 1970s, encryption was predominantly utilised by military and intelligence agencies around the world. Within the USA, cryptographic algorithms and software were explicitly categorised in the United States Munitions List. This classification originated in the Cold War when America sought to prevent the USSR and countries in Eastern Europe from acquiring Western technologies.

However, by the 1960s, demand for encryption in international financial transactions, along with the requirement to safeguard sensitive yet unclassified information, prompted the US government to develop general-purpose encryption technology suitable for broader usage.

Numerous attempts were made to create an encryption technique meeting these criteria. For instance, in 1974, IBM crafted a standard known as the Data Encryption Standard (DES). This standard was endorsed by the United States’ National Security Agency, commonly known as the NSA.

It’s no coincidence that Bitcoin emerged shortly after the 2008 financial crisis, which laid bare the vulnerabilities of the global financial system

However, DES faced criticism for perceived vulnerabilities. The academic community rightly harboured suspicions that the NSA had intentionally weakened the algorithm, rendering it decipherable only by them. The primary aim of the US government till then was to restrict public access to encryption methods which could not be decrypted by intelligence agencies like the NSA.

A breakthrough innovation emerged in 1976 when Whitfield Diffie and Martin Hellman recognised the shortcomings of traditional password systems, which relied on central administrators to manage keys. This centralisation made them vulnerable to government requests for access. They proposed a decentralised system where individuals possessed their own keys.

This concept gave rise to public-key cryptography, where each user held both a public and a private key. Anyone could encrypt a message using the recipient’s public key, but decryption required the recipient’s private key. Crucially, unlike previous initiatives, this breakthrough originated entirely outside government circles, marking a giant stride forward.

As personal computers and internet-based communication proliferated, government restrictions on encryption also escalated. The transition of all communication and data storage to digital formats underscored the paramount importance of preserving data privacy. Yet governments around the world sought mechanisms for intervention, especially in criminal investigations.

A group of cryptographers, known today as the “cypherpunks” — where cypher refers to a hidden message — observed this conflict unfolding over the preceding decades. These techno libertarians opposed state control, particularly over the internet, believing that government interventions lead to censorship and a lack of privacy.

Cypherpunks advocated for privacy and resisted government access, emphasising their core belief in privacy as a fundamental human right. Hence, for cypherpunks, cryptography represented the path to freedom and the means to maintain absolute privacy in communications in the age of the internet.

However, over time, the cypherpunks eventually came to a profound realisation that extended beyond the realm of privacy alone. Their awakening occurred after the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1971, a pivotal moment when the global economy transitioned from the gold standard to a purely fiat monetary system.

Many among them vehemently opposed the new global monetary framework and firmly believed that a fiat monetary system, which granted central banks unchecked authority to expand the money supply at their discretion, constituted a form of long-term theft from ordinary citizens.

At the heart of their concern lay the pernicious impact of inflation, which disproportionately affected working-class individuals, magnifying the economic disparity between the masses and the privileged elite.

Zimbabwe’s experience is a glaring example of the dire consequences of unrestrained money supply expansion. The nation grappled with a hyperinflation crisis, exacerbated by government mismanagement and rampant corruption, resulting in astronomical price increases and the erosion of citizens’ savings.

Likewise, Venezuela’s descent into economic turmoil, intensified by political corruption and inefficient governance, starkly illustrated the devastating repercussions of unchecked money creation within a fiat system. Inflation spiralled out of control, rendering basic necessities unaffordable for ordinary Venezuelans, while those in power remained insulated from the crisis.

In the eyes of the cypherpunks, the remedy lay in creating an unassailable digital currency that could facilitate a state-independent economy, affording unrestricted freedom within the digital realm. They sought to realise this vision through the potent tools of cryptography.

The conceptual groundwork for cryptocurrencies was laid as far back as 1983 when computer scientist David Chaum first proposed the idea of a digital currency. One of the earliest incarnations of this concept materialised in 1989 under the name DigiCash. However, the initial enthusiasm was short-lived as DigiCash filed for bankruptcy in 1998.

Nonetheless, despite their commercial failures, these pioneering efforts introduced foundational principles such as encryption and cryptography into the public discourse. These principles would later prove instrumental in shaping the cryptocurrencies of today.

Consequently, it’s no coincidence that Bitcoin emerged shortly after the 2008 financial crisis, which laid bare the vulnerabilities of the global financial system. The maximum number of Bitcoins that can ever be mined is capped at 21 million. This means that only a finite quantity of Bitcoins can ever come into existence, a stark contrast to central bank fiat currencies, which can undergo inflationary increases driven by political considerations, impending elections, or the demands of an expanding government apparatus.

Consequently, over the years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have garnered favour among early tech enthusiasts, libertarians, and proponents of laissez-faire economics, all of whom advocate for minimal government interference in individuals’ economic affairs.

The success or failure of this experiment remains uncertain, and only time will unveil its outcome. Yet, residing in Pakistan today, one can gain a deeper appreciation for the insights of the cypherpunks from decades ago, who foresaw the imperative of anonymous currency and robust data protection when a state prioritises the privileges of its ruling elite over the well-being of its citizens.

The writer is an assistant professor at the Lahore University of Management Sciences

Published in Dawn, The Business and Finance Weekly, October 2nd, 2023Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world

DAWN
Iraq opposes Turkish strikes in Kurdistan, seeks solution

Agencies Published October 3, 2023 

BAGHDAD: Iraq rejects repeated Turkish air strikes or the presence of Turkish bases in its Kurdistan region and hopes to come to an agreement with Ankara to solve this problem, Iraqi President Abdul-Latif Rashid said in comments aired on Monday.

Turkey said on Sunday it carried out air strikes in northern Iraq that destroyed 20 targets belonging to the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) after the outlawed group said it orchestrated the first bomb attack in Ankara in years.

On Sunday morning, two attackers detonated a bomb near government buildings in Ankara, killing both and wounding two police officers. The outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) claimed responsibility.

The blast rattled a district that is home to ministries and the parliament, in an attack coinciding with the reopening of the Turkish assembly.

Turkiye regards the PKK as a terrorist group and regularly carries out air strikes in northern Iraq, which has long been outside the direct control of the Baghdad government.

Turkiye has also has sent commandos and set up military bases on Iraqi territory to support its offensives.

“These violations are rejected by the Iraqi people, the (Kurdistan) region and all of Iraq’s inhabitants,” President Rashid said in an interview with Saudi state-owned broadcaster Al Hadath, a short clip of which was aired on Monday.

Rashid said such strikes sometimes killed civilians, including people visiting the region who “become victims of Turkish bombing”.

The Iraqi president said Baghdad hoped to come to an agreement with Ankara to resolve the issue in a manner similar to a security agreement Iraq has inked with Iran to deal with Iranian Kurdish separatist groups in the Kurdistan region.

Turkiye denies targeting civilians and says it works to avoid civilian casualties through its coordination with Iraqi authorities.

Abdul-Latif Rashid is a member of the Iraqi Kurdish PUK party, which has close ties to Iran and has criticised Turkiye’s strikes in Iraq’s north. The post of president is largely ceremonial in Iraq.

Police raids

Counterterrorism poli­­ce detained 20 people in raids targeting PKK-linked suspects in Istanbul and elsewhere, Turkish Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya said on Monday.

A provincial Kurdish spokesman and district heads of a large pro-Kurdish political party were among those detained, suspected of collecting aid and providing shelter for PKK members, Yerlikaya said on X.

The ANF News website, which is close to the PKK, cited the militant group as saying in a statement on Sunday that a team from its Immortals Battalion unit had carried out the attack.

The bomb on Ataturk Boulevard was the first in Ankara since 2016, when there was a spate of attacks in Turkish cities claimed by Kurdish militants, Islamic State and other groups.

The Turkish armed forces have in recent years conducted several military operations in northern Iraq and northern Syria against Kurdish militants.

Published in Dawn, October 3rd, 2023




India tells Canada to withdraw 41 diplomats: report

Reuters 
Published October 3, 2023 

India has told Canada that it must repatriate 41 diplomats by October 10, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday.


Ties between New Delhi and Ottawa have become seriously strained over Canadian suspicion that Indian government agents had a role in the June murder in Canada of a Sikh separatist leader and Canadian citizen, Hardeep Singh Nijjar, who India had labelled a “terrorist”.

Nijjar, 45, was the president of Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara temple in Surrey, British Columbia and advocated for the creation of a Sikh state known as Khalistan.

India has dismissed the allegation as absurd.

On September 21, Trudeau called on India to cooperate with an investigation into the murder of the separatist leader in British Columbia and said Canada would not release its evidence for their claims.

India suspended new visas for Canadians and asked Ottawa to reduce its diplomatic presence in the country on the same day.

Last week, the Indian foreign minister spoke to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan about Canadian allegations of New Delhi’s possible involvement killing of the separatist leader in Canada.

Jaishankar said that New Delhi had told Canada it was open to looking into any “specific” or “relevant” information it provides on the killing.

Trudeau, who is yet to publicly share any evidence, said he has shared the “credible allegations” with India “many weeks ago”.

The Financial Times, citing people familiar with the Indian demand, said India had threatened to revoke the diplomatic immunity of those diplomats told to leave who remained after October 10.

Canada has 62 diplomats in India and India had said that the total should be reduced by 41, the newspaper said.

The Indian and Canadian foreign ministries did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Talking to reporters, Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly said: “We are in contact with the government of India. We take Canadian diplomats’ safety very seriously and we will continue to engage privately because we think diplomatic conversations are best when they remain private.”

Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar had last week said there was a “climate of violence” and an “atmosphere of intimidation” against Indian diplomats in Canada, where the presence of Sikh separatist groups has frustrated New Delh