Saturday, July 27, 2024

 

Thousands of birds and fish threatened by mining for clean energy transition



Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE

Illegal gold mine in southern Ghana 

IMAGE: 

SOUTHERN GHANA IS A GLOBAL HOTSPOT OF EXTRACTION-INDUCED THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY. ARTISANAL SMALL-SCALE ALLUVIAL GOLD MINING LIKE THIS THREATENS IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL MERCURY POLLUTION.

view more 

CREDIT: DAVID EDWARDS




New research has found that 4,642 species of vertebrate are threatened by mineral extraction around the world through mining and quarrying, and drilling for oil and gas.

Mining activity coincides with the world's most valuable biodiversity hotspots, which contain a hyper-diversity of species and unique habitats found nowhere else on Earth.

The biggest risk to species comes from mining for materials fundamental to our transition to clean energy, such as lithium and cobalt – both essential components of solar panels, wind turbines and electric cars.

Quarrying for limestone, which is required in huge amounts for cement as a construction material, is also putting many species at risk.

The threat to nature is not limited to the physical locations of the mines - species living at great distances away can also be impacted, for example by polluted watercourses, or deforestation for new access roads and infrastructure.

The researchers say governments and the mining industry should focus on reducing the pollution driven by mining as an ‘easy win’ to reduce the biodiversity loss associated with mineral extraction.

This is the most complete global assessment of the threat to biodiversity from mineral extraction ever undertaken. The results are published today in the journal Current Biology.

“We simply won’t be able to deliver the clean energy we need to reduce our climate impact without mining for the materials we need, and that creates a problem because we’re mining in locations that often have very high levels of biodiversity,” said Professor David Edwards in the University of Cambridge’s Department of Plant Sciences and Conservation Research Institute, senior author of the report.

He added: “So many species, particularly fish, are being put at risk through the pollution caused by mining. It would be an easy win to work on reducing this freshwater pollution so we can still get the products we need for the clean energy transition, but in a way that isn’t causing so much biodiversity loss.”

Across all vertebrate species, fish are at particularly high risk from mining (2,053 species), followed by reptiles, amphibians, birds and mammals. The level of threat seems to be linked to where a particular species lives and its lifestyle: species using freshwater habitats, and species with small ranges are particularly at risk.

“The need for limestone as a core component of construction activity also poses a real risk to wildlife. Lots of species are very restricted in where they live because they're specialised to live on limestone. A cement mine can literally take out an entire hillside - and with it these species’ homes,” said Ieuan Lamb in the University of Sheffield’s School of Biosciences, first author of the report.

The Bent-Toed Gecko, for example, is threatened by limestone quarrying in Malaysia – it only exists on a single mountain range that planned mining activity will completely destroy.

To get their results, the researchers used International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) data to see which vertebrate species are threatened by mining. By mapping the locations of these species they could investigate the types of mining that are putting species at risk, and see where the risks are particularly high.

The researchers discovered that species categorised as ‘vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered’ are more threatened by mineral extraction than species of lesser concern.

Watercourses can be affected in many ways, and water pollution can affect hundreds of thousands of square kilometres of rivers and flood plains. Mining sand as a construction material, for example, alters patterns of water flow in rivers and wetlands, making birds like the Indian Skimmer more accessible to predators.

Mineral extraction threatens vertebrate species populations across the tropics, with hotspots in the Andes, coastal West and Central Africa, and South-East Asia – which coincide with high mine density. For example, artisanal small-scale alluvial gold mining in Ghana threatens important bird areas through environmental mercury pollution.

Global demand for metal minerals, fossil fuels and construction materials is growing dramatically, and the extraction industry is expanding rapidly to meet this demand. In 2022 the revenue of the industry as a whole was estimated at US $943 billion.

Biodiversity underpins the protection of the world’s carbon stocks, which help to mitigate climate change.

The study focused only on vertebrate species, but the researchers say mining is also likely to be a substantial risk to plants and invertebrates.

“There's no question that we are going to continue to mine - our entire societies are based on mined products. But there are environmental tensions embodied in our use of these products. Our report is a vital first step in avoiding biodiversity loss amidst the predicted drastic expansion of the mining industry,” said Edwards.

“Wildlife is more sensitive to mining in some regions of the world than in others, and our report can inform choices of where to prioritise getting our minerals to cause the least damage to biodiversity. Future policy should also focus on creating more circular economies - increasing recycling and reuse of materials, rather than just extracting more,” said Lamb.

 threatens vertebrate species populations across the tropics. Even legal mines, like this one within the Jamari National Forest, can threaten hyper-biodiverse forests.

CREDIT

David Edwards

Supporting school re-entry of children with special health care needs post extended hospitalizations



Study underscores the need for better coordination and communication to facilitate seamless transitions



KESSLER FOUNDATION

Yu-Lun Chen 

IMAGE: 

LEAD AUTHOR YU-LUN CHEN, PHD, OTR/L, RESEARCH SCIENTIST, CENTER FOR OUTCOMES AND ASSESSMENT RESEARCH AT KESSLER FOUNDATION.

view more 

CREDIT: KESSLER FOUNDATION




East Hanover, NJ – July 26, 2024 – Children with special health care needs (CSHCN) often face significant disruptions in their education due to extended hospitalizations. A recent study published online in Disability and Rehabilitation on July 1, 2024, by a multidisciplinary team of Kessler Foundation and Children Specialized Hospital researchers, highlights critical areas needing attention to ensure smoother school re-entries for CSHCN, ensuring they receive the necessary educational support post-hospitalization.

Involving parents, former patients, and rehabilitation professionals, the study underscores the need for better coordination and communication to facilitate seamless transitions back to school for CSHCN. Titled Experiences of patients, parents, and healthcare professionals in the process of transitioning from hospital to community after inpatient pediatric rehabilitation among children with special health care needs (https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2362951), the article offers insights into the challenges and solutions for improving school re-entry for CSHCN.

Foundation authors are Yu-Lun Chen, PhD, OTR/L; Stephanie Jimenez; Alexa Bartalotta; John O’Neill, PhD; and Amanda L. Botticello, PhD, MPH. Claire M. Marchetta, MPH, is from Children’s Specialized Hospital.

Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with parents (n = 12), former patients (n = 20), and rehabilitation professionals (n = 8). “Through a detailed analysis of recurring themes, we identified three essential points to help achieve the best outcomes. However, these steps were not always effectively implemented to achieve the desired results,” said lead author Dr. Chen, research scientist, Center for Outcomes and Assessment Research at the Foundation.

“Inpatient educational support such as instruction and schoolwork helped reduce the learning loss during hospitalization. However, these supports were sometimes complicated by lags in school approvals and challenges in coordination between systems,” said Dr. Chen.  

“Transition planning involved establishing necessary services to support CSHCN’s educational and healthcare needs at school re-entry, though families reported limited information and guidance as key barriers,” she explained. Providing clear and accessible information to families about transition processes is particularly crucial for those dealing with newly acquired health conditions, though families highlighted the lack of information and guidance as significant barriers to effective transition planning.

 “And finally, continued support after discharge was essential, with many participants recommending reassessment and adjustment of transition plans to account for evolving developmental and educational needs. However, these supports were sometimes hindered by delays in school approvals and coordination challenges between healthcare and educational systems,” concluded Dr. Chen.

The study stressed the urgent need to improve communication between clinicians and educators, provide comprehensive information for families, and ensure long-term follow-up on the changing educational needs of CSHCN post-rehabilitation.

Funding: National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). 

About Kessler Foundation
Kessler Foundation, a major nonprofit organization in the field of disability, is a global leader in rehabilitation research. Our scientists seek to improve cognition, mobility, and long-term outcomes, including employment, for adults and children with neurological and developmental disabilities of the brain and spinal cord including traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, stroke, multiple sclerosis, and autism. Kessler Foundation also leads the nation in funding innovative programs that expand opportunities for employment for people with disabilities. For more information, visit KesslerFoundation.org.

Press Contact at Kessler Foundation:
Deborah Hauss, DHauss@kesslerfoundation.org;

Stay Connected with Kessler Foundation
X (formerly known as Twitter) | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram | SoundCloud

New study highlights global disparities in activity limitations and assistive device use


MCMASTER UNIVERSITY





A new study of over 175,000 people in 25 countries revealed that individuals in low- and middle-income countries face greater challenges with daily activities and are less likely to use assistive devices compared to those in high-income countries. These findings raise concerns about the global burden of disability, particularly in low-income countries.

Despite decreases in death and cardiovascular disease rates and increases in life expectancy worldwide, people in low- and middle-income countries still experience significantly worse health outcomes than those in high-income countries. Less is known, however, about the global prevalence of disabilities and how they differ between countries. In the first prospective study of its kind in 25 countries, over 175,000 participants were surveyed about limitations in mobility, vision, and hearing. The study found that activity limitations are common worldwide, with the most frequent being difficulties in walking, bending, and seeing. A third of the participants reported at least one limitation, with these issues being particularly prevalent among older adults and women.

Activity limitations were more common in low and middle-income countries compared to high-income countries, including two-times higher walking impairment and five-times higher visual impairment.

“Current data on activity limitations and how they affect health around the world are limited,” said Raed Joundi, first author of the study and a scientist at the Population Health Research Institute (PHRI), a joint research institute of McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences. “Our research aimed to fill this gap by looking at the prevalence of basic activity limitations, the use of assistive devices, and health outcomes in 25 countries.”

The study is part of the ongoing Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study, coordinated by PHRI and led by Salim Yusuf, senior scientist at PHRI. Published in The Lancet on July 25, 2024, the study collected data from participants aged 35 to 70 years old using standardized questionnaires and followed them for an average of 11 years and up to 20 years.

Activity limitations in daily life can be alleviated or rectified by using low-cost devices such as canes or glasses. However, the research showed that despite the much higher percentage of people with activity limitations in low and middle-income countries, the use of simple devices like canes or walkers, glasses, and hearing aids was less than half of that in high-income countries. 

“Having access to assistive devices when needed, like glasses and walking aids, is essential for achieving a person’s potential despite having disabilities and improving quality of life,” stated Yusuf. “The limited access to assistive devices in low and middle-income countries represents an important opportunity for health policies and interventions.”

Movement limitations were linked to serious health problems. For example, difficulties with walking were associated with higher risks of death and other health issues, including cardiovascular disease, pneumonia, and falls.

“The striking differences between high-income and low and middle-income countries in our study highlight the need for policies and programs to make sure people with disabilities have access to simple assistive devices and other resources needed to maintain their health” added Joundi.

“We also need to better understand the factors contributing to these activity limitations and develop public health strategies to prevent them from happening in the first place, so people can live longer, healthier, and happier.”

The PURE study is supported by several Canadian health agencies including Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario and the Ontario Ministry of Health, along with unrestricted grants from several pharmaceutical companies, the PHRI and the Hamilton Health Sciences Research Institute, with additional contributions from various national or local organizations in participating countries.

____________________________________________________________________________________

For Media Inquiries:

To arrange an interview with Raed Joundi, please contact him at raed.joundi@phri.ca.

For additional assistance, reach out to Adam Ward, media relations officer with McMaster University’s Faculty of Health Sciences, at warda17@mcmaster.ca.

 

Study finds big disparities in stroke services across the US



UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO





FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Media Contact: Elizabeth.Fernandez@ucsf.edu, (415) 502-6397 
Subscribe to UCSF News

Study Finds Big Disparities in Stroke Services Across the U.S. 
Low-income communities are up to 42% less likely to obtain stroke center certification. 

Hospitals in poor communities are significantly less likely to obtain certification for stroke services, which makes them unable to provide urgent, lifesaving treatment, UC San Francisco researchers are reporting in a 14-year study of the nation’s hospitals.   
 
By contrast, hospitals located in economically mixed or affluent communities were more likely to become stroke certified. Such specialized services are associated with better stroke care and patient outcomes. The findings demonstrate significant disparities across the United States in access to critical neurologic treatment, the researchers said.  
 
The study appeared July 25 in JAMA Network Open.  
 
“Some hospitals do not have the necessary resources to treat patients experiencing certain types of strokes,” said lead investigator Renee Y. Hsia, MD, a UCSF professor of emergency medicine and vice chair for Health Services Research in the Department of Emergency Medicine.  
 
“Our findings can help inform the adoption of broad-based social and policy interventions at the local, state and federal levels to promote equal opportunity and access to important community resources.” 
 
Socioeconomic disadvantage  
 
Stroke center certification, which was introduced in 2004 to improve the quality and coordination of acute stroke care, is granted to acute care hospitals that demonstrate the ability to provide specialized stroke services.   
 
Researchers looked at 5,055 acute, non-federal hospitals from 2009 to 2022. They found that 6% of hospitals were located in the most affluent communities, 11% in relatively advantaged communities, 39% in mixed, 36% in relatively disadvantaged and 7% in the most disadvantaged. Hospital ownership varied: 57% of hospitals were not-for-profit, 17% were for-profit and 22% were government-owned.  
 
After adjusting for population size and hospital capacity, researchers found that hospitals near socioeconomically disadvantaged communities were 20 to 42% less likely to obtain stroke center certification compared with hospitals near communities of average socioeconomic status.  
 
“Hospitals with stroke centers that serve patients with a high proportion of commercial insurance and Medicare tend to be revenue centers, meaning they bring in money for the hospitals,” said Hsia, who is also with the UCSF Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies. “Whereas stroke centers in areas with a 'poor' patient payer mix – those with uninsured or Medicaid-insured patients with low reimbursement rates – will operate with much lower or often negative profit margins for those services.  
 
“Providing support for hospitals in disadvantaged communities to obtain stroke center certification may help reduce disparities in stroke care,” she said.   
 
Authors: The other authors were Nandita Sarkar, PhD, of the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge, Mass.; and Yu-Chu Shen, PhD, of the Department of Defense Management at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif. 
 
Funding: The project was supported by the Pilot Project Award from the NBER Center for Aging and Health Research, funded by the National Institute on Aging Grant (P30AG012810) and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R01MD017482).  

 

About UCSF: The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) is exclusively focused on the health sciences and is dedicated to promoting health worldwide through advanced biomedical research, graduate-level education in the life sciences and health professions, and excellence in patient care. UCSF Health, which serves as UCSF's primary academic medical center, includes top-ranked specialty hospitals and other clinical programs, and has affiliations throughout the Bay Area. UCSF School of Medicine also has a regional campus in Fresno. Learn more at ucsf.edu, or see our Fact Sheet.

###

 

 

 

Posttraumatic stress disorder among adults in communities with mass violence incidents



JAMA Network Open



About The Study: In this survey study of 5,991 participants, presumptive posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was quite prevalent long after the mass violence incident (MVI) among adults in communities that have experienced an MVI, suggesting that MVIs have persistent and pervasive public health impacts on communities, particularly among those with prior exposure to physical or sexual assault and other potentially traumatic events. Focusing exclusively on direct exposure to MVIs is not sufficient. Incorporating these findings into screening should improve efforts to identify the individuals most in need of prevention or mental health service after MVIs. 


Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Angela D. Moreland, Ph.D., email moreland@musc.edu.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.23539)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article This link will be live at the embargo time http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.23539?utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=072624

About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is an online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. On weekdays, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.

 

US state restrictions and excess COVID-19 pandemic deaths


JAMA Health Forum




About The Study: This cross-sectional study indicates that stringent COVID-19 restrictions, as a group, were associated with substantial decreases in pandemic mortality, with behavior changes plausibly serving as an important explanatory mechanism. These findings do not support the views that COVID-19 restrictions were ineffective. However, not all restrictions were equally effective; some, such as school closings, likely provided minimal benefit while imposing substantial cost. 


Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Christopher J. Ruhm, Ph.D., email ruhm@virginia.edu.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2006)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article This link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2006?utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=072624

About JAMA Health Forum: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports and opinion about national and global health policy; innovative approaches to health care delivery; and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity and reform. Its distribution will be solely digital and all content will be freely available for anyone to read.

Disclaimer: AAAS an

 

Medical and educational indebtedness among health care worker



JAMA Health Forum





About The Study: U.S. health care workers are more likely than other workers to carry medical and educational debt, collectively owing more than $150 billion. This study found that medical debt was more prevalent among women, home health and nursing home personnel, uninsured individuals, and those with recent hospitalization. Educational debts disproportionately burdened Black workers and younger workers and those with higher education.


Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Kathryn E.W. Himmelstein, M.D., M.S.Ed., email khimmelstein@mgb.org.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1917)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article This link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1917?utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=072624

About JAMA Health Forum: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports and opinion about national and global health policy; innovative approaches to health care delivery; and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity and reform. Its distribution will be solely digital and all content will be freely available for anyone to read.

Plan for UK’s biggest solar farm will be biggest test of Government’s anti-nimby drive

Ed Miliband will shortly rule on whether an eight-square-mile solar farm capable of powering 180,000 homes should get the go-ahead

The Government faces the biggest test so far of its anti-Nimby drive as it decides whether to give the green light to what would be the UK’s biggest solar farm.

The Cottam Solar project would occupy 12.5 square kilometres – almost eight square miles – of farmland on the border of Lincolnshire and Nottinghamshire, generating enough electricity to power 180,000 homes.

It would be considerably bigger than any solar farm currently in operation, generating eight times the energy of the largest site at the moment, Llanwern in Wales.

And it would be almost 25 per cent bigger than Sunnica, the giant solar development on the border of Cambridgeshire and Suffolk, which Energy Secretary Ed Miliband waved through this month just three days into his new job – despite being opposed by the Government’s own Planning Inspectorate.

He now has until 5 September to make a decision on Cottam Solar, near the market town of Gainsborough.

Mr Miliband will consider the need to quickly and dramatically scale up solar and onshore wind generation if the UK is to have any chance of meeting highly ambitious and legally binding targets to make power virtually net zero in just six years.

And he will set that against very strong local opposition and the unprecedented size of solar farm, by UK standards, experts said.

Simon Skelton, a retired coal and gas power station worker who moved to the area in search of a country lifestyle, is one of the locals strongly opposed to the project.

“I live in the middle of the Cottam Solar project site and I just can’t image what it will do to the landscape – it will be horrendous. The panels are 4.5 metres high, which is the height of a double decker bus, covering three thousand acres,” he told i.

“Apart from the visual impact it’s a very inefficient use of agricultural land. If we’re going to go down this route of putting solar panels everywhere then we should start on rooftops first to see whether we can do it that way – before we start taking up huge amounts of farmland, which we feel is foolhardy.”

Simon Skerry stands on the proposed site for Cottam Solar with a 4.5 metre high pole – the same height as the solar panels will be (Photo: Simon Skerry)

Jerry Parker, a retired IT business owner who lives in the nearby village of Cammeringham, told i: “We would say we’re not Nimbys. A Nimby, to me, is somebody who wants nothing near them, no matter what they are and why they might be placed there. We don’t fall into that category.

“It’s not because we’re Nimbys, it’s because solar technology is inefficient. It takes vast amounts of land to produce the power it does.

“We just seem to be inundated in Lincolnshire with these projects. We’re going to live in an industrial zone and none of us live where we do because we want that type of environment. I think it’s a David and Goliath situation we have here.”

Sir Edward Leigh, Conservative MP for Gainsborough, said the project “is utterly inappropriate. By building on quality agricultural land, we will destroy a natural resource in the heart of England’s green and pleasant land.”

On Monday, a major report led by the Royal Academy of Engineering called for decarbonising the electricity grid by the end of the decade to be treated as a national mission similar to the work of the Covid vaccines taskforce.

The panel of behind the report, including science minister Sir Patrick Vallance, suggested the Government’s target of ”clean power by 2030” could see net-zero energy generation on three quarters of days.

On remaining days, when wind or sunshine levels are lower, small amounts of electricity from gas power stations would top up supplies.

Dr Simon Harrison of engineering consultancy Mott MacDonald, who worked on the report, said: “The scale of work required to decarbonise the electricity system in such a short period of time cannot be underestimated. A radical shift in our approach will be needed.”

What the Royal Academy of Engineering report is calling for:

  • Strong central leadership, backed by the Prime Minister, and a clear strategic plan for the country to deliver the infrastructure needed.
  • Ministers must get the public and industry on board with the “mission” to deliver clean power by 2030, and spell out the benefits which include…
  • Personal benefits – for example lower bills from electricity tariffs that let the supplier have flexibility on when to charge an electric vehicle;
  • Local benefits – for example the jobs clean power can bring to an area;
  • Benefits for society as whole – avoiding the worst impacts of climate change, combating respiratory illnesses by switching from polluting boilers and vehicles; reducing costs to the NHS because of this;
  • The Government must tackle difficult decisions on planning, consents and delays to connecting new schemes to the grid – such as local opposition to overhead power lines, or the higher costs on bills of putting them underground.

However, he added: “We not advocating for running roughshod over the planning system”.

Ed Griffiths of Barbour ABI, which provides construction data to the Government, was not involved in that report, but said: “The Cottam Solar decision looks set to be the biggest test case yet for the Government’s determination to push ahead with new solar farms.

“We have consistently seen a lot of planning activity for green energy projects in Lincolnshire and, at approximately 3,000 acres and 600 megawatts, our research shows Cottam would be the biggest solar development anywhere in the UK.”

A spokesperson for Island Green Power, the London-based renewable energy developer behind Cottam Solar, said: “Since 2021, we have been working with the local councils, communities and stakeholders to develop proposals for Cottam Solar Project, which have also gone through rigorous examination by the Government’s Planning Inspectorate.

“The end result is a proposal that, if approved, will make a significant contribution to the Government’s commitment to make Britain a clean energy superpower, creating a renewable source of electricity that is enough to power 180,000 UK households annually.

“Beyond delivering affordable, renewable electricity, we’re pleased that our final proposals will improve biodiversity across the area. Environmental studies suggest there will be improvements of up to 96 per cent measured in habitat units.

“At the same time, we’re committed to providing direct funding to local communities near to the project. This will be scoped in consultation over the coming months.”

Mr Miliband has been sent the Planning Inspectorate’s report and recommendation – although he has not said whether it is for or against the project.

However, he disregarded a recommendation against development earlier this month when he gave permission to Sunnica – so he will not automatically go with the inspectorate’s advice.

The Department for Energy and Net Zero said it was unable to comment on Cottam Solar because it is a live planning application. A spokesperson added: “Solar power is crucial to achieving net zero, providing an abundant source of cleaner, cheaper energy.

“The Energy Secretary has taken immediate action to boost the role of solar – approving three major solar projects and launching a rooftop revolution for solar panels on new homes.

“We will make tough decisions with ambition and urgency – all part of our plan to make the UK a clean energy superpower.”

Earlier this month, Mr Miliband said “solar power is crucial to achieving net zero” and he has declared his intention to drive through onshore wind and solar farms where the case for them is merited.

On Friday he wrote to the developers of Cottam Solar looking for further clarification on any potential harm caused to fish by the electromagnetic fields that would be generated by the solar farm; and on targets to boost biodiversity on the site.

Friday, July 26, 2024

 

New research on legal aid cuts shows wasted money and 'embarrassing' data gaps in UK

UK government
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

There needs to be "significant improvements" to the way data is collected across UK Government to prove if major changes to legal aid have delivered value for money to the taxpayer, a new report says.

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act of 2012 was intended to make significant savings to the cost of the civil legal aid budget. The previous government was unable to provide evidence for this.

The report argues there needs to be more systematic collection and analysis of quantitative data across government and local government. This would then show if legal aid cuts have led to savings to the public purse, of if the costs have been passed on to  and other organizations via legal or  associated with the slowing down of court cases, or by people waiting for judgements not being able to work and pay tax.

The report, authored by Emma Marshall, Samuel Engle and Siân Pearce from the University of Exeter in partnership with Public Law Project and Migrants Organise, spells out what data Government needs to collect to work out the actual costs of the 2012 LASPO Act legal aid cuts and if, as current evidence suggests, the cuts were a false economy all along.

It says without information about the full costs of LASPO, it is impossible to know whether better value for money has in fact been delivered. Better data would enable a better understanding of the impact of changes to immigration legal aid under LASPO, and would also improve understanding of the wider impact of changes to the scope of civil legal aid.

The report says Government has wasted nearly £400,000 a year assessing immigration legal aid applications that fall under Exceptional Case Funding, even though almost 90% are approved.

Dr. Marshall said, "Improving the sustainability of legal aid must now be a priority for the Government. We currently have a legal aid system that is neither fair nor fit for purpose and it is putting a considerable strain on many areas of governance.

"Reinstating immigration legal aid would help the whole immigration system to function more fairly and efficiently, as well as reducing costs across other parts of government."

Public Law Project's Dr. Jo Hynes, said, "Immigration legal aid is now available to only a fraction of the people who need it. The appalling injustice and harm this causes is well known to anyone working in immigration.

"But putting the price of injustice to one side: are cuts costing more money than they saved, and could we in fact have a fairer and more efficient system by spending money in different ways?

"This report clearly spells out which data the incoming Government needs to keep track of in order to find that out.

"There are clearly false economies in play. The tax-payer has just sunk £320 million on the Rwanda plan. That is 21 years' worth of the total reduction in spending for immigration legal aid caused by LASPO.

"We are at a point where the need for evidence to demonstrate the full costs of LASPO is embarrassingly urgent. By collecting the  we identify, the Government will be able to start building immigration legal aid policy on a sound evidence base."

"Immigration Legal Aid and value for money" points to existing evidence which shows that:

  • Legal aid cuts have led to increased spending in other parts of government and public services, placing pressure on courts, , local authorities, prisons and social services.
  • Reducing immigration legal aid has impacted local authorities who have legal duties to support those who cannot access other public funds.
  • Where immigration legal aid is inaccessible, costs are shifted to other government departments, including the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and the Department of Health and Social Care.
  • New calculations contained in the report show that the Legal Aid Agency spends nearly £500,000 a year on assessing applications for immigration legal aid through the Exceptional Case Funding (ECF) scheme, even though 87% of applications are approved.

More information: Immigration legal aid and value for money: Identifying the missing data (2024). publiclawproject.org.uk/conten … riefing-paper-AW.pdf

Chancellor Rachel Reeves pledges to 'fix' economy - as expert says 'black hole' matches Tory tax cuts

Paul Johnson of the Institute for Fiscal Studies says the £20bn "black hole" reported to exist in the public finances roughly equates to the cuts to National Insurance made by the Conservatives in the run-up to the election.


Tim Baker
Political reporter
Friday 26 July 2024 
Chancellor Rachel Reeves says she wants to 'fix' the black hole. Pic: PA


Chancellor Rachel Reeves has promised to "fix" the "mess" the Conservative government left in the economy, amid reports of a £20bn "black hole" in the public finances.

Ms Reeves, who is currently on a visit to the G20 in Brazil, told broadcasters she aimed to tell the world that the UK "is open for business" and the new government "want private investment into the UK economy".

The chancellor, who is set to deliver a speech on Monday about the state of the UK's finances, was also asked about reports of a £20bn "black hole" in the UK's economy.

"I have been honest during the election campaign and in the last three weeks about the scale of the inheritance that this government would have to pick up," she said.

"The Conservatives have created this mess. But let me be very clear. I will fix it."

Meanwhile, Paul Johnson, the head of the independent Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), told Sky News that the £20bn gap was "almost exactly the cost of the National Insurance cuts that Jeremy Hunt introduced this year".

There has been speculation Ms Reeves could scale back spending or implement tax rises in this autumn's budget.

Mr Johnson said: "Reversing [the previous cuts] and getting back to where we were last autumn in National Insurance would actually deal with a large part of the problem.

"It looks like Labour have ruled that out.

"That leaves them with much more difficult, sorts of tax changes, quite technical changes to capital gains tax - that perhaps needs to happen to be fair - and to inheritance tax."

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky NewsTap here

However, Mr Johnson threw some cold water on the new government's pronouncements that it did not know how bad the books were prior to being elected.

He said: "I think that at a high level, the new government was well aware they were coming in facing a really difficult position in terms of the scale of problems facing the public services."

"But there may have been some specifics they did not know about.

"There is no doubt that having taken over at the Ministry of Justice and the Home Office and the Department of Education and so on, they will have seen some things that they didn't know, and it may well be that things are even worse than they imagined.

"But there's no question that they knew that things were going to be difficult."

Shadow Chancellor Jeremy Hunt branded Ms Reeves claims about finding the economy in a worse state than expected "nothing but a fabrication".

£The reality is she does not want to take the difficult decisions on pay, productivity or welfare reform that would have meant we could live within our means and is laying the ground for tax rises,£ he added.