Wednesday, July 31, 2024

Microbeads made from brewery waste can contribute to a plastic-free future

The Conversation
July 27, 2024 

Cold Beer to Go (Shutterstock)

Plastic microbeads, those tiny troublemakers found in the personal care products of the early 1990s to the late 2010s, wreak havoc on the environment. These minuscule bits, smaller than a sesame seed, escape the clutches of wastewater treatment plants, accumulating in oceans and rivers where they pose a threat to marine life.

Thankfully, soaps and scrubs containing plastic microbeads are impossible to find on today’s store shelves. In recent years, many countries have recognized these microbeads as a source of marine plastic pollution and banned them from personal hygiene products. Microbead bans make room for more environmentally friendly substitutes, allowing consumers to continue to experience that satisfying deep-cleaning feeling without harming the environment.

Instead of relying on synthetic plastics, research shows that a treasure trove of possibilities is hidden within biowaste. Once such gem is brewer’s spent grain (BSG), the leftovers from brewing beer. Inexpensive and abundant, BSG is used in animal feed, biogas production, compost and fertilizer.

More recently, BSG is used as a protein- and fibre-rich ingredient in crackers, breads and cookies.

Our research has found that BSG is well-suited for use in personal hygiene products in the form of sustainable exfoliating microbeads.



The Story of Stuff looks at plastic microbeads.



Chemical properties of cellulose


Cellulose — the main molecule constituent in plant cell walls — is a key component of brewer’s spent grain. For over a century, scientists have prepared vast amounts of cellulose-based materials by transforming trees through a relatively straightforward chemical process. Trees are felled, debarked, chipped, pulped and bleached, then the cellulose that remains is shaped into its desired final form.


Cellulose fibers don’t dissolve in most solvents, and thankfully so, otherwise cotton t-shirts would be washed away in the rain and acetone-soaked tissues would melt instead of removing nail polish.

In the cellulose-processing industry, few chemicals are available to overcome cellulose’s resistance. Most options are ill-reputed for their instability, high toxicity, high cost or poor recyclability.

However, sodium hydroxide dissolved in water in various concentrations provides a more sustainable option. Additionally, with sodium hydroxide, cellulose can be converted back into a solid through a simple neutralization reaction.


This alkali-based process can yield pure cellulose microbeads, which were first prepared about a decade ago. Cellulose pulp is dissolved in aqueous sodium hydroxide, then neutralized, one drop at a time, in an acid bath. When the acid bath is drained away, spherical cellulose-based microbeads remain.
Fine-tuning the process

Our research considered whether the abundance of cellulose-based biowaste generated from agri-food industries could generate microbeads. With BSG as our cellulose-rich starting material and exfoliating microbeads as our goal, we started experimenting in the lab.




Inexpensive and abundant, brewer’s spent grain is used in animal feed, biogas production, compost and fertilizer. (Shutterstock)

BSG presented a challenge for creating pure cellulose microbeads due to the complexity of its composition. Besides cellulose, BSG contains hemicellulose, lignin, proteins, lipids and small amounts of ash, all carefully intertwined to create different plant-cell structures.

To overcome this obstacle, dilute acid hydrolysis loosens BSG’s cellulose and other fibers (hemicellulose and lignin). Coarse filtration washes simple sugars and proteins away, leaving behind a cellulose- and lignin-enriched pulp.

Next steps involve fine-tuning the sodium hydroxide solution. Only at specific temperatures and concentrations are sodium hydroxide solutions stronger than the bonds that hold cellulosic fibers together; this is true of more complex BSG-pulp as well.

Our experiments revealed a narrow processing window where BSG pulp completely dissolved, aided by small amounts of zinc oxide. Then, introducing these BSG-solutions, drop by drop, into an acid bath simultaneously achieved our shaping and solidification goals.


After a few hours, the acid bath was drained away and smooth, spherical BSG-based microbeads remained.

Finally, strength and stability testing proved that BSG beads had the necessary strength to hold up to their conventional plastic counterparts. When incorporated into soaps, BSG-based microbeads performed better than other plastic microbead alternatives currently available, such as ground coconut shells and apricot pits.




Plastic microbeads, once popular in the personal care products of the early 1990s to the late 2010s, are environmentally damaging. (Shutterstock)
Creative solutions

The transformation of brewery waste into exfoliating microbeads represents yet another step towards a more sustainable future. By harnessing the properties of the cellulose and lignin present in BSG, this innovation demonstrates the potential of waste materials to contribute to sustainable solutions.


This success ultimately underscores the importance of research and innovation in transitioning towards more environmentally friendly practices. Finally, it encourages exploring other similar opportunities to reduce our ecological footprint.

If it’s possible to transform brewery waste into a valuable component of personal hygiene products, just imagine what other opportunities may be found in the trash.

Amy McMackin, Doctoral Researcher, Sustainable Food Processing, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich and Sébastien Cardinal, Professeur en chimie organique, Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR)


This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


Ozempic-producer Novo Nordisk on track for record spending on lobbying in 2024


Maia Cook, OpenSecrets
July 26, 2024 

Boxes of the diabetes drug Ozempic rest on a pharmacy counter on April 17, 2023, in Los Angeles. - Mario Tama/Getty Images North America/TNS

This article originally appeared in OpenSecrets

Novo Nordisk — the pharmaceutical giant behind popular weight-loss drugs Ozempic and Wegovy — spent a record $3.2 million on lobbying in the first six months of 2024 as the Denmark-based company expanded its footprint in the United States.

In 2017, after two years of clinical trials, the Food and Drug Administration approved Novo Nordisk’s injectable weight-loss drug Ozempic strictly for adults with Type 2 diabetes. Four years later, the FDA approved Wegovy, another weight-loss drug that is not strictly for type 2 patients but contains the same active ingredient as Ozempic, semaglutide.

Although Ozempic was originally approved for patients with diabetes, some non-diabetics buy it for the purpose of general weight loss under “off-label” prescriptions. The popularity of these prescriptions has contributed to a shortage of Ozempic in the United States, leaving it out of the hands of those who need it most.

An estimated 15.5 million Americans, or 6% of the U.S. population, have reported using injectable weight-loss drugs, according to a Gallup poll released in May. These drugs rose in popularity in 2023 as Novo Nordisk launched an aggressive advertising campaign, spending a total of $471 million to market Ozempic and Wegovy in one year.

In 2023, Novo Nordisk and its U.S. subsidiary, Novozymes North America, spent over $5 million on lobbying, hiring a whopping 77 lobbyists across 13 firms. This marked a 51% increase from the number of lobbyists hired in 2022. Of those, 54 previously held government jobs, bringing insider knowledge and industry connections to each role.

Novo Nordisk lobbied a total of six bills in 2023, all of which were related to the pharmaceutical industry. Among these were the Treat and Reduce Obesity Act of 2023, the Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act of 2023, and the FAIR Labels Act of 2023, all targeted at making medical care more accessible, equitable, and transparent to all Americans.

In addition to its lobbying efforts, Novo Nordisk has also been actively making campaign contributions in the U.S., spending over $497,000 between its PAC, employees, and executives in the 2023-2024 cycle, as of July 16.

Novo Nordisk currently charges around $1,000 for a month’s supply of Ozempic injections. The high cost of this medicine has been criticized for squeezing low-income patients with diabetes out of the market for life-changing drugs.

Medicare only covers Ozempic when it is used to treat patients with diabetes. Similarly, Wegovy is only covered for patients at cardiovascular risk. Yet, when used for general weight loss, Medicare does not cover the cost of Ozempic or Wegovy.

Novo Nordisk hired a law firm, Arnold & Porter, to lobby for Ozempic to be covered by Medicare as more and more Americans became customers in 2023.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) argues that the high price of these weight-loss drugs has the power to bankrupt the Medicaid system. In June, Sen. Sanders threatened to subpoena Novo Nordisk CEO Lars Fruergaard Jorgensen, criticizing Novo Nordisk’s high American price tag on Ozempic when it is significantly lower in other countries.

“The American people are sick and tired of paying, by far, the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs. Novo Nordisk currently charges Americans with Type 2 diabetes $969 a month for Ozempic, while this same exact drug can be purchased for just $155 in Canada and just $59 in Germany.”

Jorgensen voluntarily agreed to testify in a Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions hearing in September. The name of the hearing: “Why Is Novo Nordisk Charging Americans with Diabetes and Obesity Outrageously High Prices for Ozempic and Wegovy?”
What is love? A philosopher explains it’s not a choice or a feeling − it’s a practice

The Conversation
July 30, 2024 


Heart Balloons (© TORSTEN BLACKWOOD / AFP)


Curious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, send it to curiouskidsus@theconversation.com.


How do you define love? Is it a choice or a feeling? – Izzy, age 11, Golden, Colorado


Love is confusing. People in the U.S. Google the word “love” about 1.2 million times a month. Roughly a quarter of those searches ask “what is love” or request a “definition of love.”

What is all this confusion about?

Neuroscience tells us that love is caused by certain chemicals in the brain. For example, when you meet someone special, the hormones dopamine and norepinephrine can trigger a reward response that makes you want to see this person again. Like tasting chocolate, you want more.

Your feelings are the result of these chemical reactions. Around a crush or best friend, you probably feel something like excitement, attraction, joy and affection. You light up when they walk into the room. Over time, you might feel comfort and trust. Love between a parent and child feels different, often some combination of affection and care.

But are these feelings, caused by chemical reactions in your brain, all that love is? If so, then love seems to be something that largely happens to you. You’d have as much control over falling in love as you’d have over accidentally falling in a hole – not much.

As a philosopher who studies love, I’m interested in the different ways people have understood love throughout history. Many thinkers have believed that love is more than a feeling.

More than a feeling

The ancient Greek philosopher Plato thought that love might cause feelings like attraction and pleasure, which are out of your control. But these feelings are less important than the loving relationships you choose to form as a result: lifelong bonds between people who help one another change and grow into their best selves.

Similarly, Plato’s student Aristotle claimed that, while relationships built on feelings like pleasure are common, they’re less good for humankind than relationships built on goodwill and shared virtues. This is because Aristotle thought relationships built on feelings last only as long as the feelings last.

Imagine you start a relationship with someone you have little in common with other than you both enjoy playing video games. Should either of you no longer enjoy gaming, nothing would hold the relationship together. Because the relationship is built on pleasure, it will fade once the pleasure is gone.


Relationships that endure are based on more than just feelings of pleasure. Westend61/Westend61 via Getty Images

Compare this with a relationship where you want to be together not because of a shared pleasure but because you admire one another for who you are. You want what is best for one another. This kind of friendship built on shared virtue and goodwill will be much longer lasting. These kinds of friends will support each other as they change and grow.

Plato and Aristotle both thought that love is more than a feeling. It’s a bond between people who admire one another and therefore choose to support one another over time.

Maybe, then, love isn’t totally out of your control.

Celebrating individuality and ‘standing in love’

Contemporary philosopher J. David Velleman also thinks that love can be disentangled from “the likings and longings” that come with it – those butterflies in your stomach. This is because love isn’t just a feeling. It’s a special kind of paying attention, which celebrates a person’s individuality.

Velleman says Dr. Seuss did a good job describing what it means to celebrate a person’s individuality when he wrote: “Come on! Open your mouth and sound off at the sky! Shout loud at the top of your voice, ‘I AM I! ME! I am I!’” When you love someone, you celebrate them because you value the “I AM I” that they are.

You can also get better at love. Social psychologist Erich Fromm thinks that loving is a skill that takes practice: what he calls “standing in love.” When you stand in love, you act in certain ways toward a person.

Just like learning to play an instrument, you can also get better at loving with patience, concentration and discipline. This is because standing in love is made up of other skills such as listening carefully and being present. If you get better at these skills, you can get better at loving.

If this is the case, then love and friendship are distinct from the feelings that accompany them. Love and friendship are bonds formed by skills you choose to practice and improve.


Love is a skill that takes practice. 
PeopleImages/iStock via Getty Images Plus


Does this mean you could stand in love with someone you hate, or force yourself to stand in love with someone you have no feelings for whatsoever?

Probably not. Philosopher Virginia Held explains the difference between doing an activity and participating in a practice as simply doing some labor versus doing some labor while also enacting values and standards.

Compare a math teacher who mechanically solves a problem at the board versus a teacher who provides students a detailed explanation of the solution. The mechanical teacher is doing the activity – presenting the solution – whereas the engaged teacher is participating in the practice of teaching. The engaged teacher is enacting good teaching values and standards, such as creating a fun learning environment.


Standing in love is a practice in the same sense. It’s not just a bunch of activities you perform. To really stand in love is to do these activities while enacting loving values and standards, such as empathy, respect, vulnerability, honesty and, if Velleman is right, celebrating a person for who they truly are.
How much control do you have over love?

Is it best to understand love as a feeling or a choice?

Think about what happens when you break up with someone or lose a friend. If you understand love purely in terms of the feelings it stirs up, the love is over once these feelings disappear, change or get put on hold by something like a move or a new school.

On the other hand, if love is a bond you choose and practice, it will take much more than the disappearance of feelings or life changes to end it. You or your friend might not hang out for a few days, or you might move to a new city, but the love can persist.

If this understanding is right, then love is something you have more control over than it may seem. Loving is a practice. And, like any practice, it involves activities you can choose to do – or not do – such as hanging out, listening and being present. In addition, practicing love will involve enacting the right values, such as respect and empathy.

While the feelings that accompany love might be out of your control, how you love someone is very much in your control.

---

Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you’d like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com. Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live.

And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you’re wondering, too. We won’t be able to answer every question, but we will do our best.


Edith Gwendolyn Nally, Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Missouri-Kansas City

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Inside J.D. Vance's 'Elegy' grift

Thom Hartmann
July 25, 2024 

Republican vice presidential nominee Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) speaks during a campaign rally at Middletown High School on July 22, 2024 in Middletown, Ohio. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz this week blasted JD Vance for being a “grifter,” because Vance claimed he was some sort of a hillbilly who grew up in rural Appalachia when, in fact, he grew up in the suburbs of Cincinnati. Governor Walz, on the other hand, grew up in a town of 400 people with “24 kids in my graduating class” where “12 were cousins.

In Vance’s autobiography Hillbilly Elegy he trash-talks his poor relatives, essentially accusing them of not being successful in life because of moral defects like laziness and addiction; he doubled down on these memes in his RNC speech, pointing out his own mother’s drug use.

In fact, they’re victims of Republican policies that make the rich richer and keep poor people poor; his mother’s addiction is a symptom, not a cause.

Vance, of course, “nobly” rose above it all with the help of our socialist GI Bill (which Republicans opposed) paying his way through Yale, and with help from rightwing billionaires who took Vance under their wings and helped him set up a hedge fund that made him fabulously rich.

Often, the media refers to his life as a true “Horatio Alger story.”

When I was a kid, my dad was the national president of the book-collecting group TheHoratio Alger Society: Vance’s is a story right out of Alger’s books. Alger wrote stories about poor young men being lifted up into business success by wealthy older men, although he’s now out of favor because was busted as a gay predator. Even the Horatio Alger story itself, it turns out, was a grift.

Just like Vance’s career and his life story are a grift. Just like most all of Donald Trump’s failed businesses. Just like Nixon’s racist “law and order” grift. And Reagan’s tax-cut-for-the-rich “supply side” grift. And Bush and Cheney’s oil-grabbing Iraq “weapons of mass destruction” grift.

Republican policies, in fact, have been one long grift for more than half a century.

They’ve even turned our entire economy into a massive grift.

For example, when Louise and I moved to Washington, DC in 2008, we bought a Chris Craft Constellation 46-foot motorboat to live aboard (in the same marina where Joe Manchin keeps his much, much larger yacht) for the following seven years. It was built in 1986 — over 30 years earlier — and all the appliances were original and still worked, including the washer and dryer, stove, and refrigerator.

Try buying reasonably priced appliances today that will last 30 years: they don’t exist. After we moved back to Portland, we went through four toasters in the first five years, although one of my brothers still has my mom’s from the 1950s. And don’t get me started on dishwashers. Manufacturing has become a grift.

Largely thanks to Ronald Reagan’s 1983 suspension of enforcement of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and other similar legislation, the entire American economy has become one giant grift.

Every company, it seems, is trying to hustle us. Pretending they care about customer service or making/selling quality products as a corporate mission statement has become a rude joke. It’s all a grift.

So why should it surprise us that our post-Reagan politics have also been dominated by grifters for 40+ years? And now two grifters are running for the presidency on the Republican ticket…

As I document in gruesome detail in The Hidden History of Neoliberalism: How Reaganism Gutted America, since Reagan and Republicans on the Supreme Court adopted Robert Bork’s idea that monopolies were a sign of economic success rather than a crisis, everything has gotten more consolidated and, thus, more expensive. Reaganomics killed competition.

Cell phone service that costs $15 a month in France or $12 a month in Australia bills out at an average of $61.85 per month in the United States. High-speed broadband that’s a bit over $31 a month in France or $36 in Germany (for higher speeds and better reliability than almost anywhere in the United States) averages nearly $70 per month in the US.

America is literally the only developed country in the world where families get wiped out and rendered homeless by medical bankruptcy simply because somebody got sick.

We’re the only developed country in the world with widespread college debt.

We’re the only developed country whose entire healthcare system rests on predatory for-profit health insurance companies, doctors’ offices and hospitals owned by hedge funds, and “pharmacy benefit managers.”


Similar metrics are found with virtually every other product or service category dominated by giant corporations. They’re all grifting us and getting rich doing it.

The average American family pays around $5,000 a year more for the general necessities of life than the average European, Japanese, South Korean, Canadian, Taiwanese, or Australian family. And things are steadily getting worse as monopolistic corporations and cartels tighten their grip on every American industry from banking to telecom to energy to food.

They even used inflation as an opportunity to grift, pushing prices up way above the actual inflation rate; corporate profits and executive pay in America over the last two years are higher than they’ve ever been in American history.


It’s all a grift, making stockholders and executives rich while impoverishing working people.

We pay more for pretty much everything and, as a result (along with stagnant wages from 40+ years of Reagan’s War On Unions), more than half of America is stuck in something close to (if not deep within) a type of debt-driven poverty from which escape is nearly impossible.

Social and economic mobility in America, the envy of the world for over a century, is today lower than in any other developed country.


The GOP grift that started when Reagan adopted Reaganomics and began destroying unions and imposing “austerity” took us from a nation where two-thirds of us had a middle-class lifestyle that let people buy a home and car, take an annual vacation, put their kids through school, and retire comfortably with a pension to where only around 45 percent of us today qualify.

The largest cohort in America today is, like it was before the New Deal, the working poor. The Republican grift has already reversed over 50 years of progress, and now Trump and Vance want to double down.

Meanwhile, conservatives on the Supreme Court told usthat those same rip-off corporations are “persons with constitutional rights” and their “money is First Amendment-protected free speech.”


Thus, businesses and billionaires can now buy and sell politicians as easily as they buy and sell companies. Five conservatives on the Court — Clarence Thomas being the deciding vote after taking millions in naked bribes from billionaires with business before the Court — nailed down this new grift in 2010, over the loud and shocked objections and dissents of their colleagues, with their Citizens United decision.

So now corporations are people, and they can legally buy politicians and judges/justices. Most recently, the Republicans on the Court ruled that if a bribe is paid after the vote, legislation, or decision is rendered, it’s merely a “tip.” It’s a whole new grift.

But when corporations kill people — like PG&E did when they were convicted of burning 84 people to death in 2018 and faced charges of murdering 4 more people in 2020 — they don’t get the death penalty or even have to send their decision-making executives to prison. They just reduce slightly the payouts to their stockholders to cover the fines so they can keep on making money and, from time to time, killing more people.

And, up until recently, we’ve just been accepting these grifts.

Few California politicians dare stand up to PG&E any more than national politicians are willing to stand up to any other corporation: the resources of even middle-sized national and transnational corporations are more than adequate to destroy — or put and keep in office — any politician from a Town Clerk to the United States Senate. Just ask sellouts like Joe Manchin or Kyrsten Sinema.

A column in The Washington Post asked the question: “Why is Washington so dysfunctional?” The author interviewed two former members of Congress (a Democrat and a Republican) and a reporter whose beat is Congress.

Not a single one identified the obvious and simple answer to the question: the giant grift driven by money in politics, adopted by literally every Republican in Congress and more than a handful of Democrats, courtesy of Republicans on the Supreme Court and the last four Republican presidents.

It’s as if big-money grifting in politics has become so normalized since Reagan that it just doesn’t occur to people inside the beltway that it’s at the core of our problems.

The latest grift is Trump and Vance promising that they’ll “restore American greatness” when it was their Party and policies that stole America’s greatness, handing it off to the morbidly rich and the world’s largest corporations.

This is not complicated and, finally, voters have figured it out.

Joe Biden is the first American president to repudiate neoliberalism since Reagan adopted it and imposed it on America in 1980, writing NAFTA, creating the GATT, gutting unions, defunding education, blocking enforcement of antitrust laws, and cutting taxes on the morbidly rich.

Kamala Harris promises to continue Biden’s return to the policies of Keynesian economics, and the proof that Americans want it is obvious from the explosion of donations and support for her candidacy.

Finally, after two generations, the working class is beginning to climb out of the hole the GOP (and a few bought off “problem solver” Democrats) threw us into.

We’re on the verge of a new day in America. And it can’t come soon enough.

READ: 'Rachel is activated': Jennifer Aniston unloads on J.D. Vance over controversial comment
UK

Free the Just Stop Oil truth-tellers

Recent climate disasters show that Just Stop Oil activists are telling the truth


The police are repressing Just Stop Oil (Picture: Just Stop Oil Twitter)

SOCIALIST WORKER
Tuesday 30 July 2024

A court remanded eight Just Stop Oil activists to prison last week for campaigning against the environmental destruction caused by fossil fuels. In jail they join Roger Hallam, Daniel Shaw, Lucia Whittaker De Abreu, Louise Lancaster and Cressida Gethin—who the state recently sentenced to four or five years behind bars.

These were the longest ever sentences for peaceful direct action in British history. Yet the last week underlines that these people have been persecuted for telling the truth.

Capitalism and its fossil fuel economy will destroy us if it’s not overthrown. Landslides, triggered by flooding and unusually heavy rainfall, in the south-west of Ethiopia in east Africa have killed at least 257 people.

The United Nations’ office for humanitarian affairs says the death toll could reach 500. A series of landslides linked to recent monsoons also hit India’s southern state of Kerala killing at least 49 people.

The landslides began last Tuesday crushing hundreds of homes in the mud. Scientists say monsoons are becoming more erratic because of climate change . A “park fire” that started on Wednesday last week in California in the United States has spread to be this year’s largest in the state— scorching an area nearly the size of Los Angeles.

These are all signs of ever growing and disastrous climate change. Nobody should be imprisoned for telling that truth and fighting to save the environment.
UK

Labour begins process of renationalising rail


29 July, 2024 
Left Foot Forward

This afternoon MPs are debating the Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - which will see private rail franchises taken into public ownership as they expire.



Today sees the Labour Party begin the process of renationalising the railways after more than 30 years of failure following privatisation.

This afternoon MPs are debating the Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill – which will see private rail franchises taken into public ownership as they expire.

Transport Secretary Louise Haigh is set to oversee the biggest overhaul of Britain’s rail network since the 1990s, which her allies say is part of a “radical agenda which has not been picked up in the media” and proves doubters of Labour’s socialist credentials wrong.

Haigh told The Independent: “This bill demonstrates the sheer scale of our ambition to rebuild Britain, putting transport at the heart of our plans for change.

“As ‘passenger-in-chief’, I said we’d move fast and fix things and that’s exactly what we’re doing with this radical legislative agenda.”

Support for nationalising the railways has grown in recent years, with fully three quarters of Britons (76%) saying that railway companies should be run in the public sector, according to YouGov.

The Labour Party has pledged to renationalise the railways within five years of coming to power.

Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward
UK

RMT’s Eddie Dempsey makes powerful speech on beating the far right at anti-racism march

29 July, 2024
 Right-Wing Watch

Thousands of counter-protesters united in London against a large Tommy Robinson rally



Thousands of people joined a counter-protest in London on Saturday to unite against a Tommy Robinson march, as trade union leaders and anti-racism campaigners made rallying calls opposing the far right.

RMT’s Eddie Dempsey joined a large line-up of speakers and used the occasion to highlight the power of solidarity and how to beat back the far right.

15,000 people took part in the march organised by far-right activist and English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson, while a group of 5,000 protesters rallied in opposition to Robinson’s divisive and racist politics.

Organised by the campaign group Stand Up to Racism, speakers at the rally included Jeremy Corbyn, National Education Union leader Daniel Kebede and RMT Assistant General Secretary Eddie Dempsey, among numerous other important figures in the fight against racism.

In a powerful speech at the event, Dempsey hit out at the divisive narrative from politicians as he said the large march by Robinson supporters was “called on” by the likes of Suella Braverman and Rishi Sunak to “undermine the anti-war movement”. The trade union figure said they had “opened the door and made the way for these people to come out and sow further hate and division in our communities.”

He went on: “What people care about in this country are class issues, housing, wages, our communities. And that’s what we must fight for, and that’s how we undermine these people.

“So finally I’ll say this. We defeated the EDL, we defeated the Football Lads Alliance. Tommy’s back out again, and we’ll defeat him again. Solidarity is always more powerful than division. We’ve got a weapon of solidarity and today we’re going to use it.”

Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward

Resist far right after Tommy Robinson supporters riot in Southport

It came after Nazi Tommy Robinson mobilised over 15,000 in London last Saturday


The far right mob attack a mosque in Southport

By Charlie Kimber
Tuesday 30 July 2024
SOCIALIST WORKER Issue

Fascists are trying to use the appalling murders of children in Southport to whip up Islamophobic violence and boost racism. On Tuesday evening they tried to burn down a mosque in the town.

Three children were murdered on Monday—Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe and Alice Dasilva Aguiar.

Five children and two adults remain in a critical condition after the attack. Local people came together for a remembrance vigil on Tuesday.

But later, and completely separately, around 200 Islamophobes gathered at a mosque near the site of the stabbing attack in Southport. Merseyside. Hundreds of people threw bricks, bottles and other missiles at the mosque. They chanted, “No surrender!” and, “England till I die!”

Stand Up To Racism said, “A mob has gathered to chant the same hateful slogans heard on Tommy Robinson’s far right demo in London last Saturday.

“This is a disgusting response to the tragedy. We cannot allow the far right to capitalise on the loss of precious lives.”

As the Southport riot happened, Robinson said the racists were “justified” in their actions.

On Twitter he posted, “Before anyone starts condemning the angry English men up in Southport, ask yourselves this, what do you fucking expect them to do.

“Don’t call them hooligans, they’re justified in their anger.”

The Searchlight anti-fascist magazine has reported, “Tommy Robinson’s right hand man, Danny Tommo, real name Daniel Thomas, has posted a hate-filled video on YouTube, calling for riots in British cities if the assailant in the Southport stabbings turns out to be a migrant.

“In a video entitled ‘Get ready. We’re making plans’, Tommo sits in a car, going off on a hate-filled diatribe calling for riots. He says, “Every city has to go up.

“Get prepared. Be ready. We have to. It has to go off in different cities. We have to show them we’ve had enough.”

Laurence Fox, who spoke at Robson’s rally, had tweeted, “Enough of this madness now. We need to permanently remove Islam from Great Britain.

“Completely and entirely.”

Far right activists instantly reacted to news of the murders with lies and hate. They claimed the attacker was an “illegal immigrant” who had arrived on a small boat across the Channel. They said he was a Muslim known to MI6.

All wrong. All designed to make people hate Muslims.

Police confirmed on Tuesday that the suspect had been born in Cardiff, Wales. The media reported he had parents who had come to Britain from Rwanda .

This frustrated the racists, who had desperately hoped to fuel their Islamophobia with a campaign about “killer migrants” and best of all “killer Muslim migrants”. So some of the far right moved on to say it was an anti-white attack, or a sign of the failure of multiculturalism—although at least one of the murdered children has migrant parents.

We don’t know the full facts about the case. And any such horror will always defy full explanation.

But in any case, facts don’t matter to racists.

As the mosque-burners were assembling, Reform UK MP Nigel Farage questioned “whether the truth is being withheld from us” over the stabbings”.

“I wonder whether the truth is being withheld from us. I don’t know the answer to that but I think it is a fair and legitimate question,” he said.

“What I do know is something is going horribly wrong in our once beautiful country.”

For Farage the murders have to be rooted in foreigners, the perceived evil of migrants and the ugliness of non-Britishness. It’s racist to the core.

Farage is echoing what Robinson said last Saturday—‘Enough is enough, a line in the sand has been drawn. We’re being replaced no longer.’

Violent racism is what Robinson wants to encourage. And Farage is an accomplice in the background of anti-migrant hatred.

The murders of small children are used by such people as ammunition in a race war.


Anti-racists were right to demonstrate against Robinson last weekend. And we need far more of such campaigns now.

By Socialist Worker journalists
Saturday 27 July 2024


Anti-fascists defy Nazi Tommy Robinson in London

The turnout was significantly better on the anti-racist side than the last time Tommy Robinson marched in June—but we still face a big challenge



Anti-fascists march on the Stand Up To Racism counter-protest against Nazi Tommy Robinson (Picture: Guy Smallman)

Around 15,000 of Nazi Tommy Robinson’s supporters marched through central London on Saturday in one of the largest far right marches in recent memory.

It’s a warning of how the torrent of racism against refugees, migrants and Muslims from politicians has boosted the far right.

Around 5,000 people joined a counter-protest organised by Stand Up To Racism (SUTR). It’s a significant improvement on the 300 people who turned out to oppose Robinson’s last rally of up to 5,000 in June.

But this must be only the start of building a much bigger response to the fascists—and the state racism that fuels their rise.


The far right gathered outside of the Royal Courts of Justice and chanted Islamophobic slogans such as, “This is fucking England, you can stick Islam up your arse.”

Robinson’s supporters were overwhelming white, predominantly male and older. Their march reflected how fascists feed off the racism that’s been pushed by the Tories—and which Labour has gone along with.

When asked why he was marching, one racist said, “Migrants are taking all of the money in our country and we need to fight back.”

Another said, “London is becoming an Islamic city—especially after all of the Palestine protests.”

One said, “Being on this march is the first time in London I’ve felt among my own people and where we can speak freely—just don’t talk about the Jews.”

The far right march was a sea of St George’s and Union Jack flags—interspersed with Israeli flags and banners supporting Donald Trump.

When the police walked through the crowd, they booed, jostled and jeering, “You let your country down.”

Another Robinson supporter was chatting to a cop. The officer said, “I think a lot of what Robinson says isn’t too bad. There are too many people living in every country. We are only a little island and we’re getting overwhelmed.”

Robinson opened up the speeches in Trafalgar Square with, “Not a Palestinian flag in sight—this is what our capital city should look like.”

He is hoping to use the election of Nigel Farage and four other MPs for the far right Reform UK party—and could be hoping for a regroupment of the far right.



Tommy Robinson’s supporters on the march in London (Picture: Guy Smallman)

At one point, Robinson asked the crowd to put their hands up for what party they voted for. “Labour?” Robinson asked. No hands went up. “Tories?” Still no hands up. “Reform UK?.” Almost every hand went up.

Farage shifted to more openly far right language in the general election, but has shied away from openly embracing fascists.

“He doesn’t want to pick a fight,” Robinson said. “But Nigel Farage needs to stop kicking people out of Reform UK for speaking the truth”—a reference to the fascists Farage has been forced to distance himself from.

Disgraced actor Lawrence Fox echoes this. “When I texted Farage to ask if he was going to come up, he said sorry I can’t make it,” he said. “But the people here today are his voters.”

Anti-fascists gathered at Russell Square and march down to Whitehall within sight of the Robinson rally.

Sarah, a student who joined the counter-protest, told Socialist Worker, “The world is traveling in the direction of the 1930s. It’s terrifying to queer people, people of colour, migrants and is a threat to everybody.

“We can’t let history repeat itself, we need the presence of the left.”

Speakers included Jeremy Corbyn MP, RMT union assistant general secretary Eddie Dempsey, NEU union general secretary Daniel Kebede and Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) director Ben Jamal.

Jamal said, “We’re here today because we’re united by a set of values which are an affront to Tommy Robinson and his thugs. No to Tommy Robinson, no to Nigel Farage and no to Benjamin Netanyahu and their policies of hate.”

Jeremy Corbyn, the Independent MP for Islington North, told Socialist Worker, “The conditions under which fascism arose in the past in Europe, particularly in Germany, are beginning to be here again.

“The poverty and shortages of funding for public services and that led to blame cultures in society in which fascists thrived.”

“We need to push back against it by serious economic policies and demanding the redistribution of wealth.”

He added, “Thank you very much for everyone here for showing your solidarity to victims of racism and standing up to the hate message that Tommy Robinson represents.”

Zamard Zahid, an anti-racist and community campaigner from Glasgow, came as part of a delegation of around 30 people from Scotland. “I’m here because there has been a rise in Islamophobia,” she told Socialist Worker

“We saw the racist rhetoric from the Tory government and Tommy Robinson is emboldened.

“When the National Front (NF) was organising, in my parents’ generation, there was a lot of anti-racist activism. We’ve got to remember that whenever racism shows itself, we have to come together and stand against it. I had to be here.”

Zamard argued that, alongside confronting the far right, people “need to organise in our communities” to take on the racism arguments. “We did that in Erskine,” she explained—a Scottish town where anti-racists successfully organised against anti-refugee protests.

There was an impressive turnout from trade unions (see below). Ken is a CWU communication workers’ union member in east London. “When you look around at the world today, it’s looks like a world driven by racism,” he told Socialist Worker.

He pointing to the rise of the far right in the US and Europe. “You watch what’s going on and there’s Donald Trump, then there’s this guy, and this guy and another guy somewhere else pushing racism,” he said.

“Whenever there is racism, you’ve got to stand up against it. I’ve been on a fair few of these against the far right. Sometimes there’s not many of you, but we can’t stop opposing them and taking a stand.”

Delegations came from towns and cities across Britain, including Bristol, Birmingham, Manchester, Coventry and South Wales.

Helen is Unison union member and council worker from South Wales. “Our union’s LGBT+ group paid for a coach and we’ve got people from different branches from South Wales on the march,” she told Socialist Worker.

“We’ll be marching on London Trans+ Pride later—it’s important to have solidarity across the movements.”

A contingent of anti-fascists, including many with trade union banners, went on to join London Trans+ Pride which turned out 50,000 people.

Carrie, a Unison union member and health worker, told Socialist Worker, “We’ve come up from Bournemouth with three people from my branch who’ve never been on marches before. Trade unions are key to mobilising people—it’s important to have bodies on the streets to oppose racism and the far right.”

She added that fighting on Palestine or taking on racism or transphobia is “not just down to one group” and that’s why it’s a “trade union issue”.

The turnout was significantly better on the anti-racist side and was down to hard work by activists across Britain. But we face a big challenge.

Weyman Bennett, SUTR co-convenor, told Socialist Worker, “Today anti-racists and anti-fascists drew a line in the sand. Every time Tommy Robinson brings racist and Nazi thugs onto the streets, we will be there to oppose them.

“Stand Up To Racism united thousands, from trade unions, faith organisation and right across the movement, to say no to racism and fascism.

“Robinson and his supporters exposed the hatred and racism at the heart of his mobilisation today with far right slogans and Islamophobic chants

“The task is an urgent one now. The anti-racist majority we know exists in Britain needs to mobilise against Farage’s racism in parliament and beat back the fascist threat on the streets.”

Many people voted for the Labour Party hoping for a change from the Tories policies of austerity and racism. They will be against Farage and Robinson and racist scapegoating—and show the potential size of our side.

The new government has cancelled the Rwanda Deportations scheme and said it will shut the Bibby Stockholm prison barge. That wouldn’t have happened without a determined campaign by anti-racists—and, in the case of the barge, refugees themselves.

But when home secretary Yvette Cooper promises a “summer blitz” of deportations, our movement has to respond. It’s right that SUTR demands that Labour breaks with Tory policies—and is keeping up campaigning to welcome refugees and against the state’s Islamophobia.

But Labour isn’t breaking with the Tories’ “hostile environment”. And it won’t deliver fundamental change for ordinary people, which can lead to disillusionment that will allow the likes of Farage and Robinson to grow.

We have to mobilise on the streets—against the far right and the state racism that fuels it—in larger numbers to stop that happening.

A list of the trade union banners on the Stand Up To Racism counter-protest: Warwickshire NEU
Goldsmiths UCU
London Region UCU
London Region CWU
Brighton University UCU
Salisbury Trades Council
Barnet Unison
Brent NEU
London, East & South East Region TUC
Coventry Trades Council
UCLH Unison
Unite Tom Mann
CWU South Mids
Dorset Healh Unison
South Central CWU
Unison North West Region
Essex Amal CWU
Camden Unison
Hammersmith & Fulham Unison
Dorset County Unison
Salisbury & District TUC
Cambridgeshire NEU
Lambeth Unison
Wilts & Avon Health Unison
Lambeth NEU
London & South East Region PCS
Unison Wales LGBT+
City and County of Swansea Unison
Southend LG Unison
Lambeth Unison
Tower Hamlets Trades council
Kirklees Unison
Dudley Trades Council
Harringey NEU
Glasgow City Unison
Hackney NEU
Cardiff County Unison
Chesterfield UCU
South Yorkshire NUJ
Rotherham Trades Council
Sheffield Trades Council
Chesterfield Trades Council
Unite Sheffield CYW & NFP South Yorks NE/493/5
Lambeth Unison black workers group
Greenwich Unison
Portsmouth Unison
Doctors in Unite
Swansea Bay Unison Health Branch
Trafford Unison
Unison Scotland region
Portsmouth Trades Council
Redbridge NEU


Topics Anti-fascismAnti-racism
UK Trade unions welcome pay deal announcements from Chancellor


Yesterday
Left Foot Forward


Union leaders praise change in direction, but warn of divisions in pay restoration for NHS workers


Trade unions have welcomed Rachel Reeve’s announcement that the Labour Government is accepting public sector pay review recommendations in full. General Secretary’s have praised an improved approach to workers’ pay and conditions, however also warned Labour about ‘dividing NHS workers‘.

Health workers


After announcing the breakthrough 22.3% deal being put to junior doctors, Reeves confirmed that pay review body recommendations will be accepted for all other health workers, with union leaders praising the quick action of the new government to address public sector pay.

The General Secretary of the UK’s largest union Unison said Labour had “thankfully” acted quicker than its predecessors, while she highlighted that pay and investment will be key to addressing issues in the NHS.

Christina McAnea welcomed the above inflation 5.5% pay increase, however she added that health workers will also compare it with the larger deal agreed for junior doctors.

Nurses will also be weighing up their thoughts on the pay offer, as the Royal College of Nursing reacted saying it will push the government to present its plans for improving the NHS.

“We do not begrudge doctors their pay rise. We work together closely, in the interests of our patients. What we ask for is the same fair treatment from government,” said RCN General Secretary and Chief Executive Professor Nicola Ranger. “Our members will vote on whether they see today’s announcement as enough of a start on our journey.”

She added: “Nurses are the ever-present, safety critical workforce across the whole of health and care. Our wages do not reflect that and still won’t after today.”

This sentiment was echoed by Unite the union which represents NHS workers. The union said it was “imperative to ensure that we are not dividing NHS workers.”

Teachers


The threat of another teachers strike could well be quelled after the Chancellor confirmed an investment in the profession with a 5.5% pay deal, which the teachers’ union will put to members.

Daniel Kebede, General Secretary of the National Education Union, responded by thanking the Education Secretary for, “showing the positive leadership needed on teacher pay and the recruitment and retention crisis that was missing under the previous 10 Conservative Education Secretaries.”

Kebede called the deal a “necessary first step” in reversing the real terms pay cuts to the sector since 2010, with still “some way to go” to restore pay, but that the announcement was a “a strong signal to the profession about a new course of direction in education.”

Civil servants

A recommended 5% pay uplift for civil servants was also agreed by Reeves in her announcement, which the FDA union welcomed as a step in “the right decision.”

FDA General Secretary Dave Penman said: “If we want world-class public services then we must invest in the public servants that deliver them, and this announcement is the first step in the right direction.”

However, the leader of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) that also represents civil servants siad it was “disappointed” that the government had “missed the opportunity to adopt our proposals for dealing immediately with low pay and structural problems.”

Leader Fran Heathcote said: “While we welcome the change of tone and atmosphere from the new government towards the civil service, we want immediate talks to address all of our members’ issues.”

She also said that there was “no justification” for civil servants “getting less than other public sector workers.”

Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward


UK Junior doctors to be offered 22% pay rise, according to reports


© Chris Marchant / CC BY 2.0

Junior doctors’ leaders have reportedly agreed to a new pay deal with the government, according to The Guardian.

Under the reported terms of the deal, wages would be set to rise by an average of 22% over two years.

The deal, if accepted by members of the British Medical Association (BMA), would spell an end to strike action which has led to the cancellations of more than one million appointments since December 2022.

The Guardian reports that stoppages by staff have cost more than £3bn to the health service.

Campaigners had been calling for a 35% pay rise to make up for years of below-inflation pay increases.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce the terms of the deal in a statement to the House of Commons later this afternoon.

Asked about earlier reports about a potential new pay deal, the Prime Minister’s spokesperson told reporters this morning that the government is “committed to working to find a solution” to the dispute.

They added: “We’ve been honest with the public and the sector about the economic circumstances we face. But the government is determined to do the hard work necessary to finally bring these strikes to an end.”

Junior doctors in England offered 22.3% pay deal

29 July, 2024   Left Foot Forward

Breakthrough pay offer will be put to BMA members for a vote  



Junior doctors in England have struck a new pay deal with ministers that amounts to a 22.3% pay increase over two years in a breakthrough in the long running dispute, it has been reported.

Following negotiations between the Government and the British Medical Association (BMA), junior doctors are to be offered a pay deal that includes a backdated pay rise of 4% for 2023/24, a one off payment of £1,000, a rise of 6% for 2024/25 and an existing increase between 8.1% and 10.3%.

According to The Times which broke the story, the BMA will put the offer to its members who will vote on whether to accept it and therefore ending the strike action.

The union initially made a 35% pay restoration demand to reverse a decade of real terms pay cuts in the sector, however the offer from the Labour government represents a significantly improved deal compared to previous staled negotiations with Conservative minister.

If accepted, the deal would end the long-running dispute that has affected junior doctors and services for 20 months under the Tory government which failed to solve the issue that saw ongoing strike action, at a financial cost of over £1bn. The offer compares to an 8% pay increase imposed on junior doctors by the previous government last year.

Formal negotiations between the BMA and the Department of Health and Social Care under Labour began on Tuesday 23 July and were due to conclude by 16 August.

Rachel Reeves is expected to confirm the pay rise this afternoon when she is set to make a statement on the public finances.

The BMA has confirmed it will recommend the offer to members. BMA’s junior doctors committee (JDC) co-chairs Dr Robert Laurenson and Dr Vivek Trivedi said the offer “changes the current trajectory of our pay, en though there is further to go yet.”

They said in a statement: “It should never have taken so long to get here, but this offer shows what can be achieved when both parties enter negotiations in a constructive spirit.”

It added: “We recognise the speed and effort put into this round of negotiations which we believe shows the beginning of a Government that is learning to treat doctors with more respect. There is a catastrophic NHS workforce crisis that needs addressing and they at least appear to recognise that fixing pay must be part of the solution.”

This article will be updated as the story develops.

Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward


UK

Labour ensures minimum wage takes account of cost of living for first time


Jonathan Reynolds. Photo: UK Government

The Labour government has overhauled the way the minimum wage is set to ensure for the first time that the cost of living is taken into account, delivering on one of the party’s manifesto commitments.

The Department for Business and Trade announced today that the government has changed the remit of the Low Pay Commission (LPC) – the independent body that advises on the national living wage and the national minimum wage – to ensure the cost of living is factored into future recommendations.

Jonathan Reynolds and Angela Rayner have also instructed the LPC to “narrow the gap” between the minimum wage rate for 18- to 20-year-olds and the national living wage, which the government said “will be the first step towards achieving a single adult rate” – another manifesto pledge.

READ MORE: Sign up to our must-read daily briefing email on all things Labour

In a letter to the LPC’s chair Conservative peer Baroness Stroud, the Business and Trade Secretary and the deputy Prime Minister said the government is “committed to ensuring that the minimum wage is a genuine living wage which delivers improved living standards for working people right across the United Kingdom”.

The LPC’s updated remit requests that the body recommend a national living wage to apply from April 2025 that “take[s] into account the impact on business, competitiveness, the labour market, the wider economy and the cost of living, including the expected annual trends in inflation between now and March 2026”.

Commenting on the announcement, Reynolds said: “For too long working people have faced the worst of the cost-of-living crisis, but this government is taking bold action to address it and make work pay.

“The new remit to the LPC is the first of many vital steps we will take to support more people to stay in work and improve living standards. Our focus remains on putting more money in working people’s pockets and boosting economic growth.”

READ MORE: Rayner promises to ‘get Britain building’ as she details plans for housebuilding

Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: “Economic growth is our first mission, and we will do everything we can to ensure good jobs for working people. But for too long, too many people are out of work or not earning enough.

“The new LPC remit is an important first step in getting people into work and keeping people in work, essential for growing our economy, rebuilding Britain and making everyone better off.”

Also commenting, TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said: “Hard work should pay for everyone. These are significant first steps towards making the minimum wage a real living wage and will make a difference to millions.

“We welcome the government’s decision to ask the Low Pay Commission to be more ambitious next year and into the future.

“We also support the government’s commitment to ending discriminatory age bands for minimum wage workers. Young people face the same cost-of-living pressures as other adult workers and will welcome their pay being brought into line.”