Wednesday, March 06, 2024

 

Studies on coffee consumption − New biomarker proposed


N-methylpyridinium could be used as a new, practical food biomarker


Peer-Reviewed Publication

LEIBNIZ-INSTITUT FÜR LEBENSMITTEL-SYSTEMBIOLOGIE AN DER TU MÜNCHEN

Roasted coffee beans 

IMAGE: 

ROASTED COFFEE BEANS IN A PILE ON WHITE BACKGROUND.

view more 

CREDIT: GISELA OLIAS / LSB




In order to record coffee consumption in nutrition and health studies, researchers usually rely on self-reporting by participants. However, this is not always reliable. It would therefore be desirable to conduct additional studies to objectively verify individual consumption using biomarkers. A research team led by the Leibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich has now validated the suitability of a specific roasted coffee compound and proposes it as a new, practical food biomarker.

Millions of people around the world drink coffee every day. The beverage contains a large number of bioactive substances, and its health effects on the human metabolism are therefore frequently subjects of scientific studies. In many of these studies, however, the data on coffee consumption is largely based on self-reporting by the participants and is therefore not always accurate. This can affect the scientific validity of nutritional studies.

Biomarkers could provide a remedy

Reliable biomarkers could remedy this problem by using biological samples to objectively distinguish between coffee drinkers and non-coffee drinkers. "So far, however, only a few substances are known that could be used as coffee markers," says principal investigator Roman Lang from the Leibniz Institute. “However, these are not yet sufficiently validated or available in sufficient quantities to serve as reference substances for comparative measurements in nutritional studies,” he continues.

The research team, which also includes the nutritional physician Thomas Skurk and first author Beate Brandl from the ZIEL - Institute for Food & Health at the Technical University of Munich, has therefore comprehensively validated the roast coffee compound N-methylpyridinium as one such biomarker candidate for its suitability. Researchers at the Technical University of Munich first proposed the substance as a biomarker candidate in 2011 as part of a pilot study.

Data from over 460 people analyzed

As part of the scientific validation, the team analyzed existing literature data. It also analyzed urine, blood and plasma samples from more than 460 people from Freising and Nuremberg who had participated in a nutrition study conducted by the BMBF-funded enable cluster.

As the study shows, N-methylpyridinium is a compound that is specific to roasted Arabica and Robusta coffee. The substance is chemically very stable and its absorption into the organism is concentration-dependent. The substance can also be easily and reproducibly detected in various body fluids after coffee consumption, before leaving the body unchanged in the urine within a few hours to days.

Roman Lang, who heads the Biosystems Chemistry & Human Metabolism research group at the Leibniz Institute, explains: "As we have shown, N-methylpyridinium fulfills all the criteria that science demands of a biomarker to control food intake. Even if we cannot draw direct conclusions about the amount of coffee consumed due to various factors, the roasting substance is still suitable as a marker. This is because it allows us to distinguish objectively and practically between people who have drunk coffee and those who have not. We therefore propose it as a reliable qualitative biomarker for coffee consumption."

Publication: Brandl, B., Czech, C., Wudy, S.I., Beusch, A., Hauner, H., Skurk, T., and Lang, R. (2024). Validation of N-Methylpyridinium as a Feasible Biomarker for Roasted Coffee Intake. Beverages 10, 12. 10.3390/beverages10010012. www.mdpi.com/2306-5710/10/1/12

 

Roasted coffee beans that make the word coffee on white background

CREDIT

Gisela Olias / LSB


More Information:

About N-methylpyridinium:

N-methylpyridinium was already proposed as a biomarker candidate for coffee consumption in 2011: Lang et al., 2011 onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mnfr.201000656

N-methylpyridinium is formed from the natural alkaloid trigonelline, which is abundant in green coffee, when exposed to high heat at over 220 °C. Depending on the degree of roasting, roasted Arabica and Robusta coffee beans contain concentrations of around 0.5 to 2 mg/g of the substance - regardless of special processing methods such as steaming or decaffeinating. N-methylpyridinium is contained in brewed coffee (20-40 mg/l) and can be easily detected in blood, plasma and urine samples.


Coffee consumption in Europe and the USA:

In the USA alone, 74 percent of the population over the age of 20 describe themselves as coffee drinkers. In European countries, the calculated per capita consumption of roasted coffee in 2022 ranged from around 4 kilograms in Italy to 10 kilograms in Luxembourg.


Validation criteria:

The validation was based on criteria already proposed in 2018 for food biomarkers: plausibility, dose-response, time-response, robustness, reliability, stability, analytical performance and reproducibility. Dragsted, L.O. et al. 2018. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975465/pdf/12263_2018_Article_603.pdf


Read also: New biomarkers for coffee consumption

www.leibniz-lsb.de/presse-oeffentlichkeit/pressemitteilungen/pm-20221207-pressemitteilung-biomarker-kaffeekonsum/


Information on the enable cluster: www.enable-cluster.de
 

Information about the Institute:

The Leibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich (Leibniz-LSB@TUM) comprises a new, unique research profile at the interface of Food Chemistry & Biology, Chemosensors & Technology, and Bioinformatics & Machine Learning. As this profile has grown far beyond the previous core discipline of classical food chemistry, the institute spearheads the development of a food systems biology. Its aim is to develop new approaches for the sustainable production of sufficient quantities of food whose biologically active effector molecule profiles are geared to health and nutritional needs, but also to the sensory preferences of consumers. To do so, the institute explores the complex networks of sensorically relevant effector molecules along the entire food production chain with a focus on making their effects systemically understandable and predictable in the long term.

The Leibniz-LSB@TUM is a member of the Leibniz Association, which connects 97 independent research institutions. Their orientation ranges from the natural sciences, engineering and environmental sciences through economics, spatial and social sciences to the humanities. Leibniz Institutes devote themselves to social, economic and ecological issues. They conduct knowledge-oriented and application-oriented research, also in the overlapping Leibniz research networks, are or maintain scientific infrastructures and offer research-based services. The Leibniz Association focuses on knowledge transfer, especially with the Leibniz Research Museums. It advises and informs politics, science, business and the public. Leibniz institutions maintain close cooperation with universities - among others, in the form of the Leibniz Science Campuses, industry and other partners in Germany and abroad. They are subject to a transparent and independent review process. Due to their national significance, the federal government and the federal states jointly fund the institutes of the Leibniz Association. The Leibniz Institutes employ around 21,000 people, including almost 12,000 scientists. The entire budget of all the institutes is more than two billion euros.

+++ Stay up to date via our X (Twitter) channel twitter.com/LeibnizLSB +++

 

Labor market researcher Simon Jäger wins the In_equality Research Award


The Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality" at the University of Konstanz presents In_equality Research Award 2024 to economist Simon Jäger in recognition of his exceptional research achievements and their social relevance



Grant and Award Announcement

UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ





The In_equality Research Award honours exceptional research achievements with a large social impact and significant contributions to improving social systems. The Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality" at the University of Konstanz presents the 2024 award to renowned economist Simon Jäger who studies the origins and consequences of inequality in the labour market as well as the influence of institutions on social and economic participation. His work combines experimental methods with the analysis of large data sets. In his research, Simon Jäger was able to show how psychological factors can cause poverty traps in the labour market.

Marius R. Busemeyer, speaker of the Cluster of Excellence and a member of the award committee, explains: "Our aim is to promote courageous research on inequality that simultaneously initiates social change processes. Our award winner, Simon Jäger, is committed to precisely this goal in his research and understanding of knowledge transfer".

Simon Jäger is a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he also holds the Silverman (1968) Career Development Chair. In addition, he is a research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) and other leading research institutions. Since February 2024, he has been advising the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) led by Robert Habeck. "I am very honoured to receive the In_equality Research Award", Jäger says. "It is especially important for me to translate my research findings into impulses for the public discourse". Danyal Bayaz, Minister of Finance in Baden-Württemberg, will give the welcoming address for the award ceremony. The In_equality Research Award is worth 20,000 euros and can be used to fund future research projects, particularly in collaboration with the Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality".

The In_equality Conference
The award ceremony will take place at the opening ceremony for the In_equality Conference 2024 on 10 April 2024. Around 300 (inter)national researchers will attend the conference, which the Cluster of Excellence is hosting for the second time at the Bodenseeforum Konstanz. The programme includes 27 interdisciplinary panels focusing on topics like gender, ethnicity, wealth and education inequality, language, and questions involving the welfare state and climate change. In addition to the panels, there will be roundtables on knowledge transfer, open science and the Global South as well as impulses from collaboration partners, the foundation "Bertelsmann Stiftung", the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) and the Hans-Böckler-Foundation’s Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI).

 

Key facts

  • Labour market researcher Simon Jäger (MIT) wins the 2024 In_equality Research Award. The award is presented by the Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality" at the University of Konstanz.
  • Simon Jäger receives the prize for his extraordinary contribution to inequality research as well as his commitment to knowledge transfer. The prize, worth 20,000 euros, can be used to fund future research projects.
  • The award ceremony will take place at the opening ceremony for the In_equality Conference 2024 at the Bodenseeforum in Konstanz.
  • The Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality" at the University of Konstanz researches the political causes and consequences of inequality from an interdisciplinary perspective. The research is dedicated to some of the most pressing issues of our time: access to and distribution of (economic) resources, the global rise of populists, climate change and unfairly distributed educational opportunities.

 

 

Note to the editors:

Media representatives are welcome to attend the award ceremony on 10 April 2024 at 18:15 in Bodenseeforum Konstanz (Reichenaustraße 21, 78467 Konstanz, Germany). The following people are available for interviews:

  • Simon Jäger, professor of economics at MIT and winner of the In_equality Research Award 2024
  • Marius R. Busemeyer, professor of political science at the University of Konstanz and speaker of the Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality"

 

A picture can be downloaded here:

https://www.uni-konstanz.de/fileadmin/pi/fileserver/2024_EXTRA/arbeitsmarktforscher.jpg
Caption: Simon Jäger, winner of the In_equality Research Award 2024.

Picture: David Degner

 

Pollution: Impact of agricultural activities on PM2.5 in Lombardy is comparable to that of urbanization, industry and transportation


A research study from Politecnico di Milano published in Chemosphere


Peer-Reviewed Publication

POLITECNICO DI MILANO





Milan, 4th March 2024 – A research study from  Politecnico di Milano on the journal  Chemosphere has quantified the impact of agricultural activities on the spatial distribution of fine dust (PM 2.5) in Lombardy, showing that it is comparable to the impact of other well known sources of pollution, such as  urbanization, industry, and transportation.

Such comparable impact was found not only in the rural areas, but also when considering more densely populated areas.

In particular, the agriculture's contribution resulted correlated more to pollution spikes rather than to a baseline increase, but with a limited duration over time. Among the analyzed crops, while rice fields showed a minimal impact, corn and cereals fields showed a significant contribution to pollution.

 

These results has been obtained using an innovative framework and a data-driven model that includes the evaluation of the impact of the different land use on the spatial distribution of  PM2.5 concentration, particularly suited for the analysis of agricultural land, with a higher precision compared to pre-existing models.

To this aim, both Earth observation data by satellites and atmospheric models of the Copernicus program were utilized to derive the PM2.5 concentration, while information on the land use were obtained from the open access database and the agricultural information system of the Lombardy Region. For the analysis, an innovative GEOAI (Geomatics and Earth Observation Artificial Intelligence) system composed by a three-steps architecture, that allows to measure and interpret spatial dynamics on a local scale and to compare effects of different land use on pollution, was utilized. Thanks to this new approach, it will be possible to generate new evidence on the pollutant concentration due to specific agricultural activities, such as fertilization and manure spills.

This research originated by the D-DUST (Data-driven moDelling of particUlate with Satellite Technology aid) project, funded by Cariplo Foundation, with the aim to evaluate the potential - in terms of operability, cost-efficacy ratio, and accuracy – of a systematic integration of non-conventional data into the traditional PM2.5 monitoring approaches based on ground stations, with a focus on satellite data and agriculture-related pollutants emission.

The project was conducted by professor Maria Brovelli and Dr Daniele Oxoli, from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, in collaboration with professor Enrico Caiani and Dr. Lorenzo Gianquintieri, from the Department of Electronics, Information and Biomedical Engineering at Politecnico di Milano, with Dr. Santoni from Fondazione Politecnico di Milano and with professor Andrea Spinazzè from Università degli Studi dell'Insubria.  

 

The published paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004565352400331X

 

Conservation value of field research stations grossly misunderstood and underfunded according to 173 conservation scientists in new study


Peer-Reviewed Publication

SAN DIEGO ZOO WILDLIFE ALLIANCE





SAN DIEGO – Funding of field conservation research stations worldwide has been drastically reduced since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, raising the alarm of more than 170 conservation researchers representing 157 field stations in 56 countries in a new paper published in Conservation Letters. The authors contend that field research stations have a high return on investment and are essential and highly effective tools for biodiversity conservation.

Trillions of U.S. dollars were mobilized in economic recovery following the pandemic, yet the authors raise concerns that resources to address biodiversity loss and the climate crises are constrained at a time when they are most urgently needed. The pandemic caused roughly half of the surveyed field stations to close partially, and about one-quarter have remained partially or completely closed, with most field stations seeing a reduction in funding altogether.

Dr. Timothy Eppley, lead author of the paper, Chief Conservation Officer of Wildlife Madagascar, and a former Post Doctoral Research Fellow with San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, said “A fundamental challenge is that governments and other funding agencies aren’t factoring in the true conservation return on investment and don’t realize the critical economic role of ecosystem services being protected by those field stations.”

Eppley and co-authors suggest the work of field research stations is often interdisciplinary, and some of the direct and indirect benefits of the research, education, and public engagement that takes place at field stations have long-term objectives that the current models for cost-benefit analyses do not capture.

“Field stations often function autonomously, with few studies exploring the aggregate impact of their work. Cumulatively, they make a substantial contribution to conservation,” said Eppley.

Dr. Russ Mittermeier, Chief Conservation Officer of Re:wild and senior author on the paper, shared a similar sentiment, saying “Field research stations are a cost-effective and multifaceted tool to addressing global conservation challenges and not just places where esoteric research is conducted, as is often the perception.  Almost invariably, one finds higher densities of wildlife in the vicinity of these field stations than in other parts of a particular region, even within protected areas.”

The study consisted of a survey, which focused on field stations in mostly tropical and subtropical countries, to understand the impact of the pandemic on funding and evaluate the conservation benefits of the field stations. Findings include improved habitat quality of the surrounding areas by reducing nearby deforestation, reducing rates of hunting, and improving enforcement of laws regarding wildlife use and resource extraction. Additionally, 93% hire locals, supporting the local economy, in addition to generating significant scientific output that informs conservation policies.

The authors advocate for greater recognition and investment in field research stations. “The benefits of supporting these stations extend beyond preserving biodiversity to advancing scientific research, education, and local community development,” said Mittermeier.

“Our research underscores the critical need for enhanced support for field research stations to ensure their ability to continue their indispensable work. Failing to include field stations in international policy frameworks that address the global biodiversity crisis represents a profound missed opportunity,” said Eppley.

                                                                                                            ###       

About San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance 

San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, a nonprofit conservation leader, inspires passion for nature and collaboration for a healthier world. The Alliance supports innovative conservation science through global partnerships. Through wildlife care, science expertise and collaboration, more than 44 endangered species have been reintroduced to native habitats. Annually, the Alliance reaches over 1 billion people, in person at the San Diego Zoo and San Diego Zoo Safari Park, and virtually in 150 countries through media channels, including San Diego Zoo Wildlife Explorers television programming in children’s hospitals in 14 countries. Wildlife Allies—members, donors and guests—make success possible.

 

 

Study underscores social factors of low breast cancer screening in the US


Researchers examine social determinants of health, health inequities


Peer-Reviewed Publication

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY

Social Determinants of Health, Health Inequities 

IMAGE: 

RESEARCHERS FROM FAU'S SCHMIDT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE EXAMINED SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH INEQUITIES IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING IN WOMEN AGED 40 AND OLDER IN THE U.S. 

view more 

CREDIT: ALEX DOLCE, FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY




There is a pressing need to explore and understand which social determinants of health (SDOH) and health inequities act as significant influential factors that contribute to low breast cancer screening behaviors in the United States.

Health disparities have been consistently associated with delayed screening, which then contributes to higher mortality rates among both Hispanic and Black populations. Moreover, poverty, lack of education, neighborhood disadvantage, residential segregation, racial discrimination, lack of social support and social isolation also play a role in the breast cancer stage at diagnosis.

Researchers from Florida Atlantic University’s Schmidt College of Medicine conducted a scoping review of 72 peer-reviewed observational studies published between 2013 and 2023 to identify the major SDOH that hinder breast cancer screening in women aged 40 and older in the U.S. They focused on race/ethnicity, employment, education, food security, insurance status, housing and access to quality health care.

Results, published in the journal Frontiers in Public Healthshowed that among the various SDOH identified, those related to socioeconomic status exhibited the highest frequency. Specifically, factors such as income, education level, employment status, birthplace/citizenship, acculturation/years lived in the U.S., marital status, social support and number of children were among the key elements.

Access to health care emerged as a statistically significant theme (61 percent of the studies), with sub-categories such as insurance status, accessibility of health care services and providers, insurance coverage, access to mammography facilities, insurance co-payments, time from breast cancer diagnosis to first treatment, travel time to clinic and county uninsured rate.

Insurance status was the most reported sub-categorical factor of access to quality health care. Many of the studies in the review demonstrated a strong association between a lack of health insurance and a lower rate of breast cancer screening.

“One of the most influential roles of social determinants of health lies within the realm of equitable access,” said Lea Sacca, Ph.D., senior author and an assistant professor in the Department of Population Health and Social Medicine, FAU Schmidt College of Medicine. “Results from our research could inform future evidence-based interventions aimed at addressing the underlying factors contributing to low screening rates for breast cancer in the country.” 

Race/ethnicity, sex/gender and sexual orientation were additional factors reported. Fifty-eight percent of the studies showed statistical significance in the social and community context category, with the highest sub-categories being age and ethnicity. Ethnic minority women, with the exception of those identifying as Asian, had a lower likelihood of being screened and Black women experienced a higher risk of diagnosis upon first screening. White bisexual women had significantly lower mammography rates than white heterosexual women, while mammography rates were significantly higher for bisexual Black women than for heterosexual Black women.

Language was the third highest issue, highlighting its significance as an influential factor of screening behavior. In addition, 38 percent of the studies exhibited statistical significance in the economic stability category, with income level (27 percent) being the most common sub-categorical indicator emphasized. Women with estimated household incomes greater than $38,100 have been found to have rates of repeat mammography higher than those of women below $25,399.

Both high levels of poverty and impoverished rural regions were associated with lower screening rates. In addition to household income, food security was another influential factor of mammography rates. 

“When women are forced to choose between feeding their families and pursuing preventive care, mammography becomes more of a luxury than lifesaving care,” said Sacca. “Women facing food insecurity have a 54 percent lower likelihood of getting a mammogram.”

Thirty-three percent of the articles showed statistical significance in education access and quality as strong indicators of mammography rate, with the highest level of education completed acting as the strongest sub-categorical factor.

Location, transportation, housing, county poverty rate, internet access, area deprivation index, diversity index, perceived discrimination, health beliefs and trust in health care providers/systems and cultural and religious beliefs also were cited in the review. For example, fatalism-emphasizing religions (fate or destiny), were associated with less screening adherences and maintenance of modesty did not prove a significant limitation for women receiving mammograms.

“Improving patient-provider communication, addressing perceived discrimination and improving trust in the health care system is necessary to improve screening rates across all demographics,” said Sacca. “Additionally, structural efforts to improve health insurance coverage, language proficiency and transportation services could be beneficial. These steps will need to involve the local community to develop community-tailored educational campaigns to reinforce the importance of establishing regular mammogram screenings.”

Study co-authors are FAU second-year medical students Vama Jhumkhawala; Diana Lobaina; Goodness Okwaraji; Yasmine Zerrouki; Sara Burgoa; Adeife Marciniak; Sebastian Densley; Meera Rao; and a post-graduate biology student, Daniella Diaz, FAU Charles E. Schmidt College of Science; and Michelle Knecht, librarian, FAU Schmidt College of Medicine.

- FAU -

About the Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine:

FAU’s Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine is one of approximately 156 accredited medical schools in the U.S. The college was launched in 2010, when the Florida Board of Governors made a landmark decision authorizing FAU to award the M.D. degree. After receiving approval from the Florida legislature and the governor, it became the 134th allopathic medical school in North America. With more than 70 full and part-time faculty and more than 1,300 affiliate faculty, the college matriculates 64 medical students each year and has been nationally recognized for its innovative curriculum. To further FAU’s commitment to increase much needed medical residency positions in Palm Beach County and to ensure that the region will continue to have an adequate and well-trained physician workforce, the FAU Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine Consortium for Graduate Medical Education (GME) was formed in fall 2011 with five leading hospitals in Palm Beach County. The Consortium currently has five Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited residencies including internal medicine, surgery, emergency medicine, psychiatry, and neurology.

 

About Florida Atlantic University:
Florida Atlantic University, established in 1961, officially opened its doors in 1964 as the fifth public university in Florida. Today, the University serves more than 30,000 undergraduate and graduate students across six campuses located along the southeast Florida coast. In recent years, the University has doubled its research expenditures and outpaced its peers in student achievement rates. Through the coexistence of access and excellence, FAU embodies an innovative model where traditional achievement gaps vanish. FAU is designated a Hispanic-serving institution, ranked as a top public university by U.S. News & World Report and a High Research Activity institution by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. For more information, visit www.fau.edu.

 

Study reveals social media usage impacts the desire to undergo cosmetic procedures


Findings help explain the increased frequency with which patients have sought these treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic


Peer-Reviewed Publication

BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE





FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, March 4, 2024
Contact: Gina DiGravio, 617-358-7838, ginad@bu.edu

Study Reveals Social Media Usage Impacts the Desire to Undergo Cosmetic Procedures

Findings help explain the increased frequency with which patients have sought these treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic

(Boston)—Social media platforms such as Snapchat and Instagram have been pivotal in perpetuating “selfie” culture, whereby an individual takes and shares a photo of themselves. Globally, social media usage has been increasing, with at least 3.5 billion using social media in 2019. As of 2018 the average adult was spending 6.3 hours per day on an internet connected device. A particularly troubling consequence of an increase in social media usage is the effect it has on body perception and self-esteem.

 

The angle of the “selfie” photographs taken for social media often distorts facial features in a way that leads to dissatisfaction.4 Medical professionals have reported a phenomenon of “snapchat dysmorphia,” whereby patients seeking cosmetic procedures attempt to emulate filtered and edited versions of themselves.

 

A new study by researchers at Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine has found that time spent on social media and the use of photo-editing applications correlates with a person's desire to undergo cosmetic procedures, and likely led to the increase in cosmetic visits seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. They also found patients who followed and engaged with celebrities and influencers on social media, as well as following and engaging with plastic surgery, dermatology or other accounts showing the results of cosmetic procedures on social media significantly influences the desire to have a cosmetic procedure done.

 

“While there was an increase in cosmetic focus during the COVID pandemic, until now there has not been data highlighting a clear link or factors that made patients more or less likely to participate in cosmetic treatments,” explained corresponding author Neelam Vashi, MD, associate professor of dermatology at the school and director of the Boston University Cosmetic and Laser Center at Boston Medical Center.

The researchers asked patients at a dermatology clinic to complete surveys (October 2019 through June 2021) regarding their social media usage as well as their desire to undergo cosmetic procedures. After reviewing these surveys, they found that the number of hours individuals spent using Snapchat and/or Instagram every day had a statistically significant difference in the belief that media or social media had influenced their desire to have a cosmetic procedure done.

 

Furthermore, they found a statistically significant difference between the use of photo editing applications such as FaceTune, Lightroom, or SnapSeed to edit photos before sharing selfies on social media and thoughts about undergoing a surgical or non-surgical cosmetic procedure.

 

According to the researcher, this study indicates that practitioners ought to discuss social media usage with their patients to better understand the desire to undergo cosmetic procedures. “Quality care begins with quality conversations, and we hope this study encourages providers to ask about all aspects of a patient's life to better understand their motivations and goals of care,” said Vashi.

These findings appear online in the Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology.

 


Novel material degrades a widely used antibiotic that contaminates water


An electrode with films of iridium dioxide and niobium oxide on a titanium substrate removed molecules of the drug levofloxacin, considered an emerging pollutant.


Peer-Reviewed Publication

FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO

Novel material degrades a widely used antibiotic that contaminates water 

IMAGE: 

THE STUDY OBTAINED EXCELLENT RESULTS IN TERMS OF DEGRADING THE DRUG IN SIMULATED AND REAL WATER SAMPLES 

view more 

CREDIT: CDMF




Levofloxacin is a widely used antibiotic prescribed to treat pneumonia, bacterial rhinosinusitis, bacterial prostatitis, pyelonephritis, urinary tract infections, skin disorders and skin structure infections, among other conditions. The drug is prevalent in aqueous environments owing to its low degradability in wastewater treatment plants and is therefore considered an emerging pollutant.

In light of its high toxicity and possible endocrine-disrupting effects, widespread consumption of levofloxacin makes its impact on the environment particularly harmful. Researchers at several universities and institutions in São Paulo state (Brazil) have joined forces to develop ways of removing it from aqueous environments or converting it to biodegradable by-products with low toxicity.

Funded by FAPESP (projects 14/50945-4 and 17/11986-5), the study obtained excellent results, degrading the antibiotic in simulated and real water samples with the aid of an electrode comprising iridium dioxide and niobium oxide films on a titanium substrate.

The results are described in an article published in the journal Electrochimica Acta.

The films were obtained by the modified Pechini method, and the electrode, after morphological, structural and electrochemical characterization, was used to degrade the antibiotic using different processes, including electrolysis and photoelectrolysis. The material displayed excellent photoelectrocatalytic activity and stability, as well as a large electrochemically active surface area. The results were considered highly satisfactory, with promising prospects for treatment and removal of organic pollutants in water.

The authors of the article include Lucia Helena Mascaro, a professor at the University of São Carlos (UFSCar), co-principal investigator at the Center for Development of Functional Materials (CDMF), and a researcher at the Center for Innovation in New Energies (CINE).

CDMF is a Research, Innovation and Dissemination Center (RIDC) established by FAPESP at UFSCar. CINE is an Engineering Research Center (ERC) supported by FAPESP and Shell.

About São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)

The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) is a public institution with the mission of supporting scientific research in all fields of knowledge by awarding scholarships, fellowships and grants to investigators linked with higher education and research institutions in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. FAPESP is aware that the very best research can only be done by working with the best researchers internationally. Therefore, it has established partnerships with funding agencies, higher education, private companies, and research organizations in other countries known for the quality of their research and has been encouraging scientists funded by its grants to further develop their international collaboration. You can learn more about FAPESP at www.fapesp.br/en and visit FAPESP news agency at www.agencia.fapesp.br/en to keep updated with the latest scientific breakthroughs FAPESP helps achieve through its many programs, awards and research centers. You may also subscribe to FAPESP news agency at http://agencia.fapesp.br/subscribe.