Sunday, January 28, 2024

Russia Builds Out Arctic Oil Route As Middle East Tensions Escalate

By Simon Watkins - Jan 24, 2024,

Russian President Vladimir Putin has long seen the development of the country’s Arctic resources as one of its core strategically vital projects.

Russia is looking to keep open the arctic Northern Sea Route all year long.

This year, Russia decided to build another cargo base plus 14 additional terminals along the route from Murmansk to Vladivostok.


This year will see a major push by Russia to ensure that the Northern Sea Route (NSR), which is vital for shipping minerals, oil, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its huge Arctic operations, remains fully functional all year round, according to a senior Moscow-based oil analyst exclusively spoken to by OilPrice.com last week. Given the hostile climate in the region, ships have been unable to sail at all during March, April, and May, and have struggled to do so at other times as well. This new impetus comes as Russia faces new sanctions on its energy deliveries following its February 2022 invasion of Ukraine and as escalating tensions around the Red Sea cause increased dangers for shipping through key Middle Eastern routes. “33 million tonnes of cargo was moved in 2021, 34 million [tonnes] in 2022, and just over 36 million [tonnes] last year,” said the Moscow-based analyst. “Rosatom [the Rosatom State Nuclear Energy Corporation, which manages a fleet of nuclear-powered icebreakers, among other things] and Novatek [Russia’s second-largest gas producer and spearheading its Arctic LNG developments] have told the Far East and Arctic Development Ministry that they can support an increase to 100 million tonnes by 2026 and 200 million tonnes [or cargo] by 2030,” he added.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has long seen the development of the country’s Arctic resources as one of its core strategically vital projects, as analysed in full in my new book on the new global oil market order. One reason for this is the sheer size of its gas and oil reserves there, estimated at around 35.7 trillion cubic metres (tcm) of gas and over 2.3 billion metric tons of oil and condensate. The majority of these are located in the Yamal and Gydan peninsulas, lying on the south side of the Kara Sea. An adjunct to this is that much of its gas resources there have been earmarked for a major advance in the country’s LNG output, as Putin has also long believed that Russia’s presence in that market does not reflect its enormous presence in the broader world gas and oil market. Since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, LNG has also become the ‘swing emergency gas’ product for many major economies, given sanctions imposed on its natural gas and oil exports. LNG is readily available in the spot markets and can be moved very quickly to anywhere required, unlike gas or oil sent through pipelines. Unlike pipelined energy as well, the movement of LNG does not require the build-out of vast acreage of pipelines across varying terrains and the associated heavy infrastructure that supports it. Related: Red Sea Shipping Crisis Rekindles Inflation Fears

Another reason why Russia’s Arctic oil and gas reserves are so important to Putin is that they can be seamlessly delivered to China through the NSR. It is true that over the past 30 years, there has been a turnaround in the power relationship between the two former great Communist powers, with Beijing now the more dominant partner. Crucially, though, it is also true that Russia’s enormous oil and gas reserves still give it some leverage with China. Its oil and gas flows into the country mean that Moscow can continue to count on the military and political force-multiplier effect of China as a major presence in the Asia Pacific theatre of potential conflict, if not directly in the European one. In precisely this vein, around the same time as the invasion of Ukraine, Russian state gas giant Gazprom signed a deal to supply 10 billion cubic metre per year (bcm/y) of gas to the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC). This built on another 30-year deal between the two companies signed in 2014 for 38 bcm/y and this in turn was a part of, but significantly bolstered, the ‘Power of Siberia’ pipeline project – managed on the Russian side by Gazprom and on the China side by CNPC – that was launched in December 2019. Given Russia’s poor performance in the Ukraine war to date, the force multiplier effect of Moscow’s relationship with Beijing has never been more important to it. Aside from remaining a menacing presence in the background, China’s technology and expertise has made possible the array of weaponry that has been supplied to Russia from Iran for use in Ukraine. Beijing’s hold over Iran was firmly established in the all-encompassing ‘Iran-China 25-Year Comprehensive Cooperation Agreement’, as first revealed anywhere in the world in my 3 September 2019 article on the subject and analysed in full in my new book on the new global oil market order.

A final key reason at play in Russia’s Arctic gas and oil drive is its capacity to subvert the U.S. dollar-based hegemony in the energy market, as also analysed in my new book, particularly as it features one of the world’s biggest oil and gas producers and one of its biggest buyers. Very early in the Arctic LNG projects’ history, Novatek’s chief executive officer, Leonid Mikhleson, said that future sales to China denominated in renminbi were under consideration. This was in line with his comments on the prospect of further U.S. sanctions - following Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 - that they would only accelerate the process of Russia trying to switch away from U.S. dollar-centric oil and gas trading. “This has been discussed for a while with Russia’s largest trading partners such as India and China, and even Arab countries are starting to think about it... If they do create difficulties for our Russian banks then all we have to do is replace dollars,” he said. Such a strategy was tested in 2014, when the state-run Gazprom Neft tried trading of cargoes of crude oil in Chinese yuan and roubles with China and Europe, to reduce Russia’s dependence on crude trading in dollars, in response to the initial Western sanctions against Russia’s energy sector

As it stands, according to the Moscow-based oil analyst, at a meeting last May between Putin and several key figures connected to the development of the NSR, it was decided that new developments would include the building of another cargo base plus 14 additional terminals along the route from Murmansk to Vladivostok, the creation of a new satellite network connected with the NSR (allowing for near real-time ice monitoring), centralising ship navigation control with Rosatom, and expanding the fleet of tankers and ice-breakers. At the same time, Russia is forging ahead with its Arctic LNG projects, the most recent notable development of which is Arctic LNG 2. This aims for three LNG trains (manufacturing facilities) of 6.6 million metric tonnes per annum (mmtpa) each, based around the gas resources of the Utrenneye field, which has at least 1,138 billion cubic metres of natural gas and 57 million tons of liquids in reserves. The first train was successfully delivered last August on the western shore of the Gydan Peninsula in West Siberia. The second and third trains are expected online this year and in 2026, respectively.

The project is also emblematic of Putin’s attempts to make Russia’s Arctic LNG projects as ‘sanction-proof’ as possible, as also analysed in my new book on the new global oil market order. This meant Russian company Novatek – the key developer of Yamal LNG (and the later Arctic LNG 2) - becoming as self-sufficient as possible in this regard. Consequently, Novatek aimed to localise the fabrication and construction of LNG trains and modules to decrease the overall cost of liquefaction and develop a technological base within Russia, and it made great progress in realising this. As part of this objective, Novatek developed the ‘Arctic Cascade’ process for creating LNG. This is based on a two-stage liquefaction process that capitalises on the colder ambient temperature in the Arctic climate to maximise energy efficiency during the liquefaction process and was the first patented liquefaction technology using equipment produced only by Russian manufacturers. Having said this, moves are afoot from the U.S. to roll out further sanctions aimed at undermining Russia’s Arctic LNG ambitions, partly through blocking sales of technology still needed by Novatek and others, and partly by blocking sales of Russian LNG in full.

By Simon Watkins for Oilprice.com

 

Nuclear Waste: Small in Volume, Big in Energy Discussions

  • Nuclear waste is categorized into four types based on its level of hazardousness and disposal needs.

  • High-level waste, often a focus of safety concerns, constitutes less than 0.25% of total radioactive waste.

  • Compared to other industrial activities, the volume of waste produced by the nuclear power industry is relatively small.

Nuclear power is among the safest and cleanest sources of electricity, making it a critical part of the clean energy transition.

However, nuclear waste, an inevitable byproduct, is often misunderstood.

In collaboration with the National Public Utilities CouncilVisual Capitalist's Bruno Venditti created the following graphic to show the volume of all existing nuclear waste, categorized by its level of hazardousness and disposal requirements, based on data from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Storage and Disposal


Nuclear provides about 10% of global electricity generation.

Nuclear waste, produced as a result of this, can be divided into four different types:

  • Very low-level waste: Waste suitable for near-surface landfills, requiring lower containment and isolation.
  • Low-level waste: Waste needing robust containment for up to a few hundred years, suitable for disposal in engineered near-surface facilities.
  • Intermediate-level waste: Waste that requires a greater degree of containment and isolation than that provided by near-surface disposal.
  • High-level waste: Waste is disposed of in deep, stable geological formations, typically several hundred meters below the surface.

Despite safety concerns, high-level radioactive waste constitutes less than 0.25% of total radioactive waste reported to the IAEA.

Stored and disposed radioactive waste reported to the IAEA under the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. Data is from the last reporting year which varies by reporting country, 2019-2023.

The amount of waste produced by the nuclear power industry is small compared to other industrial activities.

While flammable liquids comprise 82% of the hazardous materials shipped annually in the U.S., radioactive waste accounts for only 0.01%.

Bolivia launches new international tender for lithium extraction

Reuters | January 26, 2024 | 

Uyuni salt flats. Altiplano, Bolivia. Stock image.

Bolivia’s government has launched a new international tender for companies to extract lithium from the country’s salt flats, the energy minister said on Friday.


The tender, from state-owned Yacimientos de Litio Bolivianos, seeks to develop projects in various salt flats in the Altiplano region, including three of the South American country’s biggest lithium reserves.

Bolivia, together with Argentina and Chile, sits atop the so-called “lithium triangle” which contains more than half the world’s resources of the metal, but has struggled to launch industrial production.


Lithium mining: ‘A new Bolivia’, says EnergyX CEO

Speaking at an event, Energy Minister Franklin Molina said the government aimed to attract companies using “cutting-edge technology” for industrial-scale lithium production, and expected applicants to respect local communities and the environment.

The contenders must prove their technical capacity to operate in the salt flats and submit investment proposals, he noted.

Bolivia issued its first call for foreign companies to explore lithium extraction in 2021. The government signed agreements with Chinese companies CBC and Citic Guoan, as well as Russia’s Uranium One Group, to build industrial facilities for the production of lithium carbonate.

(By Daniel Ramos; Editing by Daina Beth Solomon and Alistair Bell)
Guatemalan Ministry of Mines to review all mining licenses

Staff Writer | January 27, 2024 | 

Victor Hugo Ventura, Guatemala’s Minister of Energy and Mines. (Image by MEM.)

The Guatemalan Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) will revise all decisions made in the recent past related to mining exploration, exploitation and export licenses.


According to local media, the new head of the MEM, Víctor Hugo Ventura, announced the measure in response to multiple complaints regarding bribes, corruption and other illegal activities taking place within the country’s mining sector.

Talking to journalists, Ventura noted that mining started in Guatemala 70 years ago and that all decisions that are made regarding the sector will balance out the social, economic, environmental and financial costs and benefits.

To deal with bribery and corruption accusations, the minister requested the support of the Comptroller General of Accounts, as well as information from interested parties, including countries such as the United States of America.

Ventura recalled that back in 2022, the US applied sanctions to the export licenses of Compañía Guatemalteca de Níquel (CGN), Compañía Procesadora de Níquel de Izabal (ProNiCo) and Mayaníquel, which are subsidiaries of the Swiss-based Solway Investment Group. These sanctions were lifted on the third week of January 2024 and Guatemalan authorities are asking for further information to re-authorize their operations.

The MEM’s approach is aimed at following the principles of transparency and zero tolerance for corruption that the administration of President Bernardo Arévalo is promoting, after taking office on January 15, 2024.

On the same note, the Guatemalan Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MARN) announced that it will review Bluestone Resources’ (TSX-V: BSR) Cerro Blanco operation, whose environmental license was granted in 2007 and updated on January 9, 2024, giving the green light to open-pit exploitation of gold deposits in the Asunción Mita municipality.

Initially, the Vancouver-based miner had proposed an underground operation but decided to switch the mining method as a response to the results of advanced engineering and optimization work that revealed an opportunity to capitalize on the project’s near-surface, high-grade mineralization through an open-pit development scenario. The assessment showed a doubling of the gold resource ounces and production profile.

A feasibility study for Cerro Blanco released in February 2022 calls for an open-pit gold mine with an average annual production of 197,000 ounces over its 14-year life. At peak production, the operation would produce 347,000 ounces of gold a year.

However, the fact that an open-pit operation would require the use of cyanide set off the alarms of nine environmental groups both in Guatemala and El Salvador, who expressed concern over the potential contamination of shared freshwater bodies such as the Güija lagoon and the Lempa River. The latter is the main water source for San Salvador, the Salvadoran capital.

In a recent meeting between the Salvadoran Foreign Affairs Minister, Alexandra Hill, and the Guatemalan ambassador to El Salvador, Rubén Estuardo Nájera, the former expressed her concern over the mine.

Yet, Bluestone has said that the mine’s development plans include a cyanide destruction process to neutralize it, which should ease such concerns.
BHP to review $9.7 billion charge over Brazil dam failure

Cecilia Jamasmie | January 26, 2024 |

October 2017 aerial image of the area affected by the tailings dam failure in Mariana, Minas Gerais, Brazil. (Photo by Vinícius Mendonça, courtesy of Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA).)

BHP (ASX: BHP) said on Friday it had yet to receive a formal notification from Brazilian authorities about a court decision sentencing it to pay 47.6 billion reais ($9.7 billion) in damage repairs over a burst tailings dam in 2015.


The world’s largest miner said the fine is part of a broader claim filed in 2016, seeking 155 billion reais (or $44 billion at the time) for reparation, compensation and moral damages in relation to the Fundão dam failure.

The Fundão dam, owned by the Samarco JV between BHP and Vale, burst in November 2015, releasing 39.2 million cubic meters of tailings waste into the Rio Doce Basin. It was Brazil’s worst environmental disaster ever, resulting in the death of 19 people.

BHP said this week’s ruling is interlocutory, which means it does not settle all of the issues of the case, as it refers only to the collective moral damages caused by the deadly accident.

It noted it would review the implications of the decision, as well as potential for an appeal and any possible impact on its provision related to the dam’s collapse.

In its 2023 annual report, BHP noted that it had earmarked $3.7 billion to cover issues related to the accident near Mariana, in Minas Gerais state.

The parties involved in the suit have been in negotiations to seek a settlement of obligations under a framework agreement since 2021, with talks scheduled to resume next month.

The news comes only two months after a British court rejected Vale’s appeal against its inclusion in a lawsuit worth at least $46 billion against Vale, Samarco and BHP due to the same dam disaster.

The Court of Appeal refused the Brazilian miner permission to appeal the dismissal of its challenge to the jurisdiction of the English Court.

This means that if the claimants are successful in holding BHP liable for their losses, the third party claim will proceed and the Australian mining giant will seek to hold Vale liable for 50% or more of any damages awarded to the claimants.

The lawsuit is the largest group litigation in English legal history and involves over 700,000 victims.
Chiefs of Ontario ask provincial government for year-long moratorium on mine claims staking

Amanda Stutt | January 26, 2024 | 

Esker camp in Ontario’s Ring of Fire. 
Credit: Noront Resources

The Chiefs of the Canadian province of Ontario this week issued a statement calling for a 365-day moratorium on the Mining Lands Administration System (MLAS), beginning January 24.


The move follows an exponential rise in the number of mining claims being staked over the past year on First Nations territories – some as high as 30% — the highest annual number of mining claims staked in Ontario over the last six years, according to the Chiefs of Ontario.

The Chiefs said the increase in claims led to an “insurmountable” administrative burden for First Nation communities responsible for reviewing and responding to the mining claims.

“In accordance with Resolution 23/30S, which was passed at the Fall Chiefs Assembly 2023, the Chiefs of Ontario are calling on the Government of Ontario to declare a territory-wide moratorium on the Mining Lands Administration System (MLAS) for 365 days,” Ontario Regional Chief Glen Hare said in the statement.

“Mining claim-staking continues to grow at a pace that far outstrips the ability for First Nations to respond and directly impacts our inherent, treaty, and constitutionally protected rights.”

Hare said a 365-day moratorium will give First Nations communities the time required to assess the impacts of the MLAS, the effects of the mine claims currently being staked, and develop a process “whereby meaningful and fulsome engagement and consultation can be integrated into the MLAS processes.”

In 2022, the Anishinabek Nation were unsuccessful when they made a similar request. The Ministry of Mines declined, stating a moratorium on mining was not considered an appropriate way to resolve the concerns.

Under the current MLAS system, prospectors can stake a mining claim online, and are not required to engage or consult with First Nations – even if the area in which the claim is staked is within their territories.

As a result, Chiefs of Ontario said, the area of land that has been staked is automatically removed from Treaty and Crown land that First Nations may have otherwise had access to add to reserve land, convert into parks, or is land that is currently undergoing land settlements via claims negotiations.

This week, Wyloo Metals said it is looking ahead to development at its Eagle’s Nest project in Ontario’s Ring of Fire, seen as highly prospective for nickel, copper, platinum and palladium, despite resistance to the project voiced by Indigenous leaders.
Gitxaala v. British Columbia

In April 2023, British Columbia’s Gitxaała Nation launched a legal challenge against the provincial government’s “free entry” mineral claim staking regime.

BC’s current Mineral Tenure Act also permits anyone with a free miner certificate to acquire mineral claims online through an automated system in First Nations’ territories, without their consultation or consent.

While critics challenge the system, the industry argues it violates prospectors’ intellectual property by giving notice that it expects to find mineralization in a given area before any security of tenure is granted.

A September 2023 Supreme Court decision declared that B.C.’s current online mineral claim system breaches the Crown’s duty to consult.

The court gave the province 18 months to design a new system that incorporates consultation — which the Chiefs of Ontario said sets an important precedent for First Nations in other provinces.
Chinese companies to invest up to $7 billion in Congo mining infrastructure

Reuters | January 27, 2024 |

Jules Alingete, head of the DRC’s Inspection Generale des Finances. (Image by Alingete’s social media team, X.)

Chinese construction companies will invest up to $7 billion in infrastructure projects as part of an agreement over their Sicomines copper and cobalt joint venture in the Democratic Republic of Congo, they said on Saturday.


Both parties agreed to maintain the current structure of the shareholding, while the Chinese partners, Sinohydro Corp (SINOH.UL) and China Railway Group Limited, will pay 1.2% of royalties annually to Congo, according to a statement.

President Felix Tshisekedi’s government had been revisiting the deal struck by his predecessor Joseph Kabila under which the Chinese partners agreed to build roads and hospitals in exchange for a 68% stake in the joint venture with Congo’s state mining company Gecamines.

Under the deal, the Chinese investors committed to spending $3 billion on infrastructure projects, but the state auditor – Inspection Generale des Finances (IGF) – last year demanded that the commitment be increased to $20 billion.

Tshisekedi instructed his government to hold talks with the investors ahead of a visit to China in May 2023. He had aimed to boost Congo’s stake in the joint venture to 70% from 32%.

“It is a win-win deal,” IGF head Jules Alingete said in a press conference, adding that negotiations had not been easy.

Ernest Mpararo, head of the Congolese Anti-Corruption League, said the announcement was a step forward but flagged that Sicomines remained exempt from paying taxes.

He also pointed to money owed under the last agreement. A 2023 IGF report found that only $822 million of the $3 billion promised for infrastructure investments had been spent.

Congo is the world’s biggest producer of cobalt, a key component in batteries for electric cars and mobile phones. It is also the world’s third-largest copper producer. Its mining sector is largely dominated by Chinese companies.

Tshisekedi, who won a second mandate in December, had signposted the agreement in his Jan. 20 inauguration speech.

(Reporting by Sonia Rolley, Additional reporting by Ange Kasongo in Kinshasa, Writing by Portia Crowe, Editing by William Maclean, Nick Macfie and Clelia Oziel).

Marxists.org

https://www.marxists.org/archive/bukharin/works/1917/imperial

Lenin. Written: 1915 and 1917. Source: Nikolai Bukharin "Imperialism and World Economy", Monthly Review Press, no date. First Published in English: Nikolai ...


Elon Musk's plans for Optimus, Tesla's humanoid robot

Tesla’s financial outlook – or lack thereof – set off a panic on Wall Street this week.

Some analysts suggested Tesla denied them sought-after clarity on the company’s production growth expectations for this year, after a disappointing set of earnings results.

But while the number crunchers got caught up on the short-term, they may have missed new details tied to the long-term.

CEO Elon Musk provided an update on Tesla’s humanoid robot plans during the company’s Wednesday earnings call.

He noted he had spent the previous evening in Tesla’s Optimus lab, where things, in his words, are “advancing very quickly.”

Optimus is the loving name given to Tesla’s bot, in a nod to the “Transformers” character. 

In his comments, Musk said that the company’s bot business has the potential to far exceed the value of everything else at Tesla combined. 

That’s a considerable comment from the CEO of a company that came close to generating US$100 billion last year.


Tesla's road to robotics

Here’s a quick version of Musk’s roadmap – it starts with incorporating AI into Tesla vehicles. 

You often hear Tesla talk about its progress in the area of FSD, or full self-driving. 

As the company pushes ahead with autonomous vehicles, Musk has increasingly worked robot terminology into his messaging. On this week’s earnings call, he referenced Tesla vehicles as essentially now being robots on four wheels.

Tesla’s robot, meanwhile, has been learning through AI the same way the vehicles have been teaching themselves. 

Musk believes quite strongly that in the not-too distant future, the bots will be so advanced that people will be willing to pay for them just as they are willing to buy cars

.

Cost and utility: what would a Tesla robot do?

Price-wise, they are not initially expected to be cheap to buy.

In the past, Musk has alluded to pricing them at less than $20,000 a pop, and what you would get for that price tag remains a work in progress.

But think of a humanoid machine that can do dangerous work that humans would rather avoid.

Of course, there’s also lots of boring stuff people might want to skip too, from groceries to ironing. 

Tesla has even alluded to Optimus being your non-human friend. 


Sci-fi or not-so-distant future?

While it all sounds fairly sci-fi, the future, in Musk’s view, is rapidly approaching.

As a narrative, that’s not such a stretch when you consider how much of the market’s attention in the past year has been focused on the promises of AI.

What was particularly notable in Musk’s latest comments is that he suggested Tesla has a good chance of shipping some Optimus units next year.

He had previously stated some of the robots could be on the market within five years – which, in itself, seems pretty fast.

Skeptics would say Musk has shared big predictions in the past that have had to be pushed back.

But it is clear that Musk wants Tesla to evolve into an AI and robotics company, and the rapid advancements in that area deserve as much attention – if not more than - the dialogue around how many vehicles Tesla will sell this year.





SWEATSHOP 

Pzena escalates Gildan battle, tells board not to delay shareholder vote


Clothing manufacturer Gildan Activewear Inc. is coming under renewed pressure from a major shareholder to organize a vote soon to decide who’s on the board of directors.

Pzena Investment Management Inc. said it supports the efforts of another firm, Browning West LP, to force a meeting of investors at which they would cast ballots on a proposed new slate of directors. 

“We have been speaking with the board and urging them to hold the requisitioned special meeting as soon as possible,” Akhil Subramanian, a Pzena portfolio manager, told Bloomberg. The New York-based firm would be one of the most influential players in a proxy fight, owning 6.5 per cent of Gildan, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. 

Gildan, which is located in Montreal and owns the American Apparel brand, has been embroiled in a messy dispute with key investors over the dismissal of longtime Chief Executive Officer Glenn Chamandy in December. 

Investment firms holding about a third of the shares, including Jarislowsky Fraser and Janus Henderson Group, have publicly said they want Chamandy to come back. Some also want the board replaced, and Browning West has put together a proposed list of eight new directors, to be led by United Rentals Inc. Chair Michael Kneeland. 

But the existing board is digging in for a fight, stating that Chamandy had become a disengaged CEO, that the company needs new ideas and that he wanted to pursue acquisitions that would have been reckless. Chamandy fired back this week with a statement saying their allegations are “false, defamatory and misleading.”

Pzena’s Subramanian said the board must “let the shareholders decide on who they wish to represent them.”

“The board of directors is reviewing the requisition request and will respond within the 21-day deadline,” Genevieve Gosselin, a spokesperson for Gildan, said by email.

Earlier this week, Toronto-based Turtle Creek Asset Management Inc. sent a letter scolding board members. “Your current destructive PR campaign of inferences and innuendo is, quite frankly, embarrassing to the company and to each of you,” wrote the firm. “For the sake of each of your reputations, and for the sake of the company, we urge you to end it.”


Not 'a small adjustment': IKEA Canada CEO on price cuts


The CEO of IKEA Canada says the furniture retailer is spending more than $80 million on price reductions in response to customer affordability concerns.

“We know that our consumers now are finding affordability as a crisis,” Selwyn Crittendon, CEO and chief sustainability officer at IKEA Canada, told BNN Bloomberg in a Thursday television interview.

“They have less money for home, for food and for fun. So what can we do at IKEA to balance out that need? (We can) be that first pillar of lowering prices and having more Canadians be available to afford our products and services.”

In a Wednesday press release, the company said it “has begun a long-term journey throughout 2024 to reduce the prices of products across the entire IKEA range.”

Items now being sold for less include the “BILLY” bookcase, selling at $199, or $50 off the previous price, the “STRANDMON” armchair, selling at a $50 discount for $349, and the “VITTSJÖ” laptop stand, being sold for $29.99, down from $59.99. 


Supply challenge solutions

IKEA and other retailers had hiked prices in recent years – increases that Crittendon said were to due economic constraints initially brought on by the pandemic, then by high inflation and supply chain challenges.

“But we’ve worked hard … we have found more efficient ways to operate and we have found costs that we can reduce, but also better supply,” he said.

Crittendon said the company now plans to reinvest those found savings into creating more affordable products, which he said is part of a long-term commitment by IKEA appeal to a wider range of customers.

“We’re not talking about a small adjustment,” he said, “we’re talking about an investment of over $80 million on 1,500 of our favourite products here at IKEA,” adding that the price reductions will also extend to services and food offers.