Thursday, February 22, 2024

SPACE

Little groundwater recharge in ancient Mars aquifer, according to new models


Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN

Mars 

IMAGE: 

MARS IN TRUE COLOR, TAKEN BY THE EMIRATES MARS MISSION IN AUGUST 2021. 

view more 

CREDIT: KEVIN M. GILL / WIKIPEDIA




Mars was once a wet world. The geological record of the Red Planet shows evidence for water flowing on the surface – from river deltas to valleys carved by massive flash floods.  

But a new study shows that no matter how much rainfall fell on the surface of ancient Mars, very little of it seeped into an aquifer in the planet’s southern highlands.

A graduate student at The University of Texas at Austin made the discovery by modeling groundwater recharge dynamics for the aquifer using a range of methods – from computer models to simple back-of-the-envelope calculations.

No matter the degree of complexity, the results converged on the same answer – a miniscule .03 millimeters of groundwater recharge per year on average. That means that wherever rain fell in the model, only an average of .03 millimeters per year could have entered the aquifer and still produced the landforms remaining on the planet today.  

For comparison, the annual rate of groundwater recharge for the Trinity and Edwards-Trinity Plateau aquifers that provide water to San Antonio generally ranges from 2.5 to 50 millimeters per year, or about 80 to 1,600 times the Martian aquifer recharge rate calculated by the researchers.

There are a variety of potential reasons for such low groundwater flow rates, said lead author Eric Hiatt, a doctoral student at the Jackson School of Geosciences. When it rained, the water may have mostly washed across the Martian landscape as runoff. Or it may have just not rained very much at all.

These findings can help scientists constrain the climatic conditions capable of producing rainfall on early Mars. They also suggest a very different water regime on the Red Planet than what exists on Earth today.

“The fact that the groundwater isn’t as big of a process could mean that other things are,” Hiatt said. “It might magnify the importance of runoff, or it could mean that it just didn’t rain as much on Mars. But it’s just fundamentally different from how we think about [water] on Earth.”

The results were published in the journal Icarus. The paper’s co-authors are Mohammad Afzal Shadab, a doctoral student at the Jackson School and faculty members Sean Gulick, Timothy Goudge and Marc Hesse.

The models used in the study work by simulating groundwater flow in a “steady state” environment where inflow and outflow of water into the aquifer is balanced. Scientists then changed the parameters affecting the flow – for example, where rain falls or the average porosity of the rock – and observed what other variables would have to change to maintain the steady state and how plausible those charges are.

While other researchers have simulated groundwater flow on Mars using similar techniques, this model is the first to incorporate the influence of the oceans that existed on the surface of Mars more than three billion years ago in the Hellas, Argyre, and Borealis basins.

The study also incorporates modern topographical data collected by satellites. The modern landscape, Hiatt said, still preserves one of the planet’s oldest and most influential topographical features – an extreme difference in elevation between the northern hemisphere – the lowlands – and the southern hemisphere – the highlands – known as the “great dichotomy.” The dichotomy preserves signs of past groundwater upwelling in which groundwater rose up from the aquifer to the surface. The researchers used geological markers of these past upwelling events to evaluate different model outputs.

Across different models, the researchers found the mean groundwater recharge rate of .03 millimeters per year to match most closely with what’s known about the geologic record.

The research isn’t just about understanding the Red Planet’s past. It has implications for future Mars exploration too. Understanding groundwater flow can help inform where to find water today, Hiatt said. Whether you’re looking for signs of ancient life, trying to sustain human explorers, or making rocket fuel to get back home to Earth, it’s essential to know where the water would most likely be.

The research was funded by NASA, the University of Texas Institute for Geophysics, and the UT Center for Planetary Habitability.

 

Mask wearing and skincare preservatives: A double challenge for skin health


Peer-Reviewed Publication

NANJING INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, MEE

Graphical abstract. 

IMAGE: 

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT.

view more 

CREDIT: ECO-ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH




Amidst growing concerns over air pollution and the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of masks and skincare products containing preservatives like MeP has risen. This study investigates the combined effects of MeP and hypoxia on skin health, using advanced metabolomics and network toxicology to uncover the underlying mechanisms of dermal toxicity.

The skin, our largest organ, can absorb many chemicals, including methylparaben (MeP), commonly used in cosmetics. MeP, found in 72% of tested personal care products in a Czech study, can accumulate in the skin, potentially causing adverse effects such as skin aging and oxidative stress. Additionally, mask wearing creates a hypoxic environment for facial skin, impacting skin metabolism and thickness.

A new study (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eehl.2024.01.003), published in Eco-Environment & Health on January 19, 2024, reveals the cumulative effects of mask wearing and exposure to methylparaben (MeP) on skin health, addressing a critical area of concern in the context of increased mask usage and skincare products during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Researchers have unveiled how wearing masks and using skincare products containing methylparaben—a common preservative—can together affect skin health. Through experiments on skin cells and mice, the study discovered that methylparaben can lead to skin cell damage and disrupt important skin protective mechanisms. Additionally, the low oxygen levels caused by mask wearing exacerbate these effects, increasing the risk of skin inflammation and aging. This research sheds light on the need for reevaluating skincare routines and product formulations, especially in an era where mask-wearing has become commonplace, to ensure skin health is not compromised.

Highlights
• Hypoxia exacerbated the lipid peroxidation in normal keratinocytes caused by MeP exposure.
• Hypoxia increased the interference of MeP on purine metabolism pathway of HaCaT cell and ICR mouse.
• Hypoxia elevated MeP-induced oxidative damage and skin pro-inflammatory risk.
• Network toxicity revealed CAT, PPARG and MMP2 as the possible key genes for MeP and hypoxia synergistic effect.

The lead researcher, Lei Wang, from Nankai University, China, emphasizes the importance of understanding how everyday practices like mask-wearing and the use of common preservatives in personal care products can impact our skin's health.

By delving into the intricate effects of environmental and chemical factors on skin health, it calls for heightened vigilance among consumers and producers alike towards skincare selections, considering the ongoing global health scenario. Moreover, it advocates for a reassessment of skincare components and methods, paving the way for future investigations into the enduring impact of these elements on skin wellness.

###

References

DOI

10.1016/j.eehl.2024.01.003

Original Source URL

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eehl.2024.01.003

Funding information

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20614&41722304); The Ministry of Education, China (T2017002).

About Eco-Environment & Health

Eco-Environment & Health (EEH) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal designed for publications on the frontiers of the ecology, environment and health as well as their related disciplines. EEH focuses on the concept of "One Health" to promote green and sustainable development, dealing with the interactions among ecology, environment and health, and the underlying mechanisms and interventions. Our mission is to be one of the most important flagship journals in the field of environmental health.