Saturday, October 07, 2023

The mysteries of a mass graveyard of early Indians

BBC
Fri, October 6, 2023 

Scientists estimate the presence of at least 500 graves at the 40-acre burial site in Gujarat

Scientists have unveiled a sprawling burial site in India belonging to one of the world's earliest urban civilisations. The BBC's Soutik Biswas delves into the clues the graves might give us about how the early Indians lived and died.

In 2019, as scientists embarked on excavating a mound of sandy soil near a remote village in the sparsely populated Kutch region, situated not far from Pakistan in India's western state of Gujarat, they had no inkling of the surprise that lay in store for them.

"When we began digging, we thought it was an ancient settlement. Within a week, we realised it was a cemetery," says Rajesh SV, an archaeologist with the University of Kerala, who led the search.

How ancient DNA may rewrite prehistory in India

Three excavation seasons - involving more than 150 Indian and international scientists - have been conducted so far at the 40-acre site. Researchers now estimate the presence of at least 500 graves of the Indus society, one of the world's earliest urban civilisations. (Some 200 of these graves have been excavated.)

Also known as the Harappan civilisation, named after its first city, this society - austere farmers and traders who lived in walled, baked-brick cities - rose to prominence some 5,300 years ago in what is now north-west India and Pakistan. In a century since the civilisation's initial discovery, researchers have unearthed up to 2,000 sites in India and Pakistan.

Scientists reckon the sprawling burial ground near Khatiya village in Gujarat may potentially be the largest "pre-urban" cemetery of the society discovered so far. They believe it was in use for about 500 years, spanning from 3200BC to 2600BC, making the oldest graves here around 5,200 years old.

Excavations so far have yielded a single intact male human skeleton, as well as partly preserved skeletal remains including skull fragments, bones and teeth.

Secrets of ancient 'mystery couple' revealed

They have also found an array of burial artefacts - more than 100 bangles and 27 beads made of shell. Ceramic vessels, bowls, dishes, pots, small pitchers, beakers, clay pots, water cups, bottles and jars have also been discovered. Minor treasures include beads made of the semi-precious stone, lapis lazuli.

The graves have unique features, including sandstone-lined burial shafts that point in different directions. Some are oval shaped; others rectangular. There are smaller graves where children were buried. The bodies appear to be laid supine, but most bones have dissolved because of the acidic soil.

"This is a hugely significant find," says Brad Chase, a professor of anthropology at Albion College, Michigan.

Scientists have found an array of burial artefacts in the graves

"Several pre-urban cemeteries have been discovered in Gujarat, but this is by far the largest - and therefore has the potential to reveal a greater diversity of grave types that will help archaeologists to more fully understand pre-urban society in the region as well as provide crucial context for the other smaller cemeteries that have been previously discovered," says Prof Chase.

Earlier excavations of Indus sites in the Punjab region of today's Pakistan offer some clues about the burial practices of the Indus people.

Early civilisation thrived without river

The funerals were unostentatious, unlike those of the elites in Egypt and Mesopotamia. No jewels and weapons accompanied the dead to the afterlife. Here, most bodies were wrapped in shrouds of textile and placed in rectangular wooden coffins. The grave pit was often filled with pottery offerings before the coffin was lowered into it, according to Jonathan Mark Kenoyer of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who is a scholar of the Indus Valley civilisation.

Some people were buried with personal ornaments - bangles, beads, amulets - which could not be passed on to others. Some women were buried with a mirror made of copper. Adults were buried with different types of vessels associated with serving and storing food, and some with specific ornaments - shell bangles were typically found on the left arms of adult females. Infants and children were not usually buried with any pottery or ornaments.

There was no evidence of substantial wealth in the graves and the health profile indicates that most were "well fed and healthy, although some had indications of arthritis and physical stress".

But the mystery of the massive burial ground in Gujarat is still to be unearthed.

For the scientists the discovery itself was fortuitous. In 2016, a village headman who also doubled up as a driver, was taking around a team of University of Kerala archaeology students when he showed them the site.

Prehistoric art hints at lost civilisation

It was a mere 300m (985 feet) from Khatiya, a tiny village of 400 people, who grew groundnut, cotton and castor on rainfed farms for a living. Some of their farms even abutted the graveyard.

"After rains we would see bits of pottery and stuff coming to the surface. Some people would say there were ghosts here. But we had no idea that we were living next door to such a big graveyard," said Narayan Bhai Jajani, the former headman.

The graves have sandstone-lined burial shafts that point in different directions

"Now every year we have scientists from all over the world visiting our village and trying to find out more about the people who were buried here."

What secrets do the latest graves in Gujarat hold? Who were the people who were interred here?

The sheer number of burials in one location raises questions about the significance of this burial ground. Did it serve as a communal resting place for a cluster of nearby settlements, or does it hint at the existence of a larger settlement?

Why a film has been accused of distorting Indus Valley

Moreover, could it have functioned as a sacred cemetery for nomadic travellers, considering that the closest source of lapis lazuli found in these graves likely traces back to distant Afghanistan? Or could it have served as a "secondary" burial site, where bones from the deceased were interred separately?

"We still don't know. We haven't found a settlement in the neighbourhood yet. We are still digging," says Abhayan GS, an archaeologist at the University of Kerala.


Up to 800 Indus sites have been found in Gujarat, including this one in Dholavira

Mr Kenoyer says he's confident that "there must be some settlements that relate to the cemetery, but they are probably lying beneath modern habitations or so far undiscovered". That the burials were made with well-defined stone walls suggests that the people were familiar with building with stone, and such stone buildings and walled settlements are to be found between 19-30km (11-18 miles) from the cemetery.

More chemical studies and DNA testing of the human remains will tell us more about some of the earliest Indians who lived and died here.

Mysteries about the Indus civilisation endure: the writing, for example, has still not been deciphered. This winter, scientists plan to excavate a site north of the cemetery near Khatiya aiming to uncover a potential settlement. If they find one, one part of the puzzle will be solved. If they don't, they will continue to dig. "Someday, hopefully sooner than later, we will have some answers," says Mr Rajesh.
Meta and X questioned by U$ lawmakers over lack of rules against AI-generated political deepfakes


Thu, October 5, 2023 

Deepfakes generated by artificial intelligence are having their moment this year, at least when it comes to making it look, or sound, like celebrities did something uncanny. Tom Hanks hawking a dental plan. Pope Francis wearing a stylish puffer jacket. U.S. Sen. Rand Paul sitting on the Capitol steps in a red bathrobe.

But what happens next year ahead of a U.S. presidential election?

Google was the first big tech company to say it would impose new labels on deceptive AI-generated political advertisements that could fake a candidate's voice or actions. Now some U.S. lawmakers are calling on social media platforms X, Facebook and Instagram to explain why they aren't doing the same.

Two Democratic members of Congress sent a letter Thursday to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and X CEO Linda Yaccarino expressing “serious concerns” about the emergence of AI-generated political ads on their platforms and asking each to explain any rules they're crafting to curb the harms to free and fair elections.

“They are two of the largest platforms and voters deserve to know what guardrails are being put in place,” said U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota in an interview with The Associated Press. “We are simply asking them, ‘Can’t you do this? Why aren’t you doing this?’ It’s clearly technologically possible.”

The letter to the executives from Klobuchar and U.S. Rep. Yvette Clarke of New York warns: “With the 2024 elections quickly approaching, a lack of transparency about this type of content in political ads could lead to a dangerous deluge of election-related misinformation and disinformation across your platforms – where voters often turn to learn about candidates and issues."

X, formerly Twitter, and Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, didn't immediately respond to requests for comment Thursday. Clarke and Klobuchar asked the executives to respond to their questions by Oct. 27.

The pressure on the social media companies comes as both lawmakers are helping to lead a charge to regulate AI-generated political ads. A House bill introduced by Clarke earlier this year would amend a federal election law to require disclaimers when election advertisements contain AI-generated images or video.

“That's like the bare minimum” of what is needed, said Klobuchar, who is sponsoring companion legislation in the Senate that she hopes will get passed before the end of the year. In the meantime, the hope is that big tech platforms will “do it on their own while we work on the standard,” Klobuchar said.

Google has already said that starting in mid-November it will require a clear disclaimer on any AI-generated election ads that alter people or events on YouTube and other Google products. This policy applies both in the U.S. and in other countries where the company verifies election ads. Facebook and Instagram parent Meta doesn’t have a rule specific to AI-generated political ads but has a policy restricting “faked, manipulated or transformed” audio and imagery used for misinformation.

A more recent bipartisan Senate bill, co-sponsored by Klobuchar, Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri and others, would go farther in banning “materially deceptive” deepfakes relating to federal candidates, with exceptions for parody and satire.

AI-generated ads are already part of the 2024 election, including one aired by the Republican National Committee in April meant to show the future of the United States if President Joe Biden is reelected. It employed fake but realistic photos showing boarded-up storefronts, armored military patrols in the streets, and waves of immigrants creating panic.

Klobuchar said such an ad would likely be banned under the proposed rules. So would a fake image of Donald Trump hugging infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci that was shown in an attack ad from Trump's GOP primary opponent and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

As another example, Klobuchar cited a deepfake video from earlier this year purporting to show Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren in a TV interview suggesting restrictions on Republicans voting.

“That is going to be so misleading if you, in a presidential race, have either the candidate you like or the candidate you don’t like actually saying things that aren’t true,” Klobuchar said. “How are you ever going to know the difference?”

Klobuchar, who chairs the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, presided over a Sept. 27 hearing on AI and the future of elections that brought witnesses including Minnesota's secretary of state, a civil rights advocate and some skeptics. Republicans and some of the witnesses they asked to testify have been wary about rules seen as intruding into free speech protections.

Ari Cohn, an attorney at think-tank TechFreedom, told senators that the deepfakes that have so far appeared ahead of the 2024 election have attracted “immense scrutiny, even ridicule,” and haven't played much role in misleading voters or affecting their behavior. He questioned whether new rules were needed.

“Even false speech is protected by the First Amendment,” Cohn said. “Indeed, the determination of truth and falsity in politics is properly the domain of the voters.”

The Federal Election Commission in August took a procedural step toward potentially regulating AI-generated deepfakes in political ads, opening to public comment a petition that asked it to develop rules on the misleading images, videos and audio clips.

The public comment period for the petition, brought by the advocacy group Public Citizen, ends Oct. 16.

—-

Associated Press writer Ali Swenson contributed to this report.

Matt O'brien, The Associated Press
Deadly history of Canada's Speaker: What's really behind the 'dragging' tradition?

Throughout history, the Speaker's job was to deliver news to the monarch, and if they didn't like it: "Off with your head!"



Joy Joshi
·Writer, Yahoo News Canada
Updated Thu, October 5, 2023 

Liberal MP Greg Fergus became the first Black Canadian Speaker of the House of Commons after being picked by his colleagues through a secret ranked-ballot vote.

While most Canadians were occupied listening to the first remarks of the newly elected Speaker, others were left scratching their heads over what preceded the inspiring speech by Fergus.

Canada’s first Black Speaker of the House of Commons was “dragged” by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Leader of the Opposition Pierre Poilievre to the Chair.

“As U.S. speaker of the house historically removed from his position, Canada on the other side has anointed the first Black man to be a speaker of the house in history, you had to be there and watch how they dragged him to the altar (it was amazing) 🤭🤭😂😂,” chuckled a social media user on X, formerly Twitter.




Why do politicians "drag" the newly elected Speaker?


Newly elected Speaker of the House of Commons Greg Fergus is escorted into the House of Commons by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

Although an amusing sight, the logic behind “dragging” a newly elected Speaker traditionally was lost on many, including credible historians who were sent back in time when asked about the historical significance of the now perceivably weird but funny act.

“God, this takes me back to my undergraduate days. And even back then I find zero knowledge,” historian Robert Bothwell told Yahoo News Canada.

However, when pressed, the University of Toronto Professor Emeritus was quick to dig into his history notes and link the reason behind playful hesitance on Fergus’ part as the PM and the Conservative Leader dragged him across the House to the British Parliament centuries ago.

“When a new Speaker of the House of Commons is elected, the successful candidate is physically dragged to the Chair by other MPs.”



This custom has its roots in the Speaker's function to communicate the Commons' opinions to the monarch. Historically, if the monarch didn't agree with the message being communicated then the early death of the Speaker could follow. Therefore, as you can imagine, previous Speakers required some gentle persuasion to accept the post.Robert Bothwell, Historian

“This custom has its roots in the Speaker's function to communicate the Commons' opinions to the monarch. Historically, if the monarch didn't agree with the message being communicated then the early death of the Speaker could follow. Therefore, as you can imagine, previous Speakers required some gentle persuasion to accept the post,” the noted historian told Yahoo News Canada, citing the UK Parliament website following his brief research.

The historically perilous role of Canada's Speaker


Bothwell was also roughly able to trace how far back the source of this tradition actually went.

“If it ever happened it would be prior to 1560. The last really unreasonable monarch was Mary I, who died in 1558. Her successors certainly never did it, though James II might have found some means other than death. However his parliaments were pretty subservient. Charles II, his predecessor, had some trouble with parliaments, but nothing that would have involved punishing the Speaker.”



Until the seventeenth century, the Speaker was often blamed if they delivered news from Parliament that the King did not like which made the role quite perilous.

The evidence of which lies in the fact that between 1394 and 1535 seven Speakers were executed by beheading, according to the British Parliament.

“Three ex-Speakers were executed in the reign of Henry VIII, the best-known being Sir Thomas More. He had been Speaker of the 1523 Parliament, but was not executed until 1535 after he was accused of denying the King was the legitimate head of the church,” said Bothwell citing the British Parliament history.

Therefore, Speakers in and around the 15th century leading up to the era of ruthless King Henry VIII were or could be minor political figures, and if they supported the wrong side, off with their heads.

However, after 1560 the monarchs got out of the habit of executing (ex) speakers and the tradition transitioned into a much lighter life-sparing version of jokingly physically hauling a newly elected Speaker to the House Chair.



While the first Black Canadian Speaker, Fergus isn’t the first Speaker to be escorted across the hall in this fashion.

Liberal MP Anthony Rota was heaved along in 2019 by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and then Opposition Leader Andrew Scheer on being appointed the Speaker of the House a Common, a practice that was repeated in 2021 on his re-election.
CANADA
Is the carbon tax an easy scapegoat for high food prices? OUI!

CBC
Sat, October 7, 2023

The Summerhill Market in Toronto on Wednesday February 2, 2022. The affordability argument against carbon pricing ignores some inconvenient facts. (Frank Gunn/The Canadian Press - image credit)

Seven years ago this week, Justin Trudeau stood in the House of Commons and announced that his government would implement a national price on carbon emissions.

It remains one of the boldest and most consequential decisions of his time in office. It's also one of the most loudly contested — even after two federal elections that might have been expected to settle the issue.

This week, the House voted on yet another Conservative motion calling on MPs to condemn the carbon tax — the Official Opposition's fifth such motion in the last 12 months. This time, the Conservatives were able to win the support of one Liberal backbencher — Ken McDonald, who represents the Newfoundland riding of Avalon — illustrating the public consternation Liberal climate policies are facing in Atlantic Canada.

But the Conservatives are also hammering away with television ads that blame the carbon tax for the high price of groceries, an argument that might hold particular power as Canadians prepare to celebrate Thanksgiving.


Pierre Poilievre, leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, is pictured during a press conference in Vancouver, B.C, on Thursday, September 14, 2023.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's statements about the impact carbon pricing has on affordability ignore one big factor: the rebates. (Ben Nelms/CBC)

"Mr. Speaker, when one taxes the fuel of the farmers who make the food and the fuel of the truckers who ship the food, then one taxes all those who buy the food," Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre told the House this week, ably reenacting his party's ads.

This period of high inflation certainly presents a fresh political test for any climate policy that creates a new cost for industry or consumers. But in the debate about food prices, the carbon tax is being saddled with an outsized and undeserved role — one that, ironically, distracts from the very real impact climate change and extreme weather are having, and will have, on the cost of groceries.

What's really driving up food prices?


It's not that the carbon tax has no impact on food prices and inflation. It's just not obvious that it is having a particularly large impact.

The Bank of Canada has estimated that the carbon tax increases inflation by 0.15 per cent. Trevor Tombe, an economist at the University of Calgary who has studied the impact of the carbon price on consumer costs, points to Statistics Canada data that suggests its impact on food prices is less than one per cent.

That's not nothing, and every dollar counts when it comes to the cost of essentials, particularly for those on low incomes.

But concerns about the impact of the carbon tax also tend to ignore the fact that the policy has two parts — a fuel charge collected by the federal government and a rebate that returns 90 per cent of the revenue generated by the levy to Canadian households. (The remaining 10 per cent is directed toward businesses, farmers and Indigenous communities.)

Unlike any number of other federal and provincial policies that might be said to contribute to the cost of food — from corporate taxes to food safety regulations — the federal carbon tax comes with a rebate.

The parliamentary budget officer has consistently found that nearly all households receive more from the rebate than they pay in direct and indirect costs. Only households in the highest income quintile are projected to pay out more than they receive — because they consume more. Repealing the carbon tax could actually leave many Canadians worse off.

Recent polling suggests a sizeable number of Canadians like the idea of reducing or eliminating the carbon tax. Maybe the same would be true of a poll about any kind of tax. Regardless, the Liberals might need to redouble efforts now to make the case for one of Trudeau's signature policies.

But any discussion of food prices has to include the impact of climate change — the very problem that the carbon tax is meant to help combat.

An analysis from Statistics Canada published last November linked "erratic weather" — including droughts, heat waves, flooding and heavy rainfall — with increases in the prices of meat, fruit, vegetables, sugar and coffee. In June, economists at RBC reported that, while food price inflation was expected to slow, a return to pre-pandemic prices was unlikely — in part because "extreme weather events are becoming more frequent across different regions and could meaningfully limit farm production."

. Provincial government ministers are scheduled to visit the region Thursday for an update on the work taking place to rebuild the road that connects Spences Bridge with Merritt.Mud and debris covers a farm on the Nicola River that was destroyed by flooding in November, west of Merritt, B.C., on Wednesday, March 23, 2022.
 (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press)

Other sources of inflation cited by RBC include Russia's invasion of Ukraine, supply chain disruptions and labour shortages. And Canada is hardly alone in feeling the impact on food prices.

Kelleen Wiseman, academic director of the master of food and resource economics program at the University of British Columbia, said price increases from extreme weather events typically are temporary. But Mike von Massow, a professor of food economics at the University of Guelph, said "the impact of climate [on food prices] is at least an order of magnitude bigger than the impact of the carbon tax."

"I think that there is little doubt that extreme weather, the increasing frequency and severity, is not only causing food price inflation but will lead to ongoing greater instability in food prices," vow Massow said. "It'll be much more difficult to predict where we're going because of the unpredictability of these weather events."

In hopes of containing prices, the federal government has put its focus on major retailers. Von Massow said that what's really needed is a broader "food system discussion" that brings all the players together to talk about building a resilient, integrated system that can withstand the forces that climate change is unleashing.

Why is the carbon tax taking the blame?


Tombe, who has also dismissed the utility of blaming retailers, has suggested it would make more sense to look at dismantling the supply management system for dairy and poultry in Canada. Regardless of how one feels about that proposal, it's at least interesting to note that no political party is choosing to make supply management a target right now — while scorn is being heaped on the carbon tax.

Across the federal parties, support for supply management is virtually unanimous. Killing it might lower prices of milk, eggs and chicken for consumers. But the major parties apparently have calculated that the political and practical benefits of the system outweigh its costs — that the trade-offs are worth it.


The Bryanton family has been farming in Belmont-Lot 16 for over 35 years. They got in to the dairy industry in 2006 and also farm about 700 acres of land.Supply management retains broad support in mainstream Canadian politics, even though it drives up the cost of food.
 (Nicola MacLeod/CBC)

The presence of the rebate minimizes the degree to which the federal carbon tax requires any kind of trade-off. But to the degree carbon pricing does increase costs for fuel and other goods, the trade-off is reducing the greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change.

Economists have long argued that putting a price on carbon is the least expensive way to drive emissions down. And Trudeau is hardly alone in accepting that logic. According to the World Bank, 23 per cent of global emissions are now covered by some kind of pricing policy — up from 13 per cent in 2016.

The federal carbon tax might someday come to be as politically untouchable as supply management. For now, the Conservatives seem to believe it's in their interests to direct anger at the carbon tax — even while they seem unable to say what they would do instead to reduce emissions.

But if climate policy is going to be scapegoated every time the price of groceries goes up, Canada is going to have a very hard time sustaining a serious response to climate change.

Trudeau’s Government Launches Plan to Stabilize Canada’s Food Prices

Laura Dhillon Kane
Thu, October 5, 2023 



(Bloomberg) -- Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government outlined the first steps of a plan to stabilize food prices as Canadians continue to hammer his Liberal Party in the polls over the high cost of living.

Industry Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland provided details on Thursday, several weeks after meeting with executives of grocery stores and food manufacturers.

Champagne said the top five grocery chains — Walmart Inc., Loblaw Cos., Metro Inc., Empire Co. and Costco Wholesale Corp. — have agreed to support efforts to restore price stability to store shelves. Shares of the Canadian grocers showed little immediate reaction to the news.

Canadians can expect to “soon” see aggressive discounts across a basket of key food products for most households, as well as price freezes and price-matching campaigns, he said.

“Bottom line, we’re going to hold their feet to the fire,” Champagne said.

Trudeau announced last month that his government would demand grocery-store executives restore price stability as part of a suite of measures aimed at making life more affordable. The skyrocketing cost of food and housing in Canada has plunged the prime minister’s popularity to career lows in many polls.

Trudeau has decried grocers for making “record profits” while Canadians struggle to put food on the table, pushing food-bank use to new heights.

Grocery inflation slowed to 6.9% in August compared with 8.5% in July, but it still outpaced headline inflation of 4%.

If the government doesn’t see results from grocers and food manufacturers, it will take additional action including potentially imposing a tax on grocers, the ministers warned on Thursday. “No measures are off the table,” Freeland said.

Champagne rejected criticism from industry observers who say food inflation is expected to slow in coming months regardless of his government’s efforts, and that many grocers typically freeze prices over the winter holiday season, refusing to accept price hikes from suppliers during a crucial shopping period.

The minister said each of the five major grocers provided him with individual plans to stabilize prices and those initiatives will have an impact. “If you look at the measures they’re looking to take, for example a basket of discounted goods, the extent of that and the scope of it is more than what we have seen in Canada.”

The grocers will also be forced to compete with each other as their plans roll out and they see lower prices elsewhere, he said. “What we have been able to create in Canada is a competitive pressure that did not exist before.”

Keeping food prices as low as possible has been the top priority for Canada’s grocers since inflation surged at the end of the pandemic, said Michelle Wasylyshen, spokesperson for the Retail Council of Canada, in a statement.

Canada’s food inflation is lower than that of many other developed countries including the UK, Australia and France, and should fall further in coming months as input costs start to ease. Between 70% and 80% of checkout prices are determined before the food hits the shelves, she said. “It therefore remains critical that all members of the complex supply chain address their respective roles in food pricing.”

Champagne has said he also met with food manufacturers, including Nestle and Kraft Heinz Co., and urged them to play a role in slowing food inflation.

He also announced Thursday that the government will strengthen the Office of Consumer Affairs by creating a Grocery Task Force, which will monitor the grocers and manufacturers on a monthly basis and investigate practices such as “shrinkflation,” in which the price of an item remains stable but the weight or size gets smaller.

The government will also speed up industry-led work to establish a Grocery Code of Conduct to support fairness and transparency across the sector, as well as create a data hub for food price information including the cost breakdown throughout the supply chain, he said.

Trudeau’s government has also introduced a bill to amend the Competition Act in an effort to boost competition in the grocery sector, though the changes will affect all industries.

The government is also facing pressure to reduce its fiscal footprint, and to that end, Treasury Board President Anita Anand announced new guidelines for public sector managers who contract out professional services.

Bloomberg Businessweek


Volkswagen, Umicore venture picks Poland for first car battery parts plant

Reuters
Sat, October 7, 2023 

 Volkswagen shares new details on planned Ontario battery plant, in St. Thomas

BERLIN (Reuters) - The auto battery parts joint venture between Volkswagen's PowerCo and Belgian materials firm Umicore has chosen Poland as the site for its first factory, PowerCo said on Saturday.

Through the $2.9 billion joint venture, dubbed Ionway, first flagged in December 2021, the companies are joining a number of European automakers that have brought battery supplies closer to home in the shift towards electric vehicles.

The Polish government is providing 350 million euros ($371 million) in cash grants for the investment in the southwestern town of Nysa that would create around 900 jobs, it said.

Ionway wants to build up its annual production capacity by the end of the decade to around 160 gigawatt hours (GWh) per year - enough for 2.2 million electric vehicles.

PowerCo - whose Poland initiative comes after VW in April set out plans to invest up to C$7 billion to build a car battery plant in Ontario, Canada - said it had decided on Poland because the location was strategically favorable, plus there was sufficient skilled labour and renewable energy sources for production.

Construction work will begin as soon as the permitting process is completed, it said.

Ionway is intended to supply PowerCo's European battery cell factories with key battery materials and to cover a large portion of PowerCo's needs in the European Union. In return, Umicore receives secured access to an important part of Europe's demand for cathode materials for electric vehicles.

($1 = 0.9446 euros)

(Reporting by Sabine Wollrab and Sarah Marsh; Editing by David Holmes)
Pete Buttigieg Has The Perfect Response To Trump's Comments About Wounded Vets

Josephine Harvey
Fri, October 6, 2023

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg has weighed in on Donald Trump’s stunning remarks about veterans and wounded service members.

Buttigieg, an Afghanistan War veteran, said Thursday on MSNBC that it was “unthinkable” for a former president to express “that kind of disrespect for somebody who puts their life on the line.”

According to a recent profile of Army Gen. Mark Milley in The Atlantic, Trump once asked the now-former chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff why he had invited a wounded Army captain to sing “God Bless America” at an event.

“Why do you bring people like that here? No one wants to see that, the wounded,” Trump reportedly said in 2019, directing Milley not to invite the man to future public gatherings.

On MSNBC, Buttigieg summed up his thoughts on the matter:

To me, it comes down to this: If being around an injured or wounded or disabled veteran makes you uncomfortable, it should make you uncomfortable in the direction of wanting to be more like them.

It should make you uncomfortable in the direction of asking whether you have done enough to make your life and your community and your country worthy of the price that was paid in blood to keep that country safe.

I think that’s something that all of us, regardless of political persuasion, ought to be able to come together around.

In 2020, The Atlantic reported that Trump had called Americans who died at war “losers” and “suckers.”

His former chief of staff John Kelly told CNN on Monday that Trump had indeed made various critical remarks about veterans, and that he had expressed disdain for injured and deceased service members.

John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, said in an interview this week that he didn’t “have any doubt that what John Kelly said was true.”

Trump’s campaign has rejected Kelly’s comments, telling multiplemedia outlets that “John Kelly has totally clowned himself with these debunked stories he’s made up because he didn’t serve his President well while working as Chief of Staff.”

Listen to Buttigieg’s remarks to MSNBC below:
THE  NEW CONFEDERACY
Liz Cheney Warns On What Jim Jordan Becoming Speaker Could Mean For The Constitution


Marita Vlachou
Updated Fri, October 6, 2023

Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) didn’t mince her words about Rep. Jim Jordan, the Ohio Republican who is now running for the speaker’s gavel following the showdown that saw Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) voted out.

In a speech at the University of Minnesota on Wednesday, the former vice chair of the House Select Committee tasked with investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection said Jordan was the leader among those who were aware of former President Donald Trump’s plans to cling on to power despite losing the 2020 election.

“Jim Jordan knew more about what Donald Trump had planned for January 6th than any other member of the House of Representatives,” Cheney said. “Jim Jordan was involved, was part of the conspiracy in which Donald Trump was engaged as he attempted to overturn the election.”

While Cheney said she didn’t expect Jordan to win the upcoming contest, she said his potential ascension to the position would send a strong message about where the GOP’s allegiance lies.

“If they were to decide that, there would no longer be any possible way to argue that a group of elected Republicans could be counted on to defend the Constitution,” she said.

Jordan has secured the endorsement of Trump, who continues to exert influence on a big chunk of the Republican caucus.

“He will be a GREAT Speaker of the House,” Trump said of Jordan in a post on his Truth Social platform.

Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) is the only other member so far to join the contest, but others are also expected to announce their candidacies.

Cheney also weighed in on McCarthy’s ouster as speaker. She said Democrats made a “principled” decision in choosing not to save McCarthy’s job given his track record, citing McCarthy’s decision to continue abiding and apologizing for Trump. All present 208 Democrats, along with eight Republicans, voted for McCarthy to be removed.

Cheney said, “I think they did exactly the right thing, and it was a courageous show of leadership.”
EU summit points to reforms the bloc needs in order to welcome Ukraine and others as new members


European Council President Charles Michel speaks on arrival for the second day of the Europe Summit in Granada, Spain, Friday, Oct. 6, 2023. European Union leaders have pledged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy their unwavering support. On Friday, they will face one of their worst political headaches on a key commitment. How and when to welcome debt-laden and war-battered Ukraine into the bloc. (AP Photo/Fermin Rodriguez)


RAF CASERT and IAIN SULLIVAN
Updated Fri, October 6, 2023

GRANADA, Spain (AP) — European Union leaders acknowledged Friday that just as aspiring members must meet exacting criteria to join the bloc, the 27 member nations also must work hard to reform the EU to make sure it can work smoothly with 30-plus nations.

Although Ukraine was hoping for a swift timetable for joining, the 27 leaders declined to adopt a target date of 2030 for Kyiv's membership as had been proposed by EU Council President Charles Michel.

The group pledged unwavering support to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Thursday, but the summit ended by saying that any aspiring member must complete the EU's long and tortuous merit-based process that can last years or decades. Shortcuts for geopolitical reasons were ruled out.

“Aspiring members need to step up their reform efforts, notably in the area of rule of law, in line with the merit-based nature of the accession process,” said the joint declaration of the leaders. “In parallel, the Union needs to lay the necessary internal groundwork and reforms.”

Avoiding any target date for new members sidestepped a rift at the summit between those who want to draw Kyiv and other aspiring nations in as quickly as possible, and others that want the bloc to bide its time, setting up difficult talks on an issue that requires unanimity among the 27 member states.

Most EU nations have said since the February 2022 start of the war that they would work steadfastly on a “lasting unity” with Ukraine that would eventually translate into Kyiv's membership in the wealthy bloc. This week, Hungarian President Viktor Orbán, ever the recalcitrant voice at summits, insisted that the whole idea should be rethought from scratch.

“We have never done an enlargement to a country that is in a war. And we don’t know where are the effective borders, how many people are living there,” Orbán said. “Sorry, it’s painful to get these countries in the EU.”

Leaders will have to decide whether to officially open talks with Ukraine in December. Orbán said the bloc remained unprepared to take such momentous decisions. And Hungary, like other nations, has a power of veto on the issue, which requires unanimity.

Orbán insisted the budgetary consequences had not yet been fully worked out, in addition to the impact of Ukraine's massive agricultural production on the fate of the other nations with large farm sectors.

“Are you ready for that? Are the French peasants ready for that? So many such questions," Orbán said.

EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen insisted that the EU’s near-seamless single market for business and trade was its greatest asset, and that its expansion would eventually benefit all involved. “The enlargement of the single market is always a huge added value for all of us,” she said.

But von der Leyen has stressed that “accession is merit-based.”

She says the progress that candidate countries make in aligning their laws with EU rules and standards should dictate the pace of membership, rather than some arbitrary deadline. The bureaucratic pace of falling in line with thousands of EU rules can easily take a decade or more.

Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas emphasized the advantages for Estonia since joining the bloc in 2004, making its way up from a relatively poor nation to one that is near the EU average of GDP in less than two decades.

“We would all benefit from enlargement,” Kallas said.

And just as aspiring members must push through reforms, so must the EU refashion itself on a larger scale. That includes reassigning funds, turning current beneficiaries into contributors to help poorer new members, and streamlining decision-making to reduce the number of decisions requiring unanimity.

That already has proven difficult enough for the current members, especially with decades-old rules still on the books that originally were designed for a dozen closely-knit nations.

So the EU challenge now is to make sure the necessary reforms will be in place when the aspiring members are ready to join.

“If the countries fulfill all the criteria, I think it’s wrong to say to them that, ‘oh, but we are not ready now’,” said Kallas. “So we definitely have to do our homework on our side.”

___

Casert reported from Brussels. Ciaran Giles and Aritz Parra contributed from Madrid, Joseph Wilson from Barcelona
Timeline of recent clashes between Israel and Palestine

Reuters 
Published October 7, 2023 
People assess the destruction cause by Israeli air strikes in Gaza City on Saturday (Oct 7)

Palestine’s Hamas launched its biggest assault on Israel in years early on Saturday, firing a barrage of rockets from Gaza and sending fighters across the border.

Israel said it was “on a war footing” and launched its own strikes against Hamas targets in Gaza, with Israeli media reporting gunbattles between bands of Palestinian fighters and security forces in southern Israel.

The following timeline, which begins with Israel’s 2005 withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, details the major events and flare-ups in the conflict between Israel and Palestinian groups in the crowded coastal enclave, which is home to 2.3 million people.

August 2005 - Israeli forces unilaterally withdraw from Gaza 38 years after capturing it from Egypt in the Middle East war, abandoning settlements and leaving the enclave under the control of the Palestinian Authority.

Jan 25, 2006 - Hamas wins a majority of seats in a Palestinian legislative election. Israel and the US cut off aid to Palestinians because Hamas refuses to renounce violence and recognise Israel.

June 25, 2006 - Hamas militants capture Israeli army conscript Gilad Shalit in a cross-border raid from Gaza, prompting Israeli air strikes and incursions. Shalit is finally freed more than five years later in a prisoner exchange.

June 14, 2007 - Hamas takes over Gaza in a brief civil war, ousting Fatah forces loyal to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who is based in the West Bank.

Dec. 27, 2008 - Israel launches a 22-day military offensive in Gaza after Palestinians fire rockets at the southern Israeli town of Sderot. About 1,400 Palestinians and 13 Israelis are reported killed before a ceasefire is agreed.

Nov 14, 2012 - Israel kills Hamas’s military chief of staff, Ahmad Jabari. Eight days of Palestinian militant rocket fire and Israeli air strikes follow.

July-August 2014 - The kidnap and killing of three Israeli teenagers by Hamas leads to a seven-week war in which more than 2,100 Palestinians are reported killed in Gaza and 73 Israelis are reported dead, 67 of them military.

March 2018 - Palestinian protests begin at Gazas fenced border with Israel. Israeli troops open fire to keep protestors back. More than 170 Palestinians are reported killed in several months of protests, which also prompt fighting between Hamas and Israeli forces.

May 2021 - After weeks of tension during the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan, hundreds of Palestinians are wounded in clashes with Israeli security forces at the Al Aqsa compound in Jerusalem, Islams third holiest site.

After demanding Israel withdraw security forces from the compound, Hamas unleashes a barrage of rockets from Gaza into Israel. Israel hits back with air strikes on Gaza. Fighting goes on for 11 days, killing at least 250 people in Gaza and 13 in Israel.

Aug 2022 - At least 44 people, including 15 children, are killed in three days of violence that begin when Israeli air strikes hit a senior Hamas commander.

Israel says the strikes were a pre-emptive operation against an imminent attack by the Iranian-backed militant movement, targeting commanders and arms depots. In response, Islamic Jihad fires more than 1,000 rockets towards Israel. Israel’s Iron Dome air defence system prevents any serious damage or casualties.

Jan 2023 - Islamic Jihad in Gaza fires two rockets towards Israel after Israeli troops raid a refugee camp and kill seven Palestinian gunmen and two civilians. The rockets set off alarms in Israeli communities near the border but cause no casualties. Israel responds with air strikes on Gaza.

Oct 2023 - Hamas launches the biggest attack on Israel in years from the Gaza Strip, with a surprise assault combining gunmen crossing the border with a heavy barrage of rockets. Islamic Jihad says its fighters have joined the attack.

Israel’s military said it was on a war footing, adding it had carried out strikes targeting Hamas in Gaza and had called up reservists.
Why Hamas' unprecedented wave of attacks is a humiliation for Israel's legendary spy networks, say security analysts

Alia Shoaib
Sat, October 7, 2023 

A member of Israel's police forces walks towards a fire as rockets are launched from the Gaza Strip, in Ashkelon, southern Israel October 7, 2023.Sinan Abu Mayzer/Reuters

The Hamas militant group launched a surprise multi-front attack on Israel, killing at least 40 people.


Israel's inability to anticipate the attack was a "colossal" intelligence failure, analysts say.


Israel has one of the most sophisticated intelligence networks in the Middle East.

Israel was rocked by a wave of unprecedented attacks carried out by Hamas fighters on Saturday, with reports of thousands of rockets being fired into the country and gunmen roaming the streets.

Observers have noted that Israel's failure to anticipate the attack, which likely took months of complex planning, is a failure of their famously sophisticated intelligence agencies.

"All of Israel is asking itself: Where is the IDF, where is the police, where is the security?" Eli Maron, the former head of the Israeli Navy, said on Channel 12 news, per The Times of Israel.

"It's a colossal failure; the hierarchies have simply failed, with vast consequences."

Israel is reputed to have one of the most sophisticated intelligence networks in the Middle East, comprising several key agencies and informats embedded in militant groups across the region, BBC security correspondent Frank Gardner said.

He said that Hamas being able to carry out these coordinated attacks "seemingly in total secrecy" suggests that Israel was "caught asleep at the wheel."

Israeli government officials told Gardner that a major investigation is being launched as to how Israeli intelligence failed to anticipate the attack, with one saying the investigation could go on for years.

Another BBC reporter, diplomatic correspondent Paul Adams, described it as likely to be the worst intelligence failure since the 1973 Yom Kippur war, when Egypt and Syria launched a coordinated surprise attack on Israel.

John Sparks, Sky News' international correspondent, said the wave of attacks would "unnerve" Israel, due to the scale of attacks and the level of tactical organization the Palestinian fighters could mount.

"There are pictures on social media of heavily armed in the back of pickup trucks, for example, operating within Israel. That will unnerve the authorities in Israel a great deal," he said.

Israeli soldiers work to secure residential areas following a mass-infiltration by Hamas gunmen from the Gaza Strip, in Sderot, southern Israel October 7, 2023.REUTERS/Ammar Awad

At least 40 Israelis have been killed and 740 wounded, according to local media, per the BBC.

After a barrage of rockets were fired from multiple locations in Gaza, Hamas fighters infiltrated Israel from "land, sea, and air," an IDF spokesperson said – including some by paraglider.

Israel's heavily fortified border with Gaza had been breached in several places, Army Radio reported, per The Times of Israel.

There have also been unconfirmed reports of IDF soldiers and Israeli civilians being captured by Hamas fighters and taken to Gaza.

Adams noted that this is Hamas' boldest move yet, as Gaza's ruling group have in the past typically used tactics like suicide bombs, tunnel networks, and incendiary balloons to attack Israel.

"By their standards, this was an astonishingly sophisticated — and, yes, brutal — act of hybrid warfare, using hundreds of rockets as the prelude to a mass breakout at multiple points along the normally impregnable fence," he wrote.

The IDF has operated under the assumption that Hamas would not carry out major attacks on Israel out of fear of the ferocity with which Israel would respond, The Times of Israel said, which has proved to be a misguided belief.

The attack is the deadliest to take place in Israel for years.

Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif called the attacks "Operation Al-Aqsa Storm" and said the group had "warned the enemy not to continue his aggression against the Al-Aqsa Mosque," per Haaretz.

The Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem is an important religious site for both Muslims and Jews and is often the site of clashes.

President Benjamin Netanyahu said that the country was "at war" and "will win" in a video message, suggesting a forceful retaliation is incoming.


Hamas’s murderous attack will be remembered as Israeli intelligence failure for the ages

Peter Beaumont
Sat, October 7, 2023 

Photograph: Reuters

Hamas’s surprise attack on Israel, on the 50th anniversary of the Yom Kippur war, will be remembered as an intelligence failure for the ages.

In the space of several hours, dozens of Gaza militants broke through the border fence into southern Israel, surprising local military positions.

Gunmen kidnapped and murdered Israelis in the southern border communities, filming their assault as they advanced in numerous locations. In one instance, a Gaza television journalist delivered a standup report about one attack from inside Israel, an almost unthinkable moment.

While the images of several thousand rockets sectoring the sky has become familiar over the years during the periodic upticks in fighting around Gaza, the footage of Hamas assault teams moving through the streets in communities such as Sderot, blowing the gates off a kibbutz and firing on passing cars and pedestrians, showed scenes not witnessed by most Israelis, for whom short-lived attacks in cities have become a fact of life.

Related: Hacking of activists is latest in long line of cyber-attacks on Palestinians

If it is surprising it is because Israel’s surveillance of Palestinian society is both highly sophisticated and highly invasive, with monitoring of Hamas’s activity in particular one of the most important tasks for the security establishment.

As whistleblowers from the Israeli defence forces cyberwarfare 8200 Unit revealed to the Guardian and other media in 2014, the net for developing sources is almost all-encompassing in their task to identify potential informers in the occupied Palestinian territories.

They were told to seek individuals with financial and health problems, those vulnerable because of sexual impropriety, efforts duplicated in entry and exit interviews for those Palestinians allowed to leave the coastal strip.

Members of militant groups inside Israeli prisons have also historically been targeted for intelligence efforts, all of which makes Israel’s being unsighted on the planned Hamas attack all the more surprising.

Israel’s surveillance technology industry, as evidenced by the Pegasus spyware scandal, is among the most advanced in the world. Despite all of this, Hamas’s preparations were missed.

It is true that Hamas, while always determined and capable of long-term planning, has become much more skilful at adapting to the military challenges it faces, often expending large amounts of effort in its planning and in its identification of Israeli vulnerabilities, a fact very well-known to Israel’s defence forces.

While it is known from previous rounds of fighting in Gaza that Hamas has worked to develop independent and redundant military communication networks, including their own battlefield rebroadcast systems, this suggests two things.

The first is that this was planned with a level of operational security, not just within Hamas but also rival Gaza factions, unprecedented in previous rounds of fighting where at least the broad shape if not the extent of Hamas’s building-up of stockpiles has been identified and broadcast by Israel.

Military analysts have already been quick to suggest that Hamas is likely to have employed significant deception as well as the shock of attacks from multiple domains – including rocket and infiltration – to create maximum chaos.

What is clear is that at several points in the buildup, potential preparations were missed: planning, stockpiling, but most crucially, in the immediate run-up to the Hamas offensive when its fighters were mustering and approaching border areas overseen by regular patrols, cameras, ground motion sensors and remote-controlled mini-cannon in places which in the past have proved effective against attempts to storm the border fence.

All of which suggests an operation which – like previous Hamas surprise infiltration attacks including those involving tunnels into Israel – required a huge amount of preparation.

Perhaps significant is the fact – as Israeli media has pointed out – that incidents involving Hamas in recent months were not identified by the Israeli defence forces and intelligence agencies as part of a buildup to war.


People look at the damage on their street in Ramla, Israel, after a rocket attack by Hamas. Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Even as firefights continued with Hamas infiltrators in Israeli communities in southern Israel, the Israeli media was asking the inevitable question: how this could have been allowed to happen on the 50th anniversary of the Yom Kippur war, itself regarded as a colossal intelligence failure when Israel was attacked by an Arab coalition.

“All of Israel is asking itself: Where is the IDF, where is the police, where is the security?” asked Eli Marom, the former head of the Israeli navy, on live television. “It’s a colossal failure; the hierarchies have simply failed, with vast consequences.”

On social media and elsewhere, Israeli leaders – including the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu – were being openly castigated for hours from officials as the attack unfolded, a silence that was only broken by the appearance of the defence minister, Yoav Gallant.

One thing is clear, however: this attack takes place in the midst of a period of profound social dislocation for Israel. Netanyahu’s far-right government, peopled with individuals in cabinet roles who should not hold public office, such as Itamar Ben Gvir, the minister for national security, have spent their time pouring petrol on what was an already highly combustible situation in the occupied territories.

Netanyahu’s pointless and self-serving conflict with large parts of Israeli society over his much-criticised plans to undermine the country’s supreme court, even as he is in the midst of legal proceedings for allegations of corruption, has overwhelmed public debate, prompting large numbers of reservists to threaten to withhold their service.

Even when Netanyahu did finally speak, it was to reflect an Israeli political and security establishment profoundly shaken. This was not an “operation” or a “round” of fighting he stated, but a state of war.

With Hamas unable to sustain its incursion for any length of time, it seems horribly clear that it will end with maximum horror. Shock was, and is, the point.

The major question is the scope of Israel’s response. Already framed as a war, Hamas’s attack will put pressure on Netanyahu from a far right that has long pushed for a definitive attack on Gaza, perhaps ending in full reoccupation. Messages from friends in Gaza and Israel show the fear over what comes next is overwhelming.

Peter Beaumont is a former Jerusalem correspondent for the Guardian and the Observer