Sunday, January 21, 2024

Panama Hits Activists With Terrorism  Charges Over Successful Anti-Mining Protests

Activists in Panama defeated a mining project. Now the state is criminalizing them.
PublishedJanuary 19, 2024
Protesters march in the Chiriquí mountain town of Boquete in Panama.
MICHAEL FOX

Damaris Sanchez is a soft-spoken environmentalist from the hills of Western Panama. She lives in an area called Cerro Punta in the Tierras Altas, or Highlands, of the state of Chiriquí. She was born and raised on the flanks of Panama’s only volcano. Her family has farmed here for generations. She’s also the coordinator of Panama’s National Network in Defense of Water.

“My family has been closely linked to the Barú Volcano National Park since I was little,” she told Truthout. “We had a farm there at that time, when it wasn’t yet a park. My father started working in the area and he still tells the stories of how they developed the farms here in the region.”

Sanchez is 53. Dark hair, neatly pulled back. Glasses. Grey sweatshirt. She speaks clearly and passionately about the issues she cares for: the local community. The land. The water. The environment.

Get our free emails

Email*









“The children of my family — my generation — have had to look at the other side of caring for the land, and tried to contribute to protecting the environment,” she said.

Sanchez was a vocal figure in the anti-mining protests that shut down portions of Panama late last year, and forced the country to rescind the contract for the largest open-pit copper mine in Central America in November.


New Book Captures Revolutionary Spirit of Latin American Liberation Movements
The book documents daily life on the margins of movements for social and economic justice in photographs and poetry.
By Matt Dineen , TRUTHOUTNovember 25, 2023


Now, she is being taken to court.

She is one of 21 people being accused of terrorism in Panama’s western state of Chiriquí and roughly 30 people around the country who are facing charges. The cases against the activists are part of what Panamanian social movement leaders are describing as an unprecedented wave of criminalizations, on the backs of widespread police repression during the country’s recent month-long protests.

“They are trying to tell people, OK, this time you won, but next time we are not going to even let you out on the street, because we are going to prosecute and criminalize anyone who does so,” said Sanchez.
The Protests

The protests kicked off on October 23, three days after Panama’s congress approved a new mining contract with the Canadian firm First Quantum Minerals. President Laurentino Cortizo signed it into law only hours later.

The government praised the new contract, saying it would create windfall profits for the state. Cortizo vowed to use the funds to shore up the social security system and improve pension benefits.

“The contract ensures a payment to the state of $395 million for 2022 and a minimum payment of $375 million a year, for the next 20 years,” Commerce Minister Federico Alfaro told a local news outlet at the time. “If you can compare this with what the state was receiving before, which was $35 million a year, it’s a substantial improvement to the past.”

First Quantum Minerals began operations on the Cobre Panama mine in 2019, and has extracted roughly 300,000 tons of copper a year ever since. The mine accounted for roughly 75 percent of Panama’s exports and 5 percent of the GDP.

But Panamanians did not care. They said the contract was a handout to a foreign company and an attack on Panamanian sovereignty. That’s a big issue in Panama, which fought for most of the 20th century to remove the United States from its control over Panama’s Canal Zone region.

Panamanians also said they feared for the mine’s impact on the country’s environment and water reserves, amid increasing drought.

“We are going to fight to the death for our environment, because without our environment, here in Panama, we are nothing,” 20-year-old student Yuleysi Vargas told Truthout. She joined thousands on the streets of Panama City.

Unions, students, teachers and Indigenous groups marched across the country. The country’s anti-mining movement “Panama Is Worth More Without Mining,” composed of more than 30 Panamanian social and environmental groups, led the way. They accused the government of handing over part of Panama to a foreign company. They promised to remain in the streets until the contact was cancelled. And they kept their word.

Protesters set up roadblocks across the country. They shut down major portions of the Pan-American Highway — the country’s main thoroughfare running east and west. The barricades blocked shipments of products and goods. In Panama City, vegetables and produce disappeared from shelves. In the states of Bocas del Toro and Chiriquí, fueling stations ran dry, and then propane. Grocery shelves emptied out. School classes were canceled, or went online
.
Protesters block the road in Boquete.MICHAEL FOX
MICHAEL FOX

Protesters in Damaris Sanchez’s area of Tierra Altas, Chiriquí, held strong. They refused to allow all but ambulances and emergency services through their highway roadblock for more than a month.

“What would it mean that if this transnational company were able to achieve all of these advantages and benefits from the state? There would be no way to stop another transnational company interested in the mining deposits in the Barú Volcano National Park or anywhere else in country,” said Sanchez. “We said, if we don’t stop this now, there will be no way in the future to stop any other interests in metal mining in Panama. That is why we took action.”

They finally lifted the road block after a landmark Supreme Court ruling on November 28 that declared the new mining contact unconstitutional.MICHAEL FOX
MICHAEL FOX


Businesses Hit Hard


Members of Panama’s business sector said the roadblocks cost the country $1.7 billion, in just the first four weeks of protests. Local restaurants, hotels and businesses have been hit hard.

“The situation is very difficult for us, Panamanians, as a result of the nationwide roadblocks,” small business owner Javier Antonio Pinzón told Truthout in mid-November, a few weeks into the protests. He owns a restaurant and hotel in the Chiriquí mountain town of Boquete. It was supposed to be the beginning of the high tourist season there, but due to the protests and road closures, there were only a handful of patrons each day. No hotel guests. No reservations.

“We aren’t in agreement with this open-pit mine, nor with this contract that was negotiated. But we don’t support these roadblocks,” he said. “At this moment, the province of Chiriquí is out of gas. Out of propane. Without any inputs for the agricultural sector. The losses for the agricultural sector are incalculable. And this is going to have enormous consequences for tourism, for example, because of the reputational harm that these protests are causing internationally.”

The Chamber of Commerce of Tierras Altas, Chiriquí, is the entity that has lodged the criminal complaint against Damaris Sanchez and the other 20 individuals in the state of Chiriquí.

“From our firm position in the defense of rights and the search for fair solutions, I call on all companies, businesses and entrepreneurs in Tierras Altas to join us in this crucial effort,” said Chamber of Commerce President Maru Gálvez. “Together, we can strengthen the rule of law and preserve order in our country, which is essential to the prosperity and stability of our communities and our economy.”

They accuse the activists of crimes against economic assets, damages, crimes against collective security, terrorism and unlawful association.
Protesters march past an empty gas station in Boquete.
MICHAEL FOX

Truthout reviewed a copy of the criminal complaint. In it, lawyers for the Tierras Altas Chamber of Commerce write, “In an organized manner, they conspired to disturb public peace and intimidate the Tierras Altas community through threats,” to force the government to revoke the contract with the mine.

Panamanian law experts say this crime of “unlawful association,” in particular, has historically been used by governments across the region in order to criminalize social protest.

Criminalizing Protest


“The criminalizations are efforts by the Panamanian state to try to punish the protesters,” said Celia Sanjur, a sociologist, journalist and longtime Panamanian human rights activist. “They are looking for ways to punish the population, to punish them and above all, to scare them so that they don’t do it again. But they won’t be successful. The people understand what they’re after.”

Sanjur says that, particularly in Chiriquí, business owners and the state want to “make a clear sign that protests like these road closures will not be tolerated. There will be punishment.”

“And that is why we need to send them all of our solidarity,” she said.

Groups have heeded that call. The Panama Is Worth More Without Mining movement has denounced the criminalizations and helped spread the word about the injustice of the cases. It is also supporting with the legal defense of some of its members who are accused.

Lilian Guevara is a member of the anti-mining movement in Panama and the executive director of the Panama Environmental Advocacy Center, a Panama City-based NGO that works on environmental issues across the country. She says the country has “not seen the selective criminalization of social leaders like this” since the dictatorships of Omar Torrijos and then Manuel Noriega in the 1980s.

“Now these people have criminal charges against them, accusations or complaints. And they are very prominent people with careers of social struggle, human rights defenders, environmental defenders. Teachers. They could not be further from terrorism and illicit criminal association,” she said.

This issue has been getting attention. In mid-December, a handful of Panamanian lawyers and law professors met with Panama’s Office of the Attorney General to express their concerns at the level of criminalization, among other issues. Prominent constitutional law professor, Miguel Antonio Bernal, says he left the meeting more worried than before.

“The reality is that we are faced with a group of officials, both in the judicial body and the public ministry, who enjoy an inexcusable ignorance in terms of what human rights are and their obligation as authorities and especially in the case of the Public Ministry, to respect and not to persecute,” Bernal told a local TV outlet. “We can’t continue living in a society where those who participate in demonstrations and protests are criminalized.”

Panama’s business sector blamed President Cortizo for allowing the protests and blockades to continue throughout the country and for not taking a heavier hand to remove them from the streets. But in and around Panama City, state forces cracked down hard against those on the streets.

A protester waves Panama’s flag as tear gas billows ahead.
PEDRO SILVA


Police Repression


More than a thousand people were arrested — some for vandalism — in just the first few weeks of protests.

“There was daily repression,” said Guevara, “especially against the tens of thousands of young people in the capital. At the University of Panama, the student movement was besieged without fail every day. Some communities in eastern Panama, such as Pacora, the community was besieged and attacked with tear gas bombs. The police response was disproportionate.”

Panama security forces watch a group of protesters.PEDRO SILVA
A protester stands before a police line.PEDRO SILVA

Numerous social media videos went viral during the first weeks of the anti-mining protests showing rounds of tear gas canisters being shot into crowds at rapid fire and police pushing protesters back with rubber bullets.

Aubrey Baxter is a photographer and an environmental activist who lost an eye after an officer fired at him multiple times at point-blank range with rubber bullets during one of the protests in October. He was not the only one shot in the head by a rubber bullet during the protests.

In video from moments after the attack, he’s sitting on the ground, his face and shirt covered in blood.

I met Baxter in a Panama City park in December. Today, he wears an eye patch. He’s had surgery, seen doctors and therapists. He’s still trying to deal with the reality of his new life with only one eye.

“I can try and put it into words. But it’s impossible. Feeling it is something else,” he said. “It’s a mutilation.”

Aubrey Baxter, pictured in Panama City park, lost an eye after an officer fired rubber bullets at point-blank range at him during a protest.MICHAEL FOX

Baxter says he feels an even deeper connection with the mine that the protesters helped to stop.

“Every time I see the graphic image of the open-pit hole in the ground,” he said, “I see myself, without my eye.”

The police force released a message saying they weren’t responsible for the impact that knocked out Baxter’s eye and instead blamed it on violent protesters. Baxter has lodged a criminal complaint against the force.

“We are searching for justice. So that this case does not go unpunished. So that other cases like mine do not go unpunished,” he said. “So that we create a precedent to respect people’s human rights.”

“I lost an eye. But the country has opened its eyes,” he said. “And I feel that in a way my case has helped to unite people in a sense of not allowing harm to each other.”

Four people were killed in the protests. Two were shot by an angry driver who wanted to pass through the roadblock. Another was run over at a roadblock along the Pan-American Highway in Chiriquí, the state where Damaris Sanchez and others carried out their roadblock.

Despite the resolution on the streets, and the Supreme Court decision declaring the mining contract unconstitutional, First Quantum Minerals and foreign companies involved in the mine plan to make Panama pay. First Quantum Minerals and two other foreign companies — a South Korean mining firm that had stake in the project and another Canadian firm, which had a precious metals streaming deal with the mine — have submitted notices to take Panama to arbitration proceedings over the cancelation of the mine.

Such arbitration threats are a major tool that mining firms up and down the hemisphere consistently use to keep countries in check and influence local policies and decision-making. These arbitration hearings could force the Panamanian state to fork over millions of dollars to these foreign companies in payment for supposed lost profits. But the arbitration is a process that can take years. It’s decided behind closed doors, outside of Panama and with no right to appeal from the Panamanian state.

“Today’s ‘trade’ agreements grant new rights to multinational corporations to sue governments before a panel of three corporate lawyers,” writes the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen about arbitration hearings proceedings like these. “These lawyers can award the corporations unlimited sums to be paid by taxpayers, including for the loss of expected future profits, on claims that a nation’s policy violates their rights.”

In other words, they’re very hard to fight. Anti-mining activists in Panama are trying to decide what can be done. At the same time, activists, like Sanchez, say they will do what is necessary to fight the accusations against them.

“Not only at the level of Panama, but throughout all of Latin America, transnational companies have a very powerful influence,” said Sanchez. “The mining issue here in Panama took a huge leap forward because no one expected that such a small country could achieve a victory of this type.”


MICHAEL FOX is a Latin America-based multimedia journalist and host of the podcast “Brazil on Fire.” He was previously editor of NACLA. He tweets at @mfox_us.






Frontline Fishers Force Early End to New Orleans Gas Conference

"We want our oystering back. We want our shrimp back. We want our dredges back. We want LNG to leave us alone," one participating fisherman said.



Frontline fishers and environmental activists protest the buildout of liquefied natural gas export infrastructure in Louisiana outside a meeting of Americas Energy Summit in New Orleans on January 19, 2023.
(Photo: Louisiana Bucket Brigade)
COMMON DREAMS
Jan 19, 2024

Frontline fishers and environmental justice advocates forced the meeting of the Americas Energy Summit in New Orleans to end two hours early on Friday, as they protested what the buildout of liquefied natural gas infrastructure is doing to Gulf Coast ecosystems and livelihoods.

Fishers and shrimpers from southwest Louisiana say that new LNG export terminals are destroying habitat for marine life while the tankers make it unsafe for them to take their boats out in the areas where fishing is still possible. The destruction is taking place in the port of Cameron, which once saw the biggest catch of any fishing area in the U.S.

"We want our oystering back. We want our shrimp back. We want our dredges back. We want LNG to leave us alone," Cameron fisherman Solomon Williams Jr. said in a statement. "With all the oil and all the stuff they're dumping in the water, it's just killing every oyster we can get. Makes it so we can't sell our shrimp."


The protest was part of the growing movement against LNG export infrastructure, which is both harming the health and environment of Gulf Coast residents and risks worsening the climate crisis: Just one of the more than 20 proposed new LNG terminals, Venture Global's Calcasieu Pass 2, would release 20 times the lifetime emissions of the controversial Willow oil drilling project in Alaska. Activists have also planned a sit-in at the Department of Energy in Washington, D.C., from February 6-8 to demand the agency stop approving new LNG export terminals.

The Americas Energy Summit is one of the largest international meetings of executives involved in the exporting of natural gas. More than 40 impacted fishers brought their boats to New Orleans to park them outside the Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, where the meeting was being held. After a march from Jackson Square, the fishers revved their engines to disrupt the meeting. One attendee said the disruption forced the meeting to conclude at 11 am ET, two hours earlier than scheduled.

"Wen you're here on the ground, seeing it with your own eyes and talking to the people... it feels like looking into the devil's eyes."

"They going to run us out of the channel and if they run us out of the channel then it's over," Phillip Dyson Sr., a fisherman who attended the protest with his children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, said in a statement. "We fight for them. We fight for my grandson. Been a fighter all my life. I ain't going to stop now. So long as I got breathe I'm going to fight for my kids. They are the future. Fishing industry been here hundreds of years and now they're trying to stop us. I don't think it's right."

The fishers were joined by other local and national climate advocates, including Sunrise New Orleans, Permian Gulf Coast Coalition, Habitat Recovery Project, the Vessel Project, For a Better Bayou, the Louisiana Bucket Brigade, and actress and activist Jane Fonda.

"I thought I understood. I read the articles, I read the science, I've seen the photographs. But when you're here on the ground, seeing it with your own eyes and talking to the people... it feels like looking into the devil's eyes," Fonda said at the protest. "I've talked to people who have lost what was theirs over generations and are losing their livelihoods, the fishing, the oystering, the shrimping…"

Fonda called on the Biden administration to take action: "If President [Joe] Biden declared a climate emergency he could take money from the Pentagon and he could reinstate the crude oil export [ban]. Once the export ends, the drilling will end. They're only drilling because they can export it."



The successful action came despite interference from police, who threatened to issue tickets and tow away the six boats the fishers had originally parked in front of the convention center. Some participants agreed to move their boats, but the group was able to park two boats in front of the center and persevere in their protest.

"We're standing in the fire down there. And these people over here, the decisions that they make, for which our fishermen are paying the price. That's bullshit," Travis Dardar, who organized the fishers' trip and founded the group Fishermen Involved in Sustaining our Heritage (FISH), said in a statement."The police got us blocked here, they got us blocked there. But know that the fishermen are here and we're still going to try and give them hell."
U$A

ACLU Cheers House Passage of the PRESS ACT


The bill protects journalists and their sources from government overreach and censorship.


WASHINGTON - Yesterday, the House of Representatives voted to pass HR 4250, the Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying Act (PRESS Act), which prevents the government from compelling journalists to reveal their sources and work product. The act also bars the government from spying on journalists’ phone records and search histories through third parties, like internet service providers, as a work-around.

The American Civil Liberties Union has championed this bill for years, and recently sent a letter to the House of Representatives urging it to vote yes on HR 4250. The ACLU cheers this initial victory for press freedoms, and urges the Senate to take up the bill promptly.

“The PRESS Act creates critical protections for the journalists who keep all of us informed,” said Jenna Leventoff, ACLU senior policy counsel. “The press is so vital to our democracy that protections for a free press were written into the First Amendment of the Constitution. By preventing the government from compelling the disclosure of sources, or spying on journalists as a work-around, this legislation will ensure that journalists across the country have the confidentiality they need to do their jobs.”

While the majority of states already have shield laws in place that protect journalists from compelled disclosure of their sources, the PRESS Act provides uniform protections to journalists across the country. The ACLU urges the Senate to protect our right to a free press and pass the PRESS Act.

Saturday, January 20, 2024

'This Is Not Self-Defense... This Is Ethnic Cleansing': Israel Blows Up Gaza University


"All the universities in Gaza have been damaged or destroyed," said one international relations expert.


The Israeli military used hundreds of mines to blow up Israa University in Gaza on January 17, 2024.
(Photo: Screengrab)
COMMON DREAMS
Jan 18, 2024

The Israel Defense Forces' detonation of more than 300 mines planted at Israa University in Gaza on Wednesday provided the latest evidence that Israel's objective in its bombardment of the enclave is not self-defense, rights advocates said.

"This is not self-defense," said Chris Hazzard, an Irish member of the United Kingdom's Parliament. "This is not counter-insurgency. This is ethnic-cleansing."

The International Middle East Media Center (IMEMC) called the destruction of Israa University Israel's latest attempt to carry out a "cultural genocide" along with the slaughter of at least 24,620 people in just over three months—people who Israeli officials have claimed are legitimate military targets despite the fact that roughly half of those killed have been children.

The wiping out of cultural landmarks was included in South Africa's International Court of Justice case accusing Israel of genocidal acts in Gaza last week, with the complaint noting that "Israel has damaged and destroyed numerous centers of Palestinian learning and culture," including libraries, one of the world's oldest Christian monasteries, and the Great Omari Mosque, where an ancient collection of manuscripts was kept before the building was destroyed in an airstrike last month.

"The crime of targeting and destroying archaeological sites should spur the world and UNESCO into action to preserve this great civilizational and cultural heritage," Gaza's Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities said after the mosque was bombed.

Now, international relations professor Nicola Perugini of the University of Edinburgh said, "all the universities in Gaza have been damaged or destroyed."




On its Facebook page, the university said the IDF had occupied the campus for about 70 days before planting 315 mines and detonating the institution's main building, its museum, a university hospital, and other buildings.

The IDF occupied Israa University, said administrators, "and used it as a military base for its mechanisms and a center for [the] snatching of isolated civilians in the areas of Rashid, Maghraqa, and Zahraa streets, and temporarily detained [them] to investigate with citizens before moving them."

Mitchell Plitnick, president of Rethinking Foreign Policy, said the fact that 315 mines were detonated meant that "by definition... it was not a legitimate military target."

"Israel would have to have full control to plant so many mines," said Plitnick. "This is a clear example of a war crime and destruction for the fun of it."

Eight universities in Gaza have now been targeted since the IDF began its bombardment on October 7, according to the IMEMC.

Birzeit University, in the occupied West Bank, condemned the destruction of the school and accused Israel of stealing 3,000 rare artifacts from Israa's museum.

"Birzeit University reaffirms the fact that this crime is part of the Israeli occupation's onslaught against the Palestinians," said the school on social media. "It's all a part of the Israeli occupation's goal to make Gaza uninhabitable; a continuation of the genocide being carried out in Gaza Strip."
Sanders: If Netanyahu Says No to Palestinian State, US Must Say No to Netanyahu

"There must be no more U.S. military aid to Israel to continue Netanyahu's war," the senator said.


Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) delivers a speech on the Senate floor on Thursday, 
September 10, 2020.
(Photo: Sen. Bernie Sanders/YouTube Screengrab)
COMMON DREAMS
Jan 20, 2024

Independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders said on Saturday that the U.S. must stop providing military aid to Israel for its war on Gaza now that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly stated his opposition to a Palestinian state.

Sanders' remarks came two days after Netanyahu said in a televised address that, in the future, Israel needed to have "security control of all territory west of the Jordan" and that he had told this to Israel's friends in the U.S., adding that "a prime minister of Israel has to be able to say no, even to the best of friends."

"Prime Minister Netanyahu is right," Sanders said in response. "We do need to be able to say NO to our friends."

"If Netanyahu continues down the path of military domination, he must do so alone. The United States cannot be complicit."

"He has made his position clear," Sanders continued. "He will never allow a Palestinian state, ever. He will continue his devastating war against innocent Palestinian men, women, and children. He will block the food, water, and medical supplies needed to prevent mass starvation and sickness. Now, we must make our position clear."



Sanders wrote that U.S. President Joe Biden must depart from his "unconditional support" for Israel.

"President Biden must now loudly and clearly say NO to the policies of Netanyahu's right-wing extremist government," Sanders said. "That is what a true friend of Israel must do in this moment."

He also called on Congress to take action.

"There must be no more U.S. military aid to Israel to continue Netanyahu's war," he said.

He also advocated for humanitarian aid to Gazans in need, a release of all hostages, and a "lasting peace" that includes a two-state solution.

"If Netanyahu continues down the path of military domination, he must do so alone," Sanders concluded. "The United States cannot be complicit."

Sanders' response to Netanyahu's remarks contrasted with Biden's, who insisted on Friday that a two-state solution was still possible while Netanyahu remained in office. Biden further told reporters that Netanyahu was not opposed to all two-state solutions and mentioned that some United Nations member states do not have militaries, according to Reuters.

When asked if he would consider putting conditions on aid to Israel given Netanyahu's remarks about a Palestinian state, Biden answered, "I think we'll be able to work something out... I think there's ways in which this could work."

Biden and Netanyahu spoke on the phone on Friday for the first time in almost a month, and a person familiar with the conversation toldCNN that Netanyahu told Biden his statement Thursday did not mean he opposed all potential forms of a Palestinian state. The person also said that Biden found the idea of a demilitarized Palestinian state "intriguing."

On Saturday, however, Netanyahu's office issued a statement saying: "In his conversation with President Biden, Prime Minister Netanyahu reiterated his policy that after Hamas is destroyed Israel must retain security control over Gaza to ensure that Gaza will no longer pose a threat to Israel, a requirement that contradicts the demand for Palestinian sovereignty."

Also on Saturday, Netanyahu issued a similar statement on social media.

"I will not compromise on full Israeli security control over the entire area west of Jordan—and this is contrary to a Palestinian state," Netanyahu wrote.

Journalist and former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan reshared Netanyahu's remarks on social media.



"The ongoing, public, deliberate humiliation of Biden at Netanyahu's hands continues," he wrote.


Peace Action Statement on last night’s 72-11 Senate vote to table Senator Sanders' resolution

WASHINGTON - Peace Action Executive Director Jon Rainwater issued the following statement after the Senate voted 72-11 to table Senator Sanders' resolution calling for a U.S. investigation into how U.S. arms are being used in Israel’s military campaign in Palestine.

“Anyone who cares deeply about human rights should be disappointed if not disgusted by the Senate’s vote tonight. This vote blocked a State Department investigation of how U.S. weapons are being used by Israel. Senator Sanders’ resolution should have been uncontroversial. It didn’t cut off a penny of aid. It simply asked that the U.S. find out how U.S. weapons are being used given the massive humanitarian catastrophe being caused by Israel’s war. Seventy-one senators stood up and said 'we don’t want to know.' They voted to keep their heads in the sand.

"Polls show that the majority of Americans want this brutal war to end. Congress is out of step with the voters and that’s not sustainable on such a high profile issue. We thank Senator Sanders and the ten senators who voted with him to start a needed Congressional debate over this war. That’s a critical first step in pushing Congress to do the job it is supposed to do: ensure that taxpayer funds are not being used in human rights violations. The pro-peace public must now continue the fight until this brutal war and the resulting killing, displacement, and dispossession of Palestinian civilians ends.”

Peace Action is the United States' largest peace and disarmament organization with over 100,000 members and nearly 100 chapters in 34 states, works to achieve the abolition of nuclear weapons, promote government spending priorities that support human needs and encourage real security through international cooperation and human rights.



Netanyahu Takes Palestinian State Off the Table, Vows Israeli Control From the Jordan River to the Sea

"So it's okay for Netanyahu to say 'from the river to the sea', but not for Palestinians?"



Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu holds a map of "The New Middle East" without Palestine during his September 22, 2023, address to the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
(Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
COMMON DREAMS
Jan 18, 2024

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday informed the United States that there will be no independent Palestinian state after the current war on Gaza is over, and that Israel will control Palestine "from the river to the sea."

"For 30 years I have been very consistent. This conflict is not about the lack of a Palestinian state, but the existence of a Jewish state," Netanyahu—who has previously boasted about thwarting the so-called "two-state solution" favored by Washington—said during a nationally televised press conference.

"From every area we evacuate we have received terrible terror against us. It happened in southern Lebanon, it happened in Gaza, and also in Judea and Samaria," he continued, the final part a reference to the illegally occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem.

"Therefore, I clarify that in any arrangement in the future the state of Israel needs security control over all territory west of the Jordan River," he stressed. "This is what happens when you have sovereignty."



"This truth I say to our American friends—and I also stopped the attempt to impose on us a reality that will jeopardize us—a prime minister of Israel has to be able to say no, even to the best of friends," the prime minister added. "To say no when you need to and to say yes when you can."


The "from the river to the sea" mantra—a claim to all of historic Palestine from the Jordan River in the east to the Mediterranean Sea in the west—is expressed in both the original charter of Netanyahu's right-wing Likud party and the aspirational chants of Palestinians and their supporters around the world.

"So it's okay for Netanyahu to say 'from the river to the sea', but not for Palestinians?" quipped journalist Richard Medhurst following the press conference.
"Gee, I wonder which of them has not just said it, but forced millions of people from their native homes for 75 years and just killed 24,000 people of them to achieve it."



Following Netanyahu's comments, U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said on Thursday that "there is no way to solve [the region's] long-term challenges to provide lasting security and there is no way to solve the short-term challenges of rebuilding Gaza and establishing governance in Gaza and providing security for Gaza without the establishment of a Palestinian state."

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres responded to Netanyahu's comments in a statement reiterating his stance that "the only way to stem the suffering" in the region is "an immediate humanitarian cease-fire in Gaza and a process that leads to sustained peace for Israelis and Palestinians, based on a two-state solution."

Unnamed sources have told reporters that U.S. frustration with Netanyahu's far-right government has been increasing along with the casualty count in Gaza—which Palestinian officials and international groups say is over 100,000, mostly innocent men, women, and children.

President Joe Biden has accused Israel of "indiscriminate bombing" of civilians in Gaza but continues to back Netanyahu's policy unconditionally and the U.S. has supplied Israel with billions of dollars in military aid and diplomatic support at the United Nations and beyond.



On Wednesday, Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid filed a no-confidence motion against Netanyahu's far-right government over its inability to secure the release of the 136 Israeli and other hostages still held by Palestinian militants in Gaza.

"This government cannot continue to exist," Lapid's Yesh Atid party said in a statement. "It is a failure that costs human lives and the future of the country."

Netanyahu has survived two previous no-confidence votes. He is also facing three criminal corruption cases, and opponents allege he is dragging out the war in an effort to evade justice.

Update: This piece has been updated to better reflect the exact wording of Netanyahu's statement, though the meaning has not changed.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Biden Admin Signals Arms Will Keep Flowing as Netanyahu Rejects Palestinian State

"I don't think we need to offer any kind of pressure" on the Israelis to accept a Palestinian state, said a spokesperson for the U.S. State Department.



U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken talks with spokesperson Matthew Miller and others after he departed from Manama for Tel Aviv on January 10, 2024.
(Photo: Evelyn Hockstein/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

COMMON DREAMS
Jan 19, 2024

A U.S. State Department spokesperson signaled Thursday that American weaponry will continue to flow to the Israeli military even after the nation's prime minister ruled out calls for a sovereign Palestinian state, openly defying the Biden administration's push for a two-state solution to the crisis.

"Our support for Israel remains ironclad," the State Department's Matthew Miller said during a press briefing on Thursday in response to a question about how the U.S. intends to react to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's position.

"I don't think we need to offer any kind of pressure" on the Israelis to accept a Palestinian state, Miller said. "The pressure is reality. The pressure is the reality that I just laid out, that without a tangible path to the establishment of a Palestinian state, there are no other partners in the region who are going to step forward and help with the reconstruction of Gaza."

Asked whether the U.S. will "continue to supply weapons and other support to an ally that is not listening to the warnings that you're giving," Miller acknowledged "differences with all of our allies" but said that "this is not a question of the United States pressuring them to do anything."

"This is about the United States laying out for them the opportunity that they have," Miller added. "There is a path for real security assurances—but again, we can't make those choices for anyone. They have to make them for themselves."



In an indication of its unflagging support for Israel's war assault on Gaza, the U.S. State Department has twice bypassed Congress to expedite weapons sales to the nation's government since the Hamas-led attack on October 7. Earlier this week, the U.S. Senate rejected a resolution from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) that would have required the department to produce a report on Israel's human rights practices in Gaza—which by virtually all accounts are atrocious.

The Biden administration, which could soon be facing a lawsuit at the International Court of Justice over its complicity in Israeli war crimes, opposed the Sanders resolution and has refused to formally assess whether Israel is adhering to international humanitarian law.

The Guardianreported Thursday that the State Department has "in effect been able to circumvent the U.S. law that is meant to prevent U.S. complicity in human rights violations by foreign military units—the 1990s-era Leahy law, named after the now retired Vermont senator Patrick Leahy—because, former officials say, extraordinary internal state department policies have been put in place that show extreme deference to the Israeli government."

"No such special arrangements exist for any other U.S. ally," the newspaper added.

The administration is currently working to exempt U.S. arms transfers to Israel from a "mandatory congressional notification process that applies to all other foreign arms sales," The Washington Postreported last week.


Overall, the Biden administration has sent more than 10,000 tons of weaponry to Israel over the past three and a half months, declining to place conditions on the arms even as the Israeli military openly flouts U.S. officials' entreaties to protect Gaza civilians, attacking homes, schools, bakeries, hospitals, and refugee camps.

"If Biden was truly as dissatisfied or impatient or whatever other terms are being fed to the media about his supposed handwringing over Bibi's war, he could have acted. But he didn't."


Israel's unrelenting bombing campaign and ground invasion have killed nearly 25,000 people in Gaza since October, and much of the territory is in the grip of famine as the Netanyahu government restricts the amount of aid allowed to enter the besieged territory.

Ajith Sunghay, head of the United Nations human rights office in the occupied Palestinian territory, expressed horror Friday at conditions on the ground in Gaza, calling the situation "a major, human-made, humanitarian disaster."

"People continue to arrive in Rafah from various places in their thousands, in desperate situations, setting up makeshift shelters with any material they can get their hands on," said Sunghay. "I've seen men and children digging for bricks to be able to hold in place tents made with plastic bags."

"It is a pressure cooker environment here, in the midst of utter chaos, given the terrible humanitarian situation, shortages, and pervasive fear and anger," he added. "The communications blackout has continued for a sixth consecutive day, adding to the confusion and fear, and preventing Gazans from accessing services and information on areas to evacuate."

In a column on Thursday, The Intercept's Jeremy Scahill noted that "over the course of the past 100 days of Israel's bloody rampage in Gaza, Biden has had an infinite series of events that each could have justified ceasing U.S. political and military support for Israel's explicitly offensive war."

"There is no nation on Earth that wields more influence over Israel and no politician who holds more sway than Biden. The U.S. is the arms dealer and defender of this entire enterprise," Scahill wrote. "If Biden was truly as dissatisfied or impatient or whatever other terms are being fed to the media about his supposed handwringing over Bibi's war, he could have acted. But he didn't."

"Instead, the White House made sure no cease-fire took hold, offered a public defense of Israel's conduct in the face of clear evidence of its genocidal intent submitted before the world court, circumvented Congress to keep the arms flowing, and then publicly opposed a resolution that sought to uphold U.S. law aimed at ensuring U.S. weapons and other aid are not used to commit human rights abuses. Those are the relevant facts," he continued. "There is no need for media outlets to serve as conveyor belts for the administration's disingenuous posturing. Biden's actions are the only evidence that matters. And that evidence is damning."

Thousands take to the streets again in Israel to protest Netanyahu

2024/01/20
Protesters block road during a protest calling for immediate release of all the Israeli hostages in Gaza. Ilia Yefimovich/dpa

Thousands of people demonstrated in Israel on Saturday against the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Participants at a rally in Tel Aviv demanded an immediate end to the war in Gaza in order to free the more than 100 hostages still held by Hamas.

"Stop the fighting, pay the price!" Israeli media quoted one of the speakers, whose cousin is among the hostages, as saying.

Following an initial exchange of 105 hostages for 240 Palestinian prisoners at the end of November, Hamas has said it won't release the remaining hostages abducted from southern Israel on October 7 until Israel's military withdraws from the Gaza Strip.

Netanyahu and his fellow campaigners, however, say that Hamas needs to be defeated militarily to secure the release of the remaining hostages.

In the northern port city of Haifa, several hundred supporters of the left-wing Chadash party demanded the prime minister's resignation on Saturday. Several hundred people also took to the streets in Jerusalem against the Netanyahu government.

In front of Netanyahu's home in the coastal town of Caesarea, 50 kilometres north of Tel Aviv, relatives of the hostages and supporters had started a permanent protest on Friday evening.

"We expect serious people...to come out and give us real answers about how our loved ones are doing," the Haaretz newspaper quoted a hostage's relative as saying in its online edition.

Hamas and other extremist groups attacked southern Israel on October 7, killing 1,200 people and kidnapping around 240.

Israel responded to the worst massacre in its history with massive airstrikes and a ground offensive in the Gaza Strip. Currently, 136 hostages are still being held in the coastal area. Israel assumes that around 25 of them are no longer alive.

Protesters block road during a protest calling for immediate release of all the Israeli hostages in Gaza. Ilia Yefimovich/dpa

Protesters block road during a protest calling for immediate release of all the Israeli hostages in Gaza. Ilia Yefimovich/dpa

DPA International


It’s All About Me: Netanyahu Rejects Palestinian Statehood


Israel has been given enormous license to control the security narrative in the Middle East for decades.  This is not to say it is always in control of it – the attacks of October 7 by Hamas show that such control is rickety and bound, at stages, to come undone.  What matters for Israeli security is that certain neighbours always understand that they are never to do certain things, lest they risk existential oblivion.


For instance, no Middle Eastern state will be permitted to acquire nuclear weapons on the Jewish State’s watch.  Nuclear reactors and facilities will be struck, infected, or pulverised altogether (Osirak at Tuwaitha, Iraq; the Natanz site in Iran), with, or without knowledge, approval or participation of the United States.

This is a signature mark of Israeli foreign and defence policy: the nuclear option remains the greatest, single affirmation of sovereignty in international relations.  To possess it, precisely because of its destructive and shielding potential, is to proclaim to the community of nation states that you have lethal insurance against invasion and regime change.  Best, then, to make sure others do not possess it.

Israel, on the other hand, will be permitted to develop its own cataclysmic inventory of weapons, platforms, and doomsday options, all the while claiming strategic ambiguity about the whole matter.  In that strangulating way, Israeli policy resembles the thornily disingenuous former US President Bill Clinton’s approach to taking drugs and oral sex: he did not inhale, and oral pleasuring by one by another is simply not sex.

The latest remarks from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on January 18 suggest that the license also extends to ensuring that Palestinians will never be permitted a sovereign homeland, that they will be, in a perverse biblical echo, kept in a form of bondage, downtrodden, oppressed and, given what happened on October 7 last year, suppressed.  This is to ensure that, whatever the grievance, that they never err, never threaten, and never cause grief to the Israeli State.  To that end, it is axiomatic that their political authorities are kept incipient, inchoate, corrupt and permanently on life support, the tolerated beggars and charity seekers of the Middle East.

At the press conference in question, held at the Kirya military base in Tel Aviv, Netanyahu claimed that, “Whoever is talking about the ‘day after Netanyahu’ is essentially talking about the establishment of the Palestinian state with the Palestinian Authority.”  (How very like the Israeli PM to make it all about him.)  The Israel-Palestinian conflict, he wanted to clarify, was “not about the absence of a state, a Palestinian state, but rather about the existence of a state, a Jewish state.”

With monumental gall, he complained that “All territory we evacuate, we get terror, terrible terror against us”.  His examples, enumerated much like sins at a confessional, were instances where Israel, as an occupying force, had left or reduced their presence: Gaza, southern Lebanon, parts of Judea and Samaria (the West Bank).  It followed that “any future arrangement, or in the absence of any future arrangement,” Israel would continue to maintain “security control” of all lands west of the Jordan River.  “That is a vital condition.”

As such lands comprise Israeli territory, Gaza and the West Bank, Palestinian sovereignty can be assuredly ignored as a tenable outcome in Netanyahu’s policed paradise.  He even went so far as to acknowledge that this “contradicts the idea of sovereignty” as far as the Palestinians are concerned.  “What can you do?  I tell this truth to our American friends.”

As to sceptical mutterings in the Israeli press about the country’s prospects of defeating Hamas decisively, Netanyahu was all foamy with indignation.  “We will continue to fight at full strength until we achieve our goals: the return of all our hostages – and I say again, only military pressure will lead to their release; the elimination of Hamas; the certainty that Gaza will never again represent a threat to Israel.  There won’t be any party that educates for terror, funds terror, sends terrorists against us.”

This hairbrained policy of ethno-religious lunacy masquerading as sane military strategy ensures that permanent war nourished by the poison of blood-rich hatred and revenge will continue unabated.  In keeping such a powder keg stocked, there is always the risk that other powers and antagonists willing to have a say through bombs, rockets and drones will light it.  Should this or that state be permitted to exist or come into being? The answer is bound to be convulsively violent.

It is of minor interest that officials in the United States found Netanyahu’s comments a touch off-putting.  US Secretary of State Antony Blinken had, it is reported, dangled a proposal before the Israeli PM that would see Saudi Arabia normalise relations with Israel in exchange for an agreement to facilitate the pathway to Palestinian statehood.  Netanyahu did not bite, insisting that he would not be a party to any agreement that would see the creation of a Palestinian state.

Blinken, if one is to rely on the veracity of the account, suggested that the removal of Hamas could never be achieved in purely military terms; a failure on the part of Israel’s leadership to recognise that fact would lead to a continuation of violence and history repeating itself.

In Washington, State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller stated in the daily press briefing that “Israel faces some very difficult choices in the months ahead.”  The conflict in Gaza would eventually end; reconstruction would follow; agreement from various countries in the region to aid in that effort had been secured – all on the proviso that a “tangible path to the establishment of a Palestinian state” could be agreed upon.

For decades, administrations in Washington have fantasised about castles in the skies, the outlandish notion that Palestinians and Israelis might exist in cosy accord upon lands stolen and manured by brutal death.  Washington, playing the Hegemonic Father, could then perch above the fray, gaze paternally upon the scrapping disputants, and suggest what was best for both.  But the two-state solution was always encumbered and heavily conditioned to take place on Israeli terms, leaving all mediation and interventions by outsiders flitting gestures lacking substance.

Now, no one can claim otherwise that Palestinian statehood is anything other than spectral, fantastic, and doomed – at least under the current warring regime.  Netanyahu’s own political survival, profanely linked to Israel’s own existence, depends on not just stifling pregnancies in Gaza but preventing the birth of a nationally recognised Palestinian state.


Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com. Read other articles by Binoy.
U.S. space company upbeat on next Moon mission despite lander's demise


Agence France-Presse
January 20, 2024 

Full Moon (Shutterstock)

The head of the American space company whose lunar lander failed this week in its mission to reach the Moon expressed optimism Friday that the next attempt would achieve its goal.

"I am more confident than ever now that our next mission will be successful and land on the surface of the Moon," Astrobotic CEO John Thornton told a news conference, highlighting challenges his team had overcome in the "unexpected but very exciting mission."

Astrobotic's Peregrine lander was launched on January 8 under an experimental new partnership between US space agency NASA and private industry intended to reduce costs for American taxpayers and seed a lunar economy.

But the lander experienced an explosion shortly after separating from its rocket and was leaking fuel, damaging its outer shell as well as making it impossible to reach its destination.

Thornton called it a "difficult" moment, saying the problem likely stemmed from a faulty valve and that a full investigation would be carried out.

But he remained upbeat about the mission.

"After that anomaly we just had victory after victory after victory, showing the spacecraft was working in space, showing that the payloads can operate," he said, referring to scientific experiments onboard, particularly from NASA, that were able to gather data.

Thornton said he had "independent confirmation" the crippled Peregrine lander had burned up in the atmosphere as it plunged back to Earth.

Astrobotic's next mission, scheduled for November, is to carry a rover developed by NASA to the Moon's South Pole, where American astronauts are meant to explore in coming years.

The Viper rover's mission is to learn more about the origin and distribution of water -- in the form of ice -- and determine how it could be used on future missions.

Viper will ride to the Moon on Astrobotic's Griffin lander, which is about three times the size of the ill-fated Peregrine.

Viper is "very sophisticated and costly," senior NASA official Joel Kearns said. "So we want to make sure we really understand the root cause and the contributing factors of what happened on Peregrine."

"If we have to modify our plans for Griffin... we will," he added.

NASA had paid Astrobotic about $100 million under the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program to ship its science instruments to the Moon, as it prepares to send American astronauts back to the barren world later this decade under the Artemis program.

Officials at NASA have made clear their strategy of "more shots on goal" means more chances to score. The next attempt under CLPS, by Houston-based Intuitive Machines, launches in February.

U.S. spaceship lost over South Pacific following failed Moon mission


Agence France-Presse
January 19, 2024 

Peregrine Lunar Lander © - / NASA/AFP/File

A crippled American spaceship has been lost over a remote region of the South Pacific, probably burning up in the atmosphere in a fiery end to its failed mission to land on the Moon.

Astrobotic's Peregrine lander was launched on January 8 under an experimental new partnership between NASA and private industry intended to reduce costs for American taxpayers and seed a lunar economy.

But it experienced an explosion shortly after separating from its rocket and had been leaking fuel, damaging its outer shell as well as making it impossible to reach its destination.

In its latest update, Astrobotic posted on X that it had lost contact with its spacecraft shortly before 2100 GMT Thursday, mid-morning on Friday in the local time zone, indicating a "controlled re-entry over open water" as it had predicted.

The Pittsburgh-based company added it would await independent confirmation of Peregrine's fate from the relevant government authorities. A previous update provided atmospheric re-entry coordinates a few hundred miles (kilometers) south of Fiji, albeit with a wide margin of error.

Engineers had executed a series of small engine burns to position the boxy, golf cart-sized robot over the ocean to "minimize the risk of debris reaching land."

Astrobotic also tweeted a photograph taken by the spaceship on its final day, revealing the Earth's crescent as it positioned itself between the Sun and our planet.

Peregrine operated for over 10 days in space, exciting enthusiasts even after it became clear Astrobotic would not succeed in its goal to be the first company to achieve a controlled touchdown on the Moon -- and the first American soft landing since the end of the Apollo era, more than five decades ago.

NASA had paid the company more than $100 million under the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program to ship its science instruments to the Moon, as it prepares to send American astronauts back to the barren world later this decade under the Artemis program.

Astrobotic also carried more colorful cargo on behalf of private clients, such as the DNA and cremated remains of some 70 people, including Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry and sci-fi author Arthur C. Clarke.

Though it hasn't worked out this time, NASA officials have made clear their strategy of "more shots on goal" means more chances to score. The next attempt under CLPS, by Houston-based Intuitive Machines, launches in February.

The Japanese space agency's "Moon Sniper," which launched in September, will be the next spaceship to attempt a soft lunar touchdown, a notoriously difficult feat, shortly after midnight Japan time on Saturday (1500 GMT on Friday).

If it succeeds, Japan will be the fifth nation to complete the achievement, after the Soviet Union, United States, China and India.

SpaceX Launch Sends 4 Private Astronauts to ISS

Once they arrive at ISS, the Axiom Space astronauts will conduct 30 scientific experiments that NASA says will help advance research in low-Earth orbit.

By Kimberly Johnson
January 19, 2024


Axiom Mission 3 (Ax-3), the third all private astronaut mission to the International Space Station, lifts off Thursday from Launch Complex 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. [Courtesy: NASA]


SpaceX and Axiom Space successfully launched four private astronauts into orbit Thursday, marking the third commercial mission to the International Space Station (ISS).

Axiom Mission 3 (Ax-3) on board SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft lifted off via a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket at 4:49 p.m. EST from Launch Complex 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.


On board the spacecraft is the first all-European commercial astronaut crew, which is scheduled to spend about two weeks aboard ISS conducting microgravity research, educational outreach, and commercial activities, according to NASA.

Ax-3 crew checks in from orbit on January 18. [Courtesy: Axiom Space]

“Together with our commercial partners, NASA is supporting a growing commercial space economy and the future of space technology,” NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said in a statement. “During their time aboard the International Space Station, the Ax-3 astronauts will carry out more than 30 scientific experiments that will help advance research in low-Earth orbit.”READ MORE: First U.S. Moonshot in Decades Will Fall Short—What It Means

In a quick check-in shortly after liftoff, “Ax-3 commander Michael López-Alegría confirmed the crew’s well-being and safety,” according to Axiom Space.

The Dragon spacecraft is expected to autonomously dock with the forward port of the ISS Harmony module on Saturday around 4:19 a.m. EST.

“Hatches between Dragon and the station are expected to open after 6 a.m., allowing the Axiom crew to enter the complex for a welcoming ceremony and start their stay aboard the orbiting laboratory,” NASA said.

NASA is providing live coverage of the docking event starting at 2:30 a.m. EST. It may be viewed here.

The Ax-3 astronauts are scheduled to leave the ISS on February 3 for their return to Earth and will splash down off the coast of Florida.