It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Sunday, June 16, 2024
Private equity firms have avoided taxation on over $1 trillion of income thanks to a loophole, new Oxford research reveals
Sunny Nagpaul
Thu, 13 June 2024
Anthony Devlin—Getty Images
Calls to tax the world’s richest people are now focusing on another target: the world’s wealthiest private equity firms.
The largest PE firms in the world have avoided paying income taxes on more than $1 trillion of incentive fees since 2000 alone, according to new research from Oxford University, by making payments in a structure that subjects them to a much lower tax.
Private equity firms now control one-fifth of the U.S market, and can be an important source of foreign capital, but are now the target of politicians calling for crackdowns as governments in need of more revenue are looking for sources to pull from.
The new research, spearheaded by Oxford business professor Ludovic Phalippou, found the largest firms dedicated to private investment strategies—like buyout firms, venture capital, infrastructure, and bankruptcy and debt—have earned more than $1 trillion in carried interest pay since 2000. The main purposes of the research, Phalippou said in an interview with the Financial Times, is to show the colossal wealth created by the high fees of private funds, divulge the potential tax revenue governments could collect from these firms if such fees were treated as income tax rather than capital gains, and to reveal whether private investment strategies are worth what they cost.
“It shows you the upper bound of what you could collect if all of the countries in the world coordinated to tax that pot,” Phalippou said in the interview, adding, “once you understand how much money we are talking about, you can understand why private equity is the largest donor to politicians and universities.”
Senior employees of private equity advisory firms earn salaries that are subject to standard income taxes, the report states, but they also receive payments “conditional on the performance of the funds they advise: the carried interest.”
Most tax laws, he writes in the report, consider carried interest to be a capital gain, and is taxed at a much lower rate than income tax rates. These payments often resemble a performance-related bonus payment, but it comes with an exception that “employees should personally invest in the fund under management to be eligible for this bonus.” It’s a stark difference from how publicly traded firms operate, where as much as half of these fees are paid to shareholders in the form of dividends, the Financial Times reported.
The restructured payments have been dubbed a “loophole” by politicians—and the method has been drawing political scrutiny across the U.S and Europe for years, with the U.K.’s Labour party one of its most vocal critics.
Rachel Reeves—the country’s shadow chancellor and a member of the Labour party, which is widely expected to win this year’s elections—has vowed to move forward with plans to impose higher taxes on top private equity bosses. In its election manifesto published Thursday, the party pledged to consult on closing the carried interest tax loophole, which currently allows private equity bosses to pay tax at 28% capital gains rate, rather than the higher top marginal rate of income tax at 45%.
Reiterating this promise is the party’s latest push in a years-long effort to close the tax loophole, which Reeves has estimated could raise up to £440 million for the U.K government. Critics of the Labour party’s plan cite concerns that higher tax rates will give investment groups more reason to leave London, saying that foreign capital can help address needs that Britain's stretched public finances cannot fund on their own, like infrastructure, green energy, and more affordable housing.
In the U.S., several politicians including President Joe Biden and even former presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump all made vows to end the special tax structure, but all those plans cracked under pressure from industry lobbyists.
The savings some top private equity bosses amass are sizable: Phalippou’s research calculates that Blackstone Group, the world’s largest private equity investor, earned $33.6 billion in carried interest—a sum that is over $10 billion larger than any other single investment firm.
Private equity firms have a notorious reputation for overtaking or forming monopolies in several industries by gobbling up publicly traded companies as private firms, which means they are not required by law to disclose information about their finances, operations, business risks, or legal liabilities. Such firms, though, are now in control of one-fifth of the American market, making a large chunk of the economy financially invisible to investors, the media and regulators.
Phalippou’s research is also meant to provide insight on how profitable private investment strategies really are in relation to the financial returns they generate. The report shows the median private equity fund earns just over 1.6-times investors’ money over four to five years, which is comparable to the long-term returns of U.S. stocks.
“It is hard for me to look at these numbers and be amazed,” Phalippou told the FT.
“The $1tn seems quite extraordinary. The return number, not so much,” Phalippou said. “It is good but it is not something to write home about.”
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
CBC
Thu, 13 June 2024
Elver fishers are seen on a Nova Scotia river in 2023. The image was taken from a camera set up by licence holder Atlantic Elver Fishery and shows what the company said was unauthorized fishing. (Submitted by Atlantic Elver Fishery - image credit)
A top federal fisheries enforcement official says it's likely many of those arrested this spring for illegally fishing for baby eels along Nova Scotia and New Brunswick rivers will be charged as part of enforcement efforts to try to rein in an out-of-control fishery.
Tim Kerr, the Maritime director of conservation and protection for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, said he believes deterrence is working, and the department intends to bring in new measures in an attempt to make sure next year's season runs more smoothly.
"We do expect a large number of charges and subsequent court appearances and decisions to be made against individuals who have been caught harvesting elver unauthorized this year," he said in an interview Thursday.
This year's spring season for baby eels, also known as elvers, was cancelled due to concerns related to violence and poaching. DFO has been criticized by elver fishermen and federal MPs for not cracking down soon enough on unauthorized fishing, and some have questioned whether arrests are actually leading to charges.
Kerr said 107 arrests related to illegal elver fishing were made in 2023, resulting in 133 charges under the Fisheries Act, and he expected a similar ratio this year related to the 169 arrests so far.
Elver fishers are seen on a river in Halifax County, N.S. in 2023. The image is taken from a camera set up by licence holder Atlantic Elver Fishery and shows what the company says is unauthorized fishing on a river assigned exclusively to the company by Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
The Department of Fisheries and Oceans said 103 arrests were made during last year's elver season. (Submitted by Atlantic Elver Fishery)
It's not clear how many of those charged will actually face trial, however, once the cases are in the hands of federal prosecutors. In one recent case, the Crown ended without explanation the prosecution of five Mi'kmaw men claiming they had a treaty right to fish for elvers.
Unauthorized elver fishing has soared in recent years due to demand from Asia, where they are shipped live and then grown to maturity for food.
Kerr said DFO is seeking to develop a traceability system that would be similar to the one deployed in Maine, where the elver fishery is electronically monitored in real time, with fishermen using fobs or QR codes to log the catch they sell.
A similar system in Canada would allow anyone who has elvers in their possession, from the fisherman on the river to the exporter at an airport, the ability to show where the tiny eels were harvested and prove they were caught legally, Kerr said.
The Department of Fisheries and Oceans posted this photograph from an elver seizure on May 31, 2024, at a facility in Dartmouth, N.S.
The Department of Fisheries and Oceans posted this photograph from an elver seizure this May at a facility in Dartmouth, N.S. (DFO Maritimes/X)
Stanley King, an elver fisherman, said this week the commercial sector has long been in favour of a traceability system, and is frustrated DFO would not introduce one early enough to potentially avoid this year's shutdown.
"We only have nine months left until the next season," he said. "So we are very concerned, industry is very concerned that we won't have that."
On Thursday, DFO also released a statement about the concerns raised by commercial licence holders who were told this week the department is considering handing a substantial part of their quotas to First Nations and potentially other new operators.
Some licence holders have said they are in favour of greater First Nations access to the fishery, but want DFO to buy their licences and are upset at the prospect of losing a sizable chunk of quota with no compensation.
The department said the costs of fishing for elvers is much lower than other fisheries, as it doesn't require a boat and is done using nets at the riverside. Lobster, by contrast, requires much higher investment, including a boat and specialized gear.
DFO said that's why it's not entertaining a "willing buyer, willing seller" scenario where the department will purchase elver licences from those agreeing to sell them.
"Given the significant increases in elver value and relatively low input costs, the commercial elver fishery presents a unique opportunity to broaden the distribution of the prosperity that can be generated among various types of harvesters," the statement said.
Reallocating quota, the department said, is a step toward reconciliation by "reducing the long-standing socio-economic gaps between Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick."
Shampa Roy-Mukherjee, Vice Dean and Associate Professor in Economics, University of East London
Fri, 14 June 2024
The incoming government will have to keep its promises on tax. lovelyday12
Both the Conservatives and Labour have made the same pre-election promise not to increase taxes on working people. They’ve also made many other promises to improve the NHS, crack down on illegal immigration, build more houses and many other things. So how do they think they can do these things without raising taxes?
The short answer is that they are gambling on being able to grow the economy so they have more money to pay for new things. But that’s easier said than done.
The two main parties have pledged not to raise the rates of the biggest three sources of tax: income tax, national insurance contributions and VAT. (This is except VAT private school fees, which Labour has promised to introduce).
They also have committed to stay within the same rule, which says that the country’s national debt should be falling as a percentage of GDP – the total value of all the goods and services the country produces – within five years. And they are using as the basis for their plans the same forecast that the government’s Office for Budget Responsibility gave in March.
Both parties have also promised promised to freeze tax thresholds – the amount you have to earn before you pay the different taxes – at the current levels. And they’ve promised to raise the same amount by cracking down on tax avoidance.
The problem is that it’s simply not possible to maintain the same level of taxes, spend more on public services and borrow less.
This is particularly because income tax, national insurance and VAT collectively account for about two thirds of the total tax revenue. By ruling out increases in these biggest taxes, the two main parties are limiting their choices on spending on public services.
The only way that next government can avoid further public spending cuts is by focusing on policies that will lead to higher economic growth.
The International Monetary Fund predicts that UK economy will grow by 0.5% in 2024 and 1.5% in 2025.
There has also been a significant fall in inflation – the rate at which prices rise – to 2.3% in April 2024. And this means the Bank of England may lower interest rates this summer, making it cheaper to borrow money and reducing the cost of things like people’s mortgages so they have more money to spend on other things.
This may speed up the rate of short-term growth and help in the recovery of living standards.
But the economic outlook still looks gloomy. The increase in the size of the UK population and workforce, mainly through immigration, has been good for economic growth. But this has been offset by rising numbers of people not working after the COVID pandemic.
Another area of consideration is the fall in what’s known as labour productivity, which is a measure of how efficient a country is – how much money it makes for the amount of work people do. When productivity rises, people can earn relatively more and their standard of living goes up.
Historically, growth in UK productivity has been around 2% a year, but since the financial crisis it has been growing at a much slower rate.
This has also been exacerbated by the pandemic, Brexit and other global challenges. UK productivity was around 16% below the US and Germany in 2022.
Other than higher economic growth, the other area that any new government could focus on is tax reform.
Changing the tax system to make it more attractive to invest and start your own business, could be a top priority of any new government. Policies to promote growth could attract much-needed private investment as well as helping businesses to grow.
Labour’s commitment not to raise the headline rate of corporation tax, which companies pay, for example, will give businesses more certainty for long-term investment plans.
However, the danger remains that whichever of the two main parties wins the election – and it looks likely to be Labour – they won’t be able to raise enough money through growth or tax reform to make meaningful improvements to public services.
We have all heard people complain that politicians are all the same, and never do what they promise to do. So if their gamble doesn’t pay off and they can’t improve public services, trust in our political system will continue to fall.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The Conversation
Shampa Roy-Mukherjee does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Reuters
Thu, 13 June 2024
FILE PHOTO: A logo is pictured on the Edmond de Rothschild bank in Geneva
DUBAI (Reuters) - Edmond de Rothschild Group, a specialist in asset management and private banking, is set to open an office in Saudi Arabia this year and launch a platform to provide debt finance for infrastructure projects there, the Swiss bank said on Thursday.
The platform could help Saudi Arabia with its vast Vision 2030 plan which aims to wean the economy off oil, but has so far attracted limited investment from outside the kingdom.
The plan, spearheaded by Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, the kingdom's prime minister and de facto day-to-day ruler, includes building massive new urban developments and investing in various sectors to help create thousands of new jobs.
Edmond de Rothschild will work with SNB Capital to set up the platform to help fund infrastructure projects across the Gulf country, the two companies said in a joint statement.
The Swiss bank, which has over 5 billion euros ($5.4 billion) in assets under management in infrastructure debt, has also set up a joint venture with Watar Partners to provide infrastructure debt advisory services to Saudi family offices and institutional investors.
The partnership is expected to go live in the second half of this year, together with the opening of a local office in Riyadh.
"This is a logical next step for our group, building on the long-standing business relationships we have with the country," the Geneva-based bank's CEO Ariane de Rothschild was quoted as saying in the statement.
Edmond de Rothschild last year also expanded its presence in Dubai, in the neighbouring United Arab Emirates, with an advisory office.
($1 = 0.9266 euros)
(Reporting by Federico Maccioni; Editing by Mark Potter)
David Strege
Thu, 13 June 2024
ASSHOLE
A man who suggested that his hunting exploits should be featured on outdoor TV shows was sentenced as a big-game poacher, and trespasser.
Jason Smith, 29, illegally killed four elk, four black bears and five black-tailed deer in Western Washington and bragged on social media about his tracking and killing prowess, and posted photos of his kills, the Washington Department of Wildlife announced.
Smith was charged with two felony counts of first-degree unlawful hunting of big game, 27 gross misdemeanor charges of second-degree unlawful hunting of big game, unlawful black bear baiting and unlawful waste of wildlife; and three misdemeanor charges of unlawful hunting or retrieving wildlife from private property.
A King County judge sentenced Smith to 80 hours of community service and fined him $8,000.
WDFW Police began investigating Smith in early 2021 upon seeing his multitude of successful harvest posts on social media, believing early on that the suspect had illegally killed multiple elk in the North Bend area of King County.
During the next 1½ years, officers obtained numerous search warrants for social media and mapping tools, gathering evidence of the suspect’s poaching activities.
From the WDFW:
In numerous cases, Smith used illegal means to bait deer, elk, and black bear as well as trespassed onto private property to poach or retrieve illegally killed animals. In one case, he left an elk carcass to waste after another person found the poached elk before he could retrieve it.
Smith posted photos of his exploits on social media and told friends about his tracking and killing prowess, suggesting he should be featured on extreme outdoor TV shows. In reality, much of the wildlife he poached was baited into his yard or poached on his neighbor’s property. In a text message obtained during the warrant, Smith also said he would kill another elk for a friend that hadn’t shot one yet if he got to keep the head to mount.
In the end, Officers served a search warrant at Smith’s residence and seized some of the wildlife parts, including meat. Other animals were seized from a taxidermist.
“Smith attempted to portray himself as a type of outdoor celebrity, using social media to boast, when in reality, there was nothing ethical about his actions,” said WDFW Captain Dan Chadwick.
“I commend our Officers’ hard work and ingenuity in completing this case. They are committed to ensuring safe and ethical opportunities while conserving our big game natural resources. We’d also like to thank the King County Prosecutors Office and the Attorney General’s Office Environmental Protection Division for their work on this case.”
Nora Naughton
Thu, 13 June 2024
Ford is ending a controversial program that required dealers to invest between $500,000 and $1 million to sell EVs.
EV sales are now open to all Ford dealers without certification requirements.
The change comes after Ford over-estimated EV sales growth.
Ford dealers no longer need to invest up to $1 million in order to sell electric vehicles.
The Blue Oval is ending its controversial EV dealership program less than two years after it was first announced, Ford Chief Operating Officer Marin Gjaja told reporters Thursday, according to CNBC.
Ford dealers will no longer be required to invest in certification to get EVs on their lot, opening battery-electric sales to Ford's entire dealership network — a move Gjaja said is designed to grow Ford's EV sales.
The program, first announced in September 2022, asked dealers to spend between $500,000 and $1.2 million to become "EV Certified." The steep price included expensive DC fast-chargers for dealer lots to double as charging locations and EV training for staff.
This rigorous buy-in program was built on optimistic EV sales forecasts that dealers would make back their investments as electric-car popularity increased. But a lot has changed in the US EV market since the fall of 2022, and growth in the segment hasn't played out as Ford initially expected, Gjaja said.
EV sales have slowed down in the past year. They are still on the rise but at a slower rate than the boom in growth that happened between 2020 and 2022. With wealthy early adopters largely sated, car companies are now trying to entice a new group of EV shoppers who are more frugal and practical.
Ford dealers were among the first to raise alarm bells about this slowdown when some stores started turning down Mustang Mach-E allocations last summer. Later, dealers started reporting issues with F-150 Lightning demand — further eroding Ford's relationship with its dealers.
Since then, Ford and other major automakers have gone back to the drawing board on their EV strategies.
Even before this slowdown in EV sales, many Ford dealers were unhappy with the high price of entry for selling electric cars. Several dealer associations filed lawsuits related to the program. In one case, an Illinois board ruled in favor of the dealers' claim that Ford's EV certification program violated state laws.
As of December of last year, a little more than half of Ford's nearly 3,000 US dealers had opted out of the EV investment requirements, an early sign that the program had backfired.
Ford's dealers will still need to make some investments to support EV sales on their lots, but they will no longer be held to the minimum $500,000 investment.
Ford vice chair John Lawler on EVs, 2024 profits, and why the automaker never abandoned hybrids
Pras Subramanian
·Senior Reporter
Sat, 15 June 2024
Ford (F) is having a strong sales year in the US, with deliveries up 11% in the month of May, driven by a nearly 65% boost in hybrid sales from a year ago. Even electric vehicle sales are strong.
The sales success comes after a big transformation in the company last year. New vice chair John Lawler, Ford’s former CFO, played a big part in the company’s Ford+ plan, which split the automaker’s reporting structure into three units: its traditional gas-powered business (Ford Blue), commercial business (Ford Pro), and EVs (Model e).
While the EV business has seen higher costs and softer consumer demand, the company is still bullish on battery EVs. Yahoo Finance spoke to Lawler at the Deutsche Bank Global Autos Conference in midtown Manhattan this week, where Lawler gave investors and analysts an update on Ford’s 2024 outlook. Here are the edited excerpts:
John Lawler, then Ford's Chief Financial Officer, rings the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange in New York City last year. (REUTERS/Brendan McDermid)
Pras Subramanian: Ford had a strong sales month in May, powered by not just traditional ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicles but also hybrids. Did Ford envision that a year ago at the delivering Ford+ event? EVs were the big push then but look at hybrid sales now. How do you explain that?
John Lawler: Yeah, so when you think about hybrids with Ford, we've been in hybrids for over 20 years. We're No. 3 in the US in hybrids right now. Now our hybrid sales are going to grow 40% this year; you can't just turn that on with a switch. So all the narrative and hype had been around EVs, but we never walked away from hybrids. We always had those in the plan. They were always funded, and you're seeing that now, as the demand has increased, we have the capacity to provide for consumers, and you're seeing that take place.
We're seeing the demand story for EVs slow down a bit, but Ford's EV sales are still quite strong. What's your take on that and how Ford can bridge the gap to EV profitability?
So the way we think about EVs is it's not a matter of if, it's when and how fast. And so we did see a slowdown relative to what people expected, but I think there was a false signal coming out of COVID of how quick demand was going to grow.
That was because of the early adopters — they were really excited about having the choice of electric vehicles. Then we get to the early majority. They're not willing to put up with some of the other issues that you might have with an EV around range and those types of things. So choice is important, and it's coming through where you have hybrids, where you have plug-in hybrids. Other technologies are coming along as well that I think will help that transition. So I think you're going to see the growth continue, [but] it's going be a little bit slower than what we've seen in the past.
Of course, for us, getting to profitability is key. With our segmentation, you can see exactly how we're performing in the EV space, and we have plans to improve that primarily with our second generation of vehicles, where we'll see step function changes in the cost and performance of the vehicles. And that's where we think we'll really start to gain traction from a business standpoint for our electric vehicles.
"I think you're going to see the growth continue": A Ford electric F-150 truck is displayed outside of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on March 23, 2023 in New York City. Ford held an event to explain its current operations including plans to reorganize its business units. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
So real profitability may come in those second-generation software-defined types of EVs?
Exactly. The cost structure of those vehicles is going to improve dramatically through battery technologies, efficiency of design, et cetera. That’s because [with] our first generation vehicles, to get to market quickly, we converted gas vehicles into electric vehicles. These [second-gen EVs) are ground-up platforms designed specifically to be EVs.
You’re talking about 2024 shaping up to be a strong sales year. Do you see that $10 billion to 12 billion adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) target in play?
When we came out of the first quarter, we had guided that we would be at the high end of that range. And so that's where our guidance sits right now.
I’ve known you as the CFO, grinding those numbers and financial metrics, but now you have more of a strategic role in the business. I know you used to work in Europe and Asia, and now you’re going to leverage some of those roots, right? What's the new role going to entail, and how do you make Ford more efficient from an operational point of view?
It's really around strategic initiatives. The level of change in this industry is unprecedented right now. You have the propulsion changes, moving from gas to electrification, and electrification is going to take many forms, as we're starting to see develop. You also then have the digital technologies in the platform. So I'm going to be focusing on which technologies we're going move into alliances, and as you said, partnerships are going to be key.
One of the issues with this industry has been capital efficiency, and a way you work through more capital-efficient structures is through partnerships and sharing some of that capital footprint. So we're going to focus on that. And then, of course, I've worked all over the world. I spent six years in China. I've worked in Europe. I've worked in Japan. And I think I can add a lot of value working with governments and their leaders on the policies and how Ford can help and how Ford's going to interface in those markets.
Is Ford still focused on China? Is it more of a joint-venture situation?
Well, we've always had joint ventures in China, and we have two - one in commercial vehicles, one for passenger vehicles. They're really important partners for us. I love our strategy in China. It's capital light, we're profitable in China, we're exporting from China, we're growing from that market base. So we have a lot of possibilities in China, and I'm excited about the future there.
Lydia O'Connor
Fri, June 14, 2024
Dr. Anthony Fauci, the infectious disease expert who advised the federal government on its response to the COVID-19 pandemic, detailed his whiplash-inducing relationship with Donald Trump in his new memoir.
Excerpts from the book, “On Call: A Doctor’s Journey in Public Service,” were shared Thursday by several media outlets the week before its scheduled release.
The book’s chapter about Trump, titled, “He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not,” recounts the doctor’s time working as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ― a position he held for nearly 40 years before retiring in 2022. About 70 of the book’s 450 pages are focused on Trump, the New York Times reported.
Much of their relationship, Fauci wrote, involved Trump alternately praising him then excoriating him for things he’d said about the COVID-19 pandemic. In one June 2020 phone call from Trump, the former president unleashed his fury on him for saying the virus’ vaccine was unlikely to provide lifetime protection and would probably require boosters, according to book excerpts obtained by the Daily Beast.
Dr. Anthony Fauci appears beside Donald Trump at a 2020 press briefing on COVID-19. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI via Getty Images
“The president was irate, saying that I could not keep doing this to him. He said he loved me, but the country was in trouble, and I was making it worse,” Fauci reportedly wrote, noting that the then-president’s comments to him were often laden with expletives.
“I have a pretty thick skin, but getting yelled at by the president of the United States, no matter how much he tells you that he loves you, is not fun,” he recalled, according to excerpts quoted by the Times.
In his last conversation with Trump shortly before the 2020 election, Fauci reportedly wrote, Trump insisted he’d beat now-President Joe Biden and used some some colorful language to describe the Democrat.
“I am going to win this election by a fucking landslide,” Trump said, according to Fauci’s book. “Just wait and see. I always did things my way. And I always win, no matter what all these other fucking people think. And that fucker Biden. He is so fucking stupid. I am going to kick his fucking ass in this election.”
The longtime scientist went on to serve as Biden’s chief medical adviser until his retirement.
Fauci also said Trump’s vice president, Mike Pence, was abnormally deferential to Trump.
“Vice presidents are almost always publicly loyal to the president. That is part of the job. But in my opinion, Vice President Pence sometimes overdid it,” he wrote, per the Times. “During task force meetings, he often said some version of, ‘There are a lot of smart people around here, but we all know that the smartest person is upstairs.’”
Fauci recently appeared before the House COVID-19 committee, whose Republican members have repeatedly suggested he masterminded a cover-up of the virus’s origins. Those claims, Fauci told the lawmakers, are “absolutely false and simply preposterous.”
His book is out on June 18.
Related...
Fauci Calls GOP Accusation He Covered Up COVID's Origins 'Preposterous'
Marjorie Taylor Greene Gave A Bizarre Animal Testing Rant Against Fauci. Here’s The Truth.
Anthony Fauci Name-Checks Marjorie Taylor Greene As A Driver Of Death Threats
Fauci recounts expletive-laden lecture he got from Trump when stock market didn’t increase enough on vaccine news
Katie Hawkinson
Fri, June 14, 2024
Anthony Fauci (left) and Donald Trump (right) speak. Fauci writes in a new book that Trump went on an expletive-filled rant directed at him during the pandemic (AFP)
President Donald Trump unleashed an expletive-filled rant about the stock market not increasing enough when the first Covid-19 vaccine trials were successful, Dr Anthony Fauci has recounted.
Fauci, one of the nation’s top infectious disease experts who helped lead the US response to the COVID-19 pandemic until through 2022, is publishing On Call: A Doctor’s Journey in Public Service next week. His chapter on working with Trump during the pandemic is aptly titled, “He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not,” according to The New York Times’ review of the book.
Fauci wrote the former president directed expletive-filled rants towards him when the stock market didn’t well enough to the Covid-19 vaccine: “The president was irate, saying that I could not keep doing this to him.”
“He said he loved me, but the country was in trouble, and I was making it worse,” he continued. “He added that the stock market went up only 600 points in response to the positive Phase 1 vaccine news, and it should have gone up 1,000 points, and so I cost the country ‘one trillion dollars.’”
Fauci noted Trump added an expletive to his rant.
Anthony Fauci (left) and Donald Trump (right) speak. Fauci writes in a new book that Trump went on an expletive-filled rant directed at him during the pandemic (AFP)
“I have a pretty thick skin but getting yelled at by the president of the United States, no matter how much he tells you that he loves you, is not fun,” Fauci wrote, per the Times.
The physician also criticized Mike Pence’s support of Trump during the pandemic, according to the Times.
“Vice presidents are almost always publicly loyal to the president,” Fauci wrote. “That is part of the job. But in my opinion, Vice President Pence sometimes overdid it. During task force meetings, he often said some version of, ‘There are a lot of smart people around here, but we all know that the smartest person is upstairs.’”
Fauci notes other odd details about the former president, the Times reports, including that Trump once said he had never received a flu shot.
“When I asked [Trump] why, he answered, ‘Well, I’ve never gotten the flu. Why did I need a flu shot?’ I did not respond,” Fauci wrote.
Recently, Fauci was in the national spotlight again as he testified before a Republican-led Congressional committee about the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic.
During the public portion of the hearing, right-wing Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene inexplicably accused the top infectious disease expert of practicing “evil science,” calling for Fauci’s license to be revoked.
Fauci wrote in upcoming memoir that Trump yelled expletives at him in a phone call in 2020
Sudiksha Kochi, USA TODAY
Sat, June 15, 2024
Scroll back up to restore default view.
WASHINGTON —Dr. Anthony Fauci wrote in his upcoming memoir that former President Donald Trump went into an expletive-filled rant with him during a phone call in 2020 but at the same time said he loved him, the New York Times reported.
The phone call came during the COVID-19 pandemic. Trump, then the president, would downplay the effects of COVID-19 and repeatedly attacked Fauci for the guidelines he set forth to the public in navigating the virus.
In his memoir, “On Call: A Doctor’s Journey in Public Service,” Fauci wrote that during the call Trump “was irate, saying that I could not keep doing this to him” and dropped F-bombs, according to the New York Times and the Daily Beast.
“He said he loved me, but the country was in trouble, and I was making it worse,” Fauci wrote. “He added that the stock market went up only 600 points in response to the positive Phase 1 vaccine news, and it should have gone up 1,000 points, and so I cost the country ‘one trillion dollars.’”
He added that, “I have a pretty thick skin, but getting yelled at by the president of the United States, no matter how much he tells you that he loves you, is not fun.”
Republicans in Congress have floated a number of conspiracy theories involving Fauci related to the COVID-19 pandemic. During a House hearing earlier this month, Fauci defended himself against those allegations.
“Whenever somebody gets up, whether it's a news media – you know Fox News does it a lot – or it's somebody in the Congress who gets up and makes a public statement that I'm responsible for the deaths of X number of people because of policies or some crazy idea that I created the virus, immediately it's like clockwork – the death threats go way up," he said.
His memoir is expected to be released this month.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Fauci said Trump dropped F-bombs at him in phone call during pandemic
Fauci Speaks His Mind on Trump’s Rages and Their ‘Complicated’ Relationship
Sheryl Gay Stolberg
Sat, June 15, 2024 at 8:03 a.m. MDT·5 min read
Dr. Anthony Fauci, at his home in Washington, Sept. 9, 2021. (Jason Andrew/The New York Times)
WASHINGTON — Three months into the coronavirus pandemic, Dr. Anthony Fauci was at home in northwest Washington when he answered his cellphone to President Donald Trump screaming at him in an expletive-laden rant. He had incurred the president’s wrath by remarking that the vaccines under development might not provide long-lasting immunity.
That was the day, June 3, 2020, “that I first experienced the brunt of the president’s rage,” Fauci writes in his forthcoming autobiography.
Fauci has long been circumspect in describing his feelings toward Trump. But in the book, “On Call: A Doctor’s Journey in Public Service,” he writes with candor about their relationship, which he describes as “complicated.”
Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times
In a chapter titled “He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not,” Fauci described how Trump repeatedly told him he “loved” him while at the same time excoriating him with tirades flecked with four-letter words.
“The president was irate, saying that I could not keep doing this to him,” Fauci wrote. “He said he loved me, but the country was in trouble, and I was making it worse. He added that the stock market went up only 600 points in response to the positive Phase 1 vaccine news, and it should have gone up 1,000 points, and so I cost the country ‘one trillion dollars.’” (The president added an expletive.)
“I have a pretty thick skin,” Fauci added, “but getting yelled at by the president of the United States, no matter how much he tells you that he loves you, is not fun.”
The book, which will be released Tuesday, traces the arc of Fauci’s life, from his boyhood in Brooklyn as a son of first-generation Italian Americans (his father was a pharmacist, and the family lived above the “Fauci Pharmacy”) through his 54-year career at the National Institutes of Health, 38 of them as the director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
It is 450 pages long, and Fauci devotes about 70 of them to the first year of the coronavirus pandemic, when Trump was in office. His criticisms of Trump and his White House are at times blunt and at other times oblique, leaving readers to draw their own conclusions.
Fauci served under seven presidents, shepherding the nation through infectious disease threats including AIDS, swine flu, anthrax and Ebola. But the coronavirus pandemic turned him into a polarizing public figure and a target of Republicans, particularly Trump’s most ardent supporters.
During a tense hearing this month before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, Fauci forcefully denied Republican allegations that he had helped fund research that started the pandemic or had covered up the possibility that it originated in a laboratory. He called the accusations “absolutely false and simply preposterous.”
In Fauci’s telling, the Trump White House was different from any other he had experienced, not least because of its passing relationship with the truth. Trump, he wrote, “shocked me on Day 1 of his presidency, with his disregard of facts such as the size of the crowd at his inauguration” and his “aggressive disrespect for the press.”
Those differences extended to the relationship between Trump and Vice President Mike Pence, the chair of the White House coronavirus response task force.
“Vice presidents,” Fauci wrote, “are almost always publicly loyal to the president. That is part of the job. But in my opinion, Vice President Pence sometimes overdid it. During task force meetings, he often said some version of, ‘There are a lot of smart people around here, but we all know that the smartest person is upstairs.’”
Then, without explicitly saying Pence was referring to Trump, Fauci wrote, “He was of course talking about the man sitting behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office.”
Fauci also makes clear he had little use for some of Trump’s advisers: his chief of staff, Mark Meadows; his chief economic adviser, Peter Navarro; and his medical adviser, Scott Atlas. He said Trump’s aides were feeding negative stories about him to journalists in 2020.
“The growing White House hostility toward me over the spring and summer seemed to trigger at least in part the overt attacks on me by right-wing media and trolls using social media platforms,” Fauci wrote. That August, he opened a letter containing a “fine white powder” and “instantly feared anthrax or worse.” Hazmat teams were called into his office at the National Institutes of Health; a few days later, the FBI confirmed the powder was harmless.
Fauci’s first encounter with Trump was before the coronavirus pandemic, at a White House ceremony where the president signed an executive order that called for improvements in the manufacturing and distribution of flu vaccines. After the event, Trump remarked to Fauci that he had never had a flu shot.
“When I asked him why, he answered, ‘Well, I’ve never gotten the flu. Why did I need a flu shot?’ I did not respond,” Fauci wrote. The implication was clear: The doctor was flabbergasted to discover that Trump knew so little about the purpose of vaccines.
On the morning of Jan. 29, 2020, Fauci wrote, conservative political commentator Lou Dobbs, whom the doctor had known for years, called to say Trump wanted to meet him. Several hours later, Fauci found himself in the White House Situation Room, briefing the president and his top advisers on a new virus that was circulating in China. It was instantly clear to Fauci, the scientist from Brooklyn, that he and Trump, the president from Queens, could relate to each other in the way that only New Yorkers can.
“He had a New York swagger that I instantly recognized — a self-confident, backslapping charisma that reminded me of my days in New York,” Fauci wrote.
But that is where the kinship ended. Fauci wrote that when Trump embraced hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug, as a COVID-19 treatment on the basis of anecdotal evidence, he realized that “sooner or later I would have to refute him publicly.”
He painted the president as consumed with television ratings and the economy; after one coronavirus briefing in March 2020, Trump summoned Fauci into the Oval Office and called Fox News personality Sean Hannity. Fauci recalled the moment: “‘Hey, Sean,’ he said on speakerphone. ‘You should see the ratings we have!’”
c.2024 The New York Times Company
Greene alleges Fauci committed ‘crimes against humanity’ with COVID response
Yash Roy
Sat, June 15, 2024
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), speaking at a Turning Point Action conference on Saturday, vowed to have former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Anthony Fauci sent to prison over his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Dr. Anthony Fauci should be tried for crimes against humanity,” Greene said at the conference, in comments highlighted by Mediaite, leading to the crowd chanting, “lock him up.”
She responded, “Well I can assure that if I have anything to do with it, I will lock him up. He belongs in prison.”
Green also attacked President Biden and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) during her speech.
“I’ll never forget when the Biden administration and Nancy Pelosi, as speaker of the House, brought in nearly 30,000 National Guardsmen and turned our Capitol complex into a military base,” she told the audience. “They masked schoolchildren. They shut down schools. They closed beaches. They silenced your speech.”
Biden was not president at the time. The Trump administration, at the request of Congressional leaders, including Republican leaders Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), deployed the National Guard to secure the Capitol after supporters of Trump led an insurrection in the Capitol in an attempt to stop the certification of Biden as president.
Greene has been accused of helping some of those insurrectionists by providing them with tours before January 6, 2021.
After taking over on January 20, 2021, Biden’s administration instituted a mask mandate on public transportation but did not impose a federal mask mandate.
Fauci has been a frequent target for conservatives who claim his advocacy for masking and social distance restricted freedoms and was ineffective, and have accused him of covering up the origins of the COVID-19 virus.
The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic called Fauci to testify at a heated hearing earlier this month, where Republicans accused Fauci of attempting to skirt federal Freedom of Information Act requests by using a private email server. Fauci denied the accusation.
At the hearing, Greene marked the most contentious moment of the hearing, with Democrats quickly calling for points of order after she refused to recognize Fauci as a doctor.
“Mr. Fauci, because you’re not doctor, you’re Mr. Fauci in my few minutes,” Greene said. “That man does not deserve to have a license. As a matter of fact, it should be revoked, and he belongs in jail,” Greene responded.
Fauci is set to release a book on June 18, and according to excerpts obtained by the New York Times, Fauci detailed his experience with Trump and his career. According to the Times, Fauci has a book entitled “He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not,” in which he describes how Trump would alternate between telling him that he “loved” Fauci and then later screaming expletives at him.
The Canadian Press
Fri, June 14, 2024
OTTAWA — The Narwhal and the Toronto Star have been named the winners of the 2023 Michener Award for their reporting about Ontario's Greenbelt scandal.
The Michener Awards Foundation says that throughout 2023, the magazine and newspaper revealed how "politically connected developers benefited from buying devalued farmland just before Premier Doug Ford lifted Greenbelt protection of those lands."
It says their investigation led to Ford "scrapping the plan to allow development on formerly protected Greenbelt lands and cost the government two ministers and two senior staffers."
The Canadian Press was nominated for a months-long investigation by reporter Darryl Greer that revealed a toxic workplace and allegations of sexual assault at Canada's spy agency.
CSIS director David Vigneault said it was an "extraordinary moment" for the agency while Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called the allegations "devastating."
The Michener Award was founded in 1970 by the late Roland Michener, then governor general, to honour excellence in public service journalism.
The other finalists this year included work by CBC/Radio-Canada on sex crime allegations against billionaire Robert Miller; by the Globe and Mail on Montreal fire safety; the Montreal Gazette on the suicide of a retired police officer in a hospital emergency room; and Radio-Canada on the dark side of Neptune.
Gov. Gen. Mary Simon recognized the finalists during a ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa.
"This year’s finalists have used their investigative talents to influence change within our communities," she said Friday.
"Each story being recognized tonight has made a difference. Each of your stories demonstrated the importance of journalism."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 14, 2024.
The Canadian Press
Jonathan Tirone
Fri, 14 June 2024
3 / 3
Building Nuclear Power Is a Bridge Too Far for World’s Private Investors
(Bloomberg) -- The next generation of nuclear reactors will need to be financed by taxpayers because private investors aren’t willing to bear the risks associated with building new plants.
Beaches on Singapore’s Sentosa Island Hit By Oil Spill
That was the warning from bankers at a meeting of industry and government officials in Prague this week. The Nuclear Energy Agency event underscored the hard decisions Western economies soon need to make to keep one of their biggest clean energy sources going. While the public have warmed to nuclear in recent years, spiraling project costs have made private equity cautious.
Officials have estimated that the world needs to spend $5 trillion to triple nuclear-power generation over the next 25 years. The problem is that years of delays and billion-dollar budget overruns at European and the US projects are spooking investors, and scores of reactors already running on borrowed time will need to be replaced. No private investors want to take on construction risks, said Simon Taylor, a financier at the Cambridge Nuclear Energy Centre.
“We’re at a critical juncture of in the history of nuclear energy,” said William Magwood, director general of the Nuclear Energy Agency. “We have to move quickly. Financing is critical.”
Earlier this year, Electricite de France SA said its nuclear project at Hinkley Point in the UK would cost as much as £10 billion ($13 billion) extra to build and take several years longer than planned. In the US, Southern Co.’s Vogtle nuclear facility came in more than $16 billion over budget and seven years behind schedule.
“Unfortunately, the nuclear industry has been its own worst enemy,” said Anurag Gupta, chief risk officer at Sequoia Investment Management Co.
While some private capital has gone toward designing small modular reactors — factory-built units theoretically cheaper to build than traditional plants — those projects have also been plagued by delays pushing full commercialization years later than expected. That leaves nuclear advocates struggling for investor support with the technology at hand.
Rothschild & Co.’s Steven Vaughan, an adviser for UK’s proposed Sizewell C nuclear plant, echoed the view that investors are wary of taking on exposure to construction risk.
Equity investment interest in Sizewell, currently owned by the UK government and minority stakeholder EDF, has been muted, with Centrica Plc suggesting it could become a stakeholder.
Compounding nuclear power project risks are the long life span of the assets and the uncertain development of electricity markets. Historically, nations alleviated that risk by building reactors themselves. That’s still the case in China and Russia — the two countries building the most plants.
“It’s hard for any investor to think about market design 50 years into the future,” said Iain Smedley, chairman of global banking at Barclays Plc. “It’s therefore very important they’re comfortable with the social contract.”
Some delegates in Prague suggested economies need to think about nuclear power beyond simply profit and loss. It’s an emissions-free energy source that can help meet climate targets, as well as supporting a skilled workforce.
“There is a vast need for state involvement,” said Marcin Kaminski, risk manager building Poland’s first reactors at Polskie Elektrownie Jadrowe.
Bloomberg Businessweek
U.S. Pushes to Triple Nuclear Energy Production by 2050
Editor OilPrice.com
Sat, 15 June 2024 at 11:00 am GMT-6·3-min read
This Monday Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer announced that she intends to reopen a nuclear power plant to meet the state’s decarbonization goals. If she is successful in her campaign, it would mark the first time in United States history that a nuclear power plant has been brought back online after being decommissioned – but it more than likely won’t be the last.
The owner of the Palisades Nuclear Generating Station, which currently sits dormant on the shores of Lake Michigan, received a conditional loan guarantee for a whopping $1.52 billion from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office to help fund the plant’s revival. If Holtec, the company that owns the plant, meets all of the closing conditions, the Palisades plant would be just the second or third plant in the entire world to be re-commissioned. And they plan to do it by just 2025.
Reopening the plant would not only be a trailblazing boon for low-carbon energy production in the United States, it also stands to offer a huge economic boost to Michiganders, who lost more than 600 high-paying jobs, many unionized, when the plant shuttered in May 2022. Whitmer says that if the plant is restarted, it could bring in $363 million in much-needed regional economic impact.
Although the United States has the top-producing nuclear energy fleet in the world, the country’s nuclear power sector has been in decline for years. The average age of a nuclear reactor in the United States is about 42 years old. Around one dozen nuclear power reactors have closed in the United States since 2013, and according to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 22 commercial nuclear power reactors (out of 93 total reactors) at 18 sites are in various stages of decommissioning. Meanwhile just one new power plant – Georgia’s plant Vogtle – has been added to the national fleet in the last several decades. And at present, zero new reactors are under construction in the United States.
The United States will have to see a radical repositioning and revitalization of the nuclear power sector if it is to meet its own global pledges, which includes a commitment to triple nuclear power production by 2050. At last year’s COP28 global climate conference, the United States was one of more than 20 countries that cooperated to launch the Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy.
Building new power plants is extremely cost-prohibitive, however. And Plant Vogtle has shown just how expensive and exhausting building up a new nuclear fleet could be. First approved in 2009, it has only just reached completion, with its fourth reactor finally coming online on April 29, 2024, when it officially became the most expensive infrastructure project of any kind in U.S. history, at a whopping $35 billion. “The project has been such a bloated disaster that many pundits think it could be make-or-break for the wholesale future of the United States nuclear sector,” Oilprice reported in April.
So instead of investing hundreds of billions of dollars into building out a new nuclear fleet from the ground up, why not bring a fully formed industry back from the grave? Or better yet, if the country is to have any hope of meeting that lofty triple nuclear energy pledge, why not both? Many of the defunct nuclear power plants in the United States are too far gone to restart, but even rebuilding a new reactor on the same site would be a huge advantage for efficiency and cost-effectiveness. “So you don’t have to go through the whole rigamarole again, you can just use the existing footprint to be able to increase generation capacity,” Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm was recently quoted by Fast Company.
Building new reactors as an expansion of existing plants can be another cost-effective alternative, which many companies are already taking advantage of. Granholm says that about 30 such power plant sites across the country have already been licensed or permitted for the construction of more reactors.
By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com
Jamie Tabberer
Thu, 13 June 2024
Keir Starmer's at today's Labour manifesto launch (Image: Labour)
Today, in their General Election manifesto, Labour announced it would commission a new HIV Action Plan in England and implement a ‘trans-inclusion ban’ on so-called conversion therapy.
The manifesto also states that Labour will ‘protect LGBT+ and disabled people by making all existing strands of hate crime an aggravated offence.’
Elsewhere, it says Labour will ‘modernise, simplify, and reform the intrusive and outdated gender recognition law to a new process,’ adding: ‘Labour is proud of our Equality Act and the rights and protections it affords women; we will continue to support the implementation of its single-sex exceptions.’
It adds: ‘We are currently on the cusp of eradicating new cases of HIV. Labour will commission a new HIV action plan in England, in pursuit of ending HIV cases by 2030.’
Party leader Keir Starmer unveiled the manifesto, heavily focused on economic growth and wealth creation, at a launch event in Greater Manchester today (Thursday 13 June 2024).
Labour’s election manifesto: what it says about LGBTQ issues
‘Delivering opportunities for all means that everyone should be treated with respect and dignity. Labour will protect LGBT+ and disabled people by making all existing strands of hate crime an aggravated offence.
‘So-called conversion therapy is abuse – there is no other word for it – so Labour will finally deliver a full trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices, while protecting the freedom for people to explore their sexual orientation and gender identity.
‘We will also modernise, simplify, and reform the intrusive and outdated gender recognition law to a new process. We will remove indignities for trans people who deserve recognition and acceptance; whilst retaining the need for a diagnosis of gender dysphoria from a specialist doctor, enabling access to the healthcare pathway.
‘Labour is proud of our Equality Act and the rights and protections it affords women; we will continue to support the implementation of its single-sex exceptions.’
Conversion therapy refers to the scientifically-debunked practise of trying to change someone’s sexuality and/or gender identity.
The UK’s leading HIV charity, Terrence Higgins Trust, say a new HIV Action Plan for England is “essential” in achieving the Government’s ambition to end new HIV cases by 2030.
The current HIV Action Plan is due to expire in 2025. As it stands, the UK are not on track to meet the necessary target of reducing new transmissions by 80% within 12 months. The charity affirms that a new HIV Action Plan is “exactly what is needed.”
Labour will face the Tories at the polls in the General Election on 4 July 2024.
“Ending new cases of HIV in the UK by 2030 is possible but not probable”
Richard Angell, Chief Executive at Terrence Higgins Trust, said: “With just one parliament left to deliver the UK’s commitment to end new HIV cases by 2030, this important commitment in the Labour Party’s manifesto of a new HIV action plan in England to ensure we do not miss this historic opportunity is excellent news.
“The government’s current HIV action plan expires next year, which is why today’s announcement from Labour is exactly what is needed. Ending new cases of HIV in the UK by 2030 is possible but not probable – a renewed HIV Action Plan which is bold and ambitious is essential to us achieving this historic goal.
“We are clear on what this new plan needs to include – increasing HIV testing, expanding PrEP access and ensuring everyone living with HIV gets the care they need. In two years, the opt-out HIV testing in A&Es programme has found more than 5,000 people with HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis in just four cities, and soon 47 more hospitals across England will be testing thanks to an expansion this year.
“This pioneering programme is essential to halting HIV transmission in the UK. Waiting times for PrEP average more than 12 weeks and 14,000 diagnosed people are not taking their medication. To be the generation of MPs to end the HIV epidemic and a government that makes it happen in office, we have to turn this around. Get it right and we could be the first country in the world to end new HIV cases. What a legacy that would be.”
According to a party statement, Labour “plans to deliver economic stability, cut NHS waiting times, launch a new Border Security Command, set up Great British Energy, crackdown on antisocial behaviour and recruit 6,500 new teachers” should it win the election.
The post Labour commit to HIV Action Plan and ‘trans-inclusive’ conversion therapy ban in election manifesto appeared first on Attitude.
Green Party removes HIV image from online manifesto after backlash
Joe Middleton
Fri, 14 June 2024
The Green Party manifesto includes pledges “no more HIV transmissions by 2030” (Isabel Infantes/PA) (PA Wire)
The Green Party has removed an image of a coughing man from its online manifesto after a backlash over its depiction of people with HIV.
The image appeared in an easy read version of the environmentalist party’s manifesto in the section describing its pledge to end HIV transmission by 2030.
However, the left-wing party were accused of being “misleading” for using the image by social media users.
One person said: “Not @TheGreenParty using this diagram in their easy read manifesto on their HIV commitment. Maybe a slight implication that people living with HIV are sick (and… dare I say, airborne contagious). Which would be incorrect.”
Luke Robert Black, the chairman of LGBT+ Conservatives, posted on X, formerly Twitter: “Any implication that HIV+ people are “contagious” (esp. airborne) is wrong and misleading. So long as you are on effective treatment, you cannot pass HIV on.”
Easy read documents are produced to help make text easier to understand and can be helpful for people with learning difficulties.
In its manifesto launched on Wednesday, the Green Party pledged “no more HIV transmissions by 2030”.
It said this will involve giving people access to the “HIV prevention pill online, in pharmacies and from GP services, and renewing successful opt-out HIV testing programmes in A&Es in all areas with a high prevalence of HIV”.
On the easy-read version the image of the unwell man has now been replaced by a hand holding a pill.
A spokesperson for the Green Party of England and Wales said: “Soon after publication we were alerted to how an image we used in our easy-read manifesto could be misinterpreted.
“For clarity we temporarily took the manifesto down to replace this image with a more suitable image that better communicates our policy to work towards no more HIV transmissions by 2030.”
According to HIV and sexual health charity Terrence Higgins Trust, the most recent UK-wide figures indicated around 106,890 people were living with HIV in the UK in 2019.
In 2021, a further 2,692 people were diagnosed with HIV in England, 218 in Scotland, and 60 in Wales.