Wednesday, November 01, 2023


Massacre on Mali's Niger River

Issued on: 01/11/2023 - 

Timbuktu (Mali) (AFP) – Regular passengers of the "Tombouctou", a ferry whose route runs along the Niger River in northern Mali, are accustomed to hearing gunfire from the riverbank during their journeys.

The ferry provided a regular link between Malian towns on the banks of the river 


But on September 7, they quickly realised that something unusual was happening.

The blasts that forced passengers to hit the deck that day heralded a deluge of gunfire.

It would destroy dozens of lives and leave the ferry -- which provided a regular link between Malian towns on the banks of the river across hundreds of kilometres of semi-desert -- a burnt-out wreck.

Even in a country accustomed to massacres attributed variously to jihadists, self-defence militias, the army or, more recently, the Russian paramilitary group Wagner, the carnage committed some 20 kilometres (12 miles) upstream from the town of Bamba stands out -- and not just for its scale.

Nobody really knows who unleashed the 15-minute inferno of rockets, bullets and flames on hundreds of passengers, and there is no guarantee that the truth will ever be established.

Twelve witnesses agreed to recount the events to AFP. They described the terror, but also the sacrifice of the soldiers and the solidarity between the victims.

Since 2012, the Sahel has been the scene of countless atrocities that often go unreported and without photographic evidence.

These accounts add an element of humanity to what would otherwise be just another faceless massacre.

One of these witnesses, Alhadj M'bara, described himself as a veteran of the "Tombouctou" -- the white and blue three-decker boat with a slightly old-fashioned but dashing flag bearing the logo of the Societe Malienne de Navigation (Comanav).

M'bara, who is in his sixties, sat on a mat in his old walled house in the city of Timbuktu as he recounted his story.

He said that, like others, he used to sell small household items on the boat during its multi-day journey.

He had his regular spot on deck, which is where he was at dawn on September 7.

Between 500 and 1,000 people were crammed on board, although the ferry was only designed to carry 300.

It was almost breakfast time, and the passengers were worried.

"Since we left Timbuktu, we had heard rumours that the boat would be attacked," the old man said.

Escalating tension


For weeks, the situation had been escalating between armed actors in the north, including jihadists, separatists and soldiers.

The Al-Qaeda-linked Support Group for Islam and Muslims (GSIM) had imposed a blockade on Timbuktu, and anything travelling to or from the city became a potential target.

Before the attack, the river had offered a generally safer alternative to the road.

On September 1, however, a teenager was killed by a rocket attack on a Comanav building.

Five days later, the occupants of a boat passing the Timbuktu ferry from the direction of Gao warned passengers of a threat lurking.

As a precaution, a stopover was arranged for the night at Bamba, between the cities of Gao and Timbuktu.

At around 9:00 am (0900 GMT) the next day, some 15 kilometres after Bamba, the ferry entered a bend lined with reeds.

Aicha Traore, a student, was taking photos on the bridge when one or more pick-up trucks, according to witnesses, appeared over the dunes on the horizon.

"Some people whispered that maybe it's the village chief's car," she said.

There were soldiers on board the boat, and she and others went down to inform them.

The question has been raised whether the soldiers' presence made the ferry a target -- and, if so, for whom.

"That's when the shooting started," said M'bara, the salesman.

Soldiers ordered people to lie down on the deck.

"Some of them lay on top of us to protect us," recalled Abdoul Razak Maiga, a 19-year-old student.

Counting the dead

The Timbuktu ferry has come under fire before, according to M'bara.

But "this time it was different", he said.

"We were ashore (when) suddenly a rocket came out of one of the pinasses," the small flat-bottomed boats that abound on the river, some of which were following the ferry from Bamba.

"From then on, it was every man for himself, God for all," M'bara said.

The soldiers tried to retaliate, but were caught in the crossfire of small arms and rockets.

Three rockets hit the engine, the ferry operator said.

They started a fire that spread.

"I gave my little brother to someone while I threw myself into the water," said Fatoumata Coulibaly, a shopkeeper.

"Then I signalled to him to throw me my little brother -- I was able to swim to shore with him (but) all our luggage remained, even our clothes and shoes."

In the panic, Aessata Issa Cisse, another passenger, was separated from her daughter.

"I've had no news of her -- I've searched in vain, I don't know if she's alive or dead," she told AFP.

The captain managed to reach the shore.

Local villagers were the first to come to the aid of the survivors.

A few hours later, soldiers and around 15 armed white men, possibly mercenaries from the Wagner Group, arrived.

The attackers had vanished, but the road was too dangerous to evacuate the survivors, who spent the night under military guard in front of the burning wreckage.

The dead were buried on the spot.

The number of casualties is unknown. Access to such data is hampered by a multitude of factors: the remoteness and perilous nature of the terrain, the shortcomings of telecommunications, the paucity of information relays, and also a fear of speaking out.

Massacres in the region have often been documented for NGOs and the UN based on oral testimonies.

Access has become even more limited in recent years, in a tense security and political context.

Yet news of the ferry massacre spread in a matter of hours, with images of the boat in flames circulating on social networks.

Mali's ruling junta, often slow or reluctant to speak out in such circumstances, addressed the incident publicly that same evening.

It confirmed the deaths of 49 civilians and 15 soldiers in the ferry attack and another on the same day against army positions in Bamba.
Resilience

The junta said that GSIM had claimed responsibility for both operations. AFP only found traces of the group claiming responsibility for the attack on army positions, but not for the ferry.

Subsequently, authorities lumped the assault together with other acts by "terrorist" groups, a term they now apply to the separatist fighters who have just taken up arms against the state in the north.

Pro-junta groups active on social networks openly blame the predominantly Tuareg rebellion for the ferry tragedy, compounding it with GSIM.

"Renewed tension in the north -- the coalition of terrorists and independence fighters at work," ran the headline in the government daily newspaper l'Essor on September 11.

An official from the Coordination of Azawad Movements (CMA) -- the main alliance of separatist groups -- has denied any involvement, speaking on condition of anonymity so as not to appear to grant credibility to the claims.

As is often the case, eyewitness accounts also invalidate the official death toll.

Several survivors say that 111 dead were buried in three separate graves for men, women and children.

This does not include those who were burnt or drowned, they said.

No information is available on the identification of the victims, or whether any have been identified at all.

The ruling junta decreed three days of national mourning.

It cancelled festivities scheduled to mark Mali's independence on September 22 and ordered the celebration money be donated to the victims.

Witnesses confirmed that they had received compensation of 250,000 CFA francs (about $400).

The courts announced an investigation and the head of the junta, Assimi Goita, assured that this attack and others "will not go unpunished".

Despite suspicions, the perpetrators have not yet been identified. None of the witnesses have commented on who they might be.

The day after the tragedy, in the late afternoon, small boats took the survivors -- about 400 people -- to the town of Gourma-Rharous, a few dozen kilometres upstream.

There they waited in classrooms for several days before being taken home.

Traore, the student, remembered the screams of the traumatised survivors at night.

She said she is the only survivor from her cabin.

"What has happened to us is God's will," she said with a sombre look in her eyes but a firm voice, sitting in her mud house in the city of Timbuktu.

M'bara, who saved his son by grabbing his hand and pulling him into the water, hoped that the river traffic would resume.

"Staying idle is not the solution," he said.

© 2023 AFP
German president asks forgiveness for colonial crimes in Tanzania

Berlin (AFP) – President Frank-Walter Steinmeier on Wednesday expressed his "shame" at crimes committed during Germany's colonial rule in Tanzania and pledged to raise awareness of the atrocities in his own country.


Issued on: 01/11/2023 - 
President Frank-Walter Steinmeier asked for 'forgiveness' over crimes committed during Germany's colonial rule in Tanzania 
© SAUL LOEB / AFP/File

"I would like to ask for forgiveness for what Germans did to your ancestors here," Steinmeier said during a visit to the Maji Maji Museum in the southern city of Songea, according to a transcript of his speech.

Tanzania was part of German East Africa, which saw one of the bloodiest uprisings in colonial history between 1905 and 1907.

Experts say between 200,000 and 300,000 members of the indigenous population were brutally murdered during the so-called Maji Maji Rebellion, mostly as a result of the systematic destruction of fields and villages by German troops.

Steinmeier said Germany was ready to work with Tanzania towards a "communal processing" of the past.

"What happened here is our shared history -- the history of your ancestors and the history of our ancestors in Germany," he said, promising to "take these stories with me to Germany, so that more people in my country will know about them".

"I want to assure you that we Germans will search with you for answers to the unanswered questions that give you no peace," he added.

The museum visit came on the final day of a three-day trip to Tanzania by Steinmeier, who on Tuesday also opened the door to the return to Tanzania of artefacts looted during the colonial era.

Germany is ready to cooperate on "the repatriation of cultural property and human remains", he said after meeting President Samia Suluhu Hassan in Dar es Salaam.
Mass killings

Steinmeier's trip coincides with a visit by Britain's King Charles III to Kenya, also expected to be dominated by conversations about the colonial era.

Over the past 20 years, Germany has been gradually starting to talk more about the crimes it committed during colonial times.

In German South West Africa, now Namibia, Germany was responsible for mass killings of indigenous Herero and Nama people that many historians refer to as the first genocide of the 20th century.

Germany has returned skulls and other human remains to Namibia that it had sent to Berlin during the period.

In 2021, the country officially acknowledged that it had committed genocide in Namibia and promised a billion euros ($1.06 billion) in financial support to descendants of the victims.

Germany has also started to return cultural artefacts looted during the colonial era.

Last year, it began returning items from its collections of Benin Bronzes, ancient sculptures from the Kingdom of Benin, to Nigeria.

The 16th-18th-century metal plaques and sculptures, among the most highly regarded works of African art, are now scattered around European museums after being looted by the British at the end of the 19th century.

Berlin's Museum of Prehistory and Early History has also been carrying out research on around 1,100 skulls from German East Africa since 2017, with the aim of eventually returning the remains to the relevant countries.

In September, the city's museum authority said researchers had identified living relatives in Tanzania of the people whose skulls were pillaged.

© 2023 AFP


The Ghosts of Africa

A Novel

William Stevenson

416 Pages
January 27, 2015
ISBN: 9781629144436
Imprint: Skyhorse Publishing
$14.95buy
Amazon
Barnes & Noble
Indiebound
Bookshop.org

DESCRIPTION

A sprawling, epic saga of adventure, romance, war, and resistance based on the savage conflict in East Africa during World War I.

In German-occupied East Africa during World War I, British forces have arrived. In defiance of his orders, German military commander Paul von Lettow enlists soldiers, civilians, and African rebels to fight against the British, forming the first modern guerrilla uprising of the time. Amid his political battles, Lettow is embroiled in a romantic relationship with an American woman who loves him, but who objects to his war. To complicate things, Lettow’s actions draw the attention of the brilliant but brutal chief of British intelligence who plots to defeat him. Amid all the action, Zionists fight for influence in the region, rival tribes have to be appeased with diplomacy, and an African princess serves as a spy for the rebels.

Amazingly, these colorful characters and eventful plots are firmly based on real-life personas and historical events during the war. In the gripping style of narrative fiction, Stevenson relates the often overlooked German resistance in East Africa and their inventive use of guerrilla tactics. As a former foreign correspondent in the region, Stevenson paints an astonishingly accurate and detailed picture of the geography and political climate of East Africa.

A thrilling read, The Ghosts of Africa packs history, military tactics, romance, and adventure into a single epic tale that will both entertain and inform.
Charles stops short of apologising for UK’s ‘acts of violence’ in Kenya

Reuters Published November 1, 2023 
Britain’s King Charles III (R) attends the State Banquet hosted by Kenyan President William Ruto at the State House in Nairobi on October 31, 2023. — AFP

NAIROBI: Britain’s King Charles said on Tuesday he felt the “greatest sorrow and deepest regret” for atrocities suffered by Kenyans during their struggle for independence from colonial rule.

But in a speech at the start of a four-day state visit to Kenya, he stopped short of making a full apology called for by survivors of that period and local rights groups who are pressing for reparations from the British government.

“The wrongdoings of the past are a cause of the greatest sorrow and the deepest regret,” Charles said during a state banquet.

“There were abhorrent and unjustifiable acts of violence committed against Kenyans as they waged… a painful struggle for independence and sovereignty and for that, there can be no excuse.”

Many citizens of former British colonies, including leaders of Kenya’s Nandi people, want Charles to directly apologise and endorse reparations for colonial-era abuses, including torture, killings and expropriation of land, much of which remains in British hands.




During the 1952-1960 Mau Mau revolt in central Kenya, some 90,000 Kenyans were killed or maimed and 160,000 detained, the Kenya Hu­­man Rights Commis­sion (KHRC) has estimated.

Britain has previously expressed regret for those abuses and agreed a 20 million pound settlement in 2013.

President William Ruto praised Charles for his courage and readiness “to shed light on uncomfortable truths that reside in the darker regions of our shared experience”.

“The colonial reaction to African struggles for sovereignty, and self-rule was monstrous in its cruelty,” Ruto said.

Published in Dawn, November 1st, 2023

King Charles meets Kenya veterans after admitting colonial abuses

Issued on: 01/11/2023


Nairobi (AFP) – King Charles III met Kenyan veterans of World World II on Wednesday, after acknowledging there was "no excuse" for colonial-era abuses during Britain's rule of the East African country.

King Charles and Queen Camilla met Kenyan veterans of World World II, honouring Africans who died for Britain 
© Tony KARUMBA / AFP

Charles said he wished to "deepen my own understanding of these wrongs" during his four-day state visit to Kenya with Queen Camilla, but also to bolster "a modern partnership of equals facing today's challenges".

There have been widespread calls for Charles to formally apologise to a country Britain violently ruled for decades before Kenya's hard-fought independence in 1963.

On his first day in Nairobi on Tuesday, the 74-year-old British head of state said the "wrongdoings of the past are a cause of the greatest sorrow and the deepest regret", but stopped short of an apology.

"There were abhorrent and unjustifiable acts of violence committed against Kenyans as they waged... a painful struggle for independence and sovereignty. And for that, there can be no excuse," he told a state banquet.

King Charles said the wrongdoings of the past were 'a cause of the greatest sorrow and deepest regret' 
© Chris Jackson / POOL/AFP

"None of this can change the past but by addressing our history with honesty and openness, we can perhaps demonstrate the strength of our friendship today, and in so doing, we can I hope continue to build an ever-closer bond for the years ahead."

Charles has previously made three official visits to Kenya, but this is his first tour of an African and Commonwealth nation since becoming king last year upon the death of his mother Queen Elizabeth II.

'Feared retribution'


On Wednesday, Charles and Camilla visited a war cemetery in Nairobi to honour Africans who died for Britain in two world wars, laying a wreath in front of their graves before meeting Kenyan veterans, some in wheelchairs.

"I hope we can do something special for you," Charles told one of the veterans as he handed out medals to the former soldiers, part of a British initiative to belatedly recognise the contribution of non-European forces to the war effort.

King Charles has faced calls in Kenya to apologise for colonial-era abuses 
© LUIS TATO / AFP

One veteran, Samweli Mburia, who said he was over 100 years old, told AFP he had originally received a medal during colonial rule but got rid of it because he "feared retribution" from independence fighters.

On Tuesday, Charles and his host President William Ruto laid a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior in Uhuru Gardens, a site steeped in Kenyan history.

Charles laid a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior in Uhuru Gardens, where Kenya declared independence in 1963 
© Tony KARUMBA / AFP

It was there that Kenya's independence was declared at midnight on December 12, 1963, with the national flag replacing the Union flag.

The gardens were built on the site of a camp where British colonial authorities detained suspected Mau Mau guerrillas during the suppression of their 1952-1960 uprising.
'Uncomfortable truths'

The so-called "Emergency" period was one of the bloodiest insurgencies of the British empire and at least 10,000 people -- mainly from the Kikuyu tribe -- were killed, although some put the true figures much higher.

Tens of thousands more were rounded up and detained without trial in camps where reports of executions, torture and vicious beatings were common.

Kenyan President William Ruto called the British response to Kenya's quest for self-determination 'monstrous in its cruelty'
 © Luis Tato / AFP

Ruto said the Emergency "intensified the worst excesses of colonial impunity", and called the British response to Kenya's quest for self-determination "monstrous in its cruelty".

But he welcomed Charles' "courage and readiness to shed light on uncomfortable truths".

"Facing the Empire's dark past," was the headline in The Standard newspaper on Wednesday.

The Star said in an editorial that demands for reparations were "unrealistic", adding: "What can King Charles fix today?"

But it did suggest the monarch could help in the return of artefacts including the skull of a revered tribal leader who led a bloody resistance movement against colonial rule more than a century ago.

Kenya is where Queen Elizabeth -- then a princess -- learned in 1952 of the death of her father, King George VI, marking the start of her historic 70-year reign.

The royal programme in Nairobi and the port city of Mombasa is also focusing on efforts to tackle climate change, as well as support for creative arts, technology and youth.

© 2023 AFP





Allama Iqbal was an ardent supporter of the Palestinian cause

Though he died before the creation of Israel, the poet had written about the intentions about the British to give Palestine to the Jews.




Rauf Parekh
30 Oct, 2023

In his poem Shaam-o-Falasteen (Syria and Palestine), included in Zarb-i-Kaleem, Allama Iqbal says:

Hai khak-i-Falasteen pe yahoodi ka agar haq
Hispaniya pe haq nahin kyun ahl-i-Arab ka?

This can roughly be translated as: if Jews have a right over the soil of Palestine, why do Arabs not have a right over Spain?

So, in Iqbal’s opinion, Palestine belongs to Arabs, and if someone advocates rights of Jews over Palestine land because they were driven out of Palestine, Arabs were deported from Spain, too.

Iqbal had deep sympathies for Muslims of Palestine, as he believed Islam transcends all races, regions and borders. Though he died in 1938 and Israel was created in 1948, Iqbal had been closely following the developments in the Middle East. Western countries were bent upon granting lands to Jews in Palestine, trampling over all the promises they had made during the negotiations. So, writes Bashir Ahmed Dar in his Anwaar-i-Iqbal, a public rally was organised outside Lahore’s famous Mochi Gate on Dec 30, 1919. Speaking on the occasion, Iqbal presented a resolution demanding that the promises that the British government had made to Muslims regarding their territories in the Middle East be fulfilled. He stressed that no part of any Muslim land should be handed over to any other side (p42-43).

After Paris Peace Conference, need for an international organisation was felt for maintaining global peace. As a result, the League of Nations, a kind of precursor of the United Nations, was formed in 1920. Unfortunately, big powers held sway over the matters at the League of Nations as it had no real power to implement what it intended to do.

Iqbal was utterly disappointed with what was doled out to Muslims after the First World War and in the wake of the creation of the League of Nations. He composed a scathing four-line piece, calling the League of Nations ‘kafan duzde chand’, or a few who steal shrouds from the graves. The two verses are included in Payam-i-Mashriq, or the message from the East, a collection of Iqbal’s Persian poetry first published in 1923.

The verses have been translated into English by Syed Abdul Vahid. The translation is reproduced here:

To banish the institution of warfare from this ancient assemblage

The well-wishers of the world evolved a new order;

I know but this that a few shroud-stealers

Have formed a league for distributing graves.

During their rule Ottoman Turks had shown much permissive and tolerant attitude towards Jews. They permitted Jews to pray in front of Western Wall, an ancient wall situated in the proximity of Dome of Rock at Jerusalem and known as Buraq Wall among Muslims.

In September 1929, Iqbal delivered a speech criticising pro-Jews policies pursued by the British and said, as quoted by Muhammad Rafiq Afzal in his book Guftaar-i-Iqbal, “Turks have been showing extraordinary tolerant attitude towards Jews. They allowed them to wail before the Buraq Wall and that is why it came to be known as Wailing Wall. According to Islamic Sharia the entire court area of Al-Aqsa Mosque is ‘waqf’ (or endowment). The Jews claim its control and use but legally and historically they do not have any right over it” (page 93).

The League of Nations’ headquarter was in Geneva, Switzerland, and British was supporting the Jews. So Iqbal alluded to them in his poem Falasteeni Arab Se in Zarb-i-Kaleem:

Teri dava na Geneva mein hai na London mein
Farang ki rag-i-jaan panja-i-yahood mein hai

In this couplet Iqbal, while addressing Palestinian Arabs, says “your panacea is neither at Geneva nor at London, because the jugular vein of the West is in the clutches of Jews”.

Muhammad Hamza Farooqi has mentioned in one of his articles that Allama Iqbal participated in the Second Roundtable Conference held at London, during the last few months of 1931, to discuss the reforms for greater self-government as demanded by the Indian politicians. In those days, Motamar Al-Alam Al-Islami, or the World Muslim Congress, was organising a conference to discuss the Zionist threat. Leaving London conference, Iqbal went to Jerusalem to attend the conference.

On many other occasions, Iqbal had supported the Palestine cause. For want of space we cannot offer much here, but, his letter dated Oct 7, 1937, addressed to Muhammad Ali Jinnah, is an absolute eye opener: “The Palestine question is very much agitating the minds of the Muslims. … I have no doubt that the League will pass a strong resolution on this question and also by holding a private conference of the leaders decide on some sort of a positive action in which masses may share in large numbers. This will at once popularise the League and may help the Palestine Arabs. Personally I will not mind going to jail on an issue which affects both Islam and India.” (p.27)

The great bard was ill and died within six months, but was willing to go to jail for the Palestine cause!

drraufparekh@yahoo.com

Originally published in Dawn, October 30th, 2023
SMOKERS’ CORNER: MANUFACTURING A 'HOLY WAR'

Nadeem F. Paracha 
DAWN/EOS
Published October 29, 2023
Illustration by Abro


It is incorrect to frame the so-called ‘Israel-Palestine war’ as a “religious conflict.” Indeed, the region was once part of the Ottoman Empire and had a large Arab Muslim population. But this population had significant Arabic-speaking Christian communities as well.

During the First World War (1914-18), Arab nationalism found increasing traction among Palestine’s Arab majority. This nationalism looked to end Ottoman control and create an independent Palestine. Arab Christians, too, were part of the Arab nationalist movement. In 1919, with the Ottoman Empire crumbling, a Palestinian Arab conference of Muslim-Christian associations was held to address the other issue: Zionism.



Like Arab nationalism, Zionism too was a secular ideology. Formed in Europe in the late 19th century, it declared that Jewish people had faced persecution for centuries and, therefore, needed a country of their own. The Zionists’ first option for this country was Uganda, the second was Argentina. Their third option was Palestine and the narrative of it being a natural choice because “it was the homeland of ancient Jews” was only stressed upon much later.

Zionism was secular because it was a modern nationalist ideology. Even though it eventually sought to create a Jewish homeland in Palestine on the basis of a Biblical narrative, the homeland was to be a modern nation-state and not a Jewish theocracy. After the First World War, when Palestine began being administered by the British, Arab nationalism and Zionism clashed. In the 1930s, Arab nationalists sought to make Palestine part of a larger Arab region.

For decades, Israel has framed its conflict with Palestine as a war between Jews and Muslims, in an attempt to justify and expand its territorial occupation

Most Arab Christians largely sided with the Arab nationalists. They too opposed Zionism and the allotment of lands to Jewish immigrants in Palestine. Just before the eventual emergence of Israel in 1948, Amin Husseini, a prominent Palestinian Arab nationalist, called for the creation of a secular state in all of Palestine that would include Muslims, Jews and Christians.


The same year, Egypt, Syria and Jordan went to war against the newly-formed Israel. This too was a conflict between Arab nationalism and Zionism. This was how it was framed by the involved combatants. It was never explained as a war between Islam and Judaism. Although Israel won the war, the Palestinian diaspora living as refugees in various Arab countries began to revive Palestinian nationalism.

But this nationalism as well was based on Pan-Arabism. It was greatly inspired by the Arab nationalism championed by Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser. It was secular and also supported by Arab-speaking Christians. A Syrian Christian, Michel Aflaq, was the leading ideologue of Ba’ath Socialism — a variant of Arab nationalism that began to dominate the politics of Syria and Iraq.

In 1964, Nasser facilitated the formation of an alliance of various Palestinian nationalist groups. The alliance was dubbed the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO). It was vigorously opposed by Islamist outfits such as the Muslim Brotherhood, but supported by the ‘communist bloc’ headed by the Soviet Union. PLO did not see Israel as a Jewish homeland. It saw it as a Zionist state that had forcibly occupied Arab lands through violence.

It was, in fact, Israel that began to frame the Arab-Israeli animosity as a religious conflict. This worked in Israel’s favour because, although Israel was a secular state, any attack or criticism against it began being portrayed as an act of ‘anti-Semitism’.



Whereas large Islamist outfits such as the Muslim Brotherhood were more invested in challenging Arab nationalist regimes, smaller Islamist groups often circulated old Nazi literature and Hitler’s autobiography (translated into Arabic). Yet, these groups were never taken to task by Israel. In fact, in the 1970s, Israel consciously bolstered the political fortunes of a Palestinian Islamist, Sheikh Yaseen. He was ‘allowed’ to form his own organisation and recruit Palestinians in Gaza.

Yaseen began to build mosques, charity organisations and then a militant wing. He was regularly treated at some of Israel’s finest hospitals. Brigadier-General Yitzhak Segev, a former Israeli military governor in Gaza, is on record stating that Israel aided Yaseen’s Islamist movement, viewing it as a counterweight to the PLO (as quoted in the Wall Street Journal, January 24, 2009).

But this was not the only reason for propping up Islamist movements in territories occupied by Israel. According to the Palestinian-American author and journalist Ali Abunimah, after the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, Zionists began to increasingly frame the tussle as a religious conflict. This, they believed, would better serve Israel’s ambition to turn all of Palestine into a Zionist state.

The framing also romanticised Israel as a Jewish enclave besieged by hostile Muslims who wanted to eliminate Jews, as the Nazis had tried to do. But this narrative could not be strengthened when Israel’s core Arab enemies were secular who were framing the conflict as territorial.

Once the Islamist movements aided by Israel succeeded in weakening the PLO, these movements turned their rhetoric and guns towards Israel. In 1987, Yaseen’s movement evolved into becoming Hamas. Israel finally got itself a powerful Islamist opponent to ‘prove’ that Israel was embroiled in a religious war.

For the past three decades now, Islamists, Zionists and Israel’s Western allies have all been viewing the Israel-Palestine conflict as a war between Muslims and Jews. The Islamists do this to rationalise their militancy and Islamist rhetoric; Israel does it to justify and expand its occupation as a way to eliminate ‘anti-Semitism’; and Israel’s Western allies do it to rationalise oppressive Israeli policies against the Palestinians as a war against Islamist terrorism.

But is it working? Not quite. The recent ‘invasion’ by Hamas militants of Israel was largely denounced by most Muslims, including by the Palestinian diaspora. However, Israel’s indiscriminate bombing of Gaza that has killed thousands of unarmed men, women and children, and the mishandling (if not manhandling) of this fact by the Western media, has uncannily brought back to life the true nature of the conflict: it is a political and territorial dispute rather than a religious one.

Accusations of anti-Semitism, often floated by Western institutions against even the most secular Muslims and non-Muslims opposed to Israeli policies in Palestine, are now sounding increasingly cynical. These institutions are aligned with Israel’s ‘religious war’ narrative. But they are struggling to mitigate the reactions Israel’s brutal tactics are triggering.

The discourse is moving back to being about occupiers and the occupied instead of about a Jewish enclave besieged by Muslims. Even one of Israel’s oldest media outlets, Haaretz, isn’t falling for this narrative anymore.

Published in Dawn, EOS, October 29th, 2023
How the West has been on ‘wrong side of history’ in Palestinian tragedy

Aleezeh Fatimah Published October 30, 2023
People take part in a pro-Palestinian protest, as the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas continues, in Warsaw, Poland, October 29, 2023. — Reuters

KARACHI: As the situation in Gaza continues to deteriorate, people around the world are split between the two sides, trying to figure out which side of history is the ‘right one’. In the midst of this confusion, an online teach-in organised by Pakistani author Fatima Bhutto, tried to contextualise the current conflict, especially for a Western audience.


A number of students from around the world, who were eager to understand the situation in Palestine and how it reached such critical mass, attended the two-day teach-in, which concluded on Sunday. The atmosphere in the online gathering also showed how people were beginning to question the things they’ve learned in the name of history.

“The tragedy is not knowing, but [an even] bigger tragedy is having people who’re not even willing to know and correct themselves, which is why we’ve put together this discussion, to learn ‘unbiased history’ and know which side to choose,” Ms Bhutto said in her opening remarks.

“It is sad that people are still debating about how there are ‘two sides’ of a massacre instead of the fact that it happened, and how many times it has been repeated,” Isabella Hammad, a British-Palestinian author said as she shed light on what’s happening in Gaza at the moment.

Pakistani author Fatima Bhutto, panellists from across Middle East highlight failure of UN’s ‘neutral approach’; ask people to question ‘propaganda’ masquerading as reporting

“I think as people who’re deeply connected to academia, we need to realise that no matter where we come from, where our origin is from, whatever history we’ve studied has a tinge of biasedness in it. We have painted villains as heroes, and we have never allowed people to question, which is exactly why a holocaust is unfolding itself right in front of our eyes, which is also telecasted live through a media outlet, yet we’re deciding what side to pick? I don’t think there is anything more unfortunate than that,” she added.

Is UN neutral?


As questions rolled in regarding the United Nations resolution – demanding an immediate ceasefire – and its rejection by the Israeli government, the panellists pointed how the UN has remained silent and has seemed ‘biased’ on this issue for a long time. This is why their current stance doesn’t seem to carry much weight, as they’ve consistently opted to stay ‘neutral’ over the years, panellists said.

“You see, when you keep talking about something but don’t take a concrete action, nobody would take your serious when you call for one. So when you ask why UNGA passed a resolution in the first place when it has to be rejected, you need to know the history of what UN has exactly done for the oppressed that do not belong to a ‘certain’ colour and caste. The answer is unfortunately ‘nothing’. So, when they call for an action, and the oppressor knows they can get away with anything, who’s going to take them serious?’ Omar Barghouti, a Palestinian author said.

Mr Barghouti serves as one of the founding committee members of the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, and he’s also a co-founder of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement. In recognition of his efforts, he was honoured with the Gandhi Peace Award in 2017.

“When one side can use words like ‘dark’ and ‘light’ while talking about children, which by the way, is openly racist, yet no one calls them out, you know it is not a war. When one side has the authority to cut off water, food, internet and bombs them mercilessly, referring them to animals, you know it is not a war and it definitely has no ‘two sides’,” he said.

When asked if he condemns what Hamas did and how he views it, he smiled knowingly as if he expected this question would come up.

“You see, when Hamas attacked Israel, [Israel] responded back by bombing hospitals, churches, and even housing schemes. It has killed thousands of people. Just today I read a statement by Education Ministry of Gaza which said there would be no student graduating this year since all high school seniors have been killed. Are these kids part of a terrorist organisation? No. So, taking revenge of actions of individuals from an entire population, how is that fair?’ he cross questioned.

“Israel can respond to Hamas, but Palestine does not have the same right, so it sits in the corner helplessly watching its people die, while the world goes on about who’s right and who’s wrong,” he concluded.


Journalism or propaganda?


“The biggest media outlets, who preach about the integrity of journalism, conduct workshops over workshops about misinformation and disinformation yet never bothered to double check if there were ‘actual tunnels’ under a hospital before making a report,” Ahmed Eldin, an American-Kuwaiti journalist said, commenting on Western media coverage of the Israeli campaign against Gaza.

“The BBC implied on Twitter and TV that Hamas built tunnels under hospitals, without proof. The next day, we see a hospital going up [in flames] because well, the oppressor has the right, no? The New York Times all of a sudden dedicated an entire page to Gaza day before yesterday. There are multiple events like that where you and I both can see that there is propaganda going on in the name of journalism,” he added.

“I lived in the Gaza strip, and I remember everything about the shortages that the world is witnessing now, so let me be clear on this, this is not the ‘beginning’ of a genocide, this is just intensification of everything that has been going on for years now. You might think this is because of a Hamas attack, because the Western media has convinced you. However that is not the case,” Diana Buttu, a Palestinian-Canadian lawyer said in her closing remarks.

Published in Dawn, October 30th, 2023
UK police snoop around schools after pro-Palestine demonstrations
Published October 30, 2023

POLICE officers in London have been instructed to gather intelligence from schools after massive protests against Israeli atrocities in Gaza, sparking concerns that it will lead to more discrimination against minority communities, the Guardian has reported.

The officers of London police, also called Metropolitan police, have been ordered to “increase their visible patrols” at schools and engage with school staff in order to obtain information about “community tensions”, according to a letter sent to headteachers.

The letter written to headteachers of schools in four London districts by a top Met police officer stated that the engagement would help the force’s “intelligence and information-gathering”, accor­ding to the Guardian.

The publication said that more police officers would be stationed at schools to help create “safe spaces” in collaboration with school staff.

Activists say move will increase discrimination against minorities

Rights activists and community leaders have expressed concerns over the move, saying it would further erode the minority communities’ trust in police.

“It’s very likely these actions will stereotype and criminalise young people, especially those from minority backgrounds,” Stafford Scott, a community campaigner, told the Guardian.

“Trust and confidence in the police in the communities that I deal with is very low. Rather than reassuring children, their presence in schools generally causes alarm and concern on the basis that they disproportionately target children from ethnic minorities.”

‘Ruthless’ against hate crime

Separately, the head of London police has said his officers would “ruthlessly” arrest anyone who commits a hate crime, but there could only be prosecutions when the law is broken, Reuters reported.

Mark Rowley, the head of London’s Metropolitan Police force, said he would support a review into the legal definition of extremism in response to criticism of the way his officers handled pro-Palestinian protests in London.

Some British politicians have criticised London’s police after they failed to arrest people at a pro-Palestinian rally shouting “jihad”. The police later said the phrase could have many meanings, concluding no offence had taken place.

“There is scope to be much sharper in how we deal with extremism within this country,” the Met police chief told Sky News.



“The law was never designed to deal with extremism. There’s a lot to do with terrorism and hate crime, but we don’t have a body of law that deals with extremism, and that is creating a gap.”

UK ministers are reviewing the legal definition of extremism in a move designed to counter hate crimes, including antisemitism, according to one government official. The UK government is also examining potential changes to terrorism legislation, The Sunday Telegraph reported.

Published in Dawn, October 30th, 2023
Police shoot at unarmed, veiled woman in Paris

AFP Published November 1, 2023 
A French police officer wears a jacket, identifying herself as “Police identite judiciaire “), while walking from a metro station after a woman making threats on an RER train was shot and wounded by police, in Paris on October 31, 2023. — AFP


PARIS: French police on Tuesday shot and seriously wounded an unarmed woman at a train station in Paris during morning rush hour.


The incident came with the country on its maximum alert for potential attacks but with the police also under scrutiny over recent fatal shootings of suspects.

Witnesses said the 38-year-old woman, who was wearing a hijab, recited “Allahu akbar” and said “you will all die”, a police source said, adding that “police fired because they feared for their safety”.

After passengers on a suburban train travelling from the eastern suburbs to Paris alerted police, agents managed to “isolate” the woman at the Bibliotheque Francois Mitterrand station on the capital’s south bank which was evacuated, the source said.

Officers fired eight rounds at the woman, causing serious injury

They ordered her to sit on the ground and stop moving, Paris police chief Laurent Nunez told reporters. But instead, he said, she moved towards them and ignored an order to show her hands.

Eight shots fired

Two police officers then fired eight rounds at the woman, inflicting a life-threatening injury to her abdomen, the prosecutor’s office said. It had earlier said that one officer had fired only one shot. No explosives or other arms were found on the woman who was taken to hospital, the police source said.

Police have launched two investigations, prosecutors said. One will probe the woman’s actions, while another is to elucidate whether the police’s firearm use was justified.

Government spokesman Olivier Veran said that there had been “at least three” calls from passengers to rail operator SNCF, which in turn alerted police.

“Police, evaluating the situation to be dangerous, opened fire,” he told reporters.

Footage from the officers’ bodycams and from CCTV at the station would help establish the facts of the case precisely, he said.

Nunez said the woman, a French national, had in July 2021 been arrested by a military patrol, deployed to beef up security amid attack fears. She was detained briefly, and then committed to psychiatric care, he said.

She was never on a radicalisation watchlist, Nunez said, contrary to what two police sources had claimed earlier. France’s anti-terror unit is not part of the ongoing investigation of the incident, prosecutors said.

France on edge


The Bibliotheque Francois Mitterrand station, named after France’s national library which dominates the area, was still closed to the public in the early afternoon.

France has been under “attack alert” since Oct 13, when a teacher in the northern city of Arras was stabbed to death by a former pupil.

Many in France, which has large Muslim and Jewish populations, also fear repercussions from Israeli bombardment of Gaza.

Bomb alerts have led to the evacuation of dozens of airports, train stations and tourist sites — including the Versailles palace — in recent weeks. On Monday, Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin said that there had been 819 anti-Semitic acts in France since Oct 7, and 414 connected arrests.

Published in Dawn, November 1st, 2023

A racist liberalism

Dr Niaz Murtaza
Published October 31, 2023 


THE post-1945 liberal world order based on human rights and democracy is unique in history given its wide coverage of key issues and global acceptance. Many philosophies had earlier given similar ideas but had left out key issues and groups, such as women and slaves, or lacked global acceptance.

The adoption of this order in the UN conventions with its near-global membership make it the first globally dominant liberal order even if not all states accept all UN tenets. Even autocratic states are judged against, and have to defer partially to, them. It is intellectually simple. Unlike copious metaphysical edicts, all its detailed clauses can be derived from two moral tenets: don’t harm anyone and help those in need. Given these two, a secular person like me doesn’t need even a third one, let alone numerous tenets, to guide my life. Clearly, this order emerged, at least immediately, from the West though it absorbed the earlier ideas of other cultures.

This order had the potential to give a just world after 1945. But it has slowly lost its appeal. Illiberal ideologies such as fundamentalism and populism are now firing the imagination globally given its failure to fulfil its promise. While the acts of autocratic states have undercut it too, a bigger cause has been its hypocritical and racist use by its Western author states such as the US. On issue after issue, they have conjured up excuses for why these tenets can’t be applied when white Western states fight other races — on immigration, trade, global governance or in actual wars.

High racist walls are being erected around Fortresses Europe and US to exclude coloured immigrants, both documented and undocumented, on the openly racist pretext of protecting racial dominance and cultures. The logic is often couched in terms of economic burden, though studies show that immigrants of all status boost economic growth.

High racist walls are being erected in Europe and the US.


The plan to have rules-based global trade via the WTO remains unfulfilled. Western states have exacted concessions from weak southern states on issues beneficial to them such as foreign investment and intellectual rights but refuse to lower barriers in areas critical for southern ones like agriculture. Western states have stubbornly refused to democratise the IMF, World Bank and the UN. The US has shamelessly aided megalomaniac autocrats in many southern states despite the abuses its allies were inflicting locally. Even within Western states, coloured people are often treated as second-class citizens.

But this racist liberalism has unleashed its powers most destructively in wars pitting Western powers against hapless southern peoples, as in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine. Elaborate UN, and their own, laws on protecting civilians are tossed into the trash bin as the US and its Western allies pursue their military interests. The aim of eradicating terrorism has been used as free licence to inflict grievous harm on southern civilians without remorse.

Nowhere is this done more viciously now than by Israel in Gaza. We are told ad nauseam that Israel has the right to defend itself even though it’s an occupier. A rational view on this right would cover Israel beefing up its air, land and sea border security, eliminating attackers from its land and strengthening its intelligence against future attacks. These steps alone can pre-empt a similar Hamas attack, which too was wrong in targeting Israeli civilians. But only a highly racist view would include under this right indiscriminate bombing of a dense civilian area to destroy Hamas when it also kills thousands of Gaza women, kids and elderly.

The Israeli attacks are more about revenge and repairing bruised egos. Gazans are being treated like sheep locked in a small pen, not allowed to leave while being butchered brutally by a mass murderer. Yet racist Western liberal conscience remains unmoved by the sight of such ghastly suffering. Coloured lives matter less than white ones is the clear message from the West.

These actions of domestically democratic Western states globally mirror those of unaccountable autocrats. Liberalism, though, is not inherently racist, only so in the hands of Western elites who adopted liberalism as it aided capitalism to spread nationally. While capitalism exploits weaker classes in markets only, racism exploits weaker ethnicities in all facets of life. But the entire West is not complicit in this hypocrisy as the marches of hundreds of thousands in Western cities against Israel show. Resistance to Western racist liberalism exists among many whites too. The path forward is for southern progressives to link with Western ones to challenge racist liberalism and pursue a global liberalism.

The writer is a political economist with a PhD degree from the University of California, Berkeley.
murtazaniaz@yahoo.com
X (formerly Twitter): @NiazMurtaza2

Published in Dawn, October 31st, 2023
Desperate Israel erases 50 lives in Jabalia camp strike

A WHOLE FAMILY ISRAEL CLAIMS ARE TERRORISTS

Agencies Published November 1, 2023 
 Updated about 6 hours ago
Palestinian fighters offered stiff resista­nce to invading forces, but the relentless Israeli bombing of the besieged enclave claimed at least 50 lives in the Jabalia refugee camp.


• Hamas fighters offer stiff resistance as Tel Aviv’s forces push into north Gaza

• Palestinian death toll crosses 8,500

GAZA STRIP: Palestinian fighters offered stiff resista­nce to invading forces, but the relentless Israeli bombing of the besieged enclave claimed at least 50 lives in the Jabalia refugee camp, on Tuesday.

This takes the total number of those killed in Israel’s brutal bombing campaign to 8,525, including 3,542 children, according to the latest count by the health ministry.

The director of Gaza’s Indonesian Hospital told Al Jazeera that more than 50 Palestinians were killed and 150 wounded in Israeli air strikes on a densely populated area of the Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza.

AFP video footage from the scene showed at least 47 bodies recovered from the rubble after the strike hit several houses in the densely crowded camp.

Dozens of onlookers could be seen standing on the edges of two vast craters as people searched for survivors.

Ragheb Aqal, a Jabalia resident, described the strikes as “an earthquake” which shook the entire refugee camp.

“I went and saw the destruction… homes buried under the rubble and body parts and martyrs and wounded in huge numbers,” the 41-year-old told AFP.

“There’s no exaggerating when they talk about hund­reds of martyrs and wounded. People were still “transporting the remains of children, women and elderly”, he added.

The Jabalia camp is Gaza’s largest refugee camp. Accor­ding to the United Nations agency for Palestinian Refugees, the densely populated camp is situated in the north of the besieged enclave and covers an area of 1.4 square km. There are approximately 116,000 registered refugees in the camp.

The camp also housed three UN-run schools, which had subsequently been converted into shelters for hundreds of displaced families.

Fourth night of invasion

On Tuesday, Tel Aviv said it struck 300 targets during its fourth night of land operations in northern Gaza.

A man stands near a donkey-drawn cart loaded with sacks of garbage, collected from a street in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, on Tuesday.—AFP

Warplanes kept up a relentless barrage of strikes on Gaza, while Israel also claimed that its forces were engaging Hamas fighters inside their vast tunnel network beneath Gaza.

“Over the last day… IDF struck approximately 300 targets, including anti-tank missile and rocket launch posts below shafts, as well as military compounds inside underground tunnels belonging to Hamas,” an Israeli military statement said.

Footage from the Israeli military showed tanks and armoured bulldozers churning up bomb-scarred dirt tracks and troops going from building to building.

In addition, AFP images showed plumes of smoke rising above Gaza and Israeli helicopters raining down rockets on the northern Gaza Strip.

Meanwhile, Hamas said in a statement its fighters were engaging in fierce battles with Israeli ground forces, who were taking losses. “The occupation is pushing its soldiers into proud Gaza, which will always be the cemetery of invaders,” Hamas said.

Hamas has also released footage of battles within Gaza, including what it said was a military vehicle on fire.

The al-Qassam Brigades said fighters also clashed with Israeli forces invading Gaza’s south early on Tuesday, hitting four Israeli vehicles with missiles.

The fighters also fired at two Israeli tanks and bulldozers in northwest Gaza, the group said.

Hazem Qassem, a Hamas spokesman, denied that a Hamas commander had been in the area struck by Israel fighter jets in Jabaliya, according to The New York Times.

Hamas has told mediators it will release a number of foreign prisoners in the coming days, Abu Ubaida, the spokesman of the group’s armed wing, al-Qassam Brigades, said in a video on its Telegram account on Tuesday, Reuters reported.

He also said his group clashed with the Israeli army on three fronts and was able to “kill and injure a number of Israeli soldiers” as well as destroy 22 military vehicles. The unit’s navy also used an underwater missile called ‘Aasif’ for the first time in the conflict, Abu Ubaida said.

Abu Ubaida also denied that a prisoner freed by Israel had been in Hamas’ hands, saying a number of prisoners were being held by other groups and individuals in the Gaza Strip.

But even as Israel’s staunchest allies voiced concern about the humanitarian crisis in southern Gaza, the UNRWA said there was not nearly enough aid to meet the “unprecedented” needs.

Hisham Adwan, Gaza director of the Rafah crossing with Egypt where some aid has been allowed in, said 36 trucks had been waiting there since the previous day.

Published in Dawn, November 1st, 2023


Hamas said Israeli strike killed at least 50 in Jabalia refugee camp

Issued on: 01/11/2023
02:07
Video by: FRANCE 24

An Israeli air strike killed about 50 people in a refugee camp, according to Palestinian health officials. Israel said the attack killed a senior Hamas commander and other combatants. While many Arab states have condemned the strike as beyond proportional, the US has refrained from categorising the attack as a war crime, saying it is still analyzing the situation.


Israeli strike on Jabalia refugee camp draws criticism of indiscriminate bombings


Issued on: 01/11/2023 - 
06:12
Douglas Herbert on Israeli strike on Gaza refugee camp
FRANCE 24

Video by: Douglas HERBERT

The Hamas-run health ministry said at least 50 people were killed Tuesday in Israeli bombardment of the Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza. The Israeli attack represents the international community's worst fears of indiscriminate bombings and disproportionate response from Israeli forces, FRANCE 24's International Affairs Editor Douglas Herbert said.