Tuesday, July 02, 2024

 From Labour leader to independent, Jeremy Corbyn vows to work in the UK and Europe for a ceasefire in Gaza



Former Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn (C) joins pro-Palestinian supporters preparing to march through central London, on May 18, 2024, at a demonstration to commemorate the 76th anniversary of the Nakba and call for an end to arms sales to Israel.
 [BENJAMIN CREMEL/AFP via Getty Images]

by Muhammad Hussein
June 30, 2024 

Rises and falls are all part and parcel of the life of many a political figure, often in numerous occurrences and often at the hands of forces too big to be beaten. Jeremy Corbyn is no exception to that rule. Having served as leader of the UK’s Labour Party from 2015 to 2020, to being exiled from that very same party, he now stands as an independent candidate for his parliamentary seat of Islington North.

The former prime ministerial candidate, if anything, is known for his adherence to certain principles – long-held over many decades but untested by national leadership – which include proclamations of justice, accountability, security reformation, and an opposition to war and conflict.

Speaking to Middle East Monitor, Corbyn recalled his avid involvement in local politics from an early age, having first become active in his school years over issues such as the Vietnam war and environmental sustainability, as well due to an interest in tackling injustice, poverty, and discrimination.

He then worked as a trade union organiser in London in his twenties, before becoming a councillor and then an MP for Islington North in 1983. With his worldview and interest in history having been significantly influenced by his early years in the Caribbean, he stated that his decades representing his local community have “been a learning journey, learning from people from all over the world who’ve made their homes here and trying to speak up for them in parliament”.

Corbyn stressed that “I hate war and the violence that goes with it, so I started life campaigning against the Vietnam war”, highlighting his advocacy for justice and his anti-colonial stance as prominent focal points in his political mission. “It’s also about global solidarity, and I have always spoken up on issues such as apartheid in South Africa, the cause of the Palestinian people, and the cause of people which are denied representation around the world”.

Having been a member of the Labour Party since the age of 16, in which he held multiple roles and positions throughout the decades, his leadership and candidacy for prime minister of the UK – after the defeats in the 2017 and 2019 elections – ended in 2020 when he stepped down, and culminated in his brief suspension from the party that same year over his interpretation of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of antisemitism.

He was reinstated three years later, and “that could and should have been the end of the matter”, but the party’s new leader Keir Starmer “decided I should be suspended from the parliamentary party and that dispute has gone on ever since.”
An independent focus on the constituency’s challenges

The new Labour then debarred from being a candidate in this year’s upcoming general election, to take place on July 4, as well as debarring Islington North “from selecting anybody else, or even having a chance to choose me, if that’s what they wanted to do. Then when they tried to impose a candidate I attempted to put my name forward they denied it and told 
me the rules of natural justice did not apply to the Labour Party”.


Jeremy Corbyn MP addresses demonstrators gathered at a rally in Whitehall in solidarity with the Palestinian people and to demand an immediate ceasefire to end the war on Gaza on the 76th anniversary of Nakba in London, United Kingdom on May 18, 2024. [Wiktor Szymanowicz – Anadolu Agency]d

Now running as an independent candidate to maintain his seat as the constituency’s MP, he said his campaign has been “getting wonderful levels of support and enthusiasm from volunteers” and from the wider community. That campaign “is not about me”, Corbyn insisted. “It’s about the issues. It’s about peace, it’s about justice, it’s about social justice and equality in Britain”.

With his own community and constituency at the forefront of his campaign, he said that Islington North “contains all the problems and joys of modern British society. It’s a diverse community, there are 70 different languages spoken in the constituency. It has, sadly, over 40 percent of our children living in degrees of poverty within society”, in addition to “some very rich people living in very big houses in certain parts of the constituency”.

Ming vase politics: UK Labour and purging the Corbynistas

Amongst the main issues facing that community are “poverty and housing”, Corbyn said, highlighting the high mortgages, rent increases, low security of tenure, and bad energy efficiency that many in the constituency have suffered, despite the council’s best efforts to tackle such challenges. The high numbers of rough sleepers and homeless people are also a constant issue, he said, as elsewhere in the British capital.
Securing peace in the Middle East

Saying he is “passionate about the cause of peace in the Middle East”, Corbyn recounted that “I’ve been nine times to Palestine, to Israel, to the refugee camps, and all of the neighbouring countries – Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and so on.” Those trips have been a key factor in his long-held stance on the urgency of a resolution to the decades-long Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the failure of which has led to the current ongoing Israeli offensive on Gaza and the destruction of the Strip, now entering its tenth month. “I’m just horrified, every day, as more horror stories of what went on and is going on now in Gaza on top of the events of October 7, and so I’m campaigning on that.”

His plan to secure a ceasefire in Gaza, if re-elected, would include “working with colleagues in parliament”, which would reportedly be a continuation of his efforts during his past term. “For the whole of the last parliament, I’ve been a member of the parliamentary assembly of the Council of Europe… and I’ve constantly raised the issues of Gaza there. I will continue that work at the European level”.

He insisted that he would also continue to raise his voice at pro-Palestine demonstrations, as well as to further work with allies from various other parties in the UK “to demand an immediate and complete ceasefire, but above all, recognition of the State of Palestine”.

Read: UK carried out 200 spy missions over Gaza in support of Israel

A key factor facilitating the Israeli genocide in Gaza which Corbyn particularly highlighted, however, is the UK’s own complicity in supplying arms and military assistance to Tel Aviv. He plans to use “the platform in parliament to expose the arms trade, British military participation, the use of RAF Akrotiri [the British airbase in Cyprus], the supply of arms from this country to Israel, and also, of course, legal issues.” Corby insisted that “I won’t stop until we get a ceasefire, until we get justice for the Palestinian people”.

If he is re-elected back into parliament, he said, “I will be working with anyone in parliament that agrees with the need for immediate recognition [of Palestinian statehood], which would in turn encourage a peace process.” Recalling the recent recognition of Palestine by Ireland, Norway, and Spain, Corbyn stated that such a step was “very important, because having a significant bloc of European Union member states recognising Palestine makes it much harder for the other countries not to do so. The biggest stumbling blocks are Britain, France, and Germany at the present time”.
Labour’s fall from Palestine’s grace

With regards to any possibility of the Labour Party – as well as its leader Keir Starmer – reforming its stance on the Gaza conflict and recognising Palestinian statehood, Corbyn said “I would like to be optimistic and say they will”, but he reserves doubts that would be the case due to the party’s stance that recognition of the State of Palestine is part of a peace process. “No, it has to be an unconditional and immediate recognition of the state of Palestine”, he stressed. “The vast majority of the world’s nations have done that, in some cases many years ago.”

Throughout the past year, Labour’s weak stance on the Israeli bombardment of Gaza and its reluctance to recognise Palestine has disappointed many long-time members and supporters of the party, disillusioning them and leading significant voter blocs to refuse further support for Labour in this election.




Jeremy Corbyn (c), Independent candidate for Islington North, stands with supporters holding posters in Archway before a canvassing session in support of his General Election campaign on 29th June 2024 in London, United Kingdom. [Mark Kerrison/In Pictures via Getty Images]“It’s done enormous damage to the Labour standing”, Corbyn stated, lamenting that the party has ridden back from its pro-Palestinian stance when he held the leadership. “They are wrong. They’re wrong to put caveats on it [Palestinian statehood] and they’re wrong to…not to recognise in any sense that it is always completely illegal to deny people access to water, power, food, and medicine. Those are war crimes if you deny people those things.”

Emphasising the need for “real security” in international relations, which include rights to food, clean water, and other necessities, Corbyn said that “the issues facing this planet are inequality, poverty, environmental disaster, are the wars created in the greed of trying to get minerals”.

He further added that “real security comes in this world if you have food, you have education, you have a health service, and you have clean air and a clean environment. Those are the issues that we have to be concentrating on, not encouraging more wars by the development of the arms trade, and ensuring that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights means what it says, and children don’t get bombed in Gaza, in Yemen, in the Congo, or anywhere else in this world.”



Jeremy Corbyn supporting Islington Hands Off Our Public Services (IHOOPS.)

Starmer’s ban on Corbyn may mean “irreparable” damage to Labour in Islington

“The impact across the borough Party of the leadership’s persecution of Jeremy Corbyn has been profound. The Council & Party are both very divided & unhappy.”

From LabourHub

Over 70 members of Islington North Labour Party are today asking voters to vote for the independent candidate Jeremy Corbyn, including the overwhelming majority of the CLP’s executive committee. Further below we reproduce their letter in full. First, we publish an exclusive article from a group of Party activists who are bitterly angry at how have they have been treated.

This is a strange election, but for some of us it is even stranger.  We have been Labour Party members in Islington North for decades, and have loyally turned out to campaign for all sorts of deadbeats, no-hopers and right wingers.  But this time, like most of the members of the constituency, we are not. 

In May Cllr Anjna Khurana was elected Mayor of Islington for this year.  Anjna represents the best of us: hardworking, principled and brave, she took legal action, challenging the sale of local GP surgeries to an American health care company.  It’s convincing proof of how Islington Labour defends the vulnerable and sick, great to mention on the doorstep, as one of those surgeries returns to the local GP Federation at the beginning of July. Well, we are not on the doorstep and we doubt anyone who is canvassing for Labour is mentioning it. 

Everyone knows what has happened to our MP of over 40 years, and that Jeremy Corbyn is now standing as an independent.  Islington North members were presented with a shortlist of two by the NEC, and then told that even that ‘choice’ was denied them, and someone called Praful Nargund was to be the Labour candidate in this hitherto safe seat.

Most residents had never heard of him, but we Party members had.  There were rumours about his ambitions to be an MP, ever since he was elected as a local councillor two years ago, after a ‘selection’ in which, unusually, only those selected stood, in a ward in the neighbouring constituency.  He is alleged to have employed a PR or lobbying firm to further his ambitions, soon after buying a house in Barnsbury (a terraced house there will set you back over £4m today). 

So who is Praful Nargund? According to the Daily Mail, he is a multi-millionaire private healthcare entrepreneur, who was educated at the now £25,000-per-year King’s College School in Wimbledon and holds more than  £9.4million worth of shares in his family’s holding company. He is reported to have been a director of a US-owned private healthcare company, which made £16million profit in just nine months, from UK patients, and only left his role just prior to being publicly announced as Labour’s imposed Islington North candidate.

In spite of all those resources, however, he has been undistinguished as a councillor in the London Borough of Islington where he sat  on only two council committees – the minimum. Unsurprisingly, Praful Nargund is refusing to take part in election hustings or talk to the local press, skewered by his comments in favour of the privatisation of health services.

His candidacy is in stark contrast to the hugely popular and hardworking MP whom he seeks to replace. Many local  councillors and branch and constituency officers have chosen not to campaign for him, despite pressure to do so. Scores of activists have left the Party in disgust, including many branch organisers, chairs and even the chair of the CLP. 

The constituency has had no access to Organise or Contact Creator for several months, making it difficult to organise campaigning for Sadiq Khan during the mayoral campaign. Seemingly, Sadiq’s victory was less important to some in the Party bureaucracy than the need to stop the local Party functioning. Yet we overcame the problems and turned out to campaign for him in spite of it.  The shutdown was supposedly because of a data breach which prevented branch and constituency meetings.  But miraculously now we can all get Party emails, and one of the first was from Nargund, asking for campaign donations. 

The impact across the borough Party of the leadership’s persecution of Jeremy Corbyn has been profound. The Council and Party are both very divided and unhappy. As members leave, there is demoralization and drift. Beyond the Party, there is confusion and dismay among ordinary voters that a much-loved MP no longer has the official Labour label.

Whoever becomes the MP for Islington North, the damage to the local Party may be irreparable. Many of those who left may not return to a Party that is so tainted and is fast becoming home to a small group of bumptious, entitled right wingers and where what was once a pioneering progressive council is losing its values and its touch. 

In the circumstances, it is important that those on the left who are staying in the Party do not dance to the tune of the right and seal themselves off from those who felt they had to leave. Member and ex-members, the left inside and out, need to work together and prepare for the battles to come.

Media outlets are reporting today that 72 members including most CLP executive officers have signed an open letter calling on voters in the constituency to back Jeremy Corbyn, who is now standing as an independent. But few are publishing the letter in its entirety with all its signatories. Labour Hub reproduces this below.

A plea from resigning and former members of Islington North Labour Party: vote for Jeremy Corbyn, Independent

Dear voters of Islington North,

We have been proud members of Islington North Labour Party for many years. Together, we have campaigned on a wide range of issues, from defending the local Number 4 bus route to saving the local hospital’s A&E. These campaigns have united members from all sides of our Party, and we are proud of the collegiate atmosphere that we have created. In many ways, Islington North CLP was the genuine broad church that the Labour Party claims to be.

This year, we have been denied the right to choose our own candidate for the General Election. Not a single person in Islington North has had a say. We believe in democracy – and the people of Islington North deserve an MP who believes in democracy too.

Jeremy Corbyn has dedicated his life to this constituency. We hear on a regular basis from people how Jeremy has been there for them in their time of need, whether that is housing, education or anything else. He has always worked in partnership with our progressive Labour Council, both as a Labour MP and as an Independent MP.

We have been proud to stand alongside Jeremy over the course of ten General Elections. This year, we will be campaigning for him as an independent candidate for Islington North. Many of us have already resigned or been expelled from the Labour Party as a result. Those of us who are still in the Party know our support for Jeremy will

result in the termination of our membership. We do not take this decision lightly, but it is  time to take a stand in the name of democracy and justice.

We will campaign on the same principles we have always had. That includes ending all privatisation of our NHS in order to restore the principle of free, public and universal healthcare.

Jeremy has always been an honest, brave and principled voice. We need that voice now, more than ever. We implore Labour voters to support Jeremy Corbyn as an independent candidate, and vote for him on the 4th July.

Signed,

Alison McGarry (CLP Chair)

Bisi Williams (CLP Vice Chair Membership)

Gill Lawton (CLP Vice Chair Membership)

Ruth Clarke (CLP Women’s Section Secretary)

Steph Linkogle (CLP Vice Chair Campaigns)

Sarah Doyle (CLP Secretary)

Oliver Durose (CLP Assistant Secretary)

Martin Franklin (CLP Environment Officer,

Tufnell Park ward delegate)

Michael Rowan (CLP Communications and Social Media)

Simon Hinds (ex-CLP BAME Officer)

Terry Conway (CLP LGBT Officer, GM

delegate Unite LE 00014 branch)

Karen Shook (Finsbury Park Ward Executive Committee)

Nadine Finch (Union delegate from Unite LE 790 Branch, Chair of Arsenal Ward)

Mumtaz Khan (Union delegate from Unite LE 00014 branch)

Talal Karim (Union delegate from Unite LE 525 branch)

Gillian Dalley (Tollington Ward Chair)

Diane Reay (Vice Chair Tollington Ward)

Kate Buffery (Junction Ward GM delegate, Local Campaign Forum)

Peter Murray (Treasurer, Junction Ward)

Jonathan Gore (Ward Organiser, Highbury)

Cassie Mayer (Hillrise Ward GM delegate)

Sophie Maisey (Hillrise Ward GM delegate)

Ginette Williams (Hillrise GM Ward delegate)

Jan Whelan (Hillrise Ward GM delegate)

Mica Nava (Tufnell Park Ward GM delegate)

Dr Azhar Malik (Tufnell Park Ward GM delegate)

Jeremy Maher (Tufnell Park Ward GM delegate)

Annette Thomas (Tufnell Park Ward GM delegate)

Tony Graham (Highbury Ward GM delegate)

Stelios Foteinopoulos (Finsbury Park Ward GM delegate)

Minda Burgos-Lukes (Highbury Ward GM delegate)

Nick Davidson (Highbury Ward Treasurer, GM delegate)

Jan Whelan (Hillrise Ward GM delegate)

Dr Zohra Malik

Dr Rohi Malik

Sive Malik

Reem Abou-El-Fadl

Jan Pollock

Celie Hanson

William Murphy

Jenny Howell

Judy Garton-Sprenger

Tom Cockcroft

Juliette Mullin

Joei Silvester


  • This was originally published by LabourHub here and we reproduce in full for information purposes.
UK
NHS relies on overseas workers just like Windrush era, says nursing director

Despite demand for their skills stories of overseas nurses receiving racial abuse from patients are still common


THE NHS is still heavily dependent on overseas workers just like during the Windrush-era, a leading director of nursing has said.

Dionne Daniel, Director of Nursing for the Fundamentals of Care at Epsom and St Helier Hospitals, says that a large number of job vacancies exist in the healthcare sector and staff shortages have made it crucial to recruit nurses from overseas, particularly from regions such as the Caribbean.

This international recruitment strategy has become an essential component in efforts to build and sustain the NHS workforce ensuring that patient care standards are maintained.

She said: “There are still huge vacancies today and we are dependent on international nurses to work for the NHS.”

Daniel was speaking after the launch of a new app launched by St George’s, Epsom, and St Helier hospitals aimed at providing overseas nurses with more support after they arrive in the UK.

The ‘Ask Aunty’ app pairs newly arrived staff with a colleague who can help them settle into life in the UK. Through its innovative platform, the app facilitates invaluable connections between experienced colleagues, affectionately referred to as “Aunties,” and those embarking on their journey in a new country, offering a wealth of knowledge and practical advice to help newcomers navigate the intricacies of life in the UK.

According to Daniels, although the demand for overseas health professionals is high, many still encounter significant discrimination which not only affects their professional experiences but also poses challenges to their ability to settle into life in the UK.
Racial abuse

She says this echoes the experience of people like her aunt Yvonne, a member of the Windrush generation, who was trained in both nursing and midwifery, and came here from the Caribbean to work as a nurse.

Speaking about her aunt’s experience as an employee of the NHS she said: “Over the years, she’s shared with me some of her experiences including patients refusing to be cared by her and racially abusing her, as well as when she bought her house, as the first Black person on the street, people in the area moved away.”

She added: “Sadly some of the stories she has told me, I still hear similar ones these days from new starters in the NHS.”

Support

Daniel said she was pleased to see the launch of the Ask Aunty app.

“As we remember those who came here many years ago, it is encouraging to see initiatives – such as Ask Aunty – to support those health care professionals who are still coming to work in the NHS” she said.

The healthcare specialist shared fond memories of her aunt including “Caribbean people coming together for parties and supporting each other through difficult times.”

“When she wasn’t working in the NHS, she was very much involved with her local church and community.

“My aunt served in the NHS for several years and raised her family in the UK, and is now enjoying time with her grand and great-grandchildren.”

She added: “My aunt and her generation made a very positive contribution to the NHS and society, and I hope that we never forget this.”

 

Labour’s NHS manifesto not ‘Fit for the Future’

“We believe that the vote that brings them to office will reflect widespread, deep disaffection with the Conservative Government and does not give Labour a mandate to enforce its woefully inadequate plan for the NHS in its manifesto.”

By Keep Our NHS Public

The recovery of the NHS is in the hands of the incoming government and the balance of forces able to force change. Keep Our NHS Public’s crucial concerns in the Labour Manifesto on the NHS are:

▪︎ No commitment to invest the required funds in the public NHS after 14 years of austerity – every chance finances will be squeezed further
▪︎ Insistence that government must prioritise thoroughgoing NHS reforms over funding
▪︎ No commitment to ending the wasteful and damaging investment in the private sector invited into the NHS body and parasitising it
▪︎ Insistence that there is ‘spare capacity’ in the private sector that can benefit the NHS and end waiting lists, when all the evidence shows exactly the reverse is true
▪︎ No commitment to pay restoration for NHS staff and a reliance on their agreeing to work overtime to reduce the NHS waiting lists
▪︎ No commitment to ending the charging of undocumented people for healthcare
▪︎ It is simply not true that Labour’s plans are ‘in line with the principles of the NHS that Labour founded’

It is inevitable now that the government to be elected on 4 July 2024 will be Labour, so Labour’s manifesto on the NHS (‘Build an NHS Fit For the Future’ pp91-103) is of particular importance. (A critique of other parties’ manifesto is here). 

Labour’s promises

Labour says: ‘Labour will stop the chaos in our health and care services, turn the page, and reform them in line with the principles of the NHS that Labour founded.’ (Manifesto p103)

We say: Labour’s plans overturn several founding principles of the NHS, which are: a national health service that is publicly provided and publicly accountable, as well as universalcomprehensive, and free at the point of use. Labour’s Manifesto embraces the private sector, despite the damage it has already done, and continues the Tory fragmentation of our NHS. It does nothing to overturn the Hostile Environment and restore free treatment for everyone in Britain, another founding principle. Immediately, the NHS needs stability and urgent funding, not “reform” and further disorganisation. NHS staff and services need security to do their job and to treat patients safely and well. Primary and community care, hospitals and public health desperately need urgent support. To restore the public NHS, the government needs to bring forward new legislation to undo the damage of the 2012 and 2022 Health acts.

On commitment to the NHS model

Labour says: ‘The best health services should be available, free for all. Money should no longer be the passport to the best treatment. People should get the best that modern science can offer. The NHS will always be publicly owned and publicly funded.’ (p93)

We say: Labour does not say the NHS will be publicly provided, a key founding principle. Labour’s silence on this speaks volumes. Whole sections of NHS provision, management and planning are being contracted out – not ‘sold off’. These contracts cause long-term damage to NHS services, which are critically losing NHS staff and NHS funding to the private sector.

The NHS needs ‘fundamental reform’

Labour says: ‘Labour’s mission is to build an NHS fit for the future. Investment alone won’t be enough to tackle the problems facing the NHS; it must go hand in hand with fundamental reform.’ (p93)

We say: The NHS model does not need reform, it needs restoring. It is the successive re-disorganisations and policies undermining the NHS for decades that must go.

The NHS, when funded to meet need, not defunded for ideological reasons, has been and can be again one of the best health systems in the world.

The NHS needs urgent funding – there is a shortfall of £40bn a year compared to France. Investing in scanners, IT systems and other technology is very different from ‘fundamental reform’. It is merely giving NHS staff the tools they need and the support they deserve. Of course ‘investment alone’ is not sufficient: alongside investment in the public NHS must be the missing commitment to publicly provided healthcare.

‘Not just a sickness service’ (p93)

Labour says: ‘We must change the NHS so that it becomes not just a sickness service, but able to prevent ill heath in the first place.’
And we will embed a greater focus on prevention throughout the entire healthcare system and supporting services.’

We say: We have to rebuild a coherent and comprehensive public health service and tackle health inequalities, alongside the rebuilding of primary, community and hospital care.  

The Conservative government defunded, fragmented and weakened public health services which have been an essential part of the NHS since 1948. The consequences were seen in the Covid pandemic. They have heightened poverty and inequality, worsened health inequality and undermined the NHS. These have to be addressed.

Community-based care: ‘Healthcare closer to home’

Labour says: ‘Labour’s reforms will shift our NHS away from a model geared towards late diagnosis and treatment, to a model where more services are delivered in local communities.’ (p92)
‘The National Health Service needs to move to a Neighbourhood Health Service, with more care delivered in local communities to spot problems earlier.’ (p98)

We say: A comprehensive and safe NHS absolutely needs well-funded hospitals in partnership with well-staffed, properly paid and clinically trained community, GP and mental health services. Community services must be able to rely on hospital back up when needed. When that is achieved, we can truly talk about safe community-based care. Without a cast-iron commitment to build back the capacity of hospitals and the resources of GP and primary care, ‘care in the community’ will be used as a smokescreen for refusing to invest in hospitals.

Reliance on big tech and AI

Labour says: ‘We will harness the power of technologies like AI to transform the speed and accuracy of diagnostic services, saving potentially thousands of lives.’ (p94)

We say: Labour is silent on the risks of increasing reliance on technology, much of which is controlled by global corporations. What happens when computers crash, or data is hacked, or new diseases emerge? We reject the policy assumption that the ‘solution’ to NHS capacity is technology. The quality, safety and effectiveness of the NHS is founded primarily on its staff. Human interaction in clinical decision-making must not be further marginalised, with worrying implications for patients and staff. AI and data systems must serve the needs of patients and staff, not the monetising intentions of major tech and data corporations at the expense of NHS skilled staff. Management of our data by the NHS should be founded on public trust. Data must not be exploited for profit.

Waiting list and NHS staff

Labour says: ‘We will deliver an extra two million NHS operations, scans, and appointments every year; that is 40,000 more appointments every week. We will do this by incentivising staff to carry out additional appointments out of hours.’ (p95)

We say: There are 1.6 million interactions with patients in the NHS daily. Labour is relying on an extra 8000 appointments per day –0.5% of daily NHS activity in comparison. And without a commitment to pay justice for NHS staff, it is expecting a burnt out and exhausted workforce to work extra evenings and weekends. This is not an acceptable strategy. The NHS will solve the waiting list crisis if staff numbers are built back, if staff are paid fairly and if the NHS is invested in. The priority is to build back respect for NHS and care staff and halt the haemorrhaging of workforce away from the NHS.

Waiting lists and ‘spare capacity’

Labour says: ‘Labour will use spare capacity in the independent sector to ensure patients are diagnosed and treated more quickly.’ (p95

We say: There truly is no spare capacity in the private sector that would not further undermine the NHS. Private healthcare relies on more doctors, nurses and technicians taken from the NHS, and the diversion of NHS funding to profit-taking companies. Very clear evidence of the negative impact is the impact on NHS ophthalmology. The rapid expansion of private provision of NHS cataract surgery from 24% to 60% in five years is undermining the funding of NHS eye departments – patients with serious conditions are going blind on waiting lists. In the 2000s, it was the growth of NHS capacity that solved the waiting lists inherited from the Tory Government, not the disruptive, ineffective, and heavily subsidised independent sector treatment centres imposed on the NHS

Workforce planning

Labour says: ‘We will deliver the NHS long-term workforce plan to train the staff we need to get patients seen on time…’ (p96)

We say: The NHS long-term workforce plan must be fully funded. But the current plan will replace trained doctors and nurses in hospital and primary care with the planned 10,000 ‘Physician Associates’ (PAs) and 2,000 ‘Anaesthesia Associates’, along with many thousands of ‘Nursing Associates’. Surgical Care Practitioners, another group without full clinical training, are now doing surgical operations for which they are not qualified. PAs are now prescribing and taking on-call duties, dangerously beyond their role in supporting trained doctors. 1000s of newly qualified GPs are now finding there may be no job for them to take up and training opportunities given to PAs instead.

NHS strikes

Labour says:… Too many patients have seen their treatment affected by strikes.’ (p96)

We say: The new government must address the causes of the NHS strikes – loss of pay, covering 120,000 vacancies, insufficient staff, lack of respect despite the dedication shown during Covid. There must be pay justice and improved work conditions to repair morale and retain nurse, junior doctors and all NHS staff

Primary care

Labour says: ‘Labour will also take the pressure off GP surgeries, by improving access to services and treatment through new routes. We will create a Community Pharmacist Prescribing Service, granting more pharmacists independent prescribing rights.’ (98)

We say: Where is the commitment to more GPs? It is widely accepted that there are over 4200 vacancies expected to grow to 8800 by 2031. There are 1800 fewer GPs today than in 2015. The Labour Manifesto does not mention the Longterm Workforce Plan intention to develop 10,000 non-doctor ‘Physician Associates’, nor that they are being used to replace rather than support GPs, and that there are 1000s of GP trainees at the end of their training now unemployed qualified GPs. The new government must urgently reverse the decision to put the GMC (doctors’ regulatory body) in charge of regulating non-doctor Medical Associate Professions (MAPs, including Physician Associates). It must immediately reverse the block on expanding GP numbers.

Dentistry

Labour says: ‘To rebuild dentistry for the long term, Labour will reform the dental contract, with a shift to focusing on prevention and the retention of NHS dentists.’ (p99)

We say: We welcome the commitment to restore NHS dentistry and retain dentists. But it is urgent that more dentists, dental nurses and hygienists are trained and existing dental staff are retained. A new contract should support dentists to provide a full range of treatments on the NHS and be patient-focused and preventive. The contract should be payment per numbers of patients, and charging must be abolished. Dentists should be co-located with General Practitioners in neighbourhood health centres where the staff work as public servants for a public service.

Covid and technology

Labour says: ‘The Covid-19 pandemic showed how a strong mission-driven industrial strategy, involving government partnering with industry and academia, could turn the tide on a pandemic. This is the approach we will take in government.’ (p96)

We say: The overriding lesson from the pandemic was that an undermined NHS and public health service, by-passed by a politically incompetent and corrupt government, led to tens of 1000s of avoidable deaths. This was Misconduct in Public Office.

How can Labour fail to mention here the money wasted on failed PPE contracts and an expensive private Test & Trace system which did not work. These partnerships with industry did not turn the tide on the pandemic. NHS staff risked their lives and thousands died doing so.

Procurement

Labour says: ‘We will develop an NHS innovation and adoption strategy in England. This will include a plan for procurement, giving a clearer route to get products into the NHS, coupled with reformed incentive structures to drive innovation and faster regulatory approval for new technology and medicines.’ (p97)

We say: The NHS Logistics Authority was prepared for privatisation under Labour in the 2000s and dissolved in 2018 to make way for a privatised system under ‘NHS Supply Chain’. This process was responsible for the lethal failures of PPE. Control and management of procurement must be brought back into the NHS. Regulatory approval cannot be rushed or bypassed. The fact that a new product has been tried out at one Trust does not justify a national roll-out without investigating that it is safe, effective, efficient, and suitable for other groups of patients elsewhere in Britain.

Patient empowerment, patient choice, self-referral

Labour says: ‘Labour will therefore transform the NHS app, putting patients in control of their own health to better manage their medicine, appointments, and health needs.’ (p97)

We say: However convenient for many patients a health app may be, it does not put patients ‘in control of their own health’. It does even less for those without smart phones, no access to the internet or disabled people presented with barriers to their engagement.

‘We will allow other professionals, such as opticians, to make direct referrals to specialist services or tests, as well as expanding self-referral routes where appropriate.’ (p99)

We say: Regarding self-referral, we agree with Oxford GP Dr Helen Salisbury writing in the BMJ:
‘Some of [Wes Streeting’s] comments demonstrate a failure to understand the workings of the service over which he’d one day like to preside… To a certain extent this [the referral routes] already occurs… [but] it would make no sense for people to add to waiting lists without any triage or guidance, only to find that they’d sought help from the wrong expert.’

Maternity and patient safety

Labour says: ‘Labour will ensure that trusts failing on maternity care are robustly supported into rapid improvement. We will train thousands more midwives as part of the NHS Workforce Plan and set an explicit target to close the Black and Asian maternal mortality gap.’ (p98)

We say: A commitment to deliver safe maternity care has to be welcomed. But as with the whole restoration required, it will take investment and it will also require a determination to fight inequality and racism across departments of government and the NHS.

And what about patient safety beyond maternity?

We say: There is a national emergency in the NHS. The UK has one of the worst avoidable deaths record of OECD countries, with the USA and Greece – patients who would have survived with appropriate treatment. Over 250 patients are dying every week from delayed emergency care and 39,000 died on cardiac waiting lists in 2022 alone. A national emergency should be called and measures taken to invest and expand NHS capacity.

Governance

Labour says: ‘Labour will implement professional standards and regulate NHS managers, ensuring those who commit serious misconduct can never do so again. And we will establish a Royal College of Clinical Leadership to champion the voice of clinicians.’ (p98)

We say: We want a commitment to restore the NHS along with a primacy of public duty of managers and NHS staff to serve the interests of patients above all.
There are dangers to be avoided in pitting managers against clinicians and clinicians against non-clinical staff. NHS teamwork needs to be rebuilt.

Social Care reforms

Labour says: ‘Labour will undertake a programme of reform to create a National Care Service by national standards, delivering consistency of care across the country. We will enhance partnership working across employers, workers, trade unions and government and establish a Fair Pay Agreement in adult social care.’ (p100)

We say: We must end this social care disgrace. Social care should be free at the point of use, publicly provided, funded and accountable. A national care, support and independent living service is urgent. This important commitment simply must not be delayed over a ten-year period before it takes effect. And the positive change must be based on a process which listens to disabled people, paid and unpaid carers, patient and pensioner groups. The current social care system is predominantly private and major hedge funds are extracting huge profits. This parasitisation of social need must be stopped.  

Mental health and autism and learning disability

Labour says: ‘Across society, mental health has stepped out of the shadows, yet it is difficult to argue the NHS has kept up… And, as a crucial part of that, we will reform the NHS to ensure we give mental health the same attention and focus as physical health’. (p94-5)

‘Labour will bring waiting times down and intervene earlier. We will recruit an additional 8,500 new staff to treat children and adults through our first term…

‘Mental health legislation is also woefully out of date. The treatment of people with autism and learning difficulties is a disgrace. The operation of the Mental Health Act discriminates against Black people who are much more likely to be detained than others. Labour will modernise legislation to give patients greater choice, autonomy, enhanced rights and support, and ensure everyone is treated with dignity and respect throughout treatment.’ (p101-2)

We say: Political leaders have been saying ‘parity of esteem for mental and physical health’ for too long. If these commitments are met, they will be welcomed. To be met, they will need significant investment in NHS hospital and community mental health. And this cannot be at the expense of primary, hospital and public health services, but alongside the restoration of those services.

The investment in, and reliance on, private mental health hospitals and the damaging out of area inpatient admissions must end.

Obesity

Labour says: ‘We face a childhood obesity crisis. So, Labour is committed to banning advertising junk food to children along with the sale of high-caffeine energy drinks to under-16s.’ (p102)

We say: To tackle obesity is to view it through the prism of social and economic inequalities and the health inequalities that flow from these. It requires commitment to tackle the massive conflict of interest of the sugar lobby, food and drink industries.

Health inequalities

Labour says: ‘Labour will tackle the social determinants of health, halving the gap in healthy life expectancy between the richest and poorest regions in England. Never again will women’s health be neglected. Labour will prioritise women’s health as we reform the NHS.’ (p103)

We say: If the social factors affecting health inequalities are to be addressed, a commitment to and investment in social justice and equity is required including:

Equity of access to healthcare for all – including disadvantaged groups

Action to address social inequality, poverty, low pay and unsafe working conditions, food insecurity, poor housing, under-investment in children and young people, discrimination and racism, pollution, and climate change – the overarching causes of health inequality.

NHS charging of undocumented people for their health care

The Labour manifesto contains no commitment to end health charging of migrants, denial of healthcare to undocumented adults and children, or exploitative health surcharges of migrant workers.

We say:
The outgoing Government’s Hostile Environment scapegoats undocumented people for crumbling public services. They use this disgraceful lie to deflect their blame by fuelling racism. Universal access to healthcare free at the point of need has ended – so many migrants are being charged for NHS care. NHS charges for everyone in Britain, including undocumented people, must be abolished immediately

The Labour Manifesto concludes:

‘Labour will stop the chaos in our health and care services, turn the page, and reform them in line with the principles of the NHS that Labour founded.’

We say:
In truth, the founding principles of the NHS have been overturned, and Labour’s embrace of the private sector would have Nye Bevan turning in his grave.

Restore the People’s NHS

The NHS is under unprecedented pressures, people are dying avoidable deaths and the population is suffering: difficulty seeing a GP and targets being missed; over 250 deaths every week caused by delay in assessment and treatment of seriously ill people; over 39,000 dying prematurely on cardiac waiting lists (in 2022 alone); 120,000 vacancies in the NHS and over 150,000 vacancies in the care sector whilst the services are haemorrhaging staff due to low pay, lower morale and staff looking for work elsewhere.

This stark reality means the Government should declare a national health emergency to release emergency measures proportionate to the severity of loss of life, health and livelihood and to build the capacity of the NHS.

It is inevitable now that the government to be elected on 4 July 2024 will be Labour, so Labour’s manifesto on the NHS (‘Build an NHS Fit For the Future’ pp91-103) is of particular importance. (A critique of other parties’ manifesto is here.) Labour may claim that the election is a mandate to carry through their manifesto on health. But there has been no public debate on the detail. We believe that the vote that brings them to office will reflect widespread, deep disaffection with the Conservative Government and does not give Labour a mandate to enforce its woefully inadequate plan for the NHS in its manifesto.



We’ll hold Labour’s feet to the fire – Mick Lynch, RMT

“We need to find people that want to work with us, rather than knock us on the head — which is where we’ve been for the last 40 years under an extended period of Thatcherism.”
Mick Lynch, RMT General Secretary

RMT General Secretary Mick Lynch spoke to The Morning Star’s Elizabeth Short on holding Starmer to account over his promises to scrap anti-strike laws and renationalise rail, and for the lack of a transformative green new deal to create jobs and tackle the climate crisis.

In the countdown to the general election, RMT general secretary Mick Lynch’s message is resolute: “The main task ahead of us for anyone that’s in any way progressive — is to get the Tories out.”

The Morning Star caught up with him amid a barrage of pre-election interviews and just ahead of the union’s AGM.

RMT has not shied away from criticising Labour — as a socialist union, it’s hard not to. Yet Lynch remains practical — the only way to end the Tories’ 14-year reign is by getting Labour in.

“But that doesn’t mean we’re giving a blank cheque,” he says.

RMT has not always engaged with Labour in the same way as other trade unions and has not been affiliated with the party since 2004.

Its links were severed after several branches backed the Scottish Socialist Party, in exasperation with the direction of Blair’s New Labour.

“We’ve got a bigger Labour group of MPs that we co-ordinate in Parliament than we ever had when we were affiliated,” Lynch says.

“We will have Cabinet ministers probably in our RMT group. So we could exert influence and take part, but with a sort of uniqueness of identity.”

He vowed to hold the party’s feet to the fire on repealing the draconian Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023, which requires a percentage of staff to cross their own pickets during industrial action.

The pledge is part of Labour’s New Deal for Workers, and Lynch says that RMT, along with other unions, will apply the pressure to make sure it stays “undiluted.”

Among Labour’s other pledges are plans to bring passenger rail under public ownership, something which Lynch describes as a “major step.”

Although, he points out, the plans do not extend to freight and rolling stock — the carriages and locomotives leased by private companies.

Bringing rolling stock into public ownership is complicated, Lynch admits: “One of the difficulties is that they’ve been set up confidentially with commercial firms, and they are 25 to 30-year contracts.

“So with all the priorities that Labour’s got, it wouldn’t be easy with the best will in the world to unravel those contracts.”

One striking omission from Labour’s manifesto is the absence of a green new deal, a programme to decarbonise Britain, which was initially backed by the party in 2019. And in this, transport would have had a pivotal role.

“I think it would have been transformational,” Lynch says. “Transport, carbon emissions and the new energy revolution are all one thing, they’re all knitted together.”

While green policies could have prompted a switch from car use to public transport, a transition to more high-speed rail could have resulted in a “modal shift” from aviation, Lynch says, as seen in plans in China and South Korea.

Fundamentally, though, backing away from green policies is a great loss for working-class communities.

“Council housing stock would have been updated, insulated, improved,” Lynch says.

“People’s bills would have come down, which would have been a great help, but we could also have generated thousands and thousands of jobs in our community where we re-skilled working-class people.”

Such a transition could have a profound impact on employment, creating opportunities in areas such as heating engineering, construction and insulation.

“You’ve got to have a political party that’s got the ambition and the depth of vision that says I’m going to do all of these things and we’ve got to co-ordinate them all together.

“At the moment we’re just getting a very tight fiscal settlement that’s not very ambitious.”

In a world of rampant job insecurity and the Uberisation of work, the union remains steadfast in championing campaigns that support some of the most exploited workers.

One of the RMT’s priorities has been to get better deals for subcontracted workers such as cleaners and caterers, and ultimately, to put an end to outsourcing — change which could ripple through to other industries.

“I think what’s unique about it is we still have the ability to fight on those issues because we haven’t lost so much ground as many other sectors have,” Lynch says.

“So if you take hospitality, bar work and catering work, that’s completely non-unionised — more or less — people are working casually and being super-exploited.

“But if you do that work on the railway as a catering worker — you’ve still got terms and conditions, you’ve still got a pension, you’ve still got union recognition.

“So that’s why we keep going really, because we want to bring those benefits back to everybody else if we can.”

Among their achievements, the union secured a 21.21 per cent pay increase for contracted-out caterers working on TransPennine Express services last year.

In 2022, over 40,000 RMT rail workers voted to strike in the biggest industrial action since privatisation nearly 30 years prior.

The powerful scale of industrial strength prompted hysterics from Grant Schapps, the transport secretary at the time, who branded the rail unions Luddites, in the face of legitimate concerns for safety and workers’ rights.

“Technology is good if it’s in the hands of the right people,” Lynch says.

“If it’s in the hands of super-exploitative capitalists like Bezos and Elon, then they’re just going to cast people out of jobs.”

Technological advancements may lead to shorter working weeks — or fragmented shifts.

“But we can’t have people just driven into impoverishment because technology has moved forward,” Lynch says.

“People talk about productivity, but there’s no point in pushing up the retirement age if there’s not enough work for people who are already under the retirement age.”

“It’s a big conversation, and we can’t just allow the companies and the employers to be in charge of that.

Lynch says it is more of a societal question about the nature of work and how to distribute wealth to look after everyone going forward — which may mean conversations around universal basic income.

“If we can’t provide enough work for people, we can’t just cast them out into some kind of nether region of unemployment with no prospects going forward.”

He concludes: “But we need to find people that want to work with us, rather than knock us on the head — which is where we’ve been for the last 40 years under an extended period of Thatcherism.”


Briton who founded charity helping Ukrainian soldiers dies ‘in battlefield’

Nadeem Badshah
THE GUARDIAN
Mon, 1 July 2024 


Peter Fouché had helped build a field hospital in Kyiv before setting up Project Konstantin.Photograph: Project Konstantin/X


A British man who founded a charity providing support to Ukraine soldiers has died while fighting in the country, the organisation said.

Peter Fouché died last Thursday “in the battlefield” after getting badly injured “in combat against Russian forces”, Halyna Zhuk, commercial director and co-founder of Project Konstantin, said in a video message.

Fouché set up the charity in 2022 as a team of independent volunteers that provide essential supplies such as drones and food to Ukrainian soldiers. It also evacuates the soldiers and civilians and delivers humanitarian aid to conflict zones near the frontline.


In a statement shared on X on Sunday, Project Konstantin said: “It is with the heaviest of hearts that we announce the passing of Pete, our beloved director and founder. There are no words that can do Pete’s life justice. No words or phrases that could ever encapsulate how much he meant to all of us.

“Pete’s unwavering dedication, endless compassion, and relentless commitment to Ukraine and her people have left an everlasting impact on the countless lives he touched.”

Fouché had previously helped to build a field hospital in Kyiv before he founded Project Konstantin and later enlisted as a contracted soldier with the armed forces of Ukraine, according to the charity’s website.

It added that his “extraordinary” actions would “for ever be etched in our hearts”, and described his loss as the “worst nightmare”.

“Pete was more than a leader; he was a beacon of hope, a true hero, and a friend to all,” the charity said. “His wisdom, compassion, and faith in God inspired us every day.”

Project Konstantin became a registered charity last year and has thus far helped to evacuate 219 Ukrainian soldiers, according to its website. A Foreign Office spokesperson said it was supporting the family of a British man who had died in Ukraine and was in contact with local authorities.

Last September, a former British army soldier who had gone to the country to fight alongside Ukrainian soldiers was found dead in a body of water with his hands tied behind his back.

Jordan Chadwick, 31, who served in the Scots guards from 2011 to 2015, had travelled to Ukraine to fight in 2022.

In August 2023, Samuel Newey, from Solihull, was killed while fighting in east Ukraine, his family said. The 22-year-old had been volunteering as a fighter in Ukraine for more than a year.

Other Britons who have died in the country since the invasion by Russia in February 2022 include Simon Lingard, 38, from Blackburn, and Jordan Gatley, who died fighting Russian forces in the city of Sievierodonetsk in June 2023.

Scott Sibley, 36, died in April last year in Mykolaiv after a drone dropped mortars on his regiment and Craig Mackintosh, from Norfolk, was killed while volunteering as a medic in September 2022.



Met Police are trying to SHUT DOWN pro-Palestine demo on 6 July to ‘protect Labour’

 
by The Canary
1 July 2024

Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) and its coalition partners have condemned attempts by the Met Police to prevent a pro-Palestine march in central London on Saturday 6 July, and called upon the police to accept the compromise route which has been suggested. Organisers say cops are doing this to ‘protect the new Labour Party government from embarrassment’.
Pro-Palestine march on 6 July

The pro-Palestine march on 6 July will be the 16th major demonstration in London since Israel began its genocidal attack on Gaza in October 2023.


However, despite following all the normal protocols in coordinating with the police, the march organisers have not been offered any central London start or end point for the demonstration, in contrast to every other occasion.

No persuasive reason has been given by the police and the organisers believe it reflects a political consideration not to have a new government, which all the polls indicate will be led by Sir Keir Starmer, overshadowed by hundreds of thousands of demonstrators seeking to end UK complicity with Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

The Coalition behind the marches had notified the police of the intention to hold a demonstration over a month ago, and have had meetings to discuss several routes which have become well established over the last nine months.

In a meeting with the Gold Commander on 21 June, no objections were raised about the proposal to rally in Whitehall at the end of the march, and it was agreed that the police would confirm acceptance on 24 June.

Despite the coalition organisers chasing the police for confirmation that day, no communication was received until 26 June when the police indicated that they would not allow a march which ended on Whitehall or Parliament Square, citing the need for businesses, tourists, the media, and politicians to have access to that area all day.

Met Police protecting the new Labour government?

The marches have been overwhelmingly peaceful by the police’s own admission and with few arrests – just two out of 175,000 people at the last demonstration. Despite this the police have sought to reject these proposals without providing any convincing justification.

The coalition has written to the police suggesting a compromise route beginning on the Embankment, marching via Parliament Square to the Israeli Embassy. This would occupy one side of the square for a maximum of two hours as protestors marched though and leave Whitehall completely free.

The police have been asked to respond positively to this compromise to allow the march to proceed without hindrance.

Stop The War Coalition said in a statement:

We believe the [Met Police’s] aim is to ensure an incoming (Keir Starmer) Government is not confronted with the views of hundreds of thousands of people demanding an end to the genocide.

Ben Jamal, PSC director, said:

Keir Starmer is facing his first test on the willingness of his government to support the right to peaceful protest, including for protest to take place near Westminster.

The Met Police are threatening to use repressive powers under pernicious legislation passed by the Tory government to stop a protest near Parliament. It has been legitimate for nine months for hundreds of thousands of people to bring their demands for justice for Palestine to the seat of Government, but suddenly it is not.

There is no sensible or persuasive reason for this, other than the new government might be embarrassed to have pictures beamed around the world with people in Whitehall demanding justice for Palestine. This is the first big test of the incoming government – will they robustly uphold the democratic right to protest?

Featured image via the Canary

Met Police attempts to stop Palestine protest rejected – Palestine Solidarity Campaign

“The Met Police are threatening to use repressive powers under pernicious legislation passed by the Tory Government to stop a protest near Parliament.”
Ben Jamal, Director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign

By the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC)

Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) and its Coalition partners have today condemned attempts by the Met Police to prevent a pro-Palestine march in central London on Saturday 6th July, and called upon the police to accept the compromise route which has been suggested. To date the police are suggesting they will only allow a protest well away from central London.

This will be the 16th major demonstration in London since Israel began its genocidal attack on Gaza in October 2023. Despite following all the normal protocols in coordinating with the police, the march organisers have not been offered any central London start or end point for the demonstration, in contrast to every other occasion. No persuasive reason has been given by the police and the organisers believe it reflects a political consideration not to have a new Government, which all the polls indicate will be led by Sir Keir Starmer, overshadowed by hundreds of thousands of demonstrators seeking to end UK complicity with Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

The Coalition behind the marches had notified the police of the intention to hold a demonstration over a month ago, and have had meetings to discuss several routes which have become well established over the last 9 months. In a meeting with the Gold Commander on June 21st, no objections were raised about the proposal to rally in Whitehall at the end of the march, and it was agreed that the police would confirm acceptance on June 24th. Despite the coalition organisers chasing the police for confirmation that day, no communication was received until June 26th when the police indicated that they would not allow a march which ended on Whitehall or Parliament Square, citing the need for businesses, tourists, the media and politicians to have access to that area all day.

The marches have been overwhelmingly peaceful by the police’s own admission and with few arrests – just 2 out of 175 000 people at the last demonstration. Despite this the police have sought to reject these proposals without providing any convincing justification. The Coalition has written to the police suggesting a compromise route beginning on the Embankment, marching via Parliament Square to the Israeli Embassy. This would occupy one side of the square for a maximum of 2 hours as protestors marched though and leave Whitehall completely free. The police have been asked to respond positively to this compromise to allow the march to proceed without hindrance.

Ben Jamal, PSC Director, said:

“Keir Starmer is facing his first test on the willingness of his government to support the right to peaceful protest, including for protest to take place near Westminster. The Met Police are threatening to use repressive powers under pernicious legislation passed by the Tory Government to stop a protest near Parliament. It has been legitimate for nine months for hundreds of thousands of people to bring their demands for justice for Palestine to the seat of Government, but suddenly it is not. There is no sensible or persuasive reason for this, other than the new Government might be embarrassed to have pictures beamed around the world with people in Whitehall demanding justice for Palestine. This is the first big test of the incoming Government – will they robustly uphold the democratic right to protest?”