Monday, June 17, 2024

 

UK

Campaigners demand to know party policies on Covid-19

By Covid Action

JUNE 14, 2024

Covid-19 has not disappeared. People are still falling sick, being hospitalised and dying from it. Long Covid numbers are increasing, preventing sufferers from working and adding to the number of unemployed and the costs of long-term sickness benefits, and thousands of clinically vulnerable people are still unable to rejoin society and lead ‘normal’ lives.

 For the past two years the Tory Government has treated Covid as though it were no more than a bad cold, removing protections against infection and the means by which new variants and surges can be identified and monitored.

 Speaking on behalf of Covid Action, Joan Twelves says: “Measures to prevent infection will more than pay for themselves and will go a long way to improving the health of the nation.

“The pretence that Covid has gone away has to stop. We are calling on the main political parties to clarify their policies on Covid-19 by answering a series of important questions about infection controls, our right to clean air, indoors and out, data collection, vaccines and Long Covid.”

Covid Action has asked the parties whether they will call on the next Government to:

1.        make Covid an occupational disease, and Long Covid recognised as a disability under equality legislation?

2.        make tests freely available to everyone and restore regular testing of staff and patients in hospitals and care homes?

3.        restore data collection and surveys, such as the ONS survey and other research programmes and projects on the prevalence of Covid-19 and potential new variants of SARS and other viral threats?

4.        follow the example of the Mayor of London and institute a programme of installing air filtration systems in schools, colleges, hospitals and care homes?

5.        provide free booster vaccines for all those who want them?

6.        provide specialist clinics and support for Long Covid sufferers, and a programme of research into its causes?

7.        review the infection prevention and control guidelines?

8.        restore the tasks of testing and tracing any new disease to local authority public health specialists?

9.        increase sick pay?

10.      raise Covid awareness by providing public information that Covid is still here and that it is an airborne disease?

11.      fund not-for-profit research to develop new vaccines and antiviral drugs?

12.      vigorously go after the Covid-profiteers and fraudsters?

13.      ensure that the NHS, public health authorities and other agencies are fully prepared for any new health threats to the population, including being fully stocked with PPE?

Supporters of Covid Action are asking these same questions of candidates standing for election in constituencies across England and Wales.


Covid Action UK is grassroots, activist campaign of individuals and affiliated labour and trade union organisations who came together in November 2020 to challenge the UK government’s then approach to the pandemic. CONTACT US:Email: info@covidaction.uk

 

UK

Labour’s transphobia failure

By Alex Burt

JUNE 17, 2024


With hindsight, it’s easy for the trans community to look back on 2019 fondly. Things were not perfect, but progress towards dignity and equality for transgender people seemed inevitable.. For a start, 64% of respondents to a government consultation had expressed support for the concept of ‘Self-ID’, a de-medicalising of the Gender Recognition Act. Labour would carry a promise to do similar into the 2019 election. Public attitudes indicated broad support for an extension of trans rights.

Why do I say this? Because that, as we now know, is not what happened. Self-ID was canned by Liz Truss in 2020, ostensibly because she felt it “was not a priority” for trans people. Since then we have become an ever more tempting target in an ever more vicious culture war with an ever more hostile political and media class. From being the party of Self-ID under Theresa May, Sunak’s manifesto contains several anti-trans pledges, including one to ensure the Equality Act explicitly excludes trans people from any definition of sex.

Unfortunately, as with so much else, when offered the chance to set out a progressive stall, Starmer instead decided to shift to a right wing stance. And in this case, I do mean a right wing stance, not a rightward shift. The 2024 manifesto includes halving the amount of time someone must live as their preferred gender to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate and a trans inclusive conversion therapy ban, but that is about it for any limited trans positive policy. The promise to implement the Cass Report recommendations, despite the flawed and biased methodology they come from (rejecting all non-double-blind studies in an area where that is deeply unethical, being a particularly bad example), is a deeply reactionary approach to trans rights which puts people like me on the altar of appeasing those in the media who are obsessed with us.

The problem with Labour’s approach to trans rights isn’t just policy either. It is the words our leadership uses. It is the way we are seen, not as people, but as a pawn used to get votes, and it’s not our votes he wants. Figures across the shadow cabinet have repeatedly engaged in dog-whistle politics around transphobia, but in particular Wes Streeting, and Keir Starmer himself have become some of the frontbench’s most outspoken transphobes. This goes alongside NEC intervention to dismiss a complaint against Rosie Duffield for transphobia and antisemitism after she denied trans people were targets of Nazi German genocide, and the similarly insidious statements from other backbench MPs to create a climate where queer people do not feel safe in the Labour Party.

The Starmerite approach to trans rights is a triangulated gamble that values our votes and, perhaps more crucially, our comfort and safety, behind voters in Tory heartlands. When we complain, we are told vague lines about how the debate is ‘toxic’ (it is), that the Tories are worse and that we should be more considerate. When middle-class media trans-exclusionary radical feminists complain, we get the front bench stumbling over themselves to say that trans people will, where they can get away with it, be excluded from society if they want to live as their authentic selves. It would be pathetic if it wasn’t so personal and terrifying.

The ‘trans debate’ is toxic. It is toxic for the thousands of people, like myself, who will face abuse, slurs and threats if we even dare to stick our heads above the parapet. It is toxic for the trans people who see our politicians debating their validity and using what rights they should have as a political football. It is not toxic for those in our ruling class who debate and legislate on us. It is not their lives that are threatened by the consequences of their actions, nor is it their rights on the line. 

This manifesto was an opportunity. Labour could have used the political space created by the incompetence of the Tories and the rise of Reform to put forward at least some progressive social policy. It was an opportunity we were never going to take. I don’t know if Keir Starmer or a majority of the shadow cabinet believe what they say about trans people, but that is not the point. The point is, they have decided we do not matter to their political project, and a generation of queer people won’t forget that the side of history the leadership chose was the wrong one.

Allyship matters. Even in opposition, seeing a major party standing up for progressive social values gives queer people hope that somewhere in the future, it will get better. Theory without practice is useless, and it is important that those that say they stand with us, do so in practice rather than in theory. For many in positions in the Party, transphobia is an inconvenient facet of the Labour party to be ignored. My message to all those who read this is to not let that become the norm. Do not be a bystander, hold those in power accountable and just maybe, we will find that things can only get better from here.

Alex Burt is a Labour Party and Momentum member in Leicester South, currently serving as Youth Officer. They also chair their university Labour Society and Leicester Young Labour.

Image: https://www.liberationnews.org/uk-court-ruling-on-trans-childrens-care-puts-bigotry-before-science/ Creator: Ted Eytan Licence:CC ATTRIBUTION-SHAREALIKE 4.0 INTERNATIONAL.

 

ITF donates £50,000 to Palestinian workers

We stand firm in our resolve to support Palestinian workers and our affiliated unions until peace and dignity are restored through self-determination and the establishment of a Palestinian state
Stephen Cotton

The International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) has pledged an additional £50,000 to its Palestine Solidarity Fund to mobilise resources to support workers, trade unions and humanitarian organisations on the ground in Palestine.

At the Council of Global Unions’ meeting in Geneva, ITF General Secretary Stephen Cotton underscored the Federation’s steadfast support for Palestinian transport workers, emphasising that its commitment extends beyond mere financial assistance.

“Our unwavering commitment to Palestinian workers extends far beyond just a financial gesture of solidarity. We stand firm in our resolve to support Palestinian workers and our affiliated unions until peace and dignity are restored through self-determination and the establishment of a Palestinian state”.

The commitment was solidified during the ITF leadership’s visit to Ramallah in the West Bank alongside other global union federations, where ITF President Paddy Crumlin reiterated the solidarity of the world’s transport workers with Palestinian counterparts.

“We bring resolute solidarity from the 18 million transport workers the ITF represents and a commitment to work with Palestinian unions in their tireless efforts to support their communities in the face on unimaginable suffering and violence,” said Crumlin. “We are here in Ramallah to stand by this commitment.”

The ITF leaders met with Palestinian trade union leaders during the mission, hearing about the dire realities faced by Palestinian workers in Gaza as well as in the West Bank amidst severe restrictions from occupation forces and increasing settler violence. The delegation also met with the new Palestinian cabinet, including President Mahmoud Abbas, Deputy Prime Minister Samah Abou Oun, Minister of Labour Enas Dahadha, and Minister of Telecommunications and Digital Economy Abdel Razzaq Natsheh.

Expressing deep concern over the ongoing bloodshed in Gaza, Crumlin condemned the indiscriminate attacks on innocent civilians sheltering in refugee camps, hospitals and schools and reiterated the call for an immediate ceasefire. He also urged Israel to comply with the International Court of Justice’s orders for an immediate end to the Rafah offensive and demanded unrestricted humanitarian access to Gaza.

“We stand shoulder to shoulder with Palestinians, Israelis and people around the world condemning these horrific acts and demanding an immediate ceasefire. For lasting peace, we need a rapid de-escalation including the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages and others held without due judicial process,” said Crumlin.

ITF General Secretary Stephen Cotton echoed these sentiments, stating: “The international community cannot remain silent while such atrocities and flagrant violations of international law continue.”

Cotton called on Israel to halt its offensive, open border crossings for urgently needed humanitarian aid, and lift all economic restrictions, including on workers’ funds, that are causing widespread economic starvation across the Palestinian Occupied Territories.

In alignment with the International Court of Justice’s recent orders in the case filed by South Africa against Israel regarding the application of the Genocide Convention, the ITF urged Israel to immediately halt its military offensive on Rafah, open the Rafah crossing to ensure unhindered access to humanitarian assistance, and to allow unimpeded access to UN-sanctioned investigators.

The ITF also echoed an earlier call from global unions for all States to bolster trust in the international legal order and support international legal institutions including for all States Parties to the Genocide Convention to fulfil their common obligation to prevent genocide, including reviewing funding for arms and Israel’s military activities.

Cotton also urged trade unions globally to reaffirm their support the independence and impartiality of the International Criminal Court, particularly in light of recent attacks by some government officials.

“Prosecutorial and judicial independence is one of the key components of the rule of law,” Cotton asserted. “The work of the ICC and its Prosecutor to investigate documented war crimes by the Israeli Government and Hamas should not be hindered in any way. States must cooperate with the ICC and fulfil their responsibility to prevent and end international crimes.”

Crumlin reiterated the ITF’s unwavering commitment to a peaceful resolution, stating: 

“We will continue to stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people and all those who yearn for peace. We call upon all parties to prioritise diplomacy and dialogue, to choose the path of peace over violence, and to recognise the State of Palestine and work towards a future where Palestinians and Israelis alike can live in safety, security, and dignity”.

The ITF also reiterates earlier calls for: 

  • World leaders to prioritise diplomacy and dialogue over violence to secure the release of all hostages and work towards an immediate and lasting ceasefire that guarantees the safety and security of all Palestinians and Israelis.
  • The international community to take immediate and decisive action to protect civilians, ensure accountability for violations of international law, and work towards a just and lasting peace based on the full implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338.
  • Governments to condemn attacks on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) and urgently renew and strengthen its funding.
  • The global labour movement, under the leadership of the global unions, to consider and pursue all possible options to target and pressure companies, employers and investors that are involved in, or that facilitate the expansion and continuation of, illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied territories.

  • This article first appeared on the ITF website on 12 June 2024.

UK

Labour manifesto and Palestine: What is now party policy?

Creative-Asylum / Shutterstock

Labour has committed to recognising a Palestinian state “as a contribution to a renewed peace process which results in a two-state solution” as part of the policy platform set out in its general election manifesto.

The party has faced scrutiny over its stance on Palestinian statehood amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza, with former shadow minister Richard Burden last year calling on Labour to reinstate the Jeremy Corbyn-era policy of immediately recognising the state of Palestine.

A Labour spokesperson told LabourList at the time the party was committed to recognition alongside international partners as part of efforts to secure a two-state solution, and one insider dubbed the alternative Corbyn-era stance of immediate, unilateral recognition an “unrealistic gesture” that would hinder peace efforts.

The wording in the manifesto sees a slight change from the wording of the final document produced by the party’s National Policy Forum policymaking process, which stated that the party would “work alongside international partners to recognise the state of Palestine alongside the state of Israel”.

Here is a summary of the party’s key manifesto pledges on Palestine and Israel:

  • Labour has pledged to continue to push for:
    • An immediate ceasefire.
    • The release of all hostages.
    • The upholding of international law.
    • The rapid increase of aid into Gaza.
  • The manifesto describes Palestinian statehood as the “inalienable right of the Palestinian people”.
  • Committed to recognising a Palestinian state as a contribution to a renewed peace process which results in a two-state solution with a safe and secure Israel alongside a viable and sovereign Palestinian state.

UK

 

PCS launches its key asks for a future government

“We call on the incoming government to stop using our members as political fodder to appease the right-wing media and treat them with the respect they deserve – and that starts with giving them a fair pay rise.”
Fran Heathcote, PCS General Secretary

By the PCS Union

PCS has launched its charter for an incoming government highlighting nine key demands.

PCS members will ultimately deliver the policy objectives of the future government, therefore it is vital during this period of election campaigning that potential candidates, and parties, are aware of our demands. We urge PCS members who wish to lobby their local candidates to focus on the following asks:

  1. Pay – return to national collective bargaining for civil service, pay restoration and inflation proofed pay rise
  2. Jobs – investment in the civil service including a properly staffed civil service helps every community in the country and ensure successful day to day functionality of government.
  3. Pensions – commitment that civil servants will secure pensions justice and an immediate review of state pension age.
  4. Hybrid working – civil servants have continued to fulfil their roles to an incredibly high standard, with increased productivity, when given access to hybrid working. Future Government must acknowledge the changing world of work and the need for flexibility.
  5. Insourcing – PCS has led campaigning efforts to bring workers back into the public sector, supporting members employed in facilities management across government departments to challenge poor private employers. Insourcing should be a key commitment of any future government, giving these valued workers the same rights and opportunities as their civil service colleagues.
  6. Social Security – a system with support at its heart. Universal Credit is a dangerously flawed system, the most vulnerable continue to slip through its cracks and our members are the scapegoats for over a decade of social security failures. We need a system which supports the individual and does not demonise those who cannot work.
  7. Tax Justice – With the current tax gap estimated to be over £40bn it is time for a future government to invest in HMRC and ensure those who can pay more, do. Big business and the top 1% must pay their fair share and HMRC must be adequately resourced to ensure that the gap is reduced, and the public finances are restored off the backs of those who can and should pay more.
  8. Safe Passage – a policy which has broad support and will help to stop the boats in a humane and safe manner. Investment in the Home Office to ensure adequate support is given to those who are entering the UK, allowing them to contribute to society quickly. Working with our European partners to establish the policy and protect the most vulnerable. A future government must build on this policy, work with PCS, Care4Calais, and others to ensure the asylum system is reformed.
  9. Trade Union Rights – repeal all anti trade union laws in the UK. Working with trade unions to ensure democracy, fairness and access to a union is paramount in the world of work. Implement electronic balloting for trade unions and a return to adequate facility time for trade union activists.

PCS General Secretary, Fran Heathcote said: “The previous government has consistently attacked civil servants, making our members scapegoats for ministers’ own failed policies.

“We call on the incoming government to stop using our members as political fodder to appease the right-wing media and treat them with the respect they deserve – and that starts with giving them a fair pay rise.”

Visit our general election page and ensure you are registered to vote, secure free voter ID, and take part in your democratic rights on 4 July.


 



UK

We must resist a ‘permanent austerity’ consensus

“On the left, we can’t let a new consensus for “permanent austerity” be formed by the ruling class. It is the route to economic and social catastrophe, and a further rise of far-right politics in the years to come.”

By Matt Willgress, Labour Assembly Against Austerity

The upcoming general election takes place in the middle of the deepest cost-of-living crisis in generations, which has become a permanent cost-of-living emergency for millions.

Councils are going bust. Poverty and inequality are spiralling. Homelessness is out of control. There are regular warnings that unemployment could be set to jump dramatically. And people’s living costs just keep going up and up while wages and benefits fail to follow.

Yet there seems to be a collective denial of the depth of this social and humanitarian crisis across the front benches in Westminster.

This is extended to much of the so-called “mainstream media” which is more interested in stirring up division and hatred than shining a light on the misery suffered by the 18 per cent of our population in absolute poverty, for example.

In this increasingly desperate social context, it has been widely noted and realised by millions in recent years that the Tories are more interested in doing the bidding of their rich backers than our jobs and livelihoods — but what is becoming clearer by the week is also that the whole political Establishment seems intent on never-ending austerity.

On the Labour side of Parliament, this is reflected by shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves’s increasingly conservative “fiscal framework,” which is working through to the abandonment or watering-down of policy after policy that could start tackling the cost-of-living crisis, from public ownership of energy and water to the ditching of popular green investment policies, and much more besides.

In a recent BBC interview Reeves committed to an injection of cash into public services that would see an extra 40,000 NHS appointments a week, and an additional 6,500 teachers in state schools and 13,000 police and community support officers.

This will be welcomed by teachers, health workers and others, especially after 14 years of Tory misrule.

In the same interview she said: “There is not going to be a return to austerity under a Labour government.”

But an objective assessment of how deep the crises we face are shows that the approach she spoke of is not even a sticking plaster to what damage austerity has done to public services across the board.

We need to look at, for example, how both Labour and the Tories have absolutely no plans to even start in any serious way to reverse the vicious starving of local government funding since 2010.

And when discussing whether austerity and the cuts this means will in reality continue under Labour’s current agenda, context — and what is not being mentioned or committed to — also matters.

Just days into the campaign, Keir Starmer talked of how abolishing the two-child benefit cap “is not our policy for a reason [as] we are not going to be able to afford to scrap it because of the damage the Tories have done.”

In other words, Labour will maintain a flagship Tory austerity policy that condemns millions to the poverty.

And the day before Reeves’s aforementioned interview, Unite felt compelled to issue a press release warning people of the latest watering-down of the new deal for workers.

In it, general secretary Sharon Graham said that “the again revised New Deal for Working People has more holes in it than Swiss cheese. The number of caveats and get-outs means it is in danger of becoming a bad bosses’ charter.”

She added: “Working people expect Labour to be their voice. They need to know that Labour will not back down to corporate profiteers determined to maintain the status quo of colossal profits at the expense of everyone else. The country desperately needs a Labour government, but the party must show it will stick to its guns on improving workers’ rights.”

The reason that this key policy area is a continual point of contention between the unions and party leadership was summed up recently by John McDonnell when he wrote that “still standing at the moment, one policy that is genuinely transformative is the New Deal for Workers, in that it does shift an element of power away from the powerful.”

It is because of this that “there continues an intense lobbying campaign from elements inside and outside the party to water it down.”

On all other key issues so far, Labour’s leadership has moved to the position of the bosses and away from that of the unions.

It’s good then — and significant — to see unions resisting these efforts from the ruling class, and what is needed is further resistance on other issues where Labour’s conservative approach will mean continued misery for millions, including on the need to scrap the two-child benefit cap and introduce free school meals, to give just two examples.

On the left, we can’t let a new consensus for “permanent austerity” be formed by the ruling class. It is the route to economic and social catastrophe, and a further rise of far-right politics in the years to come.

We therefore need to urgently put forward — and mobilise now for — policies that could both actually address the depth of the crises we face, and provide the basis for action in our workplaces and communities in the months and years ahead.

As part of this effort, and as a contribution to discussion across the left, labour and social movements on the programme we need — we are renewing efforts to get further support for the Workers Can’t Wait demands online, including these 10 measures:

• Britain needs a pay rise — National Minimum Wage raised to at least £15 an hour for all; the pay rise public-sector workers are asking for; increase statutory sick pay to a real living wage for all from day one.

• A social security system to end poverty — scrap the two-child benefit cap, reverse the universal credit cut and extend the uplift to legacy benefits; boost and inflation-proof benefits; for a minimum income guarantee.

• Control costs — energy price freezes now at April 2022 rates, cap rents and basic food costs.

• Stop the corporate rip-off — public ownership of energy, water, transport, broadband and mail to bring bills down and end fuel poverty. Lower public transport costs. Higher taxes on profits and the super-rich. Open the books — back the workers’ commission on profiteering.

• Extra resources to create universal, comprehensive public services — stop cuts and privatisation; save our NHS — for a national care service; properly fund local government. Tax wealth to fund our public services.

• Homes for all — no evictions or repossessions; tackle the homelessness emergency; fix the housing crisis with a mass council housebuilding programme.

• For the right to food — enshrine the right to food in law; universal free school meals all year; for a national food service.

• Decent jobs for all — for full employment; end insecure working and ban zero-hours contracts; for the right to flexible work on workers’ not bosses’ terms.

• Defend and extend our right to organise — reverse anti-trade union laws and repeal the draconian anti-protest laws; ban fire and rehire; for full union rights to bargain for better pay and conditions.

• End austerity for good — invest in our future with a Green New Deal; end the dependency on fossil fuels and soaring oil and gas prices; for a massive investment in renewables, green infrastructure and jobs; insulate buildings to bring bills down.

As a whole, these provide a clear, popular and radical framework that genuinely could tackle the depth of the crises we face and would shift power from the few to the many.

Alongside building support for these demands, moving forward, we also need a an urgent discussion on how to co-ordinate, renew and strengthen all those initiatives that seek to address the cost-of-living emergency and support struggles for an end to austerity for good. This will become all the more important under the likely Starmer-led government from July.

Please add your name in support of Workers Can’t Wait, take the policies to labour movements and community groups for endorsement and discussion, and keep mobilising against austerity — and for investment, not cuts.


UK

‘Freedom to Buy’ “helps only a small minority and ignores the core problem”

“Many people in this country are closer to homelessness than homeownership. If political parties are serious about giving people ‘security’ in their homes, there’s only one way to do it.”
Polly Neate, Shelter

By the Labour Campaign for Council Housing (LCCH)

Angela Rayner has announced Labour’s “Freedom to Buy” policy. This is a mortgage guarantee to encourage mortgage providers to offer low deposits; a revamped version of the Tories’ Mortgage Guarantee Scheme.

We haven’t seen any detail (including costs) but the guarantee is to the mortgage provider should the buyer be unable to continue paying. However, it is only on offer to 80,000 over five years. According to the ONS there are 6.7 million people aged 15-34 living with their parents in 2022. As Polly Neate of Shelter has said another home ownership scheme “that helps only a small minority and ignores the core of the problem isn’t going to cut it”.

“Many people in this country are closer to homelessness than homeownership. If political parties are serious about giving people ‘security’ in their homes, there’s only one way to do it. With 1.3 million households stuck on social housing waiting lists and the country haemorrhaging social homes through sales and demolitions – we need to build 90,000 social homes a year with rents tied to local incomes. And politicians must get on with renting reform – no-fault evictions must be abolished, and renting made safer, secure and more affordable.”

This is right. A large scale building/acquisitions programme of social rent housing will provide secure and more affordable homes for people imprisoned in the private sector: in the case of council housing the ‘secure tenancy’. Taking hundreds of thousands of people out of the market it would be likely to drag down prices for those who want to buy.

Unfortunately, Shadow Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook, has said that a Labour government will not increase the parsimonious amount of grant currently available under the Tories. Interviewed recently he talked of “sweating grants”. In other words getting more building out of the existing grants. But what is needed is more grant. Matthew is saying there is no more money because of Rachel Reeves self-imposed economic straight-jacket. “We have no more money” is only true if you leave the regressive taxation system in place. But there are plenty of ways to raise the funding needed.

For instance at the 2021 Labour conference, none other than Rachel Reeves said that Labour would equalise capital gains tax with income tax. In her speech she said:

“How can it be right that the police constable on £27k a year should be taxed at 32p in the pound but someone making many times more from buying & selling stocks & shares should pay just 20p in the pound? That will not stand under Labour.”

Alas, it now will stand under Labour because equalising cgt has been abandoned.

In his comments in relation to ‘freedom to buy’ Keir Starmer said that “a generation face becoming renters for life”. The implication is that renting is a lesser thing than home ownership. Council tenants are often happy becoming “renters for life” because it offers them security of tenure and rent far lower than the private sector. There is nothing wrong with being a “renter for life” so long as it’s not in the expensive and often poor quality private sector. In any case home ownership does not offer security. It can become a burden which becomes unmanageable.

With 1.3 million households on housing waiting lists and 112,000 households in temporary accommodation, including 145,000 children, what is required is a focus on social rent homes.

To shift the Labour leadership it will be necessary to build the widest possible campaign to pressure the government to provide the funding needed to build the 90,000 plus social rent homes that are necessary to begin to resolve the housing crisis. Without that millions of people will remain imprisoned in the expensive and insecure private rented sector.


UK

Wanted – a foreign policy for people, planet and peace

“A forward-looking approach must involve refusing to get involved in a costly new arms race – and see Labour seek to engage with the majority of the world to advance the causes of peace, self-determination and social progress.”

By Matt Willgress

A column today on what approach the new Government should take to foreign policy must lead with Palestine – and recognise Britain has been increasingly isolated on Gaza, in terms of both the Government and Labour leadership responses, at a time when UK weapons are making possible what the International Court of Justice (ICJ) regards as potentially a plausible case of genocide.

The priority must then be to seek to shift the new Government’s approach, not only to support an immediate and lasting ceasefire – but also to address the fact that Israel continually flouts international law.

The reality is it will continue to do so, unless there are consequences for its actions. ‘Labour & Palestine’ argues that consequences concretely “means an immediate arms embargo, leading to a full cessation of arms trade if Israel fails to comply with international law”

It also means joining the majority of countries internationally – including Ireland, Spain and Norway recently– in immediately recognising a Palestinian state, as voted for by the UN Assembly.

This is the response needed based on putting people, their rights and international justice first – rather than slavish adherence to the US’ agenda.

It is widely known Labour’s leadership has consulted with US government figures over their stance on Gaza and, as a former Shadow Minister said in response, “We don’t have an independent foreign policy, a Labour policy… We have outsourced it to the US administration.”

But this is also the case way beyond the issue of Palestine, and this ‘Atlantacist’ approach refuses to recognise the world is a very different place to 25 years ago.

We live in a time of multiple crises globally, and the foreign policy agenda of a Government needs to address these seriously and in a different way to the the US position, recognising that numerous economies and economic blocs are growing to be both more independent of the US and weightier in the global economy.

In response to this, the US Empire – which remains in comparative decline economically – is lashing out through permanent interventions to try and re-assert dominance in different parts of the world. But it is failing – as Latin America shifting to the Left again and the isolation of Israel at the UN illustrate.

It is because, they are desperate to continue subordination to the US’ agenda, that the ruling-class has sought to lock-in Britain’s high and rising levels of military spending for years – and the current Labour leadership has backed this, whilst avoiding any serious discussion internally on the issue.

Yet spending levels in this area are incredibly high already, with 2021 figures making the UK the fourth highest spending country globally, and highest in Western Europe. Then in 2022, Liz Truss pledged to spend 3 per cent of GDP on this area by 2030. Since then, both Labour and the Tories have committed to increasing it to 2.5%.

Furthermore, renewing Trident nuclear weapons will cost at least £205 billion but Labour’s leadership has signed-up to this even though they regularly say the money available in Government will be extremely limited.

With the climate catastrophe, the starving of resources for public services and the cost-of-living emergency needing to be addressed, these militarist public spending priorities will be a disaster both electorally and in human terms.

Instead, a forward-looking approach must involve refusing to get involved in a costly new arms race – and see Labour seek to engage with the majority of the world to advance the causes of peace, self-determination and social progress.

The disastrous alternative is to continue to slavishly follow the US – at a time when Trump may return to the Presidency – at great cost to people, planet and peace.


  • This article was originally published by Labour Briefing.