Sunday, May 19, 2024

 

Tobacco corporation attempts to gain public trust in its science are having success – new research



Philip Morris International gains trust in industry-funded science by posing as a generous supporter and concealing its involvement through third parties



UNIVERSITY OF BATH





A new study suggests that the tobacco company Philip Morris International (PMI), is successfully increasing public trust in industry-funded science by portraying itself as a generous supporter of scientific research while simultaneously concealing its involvement through third parties.

The paper, published in Frontiers in Communication, was co-authored by researchers in the Tobacco Control Research Group (TCRG) at the University of Bath, University of Colorado and University of Bristol.

In 2017, whilst publicly proclaiming itself to have transformed into a transparent organisation funding robust science, tobacco producer Philip Morris International (PMI) launched a new scientific organisation: the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World (FSFW). On 13th May 2024, FSFW rebranded itself Global Action to End Smoking.

The new study aimed to understand the extent to which the public trusts PMI’s involvement in science, and whether channelling funds through the third-party organisation, FSFW, affected levels of trust in its science. 1,580 UK residents were asked to rate their level of trust in: PMI, FSFW, or Cancer Research UK (CRUK), on a scale from 1 (no trust) to 7 (complete trust). CRUK was selected as a control group as a highly trusted scientific organisation, wholly independent from the tobacco industry.

Key Findings:

• Overall trust in PMI was 4.66 on a scale from 1 (no trust) to 7 (complete trust), compared to 5.79 out of 7 in Cancer Research UK, indicating moderate trust in PMI's scientific endeavours.

• Overall trust for FSFW was 5.04 out of 7. After participants were informed that FSFW is funded by the tobacco industry, the overall trust rating dropped to 4.77 out of 7. This suggests that when research is funded through a third-party scientific group such as FSFW, people are more likely to trust the science that emanates.

Dr Tess Legg, Research Associate from the University of Bath’s Department for Health and lead author of the paper, said:

“This work is important because tobacco companies use their involvement in science as ‘proof’ that they are credible research organisations. They also funnel research funds through third-party companies and historically this has involved attempts to obscure their involvement in the resulting science.”

Up until now, there has been no clear understanding of whether – and to what extent – these two strategies work to build trust in the industry and its science. This study is the first in the UK to try to gain quantitative evidence of how effective these tactics are at making people trust the tobacco industry and its science.

The study's authors warn against the ongoing acceptance of tobacco industry funding and dissemination of scientific findings. They call for increased efforts to educate the public about the subtle yet harmful tactics employed by these industries. Dr Legg notes:

“As it stands, FSFW still has an immense amount of money from PMI at its disposal and so the risk of it continuing to further the industry’s interests is high. Our findings suggest that more needs to be done by the tobacco control and public health communities to help the UK public understand how underhand the tobacco industry’s attempts to rebrand really are, and to stop scientific front groups from muddying the water by lending the industry an air of credibility.

While the findings don’t make particularly happy reading for those of us working to counter the tactics used by the tobacco industry, it’s important to build up a quantitative picture of the effects the strategies used by industries to influence science are having.

Beyond this, at a time when the tobacco industry continues its abhorrent attempts to infiltrate science as part of its ‘pseudo-transformation’, we need to focus efforts on reforming science to ensure it works in the public interest.”

This work builds on TCRG’s previous work mapping the tactics that the tobacco industry (and other industries) use to influence science. It also builds on the group’s work on the FSFW which has demonstrated that the tobacco industry continues its attempts to influence the evidence base on its products and paint itself as a credible partner in science.

 

Study reveals consumers value animal welfare more than environmental sustainability when buying meat and dairy products



Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH




The treatment of animals rates higher than green issues when consumers choose meat and dairy products.  

That’s according to a new study, which suggests that while consumers consider sustainability important, other factors such as taste, quality, and animal welfare take precedence in their purchasing decisions.

On product labels, consumers valued information regarding animal welfare, food safety, and health and nutrition. The results can help producers to market particularly sustainably produced food products in a more targeted way and make them more attractive to consumers.

The study was conducted across five European countries—Czechia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK to identify the attributes that are most important to consumers buying meat or dairy products.

Taking part in an online survey, 3,192 participants were asked to rate the importance of 18 different factors when shopping for meat and dairy products on a scale from 1 (not at all important) to 5 (extremely important):

·       Attributes - freshness, quality/taste, healthy eating, nutrition, price, processing, special offers, convenience of use/preparation, and familiarity of brand.

·       Animal welfare attributes - animal welfare, outdoor-reared/free range, and pasture-fed.

·       Attributes related to environmental sustainability - locally produced, sustainable packaging, food miles, carbon footprint, and organic.

·       Social sustainability - Fair trade or producer/farmer fairly paid.

Across all surveyed countries, consumers consistently prioritised freshness, quality/taste, and animal welfare as the most important attributes. In contrast, environmental factors such as food miles, carbon footprint, and organic production were deemed less important in influencing purchasing decisions. However, sustainability labels were perceived as helpful among consumers.

Study co-author Dr Andy Jin, Senior Lecturer in Risk Management in the Faculty of Business and Law at the University of Portsmouth, said: “Our study highlights the complex interplay of factors that influence consumer behaviour when buying meat and dairy products. Consumers indicated that information related to animal welfare, food safety, and health and nutrition was considered more important than environmental sustainability when making food choices.

“The findings demonstrate the importance of labelling strategies that encompass multiple aspects of product attributes, beyond environmental considerations alone.”

The implications of the research extend further than consumers to policymakers, producers, and retailers in the food industry who are striving to meet evolving consumer demands for more sustainable products.

Dr Jin added: “Labels on their own are not enough to change behaviour, especially for consumers who have low or no behavioural intention to buy sustainable meat or dairy products.

“These results should be translated into additional policy measures, such as nudges or behavioural interventions, helping individuals translate their attitudes into behaviour and facilitating the choice of sustainably produced products.”

The research, published in the journal Food Quality and Preference, was conducted by the universities of Portsmouth and Newcastle in the UK, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, University of Córdoba in Spain, Mendel University in Czech Republic and Agroscope from Switzerland.

 

Macaque Brainnetome Atlas: A multifaced brain map of rhesus monkey




SCIENCE CHINA PRESS
Macaque Brainnetome Atlas 

IMAGE: 

(A) 248 CORTICAL SUBREGIONS AND (B) 56 SUBCORTICAL SUBREGIONS OF MACAQUE BRAINNETOME ATLAS

view more 

CREDIT: ©SCIENCE CHINA PRESS




This study is led by Prof. Tianzi Jiang (Brainnetome center of the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Prof. Lingzhong Fan (Brainnetome center of the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences), and Prof. Zhengyi Yang (Brainnetome center of the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences).

As an ideal model for studying human cognitive function and brain diseases, macaques are highly similar to humans in genetics, physiology, and brain structure. Currently, non-human primates are considered as a core source for exploring cognitive neural mechanisms and promoting translational medicine. Therefore, a multifaced brain atlas elucidating the architecture of the macaque brain is of great significance for translating research findings from macaques to humans. Such an atlas can characterize profiles of whole-brain regions, including connectivity, anatomy, and geometric topology, aiding in our understanding of brain function, development, and evolution. However, existing atlas have primarily focused on fragmented regions and single-modal data, while comprehensive macaque brain atlases have been challenging to achieve.

Recently, the research team led by Dr. Tianzi Jiang at the Brainnetome center of the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences delineated a multifaced macaque brain atlas, Macaque Brainnetome Atlas (MacBNA). MacBNA not only provides fine-grained parcellation of brain regions but also describes the macroscopic connections between subregions. Serving as a reliable reference system, it can effectively integrate multi-scale brain images and multi-omics data, thus delineating a multi-modal, cross-scale atlas of the macaque brain. Macaque Brainnetome Atlas, as a multifaced brain atlas depicting the architecture of the macaque brain, will overcome many limitations of existing atlases, including focusing solely on specific anatomical regions or single-modal information. Additionally, brainnetome atlases of both humans and macaques constructed using the same method will play a crucial role in effectively transferring information and knowledge acquired from monkey brains to human brains.

In addition, the multi-modal multi-scale dataset in this study will also provide an open-access platform for addressing computational issues, such as establishing macaque digital twin brains and cross-scale image registration. Researchers are currently continuing to collect data to further enrich MacBNA. Furthermore, the principles and methods of brain network atlas construction have the potential to extend to comparative studies in other species. Therefore, they anticipate that MacBNA and its related multimodal multi-scale resources will play a crucial role in cross-species comparisons, translational medicine, and computational modeling. The development of brainnetome atlases will evolve towards cross-species brain atlases and multimodal multi-scale brain atlases, providing a solid foundation for diagnosis, treatment, cross-species research, and inspiration for neuromorphic intelligence.

 

What is "time" for quantum particles?


Publication by TU Darmstadt researchers in renowned journal "Science Advances"


TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAT DARMSTADT




What is "time" for quantum particles?

Publication by TU Darmstadt researchers in renowned journal "Science Advances"

In an amazing phenomenon of quantum physics known as tunneling, particles appear to move faster than the speed of light. However, physicists from Darmstadt believe that the time it takes for particles to tunnel has been measured incorrectly until now. They propose a new method to stop the speed of quantum particles.

In classical physics, there are hard rules that cannot be circumvented. For example, if a rolling ball does not have enough energy, it will not get over a hill, but will turn around before reaching the top and reverse its direction. In quantum physics, this principle is not quite so strict: a particle may pass a barrier, even if it does not have enough energy to go over it. It acts as if it is slipping through a tunnel, which is why the phenomenon is also known as “quantum tunneling”. What sounds magical has tangible technical applications, for example in flash memory drives.

In the past, experiments in which particles tunneled faster than light drew some attention. After all, Einstein’s theory of relativity prohibits faster-than-light velocities. The question is therefore whether the time required for tunneling was “stopped” correctly in these experiments. Physicists Patrik Schach and Enno Giese from TU Darmstadt follow a new approach to define “time” for a tunneling particle. They have now proposed a new method of measuring this time. In their experiment, they measure it in a way that they believe is better suited to the quantum nature of tunneling. They have published the design of their experiment in the renowned journal “Science Advances.”

According to quantum physics, small particles such as atoms or light particles have a dual nature.

Depending on the experiment, they behave like particles or like waves. Quantum tunneling highlights the wave nature of particles. A “wave packet” rolls towards the barrier, comparable to a surge of water. The height of the wave indicates the probability with which the particle would materialize at this location if its position were measured. If the wave packet hits an energy barrier, part of it is reflected. However, a small portion penetrates the barrier and there is a small probability that the particle will appear on the other side of the barrier.

Previous experiments observed that a light particle has traveled a longer distance after tunneling than one that had a free path. It would therefore have traveled faster than the light. However, the researchers had to define the location of the particle after its passage. They chose the highest point of its wave packet.

“But the particle does not follow a path in the classical sense,” objects Enno Giese. It is impossible to say exactly where the particle is at a particular time. This makes it difficult to make statements about the time required to get from A to B.

Schach and Giese, on the other hand, are guided by a quote from Albert Einstein: “Time is what you read off a clock”. They suggest using the tunneling particle itself as a clock. A second particle that does not tunnel serves as a reference. By comparing these two natural clocks, it is possible to determine whether time elapses slower, faster or equally fast during quantum tunneling.

The wave nature of particles facilitates this approach. The oscillation of waves is similar to the oscillation of a clock. Specifically, Schach and Giese propose using atoms as clocks. The energy levels of atoms oscillate at certain frequencies. After addressing an atom with a laser pulse, its levels initially oscillate synchronized – the atomic clock is started. During tunneling, however, the rhythm shifts slightly. A second laser pulse causes the two internal waves of the atom to interfere. Detecting the interference makes it possible to measure how far apart the two waves of the energy levels are, which in turn is a precise measure of the elapsed time.

A second atom, which does not tunnel, serves as a reference to measure the time difference between tunneling and non-tunneling. Calculations by the two physicists suggest that the tunneling particle will show a slightly delayed time. “The clock that is tunneled is slightly older than the other,” says Patrik Schach. This seems to contradict experiments that attributed superluminal speed to tunneling.

In principle, the test can be carried out with today’s technology, says Schach, but it is a major challenge for experimenters. This is because the time difference to be measured is only around 10-26 seconds – an extremely short time. It helps to use clouds of atoms as clocks instead of individual atoms, explains the physicist. It is also possible to amplify the effect, for example by artificially increasing the clock frequencies. “We are currently discussing this idea with experimental colleagues and are in contact with our project partners”, adds Giese. It is quite possible that a team will soon decide to carry out this exciting experiment.

Publication: Patrik Schach, Enno Giese: „A unified theory of tunneling times promoted by Ramsey clocks“, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adl6078

 

Using solar energy to generate heat at high temperatures



ETH ZURICH
Illustration of the experimental thermal trap. It consists of a quartz rod (inside) and a ceramic absorber (outside). Solar radiation enters at the front, heat is generated in the rear area. 

IMAGE: 

ILLUSTRATION OF THE EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL TRAP. IT CONSISTS OF A QUARTZ ROD (INSIDE) AND A CERAMIC ABSORBER (OUTSIDE). SOLAR RADIATION ENTERS AT THE FRONT, HEAT IS GENERATED IN THE REAR AREA.

view more 

CREDIT: VISUALIZATIONS: CASATI E ET AL. DEVICE 2024, EDITED




The production of cement, metals and many chemical commodities requires extremely high temperatures of over a thousand degrees Celsius. At present, this heat is usually obtained by combusting fossil fuels: coal or natural gas, which emit large amounts of greenhouse gases. Heating with renewable electricity is not an alternative, as this would be inefficient at these high temperatures. Although much of our economy and society will need to become carbon neutral in the coming decades, these industrial processes are likely to continue to be powered by fossil fuels for the near future. They are considered difficult to decarbonise.

Researchers at ETH Zurich have now demonstrated, in the lab, a way to make these industries independent of fossil fuels. Using solar radiation, they have engineered a device that can deliver heat at the high temperatures needed for the production processes. The team led by Emiliano Casati, a scientist in the Energy and Process Systems Engineering Group, and Aldo Steinfeld, Professor of Renewable Energy Carriers, has developed a thermal trap. It consists of a quartz rod coupled to a ceramic absorber which, thanks to its optical properties, can efficiently absorb sunlight and convert it into heat.

In their lab-​scale experiments, the team used a quartz rod measuring 7.5 centimetres in diameter and 30 centimetres in length. They exposed it to artificial light with an intensity equivalent to 135 times that of sunlight, reaching temperatures of up to 1050 degrees Celsius. Previous studies by other researchers have achieved a maximum of 170 degrees with such thermal traps.

Large-​scale solar concentrating technologies are already established at an industrial scale for solar power generation, for example in Spain, the US and in China. These plants typically operate at up to 600 degrees. At higher temperatures, heat loss by radiation increases and reduces the efficiency of the plants. A major advantage of the thermal trap developed by ETH Zurich researchers is that it minimises radiative heat losses.

High-​temperature solar plants

Our approach significantly improves the efficiency of solar absorption,” says Casati. “We are, therefore, confident that this technology supports the deployment of high-​temperature solar plants.” However, detailed technical and economic analyses are still pending, he says. Such analysis is beyond the scope of the current experimental study, which the researchers have published in the scientific journal Device.

Casati is continuing his research to optimise the process. The technology could one day make it possible to use solar energy not only to generate electricity, but also to decarbonise energy-​intensive industries on a large scale. “To combat climate change, we need to decarbonise energy in general," says Casati. “People often think of energy in terms of electricity, but we actually use about half of our energy in the form of heat.”

 

Wind farms can offset their emissions within two years, new study shows




TAYLOR & FRANCIS GROUP





After spinning for under two years, a wind farm can offset the carbon emissions generated across its entire 30-year lifespan, when compared to thermal power plants.

That’s according to a new peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand – which also shows within six months a turbine can generate all the energy consumed across its life-cycle.

The research uses data from the Harapaki onshore wind farm in Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand – however the authors of the paper explain that their findings would be replicated across most, if not all, wind farms internationally.

“The wind turbine technology employed in New Zealand is consistent with that used internationally,” explains lead author Isabella Pimentel Pincelli from the Sustainable Energy Systems research group, Wellington Faculty of Engineering, at Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of Wellington.

“Although the carbon offset depends on the exact older technology the wind turbines are replacing, we would expect a similar offset internationally. In New Zealand it is gas turbines, but many countries will be displacing fossil fuel generators.

“The outcomes of our study underscore the environmental efficiency of onshore wind farms and their important role in the energy transition. Notably, the manufacturing of wind turbines is the primary contributor to the carbon and energy footprints, highlighting a critical area for targeted environmental mitigation strategies.”

The study reviewed current literature on wind farms, as well as using real construction data to take into account everything from the manufacturing of individual turbine parts, to transporting them into place, to decommissioning the entire wind farm at Harapaki – which comprises 41 turbines.

The results indicate that this particular farm will leave a carbon footprint of 10.8 gCO2eq/kWh, which equates to a greenhouse gas payback time of 1.5–1.7 years for avoided combined cycle gas turbines, and an energy payback time of 0.4–0.5 years.

Co-author Professor Alan Brent, Chair in Sustainable Energy Systems at Wellington, explains while the results underscore how onshore wind plants are aligned with the principles of sustainable development, more can still be explored with making the manufacturing process more eco-friendly.

“The environmental impacts of the installation and transportation phases are important. Together they accounted for nearly 10% of the overall emissions,” states Brent, a Professor of Sustainable Energy Systems.

“It therefore remains crucial to continue implementing improvements aimed at limiting negative environmental impacts while maximizing positive contributions throughout the supply chain of onshore wind plants.

“Notably, the manufacturing of wind turbines is the primary contributor to the carbon and energy footprints, highlighting a critical area for targeted environmental mitigation strategies.”

To address the carbon outlay of the process of developing such wind farms, the expert team recommend developing a recycling process for end-of-life blades.

Currently blades are disposed of in landfill due to commercial feasibility, but by recycling the blades – either mechanically or chemically – could drop the emissions from the current 10.8 gCO2eq to a potential 9.7.

Additionally, the team recommend that research is carried out regularly in this area as with the “rapid advancements of technologies” it will be “necessary to ensure research remains reflective of current practices to accurately inform decision-making processes”.

This study has some methodological limitations. First, it focuses only on the energy intensity and emissions throughout the life cycle of the wind farm, even though there are other environmental impacts, such as ozone depletion, human toxicity, acidification, eutrophication, and resource depletion. Social, wildlife, or economic impacts were also not considered.