Sunday, May 26, 2024

CANADA

Private property or public space? Encampments spark debate over campus status

Joe Bongiorno
Sat, May 25, 2024 



MONTREAL — After four weeks that have featured torrential downpours, blistering heat and two failed legal bids to have them removed, pro-Palestinian protesters remain encamped on McGill University’s downtown campus.

Quebec Minister of Higher Education Pascale Déry said their continuing presence is an affront to the rule of law.

"These encampments have to be dismantled," she told reporters this week in Quebec City. "It is not the appropriate place. Again, we are talking about private lands that are currently occupied."

McGill, which last week failed in a bid for an injunction, has also labelled the encampment an illegal occupation of its property.

But as protesters angry over the mounting death toll in Gaza have erected tent cities on Canadian campuses in the past month, demanding that schools divest from Israeli companies and cut ties with Israeli universities, the legality of their actions remains a subject of debate.

Experts say the nature of a university means the answer is not as clear-cut as the minister and McGill suggest.

Constitutional lawyer and Université de Montréal instructor Frédéric Bérard says that while a campus belongs to a university, it shouldn’t be understood in the way a private residence belongs to an individual.

Bérard said in an interview this week that unlike a private residence a campus is a venue for engaging in debate, and the public’s right to access and use that space for free speech and peaceful assembly is enshrined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

He said a court considering a challenge to an encampment has to decide if the right to free speech outweighs property rights, which in most cases it does.

Emmett Macfarlane, a professor of political science specializing in constitutional law at the University of Waterloo, said there is legal debate over whether universities, as private entities, are subject to the Charter.

But he said courts have in many cases applied the Charter to university actions affecting free expression.

"It may be true that university campuses have the legal status of private property, but I think there's a broader principle here in that they are not like any other private space," he said, comparing a campus to a public park and Parliament Hill. "They are public institutions and public universities, and the use of their space as part of a public forum for free expression is well established."

He called the almost universal response of Canadian university administrators to seek the removal of protest encampments a failure to respect free expression and the right to peaceful assembly.

“Across North America, and yes, within Canada, they have been far too quick to demand that encampment(s) be removed," Macfarlane said. "In almost all of the circumstances that we're seeing, including at my own university at University of Waterloo, the encampments have indeed been peaceful.”

Protests are disruptive by definition, he added, but students and staff have not been prevented from attending class.

The University of Toronto issued a trespass notice against a campus pro-Palestinian encampment on Friday, vowing to take "all necessary legal steps" if protesters did not clear out by Monday morning.

American universities have seen clashes, and earlier this month Edmonton police dismantled a pro-Palestinian encampment on the University of Alberta's campus. Students and academics there said police fired tear gas, and video posted to social media shows police striking students with batons, yet police denied using tear gas and said their use of force was limited.

"Almost all of the violence that we have seen in relation to these particular protests have not been the result of the protesters, but instead have been the result of police and universities moving to have the encampments removed or the protests ended,” Macfarlane said.

But that doesn’t mean the rights to free speech and assembly are without limits. Speech that is considered hateful is not protected. Neither is threatening the safety of others.

So far, Bérard noted, the courts have ruled against McGill’s claims that such behaviour was taking place on campus, even if the speech is considered controversial by some.

“Each and every encampment Is unique,” he said. “You cannot compare McGill to Université du Quebec à Montréal to University of Toronto or what’s happening in Edmonton. The court has to take into account the evidence that’s in front of it.”

Bérard said there is no hard limit to how long a campus can be occupied. He gave the example of the "Freedom Convoy" protests in Ottawa in 2022, saying that if they had happened on a university campus and had not blocked public access, they could theoretically have gone on indefinitely.

Macfarlane said the right to occupy a public space, like other Charter rights, is subject to limits, but universities need to show restraint as long as protests remain peaceful.

"The question is, what margin of appreciation do we as a society and as the law require for temporary disruptions of public space?" he said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 25, 2024.

Joe Bongiorno, The Canadian Press

BR-Que-McGill-Encampment

Sat, May 25, 2024 

Pro-Palestinian tent encampments on Canadian universities are sparking debate over whether campuses are private or public property.

Quebec's Minister of Higher Education says the encampment on Montreal's McGill University campus must be dismantled, arguing the ``private lands'' are not an appropriate place for the demonstration.

McGill's downtown encampment has survived two failed legal bids to have them removed, as protesters demand schools divest from Israeli companies and cut ties with Israeli universities.

Experts say the nature of a university means the answer is not as clearcut as the minister and McGill suggest.

A constitutional lawyer says while a campus belongs to a university, it shouldn't be understood in the way a private residence belongs to an individual.

Frederic Berard--who is also an instructor at the Universite de Montreal,-- says a court considering a challenge to an encampment has to decide if the right to free speech outweighs property rights-- which in most cases, it does.

Université du Québec à Montréal seeking injunction against pro-Palestinian encampment

The Canadian Press
Thu, May 23, 2024 



MONTREAL — Université du Québec à Montréal has filed for an injunction against pro-Palestinian protesters who set up an encampment on its downtown campus a little over a week ago.

UQAM is asking the Quebec Superior Court to prohibit protesters from setting up tents and other material within three metres of campus buildings.

It also wants protesters stop allegedly obstructing access to its campus, damaging surveillance cameras, engaging in vandalism and destroying university property.


UQAM says protesters are posing a safety risk by blocking an emergency exit, being in possession of gasoline canisters and iron bars, and potentially "overloading" the university's electrical network with unauthorized extension cords.

Since the encampment started on May 12, protesters have demanded that the university cut ties with Israeli institutions and disclose its links to Israel, and that the Quebec government cancel plans for a diplomatic office in the country.

The university's court application says the inner courtyard of its science centre is being occupied by about 40 tents.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 23, 2024.


Pro-Palestinian protesters expected to meet with U of T administration

The Canadian Press
Sun, May 26, 2024 


TORONTO — Pro-Palestinian protesters who have set up an encampment on the University of Toronto campus are expected to meet with school officials today.

The meeting, which is scheduled for 5 p.m. local time, comes after the university issued a trespass notice to the protesters on Friday.

The school has said it will take "all necessary legal steps" if the protesters don't clear out by Monday at 8 a.m.

The notice threatens to seek a court order against the camp.

The encampment was set up on May 2 at the heart of the university's downtown campus, part of a massive wave of pro-Palestinian demonstrations at post-secondary institutions in Canada and the United States.

Organizers called on the university to cut its ties with Israel, divest from companies profiting from Israel's offensive in Gaza, and terminate partnerships with the country's academic institutions deemed complicit in the war.

The school made an offer to the protesters on Thursday, which organizers say doesn't meaningfully address their demands.

Organizers say the university's offer was presented to them at the same time President Meric Gertler held a hastily arranged press conference Thursday publicizing its terms and imposing a Friday deadline to accept.

The university's offer said it would form a working group to consider options for the disclosure of the school's investments, but it would not end any partnerships with Israeli universities.

On divestment, the university said it would strike an advisory committee to review the students' request under existing school policies.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 26, 2024.


U of T encampment trespass notice sets Monday deadline, negotiations set for Sunday

The Canadian Press
Fri, May 24,2024



TORONTO — The University of Toronto issued a trespass notice Friday to a pro-Palestinian encampment on campus, vowing to take "all necessary legal steps" if protesters did not clear out by Monday morning.

Despite the notice, encampment organizers said university administrators had also agreed to meet on Sunday at 5 p.m. for continued negotiations.

"There's lots of room between now and then. And we implore the administration to do the right thing, to be on the right side of history," said Erin Mackey, a spokesperson for the encampment.

"We'll continue to be here, and we'll continue to demand divestment."

The notice comes after the university made an offer Thursday, with a 24-hour deadline, to end the weeks-long protest. Organizers called the offer an "ultimatum" with little meaningful response to their demands.

The trespass notice, meanwhile, calls Thursday's offer "full and fair" and gives a deadline of Monday at 8 a.m. for protesters to leave. It threatens to seek a court order against the camp and warns protest participants may be subject to disciplinary action, up to an expulsion recommendation for students and termination for faculty and staff.

"The encampment has created an environment on campus that is contrary to the university’s commitment to fostering a welcoming and safe community for all members to partake of and express themselves freely," the notice said.

The encampment was set up on May 2 at the heart of the university's downtown campus, part of a massive wave of pro-Palestinian demonstrations at post-secondary institutions in Canada and the United States. Organizers called on the university to cut its ties with Israel, divest from companies profiting from Israel's offensive in Gaza, and terminate partnerships with the country's academic institutions deemed complicit in the war.

Organizers say the university's offer was presented to them at the same time president Meric Gertler held a hastily arranged press conference Thursday publicizing its terms and imposing a Friday deadline to accept.

The university's offer said it would form a working group to consider options for the disclosure of the school's investments, but it would not end any partnerships with Israeli universities.

On divestment, the university said it would strike an advisory committee to review the students' request under existing school policies.

The committee would be tasked with presenting its findings by the end of October. The president would then make a decision "in a timely manner," the offer said. Students could "suggest" advisers, but final approval would be with the university's executive committee, on the president's recommendation.

At a news conference earlier Friday, Mackey said the students want "upfront commitments" on divestments and disclosure, not "vague committees" to study the matter. She noted that in 2016 Gertler turned down an advisory committee's recommendation for the school to divest from fossil fuel holdings, only to reverse course years later.

"In this current moment, it is up to the administration, whether they are willing to be serious to engage in a genuine conversation about commitments towards divestment or they're going to continue to give us big committees that ultimately will lead us nowhere," said Mackey.

Sara Rasikh, a master’s student and another spokesperson for the encampment, said organizers are preparing a counteroffer to present to the university at Sunday's meeting.

"We are hoping that they will be receptive to this, to actually listen to their students," she said.

Rasikh said protesters hope the university will not call in the police to clear the camp.

Earlier this month, police officers forcibly removed a group of demonstrators from an encampment set up on the University of Calgary campus.

Pro-Palestinian protesters remain encamped on other campuses in the country, including at McGill University in Montreal and several universities in British Columbia.

In B.C., tents first went up on a field at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver on April 29. Since then, similar encampments have emerged at the University of Victoria and Vancouver Island University in Nanaimo.

In an update on Thursday, the University of Victoria called the protesters’ demands “complex” while promising to support “peaceful expression” and faculty members’ academic freedom to engage both Israeli and Palestinian academics.

UBC president Benoit-Antoine Bacon said last week that the school must remain neutral on the conflict in Gaza in response to demands from encampment organizers.

— With files from Sonja Puzic in Toronto and Chuck Chiang in Vancouver

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 24, 2024.

Jordan Omstead and Rianna Lim, The Canadian Press


U of T encampment rejects school's offer

CBC
Fri, May 24, 2024 

Kalliopé Anvar McCall, a fourth-year U of T student in diaspora studies, speaks at a news conference at the King’s College Circle encampment on Friday, May 24, 2024. She called the school’s negotiations ‘a joke.’ (Chris Glover/CBC - image credit)


A pro-Palestinian encampment at the University of Toronto said the school's latest offer, made in a bid to end an ongoing demonstration on campus, is "an ultimatum."

"This is a joke of a negotiation," encampment organizer Kalliopé Anvar McCall, a fourth-year U of T student in diaspora studies, said at a news conference at the King's College Circle encampment Friday morning.

Organizers criticized the university for its negotiation tactics — particularly, speaking to media outlets, including CBC Radio's Metro Morning, rather than directly with U of T Occupy for Palestine.

The university says it plans to issue a trespass notice if protesters are not gone by 4 p.m. Friday.

"It's not 4 p.m. yet," said student Erin Mackey, a spokesperson for U of T Occupy for Palestine, at the news conference. "We are still trying to figure out what our next steps are."

She also said: "We will continue to be here."

Mackey spoke with Metro Morning earlier on Friday, shortly after the university president did.

"They brought forward a proposal for commitments but commitments aren't good enough," Mackey said.

She is among dozens of students, staff and faculty who have been occupying a green space at King's College Circle on the university's St. George Campus in downtown Toronto since May 2. They've set up tents and canopies in solidarity with other encampments at universities throughout North America, calling for an end to the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

'Problematic' to even negotiate: Jewish group

Hillel Ontario, a group that advocates on behalf of Jewish students, raised concerns when the protest first began about demonstrators chanting, "All the Zionists are racists" and chalk on the ground reading "Go back to Europe."

"The university has an obligation to make sure its campus is safe for all students," said Jay Solomon, Hillel Ontario's chief advancement officer.

"Students are feeling uncomfortable, they're feeling unsafe and they're looking for the university to take some action," he said from nearby the encampment on Friday. "The fact that the university is even negotiating with this group is problematic."

U of T's offer

In its Thursday offer, the university said it would not end partnerships with Israeli universities. It said students would be invited to attend the university's business board of governing council's meeting on June 19 to present their demands, as well as a working group to consider options for disclosure and increased transparency of investments.

If the encampment doesn't accept the offer within 24 hours, the university will issue a trespass notice, U of T president Meric Gertler said Thursday afternoon.

LISTEN | U of T president speaks on Metro Morning:

Gertler reiterated his points Friday morning on Metro Morning.

"I hope … that they will see what we're putting on the table here is a very fair and considered offer," he said.

Gertler said "nothing is more fundamental in many ways to our society" than the right to protest, but also that "we have to balance some other rights, particularly rights of inclusion."


Erin Mackey, a University of Toronto student participating in the protest.

Erin Mackey, a University of Toronto student participating in the protest, is pictured on May 2, 2024. On Friday, she told CBC Radio: 'If they want to clear this encampment, they can meet our demands.' (Meagan Fitzpatrick/CBC)

As of Thursday, Gertler said the university has received 38 reports of harassment, discrimination and "hateful speech and hateful actions" as a result of the encampment.

"The tension that has been generated by the continued presence of the encampment has reached a point where we feel now is the time to end the encampment," he said.

Mackey, meanwhile, said if the university wants to clear the encampment, officials can meet protesters' demands.

"The fact that U of T is willing to call the Toronto police on this encampment — or threaten so, in this current moment — says a lot about where they're at, that they are unwilling to stop funding a genocide, stop investing in bombs and instead call police on their own students."

Speaking on Metro Morning, Gertler said the university is "doing our level best to avoid police involvement."

Queen's encampment packing up as protesters declare small victory in ongoing battle


Local Journalism Initiative
Fri, May 24, 2024 

Editorial note: The views and accounts quoted by those protesting at the encampment on Queen's University do not necessarily reflect those of Kingstonist and have not been independently verified.

“Children needlessly slaughtered, their potential stolen. An afterthought at best in a campaign of indiscriminate violence and continued genocide against the Palestinian people: tragic, unimaginable, but heartbreakingly common." This is how one protester at Queen’s framed her reasons for participating in a 12-day encampment at Queen’s University this month.

That encampment will be packed up by the end of the day today, Wednesday, May 22, 2024, the protest leaders --- Queen’s University Apartheid Divest (QUAD) --- explained at a noon-hour press conference. And though they don’t consider the end of their occupation of the “liberated zone” in a quad behind Richardson and Dunning Halls to be a victory, they do say it is one positive step on what they suggest is a long journey of negotiations with the university.

According to speakers from QUAD, the “liberated zone” encampment was initially planned for one night on Friday, May 10, 2024. The original intention was to disrupt the Board of Trustees meeting on May 10 and 11. QUAD submitted a report to the principal and the Board of Trustees on Thursday, May 9, asking to be added to the board's open session agenda. At that time, they submitted a 30-page report detailing divestment recommendations and indicating that $150 million of Queen’s endowment funds are invested in companies “that facilitate the violence and Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories.”

As part of the Palestinian liberation movement, QUAD demanded that Queen's divest from “all companies and institutions that have upheld and continue to uphold the 76 years of Israeli settler colonial occupation, apartheid, and violence.”

The group, who define themselves on social media as “a coalition of students, organizations, and faculty united by the belief that the struggle for Palestinian liberation is intrinsic to our collective pursuit of justice,” aims to uphold the legacy of the 1987 Queen’s University South African anti-apartheid movement and the outspoken alumni who succeeded in persuading Queen’s to divest at least partially from South African companies and holdings.

QUAD called the encampment “an escalation tactic” to pressure Queen's to eliminate its $150 million in problematic investments. And while they could not present the report in the open session, the board chair agreed to meet with student representatives from QUAD along with the principal and incoming board chair, according to the protesters.

QUAD stated that their demands had been addressed and discussed in meetings of their negotiation team with Queen’s administration and that “[Principal] Patrick Deane has since accepted our formal request for divestment, and [he has promised to] commence the committee on divestment within one week's time.”

Throughout negotiations, QUAD representatives stated, “We actively and consistently reminded them how every 10 minutes another child in Gaza is killed. That every day another child in Gaza gets amputated. That every university in Gaza has been destroyed. We reminded senior administration that they are active contributors of this scholasticide and genocide. Queen's cannot be platformed as third in the world for its sustainable development goals while investing in the war machine and profiting from Palestinian blood.”

“We have been told that the committee chair will be announced by the end of this week," they shared, "We have requested two seats on this committee. We have also requested that a committee timeline and selection criteria be provided for transparency and measure of good faith.”

The speakers were proud that the students, faculty, and community of QUAD “and our pressure through this encampment” had brought about the formation of the divestment committee. Still, they said they were under no Illusions: “We do not believe the future meetings and future policy promises are divestment victory. These delays are meant to pacify us. But let it be clear that we will remain persistent towards our goals for full divestment, full disclosure, a full academic boycott in a fully liberated Palestine.”

Regarding the other demands, the group shared that Vice-Principal (Culture, Equity, and Inclusion) Stephanie Simpson has stated they will look into and provide more information on implementing a definition of anti-Palestinian racism, “specifically implementing it through training for staff, faculty, and administration."

They also shared that Vice-Provost Sandra den Otter had informed them that “there is no precedent of academic boycott in Queen's history." In response, they said, “we take this as a commitment to be the first to ensure Queen's severs ties from institutions that facilitate these war crimes.”

“We also demanded that Queen’s take restorative action to rebuild and reinvest in Palestinian academia through the establishment of partnerships with Palestinian universities, and this is something we will continue to pressure the administration to commit to,” they stated.

Finally, they noted that as a precondition to decamping, “we have received confirmation via email from the provost that there will be no retaliation from the Queen's administration for all protesters and campers.”

However, they made sure to add, “we also want to highlight shameful acts of cowardice and hypocrisy from university leadership when framing the genocide in Palestine and our actions here in this encampment. On day three of our encampment, our principal, Patrick Deane, released a statement in which [the university] continued to use generalized language such as ‘the Middle East conflict,’ continuing to shamefully erase Palestine. He also referred to our actions in the protest as violent and aggressive, when the real threat came from Campus Security and calling police onto our campus.”

The group said they will be releasing more information about “these inexcusable acts of violence” in the coming days. When pressed, they gave details of one specific incident captured on video in which they said Campus Security officers brutally beat and kicked protestors.

“Queen's administration has largely not responded to any of the reports or dozens of concerns relating to surveillance, harassment, and violence perpetrated by Zionists on our campus over the past eight months. We are mindful of naming victories and aim to be transparent about our struggle.”

“In the past twelve days, senior administration has addressed all six of our demands but has used bureaucratic processes to evade accountability for their complicity in the Palestinian genocide,” they declared. “Queen's, your hands are red, and we will remind you of this until you take direct and meaningful action to materially meet these demands and fully divest from the Zionist regime.”

This is a developing story with more details to come.

Michelle Dorey Forestell, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Kingstonist.com



Pro-Palestinian protesters at Queen's pack up as university reviews divestment request

CBC
Wed, May 22, 2024

Pro-Palestinian protesters at Queen's University in Kingston, Ont., say while they plan to pack up their encampment, they'll continue pushing for their demands to be met. 
(Dan Taekema/CBC - image credit)

Pro-Palestinian protesters are packing up after 12 nights camped outside an administration building at Queen's University in Kingston, Ont.

The encampment grew out of an all-day demonstration on May 10, with more than a dozen tents sprawling across the grass outside Richardson Hall.

Posters, blood-red hand prints and chalk messages declaring the protesters' six demands, including divestment from companies with ties to Israel, quickly covered the walls of the courtyard.

On Wednesday, encampment organizers called a media conference and announced they're leaving.

"By this evening, we will be taking down ... our tents," said Yara Hussein, a fifth-year Queen's student.

While the encampment may be gone, the protesters plan to keep pressuring the university to meet their demands, she added.

"We will continue to organize and mobilize on this campus," Hussein said. "We pitched a tent in a night and we can pitch more."

Encampment organizers said Queen's principal Patrick Deane has received their formal request for divestment, along with around 600 signatures in support of it.

Deane has also agreed to strike a committee to review the request within the week, according to the group, which has requested two seats on it.

University to examine divestment

A statement shared on behalf of the university confirmed it has accepted a request to consider divestment after meeting with protesters over the past 10 days .

According to the statement, Deane is creating a "Review Committee for Responsible Investing," adding its recommendations could include coordinating consultations or arranging delegations.

Queen's student Yara Hussein is one of the encampment organizers. She said they'll continue pressuring Queen's to divest from companies with ties to Israel.

Queen's student Yara Hussein is one of the encampment organizers. She said they'll continue pressuring Queen's to divest from companies with ties to Israel. (Dan Taekema/CBC)

Those recommendations will then be provided to the principal for consideration before he hands them over to the Board of Trustees, which will have final approval.

"There will be opportunities for all those who have an interest in this matter to participate in this process," the statement adds.

The tents at Queen's were part of a wave of protests at universities across North America, some of which were forcibly cleared by police.

Protesters plan more 'escalations'

Jake Morrow, another one of the encampment organizers in Kingston, estimated roughly 150 people took part. He said the decision to leave was unanimous.

"By taking this moment to step back, we are allowing ourselves the time to prepare for our next steps, our next escalations so that the university feels the pressure again and again," Morrow said.

Protesters covered the walls of a courtyard at Queen's University with posters and paint calling for their six demands to be met.

Protesters covered the walls of a courtyard at Queen's University with posters and paint calling for their six demands to be met. (Dan Taekema/CBC)

While Queen's hasn't met all of their demands, which include an academic boycott of Tel Aviv and Ben-Gurion universities, and more disclosure around the university's investments, it has acknowledged them, the protesters said.

They added the university has also committed to ensuring no participants will face retaliation for joining the encampment.

"We don't see these as victories, but rather opportunities to hold this administration and these senior admin as accountable," Hussein said.

The encampment outside Richardson Hall was in place for twelve nights, starting on May 10, 2024.

The encampment outside Richardson Hall was in place for 12 nights, starting on May 10. (Dan Taekema/CBC)

University of Waterloo issues formal notice to protesters to end encampment

CBC
Thu, May 23, 2024 

The University of Waterloo has issued a formal notice to protesters to end an encampment set up on May 13. The school says the encampment has violated at least six university policies. (Aastha Shetty/CBC - image credit)


The University of Waterloo has issued a formal notice to people who have set up an encampment on campus to end the protest and remove all structures.

In a letter posted to the school's website on Monday, and taped to light posts near the encampment, the school says the encampment and associated events "violate several items listed on our list of prohibited activities ... and also violate various University of Waterloo policies."

The university says the protesters have contravened six policies, including:

Policy 2 in regards to signage. The school says signs, flags and banners at the encampment have been installed without permission.


Policy 15 which requires permission to use spaces on the university campus outside of regularly scheduled hours.


Policy 22 which says no modifications or attachments to a building or structure can be put up by anyone except university plant operations staff. The university says their tents and a plywood barricade were put up without authorization.


Policy 33 which "unduly interferes with the study, work or working environment of other members of the university or any aspect of another's university activity."


Policy 34 which is a health, safety and environment policy that the school says the group has gone against because they have refused to allow inspections of the encampment's structures.


Policy 74 that covers misuse of university resources, including the unauthorized use of equipment, material or a facility or service.


"We have been clear, including in writing, that the encampment cannot remain indefinitely and that members of the encampment have already breached several of our prohibited activities and policies. Because you continue to violate our policies, we require you to end the encampment immediately and to dismantle all structures," the statement says.


The university has put up its formal notice to end the encampment on light posts and umbrella stands near the area around where the encampment has been set up. (Aastha Shetty/CBC)

'We're not taking their threats very seriously'

Nicholas Joseph, the media liaison for the group Occupy UW, told CBC News Thursday afternoon that there are no plans to dismantle the encampment.

"The university admin has posted and taped heavily this list of supposed violations that we're committing. They also handed a copy to us. It seems very passive aggressive and pretty threatening and we're not taking their threats very seriously," Joseph said.

Joseph alleges the university has not engaged in an open dialogue with the group. Instead, he said the university administration has asked to do safety tours of the encampment and Joseph says the protesters have denied that request.

"Because we've put up flags and stuff like that, they've taped these things, bolding and underlining all of the supposed infractions we're committing," he said.

"It just seems threatening. It just seems they're telling us to dismantle the encampment immediately. We're not going to do that."

He said from the encampment's perspective, the next steps "are quite clear."

"They need to concede to our demands," he said.

The protesters say they decided to set up the encampment because of the growing number of deaths during the on-going Israel-Hamas war.

The group that organized the encampment has previously held rallies on campus and attended a university senate meeting earlier this month to demand the university should boycott and divest from all institutions supporting Israel in the midst of the ongoing war.

A similar encampment went up at the University of Guelph campus on Tuesday of this week. Other encampments have taken place at university campuses across the country, including at McGill University in Montreal, the University of TorontoMcMaster University in Hamilton and University of Windsor.


Staff, students want independent investigation into police removal of U of A protesters

CBC
Thu, May 23, 2024 

More than 100 students, staff and supporters gathered at the University of Alberta on May 9 to start a Pro-Palestinian encampment in support of Gaza. Edmonton Police dismantled the encampment on May 11. (Mrinali Anchan/CBC - image credit)


University of Alberta staff and student associations are calling for an independent investigation into the forceful removal of pro-Palestinian protesters in mid-May.

Representatives of the University of Alberta Students' Union and various staff associations said they met with university leaders Wednesday and demanded a third-party investigation into decisions that led to the Edmonton Police Service being called on May 11 to remove protesters from campus.

"There continue to be discrepancies between senior leadership and the protesters' account of what happened on May 11," Kristine Smitka, vice-president of the Academic Staff Association at the U of A, told reporters Wednesday.


"And it's really a third-party, independent investigation [that] will allow this community to start to move forward and heal from the events which transpired."

On May 9, more than 100 students, staff and supporters gathered at the school's main quad to show support for Gaza while calling on the university to disclose and divest from investments with Israeli institutions.

Smitka said Wednesday's meeting was with U of A president and vice-chancellor Bill Flanagan and other senior leaders, including Verna Yui, Todd Gilchrist and Melissa Padfield.

Smitka said a thorough investigation could be lengthy but said the process was necessary to gather testimonies from all stakeholders, including protesters and senior leadership.

In a public statement issued May 12, Flanagan said there were "serious and potentially life-threatening risks associated with the encampment." He said protesters did not act on a request to remove wood pallets and that 17 were found within 150 metres of the encampment, which a fire inspector declared was a fire hazard.

Demonstrators have said pallets had been removed and there was no violent behaviour in the encampment. Videos taken by demonstrators on May 11 and posted to social media showed officers using batons. At one point, gas started forming during the sweep.

Police have said they were in contact with the university for several days about safety concerns before being called in to clear the camp. Officers used pepper balls — non-lethal ammunition filled with pepper spray, similar to a paintball — and a muzzle blast containing pepper spray.

Videos taken by demonstrators on May 11, which were posted to social media, showed officers using batons and, at one point, gas started forming during the sweep.

Videos taken by demonstrators on May 11, which were posted to social media, showed officers using batons and, at one point, gas started forming during the sweep. (Instagram/University4Palestine.YEG)

Three men were arrested and police said no serious injuries were reported. The demonstrators have said four students were injured, including one who was sent to hospital.

"I think that our group would like to better understand what evidence was used to make this decision that the protest was an unsafe protest," Smitka said.

"What de-escalation techniques were used? One thing of great concern to us is that no senior leadership official walked into the quad to engage in dialogue with the protesters."

'Erasing history' not an option

Students' union president Lisa Glock said the union is working toward creating a mechanism for students' demands to be heard.

"Erasing history isn't something that we're interested in," Glock said when asked by media about the lasting impact on the university community.

"We want to analyze it, see why things happened and learn from it."

Students' union president Lisa Glock said the union is working toward creating a mechanism for students' demands to be heard.

Students' union president Lisa Glock said the union is working toward creating a mechanism for students' demands to be heard. (Jamie McCannel/CBC)

CBC has requested comment from the U of A regarding the investigation request and the presence of leadership during the encampment.

Smitka said another meeting with leadership is scheduled in two weeks.

"We want to think through what can be improved, especially any de-escalation techniques that can be further embedded within university policy to address protests on campus to ensure that something like this never happens at the U of A again."


Different times trigger different concerns for Alberta voters

CBC
Sat, May 25, 2024

Jason Kenney campaigned in and won the 2019 election on three words: Jobs, Economy, and Pipelines. These days, Albertans seem much more concerned about the cost of living. (CBC - image credit)


EDITOR'S NOTE: CBC News commissioned this public opinion research in April, leading into the first anniversary of the United Conservative Party's general election win last May. The poll offers insight into how Albertans feel about Danielle Smith's UCP government and the Opposition NDP.

As with all polls, this one provides a snapshot in time.

This analysis is one in a series of articles from this research. More stories will follow.

Jason Kenney swept to victory in 2019 with a tightly focused message on what polls suggested Albertans cared most about.

"This election," he declared, squaring off against NDP premier Rachel Notley during the televised leaders' debate, "is about jobs, the economy, pipelines."

But, with the persistent pinch of inflation, a hot housing market, and wages seemingly not going as far as they used to, many Albertans appear more concerned about their personal microeconomics than the province's macroeconomics.

That's a change from last year, when health care topped the list of concerns, and five years ago, when Kenney relentlessly focused his political messaging on creating jobs, kick-starting Alberta's sluggish economy, and building pipelines to get the province's oil to tidewater.

"The public is reflecting on what's happening in their lives, what they're hearing on the news, what is happening around them. That's just the nature of public discourse. It's always changing," said Janet Brown, who conducted the survey for CBC News.

"Instead of talking about the economy and the strength of the economy, people are talking about inflation and cost of living. Their concerns about the economy have become way more personal," she stressed.

After concerns about the cost of living, three in 10 (32 per cent) picked health care as their top concern. Eighteen per cent mentioned housing as their most important issue. Albertans also give the governing United Conservative Party (UCP) poor grades for handling these three big problems.

Most Important Issues

Changing concerns with changing times

Think back to the lead-up to the 2019 election.

The hangover of the 2015 recession lingered. The employment rate had not rebounded to pre-recession levels.

The province's oil sold at record-level discounts — and concerns about pipeline capacity made headlines.

The price of Alberta oil was so low that the NDP government cut oil production by nearly nine per cent in January 2019 in hopes of boosting the price.

Despite this, there were more layoffs, and Alberta's economy contracted, even slipping into a mild recession late in 2019.

CBC News polling in 2018 — a year before the newly formed United Conservative Party (UCP) catapulted to power — found pipelines, jobs, and the economy were top of mind for Alberta voters.

Different times, however, come with other concerns.

Oil prices rebounded — and crude from the oilsands is flowing through an expanded Trans Mountain pipeline.

Only seven per cent of voters mentioned the energy sector in CBC News' recent poll, compared to four in 10 voters in 2018.

Most Important Issues Tracking

With headlines about labour shortages in Alberta, it's no surprise that unemployment mentions have dropped from 20 per cent in 2018 to a mere eight per cent in CBC News' latest poll.

Alberta's population also surged in the last year — and the provincial government is even offering tax credits, hoping to attract skilled workers.

While Alberta's economy is cooking with oil and gas again, a majority of people in the prairie province say they struggle to meet their monthly expenses. Recently, economist Jim Stanford, in a report released by the Alberta Federation of Labour, even warned that the so-called "Alberta Advantage" — surrounding wages and living standards — "is disappearing quickly for workers."

Albertans feel the pinch of rising costs. The province saw the largest, year-over-year increase in rental prices nationwide last month.

Not surprisingly, housing mentions jumped from a mere three per cent in 2018 to 18 per cent in the new poll.

Brown says people feel the squeeze of inflation, and that shows up in CBC News' recent survey.

"Today," said Brown, "we have a mix of concerns that are both economic and social. Back in 2018, people were almost exclusively focused on economic issues."

Cost of living different than economy

According to CBC News polling, concerns about the economy and health care traded places in Albertans' minds for the last six years.

Before last year's election — with lingering memories of a global pandemic still weighing on Albertans — health care was top of mind for Albertans, followed by inflation.

Brown stresses the economy and cost of living are different in voters' minds.

In people's minds, the economy is bigger than them. It is macroeconomic concerns such as taxes, investment, and overall job creation.

Albertans, says Brown, are not so much worried these days about whether they have a job — but "whether their job is going to give them enough money to afford their lifestyle."

"When people are talking about cost of living, they're talking about how this is really hitting them in their own pocketbook. Cost of living is a more personal response than I'm concerned about the economy," she added.

Notably, CBC News' poll suggests Albertans don't think the governing UCP is doing enough to contain inflation and housing costs.

UCP gets bad grades on Albertans' top issues

A year into its mandate, the governing UCP appears to have hung onto the support that propelled it to a majority last May.

Despite retaining most of their vote from the 2023 election, a plurality of Albertans disapprove of the governing UCP (52 per cent) compared to 44 per cent who approve.

While Albertans give the Smith's government good marks for being prepared for natural disasters and protecting the environment, the UCP got its worst grades — total disapproval scores above 60 per cent — for handling the three most important issues to Albertans.

Government Handling

More than six in 10 Albertans somewhat or strongly disapprove of the governing party's handling of health care, building affordable housing and dealing with the rising cost of living.

Duane Bratt, who teaches political science at Calgary's Mount Royal University, calls this a potential "big danger" for the government.

"The issues that are most important to Albertans are the ones where the UCP has very poor approval ratings," he said.

Bratt adds that the UCP cannot do much about inflation, as it's mainly driven by global markets and world events.

Despite that, provincial governments can feel the wrath of voters for things beyond their control.

"We reward governments in good times and punish governments in bad times, even though governments can only make changes on the margins," said Bratt.

The UCP's poor report card on inflation, housing and health care presents a potential opening for the opposition New Democrats.

When it comes to inflation, Brown suggests the NDP could score political points by talking more about it.

"I think there's an opportunity for the NDP to show that they're more sympathetic, more understanding, more empathetic of what the average Albertan is going through," said Brown.

Additionally, as the UCP restructures the province's health care system, the NDP — which first introduced universal medical care in the early 1960s in Saskatchewan — has another opportunity to shine.

"Voters have often seen the NDP as the party of social services and the UCP as the party of the economy," said Brown.

"There's definitely a weakness here as the government is on the verge of reworking its health care system. There's definitely an opportunity for the NDP to start talking about that issue."

But as this recent poll suggests, what's top of mind now can change — and the next election remains three years away.

The CBC News random survey of 1,200 Albertans was conducted using a hybrid method between May 1 and May 15 by Edmonton-based Trend Research under the direction of Janet Brown Opinion Research. The sample is representative of regional, age and gender factors. The margin of error is +/- 2.8 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. For subsets, the margin of error is larger.

The survey used a hybrid methodology that involved contacting survey respondents by telephone and giving them the option of completing the survey at that time, at another more convenient time, or receiving an email link and completing the survey online. Trend Research contacted people using a random list of numbers, consisting of 40 per cent landlines and 60 per cent cellphone numbers. Telephone numbers were dialed up to five times at five different times of day before another telephone number was added to the sample. The response rate among valid numbers (i.e. residential and personal) was 11.7 per cent.

Most Albertans now say it's difficult to meet monthly expenses, for first time in years of polling

CBC
Thu, May 23, 2024 

A customer browses a grocery store aisle in this file photo from February. (Cole Burston/The Canadian Press - image credit)


In a recent poll commissioned by CBC News, 54 per cent of Albertans said it's been difficult to meet their monthly household expenses — marking the first time that a majority of people have felt that way over six years of similar polling.

Pollster Janet Brown has been asking Albertans a variety of questions about their personal experiences and political preferences, as part of regular polling commissioned by CBC News since 2018.

"What really struck me about this poll were the economic numbers," she said.


"I know everybody likes to look at the political stuff, but this is a huge change. I don't usually see data change this dramatically year over year. This is not a flash in the pan. There has been a shift — an important shift — in the way people are feeling about the economy."

Albertans' political perspectives, by contrast, have not changed much over that same time.

Brown said the question about monthly expenses stands out against the rest of the poll results and represents a significant change over a relatively short period of time.

In this year's poll, which was conducted over the first two weeks of May, 37 per cent of respondents described it as "somewhat difficult" to pay their bills, and 17 per cent said it's "very difficult."

Previously, the largest rate of "very difficult" responses came in March 2020, when 12 per cent of Albertans felt that way.

"The other thing we do in the polls is we also look at the demographic information quite closely," Brown said.

"So it's not surprising that unemployed people, people with low incomes, are finding it difficult to meet their monthly expenses. But we saw some other interesting differences as well."

Some of the sub-groups of respondents who were most likely to be finding it difficult to meet their monthly expenses included:

Visible minorities (71 per cent).


Those who think the economy is getting worse (69 per cent).


Those who identify as centre or left on the political spectrum (67 per cent).


18- to 24-year-olds (67 per cent).


People living in rural central Alberta (64 per cent).


People with a high school education or less (63 per cent).


Parents with kids at home (63 per cent).


Edmontonians (58 per cent).


Women (57 per cent).

The differences by age are particularly stark, with a majority of those under 45 saying it's difficult to pay their monthly bills and a majority of those aged 45 and over saying it's easy.

Brown believes that's related to the cost of housing, which has been rising rapidly in Alberta amid the recent population boom.

"The older you are, the more likely you are to have your house paid off or just about paid off," she said.

"So age is definitely a predictor of how people feel, because the older you are, the more likely you are to have hard assets and be enjoying high house prices. The younger you are, the harder it is to get into the housing market."

Buying a home 'not really an option'

Wes Kyle counts himself as one of the luckier young people to be living and working in Calgary.

He graduated university with a degree in astrophysics in 2017 and remembers the struggle in trying to get established in a career at that time, when rents were cheaper and inflation was far lower.

"I was kind of sitting there being like, 'What can I do? How do I market myself?' And that was really, really hard and discouraging," he said.

"I can't imagine what it's like for like a 20-year-old trying to get established [today]."

Kyle eventually found his way into a career as a data scientist working in securities regulation. These days, he's among those who find it easy to meet their monthly expenses. But, Kyle said, he's been largely "insulated" from some of the inflationary factors affecting so many other people — most notably, rent.

"I'm in a one-bedroom in Victoria Park and I got it at $1,400 a month, and then it just increased this year to $1,500, which is much lower than the market rates right now," he said.

Even with a good career, Kyle said he's "basically written off" the idea of buying a home in Calgary.

"I've just kind of decided that I'm not going to sweat that," he said.

"It's not really an option for me with house prices."

Housing issues expected to persist

Mark Parsons, chief economist with ATB Financial, said inflation has started to ease across Canada, but Albertans are still being hit by increases in shelter costs due to some unique circumstances in this province.

"Alberta's getting a population driver that other provinces aren't — and that's interprovincial migration. More and more people are coming here to Alberta from other provinces, and that's putting extra pressure on the housing market," he said.

"It's rent and mortgage-interest costs that's really adding to overall inflation right now."

Brown noted there are two sides to the housing situation.

"Some people are really feeling the pinch; other people are quite enjoying the high price of their housing," she said.

"And so the political challenge for government is: How do you solve that problem for people who are finding it difficult to find adequate housing, but without penalizing the seniors who are actually relying on all of the equity they have in their house to fund their retirement?"

Brown also said she's cognizant that "people are struggling" is a common theme in the news but believes the latest polling results show something significant has changed among Albertans.

"Yes, there's always been an undercurrent of people who were having trouble," she said.

"But now, the people having trouble are in the majority. So this is new, because of just how drastically the numbers have changed in just a couple of short years."

"I think that's going to define our our politics going forward," she said.

The CBC News random survey of 1,200 Albertans was conducted using a hybrid method between May 1 and May 15 by Edmonton-based Trend Research under the direction of Janet Brown Opinion Research. The sample is representative of regional, age and gender factors. The margin of error is +/- 2.8 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. For subsets, the margin of error is larger.

The survey used a hybrid methodology that involved contacting survey respondents by telephone and giving them the option of completing the survey at that time, at another more convenient time, or receiving an email link and completing the survey online. Trend Research contacted people using a random list of numbers, consisting of 40 per cent landlines and 60 per cent cellphone numbers. Telephone numbers were dialled up to five times at five different times of day before another telephone number was added to the sample. The response rate among valid numbers (i.e., residential and personal) was 11.7 per cent.


Albertans think Danielle Smith is bad on affordability. Here's why she isn't paying for it

CBC
Sun, May 26, 2024 

Premier Danielle Smith gets poor marks for her handling of key issues like cost of living and affordable housing. But that doesn't appear to be determining how Albertans feel about her government, new polling shows. (Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press - image credit)


EDITOR'S NOTE: CBC News commissioned this public opinion research in April, leading into the first anniversary of the United Conservative Party's general election win last May. The poll offers insight into how Albertans feel about Danielle Smith's UCP government and the Opposition NDP.

As with all polls, this one provides a snapshot in time. This analysis is one in a series of articles from this research.

The three most important issues to Albertans are health care, the cost of living and housing affordability — and fewer than one-third of Albertans think the provincial government is handling any of those files well, according to the latest batch of Janet Brown's polling for CBC News.

You might think these findings of public opinion ought to set off multiple fits of panic in Premier Danielle Smith's office. The big three issues, and they're all stinkers for the United Conservative government?

But Brown, arguably the most respected pollster in Alberta, has been doing this long enough to know how to dig into her own data to reach a less simplistic conclusion. She sees reasons why Team Smith probably won't be sweating the low scores on affordability or housing — yet — and flags other issues that could spell trouble for the premier against the Alberta NDP.

That deeper dive involves correlation analysis. (Please, don't throw your screen across the room or switch away to your word-puzzle app! I'll try my best to make sense of this! I'll even throw in a fast-food soda analogy!)

To really dig into which strengths and weaknesses the UCP (and its opposition) should sweat, Brown compared the government's approval rating on various issues to its overall approval rating. Does an Albertan's like or dislike of the UCP's handling of, say, the gender file drive its total impression of this government, or are people more likely to feel good or bad about the provincial handling of education regardless of how they feel about the UCP?

Then, Brown's team produces this chart:


Mobile users: tap chart to zoom in (Janet Brown Opinion Research)

Clear yet? No? Fine.

Let me try a comparison that should be quicker than an early Sunday trip for drive-thru coffee.

In a past job, Brown did opinion research for a large fast-food chain. She produced a similar piece of analysis and chart for her corporate client.

For that restaurant, the issue that everybody seemed to support but it didn't drive people's overall impression (the top left corner of this chart) was its charitable donations — whoop-dee-doo, burger joint. Many disapproved of dirty bathrooms, but it wasn't a love-or-hate motivator for people (bottom left). This meant patrons expect untidy bathrooms, so at least they will keep eating there despite the ickiness.

The strong-suit issue that correlated with customer's support (top right) was hot and crispy fries — keep serving up those, and people would come back. What people disapproved of, and found to be a turn-off (bottom right), was how fizzy the soft drinks were. Based on this data, Brown recalls, the chain invested millions in better soda fountains to keep customers satisfied and their thirst quenched.

Red meat

Back to provincial politics.

This government's core strengths, its hot and crispy fries, would be its stewardship of the economy and finances, its climate and environment policies (or perhaps lack thereof) and especially its approach to the federal government. The public believes Smith is doing well in those areas, and they're getting noticed for it, and probably want to keep doing it to stay in Albertans' good books, Brown said.

The equivalent to the fast-food chain's charity works is the Alberta government's management of wildfires, floods and other natural disasters. The big meh.

Albertans are broadly satisfied, regardless of how they feel about the government — the UCP won't get much credit for doing a fine job, just like nobody really flocked to support the Rachel Notley NDP because of how well its administration responded to the Fort McMurray wildfire in 2016.

The Summerhill Market in Toronto on Wednesday February 2, 2022. The affordability argument against carbon pricing ignores some inconvenient facts.

For the first time in years, most Albertans say they're having trouble meeting their monthly expenses. And they don't believe the provincial government is really helping ease the cost of living. (Frank Gunn/The Canadian Press)

It's going to sound awkward comparing affordable housing to dirty fast-food bathrooms, but stay with me on this.

The issues in the bottom-left corner of Brown's chart, housing and cost of living, are not proving to be make-or-break issues for the Smith government, according to the pollster. They're areas of dissatisfaction, but they're not driving overall dissatisfaction with the UCP.

"It's not like the public is holding them to account on those," Brown said.

The traditional political observation has been that there's little a government can do to ease inflation or shift the real-estate market, and that voters often realize that.

Things appear different in 2024. Federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has consistently hammered Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on living costs and housing affordability — and it might have not only battered the federal Liberals' standing in polls, but it could have also meant Albertans are far less likely to blame these cost pressures on their provincial government.

While the last affordability cheques went out a year ago, and provincial fuel taxes have gone up from where they were a year ago, Smith doesn't appear to be ignoring the affordability files. The party continues to look at auto insurance reform, along with an overhaul of the electricity market.

Bad taste in their mouths

The issues in the last box are the ones that bode ill for the UCP, in the same way that burger chain had to get its fizzy-drink house in order to prevent losing customers. "If it's in the bottom right-hand box, these are things that matter to people, but they're not happy with the way governments manage them," Brown said.

While it's only really the naysayers that don't believe Smith's crew is providing honest government, ask former premiers Jason Kenney, Alison Redford or Jim Prentice how quickly the bottom can fall out on that measure.

Then there's how they deal with governments even closer to home. "It seems like the way they deal with the federal government, that's something they should continue because that's a strength for them," Brown said. "But the way they're dealing with the municipal governments — that matters to people, but people aren't nearly as happy with what they're doing in that area."

To ease tensions with mayors in big- and small-town Alberta, the Smith government has diluted the powers it sought to wield over municipalities. It appears it's not helping. So watch that space — a two-front provincial war with the feds and municipal councils may prove too much for voters to bear.


Health Minister Adriana LaGrange introduced Bill 22 in the legislature on Tuesday. The bill would break Alberta Health Services into four different organizations.

Premier Danielle Smith and Health Minister Adriana LaGrange have made breaking up Alberta Health Services into four agencies their key health-care reform measure. (Nathan Gross/CBC )

Then there's health care, which always has the potential to be an albatross around a premier's neck. Albertans think the government is mismanaging this crucial file, and it appears to be driving down the UCP's overall approval rating, according to Brown's polling.

Smith's dismantling of Alberta Health Services into four pieces appears to be her big idea for solving the system's various crunches and crises. Taxpayer-funded provincial TV ads now suggest the reorganization will somehow mean fewer patients in emergency-room waiting areas.

That whole move is a high-stakes gamble, designed to ease the public's drive to blame the UCP for what's ailing the health system. Smith will want to prevent it from falling as flat as non-fizzy cola.

The CBC News random survey of 1,200 Albertans was conducted using a hybrid method between May 1 and May 15 by Edmonton-based Trend Research under the direction of Janet Brown Opinion Research. The sample is representative of regional, age and gender factors. The margin of error is +/- 2.8 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. For subsets, the margin of error is larger.

The survey used a hybrid methodology that involved contacting survey respondents by telephone and giving them the option of completing the survey at that time, at another more convenient time, or receiving an email link and completing the survey online. Trend Research contacted people using a random list of numbers, consisting of 40 per cent landlines and 60 per cent cellphone numbers. Telephone numbers were dialed up to five times at five different times of day before another telephone number was added to the sample. The response rate among valid numbers (i.e. residential and personal) was 11.7 per cent.
Alberta Aviation Museum lobbies to take over historic Hangar 14 at Blatchford
CBC
Thu, May 23, 2024 

Hangar 14 and the surrounding 5.89 acres of property in Edmonton were up for sale for four months. (Alberta Aviation Museum - image credit)

UPDATEThe City of Edmonton is now in negotiations with the Alberta Aviation Museum for the museum to take over ownership of Hangar 14, the historic building it occupies.

City council's executive committee made the decision Thursday. At the meeting, museum board members argued against the sale of the property to a third party, as was originally recommended in a report presented to councillors. 

"This decision marks a crucial step in the museum's future, as we now have a clear path forward, without the uncertainty a third-party owner might bring," Ryan Lee, curator of the museum said in a news release Friday.

The Alberta Aviation Museum Association is fighting to stay in its home in Hangar 14 on Edmonton's former City Centre Airport and will ask the city to transfer ownership of the 82-year-old building to the non-profit.

The city put the Second World War-era building up for sale last October after council decided it shouldn't spend an estimated $42 million to rehabilitate the building.

At the end of February, after four months on the market, the city received a "small sample of proposals," a new city report says. Council's executive committee is scheduled to review the proposals, which remain in private, on Thursday.

Jean Lauzon, the museum's executive director, hopes to persuade the committee that the museum should take over the hangar and the property — with some help.

"We would not be asking for the moon but there needs to be some kind of financial input into the rehabilitative work that has to go into that hangar," Lauzon said in an interview Monday. The non-profit has already contacted other levels of government about prospective support, she added.

Anne Stevenson, the councillor for Ward O-day'min, said she's open to hearing options but noted it would be a trade-off with other capital funding priorities.

"Preserving our heritage is a very important part of the city plan," Stevenson said in an interview Wednesday. "I hope to advocate to have some measure of city support to help this be a viable project, but I want to be realistic in terms of the other financial pressures that we're facing."

The sale listing didn't include an asking price but said it was "open to offers." It required bidders to describe how they would keep the museum on-site and continue to invest in the facility.

It will be up to council whether the city negotiates a deal with one of the bidders.

If council doesn't specify the next move, administration will list the building again but without the caveat for retaining the museum.

The museum association is trying to garner support and is encouraging people to speak to city councillors.

"Failure to approve this proposal would mark a significant setback for the museum, potentially spelling the end of its operations as they have stood for the past three decades," the museum said Wednesday in a news release.

Historic designation 

The hangar, at Kingsway and 114th Street on the Blatchford development property, was built in 1942 and is designated a provincial and municipal historic resource. Hangar 14 is the only remaining double-wide, double-long hangar in Canada.

It's legally protected from demolition or inappropriate alteration, which limits what a future owner could do with it.

"It's not like you can tear down lots of big walls and put in big atriums and change the look of the building," Lauzon said.

The structure symbolizes Canada's wartime aviation experiences and played an important role in the British Commonwealth Air Training Plan (BCATP) during the Second World War.

The museum has leased the hangar since 1992, featuring a large area with aircraft exhibits, educational programming, a gift shop and a parade square.

Hangar 11 fire

Last month, Hangar 11 was destroyed in a massive fire. That bolsters the need to preserving Hangar 14, Lauzon said.

"It's vastly important. We are one of three pieces left on Blatchford lands that have any heritage significance," she said.

The old terminal building and air traffic control tower are the two other historic structures, she said.

"Unfortunately, you can't just rebuild pieces of history and have that same historic effect," she said. "Once it's gone, it's gone."

Mercury poisoning near Grassy Narrows First Nation worsened by ongoing industrial pollution, study suggests

CBC
Thu, May 23, 2024

People are seen collecting samples from the English-Wabigoon River in northwestern Ontario as part of an experiment looking at levels of methylmercury in the water. The study found that large amounts of sulfate and organic matter in the industrial wastewater pouring into the river has fed the amount of methylmercury in the system. (Submitted by Brian Branfireun - image credit)More

A new study from the University of Western Ontario suggests mercury contamination in northwestern Ontario's English-Wabigoon River has been made worse by ongoing industrial pollution.

Contamination of the river system dates back to the 1960s and 70s, when the pulp and paper mill dumped an estimated nine tonnes of mercury into the water.

The mercury has impacted generations of people living in Grassy Narrows First Nation, also known as Asubpeeschoseewagong Netum Anishinabek, a community about 150 kilometres from Dryden near the Ontario-Manitoba border, and Wabaseemoong Independent Nation.

However, the new study, published Thursday, has found that discharge of wastewater from the Dryden Paper Mill, combined with existing mercury, has created high levels of methylmercury – an even more toxic compound.

"Other forms of mercury don't accumulate as strongly as methylmercury, but because it accumulates, it builds up to high levels in organisms, presenting that greater risk," said Brian Branfireun, a biology professor at the University of Western Ontario. "It's actually more serious than I even imagined."

Evan Mitsui/CBC

The experiment was conducted by masters student Eric Grimm under Branfireun's supervision.

Dianne Loewen, communications and engagement co-ordinator for Dryden Fibre Canada, the owner of the Dryden Paper Mill, said in an email to CBC News on Wednesday that she could not comment on the study.

"Dryden Fibre Canada only recently acquired the mill from Domtar. We are not in a position to comment as we have not seen, nor have we been briefed on, Dr. Branfireun's report."

Dryden Fibre Canada took over the mill from Domtar in August 2023.

Poison through the food chain

While the wastewater coming from the mill today does not contain mercury, it does contain high levels of sulfate and organic matter, which "feed the bacteria that produce methylmercury from inorganic mercury in the environment," the study says.

These toxins build up in the river's fish, which are then passed on to the people that consume them.

"The accumulation of methylmercury in the human body causes neuromuscular problems and can also lead to death," Branfireun said.

WATCH | Chief says research confirms community's fears:



Just under 1,000 people live in Grassy Narrows First Nation, and fish are a staple part of the community's diet.

"Most of the families continue to fish, they continue to eat the fish. It's something they've done for hundreds of years – you can't really stop them," said Grassy Narrows Chief Rudy Turtle in an interview with CBC News.

It is estimated that 90 per cent of Grassy Narrows' population has symptoms of mercury poisoning, which causes problems including tremors, insomnia, memory loss, neuromuscular effects, headaches and cognitive and motor dysfunction.

For years, Turtle has called for the paper mill to be closed and for the river to be cleaned up. The community has also been anxiously awaiting the construction of a Mercury Care Home, for which the federal government signed a funding agreement in 2020.

"We continue to be poisoned," said Turtle, who himself has shared his experiences with mercury poisoning.

Mercury Care Home construction slated for summer

Anispiragas Piragasanathar, a spokesperson for Indigenous Services Canada (ISC), provided CBC News an emailed statement about the Mercury Care Home.

Piragasanathar said the federal government has committed:

$77M to build the Mercury Care Home.

$68.9M for operations, maintenance and specialized service delivery.

"ISC continues to support Grassy Narrows leadership as they take steps toward realizing their vision for health-care delivery in their community through the Mercury Care Home," Piragasanathar said.

"Together, we have developed key construction milestones to ensure that the Mercury Care Home is built in a timely manner."

Construction is planned to begin by July 1 and take about two to three years to complete.

Turtle said he is pleased with the additional funds the government has committed to the project this year, and that a ceremony will be held in the community once the shovels hit the ground.

No simple solutions


It is possible to remove the methylmercury from the water – but it won't be easy, Branfireun said.

"We are talking about potentially hundreds of kilometres of rivers and lakes and wetlands in a very complicated landscape that is not developed," he said.

While cleaning up the river will take substantial time and resources, removing the sulfate and organic matter is a more manageable solution for the short-term, Branfireun said.

Jody Porter/CBC

"It wouldn't completely solve the mercury problem in fish in this river, but it would dramatically improve it while these other remediation strategies are being implemented over the next few decades."

Michael Rennie is an associate professor at Lakehead University's biology department, as well as a research fellow at the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Experimental Lakes Area.

While he was not involved in the methylmercury study, he said he is not surprised by the results

We are talking about potentially hundreds of kilometres of rivers and lakes and wetlands in a very complicated landscape that is not developed. - Brian Branfireun, University of Western Ontario

"It shows a pretty clear role for the impact that the mill has on the system now just from the effluent that's going into it from the current operations," Rennie said in an interview with CBC News.

There are ways to reduce the impact of mill operations on the river, Rennie said, such as settling ponds or new environmental policies, but the level of contamination throughout the system means there are no simple solutions.

"I don't think this is saying, 'Oh my God, we have to close the mill.'

"What I think it's saying is there are likely industrial processes that can be put in to help reduce sulfate concentrations that are coming out of that effluent to help reduce organic matter, that will at least not make the problem continue to be worse," he said.

Branfireun is expected to share the study's findings on Thursday morning at the Earth Sciences Centre in Toronto.

WATCH | Mercury contamination in river made worse by ongoing industrial pollution:




Study points to Dryden mill's pollution

Local Journalism Initiative
Fri, May 24, 2024


GRASSY NARROWS – New research suggests there’s no end in sight to his First Nation’s mercury-poisoning woes, and that comes as no surprise to Chief Rudy Turtle.

“We’ve always had some suspicion that there was still something being dumped into the Wabigoon River that’s causing problems, because our band members would drive by the river and see these suds and the discoloration of the river,” the Grassy Narrows chief said in an interview Friday.

“There’s always been suspicion that something else was going on,” he continued. “So we’re not surprised, but at the same time we’re very disappointed.”

A team led by Western University biologist Brian Branfireun looked into whether effluent from Dryden's pulp and paper mill is elevating mercury levels in the Wabigoon River. They concluded it definitely is.

“The chemistry of water that’s being discharged from the mill in Dryden today is amplifying the mercury problem above what we would expect it to be if that discharge were not occurring,” Branfireun said Thursday in an interview with Dougall Media.

The mill’s emissions include sulphate and organic matter in concentrations that are much higher than what is found naturally, according to the study.

Those contaminants stimulate the formation of methylmercury, the most toxic form of mercury.

“We can connect the dots” and conclude that there is a connection between the mill’s discharges today and mercury levels in fish downstream, Branfireun said.

The mill effluents are slowing recovery from the mercury contamination that hit Grassy Narrows First Nation hard in the 1960s and ’70s, he said.

A spokesperson for Dryden Fibre Canada, the mill’s owner, said in an email to Newswatch that they “care deeply about these matters” but “we only received a copy of these observations (Thursday) afternoon and we will review them carefully before commenting further.”

The email also noted that the company has owned the mill for less than a year.



The Dryden mill was purchased last year by a U.S. corporation called First Quality, which operates Dryden Fibre as a standalone company.


A previous owner released an estimated nine tonnes of mercury from the mill into the river in the 1960s, and the mercury contaminated fish downstream.


A public health catastrophe followed as Grassy Narrows First Nation members ate contaminated fish and suffered serious effects from it.

Many were diagnosed with Minamata disease, a neurological disorder with symptoms including numbness in hands and feet, muscle weakness, damage to hearing and sight, and problems in muscle control and reflexes.

A study published in the journal Environmental Health found mercury poisoning continues to have a profound impact on the physical and mental health of people in Grassy Narrows.

Turtle said Friday he hopes Branfireun’s work sparks change so that the Wabigoon River can eventually be restored to good health.

As well, he said, people in the governments of Canada and Ontario “should be held accountable” for their regulatory failures.

Mike Stimpson, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Thunder Bay Source

RCMP officer's social media posts prompt calls for suspension from First Nation chief

The Canadian Press
Fri, May 24, 2024 



BELLA BELLA, B.C. — A British Columbia First Nation is calling for the suspension and removal of an RCMP officer from Bella Bella over social media posts he made before joining the Mounties.

Heiltsuk Tribal Council Chief Marilyn Slett says in a letter to the Bella Bella detachment of the RCMP that the officer posted "racist text and images."

Chief Supt. Brian Edmonds, who oversees the North District RCMP, says in a statement the force is aware of the concerns and a "non-conduct-related administrative process" involving the officer is underway.

Slett's letter includes images of social media posts showing a white man wearing an Afro-style wig with a caption saying "BLACK AND PROUD."

Another social media post shows a man dressed in a colonial-style uniform in front of a Union Jack, with a comment: "Now, what's to be done about these pesky natives stirring up trouble in the colonies."

Slett says Heiltsuk leaders met with RCMP officials earlier this week, but the officer remains on duty in Bella Bella.

She said RCMP officials told them a transfer process was underway for the officer but it could take 45 to 90 days to complete.

"It is unacceptable for police officers serving in Indigenous communities to have these kinds of attitudes," said Slett's letter to the detachment. "This is an urgent community safety issue. Our nation has zero tolerance towards racism in our community."

Edmonds said in his statement on Friday that the RCMP was "committed to finding the right balance between addressing the concerns through a fair process and the importance of individuals (and) community having trust and confidence in their police officers and the RCMP."

Edmonds said the social media posts were made "approximately nine to 17 years" before the officer joined the RCMP.

There have been recent tensions between the Heiltsuk and police.

Heiltsuk Nation member Maxwell Johnson was wrongly arrested and handcuffed in 2019 with his then-12-year-old granddaughter outside a Vancouver bank, triggering a human rights complaint against the Vancouver Police Board.

A trauma-healing ceremony was conducted in the community in 2022 after a settlement was reached.

But the two officers who arrested Johnson and his granddaughter did not attend, prompting a Heiltsuk chief to return a gift he received from Vancouver police Chief Adam Palmer at the ceremony.

— By Dirk Meissner in Victoria

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 24, 2024.

The Canadian Press

2 Yale researchers are pulling back the curtain on Russia's sanctions-stricken economy — and it's landed them on a list of Putin's enemies

Jennifer Sor
Sat, May 25, 2024 

Jeffrey Sonnenfeld and Steven Tian, two Yale researchers, have issued dire predictions for Russia's economy.

Their work has landed them on a list of sanctioned individuals in Russia.

In their view, the country's economy is in shambles, and Putin could end up losing support of the people.


Jeffrey Sonnenfeld and Steven Tian, two researchers at the Yale School of Management, have been targeted for their views on Russia's economy since the war in Ukraine began.

Over the last few years, they've found themselves on Vladimir Putin's watch list for stating what they see as a simple truth: the Russian economy is in trouble, and there's only so much cherry-picking of the data that can obscure that fact.

Moscow has fiercely defended its vision of a prospering economy, but the evidence speaks for itself, Sonnenfeld and Tian say. Soaring prices and ailing consumer sentiment have hit key sectors in Russia's economy, and Moscow is paying a huge cost to keep its war machine running.

The nation is in such dire straits that citizens could even start turning on Putin later this year, they predicted, assuming the West continues to supply military and financial aid to Ukraine.

"We can list for you what Putin has concealed – suddenly – the past three years. If his economy was performing at the level he claims, he'd provide the data ad not hide those facts," Sonnenfeld told Business Insider in an interview. "Putin survives only by cannibalizing Russian businesses – throwing the living room furniture into the furnace to keep the fire burning."


Jeffrey SonnenfeldCourtesy of Jeffrey Sonnenfeld

The researchers, who met as a professor-student pair at Yale, have received a lot of criticism for their work on Russia, much of it in the form of hate mail and threatening phone calls.

"I've had a lot of threats on the phone, and my home has been vandalized," Sonnenfeld told BI last summer. "Now we have so many security cameras I can't even have my shirt tails untucked, let alone walk around in my shorts at home."

Both are barred from entering Russia and were put on the nation's sanctioned US citizens list in 2022.

Still, neither of them regrets their work.

"We're pretty excited about it," they said of their research. "Any of the threats only motivate us to work down much harder."
Putin's top critics

Sonnenfeld, 70, and Tian, 25, didn't plan on getting their names added to a list of Putin's critics.

Neither are technically economists, but they began researching Russia's economy while compiling a list of companies that exited or scaled back their operations in Russia in the wake of the invasion of Ukraine.

That list went viral online, and was instrumental in getting more than 1,000 companies to scale back their business in the country, the Yale School of Management says on its website.

Steven Tian headshot

Steven TianCourtesy of Steven Tian



At that time, Tian and Sonnenfeld began noticing cracks forming in Russia's economy. Putin has claimed Russia is becoming the new "growth hub" of the world, and the IMF says Russia's economy is on track to grow over 3% this year, more than any other OECD economy, including the US. But that doesn't square with data Sonnenfeld and Tian are seeing, with some pockets of the country's economy in dire shape.

Activity in Russia's car sector is down around 95%-99%, Sonnenfeld and Tian estimate, and activity in most industries is down at least 60%, they said, despite Putin frequently brushing off the impact of sanctions.

The nation, meanwhile, is still suffering from huge capital losses from when it first invaded Ukraine. Russia lost 1 million citizens, 15% of its millionaires, as well as $19 billion in foreign direct investment in 2022 alone, making its future growth prospects dismal, the researchers say.

Among their biggest predictions is that the situation in Russia is so bad that the country could eventually turn on Putin, with a shift in the domestic temperament coming as soon as the November US presidential election this year.

That's because if Biden is re-elected, the US will likely continue supplying aid to Ukraine, forcing Russia to continue spending money and lives to keep waging war on Ukraine.

"Putin has no grand strategy other than to hope Trump wins and cuts a favorable deal with Russia," Tian said. "Russia is in for a world of economic pain for a long time to come."

Positive forecasts on Russia's economy are based on a lack of visibility, Sonnenfeld and Tian say.

The pair began working together when Tian was an undergraduate at Yale, chasing Sonnenfeld around lecture halls. Eventually, Sonnenfeld became Tian's advisor and has mentored Tian for over eight years.

The two researchers are still working on ways to urge the West to tighten and enforce sanctions on Russia. They also continue to update their list of companies that have exited the country in the hope that it will encourage more firms to do the same.

Colleagues describe Sonnenfeld as opinionated but generous and charismatic. Tian, meanwhile, has a near-photographic memory and is a highly analytical thinker, colleagues mentioned.

"Steven does a lot of the analytic heavy lifting, and I do the flamboyant color," Sonnenfeld said of their work together.

People who have worked with them also say the pair is extremely passionate about their work, and both are often known to answer emails at all hours of the night and early morning.

"We don't believe in regular sleep patterns," Sonnenfeld added. "Actually, we know it's very important, but sometimes when there's a sense of urgency, we do seriously dive into the crisis du jour. We just don't like bullies, whether or not it's Putin or some other bravado."

Business Insider
From wedding photographer to water queue: Gaza mother mourns lost dream life

Mohammad Salem
Updated Thu, May 23, 2024 

FILE PHOTO: Palestinians queue as they wait to collect drinking water, amid shortages of drinking water, as the conflict between Israel and Hamas continues, in Rafah


By Mohammad Salem

KHAN YOUNIS, Gaza Strip (Reuters) -Falasteen Abdulati mourns her vanished good life as a wedding photographer as she wearily queues day after day for scarce drinking water in a rubble-strewn street in south Gaza, fearing for the future of her children.

The mother of seven is one of over two million Gazans who struggle to survive in the eighth month of an Israeli siege and invasion triggered by a cross-border Hamas attack, with food, drinking water, medical care and safe shelter hard to find.


"I'm a wedding photographer. Someone like me should be going out and living well and spending money on their children," Abdulati, 35, said, laboriously filling a few buckets with water from a battered barrel in the city of Khan Younis.

"Our life has (been reduced) to the simplest needs. It is work and exhaustion. Nothing else. The dream that I had as a wedding photographer to open a studio and to get cameras and to make people happy, is lost. My dream is lost."

She continued: "Every morning we wake up at 7 o’clock and of course the first thing we think about is water," she said. "We come here and wait in the long queue, just to fill up four buckets with water. Other than that, our shoulders hurt. There are no men to carry it for us. There is no one but us. Women are the ones working these days."

Israel's assault on the tiny, heavily urbanised coastal enclave has displaced over three-quarters of the 2.3 million Palestinian population and demolished its infrastructure.

"The future of my children that I worked tirelessly for is lost. There are no schools (functioning), no education. There is no more comfort in life," said Abdulati.

"No safety," she added, referring to the threat of shelling or raids that Israel says target Hamas militants holed up in densely-packed residential neighbourhoods.

Abdulati, dressed in a body-length robe and head-covering, said the upheaval of war had turned the lives of Gaza women upside down. "Women are now like men. They work hard just like men. They're no longer comfortable at home."

Her husband is hospitalised with war injuries.

Breathing heavily, she lugged her buckets along a shattered, sand-covered street and up a dingy flight of cement stairs into the family flat. There she heated up the fresh water over a makeshift fire stove in a cluttered, cramped room dark for lack of electricity, watched intently by her young children.

"We are suffering due to a lack of gas because the border crossings are shut," she said, referring to Israel's siege that has severely restricted humanitarian aid shipments into Gaza.

"The water that I filled up must be rationed. I heat it up so I can wash the children, in addition to doing the dishes and washing clothes. The four buckets I can get per day are just not enough. I have to go back again and again."

(Writing by Mark Heinrich; Editing by William Maclean)
YESAB recommends against proposed placer mine on creek many Yukoners use for drinking water

CBC
Thu, May 23, 2024 

Stony Creek, west of Whitehorse. The Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board has recommended a proposed placer mine not move ahead because impacts to water can't be mitigated. (Julien Gignac/CBC - image credit)


A creek west of Whitehorse many use for their drinking water could be spared from a proposed placer mine now that the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board (YESAB) has recommended against the project.

"The project as proposed will have significant adverse effects to water quality and quantity for fish, fish habitat, human consumption and cultural water uses that cannot be mitigated," states an evaluation report posted on the board's website.

Hundreds of people rely on Stony Creek, a tributary of the Takhini River and near Mendenhall Landing, for their drinking water, according to YESAB. Some say they use the water because local wells are contaminated with uranium.


Shortly after the project was proposed, some began fighting against it, fearing irreparable impacts to water that is considered clean enough to drink straight from the creek.

An Alberta-based miner, Willy Driedger, wants to build a class four placer mine on 11 claims, each of which spans the creek. The proposal includes building several fords across the creek and a camp big enough for a crew of 12. It would also divert part of the creek.

The proposed mine would use up to 4,001 cubic metres of water per day, roughly equivalent to two Olympic-sized swimming pools.

Sean Smith, chief of the Kwanlin Dün First Nation, said the scale of the operation is enough to permanently impact the water, land, wildlife and people who have strong bonds to the place.

"Any clean water, either creek or spring, in my eyes should be protected to the utmost degree," he said. "The value of water and clean water that you can pretty much drink right out of the running creek, that's an amazing spot."

The territorial and federal governments, which will ultimately make the decision on whether the mine goes ahead, have yet to have their say. That happens next.

"We appreciate the importance of Stony Creek as a source of clean drinking water to nearby residents," said a spokesperson with the Yukon Department of Energy, Mines and Resources in an email. "We also recognize other concerns have been raised, such as the broader environmental impacts of the project and noise disturbances to nearby residents and trail users.

"The branch will be taking these concerns into account before making a decision."

Why did YESAB recommend what it did?

In large part, impacts to the water would be just too great and, according to YESAB, would likely continue for as long as there's mining in the area.

Many people could be affected, too, the report states, "across multiple generations."

"This is likely to result in a compromised ability for youth and future generations to pursue their cultural and contemporary activities," the report states.

"These effects cannot be mitigated."

YESAB also says the watershed has never seen a mining project of this magnitude before. There is a placer mine up on a bench overlooking the creek, but the board says the hand-operated mine is the only one that's active, and, as proposed and accepted by decision makers in 2015, no water would be withdrawn from the creek, nor would there be work in or near the watercourse.

Chinook salmon could also be greatly affected by the mine, YESAB states. It says for decades, juvenile salmon have been observed in the creek by First Nations citizens or researchers.

The creek appears to offer the type of habitat needed for the fish to grow — nurseries, of sorts, protected from predators like pike, raptors and other perils.

The population of Yukon River-bound chinook has been decimated, a fact that's prompted a concerted effort to help the species rebound by, among other things, implementing a fishing moratorium and work to restore spawning grounds.

Troy Friday, a Kwanlin Dün citizen and a Mendenhall resident, said if the territorial and federal governments were to accept the placer mine proposed at Stony Creek, that would contradict work to save the salmon.

Troy Friday, a citizen of the Kwanlin Dun First Nation 
He says the Stony Creek watershed should be off limits to major development.

Troy Friday, a citizen of the Kwanlin Dün First Nation. He says the Stony Creek watershed should be off-limits to major development. (Julien Gignac/CBC)

Friday has made trips to the creek his whole life. Often, he brings his family down to pick raspberries and black currants and to appreciate the land.

Friday said a mine of the scale that's proposed has no place in the area.

"I don't think it should be considered in small little watersheds such as the Stony Creek watershed. There's salmon fry here. Our salmon are very challenged right now, and we need to give them the best chance possible for any hope of return. For any hope of my grandkids seeing salmon in this creek," he said.

"I'm still very cautious of this project, and until the final word is out, I'll still be advocating for salmon in our little creek here."

Placer mining

Placer mining is the mining of stream bed (alluvial) deposits for minerals. This may be done by open-pit or by various surface excavating equipment or tunneling equipment.Wikipedia