Thursday, June 06, 2024

UPDATED 

ANOTHER DAY,ANOTHER ZIONIST WAR CRIME

US weapons parts used in Israeli attack on Gaza school: Al Jazeera analysis

Parts recovered from an Israeli attack on Thursday, which killed 40 Palestinians, made by US manufacturer.



By Al Jazeera Staff
Published On 6 Jun 2024

Among the rubble of the United Nations-run al-Sardi school in central Gaza’s Nuseirat refugee camp were the remnants of the weapons that killed at least 40 Palestinians.

The Israeli attack in the early hours of Thursday gave the displaced people sheltering in the school no prior warning. Fourteen children were killed, as well as nine women and at least 74 other people were wounded. The weapons used to carry out the attack – according to an Al Jazeera analysis of the fragments left behind – were US-made.

KEEP READINGlist of 3 itemslist 1 of 3
‘Standing Together’ against far-right Israeli hate in Jerusalemlist 2 of 3
‘Historic’: NAACP urges Biden to end arms transfers to Israel amid Gaza warlist 3 of 3
Houthis say they launched two attacks against ships at Haifa portend of list

An inertial measurement unit from the missile, used to aid with precision targeting, was manufactured by Honeywell, an American conglomerate that specialises in the design and delivery of sensors and guidance devices that are used in a variety of military weapons.

Al Jazeera’s Sanad verification unit discovered that one of the fragments found in Nuseirat bore the manufacturer and category number HG1930BA06, tracing it back to Honeywell. HG1930 refers to the specific sensor manufactured by the company.
The missile fragment found at the site of an Israeli attack on a United Nations-run school in Nuseirat on June 6. The manufacturer and category numbers on the fragment trace it back to the US manufacturer Honeywell [Sanad/Al Jazeera]

The same part was found after the Israeli bombing of a Palestinian home in Shujayea, Gaza in 2014. The two pieces, in the most recent and the 2014 bombing, have the same manufacturer part number inscribed on them.

“We see also other numbers like the MFR, HG 1930 and then BA 06. This is the manufacturer part number that provides more specific details about the component of the missiles,” Elijah Magnier, an independent military and political analyst, told Al Jazeera. “Now, if you look at the manufacturer identification … it is a format used by the aerospace and defence sector in the United States connected to Honeywell.”

“Honeywell is known for the supply of IMU in the various military applications, and particularly the guided missiles that it has been providing to the Israeli Air Force since the year 2000.”

Al Jazeera has reached out to Honeywell for comment, but has yet to receive a response.

Israeli attacks on UN spaces have become commonplace during Israel’s war on Gaza, which has now killed more than 36,000 Palestinians.

The United States has been criticised for its role in supporting Israel, and particularly its continued supply of weapons.

Major rights groups have repeatedly accused Israel of violating international law, and Israel is currently facing a genocide case at the International Court of Justice. The International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor has also sought arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for their actions in Gaza.

In May, a US government report found possible Israeli violations of international law in Gaza, but stopped short of identifying the violations that would end its continuing military aid. US President Joe Biden has threatened to stop the supply of some offensive weapons to Israel if it continues its Rafah operation, but has not carried out the threat, despite Israel pressing on in the area, which lies in southern Gaza

.
At least 40 Palestinians were killed in the June 6 attack on al-Sardi school in Nuseirat [Sanad/Al Jazeera]


Central Gaza under attack

Central Gaza has most recently come under severe Israeli bombardment, which Palestinians have described as similar to the early days of the war.

The attack on al-Sardi school in Nuseirat is part of that assault.

“The bombardment came from here,” said Naim al-Dadah, a survivor of the attack.

“We were sleeping. The flying metal reached the roof on the other side and all these nets landed over there, on the other side. What happened to us is beyond anyone’s imagination.”

Other witnesses say the attack tore people to pieces. Survivors collected body parts, including those of many children, until the early hours of the morning. Weapon debris was scattered throughout shattered rooms and the blood-stained mattresses. Multiple rooms were targeted, though the building’s structure remained intact.

Israel’s Arabic language spokesperson Avichay Adraee, claimed the UN school was targeted because it housed a Hamas command post and fighters involved in the Palestinian group’s October 7 attack on Israel, which killed 1,139 people. He also claimed Israel took several steps to minimise the possibility of civilian casualties. The director of Hamas’s government media office, Ismail al-Thawabta, rejected Israel’s claims.

In April, the media outlet +972 Magazine reported that Israel uses an artificial intelligence-targeting system called Lavender in its Gaza-bombing campaign. The report quoted Israeli military officials who said that the system generates targets to kill. For low-level Hamas targets, the report said, the army was permitted to kill 15 to 20 civilians. An attack on a more senior Hamas official with the rank of battalion or brigade commander was used to justify the killing of more than 100 civilians.

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA


Israel attacks UN-run school in central Gaza, killing at least 40

Al Jazeera English
Al Jazeera is funded in whole or in part by the Qatari government.
Wikipedia

Jun 6, 2024 #Palestine #Gaza #GazaUnderAttack

 • Jun 6, 2024 • #Palestine #Gaza #GazaUnderAttackIsraeli forces have bombed a residential building and a UN school that was sheltering forcibly displaced Palestinians in the Nuseirat Refugee Camp in central Gaza. At least 40 people have been killed. Al Jazeera’s Tarek Abu Azzoum reports and Hind al-Khoudary went to the UNRWA school which was bombed in Nuseirat Refugee camp.


Dozens Feared Dead In Israeli Airstrike On UNRWA School In Gaza

By 

Amid early reports that an Israeli strike on a UN-run school in Gaza overnight into Thursday left dozens dead, humanitarians warned that cholera and other potentially deadly diseases stalk people uprooted by the war, forced to live among “mountains of trash”.


“UNRWA can confirm that one of our schools in the Nuseirat area (Middle Areas) was hit overnight / early morning by Israeli Forces. ⁠The school was possibly hit several times,” the UN agency for Palestinian refugees told UN News. “The number of those reported killed is between 35 and 45. Scores others are injured. We are not able to confirm the above figure at this stage.”

Children caught up in war

Local officials in Gaza reported that 37 people were killed in the school building attack in Nuseirat refugee camp near Deir Al Balah in central Gaza. The toll included 14 children, it was also reported.

Media cited the Israeli military that the strike’s objective was to eliminate Hamas operatives and that it was only given the go-ahead after aerial surveillance, with additional measures taken to reduce the risk to civilians.

In an early response condemning the school attack, UNRWA said that 6,000 people had been sheltering on the premises. Since the war began, more than 180 buildings belonging to the UN agency have been hit, killing more than 450 displaced people in those facilities.

“The vast majority” were schools-turned-shelters, UNRWA said, as it issued a reminder “to all parties to the conflict that schools and other UN premises must never be used for military or fighting purposes…UN facilities must be protected at all times”.


Rubble for a home

The development came as humanitarians issued alerts about the already dire sanitary emergency in Gaza, as civilians displaced by the war “have no choice but to live amid the rubble and in destroyed UNRWA facilities”.

In its latest report on relief activities in May, the UN agency flagged that aid teams were allowed to pick up “just under 450 trucks in the past three weeks in support of the humanitarian operation. This is nothing in the face of the needs,” UNRWA said, insisting that at least 600 trucks per day “of commercial, fuel and humanitarian supplies” are required to help stave off famine and death in Gaza.

“Fuel is running short: our teams are standing by to pick it up when the Israeli Authorities give the green light,” UNRWA said, before highlighting “horrific” scenes of devastation from Jabalia Refugee Camp in northern Gaza, home to thousands of displaced people.

“All eyes are on the proposal to reach an end to this war through a ceasefire, the release of all hostages and substantial and safe flow of urgently needed supplies into Gaza,” the UNRWA update continued, as the US and 16 other countries reportedly expressed their full support for the ceasefire and hostage release proposal presented by President Biden on 31 May.

Cholera killer

As summer temperatures rise, humanitarians also expressed deep concerns that preventable disease outbreaks could spread more widely.

“Children in Gaza are living alongside mountains of trash and raw sewage as basic services reach a breaking point amid continued fighting and displacement,” said Catherine Russell, head of UN Children’s Fund, UNICEF, on X.

The lack of clean drinking water has also fuelled warnings that cholera may strike too, just as healthcare provision remains “crippled”, UN health agency chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said.

“Intense hostilities have severely crippled health care provision in Rafah where tens of thousands of vulnerable people still remain,” he said in post on X, noting that the partner medical NGO International Medical Corps had moved its 160-bed field hospital from Al-Mawasi to the west of Rafah to its existing facility in Deir Al Balah.

The World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General noted that the only functioning field hospital in Al-Mawasi was the one run by the International Committee of the Red Cross. In Rafah city, meanwhile, only the United Arab Emirates field hospital currently provides health services “but is increasingly difficult to reach due to hostilities”, Tedros said.

West Bank spiralling

In a related development in the occupied West Bank, the UN’s top aid official in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) warned of rising violence, bloodshed and killings, mainly of Palestinians.

More than 500 Palestinians and 12 Israelis have been killed in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, since 7 October, according to the UN aid coordination office, OCHA.

About 280 olive and fig trees and 580 grape vine trees were also vandalized by Israeli settlers in seven communities across the West Bank during the week-long reporting period, the UN office said in a scheduled update.

“While all eyes are on Gaza, the people of the West Bank must also be supported and protected. The situation here is volatile,” said UN Humanitarian Coordinator for the OPT Muhannad Hadi. “We can’t wait for the West Bank to become another Gaza.”

Mr. Hadi’s comments followed meetings on Wednesday with Palestinian herding and Bedouin communities in the central West Bank. Members and organizations supporting the Palestinian communities reported “heightened violence, settler activities, access restrictions, demolitions and other coercive policies and practices”, OCHA said in its update.

In the same report, the UN aid office said that Israeli forces shot and killed two Palestinian men near a military gate located in the Barrier west of Tulkarm city on Tuesdat, “after the two men reportedly opened fire at them. Their corpses have been withheld by Israeli forces”.

Bombardment in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip. Photo Credit: UNICEF/Eyad El Baba

ZIONIST EXCUSE AS PER FORMA

IDF says bombed school had Hamas compound 'embedded inside'

After an Israeli strike on a U.N. school in Gaza, the IDF says they bombed the school because it had a Hamas compound "embedded inside" it. ABC News' Mick Mulroy and Marcus Moore report.

 


Israel Hamas: IDF strikes UN school in Gaza killing 40

Channel 4 News
Channel 4 is a British public broadcast service.
Wikipedia

Warning: This report contains distressing images.



Jun 6, 2024

More than 40 people have been killed after an Israeli airstrike hit a UN-run school in central Gaza where displaced Palestinians had been sheltering. Officials from the Gaza Health Ministry said 70 others were injured. A strike hit the UNRWA Al-Sardi school in central Gaza’s Nuseirat refugee camp in the early hours of the morning. Israel claimed it had been targeting Hamas militants inside. The airstrike came as Israel escalated its military operations in central Gaza - targeting the area with artillery strikes and a ground troops operation. Most of those killed and injured have been transported to Al-Aqsa Hospital - where conditions are said to be dire. 

 

 





Pivotal rights group urges Biden to 'indefinitely' suspend arms shipments to Israel as election nears

US must 'be willing to pull the levers of power when appropriate to advance liberation for all,' says NAACP president

Michael Hernandez |06.06.2024 - 
Pro-Palestine protesters gather during Biden, Obama, Bill Clinton at New York fundraiser

WASHINGTON

The Biden administration must "indefinitely" suspend arms shipments to Israel amid an "unacceptable" civilian death toll, a Black civil rights group pivotal to the upcoming presidential election urged Thursday.

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) President and CEO Derrick Johnson said in a statement that a cease-fire proposal presented to Hamas last week "must clarify the consequences of continued violence."

The US and the international community must also "be willing to pull the levers of power when appropriate to advance liberation for all," said Johnson.

"The Middle East conflict will only be resolved when the U.S. government and international community take action, including limiting access to weapons used against civilians. The NAACP calls on President Biden to draw the red line and indefinitely end the shipment of weapons and artillery to the state of Israel and other states that supply weapons to Hamas and other terrorist organizations," he said.

"It is imperative that the violence that has claimed so many civilian lives, immediately stop. Hamas must return the hostages and stop all terrorist activity. Israel must commit to an offensive strategy that is aligned with International and Humanitarian laws," he added.

The NAACP is the largest civil rights group in the US that advocates for racial justice and police reform, and its appeal raises the stakes for President Joe Biden after he has for months refused to put meaningful limits on the supply of US arms to Israel despite a growing volume of civilian deaths cause by Israel's bombardment of the Gaza Strip.

US-made weapons have been linked to several high-profile Israeli attacks, including an airstrike overnight Wednesday that hit a UN facility.

The Black community is key to Biden's re-election efforts, and will play a pivotal role in swing states come November, including Georgia, Michigan and North Carolina.

Johnson also urged Hamas to free the hostages that it continues to hold in Gaza following its Oct. 7 cross-border attack on Israel, "and stop all terrorist activity."

More than 36,650 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza during the eight-month war, the vast majority of whom have been women and children. Over 83,300 others have been injured, according to local health authorities.

Vast swathes of Gaza now lay in ruins amid a crippling blockade of food, clean water and medicine that has pushed the coastal enclave into what the UN describes as "full-blown famine."

​​​​​​​Nearly all of Gaza's population has been forced into displacement.

Israel is accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice, whose latest ruling ordered Tel Aviv to immediately halt its operation in the southern city of Rafah, where more than 1 million Palestinians had sought refuge from the war before Israel invaded on May 6.​​​​​​​
Who will run Gaza after the war? Israel? Hamas? The UN?

Here’s a rundown of some potential plans and their prospects for success.



A Palestinian youth stands on a donkey cart in the grounds of a partially destroyed school being used as a shelter by internally displaced families in the Jabalia refugee camp, in the northern Gaza Strip on June 3, 2024, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. (Omar Al Qatta/AFP via Getty Images/TNS)

By TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE | Tribune News Service
PUBLISHED: June 6, 2024 at 11:19 a.m. | UPDATED: June 6, 2024 at 11:19 a.m.

By Tracy Wilkinson and Nabih Bulos, Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON — Pressure from numerous fronts, domestic and international, is building on Israel to end the war in Gaza.

The International Court of Justice, Arab and European leaders, angry Israeli citizens and segments of the Biden administration are calling for an urgent cease-fire as part of an initial step toward determining the future of the devastated, impoverished coastal enclave.

But what happens then?

Here’s a rundown of some of the plans being floated for the endgame in Gaza and their prospects for success.
Israeli annexation or settlement?

Some of Israel’s most right-wing politicians are calling for the annexation of parts of the Gaza Strip.

They advocate building Jewish settlements in Gaza that would dot and break up contiguous Palestinian communities. In other words, Gaza would look like the West Bank, where around half a million Israeli Jews live in heavily guarded enclaves, using their own roadways and farmland in settlements most of the world considers illegal under international law.

This was the situation in Gaza before 2005.


First, a brief history: Under the 1947 United Nations partition plan, Gaza was to be part of a new Palestinian state that also included the West Bank. Israel accepted the plan and declared statehood in 1948. Arab nations rejected it. Jordan seized control of the West Bank. Egypt moved into Gaza.

In the 1967 Middle East War, Israel captured Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Israel occupied and began settling all three areas.

In 2005, then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, a hard-liner, ordered the withdrawal of Israeli military troops from Gaza and the forcible relocation of around 8,500 Jewish settlers. Sharon characterized his move to the world as a concession to Palestinians, but critics noted that Gaza’s occupation had become particularly difficult and dangerous for Israel. And Sharon withdrew on his own terms, maintaining Israel’s blockade of the strip, controlling all access by land, sea and air.

Proponents of resettlement argue expanded Israeli military and civilian presence is the only way to ensure security for Israelis and prevent the militant group Hamas from reemerging.

There are significant problems with this plan, not the least of which is it would be seen by most of the world as a blatant violation of international law.

“Starting with it’s illegal,” said Diana Buttu, a lawyer and former advisor to the Palestinian Authority.

Critics say settlement would also be a logistical nightmare, an enormous investment of military force to protect settlers.

Palestinians, particularly Gazans, Egypt and the rest of the Arab world would never accept the return of settlements in Gaza, potentially fueling political turmoil and violence.

And politically it would be extremely difficult to sell to the world.

President Joe Biden has said Gaza must remain in the hands of Palestinians, a position that most of the international community shares.
Israeli (re)occupation of Gaza?

There’s debate about whether Israel ever actually stopped its occupation of Gaza. Some say the 2005 withdrawal in effect turned over control to Palestinians, but others say Israel’s continuing control over access to the strip essentially turned it into a vast, open-air prison.

That said, another postwar option frequently discussed would have Israel returning to a more traditional, direct military reoccupation of Gaza.

One plan calls for Israeli-controlled “buffer zones” that could encircle the Gaza population. Such zones might make it easier for Israel to prevent another Oct. 7-style attack, when militants swept into Israel, killed about 1,200 people and seized about 240 hostages.

Instead of settling the Palestinian land with Israelis, the zones would be vacant no-man areas and heavily guarded by the Israeli military.

Palestinians reject such a plan as de facto annexation of their land.

Because Gaza is only 7.5 miles wide at its east-west broadest, such zones would greatly shrink what is already a densely populated territory. As a result, this idea would face strong opposition from the international community.
The return of Hamas and status quo?

Hamas, which nearly eight months into the conflict is still fighting Israel and launching attacks, has proposed its own plan for ending the war and retaining some control over Gaza.

It starts with a permanent cease-fire followed by Israel’s withdrawal of all troops, Israel’s release of hundreds of Palestinians detained in its jails, and Hamas’ release of all hostages it still holds from its Oct. 7 attack, which triggered the war.

Under the Hamas proposal, once a “sustainable calm” is maintained, a reconstruction plan would commence along with the establishment of a realistic path to establishing an independent Palestinian state.

Israel has flatly rejected such proposals. For Israel, any plan that leaves Hamas standing — much less in power over Gaza — is unacceptable. Israel has repeatedly rejected the notion of Hamas remaining in power and has vowed to destroy the militant group.

The atrocities committed by Hamas also eroded any lingering support with international powers. The U.S. has declared that there can be no more “business as usual” in tolerance for Hamas in parts of the Middle East.

It’s unclear whether Palestinians would support such a plan. Among many Palestinians and other Arabs, Hamas has gained support for having inflicted such damage on Israel.

But in recent years, Hamas was not very popular among Palestinians and especially Gazans, who bristled under Hamas’ heavy-handed rule. Major regional powers such as Egypt do not trust Hamas.
An alternative Palestinian authority?

If not Hamas, is there some other Palestinian group that could step in?

The most obvious option would be the Palestinian Authority, which provides a measure of civil administration over Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, although still under the umbrella of Israel’s military.

In the past, the authority helped run the Gaza Strip until it was driven out by Hamas in 2006.

Biden has floated the idea of a new, reformed Palestinian Authority, which could take over postwar administration of Gaza.

Reforms would include new, younger leadership. The authority’s current president, Mahmoud Abbas, 88, has overstayed his term by more than a decade and is refusing to hold new elections. Biden also speaks about financial transparency and improved law enforcement practices.

Others have suggested incorporating Gaza clans into a new leadership.

But there’s opposition to this plan as well.

Israel, which secretly helped create Hamas decades ago as a rival to the Palestinian Authority, will probably be concerned over the prospect of Palestinian unity. The chaos and divisions among Palestinians have long been cited by Israel as reasons for not moving forward on a Palestinian state. It’s highly doubtful Israel would agree at this point to give Palestinians any control over land, water or borders in Gaza.

That explains why the authority itself has resisted such proposals in the past. No one wants to be seen as “riding into Gaza on the back of Israeli tanks,” as a common refrain goes. Palestinians don’t want to be seen as caretakers — or worse, collaborators — working under Israel’s occupation, with little real power.

Finally the authority may not want to be handed the keys to Gaza after Israel has inflicted such massive destruction to buildings and infrastructure, and left the population on the verge of starvation.

The Palestinian death toll in Gaza is more than 36,000, according to Palestinian authorities. Rebuilding after the Israeli attacks will be a monumental task.

Any alternate Palestinian power would also have to contend with whatever remains of Hamas and other Islamist groups.
International authority?

For an international authority to take over — such as a U.N. peacekeeping force — a major obstacle would be Israel’s unwillingness to relinquish control over security for the Gaza Strip.

That complicates many of the international plans on the table.

One would involve an international authority, possibly with Palestinian components, to take over Gaza once the war ends, handling the food supply, medical care and schooling while negotiating broader security relationships.

Former Deputy Prime Minister Benny Gantz this month proposed an “American, European, Arab, and Palestinian administration” to manage civilian affairs in Gaza until a new government can be formed, with Israel maintaining “security control” in the interim.

The Biden administration has already conducted outreach to regional allies such as the United Arab Emirates and Morocco regarding creating a peacekeeping force. Both Egypt and Jordan have rejected such an idea in the past for fear of being seen as interfering in Palestinian self-determination. And Palestinians have lost faith in the U.S. as a fair broker.

Emirati Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed al Nahyan shot down a proposal from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that the UAE be involved in a postwar administration.

“The UAE stresses that the Israeli prime minister does not have any legal capacity to take this step, and the UAE refuses to be drawn into any plan aimed at providing cover for the Israeli presence in the Gaza Strip,” Al Nahyan wrote on the social platform X.

On the other hand, wealthy outside powers such as Saudi Arabia could be tempted to assist a new Palestinian government if it were assured Israel was out of the picture and if it got something in return, such as the mutual defense pact that Riyadh has been seeking from Washington.


RELATED ARTICLES


VP Kamala Harris’ quiet stops in Bay Area met with Gaza ceasefire protests

13 Stanford students arrested after pro-Palestinian protesters barricade building

Daly City becomes latest Bay Area city to pass ceasefire resolution

Qatar says Israel struggling to unite over Gaza peace terms


Wilkinson reported from Washington and Bulos from Beirut.

©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit at latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


Israelis, Palestinians to launch joint bid to bring humanitarian aid to post-war Gaza

Damour for Community Development in Gaza and Arava Institute for Environmental Studies form group of companies aiming to provide off-grid services to ravaged territory


In this April 30, 2020, photo, Palestinian engineer Raed Nakhal from Palestine Children Relief Fund, right, and engineer Abdullah Dewik, check the Watergen machine that generates safe drinking water from air on the roof of al-Rantisi pediatric hospital in Gaza City. (AP Photo/Adel Hana)
In this April 30, 2020, photo, Palestinian engineer Raed Nakhal from Palestine Children Relief Fund, right, and engineer Abdullah Dewik, check the Watergen machine that generates safe drinking water from air on the roof of al-Rantisi pediatric hospital in Gaza City. (AP Photo/Adel Hana)


A new Israeli-Palestinian project to meet the need for water, sanitation, hygiene and energy in the Gaza Strip between the end of hostilities and rebuilding of the enclave is to be launched Friday.

Palestinian organization Damour for Community Development in Gaza and the Arava Institute for Environmental Studies, which already have an established track record of working together on off-grid, solar energy-driven solutions in Gaza and the West Bank, believe that such infrastructure can be quickly provided and scaled up to immediately improve the humanitarian situation in the coastal enclave.

The launch event, in English, at the Peres Center in Tel Aviv is sold out, but can be accessed via Zoom.

According to UNICEF, 96 percent of the strip’s freshwater was unsafe to drink even before the war because of contamination and high salinity.

Energy provision was inadequate and power cuts were frequent.

The war, now in its eighth month, has wreaked widespread destruction on large swaths of the enclave and its infrastructure.

Palestinians inspect the destruction following overnight Israeli strikes on Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip on May 6, 2024. (AFP)

Fuel shortages and the war itself have disabled wastewater treatment, raising the risks of water-borne diseases such as cholera, typhoid, diarrhea and tuberculosis.

More than half of all structures have been destroyed, damaged or possibly damaged since the war erupted, according to preliminary satellite analysis by the United Nations.

As The Times of Israel reported this week, Israel has quietly gone to significant lengths to fix the enclave’s water infrastructure.

For the new project, Jumpstarting Hope in Gaza, Damour and the Arava Institute have put together a consortium of companies offering a range of services.

The solutions include:

  • Watergen machines that produce water from the atmosphere. Seven machines were installed in Gaza before the war, providing clean drinking water to thousands of Gazans.
  • wastewater treatment system for purifying sewage developed by the Arava Institute and Laguna Innovation. This produces water clean enough to be used for agriculture.
  • A portable system designed by Atheer Integrated Solutions that produces freshwater from salty groundwater or seawater
  • Building blocks created by Green Cake from the ash and rubble of destroyed houses.
  • Solar panel kits for tents, wells, and desalination facilities from SunBox

Other organizations in the partnership include Home Biogas and Gigawatt Global, as well as initiatives offering off-grid services in internet connectivity, agriculture, public health, women’s empowerment, and technical training.

The Arava Institute, based at Kibbutz Ketura in southern Israel, brings Israelis, Palestinians, Jordanians, and international students and experts together through a variety of programs, all based on the conviction that environmental problems know no political boundaries, and that the best way to solve pressing issues such as water and energy shortages is together.

Spain asks to join South Africa’s case at UN court accusing Israel of genocide





By — Joseph Wilson, Associated Press
Jun 6, 2024

BARCELONA, Spain (AP) — Spain became on Thursday the first European country to ask a United Nations court for permission to join South Africa’s case accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza.
South Africa filed its case with the International Court of Justice late last year. It alleged that Israel was breaching the genocide convention in its military assault that has laid waste to large swaths of Gaza.

The court has ordered Israel to immediately halt its military offensive in the southern Gaza city of Rafah but stopped short of ordering a cease-fire for the enclave. Israel has not complied and shows no sign of doing so.

“We take the decision because of the ongoing military operation in Gaza,” Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares said in Madrid. “We want peace to return to Gaza and the Middle East, and for that to happen we must all support the court.”


Mexico, Colombia, Nicaragua, Libya and the Palestinians are waiting for the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, to grant approval to their requests to join the case.
Israel denies it is committing genocide in its military operation to crush Hamas triggered by its deadly Oct. 7 attacks in southern Israel.

Hamas killed 1,200 people and took 250 more hostage in the surprise attacks. Israel’s air and land attacks have killed 36,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, which doesn’t distinguish between combatants and civilians.

Once admitted to the case, Spain would be able to make written submissions and speak at public hearings.

Spain’s request is the latest move by the government of Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez to support peacemaking efforts in Gaza.

Spain, Ireland and Norway formally recognized a Palestinian state on May 28 in a coordinated effort by the three Western European nations. Slovenia, a European Union member along with Spain and Ireland, followed suit and recognized the Palestinian state this week.

Over 140 countries have recognized a Palestinian state — more than two-thirds of the U.N. — but none of the major Western powers, including the United States, has done so.

While Sánchez has condemned the attacks by Hamas and joined demands for the return of the remaining Israeli hostages, he has not shied away from the diplomatic backlash from Israel. Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz said that by recognizing a Palestinian state, Sánchez’s government was “being complicit in inciting genocide against Jews and war crimes.”

Sánchez’s backing of the Palestinians is generally supported in Spain, where some university students have followed their American counterparts in protesting on campuses. Spaniards will vote in elections for the European Parliament elections on Sunday.

Last year, the International Court of Justice allowed 32 countries, including Spain, to join Ukraine’s case alleging that Russia breached the genocide convention by falsely accusing Ukraine of committing genocide in its eastern Luhansk and Donetsk regions, and using that as a pretext for the invasion.

Preliminary hearings have already been held in the genocide case against Israel, but the court is expected to take years to reach a final decision.

Albares said the decision by his government had the immediate objective of adding pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to follow the court’s interim measures to stop bloodshed in Rafah.

“I insist once again that these interim measures must be complied with,” Albares said. “Whether this is genocide or not, that is for the court to decide, and Spain of course will support its decision.”

Israel sent troops into the southern city of Rafah in early May in what it said was a limited incursion, but those forces are now operating in central parts of the city. Last week, Israeli strikes hit near a U.N. Palestinian refugee agency facility in Rafah, saying they were targeting Hamas militants. An inferno that followed ripped through nearby tents housing displaced families , killing at least 45 people.

More than 1 million people have fled Rafah since the start of the operation, scattering across southern and central Gaza into new tent camps or crowding into schools and homes.

Associated Press writer Mike Corder contributed to this report from The Hague, Netherlands.
IPI calls on states to protect environmental and climate journalism

International Press Institute (IPI)
5 June 2024

New Delhi, India, 15 July 2023. A camera operator and a TV journalist report on the torrential rains in the Raghat region and the flooded Yamuna river. Pradeep Gaur/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

"We call on states around the world to ensure that climate and environmental journalists can do their work independently, freely, and safely. This includes ensuring environmental journalists are granted access to information and access to protected areas." - IPI

This statement was originally published on ipi.media on 5 June 2024.

The members of the International Press Institute (IPI), meeting at their 73nd annual General Assembly during the IPI World Congress on May 23, 2024 in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina adopted by unanimous vote a resolution calling on states to ensure robust, independent news reporting and access to information on the environment and the climate crisis that is threatening the health, prosperity, and security of societies around the world.

Addressing the global climate and environmental crisis requires accurate, independent journalism that can inform the public debate and shine a light on actions by actors with vested interests that can accelerate environmental destruction, exacerbate social and economic inequities, and endanger the most vulnerable local communities.

But this reporting is at risk. Around the world, climate and environmental journalists face multiple, complex threats to their work. These threats include legal harassment, arrest and detention, physical attacks and intimidation, online harassment, restrictions on freedom of movement, and obstacles accessing information.

Far too often, journalists covering issues related to climate change and environmental issues are targeted by powerful government and private actors who are willing to go to great lengths to shield their harmful activities from public exposure. In addition to facing physical threats and harm, journalists attempting to cover these stories often face criminal charges – including with laws criminalizing the dissemination of “false information” – as well as vexatious civil lawsuits aimed at punishing and silencing critical reporting.

Far too often, such attacks against environmental and climate journalists go under reported and under investigated, and are carried out with impunity.

We therefore call on states around the world to ensure that climate and environmental journalists can do their work independently, freely, and safely. This includes ensuring environmental journalists are granted access to information and access to protected areas to allow them to gather information and carry out fact-based investigations on issues of major public interest. Authorities must refrain from weaponizing the law to harass and intimidate journalists working to expose corruption and illegal activities that harm the environment and worsen climate change. States must commit to ending impunity for crimes against environmental journalists, and all journalists, as an essential step to ensuring the public’s right to robust, independent information on critical issues affecting the health and stability of our planet.
Top news app in US has Chinese origins and ‘writes fiction’ with the help of AI

A Newsbreak company logo is displayed at a corporate office building in Mountain View in California. 

Reuters

Last Christmas Eve, NewsBreak, a free app with roots in China that is the most downloaded news app in the United States, published an alarming piece about a small town shooting.

It was headlined "Christmas Day Tragedy Strikes Bridgeton, New Jersey Amid Rising Gun Violence in Small Towns."


The problem was, no such shooting took place. The Bridgeton, New Jersey police department posted a statement on Facebook on Dec.27 dismissing the article - produced using AI technology - as "entirely false."


"Nothing even similar to this story occurred on or around Christmas, or even in recent memory for the area they described," the post said.

"It seems this 'news' outlet's AI writes fiction they have no problem publishing to readers."

NewsBreak, which is headquartered in Mountain View, California and has offices in Beijing and Shanghai, told Reuters it removed the article on Dec.28, four days after publication.

The company said "the inaccurate information originated from the content source," and provided a link to the website, adding: "When NewsBreak identifies any inaccurate content or any violation of our community standards, we take prompt action to remove that content."

The operators of the website, findplace.xyz, did not respond to a request from Reuters for comment. The police declined to provide further comment.

As local news outlets across America have shuttered in recent years, NewsBreak has filled the void.

Billing itself as "the go-to source for all things local," Newsbreak says it has over 50 million monthly users.

It publishes licensed content from major media outlets, including Reuters, Fox, AP and CNN as well as some information obtained by scraping the internet for local news or press releases which it rewrites with the help of AI.

It is only available in the US. But in at least 40 instances since 2021, the app's use of AI tools affected the communities it strives to serve, with Newsbreak publishing erroneous stories; creating 10 stories from local news sites under fictitious bylines; and lifting content from its competitors, according to a Reuters review of previously unreported court documents related to copyright infringement, cease-and-desist emails and a 2022 company memo registering concerns about "AI-generated stories."

Reuters spoke to seven former NewsBreak employees, including five who said most of the engineering work behind the app's algorithm is carried out in its China-based offices. The former employees requested anonymity, citing confidentiality agreements with NewsBreak.

Two local community programmes assisting disadvantaged people told Reuters they were impacted by erroneous stories produced by NewsBreak's AI.

On three occasions in January, February and March, Food to Power, a Colorado-based food bank said it had to turn people away because NewsBreak stated incorrect times of food distributions.

The charity complained to NewsBreak in a Jan.30 email to NewsBreak's general customer support email address, which Reuters has reviewed.

The charity said it received no response. Harvest912, a charity in Erie, Pennsylvania emailed NewsBreak about two inaccurate, AI-based news stories which said it was holding a 24-hour foot-care clinic for homeless people, asking the outlet to "cease and desist" erroneous coverage.

"You are doing HARM by publishing this misinformation - homeless people will walk to these venues to attend a clinic that is not happening," Harvest912 told NewsBreak, in a January 12 email seen by Reuters.

In response to Reuters' questions, NewsBreak said it removed all five articles about the charities after learning they were erroneous and that the articles were based on incorrect information on some of the charities' web pages.

Without providing a reason to Reuters, NewsBreak added a disclaimer to its homepage in early March, warning that its content "may not always be error-free."

Newsbreak generates revenue by showing ads to its users, who are predominantly female, above the age of 45, without college degrees, and live in suburban or rural parts of the US, according to the seven former employees and a 2021 company presentation reviewed by Reuters.

The company launched in the US in 2015 as a subsidiary of Yidian, a Chinese news aggregation app. Both companies were founded by Jeff Zheng, the CEO of Newsbreak, and the companies share a US patent registered in 2015 for an "Interest Engine" algorithm, which recommends news content based on a user's interests and location.

NewsBreak told Reuters that the patent was assigned by Zheng to both companies because "some of the concepts were developed from Jeff's time at Yidian" and that NewsBreak is "US-based" and "US-invested."

The shared patent has "absolutely no bearing on the company and its operations," NewsBreak said in written responses to Reuters, describing the technology referenced in the patent as "outdated."

A May 2022 company memo from a NewsBreak consultant to Zheng, reviewed by Reuters, raised concerns about NewsBreak's use of AI tools to re-publish stories from local news sites under five fictitious bylines.

"I cannot think of a faster way to destroy the NewsBreak brand," Norm Pearlstine, former Executive Editor at the Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times who was working at the time as a consultant to NewsBreak, wrote in the memo to Zheng.

In an interview after NewsBreak gave him permission to speak with Reuters, Pearlstine said he learned of the practice from a NewsBreak colleague.

"I question the legality of creating fake accounts using content publishers put behind their paywalls. If I had learned about the practice while at the LA Times, I would have instructed our lawyer to seek a restraining order and sue for damages," wrote Pearlstine, whose six-month consulting role at NewsBreak in 2022 consisted of advising the company about US editorial businesses.

Pearlstine, who confirmed the memo was authentic, attributed the lapse to a lack of journalistic experience.

"A fair number of people on the staff were either new to journalism or new to the US market. That was part of the reason I felt I had to be very direct and very explicit in explaining why I thought this was important," he told Reuters.

NewsBreak said the news stories referenced in Pearlstine's memo were a "limited experiment in three US counties" to aggregate third-party content, and that the effort was disbanded after producing ten articles. The company denied going behind paywalls and said it used "snippets" of articles that were publicly visible to produce complete news stories using OpenAI.

NewsBreak also pointed Reuters towards Zheng's emailed response to Pearlstine, saying he recognized the problem and asked his team to fix it.

OpenAI told Reuters its policies prohibited using its technology to mislead people. In 2022, Patch Media, which operates digital local news feeds in every US state, reached a $1.75 million settlement in a lawsuit against NewsBreak for copyright infringement, according to court documents reviewed by Reuters, which alleged that NewsBreak republished Patch's news stories without permission or credit.

Patch did not respond to a request for comment. NewsBreak said the settlement was not an admission of wrongdoing.

Emmerich Newspapers, which operates newspapers in Mississippi, Arkansas and Louisiana, reached a 2021 settlement with NewsBreak in a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement related to NewsBreak's use of Emmerich's content without permission. NewsBreak said the settlement was "amicable."

Another copyright lawsuit is ongoing. The two parties are "embroiled in additional lawsuits which we are vigorously defending against," NewsBreak said.

Wyatt Emmerich, the company's president, said the lawsuit against NewsBreak involved "verbatim copying of content."

He added: "What worries me in the future is that news aggregators could use artificial intelligence to slightly rewrite our stories which would make proving copyright infringement much more difficult. I have witnessed instances of this happening already on news aggregation sites."

CHINA ROOTS

NewsBreak is a privately held start-up, whose primary backers are private equity firms San Francisco-based Francisco Partners, and Beijing-based IDG Capital, NewsBreak told Reuters.

Francisco Partners declined to answer questions about its investment in NewsBreak. IDG did not respond to repeated emailed requests for comment.

In February, IDG Capital was added to a list of dozens of Chinese companies the Pentagon said were allegedly working with Beijing's military.

IDG Capital told Bloomberg in February that it has no association with the Chinese military and does not belong on that list. NewsBreak did not comment on the finding. Yidian, the Chinese aggregation company, divested from NewsBreak in 2019 because "its management team at the time did not understand the US market," Zheng said. Until then, Li Ya, the president of Phoenix New Media, a Chinese state-linked media firm which held a 46.9% stake in Yidian, had been a director at NewsBreak, according to corporate records. Yidian continued to describe NewsBreak as its U.S. version on its website until 2021, according to The Wire China. Yidian in 2017 received praise from ruling Communist Party officials for its efficiency in disseminating government propaganda. Reuters found no evidence that NewsBreak censored or produced news that was favourable to the Chinese government.

A NewsBreak spokesperson said there was no ongoing commercial relationship with Yidian. Yidian, Phoenix New Media and Li Ya did not respond to requests from Reuters for comment.

About half of NewsBreak's 200 employees are China-based where they are engaged in R&D, the company said.

A 2022 company roster reviewed by Reuters showed that 100 of NewsBreak's 137 engineers at the time were based in China.

Five of the former NewsBreak employees said CEO Zheng divides his time between China and the United States.

Zheng, who was born in China, is a permanent resident of the United States and his family relocated to the US early last year, the company said.

Reuters found five job advertisements NewsBreak posted on Chinese job sites seeking data analysts or engineers for its Beijing and Shanghai-based offices capable of "in-depth mining" of "massive user behaviour data" from the app's US users.

A Republican aide to the US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee told Reuters the use of Chinese-based engineers by Newsbreak raised possible concerns that American user data can be accessed in China.

The aide declined to be identified because they were not authorised to speak to the media.

In a recent high-profile case, US officials warned that TikTok, whose parent company is the Chinese firm ByteDance, could be compelled by the Chinese government to use its algorithm to control what kind of news is viewed by Americans and hand over their data.

TikTok, the most downloaded short video app globally, with 170 million US users, now faces a forced sale or a US ban.

In response to Reuters questions, TikTok said it was planning to offer third parties more access to examine its code and verify the app functions as intended.

Zheng told Reuters that NewsBreak complies with US data and privacy laws and is maintained on U.S.-based Amazon (AWS) servers.

"Staff in China only access anonymous data stored on AWS servers in the US," he said. Amazon declined to comment.

NewsBreak also said that as a US-based business it was not subjected to Chinese data laws.

Pearlstine, the former NewsBreak consultant, said NewsBreak's ability to demonstrate it is a US company was critical.

"The long term health of NewsBreak was dependent on its being perceived as a California company and that the more the leadership was in Mountain View, the better it would be for the company," he said.

Reuters
US: Order Limiting Asylum Will Harm People Seeking Protection

Violates International Human Rights and Refugee Law





Click to expand Image
A protest against the "Remain in Mexico" policy in front of the US Supreme Court, Washington, D.C., April 26, 2022. © 2022 Photo by Michael Brochstein/ Sipa via AP Images

(Washington, DC, June 5, 2024) – An executive order United States President Joe Biden issued on June 4, 2023, that would effectively block access to asylum for people entering the US-Mexico border under certain conditions risks exposing thousands of people to harm, Human Rights Watch said today. The order is unlawful under international human rights and refugee law.

The order enables border officials to rapidly remove people who arrive in the US without a hearing when border “encounters” or arrivals have surpassed a 7-day average of 2,500 people. This would effectively shut down the border to asylum seekers. Officials would not reopen the border until the number of daily arrivals drops below a 7-day average of 1,500 people.

The executive order is based on the confused premise that “noncitizens who cross the southern border unlawfully or without authorization will generally be ineligible for asylum.” Article 31 of the Refugee Convention makes clear that it is lawful to arrive as a refugee seeking protection, but by shutting down the border to all arrivals, the order treats seeking asylum as unlawful.

“Focusing on arbitrary numbers instead of human beings seeking asylum at the US border ignores the potential harm to individuals, families, and children who could be forcibly returned to danger,” said Vicki B. Gaubeca, associate director of US immigration and border policy at Human Rights Watch. “This policy replicates some of the harshest anti-immigrant polices under the previous administration, seemingly catering to fearmongering against immigrants and driven by a desire to appear ‘tough on the border.’”

The administration claims the new “shutdown” authority is based on section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which allows the president to bar the entry of entire classes of noncitizens considered “detrimental to the interests of the United States.” However, people who are already on US soil and seeking asylum or asking for protection are protected not only by section 208 of the INA but also by international law, with which section 212(f) needs to be consistent, Human Rights Watch said.

This is not the Biden administration's first restriction on access to asylum. In May 2023, the administration announced the Circumvention of Lawful Pathways rule. This in effect bans people from applying for asylum in the US if they cross between ports of entry, if they fail to use the CBP One phone app, which forces people to wait for months in Mexico for an appointment, or if they did not apply for asylum in a country of transit. These policies have led to widespread abuse, as documented by Human Rights Watch.

Furthermore, the Biden administration is planning to increase immigration-related prosecutions by ramping up additional “prosecutors and support staff” and increasing collaboration between the Departments of Homeland Security and Justice. Human Rights Watch has long documented that prosecutions for illegal entry or re-entry violate the rights of asylum seekers and the rights of all migrants to family unity.

“Instead of contributing to the political theater that is often the backdrop for the US presidential election cycle, the Biden administration should focus on creating a rights-respecting and balanced approach for managing the US-Mexico border,” Gaubeca said.