Thursday, April 25, 2024

Students protested for Palestine before Israel was even founded

And for decades, schools have tried to crack down on their activism.

Pro-Palestine student demonstrators march from the University of Colorado campus in Boulder to show solidarity and to protest the sale of US jets to Israel in this October 1973 photo. Denver Post via Getty Images
Fabiola Cineas covers race and policy as a reporter for Vox. Before that, she was an editor and writer at Philadelphia magazine, where she covered business, tech, and the local economy.

Last week, the country watched one of the biggest escalations in campus unrest this year unfold, when dozens of New York City police officers clad in riot gear entered the grounds of Columbia University and, on the orders of university president Minouche Shafik, arrested more than 108 student protesters who had built a “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” on campus. The students are calling for the school to divest from companies and organizations with ties to Israel amid the ongoing war in Gaza.

Though Shafik said at a congressional hearing she had taken the steps to make all students feel safe amid a reported rise in antisemitic rhetoric on campus, students said the administration put them in danger by authorizing a “notoriously violent” police unit to forcibly remove them, and NYPD Chief of Patrol John Chell later described the arrested students as “peaceful.”

At schools across the country, including the University of North Carolina, Ohio State University, University of Michigan, Boston University, and University of California Berkeley, students and faculty have launched marches, walkouts, and other demonstrations in solidarity with students at Columbia and to bring attention to the 34,000 Palestinians killed in Israeli attacks in the months since Hamas killed 1,200 Israelis and took more than 200 hostage on October 7.

New Haven police arrested nearly 50 people on Yale University’s campus early Monday on the third day of an encampment demonstration, while Columbia announced that classes would be held virtually as a campus “reset” and be hybrid for the remainder of the semester. Monday night, police arrested students on New York University’s campus, where about 400 people protested, after administrators called their demonstration “disorderly, disruptive and antagonizing.”

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators’ encampment at Columbia University on April 22, 2024, as the campus continued to reel after arrests of more than 100 protesters. Stephanie Keith/Bloomberg via Getty Images

These campus crackdowns have gone hand in hand with a long history of US student activism for Palestine that began even before Israel’s founding in 1948. Pro-Israel groups and students have doxxed and surveilled student activists, the media has sometimes mischaracterized their demonstrations, and administrators and law enforcement have punished the students with probations and suspensions or long legal fights and threats of jail time.

“In the current moment, we’re seeing an exacerbation of a longstanding strategy of suppression of pro-Palestine organizations on college campuses,” said Dylan Saba, a staff attorney at Palestine Legal, the organization defending pro-Palestinian students in court, last fall, as tensions on campuses were rising.

“Instead of allowing debate to take place on campuses — and allowing student organizations to highlight what’s happening to Palestinians — school leaders have taken the approach of trying to squash out the organizing and expression altogether,” he said.

Students’ pro-Palestine protest — and its suppression — has long been a locus of debate over the bounds of criticism of Israel and Zionism on campuses, the definition of antisemitism, and who is and isn’t allowed to fully exercise freedom of expression and assembly.

A huge crowd of demonstrators on the Columbia University campus.
Demonstrators at Columbia University in the Morningside Heights neighborhood of New York, April 22, 2024.
 Stephanie Keith/Bloomberg via Getty Images
 
A group of faculty, many in ceremonial robes, hold signs and stand on the steps of a large building at Columbia University.
Faculty protest at Columbia University on April 22, 2024.
 Stephanie Keith/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The early roots of US student activism for Palestine

US student activism for Palestine predates the Nakba — the 1940s expulsion of more than 700,000 Palestinians and the destruction of villages by Zionist militias amid a war to establish the state of Israel — by decades.

Arab medical students and doctors in the US formed the Palestine Anti-Zionism Society (later known as the Palestine National League and then the Arab National League) as early as 1917 to protest the Balfour Declaration, the British government’s statement that called for the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people’’ in Palestine.


The group published 1921’s “The Case Against Zionism” (a text that, it’s worth noting, contains antisemitic views) and also testified before Congress against the establishment of a Zionist state. The students also battled the negative depictions of Arabs that were spreading across the country alongside the Zionist movement.

More than 100 years ago, two members of the group told Congress what pro-Palestinian students across America are saying today: “Palestinians are not as backward as the Zionists portray them. They are entitled to a chance to build their own homeland…”

Larger-scale collective action increased as more Palestinians immigrated to the United States through the 1930s and ’40s “as the combination of colonial British rule and Zionist immigration made their lives unbearable,” San Francisco State University professor Rabab Abdulhadi wrote in “Activism and Exile: Palestinianness and the Politics of Solidarity.”

Student activism for Palestine grew with the student movement against the Vietnam War, among other struggles. Images of last week’s arrests at Columbia have even been juxtaposed with those from 1968, when about 1,000 police officers, some on horseback and carrying nightsticks, stormed the Columbia campus to arrest students protesting the war and US foreign policy.

“Palestine liberation organizing was very much a part of the anti-establishment, antiwar counterculture of the 1960s,” author and journalist Nora Barrows-Friedman wrote in the 2014 book In Our Power: U.S. Students Organize for Justice in Palestine. The 1967 war between Israel and its neighbors brought a new wave of uprooted Palestinians who couldn’t return home, students who were “politically conscious” and wanted to maintain their Palestinian identity, according to Abdulhadi.

The next few decades saw the formation of different pro-Palestinian groups, including the Organization of Arab Students, the Association of Arab American University Graduates (created by the late Palestinian American scholar Edward Said), and the General Union of Palestinian Students. Many of the organizations faded after the Oslo Accords, the American-led effort to broker peace between Israel and Palestine, in the early 1990s.

The modern face of pro-Palestinian student activism

Students for Justice in Palestine is one of the key groups currently leading protests for Palestine across US campuses. The group organized some of the encampments that have sprouted up at campuses in the last week.

Since October 7, some campus SJP chapters have been banned or suspended by administrators who say their demonstrations, slogans, and protest chants violated school policies. For example, George Washington University’s president suspended the school’s SJP chapter after students projected slogans including “Divestment from Zionist genocide now,” “Glory to our martyrs,” and “Free Palestine from the river to the sea,” on the side of the library. The president called some of the phrases antisemitic, though students and activists say the slogans call for Palestinian liberation.

SJP reignited activism for Palestine when it was launched at the University of California Berkeley in the early 1990s, as talks to dismantle the racialized apartheid regime in South Africa were underway and students drew parallels to Palestine. But it was the group’s actions amid the Second Palestinian Intifada — the uprising that began in 2000 in which Palestinians in the West Bank, Gaza, and Israel resisted the Israeli occupation — that have come to define the organization today.

At UC Berkeley, aside from organizing teach-ins and showing films to educate fellow students about Palestine, SJP members reenacted Israeli checkpoints across campus, temporarily blocking students at various campus gates. They built mock refugee camps on campus, occupied administrative buildings, disrupted classes, and chained themselves to the main administrative building.

Initially, the group “prioritized the spectacle with the aim of radicalizing our audiences and thrusting them into mobilization. The purpose was to avoid inertia,” wrote former UC Berkeley SJP member and Rutgers professor Noura Erakat in the forward to In Our Power.

But SJP found stronger direction in its divestment and “right of return” campaigns. When a vast coalition of pro-Palestine groups announced an official movement in 2005 to boycott, divest from, and sanction Israel, or BDS, the group at Berkeley focused on pushing for the right of Palestinian refugees to return home and the need for Israel to comply with international law.

The new platform allowed the Berkeley chapter to find broader solidarity with Palestinian organizers across the country as those groups embraced BDS. SJP grew between 2003 and 2008 as students formed new SJP chapters, expanding to the East Coast, while activity ebbed and flowed based on conditions in the West Bank and Gaza.

Palestinian student demonstrators gathered outside of the Israeli consulate in Houston, 
Texas, on July 21, 1981.
 Houston Chronicle via Getty Images

“Media accounts, political analysts, and most observers noted the nascent movement with interest but dismissed it as idealistic and naïve,” wrote Erakat. Members, founders, and alumni told Vox that SJP’s staying power has come from its ability to draw in students of all backgrounds, including Jewish students.

“Historically, SJP was very dynamic because of its diversity. It wasn’t a Palestinian student organization or an Arab or Muslim one,” said William Youmans, an associate professor of media and public affairs at George Washington University who helped resuscitate UC Berkeley’s SJP chapter in 2000 and started Law Students for Justice in Palestine at Berkeley’s law school. Youmans spoke with Vox last fall as protests erupted on campuses.

As SJP chapters formed, members developed new protest strategies and signature events, some of which continue today. Students at the University of Toronto, for example, launched Israel Apartheid Week to bring attention to the BDS movement, among other issues. Students told Barrows-Friedman that the week was formed to show that Israel’s occupation was not an “intractable conflict” or “of equal burden held by both Israel and the Palestinians” but an “unequal situation in which a US-supported government with an occupying military force rules over the displaced, confined, excluded, and occupied.”

When intensified violence broke out between Israel and Hamas in 2012, SJP members at UC Riverside constructed large coffins to conduct mock funerals. Around the same time, members at San Diego State University, University of New Mexico, and University of Arizona created 10-foot-tall “apartheid walls” to draw attention to the restrictions Palestinians face. Students boycotted products with connections to Israel, like the SJP members at DePaul University who organized a movement to boycott Sabra, the hummus company.

When campuses invited Israeli soldiers to deliver speeches, SJP students protested and walked out at schools including the University of Kentucky, Rutgers University, George Mason, and San Diego State University. In violation of speech and conduct regulations, some students disrupted speakers mid-speech.

Pro-Palestinian student activists have faced pushback and consequences

As students organized, they faced counterprotests from pro-Israel student groups, backlash, and shifting rules from university administrators, and have been subjected to death threats, legal fights, and surveillance, doxxing, and targeting by pro-Israel organizations. The crackdown on student organizing after 2000 coincided with the George W. Bush administration’s “war on terror” following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, which included the passage of the Patriot Act that made it easier for the government to carry out domestic surveillance that often targeted Muslim communities.

When SJP members at Boston University planned the school’s first Israeli Apartheid Week, BU Students for Israel formed “Israel Peace Week” and scheduled it for the week before. When students planned a Right of Return Conference there in 2013, a student reported that the conference “received a lot of pushback from Zionists who called the administration in an effort to stop the conference from happening.”

After students at Florida Atlantic University spoke out and walked out of a speech given by an Israeli soldier in 2013, they were put on administrative probation barring them from holding campus leadership positions, and forced to attend an anti-bias training created by the Anti-Defamation League, the pro-Israel organization that tracks hate crimes.

In a rare criminal prosecution, 10 students who heckled then-Israeli ambassador Michael Oren during a talk he gave in 2010 at the University of California Irvine were found guilty of misdemeanors for “disrupting a public meeting,” and were sentenced to three years of probation, 56 community service hours, and fines.


Northeastern University suspended its SJP chapter in 2014 and threatened students with expulsion after they handed out mock eviction notices during the group’s Israel Apartheid Week. That same year, university administrators at Barnard quietly removed an SJP banner with the words “Stand for Justice, Stand for Palestine” with no explanation.

When SJP passed resolutions through student governments to have their institutions stop investing in companies that support Israel, universities condemned the votes. SJP activists have reported being contacted, interviewed, or followed by the FBI over their organizing.

Individual students have also worked with pro-Israel groups on a few occasions to file claims under Title VI of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging that SJP activism at UC’s Irvine, Berkeley, and Santa Cruz campuses created a “hostile environment,” with “harassment, intimidation, and discrimination” for Jewish students and amounted to antisemitism.

The most popular of these lawsuits, 2011’s Felber v. Regents of the University of California, was dismissed that same year after a judge determined that the university was working to foster dialogue and ensure safety between opposing groups.

Since October 7, pro-Palestinian students have struggled to strike the appropriate tone, critics said. The national SJP, which is not affiliated with any campus chapters, released a five-page instructional toolkit that called for chapters across the country to “resist” as part of Hamas’s attack, which was described as a “historic win for the Palestinian resistance.” The document, condemned as antisemitic, featured paraglider imagery in its graphics, reminiscent of the Hamas militants who descended on Israel during the attack. The state university system of Florida swiftly deactivated its SJP chapters after the toolkit’s release, arguing that the students were providing material support for a terrorist organization.

“October 7 was a unique moment because the scale of Hamas’ attack is unprecedented in Palestinian history. The scale of the atrocity, the spectacle of violence against civilians — it was a horrific attack,” said Youmans. “That put a lot of student organizers in this complicated position. On the one hand, the US media was focusing on the horror of it and a lot of Palestinian solidarity activists were saying that it was the natural outcome of constant bombardment of Palestine by Israel every two to three years for a decade and a half. There was this violence and traumatization that was happening for years.

“But instead of explaining that, a lot of SJP chapters used slogans or others had a celebratory tone. It was so out of touch with the larger mood in the country.”

Student organizers who spoke to Vox said that they denounce antisemitism and take time to welcome their Jewish peers at protests. At the Columbia encampment last week, students held Shabbat and sang prayers, and for the first night of Passover on Monday, students held a seder at the tents. But other Jewish students have reported feeling unsafe.

Students at New York University continue their demonstration on campus in solidarity
 with the students at Columbia University and to oppose Israel’s attacks on Gaza, on
 April 22, 2024.
 Fatih Aktas/Anadolu via Getty Images

The focus on their protest strategies, their mistakes, and the discipline they’re facing, student organizers told Vox, only detract from the reality that Israel has killed 34,000 Palestinians and has destroyed nearly 70 percent of homes in Gaza.

“There’s a respectability politics that we are forced to constantly hold ourselves to, not just as an organization, but also as students who are Arab American, or Muslim, or Palestinian on campus,” said a George Washington student who spoke to Vox last fall on the condition of anonymity because they fear for their safety, including fears that their personal information could be posted online without their permission. “We have to play into this idea of a respectful Arab who uses demure language and [act] like liberation is not at the forefront of our demands. It’s just a way to suppress the movement. The conflation with antisemitism is aggressive.”

As students approach finals season, with commencement ceremonies on the horizon, many across the country, supported by some faculty members and alumni, say they won’t stop protesting until their demands are met. “Cracking down on student protesters has only made us louder,” Columbia SJP wrote in an Instagram story. “We will not be silence[d] until Columbia divests from genocide & palestine is free.”

Clarification, April 25, 12:20 pm ET: This story has been updated to include more context about “The Case Against Zionism” and its sources, and to remove the link to the pamphlet.

OPINION

‘The political-media-industrial complex’ undermining truth and democracy in service of Israel



by Nasim Ahmed
April 25, 2024 

Students at New York University (NYU) continue their demonstration on campus in solidarity with the students at Columbia University and to oppose Israel’s attacks on Gaza, in New York, United States on April 22, 2024. 
[Fatih AktaÅŸ – Anadolu Agency]

In the relentless propaganda war waged against Palestinians, the scales have been heavily tipped in favour of Israel. Disinformation and half-truths are routinely employed to depict Palestinians as aggressors, terrorists or simply as non-existent entities within their own homeland. Every assertion made by Israeli officials in this theatre of misinformation is accepted as the unassailable truth until proven false, while any evidence that contradicts the Israeli narrative is swiftly dismissed as falsehood, requiring an overwhelming burden of proof to even be considered.

The emergence of social media and alternative news sources has helped to reverse this trend and create a more even playing field. Yet, despite these strides towards a more equitable exchange of ideas, the entrenched nexus of politics, media and industry, often referred to as the “political-media-industrial complex”, remains steadfastly aligned with the interests of the Israeli state.

Such unwavering allegiance to Israel not only undermines the pursuit of truth, exemplified by Western complicity in the unfolding genocide in Gaza, but also imperils the foundational values of a free and democratic society, illustrated by the violent crackdown on student protestors in the US.

The toll on Palestinian lives and the enduring damage to the principles of a free and democratic society, wrought by the propaganda-driven narrative perpetuated by the “political-media-industrial complex” is glaringly evident. Since 7 October, scarcely a week has passed without a stark reminder of the extent to which the West has placed itself in a highly compromised moral and legal position due to its unwavering backing of Israel.

OPINION: Israel faces an unprecedented global academic boycott

This week it was Germany’s resumption of funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA). In the catalogue of hoaxes and misinformation employed to justify Israel’s genocide in Gaza, the attack on UNRWA will perhaps be remembered as one of the most egregious.

In another powerful demonstration that, when it comes to Israel, claims of the apartheid state, however improbable, are accepted as true until proven otherwise, Germany, along with 19 donor countries, halted funding to UNRWA. The move was entirely based on Israeli allegations.

The funding was cut despite the dire needs of 2.3 million people in Gaza, most of whom have been forced from their homes by the Israeli offensive since 7 October and have been struggling to find water, food, shelter or medical care. The decision to defund UNRWA based on unverified claims was met with condemnation, especially as one of the provisional measures issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in Israel’s genocide case was the free access and delivery of aid.

Berlin’s decision to resume funding came after an independent review, conducted by former French Foreign Minister, Catherine Colonna, found that Israel had not provided any evidence to support its claims that UNRWA staff took part in the 7 October attack.

OPINION: Will Netanyahu win the battle of Rafah?

The findings of the Colonna report add to the growing list of disinformation campaigns by Israel over the past six months, casting doubt on the credibility of its statements regarding Gaza and its attempts to undermine UNRWA’s work. Israel’s claims about 7 October atrocities carried out by Hamas have also come under scrutiny. With no evidence of beheaded babies, “babies cooked in ovens” or systematic rape, it is widely recognised that Israel falsified atrocities in order to justify its military operation in Gaza.

It was evident from the beginning that Israel’s attack on UNRWA was a politically motivated attempt to shut down the UN agency once and for all, a goal which it has been seeking since its establishment in 1949. Over the decades, Israel has repeatedly called for the Agency’s dissolution, arguing that it perpetuates the Palestinian refugee problem and hinders a resolution to the conflict.

Israel has lobbied donor countries to reduce or cease funding to the Agency, accused UNRWA of inciting violence and promoting anti-Israel sentiment in its schools and pressured the UN to merge UNRWA with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).




Israel becomes ‘largest cumulative recipient’ of US foreign military aid – Cartoon [Sabaaneh/MiddleEastMonitor]With no evidence to back up its claims, 7 October presented an ideal opportunity to exploit the sympathy of its Western allies and use the shock fuelled by reports of the alleged atrocities committed by Hamas to shut down UNRWA permanently.

Top Israeli officials have acknowledged that their campaign to halt international funding to UNRWA has failed. Political sources in Israel are said to have acknowledged in talks with foreign diplomats in recent days that they had not succeeded in influencing the Colonna report in the way they had hoped, and that it is clear following the report’s publication, other countries will join Germany and renew funding for the Agency. The UK is also now considering renewing funding to UNRWA, which will leave the US as the only country to continue suspending funding to the UN agency.

Predictably, the question on the minds of many is why Western governments suspended funding initially, despite the lack of evidence from Israel to support its claim and the long-standing objective to dismantle UNRWA. The decision to adopt the Israeli narrative has not only resulted in the loss of Palestinian lives in Gaza, particularly as the besieged enclave grapples with famine and starvation, but has also eroded Western credibility even further.

The credulous manner in which the political-media-industrial complex accepts the Israeli account has not only made Western governments complicit in the unfolding genocide in Gaza, but the same credulity is also imperilling the foundational values of a free and democratic society.

The people who caused mass hysteria by pushing the allegations about UNRWA employees working for Hamas are the same people, from the same political-media-industrial complex, who are now pushing another hoax. Aiming to forcibly silence students, they are fomenting hysteria over anti-Semitism on US college campuses. In scenes reminiscent of police crackdowns on students protesting the Vietnam War, more than 100 pro-Palestinian activists were arrested this week on the campus of New York’s Columbia University.

OPINION: Why doesn’t Sisi want to run the Gaza Strip?

Protesters at the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) and the University of Southern California (USC) have also been arrested as student-led demonstrations against Israel’s war on Gaza intensified across the US and pro-Israel members of Congress suggest calling in the National Guard. Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu has called the pro-Palestinian protesters “anti-Semitic mobs” that are taking over “leading universities”.

However, the student-led protests have been peaceful and largely respectful. Nevertheless, in clear violation of the right to freedom of expression, they have been met by heavy-handed action from many universities. Jewish students have refuted allegations levelled by pro-Israel members of US Congress and university officials that protests calling for their institutions to cut ties with companies linked to Israel over the war in Gaza were anti-Semitic.

The case of UNRWA serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of blindly following Israel’s lead, as the decision to suspend funding based on unsubstantiated claims has not only exacerbated the humanitarian crisis in Gaza but also undermined the pursuit of truth and justice. Similarly, the crackdown on peaceful student protesters in the United States, fuelled by baseless accusations of anti-Semitism, demonstrates how the unwavering allegiance to Israel’s narrative has led to the suppression of free speech and the violation of democratic values.

It is time to end the unquestioning acceptance of the Israeli narrative by the political-media-industrial complex. It has not only placed the West in a highly compromised moral and legal position, but support for Israel is undermining the very essence of what we are told is the West.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor

 

Testimonies From The Occupied Palestinian Territory Show New Depths Of Israel’s Atrocities: UN Expert

CAIRO (25 April 2024) – The Occupied Palestinian Territory is enveloped in a spiral of unstoppable violence, with stories Palestinians and other witnesses relay adding new depths to atrocities the world has witnessed since the beginning of Israel’s assault on Gaza over six months ago, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Francesca Albanese said today.

“The pace and intensity with which this violence has spread to the rest of the occupied territory confirms that no Palestinian is safe under Israel’s unfettered control,” Albanese said, concluding a visit to Egypt and Jordan.

The Special Rapporteur said Israel had once again arbitrarily denied her access to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, compelling her to report on the situation of Palestinians under occupation from neighbouring states.

Albanese said her visit demonstrated that the situation in Gaza is worse than previously assessed, with serious and multi-layered long-term implications. Most victims she met had endured catastrophic injuries, witnessed family members killed and experienced the effects of Israel’s destruction of Gaza’s health infrastructure, even after 26 January 2024, when the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued a ruling ordering Israel to prevent genocide in Gaza.

Patients that previously arrived in Egypt primarily with explosive and war injury-related symptoms are now joined by patients with chronic diseases and/or malnutrition, especially children, arising from Israel’s intentional humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza.

“Photos from a mere eight months ago show a chubby-cheeked 8-year-old Hamid, now rake thin and spending his days in excruciating pain due to pancreatitis developed through the harsh conditions of the siege,” the Special Rapporteur said.

“Those who have left Gaza come out fractured and wracked by ‘survivors’ guilt’ and severe trauma,” Albanese said. “Just 50 kilometers away from the Gaza Strip, crucial, life-sustaining aid and goods, including water desalination equipment, first aid kits, oxygen cylinders and portable toilets – paid for by taxpayers across the world – languish in warehouses, barred entry into Gaza on the pretext of use by combatants.”

“Humanitarian measures implemented so far – airdrops and maritime corridors – are a mere palliative for what is desperately needed and legally due,” the expert said. “These measures are grossly inadequate to alleviate the humanitarian catastrophe that Israel’s assault has created.”

“At this point, Israel has reneged on its international obligations to a degree that warrants a call for sanctions,” Albanese said.

The Special Rapporteur said her visit only confirmed how critical the UN Relief and Works Agency’s mandate is to Palestinians and people across the region as Palestinians once more flee to safety.

“Surrounding countries cannot alone absorb the impact of Israel’s pernicious practices of killing and displacement from Gaza,” Albanese said, calling for the supply chain of support to be mainstreamed through the UN Humanitarian Coordinator. “This will alleviate responsibility for Egypt and the Egyptian people,” she said.

Albanese reiterated calls for an immediate ceasefire, an end to Israel’s illegal control of Gaza and the Occupied Palestinian Territory and a protective presence to ensure peace and stability in the region.

“It is critically important that the UN assumes full responsibility of humanitarian operations in accordance with Security Council resolution 2720,” the Special Rapporteur said.

“The horrors that people have seen in Gaza are unspeakable,” Albanese said. “But this visit also confirms that attention on the worsening situation in the West Bank including East Jerusalem has lapsed.” Increased restrictions and abuses, arbitrary detention and extrajudicial killings by Israeli soldiers and armed settlers alike are widely reported.

“Israeli policies spanning the occupied Palestinian territory are unquestionably endangering Palestinian existence on their land,” she said. “The focus of the international community must zero-in on the most likely implication – the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians – and States must do everything in their power to prevent it.”

Albanese said she had undertaken the devastating experience of meeting with Palestinians from Gaza and recording their testimonies, trusting that UN member states will act to end the slaughter and ensure accountability.

“States must insist on an immediate and unconditional ceasefire and impose sanctions on Israel to avoid further calamity,” the Special Rapporteur said.

A full report is to follow.

Ms. Francesca Albanese is the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967.

Party defending Palestinians' rights expected to run in Belgian elections in June

Viva Palestina party aims to work for recognition of Gaza genocide

Melike Pala |25.04.2024 -



ANKARA

The Viva Palestina Party, which aims to defend the rights of Palestinians, is expected to participate in the Belgian general and regional elections.

The party is expected to enter the elections, which will held June 9 in the Brussels region.

Viva Palestina aims to "work for the recognition of the Gaza genocide and lead international justice efforts," according to a website for the party, led by author and Palestine activist Dyab Abou Jahjah.

The party is "determined to eliminate Israel's apartheid system targeting Palestinians through sanctions and boycotts and to make Brussels a pioneer in the global struggle for this.”

It also aims to defend Palestinians' rights to self-defense, self-determination and statehood.

The Viva Palestina party is committed to leading international efforts to bring Israel's war criminals and those responsible to justice.

Meanwhile, a disciplinary investigation was initiated against Khadija Zamouri, a member of parliament from the Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats, for to her support for the Viva Palestina party.

Zamouri announced that she resigned from the party following an investigation and pressure campaign launched against her.

Israel has waged a brutal offensive on Gaza since a cross-border attack by the Palestinian group, Hamas, on Oct. 7, which Tel Aviv said killed less than 1,200 people.

More than 34,300 Palestinians have since been killed in Gaza, mostly women and children, and nearly 77,300 injured amid mass destruction and severe shortages of necessities.

More than six months into the Israeli onslaught, vast swathes of Gaza lay in ruins, pushing 85% of the enclave’s population into internal displacement amid a crippling blockade of food, clean water and medicine, according to the UN.

Israel is accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice. An interim ruling in January ordered Tel Aviv to stop genocidal acts and take measures to guarantee that humanitarian assistance is provided to civilians in Gaza.

*Writing by Gozde Bayar