Monday, February 26, 2024

Israel has lost the world, as not even its lies can save it

February 26, 2024 


Anti-war Israeli activists, holding banners, gather at the Paris Square near the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s house to demand an end to Israeli attacks on Gaza on February 23, 2024 on West Jerusalem.
[Saeed Qaq – Anadolu Agency]

by Motasem A Dalloul


The occupation state of Israel has a propaganda machine that reproduces lie after lie in order to generate sympathy around the globe. For more than 75 years, it has generally succeeded in gaining the sympathy of the Western world and the full support of its leaders, as well as the leaderships of many other countries, including Russia, China, Japan and India.

From the very beginning, this propaganda claimed that the state of Israel was created in “a land without a people, for a people without a land”, one of Zionism’s earliest myths. The intention was clearly to dismiss the history of Palestine and its people, and cover up the massacres and atrocities carried out to purge the land of the people who in reality lived there — and had done for centuries — and pave the way for the Zionist settlers.

The indigenous Palestinians were basically divided into three groups: those who were able to hold on to their homes and land; those driven out of their homeland at gunpoint and are still deprived of their legitimate right to return; and those displaced within historic Palestine who have, since 1967, been subjected to a brutal military occupation in the occupied West Bank, Jerusalem and Gaza Strip.

The so-called “peace process” since the early nineties which saw the creation of the Palestinian Authority, has been a sham.

Legitimate resistance to the occupation has been met with death and destruction on a massive scale over many years. Even non-violent protests, such as the 2018 Great March of Return, have been met with indiscriminate killing and brutality.

In all of this, the occupation state has lied to justify its aggression against the Palestinians and disguise its atrocities. In this it has been aided and abetted by mainstream media owned and controlled by Zionists.

In a cruel inversion of the truth, the Palestinians have been portrayed as the aggressors, while the occupation state — whose military occupation is, by default, an aggressive position — is portrayed as the victim. With political, diplomatic and military protection from world powers, especially the US, Israel has been able to act with impunity, treating international laws and conventions with open contempt. It must have thought that such blind support from world leaders would last forever.

Gaza Civil Defence: Starvation threatens 700,000 citizens in northern Gaza Strip

However, the rise of social media has laid bare the brutality of the occupation state and its disregard of the international community and international law, for the whole world to see. Global awareness has prompted a growing consciousness of the illegality of the apartheid state and its aggression against the Palestinians. So much so, in fact, that many supporters of the occupation state have turned against it.

According to Israeli journalist and commentator on Arab affairs for Israel’s Army Radio, Jackie Khogy, this has placed Israel alongside Russia on the international index of violations. He also pointed out, reported Yedioth Ahronoth, that it is placed lower than China.

Khogy quoted a foreign diplomat as telling him that the image of the occupation state is today at its lowest ever level, highlighting its “childish behaviour” over regional issues. Israel, said the diplomat, is still playing the victim card, despite killing 30,000+ Palestinians in the Gaza Strip since October.

Well-known Israeli columnist Gideon Levy wrote in Haaretz that it was difficult to find a state whose behaviour sees it hauled to The Hague twice in the space of a couple of weeks.

READ: Blinken faces scrutiny for genocide definition discrepancies

When I asked on X if any supporters of Israel had changed their minds, one person responded by saying that that is exactly what he had done, because “Now, I know they are monsters.” When another was told by her boyfriend “the harsh truth” about the occupation state after she had been brought up on its “lies” she concluded: “Only sociopaths could support the parasitic state now.”

“Before 7 October,” wrote yet another, “my impression of the region was that it was an equal fight — two nations arguing over same holy land.” So, I was mostly indifferent, added Sammy Rose. “This was not my battle. But now that I see the truth, I am questioning EVERYTHING I thought I ever knew, especially about us here in the West.”

In cities across the world you will now see thousands of people marching for Palestine.

Shows of support for Israel are tiny in comparison. Anti-occupation activists have even acted on the ground by, for example, asking Jordanian officials to airdrop food aid to Gaza.

It is clear, therefore, that the occupation state has lost the world. Yes, it still has supporters, including world leaders and media, but the evidence suggests that the vast majority of people are sick and tired of Israel. Indeed, its violence sickens them, and the more that Israeli propaganda tries to justify genocide, the more that people understand the lies and deceit that have gone on for decades, with the complicity of Israel’s allies in Western capitals. Now even that support base is weakening, though. Israel’s clock is ticking; it is losing the propaganda war; and not even its lies can save it.
Bernie Sanders says Israel has committed mass murder in Gaza

The New Arab Staff
London
26 February, 2024

In an Interview with the UK's Channel 4, former US presidential candidate Bernie Sanders spoke of the mass slaughter of women and children in Gaza and said that it "has got to end”.

The Democrat added that he was leading the effort in Congress to make sure that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu doesn't get the US funds that he needs to continue his war against the Palestinian people.

UK's largest Muslim body urges Conservative Party probe into 'structural Islamophobia' claims

The UK's largest Muslim body has called on the Conservative Party to launch an investigation into 'structural Islamophobia' within its ranks.


The New Arab Staff
26 February, 2024

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak denied on Monday that his governing party tolerates anti-Muslim prejudice [Getty]


The UK’s largest Muslim group has written to the governing Conservative Party on Sunday demanding an investigation into claims of "structural Islamophobia" within its ranks.

The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) said in a letter addressed to Conservative chair, Richard Holden, following "a week of inflammatory statements and Islamophobia from senior figures in the party".

The secretary general of the MCB, Zara Mohammed, said that anti-Muslim sentiment was "on public display this week", citing comments made by several Tory figures, including the former home secretary Suella Braverman, the former Tory party deputy chair Lee Anderson, and former prime minister, Liz Truss.

"Our view is that the Islamophobia in the party is institutional, tolerated by the leadership and seen as acceptable by great swathes of the party membership," Mohammed said in the letter.

It cited an anti-Muslim rant on GB News by pugnacious populist Anderson, who claimed that Islamists had "got control" of London Mayor Sadiq Khan and the city of London.

Anderson had the Conservative whip withdrawn on Saturday after he refused to apologise for the comments.

Khan, a Muslim and a member of the opposition Labour Party, described the Ashfield MP's remarks as "pouring fuel on the fire of anti-Muslim hatred".

Assiah Hamed

The MCB letter criticised the Conservative Party for removing the whip from Anderson only after he refused to apologise for the inflammatory comments and not after he had made them.

The letter also cited Braverman's article last week in The Daily Telegraph, in which she wrote that "Islamists … are in charge", with Mohammed highlighting that the former PM had fallen into a "well-trodden Islamophobic path".

The MCB also condemned Truss's comments in an interview with the far-right commentator Steve Bannon, during which she claimed that a "radical jihadist party" could send someone to parliament, and remained silent when Bannon described the far-right figure Tommy Robinson as a "hero".

The MCB said in its letter that: "There is no radical Islamic party – this is false and Islamophobic to play to this trope of Muslims taking over."

The MCB had shared the letter with the Equalities and Human Rights Commission to encourage Holden "to take this complaint seriously and take actions".

Mariya bint Rehan

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak denied on Monday that his governing party tolerates anti-Muslim prejudice.

In response to Anderson's comments, Sunak told the BBC: "These comments weren’t acceptable, they were wrong."

Asked whether his party has an Islamophobia problem, Sunak said: "No, of course it doesn’t."

Meanwhile, Labour Party leader Keir Starmer accused Sunak of harbouring "extremists in his party".

Speaking to The Observer, Starmer said: "Whether it is Liz Truss staying silent on Tommy Robinson or Suella Braverman's extreme rhetoric, Rishi Sunak’s weakness means Tory MPs can act with impunity."

The New Arab Staff

In 2021, an investigation into Islamophobia in the Conservative Party found there was no institutional racism in the party, although the inquiry was criticised for excluding Muslim members.

The latest string of Islamophobic rhetoric came as anti-hate monitoring group Tell MAMA reported that anti-Muslim hate incidents in the UK more than tripled in the last four months, following the outbreak of the war in Gaza.
Germany divided over criticism of Israel's Gaza war, apartheid at Berlinale

During the Berlin film festival's awards ceremony, many filmmakers denounced Israel over the bombing of Gaza.


The New Arab Staff
26 February, 2024

Abraham condemned onstage the apartheid conditions being endured by Palestinians in "aparthied Israel" [Gett]

Germany has been divided after artists at the Berlin Film Festival criticised Israel's war on Gaza, where over 29,700 people have been killed - mostly women and children.

At the awards ceremony concluding the Berlinale on Saturday, saw Palestinian Basel Adra criticise Israel's war on Gaza in his acceptance speech after his film 'No Other Land' won the top documentary prize.

"It is very hard for me to celebrate when there are tens of thousands of my people being slaughtered and massacred by Israel in Gaza," said Adra, whose film 'No Other Land' depicts the Israeli settler displacement of Palestinians in villages in the West Bank.

The film, which was an Israeli-Palestinian production, saw Adra and Israeli journalist Yuval Abraham sharing director credits

Abraham also condemned onstage the apartheid conditions being endured by Palestinians in "aparthied Israel".

"In two days, we will go back to a land where we are not equal," Abraham said. "I am living under civilian law, and Basel is under military law. We live 30 minutes from one another, but I have voting rights, and Basel is not having voting rights.

"I am free to move where I want in this land. Basel is, like millions of Palestinians, locked in the occupied West Bank. This situation of apartheid between us, this inequality, it has to end."

After the ceremony, footage of the speech went viral on social media with Abraham saying he had received death threats over the remarks.

While different people called for a ceasefire in Gaza, perhaps the speech that prompted the strongest criticism from several German politicians came from US filmmaker Ben Russell, who accepted his award wearing the Palestinian scarf, the keffiyeh, a symbol of Palestinian solidarity.

"Of course, we also stand for life here and we stand against genocide and for a cease-fire in solidarity with all our comrades," said Russell, supported by cheers in the audience.

German officials vowed to probe how criticism of Israel's onslaught in Gaza was made on stage.

"It is unacceptable that... the attack by Hamas on 7 October was not mentioned," government spokeswoman Christiane Hoffmann told a press briefing in Berlin on Monday.

Chancellor Olaf Scholz "agrees that such a one-sided stance cannot be allowed to stand", she said.

"In any debate on this topic, it is of course important to keep in mind the event that triggered this renewed escalation of the Middle East conflict - namely the Hamas attack on 7 October," she said.

The New Arab Staff & Agencies

The culture minister and the Berlin mayor will review what happened and hold talks with the festival's incoming director to ensure it does not happen in future, she said.


Culture Minister Claudia Roth and Mayor Kai Wegner have also found themselves in hot water over the ceremony.

A report in top tabloid Bild carried a picture it said showed the pair applauding Adra's remarks.

On Sunday after the ceremony, Wegner posted on social media that the anti-Israel remarks were "unacceptable", adding that "there is no place for anti-Semitism in Berlin".

Israel's onslaught on the besieged Gaza Strip has brought to the forefront debates on freedom of expression in Germany, with several arts institutions cancelling exhibitions due to expressions made by featured artists - particularly on social media - that were deemed "anti-semitic".

Almost 6,000 artists, including Wolfgang Tillmans, Agnieszka Polska and Candice Breitz, signed an open letter "for the preservation of the freedom of art and the freedom of expression".
‘I will no longer be complicit in genocide’: U.S. soldier dies of self-immolation in protest of war on Gaza

Aaron Bushnell, a 25-year-old soldier in the United States Air Force, died on Sunday after setting himself on fire outside the Israeli Embassy in Washington DC in protest of Israel's genocidal assault on Gaza.

BY MICHAEL ARRIA 
AARON BUSHNELL SHOUTED “FREE PALESTINE” BEFORE SETTING HIMSELF ON FIRE. (SCREENSHOT FROM TWITCH VIA TALIA JANE ON TWITTER/X.)

An active-duty member U.S. airman is dead after setting himself on fire outside the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C. on Sunday. The self-immolation was a protest against Israel’s assault on Gaza, which has been occurring since October.

Aaron Bushnell was a 25-year-old soldier in the United States Air Force. Before the action he uploaded a video to Twitch explaining his motivation. A censored version of the stream was uploaded to Twitter by journalist Talia Jane.

“I will no longer be complicit in genocide,” says Bushnell in the video. “I am about to engage in an extreme act of protest but compared to what people have been experiencing in Palestine at the hands of their colonizers, it’s not extreme at all. This is what our ruling class has decided will be normal.”
Advertisement

In the clip Bushnell, who is wearing his fatigues, douses himself in gasoline and lights himself on fire while yelling, “Free Palestine!” The flames were eventually put out by Secret Service members. Bushnell succumbed to his injuries at a DC hospital later that night.

Content Warning: Graphic VideoVIDEO POSTED TO AARON BUSHNELL’S TWITCH ACCOUNT. VIA TALIA JANE, TWITTER/X.

Multiple people who knew Bushnell reached out to Jane to share their memories of him.

“He is one of the most principled comrades I’ve ever known,” said one. “He’s always trying to think about how we can actually achieve liberation for all with a smile on his face,” offered another.



Bushnell also made a Facebook post the morning before he set himself on fire. “Many of us like to ask ourselves, ‘What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?’ The answer is, you’re doing it. Right now,” it read.

Since October, thousands of Americans have protested Israel’s ongoing attacks on Gaza and the United States government’s support for the bombing. In December, a protester was critically injured after lighting themself on fire outside the Israeli consulate in Atlanta. A Palestinian flag was found at the scene.

Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu is seeking cabinet approval for an invasion of Rafah, despite the fact that a temporary ceasefire is currently being negotiated. “It has to be done,” said Netanyahu recently. “Because total victory is our goal, and total victory is within reach.”

More than 30,000 Palestinians have been killed so far, more than half of the deaths have been women and children.

Who is Aaron Bushnell, the US airman who burnt himself outside Israel's embassy to protest Gaza genocide?

The world has commended a US Air Force member for his show of solidarity with Gaza after he took away his own life outside the Israeli embassy in Washington.



The New Arab Staff
26 February, 2024

Bushnell livestreamed the incident outside the Israeli embassy in Washington on social media [Getty]


A member of the US military set himself on fire outside the Israeli embassy in Washington on Sunday afternoon in protest of the genocide in Gaza.

Aaron Bushnell, a 25-year-old active duty airman, was pronounced dead later Sunday after being rushed to hospital.

Authorities extinguished the fire, and Israeli embassy spokeswoman, Tal Naim, said no staff were hurt.

In uniform, Bushnell live-streamed the incident on the social media platform Twitch, introducing himself as he approached the gates of the embassy.

The video has been widely shared on other social media platforms.

"I am an active-duty member of the United States Air Force, and I will no longer be complicit in genocide," he says, before revealing that he was going to carry out an "extreme act of protest".

He still played down the act of self-immolation, saying it did not compare to the suffering being experienced by Palestinians, battered by months of Israeli bombardment.

Bushnell sets his phone down, stands in front of the embassy gates and pours a flammable substance over himself before sparking a fire.


"Free Palestine, free Palestine!" he shouted while engulfed in flames.

Sirens could be heard only seconds later as authorities rushed to extinguish the fire.

One security guard in the video is seen pointing a gun toward Bushnell, despite the latter being on the ground. Some people on X alleged that the man holding the gun was an Israeli agent, but The New Arab could not verify the claims.

Notes of sympathy and solidarity poured in for Bushell on social media.

Who was Aaron Bushnell?


A Washington D.C. native, Bushnell specialised in software engineering and computer science attending the University of Maryland Global Campus from where he graduated in 2023, according to his profile on LinkedIn.


He was still at the Southern New Hampshire University where he was expected to earn a Bachelor of Science degree next year.

The Washington native joined the US Air Force in May 2020, gradually working his way to become a DevOps Engineer three years later.

He describes himself on LinkedIn as an "aspiring software engineer" and that he has "a talent and a passion for solving complex problems with code".

Growing frustration

At the start of December, another woman protested the war on Gaza and set herself on fire outside the Israeli consulate in Atlanta, Georgia.

There has been growing anger at Joe Biden’s administration for his unwavering support for Israel since it began its unprecedented air and ground campaign in Gaza, killing close to 30,000 people since 7 October.

Health authorities in Gaza say most of the victims are women and children.
Despite criticism of the Israeli government for the colossal death toll, the US has continued to veto resolutions at the United Nations Security Council calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, most recently a proposal put forward by Algeria.

Washington is expected to send Israel weapons including MK-82 bombs and KMU-572 Joint Direct Attack Munitions that add precision guidance to bombs, and FMU-139 bomb fuses, the Wall Street Journal reported earlier this month.

The growing backlash against Biden is especially noticeable in Arab-American communities, particularly states like Michigan which has a sizeable Middle Eastern population.

 

In echo of Vietnam war, US airman sets himself on fire in front of Israel embassy in Washington

The man was transported to hospital with “critical life threatening injuries,” the fire department said.
Monday 26/02/2024
US Secret Service vehicles block access to a street leading to the embassy of Israel in Washington, DC on February 25, 2024. AFP
US Secret Service vehicles block access to a street leading to the embassy of Israel in Washington, DC on February 25, 2024. AFP

WASHINGTON

An serving member of the US Air Force set himself on fire outside the Israeli embassy in Washington on Sunday, officials said, as media reported he was protesting the war in Gaza.

Emergency responders rushed to the scene just before 1pm (1800 GMT) in response to a “call for person on fire outside the Israeli embassy,” according to a message on X, formerly Twitter, by the capital’s fire department.

They arrived to find that officers from the Secret Service, the US law enforcement agency tasked with protecting US political leaders, visiting heads of state and others, had already extinguished the fire.

The man was transported to hospital with “critical life threatening injuries,” the fire department said.

An Air Force spokesman confirmed to AFP that he was an serving member of the Air Force, but gave no further details.

A spokesman for the Israeli embassy said no staff were injured in the incident, and that the man was “unknown” to them.

US media reported that the man apparently livestreamed himself on Twitch, wearing fatigues and declaring he will “not be complicit in genocide” before dousing himself in a liquid.

He then set himself on fire while yelling “Free Palestine!” until he fell on the ground.

Bushnell reportedly sent a message to media outlets before his self-immolation. “​​Today, I am planning to engage in an extreme act of protest against the genocide of the Palestinian people,” he said.

“I will no longer be complicit in genocide. I’m about to engage in an extreme act of protest,” the airman repeated, in footage reviewed by TIME magazine, as he walked toward the driveway of the Israeli embassy. “But compared to what people have been experiencing in Palestine at the hands of their colonisers, it’s not extreme at all. This is what our ruling class has decided will be normal.”

A policeman watches as a demonstrator waves a Palestinian flag outside the Israeli embassy in Washington, December 1, 2023. REUTERS
A policeman watches as a demonstrator waves a Palestinian flag outside the Israeli embassy in Washington, December 1, 2023. REUTERS

The shocking act came as protests are increasing across the United States against Israel’s actions in Gaza, where the Jewish state is waging a retaliatory war for an attack on October 7 by Hamas militants. An earlier act of self-immolation in protest against the war in Gaza was reported a few months ago in Atlanta, Georgia.

Opinion polls show the US public to be divided about the war, with majorities of Democrats and young people calling for a ceasefire. Protests against the war have taken place in most US cities.

The self-immolation of the US airman in protest against the Gaza war is likely to remind Americans of the Buddhist monks who burnt themselves to death protesting the Vietnam war in 1963. Their self-immolations played an important role in reshaping US policies in Southeast Asia.

With the death toll in Gaza nearing 30,000, according to the Hamas-run health ministry there, international pressure has been increasing on the United States to rein its ally Israel, which it continues to supply with weapons and shield with UN security council vetoes despite misgivings about the mounting number of casualties among civilians.

Extraordinary charges of bias emerge against NYTimes reporter Anat Schwartz

New doubts are emerging about the New York Times’s coverage of sexual violence in the October 7 attack. The paper must explain why it broke its own rules by hiring a clearly biased writer who endorsed racist and violent rhetoric toward Palestinians.
NEW YORK TIMES HEADQUARTERS. (PHOTO: WIKIPEDIA)


New doubts are emerging about the New York Times’s coverage of sexual violence during the October 7 Hamas-led attack — and the paper owes its readers an open and transparent explanation.

What’s more, its reporting on this issue has become so questionable that it should assign new reporters to go over the entire story again.

The latest questions are centered around Anat Schwartz, an Israeli who co-authored several of the paper’s most widely circulated reports, including the now well-known and scrutinized December 28 article headlined: “‘Screams Without Words’’ How Hamas Weaponized Sexual Violence on Oct. 7.

Independent researchers scrutinized the online record, and raised serious questions about Schwartz. First, she has apparently never been a reporter but is actually a filmmaker, who the Times suddenly hired in October. You would expect the paper to look for someone with actual journalistic experience, especially for a story as sensitive as this one, written during the fog of war. Surely the paper had enough of its own correspondents on staff who could have been assigned to it.

Next, the researchers found that Schwartz had not hidden her strong feelings online. There are screenshots of her “liking” certain posts that repeated the “40 beheaded baby” hoax, and that endorsed another hysterical post that urged the Israeli army to “turn Gaza into a slaughterhouse,” and called Palestinians “human animals.”


(Just this morning, more evidence emerged online; Schwartz apparently also served in Israeli Military Intelligence.)


Finally, one of her co-authors on two of the reports was Adam Sella, who is her nephew.

Let’s pause here. What would happen if the Times suddenly hired a Palestinian filmmaker with no journalistic background, who had recently publicly “liked” posts that called for “pushing Israeli Jews into the sea,” to co-write several of its most sensitive and contested reports?

(We don’t have to speculate. The Times fired Palestinian photojournalist Hosam Salam in 2022 after one of the pro-Israel media watchdog groups protested about his social media posts.)

After Anat Schwartz’s online history became public, she locked down her accounts and then deleted much of the incriminating content.

The New York Times imposes strict rules on its reporters to maintain the appearance of objectivity. Reporters are not supposed to attend demonstrations of any kind, wear campaign buttons, or post opinions on social media. By hiring Anat Schwartz, the paper clearly violated its own guidelines, and it should publicly explain and apologize.

There’s another related example of how the Times has botched the sexual violence story. One of the first Israeli organizations that arrived on the scene of the Hamas attack was Zaka, a volunteer group that recovers dead bodies. On January 15, Times reporter Sheena Frankel wrote a positive profile of the group; she included 3 or 4 sentences of criticism, only to quickly dismiss them. This site had already raised serious doubts about Zaka weeks earlier, pointing out that “the organization’s volunteers have systematically given false testimonies, and continue repeating them to journalists on behalf of the Israel government.” Then, on January 31, the Israeli daily Haaretz published a long investigation, that highlighted “cases of negligence, misinformation and a fundraising campaign that used the dead as props.” Haaretz cited one Zaka report that said a volunteer had seen a murdered pregnant woman, with the baby still attached by the umbilical cord — before concluding that the incident “simply didn’t happen.”

At this stage, there are serious doubts about many aspects of Israel’s overall account about October 7. Only a genuinely independent and impartial investigation might some day get closer to the truth. But meanwhile, at the very least the New York Times must publicly recognize its errors, and assign new, unbiased reporters to try to clean up its mess.

Israel wages war on reproductive rights in Gaza

Sewar Elejla The Electronic Intifada 
18 February 2024

Women in Gaza find themselves on the frontline in a battle for survival. Devoid of shelter, safety, food, water and sanitation, they bear the brunt of a genocidal war.

Around 70 percent of all the people that Israel has killed in Gaza are women and children.

Around 1 million women and girls are displaced. For months, they have been living in a tent or in schools.

Every woman in Gaza is weary and at constant risk.

On average, two mothers are killed per hour.

Such a chilling statistic reflects a very dire reality. What does the future hold for womanhood, motherhood, childhood?

Behind the statistics, there are individuals and families.

The responsibilities shouldered by these women, who are the main pillars of their families, have become even more challenging. More than 3,000 women have become widows and are new heads of households.

They have to take care of and protect their children in inhumane environments.

They strive to prepare scarce food on wood fires for their families in the early hours of the morning. They lack the very basic needs for their own wellbeing, most importantly sanitary needs and privacy.
No sanitary care

Dr. Areej Hijazi, an obstetrician, experiences the everyday struggles of Gaza women during this genocidal war.

“Women are in very bad conditions these days,” she said. “The lack of water and proper hygiene significantly impact their health. Sanitary pads are strikingly expensive and sometimes cannot be found.”

“Women who have recently given birth and those experiencing irregular or heavy periods are forced now to use pieces of cloth that they must wash and reuse,” she added. “This carries the risks of bacterial and fungal infections, exacerbating their situation.”

Privacy becomes a distant memory in the cramped tents and schools.

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) include universal access to adequate sanitation and hygiene. That seems like a very remote dream during this humanitarian crisis.

In 2024, women in Gaza plead for the most basic sanitary care – sanitary pads. They are struggling to survive in a world that seems to have forgotten them.

The dire situation escalates for the tens of thousands of pregnant and lactating women who lack access to sufficient care both before and after giving birth.

The critical lack of antenatal care is compounded by the absence of iron supplements.

The scarcity of medical treatment has especially adverse consequences for pregnant women with health issues such as diabetes or high blood pressure.

Antenatal care “is essentially unavailable, except for some scattered field points providing very basic services,” Areej Hijazi pointed out.

“Unfortunately, these services do not reach all areas and not all women know about them. And even if women are aware of them, finding transportation to access them becomes a formidable challenge.”
Shortage of midwives

Around 180 women give birth per day in Gaza.

The stories of women giving birth in school corridors and tents, without access to hospitals or transportation, are a desperate cry for help.

The lack of basic necessities coupled with constant exposure to traumatic scenes has an immeasurable impact on the physical and mental health of these women.

Al-Helal al-Emirati hospital in Rafah – Gaza’s southernmost city – is the only refuge for women.

The challenges its staff face are overwhelming: a shortage of towels, sutures, medicine and other supplies.

The situation is getting worse, with the amount of aid allowed completely inadequate. Matters will not improve without a ceasefire.

Each day, approximately 80 women give birth through vaginal deliveries at al-Emirati hospital. A further 20 deliveries are made via cesarean sections.

Al-Emirati is the smallest maternity hospital in Gaza. Before 7 October, it was only receiving 10-15 women in labor per day.

Having to deal with a huge increase in patients places immense strain on the hospital’s staff and on an already stretched healthcare system.

Al-Emirati hospital has a shortage of midwives and the responsibilities faced by those midwives working there are overwhelming.

Within a few hours of giving birth, women have to be discharged. They go back to tents or overcrowded schools.

New mothers are “deprived of crucial care and postpartum education, breastfeeding and hygiene,” Areej Hijazi, who works at al-Emirati hospital, noted.

“Complications have surged,” she added.

There have been increases in preterm labor, miscarriages, hemorrhaging, sepsis and postnatal depression.

The consequences will affect a whole generation. Children will be less healthy and a rise in chronic diseases is expected.

Life expectancy will be shorter and there are bound to be delays in the development of many children.
Heartbreaking

Hijazi has encountered heartbreaking cases of pregnant women who have undergone amputations after being injured by Israel’s relentless violence. Those women have faced immense struggles during childbirth.

There have been a huge number of other cases in which pregnant women were greatly traumatized after surviving Israel’s bombardments. The unfortunate outcomes in such cases have often been the loss of newborns.

Sometimes, hysterectomies had to be performed. As a result those women – frequently quite young – will have no chance of conceiving in the future.

In one case, a woman had become pregnant through in-vitro fertilization – after trying to conceive for 15 years.

She gave birth to quadruplets – three boys and a girl.

This woman and her children were killed during the current war, leaving her husband to mourn alone.

Another woman who became pregnant through IVF gave birth prematurely amid the horrors of bombardment and displacement. Her twin daughters were placed in an incubator but did not survive.

A disturbing pattern can be discerned. Israel is systematically abusing the reproductive rights of Gaza’s women.

These abuses have occurred at a time when there has been little international attention paid to the kidnapping and detention of women and children by Israeli troops invading Gaza. Evidence that these women have been tortured has been gathered by human rights groups.

Israel has fabricated stories of mass rapes on 7 October as a pretext for its genocidal attack on Gaza.

As well as amplifying Israel’s lies, the West’s governments have been complicit in Israel’s assaults on Gaza’s women.

The hypocrisy of the US has been especially stark.

Joe Biden – who promised to make gender equity a cornerstone of his presidency – is a chief enabler of Israel’s war. The fake feminists in his administration are abetting the violations of reproductive rights in Gaza.

Sewar Elejla was formerly a doctor at al-Shifa hospital in Gaza. She is now a Canada-based researcher.

 

Many older adults receiving home care do not receive palliative care before death


Peer-Reviewed Publication

CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL





Many older adults receiving home care do not receive any palliative home care before death, suggesting we need better methods to identify people who need this support, according to new research in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) https://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.221513.

"Palliative care is an essential component of a holistic, comprehensive and patient-centred approach to care for all people with a life-limiting illness from the time of diagnosis with the disease," said Dr. Amy Hsu, investigator at the Bruyère Research Institute and faculty in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa, senior author of the study. 

Starting palliative care in the months before death is linked to a more positive end-of-life experience, including improved quality of life, less anxiety, better pain and symptom management, and potentially less aggressive care at the end of life. However, Canadian estimates indicate that only 15% of people receive palliative care at home in the last year of life.

The study, conducted by Ottawa researchers, looked at data on almost a quarter million community-dwelling older adults with at least 1 interRAI Home Care assessment between August 2018 and September 2019. Using a tool called RESPECT, which was developed to help identify frail older adults' need for palliative care, the research team predicted the risk of dying within 6 months of an assessment and looked at what health services people received. 

They found that only about half of the individuals who had an estimated life expectancy of less than 3 months had received formal palliative home care. Those who had received palliative home care were people who had been flagged by physicians as having a terminal prognosis.

"Prediction algorithms, like RESPECT, can improve how we provide care to frail individuals. They can help clinicians recognize who needs care and when," said Dr. Doug Manuel, a family medicine physician and senior scientist at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, one of the study's coauthors. 

"These tools and data can also support earlier conversations about patients' preferences, goals, and wishes as they approach the end of life, and inform advance care planning," adds Dr. Hsu.

"A substantial proportion of clients likely in their last few months to years of life do not receive any palliative care and continue to be admitted to hospitals and long-term care homes. Most Canadians want to die at home or in a home-like environment, surrounded by their loved ones. When individuals are not supported to die in the community, their end-of-life care experiences may be misaligned with their preferences," said Ms. Maya Murmann, research associate at the Bruyère Research Institute, who is supporting the integration of RESPECT in various health settings.

The RESPECT calculator is available at ProjectBigLife.ca. The researchers are working with partners in home, community care, and long-term care to implement RESPECT in their settings.

 

Reforestation schemes are not enough to recover the carbon created by harvesting wood, research suggests


Book Announcement

TAYLOR & FRANCIS GROUP





Forests have a critical role to play in capturing and storing carbon from the Earth’s atmosphere – but some models exaggerate their carbon removal potential by almost three-fold, according to a leading professor of forest economics.

Global Forest Carbon: Policy, Economics and Finance by Runsheng Yin from Michigan State University emphasizes the value of nature-based solutions to the climate crisis but calls for significant changes to the way carbon credits from reforestation, afforestation, and improved forest management are calculated. He has found that current modeling of local smallholding forestation sites is not compatible with the internationally agreed Paris Agreement.

“Companies worldwide are investing heavily in reforestation strategies, and while vital this is not going to be enough to remove the amount of carbon created in making timber, and the results won’t be quick enough to counteract the carbon output created by cutting down the trees in the first place,” Yin explains.

More accountability needed

The global expert in forest economics is calling for more rigorous accounting and assessments for local forest carbon storage and sequestration schemes.  This will include properly considering what happens to the timber after it has been logged and calculating how long the carbon stored in the resulting wood products will last before returning to the atmosphere.  He recommends the creation of intermediary agencies to aggregate the contributions of local smallholders. And he asks that the process is managed coherently at national and international levels so it can have greatest impact.

Reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is critical to tackling climate change as increasing levels of greenhouse gases in the air and ocean is causing temperatures to spike, sea-levels to rise and weather to become dangerously unpredictable and extreme. The international Paris Agreement in 2015 saw nations pledge to take action to try to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

“Nations, corporations and individuals are turning to nature-based solutions to try to offset their greenhouse emissions. As the practice becomes increasingly monetized, it is crucial that the accounting is done accurately,” Yin warns.

“The climate crisis is heightening, with 2023 representing the warmest year on record. The 1.5 degrees warming limit as set out in the Paris Agreement is perilously close to being breached. Nature-based solutions have an important role to play in helping us stem the worst impacts of climate change – but rigorously assessed methods to reliably offset and reduce greenhouse gas emissions could not be more urgent.”

What does the research show?

Yin analyzed an intensively-managed pine plantation in the South of the United States and found that the amount of carbon offset credits a landowner can take was exaggerated by a factor of at least 2.76.  Yin’s empirical research indicates that this finding could be representative of the entire forestation sector. The central problem is that previous modeling has not examined fully what happens to the timber after the trees have been logged. Yin found that the amount of time it takes for carbon to return to the atmosphere after logging varies according to the different wood products created – such as furniture, plywood or paper. Each will degrade at different rates, but for carbon credits to be of value the carbon needs to be stored long enough to be classed as ‘permanent’. On the other hand, Yin noted that it can also be problematic to keep forest systems intact for the sake of storing carbon, as suggested by some analysts, with reduced or even halted timber production given the tremendous holding costs and the opportunities of using wood to substitute for products based on fossil energies or non-renewable materials.

Yin explained: “Properly accounted for, forest carbon offsetting is important and deserves to be seriously promoted and financially rewarded. But my research shows that its potential may not be as great as some analysts have claimed. That’s because existing studies have largely failed to conform to the accounting principles of the Paris Agreement, treat timber and carbon as joint products appropriately, and consider how long each of the resulting wood products will store its carbon.”

“Local schemes to offset carbon are critical but they must be nested within overarching jurisdictional approaches, led by governments, and in line with their international climate pledges.

Dr Runsheng Yin has published over ninety peer-reviewed papers and served as an editor-in-chief for the international journal of Forest Policy and Economics. Over the past three decades, he has conducted research projects evaluating ecosystem restoration programs, analyzing forest tenure reforms, accounting for and assessment of forest carbon, and exploring rural sustainable development.

 

Antidepressant dispensing to adolescents and young adults surges during pandemic


The rate of antidepressant dispensing to young people rose faster after March 2020, especially among females

Peer-Reviewed Publication

MICHIGAN MEDICINE - UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN



Antidepressant dispensing to adolescents and young adults increased sharply after the COVID-19 pandemic began – particularly among females – a new study finds.

While a growing number of young people ages 12 to 25 were receiving antidepressants before the pandemic, the antidepressant dispensing rate rose nearly 64% faster after March 2020, according to Michigan Medicine led findings in Pediatrics.

“Antidepressant dispensing to adolescents and young adults was already high and rising before March 2020. Our findings suggest these trends accelerated during the pandemic,” said lead author Kao Ping Chua, M.D., Ph.D., a pediatrician and researcher at University of Michigan Health C.S. Mott Children's Hospital and the Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center. 

Researchers analyzed data from a national database reporting 92% of prescriptions dispensed in U.S. pharmacies. They found that the increase in the antidepressant dispensing rate during the pandemic was driven by females. 

After March 2020, this rate increased 130% faster among female adolescents ages 12-17 years and 60% faster among female young adults ages 18-25 years. 

“Multiple studies suggest that rates of anxiety and depression among female adolescents increased during the pandemic,” Chua said. “These studies, coupled with our findings, suggest the pandemic exacerbated a pre-existing mental health crisis in this group.”  

In contrast to females, the antidepressant dispensing rate changed little among male young adults after March 2020 and declined among male adolescents, which Chua found surprising.

“It’s hard to believe this decline reflects improved mental health,” he said.

He believes a more likely explanation is that male adolescents may have skipped physicals and other health care visits during the pandemic, decreasing opportunities to diagnose and treat anxiety and depression.

The transition away from in-person learning, he notes, may have also decreased opportunities for teachers and other school staff to detect mental health problems in male adolescents. 

Chua said the overall rise in antidepressant dispensing to adolescents and young adults may not only be related to worsened mental health. Long waitlists for psychotherapy, for example, may have also played a role.

“In my primary care clinic, I often heard from patients and families that they were facing 6-9 month wait lists for therapy during the pandemic. In those situations, it didn’t make sense to withhold antidepressants and recommend a therapy-only approach,” he said.  

Further studies, Chua says, should identify which interventions can best promote the mental health of adolescents and young adults.