Wednesday, November 01, 2023






Women behind bars — The nightmare of prisons in Pakistan

Women prisoners, who do not have anyone to take care of their children, bring them to the prison with them. Jails in Pakistan are one of the worst places for their upbringing.
Published October 31, 2023 

A housewife from Sheikhupura was five months pregnant when she was sentenced to one-year imprisonment in 2021. “I felt as though I had sentenced my unborn child to a life behind bars since I did not know when they would let me out,” said the 26-year-old, who asked to remain anonymous.


She served her sentence in Kot Lakhpat Jail in the neighbouring district of Lahore. Her baby was not just born in the jail hospital, he also stayed with her until she completed her sentence. She also has an older child who was taken care of by her family during her prison stint.

Another former inmate, whose two-year-old child stayed with her during her three-year prison stint, complained of jail food neither being sufficient nor nutritious enough for children. Education facilities too, are woefully inadequate, she said. “Teachers were unqualified and they did not take classes regularly. Books were so old and tattered that they were hardly legible,” she explained. The government, in fact, does not even provide these basic educational facilities — they are facilitated by various non-government organisations.

She also lamented the lack of privacy needed to breastfeed children. “Since we had to do this in the open, we were often ridiculed,” she said. The jail wardens would routinely make lewd remarks and often beat them up for “shamelessly exposing” themselves. Even the children were not spared from the violence, she said, which leaves long-lasting effects on their emotional and mental wellbeing.

Moazzam Ali Shah, a Lahore-based lawyer who also champions prison reforms, said children living with their imprisoned mothers are usually under the age of six.
Double jeopardy

The prison infrastructure is often ill-equipped to cater to the special needs of women prisoners. For one, they lack arrangements and products for women going through menstruation.

Amina Begum, who spent two years in Kot Lakhpat Jail for possessing drugs with the intent to sell them, lambasted the jail authorities for not taking care of women’s sanitary needs. “It was very rare that we got the sanitary pads we needed. I have seen many women tearing off pieces of their shawls to use as pads,” she said.

Sabah Begum endured much worse. She spent six years behind bars after being sentenced on multiple counts of theft. “I was slapped, made to beg for menstrual pads and do much more that I cannot speak of.”

“The Bangkok Rules provide a clear gender-specific guideline for the treatment of female prisoners,” said Shah. Officially known as ‘The United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders’, the rules were adopted by the United Nations General Assembly, which includes Pakistan, on Dec 22, 2010. Consisting of 70 sections, “These guidelines clearly acknowledge that women have unique healthcare needs, which includes menstrual health, and that all women must be provided sanitary products free of charge and in a manner that respects their privacy and dignity.”


Under its international commitments, Pakistan is obligated to follow these guidelines, but current conditions show that this obligation exists merely on paper.

Sabah Begum shared that she has not been allowed back into her home since her release because her husband and in-laws know that she was subjected to sexual violence in prison because wardens bragged about having taken advantage of her situation.

A report by Justice Project Pakistan, a Lahore-based NGO working on prison reforms, reveals that such shocking sexual mistreatment is common in Pakistani prisons. The report states that 82 out of 134 female prisoners in Faisalabad jail reported to have been sexually violated.

One of the major reasons for such rampant abuse in Pakistani prisons is the shortage of women-only sections in jails. Punjab, the most densely-populated province in the country has just one women-only jail in Multan — other jails may have areas specifically designated for women, but given the overcrowding, they are often times forced to share spaces with men.

However, even in these designated areas, guards and wardens are often men due to the shortage of female prison staff. Female prisoners frequently report having been coerced to engage in sexual acts with male prison guards in exchange for small favours.

The lack of modern monitoring mechanisms, such as security cameras and the absence of publicly accountable and socially responsible prison supervision means that this abusive behaviour often goes unchecked. Prisoners who do wish to report the abuse they suffer often cannot do so due to a total absence of accountability mechanisms. In fact, they fear more retaliation if they dare complain about the misbehaviour of guards and wardens to their superiors.

Sabah Begum’s experience of submitting her complaint shows how it turned out to be a futile exercise. “I filed a complaint form but I did not have any proof so there was not much else I could have done,” she said. “But they protected each other and I was laughed at.”

Packing prisoners like sardines


Six prisoners died inside Lahore’s Camp Jail within 12 days of December 2021. The reason for death was they did not have adequate clothing and heat to protect them from the freezing winter temperatures, which was further exacerbated by the ill-equipped healthcare infrastructure within the jail. A news report by the Express Tribune revealed that a total of 200 prisoners had died across Punjab that year.

It seems like more of a miracle that prisoners in Pakistan — particularly women — do not suffer from such medical exigencies more frequently. Otherwise, the fact that there are only 24 female health workers available to cater to the medical needs of several thousand female prisoners across Pakistan is nothing short of a recipe for disaster. In 2020, the Federal Ministry of Human Rights report ‘Plight of Women in Pakistan’s Prisons’, highlighted the urgent need to increase medical staff for female prisoners, particularly gynaecologists and mental health specialists.

Another major reason for the lack of adequate healthcare for prisoners is their sheer number. The prisons are so overcrowded that it is impossible to keep them tidy and free from disease-causing conditions. This problem was underscored by the Islamabad High Court in a landmark verdict in January 2020. It noted that holding prisoners in an overcrowded prison without sufficient sanitation is “tantamount to cruel and inhumane treatment”.


In its 38-page verdict, the court went to the extent of ruling that “the incarcerated prisoners, subjected to the unimaginable degrading and inhumane treatment highlighted in these proceedings, may have become entitled to seek damages against the prison authorities and the state”.

To cite just one instance of this overcrowding, Kot Lakhpat Jail, which was built in 1965 to house 1,053 prisoners now houses more than 4,000 — neither having the physical infrastructure nor the money to take care of prisoners adequately.

Women prisoners are even worse off. The sole women-only prison in Punjab has an official capacity to cater to just 166 women, but it currently holds 877 women. Living in such overcrowded premises is neither easy nor conducive to a mentally stable environment.

Requesting not to be named, a woman who spent five years in Kot Lakhpat Jail explained: “The lack of space meant that sometimes 10 of us would share a cell built for four. It was difficult to even find a place to sleep”.

While serving time on charges of financial fraud, she reported routine violations of her personal space. She would be forced to use unsanitary and unhygienic facilities for bathing and washing since there was no other alternative, causing her to contract a host of medical problems including skin diseases such as scabies and lice. “Overcrowding was not just uncomfortable, it was also dangerous because it allowed disease to spread quickly among the prisoners,” she said.

She also experienced immense anxiety and depression during her imprisonment and suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to this day. She pointed out that she was not the only one. “Everyone experienced them, at times either becoming violent towards others or inflicting self-harm.”
Reform or bust

A report released by the Human Rights Watch, a New York-based human rights organisation in March 2023 titled A Nightmare for Everyone, puts prisons in Punjab under the spotlight, documenting “widespread deficiencies in prison healthcare in Pakistan”.

Following the report, the Punjab government considered introducing reform mechanisms aimed at reducing the number of prisoners and improving the quality of food and hygiene at the jail.

On April 21, 2023, former Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif visited Kot Lakhpat Jail, where he specifically inspected the healthcare facilities designated for female prisoners and directed the administration to improve sanitation and hygiene.

In reality, however, the prime minister’s directives are all but forgotten and the provincial government’s reforms did not see the light of the day. Former prisoners still give vivid descriptions of massive overcrowding and the accompanying problems of poor sanitary and hygiene conditions.


Shah believes that the central reason why prisons are so bad is “the existence of colonial-era laws governing the prison system”. He argues that “legislation in Pakistan has not been made to fit modern human rights standards.”

The most important aspect of Shah’s 13 years of advocacy includes campaigning for a decrease in the number of prisoners in Lahore’s jails by approximately 50 per cent. This reduction, he believes, can partly be achieved by providing under-trial prisoners with greater access to paroles and by awarding community service sentences to minor offenders under the Probation of Offenders Ordinance of 1960.

The 2020 report by the Ministry of Human Rights reveals that 66pc of all women in prisons were still being tried by courts without convictions.

Jails, he said, must also introduce modern monitoring technologies such as digital record-keeping, biometric access controls and close-circuit television cameras for surveillance and monitoring of both, the prisoners and the prison staff.

Shah also stressed the importance of a third party with the power to conduct regular inspections of prisons and hold incompetent and corrupt jail staff accountable as a mechanism to ensure transparency and accountability in prison administration. He cited the example of India’s Tihar Jail in Delhi, where regular inspections have helped make it an efficient prison with a “flourishing internal industry that focuses on providing employable skills and vocational training to prisoners”.

Deena Jamal, an A-Levels student at Lahore Grammar School 55 Main, is passionate about investigative journalism and documentary filmmaking. Deena is interested in humanitarian and environmental issues, and is driven by an unrelenting curiosity to uncover the hidden truths in our world. She is also a strong supporter of women and child rights.

Fatima Shafi is an aspiring poetess and journalist, currently in her first year of A Levels at Lahore Grammar School.

Yasar Adnan, an aspiring writer from Lahore Grammar School, currently serves as their head of council. He has a keen interest in political and investigative journalism.



Private jails in Balochistan’s fiefdoms
PAKISTAN

Gender inequality


Parvez Rahim 
Published November 1, 2023 


THE issue of gender inequality is not peculiar to Pakistan. Realising that such discrimination prevailed in every sphere of life everywhere, the International Lab­our Organisation framed the Equal Remu­neration Convention (C 100), 1951. This was followed by three more conventions on gender equality: the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention (C 111), 1958; Workers with Family Responsibilities Convention (C 156), 1981, and Maternity Protection Convention (C 183), 2000.

Recently, the UN issued a gender equality and women’s empowerment report, which observes: “Gender equality is not only a fundamental human right, but a necessary foundation for a peaceful, prosperous, and sustainable world. There has been progress over the last decades, but the world is not on track to achieve gender equality by 2030. Women and girls represent half of the world’s population and therefore also half of its potential. But gender inequality persists everywhere and stagnates social progress.”

C 100 makes it obligatory upon the member states to “ensure the application to all workers of the principle of equal remuneration for men and women workers for work of equal value”. Seventy-two years have lapsed since the release of this convention, yet, according to the UN, women “still earn 23 per cent less than men globally. On average, women spend about three times as many hours in unpaid domestic and care work as men”. Women work for eight hours a day but the household responsibilities keep them busy too.

C 111 has also been ratified by Pakistan. Each member must ensure “equality of opportunity and treatment in respect of employment and occupation, with a view to eliminating any discrimination in respect thereof”.

It’s a long journey towards achieving gender parity.

In the late 1970s, I was working at an MNC at Daharki. A woman, who had graduated in chemical engineering from the UK, came for an interview for the position of operations manager. She was capable and ambitious and had no inhibitions about working with male colleagues. However, the management did not offer her the job as she would be the only female working at the plant.

There are certain jobs, especially in industrial establishments, viewed as gender-specific, for instance, the job of industrial relations manager, who has to negotiate the labour union’s charter of demands periodically. During discussions union officials, in the heat of the moment, may utter words considered inappropriate in the presence of women. According to my own experience, though, the presence of women in negotiation teams had a sobering effect on union officials, who would refrain from using foul language.

C 156 “applies to men and women workers with responsibilities in relation to their dependent children. Such responsibilities restrict their possibilities of preparing for, entering, participating in, or advancing in economic activity”. Their employers should be considerate and allow them the time required to see to their obligations towards their families without reducing their pay. Besides, family duties should not be a valid reason for terminating employment.

C 183 prescribes that members shall “ensure that pregnant or breastfeeding women are not obliged to perform work, which has been determined by the competent authority to be prejudicial to the health of the mother or the child”.

Gender inequality is rampant in our society. People’s general attitude towards women remains a topic of critique in articles and editorials. Some observations published recently in this newspaper are summed up here.

— Discrimination includes the fact that there may be about 3.5 million eligible women voters who are not registered on the electoral rolls.

— Women don’t want to contend with the stares and harassment they face when they step outside their safety zones.

— Pakistan not just features as one of the world’s most dangerous countries, it is, in fact, anti-women, and has been unable to enforce international conventions regarding the issue.

Commenting on the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to the jailed Iranian human rights activist Narges Mohammadi, the UN secretary general said the award was “a tribute to all those women, who are fighting for their rights at the risk of their freedom, their health and even their lives”.

Harassment of women at the workplace is one of the major issues affecting women’s taking up a job, retention, productivity, and advancement. The UN aspires to achieve gender equality and women’s empowerment by 2030. This appears to be a gigantic task and an ambitious target, but it will still be a great achievement if most of the developing countries are able to remove key gender inequalities by the deadline.

The writer is a consultant in human resources at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi.


Published in Dawn, November 1st, 2023
Dark future


DAWN
Editorial 
Published November 1, 2023 

REFUSING to budge from the Oct 31 deadline, which ended last night, Pakistan is looking to deport an estimated 1.7m ‘illegal’ Afghan immigrants, along with other undocumented foreigners.

Condemnation, criticism and concern from both within the country and abroad have fallen on deaf ears. What will happen to the millions of Afghans who sought shelter in a country they had come to call home for decades?

They fled hostile conditions back in Afghanistan, where foreign and civil wars, both, were fought over the years, and where a deeply conservative Taliban regime awaits them upon return.

Fears of persecution run rampant among the droves of Afghans who were heartlessly provided less than 30 days to pack up the lives they had built in Pakistan, some over generations. All they have been allowed to take with them is Rs50,000 per family. Among those to have had it the worst, first in their country of origin and until recently, their country of refuge, are the Hazaras.



Major clashes with the Taliban when they first came into power in Afghanistan, drove the ethnic minority out, and here too, they suffered religious persecution, only to be driven out again.

The decision has led to “harassment, assault, and arbitrary detention” of Afghans, according to Human Rights Watch. Even those registered with UNHCR are not immune and must bribe their way out.

The state, in its zeal to safeguard security interests, seems to have overlooked the significant economic ramifications of such an abrupt exit. The contribution of Afghans to various sectors, including agriculture, construction and informal labour markets warrant serious consideration. Many established small businesses contributing to local economies and sent remittances back home.

Their deportation could disrupt these economic flows and harm businesses reliant on their patronage. Afghans over time also invested in real estate.

Their departure might result in a surplus of properties in certain areas, potentially affecting property values and the real estate market. Furthermore, they have played a vital role in cross-border transportation of goods and services.

Their removal could disrupt supply chains and impact the cost of goods, particularly in border regions. The deportation of Afghans will also likely further strain relations with Afghanistan and impact regional connectivity.

While the state may have valid concerns, it must strike a balance between national security and the preservation of economic stability and inclusivity.

Published in Dawn, November 1st, 2023

Afghan refugees detained and deported in Pakistan as deadline expires


Issued on: 01/11/2023 
03:13
FRANCE 24
Video by: Shahzaib WAHLAH

Pakistani security forces on Wednesday rounded up, detained and deported dozens of Afghans who were living in the country illegally, after a government-set deadline for them to leave expired, authorities said. Some 200,000 undocumented Afghans out of the 1.7 million living in Pakistan have already left the country voluntarily. Afghans in Pakistan have been facing harassment from authorities since several years, FRANCE 24’s Islamabad Correspondent Shahzaib Wahlah said.




Afghan refugees leave Pakistan as deportation threat looms

Issued on: 01/11/2023 - 
02:32

Hundreds of thousands of Afghans living in Pakistan faced the threat of detention and deportation on Wednesday, as a government deadline for them to leave sparked a mass exodus. Six hundred thousand Afghans found refuge in Pakistan after the Taliban took control of the country in August 2021. An Afghan journalist who has applied for asylum at the French embassy says she no longer leaves her house for fear of deportation



Mass exodus of Afghans leave Pakistan as deportation threat looms

Issued on: 01/11/2023

02:32
Video by:Sonia GHEZALI|
Shahzaib WAHLAH

In what one lawyer in Pakistan calls a "human rights disaster", hundreds of thousands of undocumented Afghans are facing a November 1 deadline to leave Pakistan or face deportation. Six hundred thousand Afghans found refuge in Pakistan after the Taliban took control of the country in August 2021. FRANCE 24's Shahzaib Wahlah and Sonia Ghezalia report.

Island in the sun

Grenada briefly stood out as a shining example.


Mahir Ali 
Published November 1, 2023
BY 1983, it had been eight years since US troops had finally departed from Indochina. Much to the consternation of some in the military-industrial-political hierarchy, the so-called Vietnam syndrome — the psychological repercussions of a superpower being defeated by a small Asian country — militated against the idea of dispatching combat troops to distant lands.

The Beirut deployment of 1982 in the wake of Israel’s invasion of Lebanon was technically a peacekeeping mission, alongside France and Italy. (None intervened to pre-empt or halt the Sabra-Shatila massacre later that year.) But when a suicide bomber drove a truck into US military barracks near Beirut airport on Oct 23, 1983, the 241 fatalities added up to the worst single-day toll for US forces since the first day of the 1968 Tet Offensive.

The Beirut attack was blamed on Hezbollah. Two days later, the US was prepared to demonstrate it remained the big boss. So, 40 years ago last week, the Reagan administration achieved a long-desired objective by invading a Caribbean island that measures no more than 350 square miles, with a population of 98,000.

Grenada had been on America’s radar since the March 1979 New Jewel Movement (NJM) revolution, which had overthrown the repressive government of Sir Eric Gairy, who straddled the island’s 1974 hop from a British colony to an independent neocolonial outpost on the southern fringes of the Caribbean, close to Venezuela but fairly distant from the US.

Grenada briefly stood out as a shining example.

The NJM was inspired by the civil rights movement in the US and liberation struggles in Africa as much as by the Cuban revolution, but its revolution was more or less peaceful. Its dozens of poorly armed cadres took the army by surprise while Gairy was out of the country — possibly having left behind instructions that the NJM, by then the main opposition party, be eliminated.

It wasn’t the fact of power changing hands that bothered the US as much as what came next. The People’s Revolutionary Government (PRG), as the new regime styled itself, lost little time in making amends for the centuries of colonial exploitation and years of postcolonial continuity. In the four-and-a-half years it was in power, unemployment fell from 49pc to 14pc. A mass literacy programme took just a year to reduce national illiteracy to 2pc. Secondary education became free, and university education almost free. Healthcare improved, as did GNP.

Equal rights and pay for women were introduced, alongside paid maternity leave. Women’s, youth and workers’ organisations were set up; these were consultative rather than decision-making bodies, but the boast of participatory democracy wasn’t an empty one. The ruling NJM, however, remained restricted to 100 or so members, and there were growing tensions between its central committee and the PRG. The prime minister, Maurice Bishop, was not only popular among Grenadians but also established an international presence disproportionate to the size of his nation.


The direction of his administration meant that his overtures to Washington went unrewarded, and the usual sources of international credit dried up. Grenada’s closeness to Havana and friendly ties with Moscow led the US to claim, with no evidence, that an airport being built with Cuban help would serve as a Soviet base. But it was game-planning an invasion for a different reason: Grenada’s successes, however modest, offered an inspiring alternative to the typical neo-imperialist model. That’s why Nicaragua was simultaneously being destabilised and the Allende experiment in Chile had been aborted a decade earlier. Fidel Castro remained the biggest thorn in Uncle Sam’s side, but invading Cuba would not have been a Grenada-style slam dunk.

It wasn’t the US invasion, though, that killed off the NJM experiment, but ructions within the party on seemingly ridiculous grounds that pitted the pragmatic Bishop against the majority of his central committee comrades. After he was placed under house arrest, a popular uprising on Oct 19, 1983, managed to liberate him, but just hours later, he and some of his colleagues were lined up against a wall and machine-gunned to death. His NJM rivals accused him of being insufficiently Leninist. They, in turn, were referred to by Castro as “hyenas” and “the Pol Pot group”.

Suffice it to say that by the time the US marines and their token Jamaican and Barbadian cohorts landed at the incomplete airport the Americans had objected to, they were effectively vultures feeding off the corpse of what the locals idealised as a ‘revo’.

The same airport today bears Bishop’s name, and this year Grenada for the first time marked his anniversary as National Heroes Day. It’s all very well to memorialise that remarkable revo, but the main lesson must be about what even the tiniest nation can achieve under appropriate guidance.

mahir.dawn@gmail.com
Published in Dawn, November 1st, 2023
Shell to sell Pakistan unit to Saudi firm

Reuters Published November 1, 2023

Shell Pakistan on Wednesday said its parent company’s unit, Shell Petroleum Company, has signed a deal with Saudi-based Wafi Energy to sell domestic operations.

Shell Petroleum Company, the international arm of Shell , said the sale is expected to complete by the fourth quarter of 2024, subject to regulatory approvals.

In June, Shell Petroleum Company said it would exit Pakistan with the sale of its 77 per cent shareholding.

The move comes after Shell made several announcements about its global operations and after Shell Pakistan (SPL) suffered losses in 2022 due to exchange rates, the devaluation of the Pakistani rupee, and overdue receivables, and as the country faces a financial crisis and economic slowdown.

“… the Board of Directors of Shell Pakistan Limited (SPL), in a meeting of its board held on June 14, 2023, have been notified by SPCo of its intent to sell its shareholding in SPL,” SPL said in a notice to the Pakistan Stock Exchange.

“This announcement does not impact SPL’s current business operations, which continue,” the notice said.

Wafi Energy is a wholly-owned affiliate of Asyad Holding Group, a fuel retailer in Saudi Arabia.

Shell Pakistan’s operations include more than 600 mobility sites, 10 fuel terminals, a lubricant oil blending plant and a 26pc shareholding in Pak-Arab Pipeline Company Limited.Follow Dawn Business on TwitterLinkedInInstagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Saudi firm eyes control of Shell Pakistan
Published November 1, 2023

KARACHI: Shell Pakistan Ltd (SPL) said on Tuesday it has received a public announcement of intention from Saudi Arabia-based WAFI Energy LLC to buy up to 77.42 per cent of its shares, which are currently held by the oil firm’s foreign sponsor.

The potential acquirer is a Saudi retail gas station network and a sole licensee of Shell retail pumps in the Gulf nation.

Earlier in June, SPL told investors that its foreign sponsor planned to divest its entire 77.42pc stake in the oil marketing company (OMC) as part of “simplifying” its global portfolio.

Shell Petroleum Company Ltd, which is a subsidiary of Shell plc, is currently the single largest shareholder in the Pakistani firm. The general public owns 15.2pc shares while the rest is controlled by public-sector companies, banks and mutual funds etc.

Takeover regulations require that any share purchase agreement with a majority shareholder must follow a public offer to help small investors take advantage of the deal. Therefore, the second leg of the acquisition will consist of a public offer for half of the remaining shareholding in SPL that’s currently held by minority investors.

As such, the potential acquirer will make a public offer for 11.29pc shareholding in the target company at an equal or higher share price than the one quoted to the foreign sponsor for its majority stake.

At the going market rate of Rs163.92 a share, the value of the foreign sponsor’s entire shareholding in the OMC is around Rs27.1 billion.

The sale of the sponsor’s shareholding in SPL will include its downstream business as well as a 26pc stake in Pak-Arab Pipeline Company Ltd.

In July, Pakistan Refinery Ltd and Air Link Communication Ltd also expressed their interest in jointly buying majority shares of SPL. Last month, Bloomberg News reported that the world’s largest oil company Saudi Aramco is exploring the possibility of making a bid for SPL. Similarly, British investment firm Prax Overseas Holdings Ltd also expressed interest in buying the local OMC.

SPL posted a net profit of Rs6.4bn for the January-Sept­ember period, up 125.2pc from a year ago.

SPL is the third-largest OMC with a share of roughly 7.1pc in volumetric sales recorded in the first quarter of 2023-24. Its volumetric sales in July-September dropped 15pc year-on-year to 272,000 tonnes.

Published in Dawn, November 1st, 2023

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

 


People called on Starlink to provide internet to Gaza after Israeli blackout. But is that possible?

A telephone and internet blackout isolated people in the Gaza Strip from the world and from each other over the weekend.
 Published October 30, 2023  

Gaza witnessed a total communications blackout over the weekend as Israel stepped up its operations in the besieged territory in response to the October 7 attack by Hamas.

A telephone and internet blackout isolated people in the Gaza Strip from the world and from each other, with calls to loved ones, ambulances or colleagues elsewhere all but impossible as Israel widened its air and ground assault.

International humanitarian organisations said the blackout, which began late on Friday, worsened an already desperate situation by impeding life-saving operations and preventing contact with their staff on the ground.

Following the blackout, #StarlinkforGaza became a top trend on social media platform X, with people calling for the Elon Musk-owned company to provide internet services for the besieged enclave.

On Saturday, Musk said that Starlink would support communication links in Gaza with “internationally recognised aid organisations”, prompting Israel’s communication minister to say Israel would fight the move.

Musk said that it was not clear who had authority for ground links in Gaza, but we do know that “no terminal has requested a connection in that area”.

Responding to Musk’s post on X, Israel’s communication minister Shlomo Karhi said Israel “will use all means at its disposal to fight this.”

“Hamas will use it for terrorist activities,” Karhi wrote. “Perhaps Musk would be willing to condition it with the release of our abducted babies, sons, daughters, elderly people. All of them! By then, my office will cut any ties with Starlink.”

While communications have been restored since then, analysts are uncertain if Starlink — the website of which says “available almost anywhere on Earth” — can work in Gaza.

Marc Owen Jones, associate professor of Middle East Studies at Hamad Bin Khalifa University based in Doha, told Al Jazeera, “We’ve seen 500,000 posts on X saying Starlink should power Gaza. But people don’t actually appreciate that ‘Starlink for Gaza’ is an impossibility.”

“Starlink terminals or dishes in Gaza would be difficult to smuggle in and distribute at scale. The Israeli government is unlikely to allow legal imports of it,” he said.

“But let’s say Starlink got in. How will it be powered? There is no fuel in Gaza right now,” Jones said.

According to Al Jazeera, Jones noted that the Starlink network relies on ground stations that would need approval within Gaza, which he says is unlikely to get under the current situation.

“Owning a Starlink terminal with two-way transmission could endanger Gazans if detected by Israeli authorities,” he said, adding that the internet provision would likely meet opposition from the United States and Israel administrations.

The report also noted that if such a scenario does happen, it would not be the first. It said that following the invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022, Musk “ensured Starlink terminals would be made available to help people and the army in Ukraine after internet services were disrupted due to the war”.

Commenting on whether Starlink could set up terminals at the Rafah border with Egypt, Jones told Al Jazeera that even if they [Egypt] allowed it or were allowed to set up Starlink terminals, “it would have limited efficacy”.

They called Mandela a terrorist

Jawed Naqvi 
Published October 31, 2023


WHEN the lights suddenly go off, we mostly lean on our primordial instincts to negotiate the darkened room with memory of passage through the maze of obstacles and locate, say, a candle.

Memory can similarly help sift fact from fiction of the tragedy unfolding in the darkened Gaza Strip where Israel is killing and displacing an occupied people and muffling their remonstrations to an outraged world.

It’s an old tactic though, experienced in Jammu and Kashmir, and more recently in Manipur in India. It’s another matter that it could never deter the keen observer from gleaning the facts, some chilling and forbidding, others pulsating with life and hope.

This Saturday would mark 28 years since Yitzhak Rabin’s assassination. The Israeli prime minister was killed by a Jewish gunman on Nov 4, 1995, at a peace rally in Tel Aviv. The killer, an angry law student, belonged to a pack of right-wing Israelis, including those that currently rule the country, who opposed the Oslo peace accords.



Rabin signed the pact with Yasser Arafat in 1993, and Bill Clinton presided over the ceremony that offered land to Palestinians in the West Bank. And though it wasn’t the greatest remedy to vacate Israel’s occupation of Palestinian homeland, Oslo, at least, took a step in the direction.


In the swirling darkness of Gaza, Netanyahu’s words from 2020 shine a light on his military campaign.

To rub salt into the wounds of its opponents, Rabin and Arafat got the 1994 Nobel Peace Prize together with Israel’s then foreign minister Shimon Peres “for their effort to create peace in the Middle East”.




The stage was set for ensuing mayhem. It would reveal itself over the next decades in the daily killings and dislocation of Palestinian civilians by Jewish settlers, nudged and armed by those who opposed the Oslo rapprochement.

Benjamin Netanyahu, the current Israeli prime minister, opposed Oslo and has been frequently accused of complicity in Rabin’s murder, not directly but in a manner that resembles charges against the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) for the assassination of Gandhiji at a prayer meeting in Delhi in 1948.

The RSS got the proverbial clean chit in the plot. But Hindutva’s all-time favourite icon from the Congress party, Sardar Patel, did note that Gandhi’s murder “was welcomed by those of the RSS and the Mahasabha who were strongly opposed to his way of thinking”.

One such ‘way’ of Gandhi’s thinking that riles Hindutva remains enshrined in his article in Harijan of Nov 26, 1938. “Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English, or France to the French.” Patel recalled that RSS members had distributed sweets over Gandhi’s murder. What about Rabin’s death?

Observing the anniversary last year of the assassination, Israel’s Labour Party chief Merav Michaeli singled out Netanyahu and Ben Gvir, the rabid right-winger and current national security minister, for mention.

“Yitzhak Rabin was murdered in a political assassination. He was murdered in a political assassination with the cooperation of Benjamin Netanyahu and [Itamar] Ben Gvir,” Michaeli said.

The Times of Israel recalled that Ben Gvir captured the national limelight when he gloated as a teen about stealing an emblem from Rabin’s car a short time before the assassination. “We got to his car, and we’ll get to him, too,” he said in televised comments.

The claims are routinely denied by Netanyahu. Reports recall, however, how in the weeks before the assassination, Netanyahu, then head of the opposition, and other senior Likud members attended a right-wing political rally in Jerusalem where protesters branded Rabin a ‘traitor’, ‘murderer’, and ‘Nazi’ for signing the peace agreement with the Palestinians earlier that year. Netanyahu also marched in a Ra’anana protest as demonstrators behind him carried a mock coffin.

In the swirling darkness of Gaza, Netanyahu’s words from 2020 do shine a light on his military campaign, now into its fourth week. “I asserted my right to express a different position. It was not only my right, but also my duty,” he said at the time. “I vehemently opposed the calls of ‘traitor’ directed towards [Rabin] but I thought he was wrong and mistaken in the direction he took. It was an error to make peace with the enemy.”



Had making peace with ‘the enemy’ been such a revolting idea, we would be still watching unending violence over Ireland, while the Irish Republican Army would remain damned as a terrorist group by those that now embrace it. Remember also that Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan had both decried African National Congress and Nelson Mandela as terrorists. Mandela remained on the US terror watch nearly until his death.

As news from Gaza remains blocked, it’s redeeming to know that journalists are still staking their lives to present the truth from ground zero. UN workers, among others, will too bear witness as aid givers.

As we wait anxiously for independent sources from Gaza for the other side of the narrative, there is a bold interview to lean on. The intrepid Kashmiri journalist Iftikhar Gilani interviewed a Hamas spokesman for India’s respected Frontline magazine.

That should help break the silence on behalf of Gaza’s unheard and oppressed. Moussa Abu Marzouk who heads Hamas’ international relations office from Doha was asked whether the killing of Israeli civilians was not a prelude to the destruction of Gaza itself.

The stand-off did not begin on Oct 7, Marzouk reminded Gilani. Point taken. Granted the root of the problem was the decades-long occupation, why kill civilians, Marzouk was asked. He denied as propaganda the popular version of the events.

“There are false Israeli narratives about civilian deaths. According to the testimony of the Israelis who lived through the events, our freedom-fighters did not kill them. Rather, some video clips prove that the fighters cared for Israeli children. An Israeli woman said that a fighter asked her permission to take a banana and eat it. Can someone who asks for permission to eat kill civilians?” That said, we still need to keep groping in the dark for the elusive candle.

The writer is Dawn’s correspondent in Delhi.
jawednaqvi@gmail.com
Published in Dawn, October 31st, 2023
The other war

THERE is a conflict going on in the Middle East, which continues to occupy centre stage in global politics. Every headline and news story, every discussion is about it.


Arifa Noor 
Published October 31, 2023 

Even in an insular society such as ours where we continue to be consumed by questions about elections, whether they will happen or not, or whether or not Nawaz Sharif will be prime minister, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict crops up inevitably. It has penetrated even the naval gazing which passes for political discussions in Pakistan.

Why haven’t you written about the war, I have been asked many times in these past weeks. Because I don’t feel equipped enough, is the embarrassed admission — rarely made publicly. Journalists, after all, should have mastery over a wide range of subjects — mastery enough to churn out a thousand words of wisdom. Perhaps, if I keep at this business of op-ed writing, in another decade or so, I may just get there.

But I digress. Over the weeks, I have found it increasingly difficult to read the Western publications which have been part of the morning routine for long. Frankly, the coverage was too biased or didn’t cater to my bias.

It was this gap which was addressed by the polarising social media; it provided a different view. A view perhaps that I was searching for. But while looking for the voices of Palestinians or Gazans, there were also images, unfiltered, and un-editorialised, which were riveting.

It is hard to remember the last time a conflict played out in such detail on social media.

It is hard to remember the last time a conflict, even in the Middle East, played out in such detail on social media; and there have been many in recent times. Yemen is an example; it passed perhaps unnoticed here, expect for a few headlines.

For obvious reasons, Palestine resonates more globally including in Pakistan. This time around, though, the coverage or attention it has garnered through social media appears unprecedented.

The visuals of destroyed buildings, the rescues as people are pulled out from beneath the rubble, men, women and children mourning their killed loved ones dominate timelines. The moment a journalist learns of his family being killed in a bombing or doctors holding a press conference in the middle of bodies or a child screaming in fear are being shared on platform after platform.

And the impact this will have on Muslim societies, the world over, may be worth keeping an eye on. This includes not just Muslim-majority countries but also those settled in the West. The huge protests in many Western cities are simply one indication of this, as are the small stories about Muslims being attacked or Jewish people being taken hostage.

But as a journalist, what is more thought-provoking is the use of social media by a side which feels its voice or version of the story is not heard or represented well enough in the powerful mainstream media. Or should it be the mainstream media of the powerful? However, now social media, with all its limitations, allows the voices, the stories and the images to be amplified.

And perhaps this is one reason, in recent weeks, people have spoken of the polarisation on social media as well as the incorrect information being spread by all sides. Words which are so familiar to someone who is constantly grappling with similar issues in Pakistan.

While these critiques are not incorrect, the larger point is that polarisation is perhaps inevitable when the dominant narrative (regardless of its accuracy or fairness) is challenged. For the real challenge comes from those who are not yet part of the system and hence don’t play by its rules. Those rules may vary from society to society and press to press but they exist. However, they exist for those within the tent. And what is difficult for those inside to understand is that those outside have no reason to follow those rules.

It is perhaps important here to remember earlier examples when the dominant account was challenged, due to new technologies. The printing press was the first such example. It led to not just the first bible but also Martin Luther, who questioned the church.

At the same time, say historians, it provided a voice to all those who had been silenced earlier, including the more radical and fringe groups. Exactly when it became clear that Luther was not just a radical, fringe writer is something researchers would know more about.

The reaction back then was also to censor but it proved impossible to reverse the clock; apparently however hard one tries to burn all the copies of an unsuitable book, an odd copy here or there tends to survive. And because it has been censored, it’s a book people are interested in reading and there is also a bookseller who is willing to take a risk because he wants to make a profit.

There are more recent examples, which journalists of today are more familiar with. Consider the impact CNN and then Al Jazeera had on the world in terms of politics and reporting. Television in general was derided in the beginning as a medium which would force politicians to make hasty decisions and this is more or less what the CNN effect was described as.

Al Jazeera perhaps took the world closer to what social media is doing now, in terms of ending the long-established rule of how information flew from the West to the rest of the world.

Social media has taken this further. And as in the past, it is matched by an effort to control the challenge; ‘shadowbanning’ is a word being used frequently these days.

How far these efforts to control the spread of information will succeed is hard to tell. But it will eventually fail, if history is any guide. The, polarisation, however can be curbed to an extent if some of the voices are engaged with and brought into the tent, so to speak. But this is not easy to achieve, when the instinctive reaction is to simply silence.

The writer is a journalist.

Published in Dawn, October 31st, 2023