Saturday, February 24, 2024

 Werner Herzog Watched 30 Minutes of ‘Barbie' and Asked: ‘Could It Be That the World of Barbie Is Sheer Hell?'



© Provided by Variety

Legendary director Werner Herzog was asked by Piers Morgan on the latter's "Uncensored" talk show to weigh in on the "Barbenheimer" phenomenon, but Herzog was no expert on the matter. The "Grizzly Man" and "Aguirre, the Wrath of God" filmmaker never got around to seeing Christopher Nolan's atomic bomb epic, and he seemed to be chilled to the bone after watching only 30 minutes of Greta Gerwig's blockbuster Mattel comedy.

"I have not seen ‘Oppenheimer' yet, but I will do it. ‘Barbie,' I managed to see the first half-hour," Herzog said. "I was curious and I wanted to watch it because I was curious. And I still don't have an answer, but I have a suspicion – could it be that the world of Barbie is sheer hell? For a movie ticket, as an audience, you can witness sheer hell, as close as it gets."

Herzog did not elaborate, but it sounds like he was not criticizing Gerwig's movie and instead theorizing that Barbie Land in the film and living in Barbie Land is "sheer hell."

"I don't know yet, Piers Morgan, give me a moment to watch the whole thing," Herzog said. "I have to watch the whole thing first."

"Trust me, let me spare you the horror," Morgan fired back. "I watched the whole thing and it is hell. I completely concur with your initial assessment after half an hour. And I would definitely recommend you don't put yourself through the rest of it."

Herzog is the latest director to make headlines by speaking about "Barbie." Oliver Stone went viral last month when critical comments he made to City A.M. about Gerwig's movie last summer resurfaced online.

"Ryan Gosling is wasting his time if he's doing that shit for money," Stone said. "He should be doing more serious films. He shouldn't be a part of this infantilization of Hollywood. Now it's all fantasy, fantasy, fantasy, including all the war pictures: fantasy, fantasy."

Stone latter issued an apology on social media, saying he "had little to no knowledge" of the "Barbie" movie when he made his original comments. He eventually watched the movie and "appreciated the film for its originality and its themes."

"I found the filmmakers' approach certainly different than what I expected. I apologize for speaking ignorantly," Stone added at the time. "'Barbie's' box office greatly boosted the morale of our business, which was welcome. I wish Greta and the entire ‘Barbie' team good fortune at the Oscars."

"Barbie" is up for eight Oscars this year, including best picture.

What is Chlormequat? Potentially harmful pesticide found in Cheerios and Quaker Oats



Farming© Unsplash


Chlormequat, a chemical potentially linked to health risks, has been found in oat-based cereals like Cheerios and Quaker Oats in the US.

recent study published by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) found that 80 per cent of human urine samples collected from the US population between 2017 and 2023 contained the chemical.

The study highlighted that the concentration of samples that contained chlormequat collected in 2023 was “significantly higher” than in previous years.

Chlormequat is a pesticide that’s actually been banned from use on most edible plants in the United States.

However, the recent findings have prompted concern about the potential health risks that the chemical may pose.

Regulation about the use of pesticides varies between the US and other countries.

There has been no evidence of chlormequat being detected in UK-sold cereals. However, the same report claims that chlormequat has been found in UK oat samples in the past.

What is chlormequat?

Farming practices around the world usually rely on a number of pesticides and chemicals while growing produce.

Chlormequat is a chemical that is used as a plant-growth regulator to support farming processes.

When the pesticide is applied to growing grains and oats, it helps prevent the plants from bending and can limit growth. This helps farmers when it comes to harvesting crops.

Although it was restricted from use in the US on edible plants, imported foods that have been treated with chlormequat are allowed to enter the country. The Environmental Protection Agency is also proposing to allow the use of chlormequat on other US products.

What are the side effects of chlormequat?

Initial studies on animals have determined that chlormequat can alter and damage the reproductive systems and developing fetuses.

However, there hasn’t been much research about the impact this may have on humans.

According to the recently released study, the toxicity data the scientists discovered “raise concerns about current exposure levels, and warrant more expansive toxicity testing, food monitoring, and epidemiological studies to assess health effects of chlormequat exposures in humans”.

Is chlormequat in breakfast cereals?

As chlormequat is often detected in food crops such as oats, wheat, and barley, there’s concern that the pesticide can be found in breakfast cereals.

Given that chlormequat has been detected in human urine in the United States, there’s strong evidence that the pesticide is found in some foods consumed by humans.

US-based research conducted in May 2023 found chlormequat in 92 per cent of oat-based foods, including Cheerios and Quaker Oats, according to CBS.

Speaking to People magazine, the manufacturers of these cereals maintained that their food products meet regulatory requirements.

"All our products adhere to all regulatory requirements," a spokesperson for the manufacturers of Cheerio’s told the outlet. "Food safety is always our top priority at General Mills, and we take care to ensure our food is prepared and packaged in the safest way possible."

Quaker Foods also told People: "At Quaker, we stand by the safety and quality of our products. We have a comprehensive food-safety management system in place. We adhere to all regulatory guidelines to ensure the safest, highest quality products for our consumers."

Cheerios in the UK are actually manufactured by Nestlé, a different brand from the US manufacturer General Mills. As this study had a US focus, there’s no evidence of chlormequat being detected in UK-sold Cheerios and Quaker Oats.

A representative for Nestlé and Quaker Oats has been approached by the Evening Standard for comment.

However, chlormequat has been identified in UK ingredients in the past few years.

A report published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) in 2022 stated that six samples of organic porridge oats that had been tested contained chlormequat.

Register now for one of the Evening Standard’s newsletters. From a daily news briefing to Homes & Property insights, plus lifestyle, going out, offers and more. For the best stories in your inbox, click here.

New Wave of Accusations Ignites MeToo Reckoning in France: ‘Women Are Fed Up. The Anger Is Enormous'


© Provided by Variety

 French film industry 'has a culture of power imbalance' (France 24)

France's film industry is undergoing a new MeToo reckoning, dominating news cycles, policy debates and even the goodie bag of the Cesar Awards' nominees dinner, which included a flyer headlined, "The cultural sector together against sexist and sexual violence."

The French #MeToo movement also made its way into the Berlinale, where actor Nora Hamzawi said that director Jacques Doillon's upcoming film "Third Grade" - in which Hamzawi stars - shouldn't be released due to the sexual misconduct allegations recently filed against the filmmkaker.

France's major producers guilds (API, SPI and UPC) have also issued a statement demanding the National Film Board (CNC) and the Minister of Culture to put specific guidelines in place. Those demands include the appointment of "experts specialized in the prevention and management of sexual violence to set up a safe environment at the start of every shoot;" additional resources for organizations fighting sexual misconduct; and setting up an insurance policy that would allow productions to immediately halt when a situation of sexual violence arises.

The subject will likely be prominent at Friday's Cesar Awards ceremony, where Judith Godrèche - the actor who has charged this new MeToo reckoning with her revelations that she had been preyed upon and groomed as a minor by directors Benoît Jacquot and Jacques Doillon - is expected to make a speech.

Godrèche's allegations are among several new sexual assault complaints filed in recent weeks. The new reckoning really kicked off in early December with the airing of an investigative documentary showing Gerard Depardieu making derogatory and sexualized comments about a pre-adolescent girl.

Since then, Anna Mouglalis, Isild le Besco, Vahina Giocante, and Julia Roy have stepped forward with new allegations against Doillon and Jacquot, while Godrèche herself has pushed the reckoning further by pressing charges against the two directors. She has also launched a social media campaign encouraging even more victims to speak up. Besides Doillon and Jacquot, a third director who is also in his 70s, Philippe Garrel, has also been accused of sexual assault by five actresses who spoke to Mediapart in September.

"I am here," Godrèche posted on Instagram on February 10, asking readers to submit their own stories to the email address MoiaussiJudith@gmail.com("MeTooJudith@gmail.com"). "Behind this account, [I am] ready to read and reflect on a project in your honor. However were you abused, please share as soon as possible."

The post has received more than 10,000 likes over the past week.

"Women are really fed up," says author and critic Hélène Frappat. "The intensity of this response displays the full extent of this pent up anger that up until now had not been measured – and clearly that anger is enormous."

Three days after Godrèche's Instagram outreach, Frappat published an Op-Ed in Le Monde situating this climate of predation within a wider, retrograde pathology. "This worldview is built on a scam," wrote Frappat. "A scam for women, not the for these so-called great creators who defend themselves by explaining that in France of the Nouvelle Vague a director must sleep with his muse in order to find inspiration. [In other words] our romantic vision is built on harassment." 

"I think many of these directors sincerely believe that such harassment, which can lead all the way to sexual assault, are products of [a romantic instinct]," she tells Variety.  "And that in turn, they feel their victims should be happy for such attention…Only we shouldn't fall into the trap of isolating cinema, because cinema is a just a blown-up image of society – and this issue affects our society on every level."

As Frappat's op-ed and Godrèche's online initiative continue to spark debate across French culture and media, organizations like Collective 50/50 now lead the charge in reshaping the audiovisual sector. Founded in 2018 under the moniker 50/50 For 2020, the activist organization has since rebranded with a wider and more ambitious goal in mind.


Collective 50/50's 2023 Conference For Equality, Parity and Diversity in Cinema.© Provided by Variety

"When the collective was created, we didn't think it would still exist in 2024," says 50/50 general secretary Laura Pertuy. "We were perhaps too optimistic, thinking and hoping that it would dissolve very quickly. But we now see that there's a colossal amount of progress to be made."

Instead, the collective has assumed a wider and intersectional point of view, encouraging parity in film festival selections by fighting for a healthier sector. The fight amounts to a full-scale rethinking of traditionally held mores – including the impunity conferred upon selected auteurs.

"We've created a terrible system, one we're now struggling to dismantle," says Pertuy. "A system that views those who create as all-powerful beings, unable to be questioned. That system encouraged a habit of not speaking up, of not being heard [because] those at the top needed to be listened to and admired at all costs."

"There's this old, imaginary world around [actors like] Depardieu and certain directors," Pertuy continues. "One gets the impression that it's more painful to separate oneself from this imaginary world than to hear the complaints, the pain or even the anger of women who have been sexually assaulted. There's a kind of blame reversal at work, which is a bit strange."

Because the film industry adheres to the same norms that govern modern life, it should come as no surprise that conferring absolute power and absolute deference on a select few can have an absolutely corrosive effect. With that in mind, Pertuy's organization has lobbied France's National Film Board (CNC) to mandate obligatory harassment prevention seminars for full casts and crews ahead of each shoot.

"This obligation, the fact of uniting and thinking about the shoot together, creates a certain atmosphere that helps deconstruct the concept of the director-king and the pyramidal organization built around them," says Pertuy. "In fact, addressing the full crew on the same level can significantly reduce violence on set."

At the same time, the CNC's work with 50/50 reflects a paradox of the current fight against harassment and the extent of the challenge ahead. 50/50's previous board resigned en masse following a sexual assault complaint and scandal in 2022, while CNC president Dominique Boutonnat still has open sexual assault charges against him. In December, President Emmanuel Macron defended Depardieu in a TV interview, saying the actor "made France proud," while the media pushback against directors Jacques Doillon and Benoit Jacquot has not yet impeded the filmmakers' upcoming work.

Doillon's latest feature, "Third Grade," has won the acclaim of First Lady Brigitte Macron and is confirmed for release in France next month, while Jacquot's Georges Simenon adaptation "Belle" – which stars Charlotte Gainsbourg and Guillaume Canet – is finishing post-production and was recently up for sale at Berlin's EFM. A source close to the market tells Variety that Jacquot's film has already sold to more than a dozen territories, while the filmmaker's scandal-tarnished image has not traveled as far beyond France's borders.

All that goes to show that the outrage newly voiced across the French industry is the beginning of a process, not the end of a chapter.

"In the face of such systemic violence, we must question the status quo that views certain actors and directors as kings," says Pertuy. "We have a clear obligation to stand up and speak out, to say we will no longer be attacked, we are no longer invisible, and we don't want to hide. That's where the revolution lies."      

 

Manitoba PCs gave 'incomplete' picture of financial challenges before election: report

NDP Finance Minister Adrien Sala accuses the Tories of misleading the public

Manitoba Finance Minister Adrien Sala said the third-party report demonstrates the former PC government made questionable spending choices in its final months in office. 'Reckless' decisions of previous government hidden from Manitobans: finance minister | Watch (msn.com)

Manitoba's former Progressive Conservative government presented an incomplete picture of the province's financial pressures, had aggressive energy-revenue assumptions and made significant spending commitments in the months leading up to the provincial election, says a consultant's report released Friday.

"From the release of the 2023-2024 budget to Oct. 3, 2023, budgetary decisions were made that collectively represent high budgetary risk," says the review by consulting firm MNP.

The review was ordered by the incoming NDP government shortly after the Oct. 3 election. In December, the government said the deficit was on track to end up at $1.6 billion — more than quadruple the original number in the spring budget and the highest shortfall in the province's history outside of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The report found instances where the Tory government appeared over-optimistic on revenues.

The Tory budget predicted a large surplus at Manitoba Hydro. And even as drought conditions caused power-generating water levels to drop sharply, the government did not reflect the change in its first quarter fiscal update in the summer. There was a caution of uncertainty about Hydro's profits given the weather but no new dollar figure.

The Tory government also assumed tax revenues would remain stable, even though it was cutting income taxes and facing a possible economic downturn, the report says.

No budgeting for health-care recruitment

It also promised in July to spend $200 million to hire more health-care workers, says the report, but it did not include the figure in its quarterly fiscal update issued the next day.

"It would have been reasonable to expect the government to have included this in the 2023-2024 first quarter report and fiscal economic update released the next day on July 28, 2023, but it was absent."

The Tories had also opened up the purse strings, boosting spending in their last budget by almost 10 per cent from the previous year, the report says.

On Friday, Finance Minister Adrien Sala accused the Tories of having misled the public in the election campaign.

"In an election year, they were desperate to hang on to power," Sala said.

The Tories rejected the report's findings.

"This is a political document with unaudited figures and incomplete information. The NDP neglected to mention that they are in charge for half of this budget's fiscal year," Tory finance critic Obby Khan said in a statement.

Despite the larger deficit and the report's findings, the NDP government committed to maintain income tax cuts that were in the Tory budget and took effect last month.

The cuts include raising personal income tax brackets and are expected to cost the treasury $486 million annually. The NDP promised during the election campaign it would follow through on that part of the Tory budget.

"Our commitments were clear on this, and we're planning on delivering on our commitments," Sala said Friday.

He also wouldn't say if the government would rein in its spending.

Previous Manitoba government made questionable spending decisions: consultant

13 hours ago
Duration2:05
A third-party review, commissioned by the current NDP government, concluded the former PC government made spending decisions in its final months in power that represented a 'high budgetary risk.'

With files from CBC News


JUST SAY NO 
Alberta regulator accepts Rockies coal mine application, will call public hearing


Alberta's energy regulator has accepted initial applications and is to open public hearings for a controversial open-pit coal mine on the eastern slopes of the province's southern Rocky Mountains that has already been turned down twice.

In an internal letter dated Thursday, the Alberta Energy Regulator says it made its decision after receiving "clarification" from Energy Minister Brian Jean about whether or not Northback's Grassy Mountain proposal should be exempted from a moratorium on coal development on those landscapes.

"The (regulator) has accepted the ... applications from Northback and has determined they should be decided by a panel of hearing commissioners," the letter says.

The news was welcomed by Blair Painter, mayor of the nearby community of Crowsnest Pass.

"It's good news for the community," he said.

"It would give us a really good industrial base. We view it as a great opportunity."

Area landowners and ranchers weren't as pleased.

"Our immediate reaction is one of great frustration and disappointment," said Bobbi Lambright of the Livingstone Landowners Group.

"It's pretty clear that this is a political rather than a regulatory decision."

The Grassy Mountain proposal, the site of significant mining in the past, has been before regulators for years. The steelmaking coal project was judged not in the public interest in 2021, after a long environmental review by a joint federal-provincial panel, and its permits were denied by both levels of government.

But the proposal was included on a list of so-called "advanced projects" exempted from a 2022 ministerial order that banned coal development in the Rockies, issued after a loud public outcry over a staking rush on those lands.

In September, the project was revived under the name Northback. Northback has applied for drilling and exploration permits and a water diversion licence and argues that it remains exempt from the order.

Opponents argue the project lost its advanced status when governments turned it down and that the regulator shouldn't consider the new applications.

"It's legally dead," Nigel Bankes, a University of Calgary emeritus professor of resource law, said in a blog post. "It's an ex-project."

In a November letter to the regulator, Energy Minister Brian Jean said once a project, always a project.


"Once a project is considered an advanced project it remains as one regardless of the outcome of regulatory applications submitted before it was declared an advanced project," he wrote. "It is my expectation that the (regulator) will review any applications related to these advanced coal projects."

That's what the regulator says it will do.

"A letter from the minister of energy clarifying the application of the (ministerial order) ... carries significant weight," says the regulator's Thursday letter.

It instructs its hearing commissioner to strike a panel to consider Northback's applications. It's not clear yet how that panel would operate or who would be eligible to appear before it.

There is likely to be significant interest.

A letter from Northback's lawyers to the regulator says 43 statements of support have been received. The regulator's website shows 83 objections to the drilling application.

It may not get that far. Katie Morrison of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society said her group is considering a legal challenge to the regulator's ruling that a proposal killed by two levels of government can still count as an advanced project.

"(The regulator) is missing the point," she said.

"This isn't a project that should be going through the regulator. It should not be considered an advanced project."

Morrison points to widespread opposition to expanded coal mining in the Rockies that exploded after the United Conservative Party government withdrew protections in 2020 for those lands without public consultation.

"Northback is refusing to hear the 'no' that has come from the vast majority of Albertans who oppose coal," she said. "The company continues to find these wedges and loopholes."

Northback CEO Mike Young wrote in an email that the company will listen to concerns of all Canadians and government regulators.

"We look forward to learning more details on the AER panel review of our proposed exploration drilling applications and sharing how our expertise and experience will ensure this exploratory drilling program is safe and protects the valuable water resources in the region,” he wrote.

Bankes said that even if the hearing goes ahead, the project still faces its previous regulatory rejections, upheld by the Alberta Court of Appeal.

"They keep trying and trying and trying, but Northback has to undermine or get quashed both the federal decision and the provincial decision," he said.

A Federal Court ruling last week rolled back the federal rejection. But that decision only compels cabinet to complete consultations with First Nations and leaves it open for Ottawa to reject the mine again.

Meanwhile, Painter is hoping for the best.

"Northback has supported our hospital and different social entities," he said. "They've been a good corporate citizen."

Here we go again, said Lambright.

"(The project) was conclusively denied by the joint review panel, the Alberta Energy Regulator, the federal and provincial governments in a regulatory process that was one of the most extended and comprehensive of any project.

"Why are we back doing a hearing again?"


This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 23, 2024.

Bob Weber, The Canadian Press


VICTORY
NDP says it has a pharmacare deal with Liberals. Here’s what it will cover

Story by Sean Boynton and David Baxter • 

NDP leader Jagmeet Singh speaks at a health-care rally on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2024. The Liberals and the NDP pharmacare negotiations are on a knife's edge, and the main point of contention is the number of drugs they plan to start with. 
THE CANADIAN PRESS/ Patrick Doyle© PD, RJB


Global News
Duration 1:57
NDP reaches national pharmacare deal with Liberals. 
Here’s what it will cover

The NDP has reached a deal with the Liberal government to introduce the first piece of a national pharmacare program that includes coverage for birth control and diabetes medication, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said Friday.

The deal is a critical piece of the supply-and-confidence agreement between the two parties and comes ahead of a March 1 deadline to table legislation. News of the deal was first reported by The Canadian Press.

"Pharmacare means that you will get the medicine you need with your health card, not a credit card," Singh said on social media while touting the deal.

"Now, millions of Canadians will save money and have better health."

An NDP source speaking on background to Global News said the deal "satisfies our end" of the supply-and-confidence pact.

Some final details may still be worked out over the weekend, but the source said the NDP expects the legislation will be tabled by the March 1 deadline.

A government source confirmed the deal had been reached and said more details would be announced next week.

The NDP says the deal includes full coverage for contraceptives close to what British Columbia covers, which includes birth control pills, IUDs and emergency contraception.

It also includes insulin for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, as well as additional diabetes drugs. The focus is on covering generics where there is an option to do so, the NDP source said. Ozempic, a new drug for diabetes that has been used off-label as a weight-loss drug, will not be covered under the agreement.

The deal also puts forward a fund to help provinces cover the cost of insulin pumps for diabetes patients, which the NDP wanted maximum coverage for, the source said.

All provinces cover 80 per cent of out-of-pocket costs for youth with Type 1 diabetes, but the coverage for adults with Type 2 diabetes varies widely — from zero per cent in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Alberta to a high of 62 per cent in Ontario, data from Diabetes Canada show.

It means that depending on their location households can be out thousands of dollars a year for diabetes medicines and supplies.

Ontario also provides many contraceptives for people under the age of 25 who don't have private insurance. Manitoba's government has already pledged to do so as well.

Abortion pills, which are different than morning-after pills, are already offered for free at pharmacies across Canada.

The New Democrats said birth control coverage will help millions of women and gender-diverse people


Global News
NDP’s Singh threatens ‘consequences’ if Liberals do not meet pharmacare deadline
Duration 1:56   View on Watch

The first deadline to reach a deal was pushed back in December, with both parties agreeing to extend it to March 1.

Singh had suggested failing to meet the March 1 deadline would result in "consequences" for the Liberals, but stopped short of explicitly saying his party would withdraw its support under the supply-and-confidence agreement. Such a move would potentially trigger an election, which the pact ensures won't be held until 2025.

Liberals had previously cited concerns about the potential costs of pharmacare, even as the NDP pushed for the program to include more right off the bat.

If the federal government moves towards fully implementing national pharmacare, that wider program is expected to cost roughly $40 billion a year in total, the parliamentary budget officer said in a report last fall. The report said the incremental cost to the public sector, including federal and provincial governments, would rise from $11.2 billion in 2024-25 to $13.4 billion in 2027-28.

However, such a program was also estimated to lead to cost savings on drug expenditures of $1.4 billion in 2024-25, with that figure increasing to $2.2 billion by 2027-28.

As the deadline to reach a deal drew nearer, Holland said the Liberals made it clear an initial pharmacare program could not be "massively expensive."

A source close to the pharmacare talks told the Canadian Press the Liberals made it clear they had about $800 million to spend for an initial program.

The Liberals campaigned on a promise to implement a national pharmacare program in the 2019 election, but made no such pledge when they went back to the polls in 2021.

—With files from the Canadian Press


SAVED THEIR ASS
Trudeau government's future looks safer after NDP says deal struck on drug costs


Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau looks on during a housing announcement in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada February 20, 2024. 
Jennifer Gauthier/File Photo© Thomson Reuters

OTTAWA (Reuters) - The chances of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau staying in office until an election next year appeared more certain on Friday after a political party that is keeping him in power said it would continue backing him.

Trudeau's ruling Liberals only have a minority of seats in the House of Commons elected chamber and need the support of other parties. In late 2021, the left-leaning New Democrats (NDP) agreed to back Trudeau in return for legislation to set up a nationwide system to help people pay for medication.

NDP leader Jagmeet Singh, who had in recent weeks complained the Liberals were dragging their feet and mused about withdrawing his automatic support for Trudeau, told the Canadian Broadcasting Corp that the two parties had now reached a deal on "pharmacare."

"We've secured something really important, I would say really historic for Canadians," he said.

Trudeau's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

A government source confirmed that terms of an agreement had been reached with the NDP and that details would be made public next week.

Continued NDP support means Trudeau would be able to govern until the next election, which by law must be held at some point in October 2025.

A string of recent opinion polls show both the Liberals and NDP would be badly defeated by the right-of-center Conservatives amid voter fatigue with Trudeau, who has been in office since November 2015.

(Reporting by David Ljunggren and Steve Scherer in Ottawa; Editing by Bill Berkrot and Sandra Maler)

 

Barclays must face US shareholder lawsuit over $17.7 billion debt sale blunder



Workers are seen in at Barclays bank offices in the Canary Wharf financial district in London, Britain,
REUTERS/Toby Melville/File Photo© Thomson Reuters


NEW YORK (Reuters) -A U.S. judge said Barclays must face part of a proposed class action by shareholders over the British bank's sale of $17.7 billion more debt than regulators had allowed.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan said shareholders adequately alleged that Barclays' failure to disclose the absence of internal controls to catch the error was a material omission of fact.

She also said shareholders can try to prove that Barclays and several officials, including former Chief Executive Jes Staley, were "actionably reckless" in reassuring them that the bank was complying with federal securities laws.

The judge nonetheless said the shareholders could not pursue a securities fraud claim over statements that Barclays made after the overissuances were discovered.

Barclays did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to similar requests.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Kirsten Donovan)

Amazon pays $1.9m to exploited workers in Saudi Arabia



All of the 54 workers from Nepal interviewed for the investigation said that recruiting firms had required them to pay stiff fees to get placed at jobs at Amazon warehouses in Saudi Arabia. Photograph: Lucas Jackson/Reuters© Photograph: Lucas Jackson/Reuters


Amazon has paid $1.9m to hundreds of current and former workers in the wake of revelations by the Guardian and other media partners about abuses against migrants who labored at the online retail giant’s warehouses in Saudi Arabia.

Amazon said in a statement that it paid reimbursements to more than 700 migrant workers who had been required to pay recruitment fees and other costs to secure work at the company’s distribution centers in Saudi Arabia. In announcing this action, the company said it’s committed to “fundamental human rights and the dignity of people connected to our business around the world”. Amazon said last fall that it employed nearly 1,500 permanent and seasonal workers in Saudi Arabia.

These payments came after the recruitment fees and other unfair practices were exposed by a joint media investigation by the Guardian, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), NBC News and Arab Reporters for Investigative Journalism.

All of the 54 workers from Nepal interviewed for the media partners’ investigation said that recruiting firms in their home country had required them to pay stiff fees – ranging from roughly $830 to $2,300 – as a condition for getting placed in jobs at Amazon warehouses in Saudi Arabia. Those amounts far exceed what’s allowed by Nepal’s government and run afoul of American and UN standards.

Forty-eight of the Nepali workers added that recruiters misled them about the terms of their employment, falsely promising they would work directly for Amazon. Instead, these workers said, they ended up working for Saudi labor supply firms that placed them in short-term contract jobs at Amazon warehouses in the Arab kingdom, then siphoned away much of their wages and in some cases demanded thousands of dollars in exit fees to allow them to go back to Nepal.


Related video: Amazon workers protest over pay in Coventry, UK (ViralPress)


The human rights group Amnesty International also issued a report on these issues. Amazon has said that its own internal monitoring system identified these problems before it became aware of the separate investigations by Amnesty and the media partners.

The Guardian and ICIJ recently talked to 40 workers from Nepal, India, Bangladesh and Pakistan who said they had received payments from Amazon or were expecting to get them soon. An Amazon spokesperson confirmed that workers from those countries had received payments and said workers from additional countries had also received reimbursements for their recruitment fees, but declined to name those countries.

“I never expected that I would get the money back,” said Bishnuman Shrestha, a Nepali laborer who worked for Amazon in Saudi Arabia from 2021 to early 2024. “I worked in Qatar and other countries before but never heard of workers getting their recruitment fees back. I never thought about it even in my dream.”

He said he received more than $1,800, which covered the amount he paid as a recruiting fee, plus interest. He told a reporter for the Guardian and ICIJ: “Keep doing this for other workers as well. It means a lot.”

The average reimbursement to the workers appears to exceed $2,500.

In its statement, Amazon said it had engaged a labor rights consulting firm to “conduct a focused assessment of foreign migrant worker issues” at two Amazon facilities in Saudi Arabia. The review, Amazon said, found multiple violations of its labor standards. Along with charging of recruitment fees, these included “substandard living accommodations, contract and wage irregularities, and delays in the resolution of worker complaints”.

The company said it has strengthened its internal controls relating to its work with labor supply firms and other “third-party” vendors, providing additional training to labor vendors and clarifying its expectations for these partner firms.

Amazon said it has also improved its communications mechanism that allows contract workers to share complaints with Amazon’s management and ensured that a Saudi labor supply firm that had provided contract laborers from Nepal was “making significant progress to improve workers’ housing”.

White House, tribal leaders hail 'historic' deal to restore salmon runs in Pacific Northwest








WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration, leaders of four Columbia River Basin tribes and the governors of Oregon and Washington celebrated on Friday as they signed papers formally launching a $1 billion plan to help recover depleted salmon populations in the Pacific Northwest.

The plan, announced in December, stopped short of calling for the removal of four controversial dams on the Snake River, as some environmental groups and tribal leaders have urged. But officials said it would boost clean energy production and help offset hydropower, transportation and other benefits provided by the dams should Congress ever agree to breach them.

The plan brokered by the Biden administration pauses long-running litigation over federal dam operations and represents the most significant step yet toward eventually taking the four Snake River dams down. The plan will strengthen tribal clean energy projects and provide other benefits for tribes and other communities that depend on the Columbia Basin for agriculture, energy, recreation and transportation, the White House said.

“Since time immemorial, the strength of the Yakama Nation and its people have come from the Columbia River, and from the fish, game, roots and berries it nourishes,'' Yakama Nation Chairman Gerald Lewis said at a White House ceremony.

“The Yakama Nation will always fight to protect and restore the salmon because, without the salmon, we cannot maintain the health of our people or our way of life,'' Lewis said, adding that Columbia Basin salmon are dying from the impacts of human development.

“Our fishers have empty nets and their homes have empty tables because historically the federal government has not done enough to mitigate these impacts,'' he said. “We need a lot more clean energy, but we need to do development in a way that is socially just.''

Lewis was among four tribal leaders who spoke at the hourlong ceremony at the White House complex, along with Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek and an array of federal officials.

The agreement, formally known as the Columbia Basin Restoration Initiative, “deserves to be celebrated,'' said Jonathan W. Smith, chairman of the Confederated Tribes ​of the Warm Springs Reservation.

The settlement “takes the interests of all the stakeholders in the Columbia Basin into account,'' he said. “It lays out a pathway to restore salmon and steelhead to healthy and abundant levels and moves forward with the necessary green energy transition in a socially just and equitable way."

Corinne Sams of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation called the signing ceremony a historic moment, not just for the tribes, but also for the U.S. government “and all Americans in the Pacific Northwest. My heart is big today.”

The Columbia River Basin, an area roughly the size of Texas, was once the world’s greatest salmon-producing river system, with at least 16 stocks of salmon and steelhead. Today, four are extinct and seven are listed under the Endangered Species Act.

Dams are a main culprit behind the salmon’s decline, and federal fisheries scientists have concluded that breaching the dams in eastern Washington on the Snake River, the largest tributary of the Columbia, would be the best hope for recovering them, providing the fish with access to hundreds of miles of pristine habitat and spawning grounds in Idaho.

Conservation groups sued the federal government more than two decades ago in an effort to save the fish. They have argued that the continued operation of the dams violates the Endangered Species Act as well as treaties dating to the mid-19th century ensuring the tribes’ right to harvest fish.

Friday's celebration did not include congressional Republicans who oppose dam breaching and have vowed to block it.

Dams along the Columbia-Snake River system provide more than one-third of all hydropower capacity in the United States, said Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, a Washington Republican who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee. In Washington state, hydropower accounts for 70% of electricity consumed.

The Snake River dams “helped transform Eastern Washington into one of the most productive agricultural regions in the world,'' including 40% of America’s wheat, Rodgers said in a statement.

She denounced “secret negotiations” led by White House senior adviser and climate envoy John Podesta, saying he and other officials “worked behind closed doors with a select group of radical environmentalists to develop a secret package of actions and commitments'' that advance ”efforts to remove the four Lower Snake River dams.''

Biden officials "ignored the concerns of people who live in the Pacific Northwest and who would be significantly impacted if these dams were breached,'' Rodgers said.

Podesta and other speakers at the White House ceremony looked past those concerns, with few even mentioning the dams.

"President Biden understands that the Columbia River is the lifeblood of the Pacific Northwest, for its culture, for its economy and for its people,'' said Brenda Mallory, chairwoman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality.

“The historic agreement is charting a new and exciting path to restore the river, provide for clean energy and live up to our responsibilities and obligations to tribal nations,'' Mallory said. "I’m confident we will secure the vision ... of securing a restored Columbia River Basin, one that is teeming with wild fish, prosperous to tribal nations, (with) affordable clean energy, a strong agricultural economy and an upgraded transportation and recreation system.''

Matthew Daly, The Associated Press