Sunday, March 17, 2024

Ivermectin: Dr. Pierre Kory and the Wonder Drug That Wasn’t

Dr. Pierre Kory, co-founder of the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance, testifies during the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing titled “Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution, Part II,” on December 8, 2020.                                                                                        Photo credit: © Tom Williams/Congressional Quarterly via ZUMA Press
LONG READ



 03/17/24

Ivermectin has fused with MAGA politics.

This past July, the UK-based anti-vaccine World Council for Health (WCfH) held its third annual “World Ivermectin Day,” inviting their international network to celebrate the antiparasitic drug’s efficacy against the COVID-19 virus — in the face of facts.

Several familiar names in ivermectin hawking spoke at their Twitter/X spaces event, most notably Dr. Pierre Kory — a Wisconsin physician and co-founder of the pro-ivermectin Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC, a WCfH coalition partner organization) — who plugged his conspiratorial new book The War on Ivermectin: The Medicine that Saved Millions and Could Have Ended the Pandemic.

Kory returned to a UK audience in December as an “expert” guest on a panel for “Democracy, Truth, and Freedom” hosted by disgraced MP Andrew Bridgen, who was kicked out of the Tory party for his anti-vax extremism. 

In a room rented on the parliamentary campus, Kory and a small group of fringe US physicians who have been involved with right-wing politics spread shoddy data, blatant disinformation, and fear over vaccine safety — while congratulating each other on being the truth-tellers of the pandemic. 

Despite Kory’s bravado on the global stage, his ivermectin crusade has not fared well back home. A lawsuit against a Wisconsin hospital system, brought by the nephew of a patient who was denied ivermectin before dying of COVID-19, was shot down by the state’s Supreme Court last spring. The American Medical Association and Wisconsin Medical Society had filed an amicus brief on behalf of the hospital system being sued, noting that the plaintiff had largely relied on Kory’s “opinion testimony” and that “the studies on which his opinion is based — including his own — have been thoroughly discredited.” 

They further highlighted that:

Additional research determined that meta-analyses touting ivermectin’s effectiveness, including Dr. Kory’s, had surveyed “largely poor-quality studies.” Indeed, one of the studies on which Dr. Kory relied was “potentially fraudulent” and included duplicated data. The journal that published Dr. Kory’s survey subsequently issued an expression of concern, which questioned Dr. Kory’s conclusions about ivermectin.

Kory fell ill with the virus in the summer of 2021 despite taking his own medicine, yet continues to push it as a “wonder drug” and has sold merchandise of himself as a cartoon superhero on the FLCCC website. Over the course of the pandemic, he has become a pariah of the global evidence-based medical community and a darling of the far-Right. 

To understand how a previously respected Wisconsin critical-care doctor inexplicably ruined his reputation over an anti-parasitic — and, far more importantly, caused chaos for global public health during a crisis — we must go back to the dawn of COVID-19.

Bad MATH+: The Genesis of Pierre Kory

In May 2020, a few months after the pandemic hit the US, Kory testified remotely at a US Senate hearing as a guest of Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) about the MATH+ hospital protocol for COVID-19 that he and his team, then referring to themselves as the Front-Line Critical Care Working Group, had developed. Kory identified his team members at the time as Drs. Paul Marik, Umberto Meduri, Joseph Varon, and José Iglesias. “MATH” stood for methylprednisolone (a steroid), ascorbic acid (vitamin C), thiamine (vitamin B1), and heparin (an anticoagulant), with the “+” indicating drugs of potential interest, including ivermectin.

The team’s COVID-19 protocol was adapted from Kory’s mentor and FLCCC co-founder Marik’s controversial vitamin C for sepsis protocol, published in the journal CHEST in 2017. The efficacy of this sepsis protocol has been thoroughly disproven, despite Marik’s accusations of “statistical obfuscation” in the studies failing to uphold his positive results. Questions had even been raised about potentially fraudulent data in his study, though, as Kory’s book boasts, they took legal action against the doctor who made those accusations, pressuring him to walk them back. Regardless, the huge mortality reduction reported in Marik’s paper has not been reproducible, the gold standard of scientific validity, and one study found increased sepsis mortality with vitamin C. 

In April 2020 Marik went on former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich’s podcast to promote their MATH+ COVID-19 hospital protocol — his vitamin C for sepsis ‘HAT’ protocol plus methylprednisolone — hoping to get the attention of the White House. Marik claims he tried to interest the World Health Organization (which, at the time, was not recommending steroids for COVID-19 treatment), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institutes of Health as well — but did not get a response. His team did, however, get the attention of Johnson.

In his first appearance before the Senate — for the remote “How New Information Should Drive Policy” roundtable — Kory railed against the exclusion of steroids from the existing COVID-19 hospital protocol. To his credit, he would be proven correct about steroids having a role in the fight against the virus. 

A non-FLCCC critical care doctor (who wishes to remain anonymous, given the retaliatory behaviors of certain FLCCC members and their allies) explained that the initial hesitation on steroids was prompted by early reports from China that they were not beneficial in decreasing mortality or length of stay but could increase viral shedding — and by additional concern that they may cause worse outcomes, as they can with flu. This ICU physician added that the MATH+ protocol’s stepwise increase in steroid dosage “lacked supporting data.” 

A February 2021 randomized control trial (RCT) out of Cleveland Clinic published in JAMA found vitamin C ineffective at lessening COVID-19 symptoms, with a November 2021 meta-analysis of RCTs further backing its lack of efficacy against the virus. But Marik and the FLCCC continue to promote his vitamin C for sepsis protocol and the MATH+ protocol — which has expanded to include more drugs and vitamins — on their website.  

In the spring of 2020 the FLCCC still presented itself as an organization that supported evidence-based medicine, trying to positively contribute to America’s imperfect response to COVID-19, and had been correct about both steroid and anticoagulant usefulness against the virus. They had only barely added ivermectin as an optional medication in their protocol as part of the “+” portion of MATH+ as the drug was gaining some traction in global research into the repurposing of existing medications — though these promising ivermectin studies would fail to hold up to scrutiny

During the May 2020 Senate hearing, Kory claimed they had sent their protocol to the White House multiple times. Johnson — who stressed the need for early treatment and plugged the Right’s ivermectin predecessor, hydroxychloroquine — assured Kory he had passed it on to Donald Trump’s chief of staff, Mark Meadows. 


Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) at the 2016 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC)

 in National Harbor, MD. Photo credit: Gage Skidmore / Wikimedia (CC BY-SA 2.0 DEED)

Also featured at Johnson’s virtual roundtable was a physician who did get the ear of the president, Dr. Scott Atlas, who would come on as a Trump adviser in July 2020 and for whom the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis’s (HSSCC) damning report The Atlas Dogma: The Trump Administration’s Embrace of a Dangerous and Discredited Herd Immunity via Mass Infection Strategy is named. 

In late 2020, Kory et al. published their MATH+ protocol in the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JICM), based on two centers where it had been implemented: United Memorial Hospital in Houston (where Varon worked) and Sentara Norfolk General Hospital in Norfolk, VA (where Marik worked).

At the time of its publication there was significant pushback from the medical community to this paper. The major issue was the non-randomized control study design, which compared the death rates at their two MATH+ sites to previously published observational data to report a “more than 75% absolute risk reduction in mortality.” In November 2021, their MATH+ paper was retracted by JICM after a tip-off from Marik’s hospital about issues with the integrity of the mortality data he had put forth. The retraction notice read:

The article has been retracted after the journal received notice from Sentara Norfolk General Hospital in Norfolk, Virginia (“Sentara”) raising concerns about the accuracy of COVID-19 hospital mortality data reported in the article pertaining to Sentara.

The same day as the retraction, Marik sued Sentara hospital over their banning of ivermectin for COVID-19 — ivermectin being the antiparasitic medication that was added to the MATH+ protocol after their submission to JICM, as the group latched on to the promise of the drug and stepped into the deeply political “early treatment” movement.

Ivermectin is what the FLCCC became known for, with Kory returning to the Senate in December 2020 to testify on the efficacy of the antiparasitic — in the US principally prescribed for veterinary use as a dewormer, but a mainstay of global health where worm infections in humans are more common — against COVID-19. In so doing, he became the face of the ivermectin movement in the US and inspired anti-vax cranks worldwide — including prominent proponent Joe Rogan, on whose Spotify podcast he would appear in June 2021. 

That same summer, former FLCCC member Dr. Eric Osgood left the organization in a “panic” as they failed to incorporate the newly available life-saving vaccines into their protocols, claiming “he had his ‘oh shit’ moment, registering the effect the group was having on social media and the way its message was being received.” 

Ivermectin: The New Hydroxychloroquine

Kory’s FLCCC would not stop with just COVID-19. It moved on to promoting ivermectin for long-COVIDRSV, and the flu

In the summer of 2023, Kory latched on to anti-vaxxer Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s presidential campaign, appearing at his health policy round table alongside a number of well-known cranks. Kennedy — who continues to say that ivermectin is the wonder drug Kory claimed — has tweeted that Kory is “honest, brave, and sincere,” which is, given what we’ve learned of Kennedy’s own nature, something of a red flag. Kory’s organization, registered as a 501c3 and part of a network of Kennedy-aligned anti-vax nonprofits, was revealed to have received massive amounts of right-wing money, including on the sly through donor advised funds, as reported in Rolling Stone and Wisconsin Watch.

Prior to ivermectin, right-wing politicians in the US had tried pushing hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for COVID-19. America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) — created in a partnership with the Trump reelection campaign — burst onto the scene with a July 2020 press conference, “The White Coat Summit” in front of the Supreme Court, pushing their “cure.” Their stunt was live-streamed by Breitbart and tweeted about by Trump, who had been promoting HCQ since March 2020 — in the face of strong pushback from the medical and scientific communities. Fronted by future insurrectionist Dr. Simone Gold, the rogue pro-Trump physicians also decried lockdowns and masks. The politicization of COVID-19, vaccination, and public health generally — a pressing goal of the far-Right — had been achieved.

At the time, the FLCCC publicly distanced itself from AFLDS by tweeting:

The physicians and associates of the Frontline Covid19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) are neither affiliated nor aligned in any way with the group calling itself “America’s Frontline Doctors” that demonstrated outside the U.S. Supreme Court on July 28th. In fact, the FLCCC strongly rejects the entirety of group’s [sic] claims — including that there is a cure for COVID-19 and that there is no need to wear masks. (Emphasis added.)

However, Kory would go on to collaborate with members of the AFLDS openly, participating alongside AFLDS member Dr. Ryan Cole on Johnson’s anti-vax panels, and applaud Gold, whose AFLDS would hawk ivermectin as well as HCQ, as a “tireless medical freedom fighter” in his book. This praise comes despite her involvement in the attempt to overthrow democracy, her ongoing involvement with MAGA extremists, and an AFLDS member’s disturbing stalking and ambushing of the president of the California Medical Board for one of their propaganda films

Prior to endorsing ivermectin, Kory contributed to the political early treatment movement as a co-author on an August 2020 preprint paper pushing back against the results of the major RCT that found no use for HCQ against COVID-19 earlier that summer. He would also appear on another pro-HCQ preprint posted in December 2020 — the same month he promoted ivermectin to the US Senate.

The exact timeline of when ivermectin became the new HCQ is difficult to parse out. There was a fair amount of overlap, as the Right’s fight for HCQ continued even as its star was fast fading and ivermectin’s rising — with the whole thing playing out in the overheated arena of a fierce battle for the White House. 

Despite the theatrics of AFLDS, the FDA had already rescinded its emergency use authorization for HCQ the month before their “summit.” This left conservative politicians — like Johnson, who had written to Trump urging action on HCQ in April 2020 — scrambling. 

report from the HSSCC detailed Johnson and his allies’ attempt to strongarm the FDA into re-authorizing HCQ throughout the summer of 2020. However, in an August 2020 email included in the same HSSCC report, Johnson confessed that outside Trump and a few insiders, the administration didn’t “want to touch HCQ with a 100’ pole,” and acknowledged “the moral aspect — the lives lost” by their continuing to push for the drug that did not work against the virus. 

Ron Johnson, COVID, email

Photo credit: US HousePDF

Johnson would further harry the FDA in two separate hearings later that year. In November, Johnson hosted a panel to argue support for “early treatment,” featuring a slew of personal anecdotes and deeply flawed studies from across the globe. In particular, Dr. Harvey Risch argued in favor of HCQ, citing unpublished research from the Brazilian hospital system Prevent Senior with a WordPress link in his official submitted testimony. 

Risch and Johnson’s American pro-HCQ colleagues’ involvement with politically aligned research out of Brazil is further discussed in the aforementioned HSSCC report. HCQ research conducted at Prevent Senior was politically motivated and carried out unethically, “manipulating medical records and data from scientific experimentation, which was conducted without obtaining the participants’ informed consent.” 

Poor quality research out of South America would prove central to the ivermectin movement as well. And Risch would write in support of Marik in his legal filing against Sentara and serve on leadership of the anti-vax group The Unity Project alongside Kory.

Johnson’s December hearing would provide more of the same anecdotal statements, questionable studies, and anti-lockdown fear-mongering — and a star-making turn for Kory, who passionately claimed, “Ivermectin is effectively a miracle drug against COVID-19.”

By October 2020, ivermectin had been upgraded from “an optional component to an essential component” of the FLCCC’s MATH+ protocol. In his book, Kory speaks of finding researcher Juan Chamie’s graphs of a supposedly successful ivermectin distribution program in Peru and “trembling” in awe as he studied them in the fall of 2020. He highlighted Chamie’s role as an FLCCC analyst in his December 2020 testimony and featured his graphs, which had quickly made their way through social media in late 2020. They were picked up by Fox News’s Laura Ingraham — who had previously pushed HCQ on Fox and to Trump directly in Spring 2020 — on Twitter just five days prior to the hearing.

Peru would have the highest COVID-19 death rate in the world in 2021. And Chamie would appear as a co-author on controversial ivermectin research out of Brazil alongside Kory. 

It was around the time of this second Senate appearance that the FLCCC conspicuously departed from any faux support for mainstream thought and professional consensus. This also coincides with their being brought on board by the international pandemic disinformation network that AFLDS was already tapped into, a hub of which was the UK-based Health Advisory & Recovery Team (HART).

The secretive HART group suffered a leak of their internal messaging system, which revealed their coordination with right-wing government and media and their manipulation of social media. Included in the leaked messages was a January 2021 email from the interim executive director of the FLCCC, Sean Burke, to a Polish self-identified AFLDS affiliate, Artur Bartosik, copied into the chat log. The message alerted the network to the emergence of Kory, Marik, and their group — and brought their ivermectin regimen to the existing global early-treatment platform previously occupied by HCQ.

Artur Bartosik Chat

Photo credit: GitHub chat room screenshot.

Screenshots, chatrooms

Photo credit: GitHub chat room screenshots.

Dr. Tess Lawrie — formerly listed as a HART member — who runs the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development group, claims on the BIRD website that it was inspired by Kory’s December 2020 Senate testimony. She is also a member of The Unity Project with Kory; and her ivermectin meta-analysis, published in the same journal as Kory’s, was also slapped with an expression of concern. Her other group, WCfH, would go on to platform the FLCCC as well as their Brazilian ivermectin-pushing counterpart, Médicos Pela Vida (Doctors for Life), which has its own deep online network and ties to Brazil’s right wing.

The FLCCC in Brazil

In addition to his work promoting ivermectin in the US, Kory was involved with publications based on research into the drug in Brazil. Like Trump, Brazil’s then-President Jair Bolsonaro was keen on downplaying the threat of the virus, which he referred to as “a little flu.” Kory is on two problematic papers (published by the known “predatory” journal Cureus) focused on the Brazilian town of Itajaí, which were highly cited by the global ivermectin movement. Kory’s involvement with work of Bolsonaro allies — such as the mayor of Itajaí who allowed the town to become a regional ‘laboratory’ in 2020 — is indicative of his reliance on far-right politics to bolster his “wonder drug” claims.

The studies are first-authored by Dr. Lucy Kerr of Médicos Pela Vida (MPV), which, like the FLCCC, is listed as a coalition partner of the WCfH. Also on the papers is Brazilian Dr. Flavio Cadegiani — added as an FLCCC clinical advisor in August 2021 — who promoted their Itajaí ivermectin research in a WCfH video alongside Kerr in April 2022.

At the time of the project, the mayor of Itajaí called Kerr a “pioneer in the fight for ivermectin,” while a pulmonary specialist at Hospital das Clínicas at the University of São Paulo Medical School cautioned, “There is a political narrative and a disinformation strategy in place to minimize the pandemic and make people think there’s an easy solution.”

One of the Kerr papers was corrected in March 2022 to reflect undisclosed financial conflicts of interest, including Kory’s position with the FLCCC and Kerr and Cadegiani’s payments from ivermectin manufacturer Vitamedic. A representative for Vitamedic admitted that between 2019 and 2020 they experienced a “600 percent increase in [sales of] ivermectin.” The company, along with Kerr’s MPV, was condemned in May of last year by the Brazilian Federal Court in the Rio Grande do Sul estate for “collective moral and health damages” resulting from their promotion of this false cure.

Furthermore, Cadegiani was involved in deeply troubling research performed in the Amazonas region into androgen receptor antagonist proxalutamide for COVID-19 — another “cure” touted, in addition to ivermectin and HCQ, by Bolsonaro — which registered 200 deaths. The Brazilian doctor performed his work without proper registration in that part of the country and with some study participants reportedly not knowing they were being experimented on. Research regulators have called his work the worst violations of human rights and medical ethics in the country’s history.

Despite accusations of “crimes against humanity” against him, the FLCCC and MPV proudly announced that the Regional Council of Medicine of the Amazonas estate had dropped all charges against Cadegiani last spring following an investigation — accountability for the powerful in Brazil being rare under both Bolsonaro and the right-wing regional institutions that survived his fall from power — with Kerr’s organization going so far as to call Cadegiani “Brazil’s greatest living scientist.” 

Following a retraction of a proxalutamide-for-COVID-19 paper of his in Frontiers in Medicine, Cadegiani took to Twitter to attack the journal as “corrupt” and accuse them, without evidence, of accepting bribes. This proxalutamide paper, retracted in June 2022, is cited in the FLCCC’s most recent “MATH+” protocol published in February of last year as well as their latest “I-CARE Early Covid Treatment” protocol published in December.

In addition to raising concerns about the political and financial conflict of interest issues with the Itajaí study, outside researchers have also questioned the methods and findings of the Cureus papers. A small team of independent researchers have re-analyzed the Kerr studies in a preprint paper currently pending peer-reviewed publication, which claims the reported benefits of ivermectin in reducing “infection, hospitalization, and mortality are entirely explained by statistical artifacts.” An author of this reanalysis paper has publicly called for the two Cureus papers to be retracted. While the reanalysis does not explain the motive for the statistical issues, the payments from Vitamedic and the political allegiances of the authors seem to answer that question. 

This was not the end of Kory’s involvement with Brazil, however. Kory, despite having no pediatric training, has recently been advocating against pediatric COVID-19 vaccine mandates in the country, as reported by Children’s Health Defense’s blog “The Defender.” Ahead of testifying remotely this February, Kory posted on Twitter/X, claiming he would “drop some truth bombs.”

The same day, Kory spoke in person at the International Crisis Summit in Washington, DC, hosted by CPAC and Johnson, continuing to promote ivermectin for COVID-19. A few days later, the seventh major study to show the inefficacy of ivermectin for COVID-19 released its results — results Kory called “fraudulent.” 

Is There Accountability in America?

Lack of accountability for Cadegiani in Brazil is unsurprising, as several charges against Bolsonaro were also shelved in 2022 by a politically aligned prosecutor after the country’s senate recommended the ex-president be charged with “crimes against humanity” and “charlatanism” for his promotion of false COVID-19 treatments such as HCQ and ivermectin.

There’s similarly been no accountability for the US politicians who promoted some of the same snake oils as did Bolsonaro and argued against vaccination, to disastrous ends. Johnson — who hosted Kory, Risch, Cole, and The Unity Project star members McCullough and Dr. Robert Malone at his anti-vax “Second Opinion Panel” in January 2022 during the deadly omicron wave — narrowly eked out a victory for a third term in the November 2022 midterm elections. 

Despite his early pandemic failures, a failed coup, and mounting criminal charges, Trump is the GOP nominee for the 2024 election. And then there is Kennedy, whose current presidential campaign would not have been possible without the anti-science antagonism of the MAGAs throughout during the pandemic. 

Additionally, there’s been a lack of medical licensing accountability for physicians involved in this deeply politically aligned early-treatment movement in the US, whom individuals like Cadegiani — recipient of an award for “research excellence” at the FLCCC’s recent conference, and, like Kory, given the superhero treatment in the FLCCC’s merchandise store — cling to for ongoing support. An investigation by The Washington Post, published last July, details the stagnation of the American state medical boards’ actions against doctors who have spread deadly COVID-19 misinformation. 

Highlighted in the report is the fact that AFLDS currently is facing an HCQ wrongful death lawsuit in Nevada and that a Wisconsin physician — following the FLCCC guidelines — remotely prescribed ivermectin for a COVID-positive patient who died four days later of a “probable COVID-19 infection.” This past month, after a year-long effort, Dr. Ryan Cole, a pathologist, had his Washington state medical license restricted owing to his telehealth prescription of ivermectin, among other violations. The initial January 2023 letter he received from the Washington Medical Commission highlighted that some patients sought him out to get on FLCCC protocols.  

Last August, following the Post’s investigation, Kory and Marik announced that the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) had alerted them that their board certifications were to be revoked for their spread of “false or inaccurate medical information.” Johnson, naturally, leapt to their supportreferring to the ABIM as part of the “COVID cartel” on Twitter/X, while Kory took to his substack to rail against the certification organization and medical journals.

While Marik claims he willingly gave up his medical license, Kory — who charges $2,350 for a series of telehealth appointments in his Leading Edge clinic, claiming to specialize in long-COVID and vaccine injuries — has somehow not lost his. Seemingly for insurance against a potential future loss of licensure, Kory has set up a practice with the Crow Indian tribe that does not fall under the jurisdiction of state medical boards. 

In September 2022, just ahead of Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom signing a COVID-19 misinformation physician licensing accountability bill into law, Kory and Johnson co-authored an opinion piece for Fox News, calling the legislation “insane” and arguing “doctors could lose their licenses simply for expressing an opinion” — which is putting what they’ve done rather lightly.

Kory is now the leading name on a lawsuit — also featuring his new political ally RFK Jr. and Children’s Health Defense — against the California Medical Board and California attorney general over infringement of physician free speech, conflating free speech and professional speech and covering for themselves.

Last summer, Kory’s first far-right ally Johnson made headlines for falsely claiming the pandemic was pre-planned by unnamed elites and that the FDA had finally, quietly approved ivermectin for COVID-19. Ignoring the conspiratorial nonsense of the former comment, the latter untrue statement ties back to a lawsuit filed against the FDA by Marik. The FLCCC co-founder and two other physicians, sued the FDA/HHS in June 2022 over the agencies’ warning against using ivermectin for COVID-19, claiming this interfered with the physicians’ practice of medicine. AFLDS filed an amicus brief in this case on behalf of the plaintiffs.

The suit was dismissed in December 2022 but the physicians have controversially revived their case with the right-wing-friendly Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, leading a representative from the FDA to correctly state they cannot stop a physician from prescribing any drug off-label — including ivermectin — in the appellate court. This was not an endorsement of ivermectin for COVID-19, but Johnson and other members of the right ran with it to the press and social media, as it served to uphold the early-treatment mirage just a bit longer.

Kory — whose tweets were included in JAMA study on physician-propagated COVID-19 disinformation online — has done plenty on the internet to shamelessly keep this act going. In his increasing desperation, he has pushed wild conspiracies about the vaccines on his substack and Twitter/X. These include the notion that massive numbers of people have died from the vaccine, as promoted by the conspiracy film Died Suddenly, and the physiological impossibility that the mRNA vaccinated can “shed” particles to make the unvaccinated sick from “spike disease.” 

Kory’s insistence to his large following that those pushing vaccines are evil and have knowingly done harm — and his targeting of specific individuals, like MAGA boogeyman Dr. Anthony Fauci and vaccine expert Dr. Peter Hotez — are beyond unethical and dangerous given how extreme the anti-vax movement has become. To save himself and keep his act afloat, Kory is putting the safety of science-based, ethically practicing health care workers — a group to which he once belonged — at risk.

In his transition to a Kennedy-grade anti-vaxxer, he has come out against all vaccines — unfortunately not limited to nonsense ramblings online. Back home, Kory testified against adding the meningitis vaccine to the Wisconsin pediatric vaccine schedule, and that addition was successfully blocked by the state’s GOP last year, putting kids at risk from a deadly disease. 

In December, Kory — who is now pushing a short film adaptation of The War on Ivermectin — appeared on Ingraham’s Fox News show as well as less mainstream conspiracy-peddling outlets to suggest the vaccines — not COVID-19 — are responsible for an increased death rate in working-age people in the US. This vaccine hysteria Kory helped stoke has led to preventable COVID-19 deaths and the current rise in measles cases driven by vaccine hesitancy.

To err is human. To intentionally deceive, for the benefit of oneself at the expense of human life to the extent that Kory has, is villainous. His true superpower appears to be evading accountability for it. A recent poll from the University of Pennsylvania showed that, in addition to waning vaccine confidence nationally, 26 percent of Americans believe ivermectin is a useful treatment for COVID-19. One has to wonder whether they would feel the same way if they knew the truth of the man behind the myth of the wonder drug.

How Do You Solve a Problem Like Pierre Kory?

To be clear, the FDA’s messaging against ivermectin for COVID-19 — the now-infamous “You are not a horse” tweet — was problematic, but not for the reason Marik claims. By mocking those taking the anti-parasitic promoted by Kory in the US Senate in this way — and so reducing a complex, well-funded international effort against public health to a punchline — the FDA only further alienated those who believed him. It plays perfectly into the narrative the far-Right uses of “elites” looking down on their followers.

And why shouldn’t they have believed what Johnson’s guest had to say? In such times of crisis, citizens should ideally be able to look to their elected leaders for guidance. In times of a health crisis, they should be able to trust doctors who have sworn an oath to protect and do no harm. They shouldn’t have to contend with unethical politicians comfortable using a pandemic as a power grab, doctors willing to play along, and medical boards unwilling to rein in their own for fear of political backlash.

These have been abnormal times, beyond the pandemic which hit the US under the Trump administration. Trump laid the groundwork for MAGA’s disdain for “mainstream” doctors like Fauci who spoke out against the president’s insistence that HCQ could solve the pandemic ahead of his reelection attempt. And, in the process, Trump elevated a fringe group of cranks and hucksters to national and global prominence.

Ivermectin, a continuation of Trump’s HCQ Big Lie, was spearheaded by MAGA loyalist, and agent of Trump’s Election Big Lie, Johnson. Had it not been for the desperation of the far-Right, Kory may very well have remained a respected physician in the critical care world and an otherwise globally unknown name. 

Now ivermectin has fused with MAGA politics — as witnessed by advertisements for ivermectin-containing kits overlaid on coverage of a recent Trump rally, and Donald Trump Jr. hawking those same kits on his podcast.

Kory, having turned his back on medicine and reason, has morphed into a political bad actor and propagandist. The audience he has targeted to radicalize against “The Establishment,” although they have contributed mightily to America’s political ruination, should not be viewed as villainous. They are victims of an elaborate disinformation campaign egged on by unscrupulous politicians and further fueled by an infusion of dark money. This COVID-19 disinformation network has disproportionately harmed GOP voters. 

If there is any hope of bringing those held captive by this arm of MAGA conspiracy-mongers back to the reality fold and beginning to heal the great societal divide pandemic politics have so exacerbated, there must be more thoughtful outreach across the aisle and a focus on the MAGA-targeted demographic in the “Middle America” Kory and Johnson call home. 

This will require both those conned by the Kory types and those who resent those who have been conned to understand the depths and danger of this deadly anti-truth movement. It will also require both sides to call for accountability for doctors like Kory, politicians like Johnson, and medical institutions that stayed all too silent even as they were ferociously attacked. 

While the GOP-led House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic — which appears to be following guidelines laid out for them by the Heritage Foundation, shot callers of the far-Right — is unlikely to engage in a needed investigation into this matter, pressure can and should be put on Democrats, reasonable Republicans, and the non-GOP-controlled media to do so. 

After years of lies about miracle cures — and data as well as “lives lost” that show their failure — it is high time the ugly truth comes out about the doctors and politicians who formed an unholy alliance against global public health. 

They must be brought to answer for the massive damage they have caused — both domestically and internationally — in derailing the pandemic response with their pushing of snake oil and campaigning against the vaccines. 

This group is deeply aligned with far-Right politics and they will abuse social media, right-wing press, and the courts to obfuscate the reality of their malfeasance and bury the consequences their actions have had on the public.

Ivermectin is not and never was a wonder drug for COVID-19, no matter what Kory and his coterie continue to say. In 2024 the drug’s promotion is a barometer for doctors, politicians, and members of the media. It goes a long way to answering the questions: Who can be trusted? Who respects science, public health, and truth — and who does not? Accountability, which Kory is so actively fighting, is the antidote for the plague of disinformation that has been destructively mounted on the back of the pandemic, with the aid of doctors who have broken bad. 

In his quest for a public health miracle and personal heroism, Kory latched onto a false cure. Worse, he has refused to let go in the face of reality and the destruction he’s caused. Lacking the humility to admit he was wrong, Kory has become a case study for the corrupting potential of hubris and proximity to power — far from the hero image he hawks.



Ireland

US has ‘got it dangerously, badly wrong’ on Palestine, McDonald says on Washington trip

Sinn Féin leader insists it is still ‘game on’ for next general election despite her party’s slide in recent polls


Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald speaks to the media at the Ireland Funds 32nd National Gala in Washington DC. 
Photograph: Niall Carson/PA Wire

Cormac McQuinn
Sun Mar 17 2024 - 

The United States has “got it dangerously, badly wrong” in relation to Palestine, Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald has said.

Speaking during her trip to Washington DC Ms McDonald said Sinn Féin’s message there has been “extremely positive when it comes to Ireland” with the Northern Ireland Executive back up and running.

However, in relation to Palestine there is an “ongoing vicious criminal, bombardment of Gaza and violence in the West Bank and the absolute, unanswerable need for a ceasefire and for the United States of America to lead in that regard”.

She said the United States needs “to take a firm position with [Israeli prime minister Binyamin] Netanyahu, with his government.”

Ms McDonald told Sky News: “We come here as friends, as people who have had the benefit of great support from the United States for our own peace process and we acknowledge that.

“But in respect to Palestine, they have got it dangerously, badly wrong.

“And the ceasefire now, that that has to be the absolute priority for everybody concerned.”

She responded to suggestions from some quarters that Sinn Féin should be boycotting events in the White House due to the US administration’s support for Israel.

[ Keith Duggan in Washington: How do we Irish get away with the annual jamboree? ]

Ms McDonald said there needs to be a ceasefire and an end to “the slaughter of women and children in Gaza, 30,000 deaths now.”

“I will talk to anybody, anywhere in a bid to stop that…

“In a way we have a unique position as Irish political leaders in that we have a very strong relationship with the United States – very strong, unparalleled access in a week like this.

“And we also have a very strong relationship with the Palestinian struggle...

“How on earth could I possibly justify not coming and not pressing that case in the strongest possible terms.”

Ms McDonald also said: “I think policymakers here know that what is going on is unconscionable and it needs to stop.”

She said the US is “absolutely key” adding: “It’s a hugely powerful nation, an ally of Israel, arming and supporting Israel.

“Of course, you have to come and speak to that and confront that.”


Separately Ms McDonald insisted it is “game on” for next general election despite Sinn Féin’s slide in opinion polls.

Sinn Féin’s support fell by six points to 28 per cent in February’s Irish Times/Ipsos B&A opinion poll, its lowest level in three years.


The party also saw its support fall in other recent polls.

Sinn Féin, like the Coalition and much of the Opposition, was also on the losing side of the referendums on family and care.

Ms McDonald was asked if Sinn Féin was losing touch with the electorate.

She said Sinn Féin’s responsibility and focus has to be on the lack of housing in Ireland and the “urgent need” to fix that as well as issues in the healthcare system and giving young people opportunities saying they are things the party has to “press forward”.

Ms McDonald said: “We’re the largest and leading party according to polling now for many, many years.

“That’s where we are now.

“We look forward to election campaigns and particularly a general election and giving people the option of change, positive progressive change.

“We’re still nailed on for that, irrespective of referendums – and the people by the way, their decision is sovereign and final.

“The question was put, the question has been answered.

“But in the context of a general election, it’s still very much game on and I still passionately believe in the kind of change that we’re advocating”.

Mr McDonald added: “I believe that we can rally people very strongly to the notion of giving a new government a chance and an opportunity to get things right.”

Asked if she would be Taoiseach handing over shamrock in the White House next year she said: “I make no assumptions about myself.

“I have no sense of entitlement to anything.

“All I can tell you is that we will work very, very hard, very sincerely and when the general election comes I will present our platform.

“I will present our team and I will ask in humility to be given the chance to be in government and to lead government.”

On immigration Ms McDonald said: “The vast, vast bulk of people want to know that somebody is in charge and managing the situation correctly and I don’t think the public has been satisfied that that is the case.

“What I support is a system that is fair, a system that is efficient, and a system that is enforced.”





Cormac McQuinn
 is a Political Correspondent at The Irish Times

 ELECTION 2024  TIPP POLL

Why Is Biden Running Again? Voters Cite Everything From Power To Principles - And Keeping Hunter Out Of Trouble, A Daily Mail Poll Shows


Voters say stopping Trump tops the President's motivations.


President Joe Biden delivers remarks at a campaign event in Atlanta, Georgia,
on March 9, 2024. (Photo by Peter Zay/Anadolu via Getty Images)

  • Voters agree that Biden is driven by keeping Donald Trump out of Oval Office 

  • They also say he's being pushed by wife Jill, son Hunter and fellow Democrats  

Most 81-year-olds have already stopped working to spend their retirements with loved ones.

Few are making plans to enter the world's biggest popularity contest and commit to a grueling job until 2029.

Not so for Joe Biden, the Democratic president who pepped himself up to deliver an energetic State of the Union speech last week as he seeks another four-year stint in the West Wing.

This leaves many voters and analysts wondering why.

With this in mind, we commissioned a DailyMail.com/TIPP Poll on what voters say motivates the president.

TIPP pollster Raghavan Mayur says respondents were 'all over the map'

Raghavan Mayur, the lead pollster, said our 1,419 participants were split.

'Respondents were all over the map when we asked why the 81-year-old president was running for a second term.' said Mayur.

'Most often, they said Biden wants to stop Trump getting back into the Oval Office.

'But large numbers also said he's in it for power, principle, or just to save the skin of his errant son, Hunter.'

Respondents could select three motivations.

By far the most popular was that Biden wants to stop his predecessor Donald Trump from winning another term in the White House.

Fully half of respondents said the president wanted to 'stop Trump.'

That's not surprising, as it echoes what Biden himself says about his reason for running.

The way the president tells it, Trump is a 'threat to democracy' who uses lies and violence to stay in power — much like he did in the assault on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Fully 11 percent of respondents said First Lady Jill Biden is driving her husband on to a second term. Photo Credit: Cheriss May, The White House
Another one-in-ten say the president is running again so he can look out for his troubled son, Hunter. Photo by Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images.

Next up, 28 percent of respondents said Biden wanted to 'continue serving the country.'

Another quarter said he wanted to complete the policies he launched in his first term.

Biden's re-election manifesto covers everything from abortion access to education.

But his central plan involves reindustrializing swathes of the US with climate-friendly infrastructure projects.

Not everyone sees noble motives, however.

A similar number of respondents — 24 percent — said Biden likes the feeling of power from sitting behind the Resolute Desk.

Another fifth said Biden was motivated by ambition and building his legacy.

That makes sense for a man who started out in politics in 1970 — a full half-century before he landed the top job.

Some 16 percent of voters said Biden was succumbing to pressure from his Democratic Party, where some, but not all, members say he's the strongest candidate to take on Trump.

Others said Biden was motivated by his personal ties, including the 11 percent who thought wife Jill Biden was nudging him toward another term.

Biden's biggest motivator, however, is keeping his predecessor Donald Trump out of the Oval Office, our survey shows. Photo by Timothy A. Clary/AFP via Getty Images
Republicans and Democrats disagree over the president's motivations, according to the survey by TIPP, which bills itself as the 'most accurate pollster for the past five presidential elections'

One-in-ten, however, said he wanted to keep the top job as he was worried about his son, Hunter, who is being probed by Republicans over a slew of damaging drug, gun, tax, and business dealings.

Finally, 7 percent said Biden is 'making way for someone else,' — which hints at the long-shot theory that Biden will withdraw his candidacy at or shortly before the Democratic National Convention in August.

That would make it easier for another candidate to clinch the nomination without fighting their way through the primaries.

The leading outside candidate is former First Lady Michelle Obama, according to Bet365, even though she says she will not run.

Republican and Democratic voters broadly agreed on Biden's motivations, though members of the president's own party were more generous towards him.

Nearly half of Democrats said Biden was running to 'serve his country' and finish up his policy agenda.

Republicans, however, were more likely to say Biden was being driven by his wife or to protect his son, Hunter.

The nationwide survey was carried out earlier this month and has a +/-2.7 percentage point error margin.

Roots of Christian Nationalism

 

Roots of Christian Nationalism

The roots of Christian Nationalism according to Professor Philip Gorski are interesting. Let a 2022 interview enlighten.

 

Sometimes, the shortest interviews are the better ones. I came across one in Yale News with David Gorski.

The January 6 Insurrection, according to Professor Philip Gorski, was a symbolic representation of White Nationalism. In the interview, he, recently, published the book entitled The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy.

When asked in this 2022 interview about Christian Nationalism, Gorski, said, “First, it is an ideology based on a story about America that’s developed over three centuries. It reveres the myth that the country was founded as a Christian nation by white Christians and that its laws and institutions are based on Protestant Christianity. White Christian nationalists believe that the country is divinely favored and has been given the mission to spread religion, freedom, and civilization.”

Those blessed by God to spread the Good News. The threat, from this perspective, becomes individuals who cannot be identified as white, as Christian, and as immigrants.

In a sense, the national soul of America becomes impure and polluted in this moral and theological framework. Given its theological orientation, God’s Law and Will are being poisoned. Why wouldn’t they be against non-white immigration who are non-Christians? They are philosophically consistent in this view. That’s respectable. As a simple matter of fact, most others disagree with them.

“By digging into the historical source materials, you can see this perspective taking shape in the 1690s, which is the title of one of the book’s chapters. In a way, you can trace it back even further,” Gorski explained, “because this idea of a white Christian nation does have roots in a certain understanding of the Bible that weaves three old stories into a new story.”

I have been told this is a form of selective literalism. These have practical effects on actions in the world. God promised a special land, a promised land for the Israelites. The problem was a discovery of the Amalekites in the land. Early settlers found themselves in this biblical narrative as a chosen people.

“North America was the new Promised Land. The Native Americans were the new Amalekites and the Puritans felt entitled to take their land. Another strand is the End Times story, which today is viewed as the Second Coming of Jesus in the most literal sense. It’s a belief that Jesus is going to come down to Earth for a final showdown between good and evil. And the Christians in America will be on the side of good,” Gorski explained.

The sense of nationalism and the interpretation of chosen people in Christian formulate the idea extant over centuries of this idea of a white, Christian, national geographic bounded structure guided by God’s Law. The peculariarity, according to Gorski, of whiteness — the sociological race concept — arose as a “justification for slavery.”

Gorski continued, “The traditional justification for slavery, theologically speaking, had been that heathens and captives of war could be enslaved. Initially, this is how slavery in America was justified, but a couple of generations later, the justification didn’t really work. You can’t argue that a young boy of African descent born in the Virginia Colony in 1690 was a captive of war. His mother might have converted to Christianity, in which case he’s not a ‘heathen.’”

This is so tragic. The new biblical justification for this racism became the story of Ham seeing his father, Noah, drunk and naked. God gave the mark not to Ham but Canaan, Ham’s son, and then condemned the children to slavery. This is one of the justifications for slacery of Africans.

Gorski expounded on the timeline in a merger in 1690. “The three biblical stories merge in 1690. You can see this very clearly in what is still one of the authoritative histories of early New England, which was written by Cotton Mather III from the great family of Boston preachers. Once this script is in place, it gets revised as time passes. Maybe the Promised Land is out West. Maybe the Native Americans are no longer the enemy, but it’s immigrants from the southern border who represent the threat.”

So, this story, as you can see, goes through evolutions as to the source of the problem or threat to Christian national identity. The political mentality focuses on the idea of a libertarian sense of social freedom. Gorski takes this as an idea of white men on top and everyone below them.

“You can really see this in the Capitol insurrection. It occurred against the background of the Black Lives Matter movement and nationwide calls for racial justice, which white Christian nationalists view as a threat to the racial order. It offends their notion of freedom and liberty,” Gorski explained, “It leads to guys showing up to the Capitol with cattle prods and bear spray ready to beat up police officers in the name of their understanding of patriotism. In the book, we call it a Holy Trinity of freedom, order, and violence.”

Gorski touched briefly on the delusions of some of the populations, not in the idea of a transcendent father figure and real estate agent. More in the idea of the Christian supporters of Trump believer Trump is a devout Christian, and a good one. They see Christianity as under attack. They like Trump because they see him as fighting for the faith.

Christians should have a right to believe and practice their faith. Democratic values and countries provide freedoms for so many religious people. Democracy brought religious freedom to different groups of Christians. Gorski sees the issue as the hard right sociopolitical turn of this population.

Emphasizing, “White Christian nationalism is a dangerous threat because it’s incredibly well-organized and powerful. There’s absolutely nothing like it on the left. The white Christian nationalists boast local and national networks that can raise money and to turn people out to the polls and to school board meetings or protests. They can effectively communicate messages and support policies that are out of step with liberal democracy, such as the coordinated attack on voting rights.”

Rise and fall: The National Front, football hooliganism, and skinhead culture in Britain in the 1970s

Far-right groups like the National Front rose in the 1960s-70s with anti-immigrant, nationalist ideologies – can we see parallels today?


byJohn Heywood
17-03-2024


image by Tav Dulay. CC BY-SA 3.0


Former Conservative – now Reform – MP, Lee Anderson and others have recently stated that they want to “reclaim our country”, asserting that “our country has been given away”. What do they mean by that, and do they truly want to go back to the days of the 1970s and early 1980s? If so, God help us.

During the late 1960s and 1970s, the National Front (NF) emerged as a prominent fascist movement in Britain, with roots tracing back to the British Union of Fascists (BUF) formed in 1932 under Oswald Mosley’s leadership. Mosley, a former Tory MP turned Labour minister, advocated protectionism and state intervention to tackle unemployment, ideas that were not well-received amidst prevailing economic orthodoxies.

Roots of British fascism

The BUF, openly embracing paramilitary tactics and fascist ideology, gained some initial mainstream support but faced significant backlash, particularly after violent clashes at events like the infamous Olympia rally in 1934. Despite claiming a substantial membership, the BUF struggled to gain significant traction beyond specific demographics, including some disaffected professionals and members of the armed forces.

Mosley’s movement was unabashedly antisemitic, with explicit ties to Nazi Germany, evidenced by his marriage at Goebbels’ home and alliances with Hitler. The party’s shift to include “National Socialists” in its name in 1936 underscored its alignment with fascist ideology.

Waning support for British fascism


The Battle of Cable Street in 1936 marked a significant anti-fascist victory, although the BUF still maintained some support, particularly in East London. Despite limited electoral success, the BUF’s influence waned by 1937 as economic conditions stabilised and support from segments of the ruling class diminished.

Following World War II, attempts to revive far-right movements faced substantial challenges due to the stigma associated with Nazi collaboration. Oswald Mosley’s post-war endeavours, including the Union Movement, aimed to bring together disparate far-right factions but largely floundered.

Post-war resurgence of far-right groups

The League of Empire Loyalists, founded in 1954, espoused a mix of white supremacy, antisemitism, and anti-Communism, finding some appeal among disillusioned Conservatives. However, it eventually shifted towards anti-immigrant sentiment, aligning with the Conservative Party’s evolving policies.

The Conservative Party Monday Club, initially focusing on apartheid and immigration, transitioned to a more mainstream conservative stance, advocating for free-market principles and limited government intervention. By the 1970s, it boasted significant Tory support but maintained a controversial reputation due to its positions on race and immigration. In 2001, the Conservative Party formally severed relations with the club, which by then has ceased to exercise significant influence,

Birth of the National Front

Rising immigration in the late 1950s and early 1960s fuelled racial tensions, exploited by figures like Enoch Powell, who’s inflammatory “Rivers of Blood” speech in 1968 exacerbated divisions within the Conservative Party and galvanised far-right sentiments.

The formation of the National Front in 1967 marked a concerted effort to consolidate various far-right factions under a unified platform, emphasizing anti-immigrant rhetoric and populist appeals. However, internal divisions and opposition from anti-fascist groups hampered its electoral success.

The NF’s attempts to capitalise on industrial disputes and racial tensions in the 1970s, including backing strikes and populist economic policies, failed to garner significant support, but did engender increasing opposition from anti-fascist organisations. the NF was not only a political force, but also a breeding ground for violence and extremism. NF members were often involved in violent clashes with anti-fascist protesters, leading to numerous confrontations on the streets of Britain’s cities.

The really nasty party

The NF was known for its aggressive tactics and street brawls with opponents. These clashes frequently turned violent, resulting in injuries and arrests. One of the most notorious incidents occurred during the Battle of Lewisham in 1977 when the NF attempted to march through a predominantly black neighbourhood in South London. The ensuing clashes between NF supporters and anti-fascist activists, along with local residents, resulted in widespread violence and injuries.

Football hooliganism also played a significant role in the NF’s activities, as many of its members were involved in organised gangs known for their violence at football matches. These gangs, often composed of young working-class men, saw football matches as an opportunity to engage in physical confrontations with rival supporters and to verbally and physically abuse black players, leading to frequent disturbances in stadiums and surrounding areas.




Skinhead culture

Skinhead culture, which emerged in Britain during the late 1960s and early 1970s, became closely associated with the NF and far-right extremism. While not all skinheads were fascists, the movement attracted a significant number of individuals sympathetic to the NF’s racist and nationalist ideologies. Skinhead gangs often clashed with anti-fascist groups and immigrant communities, contributing to a climate of fear and intimidation.

Despite efforts by law enforcement and anti-fascist organisations to combat NF violence, the group continued to pose a significant threat to public safety throughout the 1970s. By the late 1970s and early 1980s though, the NF splintered, with offshoots like the British National Party (BNP) briefly gaining traction but ultimately failing to sustain electoral momentum. While remnants of the far right persist, particularly in the form of splinter groups, their influence remains limited compared to earlier decades. Despite challenges, the legacy of these movements underscores the ongoing struggle against fascism and the importance of vigilant opposition to extremist ideologies.

THE ANTIDOTE