Saturday, March 02, 2024

Characterizing climate change from heating, not merely temperature


Climate change goals

Peer-Reviewed Publication

WORLD SCIENTIFIC

Characterizing Climate Change from Heating, not merely Temperature 

IMAGE: 

COVER FOR "JOURNAL OF CLIMATE ACTION, RESEARCH AND POLICY"

view more 

CREDIT: WORLD SCIENTIFIC



Current human–induced climate change arises primarily from the heating of the planet from changes in atmospheric composition. Only one manifestation of this is temperature change.  Yet the focus of many media reports is on temperatures and whether the Paris Agreement targets of 1.5°C or 2°C have been breached or threatened. A new paper published in the Journal of Climate Action, Research, and Policy challenges this framing.

The increasing amount of greenhouse gases (notably carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels) in the atmosphere leads to Earth’s Energy Imbalance (EEI) and altered flows of energy through the climate system. The dissemination of excess energy is partly what determines how climate change is manifested. Some of the extremes being experienced — especially those involving drought, convection, storms, flooding, and the water cycle — are mostly driven by aspects of heating. While temperature contributes through the water–holding capacity of the atmosphere, it is more a consequence than a cause. After all, water is the air–conditioner of the planet.  Natural climate variability — such as the strong El Niño currently underway — generally determines where new extremes occur and can lead to confusion as to what is going on. Human–caused change exacerbates the weather and natural variability.

The United Nations — and especially the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in their Summary for Policy Makers — focus on global temperature targets rather than broader facets of climate change including EEI, and do not always adequately discriminate between temperature and heating. This also has consequences for future climate control if or when heating is brought under control by cutting emissions. Improvements are needed in expressing how the climate is changing by properly accounting for the flow of energy through the climate system.

The new climate norm has a warmer ocean and less ice, and some changes on the warmer land mean less and maybe destabilized permafrost. Rainfall character changes substantially. Many changes do not relate directly to global temperature but are nonetheless physically related to the heating climate.

The new paper is authored by Kevin Trenberth, who has watched as climate change (global warming) was ignored, then dismissed, under–reported, largely missing in many disaster reports where it should have been included, to now being blamed for almost everything.

He emphasizes that increased heating often leads to more evaporation from the ocean and terrestrial surfaces. The resulting increased amount of atmospheric water vapor causes more intense storms and heavier rains, raising the risk of flooding.

About the author:

Dr. Kevin E. Trenberth is a Distinguished Scholar at the National Center for Atmospheric Research and an honorary affiliate faculty at the University of Auckland in New Zealand. He has been involved in climate and climate change research throughout his career. He has been prominent in most of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scientific assessments of Climate Change, including in the inter–governmental meetings that approved the second, third and fourth assessments, and has also extensively served the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) in numerous ways.

The author is affiliated with the NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, in Boulder, CO, and the University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Kevin Trenberth: +64 27 771 4868, trenbert@ucar.edu

The paper Characterizing Climate Change from Heating, not merely Temperature can be found in the Journal of Climate Action, Research, and Policy

Climate change disrupts seasonal flow of rivers


Climate change is disrupting the seasonal flow of rivers in the far northern latitudes of America, Russia and Europe and is posing a threat to water security and ecosystems, according to research published today.

Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS



Climate change is disrupting the seasonal flow of rivers in the far northern latitudes of America, Russia and Europe and is posing a threat to water security and ecosystems, according to research published today.

A team of scientists led by the University of Leeds analysed historical data from river gauging stations across the globe and found that 21% of them showed significant alterations in the seasonal rise and fall in water levels.

The study used data-based reconstructions and state-of-the-art simulations to show that river flow is now far less likely to vary with the seasons in latitudes above 50°N than previously, and that this could be directly linked to changes to the climate caused by human activity.

Until now, evidence suggesting that climate change has had an impact on river flow seasonality has been limited to local studies or has failed to consider the impact of climate change brought about by humans explicitly.

In this study the team used monthly average river flow measurements from 10,120 gauging stations from 1965 to 2014.

For the first time ever, they were able to exclude direct human interventions such as reservoir management or water extraction, to show that widespread reduction in river flow seasonality was driven by climate change.

The results of the research, which was funded by the University of Leeds and the Southern University of Science and Technology in China are published today (29 February) in the journal Science.

Lead author, Hong Wang, a PhD researcher at the University of Leeds and the Southern University of Science and Technology in China, said: “Our research shows that rising air temperatures are fundamentally altering the natural patterns of river flow.

“The concerning aspect of this change is the observed weakening of river flow seasonality, and that this is as a direct consequence of historical human-induced emissions. This signals a sustained and considerable diminishment of river flow seasonality if air temperatures continue to rise.”

Human impact on river flow

Human activities are altering river flow patterns worldwide, both directly through flow regulations such as reservoirs, and indirectly through land use change and the impacts of climate change on air temperature, precipitation, soil moisture, and snowmelt.

Over two-thirds of the world’s rivers have already been altered by humans even without considering the indirect impacts of increases in greenhouse gases and aerosols.

River flow seasonality plays a critical role in the predicted cycle of floods and droughts. A weakening of these peaks and troughs can threaten water security and freshwater biodiversity. For example, a substantial portion of the early meltwater from snowpack depletion may quickly flow into oceans and therefore not be available for human use.

Weakening river flow seasonality - for example due to a reduction in spring and early summer river levels in snowmelt regions - can also have an impact downstream on riverbank vegetation and organisms living in the river itself.

 

Gauging the seasonal flow

In northern North America, the researchers found that 40% of the 119 stations observed showed a significant decrease in river flow seasonality. Similar results were also observed in sSouthern Siberia with 32% of stations showing a significant decrease.

There was a comparable pattern in Europe, with 19% of the river gauging stations experiencing a significant decrease - mainly in northern Europe, western Russia and the European Alps.

In addition, regions in the contiguous United States (the lower 48 states in North America, including the District of Columbia) showed predominantly decreasing trends of river flow seasonality overall, except for rivers in the Rocky Mountains and Florida.

In central North America, the research showed significant decreasing river flow seasonality trends in 18% of the stations.

By contrast, the researchers found a significant increase in river flow seasonality in 25% of the gauging stations in southeast Brazil, showing that changes to the water cycle are having a different impact in some parts of the world.

Dr Megan Klaar, an Associate Professor in the University of Leeds School of Geography and a member of water@leeds, co-authored the research. She said: “The highs and lows of river flow during the different seasons provide vital cues for the species living in the water.

“For example, a lot of fish use particular increases in the water as a cue to run to their breeding areas upstream or towards the sea. If they don’t have those cues, they won’t be able to spawn.”

The research concludes that there is a need to accelerate climate adaptation efforts to safeguard freshwater ecosystems by managing flows to try to recreate some of the natural systems and processes that are being lost.

Professor Joseph Holden, the Director of water@leeds and who supervised Hong Wang’s research, added: “A lot of concern is based upon what climate change will do in the future but our research signals that it’s happening now and that increases in air temperature are driving huge changes in river flow.

“We should be very concerned about what the future holds given accelerating climate change and begin to think about mitigation strategies and adaptation planning to alleviate the future weakening of seasonal river flow, particularly in locations such as western Russia, Scandinavia, and Canada.”

Ends

Notes to editors

Anthropogenic climate change has influenced global river flow seasonality is published today (29 February) in the journal Science

The DOI is 10.1126/science.adi9501

Pictures and illustrations available here

Photo of alpine river in Zinal, Switzerland: Please credit Yoal Desurmont

Illustration 1: Credit Myriam Wares

Email: contact@myriamwares.com

The rapid rise in air temperature, driven by human-induced emissions, is diminishing the seasonal variations in river flow. This weakening pattern of river flow seasonality has the potential to impact riparian vegetation, the life cycles of freshwater biota, and water security.

Illustration 2: Credit Elena Galofaro Bansh

Email: elena@elenabanshart.com

The rapid rise in air temperature, driven by human-induced emissions, is diminishing the seasonal variations in river flow. The homogenized monthly distribution of river flow throughout the year has the potential to impact freshwater ecosystems and water security.

 

For media enquiries or interview requestsplease contact Kersti Mitchell via k.mitchell@leeds.ac.uk

Other institutions involved in the research were:

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China

North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, China

Henan Provincial Key Lab of Hydrosphere and Watershed Water Security, North China

University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, China

Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

 

University of Leeds

The University of Leeds is one of the largest higher education institutions in the UK, with more than 39,000 students from more than 137 different countries. We are renowned globally for the quality of our teaching and research.

We are a values-driven university, and we harness our expertise in research and education to help shape a better future for humanity, working through collaboration to tackle inequalities, achieve societal impact and drive change. 

The University is a member of the Russell Group of research-intensive universities, and is a major partner in the Alan Turing, Rosalind Franklin and Royce Institutes www.leeds.ac.uk 

Follow University of Leeds or tag us in to coverage: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn | Instagram

GLACIOLOGY

Young researcher makes surprising methane discovery in Yukon glaciers: "Much more widespread than we thought"


Global melting is prying the lid off methane stocks, the extent of which we do not know. A young researcher from University of Copenhagen has discovered high concentrations of the powerful greenhouse gas in meltwater from three Canadian mountain glaciers.

Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN - FACULTY OF SCIENCE

Sarah Elise Sapper 

IMAGE: 

SARAH ELISE SAPPER DIRECTED THE HELICOPTER PILOT TO LAND CLOSE TO THE GLACIER EDGE TO MEASURE THE METHANE IN WHIRLPOOLS OF MELTWATER STREAMING OUT. PHOTO: SARAH ELISE SAPPER 

view more 

CREDIT: SARAH ELISE SAPPER



Young researcher makes surprising methane discovery in Yukon glaciers: "Much more widespread than we thought"

Global melting is prying the lid off methane stocks, the extent of which we do not know. A young researcher from University of Copenhagen has discovered high concentrations of the powerful greenhouse gas in meltwater from three Canadian mountain glaciers, where it was not thought to exist - adding new unknowns to the understanding of methane emissions from Earth’s glaciated regions

The helicopter’s rotor blades spin as its skillful pilot performs aerial acrobatics between the steep Yukon mountain sides where PhD student Sarah Elise Sapper is leading her first field expedition deep into the heart of the mountains of northwestern Canada. From the helicopter windows, her eyes fall on the jagged edge of the Donjek glacier: meltwater swirls out from beneath the ice like a whirlpool.

Soon after landing, it becomes apparent that Sarah has stumbled upon an unusual find on the first attempt. Seconds after starting up her portable methane analyzer it is clear that the air is enriched with methane and the culprit is soon found. Collecting a sample of meltwater, she measures concentrations of methane that far exceed expectations.

"We expected to find low values in the meltwater because it is believed that glacial methane emissions require larger ice masses such as vast ice sheets. But the result was quite the opposite. We measured concentrations up to 250 times higher than those in our atmosphere," explains Sarah Elise Sapper of the University of Copenhagen’s Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management.

The field party lifted off and continued to two more mountain glaciers, Kluane and Dusty. And after measuring the methane in the meltwater of each of those two glaciers, the preliminary finding turned out to be more than an anomaly. Here too, measurements showed high methane concentrations. Somewhere beneath the ice, there are previously unknown sources of the gas.

Demonstrates possibility of widespread methane emissions

"The finding is surprising and raises several important questions within this area of research," says Associate Professor Jesper Riis Christiansen of the Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management.

Christiansen, the research article’s co-author, believes that the finding demonstrates the possibility of methane being present beneath many of the world’s glaciers, ones that have thus far been written off.

"When we suddenly see that even mountain glaciers, which are small in comparison with an ice sheet, are able to form and emit methane, it expands our basic understanding of carbon cycling in extreme environments on the planet. The formation and release of methane under ice is more comprehensive and much more widespread than we thought," he says.

Until now, the prevailing view has been that methane in meltwater could only be found in oxygen- free environments under large masses of ice like the Greenland Ice Sheet.

The researchers assume that the production of methane is biological and happens when an organic carbon source – e.g., deposits from prehistoric marine organisms, soils, peat or forests – is decomposed by microorganisms in the absence of oxygen, such as we know from wetlands. As such, it is surprising that the mountain glaciers emit methane.

"The meltwater from the surface of glaciers is oxygen-rich when it travels to the bottom of the ice. So we found it quite surprising that all this oxygen is used up somewhere along the way, so that oxygen-free environments form underneath these mountain glaciers. And even more surprising that it happens to such a degree, that microbes start producing methane and we can observe these high methane concentrations in the water flowing out at the glacier edges" states Sarah Elise Sapper.

"Sarah's findings change our basic understanding and send us back to the drawing board in relation to some of the key mechanisms at play," adds Jesper Riis Christiansen.

An uncertain role for the climate of the future

According to the researchers, the findings in Canada do not immediately spur an increased concern in relation to their effect on climate change. However that conclusion may be temporary.

"Methane plays a major role in warming our planet. The challenge with methane is that it is a super-potent greenhouse gas and increasing emissions will accelerate climate warming. From a global perspective, we can measure how much is emitted into the atmosphere and, roughly speaking, where the methane comes from, using the isotopes found in the atmospheric methane. And for now, the contribution of methane from ice-covered regions on our planet, including ice sheets and glaciers, isn’t increasing,” explains Jesper Riis Christiansen.

However, he emphasizes that the measurements cannot distinguish between methane from glaciated regions and methane from wetlands. Therefore, the numbers could be deceiving. And, the effect of melting remains unknown.

Jesper Riis Christiansen believes that the findings demand vigilance.

"The three sites Sarah measured were randomly selected due to the availability of a research station and helicopter, yet methane was found in all three. In itself, that is a good reason to better understand the area. There's too much that we don't know, and the melting glaciers expose unknown environments that have remained hidden for thousands of years. In reality, no one knows how emissions will behave," says Jesper Riis Christiansen.

He hopes that a better understanding of methane behaviour beneath glaciers will also help researchers better understand the mechanisms at play when wetlands release methane, and thereby contribute to the development of solutions to remove methane from the atmosphere through oxidation - e.g., through the use of certain soil types.

 

*

 

Extra info: A subglacial black box 

The actual sources and locations of subglacial methane production actually remain somewhat of a mystery, hidden beneath ice masses of all sizes. Indeed, this methane can only be measured as the meltwater emerges from beneath the ice. And because it originates from large areas below the ice masses, this makes it difficult to access exactly where the production happens.

It is known to not originate from the ice itself, as concentrations both in the ice and meltwater atop it are lower than what is measured at the glacier edge. As such, the researchers believe that the methane must derive from a source beneath the ice. And the best theory, as mentioned, is that it is formed by microbes in oxygen-free pockets and then carried out with meltwater.

But this indirect knowledge of the source leaves a great deal of uncertainty about how much methane is hidden beneath the ice.

"It's a big black box under the ice – and you could say that the meltwater is prying the lid off it. We do not know whether methane emissions from glacial areas will increase in the future with increased melting, or whether the 'lid' has already been opened to such a degree that the methane beneath the ice is actually being washed out with the meltwater," says Sarah Elise Sapper.

 

Facts: Methane and CO2 are different greenhouse gases

The half-life of methane in the atmosphere is 12 years.

CO2 has a much longer half-life, at roughly 1000 years.

On the other hand, methane is about 25 times more powerful as a greenhouse gas on a 100-year basis and a far more serious threat to global climate in the shorter term.

Due to greenhouse gas-driven climate change, researchers around the world are working to develop ways to capture or store CO2.

Similarly, solutions are being devised to limit the emission of – or increase the oxidation of – methane. Doing so requires more knowledge about how methane is formed.

 

Extra facts: Carbon circulation of methane and CO2

Biological traces from animal and plant material in the subsoil consist of carbon.

Within these environments, microorganisms have developed an ability to convert carbon into energy in a process where methane is created as a byproduct in the absence of oxygen (e.g. in beneath ice sheets or in wetlands).

However, if the methane is released into an oxygen-rich environment, it can effectively be oxidized and converted into CO2 by microbes. Wetlands play an important role in this process.

Once, in the atmosphere, methane reacts with other chemicals (hydroxyl radicals) which keep the concentrations down.

However, as temperatures rise, the amount of methane emitted from ecosystems around the world increases – from the Arctic to the Amazon. And the balance may be shifting if the processes that remove methane do not react to the same degree.

 

Extra info: An expedition of her own design

Sarah Elise Sapper’s expedition to Western Canada was the first organised on her own. The young researcher impressed her more experienced colleagues by arranging the field study completely by herself. When Sapper found out that EU funds, through the INTERACT network, were available to finance a visit to the Kluane Lake Research Station in the Yukon Territory of northwest Canada, she immediately saw the opportunity to get measurements of glacial methane emissions from places no one had thought of before.

"Together with people from the Canadian research community, she arranged for a helicopter and everything else needed for the expedition. We were really impressed by this back home. We hope that it will inspire other young researchers to embark on fieldwork on their own, when the opportunities arise," says Jesper Riis Christiansen, who in addition to being a co-author of the research article, is also Sarah's supervisor at the Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management.     

 

Behind the research

In addition to Sarah Elise Sapper and Jesper Riis Christiansen from the University of Copenhagen, the following researchers have also contributed to the study:

Christian Juncher Jørgensen from Ecoscience at Aarhus University, Denmark

Moritz Schroll and Frank Keppler from the Heidelberg Center for the Environment (HCE), Heidelberg University, Germany

 

UK

Break up the establishment’s ‘permanent austerity’ consensus

By Matt Willgress

MARCH 1, 2024

We’re in the middle of the deepest cost-of-living crisis in generations, which has become a permanent cost-of-living emergency for millions.

Councils are going bust. Poverty and inequality are spiralling. Homelessness is out of control. Unemployment could be set to jump dramatically. People’s living costs just keep going up and up while wages and benefits fail to follow.

In this increasingly desperate context, it has been widely realised by millions in recent years that the Tories are more interested in doing the bidding of their rich backers than securing our jobs and livelihoods – but what is becoming clearer by the week is also that the whole political establishment seems intent on never-ending austerity.

On the Labour side of Parliament, this is reflected by Rachel Reeves’ increasingly conservative ‘fiscal framework,’ which is working through to the abandonment or watering-down of policy after policy that could start tackling the cost-of-living crisis, from public ownership of energy and water to the ditching of popular green investment policies, and much more besides.

On the left, we can’t let a new consensus for ‘permanent austerity’ be formed by the ruling class. It is the route to economic and social catastrophe, and to a further rise of far right politics in the years to come.

We therefore need urgently to put forward – and mobilise now for – policies that could both actually address the depth of the crises we face, and provide the basis for action in our workplaces and communities in the months and years ahead.

As part of this effort, and as a contribution to discussion across the left, labour and social movements on the programme we need – we are renewing efforts to get further support for the Workers Can’t Wait demands online, including these 10 measures:

☑️  Britain needs a pay rise – National Minimum Wage raised to at least £15 an hour for all; the pay rise public sector workers are asking for; increase Statutory Sick Pay to a real living wage for all from day one.

☑️  A social security system to end poverty – scrap the two child benefit cap, reverse the Universal Credit cut and extend the uplift to legacy benefits; boost and inflation-proof benefits; for a minimum income guarantee.

☑️ Control costs – energy price freezes now at April 2022 rates, cap rents and basic food costs.

☑️ Stop the corporate rip-off – public ownership of energy, water, transport, broadband and mail to bring bills down and end fuel poverty. Lower public transport costs. Higher taxes on profits and the super-rich. Open the books – back the workers’ commission on profiteering.

☑️ Extra resources to create universal, comprehensive public services – stop cuts and privatisation; Save our NHS – for a national care service; properly fund local government. Tax wealth to fund our public services.

☑️ Homes for all – no evictions or repossessions; tackle the homelessness emergency; fix the housing crisis with a mass council house building programme.

☑️ For the right to food – enshrine the right to food in law; universal free school meals all year; for a National Food Service.

☑️ Decent jobs for all – for full employment; end insecure working and ban zero-hours contracts; for the right to flexible work on workers’ not bosses’ terms.

☑️ Defend and extend our right to organise – reverse anti-trade union laws and repeal the draconian anti-protest laws; ban fire-and-rehire; for full union rights to bargain for better pay and conditions.

☑️ End austerity for good – invest in our future with a Green New Deal – end the dependency on fossil fuels and soaring oil and gas prices; for a massive investment in renewables, green infrastructure and jobs; insulate buildings to bring bills down.

Moving forward, we also need a new and urgent discussion on how to co-ordinate, renew and strengthen all those initiatives that seek to address the cost-of-living emergency and support struggles for an end to austerity.

Please add your name, take the policies to labour movement and community groups for endorsement and discussion, and keep mobilising against austerity – and for investment, not cuts.

Matt Willgress is the National Organiser for the Labour Assembly Against Austerity.

  • No cuts – Tax the Rich – Invest in our Future! Online event. Mon. Mar. 4, 18.30. Register here // RT here  John McDonnell MP // Richard Burgon MP // Sarah Woolley (BFAWU) // ZIta Holbourne (BARAC) // Jess Barnard, Labour NEC.  Just before Sunak & Hunt’s 2024 Budget, join us to discuss how we renew resistance to austerity and popularise left economic alternatives to never-ending cuts.   Arise – A Festival of Left Ideas & Labour Assembly Against Austerity. Free event but solidarity donations key to streaming and hosting costs. 

Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/lewishamdreamer/19161843361. Creator: Jasn . Licence: CC BY-NC 2.0 DEED Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic