Tuesday, April 30, 2024

UK
‘Just cruelty’: How charities and campaigners reacted to the government’s latest attacks on disability benefits

'We continue to be the whipping community for ALL government economic failure. Enough. This is just cruelty'

Hannah Davenport 
Yesterday
Left Foot Forward


The government’s latest attacks on disability welfare has caused further outrage and concern from campaigners, charities and MPs as the Tories announce further cruel plans to cut disabled people’s benefits.

It comes as earlier this month Rishi Sunak announced a heartless clamp down on disability welfare with the aim to toughen the eligibility criteria for Personal Independence Payment (PIP), plans described as ‘an assault on disabled people’.

More proposed changes are being announced ahead of the publication of a “green paper” consultation, as the Work and Pensions Minister Mel Stride gave further details this morning on just how cruel the Tories planned welfare reforms are.

Speaking to the media today, Stride said that people with depression or anxiety could lose access to sickness benefits under the new reforms, while the Telegraph reported it could also see disabled people stripped of a monthly cash payment and provided vouchers instead.

Rishi Sunak said he wants to get more people into work and reduce the government’s welfare bill, with Stride referring to it as a “sustainability issue”. But plans to tighten the eligibility criteria for PIP have been blasted by critics with heavy criticism also aimed at the government’s harmful rhetoric towards disabled people.

The organisation Disability Rights UK said the government’s narrative that disabled people are a burden on the benefits system is “utterly untrue”, as the group reacted to the latest plans.

“Today, the Government have yet again gone on the attack by singling out Disabled people as a burden on the benefits system,” Disability Rights UK reacted. “Utterly untrue, but we continue to be the whipping community for ALL government economic failure. Enough. This is just cruelty.”

Executive Director at the disability equality charity Scope, James Taylor, said today that it was hard to have faith that the consultation was “about anything other than cutting the benefits bill, no matter the impact.”

“Life costs a lot more for disabled people, including people with mental health conditions. Threatening to take away the low amount of income PIP provides won’t solve the country’s problems,” Taylor said.

He hit back at the Prime Minister’s claims that ‘mental health culture’ had gone too far and blasted the government’s record on crumbling public services, poor quality jobs and increased rates of poverty.

“The government needs to end this reckless assault on disabled people and focus on how to fix the real underlying issues,” said Taylor.

Activist and journalist Rachel Charlton-Dailey said on X: “The whole point of benefits is to help disabled people live. Vouchers would limit where we spend our cash and “claiming back” would put us into even further debt. The tories want us dead.”

One disability campaigner wrote today on X: “Be nice today to do anything without bursting into tears at the sheer cruel, vindictive & sadistic unfairness of it all. What do I say to my disabled daughter about her future? What do I say? How do I tell her the future under this government is one they don’t want her in?”

Social change group Joseph Rowntree Foundation highlighted the link between disability and poverty, and warned against playing “political football” with people’s lives.

“Almost two thirds of people in destitution have a chronic health condition or disability. People in this position shouldn’t be used as a political football. We need action, not rhetoric from politicians”, the non-profit wrote.

“PIP is a benefit to help people with the additional costs of having a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability. This benefit is a big share of many claimants’ income.

“Cutting it will lead to a large hit to future claimants’ living standards.”

In households where an individual receives PIP and no-one is in work, seven in ten working-age adults are in material deprivation, this is three times the rate across all working-age households. In these households 40% experienced food insecurity and over 30% were unable to keep their homes warm.

Labour’s Shadow Minister for Disabled People Vicky Foxcroft accused the government of scapegoating disabled people and those with long-term health conditions for the problems they have created.

“PIP was created by the Tories but isn’t working for disabled people (or the taxpayer).DWPgovuk too often fails to get decisions right first time, leading to lengthy delays, reassessments and a stressful appeals process.”

Labour MP Marsha de Codova said it was “despicable” that the Tories are “yet again scapegoating disabled people”, “planning cruel cuts” in order to “distract attention from their mess”.

Doctors have also hit back at the government’s proposals to cut PIP and penalise those with mental health conditions.

Consultant Dr Jay Watts commented: “Dear Mel Stride,

“PIP has nothing to do with employment. PIP is for moderate to severe disability and is v difficult to qualify for. Noone gets PIP ‘for’ depression or anxiety. It is based on a functional analysis. Stop playing smoke and mirrors with people’s lives.”

A palliative care doctor wrote on X: “Mel Stride is no doctor, and nor is Rishi Sunak. They have no idea how crippling severe depression or anxiety can be. They’re simply smearing the vulnerable for cheap, populist, electoral gain. It’s vicious, unforgivable stuff.”

Whilst mental health charities also highlighted the huge waiting lists even to access mental health support and the need to focus on investing in the chronically underfunded sector.

Mental health charity Mind said: “People don’t choose to be on disability benefits. It’s their last resort.

“Stop blaming people with mental health problems. If the Secretary of State wants a grown-up conversation about this, then he should meet with us. We’ve sent an invite.”

A group of charities have backed a petition launched by Scope in reaction to the welfare cuts which demands that the government; stop demonising those who cannot work, support people who want to work and advocate for a benefits system that is kind.

(Image credit: UK Government)

Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward


The government’s latest welfare changes are a full-scale assault on disabled people

'Disabled people are not the problem'
Yesterday
Left Foot Forward Opinion

TweetShareWhatsAppMail


James Taylor is director of strategy at the disability charity Scope

It’s no overstatement to say we were horrified by the government’s latest announcements to deal with economic inactivity in this country. It feels like a full-scale assault on disabled people.

And it’s the latest in a long line of rhetoric which claims to be “helping” disabled people, but will only make life much more difficult for the UK’s 16million disabled people.

Earlier this month, the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak outlined his “moral mission” of reforming welfare to give everyone who can, the best possible chance of returning to work.

On the face of it, supporting people who want to work but don’t currently have a job is laudable. We know there are many disabled people locked out of work because of negative employer attitudes, inflexible workplaces and failures with the Access to Work scheme. But that’s not what last week’s announcement will achieve. These proposals are unlikely to work, and what’s more, they don’t add up. All they will do is push people further away from a job, and deeper into destitution.

Since Friday’s announcement, a deeply troubling report from the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) has found the government’s welfare reforms are “premised on a notion that disabled people are undeserving and wilfully avoiding employment”, which has “resulted in hate speech and hostility towards disabled people”.

Scope has also launched a petition urging the government to stop demonising people who can’t work.

The current government seems to be hellbent on cutting the benefits bill, making it harder to access financial support, and waging a war against disabled people.

It is true for the government to say we currently have incredibly high levels of economic inactivity. And people who are long term sick or are disabled are more likely to be economically inactive than other groups.

But disabled people are not the problem.

The reason for this isn’t because ‘life on benefits is easy’ (in fact it’s not, many people who claim benefits live in deep poverty). It is because our public services are crumbling, the quality of jobs is poor and the rate of poverty amongst disabled households is growing.

Is it any wonder health is deteriorating when the overall number of waits for non-emergency treatment in England was 7.5 million in February. When it comes to mental health, according to the charity Mind, there are more than 2 million people waiting to access treatment.

Announcements from the Prime Minister to make the welfare system tougher and more punitive won’t address this health crisis. In fact, they are highly likely to be detrimental to health, pushing people further from work. There is plenty of evidence to show this approach is totally counter-productive and, ultimately, more costly.

What we need is a fundamental rethink about how we value disabled people in this country, and how we can genuinely support individuals – without the threat of being sanctioned and having their benefits cut off – through the welfare system. Making, or threatening to make, a system harder to access just won’t do. And it ends up demonising disabled people.

If this government – and whoever forms the next government – is serious about wanting to help disabled people “reach their potential”, they need to invest in creating opportunities for disabled people, and removing the barriers in society which make it impossible but are out of individuals’ control.

Scope has just launched our Manifesto for An Equal Future, which sets out what the next government needs to do to transform disabled people’s lives. Change is possible, but it won’t be achieved this way.

There needs to be a bigger focus on employers, on flexibility to try working without fear of repercussions, and investment in the public services that are designed to keep us well and which presently are struggling.

Successive recent governments have set their sights on the disability employment gap – the difference in the employment rate of disabled people and non-disabled people. Yet it’s stayed at around 30 percentage points (roughly 80% vs 50%) for more than a decade.

The government claims it wants to help more disabled people get into work, and yet it’s stripping away the actual schemes that might support people find a job, if it’s right for them. They are ending the Work and Health Programme, the one national employment support programme for disabled people. In its place will be smaller programmes – WorkWell and Universal Support. Both of which are delayed, both of which are far less ambitious in the amount of individuals they intend to support.

And the government needs to be cracking down on employers’ negative attitudes. Many workplaces continue to discriminate against disabled applicants or workers.

Scope’s employment services help disabled people find and apply for the jobs they want. We’ve heard from people who’ve had job offers taken away after they told their employer they were disabled.

One neurodivergent customer was made to leave their job after asking if they could move their desk to allow them to concentrate better.

Other customers weren’t allowed by their employers to use assistive technology to help with admin.

The government needs to make sure disabled people can get the right support in work. Access to Work is a central fund which helps cover the cost of equipment and other support someone might need to do their job.

But the system is nowhere near flexible enough, isn’t given the right level of investment, there are huge backlogs, and many employers have never heard of it. We’ve heard from people who’ve had to leave their jobs after a few months because Access to Work was too slow to come through.

These latest announcements also see the government wanting to cut Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which helps cover the extra costs disabled people face. These costs include things like needing to use taxis because public transport isn’t accessible. Needing specialist equipment such as electric wheelchairs and bed hoists. Or needing to use more energy for heating because your condition makes it much harder to regulate your body temperature.

Scope’s analysis found these extra costs add up to £975 a month, even after someone’s PIP is taken into account. These extra costs mean the cost-of-living crisis has been particularly devastating for disabled people.

Our helpline at Scope has been inundated with calls from people having to ration how much they can use their wheelchairs because they can’t afford to charge them. Using candles instead of switching the lights on. Going without food for days. For the government to want to cut support is truly horrific.

And this financial hardship predates the latest crisis. The number of disabled people living in poverty has grown enormously over recent years. There are 1.8million more disabled people in poverty now compared with 15 years ago.

Support for disabled people has been squeezed and squeezed over the past decade. For 4 years, many benefits were frozen so didn’t increase in line with inflation – a real-terms cut. Then in the midst of rampant energy hikes, the government quietly cut eligibility for the Warm Home Discount – around £150 a year – for 300,000 disabled people with the highest support needs. And there was a callous disregard for disabled people during the covid pandemic, whose needs were largely forgotten despite making up 6 in 10 of all those who died.

Disabled people make up a quarter of the population, but we have been failed by successive governments for far too long.

We are a force to be reckoned with, and it’s time our voices were heard.

We want the next government to tackle the extra costs of disability. To transform attitudes to disability. To ensure that those of us who want to work can do so. To fix the broken benefits system.

It’s more crucial than ever that the next government puts a stop to these dangerous and lazy narratives demonising disabled people, and instead starts to tackle the real issues with new ideas.

Only by doing that can they create an equal future for all of us.

You can sign Scope’s petition, demanding the government stop demonising disabled people on the following link.

 

An all-out attack against disabled people – DPAC

“The report highlights the government’s shameful failure to make any significant progress with human rights for disabled people since 2016.”

Linda Burnip, Disabled People Against Cuts

Last Friday, April 19th, Rishi Sunak launched an all-out attack against disabled people and their rights. It seems the timing of this may have been related to the government receiving the latest damning report from the UN Disability Committee.

The report highlights the government’s shameful failure to make any significant progress with human rights for disabled people since 2016. Further, there has been actual regression in the government’s policies and their implementation and the continuation of the government’s “grave and systematic violations” of disabled people’s human rights.

The report outlines many of the major discriminations which disabled people continue to experience, including the appalling poverty in which many live; the increasingly dire welfare benefit system; the ongoing issues around employment; the unacceptable levels of neglect, coercion, abuse and deaths in psychiatric hospitals; the continuing need to put an end to all forms of institutionalisation which has been increasing and to ensure that disabled people can live independently in the community and achieve their whole potential. 

This report was produced before the horrific changes Sunak announced to the social security system.

Sunak attempted to justify the proposed changes by saying the system lets people down by not being focused enough on work and what disabled people might be able to do, while totally ignoring the multitude of barriers faced in getting and keeping employment. Not least of these is the six month backlog in assessments for Access to Work funding –  and if you’ve ever looked into the lack of jobs based solely on working from home, you’ll know they are non-existent.

Some of the disastrous changes proposed by Sunak include a change to the Fit Note process, stopping all payments if someone does not comply with conditions set by a Work Coach, and a pledge to “tighten” the Work Capability Assessment.

He also announced that Personal Independence Payments (PIP) will be given a major overhaul, with a new consultation set to launch in the near future, specifically looking at changes to the eligibility criteria, assessment process and types of support that can be offered particularly, but not solely, affecting people with a Mental Health condition.

The Prime Minister said that “people with less severe mental health conditions should be expected to engage with the world of work” as he set out the UK Government’s new plans. He quoted a figure of 1.35 million people having anxiety and depression but failed to say that of these 1 million people had anxiety and depression as a secondary condition which I’m sure in many cases is due to the ever-growing waiting lists for NHS treatment.

The PIP reform would only apply in England and Wales as people in Scotland currently on PIP will move to Adult Disability Payment (ADP) and the devolved Social Security Scotland IT system before the end of 2025.

So what exactly are Sunak’s plans?

Removing benefits from the long-term unemployed who do not accept a job

New legislation will be put forward in the next Parliament to change the rules so that anyone who has been on benefits for 12 months and doesn’t comply with conditions set by their Work Coach – including accepting available work – will have their unemployment claim closed and their benefits removed entirely.

Amending Work Capability Assessments

Sunak explained that the UK Government is committed to removing the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) entirely and introducing a new personalised, tailored approach to employment support, with the aim of helping disabled people and people with health conditions into work. However, these assessments would be carried out by Department for Work and Pensions staff with no medical training or qualifications, which potentially is an even more frightening prospect than having an Occupational Therapist or Physiotherapist assessing someone’s mental health condition, as is the situation currently.

The planned reforms are expected to reduce the number of people assessed as not needing to prepare for work by 424,000 by 2028-29.

Review of the Fit Note process

The Prime Minister has also announced a review of the Fit Note system to stop people being signed off as “not fit for work”. As part of this, the UK Government will consider shifting the responsibility for issuing the Fit Notes away from GPs, while creating a system where yet more medically unqualified staff will decide if you’re ill or not. This of course may simply be a good way to hide the falling numbers of GPs that there are now following Brexit. The other major flaw with this plan is: how would people in work get signed off if ill for more than five days?

Employment experts, however, say that the number of fit notes issued last year hasn’t risen since before the pandemic.

Accelerating legacy benefits move to Universal Credit

The rollout of Universal Credit will be accelerated to move all those left on Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) onto the modern IT system, although there seems to be much confusion within the DWP itself about when this could actually happen.

Changes to Administrative Earnings threshold

The UK Government has already set out regulations to increase the Administrative Earnings Threshold (AET) in Universal Credit based on how much people currently earn and how many hours they work. Anyone earning below the AET, will be placed in the Intensive Work Search Group and are required to regularly meet with their Work Coach. This of course is likely to be very negative for disabled people as many work part-time on a self-employed basis.

The threshold will rise from £743 to £892 for individual claimants and £1,189 to £1,437 for couples – or the equivalent of 18 hours at National Living Wage a week for an individual from May.

Cracking down on fraud

The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill will already enable the DWP to access people’s bank account details but Sunak says a new fraud bill will be introduced in the next Parliament which will give sweeping new powers to the DWP to carry out warrants for searches, enforce seizure of property from homes and carry out arrests. These are powers normally reserved for the police.

Figures for overpayments of PIP show that in the year ending 2023 overpayments of PIP due to fraud was a mere 0.2% which, when compared to the levels of tax evasion seemingly practised by many Tories, is an utterly insignificant amount of money.





Tory-run Facebook groups contain ‘appalling racism’ investigation finds

Anti-Ulez groups managed by Conservative-linked individuals found to be 'a cesspit of vile racism and hate speech’

London’s ultra-low emission zone (Ulez)

Yesterday
Left Foot Forward

TweetShareWhatsAppMail


Facebook groups run by Conservative Party operatives that oppose London’s ultra-low emission zone (Ulez) are ‘a cesspit of vile racism and hate speech’, an investigation by Unearthed has found.

A network of 36 private Facebook groups set up to oppose the expansion of Ulez and almost all run by people with close professional ties to the Conservative party including councillors, campaign managers and a borough mayor, have hosted nasty and violent content, the investigation has uncovered.

Reporters found widespread racism and Islamophobia as well as conspiracy theories and celebrations of criminal damage on the pages, including sharing the white supremacist slogan and antisemitic videos.

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan was targeted with much of the racist content, the investigation found, including a commenter describing the capital as “Londonistan” and claiming England is “overrun and being run by a load of foreigners” and subject to “third world people”.

The Tory London mayoral candidate Susan Hall was listed as a member of at least six of the groups, and has interacted or posted in two of them, although there was no evidence she engaged in racist, Islamophobic or other extremist content.

Other Tory MPs and councillors, including Policing Minister Chris Philp, Steve Tuckwell and Sir Bob Neill, were also members of a number of the groups although they have not posted or engaged in the extremist content. Chris Philp and Sir Bob Neil both said they were leaving the groups when its harmful content was highlighted by Greenpeace’s Unearthed investigative team.

More than two thirds of the groups targeted at different London boroughs were set up within two days of each other in January 2023, marking the run-up to the expansion of Ulez. Unearthed found that 46 out of the 82 admins have clear links to the Tory Party, including a recent digital campaign manager for the party and a conservative activist. Conservative councillor for Haywards Heath, Rachel Cromie, is an admin on all the groups.

Some groups claim that posts are actively moderated by admins and that ‘discriminative language will be removed’, however the extremely troubling material circulated suggests differently.

Ami McCarthy, political campaigner for Greenpeace UK described the groups as “an absolute cesspit of vile racism and hate speech” and “a breeding ground for dangerous conspiracy theories”.

“That they’re being managed by Conservative operatives speaks volumes about the direction in which the party has gone, and just how toxic these anti-ULEZ campaigns have become,” said McCarthy.

“Susan Hall’s track record of engaging with racist content online has been well documented, but her membership in these groups sinks her to a new low. The party should launch a full investigation into this whole shameful scandal and everyone involved.”

In response to the Unearthed investigation, a Conservative Party spokesperson said the party “unequivocally condemns all discriminatory language, and never encourages nor condones vandalism or criminal activity” and that “the Conservative Party is reviewing its processes and policies regarding Facebook groups.”

Labour’s Party chair Anneliese Dodds said the investigation uncovered “appalling racism” and condemned Susan Hall’s presence in the groups.

Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward
MAYDAY

International Workers’ Day, 2024: Solidarity with Iranian workers, women, and youth


Today
Left Foot Forward


On International Workers’ Day, 2024, we will march as a contingent on the London May Day march to express our solidarity with workers and women in Iran




Solidarity with Iranian workers, women, and youth

London May Day march contingent

Workers and women in Iran continue to protest for their rights and freedoms. Workers in sectors such as oil, steel, and elsewhere have struck for better pay and improved conditions; women have continued to resist the Islamic Republic’s repression.

The regime has responded with yet more repression and has stepped up executions, and attacks on women. Rapper and singer Toomaj Salehi is among those who have been sentenced to death for supporting protests. Moreover, dozens of trade union activists have been arrested, and many jailed. Women’s rights activists have also faced detention, and female students have been poisoned in schools. The regime is now attempting to use the threat of attacks from Israel, and their own warmongering response, to whip up nationalist sentiment to distract from the conditions faced by the Iranian people. A regional war will only serve the reactionary agenda of Israel and Iran’s rulers.

The Iranian regime is a capitalist neoliberal regime that uses execution and state terror to maintain its power and spends the wealth produced by workers to support regional proxies and destructive wars. Iran’s ruling class practices patronage and embezzlement and enriches itself via capitalist enterprises while workers and the poor in Iran face sharply declining living standards.

On International Workers’ Day, 2024, we will march as a contingent on the London May Day march to express our solidarity with workers and women in Iran. The rights we fight for – liberty, equality, and workers’ democracy – must be universal, or they are meaningless.

As well as jailing trade unionists and attacking labour activists, the Islamic regime of Iran violates numerous workers’ rights, including:The right to establish and join independent unions
The right to bargain collectively
The right to strike

Join us on May Day to say:Solidarity with workers, women, and youth in Iran
No to compulsory hijab laws and sexual apartheid; for women’s rights in Iran
No to regional war
Capital punishment is state murder: no to executions
Free jailed trade unionists and political prisoners
Expose the representatives of the anti-worker Iranian regime at the International Labour Organisation
For freedom, democracy, and equality for all: for international socialism

This contingent has been initiated by the Committee for Solidarity with the Iranian Workers’ Movement (SWIW). We welcome cosponsorship from any network or organisation committed to solidarity with Iranian workers’ struggles.


Keep speaking up for Palestine – May Day rally!

“We must keep protesting and keep remembering why we are doing this: for an end to the occupation, for the right of return for refugees and for a free Palestine.”
Jeremy Corbyn

By Matt Willgress, Labour & Palestine

The revelation last week that ministers David Cameron and Kemi Badenoch authorised British arms sales to Israel right after an airstrike killed three British charity workers in Gaza has further exposed how complicit ‘our’ Government is in Israel’s genocide in Gaza. It also underlines why it’s so important that we remain active on the streets and throughout the labour and trade union movement, speaking up for Palestine.

Additionally, the Government is also refusing to rule out whether British machinery was used in the killing of the aid workers.

The obvious truth is that Britain is arming Israel’s assault on Gaza about which the United Nations Secretary-General, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and many others have said Israel has committed grave violations of international law.

This is why it is so vital to keep demanding – in the words of Zarah Sultana’s important Early Day Motion – that “in light of plausible breaches of the Genocide Convention, [we] further call on the UK Government to demand an immediate ceasefire and suspend all arms exports to Israel.”

In this context – and with a further horrific Israeli aggression against Rafah seemingly being prepared despite the ‘crocodile tears’ of Biden and his international supporters including Keir Starmer – Saturday saw another massive national demonstration for Palestine. Following this, next week sees further solidarity activities including on International Workers’ Day, May 1st.

Alongside our major May Day rally online which will be addressed by the Palestinian Ambassador, the Stop the War Coalition have called a range of workplace actions, Workers for Palestine have activities planned and then next Saturday there will be another national day of action called by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign and others.

As Jeremy Corbyn said this week, “We must keep protesting and keep remembering why we are doing this: for an end to the occupation, for the right of return for refugees and for a free Palestine.”

Readers should support all these initiatives and also take the new model motion (below) to their local Labour parties, which concludes that, “The first step towards justice and human rights for all Palestinians is the upholding of their right to self-determination under international law, including recognition, an end to the occupation and for negotiations leading to a just and enduring peace.”

Despite the Labour front bench’s shameful line – namely still not joining the growing calls in the UK and internationally for an immediate and lasting ceasefire in Gaza and to halt the trade of arms with Israel being used illegally in the war – we will keep speaking up for Palestine!

You can view a model motion for CLPS below:

“The Israeli bombardment of Gaza has killed more than 34,000 Palestinians since 7th October, over 70% of whom are women and children. 

“This branch/CLP joins the growing calls in the UK and internationally for an immediate and lasting ceasefire in Gaza and to halt the trade of arms with Israel being used illegally in the war.

The United Nations Secretary-General, Amnesty International and many others have said that Israel has committed grave violations of international law in this assault.

“Israel has a clear obligation to ensure the basic needs of Gaza’s population are met. As famine looms in Gaza, the UK Government and the international community must urgently secure not just a ceasefire, but unfettered aid access. The UK should restore its support to UNRWA.

“The first step towards justice and human rights for all Palestinians is the upholding of their right to self-determination under international law, including recognition, an end to the occupation and for negotiations leading to a just and enduring peace.”


  • The May Day Rally for Palestine! takes place online this Wednesday, May 1st at 6.30PM. The rally is hosted by Labour & Palestine and guest speakers include the Palestinian Ambassador Husam Zomlot, Richard Burgon MP, John McDonnell MP, Kim Johnson MP, Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP, Beth Winter MP, Louise Regan (Palestine Solidarity Campaign & NEU), Maryam Eslamdoust (TSSA General Secretary), and more. Register here.
  • You can lobby your MP to sign Zarah Sultana’s Early Day Motion calling for the Government to stop selling arms to Israel here.
  • You can follow Labour & Palestine on Facebook and Twitter.
  • This article was originally published by Labour Hub on April 27th, 2024.


Number of homeless children in England reaches record high
Today
Left Foot Forward

“We desperately need UK ministers to focus on what can and will end homelessness."


A record 145,800 children are now homeless in England, the government’s latest quarterly homelessness stats have shown, highlighting once more the sheer scale of the housing crisis in the country.

The number of children living in temporary accommodation is now at the highest ever level recorded and up 15% on last year.

Almost 320,000 households were assessed as homeless or at risk of homelessness – also a record high, while the number of households threatened with homelessness and owed a prevention duty because of a section 21 notice is the highest on record, at 25,910 over the last year. It was only last week that the government failed to set a date for banning section 21 no-fault eviction notices, which continue to have devastating impacts for low-income and vulnerable households up and down the country.

Reacting to the record figures, Matt Downie, chief executive at Crisis, said: “Today’s statistics need to be a wake-up call. We are failing to stop people being forced into homelessness and we are failing to help them back out. These are the appalling consequences of our failure to get a grip on this crisis.

“We desperately need UK ministers to focus on what can and will end homelessness. We need them to get on with building social housing that will help people out of temporary accommodation, and fund support services like Housing First so people can leave the streets behind. How many more records do we have to break before action is taken?”

Darren Baxter, Principal Policy Adviser at JRF, says: “The continued increase in homelessness – now at a record high – shows the human cost of an under-regulated, insecure and unaffordable private rented sector. Evictions are on the rise, while more and more households are forced to live in temporary accommodation – in some cases for years.

“With the return of the Renters (Reform) Bill to Parliament last week, the Government had an opportunity to finally strengthen protections for private renters. Instead, after rounds of concessions to landlords and backbench MPs, the Bill doesn’t even give a timeframe for abolishing Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions – despite the Government first promising to do so over five years ago. Homelessness will continue to rise unless the Government starts to take the private renting crisis seriously and makes significant changes to the Bill.”


Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward
U.S. panel recommends all women receive breast cancer screening from 40

Agence France-Presse
April 30, 2024 

Doctor assisting patient undergoing mammogram. [Shutterstock]

Women should get screened for breast cancer every other year starting from the age of 40 to reduce their risk of dying from the disease, an influential U.S. body recommended on Tuesday.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, an independent panel of experts that receives federal funding, previously said that women in their 40s should make an individual decision about when to start mammograms based on their health history and reserved its mandatory recommendation for people turning 50.

Its new guidance was based on a review of evidence and a modeling study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, and finalizes a draft recommendation proposed last year.

"More women in their 40s have been getting breast cancer, with rates increasing about 2 percent each year, so this recommendation will make a big difference for people across the country," Task Force chair Wanda Nicholson said in a statement.

"By starting to screen all women at age 40, we can save nearly 20 percent more lives from breast cancer overall."

Breast cancer is the second most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death for women in the United States, with more than 43,000 deaths last year.

Black women are 40 percent more likely to die of the disease than white women, and so ensuring they start screening at 40 "has even greater potential benefit for Black women," said Nicholson.

The new recommendation applies to nearly all women -- those who are at average risk of breast cancer, as well as those with a family history of breast cancer, and those with dense breasts.

Nearly half of all women have what's known as dense breast tissue, which they generally only find out during their first mammogram. Dense breast tissue increases their risk for breast cancer and means that mammograms may not work as well for them.


"Unfortunately, there is not yet enough evidence for the Task Force to recommend for or against additional screening with breast ultrasound or MRI," the experts said, urgently calling for more research.

The new recommendation doesn't apply however to those with a personal history of the disease, or those at very high rise due to certain genetic markers, or who have a lesion detected on previous biopsies -- they could benefit from more regular screening, in consultation with their doctor.

The new recommendation applies up until the age of 74, after which the balance of benefit-to-risk becomes uncertain, the task force said.


While screening is a powerful tool in the fight against cancer, there are also limits, the task force said, explaining why it is not recommending annual mammograms. Over-testing increases the number of harms, such as false positives, or receiving treatment that wasn't required.

© 2024 AFP
SCOTUS
A supreme failure: How the most corrupt high court ever is getting cover from the press

D. Earl Stephens
April 30, 2024

Clarence Thomas (Photo via Shutterstock)

On Thursday, we got confirmation that our Supreme Court is completely in the tank for Donald Trump and his repellent Republicans, and our country very well might not survive it.

By having the audacity to even schedule oral arguments to consider whether one man in America can be granted immunity, and is above the laws that guide the rest of us, this rogue, corrupt court is incinerating one of the most basic tenets of our Democracy right in front of our eyes.

This 6-3 Conservative Court is also making it plain to us in no uncertain terms that they believe themselves to be above the laws that the rest of us must follow. They are flaunting the fact that they are completely untouchable and unimpeachable, and can just do whatever the hell it is they want.

The morally busted majority on this court is now using its unbridled power with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer as it swings hard to nail the door shut on 248 years of an evolving Democracy, while pushing us back to a hopeless time when crooked kings ruled with impunity and were above it all.

READ: Trump, flatulence and the last taboo

So brazen and corrupt is this reprehensible Gang of Sicks, it is even going so far as to protect its own membership from criminality in the Attack on America.

We KNOW that Justice Clarence Thomas’ wife, Ginny, was hip-deep in Trump’s violent insurrection on January 6. And still, he shamelessly did not recuse himself from this session. In fact, there has been no indication that he even gave this a whiff of consideration.

This is patently absurd. There is no way in the world this ghastly man can be an impartial juror in a decision to consider whether Trump is immune from prosecution in his attack. His wife was in on the crime, for God’s sake. She was messaging with the White House DURING the attack.

Everybody knows this.


Instead, by all indications, Thomas put his fat thumb on the scale for his wife’s friend, Trump. The very Trump who was responsible for placing three other Radical Right justices besides the heinous Thomas onto this revolting court of no-good liars.

During this tenuous time in our history, it is fair to surmise that there will never be any trial ever for the most grievous attack on our Capitol since the Civil War, because the most powerful judicial body in the world has debts to pay to the anti-American dark powers which helped fuel the attempted coup, and placed them on the court.

Our 6-3 Supreme Court is telling us wide out in the open they intend to act on behalf of the most dangerous man on Earth and his army of authoritarian lowlifes.


If they will back the play of an evil man like this, what else are they capable of?

We are seeing now the elimination of Roe was nothing but a warmup act for the Gang of Sicks. They have already stepped on and snuffed out laws protecting our vote and our environment. They have ruled that corporations are people, and that guns have more rights than our children, who are being slaughtered by the hundreds in our schools.

Everybody who truly loves this country and what she stands for should be absolutely terrified, because we simply cannot continue to sustain this punishing attack and expect to survive.

The end is near, good people, unless we rise up and say enough, and frankly it’s very hard to see that happening.

I sit here and type all these true and terrible things with the fear that most people in this country are not aware of this peril. I’ll wager 75 percent of Americans have absolutely no idea how dangerous this court is, and what their one-after-another evil rulings portend.

Do they even know that things are only going to get worse for decades to come thanks to the insane lifetime appointments of these evil-doers?


If they don’t know this, WHY don’t they know it? Willing ignorance is a large part sure, but I am also looking at you, Corporate Media.

With our Democracy under assault while the laws that should be protecting us are beaten and bruised, how come you are not sounding the alarms to inform everybody of this danger?

Why, given everything I just reported here, was this headline not leading every national newspaper and TV chyron in America on Friday:


END OF DEMOCRACY AT HAND AS SUPREME COURT CONSIDERS IF CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT IS ABOVE THE LAW

No less is on the line right now. So what in the hell is going on here????

Either our national press is proving yet again they are not up to covering and reporting on the most ominous, terrifying moment in our nation’s long history, or … they are in on it.


Honestly, after decades in the business, I never EVER thought I’d allege either of these two things — especially the second — but how else to explain it?

Instead of being on wartime footing and treating these multi-pronged attacks on America with the urgency and gusto they deserve, our major media enterprises are comporting themselves like a bunch of complete amateurs who either can’t identify and/or are failing to report on the biggest story in the world accurately.

How in the hell are they missing this? Why are they missing this?


Is it because they really are this atrocious at their jobs, or is it because they somehow see it to be in their best interests to keep things close, and to make sure we hear from both sides in this vicious one-sided attack on America.

The job of the working press is to understand the news they are covering, distill it, and give it the heft it deserves. If this legitimate threat to our Democracy can barely get a rise out of them, we are not going to make it.

And either are they.


Every American should be on high alert right now, and demanding that the people with the power and resources sound the alarms and start acting with the urgency these perilous times demand.

I am telling you this as a person who used to run a newsroom, served his country, and can smell the smoke and see the flames that will most certainly incinerate us if we don’t take to the high ground, and do whatever we can to spread this horrifying warning far and wide.

People need to know our Supreme Court has it in for us, even if our pathetic national press is loathe to report it this way.

We are but six months from the most consequential election in American history, and there is no time to waste.

We must do everything we can to save ourselves.

READ: How Fox News is lying about Trump’s trial

D. Earl Stephens is the author of “Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters” and finished up a 30-year career in journalism as the Managing Editor of Stars and Stripes. Follow @EarlofEnough and on his website.
Many old books contain toxic chemicals – here’s how to spot them

The Conversation
April 30, 2024 

The National Library of France found four books whose green covers likely contain arsenic © Stefano RELLANDINI / AFP

In our modern society, we rarely consider books to be dangerous items. However, certain books contain elements so hazardous that they require scrutiny before being placed on the shelves of public libraries, bookstores or even private homes.

The Poisonous Book Project, a collaborative research project between Winterthur Museum, Garden & Library and the University of Delaware, is dedicated to cataloguing such books. Their concern is not with the content written on the pages, but with the physical components of the books themselves — specifically, the colors of the covers.


The project recently influenced the decision to remove two books from the French national library. The reason? Their vibrant green cloth covers raised suspicions of containing arsenic.


This concern is rooted in historical practices in bookbinding. During the 19th century, as books began to be mass produced, bookbinders transitioned from using expensive leather covers to more affordable cloth items. To attract readers, these cloth covers were often dyed in bright, eye-catching colours.
Green, yellow, red

One popular pigment was Scheele’s green, named after Carl Wilhelm Scheele, a German-Swedish chemist who in 1775 discovered that a vivid green pigment could be produced from copper and arsenic. This dye was not only cheap to make, it was also more vibrant than the copper carbonate greens that had been used for over a century.

Scheele green eventually fell out of favour because it had a tendency to fade to black when it reacted with sulphur-based pollutants released from coal. But new dyes based on Scheele’s discovery, such as emerald and Paris green, proved to be much more durable. They were quickly adopted for use in various items, including book covers, clothing, candles and wallpaper.

These pigments, however, had a significant drawback: they degraded easily, releasing poisonous and carcinogenic arsenic. The frequent reports of green candles poisoning children at Christmas parties, factory workers tasked with applying paint to ornaments convulsing and vomiting green water and warnings of poisonous ball dresses raised serious concerns about the safety of these green dyes.

This issue became so notorious that in 1862, the satirical magazine Punch published a cartoon titled The Arsenic Waltz", which depicted skeletons dancing – a grim commentary on the deadly fashion trend.

The harmful effects of these pigments have even been implicated in Napoleon’s death from stomach cancer. Napoleon was particularly keen on the new green colours, so much so that he ordered his dwelling on St Helena, where he was exiled, be painted in his favourite colour.



Napoleon’s house on St Helena. Wikipedia, CC BY-SA


The theory that the arsenic in the walls contributed to his death is supported by the high levels of arsenic detected in samples of his hair. Despite the clear link between the green pigments and health issues, toxic wallpapers continued to be produced until the late 19th century.

Green isn’t the only colour to worry about, however. Red is also of concern. The brilliant red pigment vermilion was formed from the mineral cinnabar, also known as mercury sulfide. This was a popular source of red paint dating back thousands of years. There is even evidence that neolithic artists suffered from mercury poisoning. Vermilion red sometimes appears on the marbled patterns on the inside of book covers.

Yellow has also caught the eye of the poisonous book project. In this case, the culprit is lead chromate. The bright yellow of lead chromate was a favourite with painters, not least Vincent van Gogh, who used it extensively in his most famous series of paintings: Sunflowers. For the Victorian-era bookbinders, lead chromate allowed them to create a range of colours from greens (achieved by mixing chrome yellow with Prussian blue) to yellows, oranges and browns.

Both lead and chromium are toxic. But yellow books are less of a concern than green and red. Lead chromate is not particularly soluble, making it difficult to absorb. It is, in fact, still a widely used pigment.

Practical advice

So what should you do if you come across a green cloth book from the 19th century? First, don’t be overly concerned. You would probably have to eat the entire book before you’d suffer from severe arsenic poisoning. However, casual exposure to copper acetoarsenite, the compound in the green pigment, can irritate the eyes, nose and throat.

It is more of a concern for folks who may regularly handle these books where frequent contact could result in more serious symptoms. Therefore, anyone who suspects they might be handling a Victorian-era book with an emerald green binding is advised to wear gloves and avoid touching their face. Then clean all surfaces afterwards.

To aid with the identification of these potentially hazardous books, the Poisonous Book Project has incorporated crowd-sourced data into their research. The researchers now distribute bookmarks that feature safety warnings and showcase various shades of emerald green to aid their identification. As a result, they have now identified over 238 arsenic editions from across the globe.


Mark Lorch, Professor of Science Communication and Chemistry, University of Hull


This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Our laser technique can tell apart elephant and mammoth ivory

The Conversation
April 30, 2024 

An African elephant in Botswana (Shutterstock.com)

In recent years, the global trade in elephant ivory has faced significant restrictions in an effort to protect dwindling elephant populations. Many countries have stringent controls on the trade of elephant ivory. The sale of mammoth ivory, sourced primarily from long-extinct species, however, remains unregulated

But it’s a significant challenge for customs and law enforcement agencies to distinguish between ivory from extinct mammoths and living elephants. This is a process that is both time-consuming and requires destroying the ivory.

Now our new study, published in PLOS ONE, presents a major breakthrough – using a well known laser technique to tell mammoth and elephant ivory apart.

Our results couldn’t come soon enough. The number of African elephants has dramatically declined from approximately 12 million a century ago to about 400,000 today.

Annually, over 20,000 elephants are poached for ivory, primarily in Africa. This decline not only disrupts ecological balance, but also diminishes biodiversity. Ultimately, it highlights the urgent need for conservation efforts to protect these species.

The hunt for mammoth ivory is also a problem. The new regulations are leading to a rise in the modern-day “mammoth hunter”. These are people who deliberately set out to excavate mammoth remains from the Siberian permafrost in the summer months.
Driven by the lucrative market for mammoth ivory, these hunters undertake expeditions in remote Arctic regions, where permafrost melting is accelerated by climate change. This has made previously inaccessible mammoth tusks more reachable.



Mammoth fossils being unearthed. Malachi Jacobs/Shutterstock


This activity not only has commercial implications. It also raises significant ethical and environmental concerns. That’s because it disturbs preserved ecosystems and involves the extraction of resources that have great value to paleontological science.
Laser insights

Our study from the University of Bristol, in collaboration with Lancaster University and the Natural History Museum, introduces a potential game-changer. We use a non-invasive laser technique known as Raman spectroscopy to identify the origin of a piece of ivory.

The method works by analysing the biochemical makeup of the ivory, which consists primarily of mineralised tissue composed of collagen (the flexible organic component) and hydroxyapatite (a hard inorganic mineral, containing calcium).

Raman spectroscopy is a well established technique. It has previously demonstrated applications that range from identifying whisky, studying archeological human bones from the Mary Rose ship, understanding how turkey tendons develop and to even identifying the purity of meat sold by the food industry.

The technique works by directing a laser light onto the ivory sample. The energy from the light is temporarily absorbed by the bonds between molecules in the sample, and then almost instantly re-released. This released light scatters back with more or less energy than the initial laser light sent to the sample.

This carries information about the molecular vibrations within the material – providing a unique pattern of light for each type of ivory. The analysis involves studying the differences between these unique fingerprints.

Our study analysed elephant and mammoth samples provided by the Natural History Museum, London. It demonstrated that not only could the technique distinguish between mammoth and elephant ivory, it could also spot differences in ivory from living elephant species.

In fact, we successfully differentiated between ivory from the extinct woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) and two species of elephants still walking the Earth today (Loxodonta and Elephas maximus).

Important implications

This method offers several advantages over traditional techniques for ivory analysis. Raman spectroscopy is non-destructive and can be performed quickly. This makes it an ideal tool for customs officials who need to make rapid decisions. Our study was conducted on a benchtop spectrometer (a device which breaks up light by wavelength) within a laboratory. But research suggests cheaper and portable, handheld Raman spectrometers could offer equivalent results.

Further research will be needed to refine the technique and expand the database of ivory signatures. We are working with Worldwide Wildlife Hong Kong and the Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office to develop this technique.

More data will ultimately enhance the accuracy of species identification. It could potentially help us detect even finer distinctions – such as the age of the ivory or specific environmental conditions where the elephants or mammoths lived.

There are also other non-destructive techniques, such as X-Ray fluorescence spectroscopy, which could be used as a complementary method to identify the geographical region from which the ivory was taken.

As this technique becomes more accessible and widely adopted, it may become key in global conservation efforts, helping to prevent the illegal trade of elephant ivory.

Rebecca Shepherd, Senior Lecturer in Anatomy, University of Bristol

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Two charged in UK over 'Robin Hood tree' cut down

Agence France-Presse
April 30, 2024 

The tree at Sycamore Gap on Hadrian's Wall in Northumberland was a symbol of northeast England © OLI SCARFF / AFP

Two men have been charged with criminal damage over the felling of the Sycamore Gap tree, one of the country's most photographed trees that used to stand next to the Hadrian's Wall UNESCO World Heritage site in northeast England, prosecutors said Tuesday.


The tree, which stood for more than 200 years in the Northumberland National Park, was found fallen in September 2023 following storms.

Daniel Graham, 38, and Adam Carruthers, 31, have also been charged with causing criminal damage to Hadrian's Wall, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said.

They will appear before magistrates in Newcastle on May 15, it added.

When it was found, the crown of the tree lay partly on the ancient Roman fortification, which stretches 73 miles (118 kilometres) from coast to coast.

The landmark sycamore, located in a dramatic dip in the landscape, became internationally famous when it was used for a scene in the 1991 blockbuster film "Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves", starring Kevin Costner.

It won the Woodland Trust's Tree of the Year in 2016 and was a key attraction that has been photographed by millions of visitors over the years.

Its felling caused national outrage © Oli SCARFF / AFP

Efforts are now under way to see if the tree can be regrown from its stump or saplings from its seeds.


Hadrian's Wall was begun in 122 AD during the reign of emperor Hadrian, and marked the boundary between Roman Britannia and unconquered Caledonia to the north.

© 2024 AFP