Monday, November 13, 2023

Why can't women get better care for menopause or heart attacks? Jill Biden wants answers

Maureen Groppe, USA TODAY
Mon, November 13, 2023 

Washington − Women aren't getting the care they need when it comes to menopause, heart attacks and other health issues, according to the Biden administration. Now, first lady Jill Biden is giving the administration 45 days to amp up efforts to change that.

Officials said they’re trying to correct the fact that women have been understudied and underrepresented in health research, despite making up more than half the population.

“If you ask any woman in America about her health care, she probably has a story to tell. You know her. She's a woman who gets debilitating migraines but doesn't know why and can't find treatment options that work for her,” the first lady told reporters Monday. “She's the woman going through menopause, who visits with her doctor and leaves with more questions than answers.”

The new initiative announced Monday will be led by Dr. Carolyn M. Mazure, who recently joined Biden’s office from the Yale School of Medicine. At Yale, Mazure created an interdisciplinary research center on the health of women, which studies topics ranging from cardiovascular disease to cancers.

The effort will prioritize areas of research where additional investments could make a big difference, such as heart attacks in women and menopause.

A first step is coming up with specific actions the administration can take to improve research. Officials said they will identify those actions within 45 days.

First Lady Jill Biden tours the National Cancer Institute at the National Institute of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, on Oct. 25, 2023.

Gaps in women's health research


The National Institutes of Health already has an Office of Research on Women’s Health, created in 1990 because women were not being consistently included in NIH-support research.

Since then, the NIH says, it’s achieved significant progress. Policies were created to ensure women are included in research. Research into women’s health has increased. New programs were created to prepare researchers to study women’s health.

But information gaps are still too big, officials said.

“Doctors don't have the information they need, in particular to treat women in their 50’s, 60’s, 70’s and beyond,” said Maria Shriver, a former first lady of California who raised the issue with Biden earlier this year and joined her for Monday’s announcement. “And that's largely because doctors don't have the research data that can dictate their care.”

The initiative goes beyond the NIH by bringing in other federal agencies and partnering with philanthropies and research institutions.

What health conditions are more common in women?


Officials cited various examples of research gaps including:

Women make up two-thirds of the cases of Alzheimer’s but only 12% of NIH funding for Alzheimer’s and related dementias goes towards research focused on women.

Heart disease is the leading cause of death among women yet traditional testing used to diagnose a heart attack was developed based on men.

Researchers don’t know why women who never smoked are twice as likely to develop lung cancer than men who never smoked.

Women suffer from depression and anxiety at twice the rate as men.

Millions o women go through menopause each year, and yet, Biden said, “there's a stunning lack of information about how to manage and treat its symptoms, which can be debilitating.”

What is menopause?


Menopause is defined as the time that marks the end of your menstrual cycles. Most physicians will diagnose it once the individual has gone 12 months without a menstrual period.

Menopause often receives little attention during women’s visits with doctors, according to the health research organization KFF.

Just over one-third of women ages 40-64 surveyed by KFF last year said their health care provider ever talked to them about what to expect in menopause.

“They do not have the answers that they deserve,” Shriver said. “The bottom line is that we can't treat women or prevent them from becoming sick in the first place, if we have not invested in funding the necessary research.”
Is there treatment for menopause?

In the years and months leading up to menopause, known as perimenopause, some of the symptoms include irregular periods, hot flashes, sleep changes, weight gain, thinning of hair and dry skin among others.

According to the Mayo Clinic, while no treatment exists for menopause, most of the focus is working to alleviate symptoms that might become chronic. Some of these include hormone therapy, low-dose antidepressants and various medications to manage hot flashes.

Jill Biden will lead new initiative to boost federal government research into women's health

DARLENE SUPERVILLE
Mon, November 13, 2023 

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DR. JILL AND MELANIA
HOLE IN THE GLOVE

 President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden, walk to Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, Nov. 11, 2023. The White House says Jill Biden will be in charge of a new initiative to help the federal government spend more time and money on research into women's health issues. Women make up more than half the U.S. population but advocates say they remain understudied and underrepresented in health research. 
(AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File) 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration on Monday announced a White House initiative to improve how the federal government approaches and funds research into the health of women, who make up more than half of the U.S. population but remain understudied and underrepresented in health research.

That underrepresentation can lead to big gaps in research and potentially serious consequences for the health of women across the country, Biden administration officials and others told reporters during a White House conference call to announce the new effort.

The White House Initiative on Women's Health Research will be led by first lady Jill Biden and the White House Gender Policy Council.


President Biden said he's long been a believer in the “power of research” to help save lives and get high-quality health care to the people who need it. He was to sign paperwork Monday directing federal departments to get to work on the initiative.

“To achieve scientific breakthroughs and strengthen our ability to prevent, detect and treat diseases, we have to be bold," the president said in a written statement. He said the initiative will "drive innovation in women's health and close research gaps.”

Jill Biden said during the conference call that she met earlier this year with former California first lady and women's health advocate Maria Shriver, who “raised the need for an effort inside and outside government to close the research gaps in women's health that have persisted far too long.”

“When I brought this issue to my husband, Joe, a few months ago, he listened. And then he took action,” the first lady said. “That is what he does.”

Jill Biden has worked on women's health issues since the early 1990s, after several of her friends were diagnosed with breast cancer and she created a program in Delaware to teach high school girls about breast health care.

Shriver said she and other advocates of women's health have spent decades asking for equity in research but that the Democratic president and first lady “understand that we cannot answer the question of how to treat women medically if we do not have the answers that only come from research.”

Shriver said women make up two-thirds of those afflicted with Alzheimer's disease and multiple sclerosis, and represent more than three-fourths of those who are diagnosed with an auto-immune disease.

Women suffer from depression and anxiety at twice the levels of men, and women of color are two to three times more likely to die of pregnancy related complications than white women, she said. Millions of other women grapple daily with the side effects of menopause.

“The bottom line is that we can’t treat or prevent them from becoming sick if we have not infested in funding the necessary research," Shriver said on the call. “That changes today.”

Jennifer Klein, director of the White House Gender Policy Council, said the leaders of agencies important to women's health research will participate in the initiative, including those from the Departments of Health and Human Services, Veterans Affairs, Defense and the National Institutes of Health, among others.

Biden's memorandum will direct members to report back within 45 days with “concrete recommendations" to improve the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of women's health issues. It also asks them to set “priority areas of focus,” such as research ranging from heart attacks in women to menopause, where additional investments could be “transformative.”

The president also wants collaboration with the scientific, private sector and philanthropic communities.

Carolyn Mazure will chair the research effort. Mazure joined the first lady's office from the Yale School of Medicine, where she created its Women's Health Research Center.


White House establishing initiative focused on women’s health research

Alex Gangitano
Mon, November 13, 2023 


The White House announced Monday it is establishing an initiative focused on women’s health research, which will be led by first lady Jill Biden.

To launch the initiative, which will also be led by the White House Gender Policy Council, President Biden will direct multiple agencies to deliver recommendations to advance women’s health research within 45 days.

The initiative will then find areas for additional investments, like in research around heart attacks in women and menopause, according to the White House, which also plans to engage the private sector and philanthropic leaders.

The chair of the initiative will be Carolyn Mazure, a professor in women’s health research, psychiatry, and psychology at Yale School of Medicine. She created Women’s Health Research at Yale center and worked at the National Institutes of Health.

In a call with reporters, the first lady said Maria Shriver talked to her about the need for more research into women’s health, which turned into the creation of the initiative.

“Maria, thank you for bringing this urgent issue to our attention,” Jill Biden said, adding that Shriver will advise her and the philanthropic communities involved in the initiative.

“It’s a really big deal what you just announced,” Shriver said on the call with reporters.

Biden said in a statement the initiative aims to identify “bold solutions” to answer questions for women and their health.

“Every woman I know has a story about leaving her doctor’s office with more questions than answers. Not because our doctors are withholding information, but because there’s just not enough research yet on how to best manage and treat even common women’s health conditions. In 2023, that is unacceptable,” she said.

She specifically pointed to a “stunning lack of information” about how to manage menopause. When asked about research for abortion, senior administration officials said maternal and reproductive health are essential to women’s health but did not specifically outline abortion access as a key focus of the initiative.

“I have always believed in the power of research to save lives and to ensure that Americans get the high-quality health care they need. To achieve scientific breakthroughs and strengthen our ability to prevent, detect, and treat diseases, we have to be bold,” Biden said in a statement.

The battle over right to repair is a fight over your car's data

Leah Chan Grinvald, University of Nevada, Las Vegas 
Ofer Tur-Sinai, Ono Academic College
Mon, November 13, 2023 
THE CONVERSATION 

Independent repair shops are fighting for access to vehicles' increasingly sophisticated data. Matthew P/Flickr

Cars are no longer just a means of transportation. They have become rolling hubs of data communication. Modern vehicles regularly transmit information wirelessly to their manufacturers.

However, as cars grow “smarter,” the right to repair them is under siege.

As legal scholars, we find that the question of whether you and your local mechanic can tap into your car’s data to diagnose and repair spans issues of property rights, trade secrets, cybersecurity, data privacy and consumer rights. Policymakers are forced to navigate this complex legal landscape and ideally are aiming for a balanced approach that upholds the right to repair, while also ensuring the safety and privacy of consumers.

Understanding telematics and right to repair

Until recently, repairing a car involved connecting to its standard on-board diagnostics port to retrieve diagnostic data. The ability for independent repair shops – not just those authorized by the manufacturer – to access this information was protected by a state law in Massachusetts, approved by voters on Nov. 6, 2012, and by a nationwide memorandum of understanding between major car manufacturers and the repair industry signed on Jan. 15, 2014.

However, with the rise of telematics systems, which combine computing with telecommunications, these dynamics are shifting. Unlike the standardized onboard diagnostics ports, telematics systems vary across car manufacturers. These systems are often protected by digital locks, and circumventing these locks could be considered a violation of copyright law. The telematics systems also encrypt the diagnostic data before transmitting it to the manufacturer.

This reduces the accessibility of telematics information, potentially locking out independent repair shops and jeopardizing consumer choice – a lack of choice that can lead to increased costs for consumers.

Also, these telematics systems fall outside the scope of the original Massachusetts legislation and the nationwide memorandum of understanding. Recognizing the pivotal role diagnostic data plays in vehicle maintenance and repair, 75% of Massachusetts voters approved a ballot initiative on Nov. 3, 2020, to amend the state’s repair legislation. The amendment aims to ensure that the switch to telematics does not curtail an effective right to repair vehicles.

Specifically, the new law requires manufacturers selling telematics-equipped vehicles from the 2022 model year onward to provide car owners and their chosen repair shops access to the vehicle’s mechanical data through an interoperable, standardized and open-access telematics platform. Access should also encompass the ability to relay commands to components of the vehicle, if necessary, for maintenance, diagnostics and repair. Voters in Maine overwhelmingly approved a similar measure on Nov. 7, 2023.

However, the Massachusetts law was the subject of a lawsuit in federal court shortly after voters approved it in 2020, and it was suspended until June 1, 2023.


Repairing cars today is as much about data as it is nuts and bolts, but increasingly, carmakers are locking that data away from car owners and independent repair shops. Nenad Stojkovic/Flickr, CC BY

Safety and privacy concerns

While the amendment makes significant strides toward creating a level playing field in vehicle maintenance and repair, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and car manufacturers have raised concerns about the legislation.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s main concern revolves around cybersecurity vulnerabilities with potential ramifications for vehicle safety, particularly the amendment’s provision for two-way access. A hacker could potentially take control of a car’s critical systems like accelerator, brakes and steering. Consequently, the agency recommended that car manufacturers not adhere to the law.

A related argument is that Massachusetts law is preempted by federal law. This forms the basis of a lawsuit filed in November 2020 by the Alliance for Automotive Innovation against Massachusetts’ attorney general.

The manufacturers assert that abiding by the state law would inevitably put them in breach of federal statutes and regulations, such as the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act. This lawsuit was pending as of press time, although the Massachusetts attorney general declared the law effective as of June 1, 2023.

Critics also emphasize the privacy concerns associated with open access to telematics systems. Granting third-party access could expose personal details, especially real-time location data. Advocacy groups warn that this information might be used as a tracking tool by potential abusers and others aiming to exploit people.

Recent developments

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Massachusetts’ attorney general appear to have reached a consensus on alterations to the law, and the administration has dropped its recommendation that manufacturers disregard the law.

The primary adjustment would mean a telematics platform would be in compliance with the right to repair law if it were accessible within close proximity to the vehicle – for example, via Bluetooth. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration confirmed that this would be safer and align with federal law.

However, repair advocates have criticized this change as unduly restrictive. They argue that it gives authorized car dealers an unfair advantage over independent repair shops because the manufacturers allow the dealers to access the data remotely.

A new federal bill, the REPAIR Act, was recently introduced in the House, seeking to require vehicle manufacturers to provide access to in-vehicle diagnostic data, including telematics. This bill’s first hearing occurred on Sept. 27, 2023, and the bill passed out of subcommittee on Nov. 2.

Who owns your car’s data?

One issue left unresolved by the legislation is the ownership of vehicle data. A vehicle generates all sorts of data as it operates, including location, diagnostic, driving behavior, and even usage patterns of in-car systems – for example, which apps you use and for how long.

In recent years, the question of data ownership has gained prominence. In 2015, Congress legislated that the data stored in event data recorders belongs to the vehicle owner. This was a significant step in acknowledging the vehicle owner’s right over specific datasets. However, the broader issue of data ownership in today’s connected cars remains unresolved.

Whether data should be subject to property rights is a matter of debate. If deemed property, it seems logical to award these rights to the vehicle owner because the vehicle creates the data while used by the owner. However, through contractual terms and digital locks, manufacturers effectively secure control over the data.

The question of ownership aside, the crux of the matter for right to repair is guaranteed access for vehicle owners to their vehicles’ data.

A way forward

While concerns surrounding the Massachusetts legislation have merit, we believe they should not overshadow the need to preserve a competitive space in the auto repair sector and preserve the right to repair. This matters not only for safeguarding consumers’ autonomy and ensuring competitive pricing, but also for minimizing environmental waste from prematurely discarded vehicles and parts.

The hope is that policymakers and the industry can strike a balance: upholding the right to repair without compromising safety and privacy. One possibility is developing tools that segregate sensitive personal information from mechanical data.

Ultimately, a successful implementation of the new law in Massachusetts may pave the way for a renewed nationwide memorandum of understanding, capturing the essence of the original memorandum of understanding and preserving the right to repair cars in the face of rapidly advancing technologies.

This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and analysis to help you make sense of our complex world.

It was written by: Leah Chan GrinvaldUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas and Ofer Tur-SinaiOno Academic College.

Read more:

Ethiopia's Abiy takes a page from Russia, China in asserting the right to restore historical claim to strategic waters


Mahad Darar, Colorado State University
Mon, November 13, 2023
THE CONVERSATION

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed arrives in Beijing on Oct. 16, 2023. 

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed claimed on Oct. 13, 2023, that his landlocked country has a right to demand maritime access to a Red Sea port from its neighbors in the Horn of Africa – first through diplomatic means, he said, or by force if necessary.

In confrontational language, Abiy all but threatened conflict should Ethiopia be denied what he called the country’s intrinsic right to waterway expansion. He has since sought to soften his comments, but the remarks have nonetheless rattled the region.

Such a move would help Ethiopia to reassert itself as the dominant player in the Horn of Africa, located in East Africa along a strategic maritime trade route. Ethiopia has been landlocked since coastal Eritrea broke away and became independent in 1993 after a decadeslong war.


Abiy, a Nobel Peace Prize winner once acclaimed for promoting peace and international cooperation but later accused of being a belligerent warmaker, has alarmed countries in the region with his recent remarks. Abiy invoked a 19th-century Abyssinian warrior, Ras Alula Aba Nega, who had proclaimed the Red Sea as Ethiopia’s “natural boundary.” The concern is in attempting to assert itself, Ethiopia might risk reigniting a conflict.

Abiy’s comments come at a time when Ethiopia is in a period of soul-searching, caught between the paths of democracy and authoritarianism. They also signal a potential willingness by Abiy to break with international norms amid a growing shift away from once welcoming powers in the West.

His rhetoric echoes ambitious geopolitical powers like China and Russia, both of which have shown a willingness to use military force to dominate strategic waters – as evidenced by Russia’s invasion of Crimea in 2014 and China’s military posturing in the South China Sea.

They also come at a time when Abiy struggles to unite Ethiopia behind a single ideological nationalism and is unable to contain insurgencies by two ethnic groups – the Amhara paramilitary organization Fano and the Oromo Liberation Army – both of whom hold historical grievances against the Ethiopian government and strive for greater political self-determination.

Africa’s ties with the major powers


Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, Indonesian President Joko Widodo and Kazakhstan President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev head to a group photo session at the third Belt and Road forum on Oct. 18, 2023, in Beijing.    Photo by Suo Takekuma-Pool/Getty Images

As a researcher in international relations and conflict resolution, I have watched as African countries have been courted by international powers, partly because of sea trade routes. Africa’s sea trade routes are of strategic and economic importance for major powers like China and the U.S. They provide international shipping and trade, and access to critical resources. They also are key for maintaining geopolitical influence, as evidenced by military outposts such as the U.S. base in Djibouti and Russian attempts to establish a naval presence in the Red Sea.

Abiy’s new diplomatic alliances were on display on Oct. 18, 2023, during his visit to China for a forum on the Belt and Road Initiative – an infrastructure project that has seen China grow its influence across the Global South. During the meeting, Abiy was seen walking in step with Presidents Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin. Photos from the conference seemingly conveyed Abiy’s alignment with those leaders and renewed Washington’s long-standing concerns over its weakening ties to Ethiopia.

Such concerns have been in the air since the outbreak of Ethiopia’s Tigray war in late 2020. The conflict led to President Joe Biden’s Executive Order 14046, imposing sanctions on certain persons in the Ethiopian government over documented human-rights abuses, and subsequent economic and arms embargoes, effectively isolating Ethiopia from its traditional Western allies.

In response, Ethiopia turned toward China and Iran, procuring drones that eventually tipped the balance in the Tigray conflict. The Ethiopian government’s rhetoric has since become increasingly Eastern-focused, distancing itself from the West.

This shift culminated in Ethiopia’s accession alongside five other states, including Iran, to the BRICS group, composed of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – a move that offers Ethiopia additional avenues to circumvent future U.S. sanctions.

Domestic turmoil

In addition to emulating Russia and China, the timing and riskiness of Abiy’s maritime motivations warrant scrutiny, especially given Ethiopia’s ongoing internal strife.

I believe that a motivating factor for the maritime claim is Abiy seeking to galvanize the people of Africa’s second most populous country through the creation of a potent nationalist narrative. This comes in the wake of his unsuccessful “Medemer” campaign, which tried but failed to create a single unifying ideology for Ethiopians to rally behind. Medemer, which means “togetherness,” was coined by Abiy when he took power in 2018 in hopes to unite and galvanize an Ethiopia divided along ethnic lines for the past 30 years.

In addition to the insurrection threat, Ethiopia is beset by political violencehunger and poverty, and worsening religious tensions, problems that Abiy may want to divert attention from.

What Abiy risks

Abiy’s bold rhetoric may backfire in several ways, both domestically and internationally.

Given the heightened state of regional alert following Abiy’s comments, his approach could easily lead to escalated tensions or even armed conflict with neighboring countries. There are already reports of Eritrea being on high alert amid Ethiopia’s amassing troops between its border and Eritrea.

Abiy’s attempt to distract from internal discord may inadvertently generate new crises for Ethiopia’s already stretched military and recovering economy, and thereby jeopardize Ethiopia’s already strained economic and security capabilities.

In addition, Abiy’s attempts to emulate global powers like China and Russia and impose its will through force carries its own risks. China and Russia have the military might to enforce their geopolitical ambitions, a luxury that Ethiopia does not have.

And it is unlikely that China will extend the same level of support to Ethiopia as it did to Russia during its invasion of Ukraine. Unlike with Russia, Beijing doesn’t rely on Ethiopia for access to raw materials it needs. Similarly, Russia is not expected to supply arms to Ethiopia while it is seeking to replenish its own arsenal from North Korea to continue its fight in Ukraine.

As such, trying to adopt a similar assertive maritime stance in a region already fraught with tensions could prove disastrous for Ethiopia – plunging the country and its neighbors into extended turmoil.

This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and analysis to help you make sense of our complex world.

It was written by: Mahad DararColorado State University.

Read more:


UN flags lowered for staff killed in Gaza

AFP
Mon, 13 November 2023

The UN agency for supporting Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) said 101 of its employees had died in the Gaza Strip since the war erupted (Lillian SUWANRUMPHA)

Flags flew at half-mast at UN facilities across the globe Monday including at the body's New York headquarters, as staff stood in silent tribute to the more than 100 colleagues killed in Gaza during the Israel-Hamas war.

The blue and white United Nations flag was lowered at 9:30 am local time at offices in Bangkok, Tokyo and Beijing, with other UN venues following suit.

Secretary-General Antonio Guterres led UN personnel in observing a minute of silence at UN headquarters when the clock struck 9:30 am in New York.

"Since the start of this conflict, more than 100 UNRWA staff have lost their lives," he posted on X, formerly Twitter, along with a photograph of senior UN officials somberly standing in silence.

"They will never be forgotten."

The UN agency for supporting Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) said Monday that 102 of its employees had died and 27 had been injured in the Gaza Strip since the war erupted just over a month ago -- the highest number of UN aid workers killed in a conflict in the body's history, according to the agency.

"UNRWA staff in Gaza appreciate the UN lowering the flag around the world," the agency director in the Gaza Strip, Tom White, said in a statement.

"In Gaza however, we have to keep the UN flag flying high as a sign that we are still standing and serving the people of Gaza."

Israel has been relentlessly bombarding the Gaza Strip since Hamas fighters carried out an October 7 attack on southern Israeli communities, the deadliest in the country's history.

About 1,200 people, mostly civilians, were killed in the Hamas attacks and around 240 people taken hostage, according to Israeli officials.

More than 11,000 people, most of them civilians and many of them children, have been killed in Gaza in retaliatory strikes by Israel, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.

- 'Protect civilians' -

In the lobby of UN headquarters, the names of the staffers killed in Gaza were read out as dozens of colleagues listened. Some carried white sheets with the words "Stop the fighting" and "Protect civilians."

In New York and Geneva, the agency's second-largest headquarters, none of the flags of the 193 member countries were hoisted.

"Their memory and the impact they made will forever remain," the head of the UN's World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said.

"Their unwavering dedication to peace, justice, and the well-being of others serves as a guiding light and a reminder of the importance of our shared mission."

Events were also held in Kathmandu and Kabul, where the UN Secretary-General's Special Representative for Afghanistan Roza Otunbayeva led about 250 people in observing the minute's silence.

UNRWA, which has 13,000 staff working throughout Gaza, says it is sheltering some 780,000 people in more than 150 facilities in the territory.

On Sunday, a day before the worldwide tribute to fallen staff, the United Nations reported "a significant number of deaths and injuries" in strikes on one of its facilities in Gaza that was housing internally displaced persons.

At least 66 people sheltering in UNWRA facilities have been killed since October 7, according to the mission, with more than 560 people injured.

burs-nl/abd-mlm/bgs/caw/dw

US rights group sues Biden for alleged ‘failure to prevent genocide’ in Gaza


Chris McGreal
Mon, 13 November 2023 


A New York civil liberties group is suing Joe Biden for allegedly failing in his duty under international and US laws to prevent Israel committing genocide in Gaza.

The Center for Constitutional Rights’ (CCR) complaint on behalf of several Palestinian groups and individuals alleges that Israel’s actions, including “mass killings”, the targeting of civilian infrastructure and forced expulsions, amount to genocide. The CCR said that the 1948 international convention against genocide requires the US and other countries to use their power and influence to stop the killing.

“As Israel’s closest ally and strongest supporter, being its biggest provider of military assistance by a large margin and with Israel being the largest cumulative recipient of US foreign assistance since World War II, the United States has the means available to have a deterrent effect on Israeli officials now pursuing genocidal acts against the Palestinian people in Gaza,” the complaint argued.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in California, asks the court to bar the US from providing weapons, money and diplomatic support to Israel. It also seeks a declaration that the president, the secretary of state, Antony Blinken, and the defence secretary, Lloyd Austin, are required “to take all measures within their power to prevent Israel’s commission of genocidal acts against the Palestinian people of Gaza”. These include pressing Israel to end the bombing of Gaza, to lift its siege of the territory and to prevent the forcible expulsion of Palestinians.

The CCR, which won a landmark case in the US supreme court in 2004 establishing the rights of prisoners held by the US military at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp, said that the Hamas cross-border attack on 7 October, in which about 1,200 people were killed and more than 200 abducted, does not provide a legal justification for the scale of Israel’s assault on Gaza, which has killed more than 11,000 Palestinians, including 4,600 children, and displaced 1.5 million people.

The lawsuit comes as the international criminal court investigates Israel and Hamas for alleged war crimes. But legal scholars say that genocide is a harder crime to prove and question whether the president can be forced to find that Israel is committing genocide and is therefore under an obligation to act.

President Bill Clinton refused to recognise the systematic murder of 800,000 Tutsis in Rwanda in 1994 as genocide in order to sidestep the legal obligation to intervene. He later apologised to the Rwandan people.

The 1948 convention, written in the wake of the Holocaust, defines genocide as “the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”. The convention’s first article requires signatories, which include the US, “to prevent and to punish” genocide.

The lawsuit lists a series of actions taken by Israel that the CCR said amount to genocide against the Palestinian people. These include the scale of civilian deaths, systemic collective punishment and “deprivation of the most basic necessities of life”.

The group said that the Israeli order for more than 1 million Palestinians to leave their homes in Gaza, alongside the language used by Israeli political and military leaders, amounted to a call to commit genocide. The lawsuit noted prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s quoting of Deuteronomy: “You must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible, and we do remember, and we are fighting.”

The CCR’s complaint said: “In the Bible, God commands the extermination of Amalekite men, women, children, and animals, and this commandment is described by scholars as ‘divinely mandated genocide’.”

The lawsuit said senior Israeli officers stated “the intention to destroy Palestinian life in Gaza” including Ma Gen Ghassan Alian, who said: “Human animals must be treated as such. There will be no electricity and no water [in Gaza], there will only be destruction. You wanted hell, you will get hell.”

The CCR quoted an international court of justice ruling that there is an obligation by states to prevent genocide by employing “all means reasonably available to them”.

“Under international law, the United States has a duty to take all measures available to it to prevent genocide,” the lawsuit said.

“Yet, defendants repeatedly refused to use their obvious and considerable leverage to set conditions or place limits on Israel’s massive bombing and total siege of Gaza. They have done so despite escalating evidence of Israeli policies directed at inflicting mass harm to the Palestinian population in Gaza, including the creation of conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction through a total siege, and even in the face of mounting deaths including of thousands of children.”

The CCR said that the US recently affirmed its understanding and agreement with obligations to prevent and punish genocide.

“When it intervened in Ukraine’s case against Russia at the international court of justice, the United States explicitly acknowledged, as that court had previously held, that a state’s ‘obligation to prevent, and the corresponding duty to act, arise at the instant that the state learns of, or should normally have learned of, the existence of a serious risk that genocide will be committed’,” the lawsuit said.

 Pro-Palestinian protestors gather near Biden’s Delaware home


Tara Suter
Sat, November 11, 2023 



(The Hill) — Pro-Palestinian protestors gathered near President Biden’s Delaware home to demand a cease-fire Saturday.

“Delawareans from all over the state (and allies from out-of-state) are rallying to march toward @JoeBiden’s house in Wilmington & demand a #CeasefireForGazaNOW! Join us! #FreePalestine,” reads a post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, by the Delaware chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America.

The post also featured a video of a crowd chanting, “Biden, Biden, you can’t hide! We charge you with genocide!”

The president has backed Israel strongly throughout its conflict with the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which started early last month by way of a surprise attack by the militant group on Israel.

“We’re going to continue to affirm that Israel has the right, responsibility to defend its citizens from terror and it needs to do so in a manner that is consistent with international and humanitarian law and prioritizes the protection of citizens,” Biden said earlier this month.

Recently, the White House, Biden and other U.S. officials began a push for a “pause” but have not supported a cease-fire. The pause had been described by the White House as a temporary, “localized” break in fighting to allow aid into Gaza or civilians to get out.

The White House said Thursday that Israel agreed to stop operations in Gaza for at least four hours at different times each day for civilians to evacuate from the area of conflict. Palestinians will be able to head from the northern part of Gaza to the southern part. Additionally, a second safe corridor will be established.

“We understand that Israel will begin to implement four hour pauses in areas of northern Gaza each day, with an announcement to be made three hours beforehand,” National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby said in a briefing with reporters.