Saturday, July 13, 2024

SPACE

James Webb Space Telescope Dazzles Again, 

Marc Boucher July 12, 2024 


















This new Webb image shows two galaxies: a Penguin (NGC 2936) guarding an Egg (NGC 2937). Webb’s observations reveal the two are in a cosmic hug, joined together by a blue haze of stars and gas. Image credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI.



This new Webb image shows two galaxies: a Penguin (NGC 2936) guarding an Egg (NGC 2937). Webb’s observations reveal the two are in a cosmic hug, joined together by a blue haze of stars and gas. Image credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI.

It’s been two years since the Webb telescope began to deliver the science that was hoped for. To mark that anniversary a new image was released today (above) and shows “the interacting galaxies of Arp 142 that combines Webb’s NIRCam and MIRI instrument images.”



NASA EVALUATING EUROPA CLIPPER’S ABILITY TO WITHSTAND RADIATION AS LAUNCH NEARS


By Marcia Smith | Posted: July 12, 2024 


Three months before the scheduled launch of the $5 billion Europa Clipper mission, NASA has revealed that it is evaluating whether the spacecraft can withstand Europa’s intense radiation environment. At least some of the transistors that control the flow of electricity to operate spacecraft systems are not as radiation resistant as expected. Testing is underway to better understand the implications.

Scheduled for launch on October 10, Europa Clipper will study Jupiter’s moon Europa. Covered in ice, some scientists believe a liquid ocean flows underneath with plumes occasionally erupting through the ice. Life as we know it needs water and where there’s water there may be life prompting intense interest in whether microbial life could have evolved in Europa’s ocean. Clipper will orbit Jupiter and make about 50 passes of Europa, getting as close as 25 kilometers (16 miles) to study any ocean residue that may be on the surface. If lucky, it might even fly through a plume.

Artist’s illustration of Europa Clipper flying over Europa with Jupiter in the background. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

The intense radiation environment around Jupiter means the spacecraft’s electronics must be hardened to survive those repeated swingbys. Jupiter’s magnetic field is 20,000 times stronger than Earth’s, creating the most punishing radiation environment in the solar system, second only to the Sun.

Radiation-hardened spacecraft components are not uncommon. They’re needed for Earth-orbiting spacecraft that fly through the Van Allen belts and national security satellites designed to survive nuclear detonations.

Clipper’s electronics are protected by an approximately 1-centimeter (half-inch) thick aluminum “vault” that was closed up tight last October.



In May, about the same time the spacecraft was shipped to Kennedy Space Center in preparation for launch, the Europa Clipper team was “advised that similar parts were failing at lower radiation doses than expected,” NASA said yesterday.


Excerpt from NASA blog post, July 11, 2024.

The problem isn’t limited to Clipper. An industry-wide alert went out in June and NASA said “the issue that may be impacting the transistors on Europa Clipper is a phenomenon that the industry wasn’t aware of and represents a newly identified gap in the industry standard radiation qualification of transistor wafer lots.”

Europa Clipper was built at and the program is managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, CA. The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (APL) in Laurel, MD designed the spacecraft body in collaboration with JPL and NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, MD. Testing is underway at JPL, APL and Goddard to ascertain how many of the transistors may be susceptible. NASA said data obtained so far “indicates some transistors are likely to fail” and NASA is evaluating options to maximize their longevity. A preliminary analysis is expected at the end of this month.

The spacecraft is already in the final stages of processing for launch on a SpaceX Falcon Heavy during a 21-day window that opens on October 10. That provides some leeway, but if a resolution can’t be found by the end of October, the mission will have to wait until the planets are correctly aligned once again. Clipper needs gravity assists from Mars and Earth to reach Jupiter. After leaving Earth it goes around Mars, then back to Earth, then off to Jupiter, a so-called Mars Earth Gravity Assist or MEGA trajectory.

NASA declined to answer questions today, including how long it’ll be until that next launch opportunity arises, saying all the information they will provide for now is in the blog post
.
Former Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) who required NASA to build Europa Clipper when he chaired the House Appropriations Commerce-Justice-Science subcommittee.

NASA’s science priorities are guided by Decadal Surveys produced by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. A mission to Europa was the second highest priority in the 2011 planetary science Decadal Survey, with Mars Sample Return as the highest.

Budget constraints during the early years of the Obama Administration sharply limited NASA’s plans for Mars Sample Return and the agency had no plans to pursue a Europa mission, but Rep. John Culberson (R-TX), who became chair of the House Appropriations Commerce-Justice-Science subcommittee in 2015, had other ideas. Passionate about the possibility of finding life in Europa’s ocean, for all four years that he chaired the subcommittee he directed NASA to build not only an orbiter, but a lander, by specific dates and launch them on NASA’s Space Launch System rocket. The language was in the bill itself, making it the law of the land not just a recommendation in the accompanying report. Culberson often proudly proclaimed that Europa Clipper was the only NASA mission required by law.

Culberson lost his reelection bid in 2018, but Europa Clipper was far enough along that its future was secure even as costs grew to $5 billion despite replacement of the ICEMAG instrument with a less expensive model. Talk of a subsequent lander has faded, however, and Congress was finally convinced that Falcon Heavy was a better choice for the rocket.

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2024 


Exclusive black hole found in place of small galaxy that disappeared billions of years ago

12 July 2024 Exclusive black hole found in place of small galaxy that disappeared billions of years ago

By Alimat Aliyeva

Astronomers have carefully studied the star cluster, the visible remnant of the core of a relatively small galaxy absorbed by the expanding Milky Way 8-10 billion years ago. The object hidden in the center of this cluster surprised them, Azernews reports.

The researchers said that the unusual movement of seven stars in this cluster is convincing evidence of the existence of a medium-sized black hole in their center. They are larger than the usual class of black holes formed by the explosion of a single star, but smaller than the monsters that inhabit the cores of most galaxies.
About 15,800 light-years from Earth is a cluster called Omega Centauri, containing about 10 million stars. According to the researchers, the black hole inside it is at least 8,200 times larger than the Sun.

Sagittarius A*, a supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, is 4 million times more massive than the Sun. It is eclipsed by supermassive black holes in other galaxies, whose mass is billions of times that of the Sun.
"In general, the existence of intermediate—mass black holes in the Omega Centauri cluster has long been discussed, and our discovery may help resolve these disputes," says astronomer Maximilian Haberle of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Germany.


FAA investigating SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket failure

News
By Mike Wall 
published 16 hours ago
SPACE.COM

It's unclear when the Falcon 9 will be cleared to fly again.


A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launches 20 Starlink satellites toward low Earth orbit from California on July 11, 2024. The rocket's upper stage suffered an anomaly, causing the satellites to be deployed in an lower-than-intended orbit. (Image credit: SpaceX)

Update for 4:30 p.m. ET on July 12: SpaceX has announced that the July 11 Falcon 9 failure will lead to the loss of all 20 Starlink satellites. Read our failure story for more information.

The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is requiring an investigation into the recent anomaly suffered by a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket.

The issue occurred on Thursday night (July 11), during the launch of 20 Starlink internet satellites from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. The Falcon 9's upper-stage engine failed to complete its second burn as planned, and the spacecraft were deployed into a lower-than-intended orbit as a result, according to SpaceX.

"The FAA will be involved in every step of the investigation process and must approve SpaceX's final report, including any corrective actions," FAA officials wrote in an anomaly update.

"A return to flight is based on the FAA determining that any system, process or procedure related to the mishap does not affect public safety," the agency added. "In addition, SpaceX may need to request and receive approval from the FAA to modify its license that incorporates any corrective actions and meet all other licensing requirements."

Related: SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket suffers failure during Starlink satellite launch (video)

Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

SpaceX said via X early this morning (July 12) that it had made contact with five of the 20 Starlink satellites and was trying to get them to raise their orbits using their onboard ion thrusters.

"Unlike a 'Star Trek' episode, this will probably not work, but it's worth a shot. The satellite thrusters need to raise orbit faster than atmospheric drag pulls them down or they burn up," company founder and CEO Elon Musk wrote on X in response to the SpaceX post.





A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket rests on the deck of a ship at sea shortly after launching 20 Starlink satellites toward orbit from California on July 11, 2024. (Image credit: SpaceX)

— SpaceX launches next-gen US spy satellites and sticks the landing (video)

— 8 ways that SpaceX has transformed spaceflight

— Starlink satellite train: How to see and track it in the night sky

Falcon 9 anomalies are incredibly rare. The workhorse rocket has launched more than 350 times since its debut in June 2010, and it has experienced just one catastrophic in-flight failure — an explosion in June 2015 that resulted in the loss of a robotic Dragon cargo capsule headed for the International Space Station (ISS).

(Thursday night's incident, though a failure, was not catastrophic, at least not in the same way; the satellites were deployed, and some of them might still make it to their intended orbit.)

The Falcon 9 is human-rated and has flown astronauts on 13 separate occasions. The rocket has two crewed launches coming up relatively soon — the private Polaris Dawn effort to low Earth orbit on July 31 and the Crew-9 mission to the ISS for NASA sometime next month.

Those target dates could slip as a result of Thursday night's anomaly, but the wait likely won't be too long, said billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman, who funded and will command Polaris Dawn and did the same for the pioneering Inspiration4 mission back in 2021.

"SpaceX has an incredible track record with Falcon 9. I can say from personal experience they are very transparent when issues arise. I have no doubt they will arrive at a cause quickly and ensure the most cost-effective and reliable launch vehicle keeps delivering payload to orbit. As for Polaris Dawn, we will fly whenever SpaceX is ready and with complete confidence in the rocket, spaceship and operations," Isaacman said in an X post today.

Athletes speak up for Gaza: It's time to change the scoreboard for humanity

A renowned former NBA player explains the mission of Athletes4Ceasefire and calls on professional sports players to stand against Israel's genocidal war in Gaza.

TARIQ ABDUL-WAHAD


Activists protesting US support of Israel’s attacks on Gaza unfurl a banner at the 2024 NBA All-Star Game in Indianapolis on February 17 (Ziad Hefni / Jewish Voice for Peace).

A professional sport is often a numbers game. Scoring and batting averages, tie-breaks, match points, world record times – these numbers often dictate an athlete's life span.

Once we retire, those very numbers follow us – inscribed in our professional history; a value attributed to our legacy and contribution to the sport.

In our prime, those very numbers dictate the value of our contracts; determine the trajectory of our market value to brands and sponsors; and for the most part, buy our silence as public personalities.

It is the ransom we are paid to be gagged from uttering the truth as it stands. It is the price of manufactured consent and complicity in a system that would have us perform on our platforms to entertain and sell tickets but not dare use those same platforms to bear witness.



Gaza suffering


If indeed numbers carry such great value, why does the scoreboard for humanity look so bleak?


Look at Palestine. Seventy-five years of a gruesome occupation. In Gaza, nine months of genocide. Some 186,000 children, men and women who have been estimated dead from injuries, diseases, malnutrition, and overall trauma.


At least 146 journalists killed. Some 1.7 million Palestinians displaced. More than 142,000 homes obliterated, 312,000 homes partially destroyed, 467 schools damaged, 2,590 industrial facilities destroyed and 361 healthcare facilities destroyed.


An entire people massacred by a systematic regime. These are the numbers that we should all be familiar with after all these months of resolute carnage, live streamed for the world to see.


Wounded children are taken to the al-Ahli Baptist Hospital in Gaza City for treatment, in Gaza on June 27, 2024 (AA).


The privilege of playing sports is not handed to us by the ruling elite. We play as children in backyards, alleyways, public parks and street corners. We play despite poor funding in lower socio-economic areas, where adequate public resources are not made available to our youth.

We play to process, to grieve, to vent, and to dream. That privilege is a blessing of Almighty God on every child on the face of this earth – including the children of Gaza. They, like us and our children, have the right to dream and work relentlessly to achieve that dream and become champions.

The values of sports are noble; they teach us brotherhood and sisterhood, compassion, discipline and resilience. Above all, sport teaches us humility: our talent is honed but it is our faith in God and what He has decreed for our paths that keeps us determined. So, when the ungodly happens, it is essential that athletes speak up.



Risking it all


Muhammad Ali, John Carlos, Tommie Smith, Peter Norman, Bill Russell, Mahmoud Abdul Rauf, Colin Kaepernick, and so many others paved the way to use sports as a catalyst for change. At the risk of losing it all, they spoke, marched, kneeled and questioned.

Some of them did lose it all; they lost sponsors, contracts, earnings and reputations. But the ultimate cost has already been paid in the catastrophic loss of lives, so in truth, there is nothing left to lose.

When the power of empire relentlessly destroys in the most brutal and graphic of ways, human beings must gather their courage to speak up in solidarity with the oppressed.

Athletes4Ceasefire inscribes itself in this very mindset. It was born from athletes who have heart; athletes who will not do business as usual during this genocidal madness. Kenny Stills, formerly of the New Orleans Saints in the NFL and Omar Dreidi, an NBA agent, spearheaded this movement of athletes with humanity and love in their hearts.

Achieving success in professional sport did not elevate us above our communities, but instead enhanced our sense of belonging within those local and global communities. Sports made us better empaths.



As athletes, we love a level playing field and we know when something is wrong. And what is happening in the occupied Palestinian territories is not just wrong, but a violation of several international human rights laws.

Athletes4Ceasefire


Palestinian rights have been violated for decades, and this ongoing onslaught has outlined the sheer barbarity that ruling powers are brazenly willing to display. It takes us to the deepest levels of human depravity and Athlete4Ceasefire recognises that.

Failure is not unfamiliar to us. Be it bad shooting percentages, missing an open goal, double faulting, or failing to win the race – every setback is part of a longer, overarching journey. We have failed time and time again.

But we always rise to the occasion until our resilience becomes part of who we are. As athletes, we are equipped to deal with humanity's failures, and genocide is humanity's greatest failure.

The game has not been lost; the ball is in our court, and we can change the score. Of that, I am sure.

Some say courageous athletes are a placebo for civic engagement in society because we can talk, but who will listen? My contention is that if we are the placebo, citizens must become the actual cure. People must become vocal when and where the inhumane happens.

I am an athlete, sure, but I am a human being first and foremost. And it is my responsibility, as a member of the human race, to speak up for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and an end to all oppression across the globe – be it in Palestine, Sudan, Congo, and everywhere else people are suffering.

The game has not been lost; the ball is in our court, and we can change the score. Of that, I am sure.




SOURCE: TRT WORLD

Tariq Abdul-Wahad
Tariq Abdul-Wahad was born Olivier Saint-Jean in France in 1974. He was the first French basketball player to be drafted and play in the NBA in 1997. Abdul-Wahid studied Art History at San Jose State University, and also holds a Masters in Sports Management. Upon his retirement from professional basketball in 2005, he has been particularly active in youth sports in the Bay Area region of California with ventures such as BlueSox Basketball and Norcal Performance Training. He also has spearheaded many projects focused around youth sports in France and Senegal. He is married to Khadija Ibn-Lahoucine and has three kids Amine, Hind and Anas.
'There is no alternative to UNRWA,' UN chief tells pledging conference

'My appeal to everyone is this: Protect UNRWA, protect UNRWA staff, and protect UNRWA’s mandate -- including through funding,' says Antonio Guterres

Rabia Iclal Turan |12.07.2024 - 



WASHINGTON

The UN chief on Friday appealed everyone to protect Palestinian refugee agency UNRWA and its staff, saying there is "no alternative to UNRWA".

"My appeal to everyone is this: Protect UNRWA, protect UNRWA staff, and protect UNRWA’s mandate -- including through funding," Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told a pledging conference at the UN headquarters in New York aimed at increasing contributions to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA).

"Without the necessary support and financing to UNRWA, Palestine refugees will lose a critical lifeline and the last ray of hope for a better future," he said.

The UN chief said it is the time to "bring an end to this terrible war, starting with an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza and an immediate and unconditional release of all hostages".

"Ultimately, only a political solution can bring an end to this conflict – one that realizes a vision of two States – Israel and Palestine – living side by side in peace and security, with Jerusalem as the capital of both states," he said.

Speaking at the same conference, UNRWA's head Philippe Lazzarini said the agency is "staggering under the weight of relentless attack in Gaza".

He recalled that 195 UNRWA workers were killed in Israeli attacks and nearly 190 installations damaged or destroyed, killing more than 500 people seeking UN protection.

Lazzarini said that UNRWA is appealing for $1.2 billion for the occupied Palestinian territory emergency to cover critical humanitarian needs until the end of the year.

"This appeal, and the emergency appeal for Syria, Lebanon and Jordan are less than 20 percent funded," he continued.

Riyad Mansour, Palestine's UN envoy, told the conference that the past nine months have been "long," "painful," and "harrowing".

"There is nowhere safe for our refugees to turn in Gaza, as the Secretary General has indicated, not even under the UN flag, as schools continue to be targeted and bombed by the Israeli occupying forces in one attack after another, adding to the casualties, destruction and the traumas forced upon our people, 40,000 Palestinian children," Mansour said.
NAKBA 2.0
EU commissioner condemns demolition of school by Israel in West Bank

'Such demolitions and forced civilian displacement in occupied territory illegal under international law,' says Janez Lenarcic

Beyza Binnur Donmez |12.07.2024 - TRT/AA



GENEVA

The top EU crisis management official on Friday condemned the demolition of a school by Israel in the occupied West Bank, reminding that education facilities are protected under international humanitarian law (IHL).

"I condemn the demolition by Israel of a school in Khallet Amera in the West Bank," Janez Lenarcic, EU commissioner for crisis management, said on X. "Depriving children of their right to education is unacceptable."

"Education facilities are protected by IHL," Lenarcic added.

He noted that the EU was among the donors funding the school, which was providing education to vulnerable children.

He stressed that this incident is part of a larger trend of demolitions in the West Bank, including schools, homes, and other structures, and said: "At the current rate, 2024 looks set to see the highest number of demolitions of Palestinian structures in the West Bank since records started."

"There is zero ambiguity in IHL: such demolitions and the forced displacement of civilians in occupied territory are illegal under international law," he warned.

Tension has been running high in the occupied West Bank amid a deadly Israeli offensive on the Gaza Strip, which killed nearly 38,300 people since Oct. 7, 2023.

At least 573 Palestinians, including at least 133 children, have since been killed and nearly 5,350 others injured by Israeli army fire in the occupied territory, according to Gaza Health Ministry.

Israel stands accused of “genocide” at the International Court of Justice, which, in its latest ruling, has ordered Tel Aviv to immediately halt its military operation in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, where over a million Palestinians had sought refuge from the war before it was invaded on May 6.
Biden regrets failure to influence Israel

July 12, 2024

US President Joe Biden in Washington DC., United States on July 09, 2024.
 [Celal GüneÅŸ – Anadolu Agency]

President Joe Biden has acknowledged regret over his inability to persuade Israel to alter its course during the ongoing Gaza onslaught, despite months of diplomatic efforts. Speaking at a NATO summit press conference, Biden candidly admitted, “There’s a lot of things in retrospect I wish I had been able to convince the Israelis to do.”

The American leader highlighted several instances where he believes more could have been done, including increasing humanitarian aid access to Gaza, limiting the use of heavy weaponry in populated areas, promoting a more rapid ceasefire and ensuring the success of the emergency port from Cyprus.

Biden specifically mentioned his disappointment regarding the emergency port, which has now been decommissioned after facing numerous challenges. “I’ve been disappointed that the things I put forward have not succeeded as well. Like the port we attached from Cyprus – I was hopeful that would be more successful,” he stated.

Read: FACTBOX – How much has US-built Gaza aid pier helped get aid into Gaza?

The President also criticised the current Israeli administration, describing the war cabinet as “one of the most conservative in the history of Israel”. He emphasised his vision for a post-war Gaza, stressing the importance of a two-state solution and the need to avoid Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip.

Despite Biden’s expressions of regret, critics argue that US policy has consistently provided unwavering support to Israel, even in instances where American-issued red lines have been crossed. The President’s admission comes amidst growing pressure to take a firmer stance on Israel’s offensive in Gaza which has claimed the lives of over 40,000 Palestinians, the overwhelming majority of whom are women and children.

According to the British medical journal, The Lancet, the true death toll in Gaza could reach over 186,000, accounting for eight per cent of Gaza’s population.

Biden reiterated his commitment to securing a ceasefire and bringing an end to Israel’s military aggression, stating, “It’s time to end this war.” However, he faces an uphill battle in balancing diplomatic efforts with long-standing US-Israel relations, all while addressing mounting concerns over his handling of the crisis.

For many critics, Washington’s impotency in reigning in Israel and holding the apartheid state to account is further evidence of the sway that the pro-Israel lobby has in America.
GAZA BEACH FRONT DEVELOPER

EXPOSED
Fogbow, a US firm with military links, eyes maritime plan for Gaza aid


A private US firm run by former military and ex-CIA members is pushing plans to build a movable jetty off Gaza’s coast so more lifesaving goods can get into the besieged Palestinian enclave. But UN officials, aid workers and several European government officials have expressed doubts about the project and voiced scepticism over the group’s origins and motives.


Issued on: 12/07/2024 - 
 France 24

PICTURE POSTCARD
The Gaza coastline near Nuseirat Palestinian refugee camp, with ships in the distance. 


LONG READ


By: Jessica LE MASURIERFollow|Dulcie Leimbach

The bid to get humanitarian assistance to Gaza via a sea route has hit troubled waters over the past few months, but it has not stopped a US company run by former military and CIA officials from pushing its controversial plan to secure maritime access to deliver aid to the besieged Palestinian enclave.

At a press conference on Thursday, US President Joe Biden said he was "disappointed" with the problem-plagued effort to deliver aid to Gaza via a temporary pier.

The $230-million US military pier has repeatedly been detached from the shore because of weather conditions since its initial installation in mid-May.

Biden’s comments came hours after the Pentagon announced that the US military was abandoning efforts to reinstall the pier, which was detached last month due to anticipated high seas.

Despite the repeated problems with the pier, Fogbow, a US private firm, is moving forward with its plan, which it calls Blue Beach, to deliver aid to Gaza via a maritime route.

Fogbow’s backstory is replete with deep military, intelligence and financial interests in a region wracked by the nine-month Gaza war whose death toll keeps rising.

Mick Mulroy, a Fogbow company official, recently told FRANCE 24 and PassBlue that the firm is working with USAID, the UN World Food Programme, the US military and a Fogbow-linked charity to pursue the Blue Beach project despite the failure of the US pier.

Fogbow shipped its first pallets of aid, with the help of the US military, on June 27, according to Mulroy. Some 1,100 tons of flour worth “nearly $1 million” – bought by Fogbow from a Cypriot mill – were shipped from the Larnaca port in Cyprus to Gaza.

Fogbow is not only looking to run aid operations into Gaza but also to play a role in its reconstruction, according to numerous UN and US government sources. But inconsistencies in the firm’s messaging and stated goals have left some of these experts questioning the organisation’s agenda.

PassBlue and FRANCE 24 spoke with two of Fogbow’s principals, Mulroy and Chris Hyslop, on a Zoom call in late June and at least 30 people in the US, Cypriot and other European governments, as well as the UN and other NGOs, to shed light on Fogbow’s plans for Gaza.

A mysterious early-morning call

The call set off her alarm bells. It was 8am and Julia*, a human rights specialist, whose reputed NGO has an office near UN headquarters in New York, had just stepped out of the shower when the phone rang. “I’d like to speak to your events manager,” the caller barked.

“Sorry, we don’t have an events organiser. How may I help you?” she asked. The caller said she was from Fogbow, a group Julia had never heard of, which the woman said was exploring alternative ways of getting humanitarian aid into Gaza.

“I explained to the woman on the phone that we are also interested in getting aid into Gaza and suggested we might be able to collaborate,” said Julia.

“There was no, ‘Oh well, let’s all work together’ – which tends to be what the humanitarian community does,” Julia said.

“No,” the Fogbow woman said unequivocally to suggestions of collaborating. “'We are a private company.' What she wanted was to host an event with us in our space in New York.”

After Julia got off the phone, she Googled “Fogbow” and saw that it is mostly made up of former US military and intelligence people. “I thought: ‘Why are they interested in working with us? What are they up to?’”

That’s the same question that a UN front-line aid worker asked himself when a former member of the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs turned up in his office in early February on a charm offensive. Chris Hyslop, a Fogbow official, came armed with a PowerPoint presentation laying out his company’s Blue Beach proposal for a movable pier. He was accompanied by Eric Oehlerich, a former US Navy Seal.
A slide showing Fogbow's 'Blue Beach Plan' presentation. © France 24

The humanitarian aid, Hyslop said, would be bought by Fogbow and shipped through the Amalthea maritime route from the Larnaca port in Cyprus to Gaza that is being promoted by the Cypriot government. The presentation obtained exclusively by FRANCE 24 and PassBlue detailed plans for a “quay” on Gaza’s coastline.

A slide showing Fogbow's 'aid delivery zone'. © France 24

The presentation even addressed plans for “crowd control management” at the “depot area”.

There was good reason to consider crowds: More than 100 people were killed in a stampede in Gaza City in February as people desperately tried to grab some sacks of flour from a food convoy and Israeli forces fired on them.

Fogbow presentation showing Gaza Industrial Estate. © France 24

“They (Hyslop and Oehlerich) claimed they’d met at a kind of county fair, somewhere in the middle of nowhere in America,” the worker said in an interview with PassBlue and FRANCE24.

But for those involved in aid distribution, the plan seemed almost comically out of touch with the realities on the ground in Gaza, where Israel’s relentless bombing in retaliation for the Hamas October 7 massacre has complicated if not halted deliveries as famine looms.

“We sniggered because none of it made any sense,” the UN aid worker continued. “It was so removed from the political reality. It sounded like a crackpot scheme, to be honest.”

“There was something fishy from the start.”

The Fogbow team told the UN worker they had financial backing from “wealthy individuals” and the government of the United Arab Emirates. They said they had also secured the support of the Israel Defence Forces, or IDF, and a tentative green light from COGAT – Israel’s aid coordination cell in the Palestinian territories – to move ahead with the plan.

Who runs Fogbow?


The Fogbow military veterans who run the show include Sam Mundy and Mulroy. The latter is a former naval specialist with the CIA who served in the Trump administration as deputy assistant secretary of defence for the Mideast.

Mulroy was also a director of the Yemen Steering Initiative, “a $50 billion program designed to jumpstart the process to prevent Yemen from becoming a failed state”, according to his LinkedIn page. The initiative was devised, four years ago, by the RAND corporation, a think-tank closely tied to the US defence-intelligence apparatus.

RAND also did a study on the Gaza Arc in 2005, which included plans for a floating maritime dock.

Mundy served as a commander of the Marine Corps Forces Central Command (MARCENT), which is responsible for Marines deployed in the Mideast and participated in a 2022 JINSA Program in Israel focused on underscoring the importance of the US-Israel defence relationship to US national security.

Hyslop brought the UN connections to Fogbow. His LinkedIn bio says he was involved with UN “security” when he worked for the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.

Mulroy told Passblue and FRANCE 24 that Fogbow is owned by three American businessmen: Steven Fox, Robb Fipp and Brook Jerue. Fogbow's website lists the three men as its founders. Fox is also the founder of the corporate intelligence firm Veracity Worldwide, which is based in New York City, and where Jerue is a managing director. Fipp, formerly with Veracity, is in venture capital.


Screen grab from Fogbow's website. © France 24

Fox formerly worked for the State Department, specialising in Israeli and Palestinian affairs, among other regions, according to Fogbow’s website. Yet according to Eamon Javers’s “Broker, Trader, Lawyer, Spy,” a 2011 book about the secret world of corporate espionage, Fox also formerly worked for the CIA.

Mulroy said that Fox, Fipp and Jerue approached him and Hyslop in 2022 to put together an “international humanitarian assistance and disaster relief force to deliver aid to crisis-hit countries, devastated by natural disasters or war”.

That was the initial plan, until “all of a sudden Gaza started”.

“They shifted and said, ‘Can you guys look at what you could do right now in Gaza?’”

Details about Fogbow’s history and operations are scarce on its website, even as it promotes its work without citing examples of “executing complex logistical challenges delivering aid”.

Screen grab from Fogbow's website. © France 24

The site also says that Fogbow “supports the UN’s Connecting Business Initiative”. The UN initiative, however, told FRANCE 24 and PassBlue it had no dealings with Fogbow and had asked repeatedly for the claim to be removed from the organisation's website, without success.

Fogbow describes itself as a provider of humanitarian aid logistics. “We don't pretend to be a humanitarian organisation,” Hyslop said in the Zoom call with him and Mulroy, saying the firm operates merely as a “transporter”.

Hyslop told FRANCE 24 and PassBlue that funding for Fogbow’s movable pier plan would come from the Maritime Humanitarian Aid Foundation (MHAF), a Geneva- and US-based charity run by a former US diplomat, Cameron Hume, who is also an adviser for Veracity.

MHAF has secured funding commitments “in excess” of $50 million “as seed funding from donor governments”, Mulroy said.

“Based on Fogbow’s work under contract with the foundation, there is an expectation of securing significant additional funding from GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) and other donors.”

Other top advisers at Veracity include Richard Dearlove, who was head of the British intelligence agency known as MI6 (a role known informally as "C”) from 1999 to 2004, including during the US/British invasion of Iraq.

Anatomy of a pier

Mulroy and Hyslop said that they went to the White House twice, in early 2024, to discuss their Blue Beach project. The meetings were set up by Curtis Ried, Chief of Staff of the US National Security Council and Assistant to Brett McGurk, Senior Advisor to the US President for Middle East Affairs. In May, Ried was promoted as the US representative to the OSCE (Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe), with the rank of ambassador. They said they also met with Terry Wolff, a retired three-star Army general.

President Joe Biden announced in his State of the Union address on March 7 that he was directing the US military to establish a temporary pier in the Mediterranean near Gaza to bring more food and other essentials into the Palestinian enclave.

The timing was urgent: Three senior UN officials warned the UN Security Council on February 27 of “imminent famine in the Gaza Strip”, pushing for “immediate action to avert humanitarian disaster in a territory where many Council members alleged the use of hunger as a weapon of war”.

But aid groups and others have insisted that the overland routes into Gaza blockaded by Israel’s military operation remain the best way to get aid into the enclave.

US Army Major Harrison Mann described the US jetty as a PR stunt, saying: “The pier and the airdrops look like they were intended to satisfy Americans who were concerned about the suffering of Palestinians, but I’m not sure what segment of the population both deeply cares about the welfare of Palestinians but is not engaged enough to see the failure of both the pier and the airdrop projects,” he told FRANCE 24 and PassBlue.

Major Mann was the first US military and intelligence officer to resign publicly over the Biden administration’s support of Israel’s war on Gaza.

Meanwhile, Fogbow was negotiating a role in the maritime route from Cyprus to Gaza. Fogbow tried to clinch contracts with USAID and the State Department, but they were unsuccessful – partly because the firm had no history of delivering aid in the region, according to government sources who did not want to speak on the record.

Stacy Gilbert, who spent over two decades working for the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration, said that maritime aid plans would do little to alleviate the suffering in Gaza.

“For people who know anything about humanitarian assistance, the US pier doesn't make any sense because the whole reason we are doing it is because our ally Israel is blocking humanitarian assistance,” she said, adding that the money used to build the pier could have been better spent.

Gilbert resigned from the Biden administration after a controversial report to which she contributed (the NSM-20 report released May 10) concluded that Israel was not obstructing humanitarian aid to Gaza despite credible evidence to the contrary.

A USAID branch called the Bureau of Humanitarian Assistance spearheads global aid in crisis situations, with a US government source saying, “When there’s an international disaster [it] is the lead – period.”

The source said that Fogbow’s lack of respect for the lead agency (USAID) and their lack of a track record reek of “profiteering”.

“When DoD is invited to support a response, then they can use the resources they have (such as ships) to speed things up. When it comes to working with a private firm like Fogbow it has to be contracted out by the DoD," the US government source told FRANCE 24 and PassBlue. "Typically, DoD lawyers would say no, unless it was for something specific to their needs like vessel recovery.”

Fogbow said it did make some of its leased tugboats available to support the US pier operation.

Avoiding pitfalls

In an email to PassBlue, Ann Wright, a member of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, a nongovernmental organisation that has been trying to sail aid into Gaza, was dubious about the role Fogbow is striving to play in the region. Wright served in the US Army and Reserves for 29 years as well as 16 years as a diplomat. She resigned in 2003 in opposition to the US war in Iraq.

“The fact that most of the Fogbow staff are retired US military and CIA officials definitely has a ‘smell to it’ of a US covert operation,” Wright wrote in her email.

Gilbert noted: “Humanitarian organizations use former military [experts] in various roles. I think what gives us pause is when the Department of Defence is contracting for work in humanitarian assistance that they (the military) should not be doing.”

In the interview with FRANCE 24 and PassBlue in late June, Hyslop took umbrage with assumptions about Fogbow’s motives simply because of its principals’ extensive CIA and military backgrounds.

“I've never heard any humanitarian ask Maersk or APL (logistics) or major global shippers if they have former military people on their staff,” Hyslop said on the Zoom call. “Of course they do. All their logisticians primarily come from world militaries and no questions are asked. But they're asked of us. And I understand it.”

“But I also ask for some understanding from the perspective of the humanitarians, and to give our boys a chance to explain that these are not active military people,” he added. “They've properly and respectfully served their countries and now they're bringing these skills now in support of the humanitarian community, not to take over in any way.”

Mulroy told PassBlue and FRANCE 24 that the firm plans to build the movable pier as outlined in the Blue Beach proposal: a $20 million structure with a crane that will be better adapted to rough seas than the US pier has been.

Fogbow’s offshore project would involve their ocean-going barges being pushed by tugs from the Larnaca port, carrying up to 150 truck-equivalent units.

The landing zone would bring an “additive route” to overland roads and be “impervious to weather conditions and wave heights”, Mulroy said, describing how the project would work. “It's essentially on the beach and it has sea breaks and all that stuff.”

There would be a “short quay wall” and a “dredged slot” that the barges can be pulled onto the beach. Then “the containers are just offloaded with no dock or causeway”, Mulroy said.

Fogbow emphasised that their design would avoid the technical problems encountered by the US military pier.

A Palestinian billionaire, Bashar al Masri, is in discussions about partnering with Fogbow for storage and distribution of aid, according to UN sources. Al Masri previously financed the reconstruction of the Gaza Industrial Estate after it was destroyed in Israel’s 11-day offensive on Gaza in 2021. Masri built the enclave’s first luxury hotel, called Blue Beach, which was near the spot where the US pier was constructed.

But a Gazan photographer, Mohammed Hajjar, who is based in the enclave, said that Al Masri is regarded with suspicion by the local population, “Most Gazans don’t know him. We don’t know his politics, his goals, what his political programme is. My opinion [is] he is not in a position to be part of any solutions in post-war Gaza.”

“He came to Gaza once and seemed interested in trade. All of his solutions were for-profit options.”

Salman Al-Zurai’i, a Palestinian researcher and policy analyst based in Gaza, said to FRANCE 24 and PassBlue about Al Masri: “I think that Al Masri – and generally the private sector – are going to play a large role in the day after the war in Gaza.”

“The involvement of the Palestinian private sector, local stakeholders and Gazan clans in running post-war Gaza implies that neither the Palestinian Authority nor Hamas will play a role, resulting in a political vacuum in Gaza,” he added.

“The Israelis want to prevent Palestinian political actors from participating in post-war Gaza; this is a major Israeli approach that has been ongoing for 17 years and led to cementing the political separation of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.”

The idea for a sea entry point into Gaza was floated by Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu in October 2023, according to The Jerusalem Post. It was not the first time Israel had proposed a floating island off the coast of Gaza purportedly to facilitate aid delivery.

Israeli media reported in March on Netanyahu’s post-war vision for the Gaza strip, known as “Gaza 2035”. The document, later published online by Netanyahu’s office (on May 3), promotes the idea that Gaza “can become a significant industrial production centre for the shores of the Mediterranean with … access to… energy and raw materials from the Gulf while leveraging Israeli technology”.

Image from Israeli PM Netanyahu's Gaza 2035 plan. © France 24

The plan would keep Gaza under Israeli control – and allow it to exploit the enclave’s offshore energy reserves, estimated at 1.1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas – while an Arab Coalition (including the UAE and Saudi Arabia) would create a body called the Gaza Rehabilitation Authority to oversee the reconstruction efforts. The plan does not appear to give Palestinians any operative role.

UAE Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan denounced Netanyahu’s plans on X shortly after their release, making it clear that the Israeli PM had not consulted Abu Dhabi.

“The UAE stresses that the Israeli Prime Minister does not have the legal capacity to take this step, and the state refuses to be drawn into any plan aimed at providing cover for Israeli presence in the Gaza Strip,” the post read.
Fogbow eyes postwar reconstruction

Humanitarians expressed concern about the prospect of Fogbow playing a role in Gaza’s rebuilding once the war ends.

Jamie McGoldrick met with Fogbow three times earlier this year when he was the UN’s humanitarian aid coordinator for the Occupied Palestinian Territory, along with David Satterfield, then the US special envoy for the Middle East. McGoldrick said the firm was “not very transparent” about their intentions, including sources of funding – as Fogbow’s name, which means ghost rainbow, might suggest.

During a first meeting in February with McGoldrick and Satterfield, Fogbow’s representatives pitched a project not directly related to humanitarian assistance: a maritime corridor to be used for the reconstruction of Gaza. They said that the corridor could help with aid delivery if needed, but that was not its original purpose.

“What they told us about was this idea of having a supply route for reconstruction into Gaza because they saw an opportunity there – initially they were in conversations with Qatar then shifted to UAE for support,” McGoldrick said.

“They needed something like $300 million to set the whole thing up,” he added. “And they were looking for suitors, that was one of the reasons why I think they were in the room with Satterfield and others – to try and convince them to contribute to this or to be part of it.”

McGoldrick said that Fogbow’s operations in the region may be a way for the US to get into the Gaza reconstruction market.

A representative from the team of Sigrid Kaag, the US-backed senior UN humanitarian aid and reconstruction coordinator for Gaza, was also in one of the meetings with Fogbow. Her team has not responded to our questions sent by email.

McGoldrick said that conversations about the future of Gaza are now under way: Will it go from “Mogadishu on the Med to Singapore on the Med or another Dubai?", he asked. UN officials calculate that Gaza’s postwar reconstruction could cost $30 to $40 billion, but no one is saying where the money will come from.

“I worked in many places” – including in Yemen – “where I came across these private firms,” McGoldrick added, referring to Fogbow.

“And, you know, they're not there for the human dimension of things, they’re there for profit,” he said. “American Navy SEALS, nice, shiny, connected politically and they have financial muscle behind them. You've always got to be suspicious of it.”

A model for post-war Gaza similar to the post-US invasion reconstruction operation in Iraq has been floated, McGoldrick noted. The US government official Paul Bremer ran the Coalition Provisional Authority after the 2003 US invasion and was unofficially governor of Baghdad. Both former British Prime Minister and Mideast Quartet negotiator Tony Blair – who has an office in Tel Aviv – and Kaag, who is also a former Dutch politician, have been name-dropped as possible main players in the post-reconstruction effort.

By using the Cyprus maritime corridor from Larnaca to the Gaza coast, prospectors could sideline “the Egyptians in Port Said.” Such a project, McGoldrick added, would create a channel “that’s controlled more by the Emirates and other Gulf countries who want to get a piece of Gaza”.

“The project could cut Palestinians out of the picture,” noted McGoldrick, as it “likely increases the separation of Gaza from the West Bank”.

“I think it's dangerous … because you want to create a settled environment there if you're going to have a prospect for peace for Gaza,” he said. “It's got to be Gaza for Gazans.”

*Name has been changed
“I’m Bored, So I Shoot”: How Israeli Troops Are Authorized to Shoot Palestinians Virtually at Will

STORY JULY 12, 2024



GUESTS Oren Ziv
reporter and photographer for +972 Magazine.
Yuval Green
Israeli reservist who refuses to continue serving in the military.

We speak with reporter Oren Ziv of +972 Magazine, whose latest investigation details how Israeli forces in Gaza have been authorized to open fire on Palestinians virtually at will. Six soldiers who fought in Gaza describe a near-total absence of firing regulations, with soldiers shooting as they please, setting homes ablaze, leaving corpses to rot on the streets and more. “It seems soldiers were shooting not from a tactical reason or a real military reason, but just out of being bored, to pass the time or just because they could,” says Ziv. “Soldiers felt they can do whatever they want, that they won’t be accountable. And all this is done also with the awareness of the commanders.” We also hear from Yuval Green, one of the reservists who spoke to Ziv and who now refuses to continue serving in the Israeli military. “I believe that continuing this war and continuing the death of Palestinians and Israeli soldiers is not right. I believe that right now the right thing to do is to sign the ceasefire treaty that is going to release the hostages and end this war,” Green says.


Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.


AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman.

In early June, Al Jazeera aired a series of videos showing Israeli soldiers shooting dead several Palestinians walking near a coastal road in Gaza. This is an excerpt of that report.


ROB MATHESON: We’re going to begin this news hour with videos emerging out of Gaza appearing to show summary executions of Palestinians by Israeli soldiers. Al Jazeera has obtained the videos. And let me give you a warning: Some of you might find them disturbing. We’re choosing not to show the moment of death in the videos. They were taken out on al-Rashid Street. That’s the coastal road connecting north and south Gaza. Israel has designated it as a safe zone for Palestinians wanting to move between the areas.


This footage is from June 1st. It shows a person walking along the beach. Israeli soldiers appear to have stopped them, and moments later, the person is shot.


This next video is said to show a group of Palestinians walking north on May 17th. One of them steps out of the group and raises their hands in the air, apparently showing that they’re unarmed. They’re shot within minutes. Then the video appears to show soldiers coming in to take the person’s body away.


And in this footage, another person is standing in the same area with their hands in the air. This is shortly before they are shot by Israeli soldiers. The same then happens to another person later.

AMY GOODMAN: In each incident shown in that Al Jazeera report, the Palestinians shot dead by Israeli soldiers appear to be unarmed and are at a distance from the soldiers. According to a new investigative article by Israeli news outlets +972 Magazine and Local Call, these executions are consistent with the testimonies of six Israeli soldiers following their release from active duty in Gaza in recent months. The six soldiers describe being authorized to open fire on Palestinians virtually at will. The sources describe the near-total absence of firing regulations in Gaza, with Israeli troops shooting as they please, setting homes ablaze, leaving corpses on the streets, all with their commanders’ permission. The article is headlined “’I’m bored, so I shoot’: The Israeli army’s approval of free-for-all violence in Gaza.”

We’re joined now by the journalist who broke the story. Oren Ziv is a reporter and photographer for +972 Magazine. He’s joining us from outside Venice, Italy.

Oren, welcome to Democracy Now! “I’m bored, so I shoot.” First, talk about that Al Jazeera footage that we’re seeing, the footage that was taken on the coastal road in Gaza, and then that quote.

OREN ZIV: Thank you so much for having me.

So, first of all, the footage we’ve just seen from Al Jazeera is aligned with many testimonies we have been hearing from Palestinians over the last months that they are not be able — they’re not — they’re prevented from going back north, Palestinians that had to run away or to flee to the southern part of Gaza, as the Israeli army ordered. And this footage is aligned also what we are hearing during our investigation from the six soldiers. Basically, they’re saying they had a complete — almost a complete freedom to open fire.

So, we’ve been doing researches and investigation on the path from the attacks from the air, using AI and machine learning. And in this investigation, we talked to soldiers who were deployed during the war in different places, in different units on the ground. And what they are saying, basically, is that whenever they had a slight sense of fear or danger, they could shoot. Nobody would limit them. And even sensitive targets — schools, hospitals, public institutions — that officially they had to get approval from higher ranks, this was only a bureaucratical step, and it was almost always approved.

In addition, one of the soldiers described — and, actually, two — that in some areas, when the Israeli soldiers were deployed in a specific neighborhood inside the Gaza Strip, they would have a red line, a specific point, 100 meters from them, that if a Palestinian, even unarmed, even a woman or child, would cross, they were allowed to shoot in order to kill, not to arrest or warn them. And they said that every man between the age of 16 and 50, even in civilian clothes, even unarmed, was considered a fighter or a collaborator with Hamas, and it was allowed to shoot them.

AMY GOODMAN: And the quote, the headline of your piece in +972 Magazine, “I’m bored, so I shoot”?

OREN ZIV: Yes. So, many of the times, from our investigation, it seems soldiers were shooting not from a tactical reason or a real military reason, but just out of being bored, to pass the time, or just because they could. Some of the soldiers spoke to us about the, quote, “regular fire,” meaning that you shoot, and after you shoot, you say on the army radio that it is normal or regular fire, so other units in the area — and there were many soldiers deployed at the beginning of the war inside the Gaza Strip — will know that this is shooting by the Israeli army and not by Hamas fighters. But they said that this term, “regular” or “normal” shooting, was also to kind of state in other words, “I’m just shooting for fun.” One of the soldiers said that in Hanukkah, the Jewish holiday of Hanukkah, some of the units in the Gaza Strip talked on the radio to shoot on a certain time to kind of light the sky, and they were just shooting for minutes just for fun.

So, I think this is one aspect, but it also teaches us that this was a very wide policy. It wasn’t just a sporadic problem here and there, but a very wide policy that soldiers felt they can do whatever they want, that they won’t be accountable. And all this is done also with the awareness of the commanders.

I must add also that because from — from day one of the war, we heard very horrific statements from Netanyahu, from the Prime Minister Netanyahu, from senior ministers in the Israeli government, talking about revenge, talking about there’s no innocent civilians in Gaza. And this went down to the commanders and down to the simple soldiers. And the soldiers that spoke to us in our investigation said that these kind of phrases — “There’s no innocent people in Gaza,” “Everybody is involved in Hamas,” “On October 7, they were all celebrating; this is why they need to be punished” — was very widely common. And this is why, the soldiers who talked to us explained, that the acts of vandalism, of looting, of a general sense of revenge were very common.

AMY GOODMAN: Oren Ziv, all but one of the six Israeli soldiers you interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity. A 26-year-old reservist from Jerusalem named Yuval Green, in November and December, Yuval served in the 55th Paratroopers Brigade. He recently signed a letter by 41 reservists declaring their refusal to fight in Gaza after the Israeli army’s invasion of Rafah. Green said, quote, “There were no restrictions on ammunition. People were shooting just to relieve the boredom.” Well, on Thursday evening, Democracy Now! reached Yuval Green in Jerusalem and asked him what he’s calling for now.


YUVAL GREEN: I believe that continuing this war and continuing the death of Palestinians and Israeli soldiers is not right. I believe that right now the right thing to do is to sign the ceasefire treaty that is going to release the hostages and end this war. I know that the Israeli government is not yet willing to sign it.

AMY GOODMAN: Again, that’s Yuval Green, a reservist who is now refusing to fight in Gaza. All of the six that you interviewed were reservists there. You also write, “The testimonies paint … a landscape littered with civilian corpses, which are left to rot or be eaten by stray animals; the army only hides them from view ahead of the arrival of international aid convoys, so that 'images of people in advanced stages of decay don't come out.’” Go from Yuval to this picture of Gaza.

OREN ZIV: I think what several soldiers told us, that the army was not dealing with dead people, dead Palestinians, and it was very common to see them on the side of the road when they’re moving to one place to another. And also, Yuval himself and other soldiers told us that when the army was moving from — so, Israeli soldiers were deployed inside Palestinian homes and houses, and when they had to move to a new position, the official policy, as we understand, was to burn the house down. The soldiers would gather the mattresses and the furniture and light the house on fire and move on. The official explanation by the commanders to Yuval, but also to other soldiers, was the fact that they don’t want anything sensitive to be left there, military equipment or maps or anything like that, but also that Hamas will not use the houses. But between the lines, you can understand that this was also an act of revenge to punish Palestinian civilians and also to make sure they cannot go back to those areas, areas that at least some people in the army believed would stay in Israeli control.

AMY GOODMAN: Yuval also told you, Yuval Green, who was the only one to be named in your piece, about the army’s deep indifference to the fate of the hostages. Can you elaborate further? Indeed, of course, as we know, in December, the Israeli soldiers shot and killed three Israeli hostages as they approached the troops for help, speaking in Hebrew, with their arms up, stripped down, so that they could — the Israeli military would clearly see they weren’t armed. These were hostages.

OREN ZIV: Yes. So, yes. Thank you for the question. The official line of the Israeli government and the Israeli army, the force commanders, is that the operation in Gaza, the war in Gaza, is also in order to bring back the hostages alive. Now, in nine months of war, this didn’t really happen, and they managed to rescue a very small number of hostages alive by military force. Most of the hostages were released in a deal in November. And the soldiers we spoke to, not only Yuval Green, said that, in general, there were not many instructions regarding hostages, and in the way the army was using shooting on the ground, was using force, for them it was clear that hostages might get hurt or even killed.

I think, in addition to Yuval, there was another soldier that was on the regular army service that said they didn’t have any cellphone, they didn’t get any news. And he heard about the three hostages being killed on December only when he got back home for a short vacation. Now, after the killing of the three hostages by the Israeli army, the army said in statements that they would make it more clear for soldiers. But at least according to the soldier we spoke to that was on the frontline, they didn’t hear even about the incident, not to speak about new orders or guidelines.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, I want to thank you so much for being with us, Oren Ziv, reporter and photographer for +972 Magazine. We’re going to link to your piece “’I’m bored, so I shoot’: The Israeli army’s approval of free-for-all violence in Gaza.”

That does it for our show. Next week, Democracy Now! will be in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, at the Republican National Convention, bringing you an extended daily two-hour broadcast, “Breaking with Convention: War, Peace and the Presidency.” I’m Amy Goodman. Thanks so much for joining us.

This is viewer supported news. Please do your part today.DONATE

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.