Tuesday, April 30, 2024

 

Tensions grow as China ramps up global mining for green tech

By Global China Unit, BBC News

Aerial view of brine ponds and processing areas of a lithium mine in the Atacama Desert in Chile. Photo: AFP

Earlier this year, Ai Qing was woken up in the middle of the night by angry chants outside her dormitory in northern Argentina.

She peered out of the window to see Argentine workers surrounding the compound and blockading the entrance with flaming tyres.

"It was getting scary because I could see the sky being lit up by the fire. It had become a riot," says Ai, who works for a Chinese company extracting lithium from salt flats in the Andes mountains, for use in batteries.

The protest, sparked by the firing of a number of Argentine staff, is just one of a growing number of cases of friction between Chinese businesses and host communities, as China - which already dominates the processing of minerals vital to the green economy - expands its involvement in mining them.

It was just 10 years ago that a Chinese company bought the country's first stake in an extraction project within the "lithium triangle" of Argentina, Bolivia and Chile, which holds most of the world's lithium reserves.

Many further Chinese investments in local mining operations have followed, according to mining publications, and corporate, government and media reports. The BBC calculates that based on their shareholdings, Chinese companies now control an estimated 33 percent of the lithium at projects currently producing the mineral or those under construction.

But as Chinese businesses have expanded, they have faced allegations of abuses similar to those often levelled at other international mining giants.

For Ai Qing, the tyre-burning protest was a rude awakening. She had expected a quiet life in Argentina, but found herself involved in conflict mediation because of her knowledge of Spanish.

"It wasn't easy," she says.

"Beyond the language, we have to tone down many things, like how management thinks the employees are simply lazy and too reliant on the union, and how locals think Chinese people are only here to exploit them."

Latin America's "lithium triangle". Photo: AFP

The BBC Global China Unit has identified at least 62 mining projects across the world, in which Chinese companies have a stake, that are designed to extract either lithium or one of three other minerals key to green technologies - cobalt, nickel and manganese.

All are used to make lithium-ion batteries - used in electric vehicles - which, along with solar panels, are now high industrial priorities for China. Some projects are among the largest producers of these minerals in the world.

China has long been a leader in refining lithium and cobalt, with a share of global supply reaching 72 percent and 68 percent respectively in 2022, according to the Chatham House think tank.

Its capacity to refine these and other critical minerals has helped the country reach a point where it made more than half of the electric vehicles sold worldwide in 2023, has 60 percent of the global manufacturing capacity for wind turbines, and controls at least 80 percent of each stage in the solar panel supply chain.

China's role in the sector has made these items cheaper and more accessible globally.

But it's not only China that will need to mine and process minerals needed for the green economy. The UN says that if the world is to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, their use must increase six-fold by 2040.

The US, the UK and the European Union have all developed strategies, meanwhile, to reduce their dependence on Chinese supplies.

As Chinese companies have increased their overseas mining operations, allegations of problems caused by these projects have steadily risen.

The Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, an NGO, says such troubles are "not unique to Chinese mining" but last year it published a report listing 102 allegations made against Chinese companies involved in extracting critical minerals, ranging from violations of the rights of local communities to damage to ecosystems and unsafe working conditions.

These allegations dated from 2021 and 2022. The BBC has counted more than 40 further allegations that were made in 2023, and reported by NGOs or in the media.

People in two countries, on opposite sides of the world, also told us their stories.

On the outskirts of Lubumbashi in the far south of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Christophe Kabwita has been leading opposition to the Ruashi cobalt mine, owned by the Jinchuan Group since 2011.

He says the open-pit mine, situated 500m from his doorstep, blights people's lives by using explosives to blast away at the rock two or three times per week. Sirens wail when the blasting is about to start, as a signal for everyone to stop what they are doing and take cover.

"Whatever the temperature, whether it's raining or a gale is blowing, we have to leave our homes and go to a shelter near the mine," he says.

This applies to everyone, including the sick and women who have just given birth, he adds, as nowhere else is safe.

In 2017 a teenage girl, Katty Kabazo, was reportedly killed by a flying rock on her way home from school, while other rocks are said to have punched holes into the walls and roofs of local houses.

A spokesperson from the Ruashi mine, Elisa Kalasa, acknowledged that "one young kid was in that area - she was not supposed to be there and was affected by the flying rocks".

She said that since then "we have improved the technology, and now we have the sort of blasting where there are no flying rocks any more".

However, the BBC spoke to a processing manager at the company, Patrick Tshisand, who appeared to give a different picture. He said: "If we mine, we use explosives. Explosives can cause flying rocks, which can end up in the community because the community is too close to the mine... so we had several accidents like that."

Kalasa also said that between 2006 and 2012 the company compensated more than 300 families to relocate further away from the mine.

On Indonesia's remote Obi Island, a mine jointly owned by a Chinese company, Lygend Resources and Technology, and Indonesian mining giant Harita Group has rapidly swallowed up the forests around the village of Kawasi.

Jatam, a local mining watchdog, says that villagers have been under pressure to move and accept government compensation. Dozens of families have refused to relocate, saying what is on offer is below market value. As a result, some say they have been threatened with legal action for allegedly disrupting a project of national strategic importance.

Jatam says old-growth forests have been logged to make way for the mine and they've documented how the rivers and ocean have been filled with sediment, polluting what was once a pristine marine environment.

"The water from the river is undrinkable now, it's so contaminated, and the sea, that is usually clear blue, turns red when it rains," Nur Hayati, a teacher who lives in Kawasi village, says.

Indonesian soldiers have been deployed to the island to protect the mine and when the BBC visited recently, there was a noticeable, increased military presence. Jatam claims soldiers are being used to intimidate, and even assault, people who speak out against the mine. Nur says her community feels the army is there to "protect the interests of the mine, not the welfare of their own people".

The military's spokesperson in Jakarta said allegations of intimidation "cannot be proven" and that while the soldiers were there to "protect the mine" they were not there to "directly interact with locals".

In a statement, he claimed the relocation of villagers to make way for the mine had been overseen by the police in a "peaceful and smooth manner".

Nur was among a group of villagers who travelled to the Indonesian capital, Jakarta, in June 2018, to protest against the impact of the mine. But a local government representative, Samsu Abubakar, told the BBC no complaints had been received from the public about environmental damage.

He also shared an official report that concluded Harita Group had been "compliant with environmental management and monitoring obligations".

Harita itself told us that it "adheres strictly to ethical business practices and local laws" and it is "continuously working to address and mitigate any negative impacts".

It claimed it had not caused widespread deforestation, it monitored the local source of drinking water, and independent tests have confirmed the water met government quality standards. It added that it had not carried out forced evictions or unfair land transactions and had not intimidated anyone.

A year ago, the Chinese mining trade body, known as CCCMC, started setting up a grievance mechanism, intended to resolve complaints made against Chinese-owned mining projects. The companies themselves "lack the ability - both cultural and linguistic" to interact with local communities or civil society organisations, says a spokesperson, Lelia Li.

However, the mechanism still isn't fully operating.

Meanwhile, China's involvement in foreign mining operations seems certain to increase. It's not just a "geopolitical play" to control a key market, says Aditya Lolla, the Asia programme director at Ember, a UK-based environmental think tank, it also makes sense from a business perspective.

"Acquisitions are being made by Chinese companies because, for them, it's all about profits," he says.

As a result, Chinese workers will continue to be sent to mining projects around the world and for them, these projects mostly present a chance to earn good money.

People such as Wang Gang, who has worked for 10 years in Chinese-owned cobalt mines in DR Congo. The 48-year-old lives in company accommodation and eats in the staff canteen, working 10-hour days, seven days a week, with four days' leave per month.

He accepts the separation from his family in Hubei province, because he earns more than he could at home. He also enjoys the clear skies and tall forests of DR Congo.

He communicates with local mine workers in a mixture of French, Swahili, and English, but says: "We rarely chat, except for work-related matters."

Even Ai Qing, who speaks the language of her host country fluently, has little interaction with Argentines outside work. She's started seeing a fellow Chinese worker, and they mostly hang out with other people like themselves - being thousands of miles from home pulls everyone closer.

A highlight for her is visiting the salt flats high up in the Andes where the lithium is mined and life is "chill".

"The altitude sickness always gets me - I can't fall asleep and I can't eat," she says. "But I really do enjoy going up there because things are much simpler, and there are no office politics."

Ai Qing and Wang Gang are pseudonyms.

Additional reporting by Emery Makumeno, Byobe Malenga, Lucien Kahozy.

Bonza: Passengers stranded as Australian airline weighs its future

By Hannah Ritchie,
BBC News, Sydney

The low-cost carrier has only been operating flights in Australia since 2023

Australia's newest budget airline suspended all its flights on Tuesday, to discuss "the ongoing viability" of its business model.

The move has left thousands of passengers stranded around the country, forcing competitors to step in.

Bonza is the first carrier to launch in Australia in 16 years.

Dominated by two companies, aviation remains one of the nation's "most concentrated industries" according to Australia's consumer watchdog.

"We apologise to our customers who are impacted by this and we're working as quickly as possible to determine a way forward that ensures there is ongoing competition in the Australian aviation market," the airline said in a statement.

Mel Watkins, who was due to fly to Launceston for a family holiday told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) that she was "absolutely shattered" by news her flight had been axed.

"I thought it's an Australian airline, and we'd be better off supporting a small company, but it turns out no."


Responding to the cancellations - which impacted departures across Queensland and Victoria - Australia's Transport Department set up an emergency help hotline for passengers on Tuesday.

Qantas Group and Virgin Australia - which account for 95% of the nation's domestic aviation market according to its airport authority - both also offered to step in and assist anyone stranded mid-journey.

Based in Queensland's Sunshine Coast, Bonza launched in 2021, promising low-cost fares and improved regional connectivity via a suite of new destinations.

After a long-delay while it awaited regulatory approval - it finally took to the skies in 2023 but aircraft shortages and low patronage saw it slash several routes in quick succession.

Those setbacks, combined with its inability to secure access to take-off and landing spots in the lucrative Sydney market quickly sparked speculation over its future.

Bonza's eight planes - a fleet of Boeing 737-Max - were repossessed by creditors on Tuesday according to local media, but the airline has not publicly addressed the claim.

Australia's main transport union is now seeking an urgent meeting with the airlines leadership to discuss how the sudden closure will impact workers.


"Bonza must ensure staff are prioritised and informed as this process plays out," the national secretary of the transport workers union, Michael Kaine said, according to the Guardian.

Mr Kaine also criticised the "unchecked corporate greed" in the aviation industry that's led to higher fares and warned that any carrier attempting to break into the market "has little chance of survival".

Qantas illegally fired 1,700 worke
rs

Australia's major polluters could be emitting twice as much methane as reported: Study

Protesters near Crown Towers, the venue for the Woodside Energy Group Ltd. annual general meeting in Perth, on April 24, 2024. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG

APR 30, 2024, 

SYDNEY – Major polluters in Australia could be spewing more than double the methane estimated in its national inventory data, according to a report from the Melbourne-based nonprofit The Superpower Institute, which suggests the government should invest in new monitoring and verification technology.

The study, which drew on atmospheric modeling and satellite observations, is the first analysis to use the institute’s new Open Methane tool.

The monitoring system uses remote sensing data to better understand Australia’s releases of the potent greenhouse gas from fossil fuels. The project plans to offer an interactive map with daily alerts for unexpected and significant methane spikes later this year.

“We’re arguing for a verification system, which would require the government to invest in 12 ground stations and then use satellite technology” to cross reference whether what’s being reported on the ground is accurate, said Rod Sims, chairman of the institute.

Methane is responsible for around 30 per cent of the rise in global temperatures since the industrial revolution, according to the International Energy Agency.

The gas is released mainly from the fossil fuel industry, wetlands and agriculture, such as rice farming, and it has more than 80 times the warming power of carbon dioxide over the first 20 years after it reaches the atmosphere.

Australia is among the world’s top exporters of coal and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Coal mining and LNG production are large sources of methane.

A spokeswoman for Chris Bowen, Australia’s minister for climate change, said the country’s emissions reporting scheme and inventory is “world class” and “one of the most comprehensive in the world”.

She emphasised Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s government is committed to ongoing consultation and will work with experts and stakeholders to implement the most effective updates to ensure the scheme remains a reliable evidence base for effective climate action.

Empirical data from satellites and aerial surveys suggest that methane emissions from fossil fuels are widely underreported.

Recently, separate studies conducted by energy think tank Ember suggest that both Indonesia and Germany underreport releases of the potent greenhouse gas from coal mining activities. BLOOMBERG
Temporary aid pier off Gaza to be operational in May: Pentagon

Pier being constructed by US military to cost around $320 million, says spokeswoman


 Sabrina Singh
 30/04/2024 Tuesday
AA

File photo


A temporary pier being constructed off Gaza's coast for delivering humanitarian aid will be operational in May, a Pentagon spokesperson said Monday.

"We're scheduled on track to meet our goal of early May," Sabrina Singh told reporters.

The Pentagon announced on March 8 that it would undertake an emergency mission to establish a temporary pier on the Gazan coast to deliver up to 2 million humanitarian aid meals per day.

The mission includes a floating pier -- an 1,800-foot-long causeway that will be attached to the shore and a group of logistic support vessels

On April 25, the Pentagon announced that US military vessels had begun to construct the initial stages of the temporary pier and causeway at sea.

"Right now, you're seeing construction of that floating, temporary pier, and then you'll start to see construction of the causeway," Singh said.

Asked about the estimated cost of the pier, she said: "That's about our rough estimate right now, approximately $320 million."
‘Addicted to explosions’: Israel unit demolishes ‘thousands’ of Gaza buildings

'We have become addicted to explosions', a captain posted on social media

Israeli soldiers of Battalion 8219 appear to smoke as they detonate the building behind them (Photo: TikTok)

By Kieron Monks
April 30, 2024 6:00 am(Updated 6:02 am)

An Israeli engineering unit responsible for demolishing “thousands” of buildings in Gaza became “addicted” to explosions and was motivated by revenge, an investigation by open source intelligence group Bellingcat and US news channel Scripps has found.

Soldiers identified as part of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) Battalion 8219, tasked with carrying out demolitions, posted accounts of their work on social media – in common with other Israeli units – including footage that went viral of soldiers smoking as they detonated apartment blocks behind them.

Bellingcat used open sources to track the unit and the trail of destruction it left as 8219 moved through Gaza during the war from Gaza City in the north to Khan Yunis in the south, destroying residential buildings and mosques.

An unnamed user identified as a captain in the unit posted that it had destroyed “thousands” of buildings and that a battalion commander had said their work had “no precedent … in all the years of the IDF”.

The poster separately wrote: “We have become addicted to explosions.”

Battalion 8219 member Yonatan Segal told Scripps that soldiers were partly motivated by revenge after the deadly Hamas raids of 7 October. “Revenge in terms of teaching them a lesson, so to speak, so that they would never do that again,” he said.
Soldiers in front of a building they are apparently demolishing (Photo: TikTok)

The unit was part of an ongoing effort to clear a “buffer zone” around the perimeter of Gaza, open source researchers found, a practice that international law scholars say may constitute a war crime if it is indiscriminate. Twenty-one Israeli soldiers were killed carrying out demolitions in the zone in January.

About half of all of the buildings in Gaza have been damaged or destroyed by Israeli bombardment during the war, according to analyses of satellite imagery.



Balakrishnan Rajagopal, UN Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing, described destruction on this scale as “domicide” and argued it should be a crime “enshrined in international humanitarian and criminal law”.

A spokesperson for the IDF said the military was looking into the report and whether the practices described and recorded by the soldiers had broken rules.

“We are still gathering the information and working on a thorough response,” the spokesperson said.

Nick Waters, a Bellingcat investigator who researched Battalion 8219, said the unit’s apparent excesses were likely to be the tip of the iceberg.

“My main takeaway is that actually this isn’t that unique,” he said. “The article doesn’t show the totality of the buildings destroyed by 8219, and 8219 are simply one battalion among several who’ve carried out this kind of work inside Gaza, including in the ‘buffer zone’ area, which stretches along the border.

“This article is only a small window into the widespread controlled demolitions taking place.”
Why Palestinian writers must be heard
By winning the 2024 International Prize for Arabic Fiction, Basim Khandaqji's unfiltered account of his people's experience will reach a wider audience

THE NATIONAL
EDITORIAL



'A Mask, the Colour of the Sky' author Basim Khandaqji. For Palestinians, literature is one of the few means at their disposal of telling their own story. Vidhyaa Chandramohan for The National

“Imight have good friends, travel, luxuries,” Egyptian writer and Nobel Prize winner Naguib Mahfouz told The Paris Review in a 1992 interview. “But without literature my life would be miserable.” Although Mahfouz was correct about writing’s ability to enrich and uplift, it also has a more profound quality – helping people to explore and understand complex issues in a way that resonates universally.

This quality can be seen in Palestinian writer Basim Khandaqji’s novel A Mask, the Colour of the Sky, which was awarded the 2024 International Prize for Arabic Fiction in Abu Dhabi on Sunday. It tells the tale of a Palestinian archaeologist living in a refugee camp in Ramallah who finds an Israeli ID and takes on the identity of the card’s namesake to understand life behind the Israeli security fence.

Khandaqji’s story explores a theme contained in other modern Palestinian works, such as The Book of Disappearance by Ibtisam Azem. This 2019 novel is set in a Middle East where, much to Israelis’ shock and unease, the Palestinians have suddenly disappeared, leaving Israeli society frightened and confused. Both Azem and Khandaqji’s novels imaginatively explore how two peoples who live in such proximity have radically different and unequal experiences of justice, freedom and security.

Yousef Khandaqji, brother of Basim Khandaqji, reacts as the author is named winner of the 2024 International Prize for Arabic Fiction in Abu Dhabi on Sunday. Basim Khandaqji has been in an Israeli prison since 2004. AFP

For Palestinians, literature is one of the few means at their disposal of telling their story in an unmediated and unfiltered way. Palestinian public figures are often pressed in interviews with the international media to begin with a rhetorical denunciation of violence before they can make their point. Palestinian writers, however, are freer to shape their own narrative.

Sadly, because of the continuing occupation of Palestine, it is a narrative in which violence and division often play a central role. Khandaqji has been in Israeli prison since 2004, when he was given three life sentences after being convicted on charges of terrorism for planning a bombing that killed three people in Tel Aviv. That year was also one of major turmoil: the long-time Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat died, the second intifada was raging and Israeli society was in turmoil over plans to evacuate its settlements in Gaza. Twenty years later, it is a tragedy that the situation for Palestinians and Israelis has, if anything, worsened.

As the world witnesses the continuing war in Gaza, the need for Palestinian voices has rarely been greater. As the IPAF prize comes with funding for English translation, A Mask, the Colour of the Sky will soon reach a wider audience. The second Palestinian novel on the IPAF shortlist, Osama Al Eissa’s The Seventh Heaven of Jerusalem, will also gain a deservedly higher profile. Such support is a vital part of literary prizes as well as events such as the Abu Dhabi International Book Fair, which begins today. This recognition reflects the UAE’s consistent backing, seen in other prizes such as the Zayed Book Award, for important contributions from the Arab world, not just in literature but in many other fields.

It is perhaps fitting that Mahfouz, the only Arab so far to win the Nobel Prize for Literature, will be a focal point for this year’s book fair in Abu Dhabi – one of his most celebrated works, 1961’s The Thief and the Dogs, deals with themes of imprisonment and revenge, two realities that have sadly dominated much of the Palestinian experience for decades. Until such a time comes that Palestinians are free to explore other realities, we will need to listen closely to what writers such as Khandaqji have to tell us.

ILO Governing Body, 350th session - Report on crisis-related ILO work in the Occupied Palestinian Territory - EU Statement


ILO Governing Body, 350th session

Report on crisis-related ILO work in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

13 March 2024

EU statement

 

Chair,

I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union and its Member States.

The candidate countries North Macedonia*, Montenegro*, Serbia*, Albania*, Republic of Moldova, and the EFTA country Iceland, member of the European Economic Area, as well as Switzerland, align themselves with this statement.

  1. We thank the Office for the report on crisis-related ILO work in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
  2. The EU and its Member States deplore all loss of civilian lives in Israel and occupied Palestinian territory and express their deepest condolences for all UN staff members killed in Gaza since October 7. The EU strongly supports the efforts by the United States, Egypt and Qatar to agree the release of hostages and a temporary ceasefire, to ensure a sustained end to hostilities. We call on Hamas to immediately release all hostages without any precondition.
  3. We reiterate our gravest concern for the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza and call for continued, rapid, safe and unhindered humanitarian access and aid to reach those in need through all necessary measures. We are very concerned about the humanitarian consequences, which must be avoided, of a possible ground operation in Rafah, where well over a million Palestinians are currently sheltering from the fighting.
  4. The EU condemns in the strongest possible terms the brutal and indiscriminate terrorist attacks by Hamas across Israel on October 7th, which included sexual and gender-based violence. The use of civilians as human shields by Hamas is a particularly deplorable atrocity. Israel has the right to defend itself, it must do so in line with international law, including international humanitarian and human rights law.
  5. The EU will continue to follow the situation in Gaza closely and call for respect of human rights, underlining the obligation to ensure the protection of all civilians at all times in line with international humanitarian law. There must be full respect of international law, including international humanitarian law, by all sides. We note that there must be accountability for violations of international law on all sides.
  6. The EU notes the 26 January 2024 order of the International Court of Justice is legally binding on the Parties and must be complied with.
  7. We stand ready to contribute to reviving a political process towards a negotiated two-state solution.
  8. With regard to the ILO three-phase emergency response programme, which was developed to alleviate the impact of the ongoing conflict in Gaza on Palestinian workers and employers, we support its continued implementation in cooperation with other UN entities and international organisations. Aid needs to reach those in need in a safe manner and through all necessary means. The EU has already quadrupled its humanitarian assistance to Gaza, and continues to provide support to the Palestinian Authority, including through the EU-PEGASE programme with a view to contributing to the fulfilment of social rights.
  9. Chair, we welcome efforts to reach consensus and in that light we can support the decision.

Thank you, Chair.

*[North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Albania continue to be part of the Stabilisation and Association Process].

Canadian universities warn protesters against erecting pro-Palestinian encampments

APRIL 30, 2024 

April 30 (UPI) -- Universities in Canada are warning pro-Palestinian demonstrators against erecting protest encampments like those that have gone up on campuses of colleges across the United States.

The University of Toronto and the University of Ottawa have separately warned protesters that encampments and occupation of university buildings and land are not tolerated.

The Ontario higher-education institutions said they understand the situation caused by the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza and support their students' freedom of speech, but that encampments violate school policies.

"UofT's lands and buildings are private property, though the university allows wide public access to them for authorized activities," Vice Provost Sandy Welsh said in a message Monday to UofT students that was published online by Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies.

Related
Protesters arrested on college campuses as 'physical altercations' break out at UCLA
Student protesters remain as Columbia University's afternoon vacate deadline passes
Tufts: Pro-Palestinian encampment 'must end'

"Unauthorized activities such as encampments or the occupation of university buildings are considered trespassing."

Welsh continued that any student involved in unauthorized activities or conduct "may be subject to consequences."

At Ottawa, Associate Vice President of Student Affairs Eric Bercier said: "While peaceful protest is permitted in appropriate public spaces on campus according to our policies and regulations, encampments and occupations will not be tolerated."

In Montreal, Quebec, McGill University said Monday night that its senior leadership was considering next steps after protesters who had erected an encampment on campus over the weekend have rejected its call for discussions on dismantling the tents.

"We were informed through their lawyers that the students have refused to carry on these discussions and did not bring any proposals or suggestions to further the dialogue," the school said in a statement.

"They have instead indicated that they intended to remain on campus indefinitely."

It said the encampment began Saturday as some 20 tents on the lower field of its downtown campus, but the situation has "shifted significantly" with the number or protesters tripling since.

"We have become aware that many of them, if not the majority, are not members of the McGill community," it said.

The school added that Sunday night it had seen video evidence of some protesters "using unequivocally anti-Semitic language and intimidating behavior, which is absolutely unacceptable on our campuses."



The situation in Canada comes as universities in the United States have been reeling for weeks as they attempt control protests and encampments that have been erected on their campuses as pro-Palestinian protesters demand schools to divest their interests from Israel and call for an end to the Israel-Hamas war.

Many U.S. schools have moved to dismantle the encampments, resulting in hundreds of arrests at campuses across the country.

On Saturday, the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center said it was aware of only one encampment erected at McGill, though was aware of plans for others to go up in the days ahead in Ottawa and Toronto.

It said it was calling on universities to ensure campuses remain safe for Jewish students and faculty.

"University administrations must do everything in their power to protect the safety of Jewish students and faculty and ensure they're not subjected to the harsh anti-Semitic rhetoric and physical intimidation that's been a hallmark of these encampments on campuses across the U.S.," FSWC President and CEO Michael Levitt said in a statement.
Columbia students take over building on campus as deadline passes

The late-night developments began with protesters marching around campus to chants of 'free Palestine'

Eryn Davis, Sharon Otterman, Sarah Nir 
New York  Times
Published 30.04.24, 12:12 PM

A counterprotestor waves the flag of Israel as pro-Palestinian demonstrators march around the protest encampment at Columbia University on Monday, April 29, 2024. Columbia had given students until 2 p.m. to clear out from the encampment, warning them that they would face immediate suspension if they did not leave by then.(Bing Guan/The New York Times)

Protesters at Columbia University marched across the campus and occupied a building after midnight early Tuesday, hours after the university moved to suspend students who had failed to leave a pro-Palestinian encampment.

Dozens of students left the encampment about 12:35 a.m. and entered Hamilton Hall, a neoclassical building on the campus that is home to the department of classics and Columbia College.

The late-night developments began with protesters marching around campus to chants of “free Palestine.” Within 20 minutes, they had seized Hamilton Hall, with dozens linking arms and blocking the main entrance.

The unrest came just hours after the university said it had started suspending students who had not left the encampment after a Monday afternoon deadline.

Tuesday promises to be another tense day at the Columbia campus in Manhattan, with students bracing for possible further action against the pro-Palestinian encampment and administrators waiting to see if their decision to suspend demonstrators who remained at the site would blunt the protest.

On the West Coast, demonstrations were also heating up at California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt, where students had occupied the president’s office for a week and at Portland State University in Oregon, where a library was taken over by students.



Pro-Palestinian protesters gather on the campus of Columbia University in upper Manhattan on Monday, April 29, 2024.(Bing Guan/The New York Times)

Columbia announced Monday evening that it had begun to suspend students who had failed to leave the encampment on its Manhattan campus by a deadline the university had set earlier in the day. After a day of protest and confusion, the measure reflected the difficult balance Columbia administrators are seeking to strike as they try to avoid bringing the New York Police Department back to arrest those in the encampment, but also commit to the stance that the protest must end.


Students in the encampment, along with hundreds of supporters, had spent a tense afternoon rallying around the site in a show of force meant to deter the removal of its tents. But with no sign of police action, most of the protesters had begun to disperse by the end of the afternoon, leaving what appeared to be several dozen students and about 80 tents inside the encampment.


Just outside, about a dozen faculty in yellow and orange safety vests also stayed behind, with several saying that they planned to remain overnight to make sure their students’ right to protest was respected.


Columbia’s move appeared to be an effort to get the nearly two-week-old encampment to peter out gradually before the university’s May 15 graduation, rather than to root it out with force, a step that administrators fear will incite more protest. The university said it had identified some but not all of the students in the encampment. They are likely to be notified of their suspensions one by one via email.


“We have begun suspending students as part of the next phase of our efforts to ensure the safety of our campus,” said Ben Chang, a spokesperson for the university.


According to the university, only the students who remained in the encampment after its deadline of 2 p.m. Monday would face immediate suspension, not the hundreds of others who came during the afternoon to encircle the camp to protect it and show their support.


So far, at least, a core group of student protesters has vowed to stay put. At a news conference, Sueda Polat, a student organizer with the encampment, said that the university had not made significant concessions to the protesters’ main demand: divestment from companies with links to the Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip. Columbia had also stopped negotiating. As a result, she said, the students inside the encampment “will not be moved unless by force.”



Faculty members block the entrance to the protest encampment at Columbia University in New York on Monda, April 29, 2024, as a deadline set by the university to clear its central lawn passed and students inside had not dispersed. Columbia had given students until 2 p.m. to clear out from the encampment, warning them that they would face immediate suspension if they did not leave by then.(Bing Guan/The New York Times)

“We’ve been asked to disperse, but it is against the will of the students to disperse,” she said. “We do not abide by university pressures. We act based on the will of the students.”


Elga Castro, 47, an adjunct professor in the Spanish department at Barnard College, Columbia’s sister school, was among the faculty and staff members guarding access to the tents. “I have my opinions on Gaza and Palestine, but I am mainly here to protect my students,” she said.


Castro said she had not received any word from Columbia about whether faculty participating in the protest would face censure.


The protesters at Columbia have inspired similar pro-Palestinian demonstrations on campuses across the country. Hundreds of students have been arrested.


At New York University, administrators facing a renewed pro-Palestinian encampment there took a similar step to Columbia on Monday. Rather than call in police to clear the encampment, as it did a week ago, leading to more than 100 arrests, it said that it was “moving forward with disciplinary processes” against students who did not disperse.


At Princeton University in New Jersey, a group of protesters briefly occupied Clio Hall, home of the graduate school, on Monday night. Thirteen people were arrested, including five undergraduates, six graduate students, one postdoctoral researcher and one person not affiliated with the university. All those arrested received summonses for trespassing and have been barred from campus. The students will also face university discipline, which may extend to suspension or expulsion, the president of Princeton, Chris Eisgruber, said in a statement.


About 20 miles north, students erected neon-colored tents on a lawn of Rutgers University’s New Brunswick campus after a noon rally.


At Columbia, administrators distributed a notice Monday morning to the encampment stating that negotiations with student protest leaders were at an impasse. It urged the students to clear out voluntarily to allow the school to prepare the lawn for graduation ceremonies.


The university has been trying to avoid calling back the police, whose intervention April 18 at the request of Columbia administrators led to more than 100 student arrests and attracted a wave of angry protests outside the school’s gates, some of which included blatantly antisemitic rhetoric.


“We called on NYPD to clear an encampment once,” Nemat Shafik, Columbia’s president, wrote in a statement to the community last Friday co-signed by the co-chairs of Columbia’s board of trustees. “But we all share the view, based on discussions within our community and with outside experts, that to bring back the NYPD at this time would be counterproductive, further inflaming what is happening on campus.”


The notice given out Monday warned the protesting students that the “current unauthorized encampment and disruption on Columbia University’s campus is creating an unwelcoming environment for members of our community.”


It said students would not be punished for their participation in the encampment if they signed a form promising not to break any university rules through the end of the next academic year. Students in the encampment who already faced discipline from previous violations may not be eligible for the same deal, the document stated.


Columbia had already suspended about 50 students for their involvement in the original encampment on a neighboring lawn. But that measure did not deter a wider group of protesters from setting up the current encampment.


The New York Times News Service

'Dark time' at US university campuses as anti-war protests meet heavy crackdown



1 of 16Attribution: AP
By CNNAssociated Press
April 29, 2024 - 

With tension mounting over an encampment in support of Palestinians at New York's Columbia University, police strode onto campus this month and arrested more than 100 demonstrators.

On the cusp of the close of the academic year, university communities across the nation remain on edge, not only over flares of political action but also what response, if any, it might compel.

Soon, dozens more students protesting the monthslong assault on Gaza were arrested at New York and Yale universities.

At the University of Texas at Austin (pictured), police in riot gear and on horseback moved to disperse a like-minded demonstration, while nearly 100 at the University of Southern California also were arrested.




"We see that students take very seriously their role, their moral obligation to speak out and to mobilize their own communities, to speak out against injustice," Khalidi said.

"And I think history will judge them kindly."


Campus Protests and the Corporate University


 
 APRIL 30, 2024
Facebook

Photograph by Nathaniel St. Clair

The murder of the four students who protested the Vietnam War at Kent State University on May 1, 1970, was a tragedy.  The suppression of student protests on campuses across the United States in the spring of 2024 is a farce. The latter points to how little college administrators and politicians have learned when it comes to students’ speech, thinking that repression is the solution for dissent and disagreement.

The student protests of the 1960s were born of political anger. Students were unable to vote. They lacked a political voice in American elections and politics, and they lacked a voice in the governance of their schools. They demanded a seat at the table, the right to be heard and some control over the institutions that literally dictated their lives. Their demands for a voice were met with force and repression much in the same way that the civil rights demonstrators who crossed the Edmund Pettus Bridge  were.

College administrators first ignored student demands.  Then they sought to break up the demonstrations with campus police.  Politicians such as Governor Reagan in California, and Governor Rhodes in Ohio responded even more forcefully. They, along with President Richard Nixon, sought to capitalize on the protests politically and personally. They made political careers by running against challenges to authority, campaigning  as law and order candidates, claiming to speak for the silent majority, and labeling those who dissented as un-American.

A show of force was their solution across college campuses in America.  Eventually they called out the National Guard. The tragic result culminated in Kent State. Four Dead in Ohio as sung by Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young.

Colleges and politicians should have learned the lessons of this mistake.  The lesson should have been that student voices matter, that students have a right to express their views, and  force is not a way to stifle or to address differences of opinion.

They should have also learned that universities are supposed to be socially responsible. They are or have become political institutions, not private corporations. They are socially responsible in the sense that they have responsibility to act ethically and act consistent with their values. Their values include free and open inquiry, disagreement, and debate.  They need to be responsible to their stakeholders, including their students, and they need to live up to the democratic ideals and values that they are supposed to be fostering.

But what we learned in the 1960s was that schools were also hotbeds of hypocrisy. That was the source of much of the campus unrest and protest in the 1960s.  Instead of fixing the hypocrisy, living  up to their values, and respecting student demands, higher education turned corporate.  Over a fifty year period schools thought they had learned how to address the dissent on campus. They adopted even more of a corporate structure, seeking a top down mechanism for trying to control curriculum, faculty, and students. They adopted speech and civility codes as a way not to encourage debate but as a tool to discourage views that they do not want to hear.

The corporate university turned itself into a  private good, forcing students to borrow tens of thousands of dollars and thereby discipline their behavior by the demands of the economic marketplace.  Moreover, the corporate university  created its own problem by not being neutral when it came to a diversity of viewpoints, favoring some as opposed to others. It created not a tolerance but an intolerance of certain types of speech. Moreover, as universities have become even more corporate they have built lofty endowments whose investments are oftentimes questionable and which gives donors  outsized influence upon  what administrators and professors can do.

Much in the same way that the students of the 60s criticized universities for the defense contracts they took and how universities furthered the Vietnam War, students today criticize endowments for supporting causes and issues of which they do not support.  They have legitimate grievances against both the US government’s support for a war they do not endorse, and also against universities  whom they see as complicit. They demand a voice, call for disinvestment, or simply want to express their disagreement.

Yet again politicians such as Donald Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson are denouncing the protests, calling for the National Guard to quell student  speech.  Yet again a sitting president seems unable or unwilling to  listen to the students.  Yet again another war will impact a presidential campaign.

This is more than a tragedy.  It is a farce.

David Schultz is a professor of political science at Hamline University. He is the author of Presidential Swing States:  Why Only Ten Matter.